Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 03-2014RESOLUTION NO. 03 -2014 CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF AN APPLICATION TO THE METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION REQUESTING THE ALLOCATION OF $182,100 IN FY 2013 -2014 TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT ARTICLE 3 PEDESTRIAN /BICYCLE PROJECT FUNDING FOR THE OYSTER POINT BOULEVARD BIKE LANE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT, AND COMMITTING THE NECESSARY NON- FEDERAL MATCH IN THE AMOUNT OF $72,900 FOR THE PROJECT AND STATING THE CITY'S ASSURANCE TO COMPLETE THE PROJECT WHEREAS, Article 3 of the Transportation Development Act (TDA), California Public Utilities Code (PUC) Section 99200 et sue, authorizes the submission of claims to a regional transportation planning agency for the funding of projects exclusively for the benefit and /or use of pedestrians and bicyclists; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), as the regional transportation planning agency for the San Francisco Bay region, has adopted MTC Resolution No. 875, Revised, entitled "Transportation Development Act, Article 3, Pedestrian/Bicycle Projects," which delineates procedures and criteria for submission of requests for the allocation of "TDA Article 3" funding; and WHEREAS, MTC Resolution No. 875, Revised requires that requests for the allocation of TDA Article 3 funding be submitted as part of a single, countywide coordinated claim from each county in the San Francisco Bay region; and WHEREAS, the City of South San Francisco desires to submit a request to MTC for the allocation of TDA Article 3 funds to support the project described in Attachment B to this resolution, which is for the exclusive benefit and /or use of pedestrians and /or bicyclists; and WHEREAS, the TDA Article 3 funds awarded for the project are in the amount of $182,100, and the City of South San Francisco ( "City ") is required to appropriate minimum local matching funds in the amount of $72,900. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of South San Francisco declares it is eligible to request an allocation of TDA Article 3 funds pursuant to Section 99234 of the Public Utilities Code; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that there is no pending or threatened litigation that might adversely affect the project described in Attachment B to this resolution, or that might impair the ability of the City of South San Francisco to carry out the project; and -1- BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City of South San Francisco attests to the accuracy of and approves the statements in Attachment A to this resolution; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution and its attachments, and any accompanying supporting materials shall be forwarded to the Congestion Management Agency, Countywide Transportation Planning Agency, or County Association of Governments, as the case may be, of County of San Mateo for submission to MTC as part of the countywide coordinated TDA Article 3 claim. I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a regular meeting held on the 8�h day of January, 2014 by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers Mark N Addiego Pradeep Gupta and Liza Normandy Vice Mayor Richard A Garbarino and Mayor Karel Matsumoto NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None -2- ATTEST: Q,U '—L Anna Brown, Deputy City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. Attachment A Re: Request to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission for the Allocation of Fiscal Year 2013 -2014 Transportation Development Act Article 3 Pedestrian/Biacle Project Funding Findings 1. That the City of South San Francisco is not legally impeded from submitting a request to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission for the allocation of Transportation Development Act (TDA) Article 3 funds, nor is the City of South San Francisco legally impeded from undertaking the project(s) described in "Attachment B" of this resolution. 2. That the City of South San Francisco has committed adequate staffing resources to complete the project(s) described in Attachment B. 3. A review of the project(s) described in Attachment B has resulted in the consideration of all pertinent matters, including those related to environmental and right -of -way permits and clearances, attendant to the successful completion of the project(s). 4. Issues attendant to securing environmental and right -of -way permits and clearances for the project(s) described in Attachment B have been reviewed and will be concluded in a manner and on a schedule that will not jeopardize the deadline for the use of the TDA funds being requested. 5. That the project(s) described in Attachment B comply with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA, Public Resources Code Sections 21000 et seq.). 