Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
127 W Harris DEIR + Appendices
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT SCH #2015012006 PREPARED FOR: CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DIVISION 315 MAPLE AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO , CA 94083 www.ssf.net PREPARED BY: KNAPP PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING Allisonknappconsulting.com April 10, 2015 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT SCH#2015012006 Submitted to: STATE OF CALIFORNIA GOVERNORS OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RESEARCH STATE CLEARINGHOUSE P.O. BOX 3044 SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95812-3044 Submitted by: CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DIVISION 315 MAPLE AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94083 Mr. Billy Gross, Senior Planner Billy.gross@ssf.net April 10, 2015 i 127 WEST HARRIS TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1-1 1.1 Introduction 1-1 1.2 Purpose of this Draft EIR 1-1 1.3 Scope of this Draft EIR 1-1 1.4 Report Organization 1-2 1.5 Environmental Review Process 1-3 CHAPTER 2: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2-1 2.1 Introduction 2-1 2.2 Project Summary 2-1 2.3 Areas of Controversy and Issues to be Resolved/Comments on the Notice of Preparation 2-2 2.4 Summary of Project Impacts, Recommended Mitigation Measures and Mitigation Monitoring And Reporting Program 2-7 CHAPER 3: PROJECT DESCRIPTION 3-1 3.1 Introduction 3-1 3.2 Project Location and Site Conditions 3-1 3.3 General Plan and Zoning Designations 3-5 3.4 Project Objectives 3-6 3.5 Project Description 3-7 3.6 Environmental Measures Incorporated into the Project 3-8 CHAPTER 4: ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING, IMPACT AND MITIGATION 4-1 4.1.1 Introduction 4-1 4.1.2 Format of the Environmental Analysis 4-1 4.1.3 Levels of Significance 4-2 4.1.4 Approach to Cumulative Impact Analysis 4-3 4.2.1 Transportation and Circulation 4-4 4.2.2 Methodology 4-5 4.2.3 Setting 4-7 4.2.4 Circulation System Evaluation Methodology and Standards 4-7 4.2.5 Impacts and Mitigations 4-31 CHAPTER 5: ALTERNATIVES 5-1 5.1 Introduction 5-1 5.2 Project Objectives 5-2 5.3 Overview of Significant and Unavoidable Impacts 5-3 5.4 Alternatives Analysis 5-6 5.5 Environmentally Superior Alternative 5-11 CHAPTER 6: EFFECTS FOUND NOT TO BE SIGNIFICANT 6-1 6.1 Introduction 6-1 6.2 Initial Study Process 6-1 ii 6.3 Effects Found Not to Be Significant 6-1 CHAPTER 7: CEQA REQUIRED CONCLUSIONS 7-1 7.1 Growth Inducing Impacts 7-1 7.2 Cumulative Impacts 7-2 7.3 Significant Environmental Effects 7-5 7.4 Significant Irreversible Environmental Change 7-5 CHAPTER 8: REPORT PREPARATION 8-1 CHAPTER 9: REFERENCES 9-1 LIST OF FIGURES 3.1 Project Location 3.2 Downtown Station Area Plan Boundaries 3.3 Proposed Site Plan 4.1 Area Map 4.2 Existing Intersection Lane Geometrics and Control 4.3 Existing Weekday AM Peak Hour Volumes 4.4 Existing Weekday PM Peak Hour Volumes 4.5 Transit and Shuttle Routes 4.6 Year 2017 Without Project AM Peak Hour Volumes 4.7 Year 2017 Without Project PM Peak Hour Volumes 4.8 Year 2017 Lane Geometrics and Intersection Controls 4.9 Year 2035 Without Project AM Peak Hour Volumes 4.10 Year 2035 Without Project PM Peak Hour Volumes 4.11 Year 2035 Lane Geometrics and Intersection Control 4.12 AM Peak Hour Project Increment Volumes 4.13 PM Peak Hour Project Increment Volumes 4.14 Existing + Project Weekday AM Peak Hour Volumes 4.15 Existing + Project Weekday PM Peak Hour Volumes 4.16 Year 2017 With Project Weekday AM Peak Hour Volumes 4.17 Year 2017 With Project Weekday PM Peak Hour Volumes 4.18 Year 2035 With Project Weekday AM Peak Hour Volumes 4.19 Year 2035 With Project Weekday PM Peak Hour Volumes 4.20 Mitigated 2017 Lane Geometrics and Intersection Control for Level of Service and Sim Traffic Queue Reduction 4.21 Mitigated 2035 Lane Geometrics and Intersection Control for Level of Service and Sim Traffic Queue Reduction 4.22 Year 2015 Mitigations 4.23 Year 2035 Mitigations 4.24 Project Driveway Sightline Mitigation 4.25 Project Internal Circulation System Mitigation LIST OF TABLES 2.1 Summary of Impacts and Mitigation Measures and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 3.2 Hazardous Materials Remediation Measures 4.1 Signalized Intersection Level Of Service Criteria 4.2 Unsignalized Intersection Level Of Service Criteria 4.3 Intersection Level of Service Existing and Existing + Project iii 4.4 95th Percentile Vehicle Queuing Demand Existing + Project 4.5 Do Peak Hour Off-Tamp Volumes Back Up to the U.S. 101 Mainline? Existing, Year 2017 & 2035 4.6 Off-Ramp Capacity And Volumes Existing, Year 2017 & Year 2035 4.7 On-Ramp Capacity and Volumes Existing, Year 2017 & Year 2035 4.8 Freeway Mainline Levels of Service Existing, Year 2017 & Year 2035 4.9 Public Transportation Service 4.10 Caltrain/BART Shuttle Service 4.11 Year 2017 Without Project Trip Generation 4.12 Intersection Levels Of Service Year 2017 AM & PM Peak Hour With and Without Project 4.13 95th Percentile Vehicle Queues Year 2017 AM & PM With and Without Project 4.14 Freeway Mainline Levels Of Service – Year 2017 With and Without Project 4.15 Year 2035 Without Project Trip Generation 4.16 Intersection Levels Of Service – Year 2035 AM & PM Peak Hour 4.17 95th Percentile Vehicle Queuing Demand - Year 2035 4.18 Freeway Mainline Levels Of Service – Year 2035 With and Without Project 4.19 Project Trip Generation 4.20 Project Trip Distribution 4.21 Sight Lines at Project Driveway Connections to West Harris Avenue 4.22 Traffic Table Project Trip Generation Used in TKJM 2035 Model APPENDIX A Initial Study Checklist and Evaluation with all attachments: • Air Quality Assumptions and Methodologies, Construction and Operational Emissions, CALEEMOD Output Files, June, 2014. RCH Group, Mike Ratte. • Biological Resource Assessment, 127 West Harris Street, South San Francisco, California, West Harris SSF.SMa, 21 April 2014. Marangio Biological Consulting, Michael Marangio. • Engineering Report, Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites, 127 West Harris Avenue, South San Francisco, California. April 15, August 21, and October 7, 2014. Terracon. • Geotechnical Peer Review, Kuber Development Proposed Fairfield Inn and Suites. May 6, September 2, and October 16, 2014. Cotton Shires Associates. • Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites, 127 West Harris Avenue, South San Francisco, California. March 18, 2014. Terracon. • Limited Stockpile Characterization and Sampling, Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites, 127 West Harris Avenue, South San Francisco, California. March 19, 2014. Terracon. Comment Letters on the Notice of Preparation Town of Colma, Michael P. Laughlin, January 5, 2015 San Francisco International Airport, John Bergener, January 14, 2015 California Department of Transportation, Patricia Maurice, January 30, 2015 DRAFT EIR / 1.0 INTRODUCTION 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 1-1 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 INTRODUCTION The property owner and applicant (Applicant) is KUBER Hotels, represented by Shane Kuber, principal of the firm. The Applicant is seeking conditional use permit and design review approvals to construct a 128 room, 65,136 square foot select service hotel with 93 surface parking spaces. The 1.47 acre site at 127 West Harris Avenue (APN: 015-123-600), South San Francisco, California has never been developed (Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Terracon. March 18, 2014). The hotel would be five stories in height. The Project is also identified as Fairfield Inn and Suites and is a Marriott product. 1.2 PURPOSE OF THIS DRAFT EIR The Applicant proposes to grade the site, construct a hotel with surface parking and landscaping. The EIR for the Project has four purposes pursuant to Section 15002 California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3 1: 1. Inform property owners, residents, tenants, members of the City Council, and members of the Planning Commission of the City of South San Francisco of the potential environmental impacts of the Project prior to the Commission and Council taking action on the Project. 2. Identify ways that environmental damage can be avoided or significantly reduced. 3. Prevent significant, unavoidable damage to the environment by requiring changes in projects through the use of alternatives or mitigation measures when the governmental agency finds the changes to be feasible. 4. Disclose to the public the reasons why a governmental agency approved the Project (if approved) in the manner the agency chose if significant environmental effects are involved. 1.3 SCOPE OF THIS DRAFT EIR An initial study and Notice of Preparation (IS/NOP) was prepared for the Project. An initial study is intended to assist in the preparation of an environmental impact report (EIR) by focusing the EIR on the effects determined to be significant, identifying the effects determined not to be significant, explaining the reasons for determining that potentially significant effects would not be significant and identifying the type of EIR to be prepared (CCR Section 15063 (c) (3)). The IS/NOP was legally noticed and distributed to the State Clearinghouse (SCH) on January 5, 2015 SCH #2015012006 and is attached in Appendix A along with all background documents referenced therein. The IS/NOP review period commenced on January 5, 2015 and concluded on February 4, 2015 (Appendix A). The Initial Study identified traffic and circulation as potentially resulting in one or more 1 All citations in this EIR refer to California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3 and will subsequently be referred to as 14 CCR unless otherwise noted, commonly referred to as CEQA Guidelines. 1.0 INTRODUCTION DRAFT EIR / 1.0 INTRODUCTION 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2014 PAGE 1-2 significant and unavoidable impacts. As a result, pursuant to CCR Section 15161 this Project EIR focusing on traffic and circulation was prepared and circulated for review. This Draft EIR examines all the phases of the Project including planning, construction and operation. Comments on the NOP are identified and incorporated into the Draft EIR (see Chapters 2 and 4). This Draft EIR has been prepared on behalf of the City of South San Francisco in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). This chapter outlines the purpose of and overall approach to the preparation of the EIR on the Project. 1.4 REPORT ORGANIZATION This Draft EIR is organized into the following chapters. 1 INTRODUCTION summarizes the purpose and organization of the Draft EIR. 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY summarizes environmental consequences that would result from the implementation of the Project, provides a summary table that identifies any significant environmental impacts, describes mitigation measures, and indicates the level of significance of impacts before and after mitigation. 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION describes the Project and related legislative, adjudicative and ministerial approvals and actions required including the agencies involved in the actions. 4 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING, IMPACTS, AND MITIGATION describes the environmental setting, including applicable plans and policies, provides an analysis of the potential environmental impacts of the Project and cumulative impacts, and identifies mitigation measures to reduce significant impacts. Section 4.0 focuses on traffic and circulation only. 5 ALTERNATIVES summarizes three alternatives to the Project and the comparative environmental consequences and benefits of each alternative. The No Project Alternative, and two reduced density alternatives both consisting of reduced floor area ratios (FAR); a 0.5 FAR Alternative and a 0.75 FAR Alternative are analyzed. 6 EFFECTS FOUND NOT TO BE SIGNIFICANT summarizes the environmental effects found not to be significant and therefore not analyzed based upon the analysis contained in the initial study. 7 CEQA REQUIRED CONCLUSIONS contains the discussion on cumulative and growth inducing impacts and significant irreversible environmental changes. 8 REPORT PREPARATION identifies the Lead Agency and consultants involved in the preparation of this Draft EIR. 9 REFERENCES contains a brief identification of references and people contacted in the preparation of this EIR. Additionally, all references, organizations, and persons consulted 1.0 INTRODUCTION DRAFT EIR / 1.0 INTRODUCTION 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 1-3 during preparation of this Draft EIR and initial study are contained within the text of the documents and the appendices. APPENDICES to this Draft EIR include the IS/NOP including its appendices and the NOP and comments thereto. 1.5 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS The City, on April 10, 2015 filed an NOC with the State Clearinghouse, indicating that this Draft EIR has been completed and is available for review and comment. This Draft EIR will be available for review by the public and interested parties, agencies, and organizations for a review period of at least 45 days, as required by California law. Pursuant to state law (Public Resources Code Section 21091(d)(3)) the City will accept e-mail comments in lieu of mailed or hand-delivered comments; however, reviewers are encouraged to follow up any email comments with letters. Reviewers should focus on the document’s adequacy in identifying and analyzing the Project’s significant effects on the environment and ways in which the significant effects of the Project might be avoided or mitigated (CCR Section 15204(a)). Comments may be submitted in writing during the 45-day public review period to: Mr. Billy Gross, Senior Planner 315 Maple Avenue South San Francisco, California 94080 Billygross@ssf.net Responses to comments will be prepared and published in a Final EIR. The Final EIR will be available to all commenting agencies at least 10 days prior to the certification hearing, in accordance with CEQA requirements. The City will review the Final EIR (which includes the Draft and Final documents including the Initial Study) for adequacy and will exercise its independent judgment regarding certification pursuant to the requirements of CCR Section 15090. The City will consider certification of the Final EIR and then consider the Project separately for approval or denial. Findings on the feasibility of avoiding or reducing the Project’s significant environmental effects will be made and, if necessary, a Statement of Overriding Considerations will be prepared should the City choose to approve the Project. A Notice of Determination (NOD) will be prepared and filed with the State Clearinghouse if the City approves the Project. The NOD will include a description of the Project, the date of approval, and an indication of whether Findings and Statements of Overriding Considerations were prepared. The NOD will also provide the address where the EIR and record of Project approval are available for review. DRAFT EIR / 2.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 2-1 2.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2.1 INTRODUCTION This section summarizes the information and analyses presented in this Draft EIR. CCR Section 15123 requires an EIR to include a brief summary of the information presented in an EIR in language as clear and as simple as reasonably practical. Therefore, this section presents a brief description of the proposed Project located at 127 West Harris Avenue and a discussion of the potential environmental impacts of the Project and the measures recommended to mitigate these impacts. 2.2 PROJECT SUMMARY LOCATION The Project site is located in the City of South San Francisco, south of the City of Brisbane and north of the City of San Bruno. The City of South San Francisco is built on the Bay plain and on the northern foothills of the Coastal range. The City is located along major transportation routes including U.S. 101, Interstate 380, Interstate 280, and the Union Pacific Railroad. The Project site is within the City’s East of 101 Area. This area consists of roughly 1,700 acres of land, and is bounded by San Francisco Bay on the east side, U.S. 101 and railway lines on the west, the City of Brisbane on the north, and San Francisco International Airport on the south. The East of 101 Area is mostly developed and has a mix of land uses, including industry, warehousing, retail, offices, hotels, marinas, and bioscience research and development (R&D) facilities. The Project site is located at 127 West Harris Avenue southern portion of the East of 101 planning area. West Harris Avenue is located south of East Grand Avenue and north of Mitchell Avenue. San Francisco International Airport (SFO) is approximately 0.8 miles south of the site. The Colma Creek channel is approximately 250 feet south and U.S. 101 is approximately 850 feet west of the site. Mitchell Avenue provides access to West Harris Avenue. Gateway Boulevard to the west and Harbor Way to the east provide access to Mitchell Avenue PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS 1 The Applicant proposes a 128 room limited-service hotel. The hotel would include an indoor swimming pool and breakfast area. All parking would be at grade (i.e., no subgrade or structured parking) in front of the building and along the south and west property lines. Two shuttle vans and 93 surface parking spaces are proposed. Site access would be via two 30 foot wide two-way driveways along the south and north property lines 1 The Project is more fully defined in Chapter 3 the Project Description. 2.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRAFT EIR / 2.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 2-2 The 64,117 square foot (1.47 acre) vacant site is approximately 13 feet above mean sea level. Historical information indicates that the site and surrounding area were submerged swamp land from the late 1890s to the early 1950s. The site has never been developed. Periodically the site was used for parking. The adjacent Focus Hotel was constructed in 1980. According to City finance records The Focus Hotel contains 180 rooms and is identified as an “economy hotel”, meaning one that is less expensive to rent and with little or no additional amenities. The site is covered with invasive and native grasses and shrubs. The site is relatively flat, with a slight surface gradient towards the east. Evidence of illegal dumping is present on the site. There is approximately a nine foot layer of undocumented fill consisting of sandy, gravely, cobble and boulders on the site. Bay Mud appears below the undocumented fill. (Geotechnical Engineering Report, Terracon, April 15, 2014). Metal concentrations (arsenic and chromium) above California Environmental Screening Levels (ESLs) for shallow soils are present on the site. Additionally low levels of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH), polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) below ESLs are also present in shallow soils (Phase I ESA, Terracon, March 18, 2014 and Limited Stockpile Characterization and Sampling, Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites, 127 West Harris Avenue, South San Francisco, California. March 19, 2014. Additional testing found soil samples above the reporting limits for: TPH-ORO 8.8 mg/Kg, 19 mg/Kg and 7.8 mg/Kg from TP-1, SP-5 and SP-6, respectively; naphthalene concentration of 0.085 mg/Kg from TP-3, and phenanthrene concentrations of 0.061 mg/Kg and 0.12 mg/Kg from TP-3 and TP-4 respectively; and various metals from stockpiles soils, including: arsenic, barium, beryllium, chromium, cobalt, copper, lead, mercury, nickel, vanadium and zinc were at concentrations above the laboratory method reporting limits. Environmental mitigations are proposed as part of the Project. Noise and vibration; hazardous materials; geology and soils and cultural resource mitigations are proposed. 2.3 AREAS OF CONTROVERSY AND ISSUES TO BE RESOLVED AND COMMENTS ON THE NOTICE OF PREPARATION Responses to the NOP for this EIR identified questions or issues to be addressed during Project environmental review. Three letters were received on the NOP, are summarized below and included in Appendix A As noted in Chapter I, Introduction: An initial study and Notice of Preparation (IS/NOP) was prepared for the Project. An initial study is intended to assist in the preparation of an environmental impact report (EIR) by focusing the EIR on the effects determined to be significant, identifying the effects determined not to be significant, explaining the reasons for determining that potentially significant effects would not be significant and identifying the type of EIR to be 2.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRAFT EIR / 2.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 2-3 prepared (CCR Section 15063 (c) (3)). The IS/NOP was legally noticed and distributed to the State Clearinghouse on January 5, 2015, State Clearinghouse (SCH) # 2015012006 (attached in Appendix A). The initial study identified traffic and circulation as being a potentially significant and unavoidable impact. As a result, pursuant to CCR Section 15161 this Project EIR focusing on traffic and circulation was prepared and circulated for review. Comments on the NOP The State Clearinghouse (January 5, 2015) provided the City with a copy of the NOP transmittal. The review period began on January 5, 2015 and commenced on February 4, 2015. The comments are: 1. Town of Colma (Michael P. Laughlin, January 5, 2015) stating that the Initial Study appears to cover the areas of analysis and the Town will be reviewing the EIR traffic section. 2. San Francisco International Airport (John Bergener, January 14, 2015) requesting an evaluation of policies on safety and noise, described more fully below. 3. California Department of Transportation (Patricia Maurice, January 30, 2015) identifying the expected Traffic Impact Study contents and recommendations, described more fully below. San Francisco International Airport (SFO), John Bergener, Airport Planning Manager. Mr. Bergener requests that the EIR address Project impacts associated with airport land use compatibility, safety and noise with respect to its proximity to SFO including an analysis of Noise Policies NP-1 through NP-4 and Safety Policies SP-1 through SP3. Mr. Bergener also requests that the EIR address freeway noise. The Initial Study (included in Appendix A) addresses safety and noise impacts associated with the airport and noise associated with U.S.101. The potential impacts were found to be less than significant. Therefore, these impacts will not be addressed in the EIR. Specifically, the Initial Study notes on: Page 3-77 The Project site is located in the southern area of the City, within an industrial area. SFO property is 0.80 miles south of the site. The area is dominated by aircraft and roadway noise. The site is within the 65-70 dB noise contour for roadway noise (Figure 9-2 Projected Rail and Road Noise, page 283, and below the 60 dB contour for airport-related noise exposure Figure 9-1 Aircraft Noise and Noise Insulation Program page 279, South San Francisco General Plan). SFO’s website shows the site below the 65 dB contour. The airport’s contours were updated in 2012 (Comprehensive Airport Land Use 2.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRAFT EIR / 2.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 2-4 Compatibility Plan for the Environs of San Francisco International Airport, Ricondo Associates. 2012). Page 3-83 The Project area is dominated by roadway traffic from U.S. 101 and Interstate 380, South Airport Boulevard and other surface streets. U.S. 101 is an eight-lane freeway that provides access to the Project area extending from downtown San Francisco and Northern California to Los Angeles and Southern California running in the north-south direction. U.S.101 is approximately 0.38 miles west of the Project site. In 2012, U.S. 101 carried an annual average daily traffic (ADT) volume of 220,000 vehicles south of Produce Avenue, 218,000 vehicles south of Oyster Point Boulevard, and 213,000 vehicles just north of Oyster Point Boulevard. A traffic study was prepared for the Project as a part of the scope of services for this Initial Study. The Project would likely generate about 1,152 daily two- way trips (576 in and 576 out), with 51 inbound and 36 outbound trips during the AM peak hour as well as 44 inbound and 47 outbound trips during the PM peak hour (Crane Transportation Group, October, 2014). The incremental increase of traffic in the Project area does not represent a doubling of background traffic volumes. Traffic to and from the site is not expected to increase noise levels by 3 dB. The Project site is under the 65 dB noise contour interval identified as acceptable for commercial land uses. The hotel is a freeway commercial land use. A 70 dB or less noise environment is acceptable for commercial uses while 70 to 80 dBA is conditionally acceptable for commercial land uses. The Project use would be in conformance with the noise standards identified in the City’s General Plan. Additionally, the California Building Code requires noise insulation assemblies in the walls of residential uses (such as hotel rooms and multifamily housing) to attenuate sound to a 45 dB maximum. Page 3-83 and 84 e) and f) Aircraft Noise Significance Criteria: The Project would have a significant environmental impact if it were located within an airport land use plan (or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport) or in the vicinity of a private airstrip and were to expose people residing or working in the Project area to excessive noise levels. The site is located under the 65 dB contour, therefore under the 70 dB maximum permitted for commercial land uses. The interior ambient noise levels would likely be 20-25 dB less due to the construction assembly resulting in a noise level of 45 dB. The Project is not within two miles of a 2.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRAFT EIR / 2.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 2-5 private airstrip. The Project would have a less than significant impact with respect to excessive aircraft noise exposure. Table IV-2 Noise /Land Use Compatibility Criteria page IV-19 of the Comprehensive Airport Land Use Plan for the Environs of San Francisco International Airport, (CAG City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County, California. Rincondo Associates, 2012) (ALUCP) shows hotels (transient lodging) as a permitted use below 65 dB. Safety Comment Page 3-63 of the Initial Study e) and f) Safety Hazards Due to Nearby Airport or Airstrip Significance Criteria: The Project would have a significant environmental impact if it were located within an airport land use plan (or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport), if it would result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the Project area; or if it were located within the vicinity of a private airstrip, if it would result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the Project area. San Francisco International Airport is approximately 0.8 miles south of the site and within the San Mateo County Airport Land Use Commission’s (ALUC) and ALUC Plan Area jurisdiction. The ALUC allows development within its plan boundaries, provided that development is below a prescribed height limit. The City, in concert with the ALUC and in coordination with Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), established height limits in the South San Francisco General Plan (1999) in compliance with the ALUC and FAA. SFO’s Interactive Airspace Tool identifies updated height information based upon the updated 2012 Airport Land Use Plan. The maximum height allowed at the Project site is 150 above msl. The maximum height of the Project would be 65 feet. The Project would be 85 feet below the maximum permitted height in order to avoid conflicts with aircraft operations. Potential safety impacts associated with airports and airstrips is considered to be less than significant. Mr. Bergener requests an evaluation of the Project in light of the 2012 Comprehensive Airport Land Use Plan for the Environs of San Francisco International Airport San Mateo County. We understand that all of San Mateo County is within the airport’s land use influence Zone B. The Project is not within any safety compatibility zones. The closest Safety Compatibility Zones identified on Figure IV-7 page 23 of the Airport Land Use Comprehensive Plan (ALUCP) are Zones 3 and 4. The Project is approximately 0.5 miles outside Safety Zone 3 and 2.0 miles outside Safety Zone 4. The use restrictions identified in the ALUCP would not apply to the Project. Additionally, the Project is proposing a hotel, not uses identified as 2.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRAFT EIR / 2.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 2-6 unpermitted within the Safety Zones 3 and 4 shown on Table IV-2, page IV-31 of the ALUCP, such as: “ children’s schools; large child day care centers; hospitals, nursing homes; hazardous uses other than Biosafety Level 3 and 4 facilities; critical public utilities; and nursing homes” Exhibit A in Appendix A contains a summary of the tables and policies referenced in the airport’s letter. The plan can also be downloaded by on line searching 2012 Comprehensive Airport Land Use Plan for the Environs of San Francisco International Airport San Mateo County. California Department of Transportation-Caltrans (Patricia Maurice, Acting District Branch Chief) The traffic and circulation analysis contained in Chapter 4 of this EIR includes the maps, diagrams, driveways, trip generation, distribution and assignment, assumptions and methodology and average daily trip for AM and PM. The analysis includes impacts on bicyclists, pedestrians and public transportation. The Project proposes vehicle trip reduction methods by providing two shuttle buses and 93 parking spaces for a 128 room hotel. The significance criteria used is Level of Service (LOS) D/E and not the LOS C/D. The City has been consistently using the LOS D/E criteria for approximately 10 years and recognizes that the suggestions in the Caltrans letter are recommendations based upon 2002 Guidelines. 2.4 SUMMARY OF PROJECT IMPACTS, RECOMMENDED MITIGATION MEASURES AND MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Table 2.1 Summary of Project Impacts, Mitigation Measures and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, summarizes the impacts associated with the Project, recommended mitigation measures, the level of significance after mitigation and the timing and person/agency responsible for the mitigation. The table summarizes Project impacts within three categories: Less Than Significant with Mitigation; Significant and Unavoidable; and Less Than Significant and No Mitigation Required. Project related and cumulative impacts relate to traffic and circulation only. Chapter 6, Effects Found not to be Significant, contains a brief summary of the initial study. DRAFT EIR / 2.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 2-7 TABLE 2-1 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATIONS AND MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS WITH MITIGATION MITIGATION MONITORING IMPACTS AND MITIGATIONS IMPLEMENTATION /MONITORING # IMPACT MITIGATION PARTY/ AGENCY/TIMING 6 Project traffic would, increase volumes by more than 2 percent at S. Airport Boulevard/Gateway Boulevard/Mitchell Avenue an intersection already experiencing unacceptable operation. The applicant shall provide a fair share contribution as determined by the City Engineer to go towards provision of a third lane on the westbound Mitchell Avenue approach to the S. Airport Boulevard/Gateway Boulevard intersection. Applicant/City Engineer/ The full fair share payment shall be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy by the City. 12 Project traffic would increase volumes on the US 101 southbound off-ramp to Produce Avenue by more than 1 percent during both the AM and PM peak traffic hours where Without Project off-ramp traffic is projected to be backing up to the freeway mainline. No mitigation is available to completely reduce this impact to less than significant. However the Mitchell Avenue improvements are feasible and will alleviate conditions in the immediate Project area but not reduce Impact 12 to less than significant. Provide a left turn lane on the eastbound Mitchell Avenue approach to West Harris Avenue. This will just require restriping the existing 40-foot curb-to- curb width in order to provide a 12-foot- wide left turn lane as well as 14-foot- wide east and westbound thru travel lanes. Paint a “Keep Clear” message on the pavement on westbound Mitchell Avenue at West Harris Avenue. Applicant to fund or restripe eastbound Mitchell Avenue approach to West Harris and paint the keep clear signage. Improvement to be shown on the plans for issuance of a building permit. /City Engineer to review. Improvements to be constructed prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. Note that this is a mitigation measure that is required but will not reduce impacts to less than significant. 19 Project-related traffic would access West Harris Avenue via two driveways where safety impacts may result due to potential limited sight line issues. Prohibit truck parking along the entire Project frontage. Prohibit all on-street parking along the Project frontage at least 80 feet north of the south Project driveway, and at least 40 feet south of the north Project driveway. Applicant to show on plans/City Engineer to review and approve Improvements required to be constructed and signed-off by engineering prior to Certificate of Occupancy. 2.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRAFT EIR / 2.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 2-8 SIGNIFICANT AND UNAVOIDABLE IMPACTS IMPACTS WITH NO MITIGATION AVAILABLE # IMPACT 7 The Project would increase off-ramp volumes by more than 1 percent on the Northbound Off-ramp to S. Airport Boulevard/Wondercolor Lane, where Without Project volumes would be backing up to the freeway mainline (2017). The proportional amount of the City’s East of 101 traffic impact fair share contribution would still be required to adjust signal timing at Airport Boulevard/San Mateo Avenue/Produce Avenue. However, the remainder of Mitigation 7 which is restriping the northbound intersection approach and associated signalization equipment changes along with the widening of the on-ramp departure to two lanes are not on the City’s Traffic Improvement Program (TIP) and the cost would be excessive for the Project to fund. The City has determined that the intersection improvements described in Mitigation Measure 7 are infeasible for the Project to fully fund and freeway off-ramp backups to the freeway mainline would not be mitigated toless than significant. The individual measures, by themselves, would not eliminate the significant impact. While the low cost signal timing adjustment could be provided and would provide some improvement, by itself it would not reduce the impact to a less than significant. The City will need to incorporate these new improvements into the East of 101 TIP. Therefore, this impact would remain significant and unavoidable. 12 Project traffic would increase volumes on the US 101 southbound off-ramp to Produce Avenue by more than 1 percent during both the AM and PM peak traffic hours where Without Project off-ramp traffic is projected to be backing up to the freeway mainline (2035). Mitigation Measure 12 would eliminate AM and PM peak hour backups to the freeway mainline (with or without the Project) during the AM and PM peak hours (as shown in Traffic Figure 21, Year 2035 Mitigated Intersection Lane Geometrics and Control). Measures at the Mitchell Avenue/West Harris Avenue intersection while not on the City’s TIP for this area are low cost and could be implemented by the Project, and are required for the Project. However, at the Airport Boulevard/San Mateo Avenue/Produce Avenue intersection, the added right turn lane and dual right turn lane signalization are not on the City’s Traffic Improvement Program (TIP) and the cost would be excessive for the proposed Project to fund. Therefore, the City has determined that the intersection improvements described in Mitigation Measure 12 for the Airport Boulevard/San Mateo Avenue/Produce Avenue intersection are infeasible. The Project could not fully fund all the mitigations therefore freeway off-ramp backups to the freeway mainline would not be mitigated to an acceptable level. The City will need to incorporate these new improvements into the East of 101 TIP. This impact would remain significant and unavoidable. 