HomeMy WebLinkAboutRDA Minutes 1989-12-13Chairwoman Roberta Cerri Teglia M I N U T E S
Boa rdmembe rs: ~ ~ ,~ ~
Jack Drago Redevelopment Agency
Richard A. Haffey
Gus Nicolopulos Municipal Services Building
John R. Penna
Community Room
December 13, 1989
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
CALL TO ORDER: (Cassette No. 1) 7:15 p.m. Chairwoman Teglia presiding.
ROLL CALL: Boardmembers present: Drago, Haffey,
Nicolopulos,
Penna and Teglia.
Boardmembe rs absent: None.
AGENDA REVIEW AGENDA REVIEW
Executive Director Armas stated there
were no modifications to the Agenda.
CONSENT CALENDAR CONSENT CALENDAR
1.Approval of the Minutes of the Approved.
Regular Meeting of 9/27/89.
2. Approval of the Regular Bills of ~ Approved in the total amount of
10/11/89, 10/25/89, 11/8/89, ~ $38,938.60.
11/22/89, and 12/13/89.
M/S Haffey/Drago - To approve the Consent
Calendar.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
3. Reorganization of the Agency. M/S Penna/Drago - To nominate Richard A.
Haffey as Chairman of the Redevelopment
Agency.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
4. Motion to grant a one-year time ~ Assistant Executive Director/Secretary
extension to 12/31/90 for submittal Smith stated that the Specific Plan had
of precise plan for Phase I of been adopted on 1/8/86, and that exten-
Shearwater and for any other appro- sions had been granted previously for the
vals, permits or conditions pre- Precise Plan and Tentative Map due to
viously issued by the Agency that complications and delays. She stated
might expire in the interim, that the Shearwater property had recently
been sold and the extension had been
requested by Mainspring Corp., who was
the management representative of the
Developer; and extension of the Tentative
Map appeared on the Council Agenda.
12/13/89
Page i
A6ENDA ACTION TAKEN
ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
4. Motion - Continued. Boardmember Teglia questioned if there
was correspondence from Sumitomo on this
item.
Executive Director Armas stated that the
City was in receipt of a communication
from Sumitomo indicating that Mainspring
was its management representative, and
was authorized to submit documents on its
behalf, which had been received sub-
sequent to the Agenda.
Boardmember Penna questioned if
Shearwater had a Precise Plan now.
Assistant Executive Director/Secretary
Smith stated that Shearwater had a
Specific Plan now, and had not submitted
a Precise Plan.
Boardmember Penna questioned why the
Agency did not vote this down, and have
Shearwater come in with a new Precise
Plan.
Assistant Executive Director/Secretary
Smith stated that this action allowed t~he
Developer to come in with the first
Precise Plan prior to 12/31/90.
Chaiman Haffey stated that there was an
advantage for the Agency to grant the
extension, because of the favorable
agreement that went with the land for the
Oyster Point Interchange that was a
mutual advantage.
Boardmember Penna expressed concern over
there being more than a 15% change in the
Plan due to the removal of the conference
center.
Assistant Executive Director/Secretary
Smith explained that the Specific Plan
was part of the Zoning Ordinance and
that it was not being changed at this
time, and the Precise Plan when submitted
.... could be in conformance with the Specific
Plan. She stated that any Precise Plan
12/13/89
Page 2
ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
4. Motion - Continued. that was not in conformance with the
Specific Plan would call for an amendment
to the Specific Plan.
Boardmember Nicolopulos questioned if
there was a time limit for submittal of
the Precise Plan in that the letter from
Mainspring was not clear on where the
extension request applied.
Assistant Executive Director Smith stated
that there was not, however, the
Tentative Map did have a time limit with
only one further extension that could be
granted.
Executive Director Armas stated that he
would be meeting with representatives of
Mainspring tomorrow, and would make a
point of clarifying the matter.
M/S Teglia/Drago - To approve a one-year
time extension to 12/31/90 for submittal
of Precise Plan for Phase I of
Shearwater, and for any other approvals,
permits or conditions previously issued
by the Agency that might expire in the
interim.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
GOOD AND WELFARE GOOD AND WELFARE
No one chose to speak.
CLOSED SESSION CLOSED SESSION
5. Closed Session for the purpose of The Agency chose not to hold a Closed
the discussion of personnel Session.
matters, labor relations,
property negotiations and
litigation.
M/S Teglia/Drago - To adjourn the
meeting.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
ADJOURNMENT Time of adjournment was 7:25 p.m.
12/13/89
Page 3
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, APPROVED.
b~A~B t ~ C~ R~ic. har~f~fe~y,~'~~h~rman
Bar ara . at aya,
Redevelopment Agency Keoevelopment Agency'I-"
City of South San Francisco City of South San F'aN~isco
The entries of this Agency meeting show the action taken by the Redevelopment Agency to
dispose of an item. Oral communications, arguments, and comments are recorded on tape.
The tape and documents related to the items are on file in the Office of the City Clerk
and are available for inspection, review and copying.
12/13/89
Page 4