HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 08-2015 RESOLUTION NO. 08-2015
CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A MEMORANDUM OF
UNDERSTANDING (MOU) BETWEEN THE SAN MATEO
COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY AND THE
CITIES OF SAN BRUNO AND SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO FOR
THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SKYLINE BOULEVARD
(STATE ROUTE 35) WIDENING PROJECT AND
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE
MOU ON BEHALF OF THE CITY.
WHEREAS, on November 2, 2004, the voters of San Mateo County approved the
continuation of the collection and distribution by the TA of the Measure A half-cent transaction
and use tax for an additional 25 years to implement the 2004 Transportation Expenditure Plan,
beginning January 1, 2009 (Measure A); and
WHEREAS, the City requested that the TA consider funding up to $350,000 in Measure
A funds from the TA for the Skyline Boulevard (State Route 35) Widening Project ("Project");
and
WHEREAS, on October 4, 2012, through Resolution 2012-17, the TA Board of Directors
programmed and allocated up to $350,000 for the preliminary planning studies and project
initiation work for the Project; and,
WHEREAS, City staff recommends that the City Council approve the Memorandum of
Understanding for the implementation of the Project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of South San
Francisco that the City Council hereby approves the Memorandum of Understanding between the
San Mateo County Transportation Authority and the Cities of San Bruno and South San
Francisco for the implementation of the Skyline Boulevard (State Route 35) Widening Project.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute the
documents on behalf of the City, subject to approval as to form by the City Attorney.
* * * * *
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by
the City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a regular meeting held on the 28th day of
January, 2015 by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Karyl Matsumoto, Pradeep Gupta, and Liza Normandy
Vice Mayor Mark N. Addiego and Mayor Richard A. Garbarino
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None ,
�/
AT ST: ,,�!�/. /
Kris : 1 : , 1'ity Clerk
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)
Between
San Mateo County Transportation Authority
And
Cities of San Bruno and South San Francisco
for the Implementation of the Preliminary Study[Project Initiation Work for
Skyline Boulevard (State Route 35) Widening from 1-280 to Sneath Lane
for an allocation amount of 5350,000
This memorandum of understanding (MOU) is entered into as of the®day of
2015, by and between the San Mateo County Transportation Authority (TA) and the cites of
San Bruno and South San Francisco (Sponsors), each of which is referred to herein
individually as "Party" and jointly as "Parties,"
RECITALS
Whereas, on November 2, 2004, the voters of San Mateo County approved the continuation
of the collection and distribution by the TA of the Measure A 1/2 cent transaction and use
tax for an additional 25 years to implement the 2004 Transportation Expenditure Plan,
beginning January 1, 2009 (Measure A); and
Whereas, the Sponsors requested that the TA consider funding up to $350,000 in Measure
A funds from the TA for the Skyline Boulevard (State Route 35) Widening from 1-280 to
Sneath Lane Project as further described in Section A.1, below; and
Whereas, on October 4, 2012 through Resolution 2012-17, the TA Board of Directors
programmed and allocated up to $350,000 for the preliminary planning studies and project
initiation work for the Project; and
Whereas, the Sponsors desire that the TA implement the Scope of Work as described in
Section A.2, below; and
Whereas, the Parties desire and agree that the TA may use one or more third party
contractors to perform the work.
Now, THEREFORE, the Parties to this MOO agree as follows:
San Mateo Count) Transportation Authority/Cities of San Bruno and South San Francisco
Skyline Blvd(SR 35)Widening Project MOU
10767112.1
A. Project Scope and Description
1. Project. This Project is the Skyline Boulevard(State Route 35) Widening from 1-280 to
Sneath Lane Project and for purposes of this MOU such work shall be referred to as the
"Project". The Project seeks to develop and analyze short and long terra alternatives
along the 1-380 Corridor between 1-280 and US 14f that when implemented will result
in improved operation and safety within the subject corridor.
2. Scope of Work. The Scope of Work is to complete a preliminary planning study and
project initiation documents associated with the Project. The study will be prepared for
the benefit of the Sponsors, Implementing Agency and other key stakeholders to
determine if a preferred alternative or alternatives should be carried forward through a
more robust evaluation, a Caltrans Project Approval and appropriate Environmental
Document during a future phase of work. The preliminary planning work will assess the
current and projected congestion and safety issues through the collection and analysis of
traffic and accident data. It will develop potential project costs and evaluate potential
project effectiveness, including identifying potential right of way impacts and
environmental impacts of the various congestion mitigation strategies and potential
safety improvements.
3. Limited to Scope of Work. This MOU is intended to cover only the Scope of Work.
Further roles and responsibilities for subsequent phases of work on, or other tasks
related to, the Project will be determined by negotiations between the Parties.
