The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutReso 12-2015 RESOLUTION NO. 12-2015 CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA A RESOLUTION EXECUTING A FUNDING AGREEMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF$458,540 WITH THE SAN MATEO COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT FOR THE FINAL DESIGN OF THE GRAND BOULEVARD INITIATIVE COMPLETE STREETS PROJECT EXTENDING FROM KAISER WAY TO MCLELLAN DRIVE WHEREAS,the TIGER II Planning Grant funds four Grand Boulevard Initiative Complete Streets Project case studies in San Mateo County along State Route 82 (El Camino Real/Mission Street), including one within the City of South San Francisco ("City"). The case study segments serve as models for future El Camino Real Corridor improvements and are intended for replication in the region, State, and across the nation; and WHEREAS, the San Mateo County Transit District ("SamTrans") has received a federal Transportation, Community, and System Preservation ("TCSP") Program grant in the amount of $365,232 for the purpose of bringing a subsegment of the City's case study, extending from Kaiser Way to McLellan Drive, to 100% design; and, WHEREAS,use of SamTrans' TCSP federal grant funding requires a minimum 20%local agency match, and the City has budgeted$91,308 in local funds for this match; and, WHEREAS, the City intends to contribute an additional $2,000 to extend topographical survey work of this project to an adjacent portion of El Camino Real. This will result in a cost savings for a future Grand Boulevard Project; and, WHEREAS,completion of the final design is critical in moving this subsegment of the City's case study design towards construction. The City and County Association of Governments of San Mateo County("C/CAG")has allocated$1,991,000 in State Transportation Improvement Program- Transportation Enhancement funds to construct the project after completion of this final design;and, WHEREAS,City staff recommends executing the funding agreement between SamTrans and the City in order for the project to proceed; and, WHEREAS,the City Council previously approved an allocation of$110,000 in Measure A funds in the Fiscal Year 2014-2015 Capital Improvement Program to contribute to this Funding Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco that the City Council hereby approves the funding agreement between the City and SamTrans. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco that the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute the funding agreement on behalf of the City, subject to approval as to form by the City Attorney,and to take any other required action consistent with the intent of the resolution. I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a regular meeting held on the 28th day of January, 2015 by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers Karyl Matsumoto, Pradeep Gupta and Liza Normandy Vice Mayor Mark N. Addiego and Mayor Richard A. Garbarino NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None ATT T: a M nel 1, ity Clerk 1� ' FUNDING AGREEMENT between SAN MATEO COUNTY TRANSIT DIST'ICT("DISTRICT") and the CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO ("CITY") Y") for the FINAL DESIGN FOR THE GRAND BOULEVARD INITIATIVE TIGER II-FUNDED COMPLETE STREETS PROJECT CASE STUDY EXTENDING FROM KAISER WAY TO MCLEULAN DRIVE Addy r„ o Ad dl' This Funding Agreement(the "AGREEMENT") is entered jOt" this day iof i�, �;. 2015 by and between the San Mateo County Transit I)Isttct( DT CT")and the City of South sari Francisco("CITY"). r % RCIT .S f i A. The CITY was a case study party tlSa t in t I IGER II Planning Grant-funded Complete Streets Project under the Grand BoVievard "tlative� omplete Streets Program, The TIGER I1 Complete ii0 Streets Project funded the"NpNlaln zt r °dOki four Complete Streets case study segments on State Route 82 (Elmo Rea Mission Street)in San Mateo County, including that of the ,400/0 CITY"s. The ea�e`study°`sqg ent erve as models for future El Camino Real Corridor A improvements and are intended for replication in the region, State, and across the nation. " I3, The CITY's TK 11 Coln fete 'Streets Project case study included the segment of El Camino Real between West bd i Boulevard/Chestnut Avenue and McLellan Avenue. The TIGER Il Complete Streets Project funded a 25%level design plan for the case study segment, C. The DISTRICT has received a Transportation, Community,and System Preservation("TCSP") Program