HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 29-1984 RESOLUTION N0.29-84
CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION
OF A TRAFFIC SAFETY PROJECT AGREE-
MENT WITH TNE CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF
TRAFFIC SAFETY
that:
BE IT RESOLVED by the City CounCil of the City of South San Francisco
1. Execution of Agreement.
Execution of an Agreement entitled "Traffic Safety Project Agreement"
between the City of South San Francisco and the State of California, Business,
Transportation & Housing Agency, Office of Traffic Safety, to obtain a grant for
the Traffic Signal Phasing and Timing Optimization Project is hereby authorized,
and a copy of said Agreement is attached hereto as-£xhibit "A."
2. Signatures~.
The City Manager is authorized to execute said Agreement on behalf
of the City, and the City Clerk .attest his signature thereto.
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced
and adopted by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a regular
meeting held on the 14th day of March , 1984, by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Mark N. Addiego, Emanuele N. Damonte, Richard A. Haffey,
Gus Nicolopulos; and Roberta Cerri Teglia
NOES' None
ABSENT' None
ATTEST:
CALIFORNIA
OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY
state of California
Business, Transportation & Housing Agency
OFFICE OF %~qAFFIC SAFETY
~/RAFFIC SAFETY PROJECT AGREEMENT
PAGE 1 (To k~ Co~leted _by Applicant Agency)"
1. PROJF_.C~i' TITLE
Traffic Signal Phasing ~nd Timing Optimization Project
2. NAME OF AP'Pf,~[CANT AGENCY "'
City of'South san Francisco, California
3. AGENCY DNIT Io HANDLE-PROJECT
Depar'tment of Public Services
t! OTS USE ONLY-
ROJECT NUMBER
SP NO. .
r NEViS!ON NU~!BER --
'DATE
- -
Fiscal yr. ~3m~unt
,
' . $
, .
$
$
$
Total ~$
4. PROJF32T PERIOD
Month - Day - Year
.
From: 4 ] 84
TO : 7 3l 85
5. PROJECT DESCRIPTI°N (Sunm~rize the proposed-project plan covering the objectives, method'
o.f procedure, evaluation and end produCt 'in approXi~tely 100 words)
The intent is to reduce accidents, congestion and delay, and increase capacity of'
signalized intersections. A consultant will be engaged to analyze.the signal opera-
tion and accident experience at' 35+ locations. The major aspects of the project
include: l).Consu]tant selection; 2) Data acquiSition; 3) Assessment of the exist-
ing signals and identification of critical safety and capacity problems; 4) Recommen-
dations for design, operation (inCluding implementation of suggested timing plans)
and enforcement; and 5) Documentation and evaluation of results obtained.
6. FEDERAL FUNDS ALLOCATED UNDER THIS AC~REF_Z4ENT SH~LL NOT--EXCEED
7. ACCEPTANCE OF CONDITIONS - The pro~ision~--on the reverse side hereof constitute a part
of this agreement
._.
A. PROJECT DIP~EC~DR B. AUTHORIZING OFFICIAL OF APPLICAxNT AGENCY
__ -
. .
Name: Robert $. Yee Phone:
Address: (4] 5)
City of South San Francisco 877-8538
P.O. BOX- 711
South
San FranciSco~CA 94083
Title Director of ~ublic ervices
C. FISCAL OR ACCOUNTING OFFICIAL
Name: Barry R. Lipton
Title: Director of Finance
Phone: (4]5) 877-8507
A~AC~ENTS
Project Description Schedule A
Aclm. Support & Contribution Schedule A-1
Detailed Budget Esti~te Schedule B
Budget Narrative Schedule B-1
Name: Co Walter Birkelo Phone: (415)
Address: 877-8500
City of South San Francisco
P.'0. Box 711
South San~_rasci&co, CA
Signature ~ ~, ' [~-~" '~_,
Title.~ Citj Manager
ATT E S l :K~-~;~ ~ ~ ~.~~ Ci~v
Name: Barry R. Lipton, Director of Finance
Address: City of South San Francisco
Po0. Box 711
South San .Francisco, CA 9408(]
Initi~'l Evaluation Data Form Schedule C
Certification, California
~htaffic Safety Program (OTS-33)
OTS-38 (Rev 10/83)
1. It is understood'and agreed by the Project Director
and Authorizing Official that any grant received as
a result of this agreement is subject- to all Federal
and State regulations governing grants and to those
controls expressed in the California Traffic Safety
Grant Program Manuals which include, but are not '~
limited to:,
a. Only verified participating costs resulting from
activities described in this Agreement will be
eligible for reimbursement;
b. Progress Reports must be submitted by the Project
Director to the Office of Traffic Safety on
January 15, April 15, July 15, and October 15,
during each year of pr6ject operation;
,
Ail project accounting records and supporting
documents must be retained for audit purposes for
at least three years after receipt of final
payment~ audits will be in accordance wit]] A-J02
Atl.ta chmen t P.