2.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRAFT EIR / 2.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 2-9 LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS AND NO MITIGATION REQUIRED IMPACTS WITH NO MITIGATION REQUIRED # IMPACT 1 The Project would not result in any significant intersection level of service significant impacts under Existing “With Project” conditions. 2 The Project would not result in any significant vehicle queuing impacts at any analyzed location under Existing “With Project” conditions. 3 The Project would not increase peak hour volumes at any study off-ramp above acceptable diverge capacity limits under existing with Project conditions. 4 The Project would not increase Peak Hour volumes at any study on-ramp above acceptable capacity limits under Existing with Project conditions. 5 The Project would not degrade the level of service of any U.S. 101 freeway mainline segments under Existing with Project conditions. 6 The Project would not increase traffic volumes above acceptable capacity limits at any study intersection under 2017 with Project conditions. 7 The Project would not result in any significant vehicle queuing impacts at any analyzed intersection based upon Synchro software methodology for 2017 With Project conditions. 8 The Project would not increase peak hour volumes at any study off-ramp above acceptable diverge capacity limits under 2017 With Project conditions. 9 The Project would not increase Peak Hour volumes at any study on-ramp above acceptable capacity limits under 2017 with Project conditions. 10 The Project would not degrade the level of service of any U.S. 101 freeway mainline segments under 2017 with Project conditions. 11 The Project would not increase traffic volumes above acceptable capacity limits at any study intersection under 2035 with Project conditions. 12 The Project would not result in any significant vehicle queuing impacts at any analyzed intersection based upon Synchro software methodology for 2035 With Project conditions. The addition of Project traffic would not result in unacceptable 95th percentile vehicle queuing between intersections under 2035 “With Project” conditions. 13 The Project would not increase peak hour volumes at any study off-ramp above acceptable diverge capacity limits under 2035 With Project conditions. 14 The Project would not increase Peak Hour volumes at any study on-ramp above acceptable capacity limits under 2035 with Project conditions. 15 The Project would not degrade the level of service of any U.S. 101 freeway mainline segments under 2035 with Project conditions. 16 The Project would not measurably increase use of local or regional transit facilities. 2.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRAFT EIR / 2.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 2-10 LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS AND NO MITIGATION REQUIRED IMPACTS WITH NO MITIGATION REQUIRED # IMPACT 17 The Project would not measurably increase use of local pedestrian or bicycle facilities. 18 Trips generated by the Project would be less than 100 net new trips during the AM or PM Peak Hour. 20 On-site circulation would adequately conform to City guidelines and good traffic engineering practice. 21 Project Access will be provided by two driveway connections to West Harris Avenue. Access between driveways internal to the site would be provided via parking aisles around all sides of the hotel. This would provide acceptable emergency access for the site. 22 The Project would provide a sidewalk connection between the hotel lobby entrance and the sidewalk along West Harris Avenue. Sidewalks would be provided along all four sides of the hotel building and serve hotel access doorways along each building frontage. Walkways are clearly marked and vegetation does not appear to block line of sight. On-site pedestrian infrastructure appears adequate. 23 There are no transit routes or bicycle routes in operation or planned adjacent to the Project site along West Harris Avenue, a dead end street. The Project would not conflict with any policies or decrease the performance of any nearby transit or bicycle facilities. DRAFT EIR / 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 3-1 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 3.1 INTRODUCTION Chapter 3 provides a description of the proposed Project and the related actions that comprise the Project analyzed in this EIR. CEQA Guidelines Section 15124 (14 CCR § 15124) requires that the project description in an EIR contain the following information but should not provide extensive detail beyond that needed for evaluation and review of the environmental impact. The Project Description shall contain the/a: 1. Precise location and boundaries of the project on a detailed map and regional map. 2. Statement of the objectives of the project. 3. General description of the characteristics of the project, including the principal engineering proposals and supporting public service facilities. 4. Statement briefly describing the intended use of the EIR to the extent that the information is known by the Lead Agency including a list of agencies expected to use the EIR; permits and other approvals required to implement the project; related environmental review and consultation requirements required by federal , state, or local laws, regulations, or policies and to the fullest extent possible the lead Agency should integrate CEQA review with these related review and consultation requirements. 3.2 PROJECT LOCATION AND SITE CONDITIONS PROJECT LOCATION The Project site is located in the eastern area of the City of South San Francisco, known as the “East of 101 Planning Area,” south of East Grand Avenue and north of Mitchell Avenue at 127 West Harris Avenue. San Francisco International Airport (SFO) is approximately 0.8 miles south of the site. The Colma Creek channel is approximately 250 feet south and U.S. 101 is approximately 850 feet west of the site. Mitchell Avenue provides access to West Harris Avenue. Gateway Boulevard to the west and Harbor Way to the east provide access to Mitchell Avenue (See Figure 1 Project Location). LAND USE ADJACENT TO AND NEARBY THE PROJECT SITE The Project site is vacant. As noted the Project would construct a hotel on the site. Adjacent to and south of the site is the Focus Hotel and to the north a food wholesaler, CTC Food Industries, Inc. Properties in the area are developed with vacant and occupied office space, freight forwarding, building materials and food wholesalers. Land uses outside of West Harris Avenue are a mix of light industrial, manufacturing and research and development (R&D). The hill containing the “‘South San Francisco the Industrial City’” sign is visible to the northwest. The hill is known locally, as “Sign Hill” and is listed as a National Historic Resource (1996). Buildings along West Harris are one to three story structures. Denser 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION DRAFT EIR / 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 3-2 development patterns including the Embassy Suites Hotel, R&D and office buildings located on Gateway Boulevard can be seen from the Project area. These buildings are two to eight stories in height. FIGURE 1 PROJECT LOCATION EAST OF 101 AREA LAND USE HISTORY The East of 101 Area was part of the first industrial development in South San Francisco over 100 years ago. The area has undergone many transformations as industrial uses, such as steel manufacturing, and meat packaging, gave way to industrial park, warehousing and distribution uses that came to dominate the area in the 1950s and 1960s. The City adopted 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION DRAFT EIR / 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 3-3 the East of 101 Area Plan (July, 1994) to direct land use, design and resource conservation. In 1999, the City updated its General Plan and in 2010 its zoning ordinance. These documents reflect the third wave of development in the East of 101 Area: the emergence of modern office buildings and life science campuses, predominately north of East Grand Avenue. Older manufacturing uses, industrial park structures, warehousing, freight forwarding, car rental services and airport serving hotels and parking structures are predominately located south of East Grand Avenue, within the vicinity of the Project. Blocks throughout the East of 101 Area are generally very large in size and the area has a stark industrial look. Abandoned railroad spurs and dry docks are also present. Since the late 1990s, developers have preferred to redevelop the older industrial park blocks and construct new mixed office and R&D developments north of East Grand Avenue. Development has resulted in the clean-up of old industrial sites (Brownfield sites), consistent with environmental practices associated with LEED and the Environmental Protection Agency principles and objectives. The East of 101 Area has and continues to witness expansion of R&D and airport- and visitor-serving land uses. R&D is anticipated to reach approximately 12 million square feet in the East of 101 Area by 2035, in addition to the 200 acre Genentech Research and Development Facility Master Plan.1 Office space not associated with R&D is anticipated to reach 1.23 million square feet, by 2035. Other land uses include or are anticipated to include by 2035 approximately 11.3 million square feet of manufacturing; 1 million square feet of commercial/retail/home center retail; and 3,650 hotel rooms. Water related uses include a ferry terminal and 716 berths for privately owned boats. DOWNTOWN STATION AREA PLAN A significant planning effort addressing the East of 101 Area south of East Grand Avenue is the Draft Downtown Station Area Plan which can be reviewed on the City’s website (http://www.ssfdowntownplan.org/background), or Google City of South San Francisco Official Website. The Draft Plan was released for public review July, 2014; EIR was released on October 10, 2014 for the 45-day public review period; and hearings and study sessions were conducted in January, 2015. On January 28, 2015 the South San Francisco City Council certified the EIR and adopted the Plan. The Project site is approximately 100 feet from the southeastern edge of the Downtown Station Area Plan, which is identified as the “Eastern Neighborhood” (See Figure 2 Draft Downtown Station Area Plan and Project Location). The Eastern Neighborhood is bounded by East Grand Avenue to the north; Gateway Boulevard to the east; South Airport Boulevard to the south; and the U.S. 101 to the west. The Eastern Neighborhood, as planned, will experience land use changes including re-designating and rezoning properties from Industrial to R&D as shown in Figure 2. Abandoned rail spurs and the Colma Creek 1 The East of 101 Traffic Model is based upon these R&D figures. The R&D figures reflect the recent Britannia Cove at Oyster Point and the 475 Eccles EIRs, and they represent a combination of entitled and built as well as entitled and un-built projects. Crane Transportation Group, August, 2014. 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION DRAFT EIR / 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 3-4 channel will be designated Open Space. Land currently designated as Business Commercial, Mixed Industrial and Auto-Oriented Commercial will become Office /R&D. An area along East Grand Avenue includes a ‘Retail Focus’. As a result, the East of 101 Area south of East Grand Avenue could witness an increase of R&D up to 1.185 million square feet (Table 1 Existing and Proposed Land Uses, South San Francisco Downtown Station Area, Initial Study, page 7, Atkins. 2013 and page 3.9 of the Draft Downtown Station Area Plan). Excerpted from Draft Downtown Station Area Plan Figure 3 of the Draft Downtown Station Area Plan, prepared by BMS Design Group and Atkins, 2013 and site location added by Knapp Consulting FIGURE 2 DRAFT DOWNTOWN STATION AREA PLAN AND PROJECT LOCATION . PROJECT SITE CONDITIONS The 64,117 square foot (1.47 acre) vacant site is approximately 13 feet above mean sea level. Historical information indicates that the site and surrounding area were submerged swamp land from the late 1890s to the early 1950s. The site has never been developed. Periodically the site was used for parking. The adjacent Focus Hotel was constructed in 1980. The site is covered with invasive and native grasses and shrubs. The site is relatively flat, with a slight surface gradient towards the east. Evidence of illegal dumping is present on the site. The materials include pipes, cardboard boxes, glass, tires, metal fencing and plastic oil bottles. These materials, consisting of approximately one dump truck in volume, have been 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION DRAFT EIR / 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 3-5 removed from the site. Undocumented fill is present throughout the site and more pronounced in the middle of the site. There is approximately a nine foot layer of undocumented fill consisting of sandy, gravely, cobble and boulders on the site. The boulders are 12 to 42 inches in diameter (Geotechnical Engineering Report, Terracon, April 15, 2014). Bay Mud appears below the undocumented fill. Metal concentrations (arsenic and chromium) above California Environmental Screening Levels (ESLs) for shallow soils are present on the site. Additionally low levels of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH), polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) below ESLs are also present in shallow soils (Phase I ESA, Terracon, March 18, 2014 and Limited Stockpile Characterization and Sampling, Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites, 127 West Harris Avenue, South San Francisco, California. March 19, 2014). The additional testing found soil samples above the reporting limits for: TPH-ORO 8.8 mg/Kg, 19 mg/Kg and 7.8 mg/Kg from TP-1, SP-5 and SP-6, respectively; naphthalene concentration of 0.085 mg/Kg from TP-3, and phenanthrene concentrations of 0.061 mg/Kg and 0.12 mg/Kg from TP-3 and TP-4 respectively; and various metals from stockpiles soils, including: arsenic, barium, beryllium, chromium, cobalt, copper, lead, mercury, nickel, vanadium and zinc were at concentrations above the laboratory method reporting limits. The geologic formation is sandstone, shale and conglomerate. Groundwater was encountered at eight feet below ground surface (bgs). The hydrological gradient varies seasonally from southeast to southwest as does the level of groundwater (Phase I ESA, Terracon, March 18, 2014). 3.3 GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION The Project site is within the area subject to the provisions of the “East of 101” Planning Sub-Area of the City of South San Francisco’s General Plan. The General Plan designates the Project site “Business Commercial” (BC); a use intended for business and professional office and visitor service establishments and retail. Permitted uses include administrative, financial, business, professional, medical and public offices, and visitor-oriented and regional commercial activities. The General Plan (page 42) specifically notes: This category is intended for the emerging commercial and hotel district along South Airport, Gateway and Oyster Point Boulevards, and South Spruce Corridor. Maximum FAR for hotel developments shall be 1.2 with increases to a maximum total FAR of 2.0 for development meeting specified criteria. 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION DRAFT EIR / 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 3-6 ZONING CLASSIFICATION The Project site is zoned Freeway Commercial (FC). The FC zoning is one of a group of four zoning districts identified under Chapter 20.110 Employment Districts. FC zoning is intended for regional-serving retail uses, commercial lodging, visitor services and similar uses that benefit from proximity to the Bayshore Freeway [i.e., U.S. 101]. Hotels are a permitted use within this zoning classification. The FC designation identifies a 1.2 FAR for hotels; a minimum lot size of one acre; minimum lot width of 50 feet and a minimum front setback of 20 feet. A complete list of permitted and conditional uses is identified in Chapter 20.110, Table 20.110.002 Land Use Regulations-Employment Districts of the South San Francisco Municipal Code (http://qcode.us/codes/southsanfrancisco/). 3.4 PROJECT OBJECTIVES The Applicant has identified the following objectives of the Project. 1. Develop the project site with a high quality hotel use by partnering with a high quality hotelier, Marriott Hotels. 2. Develop a hotel use to own and operate for the long term. 3. Develop a hotel use that serves both business and leisure travelers and the City of South San Francisco. 4. Develop a project that is close to and connects with nearby transportation hubs such as SFO Airport, Caltrain, BART and Ferry service to give guests many options to meet their business and leisure travel needs. 5. Develop a hotel use with 128 guest rooms, the minimum number of rooms to insure the project’s economic feasibility. 6. Incorporate high-quality architecture, landscaping and sustainable design elements that are in line with the East of 101 Area guidelines. 7. Provide bus transportation for our guests, to the airport, local businesses and public transportation stations helping to reduce the local traffic burden. 8. Provide an indoor swimming pool so that guests can enjoy the amenity all year long. 9. Meet or exceed Marriott and California State Green energy initiatives. 10. Provide an exceptional working environment for more than 50 employees. 11. Become a partner and work closely with the local Chamber of Commerce to make the City of South San Francisco a better place to work and live. 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION DRAFT EIR / 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 3-7 3.5 PROPOSED PROJECT PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Applicant proposes a 128 room limited-service hotel. The hotel would include an indoor swimming pool and breakfast area. All parking would be on surface in front of the building and along the south side and west side property lines. Two shuttle vans and 93 surface parking spaces are proposed. Site access would be via two 30 foot wide two-way driveways along the south and north property lines (see Figure 3 Site Plan). The Project proposes a 1.02 floor area ratio (FAR). The building would be 63 feet in height and setback approximately 50 feet from the southern property line; 20 feet from the northern; 45 from the western; and 65 to 75 from the eastern property lines. The building would be fire sprinkled. There are three PG&E towers constructed in the southwest corner of the Focus Hotel parking area. The lines traverse in a relative north/south direction. The lines (in plan dimension) are approximately 120 to 140 feet from the western façade of the Project, and approximately 180 feet from the southwestern corner of the proposed building. The PG&E towers were emplaced in the 1940s (Phase I ESA, Terracon, March 18, 2014). LANDSCAPING Landscaping would include 57 trees consisting of Raywood Ash, Flowering Gum Eucalyptus, Date Palm, Mexican Fan Palm, Mediterranean Fan Palm and Cajeput trees. Additional landscaping includes seven varieties of shrubs and four varieties of groundcover and various placements of boulders to appear as rock outcroppings. The Raywood Ash trees may be replaced with London Plane Trees, Platanus acerifolia ‘Columbia’ or Ginkgo biloba trees as recommended by the City’s Design Review Board. Bioswales and retention areas are proposed on the north, east, and southern property lines. The front elevation would include more detailed landscaping framing the building and the entry walkway. CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE The overall construction schedule is anticipated to take 15-16 months. The heaviest portion of construction, site clearing, grading, drilling, driving and emplacing piles, structural steel and foundation work would require approximately three months. Wood framing, rough plumbing, electrical and mechanical, emplacement of block walls, and roofing would require approximately 16 to 18 weeks (4.5 months). Interior work and finishes would require approximately 12 to 14 weeks. The stages of work overlap and are rounded up to provide a conservative construction schedule.2 In summary, the most intense part of site preparation and construction would require three months. 2 Schedule is based upon information provided by Covent Construction, Inc., May 23, 2014 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION DRAFT EIR / 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 3-8 Provided by Gerald R. Kessler, Architect FIGURE 3 SITE PLAN 3.6 ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION MEASURES PROPOSED AS PART OF THE PROJECT The following measures are included as part of the Project, and are shown on the architectural drawings (sheet G0007) and in the Project application materials. These measures are in addition to the City’s standard requirements identified in Chapter 1. Therefore, the following measures are considered part of the Project for the CEQA evaluation, and omission of any of these measures may result in a significant environmental impact and may require further CEQA analysis. A. Archaeology A licensed archaeologist shall be on site during grading and pile driving to inspect site soils. Should site soils appear culturally significant the archaeologist shall call a halt to grading operations in the potentially affected areas until the potential significance of the find is evaluated. A mitigation program to preserve the cultural resource in situ, remove and preserve in a museum or university, photograph and catalogue, or other method(s) deemed appropriate by the archaeologist if warranted, shall occur. The protocols of Public Resources Code Section 21083.2 and section 15065.5(c)-(f), California Code of Regulations Title 14, Chapter 3 (CEQA Guidelines) shall be followed, as appropriate. 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION DRAFT EIR / 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 3-9 B. Hazards and Hazardous Materials The Applicant retained Terracon to conduct a limited sampling soil on the Project site, as prompted by the Phase I ESA findings and the Limited Stockpile Characterization and Sampling (127 West Harris Avenue, South San Francisco, CA, March 19, 2014. Terracon). Activities consisted of the collection of representative samples from the test pits and stockpiles on March 3, 2014. See Figure 3 Boring and Sampling Locations, above. In summary, no odors, discoloration or staining was observed on the site. The soil samples were collected from bottom of the test pits TP-1, TP-2, TP-3 and TP-4 and composite soil samples were collected from the onsite stockpiles SP-5 and SP-6. The samples were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH), gasoline range organics (GRO), diesel range organics (DRO) and oil range organics (ORO) by United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 8015B, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260B, PAHs (Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons) by EPA Method 8270C and Title-22 Metals by EPA Method 6010B. Based on laboratory analysis of the soil samples collected from test pits and stockpiled materials, the samples did not exhibit TPH or VOCs concentrations above the laboratory method reporting limits, except for a TPH-ORO concentrations of 8.8 mg/Kg, 19 mg/Kg and 7.8 mg/Kg from TP-1, SP-5 and SP-6, respectively. Additionally, the samples did not exhibit PAH compounds above the laboratory method reporting limits, except for naphthalene concentration of 0.085 mg/Kg from TP-3, and phenanthrene concentrations of 0.061 mg/Kg and 0.12 mg/Kg from TP-3 and TP-4 respectively. The stockpiled materials additionally exhibited various metals, including: arsenic, barium, beryllium, chromium, cobalt, copper, lead, mercury, nickel, vanadium and zinc at concentrations above the laboratory method reporting limits. The soil will be tested to determine the suitable disposal or reuse procedures pursuant to Hazards Table 1 (see blue shaded area). Permits from the San Mateo County Department of Environmental Health (SMCDEH), the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) and South San Francisco Fire Department will be secured. A soil management plan may be required and chain of custody shall be followed. HAZARDS TABLE 1 STANDARD REMEDIATION PRACTICES Media Hazardous Materials Approach Soil Remediation (ex-situ) Fuels • Reuse on Site (if concentration is less than 100 ppm). • Haul and Dispose at appropriate landfill. • Capping and vapor barrier. • Treat on site (see below). 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION DRAFT EIR / 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 3-10 Media Hazardous Materials Approach Soil Remediation (ex-situ) VOCs (gasoline fuels, solvents) • Consult the SMCEHD for requirements. • Haul and Dispose. • Aeration – requires a notification to BAAQMD, daily volumes are limited. • Vapor Stripping – apply vacuum system to covered piles, notify BAAQMD. • Bioremediation - apply bio-treatment materials, moisture and “work” soil piles. • Thermal Desorption – various vendors provide mobile treatment units. • Capping and vapor barrier. Soil Remediation (ex-situ) Inorganics (metals) • Consult BAAQMD and SMCEHD for requirements. • Haul and Dispose. • Chemical Stabilization. • Sorting – reduce waste volume by screening to target contaminant particle size. Soil Remediation (in-situ) VOCs • Consult SMCEHD for requirements. • Soil Vapor Extraction – apply vacuum to vapor wells, notify BAAQMD. • In-situ chemical oxidation. • In-Situ Vitrification – use electricity to melt waste and surrounding soils. Soil Remediation (in-situ) SVOCs • Consult SMCEHD for requirements. • Bioremediation – saturate soils with bio-treatment materials. • Chemical Stabilization – saturate soils with chemicals to immobilize contaminants. • In-Situ Vitrification. • Capping . Groundwater - Investigation All • If contaminants are detected in the 20 foot below ground surface soil sample an additional boring should be completed to groundwater. • Analyze sample for contaminants detected in soil. • Report results to the SMCEHD and consult on remedial alternatives. Groundwater Remediation VOCs • Consult BAAQMD and SMCEHD for requirements. • Pump and Treat – pump from wells, treat and discharge treated water. • Air Sparging – inject air to volatilize contaminants and create aerobic groundwater conditions suitable for natural bioremediation. Generally applied in conjunction with Soil Vapor Extraction to control released volatiles. • Bioremediation – inject bio-treatment materials into affected groundwater. • Chemical Oxidation – inject oxidation chemicals into affected groundwater. Groundwater Remediation SVOCs • Consult BAAQMD for requirements. • Pump and Treat. 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION DRAFT EIR / 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 3-11 Media Hazardous Materials Approach • Bioremediation. • Chemical Oxidation. Groundwater Remediation Inorganics • Consult BAAQMD for requirements. • Pump and Treat. • Chemical Immobilization – inject chemicals to precipitate or chemically fix contaminants to soil particles. C. Geology and Soils 1. Geotechnical Clarifications and Plan Review The Project Geotechnical Consultant shall review and approve all geotechnical design aspects of the project construction plans. The Consultant shall also address the following items: o Consideration shall be given to the benefits of an indicator pile testing program to confirm driving capabilities, embedment depths, and pile capacity prior to selecting final pile depths. o Planned pre-drilling for the upper portions of piles may create voids that could impact lateral resistance. The Consultant shall consider appropriate measures to address voids prior to forming pile caps. o Appropriate documentation to address the above will be submitted to the City for review by the City Engineer prior to issuance of permits for project construction. 2. Vibration Monitoring Vibration monitoring and pre- and post- construction monitoring of nearby structures shall be undertaken to evaluate and document vibration related impacts. A specific plan to address construction period vibrations should be submitted to the City for review by the City Engineer. 3. Geotechnical Construction Inspections The geotechnical consultant will inspect, test (as needed), and approve all geotechnical aspects of the project construction. The inspections should include, but not necessarily be limited to: site preparation and grading, site surface and subsurface drainage improvements, and excavations for foundations and retaining walls prior to the placement of steel and concrete. The results of these inspections and the as-built conditions of the project will be described by the geotechnical consultant in a letter and 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION DRAFT EIR / 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 3-12 submitted to the City Engineer for review prior to final (as-built) project approval. The piles would extend to a minimum depth of 48 feet. The structural engineer may add some additional depth to obtain sufficient bearing. Due to the properties of strata below about 35 feet, it seems credible that piles may be in the range of 50 to 60 feet (Ted Sayre, Principal Engineering Geologist, Cotton Shires Associates, e-mail November 6, 2014). In summary, the geotechnical report (Terracon, October 7, 2014 and Cotton Shires Associates peer review October 16, 2014) states the pile holes would be pre-drilled, and consequently, the forces needed to drive piles will be reduced. Cast-in-place piles may not be feasible with the very weak, squeezing bay muds. A rigid pile would be inserted from the surface into pre-drilled holes. Because the holes would likely squeeze in after they are drilled, there is still a need to drive the piles to get them into place. It may be necessary to place additional compacted fill around the tops of the piles to address voids that may form near the tops of the pre-drilled holes after pile insertion and to obtain the design lateral resistance near the top of the piles. D. Noise and Vibration The Applicant includes the following as part of the Project to reduce the annoyance of construction noise and to comply with the city’s permitting requirements: 1. Emplace noise reduction technologies (such as sound blankets or other temporary noise barriers) to limit noise at the southern and northern and as needed on the western and eastern property lines to not greater than 90 dB. 2. Secure a waiver to permit more than 90 dB noise levels at the property line during grading and pile driving, in the event that the noise limit is momentarily exceeded. 3. Notify property and business owners in writing within West Harris Avenue of the construction schedule and contact person for the Project for questions, complaints and comments. 4. Consider and to the extent feasible provide some periods during the day (i.e., lunch, breaks) when pile driving does not occur. 5. Instrumentation would be in place on nearby buildings to monitor vibrations during pile driving so that buildings are not exposed to harmful vibrations. Pile driving would need to be modified to reduce vibrations if measured accelerations exceed a designated threshold. Vibration reduction might include use of a smaller driving hammer, or reduced travel of the hammer to lesson impact vibrations caused by the hammer hitting the top of pile. This 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION DRAFT EIR / 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 3-13 would be like switching to more extended shallow pounding instead of a shorter duration of more forceful pounding. 3.6 REQUIRED ENTITLEMENTS LEAD AGENCY REQUIREMENTS Conditional Use Permit to allow an airport related business serving hotel to provide less parking that required by City Ordinance 3. Design Review approval. Grading and Building permits. Encroachment permits to work in the public right-of-way. OTHER AGENCY REQUIRED PERMITS Local and State approval of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan. Bay Area Air Quality District. San Mateo County Department of Environmental Health. 3 This EIR does not address parking conformance with the City’s ordinance. The City uses the conditional use permit process to determine if special provisions are included in the project to warrant less parking. Shuttle buses and hotels that are airport serving are evaluated under this process. This EIR does evaluate (Chapter 4) any potential safety impacts associates with circulation patterns that could arise from lack of parking and pedestrian or vehicular conflicts. The Initial Study (Appendix A) evaluated the impacts associated with vehicular use based upon traffic counts, maneuvering and traffic volumes for the Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, Health Risk Analysis and Noise evaluations. Impacts were considered less than significant. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION DRAFT EIR / 4.0 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 4-1 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING, IMPACT AND MITIGATION 4.1.1 INTRODUCTION Chapter 4 covers issue areas that were determined to have impacts that were potentially significant and therefore require further analysis in this Draft EIR. The impact areas are based upon the analysis contained in the initial study (see Appendix A) conducted for the Project in compliance with the CCR Section 15063 (c)(3)(A). These impact areas include Traffic and Circulation and are further analyzed in this Chapter. Chapter 4 of this Draft EIR contains a discussion of the potential environmental effects as a result of implementation of the Project. Chapter 4 includes information related to existing conditions for traffic and circulation, method of analysis, summary of impacts, and detailed analysis of the type and magnitude of individual and/or cumulative environmental impacts. 4.1.2 FORMAT OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS SETTING PHYSICAL SETTING The Physical Setting subsection describes the existing physical environmental conditions on the Project site and in the Project area to provide the baseline condition against which Project-related impacts are compared. REGULATORY SETTING The Regulatory Setting subsection describes general and regional plans or local, State or federal agency regulations applicable to the Project. This section only includes plans and regulations related to the identified impacts, and does not include a comprehensive list of all the plans and regulations that pertain to each environmental issue area addressed. IMPACT ANALYSIS The Impact Analysis subsection includes analysis of potential environmental impacts associated with implementation of the Project. The impact analysis in this Draft EIR assumes implementation of the Project within 12 years and contains an analysis of existing year 2011, year 2015, and year 2035 traffic and circulation conditions. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION DRAFT EIR / 4.0 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 4-2 METHODOLOGY AND ASSUMPTIONS This subsection identifies the methodology and major assumptions used to analyze potential environmental impacts. SUMMARY OF IMPACTS This subsection summarizes the analysis and finding of significance for each issue area. IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES Each impact is identified by a number and statement of the impact followed by the finding of significance in parentheses. The level of significance is determined by considering the predicted magnitude of the Project’s potential for significant impacts in each area. Following the discussion of each stated impact, feasible mitigation measures that could avoid or reduce the severity of identified impact(s) are identified as appropriate. If an impact is not identified for specific significance criteria listed in the section, a brief explanation is provided within the Summary of Impacts section. Citations for this chapter are contained within the relevant discussion. 