Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 238A-1928 (404) WHEREAS a case is now before the Railroad Commisslon of the State of California in which telephone rates in portions of the area about San Francisco Bay are invelved; and ~HEREAS the industrial area of South San Francisco lies in close l~eximity to the primary area for telephone rates in the City and County of San Francisco ;and WF. EREAS the Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company has heretofore included in its Oakland primary rate area, all the territory between Albany and San Leandre inc l~ ~ ve; and W~AEREAS the industrial area of South San Francisco is nearer in distance to the center of the City and County of San Francisco, than either San Leandro or Albany is to the center of Oakland; and WHEREAS a discrimination exists against the industrial area of South San Francisco in telephone ra. tes with respect to territory similarly situated in dis- tahoe from Oakland; end ~ ~tER~,_F~S said Railroad Conm~.ission of the State of California has hsreto- fore ordered tho equalization of freight rates wi~Ja res!.~ct to 0akl~nd and San Franci~sco in situations ~imilar as to distance ~L~rom the re~'pective cities of 0~kland and ~n Francisco in the foll~',~ing co~ses: (1) Case No. 9906 - Sou'th S~m Francisco Chamber of Commerce vs. Southern Pacific Co.~]m~any. Decided ~iay £1, 1919. Case No, 14ZZ - Decision ~8~21, South San Francisco Chamber of Commerce vs. Southern Pacific Company-October ll, 1920. Case No. 1980 -kp~'tication ~11703 South San Francisco Chsmber of Com~.erce vs. Southern Pacific Company- Decided February 15, 19~5. .RESOLVED by the city Ceuncil of the City of South San Franc isco that the Railroad Commission of the State of California be, and hereby is requested, to in- ciude in the primary telephone rate area of San Francisco the industrial area of South San Francisco, and that all industries located in South San Francisco be accorded the same telephone rates as those pr~ided for industries in the primary t,~lephone rate area of San Francisco. I hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco, this l?th day of December, 19~8~ by the following vote: Ayes, Councilmen A. Hyndi~, Reese Lloyd, R. Tibbetts, ~I. ~'Iinucciani, A. J. Eschelbach Noes, Councilmen None Absent, Councilmen None (Seal) Attest: Daniel McSweeney City Clerk