do- A final project report must be submitted to the
Office of Traffic Safety within 60 days after
the termination date of the project.
2. No alteration or v~riation of the terms of this ·
contract shall be valid unless made in writing and
.signed by the parties hereto, and no oral understand-
ing. or agreement not 'incorporated herein shall be
binding on any of the parties hereto.
3. The obligation of grant funds for successive fiscal
years of multi-year projects is .subject to the avail-
ability of Federal fun. dp.
SCHEDULE A
PROJECT DESCRIPT][ON
·
The City' of South San Francisco requests funding-assistance for a highway
safety project to improve the safety and adequacy 'of its traffic controls.
This proposal is submitted in conformance with the California Traffic
Safety Program Grant Program Manual.
.
GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS
South San Francisco is located on the west shore of ~an Francisco Bay in
.Northern. San Mated County.' The City is.built_upon the'Bay plain-and the
northern foothills of the Coastal Range. The City is surrounded by the San
Francisc6' Bay_to the east; Sah'.Bruno Mountain, the Cii~y of Daiy' Cti~y, the
Cityk'Of 'Coima and the City of Bri.sbane to the north; the City. of Pacifica
to the west; and the City of San Bruno to the south. Major tr'ansportatio)]
links to the City include the Southern Pacific Railroad, U.S. 101,
Interstate 280, Interstate 380 and San Francisco Airport. The San Andreas
Fault rift zone is a major geologic feature passing through the western
portion of the City.
The City of South San Francisco .is one of the ribbon of communities
extending from San 'Francisco to San Jose along, the west-shore of San
Francisco Bay. The land area within the present city lin~its measures
approximately-8.2 square miles. Elevations rise from sea level to. about
500 feet along the western city limits.
Between' its incorporation in 1908 and 1940, the population of the City
inCreased from about-2,000 to approximately 6,000. By 1940 the City had a
land area of approximately 5 square miles. During World War II, the com-
munity became a major ship building center. Following the'war, ma)~y new
single-family subdivisions were constructed at a rapid pace. During. the
1940's and 1950.'s additional land was annexed and new neighborhoods
created. The 1950 U.S. Census revealed a three-fold increase in popJ~lation
from 6,290 in 1940 to 19,351 in 1950. By 1960, the population had more
than doubled to 39,418, and by 1980 had reached approximately 50,000.
During the 1970's and early 1980's major development t-rends were charac-
terized by the ~fol 1 DWi ng'
A decrease in the construction of single-family dwelling units.
An increase of-planned residential developments including
townhouses and condominiums.
- A drecrease in heavy industrial uses.
An increas'e' in distribution centers, office-warehouses, research
and development' and hi gh .technology uses.
The revitalization of the downtown including new street.improve-
ments and remodeling of various buildings.
OTS-38b (Rev 5/82)
SCHEDULE A
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
During the 1980's, South San Francisco is expected to attract several new
office centers. These Will. include the Gateway Center, Oyster Point
Business Center, Sierra Point and Century Office Park. It is' p~ected
that more than 2,5 million square feet of commercial and office building
space, nearly 2.0 .million square feet of.building area for research and
development' distribution and high techn61o§.y u.ses, and..approximately ~500
additional dwelling unifs will be constructed within the City. Ma&or new
residential 'developments expected to be constructed during the next~ ten
years include 745 dwelling units on the South Slope of Sa, Bruno MoUntain,
155 dwel.ling units in' the Stonegate Ridge Planned Community, and 109 addi-
tional dwelling units in the St. Francis Terrace Condominium project (west
of 1-280~ o .
o .
The City ..population 'is expected to stabilize at about' 55,000. residents.
Most remaining vacant properties are expected to be developed during the
1980's. It is expected that many blighted properties in the downtown and
older industrial areas will be rehabilitated .or privately and/or publically
redevel oped.