4.1.3 LEVELS OF SIGNIFICANCE Thresholds of significance, beyond which impacts are considered to be significant, are established for each environmental issue analyzed and in the case of the Project are traffic and circulation. The thresholds of significance are based on generally accepted standards for environmental review, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines and Statutes and federal, state, regional and local significance criteria. While the criterion for determining significant impacts is unique to each environmental topic, the classification of the impacts is uniformly applied in accordance with the following definitions: NO IMPACT – The Project does not result in an impact. LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT IMPACT - The Project impact would not result in a substantial and adverse change in the environment or does not surpass thresholds of significance, and would not require mitigation. LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT IMPACT WITH MITIGATION - The Project impact may result in a substantial or potentially substantial, adverse change in the environment and the incorporation of the identified mitigation measures would reduce the potentially significant impact to a less than significant level. SIGNIFICANT AND UNAVOIDABLE IMPACT - The Project impact may result in a substantial or potentially substantial, adverse change in the environment, which cannot be reduced to a less than significant level even with implementation of feasible mitigation measures. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION DRAFT EIR / 4.0 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 4-3 CUMULATIVELY SIGNIFICANT IMPACT, PROJECT CONTRIBUTION LESS THAN CONSIDERABLE - The Project impact exceeds the defined threshold of cumulative based on projected growth for the region; however, analysis indicates that the Project’s contribution to the impact is less than considerable. 4.1.4 APPROACH TO CUMULATIVE IMPACT ANALYSIS CEQA requires that EIRs identify cumulative impacts, in addition to project-specific impacts. In accordance with CEQA, the discussion of cumulative impacts must reflect the severity of the impacts and the likelihood of their occurrence; however, the discussion need not be as detailed as the discussion of environmental impacts attributable to the project alone. CCR Section 15355 states: “Cumulative impacts” refer to two or more individual effects which, when considered together, are considerable or which compound or increase other environmental impacts. (a) The individual effects may be changes resulting from a single project or a number of separate projects. (b) The cumulative impact from several projects is the change in the environment which results from the incremental impact of the project when added to other closely related past, present, and reasonably foreseeable probable future projects. Cumulative impacts can result from individually minor but collectively significant projects taking place over a period of time. CCR Section 15130(a)(l) further states that "a cumulative impact consists of an impact which is created as a result of the combination of the project evaluated in the EIR together with other projects causing related impacts." CCR Section 15130(a) also requires that EIRs discuss the cumulative impacts of a project when the project's incremental effect is "cumulatively considerable.1" Where a Lead Agency is examining a project with an incremental effect that is not cumulatively considerable, it need not consider the effect significant but must briefly describe the basis for its conclusion. If the combined cumulative impact associated with the project's incremental effect and the effects of other projects is not significant, CCR Section 15130(a)(2) requires a brief discussion in the EIR of why the cumulative impact is not significant and why it is not discussed in further detail. CCR Section 15130(a)(3) requires supporting analysis in the EIR if a determination is made that a project's contribution to a significant cumulative impact is rendered less than cumulatively considerable and, therefore, is not significant. CEQA recognizes that the analysis of cumulative impacts need not be as detailed as the analysis of project-related impacts, but instead should "be guided by the standards of practicality and 1 Under Section 15065(a)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, "cumulatively considerable" means that "the incremental effects of an individual project are significant when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects." TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION DRAFT EIR / 4.0 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 4-4 reasonableness" (CCR Section 15130(b)). The discussion of cumulative impacts in this Draft EIR focuses on whether the impacts of the proposed project are cumulatively considerable. However, since only cumulative impacts have been determined to be significant, they are discussed in detail. 4.2.1 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION INTRODUCTION This section presents the traffic and circulation impacts resulting from development of the 128- room Fairfield Inn and Suites hotel along the west side of the West Harris Avenue cul-de-sac north of Mitchell Avenue in the City of South San Francisco (see Traffic Figure 1, all figures appear at the end of this Section). Existing, year 2017, and year 2035 conditions were evaluated by Crane Transportation Group at four nearby intersections and at the nearby U.S. 101 freeway interchanges that would be most affected by Project traffic. Project impacts to intersection level of service and vehicle queuing as well as impacts to U.S. 101 freeway ramps and mainline operation were determined, as were impacts due to Project access, internal vehicular circulation, and pedestrian/bicycle circulation. Where appropriate, excerpts and findings from the following EIRs or traffic studies have been included in this section: The Revised Draft Report of the Traffic Study for the East of 101 Area (TJKM Transportation Consultants, April, 2012), the 475 Eccles Avenue EIR (Knapp Planning and Environmental Consulting and Crane Transportation Group, ongoing), the Britannia Cove at Oyster Point EIR (URS Corporation and Crane Transportation Group) and the Downtown Specific Plan EIR (certified January 28, 2015). DEVELOPMENT SCENARIOS EVALUATED This analysis evaluated six scenarios of local circulation system operation. • Existing Conditions • Existing With Project Conditions • 2017 Without Project Conditions • 2017 With Project Conditions • 2035 Without Project Conditions • 2035 With Project Conditions INTERSECTIONS Traffic operations were evaluated at four intersections during the weekday AM and PM peak hours. Locations of these intersections are shown in Traffic Figure 2, Study Intersection Lane Geometrics and Control. All four intersections are listed below. 1. Airport Boulevard/San Mateo Avenue/Produce Avenue (Signal) 2. Gateway Boulevard/South Airport Boulevard/Mitchell Avenue (Signal) 3. South Airport Boulevard/U.S. 101 Northbound Hook Ramps/Wondercolor Lane (Signal) TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION DRAFT EIR / 4.0 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 4-5 4. Mitchell Avenue/West Harris Avenue (West Harris Avenue stop sign controlled) FREEWAY MAINLINE AND RAMPS In addition to the study intersections, this analysis evaluated traffic operations along four mainline segments of the U.S. 101 freeway, two U.S. 101 off-ramps, and two U.S. 101 on-ramps. Locations analyzed were: Mainline Segments of U.S. 101 1. North of Oyster Point Boulevard, northbound direction 2. North of Oyster Point Boulevard, southbound direction 3. North of I-380, northbound direction 4. North of I-380, southbound direction U.S. 101 Off-Ramps 1. Southbound off-ramp to Produce Avenue/S. Airport Boulevard 2. Northbound off-ramp to S. Airport Boulevard/Wondercolor Lane U.S. 101 On-Ramps 1. Southbound on-ramp from Produce Avenue 2. Northbound on-ramp from South Airport Boulevard/Wondercolor Lane 4.2.2 METHODOLOGY The Existing Conditions scenario was used to describe the current operating conditions in the Project area. Although the Project is not expected to be completed and in full operation for nearly a year, an Existing + Project scenario was developed and compared to existing conditions in order to satisfy CEQA requirements. A near term horizon analysis was then conducted to evaluate conditions based upon a realistic project completion schedule. Since the Project is not anticipated to be completely constructed until late 2015 and fully occupied until 2016, project traffic impacts were evaluated by comparing 2017 “Without Project” Conditions to 2017 “With Project” Conditions. Finally, cumulative impacts resulting from Project traffic were evaluated for year 2035 conditions. 4.2.3 SETTING EXISTING CONDITIONS A. ROADWAY SYSTEM The Project site is located in the City of South San Francisco, which is located along major transportation routes including the U.S. 101 freeway, Interstate 380 freeway, Interstate 280 freeway, and Caltrain. San Francisco International Airport is approximately 1.5 miles south of the Project site and U.S. 101 is less than a quarter mile east of the site (see Traffic Figure 1, Area Map). The Project site is served directly by West Harris Avenue, a cul-de-sac street which connects to Mitchell Avenue, while regional access is provided by the U.S. 101 freeway. Two driveway TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION DRAFT EIR / 4.0 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 4-6 connections are proposed to the west side of West Harris Avenue. Access to U.S. 101 is provided by Mitchell Avenue and then S. Airport Boulevard, which provides direct or indirect connections to north and southbound freeway ramps. Each roadway is briefly described below, while a schematic presentation of existing intersection approach lanes and controls are presented in Traffic Figure 2. MAJOR REGIONAL ROADWAYS U.S. 101 Freeway U.S. 101 is an eight-lane freeway that provides access to the Project area. U.S. 101 extends from downtown San Francisco and Northern California to Los Angeles and Southern California. Within the study area, U.S. 101 has a northbound on-ramp at S. Airport Boulevard/Wondercolor Lane and a southbound on-ramp from Produce Avenue. A northbound off-ramp is provided at the S. Airport Boulevard/Wondercolor Lane intersection (between Mitchell Avenue and Utah Avenue) and a southbound off-ramp is provided to Produce Avenue and S. Airport Boulevard. U.S. 101 has four southbound travel lanes at its southbound off-ramp to Produce Avenue and six travel lanes to the south of the Produce Avenue southbound on-ramp. U.S. 101 has six northbound travel lanes south of Wondercolor Lane (one of which exits to S. Airport Boulevard) and five travel lanes north of Wondercolor Lane. In 2012, U.S. 101 carried an annual average daily traffic (ADT) volume of 220,000 vehicles south of Produce Avenue, 218,000 vehicles south of Oyster Point Boulevard, and 213,000 vehicles just north of Oyster Point Boulevard. LOCAL STREETS South Airport Boulevard South Airport Boulevard is a four-lane divided roadway extending easterly and then southerly from the Airport Boulevard/San Mateo Avenue/Produce Avenue intersection to the San Bruno Avenue East/North McDonnell Road intersection at the San Francisco International Airport. Most of South Airport Boulevard runs parallel to and east of U.S. 101. West Harris Avenue West Harris Avenue is a two-lane industrial street that intersects the north side of Mitchell Avenue at a Tee. The West Harris Avenue southbound approach is stop sign controlled. West Harris Avenue extends northeasterly and then easterly from Mitchell Avenue before ending at a cul-de-sac. It is 40 feet wide, level and straight along the site frontage, although there are horizontal curves just north and south of the site. Curb, gutter and sidewalk line the west (Project) side of the street. Two-hour on-street parking is permitted between 8:00 AM and 6:00 PM along both sides of the street. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION DRAFT EIR / 4.0 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 4-7 Mitchell Avenue Mitchell Avenue is a two-lane industrial street running in an east-west direction connecting S. Airport Boulevard/Gateway Boulevard with Harbor Way. Curb, gutter and sidewalk line the north side of the street and a sidewalk is in place along the south side of the street. VOLUMES Existing traffic counts were obtained from the South San Francisco Downtown Specific Plan EIR Circulation Analysis and reflect year 2013/2014 conditions. In addition, counts at the Mitchell Avenue/West Harris Avenue intersection and the U.S. 101 southbound off-ramp to Produce Avenue/S. Airport Boulevard were conducted by Crane Transportation Group in April 2014. Traffic Figures 3 and 4 present existing weekday AM and PM Peak Hour volumes at all analysis intersections. 4.2.4 CIRCULATION SYSTEM EVALUATION METHODOLOGY AND STANDARDS INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY Signalized Intersections Intersections, rather than roadway segments between intersections, are almost always the capacity controlling locations for any circulation system. Signalized intersection operation is graded based upon two different scales. The first scale employs a grading system called Level of Service (LOS) which ranges from Level A, indicating uncongested flow and minimum delay to drivers, down to Level F, indicating significant congestion and delay on most or all intersection approaches. The Level of Service scale is also associated with a control delay tabulation (year 2000 Transportation Research Board [TRB] Highway Capacity Manual [HCM] operations method) at each intersection. The control delay designation allows a more detailed examination of the impacts of a particular project. Greater detail regarding the LOS/control delay relationship is provided in Traffic Table 1. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION DRAFT EIR / 4.0 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 4-8 Traffic Table 1 Signalized Intersection Level of Service Criteria Level of Service Description Average Control Delay (Seconds Per Vehicle) A Operations with very low delay occurring with favorable progression and/or short cycle lengths. ≤ 10.0 B Operations with low delay occurring with good progression and/or short cycle lengths. 10.1 to 20.0 C Operations with average delays resulting from fair progression and/or longer cycle lengths. Individual cycle failures begin to appear. 20.1 to 35.0 D Operations with longer delays due to a combination of unfavorable progression, long cycle lengths, and/or high volume-to-capacity (V/C) ratios. Many vehicles stop and individual cycle failures are noticeable. 35.1 to 55.0 E Operations with high delay values indicating poor progression, long cycle lengths, and high V/C ratios. Individual cycle failures are frequent occurrences. This is considered to be the limit of acceptable delay. 55.1 to 80.0 F Operation with delays unacceptable to most drivers occurring due to oversaturation, poor progression, or very long cycle lengths. > 80.0 Source: 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (Transportation Research Board). Unsignalized Intersections Unsignalized intersection operation is also typically graded using the LOS A through F scale. LOS ratings for all-way stop intersections are determined using a methodology outlined in the year 2010 TRB Highway Capacity Manual. Under this methodology, all-way stop intersections receive one LOS designation reflecting operation of the entire intersection. Average control delay values are also calculated. Intersections with side streets only stop sign controlled (two-way stop control) are also evaluated using the LOS and average control delay scales using a methodology outlined in the year 2000 TRB Highway Capacity Manual. However, unlike signalized or all-way stop analysis where the LOS and control delay designations only pertain to the entire intersection, in side street stop sign control analysis LOS and delay designations are computed for only the stop sign controlled approaches or individual turn and through movements. Traffic Table 2, Unsignalized Intersection Level of Service Criteria, provides greater detail about unsignalized analysis methodologies. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION DRAFT EIR / 4.0 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 4-9 Traffic Table 2 Unsignalized Intersection Level of Service Criteria Level of Service Description Average Control Delay (Seconds Per Vehicle) A Little or no delays ≤ 10.0 B Short traffic delays 10.1 to 15.0 C Average traffic delays 15.1 to 25.0 D Long traffic delays 25.1 to 35.0 E Very long traffic delays 35.1 to 50.0 F Extreme traffic delays with intersection capacity exceeded (for an all-way stop), or with approach/turn movement capacity exceeded (for a side street stop controlled intersection) > 50.0 Source: 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (Transportation Research Board). MINIMUM ACCEPTABLE STANDARD LOS D is the minimum acceptable operation for signalized or all way stop intersections in the City of South San Francisco, while LOS E is the minimum acceptable operation for stop sign controlled approaches or turn movements at a side street stop sign controlled intersection. INTERSECTION VEHICLE QUEUING Analysis Methodology The Synchro software program has been used to determine 95th percentile vehicle queues for select approaches or movements at the S. Airport Boulevard signalized intersections with Gateway Boulevard/Mitchell Avenue, Produce Avenue/San Mateo Avenue and the U.S. 101 Northbound Hook Ramps/Wondercolor Lane. The Synchro software output details queuing for one signal cycle during the peak traffic hour. In addition to Synchro software queuing evaluation, the SIM Traffic analysis program was utilized to determine if freeway off-ramp queues at the northbound off-ramp to S. Airport Boulevard/Wondercolor Lane and the southbound off-ramp to Produce Avenue would extend to the freeway mainline. The SIM traffic program evaluates operation during every signal cycle of the peak hour. For the northbound off-ramp where an auxiliary lane becomes the off-ramp lane, the storage distance to the freeway mainline is based upon the location where the auxiliary lane separates from the adjacent mainline travel lane. Queuing Standards The standard adopted by the City of South San Francisco and Caltrans is that the 95th percentile vehicle queue must be accommodated within available storage for each off-ramp and on the approaches to intersections adjacent to or near off-ramp intersections that accommodate a TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION DRAFT EIR / 4.0 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 4-10 significant amount of off-ramp traffic. In addition, no off-ramp traffic is allowed to back up to the freeway mainline during the entire AM or PM peak traffic hour. The 95th percentile queue indicates that vehicle backups will only extend beyond this length 5 percent of the time during the analysis hour. FREEWAY RAMPS OFF-RAMP DIVERGE FROM FREEWAY MAINLINE Analysis Methodology and Minimum Acceptable Standards Caltrans uses a volume of 1,500 vehicles per hour as the maximum acceptable limit that can be accommodated by a single lane off‐ramp at its divergence from the freeway. This threshold was used in this study. ON-RAMPS On-ramp operation has been evaluated using planning-level methodology contained in the Year 2010 Highway Capacity Manual. Capacity is dependent upon the free‐flow speed of on-ramp traffic. For single- and double-lane diamond on-ramps with higher speeds, capacity has been set at 2,200 and 3,300 vehicles per hour, respectively. For single-lane button hook or curving on‐ ramps, capacity has been set at 2,000 vehicles per hour. FREEWAY MAINLINE ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY U.S. 101 freeway mainline segment AM and PM peak hour conditions were evaluated using the Year 2010 Highway Capacity Manual as specified by Caltrans and the San Mateo County Congestion Management Program (CMP). Existing U.S. 101 mainline traffic volumes used for the analysis were obtained from the ongoing South San Francisco Downtown Specific Plan EIR Circulation analysis and reflect year 2013 conditions. MINIMUM ACCEPTABLE STANDARD LOS E is the minimum acceptable operation for the freeway mainline. EXISTING CIRCULATION SYSTEM OPERATING CONDITIONS Intersection Level of Service Traffic Table 3, Existing Intersection Levels of Service, shows that all analyzed intersections currently operate at good to acceptable (LOS D or better) levels of service during both the AM and PM peak traffic hours. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION DRAFT EIR / 4.0 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 4-11 Traffic Table 3 Intersection Level of Service Existing & Existing + Project Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Intersection Existing Existing With Project Existing Existing With Project S. Airport Blvd./Produce Ave./San Mateo Ave. (Signal) D-38.3(1) D-38.2 D-51.6 D-52.1 S. Airport Blvd./Gateway Blvd./ Mitchell Ave. (Signal) D-37.4(1) D-37.8 D-43.0 D-42.7 S. Airport Blvd./ US 101 NB Hook Ramps/ Wondercolor Lane (Signal) C-30.4(1) C-29.8 C-33.1 C-33.7 Mitchell Ave./W. Harris Ave. (W. Harris Stop Sign Controlled) A-10.0(2) B-10.3 B-12.2 B-13.1 (1) Signalized level of service – control delay in seconds. (2) Unsignalized level of service – control delay in seconds. W. Harris stop sign controlled approach. Year 2000 Highway Capacity Manual Analysis Methodology – Synchro software program. Source: Crane Transportation Group NOTE: Occasionally, average vehicle delay will decrease at an intersection due to the addition of traffic. The reason is that vehicles are being added to movements that have an excess of green time, typically to facilitate clearing vehicle queues, and have no impact on overall intersection operation. However, because there are more vehicles entering the intersection, the average vehicle delay will decrease. INTERSECTION 95TH PERCENTILE VEHICLE QUEUING Traffic Table 4, Percentile Vehicle Queue, shows that no intersections evaluated in this study currently have 95th percentile queues exceeding available storage based upon the Synchro software program. OFF-RAMP VEHICLE QUEUING TO FREEWAY MAINLINE Traffic Table 5, 95th Percentile SIM Traffic Off-Ramp Queuing Evaluation, shows that no off-ramps evaluated for this study currently have off-ramp 95th percentile queues extending to the freeway mainline. OFF-RAMP OPERATION AT DIVERGE FROM FREEWAY MAINLINE Traffic Table 6, Off-Ramp Capacity and Volumes, shows that currently all U.S. 101 freeway off- ramps evaluated in this study serving the Project area are operating acceptably and have volumes below 1,500 vehicles per hour during the AM and PM peak traffic hours. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION DRAFT EIR / 4.0 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 4-12 Traffic Table 4 95th Percentile Vehicle Queuing Demand Existing & Existing + Project AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Street or Off-Ramp Movement Storage (ft.) Existing (ft.) With Project (ft.) Existing (ft.) With Project (ft.) S. Airport Blvd. WB Approach to Combined Left/Thru 1640 525 550 1225 1250 Produce Ave. Right Turn Free 100 100 250 275 S. Airport Blvd. EB Approach to Left Turn 170 100 100 75 75 Gateway/Mitchell Combined Thru/Right 960 450 475 325 325 US 101 SB Off- Ramp to Produce Ave. Off-Ramp Left Turn Lane 105 25 25 25 25 US 101 NB Off- Ramp to S. Airport Blvd./Wondercolor Lane All Off-Ramp Lanes 1500 850 850 600 600 Year 2000 Highway Capacity Manual Analysis Methodology – Synchro software program. Compiled by: Crane Transportation Group Traffic Table 5 Do Peak Hour Off-Ramp Volumes Back Up To The U.S. 101 Mainline? Existing, Year 2017 & Year 2035 Year 2017 Year 2035 U.S. 101 Off-Ramp Existing Existing + Project W/O Project + Project W/O Project + Project AM Peak Hour SB Off-Ramp to Produce Ave./ S. Airport Blvd. No No No No Yes Yes (1.3%) NB Off-Ramp to S. Airport Blvd./ Wondercolor Lane No No Yes Yes (1.1%) Yes Yes (0.8%) PM Peak Hour SB Off-Ramp to Produce Ave./ S. Airport Blvd. No No No No Yes Yes (1.5%) NB Off-Ramp to S. Airport Blvd./ Wondercolor Lane No No Yes Yes (1.8%) No No Bolded – significant impact Year 2000 Highway Capacity Manual SIM Traffic Analysis Source: Crane Transportation Group TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION DRAFT EIR / 4.0 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 4-13 Traffic Table 6 Off-Ramp Capacity and Volumes Existing, Year 2017 & Year 2035 Volumes Diverge Year 2017 Year 2035 U.S. 101 Off-Ramp Capacity* (Veh/Hr) Existing Existing + Project W/O Project + Project W/O Project + Project AM Peak Hour SB Off-Ramp to Produce Ave./ S. Airport Blvd. 1500 535 550 594 609 1149 1164 NB Off-Ramp to S. Airport Blvd./ Wondercolor Lane 1500** 1216 1236 1791 1811 2357 2377 PM Peak Hour SB Off-Ramp to Produce Ave./ S. Airport Blvd. 1500 379 392 635 648 850 863 NB Off-Ramp to S. Airport Blvd./ Wondercolor Lane 1500** 763 779 910 926 945 961 * Caltrans desired volume limit that can be accommodated by a single off-ramp lane connection to the freeway mainline. ** Programmed provision of second off-ramp lane connection to the freeway mainline by 2017 will increase capacity to 3,000 vehicles per hour. Source: Crane Transportation Group ON-RAMP OPERATION Traffic Table 7, On-Ramp Capacity and Volumes, shows that currently all U.S. 101 freeway on- ramps evaluated in this study serving the Project area are operating acceptably and have volumes well below capacity during the AM and PM Peak Hours. FREEWAY MAINLINE OPERATION Existing LOS on the freeway segments in South San Francisco were based on analysis of year 2013 volumes. Traffic Table 8 presents details of the existing freeway LOS results. Currently, all analyzed U.S. 101 freeway segments are operating at an acceptable LOS E or better during the weekday AM and PM peak hours, with the exception of the southbound direction between the Produce Avenue On-Ramp and I-380 (LOS F for this weave section during both the AM and PM peak hours) and the northbound direction between the Oyster Point Boulevard on-ramp and the Bayshore Boulevard off-ramp (LOS F for this weave section during both the AM and PM peak hours). TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION DRAFT EIR / 4.0 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 4-14 Traffic Table 7 On-Ramp Capacity and Volumes Existing, Year 2017 & Year 2035 Volumes Year 2017 Year 2035 U.S. 101 On-Ramp Capacity* (Veh/Hr) Existing Existing + Project W/O Project + Project W/O Project + Project AM Peak Hour SB On-Ramp from Produce Ave. 3300** 1062 1074 1136 1148 1506 1518 NB On-Ramp from S. Airport Blvd./ Wondercolor Lane 2000 246 259 311 324 404 417 PM Peak Hour SB On-Ramp from Produce Ave. 3300** 2194 2209 2591 2606 3741 3756 (0.4%)*** NB On-Ramp from S. Airport Blvd./ Wondercolor Lane 2000 420 434 553 567 974 988 * Planning level capacity: Year 2000 Highway Capacity Manual, TRB Report 209. ** Produce Avenue on-ramp has two travel lanes. One on-ramp lane merges to the freeway mainline, while the other on-ramp continues as an auxiliary lane to the I-380 off-ramp. *** Percent Project traffic added. Compiled by: Crane Transportation Group TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION DRAFT EIR / 4.0 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 4-15 Traffic Table 8 Freeway Mainline Level of Service Existing & Existing + Project Existing Existing + Project Vol LOS Density* V/C** Vol LOS Density* V/C** % Project Traffic AM PEAK HOUR Southbound SB U.S. 101 North of Oyster Point (Basic) 8605 E 44.3 -- 8620 E 44.4 -- 0.17 SB Produce Ave. On-Ramp to I-380 Off-Ramp (Weave) 8730 F -- 1.15 8742 F -- 1.15 0.14 Northbound NB U.S. 101 North of I-380 (Basic) 9480 D 26.9 -- 9500 D 27.0 -- 0.21 NB U.S. 101 North of Oyster Point (Weave) 7573 F 43.5 0.97 7586 F 43.6 0.97 0.17 PM PEAK HOUR Southbound SB U.S. 101 North of Oyster Point (Basic) 6494 D 27.9 -- 6507 D 27.9 -- 0.20 SB Produce Ave. On-Ramp to I-380 Off-Ramp (Weave) 9006 F -- 1.33 9021 F -- 1.34 0.17 Northbound NB U.S. 101 North of I-380 (Basic) 7281 C 20.2 -- 7297 C 20.3 -- 0.22 NB U.S. 101 North of Oyster Point (Weave) 7920 F -- 1.04 7934 F -- 1.04 0.18 * Density = passenger cars/mile/lane. ** V/C = volume to capacity ratio. Year 2010 Highway Capacity Manual Analysis Methodology Source: Crane Transportation Group TRANSIT AND SHUTTLE SERVICE Transit service in the East of 101 area includes local bus service, shuttle service, ferry service and regional rail service. Traffic Figure 5, Public Transportation Routes, and Traffic Table 9, Public Transportation Service, show the type and frequency of transit service east of the U.S. 101 freeway in the project vicinity, while Traffic Table 10, Caltrain/BART Shuttle Service, lists the shuttle services available in the study area. The closest Caltrain and BART shuttle routes have stops along S. Airport Boulevard at the Wondercolor Lane intersection two blocks from the Project site. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION DRAFT EIR / 4.0 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 4-16 BUS SERVICE The San Mateo County Transit District (SamTrans) provides bus service to South San Francisco. There are SamTrans bus routes running along S. Airport Boulevard one block west of the Project site. Traffic Table 9 Public Transportation Service Services Route Frequency Area Served AM/PM Peak Hour Midday SamTrans Palo Alto-San Francisco (397) 0/0 0 S. Airport Blvd. Colma/S. San Francisco BART (38) 60/60 0 S. Airport Blvd. San Mateo‐SF (292) 15/15(a) 30 S. Airport Blvd./Baden Ave. Caltrain Gilroy‐SF 30/30 60 South SF Caltrain Station BART Pittsburg-Daly City 15/15 15 Daly City BART Station Fremont-Daly City 15/15 15 Daly City BART Station Richmond-Daly City 15/15 — Daly City BART Station Dublin-Millbrae 15/15 15 South SF BART Station Caltrain Shuttle to SSF Station Gateway Area 15/15 — 1000 Gateway, Genentech Bldgs B9, B5 Oyster Point Area 30/30(a) — Gull/Oyster Point and 384 Oyster Point Sierra Point Area 30/30(a) — 5000 Shoreline Court Utah Grand Area 25/30(a) — Cabot/Allerton/Utah BART Shuttle to SSF Station Sierra Point Area 35/35 5000 Shoreline Court Genentech 15/15 — Genentech Bldgs B5, B54 Oyster Point Area 23/23(a) — Gull/Oyster Point and 384 Oyster Point Utah-Grand Area 30/30(a) — Cabot/Allerton/Utah Alameda/ Oakland Ferry Utah – Grand Area 30-60 mins (3 runs AM) / 1 run PM 1 run AM/60 min (3 runs PM) -- -- From Alameda/Oakland To Alameda/Oakland Source: Metropolitan Transportation Commission (511.org), Peninsula Traffic Congestion Relief Alliance (commute.org), Caltrain 2014. Frequency of transit service is presented in minutes. San Francisco Bay Ferry Schedule 2014. SF = San Francisco (a) = average frequency period. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION DRAFT EIR / 4.0 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 4-17 Traffic Table 10 Caltrain/BART Shuttle Service Shuttle Station Served Schedule Area Served Oyster Point BART eight AM & nine PM trips Oyster Point Blvd., Gull Dr., Eccles Ave., Forbes Blvd., Veterans Blvd. Caltrain seven AM & seven PM trips Utah‐Grand BART eight AM & seven PM trips E. Grand Ave., Utah Ave., Harbor Way, Littlefield Ave., Gateway Blvd., S. Airport Blvd. Caltrain eight AM & seven PM trips Gateway Millbrae BART ten AM & twelve PM trips Gateway Blvd., BART Caltrain six AM & five PM trips Gateway Blvd., Genentech Office Sierra Point BART four AM & four PM trips Sierra Point, Shoreline Caltrain four AM & four PM trips Source: Peninsula Traffic Congestion Relief Alliance (Commute.org), Caltrain 2013 Both shuttles alternate between 15‐ and 30‐minute headways during both peak hours. Bus Route 292 San Francisco CBD-San Mateo operates along S. Airport Boulevard. It connects southeast South San Francisco with the San Francisco International Airport BART station and the Burlingame Caltrain station. This route operates with 15- to 20-minute peak period headways and 30- to 60- minute non-peak headways on weekdays, 30- to 60-minute headways on Saturdays and 30- to 60- minute headways on Sundays. Bus Route 397 San Francisco CBD to Palo Alto operates along S. Airport Boulevard in the Project Area. There are four southbound and three northbound runs on one-hour headways all seven days per week. Service is between about 2:00 and 5:00 AM. Bus Route 38 Colma BART Station/South San Francisco BART Station & Oyster Point Boulevard operates along S. Airport Boulevard. Bus Route 38 on weekdays has one AM run and two PM runs along S. Airport Boulevard. On Saturday and Sunday there is one AM run, and three PM runs on Saturday and one PM run on Sunday. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION DRAFT EIR / 4.0 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 4-18 CALTRAIN Caltrain provides train service between Gilroy, San Jose, and San Francisco. There is a station located on the corner of Dubuque Avenue and Grand Avenue Overcrossing in South San Francisco. During the AM commute period there are northbound trains at 7:05, 7:25, 8:05, 8:25, 9:05 and 9:25 (then hourly), while all trains southbound are on an hourly schedule. During the PM commute period there are northbound trains hourly, while southbound there are trains at 4:48, 5:08, 5:48, 6:08, 6:18, 7:08 and 7:48 (then hourly). SAN FRANCISCO BAY FERRY The San Francisco Bay Ferry provides weekday service between South San Francisco and Alameda & Oakland (Jack London Square). During the AM commute period there are three ferries to South San Francisco (leaving the East Bay at 6:25, 7:25 and 7:55 AM) and one ferry from South San Francisco (leaving at 7:20 AM). During the PM commute period there are three ferries from South San Francisco (leaving at 4:20, 5:20 and 6:20 PM) and one ferry to South San Francisco leaving the East Bay at 4:55 PM). There is also tourist service between South San Francisco and downtown San Francisco and Fisherman’s Wharf on Wednesday and Friday. CALTRAIN/BART/SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO FERRY SHUTTLES The Peninsula Traffic Congestion Relief Alliance provides van shuttle service between the South San Francisco Caltrain station and employment centers east of U.S. 101 during commute hours. Separate shuttles also provide service to and from the South San Francisco or Colma BART stations. There are no shuttle stops in the immediate project vicinity. The closest stop to the Project site for both Caltrain and BART shuttles is at the S. Airport Boulevard/Wondercolor Lane intersection two blocks to the south of the site. The Utah/Grand BART and Caltrain Shuttles provide service on S. Airport Boulevard (Wondercolor Lane to Utah Avenue), Utah Avenue, Littlefield Avenue, E Grand Avenue (Gateway to Harbor) and on Gateway Boulevard north of E. Grand Avenue. There are eight morning trips and seven afternoon trips on the BART shuttle, with eight morning trips and seven afternoon trips on the Caltrain shuttle. There is also scheduled shuttle service between the Utah/Grand area and the South San Francisco ferry terminal. The AM schedule has one trip to the ferry and three trips from the ferry, while the PM schedule has two trips to the ferry and one trip from the ferry. The ferry shuttle runs mostly the same route through the project area as the BART and Caltrain shuttles, although it does continue along S. Airport Boulevard and Gellert Boulevard just north of the site. All shuttle service is fixed-route, fixed-schedule, and provided at no cost on weekdays during the commute periods. Seventy-five percent of operating costs are borne by the Joint Powers Board (JPB), SamTrans, the Bay Area Air Quality Management District, and the City/County Association of Governments. Twenty-five percent of operating costs are borne by area employers. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION DRAFT EIR / 4.0 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 4-19 PEDESTRIAN & BICYCLE FACILITIES A sidewalk extends along the Project site’s West Harris Avenue frontage and along the north and south sides of Mitchell Avenue to the south of the Project. The Mitchell Avenue sidewalks lead to sidewalks along S. Airport Boulevard and Gateway Boulevard to the west, and the vast majority of the distance to sidewalks along Harbor Way to the east. S. Airport Boulevard and Utah Avenue in the Project vicinity currently are Class III signed bicycle routes, while Gateway Boulevard north of the S. Airport Boulevard/Mitchell Avenue intersection currently have Class II signed and striped bicycle lanes. Proposed future bike lanes, routes and paths are designated in the General Plan Transportation Element and the Bicycle Master Plan (February 2011). The Bicycle Master Plan updated and amended the Transportation Element of the General Plan in 2011 to include new routes and facilities. A Class I bicycle path is proposed along the south side of Mitchell Avenue that would ultimately connect with the Bay Trail, while Class II striped and signed bicycle lanes are proposed along S. Airport Boulevard. REGULATORY FRAMEWORK Plans and policies that pertain to the traffic conditions affecting and affected by the project include: (1) the San Mateo County Congestion Management Program (CMP) Standards; and (2) the City of South San Francisco Transportation Demand Management Program. SAN MATEO COUNTY CMP STANDARDS FOR REGIONAL ROADS AND LOCAL STREETS The LOS standards established for roads and intersections in the San Mateo County CMP street network vary based on geographic differences. For roadway segments and intersections near the county line, the LOS standard was set as LOS E in order to be consistent with the recommendations in the neighboring counties. If the existing Level of Service in 1990/91 was F, the standard was set to LOS F. If the existing or future LOS was or will be E, the standard was set to E. For the remaining roadways and intersections, the standard was set to be one letter designation worse than the projected LOS in the year 2000. If a proposed land use change would either cause a deficiency (to operate below the standard LOS) on a CMP-designated roadway system facility, or would significantly affect the 1991 CMP baseline LOS, mitigation measures are to be developed so that LOS standards are maintained on the CMP- designated roadway system. If mitigation measures are not feasible (due to financial, environmental, or other factors), a Deficiency Plan must be prepared for the deficient facility. The Deficiency Plan must indicate the land use and infrastructure action items to be implemented by the local agency to eliminate the deficient conditions. A Deficiency Plan may not be required if by eliminating from the evaluation the traffic volume that is traveling on the route between San Mateo County and an adjacent county, operating conditions would be acceptable on a CMP route and the deficiency would not occur. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION DRAFT EIR / 4.0 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 4-20 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT PROGRAM The City of South San Francisco requires that all nonresidential development expected to generate 100 or more average daily trips, based on the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) trip generation rates, or a project seeking a floor area ratio (FAR) bonus implement Transportation Demand Management (TDM) measures to reduce vehicle traffic (Chapter 20.400 Transportation Demand Management). The purposes of the TDM ordinance are as follows: • Implement a program designed to reduce the amount of traffic generated by new nonresidential development, and the expansion of existing nonresidential development pursuant to the City’s police power and necessary in order to protect the public health, safety, and welfare. • Ensure that expected increases in traffic resulting from growth in employment opportunities in the City of South San Francisco will be adequately mitigated. • Reduce drive-alone commute trips during peak traffic periods by using a combination of services, incentives, and facilities. • Promote the more efficient utilization of existing transportation facilities and ensure that new developments are designed in ways to maximize the potential for alternative transportation usage. • Establish minimum TDM requirements for all new nonresidential development. • Allow reduced parking requirements for projects implementing the requirements of this section. • Establish an ongoing monitoring and enforcement program to ensure that the measures are implemented. FUTURE “WITHOUT PROJECT” OPERATING CONDITIONS The Project’s traffic impacts have been evaluated in relation to existing, year 2017 and year 2035 Base Case conditions. Year 2017 reflects a horizon year that the Fairfield Inn & Suites hotel would be completed and in full operation, while year 2035 reflects the most distant horizon year currently utilized by the City Public Works Department and Caltrans for analysis purposes. This section details the process to determine Base Case traffic operation for year 2017 and 2035 conditions. YEAR 2017 “WITHOUT PROJECT” CIRCULATION SYSTEM OPERATION Year 2017 “Without Project” conditions include traffic generated by existing, approved, and proposed development in the study area, as well as traffic generated by projects that are under construction. Projects and their associated trip generation are provided in Traffic Table 11, 2017 “Without Project” Trip Generation, and have been utilized by TJKM Associates2 to develop local area intersection and freeway volumes for use in the City’s updated East of 101 Transportation Capital Improvement Program study. Year 2017 “Without Project” Peak Hour conditions were 2 Land use projections have been updated to reflect different development assumptions than those used by TJKM for the 328 Roebling Road, 475 Eccles, 494 Forbes and Britannia Cove at Oyster Point projects. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION DRAFT EIR / 4.0 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 4-21 developed by adding traffic expected to be generated by the approved and proposed developments in the greater East of 101 Area to existing traffic volumes. Year 2017 projections include traffic from several recently approved background projects such as the first part of the Gateway Business Park, Oyster Point Redevelopment Phase 1, Britannia Cove at Oyster Point Phase 1, 213 East Grand, 328 Roebling Road, 494 Forbes Boulevard, Home Depot, Terrabay full development, the ferry terminal and the Genentech Corporate Facilities Master Plan. Year 2017 “Without Project” AM and PM Peak Hour intersection volumes are presented in Traffic Figures 6 and 7. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION DRAFT EIR / 4.0 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 4-22 Traffic Table 11 Year 2017 Without Project Trip Generation Lane Use (ITE Code) Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Size/Unit Rate Total Trip Rate In/Out % In Out Total Trip Rate In/Out % In Out Total Genentech(1) 1,988 318 2,306 271 1,613 1,884 Oyster Point Redevelopment Phase 1 R&D/ Office 369* 48* 417* 55* 343* 398* Britannia Cove at Oyster Point Phase I 242 73 315 94 204 298 Oyster Point Non- Redevelopment Area R&D(2) Ferry Terminal(3) (010) Marina (420) 680,499 sf 1 berth 716 berths 3.62 2.96 2,464 814 2,119 0.57 0.08 83:17 33:67 322 138 19 66 26 38 388 164 57 0.47 0.19 15:85 60:40 48 54 82 272 101 54 320 155 136 Commercial(2) (820) 364,502 sf 43:19 15,741 0.91 61:39 202 129 331 4.15 49:51 741 772 1,513 Home Center(2) (862) 290,794 sf 23.29 6,774 1.26 57.43 209 158 367 2.37 48:52 331 358 689 Hotel (310) 3,385 rooms 8.17 27,655 0.56 61:39 1,156 739 1,895 0.59 53:47 1,058 939 1,997 R&D(2) (760) 7,690,317 sf 3.62 27,840 0.57 83:17 3,638 746 4,384 0.47 15:85 542 3,073 3,615 Office(2) (710) (20% TDM Reduction) 360,000 sf 7.10 2,554 1.05 88:12 333 45 378 1.00 17:83 61 300 361 Manufacturing (140) (15% TDM Reduction) 7,955,717 sf 3.25 25,856 0.62 78:22 3,848 1,085 4,933 0.62 36:64 1,776 3,157 4,933 Total Trips 12,463 3472 15,935 5113 11,186 16,299 * Oyster Point Specific Plan and Phase 1 Project Draft EIR. (1) Trips based on existing land use as published in the Genentech EIR. (2) Rates developed from ITE equations (3) Trips based on SF Bay Area Water Transit Authority (WTA) ridership forecast. Trip rate source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation (8th Edition) Compiled by: TJKM Associates TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION DRAFT EIR / 4.0 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 4-23 The TJKM near term horizon projections with specific project updates were originally for the year 2015. However, due to economic conditions and lack of development over the past four years, the City Planning and Public Works Department determined that the original 2015 projections would now better reflect year 2017 conditions based upon current development schedules for approved and pending projects. City staff also determined that it was unlikely that any significant components of the Downtown Specific Plan would be built and in operation by 2017. ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS PLANNED BY 2017 The City’s East of 101 capital improvement program funds certain roadway and intersection improvements in the City’s East of 101 area through the collection of lawfully adopted impact fees. In accordance with the Mitigation Fee Act, impact fees are imposed on and collected from development projects in the East of 101 Area, held in a separate account, and used to fund improvements benefiting the area and the projects from which the fees were collected. Like other projects in the East of 101 Area, the project would pay a proportionate share towards these improvements. The City has just updated its capital improvement program list for the East of 101 Area. Based on currently available funding, projected growth rates, and the pending update, the City of South San Francisco Public Works Department expects that the following intersection improvements in the Project area will be funded and constructed by 2017. Accordingly, the improvements have been factored into the year 2017 Base Case traffic modeling. The improvements are: 1. S. Airport Boulevard/U.S. 101 Northbound Hook Ramps/Wondercolor Lane a. Add a second northbound off-ramp right turn lane. b. Add a second off-ramp lane connection to the U.S. 101 mainline. Traffic Figure 8, Year 2017 Intersection Lane Geometrics and Control, provides a schematic presentation of expected year 2017 intersection approach lanes and control. YEAR 2017 “WITHOUT PROJECT” INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE Traffic Table 12, Year 2017 Intersection Levels of Service shows that all intersections with year 2017 “Without Project” volumes would operate at acceptable Levels of Service with the following exceptions. PM Peak Hour • S. Airport Boulevard/Produce Avenue/San Mateo Avenue (signal) – LOS F • S. Airport Boulevard/Gateway Boulevard/Mitchell Avenue (signal) – LOS F • S. Airport Boulevard/U.S. 101 Northbound Hook Ramps/Wondercolor Lane (signal) – LOS F TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION DRAFT EIR / 4.0 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 4-24 Traffic Table 12 Intersection Level of Service Year 2017 AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Intersection Without Project With Project Without Project With Project S. Airport Blvd./Produce Ave./San Mateo Ave. (Signal) D-37.9(1) D-38.1 F-137.7 F-141.8 (1.01%)* S. Airport Blvd./Gateway Blvd./ Mitchell Ave. (Signal) D-45.2(1) D-51.1 F-143.6 F-145.1 (2.5%)* S. Airport Blvd./ US 101 NB Hook Ramps/ Wondercolor Lane (Signal) D-37.3(1) D-37.3 F-162.5 F-164.2 (1.1%)* Mitchell Ave./W. Harris Ave. (W. Harris Stop Sign Controlled) B-10.1(2) B-10.5 B-12.6 B-13.6 * Percent Project traffic added. Bolded = Significant Impact (1) Signalized level of service – control delay in seconds. (2) Unsignalized level of service – control delay in seconds. W. Harris stop sign controlled approach. Year 2000 Highway Capacity Manual Analysis Methodology – Synchro software program. Source: Crane Transportation Group YEAR 2017 “WITHOUT PROJECT” VEHICLE QUEUING AT INTERSECTIONS Traffic Table 13, Year 2017 95th Percentile Vehicle Queues, shows that no analyzed intersections would have 95th percentile year 2017 “Without Project” queuing exceeding available storage as determined using the Synchro software program. YEAR 2017 “WITHOUT PROJECT” OFF-RAMP QUEUING BACK TO FREEWAY MAINLINE Traffic Table 5 shows that the following off-ramp would have year 2017 “Without Project” queuing extending back to the U.S. 101 mainline one or more times during the peak traffic hours as determined using the SIM traffic software program. • U.S. 101 Northbound Off-Ramp to S. Airport Boulevard/Wondercolor Lane (AM & PM peak hours) YEAR 2017 “WITHOUT PROJECT” OFF-RAMP OPERATION AT DIVERGE FROM FREEWAY MAINLINE Traffic Table 6 shows that neither of the evaluated off-ramps would have year 2017 “Without Project” volumes exceeding 1,500 vehicles per hour on a one-lane off-ramp connection or 3,000 vehicles per hour on a two-lane off-ramp connection to the freeway mainline. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION DRAFT EIR / 4.0 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 4-25 Traffic Table 13 95th Percentile Vehicle Queuing Demand Year 2017 AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Street or Off-Ramp Movement Storage (ft.) Without Project (ft.) With Project (ft.) Without Project (ft.) With Project (ft.) S. Airport Blvd. WB Approach to Combined Left/Thru 1640 600 600 1400 1400 Produce Ave. Right Turn Free 100 100 150 150 S. Airport Blvd. EB Approach to Left Turn 170 125 125 100 100 Gateway/Mitchell Combined Thru/Right 960 500 525 350 375 US 101 SB Off- Ramp to Produce Ave. Off-Ramp Left Turn Lane 105 25 25 25 25 US 101 NB Off- Ramp to S. Airport Blvd./Wondercolor Lane All Off-Ramp Lanes 1930 1550 1575 700 700 Year 2000 Highway Capacity Manual Analysis Methodology – Synchro software program. Compiled by: Crane Transportation Group YEAR 2017 “WITHOUT PROJECT” ON-RAMP OPERATION Traffic Table 7 shows that no evaluated on-ramps would have year 2017 “Without Project” volumes exceeding ramp capacities. YEAR 2017 “WITHOUT PROJECT” U.S. 101 MAINLINE FREEWAY OPERATION Traffic Table 14 shows that the following mainline freeway segments would be operating at an unacceptable LOS with year 2017 “Without Project” volumes. • Southbound north of Oyster Point Boulevard (LOS F during the AM peak hour) and between the Produce Avenue on-ramp and I-380 (LOS F for this weave section during both the AM and PM peak hours). • Northbound between the Oyster Point Boulevard on-ramp and the Bayshore Boulevard off- ramp (LOS F for this weave section during both the AM and PM peak hours). TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION DRAFT EIR / 4.0 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 4-26 Traffic Table 14 Freeway Mainline Level of Service Year 2017 Without & With Project Year 2017 Year 2017 + Project Vol LOS Density* V/C** Vol LOS Density* V/C** % Project Traffic AM PEAK HOUR Southbound SB U.S. 101 North of Oyster Point (Basic) 9552 F 57.6 -- 9567 F 57.9 -- 0.16 SB Produce Ave. On-Ramp to I-380 Off-Ramp (Weave) 9486 F -- 1.25 9498 F -- 1.25 0.13 Northbound NB U.S. 101 North of I-380 (Basic) 10,358 D 30.3 -- 10,378 D 30.3 -- 0.19 NB U.S. 101 North of Oyster Point (Weave) 8192 F -- 1.05 8205 F -- 1.06 0.16 PM PEAK HOUR Southbound SB U.S. 101 North of Oyster Point (Basic) 6890 D 30.2 -- 6903 D 30.2 -- 0.19 SB Produce Ave. On-Ramp to I-380 Off-Ramp (Weave) 9697 F -- 1.5 9712 F -- 1.50 0.15 Northbound NB U.S. 101 North of I-380 (Basic) 7474 C 20.8 -- 7490 C 20.8 -- 0.21 NB U.S. 101 North of Oyster Point (Weave) 8467 F -- 1.12 8481 F -- 1.13 0.17 * Density = passenger cars/mile/lane. ** V/C = volume to capacity ratio. Year 2010 Highway Capacity Manual Analysis Methodology Source: Crane Transportation Group YEAR 2035 “WITHOUT PROJECT” CIRCULATION SYSTEM OPERATION The year 2035 “Without Project” conditions include traffic generated by all development detailed in the 2017 analysis, the last half of the Genentech master plan, the last part of Britannia Cove at Oyster Point, the last part of the Oyster Point Redevelopment area, the remaining half of the Gateway Master Plan as well as other increases in manufacturing, commercial, office, and R&D uses as determined by the City Planning Department. The daily and Peak Hour trip generation potential of all developments expected in the East of 101 Area by 2035 is presented in Table 15, Year 2035 “Without Project” Trip Generation. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION DRAFT EIR / 4.0 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 4-27 Traffic Table 15 Year 2035 Without Project Trip Generation Lane Use (ITE Code) Size/Unit Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Rate Total Trip Rate In/Out % In Out Total Trip Rate In/Out % In Out Total Genentech(1) 1,988 318 2,306 271 1,613 1,884 Oyster Point Redevelopment R&D/Office/ Retail 1,158* 244* 1,402* 426* 1,195* 1,621* Oyster Point Non- Redevelopment Area R&D(2) 680,499 sf 3.28 2,232 0.52 83:17 294 60 354 0.42 15:85 43 243 286 Ferry Terminal(3) (010) 1 berth 814 138 26 164 54 101 155 Marina (420) 716 berths 2.96 2119 0.08 33:67 19 38 57 0.19 60:40 82 54 136 Britannia Cove at Oyster Point 541 130 671 180 536 716 Commercial(2) (820) 693,302 sf 34:14 23,671 0.69 61:39 291 186 477 3.33 49:51 1,130 1,176 2,306 Home Center(2) (862) 290,794 sf 23.29 6,774 1.26 57.43 209 158 367 2.37 48:52 331 358 689 Hotel (310) 3,385 rooms 8.17 27,655 0.56 61:39 1,156 739 1,895 0.59 53:47 1,058 939 1,997 R&D(2) (760) (25% TDM Reduction) 8,505,185 3.28 27,898 0.52 83:17 3,671 752 4,423 0.42 15:85 536 3,037 3,573 Office(2) (710) (25% TDM Reduction) 1,230,570 sf 4.94 6,079 0.76 88:12 825 112 937 0.87 17:83 181 886 1,067 Manufacturing (140) (15% TDM Reduction) 11,227,507 sf 3.25 36,490 0.62 78:22 5,430 1,531 6,961 0.62 36:64 2,506 4,455 6,961 Total Trips 15,720 4294 20,014 6798 14,593 21,391 * Oyster Point Specific Plan and Phase 1 Project Draft EIR. (1) Trips based on existing land use as published in the Genentech EIR. (2) Rates developed from ITE equations. (3) Trips based on SF Bay Area Water Transit Authority (WTA) ridership forecast. Trip rate source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation (8th Edition) Compiled by: TJKM Associates TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION DRAFT EIR / 4.0 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 4-28 In addition to these specific developments, traffic on Airport Boulevard to/from Brisbane to the north as well as on Sister Cities Boulevard and other surface streets to the west of the U.S. 101 freeway were projected to grow from 2017 to 2035 at rates projected in the C/CAG regional model (after allowance for traffic to/from new development east of the 101 freeway). Year 2035 intersection AM and PM Peak Hour as well as U.S. 101 freeway segment traffic volumes were developed by TJKM Associates for the City’s Update of the East of 101 Capital Improvements Program. Year 2035 “Without Project” AM and PM Peak Hour intersection volumes are presented in Traffic Figures 9 and 10. ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS PLANNED BY 2035 All roadway improvements currently listed in the City’s November 21, 2012 Traffic Impact Fee Update 3 were assumed to be built and in operation for year 2035 “Without Project” evaluation. Traffic Figure 11, Year 2035 Intersection Lane Geometrics and Control, provides a schematic presentation of year 2035 intersection approach lanes and control. YEAR 2035 “WITHOUT PROJECT” INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE Traffic Table 16, 2035 Intersection Levels of Service, shows that all intersections with year 2035 “Without Project” volumes would be operating at acceptable levels of service with the following exceptions. AM Peak Hour • S. Airport Boulevard/Gateway Boulevard/Mitchell Avenue (signal) – LOS F • S. Airport Boulevard/U.S. 101 Northbound Hook Ramps/Wondercolor Lane (signal) – LOS F PM Peak Hour • S. Airport Boulevard/Produce Avenue/San Mateo Avenue (signal) – LOS F • S. Airport Boulevard/Gateway Boulevard/Mitchell Avenue (signal) – LOS F • S. Airport Boulevard/U.S. 101 Northbound Hook Ramps/Wondercolor Lane (signal) – LOS F YEAR 2035 “WITHOUT PROJECT” 95TH PERCENTILE VEHICLE QUEUING Traffic Table 17 Year 2035 95th Percentile Vehicle Queues, shows that only one analyzed intersection would have 95th percentile year 2035 “Without Project” queuing exceeding available storage as determined using the SYNCHRO software program. The northbound off-ramp to S. Airport Boulevard/Wondercolor Lane would have AM peak hour off-ramp queuing exceeding available storage (2,325 95th percentile queue and 1,930 feet of storage). 3 Willdan Financial Services. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION DRAFT EIR / 4.0 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 4-29 Traffic Table 16 Intersection Level of Service Year 2035 AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Intersection Without Project With Project Without Project With Project S. Airport Blvd./Produce Ave./San Mateo Ave. (Signal) D-39.4(1) D-39.3 F-205.6 F-208.4 (0.7%)* S. Airport Blvd./Gateway Blvd./ Mitchell Ave. (Signal) F-147.2(1) F-156.8 (1.9%)* F-182.0 F-182.0 (1.8%)* S. Airport Blvd./ US 101 NB Hook Ramps/ Wondercolor Lane (Signal) F-118.9(1) F-121.3 (0.9%)* F-176.7 F-177.7 (1.1%)* Mitchell Ave./W. Harris Ave. (W. Harris Stop Sign Controlled) B-12.8(2) B-13.7 C-17.4 C-19.8 * Percent Project traffic added. (1) Signalized level of service – control delay in seconds. (2) Unsignalized level of service – control delay in seconds. W. Harris stop sign controlled approach. Year 2000 Highway Capacity Manual Analysis Methodology – Synchro software program. Source: Crane Transportation Group Traffic Table 17 95th Percentile Vehicle Queuing Demand Year 2035 AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Street or Off-Ramp Movement Storage (ft.) Without Project (ft.) With Project (ft.) Without Project (ft.) With Project (ft.) S. Airport Blvd. WB Approach to Combined Left/Thru 2350 700 725 1925 1950 Produce Ave. Right Turn Free 125 125 100 100 S. Airport Blvd. EB Approach to Left Turn 850 675 700 250 250 Gateway/Mitchell Combined Thru/Right 1560 350 375 250 275 US 101 SB Off- Ramp to Produce Ave. Off-Ramp Left Turn Lane 105 25 25 25 25 US 101 NB Off- Ramp to S. Airport Blvd./Wondercolor Lane All Off-Ramp Lanes 1930 2325 2350 (.85% volume increase) 675 675 Year 2000 Highway Capacity Manual Analysis Methodology – Synchro software program. Compiled by: Crane Transportation Group TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION DRAFT EIR / 4.0 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 4-30 YEAR 2035 “WITHOUT PROJECT” OFF-RAMP QUEUING BACK TO FREEWAY MAINLINE Traffic Table 5, Off-Ramp Queuing Back to the Freeway Mainline, shows that the following off-ramps would have year 2035 “Without Project” queuing extending back to the U.S. 101 mainline one or more times during the peak traffic hours as determined using the SIM traffic software program. AM Peak Hour • U.S. 101 Northbound Off-Ramp to S. Airport Boulevard/Wondercolor Lane • U.S. 101 Southbound Off-Ramp to Produce Avenue PM Peak Hour • U.S. 101 Southbound Off-Ramp to Produce Avenue YEAR 2035 “WITHOUT PROJECT” OFF-RAMP OPERATION AT DIVERGE FROM FREEWAY MAINLINE Traffic Table 6, Off-Ramp Operation, shows that neither of the analyzed off-ramps would have year 2035 “Without Project” volumes exceeding 1,500 vehicles/hour on a one-lane off-ramp connection or 3,000 vehicles per hour on a two-lane off-ramp connection to the freeway mainline. YEAR 2035 “WITHOUT PROJECT” ON RAMP OPERATION Traffic Table 7, On-Ramp Operation, shows that only one analyzed on-ramp would have year 2035 “Without Project” volumes exceeding ramp capacities. The southbound on-ramp from Produce Avenue would have a PM peak hour volume of 3,741 vehicles with a capacity of only 3,300 vehicles per hour. YEAR 2035 “WITHOUT PROJECT” U.S. 101 FREEWAY MAINLINE OPERATION Traffic Table 18 shows the following mainline freeway segments with year 2035 “Without Project” volumes would be operating at unacceptable levels of service (LOS F). • Southbound north of Oyster Point Boulevard & between the Produce Avenue on-ramp and I-380 (LOS F during both the AM and PM peak hours). • Northbound between the Oyster Point Boulevard on-ramp and the Bayshore Boulevard off- ramp (LOS F for this weave section during both the AM and PM peak hours) and north of I-380 (LOS F during the AM peak hour). TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION DRAFT EIR / 4.0 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 4-31 Traffic Table 18 Freeway Mainline Level of Service Year 2035 Without & With Project Year 2035 Year 2035 + Project Vol LOS Density* V/C** Vol LOS Density* V/C** % Project Traffic AM PEAK HOUR Southbound SB U.S. 101 North of Oyster Point (Basic) 13,816 F > 60 -- 13,831 F > 60 -- 0.11 SB Produce Ave. On-Ramp to I-380 Off-Ramp (Weave) 12,888 F -- 1.69 12,900 F -- 1.69 0.09 Northbound NB U.S. 101 North of I-380 (Basic) 14,312 F 57.4 -- 14,332 F 57.7 -- 0.14 NB U.S. 101 North of Oyster Point (Weave) 10,073 F -- 1.30 10,086 F -- 1.30 0.13 PM PEAK HOUR Southbound SB U.S. 101 North of Oyster Point (Basic) 8672 F 45.1 -- 8685 F 45.2 -- 0.15 SB Produce Ave. On-Ramp to I-380 Off-Ramp (Weave) 12,806 F -- 2.24 12,821 F -- 2.24 0.12 Northbound NB U.S. 101 North of I-380 (Basic) 8344 C 23.3 -- 8360 C 23.3 -- 0.19 NB U.S. 101 North of Oyster Point (Weave) 10,928 F -- 1.67 10,942 F -- 1.67 0.13 * Density = passenger cars/mile/lane. ** V/C = volume to capacity ratio. Year 2010 Highway Capacity Manual Analysis Methodology Source: Crane Transportation Group 3.2.5 IMPACTS AND MITIGATION A. SIGNIFICANCE CRITERIA The significance of Project traffic impacts has been evaluated based upon state CEQA guidelines (environmental checklist form, Appendix G) as well as City of South San Francisco and C/CAG guidelines. Each set of guidelines is listed below. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION DRAFT EIR / 4.0 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 4-32 1. CEQA Guidelines Appendix G Would the Project: a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? 2. C/CAG Guidelines Implementation of the Project could have a significant effect on the environment if the Project would exceed 100 net new peak hour trips on the local roadway system. 3. City of South San Francisco Guidelines Implementation of the Project could have a significant effect on the environment if the Project would result in any of the following conditions: • Signalized intersection operation and all-way-stop intersection operation would change from Level of Service (LOS) A, B, C or D to LOS E or F and total volumes passing through the intersection would be increased by at least two percent. • Uncontrolled turn movements or stop sign controlled approaches at side street stop sign controlled intersections would change from LOS A, B, C, D or E to LOS F and total volumes passing through the intersection would be increased by at least two percent. Side street criteria are applicable only for stop sign controlled approaches with more than 25 trips during any peak traffic hour. • The Project would increase total volumes passing through an intersection by two percent or more with signalized or all-way stop operation already at a Base Case LOS E or F, or when the intersection is side street stop sign controlled and the stop sign controlled Base Case operation is at LOS F (and there are more than 25 vehicles on the stop sign controlled approach). • Project traffic would increase Base Case volumes at an unsignalized intersection to meet Peak Hour volume signal warrant criteria levels, or to meet pedestrian/school crossing signal warrant criteria levels. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION DRAFT EIR / 4.0 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 4-33 • The Project would increase traffic entering an unsignalized intersection by two percent or more with Base Case traffic levels already exceeding Peak Hour volume signal warrant criteria levels. • Project traffic would increase acceptable Base Case 95th percentile vehicle queuing on a freeway off-ramp and/or also on the approaches to adjacent intersections leading away from off-ramp intersections to unacceptable levels (as determined by the Synchro software program), or if Base Case 95th percentile queuing on the freeway off-ramps or on the approaches to adjacent intersections leading away from off-ramp intersections is already projected at unacceptable lengths, the Project would increase queuing volumes by one percent or more. • Project traffic results in queues exceeding off-ramp storage capacity based upon SIM traffic software evaluation. If base case traffic already exceeds the storage capacity of the off-ramp, then a one-percent addition in traffic to the off-ramp due to the Project is considered a significant impact. • Project traffic would degrade operation of the U.S. 101 freeway or freeway ramps from LOS E to LOS F with at least a one percent increase in volume, or would increase volumes by more than one percent on a freeway segment or a freeway ramp with Base Case LOS F operation. • If on-site circulation would be confusing to drivers and result in excessive traffic flow through various parts of the Project site. • Project development or Project traffic would produce a detrimental impact to local transit or shuttle service. • If, in the opinion of the registered traffic engineer conducting the EIR analysis, a significant traffic, pedestrian or bicycle safety concern would be created or worsened. For evaluation purposes, C/CAG and City of South San Francisco evaluation results have been grouped under the appropriate state CEQA guidelines criteria. B. PROJECT TRIP GENERATION Traffic Table 19, Project Trip Generation, shows that the 129-room Fairfield Inn & Suites hotel would be expected to generate about 1,150 daily two-way trips (575 in and 575 out), with 51 inbound and 36 outbound trips during the AM peak hour as well as 44 inbound and 47 outbound trips during the PM peak hour. While all trips would be newly added to the South San Francisco surface street system and to the U.S. 101 freeway ramps, a small proportion of guest trips would likely be attracted from traffic already traveling on the U.S. 101 freeway. Trip rates utilized in the analysis have come from the traffic engineering profession’s standard source of trip rate data, Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition, by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2012. It should be noted that year 2035 traffic modeling for the East of 101 area had included traffic from development of a 25-unit hotel on the Project site.4 Traffic from this smaller development was removed from the 2035 modeling results in order to develop a true “without” Fairfield Inn & Suites 4 See Appendix for trip generation projections from a 24-unit hotel. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION DRAFT EIR / 4.0 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 4-34 Project site development scenario. Traffic from the proposed 129-unit Project was then added to the system in order to provide “With Project” 2035 conditions. Traffic Table 19 Project Trip Generation Daily AM Peak Hour Trips PM Peak Hour Trips 2-Way Trips In Out In Out Use Size Rate Vol Rate Vol Rate Vol Rate Vol Rate Vol Hotel with Suites 129 rooms 8.92 1152 .39 51 .28 36 .34 44 .36 47 Trip Rate Source: Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition, by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2012 Compiled by: Crane Transportation Group B. PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION Project traffic was distributed to the regional roadway network partially based on East of 101 development traffic patterns contained in the 2001 EIR for the South San Francisco General Plan Amendment and Transportation Demand Ordinance, the 2008 Genentech Corporate Facilities Master EIR, and recent research for the East of 101 Traffic Modeling update traffic study (see Traffic Table 20, Project Trip Distribution). Minor adjustments were then made reflecting that most guests associated with the proposed Project would likely be destined to/from the U.S. 101 freeway and would access the freeway via the S. Airport Boulevard/Wondercolor Lane ramps for northbound traffic and the S. Airport Boulevard/Produce Avenue ramps for southbound traffic. Some hotel employee traffic would also be destined to/from the freeway, although some would also be expected to use the surface street system west of the freeway and live in the local area. The AM and PM peak hour Project traffic increment would be distributed to the local roadway network as shown in Traffic Figures 12 and 13. Resultant Existing “With Project AM and PM peak hour volumes are presented in Traffic Figures 14 and 15, year 2017 “With Project” AM and PM peak hour volumes are presented in Traffic Figures 16 and 17, while year 2035 “With Project” AM and PM peak hour volumes are presented in Traffic Figures 18 and 19. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION DRAFT EIR / 4.0 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 4-35 Traffic Table 20 Project Trip Distribution AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Direction In Out In Out U.S. 101 North/San Francisco/ Brisbane 32 36 30 32 U.S. 101 South(1) 41 36 41 36 South San Francisco (Central & West Areas)(2) 21 6 9 19 Local East of U.S. 101(3) 6 22 20 13 TOTAL 100% 100% 100% 100% (1) Also includes use of S. Airport Blvd. to/from I-380 interchange. (2) Primarily employees. (3) Primarily guests to/from East of 101 businesses. Source: City of South San Francisco, Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact report, South San Francisco General Plan Amendment and Transportation Demand Management Ordinance, April 2001, Genentech Central Campus Master Plan EIR, Crane Transportation Group Projections of Hotel Guest & Employee Origins & Destinations IMPACT ANALYSIS CEQA TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC CRITERIA A Would the project conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? EXISTING WITH PROJECT IMPACTS Impact 1: The Project would not result in any significant intersection level of service significant impacts under Existing “With Project” conditions. (Less than Significant) Traffic Table 3, Existing Intersection Levels of Service shows that the addition of Project traffic would not result in an unacceptable level of service at any of the study intersections under Existing “With Project” conditions. All study area intersections would operate at an acceptable level of service. This impact would be less than significant. Mitigation Measure: None required. Impact 2: The Project would not result in any significant vehicle queuing impacts at any analyzed location under Existing “With Project” conditions. (Less than Significant) TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION DRAFT EIR / 4.0 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 4-36 Traffic Table 4, Existing 95th Percentile Queuing Demand, and Traffic Table 5, Off-Ramp Vehicle Queuing to the Freeway Mainline, show that the addition of Project traffic to existing volumes would not result in any unacceptable vehicle queuing at any analyzed location. The impact would be less than significant. Mitigation Measure: None required. Impact 3: The Project would not increase peak hour volumes at any study off-ramp above acceptable diverge capacity limits under existing with Project conditions. (Less than Significant) Traffic Table 6, Off-Ramp Capacity and Volumes, shows that the addition of Project traffic would not increase peak hour volumes above acceptable diverge capacity limits at any study off- ramps under Existing with Project conditions. This impact would be less than significant. Mitigation Measure: None required. Impact 4: The Project would not increase Peak Hour volumes at any study on- ramp above acceptable capacity limits under Existing with Project conditions. (Less than Significant) Traffic Table 7, On-Ramp Capacity and Volumes shows that the addition of Project traffic would not increase Peak Hour volumes above acceptable capacity limits at any study on-ramps under Existing with Project conditions. This impact would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: None required. Impact 5: The Project would not degrade the level of service of any U.S. 101 freeway mainline segments under Existing with Project conditions. (Less than Significant) Traffic Table 8, Existing Freeway Mainline Levels of Service shows that the addition of Project traffic would not result in an unacceptable level of service at any of the study freeway mainline segments operating acceptably under Existing with Project conditions. In addition, Project traffic would not increase volumes by more than 1 percent on segments already experiencing unacceptable operation. This impact would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: None required. YEAR 2017 WITH PROJECT IMPACTS Impact 6: The Project would not increase traffic volumes above acceptable capacity limits at any study intersection under 2017 with Project conditions. Project traffic would, however, increase volumes by more TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION DRAFT EIR / 4.0 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 4-37 than 2 percent at an intersection already experiencing unacceptable operation. (Potentially Significant; Less Than Significant with Mitigation) Traffic Table 12, Year 2017 Intersection Levels of Service shows that the addition of Project- related traffic would not result in an unacceptable level of service at any intersection. However, Project traffic would increase PM peak hour volumes by more than 2 percent (2.5%) at the S. Airport/Gateway Boulevard/Mitchell Avenue intersection, which would already be experiencing unacceptable operation. This would be a potentially significant impact. Mitigation Measure 6: Intersection Level of Service • S. Airport Boulevard/Gateway Boulevard/Mitchell Avenue The applicant shall provide a fair share contribution as determined by the City Engineer to go towards provision of a third lane on the westbound Mitchell Avenue approach to the S. Airport Boulevard/Gateway Boulevard intersection (as shown in Traffic Figure 20, Year 2017 Mitigated Intersection Lane Geometrics and Control). The full fair share payment shall be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy by the City. Impact After Mitigation: Measure 6 would improve “with Project” PM peak hour operation to LOS F-120.8 seconds control delay, which would be better than “without Project” operation (LOS F-143.6 seconds control delay). The City has determined that the intersection improvements described in Mitigation Measure 6 are feasible and would restore intersection operations to an acceptable level. The City has a traffic impact fee program pursuant to which the City will collect funds from all future development in the East of 101 area to construct these improvements. With the payment of the Project’s fair share of the cost of this improvement, the Project’s impact would be reduced to a less than significant level. Impact 7: The Project would not result in any significant vehicle queuing impacts at any analyzed intersection based upon Synchro software methodology for 2017 With Project conditions. However, the Project would increase off-ramp volumes by more than 1 percent on the Northbound Off-ramp to S. Airport Boulevard/Wondercolor Lane, where Without Project volumes would be backing up to the freeway mainline. (Significant and Unavoidable) Traffic Table 13, Year 2017 95th Percentile Queuing Demand shows that the addition of project traffic would not result in unacceptable 95th percentile vehicle queuing between intersections under 2017 “With Project” conditions. However, Traffic Table 5, Year 2017 Off-Ramp Vehicle Queuing Back to the Freeway Mainline, shows that the proposed project will increase off-ramp volumes by more than 1 percent on the northbound off-ramp to S. Airport Boulevard/Wondercolor Lane where “Without Project” volumes would already be backing up to the freeway mainline. • Northbound Off-Ramp to S. Airport Boulevard/Wondercolor Lane (AM & PM peak hours) TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION DRAFT EIR / 4.0 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 4-38 + 1.1 % during the AM peak hour + 1.8 % during the PM peak hour Mitigation Measure 7: The applicant shall provide a fair share contribution as determined by the City Engineer to go towards the following measures. Airport Boulevard/San Mateo Avenue/Product Avenue • Adjust signal timing. This measure is required to clear northbound/westbound S. Airport Boulevard traffic through this intersection and eliminate backups extending through the Gateway and Wondercolor intersections. S. Airport Boulevard/U.S. 101 Northbound Hook Ramps/Wondercolor Lane • Restripe the northbound S. Airport Boulevard approach to provide two left turn lanes and one combined through/right turn lane. • Widen the northbound on-ramp to provide two departure lanes, which will then merge to a single lane before merging to the freeway mainline. • Adjust signal timing. • Reconfigure the northbound off-ramp intersection approach to S. Airport Boulevard to provide two exclusive left turn lanes, one shared through/right turn lane and one exclusive right turn lane. Resultant 2017 With Project Operation would be: PM Peak Hour: LOS D-42.8 seconds control delay, which would be better than “Without Project” operation (LOS F-162.5 seconds control delay) Impact After Mitigation: Mitigation Measure 7 would eliminate AM and PM peak hour backups to the freeway mainline (with or without the Project) during the AM and PM peak hours (as shown in Traffic Figure 20, Year 2017 Mitigated Intersection Lane Geometrics and Control). However, the restriping of the northbound intersection approach and associated signalization equipment changes along with the widening of the on-ramp departure to two lanes are not on the City’s Traffic Improvement Program (TIP) and the cost would be excessive for the proposed Project to fund. The City has determined that the intersection improvements described in Mitigation Measure 7 are infeasible for the proposed Project to fully fund and freeway off-ramp backups to the freeway mainline would not be mitigated to less than significant. The individual measures, by themselves, would not eliminate the significant impact. While the low cost signal timing adjustment could be provided and would provide some improvement, by itself it would not reduce the impact to a less than significant level. The City will need to incorporate these new improvements into the East of 101 TIP. Therefore, this impact would remain significant and unavoidable. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION DRAFT EIR / 4.0 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 4-39 Impact 8: The Project would not increase peak hour volumes at any study off- ramp above acceptable diverge capacity limits under 2017 With Project conditions. (Less than Significant) Traffic Table 6, Off-Ramp Capacity and Volumes shows that the addition of Project traffic would not increase peak hour volumes above acceptable diverge capacity limits at any study off- ramps under 2017 “With Project” conditions. This impact would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: None required. Impact 9: The Project would not increase Peak Hour volumes at any study on- ramp above acceptable capacity limits under 2017 with Project conditions. (Less than Significant) Traffic Table 7, On-Ramp Capacity and Volumes shows that the addition of Project traffic would not increase Peak Hour volumes above acceptable capacity limits at any study on-ramps under 2017 with Project conditions. This impact would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: None required. Impact 10: The Project would not degrade the level of service of any U.S. 101 freeway mainline segments under 2017 with Project conditions. (Less than Significant) Traffic Table 14, 2017 Freeway Mainline Levels of Service shows that the addition of Project traffic would not result in an unacceptable level of service at any of the study freeway mainline segments operating acceptably under 2017 with Project conditions. In addition, Project traffic would not increase volumes by more than 1 percent on segments already experiencing unacceptable operation. This impact would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: None required. YEAR 2035 WITH PROJECT IMPACTS Impact 11: The Project would not increase traffic volumes above acceptable capacity limits at any study intersection under 2035 with Project conditions. (Less than Significant) Traffic Table 16, Year 2035 Intersection Level of Service shows that the addition of Project traffic would not result in an unacceptable level of service at any intersection. In addition, Project traffic would not increase volumes by more than 2 percent at any intersection experiencing unacceptable “Without Project” operation. This impact would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: None required. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION DRAFT EIR / 4.0 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 4-40 Impact 12: The Project would not result in any significant vehicle queuing impacts at any analyzed intersection based upon Synchro software methodology (95th percentile) for 2035 With Project conditions. However, Project traffic would increase volumes on the US 101 southbound off-ramp to Produce Avenue by more than 1 percent during both the AM and PM peak traffic hours where Without Project off-ramp traffic is projected to be backing up to the freeway mainline. (Significant and Unavoidable) Traffic Table 17, Year 2035 95th Percentile Queuing Demand shows that the addition of Project traffic would not result in unacceptable 95th percentile vehicle queuing between intersections under 2035 “With Project” conditions.5 However, Traffic Table 5, Year 2035 Off- Ramp Vehicle Queuing Back to the Freeway Mainline, shows that the proposed project will increase off-ramp volumes by more than 1 percent on the southbound off-ramp to Product Avenue where “Without Project” volumes would already be backing up to the freeway mainline. • Southbound Off-Ramp to Produce Avenue (AM & PM peak hours) + 1.3 % during the AM peak hour + 1.5 % during the PM peak hour Mitigation Measure 12: The applicant shall provide a fair share contribution as determined by the City Engineer to go towards the following measures. Airport Boulevard/San Mateo Avenue/Produce Avenue • Adjust signal timing. • Provide a second right turn lane on the northbound Produce Avenue approach to eastbound S. Airport Boulevard with the same curvature as the existing right turn lane. Signal control both right turn lanes and provide overlap phasing with the westbound left turn movement. S. Airport Boulevard/Gateway Avenue/Mitchell Avenue • Extend the left turn lanes on the eastbound S. Airport Boulevard approach to Gateway Boulevard/Mitchell Avenue to at least 225 feet. Mitchell Avenue/West Harris Avenue • Provide a left turn lane on the eastbound Mitchell Avenue approach to West Harris Avenue. This will just require restriping the existing 40-foot curb-to-curb width in order to provide a 12-foot-wide left turn lane as well as 14-foot-wide east and westbound thru travel lanes. 5 The percent increase for evaluation purposes is based upon volumes (found in Table 6), not the increase in queue length. The volume increase due to the Project for this movement is 0.85 and is included in Table 17. Also, all queue demand results are to the foot, but have been rounded upwards to the next 25-foot increment. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION DRAFT EIR / 4.0 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 4-41 • Paint a “Keep Clear” message on the pavement on westbound Mitchell Avenue at West Harris Avenue. Resultant 2035 With Project Operation at Airport Boulevard/Produce Avenue/San Mateo Avenue would be: AM Peak Hour: LOS D-38.6 seconds control delay PM Peak Hour: LOS F-205.4 seconds control delay, which would be better than “Without Project” operation (LOS F-205.6 seconds control delay) Impact After Mitigation: Mitigation Measure 12 would eliminate AM and PM peak hour backups to the freeway mainline (with or without the Project) during the AM and PM peak hours (as shown in Traffic Figure 21, Year 2035 Mitigated Intersection Lane Geometrics and Control). Measures at the Mitchell Avenue/West Harris Avenue intersection while not on the City’s TIP for this area are low cost and could be implemented by the Project. However, at the Airport Boulevard/San Mateo Avenue/Produce Avenue intersection, the added right turn lane and dual right turn lane signalization are not on the City’s Traffic Improvement Program (TIP) and the cost would be excessive for the proposed Project to fund. Therefore, the City has determined that the intersection improvements described in Mitigation Measure 12 for the Airport Boulevard/San Mateo Avenue/Produce Avenue intersection are infeasible. The Project could not fully fund all the mitigations therefore freeway off-ramp backups to the freeway mainline would not be mitigated to an acceptable level. The City will need to incorporate these new improvements into the East of 101 TIP. This impact would remain significant and unavoidable. Impact 13: The Project would not increase peak hour volumes at any study off- ramp above acceptable diverge capacity limits under 2035 With Project conditions. (Less than Significant) Traffic Table 6, Off-Ramp Capacity and Volumes shows that the addition of Project traffic would not increase peak hour volumes above acceptable diverge capacity limits at any study off- ramps under 2035 “With Project” conditions. Note that a second off-ramp line connection to the freeway mainline will be constructed by 2017, thereby raising diverge capacity to 3,000 vehicles per hour. Thus, while projected diverge capacities will exceed current capacity limits, they will be under future capacity thresholds. This impact would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: None required. Impact 14: The Project would not increase Peak Hour volumes at any study on- ramp above acceptable capacity limits under 2035 with Project conditions. (Less than Significant) Traffic Table 7, On-Ramp Capacity and Volumes shows that the addition of Project traffic would not increase Peak Hour volumes above acceptable capacity limits at any study on-ramps under 2035 with Project conditions. In addition, at the one on-ramp where PM peak hour “without TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION DRAFT EIR / 4.0 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 4-42 Project” volumes would already exceed capacity (Southbound On-Ramp from Produce Avenue), the addition of Project traffic would only increase volumes by 0.4%, which is less than the 1% traffic added significance criteria level. This impact would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: None required. Impact 15: The Project would not degrade the level of service of any U.S. 101 freeway mainline segments under 2035 with Project conditions. (Less than Significant) Traffic Table 18, 2035 Freeway Mainline Levels of Service shows that the addition of Project traffic would not result in an unacceptable level of service at any of the study freeway mainline segments operating acceptably under 2035 with Project conditions. In addition, Project traffic would not increase volumes by more than 1 percent along those segments of U.S. 101 projected to be experiencing unacceptable Without Project operation. This impact would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: None required. Impact 16: The Project would not measurably increase use of local or regional transit facilities. (Less than Significant) Few Project guests would be expected to use bus, rail or ferry service to access the proposed hotel. Shuttle service to/from San Francisco International Airport would be expected for some people and these trips are included in the Project trip generation projections. In addition, a less than significant number of employees would be expected to use transit to access the Project site due to the lack of frequent bus service to the Project site vicinity and lack of normal shift times for a large number of the employees, when transit service would be less frequent than during normal commute times. Mitigation Measures: None required. Impact 17: The Project would not measurably increase use of local pedestrian or bicycle facilities. (Less than Significant) Few, if any Project guests would be expected to utilize local pedestrian facilities due to the industrial nature of the area. However, sidewalks and intersection crosswalks are in place between the hotel and downtown South San Francisco as well as restaurants in the immediate area. Also, few if any guests would be expected to bring bicycles to the hotel or, if they did, ride along local streets due to the industrial nature of the area and traffic congestion (including trucks) during commute periods. While the partially completed Bay Trail bicycle path is in the east of 101 area, it is doubtful if many guests would avail themselves of this facility. The hotel would be half a block from the US 101 freeway and in an industrial area. There is no suggestion that the hotel would be appealing to guests interested in extensive nearby bicycle or pedestrian facilities. A few employees may decide to commute by bicycle if they live in South San Francisco or San Bruno; however bicycling is TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION DRAFT EIR / 4.0 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 4-43 anticipated to be infrequent, due to the heavy traffic volumes on the local roadways. Minimal bicycle traffic was observed on local roadways during several field surveys. Mitigation Measures: None required. CEQA TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC CRITERIA B Would the Project conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? Impact 18: Trips generated by the Project would be less than 100 net new trips during the AM or PM Peak Hour. (Less than Significant) Traffic Table 19, Project Trip Generation shows that the Project would result in 87 new two-way trips during the AM Peak Hour and 91 new two-way trips during the PM Peak Hour, which is less than the C/CAG threshold of 100 net new trips. C/CAG Agency Guidelines for implementation of the 2011 Final Congestion Management Program (C/CAG Guidelines) specify that local jurisdictions must ensure that the developer and/or tenants would mitigate all new Peak Hour trips (including the first 100 trips) projected to be generated by a development. Since the project would not exceed this threshold, the applicant will not be required to implement a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Program. Mitigation Measure: None required. CEQA TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC CRITERIA C Would the Project result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? The Project would produce no changes to air traffic patterns. As noted in the Initial Study (Attachment A) the Project would be 85 feet below the maximum permitted by the Airport Land Use Commission and the Federal Aviation Administration. This would be a less than significant impact. CEQA TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC CRITERIA D Would the Project substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? Impact 19: Project-related traffic would access West Harris Avenue via two driveways where safety impacts may result due to potential limited sight line issues. (Potentially Significant; Less than Significant with Mitigation) The Project site will be served via two driveway connections to West Harris Avenue, one at the north end of the site and one at the south end of the site. Sight lines at each location are as follows. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION DRAFT EIR / 4.0 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 4-44 Traffic Table 21 Sight Lines at Project Driveway Connections to West Harris Avenue North Driveway South Driveway Sight Line to South 420’ *, ** 200’ * Sight Line to North (and East) 350’ 350’ ** * To the Mitchell Avenue intersection. ** Assuming sight lines not blocked by on-street parking. Source: Crane Transportation Group Travel speeds along West Harris Avenue are about 20 to 25 miles per hour at the north end of the project site and about 20 miles per hour at the south end of the site. Based upon data from A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets,6 the minimum stopping sight distance on a level street at 20 miles per hour is 115 feet, and at 25 miles per hour 155 feet. Therefore, sight lines for drivers exiting either Project driveway would be acceptable, assuming sight lines are not blocked by on- street parking, which is currently allowed today along the site frontage. In particular, trucks now park along the Project frontage, which can reduce site lines for an exiting driver down to 60 feet. Allowing on-street parking along the Project frontage (west side) of West Harris Avenue in close proximity to Project driveways could limit sight lines to unacceptable distances. This would be a potentially significant impact. Mitigation Measure 19: The applicant and City shall be responsible for the following safety improvements. These improvements shall be provided before occupancy. • Prohibit truck parking along the entire Project frontage. • Prohibit all on-street parking along the Project frontage at least 80 feet north of the south Project driveway, and at least 40 feet south of the north Project driveway. Impact after Mitigation: Implementation of the measures listed above in Mitigation Measure 19, which are feasible, would reduce this impact to a less than significant level. Impact 20: On-site circulation would adequately conform to City guidelines and good traffic engineering practice. (Less than Significant) Parking would be provided on three sides of the building; east, west and south. A 25 foot wide access aisle (i.e., interior roadway) would be provided around the building. The east and west parking areas would include parking on both sides of the aisle, while parking along the southern side would be single loaded (i.e., one side only). A pickup/drop off area would be provided adjacent to the lobby access. All proposed parking would be at 90 degrees. The aisles would be 25 feet wide adjacent to all parking spaces, which meets City criteria and provides standard and adequate back-up area for passenger vehicles. The access aisle along the north side of the building would be 20 feet wide with no adjacent parking. This also meets City 6 American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2011. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION DRAFT EIR / 4.0 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 4-45 criteria. Both driveway connections to West Harris Avenue would be 30 feet wide, and meet City criteria. The design features of the internal circulation plan allow for one to two point back up movements and would not create significant operational or safety concerns for vehicles or pedestrians. The hotel is targeted for business and leisure travel patrons. Patrons would not be expected to all arrive and depart at the same time and would not have to circle for parking, as is typical when arriving or departing a movie theatre or other event that has specific arrival and departure times. Safety and circulation impacts associated with the site plan would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: None required. CEQA TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC CRITERIA E Would the Project result in inadequate emergency access? Impact 21: Project Access will be provided by two driveway connections to West Harris Avenue. (Less than Significant) Access would be provided to the Project site via two driveway connections to West Harris Avenue, one on each side of the hotel structure. Access between driveways internal to the site would be provided via parking aisles around all sides of the hotel. This would provide acceptable emergency access for the site, as discussed in the Initial Study (Appendix A). Mitigation Measure: None required. CEQA TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC CRITERIA F Would the Project conflict with adopted policies, plans or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? Impact 22: The Project would provide a sidewalk connection between the hotel lobby entrance and the sidewalk along West Harris Avenue. Also, sidewalks would be provided along all four sides of the hotel building and serve hotel access doorways along each building frontage. Walkways are clearly marked and vegetation does not appear to block line of sight. On-site pedestrian infrastructure appears adequate. (Less than Significant) Mitigation Measures: None required. Impact 23: There are no transit routes or bicycle routes in operation or planned adjacent to the Project site along West Harris Avenue, a dead end street. The Project would not conflict with any policies or decrease the performance of any nearby transit or bicycle facilities. (Less than Significant) Mitigation Measure: None required. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION DRAFT EIR / 4.0 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 4-46 Traffic Table 22 Project Site Trip Generation Used in TJKM 2035 Model Daily AM Peak Hour Trips PM Peak Hour Trips 2-Way Trips In Out In Out Use Size Rate Vol Rate Vol Rate Vol Rate Vol Rate Vol Hotel with Suites 25 rooms 8.92 224 .39 10 .28 7 .34 9 .36 9 Trip Rate Source: Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition, by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2012 Compiled by: Crane Transportation Group Figure 1 NORTH Not To Scale Area Map 101 Mitchell Ave S . A i r p o r t B l v d W a y H a r b o r Blvd Gate w a y Air p o r t B l v d Grand A v e Gr a n d A v e Grand view Dr Sa n M a t e o A v e Pr o d u c e A v e For b e s 101 Sister C i t i e s B l v d Bay s h o r e B l v d Oyster Point Blvd Exe c u t i v e D r B l v d Dub u q u e A v e Eccle s Ave G u l l Rd Alle r t o n Ave Li t t l e f i e l d A v e Utah A v e 380 East E Grand Roe b l i n g R d PROJECT SITE W Harris Ave = Signal Figure 2 Existing Lane Geometrics and Intersection Control STOP = Side Street Stop Sign Controlled Intersection STOP W H a r r i s STOPMitchell Ave NORTH Not To Scale STOP STO P STO P S T O P STO P STO P STOP STO P Mitchell Ave Driveways Gate w a y B l v d W H a r r i s A v e S Airpo r t B l v d A i r p o r t B l v d US 1 0 1 S B O f f r a m p US 1 0 1 N B O f f r a m p U S 1 0 1 N B O n r a m p Wondercolor Ln S A i r p o r t B l v d P r o d u c e A v e San M a t e o A v e 101 101 101 101 PROJECT SITE STOP STOP STO P San Ma t e o Ave S Airpo r t B l v d P r o d u c e A v e A i r p o r t B l v d Gateway Blvd Airport Blvd Mitchell Ave S Airport Blvd S Airport Blvd S Airport Blvd US 101 NB Onramp US 101 NB Offramp Wonder- color NORTH Not To Scale = Signal Figure 3 Existing Weekday AM Peak Hour Volumes Mitchell W H a r r i s 6 7 82 440 27 73 STOP STO P STO P S T O P STO P STO P STOP STO P Mitchell Ave Driveways Gate w a y B l v d W H a r r i s A v e S Airpo r t B l v d A i r p o r t B l v d US 1 0 1 S B O f f r a m p US 1 0 1 N B O f f r a m p U S 1 0 1 N B O n r a m p Wondercolor Ln S A i r p o r t B l v d P r o d u c e A v e San M a t e o A v e 101 101 101 101 PROJECT SITE Mitchell Ga t e w a y S A i r p o r t S Airport 7 98 25 344 330 438 6 134 139 81 186 404 Wonder-US 101 NB Ramps Color S A i r p o r t 12 10 13 6 17 12 76 339 261 164 364 842 S Airport San Mateo A i r p o r t P r o d u c e 52 183 220 272 34643186 147680 52 178 110 101 SB OfframpP r o d u c e 50 485 Figure 4 Existing Weekday PM Peak Hour Volumes NORTH Not To Scale = Signal STOP STO P STO P S T O P STO P STO P STOP STO P Mitchell Ave Driveways Gate w a y B l v d W H a r r i s A v e S Airpo r t B l v d A i r p o r t B l v d US 1 0 1 S B O f f r a m p US 1 0 1 N B O f f r a m p U S 1 0 1 N B O n r a m p Wondercolor Ln S A i r p o r t B l v d P r o d u c e A v e San M a t e o A v e 101 101 101 101 PROJECT SITE Mitchell Ga t e w a y S A i r p o r t S Airport 8 121 4 418 123 73 424 239 148590 409 41 Mitchell W H a r r i s 12 11 130 949 105 147 Wonder-US 101 NB Ramps Color S A i r p o r t 36 13 11 8 17 26 130 595 435282 159 591101 SB OfframpP r o d u c e 44 335 S Airport San Mateo A i r p o r t P r o d u c e 465 213 755 22835 93 182120091 145 160 239 NORTH Not To Scale Figure 5 Transit and Shuttle Routes C C SOUTH SAN FRANCISCOCALTRAIN STATION 1 2 Bus & Shuttle stops nearest Project Site 264 S Airport Blvd S Airport Blvd/Utah Ave 255 S Airport Blvd Mitchell Ave Gate w a y B l v d E G r a n d A v e Grand Ave Grand A v e W H a r r i s A v e A i r p o r t B l v d Utah A v e Ha r b o r B l v d S A i r p o r t B l v d Sa n M a t e o A v e PROJECT SITE P r o d u c e A v e Wonder- color Ln 101 101 = Caltrain = SamTrans Route 292 = Utah-Grand Area (BART) Shuttle = Utah-Grand Area Employer Shuttle = Utah-Grand Area (Ferry) Shuttle = SamTrans Route 397 = SamTrans Route 38 1 3 3 2 Figure 6 2017 (without Project) Weekday AM Peak Hour Volumes S Airport San Mateo A i r p o r t P r o d u c e 76 183 221 332 37351211 147689 121 196 115 Wonder-US 101 NB Ramps Color S A i r p o r t Mitchell W H a r r i s 7 9 82 457 32 88 53 64 27 55 17 9 76 286 512 180 428 1299 NORTH Not To Scale = Signal STOP STO P STO P S T O P STO P STO P STOP STO P Mitchell Ave Driveways Gate w a y B l v d W H a r r i s A v e S Airpo r t B l v d A i r p o r t B l v d US 1 0 1 S B O f f r a m p US 1 0 1 N B O f f r a m p U S 1 0 1 N B O n r a m p Wondercolor Ln S A i r p o r t B l v d P r o d u c e A v e San M a t e o A v e 101 101 101 101 PROJECT SITE Mitchell Ga t e w a y S A i r p o r t S Airport 7 101 27 357 1026 445 6 173 190 97 205 414 101 SB OfframpP r o d u c e 56 538 Figure 7 2017 (without Project) Weekday PM Peak Hour Volumes Mitchell W H a r r i s 2 2 420 222 130 20 NORTH Not To Scale = Signal STOP STO P STO P S T O P STO P STO P STOP STO P Mitchell Ave Driveways Gate w a y B l v d W H a r r i s A v e S Airpo r t B l v d A i r p o r t B l v d US 1 0 1 S B O f f r a m p US 1 0 1 N B O f f r a m p U S 1 0 1 N B O n r a m p Wondercolor Ln S A i r p o r t B l v d P r o d u c e A v e San M a t e o A v e 101 101 101 101 PROJECT SITE Mitchell Ga t e w a y S A i r p o r t S Airport 14 121 4 427 130 136 918 278 308597 452 67 Wonder-US 101 NB Ramps Color S A i r p o r t 125 35 39 88 77 26 131 707 449334 175 700 101 SB OfframpP r o d u c e 50 585 S Airport San Mateo A i r p o r t P r o d u c e 458 261 1224 265197 157 1981114105 191 176 253 = Signal Figure 8 2017 Lane Geometrics and Intersection Control STOP = Side Street Stop Sign Controlled Intersection STOP W H a r r i s STOPMitchell Ave NORTH Not To Scale STOP STO P STO P S T O P STO P STO P STOP STO P Mitchell Ave Driveways Gate w a y B l v d W H a r r i s A v e S Airpo r t B l v d A i r p o r t B l v d US 1 0 1 S B O f f r a m p U S 1 0 1 N B O f f r a m p U S 1 0 1 N B O n r a m p Wondercolor Ln S A i r p o r t B l v d P r o d u c e A v e San M a t e o A v e 101 101 101 101 PROJECT SITE STOP STOP STO P San Ma t e o Ave S Airpo r t B l v d P r o d u c e A v e A i r p o r t B l v d Gateway Blvd Airport Blvd Mitchell Ave S Airport Blvd S Airport Blvd S Airport Blvd US 101 NB Onramp US 101 NB Offramp Wonder- color NORTH Not To Scale = Signal STOP STO P STO P S T O P STO P STO P STOP STO P Mitchell Ave Driveways Gate w a y B l v d W H a r r i s A v e S Airpo r t B l v d A i r p o r t B l v d US 1 0 1 S B O f f r a m p U S 1 0 1 N B O f f r a m p U S 1 0 1 N B O n r a m p Wondercolor Ln S A i r p o r t B l v d P r o d u c e A v e San M a t e o A v e 101 101 101 101 PROJECT SITE Figure 9 2035 (without Project) Weekday AM Peak Hour Volumes S Airport San Mateo A i r p o r t P r o d u c e Mitchell W H a r r i s 8 10 82 919 33 94 77 233 236 526 801160213 244838 137 278 142 Mitchell Ga t e w a y S A i r p o r t S Airport 6 106 24 787 1101 495 6 194 394 550 247 526 Wonder-US 101 NB Ramps Color S A i r p o r t 94 87 28 65 19 15 120 544 280 219 445 1825 101 SB OfframpP r o d u c e 85 1064 Figure 10 2035 (without Project) Weekday PM Peak Hour Volumes Mitchell W H a r r i s 3 3 736 186 98 19 NORTH Not To Scale = Signal STOP STO P STO P S T O P STO P STO P STOP STO P Mitchell Ave Driveways Gate w a y B l v d W H a r r i s A v e S Airpo r t B l v d A i r p o r t B l v d US 1 0 1 S B O f f r a m p U S 1 0 1 N B O f f r a m p U S 1 0 1 N B O n r a m p Wondercolor Ln S A i r p o r t B l v d P r o d u c e A v e San M a t e o A v e 101 101 101 101 PROJECT SITE Mitchell Ga t e w a y S A i r p o r t S Airport 7 101 3 750 103 135 1623 510 338582 541 242 Wonder-US 101 NB Ramps Color S A i r p o r t 117 70 45 105 76 15 401 722 327468 225 650 101 SB OfframpP r o d u c e 65 785 S Airport San Mateo A i r p o r t P r o d u c e 548 334 2073 475206 185 206 140899 183 205 260 = Signal Figure 11 2035 Lane Geometrics and Intersection Control STOP = Side Street Stop Sign Controlled Intersection STOP W H a r r i s STOPMitchell Ave NORTH Not To Scale STOP STO P STO P S T O P STO P STO P STOP STO P Mitchell Ave Driveways Gate w a y B l v d W H a r r i s A v e S Airpo r t B l v d A i r p o r t B l v d US 1 0 1 S B O f f r a m p U S 1 0 1 N B O f f r a m p U S 1 0 1 N B O n r a m p Wondercolor Ln S A i r p o r t B l v d P r o d u c e A v e San M a t e o A v e 101 101 101 101 PROJECT SITE S Airport Blvd S Airport Blvd US 101 NB Onramp US 101 NB Offramp Wonder- color Mitchell Ave Gateway Blvd Airport Blvd S Airport Blvd A i r p o r t B l v d S Airpo r t B l v d P r o d u c e A v e San Ma t e o Ave STO P Figure 12 AM Peak Hour Project Increment S Airport San Mateo A i r p o r t P r o d u c e 1 1 12 15 8 3 Mitchell W H a r r i s 4 132 50 NORTH Not To Scale = Signal STOP STO P STO P S T O P STO P STO P STOP STO P Mitchell Ave Driveways Gate w a y B l v d W H a r r i s A v e S Airpo r t B l v d A i r p o r t B l v d US 1 0 1 S B O f f r a m p U S 1 0 1 N B O f f r a m p U S 1 0 1 N B O n r a m p Wondercolor Ln S A i r p o r t B l v d P r o d u c e A v e San M a t e o A v e 101 101 101 101 PROJECT SITE Mitchell Ga t e w a y S A i r p o r t S Airport 3 26 4 14 14 21 Wonder-US 101 NB Ramps Color S A i r p o r t 13 1 1 20 101 SB OfframpP r o d u c e 15 Figure 13 PM Peak Hour Project Increment S Airport San Mateo A i r p o r t P r o d u c e 7 2 15 13 2 2 Mitchell W H a r r i s 2 245 42 NORTH Not To Scale = Signal STOP STO P STO P S T O P STO P STO P STOP STO P Mitchell Ave Driveways Gate w a y B l v d W H a r r i s A v e S Airpo r t B l v d A i r p o r t B l v d US 1 0 1 S B O f f r a m p US 1 0 1 N B O f f r a m p U S 1 0 1 N B O n r a m p Wondercolor Ln S A i r p o r t B l v d P r o d u c e A v e San M a t e o A v e 101 101 101 101 PROJECT SITE Mitchell Ga t e w a y S A i r p o r t S Airport 7 17 5 24 16 18 Wonder-US 101 NB Ramps Color S A i r p o r t 14 2 2 16 101 SB OfframpP r o d u c e 13 NORTH Not To Scale = Signal Mitchell W H a r r i s 10 8 82 440 59 123 STOP STO P STO P S T O P STO P STO P STOP STO P Mitchell Ave Driveways Gate w a y B l v d W H a r r i s A v e S Airpo r t B l v d A i r p o r t B l v d US 1 0 1 S B O f f r a m p US 1 0 1 N B O f f r a m p U S 1 0 1 N B O n r a m p Wondercolor Ln S A i r p o r t B l v d P r o d u c e A v e San M a t e o A v e 101 101 101 101 PROJECT SITE Mitchell Ga t e w a y S A i r p o r t S Airport 11 112 39 365 330 438 9 134 139 81 212 404 Wonder-US 101 NB Ramps Color S A i r p o r t 12 10 13 6 17 12 89 340 262 164 364 862 S Airport San Mateo A i r p o r t P r o d u c e 52 184 221 284 36143186 155680 52 181 110 101 SB OfframpP r o d u c e 50 500 Figure 14 Existing + Project Weekday AM Peak Hour Volumes NORTH Not To Scale = Signal STOP STO P STO P S T O P STO P STO P STOP STO P Mitchell Ave Driveways Gate w a y B l v d W H a r r i s A v e S Airpo r t B l v d A i r p o r t B l v d US 1 0 1 S B O f f r a m p US 1 0 1 N B O f f r a m p U S 1 0 1 N B O n r a m p Wondercolor Ln S A i r p o r t B l v d P r o d u c e A v e San M a t e o A v e 101 101 101 101 PROJECT SITE Mitchell Ga t e w a y S A i r p o r t S Airport 15 138 9 442 139 91 424 239 148590 409 41 Mitchell W H a r r i s 14 13 130 949 150 189 Wonder-US 101 NB Ramps Color S A i r p o r t 36 13 11 8 17 26 144 597 437282 159 607101 SB OfframpP r o d u c e 44 348 S Airport San Mateo A i r p o r t P r o d u c e 472 215 770 24135 93 184120091 145 162 239 Figure 15 Existing + Project Weekday PM Peak Hour Volumes S Airport San Mateo A i r p o r t P r o d u c e 76 184 222 344 38851211 155689 121 199 115 Wonder-US 101 NB Ramps Color S A i r p o r t Mitchell W H a r r i s 11 10 82 457 64 138 53 64 27 55 17 9 89 287 513 180 428 1319 NORTH Not To Scale = Signal STOP STO P STO P S