Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 35-1984that: RESOLUTION NO. 35-84 CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH MARTIN CARPENTER ASSOCIATES TO PREPARE REVISED HOUSING ELEMENT FOR THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco 1. Execution of Agreement. Execution of an Agreement entitled "Consultant Services Agreement" between the City of South San Francisco and Martin Carpenter Associates is hereby authorized, and a copy of said Agreement is attached hereto as Exhibit "1". 2. Signatures. The Mayor is authorized to execute said Agreement on behalf of the City, and the City Clerk attest his signature thereto. I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a regular meeting held on the 14th,day of March , 1984, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: Councilmembers Mark N. Addiego, Emanuele N. Damonte, Richard A. Haffey, Gus Nicolopulos; and Roberta Cerri Teglia None ABSENT: None ATTEST- ~City Clerk~ EXHIBIT "1" TO .RESOLUTION NO. 35-84 CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT · THIS AGREEMENT is made at South San Francisco, California~ as of April 2 1984, by and between the CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCICO (hereinafter referred to as -"CITY") and Martin Carpenter AssociateS~ a. California Corporation, (hereinafter referred.to as "CONSULTANT"), who agree as roi.lows: 1~ Services~ Subject to the 'terms 'and conditions set forth in this Agreement~ Consultant shall provide, to City the services described in Exhibit "A", "Proposal to prepare Revised Housing Element for City of South San Francisco," January.17, 1984~ attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein as though set forth verbatim. '2~ Compensation~ City shall pay Consultant for services rendered pursuant to this Agreement at the time and in the manner set forth in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein as though set forth verbatim. ._The payments specified in Exhibit "B" shall be the only payments to be made to Consultant for services rendered pursuant to this Agreement~ Consultant shall submit all billings for said services to City in the manner specified in Exhibit II B ~ II 3~ Facilities and Equipment~ Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, furnish all facilities and equipment 'which may be required for furnishing its - services pursuant to this Agreement. January 30, 1984, pursuanl 4' Time of Performance~ Consultant sh~ll began work on to letter from City Manag( .. dated 1/30/84. and shall complete services rendered'pursuant to this Agreement in accordance with the proposed Work Schedule set forth at Page'7 of Exhibit "A~" previously incoporated herein by reference. 5. ~wnership of Documents. Cit~ s~_ll have f,Jll end complete access to Consultant's working papers, drawings and other ~C-~JT.e~ts during progress of th~ ~.,,ork. All documents prepared by Cc-.sultant s~!l become the property of th~ City at the completion of the project. The C~-sultant may retain a copy. of all material produced pursuant to t~=s Agreement for its use in its general business activities, 6. Insurance. The Consultant shall take out aF.~ maintain during the life of this Agreement the following policies of insurance: {a) ~'orker's Compensation an~ e~ployers' liability insurance in the statutory amount, as applicable. {b) Public Liability Insura~c= In an : .... ~n~ not less than FIVE HUNDRED lHDUSAND DDLLARS (S50D,DOD.OD) for injuries inclu~i.~-g, but not limited to death to any one person and subject to t~e same l ii, it for each person, in an amount not less than ONE MILLION DDLLA~S (SI,O00,C~[.K~.O0) on account of any one occurrence. (c) Property Damage Insurance. In an a~:~ur.t not less than FIVE HUNDRED IHOUSAND DDLLARS ($50D,000.00) for da[~a-~ to the ~rc~erty of each person on account of any one occurrence. (d) Contractual Liability Insurance. C~nsultant shall take out and maintain during the life of this Agrea~eF~t an insurance policy in the amount of at least ONE MILLION DOLLARS ($1,0C:~:C~0.00), ins'Jring City, its elective and appointive boards, commissions, offl-ers, ag6~=~ and employees, and Consul- tant against damages sustained by reastn of any act~>n or actions at law or in provisions thereof, or by reason o~ ary contra-~l liability, or alleged contractual liability on any contract, aF. tered ir. tc by Consultant and/or any of its agents or employees. ~hau the i~s ~ance req~i a~ by Subsections b, c and d (e) It is agreed ~ ~ ,. '~ r shall ~ extended to include the City of South San Francisco, its.elective and a~_~intive boards, officers, agents and employees, with respect to opera tions >~rformed by An Consultant, as described herein. Evidence of this ins~.