Traffic will increase substantially during'the 1980's and.beyond. Traffic
safety and congestion, noise and air pollution will continue to be major
issues in the 1980's as new residential and office developments are com-
pleted.
Public transportation will be improved with the expansion of Southern
Pacific Commuter service, increase numbers of SamTrans' routes, and the
possible extension of BART to the San Francisco Airport, Traffic cir-
culation, particularly east of the Bayshore Freeway will be improved when
the East Grand Avenue and Oyster Point Blvd, interchanges are completed.
STREETS AND HIGHWAYS
. .
The total paved roadway mileage in the City of South San F~ancisJo is
approximately 126.. Of this amount City~ streets are the major portion of
119 miles,, but there are also about 3 miles of conventional highway and 4
miles of freeway 'under the California Department of Transportation
( Cal Tran s ).
CITY SERVICES
City government provides most of the essential services including police,-
fire and public works. The Department of Public Services {public works),
and under it the Engineering Division, provides administration and support
for the street and sewer maintenance, Water Quality Control, and Building
Inspection Divisions. The staff providing these support services includes
the Director' of Public Services, three associate engineers and .two engi-
neering technicians. The traffic engineering function Shares.this staff's
time with the other services.
OTS-38b .(Rev 5/82)
SCHEDULE A
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The maintenance division, under the Superintendent of Public Works, has an
electrical supervisor and four electrical technicians devoted to signals
and lighting, four maintenance workers for signs and striping, and-four
sweeper, operators. The Police Department has 52 officers in the Patrol
Division. Five of these, in the motorcy, cle patrol, are.a.ssigne4 exclusi-
· rely to traffic enforcement and one is a parking enforcement officer. The'
rest perform traffic dut'ies as time permits.
._
EXISTING SYSTEMS - -
. .
The City' has participated in. a' Computerized Accident-P, ecord-System (CARES)~.
since 1971 and subscribes to SWITERS.as well... Traffic'c'ounl;s, which are
performed, as needed, are sent to CARES for pr. ocessing. £ARES'prints quar'
terly and annual st'atistical reports and special reports as requested. The
regular CARES National Safety Council Reports (NSC) comtain a summary of
alt accidents in the South San-Francisco .jurisdiction. It consists of
tables containing accident totals in the following cata~lories:
Type of 'accident
Type of accident by previous year totals
Street classification
Age of casualty
Hour and day of accident
Directional analysis
Pedestrian actions by age group
Age of driver
Sex of driver
Residence of driver
Contributing circumstances
Type of-motor, vehicle
Road surface condition
Kind of location
Light condition
Pedestrian action by vehicle action
Accident r. eported by
Road character
For specific locations, Traffic Accident/Location Analysis Reports can be
obtained for histories of up to 10 years.. These contain information on
both intersection and non-intersection accidents, indicating date, .day,
time of day, severity, vehicle type, accident type, vehicle/pedestrian
actions, point of impact, direction, contributing circumstances, cause,
lighting-conditions; 'and age.
Other data can .be retrieved listing lOcations in order of category acci-
dents, by number of intersection accidents, intersection accidents by
street names, non-intersection accidents by street names, and intersection
accidents by-accident rate.
--
OTS-38b (.Rev 5/82
SCHEDULE A
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Other ·resources available include basic· city maps,-traffic studies for cer-
tain development projects, and recording traffic counters (,1 in good con-
dition and 5 stored in various degrees of servicability). Traffic signal
phase diagrams and programming are kept inside each controller cabinet with
a maintenance log giving time, date, nam.e, and type' of service'o~ adjust-
ment made.
THE PROBLEM
The problem facing the City of South San Francisco is' ~.h~t althmmgh' the
· Department of Public Services and Police Department have directed their
best efforts t°ward improving .safety and reducing con§es'~.ion and delay, the'
total number of accidents per year has not decreased 'signi:ficantly and
traffic volume and congestion has greatly increased. Due to' _the planned
future growth, these trends are expected to continue and in certain areas
become much worse~ .-
There are currently 50 traffic signals in the City. Thirty Seven (37) are
City-owned and operated; the rest belong to CalTrans. In the near future
about a dozen new signals are expected to be added to the City's respon-
sibility. Only three existing signals are coordinated, though a centra-
lized control is proposed, for many of the future signals. The signals in
the central business district are mostly fixed-time or semi-actuated, .but
the street grid pattern makes synchronization attractive.