T O P STO P STO P STOP STO P Mitchell Ave Driveways Gate w a y B l v d W H a r r i s A v e S Airpo r t B l v d A i r p o r t B l v d US 1 0 1 S B O f f r a m p US 1 0 1 N B O f f r a m p U S 1 0 1 N B O n r a m p Wondercolor Ln S A i r p o r t B l v d P r o d u c e A v e San M a t e o A v e 101 101 101 101 PROJECT SITE Mitchell Ga t e w a y S A i r p o r t S Airport 11 115 41 378 1026 445 9 173 190 97 231 414 101 SB OfframpP r o d u c e 56 553 Figure 16 2017 With Project Weekday AM Peak Hour Volumes Mitchell W H a r r i s 4 4 420 222 175 62 NORTH Not To Scale = Signal STOP STO P STO P S T O P STO P STO P STOP STO P Mitchell Ave Driveways Gate w a y B l v d W H a r r i s A v e S Airpo r t B l v d A i r p o r t B l v d US 1 0 1 S B O f f r a m p US 1 0 1 N B O f f r a m p U S 1 0 1 N B O n r a m p Wondercolor Ln S A i r p o r t B l v d P r o d u c e A v e San M a t e o A v e 101 101 101 101 PROJECT SITE Mitchell Ga t e w a y S A i r p o r t S Airport 21 138 9 451 146 154 918 278 308597 452 67 Wonder-US 101 NB Ramps Color S A i r p o r t 125 35 39 88 77 26 145 709 451334 175 716 101 SB OfframpP r o d u c e 50 598 S Airport San Mateo A i r p o r t P r o d u c e 465 263 1239 278197 157 2001114105 191 178 253 Figure 17 2017 with Project Weekday PM Peak Hour Volumes NORTH Not To Scale = Signal STOP STO P STO P S T O P STO P STO P STOP STO P Mitchell Ave Driveways Gate w a y B l v d W H a r r i s A v e S Airpo r t B l v d A i r p o r t B l v d US 1 0 1 S B O f f r a m p U S 1 0 1 N B O f f r a m p U S 1 0 1 N B O n r a m p Wondercolor Ln S A i r p o r t B l v d P r o d u c e A v e San M a t e o A v e 101 101 101 101 PROJECT SITE S Airport San Mateo A i r p o r t P r o d u c e Mitchell W H a r r i s 12 11 82 919 65 144 77 234 237 538 816160213 252838 137 281 142 Mitchell Ga t e w a y S A i r p o r t S Airport 11 120 38 808 1101 495 9 194 394 550 273 526 Wonder-US 101 NB Ramps Color S A i r p o r t 94 87 28 65 19 15 133 545 281 219 445 1845 101 SB OfframpP r o d u c e 85 1079 Figure 18 2035 with Project Weekday AM Peak Hour Volumes Mitchell W H a r r i s 5 5 736 186 143 61 NORTH Not To Scale = Signal STOP STO P STO P S T O P STO P STO P STOP STO P Mitchell Ave Driveways Gate w a y B l v d W H a r r i s A v e S Airpo r t B l v d A i r p o r t B l v d US 1 0 1 S B O f f r a m p U S 1 0 1 N B O f f r a m p U S 1 0 1 N B O n r a m p Wondercolor Ln S A i r p o r t B l v d P r o d u c e A v e San M a t e o A v e 101 101 101 101 PROJECT SITE Mitchell Ga t e w a y S A i r p o r t S Airport 14 118 8 774 119 153 1623 510 338582 541 242 Wonder-US 101 NB Ramps Color S A i r p o r t 117 70 45 105 76 15 415 724 329468 225 666 101 SB OfframpP r o d u c e 65 798 S Airport San Mateo A i r p o r t P r o d u c e 555 336 2088 488206 185 208 140899 183 207 260 Figure 19 2035 with Project Weekday PM Peak Hour Volumes = Signal Figure 20 NORTH Not To Scale STOP STO P STO P S T O P STO P STO P STOP STO P Mitchell Ave Driveways Gate w a y B l v d W H a r r i s A v e S Airpo r t B l v d A i r p o r t B l v d US 1 0 1 S B O f f r a m p U S 1 0 1 N B O f f r a m p U S 1 0 1 N B O n r a m p Wondercolor Ln S A i r p o r t B l v d P r o d u c e A v e San M a t e o A v e 101 101 101 101 PROJECT SITE STOP STOP STO P San Ma t e o Ave S Airpo r t B l v d P r o d u c e A v e A i r p o r t B l v d T STOP Mitchell Ave S Airport Blvd S Airport Blvd US 101 NB Onramp US 101 NB Offramp Wonder- color T Restripe from through to left turn lane Provide 2nd departure lane = Timing optimized for queue reduction = Added or restriped lane T Mitigated 2017 Lane Geometrics and Intersection Control for Level of Service and SimTraffic Queue Reduction Restripe from left/through and right to left and through/right lanes Restripe from left/through and right to left and through/right lanes. Provide protected signal phasing Gateway Blvd Airport Blvd Mitchell Ave S Airport Blvd Add 2nd westbound through lane Mitigated for Level of Service Improvements for SimTraffic queue mitigation Improvements for SimTraffic queue mitigation = Signal Figure 21 Mitigated 2035 Lane Geometrics and Intersection Control for SimTraffic Queue Reduction STOP = Side Street Stop Sign Controlled Intersection STOP W H a r r i s STOP Mitchell Ave NORTH Not To Scale STOP STO P STO P S T O P STO P STO P STOP STO P Mitchell Ave Driveways W H a r r i s A v e S Airpo r t B l v d US 1 0 1 S B O f f r a m p U S 1 0 1 N B O f f r a m p U S 1 0 1 N B O n r a m p Wondercolor Ln S A i r p o r t B l v d P r o d u c e A v e San M a t e o A v e 101 101 101 101 PROJECT SITE Mitchell Ave Gateway Blvd Airport Blvd T T = Timing optimized for queue reduction = Added or restriped lane A i r p o r t B l v d S Airpo r t B l v d P r o d u c e A v e San Ma t e o Ave Add secong right turn lane and sig- nalize approach to Airport Blvd (with right turn overlap) T Extend eastbound left turn lanes to 225’ Gat e w a y B l v d S Airport Blvd Add eastbound left turn lane Paint “KEEP CLEAR” on Pavement Mitigations recommended for 2017 assumed to be in place in 2035 KEEP CLEAR A i r p o r t B l v d DRAFT EIR / 5.0 ALTERNATIVES 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 5-1 5.0 ALTERNATIVES 5.1 INTRODUCTION Alternatives are evaluated in an EIR to provide information on whether or not a variation of a proposed project would reduce or eliminate the project’s significant impacts within the basic framework of the objectives. CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6(a) specifies that the range of reasonable alternatives to be included in an EIR must consist of alternatives that “would feasibly attain most of the basic objectives of the project but would avoid or substantially lessen any of the significant effects of the project.” The range of alternatives studied in the EIR must be broad enough to permit a reasoned choice by decision-makers when considering the merits of the project. CCR Section 15126.6(f) specifies that the range of alternatives is governed by the “rule of reason,” requiring the evaluation of only those alternatives “necessary to permit a reasoned choice.” Further, an EIR “need not consider an alternative whose effect cannot be reasonably ascertained and whose implementation is remote and speculative.” CCR Section 15126.6(e) requires the analysis of a “No Project Alternative.” The purpose of describing and analyzing a No Project Alternative is to allow decision makers to compare the impacts of approving the proposed project with the impacts of not approving the proposed project. The No Project Alternative is the circumstance under which the Project would not proceed. The No Project Alternative shall discuss the existing conditions at the time the notice of preparation is published as well as what is reasonably expected to occur in the foreseeable future if the project were not approved based on current plans and consistent with available infrastructure. In both cases, the consequences of not approving the project must be discussed. Alternatives that are remote, infeasible or speculative should not be discussed in the alternatives analysis (14 CCR Section 15126.6(a)). The alternatives analysis shall focus on reducing or avoiding significant environmental impacts associated with the project as proposed “even if these alternatives would impede to some degree the attainment of the project objectives, or would be more costly’ (CCR Section 15126.6(b)). Additionally, 14 CCR Section 15126.6 (f) Rule of Reason also states that the EIR: “…set forth only those alternatives necessary to permit a reasoned choice. The alternatives shall be limited to ones that would avoid or substantially lessen any of the significant effects of the project. Of those alternatives, the EIR need examine in detail only the ones that the Lead Agency determines could feasibly attain most of the basic objectives of the project.” The Project is described and evaluated for its environmental impacts in Section 4.0 and the initial study contained in Appendix A of this EIR. The EIR analysis identifies potentially significant impacts and mitigation measures to avoid these impacts and significant unavoidable impacts related to traffic and circulation. The alternatives selected for analysis in this section were identified based on the ability of these alternatives to avoid or lessen the significant environmental impacts of the Project, while attempting to meet the basic 5.0 ALTERNATIVES DRAFT EIR / 5.0 ALTERNATIVES 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 5-2 objectives of the Project and the No Project alternative required by law. Therefore, the evaluation of alternatives provided herein address traffic and circulation impacts. 5.2 PROJECT ALTERNATIVES Alternatives in the EIR should be feasible, and should attain most of the basic project objectives. Objectives of the 127 West Harris Project originates, in part, from the development goals contained in City’s General Plan, including the East of 101 Area Plan. The General Plan designates the Project site “Business Commercial” (BC). The land use framework of the General Plan is guided by several key principles. Principals are intended to provide opportunities for continued evolution of the City’s economy, from manufacturing and warehousing/distribution to high technology and biotechnology opportunities and business serving commercial land uses. The BC designation is intended for business and professional office and visitor service establishments and retail. Permitted uses include administrative, financial, business, professional, medical and public offices, and visitor- oriented and regional commercial activities. The General Plan (page 42) specifically notes: This category is intended for the emerging commercial and hotel district along South Airport, Gateway and Oyster Point Boulevards, and South Spruce Corridor. Maximum FAR for hotel developments shall be 1.2 with increases to a maximum total FAR of 2.0 for development meeting specified criteria. The Project site is zoned Freeway Commercial (FC). The FC zoning is one of a group of four zoning districts identified under Chapter 20.110 Employment Districts. FC zoning is intended for regional-serving retail uses, commercial lodging, visitor services and similar uses that benefit from proximity to the Bayshore Freeway [i.e., U.S. 101]. Hotels are a permitted use within this zoning classification. The goals of the Project are to: 1. Develop the project site with a high quality hotel use by partnering with a high quality hotelier, Marriott Hotels. 2. Develop a hotel use to own and operate for the long term. 3. Develop a hotel use that serves both business and leisure travelers and the City of South San Francisco. 4. Develop a project that is close to and connects with nearby transportation hubs such as SFO Airport, Caltrain, BART and Ferry service to give guests many options to meet their business and leisure travel needs. 5. Develop a hotel use with 128 guest rooms, the minimum number of rooms to insure the project’s economic feasibility. 6. Incorporate high-quality architecture, landscaping and sustainable design elements that are in line with the East of 101 Area guidelines. 5.0 ALTERNATIVES DRAFT EIR / 5.0 ALTERNATIVES 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 5-3 7. Provide bus transportation for our guests, to the airport, local businesses and public transportation stations helping to reduce the local traffic burden. 8. Provide an indoor swimming pool so that guests can enjoy the amenity all year long. 9. Meet or exceed Marriott and California State Green energy initiatives. 10. Provide an exceptional working environment for more than 50 employees. 11. Become a partner and work closely with the local Chamber of Commerce to make the City of South San Francisco a better place to work and live. 5.3 OVERVIEW OF SIGNIFICANT AND UNAVOIDABLE IMPACTS OF THE PROJECT Development of the Project would result in two significant and unavoidable impacts, excerpted below, with respect to traffic and circulation. The mitigation measures would reduce part of the impact but not wholly, and as a result, two impacts would remain significant and unavoidable. The underlined portions of the mitigation measures identify the impacts that would remain significant and unavoidable. Impact 7: The Project would increase off-ramp volumes by more than 1 percent on the Northbound Off-ramp to S. Airport Boulevard/Wondercolor Lane, where Without Project volumes would be backing up to the freeway mainline. (Significant and Unavoidable) Mitigation Measure 7: The applicant shall provide a fair share contribution as determined by the City Engineer to go towards the following measures. Airport Boulevard/San Mateo Avenue/Product Avenue • Adjust signal timing. This measure is required to clear northbound/westbound S. Airport Boulevard traffic through this intersection and eliminate backups extending through the Gateway and Wondercolor intersections. S. Airport Boulevard/U.S. 101 Northbound Hook Ramps/Wondercolor Lane • Restripe the northbound S. Airport Boulevard approach to provide two left turn lanes and one combined through/right turn lane. • Widen the northbound on-ramp to provide two departure lanes, which will then merge to a single lane before merging to the freeway mainline. • Adjust signal timing. • Reconfigure the northbound off-ramp intersection approach to S. Airport Boulevard to provide two exclusive left turn lanes, one shared through/right turn lane and one exclusive right turn lane. 5.0 ALTERNATIVES DRAFT EIR / 5.0 ALTERNATIVES 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 5-4 Resultant 2017 With Project Operation would be: PM Peak Hour: LOS D-42.8 seconds control delay, which would be better than “Without Project” operation (LOS F-162.5 seconds control delay) Impact After Mitigation: Mitigation Measure 7 would eliminate AM and PM peak hour backups to the freeway mainline (with or without the Project) during the AM and PM peak hours (as shown in Traffic Figure 20, Year 2017 Mitigated Intersection Lane Geometrics and Control). The restriping of the northbound intersection approach and associated signalization equipment changes along with the widening of the on-ramp departure to two lanes are not on the City’s Traffic Improvement Program (TIP) and the cost would be excessive beyond the Project’s fair share contribution for the Project to fund entirely. The City has determined that the intersection improvements described in Mitigation Measure 7 are infeasible for the Project to fully fund and freeway off-ramp backups to the freeway mainline would not be mitigated to less than significant. The individual measures, by themselves, would not eliminate the significant impact. While the low cost signal timing adjustment could be provided and would provide some improvement, by itself it would not reduce the impact to a less than significant level. The City will need to incorporate these new improvements into the East of 101 TIP. Therefore, this impact would remain significant and unavoidable. Impact 12: The Project would not result in any significant vehicle queuing impacts at any analyzed intersection based upon Synchro software methodology for 2035 With Project conditions. However, Project traffic would increase volumes on the US 101 southbound off-ramp to Produce Avenue by more than 1 percent during both the AM and PM peak traffic hours where Without Project off-ramp traffic is projected to be backing up to the freeway mainline. (Significant and Unavoidable ) The Project would increase off-ramp volumes by more than 1 percent on the northbound off-ramp to S. Airport Boulevard/Wondercolor Lane where “Without Project” volumes would already be backing up to the freeway mainline. • Northbound Off-Ramp to S. Airport Boulevard/Wondercolor Lane (AM & PM peak hours) + 1.1 % during the AM peak hour + 1.8 % during the PM peak hour The Project would increase off-ramp volumes by more than 1 percent on the southbound off-ramp to Product Avenue where “Without Project” volumes would already be backing up to the freeway mainline. • Southbound Off-Ramp to Produce Avenue (AM & PM peak hours) + 1.3 % during the AM peak hour + 1.5 % during the PM peak hour Mitigation Measure 12: The applicant shall provide a fair share contribution as determined by the City Engineer to go towards the following measures. 5.0 ALTERNATIVES DRAFT EIR / 5.0 ALTERNATIVES 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 5-5 Airport Boulevard/San Mateo Avenue/Produce Avenue • Adjust signal timing. • Provide a second right turn lane on the northbound Produce Avenue approach to eastbound S. Airport Boulevard with the same curvature as the existing right turn lane. Signal control both right turn lanes and provide overlap phasing with the westbound left turn movement. S. Airport Boulevard/Gateway Avenue/Mitchell Avenue • Extend the left turn lanes on the eastbound S. Airport Boulevard approach to Gateway Boulevard/Mitchell Avenue to at least 225 feet. Mitchell Avenue/West Harris Avenue • Provide a left turn lane on the eastbound Mitchell Avenue approach to West Harris Avenue. • Paint a “Keep Clear” message on the pavement on westbound Mitchell Avenue at West Harris Avenue. Resultant 2035 With Project Operation at Airport Boulevard/Produce Avenue/San Mateo Avenue would be: AM Peak Hour: LOS D-38.6 seconds control delay PM Peak Hour: LOS F-205.4 seconds control delay, which would be better than “Without Project” operation (LOS F-205.6 seconds control delay) Impact After Mitigation: Mitigation Measure 12 would eliminate AM and PM peak hour backups to the freeway mainline (with or without the Project) during the AM and PM peak hours. However, at the Airport Boulevard/San Mateo Avenue/Produce Avenue intersection, the added right turn lane and dual right turn lane signalization are not on the City’s Traffic Improvement Program (TIP) and the cost would be beyond the Project’s fair share contribution to fund. Also, measures at the Mitchell Avenue/West Harris Avenue intersection are also not on the City’s TIP for this area and for the proposed Project. Therefore, the City has determined that the identified intersection improvements described in Mitigation Measure 12 are infeasible. The Project could not fully fund all the identified mitigation measures, and therefore freeway off-ramp backups to the freeway mainline would not be mitigated to less than significant level. The City will need to incorporate these new improvements into the East of 101 TIP. This impact would remain significant and unavoidable. 5.0 ALTERNATIVES DRAFT EIR / 5.0 ALTERNATIVES 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 5-6 5.4 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS Three alternatives to the Project are evaluated in this EIR. Each alternative is examined for its ability to reduce environmental impacts relative to the Project, feasibility of implementation, and ability to meet Project objectives. The alternatives analysis is consistent with other environmental impact reports prepared for the East of 101 Area. The alternatives are: No Project Alternative-Existing Conditions Vacant Undeveloped and Variants 0.75 Floor Area Ratio (FAR)- 96-room hotel 0.50 FAR-64-room hotel The 0.75 and 0.50 FAR thresholds are analyzed to remain consistent with the alternatives analysis performed in other environmental documents in the East of 101 area. It should be noted that, the Project would have to be reduced by 55 percent to reach a less than significant impact in 2017. A reduction of 65 percent would be necessary to drop below a level of significance for 2035 impacts. Therefore 55 percent reduction (to 70 rooms) would be necessary to reduce traffic impacts to less than significant for both 2017 and 2035 impacts. SIGNIFICANT UNAVOIDABLE IMPACTS ALTERNATIVES COMPARISON Year 2017 Impact Year 2035 Impact Summary of Significant Unavoidable Impact (SU) NB US 101 off Ramp connection to S. Airport at Wondercolor Ln/ AM and PM Peak Hour 13 SB US 101 off ramp connection to Produce Ave. / AM and PM Peak Hour % of Project # of Rooms No Project 0 No Impact No Impact 0.75 96 Remains SU Remains SU 0.50 64 Less than Significant Less than Significant ALTERNATIVE 1: NO PROJECT Description The “No Project” analysis focuses on the existing conditions as well as what would reasonably be expected to occur in the foreseeable future if the Project was not approved (CCR Section 15126.6(e) (2) and (3) (B)). Three variants of the No Project Alternative are identified below. • The Undeveloped No Project Alternative would result in a vacant undeveloped site. The site would remain in its current condition as a vacant site. • A Reduced Development No Project Alternative assumes a smaller 70 room hotel. 5.0 ALTERNATIVES DRAFT EIR / 5.0 ALTERNATIVES 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 5-7 • A Retail Commercial Development Alternative assumes development of other types of uses permitted in the Freeway Commercial District (Chapter 20.110 Employment Districts). The types of uses could be pet stores, public safety facilities, full service restaurants, personal services, public utilities and large format retail. Impact Analysis None of the impacts associated with the Project would occur under the Undeveloped No Project Alternative or the Reduced Hotel Alternative. A low intensity Retail Commercial Development Alternative could reduce Project impacts to less than significant, if the specific intensity of use did not trigger traffic impacts. The No Project Alternative development variants would not fulfill the Project’s Objectives or any of the East of 101 Area Plan’s stated purpose of maximizing the potential of underdeveloped or underused properties in the City’s East of 101 Area. According to the City’s Finance Department there are 17 business serving hotels within the City of which 70 percent have 100 guest rooms or more, and 10 economy hotels within the City of which 80 percent have less than 100 guest rooms (Transit Oriented Tax [TOT] FY 2013-14, Angelia Teaupa). A few higher quality business and leisure serving hotels under 100 rooms include boutique products (Inn at Oyster Point) and specialized developers such as the Hampton Inn (99 rooms). Business serving hotels typically provide more amenities than economy hotels, and therefore a higher number of rooms are provided to offset increased costs. The types of services and amenities to be provided inform development and operational costs as well as the quality of construction, location, cost of site preparation and in some cases like the Project, hazardous material remediation. A smaller hotel would likely result in value engineering, which promotes the substitution of materials with less expensive alternatives and can result in a lesser quality project. The Applicant has indicated that a 128 room product is at the lowest threshold of guest rooms to insure the Project’s economic feasibility for a limited service Marriott Hotel product. Therefore it is reasonable to assume that a higher quality business serving hotel would not be feasible, and if a hotel were built it would be an economy hotel. All hotels are required to pay a conference center tax of $2.50 per room to support the City’s Conference Center at 255 Airport Boulevard. The conference center is approximately 0.75 miles from the Project site. The No Project and Reduced Project Alternatives would not be feasible for this developer and would not meet the Project objectives. The synergy of use and revenue to the City would likely remain unrealized for a longer period of time. Development of a smaller hotel on the site would likely not achieve the City’s goals identified in the Downtown Station Area Plan, as noted in Chapter 3.0 Project Description. The Project site is approximately 100 feet from the southeastern edge of the Downtown Station Area Plan, in what is identified as the “Eastern Neighborhood.” The Eastern Neighborhood, will experience land use changes from Industrial to Research and Development/Office and Commercial. Abandoned rail spurs and the Colma Creek channel 5.0 ALTERNATIVES DRAFT EIR / 5.0 ALTERNATIVES 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 5-8 will be converted to Open Space. A higher quality business serving hotel product would lend support to these land use changes, i.e., provide a quality hotel product for business and leisure travelers. A Retail Commercial Development Alternative would likely not provide for the needs of the traveling public with the exception of a full service restaurant. Pet stores, public safety facilities, personal services, utilities and large format retail are not business serving, nor are they proposed by the Applicant. The East of 101 Traffic Impact fees are based upon a fee per square foot of development. The fee is used to construct area-wide traffic improvements in the East of 101. Ability to Accomplish Project Objectives The No Project Alternative variants would not meet the following Project objectives. 1. Develop the project site with a high quality hotel use by partnering with a high quality hotelier, Marriott Hotels. 2. Develop a hotel use to own and operate for the long term. 3. Develop a hotel use that serves both business and leisure travelers and the City of South San Francisco. 4. Develop a project that is close to and connects with nearby transportation hubs such as SFO Airport, Caltrain, BART and Ferry service to give guests many options to meet their business and leisure travel needs. 5. Develop a hotel use with 128 guest rooms, the minimum number of rooms to insure the project’s economic feasibility. 6. Incorporate high-quality architecture, landscaping and sustainable design elements that are in line with the East of 101 Area guidelines. 7. Provide bus transportation for our guests, to the airport, local businesses and public transportation stations helping to reduce the local traffic burden. 8. Provide an indoor swimming pool so that guests can enjoy the amenity all year long. 9. Meet or exceed Marriott and California State Green energy initiatives. 10. Provide an exceptional working environment for more than 50 employees. 11. Become a partner and work closely with the local Chamber of Commerce to make the City of South San Francisco a better place to work and live. 5.0 ALTERNATIVES DRAFT EIR / 5.0 ALTERNATIVES 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 5-9 The No Project Alternative variants would not meet Project feasibility thresholds. Alternative 2: 0.75 Floor Area Ratio Description The Project would be a 96 room hotel. Impact Analysis Both significant and unavoidable impacts would remain with the 0.75 FAR Alternative. However it is worthy to note that the significant and unavoidable impacts relate to the delay in traffic queuing and flow. The significant and unavoidable impacts do not increase air quality, greenhouse gas, health risks, noise exposure or hazards and hazardous materials impacts; these impacts would still remain less than significant. The impacts associated with the Project relate to traffic queuing and flow only. All environmental impacts associated with aesthetics, agriculture and forest resources, air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, land use and planning, mineral resources, noise, population and housing, public services, recreation, and utilities and service systems are considered less than significant. The Project would have either no impact or a less than significant impact with respect to the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. As identified in the Initial Study (see Appendix A) and Chapter 6 of this DEIR, the Project would not have environmental effects that would cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The reduced project alternative would not eliminate the impacts associated with traffic. There would be no environmental benefit with this alternative. The Applicant has indicated that 128 rooms is the bright line for economic feasibility of the Project. Another hotel developer could apply for entitlements to construct a hotel and it would likely not be of the same quality as a Marriott product. Ability to Accomplish Project Objectives At a minimum the following Project objectives would likely not be met: 1. Develop the project site with a high quality hotel use by partnering with a high quality hotelier, Marriott Hotels. 5.0 ALTERNATIVES DRAFT EIR / 5.0 ALTERNATIVES 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 5-10 4. Develop a project that is close to and connects with nearby transportation hubs such as SFO Airport, Caltrain, BART and Ferry service to give guests many options to meet their business and leisure travel needs. 7. Provide bus transportation for our guests, to the airport, local businesses and public transportation stations helping to reduce the local traffic burden. 8. Provide an indoor swimming pool so that guests can enjoy the amenity all year long. 9. Meet or exceed Marriott and California State Green energy initiatives. The 96-room hotel would likely be value engineered and amenities would likely be reduced or eliminated, such as the indoor swimming pool. A hotel providing less amenities would likely not support the synergy of use supporting the Downtown Station Area Plan and the General Plan goals of intensifying development opportunities on vacant and underutilized properties to the extent that a hotel providing more services on the site would. Alternative 3: 0.50 Floor Area Ratio Description The Project would be a 64 room hotel. Impact Analysis Both significant and unavoidable impacts would be eliminated. The Applicant would likely not build the Project. As stated in the project objectives, 128 rooms is the bright linedefined by the Applicant for fiscal feasibility. The Project would likely be value engineered to provide no services and result in being an economy hotel. Another hotel developer could apply for entitlements to construct a hotel and it would likely be an economy hotel product. Ability to Accomplish Project Objectives Reducing the Project by half would likely not meet the following objectives: 1. Develop the project site with a high quality hotel use by partnering with a high quality hotelier, Marriott Hotels. 2. Develop a hotel use to own and operate for the long term. 3. Develop a hotel use that serves both business and leisure travelers and the City of South San Francisco. 4. Develop a project that is close to and connects with nearby transportation hubs such as SFO Airport, Caltrain, BART and Ferry service to give guests many options to meet their business and leisure travel needs. 5.0 ALTERNATIVES DRAFT EIR / 5.0 ALTERNATIVES 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 5-11 5. Develop a hotel use with 128 guest rooms, the minimum number of rooms to insure the project’s economic feasibility. 6. Incorporate high-quality architecture, landscaping and sustainable design elements that are in line with the East of 101 Area guidelines. 7. Provide bus transportation for our guests, to the airport, local businesses and public transportation stations helping to reduce the local traffic burden. 8. Provide an indoor swimming pool so that guests can enjoy the amenity all year long. 9. Meet or exceed Marriott and California State Green energy initiatives. 10. Provide an exceptional working environment for more than 50 employees. 11. Become a partner and work closely with the local Chamber of Commerce to make the City of South San Francisco a better place to work and live. The 96-room hotel would likely be value engineered and amenities would likely be reduced or eliminated, such as the indoor swimming pool. A hotel providing less amenities would likely not support the synergy of use supporting the Downtown Station Area Plan and the General Plan goals of intensifying development opportunities on vacant and underutilized properties to the extent that a hotel providing more services on the site would. 5.5 ENVIRONMENTALLY SUPERIOR ALTERNATIVE An EIR is required to identify an environmentally superior alternative. CCR Section 15126.6(e)(2) notes “if the environmentally superior alternative is the ‘no project’ alternative, the EIR shall also identify an environmentally superior alternative among the other alternatives.” The alternatives to a project are intended to minimize adverse impacts to the environment (CCR 14 Section 15126.6 (b). Public Resources Code, Division 13 Section 21002.1 (c) states that “if economic, social, or other considerations make it infeasible to mitigate one or more significant effects on the environment of a project, the project may nonetheless be carried out or approved at the discretion of the public agency if the project is otherwise permissible under applicable laws and regulations.” The No Project Alternative would avoid all of the significant environmental impacts of the Project which are related to traffic and circulation. The No Project Alternative would not result in the environmental benefits of site development that would occur under new laws and regulations designed to improve environmental quality and sustainability that have come into effect over the years. The site would likely remain fenced with no trespassing signs, and would likely be periodically vandalized as it has been in the past. As noted in Chapter 3 Project Description and the Initial Study (Appendix A) the site has been broken into, fires have been built and dumping has occurred. 5.0 ALTERNATIVES DRAFT EIR / 5.0 ALTERNATIVES 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 5-12 The site would not contribute to the Downtown Station Area Plan planning efforts, would not generate tax revenue for the City and would not result in developing a business and leisure serving Marriott quality hotel. The No Project Alternative would not result in implementation of the measures the Project proposes to foster environmental sustainability, such as exceeding CalGreen Building Standards and improve environmental quality by remediating the hazardous materials located on the site. As noted in Chapter 3, Project Description the site contains metal concentrations (arsenic and chromium) above California Environmental Screening Levels (ESLs) for shallow soils are present on the site. Additionally low levels of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH), polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) above ESLs are also present in shallow soils. Various metals from stockpiles soils, including: arsenic, barium, beryllium, chromium, cobalt, copper, lead, mercury, nickel, vanadium and zinc were at concentrations above the laboratory method reporting limits. Site remediation is proposed as part of the Project. The No Project Alternative would not meet any of the key objectives of the Project. The 0.5 Floor Area Ratio Alternative (or 0.55 FAR) would not be developed by the Applicant. As identified in the Applicant’s objectives, to meet a Marriott quality hotel 128 rooms are necessary, provide an indoor swimming pool, breakfast service, shuttle service to the airport and exceed CalGreen Building standards. Another hotel developer could apply for entitlements to construct a hotel and it would likely be an economy product. A quality restaurant that conforms to the general plan and zoning specifications for the site could arguably be the superior environmental alternative, provided that the amount of traffic would not trigger the same circulation impacts associated with the Project. A restaurant would not have the opportunity to incorporate a TDM Program to reduce traffic trips. However a restaurant use could capture pass-by trips on Highway 101 and local patrons may choose to dine after the higher peak travel period from 5 to 7 PM. Employees in the East of 101 area could carpool to the site for lunch and an early dinner. The Project could also arguably be the environmentally superior approach to development of the site. The significant and unavoidable impacts relate to traffic delays would remain. As noted above, there would be no significant air quality, greenhouse gas, hazard risk or noise impacts as shown in the Initial Study Section 3.3 Air Quality and Section 3.12 Noise (see Appendix A, Chapter 6 and summarized above of this EIR). One safety impact (line of sight) is identified along with mitigation to reduce the impact to less than significant and is fully vetted in Chapter 4 of this EIR. Worthy of note, in 2016 the methodology to determine traffic impacts under CEQA will shift to vehicle miles traveled and away from Level of Service. These types of traffic impacts may become moot. 6.0 EFFECTS FOUND NOT TO BE SIGNIFICANT DRAFT EIR / 3.0 EFFECTS FOUND NOT TO BE SIGNIFICANT 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 6-1 6.0 EFFECTS FOUND NOT TO BE SIGNIFICANT 6.1 INTRODUCTION CCR Section 15128 requires an EIR to summarize the environmental effects found not to be significant and therefore not analyzed in an EIR. The statement may be attached in the initial study or summarized within the EIR. This EIR contains a brief summary of the effects found not to be significant and a detailed analysis is contained in the Initial Study attached in Appendix A. 6.2 INITIAL STUDY PROCESS An initial study, contained in Appendix A, was prepared for the Project that determined topics for which there could be potentially new or increased impacts associated with the Project. Following is a brief summary of the effects found not significant based upon the analysis contained in the Initial Study. The full analysis supporting the findings is contained in Appendix A. 6.3 EFFECTS FOUND NOT TO BE SIGNIFICANT AESTHETICS: The Project would not have an impact on the aesthetics or scenic quality on the site or in the area. There would be no individual or cumulative impacts with respect to aesthetic, visual quality or light and glare associated with the Project. AGRICULTURAL AND TIMBER RESOURCES: The Project would not adversely affect any existing agricultural operations as none exist on the site. The Project would not impact agricultural resources individually or cumulatively and does not contain any Farmland, Unique Farmland, Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), or land in a Williamson Act Contract. The site is not zoned for timberland production or in use as such, and would not cause rezoning of forest land (as defined in the Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526) or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section51104(g)). AIR QUALITY/HAZARD RISKS: The maximum cancer risk for a residential-adult receptor would be 0.02 per million and for a residential-child would be 0.20 per million. The maximum cancer risk for a school child receptor would be less than 0.01 per million. Thus, the cancer risk due to construction activities is below the BAAQMD threshold of 10 per million and would be less than significant. The health impacts from Project operations would be 0.01 below the BAAQMD threshold of 10 per million and less than significant. 