B. Funding and Payment
1. Funding Commitment, The TA will provide up to $350,400 of Measure A funds for the
Scope of Work.
2. Cost Savings. Any cost savings of the Measure A funds allocated for the Scope of Work
will revert to the Measure A Highway Program for the TA to reallocate to any eligible
project through its usual fund programming and allocation activities.
3. Insufficient Funding. In the event that additional funding is needed to complete the
Scope of Work, the TA will identify the additional amounts needed and review those
estimates with the sponsors. The Parties will work together to identify potential sources
of funding, as well as obtain the necessary funds to complete the Scope of Work. If
additional funding is needed due to a change in the Scope of Work requested by the
Sponsors, the TA will identify the additional amounts needed and review those estimates
with the Sponsors. It is the responsibility of the Sponsors to identify the potential
sources of funding, as well as obtain the necessary funds to complete the changed Scope
of Work. The TA may consider requests for additional funding,but is under no
obligation to grant such requests.
San Mateo County Transportation Authority!Cities of San Bruno and South San Francisco
Skyline Blvd(SR 35)Widening Project MOU
2
10767112.1
-4-
C. Term
1. Term.ofAgreement. This MOU is effective upon execution, and will terminate upon the
earliest of; (a) six months after written acceptance/endorsement of the Sponsors of the
completion of the Scope of Work, (b)tenmination by Sponsors or tl7e TA pursuant to
Section C.3, CA or C.5 of this MOU, or(c) October 31, 2016.
2. Time of Performance, This project Scope of Work must be completed no later than
April 30, 2016.
3 Termination by Sponsors. The Sponsors may at any time terminate the Scope of Work,
with or without cause by giving ten (10) days' written notice to the TA. A termination
by one Sponsor will be considered by the TA as a termination by both Sponsors. The
Sponsors will reimburse the TA for all funds properly expended pursuant to the terms of
this MOU within 90 days of the TA's submission to Sponsors of a detailed statement of
the payments and costs associated with such expenditures by the TA. Notwithstanding
the foregoing, if the Sponsors tenninate the Scope of"Work for the TA's default,
Sponsors will have no obligation to make any payments or reimbursements to the TA.
4. Termination by the TA. The TA may at any time terminate the Scope of Work, with or
without cause, by giving ten (10) days' written notice of such termination to the
Sponsors. if the TA terminates the Scope of Work for either Sponsors default, Sponsors
will reimburse the TA for all funds properly expended by the TA in connection with the
performance of this MOIL. if the TA terminates the MOLD for convenience, the TA will
pay to Sponsors all costs and expenses incurred by Sponsors as a result of such
termination.
5. Termination by the Parties, if it is mutually agreed by the parties that it would be in
their mutual best interests to terminate or suspend work on the Project, no Party may
seek, or be entitled to receive, further reimbursement for any costs or expenses incurred
in connection with the Scope of Work or termination of this MOU.
6. Expiration of TA Financial Obligations. Any and all financial obligations of the TA.
pursuant to this MOLD will expire upon the expenditure of the TA's maximum
contribution to the Scope of Work as established in Section B. 1, above, or upon
termination of this MOU under Section.C. 1, above.
D. TA Responsibilities
1. The TA will implement, perform and complete the Scope of Work, either through its
own forces or the use of one or more third-party contractors.
2. The TA will make available to the Project up to $350,000 of Measure A funds for the
Scope of Work.
3. For purposes of delivering the Scope of Work, the TA agrees to:
San Mateo County Transportation Authority,'Cities or San Brano and South San Francisco
Skyline Blvd(SR 35)Widening Project MOU
3
10767112.1
-5-
a. Manage the Scope of Work, including developing and carrying out the Scope of
Work on schedule and within budget;
b. Provide technical oversight for perforinance of the Scope of Work;
c. Lead coordination with Caltrans and other permitting agencies as necessary for the
Scope of Work;
d. Obtain the necessary permits and approvals required for the Scope of Work;
c. Procure and administer the consultant/contractor services to complete the Scope of
Work;
f. Organize and facilitate regular meetings of a Project 1=Development.Team (PDT)
comprised of various Caltrans functional units, the Sponsors and representatives
from involved local and regional entities to provide input and guidance on the Scope
of Work;
g. Keep Sponsors apprised of developments, such as award of contracts or potential
changes that may affect the scope, schedule, or budget of the Project or Scope of
Work; .and
h. Consult with Sponsors where necessary/appropriate.
4. The TA will prepare and provide to 'Sponsors status reports including anticipated and
expended costs and Scope of Work delivery milestones and schedule forecasts.
