HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 3436-1962RESOLUTION NO. 3436
RESOLUTION GIVING NOTICE OF PROPOSED ANNEXATION
TO CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OF "UNINHABITED
TERRITORY DESCRIBED HEREIN AND DESIGNATED
'PONDEROSA PARCEL'" AND GIVING NOTICE OF TIME
$
AND PLACE FOR HEARING OF PROTESTS THERETO
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of South San Francisco:
1. That, pursuant to the provisions of the Annexation of Uninhabited Terri-
tory Act of 1939, a petition signed by owners of not less than one-fourth of the land
in the hereinafter described territory, by area and by assessed value as shown on the
last equalized assessment roll of the County of San Mateo, was filed with the Council
of the City of South San Francisco on April 6, 1962, requesting annexation of the here-
inafter described territory to said City.
2. That the territory which the petitioners request be annexed to the City
of South San Francisco and which said City and its Council propose to annex, is sit-
uated in the County of San Mateo, State of CaIifornia, hereby designated as "Ponderosa
Parcel" and described as follows:
BEGINNING at a point which is the most Northerly corner
of that certain parcel of land as described in deed to the Roman
Catholic Welfare Corporation and recorded in the office of the
recorder of San Mateo County on February 28, 1958 in Book 3355 at
page 545 (File No. 22529-Q); said point also lies on the corporate
limit of the City of South San Francisco as established by Ordi-
nance No. 209 on August 26, 1940; said point also lies on the
Westerly line of E1Camino Real; thence leaving the corporate
limit of the City of South San Francisco and proceeding along the
Northerly line of said parcel (File No. 22529-Q) 250.00 feet South
58° 45' West to the most Easterly corner of that certain parcel of
land as described in deed to A. Haskins and recorded in the office
of the recorder of San Mateo County on January 20, 1961 in Book
2923 at page 161 (File No. 24886-T); thence continuing along the
Southerly line of said parcel (File No. 24886-T) said line being
parallel to and an extension of the previous course 283.95 feet
South 58° 45' West; thence South 27° 45' West 5.07 feet to the
most Southerly corner of said parcel (24886-T), said point also
bein~ the most Easterly corner of that certain parcel of land as
described in deed to R. DeNardi.and recorded in the office of the
County Recorder of San Mateo County of May 9, 1961 in Book 3980
at page 37 (File No. 56248-T); thence along the Southeasterly line
of said parcel (56248-T) South 27° 45' West 183.14 feet to the
Southwesterly corner of said parcel (56248-T); thence alon~ the
Southwesterly llne of said parcel (56248-T) and a prolongation
thereof which is the southwesterly line of that certain 50.00 foot
strip of land as conveyed to the City of South San Francisco and
recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Mateo County
on July 17, 1956 in Book 3061 at page 124 (File No. 71283-N) North
38o 50' 20" West 339.86 feet to a point on the corporate limit of
the City of South San Francisco as established by Ordinance No.
331 on July 25, 1952; said point also lies on the Northerly line
of the 50.00 foot wide Ponderosa Road; thence North 55° 07' 30'~
East 190 feet more or less alone the above-mentioned corporate
limit line (Ordinance No. 331);-thence continuing along the same
line Which is also a corporate limit line being established by
Ordinance No. 215 on December 1, 1941, 561.35 feet to an angle
point on the corporate limit of the City. of South San Francisco;
thence continuing along the corporate limit of the City of South
San Francisco in a southeasterly direction as set by Ordinance
No. 209 on August 26, 1940; said line also being the Westerly
line of E1Camino Real 285 feet more or less to the point of
beginning.
394
RESOLUTION NO. 3436: (Continued)
3. That the County Boundary Commission of San Mateo County, California, did
in session duly assembled on the 18th day of January, 1962, consider the proposed
annexation "
boundaries of said Ponderosa Parcel , as above described, and as submitted
to said Commission by the proponents of said annexation, and did in Resolution No.
698 of said Boundary Commission approve same.
4. That June 4, 1962, at the hour of 8:00 P.M., in the Council Chambers
in the City Hall in the City of South San Francisco, County of San Mateo, Califor-
nia, is hereby fixed as the time and place when and where any person owning real
property within the uninhabited territory above described and proposed to be annexed
to the City of South San Francisco, and having any objections to the proposed annex-
atiou, may appear before the Council of the City of South San Francisco and show
cause why such uninhabited territory should not be so annexed to the City of South
San Francisco. The protest must be in writing, may be filed at any time before the
hour set for hearing objections to the proposed annexation, and shall state the name
or names of the owner or owners of property affected and the description and area
of such property, in general terms.
5. The City Clerk of the City of South San Francisco is hereby authorized
and directed to cause a copy of this resolution to be published at least twice, but
not oftener than once a week, in the Enterprise Journal, a newspaper of general cir-
culation published in said City of South San Francisco, the city to which it is pro-
posed to annex the aforesaid territory, and also iu the Advance-Star, a newspaper
of general circulation published outside the City of South San Francisco, but in the
County of San Mateo, California, the county in which is located the territory pro-
posed to be annexed to the City of South San Francisco, said publication to be com-
plete at least twenty (20) days prior to the date set for hearing.
6. The said City Clerk is further authorized and directed to cause writ-
ten notice of such proposed annexation to be mailed to each person to whom land
within the territory proposed to be annexed was assessed in the last equalized
county assessment roll available on the date the above said proceedings were ini-
tiated, at the addresses shown on said assessment roll or known to said Clerk, and
to any person who has filed his name and address and the designation of the lands
in which he has an interest, either legal or equitable, with said Clerk, such no-
tice to be given not less than twenty ~20) days before the first public'heariug
on the proposed annexation.
7. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to transmit or cause to be
transmitted a copy of the resolution to the governing board of each school district
which iu part, or iu whole, is included in the territory sought to be included in
the city, and which has made written request therefor.
8. The said City Clerk is further authorized and directed to cause writ-
ten notice of such proposed annexation to be mailed to each person to whom land
within the territory proposed to be annexed is assessed iu the last equalized assess-
ment roll available on the date the proceedings were initiated, at the address shown
on assessment roll or as known to said Clerk, and to any person who has filed his
name and address and the designation of the lands iu which he has any interest,
either legal or equitable, with said Clerk.
9. In the event any land within the territory proposed to be annexed is
owned by a county, the City Clerk is directed to cause written notice of such pro-
posed annexation to be mailed to the Board of Supervisors of such county, such no-
tice to be given not less than twenty (20) days before the first publlc hearing on
the proposed annexation.
10. In the event there is, upon the land proposed to be annexed to said
City, a structural improvement owned, being acquired or leased by a county fire pro-
tection district, the City Clerk is directed to cause written notice of such proposed
annexation to be mailed to the governing body of such district, such notice to be
sent not less than twenty (20) days before the first hearing upon such proposed an-
nexation.
11. The City Clerk is directed to cause written notice to be given to
such other persons as may be legally entitled thereto, in the manner required by
law.
I hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was
regularly introduced and adopted by the City Council of the
City of South San Francisco at a regular meeting held this
16th day of April, 1962, by the following vote:
Ayes, Councilmen
Noe s,
Absent,
G. J. Rozzi, Patrick E. Ahern, Emilio Cortesi,
and Leo J. Ryan
None
Andrew Rocca
ATTEST:
ARTHUR A. RODONDI
City Clerk