-a~-e described a~ove shall be provided to City upon execution of this agrea.-~.~t and shall be subject to approval by the City Attorney as to form, amo.~r,t ~nd carrier. The policy of insurance shall.also contain a provision indicating that such insurance shall not be reduced or cancelled except upon thirty (30) days written notice to City'~ In addit-ion~ the .follew~ng endorse- ment s?:all be made on sa id policy of insurance. "Nothwithstan~ing any other provisions in th~s policy~ the insurance afforded hereunder to the C~ty of South San Francisco sh~ll be primary as to any other ~nsurance or reinsurance covering or available to the City o~ South San Francico, and such other insurance or reinsurance shall not be required to contribute to any liability or loss until and unless the a~roximate'limit of liability afforded hereunder is exhausted.'~ ~_-.~o.qsibility, '_,ndemnification Consultant shall indemnify, save harmless, and at Cit~'s request, dafend City, its employees~ agents and representatives from an~ a~_ainst all claims; demands, actions, causes of action, losses, damages, liabilities, costs and ex.~enses including reasonable attorney's fees or obli- gations, f.sr or in connection with personal injury (including death) and proPerty damage :~.~ich arises out ~.f or is in any way connected with the negligent act, error or c-ission of Con_='~ltant and its agents, subcontractors, or employees as a result ~f Consultant's ~endering of services under this Agreement. 8. ~s~ of Subcontractors. Unless ~ritten approval from the City is received, the Cons"';~.nt shall not ~'.~bcontract any services to be provided hereunder, except f.~r service firths ~ngaged in reproduction~ typing and printing. Consultant shall b~ s:~ely respo.qsi~ie for reimbursing any subcontractors and the City shall h~-'.'e no obligation to them, 9. Assi§n~ent. Consultant shall not assign any of its rights nor transfer any of its obligations under this Agreement without the prior written consent of the Ci'ty, wSich consent may be withheld at the sole discretion of the City 10. Termination. ~he City may terminate this Agreement upon ten (10) days written notice to the Consultant in the event of substantial failure by the Consultant to perform in accordance with the terms of this ~greement through no fault of the City] In the event of Termination~ the Consultant shall deliver to the City all work products.co~p!eted to date, and shall be paid by the City for all services performed to date in accordance with terms of the Agreement. 11. Consul~ant's Qualifications. By executing this agreement, Consultant holds himself out as a qualified City and Regional Planner, possessing the experience and specialized skills necessary to perform the tasks mentioned in Paragraph I herein and agrees that.he will render to the best of h~s ability the services described in that paragraph during the full term of this agreement. 12. Consultant's Status. The services shall be provided City as set forth - herein by Consultant 'as an independent consultant, as d~f~ed in Labor Code Section 33~, under the general control of the Director of Com. munity Development of the City of South San Francisco, concerning the results of the work, but not the means by which such result is accomplished. Nothing herein contained shall be construed to make the Consultant an agent Or employee of City while providing said services, a~d Consultant shall be entitled to no other benefits or compen- sation exc~ as provided herein. 13. '~;~tices. All notices herein required_ shall be in writing, and shall be delivered in person or sent by certified mail, postage ~,r_~id ~-iotices required to be given to City shall be addresses as follows' Notices required to be given to City shall be addressed as follows- City Clerk 400 Grand Avenue~ P~O~ Box 711 South San Francisco, CA 94080 Notices required to be given to Consultant-shall be addressed as follows' M~"'Neil Martin Martin Carpenter Associates, City and Regional'Planners 1640 Laurel Street _ San Carlos, CA 94070 · IN WITNESS WHEREOF, duly authorized representatives of the City and the Consultant have signed in conformatiOn of this Agreement as of the day and year first above written CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 400 Grand Avenue South San Francisco, California 94080 -ATTEST: MARTIN CARPENTER ASSOCIATES 1640 Laurel Street San Carlos, California By I~ROPOSAL TO PREPARE REVISED HOUSING ELEMENT FOR CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO January 17 ,. 