0.01. The chronic HI would be less than 0.01. The chronic HI would be well below the BAAQMD threshold of 1 and the impact of the Project would therefore be less than significant. The acute HI would be 0.03. The acute HI would be below the BAAQMD threshold of 1 and the impact of the Project would therefore be less than significant. 6.0 EFFECTS FOUND NOT TO BE SIGNIFICANT DRAFT EIR / 3.0 EFFECTS FOUND NOT TO BE SIGNIFICANT 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 6-2 The annual PM 2.5 concentration due to implementation of the Project would be below the BAAQMD threshold of 0.3 µg/m3, and hence is considered less than significant. The cumulative impacts are below the BAAQMD significance thresholds. Secondly, given that the Project would not result in increased health impacts exceeding the Project‐level thresholds, the Project would also not result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to localized health risk and hazard impacts, resulting in a less than significant cumulative air quality impact. The Project would not result in a significant impact to air quality and would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of criteria nonattainment pollutants (ozone precursors, PM 10 , and PM 2.5 ). The City’s building permit procedure captures the BAAQMD permitting regulations, as well as BAAQMD’s recommended emission control measures. The Project would not result in exceeding any Health Risk Screening Analysis Guidelines significance criteria. The Project would not introduce objectionable odors to the area. GREENHOUSE GAS: The GHG construction impacts would be 1,071 less than the BAAQMD GHG operational threshold of 1,100 metric tons. The Project has been reviewed relative to the AB 32 measures and South San Francisco Climate Action Plan and it has been determined that the Project would not conflict with the goals of AB 32 and the applicable Climate Action Plan. BIOLOGY: After review of California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) reports and map overlays for the general Project area, and field evaluations of the site, the habitat was found to be highly disturbed and isolated from other areas containing sensitive habitat. As a result, the site is considered to be of very low value for plants and wildlife in general, and as well for sensitive species of plants and animals. No significant biological impacts would result from full development of the Project site. CULTURAL RESOURCES: There are no structures on the Project site. There is a moderate chance that cultural resources may be present on the site. The project plans state that an archaeologist shall be present during site grading and pile driving. The archaeologist would follow the protocols of Public Resources Code Section 210832.2 and Section 15065.5(c)-(f), California Code of Regulations Title 14, Chapter 3 (CEQA Guidelines). The Project would have a less than significant impact on cultural resources. GEOLOGY AND SOILS: There are no active faults underlying the site and the nearest one is the San Andreas Fault, located about three miles southwest. Implementation of the geotechnical measures required by law (the City’s standard permitting requirements for peer review of all geotechnical reports and the final recommendations to become part of the Project) would reduce geologic instability to less than significant. The Project would have no impact on soils due to septic systems as the Project would be connected to the City’s wastewater system. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: The Project through the entitlement process and routine inspection is required as a matter of law to operate under all applicable, federal, state and local guidelines governing hazardous waste. The Project would have no impact from the emission or handling of hazardous materials or wastes on schools within a quarter of a mile 6.0 EFFECTS FOUND NOT TO BE SIGNIFICANT DRAFT EIR / 3.0 EFFECTS FOUND NOT TO BE SIGNIFICANT 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 6-3 or from any environmental contamination posed by the sites listed on the Cortese List. The impact of the Project with regards to hazardous materials would be less than significant with respect to operational activities. The Project as proposed would have a less than significant impact with respect to the release of hazardous materials during construction. There are no existing or proposed schools or day care centers or facilities within a quarter mile of the Project site. The Project would be 65 feet in height and 85 feet below the 150 foot maximum permitted to avoid conflicts with aircraft operations. The Project would be well under the maximum permitted height determined by the ALUC and FAA. There are no emergency response or evacuation plans in effect in the Project vicinity. Therefore the Project would have no impact on the implementation of any adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. The South San Francisco Fire Department is in the process of initiating a study to identify offensive capabilities in the Project area. The Project would be required through conditions of approval to provide a fair share financial contribution to the department’s study and improvements. There is no wildland in the vicinity of the Project site or area. The Project would have no impact with respect to wildland fires. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY: The City’s standard conditions of approval which implement state, federal and local regulations are required by law and are adequate to address any potential water quality impacts as a result of Project construction or occupation. The site is not within a flood zone or an area subject to seiche or tsunami inundation or run-up zones. No mitigation measures, above those required by the City as a matter of law, are identified in this Initial Study. The Project would not result in an impact or contribute to a cumulative impact to hydrology or water quality resources. LAND USE AND PLANNING: The Project would not physically divide an established community. The site is planned for a hotel use and the Project is consistent with the planned uses. There are no conservation or natural community conservation plans that govern the Project site or area. The Project would not result in any individually or cumulatively considerable impacts. MINERAL RESOURCES: The Project site does not contain any local or regionally significant mineral resources. The Project would not result in an impact or contribute to a cumulative impact to mineral resources. NOISE: With the applicant complying with noise limits in the City Noise Ordinance, construction related noise impacts would be less than significant. Traffic associated with the Project would not increase noise levels in the area. The Project would not contribute to a cumulative noise impact. Noise impacts associated with the Project would result a less than significant impact. The Project would have a less than 6.0 EFFECTS FOUND NOT TO BE SIGNIFICANT DRAFT EIR / 3.0 EFFECTS FOUND NOT TO BE SIGNIFICANT 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 6-4 significant impact with respect to excessive aircraft noise exposure. The site is located under the 65 dB contour interval therefore 5 dB less than the 70 dBA maximum permitted (i.e., without additional mitigation) for commercial land uses. The interior ambient noise levels would likely be 20-25 dB less (i.e., 45 dB) due to the exterior-to-interior noise reduction from the building walls. POPULATION AND HOUSING: The Project site has been planned for a hotel use since the City adopted the 1999 General Plan. The site was analyzed in the East of 101 Traffic Model as containing a 25 room hotel. The Project would construct 128 rooms. The Applicant states there would be at least 52 employees for the Project and a total of three shifts. For CEQA purposes we assume 100 employees. The Project site does not include housing and would not displace housing units or residents. PUBLIC SERVICES: The Project was reviewed by Police and Fire Department representatives and staffing or facility needs were not identified as insufficient. Development of the Project site would not increase the demand for public services individually or cumulatively. RECREATION: The Project would be a freeway commercial land use, largely serving airport and business travel lodging needs. The Project would likely employ up to 100 persons and is not a major employer as identified in “Population and Housing”, above. The Project impact on recreational facilities and the need to construct new facilities would be less than significant. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION: Due to potential cumulative impacts associated with U.S. 101 an EIR shall be prepared focusing on traffic and circulation. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: The City’s wastewater treatment plant was upgraded in 2000-01. The Project as a matter of law would be required to pay wastewater improvement fees to research the potential for future upgrades. The wastewater treatment plant has capacity to treat Project and cumulative projected wastewater. The UWMP, adopted in 2006, shows adequate water is available for the Project and projected cumulative development. CWSC developed an Integrated Long Term Water Supply Plan (ILTWSP) for its three peninsula districts in 2010. The findings of the ILTWSP recommend continuing with conservation and further evaluating desalination and water transfers. The Project would also be required to comply with the California Green Building Code which identifies measures to reduce water consumption, reduce building construction waste, and energy consumption in both the construction and operation of buildings and for the life of the building. The regulations prescribe methods to test, report, maintain, and improve the measures employed to promote environmental sustainability. The Project would not be a major employer (high estimate for CEQA is 100 persons), well below the threshold of significance of 1,000 employees for preparation of an Urban Water Management Plan. There is adequate capacity at Ox Mountain landfill for Project and cumulative solid waste and the City is meeting its 50 percent solid waste diversion mandate. Demolition, 6.0 EFFECTS FOUND NOT TO BE SIGNIFICANT DRAFT EIR / 3.0 EFFECTS FOUND NOT TO BE SIGNIFICANT 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 6-5 construction and operations of the Project would be required to incorporated LIDs and BMPs for stormwater treatment; an improvement over existing conditions. Stormwater is required to be treated on-site. The Project would not contribute individually or cumulatively to water, wastewater, solid waste, stormwater, or utility impacts. The Initial Study for the Project resulted in the following findings: 1. All environmental impacts associated with aesthetics, agriculture and forest resources, air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, land use and planning, mineral resources, noise, population and housing, public services, recreation, and utilities and service systems are considered less than significant. The Project would have either no impact or a less than significant impact with respect to the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. 2. The Project would not have environmental effects that would cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. DRAFT EIR / 7.0 CEQA REQUIRED CONCLUSIONS 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 7-1 7.0 CEQA REQUIRED CONCLUSIONS 7.1 GROWTH INDUCING IMPACTS The Draft EIR must examine the potential growth-inducing impacts of the project. CCR Section 15126.2(d) requires that the EIR “discuss the ways in which the proposed project could foster economic or population growth, or the construction of additional housing, either directly or indirectly”. The analysis must also consider the removal of obstacles to population growth, such as improvements in the regional transportation system. Growth-inducing impacts such as those associated with job increases that might affect housing and retail demand in other jurisdictions over an extended time period are difficult to assess with precision, since future economic and population trends may be influenced by unforeseeable events, such as natural disasters and business development cycles. Moreover, long-term changes in economic and population growth are often regional in scope; they are not influenced solely by changes in policies or specific development projects. Business trends are influenced by economic conditions throughout the state and country as well as around the world. Another consideration is that the creation of growth-inducing potential does not automatically lead to growth. Growth occurs through capital investment in new economic opportunities by the private and/or public sector. Investment patterns reflect, in turn, the desires of investors to mobilize and allocate their resources to development in particular localities and regions. A combination of these and other pressures serve to fashion policy. The regulatory authority of local governments, serve to mediate the growth-inducing potential or pressure created by a project or plan. Despite these limitations on the analysis, it is still possible to qualitatively assess the general potential growth-inducing impacts of the Project. PROJECTED GROWTH The initial study included in Appendix A made the following findings: The Project site has been planned as a freeway commercial land use, largely serving airport and business travel lodging needs (General Plan, 1999). The Applicant states there would be at least 52 employees for the Project in a total of three shifts to serve the 128 room hotel. For CEQA purposes we assume up to 100 employees. The hotel service industry typically does not conduct national employment recruitment efforts but relies on the local workforce. Therefore the Project would obtain its workforce from the local peninsula population. The Project is not anticipated to spur an increase in growth and population in the area but would serve the business needs of a traveling public and support the needs of the Research and Development uses in the East of 101 Area. 6.0 CEQA REQUIRED CONCLUSIONS DRAFT EIR / 7.0 CEQA REQUIRED CONCLUSIONS 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 2, 2015 PAGE 7-2 7.2 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS An EIR is required to examine cumulative impacts. CCR Section 15130(a)(1), defines a cumulative impact as consisting “of an impact which is created as a result of the combination of the project evaluated in the EIR together with other projects causing related impacts.” The analysis of cumulative impacts need not provide the level of detail required of the analysis of impacts from the project itself, but shall “reflect the severity of the impacts and their likelihood of occurrence” (CCR Section 15130(b)). The EIR must analyze either a list of past, present, and probable future projects or a summary of projections contained in an adopted general plan or related planning document. The Initial Study (Appendix A) analyzed the potential for cumulative impacts and as a result identified cumulative impacts relating to traffic and circulation. Chapter 4, Setting Impacts and Mitigations identifies projects that are anticipated in the East of 101 area 2035 horizon (see Table 15 in Chapter 4). Chapter 4 identifies the cumulative impacts that cannot be reduced to a less than significant level associated with the Project’s contribution to cumulative development. These following two impacts are transportation and circulation related. Impact 7: The Project would increase off-ramp volumes by more than 1 percent on the Northbound Off-ramp to S. Airport Boulevard/Wondercolor Lane, where Without Project volumes would be backing up to the freeway mainline. (Significant and Unavoidable) Mitigation Measure 7: The applicant shall provide a fair share contribution as determined by the City Engineer to go towards the following measures. Airport Boulevard/San Mateo Avenue/Product Avenue • Adjust signal timing. This measure is required to clear northbound/westbound S. Airport Boulevard traffic through this intersection and eliminate backups extending through the Gateway and Wondercolor intersections. S. Airport Boulevard/U.S. 101 Northbound Hook Ramps/Wondercolor Lane • Restripe the northbound S. Airport Boulevard approach to provide two left turn lanes and one combined through/right turn lane. • Widen the northbound on-ramp to provide two departure lanes, which will then merge to a single lane before merging to the freeway mainline. • Adjust signal timing. • Reconfigure the northbound off-ramp intersection approach to S. Airport Boulevard to provide two exclusive left turn lanes, one shared through/right turn lane and one exclusive right turn lane. 6.0 CEQA REQUIRED CONCLUSIONS DRAFT EIR / 7.0 CEQA REQUIRED CONCLUSIONS 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 2, 2015 PAGE 7-3 Resultant 2017 With Project Operation would be: PM Peak Hour: LOS D-42.8 seconds control delay, which would be better than “Without Project” operation (LOS F-162.5 seconds control delay) Impact After Mitigation: Mitigation Measure 7 would eliminate AM and PM peak hour backups to the freeway mainline (with or without the Project) during the AM and PM peak hours (as shown in Traffic Figure 20, Year 2017 Mitigated Intersection Lane Geometrics and Control). The restriping of the northbound intersection approach and associated signalization equipment changes along with the widening of the on-ramp departure to two lanes are not on the City’s Traffic Improvement Program (TIP) and the cost would be excessive for the Project to fund. The City has determined that the intersection improvements described in Mitigation Measure 7 are infeasible for the Project to fully fund and freeway off-ramp backups to the freeway mainline would not be mitigated to an acceptable level. The individual measures, by themselves, would not eliminate the significant impact. While the low cost signal timing adjustment could be provided and would provide some improvement, by itself it would not reduce the impact to a less than significant level. The City will need to incorporate these new improvements into the East of 101 TIP. Therefore, this impact would remain significant and unavoidable. Impact 12: The Project would not result in any significant vehicle queuing impacts at any analyzed intersection based upon Synchro software methodology for 2035 With Project conditions. However, Project traffic would increase volumes on the US 101 southbound off-ramp to Produce Avenue by more than 1 percent during both the AM and PM peak traffic hours where Without Project off-ramp traffic is projected to be backing up to the freeway mainline. (Significant and Unavoidable) The Project would increase off-ramp volumes by more than 1 percent on the northbound off-ramp to S. Airport Boulevard/Wondercolor Lane where “Without Project” volumes would already be backing up to the freeway mainline. • Northbound Off-Ramp to S. Airport Boulevard/Wondercolor Lane (AM & PM peak hours) + 1.1 % during the AM peak hour + 1.8 % during the PM peak hour The Project would increase off-ramp volumes by more than 1 percent on the southbound off-ramp to Product Avenue where “Without Project” volumes would already be backing up to the freeway mainline. • Southbound Off-Ramp to Produce Avenue (AM & PM peak hours) + 1.3 % during the AM peak hour + 1.5 % during the PM peak hour 6.0 CEQA REQUIRED CONCLUSIONS DRAFT EIR / 7.0 CEQA REQUIRED CONCLUSIONS 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 2, 2015 PAGE 7-4 Mitigation Measure 12: The applicant shall provide a fair share contribution as determined by the City Engineer to go towards the following measures. Airport Boulevard/San Mateo Avenue/Produce Avenue • Adjust signal timing. • Provide a second right turn lane on the northbound Produce Avenue approach to eastbound S. Airport Boulevard with the same curvature as the existing right turn lane. Signal control both right turn lanes and provide overlap phasing with the westbound left turn movement. S. Airport Boulevard/Gateway Avenue/Mitchell Avenue • Extend the left turn lanes on the eastbound S. Airport Boulevard approach to Gateway Boulevard/Mitchell Avenue to at least 225 feet. Mitchell Avenue/West Harris Avenue • Provide a left turn lane on the eastbound Mitchell Avenue approach to West Harris Avenue. • Paint a “Keep Clear” message on the pavement on westbound Mitchell Avenue at West Harris Avenue. These two Mitchell and West Harris Avenue measures are feasible and are required of the Project but will not in and of themselves reduce project impact 12 to less than significant. Resultant 2035 With Project Operation at Airport Boulevard/Produce Avenue/San Mateo Avenue would be: AM Peak Hour: LOS D-38.6 seconds control delay PM Peak Hour: LOS F-205.4 seconds control delay, which would be better than “Without Project” operation (LOS F-205.6 seconds control delay) Impact After Mitigation: Mitigation Measure 12 would eliminate AM and PM peak hour backups to the freeway mainline (with or without the Project) during the AM and PM peak hours. However, at the Airport Boulevard/San Mateo Avenue/Produce Avenue intersection, the added right turn lane and dual right turn lane signalization are not on the City’s Traffic Improvement Program (TIP) and the cost would be excessive for the proposed Project to fund. Also, measures at the Mitchell Avenue/West Harris Avenue intersection are also not on the City’s TIP for this area and may not be financially feasible for the proposed Project. Therefore, the City has determined that the intersection improvements described in Mitigation Measure 12 are infeasible. The Project could not fully fund all the mitigations therefore freeway off-ramp backups to the freeway mainline would not be mitigated to an acceptable level. The City will need to incorporate these new improvements into the East of 101 TIP. This impact would remain significant and unavoidable. The initial study did not identify any other potential cumulative impacts that could not be mitigated to a level that is less than significant. A summary of these findings is contained in 6.0 CEQA REQUIRED CONCLUSIONS DRAFT EIR / 7.0 CEQA REQUIRED CONCLUSIONS 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 2, 2015 PAGE 7-5 Chapter 6 Effects Found Not to be Significant and the full analysis is contained in the initial study in Appendix A. 7.3 SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS CCR Section 15126(b) requires that EIR discuss any significant environmental impacts that cannot be avoided under full implementation of the Project. Chapter 4, Setting Impacts and Mitigations identifies the significant and unavoidable impacts associated with the Project in detail which are also identified in 6.2 above. The EIR must discuss why the Project is being proposed; not withstanding such impacts. Chapter 5 Alternatives contains this required analysis. 7.4 SIGNIFICANT IRREVERSIBLE ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE The EIR is required to consider whether “uses of nonrenewable resources during the initial and continued phases of the project may be irreversible since a large commitment of such resources makes removal or non use thereafter unlikely” (CCR Section 15126.2(c)). “Nonrenewable resource” refers to the physical features of the natural environment, such as land, waterways, etc. The initial study did not identify areas of significant irreversible environmental change. Chapter 6 Effects Found Not to be Significant summarizes these findings and the initial study provides the full analysis. Construction and implementation of the Project would not result in a large commitment of natural resources, require highway improvements to previously inaccessible areas; or irreversible damage due to environmental accidents. DRAFT EIR / 8.0 REPORT PREPARATION 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 8-1 8.0 REPORT PREPARATION LEAD AGENCY CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DIVISION 315 Maple Avenue City of South San Francisco, California 94080 Billy Gross, Senior Planner CONSULTING TEAM KNAPP PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING 511 Linden Street, Suite B San Francisco, CA 94102 Allison Knapp, Principal/Project Manager In consultation with: CRANE TRANSPORTATION GROUP 2621 East Windrim Court Elk Grove, California 95758 Mark Crane, Managing Principal RCH GROUP, INC. RCH Group, Inc. 11060 White Rock Road, Suite 150-A Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 Paul Miller, Principal Environmental Services Michael Ratte, Senior Air Quality Scientist DRAFT EIR / 9.0 REFERENCES 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 2015 PAGE 9-1 9.0 REFERENCES 9.1 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS Following is a list of documents reviewed in the preparation of this EIR. These references are in addition to the ones contained in the Initial Study contained in Appendix A. General Plan, 1999 General Plan EIR, 1999. Zoning Ordinances, 2010. South El Camino Real General Plan Amendment Draft and Final EIR (2010). Downtown Station Area Plan and Environmental Impact Report (2015). Initial Study 127 West Harris, South San Francisco (2015). East of 101 Traffic Model, DKS APPENDIX A A-1 APPENDIX A Initial Study Checklist and Evaluation Chapters 1-3 with Technical Appendices including: 1. Air Quality Assumptions and Methodologies, Construction and Operational Emissions, CALEEMOD Output Files. June, 2014. RCH Group, Mike Ratte. 2. Biological Resource Assessment, 127 West Harris Street, South San Francisco, California, West Harris SSF.SMa, 21 April 2014. Marangio Biological Consulting, Michael Marangio. 3. Engineering Report, Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites, 127 West Harris Avenue, South San Francisco, California. April 15, August 21, and October 7, 2014. Terracon. 4. Geotechnical Peer Review, Kuber Development Proposed Fairfield Inn and Suites. May 6, September 2, and October 16, 2014. Cotton Shires Associates. 5. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites, 127 West Harris Avenue, South San Francisco, California. March 18, 2014. Terracon. 6. Limited Stockpile Characterization and Sampling, Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites, 127 West Harris Avenue, South San Francisco, California. March 19, 2014. Terracon. Comment Letters on the Notice of Preparation 1. Town of Colma, Michael P. Laughlin, January 5, 2015 2. San Francisco International Airport, John Bergener, January 14, 2015 3. California Department of Transportation, Patricia Maurice, January 30, 2015 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO INITIAL STUDY FOR THE PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PREPARED FOR: CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DIVISION 315 MAPLE AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO , CA 94083 www.ssf.net PREPARED BY: KNAPP PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING Allisonknappconsulting.com January 2, 2015 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO INITIAL STUDY FOR THE PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT Submitted to: STATE OF CALIFORNIA GOVERNORS OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RESEARCH STATE CLEARINGHOUSE P.O. BOX 3044 SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95812-3044 Submitted by: CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DIVISION Mr. Billy Gross, Senior Planner 315 MAPLE AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94083 January 2, 2015 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO INITIAL STUDY Submitted to: STATE OF CALIFORNIA GOVERNORS OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RESEARCH STATE CLEARINGHOUSE P.O. BOX 3044 SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95812-3044 Submitted by: CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DIVISION Mr. Billy Gross, Senior Planner 315 MAPLE AVENUE, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94083 January, 2015 i TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1-1 1.1 Initial Study/Legislative Framework 1-1 1.2 Project Applicant/Team/Contact 1-2 1.3 Documents Incorporated by Reference 1-3 1.4 City of South San Francisco Project Review Process 1-3 1.5 Standard Conditions of Approval Required by Law Addressing Environmental Impacts 1-4 1.6 Environmental Determination 1-13 CHAPTER 2: PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2-1 2.1 Project Location and Setting 2-1 2.2 Proposed Project 2-4 2.3 Environmental Mitigation Measures Proposed as Part of the Project 2-7 2.4 General Plan and Zoning 2-11 2.5 Required Entitlements 2-12 CHAPTER 3: ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 3-1 3.1 Aesthetics 3-2 3.2 Agriculture and Forest Resources 3-7 3.3 Air Quality 3-9 3.4 Greenhouse Gas Emissions 3-20 3.5 Biological Resources 3-30 3.6 Cultural Resources 3-42 3-7 Geology and Soils 3-45 3-8 Hazards and Hazardous Materials 3-55 3-9 Hydrology and Water Quality 3-65 3-10 Land Use and Planning 3-74 3-11 Mineral Resources 3-76 3-12 Noise 3-77 3-13 Population and Housing 3-84 3-14 Public Services 3-85 3-15 Recreation 3-88 3-16 Transportation and Traffic 3-89 3-17 Utilities and Service Systems 3-91 3-18 Mandatory Findings of Significance and Summary of Findings 3-96 LIST OF FIGURES Project Location 2-1 Draft Downtown Station Area Plan and Project Location 2-3 Boring and Sample Locations 2-5 Site Plan 2-6 APPENDIX A Air Quality Assumptions and Methodologies, Construction and Operational Emissions, CALEEMOD Output Files, June, 2014. RCH Group, Mike Ratte. A-1 ii Biological Resource Assessment, 127 West Harris Street, South San Francisco, California, West Harris SSF.SMa, 21 April 2014. Marangio Biological Consulting, Michael Marangio. Engineering Report, Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites, 127 West Harris Avenue, South San Francisco, California. April 15, August 21, and October 7, 2014. Terracon. Geotechnical Peer Review, Kuber Development Proposed Fairfield Inn and Suites. May 6, September 2, and October 16, 2014. Cotton Shires Associates. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites, 127 West Harris Avenue, South San Francisco, California. March 18, 2014. Terracon. Limited Stockpile Characterization and Sampling, Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites, 127 West Harris Avenue, South San Francisco, California. March 19, 2014. Terracon. 127 WEST HARRIS – CHAPTER 1 OF INITIAL STUDY PAGE 1-1 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 INITIAL STUDY/LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK This Initial Study has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), which can be found in the California Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 21000 et seq., and the CEQA Guidelines found in California Code of Regulations Title 14, Chapter 3, (CCR) Section 15000 et seq., as amended. This Initial Study identifies the potential environmental impacts associated with demolition, grading, construction and future occupancy of the Project which includes any reasonably foreseeable impacts associated with the Project in its entirety. CEQA (PRC Section 21065) defines a Project as: An activity which may cause either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, and which is any of the following: a) An activity directly undertaken by a public agency. b) An activity undertaken by a person which is supported, in whole or in part, through contracts, grants, subsidies, loans, or other forms of assistance from one or more public agencies. c) An activity that involves the issuance to a person of a lease, permit, license, certificate, or other entitlement for use by one or more agencies. The Applicant is seeking conditional use permit and design review approvals to construct a 128 room select service hotel with 93 parking spaces at 127 West Harris Avenue in South San Francisco, California. The ministerial actions include grading and building permits. The proposed project (Project) meets criteria “c”, identified above, and therefore requires environmental review. Preparation of an environmental analysis and subsequent environmental determination is required prior to or simultaneously with entitlement review. Environmental review does not constitute Project approval, but is an independent analysis of potential Project impacts and mitigation measures. The Lead Agency may, after review of the entirety of the record, find that the environmental analysis is adequate and approve, disapprove or conditionally approve the Project based upon environmental and merits review. The Lead Agency for this document is the City of South San Francisco. The Planning Commission will hold a study session to take public comments and the City Council will make the final determination on the environmental document. These actions will take place in legally- noticed public hearings. This Initial Study, City Project Number P13-0057, UP13-0012 & DR13-0035 is for the project identified as Fairfield Inn and Suites at 127 West Harris Avenue in South San Francisco, California (APN: 015-123-600). The proposed project (Project) would construct a 128 room CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION PAGE 1-2 127 WEST HARRIS – CHAPTER 1 LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK hotel on a vacant 1.47 acre lot. The 65,136 square foot hotel would be five stories in height and include 93 onsite parking spaces (Sheet G002 Architectural Drawings, Gerald D. Kessler, Inc., 10/30/13). The hotel would be airport serving. The site has never been developed (Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Terracon. March 18, 2014). 