HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 03-2014RESOLUTION NO. 03 -2014
CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF AN
APPLICATION TO THE METROPOLITAN
TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION REQUESTING THE
ALLOCATION OF $182,100 IN FY 2013 -2014
TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT ARTICLE 3
PEDESTRIAN /BICYCLE PROJECT FUNDING FOR THE
OYSTER POINT BOULEVARD BIKE LANE IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT, AND COMMITTING THE NECESSARY NON-
FEDERAL MATCH IN THE AMOUNT OF $72,900 FOR THE
PROJECT AND STATING THE CITY'S ASSURANCE TO
COMPLETE THE PROJECT
WHEREAS, Article 3 of the Transportation Development Act (TDA), California Public
Utilities Code (PUC) Section 99200 et sue, authorizes the submission of claims to a regional
transportation planning agency for the funding of projects exclusively for the benefit and /or use
of pedestrians and bicyclists; and
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), as the regional
transportation planning agency for the San Francisco Bay region, has adopted MTC Resolution
No. 875, Revised, entitled "Transportation Development Act, Article 3, Pedestrian/Bicycle
Projects," which delineates procedures and criteria for submission of requests for the allocation
of "TDA Article 3" funding; and
WHEREAS, MTC Resolution No. 875, Revised requires that requests for the allocation
of TDA Article 3 funding be submitted as part of a single, countywide coordinated claim from
each county in the San Francisco Bay region; and
WHEREAS, the City of South San Francisco desires to submit a request to MTC for the
allocation of TDA Article 3 funds to support the project described in Attachment B to this
resolution, which is for the exclusive benefit and /or use of pedestrians and /or bicyclists; and
WHEREAS, the TDA Article 3 funds awarded for the project are in the amount of
$182,100, and the City of South San Francisco ( "City ") is required to appropriate minimum local
matching funds in the amount of $72,900.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of South San Francisco declares
it is eligible to request an allocation of TDA Article 3 funds pursuant to Section 99234 of the
Public Utilities Code; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that there is no pending or threatened litigation that
might adversely affect the project described in Attachment B to this resolution, or that might
impair the ability of the City of South San Francisco to carry out the project; and
-1-
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City of South San Francisco attests to the
accuracy of and approves the statements in Attachment A to this resolution; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution and its
attachments, and any accompanying supporting materials shall be forwarded to the Congestion
Management Agency, Countywide Transportation Planning Agency, or County Association of
Governments, as the case may be, of County of San Mateo for submission to MTC as part of the
countywide coordinated TDA Article 3 claim.
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the
City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a regular meeting held on the 8�h day of
January, 2014 by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Mark N Addiego Pradeep Gupta and Liza Normandy
Vice Mayor Richard A Garbarino and Mayor Karel Matsumoto
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT:
None
-2-
ATTEST: Q,U '—L
Anna Brown, Deputy City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO.
Attachment A
Re: Request to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission for the Allocation of Fiscal Year
2013 -2014 Transportation Development Act Article 3 Pedestrian/Biacle Project Funding
Findings
1. That the City of South San Francisco is not legally impeded from submitting a request to
the Metropolitan Transportation Commission for the allocation of Transportation
Development Act (TDA) Article 3 funds, nor is the City of South San Francisco legally
impeded from undertaking the project(s) described in "Attachment B" of this resolution.
2. That the City of South San Francisco has committed adequate staffing resources to
complete the project(s) described in Attachment B.
3. A review of the project(s) described in Attachment B has resulted in the consideration of all
pertinent matters, including those related to environmental and right -of -way permits and
clearances, attendant to the successful completion of the project(s).
4. Issues attendant to securing environmental and right -of -way permits and clearances for the
project(s) described in Attachment B have been reviewed and will be concluded in a
manner and on a schedule that will not jeopardize the deadline for the use of the TDA funds
being requested.
5. That the project(s) described in Attachment B comply with the requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA, Public Resources Code Sections 21000 et
seq.).
6. That as portrayed in the budgetary description(s) of the project(s) in Attachment B, the
sources of funding other than TDA are assured and adequate for completion of the
project(s).