1984 ?',artin. Carpenter. Associates, City and Regional Planners 1640 Laurel Street, San Carlos, CA 94070 (415) 593-1681 MAR(IN-CARPENTER 1640 Laurel Street · San Carlos. California 940?0 * {:415}59..1-1681 Neal J. Manln Malcolm C. Carpenter Nancy Maddox Lytle . ,t[-SSOCIATES · .. January 17, 1984 Mr. Philip Gorny, Senior Planner Department of Community Development 400 Grand Avenue · South San Francisco, CA 94080 Dear Phil Thank you for inviting us to submit this proposal to assist you in updating the Housing Element of the South' San Francisco General · Plan. Our proposal includes a summary of our understanding.of the project, a list of the various tasks, to be proposed under the scope of work and the qualifications of our-firm members. As in past contracts with the City of South San Franc.isco, I would be the Project Director responsible for preparation of. the updated Housing- Element if we are selected. We propose to accomplish the entire update for a maximum budget of $9,500. We would be willing to work either on a lump sum or time and materials basis at your direction. I am sure that we can easily complete the Housing Element Update prior to July 1,.1984 as indicted in our proposed schedule. ~ hope this proposal adequately outlines cur philosophy, approach and scope of ,~..~rk.. If you have any questions or further requests, please do not hesitate to Call. Thank you for your consideration. Very trul~~~ Nea'/ro. V, artin, AICP NJM/s · OUR UNDERSTANDING OF THE PROJECT In 1981 the South San Francisco City Council adopted its current Housing Element. The element was designed to meet both the California Depart- ment of Housing and Community Development (HCD) Housing Element Guide- lines in effect prior to October l, 1981 and the revised Housing Element statutes contained in Government Code Article 10.6..Although the element was rejected by HCD on the primary basis that it did not contain the ABAG Housing needs' numbers, it was determined to be adequate 'through adjudication by San Mateo County Superior Court in the suit Pollard et al versus South San Francisco, The Housing-Element Statute, now in effect, requires an.update of each ~urisdiction's plan bY July l, 1984. That revision should include an update of the City's data base using the 1980 Census and the most recently available population, employment and housin§ projections. It is our understanding that the City desires to update and revise its 1981 Housing Element in accordance with the Statute and to seek a positive review of that plan from HCD. We propose to help the City accomplish that objective. It is our understanding the consultant w~ll be required to complete the following tasks as part of the revision process- 1. Update the population, employment and housing data base using the 1980 U.S. Census. 2. Incorporate the most recent projections Of population, employment and housing into the plan. Incorporate acceptable housing needs determination into the plan. 4. Prepare Administrative Draft Housing Element Reports. 5. Present the Draft Housing Element to the Planning Commissien and City Council at required public hearings. 6. Seek acceptance of the document by 'HCD. 7. Produce a camera ready copy of the final adopted Housi;~ Element for publication by the City. It is also our understanding that the citizen participation process to be 'used in preparation of the Draft Housing Element will occur -1- L :hrough the normal Planning Commiss~-o ~r,d City Council public hearing -.rocess. No special citizen's co~,.. '..=:~ ~re pro~se~, to work with consultant on this project. OUR APPROACH TO THE PROJECT he principals of Martin. Carpenter Asz~ciates have had broad experience in providing'planning services to comunities with characteristics similar' to those of South San Francis:.~. Each member has worked extensively ~'ith California cities an~ counties in all phases of. :urrent and advance planning. Exanpl=_s of past and present clients ,ithin San Jd~_teo County include Beim, c,,t, San Carlos, Foster City, Daly City, Pacifica, Millbrae and'the Coun:L.' ~f San Hateo. As a small firm, we offer the client ::rect contact w~th the principals ~ho do most of the work from element -rep~_ration to public hearing )resentation. The principals will be =_¥~ilable to the cljeat and ~taff at regular intervals and upon s'.-c, rt notice. We woul(l establish ~_ regular schedule of progress meetir,,]~ ar:d liaison with the City ~taff. Our orientation is toward physical pl=~ning and economic responsibility. '~e believe that development and growt: sh.~uld benefit, not burden, a :ommunity. Cur primary concerns'wsu1- be the development of legally :_dequate elements and ordinances that ':,auid comply with State law and implementing guidelines. .~roduct Description - Compliance w~t?, 5tare Guidelines Our firm is product orie6ted with hot- written and graphic material .