6. That as portrayed in the budgetary description(s) of the project(s) in Attachment B, the sources of funding other than TDA are assured and adequate for completion of the project(s). 7. That the project(s) described in Attachment B are for capital construction and /or design engineering; and /or for the maintenance of a Class I bikeway, which is closed to motorized traffic; and/or for the purposes of restriping Class II bicycle lanes; and /or for the development or support of a bicycle safety education program; and /or for the development of a comprehensive bicycle and /or pedestrian facilities plan, and an allocation of TDA Article 3 funding for such a plan has not been received by the City of South San Francisco within the prior five fiscal years. 8. That the project(s) described in Attachment B which are bicycle projects have been included in a detailed bicycle circulation element included in an adopted general plan, or included in an adopted comprehensive bikeway plan (such as outlined in Section 2377 of the California Bikeways Act, Streets and Highways Code section 2370 et seq.). 9. That any project described in Attachment B that is a "Class I Bikeway," meets the mandatory minimum safety design criteria published in Chapter 1000 of the California Highway Design Manual. 10. That the project(s) described in Attachment B are ready to commence implementation during the fiscal year of the requested allocation. -3- 11. That the City of South San Francisco agrees to maintain, or provide for the maintenance of, the project(s) and facilities described in Attachment B, for the benefit of and use by the public. 0 Resolution No. Attachment B Page 1 of 1 TDA Article 3 Project Application Form Fiscal Year of this Claim: 2013/2014 plicant: City of South San Francisco Contact person: Sam Bautista Principal Engineer Mailing Address: 315 Maple Avenue South San Francisco CA 94080 E Mail Address: sam baubstaOssf net Telephone: (650) 829 -6652 Secondary Contact (in event primary not available) Brian McMinn E Mail Address: brian mcminn gAssf net Telephone: (650) 829 -6652 Short Title Description of Protect: Oyster Point Boulevard Bike Lane Improvements Project Amount of claim: $182100 Functional Description of Project: The Oyster Point Boulevard Bike Lane Improvement Proiect includes the design and installation of improved bike lanes on Oyster Point Boulevard iust west of Gateway Boulevard to Marina Boulevard It will include installation of sharrows and green bike lane markings to increase driver awareness of bicyclists on the Oyster Point corridor. Financial Plan: List the project elements for which TDA funding is being requested (e.g., planning, environmental, engineering, right -of -way, construction, inspection, contingency, audit). Use the table below to show the project budget. Include prior and proposed future funding of the project. If the project is a segment of a larger project, include prior and proposed funding sources for the other segments. Project Elements: installation of sharrows and preen bike lane markings to increase driver awareness of bicyclists on the Oyster Point corridor. Funding Source All Prior FYs Application FY Next FY Foil owin FYs Totals TDA Article 3 YES $182,100 YES E. Has the public availability of the environmental compliance documentation for the project (pursuant to CEQA) been evidenced by the dated stamping of the document by the county clerk or county recorder? (required only for projects that include construction). $182,100 Local Match YES $72,900 YES $72,900 1. Design $30,000 2. Construction $205,000 3. Constr. Engineering $25,000 4. Totals $255,000 J$255,000 Project Eligibility: YES ?!NO? A. Has the project been approved by the claimant's governing body? (If "NO," provide the approximate date approval is anticipated). YES B. Has this project previously received TDA Article 3 funding? If "YES," provide an explanation on a separate page. NO C. For "bikeways," does the project meet Caltrans minimum safety design criteria pursuant to Chapter 1000 of the California Highway Design Manual? (Available on the intemet via: http:l/www.dot.ca.gov). YES D. Has the project been reviewed by a Bicycle Advisory Committee? (If "NO," provide an explanation). YES E. Has the public availability of the environmental compliance documentation for the project (pursuant to CEQA) been evidenced by the dated stamping of the document by the county clerk or county recorder? (required only for projects that include construction). YES F. Will the project be completed before the allocation expires? Enter the anticipated completion date of project (month and year) June 30.2015 YES G. Have provisions been made by the claimant to maintain the project or facility, or has the claimant arranged for such maintenance by another agency? (If an agency other than the Claimant is to maintain the facility provide its name: YES -4-