Staff limitations have not permitted the allocation of effort necessary to
develop a systematic approach to signal timing. Programming is a, rrently
done by maintenance personnel who have no training in 'traffic engineering
and can only use a "seat of the pants" method to find a timing that works.
The concentration of housing on one. side of the City and employment centers
on the other results in heavy peak hour traffic volumes in one direction in
the morning and the other direction in the evening. ~uc|i of this b-affic
is from out of town, as the City's population in effect doubles-on weekdays
due to commuter influx.
The street system is not well adapted to the demands made upon it. While
there is a need for east-west arterials connecting- the residential-and
employment centers, most of' the major highways have a north-south orien-
tation. The 'east-west streets are discontinuous and funnel traffic into a
very few roads which access the industrial parks. Severe peak hour
congestion and delay occur at these gateways.
ATTEMPTS TO SOLVE THE PROBLEM
-
Over the'years the City and CalTrans have installed various traffic control
devices to facilitate traffic flow and decrease driving hazards' These
include stop signs,'-striping,'-chann.elization, and traffic signals..
.
OTS-38b (Rev 5/82) ---
SCHEDULE A
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
FrequentlY the City is asked to~ install traffic controls whiCh are unne-
ces. sary and only serve to prevent efficient operation. .
.
Limited studies have been made at certain locations 'in attempts'to resolve
specific problems: However, the extent'and, comprehensiveness of traffic
studies has always been' constrained by Shortages of money and personnel.
When major developments, have been proposed, traffic reports have been
required as conditions 'of' approVal, But these stud!es 'have been limited to
the issues .pertinent to the development.. ]_ ' .
.
.
Much pr6gress ~has been, and 'will be made in the near future
improving access to the .industrial area with new grade separationS, mew
roads and widening of existing, streets, and. implementation of transpor-
tation system management plans. But even with all of these improvements,
it. is predicted 'that the increased traffic generated by new development
will'more than offset the increased capacity.
PROJECT OBJECTIVE
The primary goal of the proposed project is to reduce delay a'nd congestion
at signalized, intersections and reduce the number of traffic accidents,
This will be accomplished through secondary objectives designed to'
accomplish this goal:
a. To assess the adequacy and effectiveness of all existing traffic
signals and controllers, {To be accomplished by ).2-31-84)
b. .To determine the feasibility of interconnecting, and coordinati6g
approximately ten signals in the downtown area as one system, four
signals on Chestnut Avenue - Westborough Blvd. at E1 Camino Real
as another system, and four signals on Westborough' Blvd. at
1-280/Junipero Serra Blvd. as a third system, (To be accomplished
by 6-30-85) '
c.* To submit r'ecommendations to improve the effectiveness of traffic
signal .operation. {To be accomplished by 6-30-85)
d. To develop and implement new traffic signal timing instructions
for all 35+ existing City-owned signals. (To be accomplished .by
6-30-85)
e.
To decrease the average delay at signalized intersections by
percent. {Percentage to be determined by consultant by 9-30-84.
Objective to be accomplished by 7-31-85)
To drecrease~the accident rate at si·gnalized 'intersections by
percent (Percentage to be determined by consultant by' 9-30~84.
Objective to be accomplished by 7-31-85)
oTS-38b (Rev 5/82)
SCHEDULE. A
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
METHOD OF PROCEDURE
Ail tasks necessary .to meet the stated objectives would be 'undertaken
within the project phases outlined below:
· .
Phase 1 - , .Start-up and Consultant Select(on
·
·
4/1-6/30/84 Obtain traffic engineering consultant services.
Phase 2 -
· ,,
7/1-9/30/84
·
Collect'Accident, Traffic Volume and Travel Speed Data
The consultant 'shall use the CARES' program to Obtain
accident data for the street' system.' Turning.movement
counts and delay studies that are needed fop .the.project
shall be obtained by the consultant. Mechanical traffic
· counts shall be provided by the City.
Phase 3 -
-_
ASsess Adequacy of Existing Signal System and Identify
Critical Safety and'CapaCity Probl.ems "-
·
10/1-12/31/84 Consultant will prepare Collision diagrams 'from the
· accident data acquired in Phase 2. Analysi's of the data
and diagrams will 'be accomplished in .this. task.
Accident rates' and frequencies will be calculated to
determine the locations susceptible to improvement by
traffic signal retimings or modifications. Removal of
unwarranted or unneeded signals will also be considered
along with an estimated of the potential accident, reduc-
tion to be expected.