~esigned for easy reference. Written ~t:_rial is directly to the 9oint and in plain english; we partic_!,~rly avoid the use of planning jargon. Our product would-.be designe: in compliance with the 1981 statutes relating to the content of h:.Jsir~g elements (Government Code ~ection 6558~ et seq) and other ap.31i:.=_bl=~ provisions of State law. Zn addition, internal consistency Se%-_-e,~ the various elements as well =s a logical progression from goals ~: ~-jectives, policies and ~rograms is necessary. This element would be prepared to te '-~ter,qally consistent with the ~thers and wtuld follow an easily ref=_-enced.forr..at. We anticipate that the ele~.-.Bnt would contain its c,~,.'- ~=_tailed table of contents, statement of how.it relates to other-i~.q elements, pertinent data -'_-nalysis, plan proposals, recommen,~e~ _-,~ilcies and clearly defined implementation programs setting fc:'t~ .-:~thv-~-~'~~'~'-"';"~:, :~ and personnel responsible for carrying out specifi: ~c:ions. -2- .Past Experience in the City of South S~n Francisco We feel that Martin. Carpenter. Associates has a major asset in its knowledge and past experience workincj with the City ol= South San Fran- cisco. Mr.' Neal Martin, President of the firm, has been a consultant to the Planning Department continuously fram 1965 to tI~e present. On t~m occasions, for approximately one year e~ch, Mr. ~.tartin served as Acting Planning Director. of the City. Mr. l.',.=_rtin was a Vice-President of Hahn- Wise & Associates and consultant in ck=-r§e of'worki~I with the City staff to prepare the 1969 docum'ent "Orderly Growth" and the Hous~§ Element. In addition, Mr. Martin pre.~.=~red the Subd~¥ision Ordima:ce which is currently in use by the City. He preparect the Housing) Element currently in effect in South San Francisco. ~,le feel that this extensive experience and knowledge'of the City's goals, obSectives and policies would be of value in preparing the up~=_ted plan. Timing and Consultant Availability Martin. Carpenter. Associates would be =~¥ailable to be§in work i~r~qediately upon execution of a cohtract for planning services. It would be our intent to deliver-the administrative draft of the element for ~taff review within eight weeks from the proj=~ct beginning date. The admini- strative draft would be reviewed by tVe Planning Division staff prior to submitting a formal draft to the Planning Commission and City Council. Progress reports would be submitted on a monthly basis including reference to any major problems encountered. 0~? firm is particularly responsible about meeting deadline co.~,,~itments. ?=_st client references will attest to this quality. Cal ifornia Environmental Quality Act - ~e ;.~ill work with the Planning Divisic_q staff to thoroughly prepare the checklists and initial study required ~y the California Environmental Quality Act. We will prepare written responses to all topics ~here a potentially significant impact is fouF~. Should the initial stt~..-ty lead to the conclusion that a Negati¥-~ Declaration will be appropriate, we will help the Planning Division st=_-'f prepare that documentation. Should the initial study lead to the '-_~nclusion that an EIR should be prepared we would be pleased to prepa.--~ such a document for the City. Howe,~er, the preparation of an EIR is ~-eyond the scope of this proposal and >dditional financial arrangemer~ts for the preparation oi~ that document would be necessary. ( PROPOSED WORK PROGRAt4 This section of the proposal con-:ists of a description of the work tasks that would be undertaken to complete the revised Housing Element. If selected, our first task would be to meet with the City staff to refine, detail and.perhaPs amend this work program to assure that it is consistent with the City's objectives. Task l- _Prepare Outline of Revised Housing Element This task will involve working with the'Planning Division staff to prepare a refined outline of the Housing Element Revision.' Our objective would be to achieve compliance with the Housing Element Statute (Government Code Article 10.6). Our intent would be to address each specific requirement as stated ir. the .Statute, taking into consideration the individual characteristics of South San Francisco. This task would also include an identification of'issues to be discussed and resolved through the Planning Co~}ssion and City Council process. .. Task .2- Update all Basic Information Using 1980 Census and Other Recent Data Sources This task involv, es updating the existing "Technical Housing Data" appendix and other data items in the report to reflect the results of the 1980 U.S. Census and other available recent studies. This updated data will be presented in tabular form by census tract and for the City as a whole. ABAG's "Projections '83" will be included as the City's .population and employment projections. ABAG housing needs numbers will be included to the extent that they are acceptable to the City. Task 3- Review Base Data, projections and Issues with Staff and lndividual Commission and Council Members' After all base data, information, projections and issues have been completed or identified, the information will.be reviewed with City staff Any required additional information ,,.till be prepared 'and the report out- line will 'be modified if necessa'."