7. That the project(s) described in Attachment B are for capital construction and /or design
engineering; and /or for the maintenance of a Class I bikeway, which is closed to motorized
traffic; and/or for the purposes of restriping Class II bicycle lanes; and /or for the
development or support of a bicycle safety education program; and /or for the development
of a comprehensive bicycle and /or pedestrian facilities plan, and an allocation of TDA
Article 3 funding for such a plan has not been received by the City of South San Francisco
within the prior five fiscal years.
8. That the project(s) described in Attachment B which are bicycle projects have been
included in a detailed bicycle circulation element included in an adopted general plan, or
included in an adopted comprehensive bikeway plan (such as outlined in Section 2377 of
the California Bikeways Act, Streets and Highways Code section 2370 et seq.).
9. That any project described in Attachment B that is a "Class I Bikeway," meets the
mandatory minimum safety design criteria published in Chapter 1000 of the California
Highway Design Manual.
10. That the project(s) described in Attachment B are ready to commence implementation
during the fiscal year of the requested allocation.
-3-
11. That the City of South San Francisco agrees to maintain, or provide for the maintenance of,
the project(s) and facilities described in Attachment B, for the benefit of and use by the
public.
0
Resolution No.
Attachment B
Page 1 of 1
TDA Article 3 Project Application Form
Fiscal Year of this Claim: 2013/2014 plicant: City of South San Francisco
Contact person: Sam Bautista Principal Engineer
Mailing Address: 315 Maple Avenue South San Francisco CA 94080
E Mail Address: sam baubstaOssf net Telephone: (650) 829 -6652
Secondary Contact (in event primary not available) Brian McMinn
E Mail Address: brian mcminn gAssf net Telephone: (650) 829 -6652
Short Title Description of Protect: Oyster Point Boulevard Bike Lane Improvements Project
Amount of claim: $182100
Functional Description of Project:
The Oyster Point Boulevard Bike Lane Improvement Proiect includes the design and installation of improved bike lanes on Oyster Point
Boulevard iust west of Gateway Boulevard to Marina Boulevard It will include installation of sharrows and green bike lane markings to increase
driver awareness of bicyclists on the Oyster Point corridor.
Financial Plan:
List the project elements for which TDA funding is being requested (e.g., planning, environmental, engineering, right -of -way, construction,
inspection, contingency, audit). Use the table below to show the project budget. Include prior and proposed future funding of the project. If the
project is a segment of a larger project, include prior and proposed funding sources for the other segments.
Project Elements: installation of sharrows and preen bike lane markings to increase driver awareness of bicyclists on the Oyster Point corridor.
Funding Source
All Prior FYs
Application FY
Next FY
Foil owin FYs
Totals
TDA Article 3
YES
$182,100
YES
E. Has the public availability of the environmental compliance documentation for the project (pursuant to CEQA) been
evidenced by the dated stamping of the document by the county clerk or county recorder? (required only for projects that
include construction).
$182,100
Local Match
YES
$72,900
YES
$72,900
1. Design
$30,000
2. Construction
$205,000
3. Constr. Engineering
$25,000
4.
Totals
$255,000
J$255,000
Project Eligibility:
YES ?!NO?
A. Has the project been approved by the claimant's governing body? (If "NO," provide the approximate date approval is
anticipated).
YES
B. Has this project previously received TDA Article 3 funding? If "YES," provide an explanation on a separate page.
NO
C. For "bikeways," does the project meet Caltrans minimum safety design criteria pursuant to Chapter 1000 of the California
Highway Design Manual? (Available on the intemet via: http:l/www.dot.ca.gov).
YES
D. Has the project been reviewed by a Bicycle Advisory Committee? (If "NO," provide an explanation).
YES
E. Has the public availability of the environmental compliance documentation for the project (pursuant to CEQA) been
evidenced by the dated stamping of the document by the county clerk or county recorder? (required only for projects that
include construction).
YES
F. Will the project be completed before the allocation expires? Enter the anticipated completion date of project (month and
year) June 30.2015
YES
G. Have provisions been made by the claimant to maintain the project or facility, or has the claimant arranged for such
maintenance by another agency? (If an agency other than the Claimant is to maintain the facility provide its name:
YES
-4-