The consultant' will ·analyze current traffic volume data
obtained in Phase 2, relate these, volumes to capacities
'on the existing street' System, estimate diversionary
effects (if any) of Changes to the signal ..System, and
identify critical locations,
Phase 4 -
1/1-6/30/85
Recommend Design, Operational or Enforcement Treatments
:.
COnsultant Will:
(1) Analyze traffic flows at Antoinette- .Chestnut-
Westborough - E1 Camino, where interconnection is
already possible. Develop signal system timing
plans which will improve travel speed and reduce
delay. Coordinate with CalTrans to obtain
necessary approvals for modifications to the
Chestnut - E1 Camino controller.
_.
OTS-38b {[Rev 5/82)
SCHEDULE A
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
(2) Develop and implement · t~'affic signal timing
instructions by 6/30/82 for the approximately 33
traffic signals not .now on a coordinated'system.
(3) 'Analyze traffic movements al°ng~th.ose streets that.
are candidates for signal coordination to determine
%he best method of signal control, This would
include identifying the numbe'r of different signal
·
timing plans needed pet- day, the method of selec-
tion of the plans,, and the number of. independent
control areas that would be required throughout the
City. 'The analysi's will take into'account 'actual'
driving s. peeds, number of stops and. 1.ength of stops
:both during peak and.off-peak .traffic .conditions,
and through traffic and turning traffic counts at
the busy intersections.
(4) Investigate the applicability and desirability of
the full range of additional..features and functions
which are associated' with the current generation of
traffic signal control systems. Specifically, the
items to be considered will include:
· central monitoring of controllers and detec-
tors (both intersection and system) for
improved maintenance response,
. special function control,
· performance evaluation through measures of
effectiveness such as stops and delay,
.. logging of system events and tr.affic 'flow
data,
. Generation of management' oriented repo~'ts
including those produced automatically as well
as those produced on request only.
(5) Inventory existing .traffic signal equipment at all
intersections and for all signal systems to deter-
mine which should be replaced, upgraded, or used as
is, in conjunction with the more advanced control
systems that the StUdy may recon~nend.
(6) Develop recommendations which provide the City with
a description of the best method of traffic signal
control both-now and in the future. Describe
whether the City' should continue installing.
arterial coordination systems, a central system, a
combination of both control methods, etc.
. _ z
. .
OTS-38b (Rev 5/82)
SCHEDULE A
Phase 5 -
-
7/1-7/31/85
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
_- - '2'.2'. -"- -. . ...... - ...... '-'L2.-. -~' '-~2.,--- ~.,~
(7) Estimate the probabl~ effect upon travel speed and
delay of the recommendations made in'Nos. (1) and
(2) above. Estimate the probable benefits and
drawbacks of the consultant's findings in Nos. (3),
(4), (5) and (6) %bore.
·
(8) ~Actually measure the changes in-travel speed/delay
resulting from Nos. (.1) and (2)aSove.
'(9)' Estimate the probable cost to effect the recommen-
dations contained in Nos. (1)through (6) above.
Documentation and Evaluation -
-A final report will be p~oduced by the consultant to
. document the procedures, findings an~ recommendations .of
the-project. -The report will also recommend procedures
for future use by the City in evalUat, ing the benefits
that result from implementation, of 'the recommended
improvements.
METHOD OF EVALUATION
·
This.project will be administratively evaluated by the South San Francisco
Director of Public 'Services. The project evaluation will occur at the
conclusion of Phases 3, 4 and 5. The evaluation will be an assessment of
the project's success based on the findings derived from the following
processes:
a. Was the .timing of all traffic signals and traffic signal control
systems studied by 12-31-847
b." Was the feasibility of interconnecting and coordinating the
appro, ximately 10 signals in the downtown area, 4 signals at
Antoinette - Chestnut- Westborough - E1 (;amino, and 4 signals, on
Westborough'at 1-280/Junipero Serra complete by 6-30-85?
c. Were recommendations made to improve the timing of all existing
traffic signals and traffic signal control systems by 6-30-85?
d. Was implementation of timing instructions for all 37 existing
City-owned'traffic signals completed by 6-30-85?
e. Was the average delay at signalized intersections decreased'by
percent?
f.
Was the accident rate at signalized intersections decreased by
p6rcent?