-y to reflect any issues or details emerging during this review. If desired, we will meet with.the Planning Commission and City Council, eit~:-=-r individually or in regular session to review progress on the project a:~d to obtain input from these bodies. The product of this task will be an update of the technical housing data appendix, to provide the base data requirements called for in the Housing Element Statute. This will also include an identification of any new or changed issues which have evolve-' since the preparation of the existing element. -4- -ask 4' _Preparation of Revised Adr,,i-.istrative Draft and Draft Housing Element The first portion of this task invoi';es the preparation of the revised Fousing Element in administrative dr=_ft form.' We will work closely with -_-taff in preparing this document. ~,'~en the administrative draft has ~een completed, we will review it wi~h staff and make any modifications cr additions'necessary 'to obtain a d~cument to their satisfaction. We ~ntend to generally follow the outline of tile existing element, however, ~t should be modified in certain are=-s to more closely follow the 'require- ~ents of the Statute~ We propose to use the strategy for obtaining approval of the document from HCD, w~ich we-have used successfully in c. ther jurisdictions. That'strate§y involves carefully addressing each statutory requirement and'tailoring the contents of each section to fit the special circumstances in South S=.n Francisco. The Housing Element ~ill contain specific Government Coda references for each .required piece cf information. Those references will be in the form of margin notes or Sy some other appropriate method to enable the user to identify how the ~ocument responds to the'statute. general we propose the following ~eport. contents- INTRODUCTION 'Purpose Definition of income categories Relation to other element~ State Housing Plan Information sources for %qe Housing Element ASSESSMENT OF HOUSING NEEDS Population and employment characteristics of South San Francisco Housing characteristics c-- South San Francisco Housing needs determinat:~n SPecial housing needs INVENTORY OF RESOURCES AND CO!~STP~tINTS TO MEETING HOUSING NEEDS Inventory of land suitab'e for residential development Inventory of vacant site.: Sites with redevelopment -otential Sites suitable for factc.'¥-built mobile home housing Availability of sites fo" non-market rate housing Analysis of potential an- ~c'tual governmental constraints Analysis of potential ar- actual non-governmental .Constraints HOUSING GOALS, S3JECTIVES, P~LICIES AND II.~?L.-ZMENTATION I~ROGRAMS Citizen ir.,~l vement Housing gs=_ls Housing p,~.orities Housing objectives and programs Summary of 5-year sc~.ed;le of action After review of .the AL,ainistrative Draft Housing Element we vlill make necessary modifications and produc=, the Draft Housing Element suitable for presentation at r=_quired Plann.in§ Commission ~nd City Council public hearings. ~e' :rill provi~.e -' camera ready copy of the Draft Housing Element for City reproduction as spe.cified, in the ReQuest for Proposals. , Task 5- Presentation of Draft E~using Element to ?lannin'g Commission_ and City Co,s~ci I This task involves presentation Df the Draft Housing Element to.the Planning Com.~ission 2-.-_4 City Council at required ~.'-Jblic hearings.- We ,~ill present the rep~ + answer questions and res~-~nd to any-issues raised during th'e ~.~=~-' . . ' a .:._, ~ngs We ~rapose to attend t least two public hearings as part of ~5t=_ scope of s.=_rvices. Task 6: ASSistance is Seeking Approval from HCD We will assist the P!=-nning Division staff in see>.ing approval of the revised Housing Ele~--_:t from HCD.. As noted in ou, Statement of Qualifi6ations, v:e h---;e-had considerable success i~ obtaining HCD approval of elements ~iqich we have prepared. Our approach is to ~vork directly with HCD staff by respcndlng to their in?ut and requests for information. Task 7: 'Production c,.-- Final Adc~pted Housing Ele,:-,=-r~t After adoption of =.~.