5. The TA will review,process, and audit (at its discretion) invoices and other
documentation of expenditures for work performed under this MOU. The TA will also
track the accumulation and expenditure of Measure A funds allocated for the Scope of
Work, and process other documentation of expenditures in compliance with TA
accounting and budgeting requirements.
E. Sponsors Responsibilities
1. The Sponsors will be responsible for championing the effort of obtaining political and
public support of the Project within their respective jurisdictions.
. The Sponsors will be the public face of the Project for purposes of leading outreach
efforts to local stakeholders and community members, including coordination of public
meetings and solicitation of public comment..
3. The Sponsors will provide input and oversight based on local policies and desires
regarding the outcome of and deliverables of the Project.
San Mateo County Transportation Authority/Cities of San Bruno and South San Francisco
Skyline Blvd(SR 35)Widening Project MOU
4
10767112.1
-6-
4. The Sponsors will actively participate in the PDT meetings related to the Scope of
Work.
5. The Sponsors may, at their discretion, review any professional services agreements,
change orders and any other agreements that the TA has entered into for the
performance of Scope of Work; however, the TA retains ultimate authority over
contracting and related decisions.
6. The Sponsors may, at their discretion, review the work products and deliverables
produced by the TA and/or its contractors/consultants for the Scope of Work, including
reports, designs, drawings,plans, specifications, schedules and other materials; however,
the TA retains ultimate authority to accept or reject contractor/consultant work.
7. The Sponsors will approve or endorse, in writing, the final deliverables or work products
produced by the TA and/or its contractors/consultants for the Scope of Work.
8. The Sponsors will review progress reports prepared and provided by the TA.
9. The Sponsors may, at their discretion,review and audit invoices and other
documentation of the expenditure of Measure A funds allocated for the Scope of Work,
however, the TA retains ultimate authority for expenditure of Measure A funds on the
Project.
P. Indemnification
1. Each of the Parties will indemnify, hold harmless and defend the other Party and its
directors/counci'lmembers, officers, employees and agents (collectively, "'Indernnitees")
against all liability, claims, suits, actions, costs or expenses arising from loss of or
damage to property, and injuries to or death of any person.(including but not limited to
the property or employees of each Party) when arising out of or resulting from any act or
omission by the indemnifying Party, its agents, employees, contractors or subcontractors
in connection with any aspect of the Project, including Project design, construction
and/or maintenance.
2. Each of the Parties will also fully release, indemnify, hold harmless and defend the other
Party and Indemnitees from and against any and all claims or suits that may be brought
by any of the Indemnifying Party's contractors or subcontractors performing work in
connection with or related to the Project
3. The indemnifying Party's obligation to defend includes the payment of all reasonable
attorneys" fees and all other costs and expenses of suit, and if any judgment is rendered,
or settlement entered, against any Indemnitee, the indemnifying Party must, at its
expense, satisfy and discharge the same. Indemnitees may require the indemnifying
Party to obtain counsel satisfactory to the Indemnitees.The indemnifying Party's
San Mateo County Transportation Authority/Cities of San Bruno and South San Francisco
Skyline;Blvd(SR 35)Widening Project 1'M1oU
5
10767112,1
-7-
obligation to defend includes the payment of all reasonable attorneys' fees and all other
costs and expenses of suit, and if any judgment is rendered, or settlement entered,
against any Indemnitee, the indemnifying Party must, at its expense, satisfy and
discharge the same, Indenrnitees may require the indemnifying Party to obtain counsel
satisfactory to the Indemnitees.
4. This indemnification shall survive termination or expiration of the 10 OU,
San Mateo County Transportation Authority/Cities of San Bruno and South San Francisco
Skyline Blvd(SR 35)Widening Project NIOU
6
107671 12.1
G. Miscellaneous
1. 0wnerrhip of Fork. All reports, designs, drawings, plans, specifications, schedules,
studies, memoranda, and other-documents assembled for or prepared by or for; in the
process of being assembled or prepared by or for; or furnished to the TA or the Sponsors
under this MOU are the joint property of the TA and the Sponsors, Each Party is
entitled to copies and access to these materials during the progress of the Project and
upon completion of the Scope of Work or termination of this MOU, All Parties may
retain a copy of all material produced under this MOU for use in their general activities.
2. Attribution to the TA. 'Sponsors must include attribution that indicates work was funded
by Measure A funds from the TA. This provision applies to any project, or publication,
that was funded in part or in whole by Measure A funds. Acceptable forms of
attribution include TA branding on Project-related documents, construction signs,public
information materials, and any other applicable documents„
3. No Waiver, No waiver of any default or breach of any covenant of this MOU by any
Party to this MOU can be implied from any omission by the other Parties to take action
on account of such default if such default persists or is repeated. No express waiver will
affect any default not specified in the waiver-, and the waiver will be operative only for
the time or extent stated. The Consent or approval of any act by any Party will not be
deemed to waive or render unnecessary consent or approval to any subsequent, similar
acts.