OTS-38b (Rev 5/82
SCHEDULE A
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
TIME TO COMPLETE
T. he total time that will be required to complete the 'project' including
start--up' time and final report printing is estimated at oi§hteen'monthS.
·
·
_
ESTIMATED cost TO COMPLETE .
·
The total cost est{mate to complete the project will amom)~, to $35,000.'
o.
..
STATEMENT OF.INTENT · " ' '
, .
.
It is the intent of this City to continue the operational ac'tivity deve-
loped by this project as an ongoing analysis of the traffic .signal
control s.
OTS-38b (Rev 5/82)
SCHEDULE A-1
ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT STATEMENT - Explain what type of priority this
project has in your jurisdiction.
The City of South San Francisco places high priority on traffic Safety.
The Director of Public Services/City Engineer and the Engineering Technicians
who will be assigned to this project are experienced and well-versed in traffic.
engineering theory .and practice. Additionally, the Police 'DepartTaent has' five
officers assigned to traffic safety enforcement. This project has the support
of the City Council and City Management.
AGENCY CONTRIBUTION - Explain what services or funds are being, contr].b-
uted by your agency in support of this project.
~he city of South San. Francisco will contribute i'n-house support services as
quired for coordinating, supervision and evaluation of the project. Additiona]ly,~
the City will assist the consultant with some portion of the da~, collection
phase.
It is estimated that the Director of Public Services/City Engineer, Engineering
Technicians and Drafters will provide the following-
Director 'of 'Public Servi;ces/City Engineer.~-l.lO working days ~ $290 =-$ 2,900
Engineering Technician~' - 15 working days @ $140 = 2,100
Drafter - 15 working days @ $ 80: 1,200
$ 6,200
No program income will be generated as a result of this project
OTS-38c (Rev 5/82)
SCHEDULE B
COST CATEGORY FY-1
]983-84.
A. PERSONNEL COSTS
Positions .......... ""
and Salaries 4/]-9/30
DETAILED BUDGET ESTIMATE
FISCAL YEAR ESTIMATES
-'~"9'-/' j ...... FY-3
·
1984-85
10/1 7/3l
, Page" 1.
· Employee Benefits .
%
Total
Personnel Costs
.
B. TRAVEL EXPENSE
-0-
-0- j
Total
Travel Expense -0-
.-
C. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
_.
Consultant Services $ 6,000
-0-
$ 29,000
-0-
$ 35,000
Total Contractual
Services
$ 6,000
_.
$'29,000
$ 35,000
OTS-38d (Rev .-5./82 )
COST CATEGORY
D. EQUIPMENT
FY-1
-
]983 - 84
4/] - 9/30
SCHEDULE B
DETAILED BUDGET ESTIMATE
FISCAL YEAR ESTIMATES
FY-2 I FY-3
]984 - 85
]0/] - 7/3]
---
Page 2
TOTAL COST
TO PROJECT
_
Total Equipment
-
E. OTHER DIRECT COST
-0-
-0-
-0-
Total
Other Direct Costs
-0-
-0-
.0-
Fo INDIRECT COSTS
Total
--ld_irect Costs
TOTAL BUDGET ESTIMATE
All _Categories
OTS-38e (Rev 2/83)
-0-
$ 6,000
-0-
$ 29,000
SCHEDULE B-1
BUDGET NARRATIVE
A qualified consultant will be retained to accomplished this
project..
Efforts will be made to allow Minority Busil]ess Enterprises 'to
respond to the Request for Proposals.
The City will attempt to secure proposals .from at least'thr~e
consulting firms by soliciting a large number of firms.
OTS-38f (Rev 5/82)
1983-84
4/1- 9/30
1 2 3
Da ta
Co] lac-
tion
Assess
& Iden-
Rocol~-
mend
Treat-
mon t
Eva lu-
ate &
.Doculaont
Quarl:erly
Costs
"' 0 i
Quartb~'ly ~ - 0 -
Co,s~$, ..: ~.~.
4 5
$ 6,000
Pro~ ect
Time and ,-"-xpen~i~-ure
·
!
Schedule
6 7 8
t
-
%,
.,
1984-85
e
· ,
$ 8,000 $ 9,000
-
" i
$ ~',ooo . $ ~,ooo
i
$' 6,000 $]4,000 $23,000 $32,000 $35,000
'e
OTS-. F-I
..