~ final Housin- Element by the City Council ~e will prepare a camera read/ copy of ~he approved versis~r,. This will include all changes and addis!ons adopted ~y the City Co~r. sil and citation of the adopting resolut~s-ss. The ca~.~ra ready copy -,;ill be delivered to the Planning Divisqc.- staff wit~qin ten days of ad.--ption. PROPOSED WORK SCHEDULE Task Item 1. 0utl ine Preparation 2. Data Base'Update 3. Staff Review ~)a. Preparation of Administra- tive Draft Housing-E1 ~ ~ eIil~n ~ 4b. Staff review of Administra- tive Draft and Production of Draft Housing Element City Council workshop (must be scheduled in advance) 7. HCD Review. of AdministratiYe Draft Weeks. to Complete Task 1 2 1 Completion Date Assuming Start On January 30, 1984 February $, .1984 February 20, 1984- February 27, 198¢ Harch 26, 1984 April 16, 1984 April 27, 1984 6 Hay 7, 1984 5a. Planning Commission P'ubl ic 'Hearing 1 o Hay. lO & 24, 1984 5b. City Council Public Hearing/Adoption 8. Publish Final Housing Element June 13 & 27, 1984 2 July 12, 1.984 It should'be noted that adherer, t-~.to this schedule will result in the adoption of the revised'Housin~ -lament prior to the July l, 1984 statutory deadline. FEE SCHEDULE Martin. Carpenter. Associates proposes to perform all necessary professional and technical tasks outlined in the proposed work program for a lump sum of $9,5oo. DETAILED BREAKDOWN OF. COST ESTIMATE Task. .-. Description Cost Estimate 1 Outline Preparation $ 300 2 Data Base Update 1200 3 Staff Review 600 Preparation of Administrative Draft and Draft Housing Element 5300 Planning Commission and. City Council Public Hearings (2) 5OO 6 HCD Review 800 7 Prepare Final Housing Element 800 $9500 If the client prefers, we would be willing to work lon a time and materials basis with a maximum not to exceed .$9,500 at the billing rates indicated below: Principal Planner Senior Associate Planner Research Associate Draftsperson Secretary $70.O0/Hour $40. O0/Hour $32.50/Hour $32.50/Hour $22.50/Hour Exclusions and Limitations It is requested that the City provide all computer printouts of the 1980 U..S. Census Data available either from the Bureau of Census or the Associa- tion of Bay Area Governments. The consultant will prepare plans in a form for adoption by the client. However, the consultant cannot guarante'e or warrant that the proposed element will be adopted by the local agency of jurisdiction. -8- ( ¢. STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS Martin. Carpenter. Associates 'is a firm specializing in com~nunity and regional planning, environmental impact reporting and interagency coordina- tion- The firm was formed in 1972 and has worked primarily in the San Francisco Bay Area. The firm's planning experience ranges from plan preparation for cities, counties and regional agencies to site plans for' larger properties. Over the past three years, Martin. Carpenter. Associates has worked closely with the State Department of. Housing and Community Development, the Association of Bay Area Governments and other local jurisdictions in preparing housing elements for the following co,unities- Jurisdiction Certified Local by HCD or Approved and Review Co~T~m.enti ng Adopted by 'in Period Jurisdiction Progress Expired Benicia X Colma X Atherton X San Carl os - Half Moon Bay South San Francisco X X X No n-Cert i f i ed E1 ement upheld as adequate in Court Decision ., General Plans and Plan Elements. Martin. Carpenter. Associates has,' within the past eleven years, prepared General Plan revisions and updates for the fol lowin'g co,unities- - City of Belmon'C. Comprehensive nine-element update 'and several specific plans. - City of Benicia. Comprehensive revision of all elements, most recently the Housing Element, State certified in 1982. - City of Pittsburg. Cumplete General Plan revision. - City of South San Francisco. Preparation of Land Use, Circulation and Public Facilities Elements. - City of San Carlos. Comprehensive General Plan Update and Downtown Core Area Specific Plan. - Town of Colma. Housing Element revision ~nd update, State certified in 1983; update of other Plan Elements (in progress). - Town of Atherton. Housi.ng Element.revision and update; revision of the Zoning Ordinance. - City of Half Moon Bay. Housing Element revision and update. (in progress). Consulting Planning Directorships. The firm has served or is now serving as consulting planning d-irector-to the following cities: · . Belmont, San Carlos, SOuth San Francisco, Foster.City and Colma. Mining Reclamation Plans. One of the firm's clients, Quarry Products, - Incorporated, owns a' number of quarries throughout Northern California. The firm has prepared mining