4. Assignment, No Party can assign, transfer or otherwise substitute its interest or
obligations under this MOU without the written consent of the other Parties.
5. Governing Law, This MOU is governed by the laws of the State of California as applied
to contracts that are made and performed entirely in California.
6. Modifications„ This MOU may only be modified in writing executed by all Parties.
7. Disputes. if a question arises regarding interpretation of this MOU or its performance, or
the alleged failure of a Party to perform, the Party raising the question or making the
allegation must give written notice thereof to the other Parties. The Parties will promptly
meet in an effort to resolve the issues raised. If the Parties fail to resolve the issues
raised, alternative forms of dispute resolution, including mediation or binding
arbitration, may be pursued by mutual agreement. It is the intent of the Parties to the
extent possible that litigation be avoided as a method of dispute resolution,
8, Attorneys" Fees. In the event legal proceedings are instituted to enforce any provision of
this MOU, the prevailing Party in said proceedings will be entitled to its costs, including
reasonable attorneys' fees, in addition to such other remedies to which it may be entitled.
Reasonable attorneys' fees includes fees determined using reasonable market rates for
attorneys even if the attorneys involved are a Party's salaried staff attorney
San Mateo County Transportation Authority/Cities of San Bruno and South San Francisco
Skyline Blvd(SR 35)Widening Project MOU
7
10767112,1
-9-
9. Relationship of the Parties. It is understood that this is an MOU by and between
independent contractors and is not intended to and does not create the relationship of
agent, servant, employee, partnership,joint venture or association, or any other
relationship whatsoever other than that of independent contractor.
10. Accessibility of Services to Persons with Disabilities. The Project must be implemented
in compliance with, and in a manner that does not subject any of the Pal-ties to liability
under, the Americans with Disabilities Act, the California Disabled Persons Act, of any
other state or federal laws protecting the rights of persons with disabilities,
11. Warranty of Authority to Execute MOU. Each Party to this MOU represents and
warrants that each person whose signature appears hereon is duly authorized and has the
fall authority to execute this MOU on behalf of the entity that is a Party to this MOU.
12. Severability. If any term, covenant, condition or provision of this MOU, or the
application thereof to any person or circumstance, is held,by a court of'competent
jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remainder of the terms, covenants,
conditions and provisions of this MOU, or the application thereof to any other Person or
circumstance, will remain in full force and effect and will in no way be affected,
impaired or invalidated thereby.
13. Counterparts. This MOU may be executed in counterparts, each of which may be
deemed an original, but all three of which together are a single agreement.
14. Entire MOU. This MOU constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties pertaining
to its subject matter and supersedes any prior or contemporaneous written or oral
agreement between the Parties on the same subject,
15. Notices. All notices affecting any of the clauses of this MOU must be in writing and
mailed postage prepaid by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, or by
personal delivery or overnight courier to the appropriate address indicated below or at
such other place(s)that any Party may designate in written notice to the others. Notices
will be deemed received upon delivery if personally served, one (1) day after mailing if
delivered via overnight courier, or two (2) days after mailing if mailed as provided
above.
To TA: San Mateo County Transportation Authority
1250 San Carlos Avenue
P.O. Box 3006
San Carlos, CA 94070-1306
Attn: Michael Scanlon
Executive Director
San Mateo County Transportation Authority!Cities of San Bruno and South San Francisco
Skyline Blvd(SR 35)Wideniag Project MOU
8
10767112A
-10-
To Sponsors: City of San Bruno
567 El Camino Real
San Bruno, CA 94066
Attn: Connie Jackson
City Manager
City of South San Francisco
400 Grand Avenue
South San Francisco, CA 94083
Attn: Mike Futrell
City Manager
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have hereunder subscribed their names to this
Memorandum of Understanding for the hriplementation of 1-380 Congestion Relief Project
effective as of the day and year first indicated above.
CITY OF SAN BRUNO
By:
Name:
Its-,
Approved as to Form:
City Attorney
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
By:
Name:
Its:
Approved as to Form:
City Attorney
San Mateo County Transportation Authority:`Cities of'San Bruno and South San Francisco
Skyline Blvd(SR 35)Widening Project MOO
9
10767112.1
SAN MAT O COUNTY TRANSPORTATION
AUTHORITY
By:
Name:
Its:
Attest:
Authority Secretary
Approved as to Form:
By:
Name:
Legal Counsel for the TA
23$7s27A
San Mateo County Transportation Authority/Cities of San Bruno and South San Francisco
Skyline Blvd(SR 35)Widening Project MOU
10
10767112.1
-12-