grant in the amount of$365,232 for the purpose of bringing a subsegznent of the CITY's Complete Streets Project,extending from Kaiser Way to McLellan Thrive, to 100% design ("PROJECT"). D. Use of the DISTRICT's TCSP grant funding requires a minimum 20%non-federal match. E. The CITY has committed $91,308 in local funds as match to the TCSP funds. F. Completion of the final design is critical in moving this subseginent of the CITY's case study design towards construction. The City and County Association of Governments of:San Mateo Page t of 5 10772239.1 -3- SECTION 11 The CITY agrees: 1. To serve as PROJECT Sponsor and to manage the PROJECT,with the exception of the administrative management activities to be performed by the DISTRICT, as set forth in SECTION I. 1 To provide PROJECT information to the DISTRICT to fulfill the grant reporting requirements and to review all grant report deliverables. 3. To contribute the maximum sum of$91,308 for the required TCSP grant non-federal match. 4. In addition to the required TCSP grant non-federal match,to contribute$2,000 for the aerial map survey for the El Camino Real segment between Arroyo Aver a'lk e an d Chestnut � "API Avenue/Westborougb Boulevard,which will be coi-npleted,,,i/"h"'econcei-t with the aerial mapping for # the PROJECT. wr AC-11 S. In the event that PROJECT costs exceed a total of/,,45456,540,the DISTRICT will identify the A/E/`�/1 additional amounts needed and review those est!" ates wildi the CITY, As needed,the CITY will be notified of expected cost overages by the DISTI, „and will have an opportunity to review and approve the additional costs before phar ge s beyond$456,540 are incurred. The CITY's approval shall not be unreasonably it itionei,,' r delayed. While the Parties will work together to identify potential sources of in f t responsibility of the CITY, as PROJECT Sponsor, to obtain the necess c let,e the Scope of Work. The DISTRICT will al s t provide assistance in seelqnk` dditi Hal fun fag and may consider requests for additional funding,but is under no ligati additional funding or grant such requests. M ........... 47 47 47 47 ,Wg g0k 1/011/k "Tc 6. Tor,emitpaymeiit,�td,�,ttb:o-,�i)isyl"� r for the full amount billed within 30 days after receipt of each "a invoice and to,vadke such"p" ent5,,,,/ ntil the PROJECT is complete, 7. To review and b*ivrove all ultant invoices within 5 days after receipt from the DISTRICT. The CITY's app 0'111& it required prior to the DISTRICT's invoice approval and payment. 11,11 S. To cooperatively r ici ate with the DISTRICT in the planning for the PROJECT. 9. That CITY staff time shall not be charged to the PROJECT. SECTION Ill It is mutually agreed: 1. The total maximum cost of the PROJECT shall not exceed$456,540.The TCSP grant will fund 80% of the total consultant costs and such costs shall not exceed$365,232, The CITY shall provide the 20% non-federal local match,not to exceed$91,308. In the event additional funds are required to complete the PROJECT,the Parties shall follow the process set forth in SECTION Page 3 of 5 10772239.1 -5- IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the Parties have executed this Agreement on the dates set forth below. City of South San Francisco Saar:Mateo County Transit District By: By: Mike Futrell Michael J. Scanlon City Manager Executive Director and CEO Date: Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM: APP,I 11.y �£�R?ED AS TO FORM:: City Attorney " Attorney Page 5 of 10772239.1 f I�IY Ln i e ui V) ro V fu (D z uL i rte"" m RNW&NAM 4-J -� "°" w LM u E 0 i . . . . . Ul >- E E E M m _._......_. _.... ........................................ Q6��» c CD Ch CL w arl i +ew eao-m� hM�r� �s + iUNr� CL, ul CL V' 0 J cnu � LM OW UJ I 9 a r— t did Y Cl 0 tA Gin �Y. adze/ nP yd -��fF 'd,: ' nmm arm / Q a /Oy,�; 1 ur �� w en fa y 9 9 3. tlp i.., ME i. ii �,e bah 6 m cl w n m Ch 0 Ln w -------------- ....w..._ ...._....__.. .......... 12 -0 C) 4-J u 4-J -0 C) 0-) > C)- (3) = 0 C) 4-5 0 -0 4-J Q) -0 Ln u 40- 4-J Ln M C. 4-J 0 m m 4-J -C- CD U U C: L- Ln 0 r1a, _0 o E U) u 0) + 4— -0 0 C: u ............. 0 Cl 4-j ro = cn 00 mmmmm� 4-j m moo= C) �U M 0 4*41 C fy) 0 :3 cn 4=J u 4-J ro 4--J fu E Ul E 4-J CD C w x E E 110 0 E Ewmmn 4-J 0 4-J 4-J 0 C: u U W a) Ln cp E w c Lolo 4 2 fu Lo m u 4==J Ln A M k m V �b i M 1r�4 � I A V ,gyp N Iw G7 roll Vo P,a lei �m �r _ �I c� t 2 II Iy�M �l 1, / r,�,K CY o t /, f I s �g N Al IL 5 � jk // a a1 i�Y r ai_ c in � fj M c EC ;crJ r'pan IL3 w. fu