reclamation-plans for quarries located in Brisbane, Pacifica, Richmond, Petaluma 'and Windsor, bCalifornia. Environmental Impact Reports and 'Environmental Assessments. Examples of some of the Environmental Impact Reports and'Assessments that have been prepared recently are listed ~below: - Sugarloaf Area EIR, San Mateo County . ~ Sand and Gravel Operations Along the Feather It~ver, Sutter County - Rancho Canada de Verde, San Mateo County - La Selva Condominium Conversion EIR and Housing Impact Report, City of San Mateo - Rancho Sunol Development, DEIR, Alameda County - South San Francisco General Plan EIR, City of South San Francisco Specific Plans. The following list overviews the specific plans prepared by Martin. Carpenter. Associates for both private clients and public agencies- - Seacliff Estates, Richmond. A 43-acre redevelopment project in Richmond's industrial waterfront area - Cascade Ranch,. San Maceo County. A 4,000-acre agricultural enhancement scheme and clustered homesite design on the coastside -10- - Cement Ranch, Solano County. A 1500-acre site northwest of the City of Fairfield is a mixed use concept involving light industrial, reSidential and open space uses. - San Juan Area, Belmont. The specific plan for this developin§ neighborhood included residential design, lot consolidation and · open space preservation - I~estern Hills, Belmont. This design called i~or residential, commercial and executive office uses in a one square mile developing neighborhood - Rancho Canada de Verde, San'Mateo County. A 2,000-acre timber management and harvesting plan was compiled with a homesite design for 40-50 residences. · - Paradise Valley, Solano County. In a cooperative effort with Reiners and Hayes, .HCA prepared the Specific Plan to be adopted as a General Plan'Amendment, for this 800-acre project which incorporated a championship golf course and 1700 residential dwelling units, adjacent to the City of Fairfield - SyCamore Valley,' Contra Costa County. In 1979 Martin.Carpenter. Associates served as environmental planners for the unincorporated Sycamore Valley, 2~300-acre residential and commercial development in south central Contra Costa'County. NEAL J. MARTIN, AICP President EXPERIENCE Martin. Ca rpenter. As soc i ates As PreSident of MC.A since 1972, Mr. Martin i~olds overall responsibility for corporate administration. His experience includes a full ran§e of planning services. He has prepared General Plans, examples of which include Belmont, Lake County, Mono County, and South San Francisco. He was directly responsible for Specific Plans for Paradise Valley,. Fairfield, Lower Ralston Avenue, Cascade Ranch, and Rancho Canada de Verde. Nr. Martin has prepared implementing ordinances, for example the San Carlos Zoni,~g Ordinance, Atherton Zoning Ordi n~_nce, South San Francisco Subdivision Ordina.qce and Hillside D_=vel op:.:eF.' Standards, Belmont. 14r. Martin's current planning experience has taken t:~e form of Cen~ulting Planning Director to the City of South San Francisco on two occasions, Belmont from 1969 to 1979 ~and currently, Foster City from 1969-71 and San Ca~ios from 1979 to the present. Past Experience Prior to 1972~ Mr. ~4artin served as Vice President of a major West Coast Planning firm. He managed' and conducted General Plan and Advanced Planning 'studies for a wide variety, of cities and counties. He .provided counsel to more than 30 cities and counties on current planning, advanced planning and zoning matters. EDUCATI ON ' · University of Illinois, B.S., Civil Engineering University of California, Berkeley, 'graduate studies in Urban Planning MEMBERSHIPS American Planning Association American Institute of Certified Planners Building Industry Association -12- MALCOLM C. CA~-'= '-= AICP Vice President 'EXPERIENCE Ma rti n. Car pen ts-..'-~ soc i a tes As Vice Presid=Lr.: and principal of the firm s~n:e 1975, Mr. Carpenter hol~s :~eralt responsibility --:- r~n~ging * ° '- :_ccounts. half of ~h~ fi~. ~ His experience :r..~iuSes a full range of plannir.~ and resource management servf~es to cities, counties and Fri-~'_t_ clients Mr. Carpenter i--~ -'h=~.,_ consulting planning direct:r for the 7own of Colma; ~ana~-z5 the firm's quarry land re~'..~_.-ation division, including an ~,.t=..Jisc~plinary team of subcon-':~rfad biologists, landscape arckf _-_-_t~, engin_=ers and foresters- =_qf represents a number of pr~v=_'= land holders by r~anaging p~_:=~t develop- men~ thr.ou~h _-. _: ~ann~ng, rezoning, _cener=_~ plan amend- ment, specifi'c -- an, and permit '-'- Carpenter has' processing, ~.~. previously servel ~s Plannin~, Director for ti.-.=_ C~ty of Bel'mont. Past Experi eno=_ Nr. Carpenter principal -in-el- =-~-=- of Carpenter Assc]".