(Kev,
e'
e
__
Total "
Frc~.c=
Cost
By Task
:
$ 0
6,000
8,000
18,000
3,000
·
$35,000
$35,000
6/73
(i) PoPulation
(2) Roadway Miles
$CItF~'." ~) E
3-Year Traffic Data Summary
,
,
City. of South San FranciSco in/oF County of San Mateo
·
·
Last Year (19.83)
2. Years Ago (1982
3 Years
--
50,400
50,200
50,'[00:
119
118
118
0'£S
Use Onl)
(3) ;/ Ci'tations for
Moving Violations
4,315
5,47l
3,923
(q) t! Accidents
All HV Accidents 2 247
2 225
2 279
Motorcycle* ......
Bicycle 0 7 0 17 0 13
Pedestrian 1 ,27 0 30 0 24
($') /1- Victi)ns
l, iotor veD. ccc.
biotorcyclist/pass.
BiCyclist/pass.
Pedestrian
Total Victims
1 287
0 '8.
1 28
2 323
* Information not available.
2
O'
0
2'
243
17
30
'290 .
2 344
0 13
0 24
2 381
· ·
OTS-F-1 (Rev. 11/73)
CERTIFICATION
CALIFORNIA TRAFFIC SAFETY PROGRAM
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY ASSURANCE
Pursuant to .the requirements of Title VI provisions of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964t the certifying applicant acting through its
chief administrative officer, desiring %0 avail itself of the
benefits of Chapter 1, Title 23, United States Code, and as a
· ~
condition to obtaining the approval of the Secretary. of Transpor-
tation and Governor of California of any highway safety projects
as provided for in Title 23, United States Code, .Section 105(a),
hereby gives its assurance that all provisions of Equal Oppor-
tunity Assurance with regard to the Highway Safety Program will
be complied with fully.
MINORITY BUSINESS ENTERPRISE
{1)
"Policy. It is the policy of the Office of Traffic Safety
and the certifying applicant that minority business enter-
prises as defined in' 49 CFR Part 23 shall have the maximum
opportunity to participate in the performance of contracts
financed in whole or in part with Federal funds under this
agreement. Consequently, the MBE requirements of 49 CFR
Part 23 apply to this agreement."
(2)
"MBE Obligation. The certifying applicant or its contractor
agrees to ensure that minority business enterprises as
defined in 49 CFR Part 23 have the maximum opportunity to
participate in the performance of contracts and subcontracts
financed in whole or in part with Federal funds provided
under this agreement. In this regard the certifying appli-
cant and all contractors shall take all necessary and
reasonable steps in accordance with 49 CFR Part 23 to ensure
that minority business enterprises have the maximum oppor-
tunity t° compete for and perform contracts. The certifying
applicant and its contractors shall not discriminate on the
basis of race, color, national origin, or sex in the award
and performance of DOT-assisted contracts."
OTS-33 (Rev-5/82)
(over }
SECTION 504, REHABILITATION ACT OF 1973
Pursuant to Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, no
qualified handicapped person shall, because a certifying appli-
cant's facilities are. inaccessible, to or unusable by, handicapped
persons, be denied the benefits of,. be excluded fro], participation
in, 'or otherwise be subjected to discrimination under any program
or activity funded under the Highway Safety Act of 1966 (U.S.
Code, Title 23~ Section 402 et. seq.).
HATCH ACT
All emp!oyees~ of this certifying applicant whose principal employ-
ment is-in connection with any Highway Safety Project financed in
whole or in part by' loans or grants under the Highway Safety Act
of 1966 have been made aware o'f the provisions of Section 12(a) of
the Hatch Act (5.U.S.C. ll8k(a)). ·
NON-DUPLICATION OF GRANT FUND EXPENDITURE
The certifying applicant has no ongoing or completed projects
under agreement with TOPICS, CCCJ (LEAA), HEW, or other Federal
fund sources, which duplicate or overlap..any work contemplated
or described in this Traffic Safety Project.
It is fur%her agreed that any pending or proposed request for
other Federal grant funds which would duplicate or overlap .work
under this Traffic Safety Project, will be revised to exclude any
such duplication of grant fund expenditures.
It is understood .that any such duplication of Federal fund expen-
ditures subsequently determined by audit will be Subject to
recovery by the Office of Traffic Safety.
CERTIFIED
Robert S. Yee~ Dirlctor of Public Services
~pe Name and Title
City of South San Francisco
Certifying Applicant Agency