~t=-s,-prior to t?,e consol i._=_i~n of both fi r~:...s. Majo~ included the 5~_-iaSa General Plan and numer:__--, quarry reclamation p'~_-_:: in Contra Costa and $onoma Counties. Before forming his own firm, Mr. Carpenter was employed-by the City of Pacifica as Planning Adminis- trator, responsible for both planning and engineering staffs. Prior to the Pacifica position, l,lr. Carpenter Was a planning project manager for the consulting firm of Hall and Goodhue, a staff member for City of Oakland, and was formerly an ur'ban designer for Leslie Properties, Inc. EDUCATION University of California,'Berkeley . B.A., Architecture I,i.A., Urban and Re§ional Planning MEIqBERSHIPS American Planning Association American Institute of Certified Planners Petaluma Citizens Planning Advisn'-y Group NANCY l-tqDDOX LYTLE Associate Planner EXPERIENCE Nartin. Carpenter. Associates I."L~. Lytle joined H~A in 1981. As a Senior As'sociate, she has successfully managed contracts for private and public clients, including the La Selva Housing Impact Report, and the Lands of Jack and IASCO Subdivision. While with MCA, .she has been a major contributor to.the following planning consulting contracts- Housing Elements of six con~nunities, two complete General Plan revisions, mining reclamation plans, and numerous environmental impact reports a~d specific plans. She has ]nte?mittently acted as Staff Planner to San Carlos and Colma. Previous Experience Ms. Lytle began her car. eer as a research analyst for NASA, Earth Resources Division. Her project management experience was acqdired with' Spectral Data Corp., N.Y., where she was responsible at various times for 'a staff of 30 technicians and engineers. Major contracts were with U.S. Army Topographic Labs and d.S. State Department, and consisted of computer modeling ~nd management information systems applications. From 1978-81, Ms. Lytle was an urban planner and environmental analyst for Shastec Environmental · Services, Redding, and R. C. Fuller ASsociates, Sacramento. EDUCATION University of Californiaj Santa Barbara B.A. Environmental Studies and Geography University of California, Davis, Graduate studies in Geography MEMBER American Society of ?hotog~am- metry and Remote Sensing Urban an,~ Regional' Information Systems Associat -14- I LA'RRANCE F.'. O?,Z" Planner EXPERIENCE Martin. Carpenter. Associates Mr. Florin joined ~:lCA in 1983. As a planner he has worked on projects for public and private sector clients. He has ',.'ritten economic and planning sections for numerous environmental impact reports, market studies for real estate developers and reviewed development plans for local governr..ents. Mr. Florin has also computerized survey results and used micro- computers -in. financial and economic .analysis projects. Previous Experience Mr. Florin previously worked as an environmental planner for Earth :-~etrics, a Say Area -consulti~.g firm. While at Earth Metrics, Mr. Florin worked on n:merous environ.q- mental impact reports and General Plans for several Bay Area co,unities. He was also a staff planner for ~h~_ City of Philadelphia and was responsible for numerous presentations l~efore th=- Pi annin.3 COn,hi ssion. EDUCATION University of Pennsylvania M.A. 'in City Planning State University of New York College ol= ~urchase B.A. in Economics AWARDS l~ational EndownTent for the Arts Special project award winner llew York State'Re§ents .Scholarship Award W~n~er MENBER American Planning Association EXHIBIT "B" w ,, ENSATION City agrees to pay and Consultant agrees to accept' compen_--,=_tion on an hou~'ly basis at Consultant's regular charge ras=_s. The folis,"-~ char~=_ rate ranges are in effect: .Principal Planner Senior Associate Pl-anner Research Associate Draftsperson Typist $70.00 Per Hoar 40.00 Per Ho:ur 32.50 Per Ho~ur 32.50 Per Hour 22.50 Per H¢'Jr Reimbursable expenses not included in the above rates a..'.-e: Auto mileage {at $.22 mile); telephone calls and reproduction, and other dire-se _--xpenses ylhen aut~ ,,orized by City. Reimbursable expenses are 5iiled to the Cit;z at cost plu~ lO percent for administrative and handling costs. )-tqXi)qUM CO~,iPENSATI ON . The total compensation for all services p~rformed purs:3nt to this A§reem~nt shall not exceed the sum of Nine Thousand Five Xundred Dollars =_sd i';,~ C=_nts - ($e,500.00). ~,~ ~,,OD OF PAYMENT · Consultant shall invoice City each month s~ecifying the ~c~'nt due for services performed by Consultant and a list OT = ~ ~ncurred exp=_ns-'_s for t?~_= past · calendar month. Upon approval of the invoice, the City sha'i .s.-_-y Consultant -- the amounts invoiced up to the maximum total s._-_=cified above.