1.2 PROJECT APPLICANT/TEAM/CONTACT PROJECT APPLICANT AND TEAM The property owner and applicant (Applicant) is KUBER Hotels, represented by Shane Kuber, principal of the firm. The applicant has assembled a Project team consisting of Jerry Kessler of Gerald Kessler, Inc Architects; Mike Jackson of Tamad, Taylor and Gaines civil engineers; and, Islam R. Noaman, for the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment and Donald R. Clark and Fouad Abuhamdan for geotechnical services at Terracon Environmental, Facilities, Geotechnical and Materials Engineering. The contact for the Project is: Mr. Jerry Kessler 1823 Desert Lane Phoenix Arizona, 85042 (602) 466-1083 LEAD AGENCY AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANT The Lead Agency for this Initial Study is the City of South San Francisco. The administrative record for the Project is on file at the City’s Planning Division. The following person has been assigned as the custodian and Case Planner/Project Manager for the Lead Agency: Mr. Billy Gross, Senior Planner Department of Economic and Community Development-Planning Division 315 Maple Avenue South San Francisco, CA 94080 (650) 877-8535 The Environmental Document was prepared by: Allison Knapp Wollam, Environmental Consultant KNAPP PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING 511 Linden Street, Suite B San Francisco, CA 94102 (415) 902-3238 The environmental consulting team consists of Allison Knapp Wollam, Mr. Mike Ratte of KB Environmental Engineering for the air quality, greenhouse gas and hazard risk assessments, Mr. Michael Marangio of Marangio Consulting for the biological resource assessment, Mr. Paul Miller of RCH Group for the noise analysis and Mr. Mark Crane of Crane Transportation Group for the traffic modeling and analysis. CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 127 WEST HARRIS – CHAPTER 1 LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK PAGE 1-3 1.3 DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE GEOLOGY Engineering Report, Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites, 127 West Harris Avenue, South San Francisco, California. April 15, August 21, and October 7, 2014. Terracon. Geotechnical Peer Review, Kuber Development Proposed Fairfield Inn and Suites. May 6, September 2, and October 16, 2014. Cotton Shires Associates. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites, 127 West Harris Avenue, South San Francisco, California. March 18, 2014. Terracon. Limited Stockpile Characterization and Sampling, Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites, 127 West Harris Avenue, South San Francisco, California. March 19, 2014. Terracon. 1.4 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PROJECT REVIEW PROCESS As a matter of law, the Project is required to comply with federal, state and local laws and regulations. These regulations are verified as satisfied and incorporated into the Project as a matter of demolition, grading and /or building permit issuance or permits will not be issued by the City of South San Francisco. As such, these requirements are considered a part of the Project, not a separate and distinct requirement levied through CEQA review. City of South San Francisco project processing requires that applications for projects are first reviewed by the City’s Technical Advisory Group (TAG). TAG is comprised of representatives from Planning, Building, Police, Fire, Engineering, Parks and Recreation, and Water Quality Control. TAG review identifies changes and additions that are required in a project to comply with local, state and federal laws that are implemented through the City’s Municipal Code. The Planning Division, subsequent to TAG review, issues a letter to the applicant identifying the changes required in Project plans and supporting materials necessary to comply with prevailing laws pursuant to site development, construction and land use. The applicant is required to revise the plans and supporting documentation or the application is not certified as complete and not processed. Revised plans and documentation are submitted to the Planning Division to be routed again to all affected City departments and divisions; again to evaluate the application in light of their earlier comments and requirements. The process results in an application that can be certified ‘complete’ as well as identification of the Conditions of Approval (COAs) that are required should the Project be approved. Many of these COAs implement environmental mitigations that were historically identified through the environmental review process (California Environmental Quality Act, or CEQA) and now have become a part of the City’s legislative requirements, through its general plan, specific, area, municipal code, special districts, or memoranda of understanding (i.e., its police power). CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION PAGE 1-4 127 WEST HARRIS – CHAPTER 1 LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK After a project application is complete it is subject to environmental, public and discretionary review through and by the Planning Commission and/or City Council, depending upon the type of project, as defined by the Municipal Code of South San Francisco and state law. The COAs identified through staff review of the project, and any additional ones identified through the public review process become required of the project as a matter of law. Prior to the City issuing a building, grading and/or demolition permit, all City departments and divisions (identified above) review the project plans for compliance with their identified COAs and any additional ones added through the public review process. Permits are not issued by the Building Division in absence of authorization from City staff or in absence of the requirements being incorporated into the Project plans. 1.5 STANDARD CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REQUIRED BY LAW ADDRESSING ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES The following COAs are designed and implemented to reduce environmental impacts and are required through the City of South San Francisco’s standard review and permitting procedures. Therefore, these measures are not separately identified as mitigation measures. As is the case with all aspects of an approved project, the Project’s conditions of approval could not be altered without additional City review and approval, which could entail subsequent or supplemental CEQA review. Failure of the Applicant to meet the required measures and/or elements of their Project description relating to environmental issues may obviate the environmental document and require subsequent or supplemental CEQA review. In summary, the Project as proposed coupled with the required conditions of approval is the baseline from which environmental impacts are evaluated for the Project described in Chapter 2 Project Description. 1. AESTHETICS AESTHETICS LIGHT AND GLARE: Signage is required to be reviewed by staff, and in some instances the Design Review Board and the Planning Commission. Lighting, size, color, placement, design and compatibility with surrounding land uses is addressed and assured through this process. The City’s sign regulations are intended to preserve and improve appearance, protect from visual clutter and blight, protect property values and enhance community appearance, minimize diversion of vehicle operators’ attention and safeguard life, health, property and public welfare. Potential environmental impacts and the need or lack thereof for environmental clearance is also addressed and undertaken as a part of the Sign Permit procedure (Chapter 20.360 South San Francisco Municipal Code-Zoning). The Planning Division implements and monitors this requirement. Projects are reviewed by the City’s Design Review Board consisting of professional architects and landscape architects. The Planning Commission, and in some cases the City Council, adds design elements to projects. Projects that are within a state or local scenic corridor are further addressed through the CEQA process. CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 127 WEST HARRIS – CHAPTER 1 LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK PAGE 1-5 2. AIR QUALITY AND GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS AIR QUALITY DUST CONTROL: All construction projects are required to comply with the Bay Area Air Quality Management District’s (BAAQMD) dust control measures. These measures are levied by the Engineering Division as a condition of building permit issuance and are monitored for compliance by staff and/or special City Engineering and/or Planning inspectors. The measures include all the Basic Fugitive Dust Emissions Reduction Measures, Basic Exhaust Emissions Reduction Measures and some of the Additional Fugitive Dust Emissions Reduction Measures identified by the BAAQMD May, 2011. The City requires Projects to: a) Water all active construction sites at least twice daily. b) Cover all trucks hauling soil, sand, and other loose materials or require all trucks to maintain at least two feet of freeboard. c) Pave, apply water three times daily, or apply (non-toxic) soil stabilizers on all unpaved access roads, parking areas, and staging areas at construction sites. d) Sweep daily (with water sweepers) all paved access roads, parking areas and staging areas at construction sites. e) Sweep streets daily (with wet power vacuum sweepers) if visible soil material is carried onto adjacent public streets at least once per day. The use of dry power sweeping is prohibited. f) Hydroseed or apply (non-toxic) soil stabilizers to inactive construction areas (previously graded areas inactive for ten days or more). g) Enclose, cover, water twice daily, or apply non-toxic soil binders to exposed stockpiled materials. h) Install sandbags or other erosion-control measures to prevent silt runoff to public roadways. i) Replant vegetation in disturbed areas as quickly as possible. j) Watering should be used to control dust generation during the break-up of pavement. k) Cover all trucks hauling demolition debris from the site. l) Use dust-proof chutes to load debris into trucks whenever feasible. m) Water or cover stockpiles of debris, soil, sand or other materials that can be blown by the wind. n) All construction equipment shall be maintained and properly tuned in accordance with manufacturer’s specifications. All equipment shall be checked by a certified mechanic and determined to be in proper running order prior to operation. o) Diesel powered equipment shall not be left inactive and idling for more than five minutes, and shall comply with applicable BAAQMD rules. p) Use alternative fueled construction equipment, if possible. q) All vehicle speeds on unpaved roads shall be limited to 15 mph and slower should wind and dust conditions necessitate. CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION PAGE 1-6 127 WEST HARRIS – CHAPTER 1 LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK r) All roadways, driveways, and sidewalks to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. Building pads shall be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used. s) Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the maximum idling time to five (5) minutes (as required by the California airborne toxics control measure Title 13, Section 2484 of the California Code of regulations). Clear signage shall be provided for construction workers at all access points. t) Post a visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact at the Lead Agency regarding dust complaints. This person shall respond and take corrective action within 24 hours. The Air District phone number shall also be visible to ensure compliance with applicable regulations. AIR QUALITY TOXIC AIR CONTAMINANTS: The potential for toxic air contaminants (asbestos and lead based paint) to be released into the environment is regulated and monitored through the Building Division in compliance with BAAQMD Regulation 11, Rule 2 during Demolition. Any applicant requesting a building or demolition permit involving a structure suspected of containing asbestos (defined as a building constructed prior to 1978) and/or lead based paint (defined as a building constructed prior to 1960) is required to obtain a J-Permit from the BAAQMD. The J Permit is required to be posted on the job site, and if it is not there the job will be fined by the BAAQMD and may be shut down by the City’s Building Division. Through this process, the BAAQMD and the City Building Division ensure that asbestos and lead based paints are handled, removed, encapsulated and disposed of in accordance with prevailing law requisite to protect the environment, the people conducting the work and nearby sensitive receptors. The process typically requires surveys and removal of lead based paints and asbestos by licensed contractors certified in the handling methods requisite to protect the environment and public health and safety. The process also provides for BAAQMD and City supervision to ensure compliance. AIR QUALITY VEHICLE EMISSIONS: The potential for air quality degradation from vehicle emissions is regulated to some extent by Section 20.400.003 of the South San Francisco Code. Table 20.400.003 in the Zoning Ordinance establishes specific program requirements for a project generating one hundred or more vehicle trips per day or a project seeking a floor area ratio (FAR) bonus. The required alternative mode (mode shift) use for all projects is twenty- eight percent below standard trip rates modeled for the project without TDM measures in place. Projects with an increased FAR are required to increase their alternative mode use accordingly. The Planning Division implements and monitors this requirement. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO CLIMATE ACTION PLAN: The City adopted a Climate Action Plan (CAP) on February 12, 2014. The CAP identifies strategies and actions to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions 15 percent by 2020 (below 2005 GHG baseline). The City has and continues to implement GHG reduction measures. Some examples include the installation of solar facilities at City buildings; requiring bioswales in private development; adopting and enforcing a construction and demolition waste recycling ordinance; adopting and implementing a transportation demand management program and providing electrical car charging stations at City facilities. The City actively participates in the San Francisco International Airport noise insulation program which also reduces heat loss and hence GHG emissions in older buildings. The City also spearheads educational programs to reduce GHG emissions. Through conditions CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 127 WEST HARRIS – CHAPTER 1 LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK PAGE 1-7 of approval development projects are required to implement a variety of GHG reduction measures. Some measures include use of renewable and alternate energy including solar and cogeneration, electric car facilities, water conservation and waste reduction. 3. GEOLOGY AND SOILS CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE TITLE 24: All construction projects are required to comply with the California Building Code (CBC), as periodically amended. Design specifications are identified and required for projects located on sites subject to liquefaction, differential settlement, severe groundshaking. These requirements are enforced and monitored by the Engineering Division. Compliance with the CBC is also implemented and monitored by the Building Division. GEOLOGY AND SOILS GEOTECHNICAL REPORTS: The City Engineering Division also requires geotechnical reports as a part of the permit package for projects to be constructed on vacant land, for demolition and rebuilding and for additions to buildings that require grading and additional loading. The geotechnical reports are required to be prepared by a licensed geologist, geotechnical engineer or engineering geologist. The reports address design and construction specifications for the project including grading, site drainage, utility and infrastructure design specifications and placement and building design. The reports are peer reviewed by the City’s geotechnical consultant, and are modified as recommended by the City’s consultant. Geotechnical approval is required prior to issuance of a building permit. The geotechnical professional of record is required to sign all project drawings. The City’s geotechnical consultant provides construction inspections, oversight and monitoring for the City. The Engineering Division implements and monitors this requirement. 4. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY: The following is a summary of applicable requirements in Provisions C.3.b.ii and C.3.c.i.2 of the San Francisco Bay Region Municipal Regional Stormwater National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit (“Municipal Regional Permit” or “MRP.” All projects that are required to treat stormwater will need to treat the permit-specified amount of stormwater runoff with low impact development methods. These methods include rainwater harvesting and reuse, infiltration, evapotranspiration, or biotreatment (filtering stormwater through vegetation and soils before discharging to the storm drain system). However, biotreatment will be allowed only where harvesting and reuse, infiltration and evapotranspiration are infeasible at a project site. Vault-based treatment will not be allowed as a stand-alone treatment measure. Where stormwater harvesting and reuse, infiltration, or evapotranspiration are infeasible, vault-based treatment measures may be used in series with biotreatment, for example, to remove trash or other large solids (see Provision C.3.c.i.2 of the MRP). Projects that create and/or replace 5,000 square feet or more of impervious surface related to auto service facilities, retail gasoline outlets, restaurants, and/or surface parking are required to provide low impact development treatment of stormwater runoff. This requirement applies to uncovered parking that is stand-alone, or included as part of any other development project, and it applies to the top uncovered portion of a parking structure, unless drainage from the uncovered portion is connected to the sanitary sewer (see Provision C.3.b.ii.1 of the MRP). For all other land use categories, 10,000 square feet is the regional threshold for requiring low impact development, source control, site design, and stormwater treatment, although municipalities may CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION PAGE 1-8 127 WEST HARRIS – CHAPTER 1 LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK have the authority to require treatment to the maximum extent practicable for smaller projects. The new requirements are built into the following (see below) standard requirements. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY STORMWATER RUNOFF PREVENTION (OPERATIONAL): All Projects are required to comply with the San Mateo Countywide Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program (STOPPP), an organization of the City/County Association of Governments (C/CAG) of San Mateo County holding a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Storm Water Discharge permit. The City requires the implementation of Best Management Practices (BMPs) for new development and construction as part of its storm water management program, as levied through standard City COA’s. The requirements are implemented and monitored by the Engineering and Water Quality Control Divisions. The measures address pollution control and management mechanisms for contractor activities, e.g. structure construction, material delivery and storage, solid waste management, employee and subcontractor training. Stormwater pollution prevention measures also affect site development and operations in order to prevent pollution due to Project occupancy. Typical storm water quality protection measures include: a) Walking and light traffic areas shall use permeable pavements where feasible. Typical pervious pavements include pervious concrete, porous asphalt, turf block, brick pavers, natural stone pavers, concrete unit pavers, crushed aggregate (gravel), cobbles and wood mulch. b) Parking lots shall include hybrid surfaces (pervious material for stalls only), concave medians with biofilters (grassy swales), and landscaped infiltration/detention basins as feasible. c) Landscape design shall incorporate biofilters, infiltration and retention/detention basins into the site plan as feasible. d) Outdoor work areas including garbage, recycling, maintenance, storage, and loading, applicable storm water controls include siting or set back from drainage paths and water ways, provision of roofing and curbs or berms to prevent run on and run off. If the area has the potential to generate contaminated run off, structural treatment controls for contaminant removal (such as debris screens or filters) shall be incorporated into the design. e) Roof leaders and site drainage shall be filtered and directed to the City storm drain system and harvesting of rainwater shall occur. f) Drainage from paved surfaces shall be filtered through vegetated swales, buffer or sand strips before discharge to the City’s storm drain system. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY STORMWATER RUNOFF PREVENTION (CONSTRUCTION): The City of South San Francisco requires through COAs, Project compliance with the State Water Quality Control Board’s general permitting requirements which requires the applicant to secure a Construction Activities Storm Water General Permit, complete a Notice of Intent (NOI) and prepare and obtain approval of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The state issues a Waste Discharge Identification number within 10 days of receipt of a complete NOI and SWPPP. The applicant is then required to submit copies of the NOI and SWPPP to the City of South San Francisco’s Technical Services Supervisor within the Water Quality Control Plant of the Public Works Department prior to issuance of CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 127 WEST HARRIS – CHAPTER 1 LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK PAGE 1-9 building and/or grading permits. The requirements are implemented and monitored by Water Quality Control personnel. Typical construction stormwater protection measures include: a) Identify all storm drains, drainage swales and creeks located near construction sites and prevent pollutants from entering them by the use of filter fabric cloth, rock bags, straw wattles, slope hydroseeding, cleaning up leaks, drips or spills immediately, use dry cleanup methods to clean up spills, use of berms, temporary ditches and check dams to reduce the velocity of surface flow. b) Place rock bags at all drain inlets to filter silt and along curb and gutter to filter water before the drain inlets. c) Place straw wattles and hydroseed the sloped areas. d) Place straw matting at the temporary sloped areas for erosion control. e) Place drain systems to filter and then drain into drain inlets. f) Use silt fencing with straw mats and hand broadcast seed for erosion control. g) Construct temporary drainage systems to filter and divert water accordingly. h) Construct temporary rock and asphalt driveways and wheel washers to buffer public streets from dirt and mud. i) Use part and full time street sweepers that operate along public streets and roads. j) Cover all stockpiled soils to protect from erosion. Use berms around stockpiled soils. k) Cover and protect from erosion plaster, concrete and other powders which create large amounts of suspended solids. l) Store all hazardous materials (paints, solvents, chemicals) in accordance with secondary containment regulations and cover during wet weather. m) Use terracing to prevent erosion. n) Through grading plan review and approval, phase grading operations to reduce disturbed areas during wet weather, limit vegetation removal, delineate clearing limits, setbacks, easements, sensitive or critical areas, trees, drainage courses and buffer zones to prevent unnecessary disturbance and exposure. Limit or prohibit grading during the wet weather season, October 15 to April 15th. o) Prevent spills and leaks by maintaining equipment, designating specific areas of a site for such activities that are controlled and away from water courses and perform major maintenance off-site or in designated areas only. p) Cover and maintain all dumpsters, collect and properly dispose of all paint removal wastes, clean up paints, solvents, adhesives and all cleaning solvents properly. Recycle and salvage appropriate wastes and maintain an adequate debris disposal schedule. q) Avoid roadwork and pavement stormwater pollution by following manufacturers’ instructions. 5. NOISE INTERIOR AMBIENT NOISE: The City of South San Francisco regulates noise exposure through state law and its General Plan and East of 101 Area Plan. A chapter of the CBC CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION PAGE 1-10 127 WEST HARRIS – CHAPTER 1 LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK collectively known as Title 24, contains acoustical requirements for interior sound levels in habitable rooms for multi-family residential land uses. Title 24 contains requirements for construction of new hotels, motels, apartment houses, and dwellings other than detached single- family dwellings intended to limit the extent of noise transmitted into habitable spaces. The standard specifies the extent to which walls, doors, and floor-ceiling assemblies must block or absorb sound in between units and the amount of attenuation needed to limit noise from exterior sources. The standard sets forth an interior noise level of 45 dBA (CNEL or L dn ) in any habitable room with all doors and windows closed. The code requires an acoustical analysis demonstrating how dwelling units have been designed to meet this interior standard where such units are proposed in areas subject to noise levels greater than 60 dBA (CNEL or L dn ). Title 24 requirements are enforced as a condition of building permit issuance by the Building Division. The City, through its General Plan, adopted the Noise Guidelines of the State Department of Health Services in its Noise Element (1999). Table 9.2-1, Land Use Criteria for Noise Impacted Areas, (General Plan, page 280) guides land use decisions based upon noise thresholds correlating to land use classifications, acoustical analyses and mitigations. The City implements the Federal Aviation Administration adopted noise contours, participates in an aircraft noise insulation program and City/County Association of Governments (C/CAG) airport noise planning efforts. Figure 9-1 of the General Plan Aircraft Noise and Noise Insulation Program (page 279) identifies the noise contours and program area for these planning efforts. C/CAG updated the San Francisco International Airport noise impact boundaries in October, 2012. The new boundaries for South San Francisco are on page 118 of the Comprehensive Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan for the Environs of San Francisco International Airport for City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County, Redwood City, California (Ricondo Associates, Jacobs Consultancy, Clarion Associates. October, 2012) (ALUP). Therefore the maps contained in the South San Francisco General Plan must be used in conjunction with the updated ALUP. The East of 101 Area Plan requirement for interior ambient noise for commercial, office and retail is 45 dBA, L eq , echoing state law. Residential land uses in the East of 101 are prohibited. The Noise Guidelines are implemented by the Planning Division through new project review. NOISE EXTERIOR AMBIENT NOISE: The City of South San Francisco regulates exterior noise levels through the South San Francisco Municipal Code (Section 8.32.030). The Municipal Code identifies maximum noise exposure corresponding with land use and time of day. Low density residential maximum noise exposure (excluding vehicle horns and emergency vehicles) is restricted to 50 dB 10 P.M. to 7 A.M. and 60 db from 7 A.M. and 10 P.M. Higher density residential and commercial land use noise exposure is restricted to 55 dB from 10 P.M. to 7 A.M. and 65 db from 7 A.M. and 10 P.M. Industrial land uses are restricted to 70 dB anytime of the day. These noise standards are implemented largely through enforcement actions (i.e., citizen complaint and governmental response). The Fire Department’s Code Enforcement Officer implements these regulations. The following text and table are excerpted from Section 8.32.030. (a) It is unlawful for any person to operate or cause to be operated any source of sound at any location within the city or allow the creation of any noise on property owned, leased, occupied or otherwise controlled by such person, which causes the noise level when measured on any other property to exceed: CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 127 WEST HARRIS – CHAPTER 1 LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK PAGE 1-11 (1) The noise level standard for that land use as specified in Table 8.32.030 for a cumulative period of more than thirty minutes in any hour; (2) The noise level standard plus five dB for a cumulative period of more than fifteen minutes in any hour; (3) The noise level standard plus ten dB for a cumulative period of more than five minutes in any hour; (4) The noise level standard plus fifteen dB for a cumulative period of more than one minute in any hour; or (5) The noise level standard or the maximum measured ambient level, plus twenty dB for any period of time. Table 8.32.030 NOISE LEVEL STANDARDS Land Use Category Time Period Noise Level (dB) R-E, R-1 and R-2 zones or any single-family or duplex residential in a specific plan district 10 p.m.—7 a.m. 50 7 a.m.—10 p.m. 60 R-3 and D-C zones or any multiple-family residential or mixed residential/commercial in any specific plan district 10 p.m.—7 a.m. 55 7 a.m.—10 p.m. 60 C-1, P-C, Gateway and Oyster Point Marina specific plan districts or any commercial use in any specific plan district 10 p.m.—7 a.m. 60 7 a.m.—10 p.m. 65 M-1, P-1 Anytime 70 Source: City of South San Francisco Municipal Code Construction noise exposure is also regulated by the Municipal Code (Section 8.32.050(d)). Hours of construction are exempt from the standards identified in the preceding paragraph and are limited to 8 A.M. to 8 P.M. Monday through Friday, 9 A.M. to 8 P.M. on Saturdays and 10 A.M. to 6 P.M. on Sundays and holidays. The Building Division enforces and monitors these regulations. Exceptions to the hours of construction and maximum temporary noise levels may be granted by the Chief Building Official. (a) Sound Performances and Special Events. Sound performances and special events not exceeding eighty dB measured at a distance of fifty feet from the loudest source are exempt from this chapter when approval therefore has been obtained from the appropriate governmental entity. (b) Vehicle Horns. Vehicle horns, or other devices primarily intended to create a loud noise for warning purposes, shall be CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION PAGE 1-12 127 WEST HARRIS – CHAPTER 1 LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK used only when the vehicle is in a situation where life, health or property are endangered. (c) Utilities and Emergencies. Utility and street repairs, street sweepers, franchised garbage services and emergency response warning noises are exempt from this chapter. (d) Construction. Construction, alteration, repair or landscape maintenance activities which are authorized by a valid city permit shall be allowed on weekdays between the hours of eight a.m. and eight p.m., on Saturdays between the hours of nine a.m. and eight p.m., and on Sundays and holidays between the hours of ten a.m. and six p.m., or at such other hours as may be authorized by the permit, if they meet at least one of the following noise limitations: (1) No individual piece of equipment shall produce a noise level exceeding ninety dB at a distance of twenty-five feet. If the device is housed within a structure or trailer on the property, the measurement shall be made outside the structure at a distance as close to twenty-five feet from the equipment as possible. (2) The noise level at any point outside of the property plane of the project shall not exceed ninety dB. (Ord. 1088 § 1, 1990). 6. CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING CODE New California Green Building Code Standards became effective on January 1, 2014. The mandatory and voluntary measures for residential, non-residential and mixed use buildings are designed to reduce our carbon footprint and promote environmental sustainability; i.e., decrease impacts incumbent upon the environment resulting from human activities. The collection of regulations is contained in the California Building Code. The regulations prescribe measures to reduce water consumption, reduce building construction waste, and energy consumption in both the construction and operation of buildings and for the life of the building. The regulations prescribe methods to test, report, maintain, and improve the measures employed to promote environmental sustainability. The Green Building Code also regulates the exposure (i.e., off gassing) of VOCs (volatile organic compounds), aerosols and formaldehyde and moisture and dust penetration in the use and application of building materials. Regulations address the types of as sealants, coatings, finishes, flooring (wood, carpet, particle board) and architectural finishes that are not permitted based upon the performance and potential toxicity of the substances. Design standards limit and as appropriate prohibit the amount of building heat loss and light pollution incident upon adjacent properties. Standards address the use of potable, grey and recycled water for interior and exterior, residential and non-residential uses. Maximum Sound Transmission Class (STC) ratings are also identified and apply to interior exposure levels and noise levels at property lines. Distance thresholds are identified that trigger additional STC ratings for buildings within prescribed proximity to freeways, airports and 65dB exceedances at property lines. CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 127 WEST HARRIS – CHAPTER 1 LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK PAGE 1-13 Amenities to support people using bicycles are identified and include lockers, showers and secure lock-up areas. Provision of preferential parking spaces for low fuel vehicles at a percentage of overall parking provided on a site is also specified. 1.6 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED This Initial Study evaluates the Project which is defined as that proposed by the Applicant and as modified by the City of South San Francisco’s standard COAs, identified above. Therefore, any impacts identified by the following Initial Study are those that could exceed the impacts that would be mitigated by the City’s standard permitting process and as such will require additional mitigation and/or additional environmental review. Environmental factors that may be affected by the Project, as defined by CEQA and as described in Chapter 3, are listed below. Factors identified with sshhaaddiinngg have been determined to have the potential for significant impacts as discussed in Chapter 3. These factors will be addressed in an EIR. Factors which are unshaded have been determined to pose no potential for significant impacts. Aesthetics Hazards &Hazardous Materials Public Services Agriculture & Forest Resources Hydrology and Water Quality Recreation Air Quality Land Use and Planning TTrraannssppoorrttaattiioonn Greenhouse Gas Mineral Resources Utilities &Service Systems Biological Resources Noise Cumulative Impacts Cultural Resources Population &Housing Geology &Soils CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION PAGE 1-14 127 WEST HARRIS – CHAPTER 1 LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK 1.7 LEAD AGENCY'S DETERMINATION On the basis of the analysis contained in Chapter 3: 127 WEST HARRIS – CHAPTER 2 OF INITIAL STUDY PAGE 2-1 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.1 PROJECT LOCATION AND SETTING PROJECT LOCATION The Project site is located in the eastern area of the City of South San Francisco, known as the “East of 101 Planning Area,” south of East Grand Avenue and north of Mitchell Avenue at 127 West Harris Avenue. San Francisco International Airport (SFO) is approximately 0.8 miles south of the site. The Colma Creek channel is approximately 250 feet south and U.S. 101 is approximately 850 feet west of the site. Mitchell Avenue provides access to West Harris Avenue. Gateway Boulevard to the west and Harbor Way to the east provide access to Mitchell Avenue (See Figure 1 Project Location). FIGURE 1 PROJECT LOCATION CHAPTER 2: PROJECT DESCRIPTION PAGE 2-2 127 WEST HARRIS – CHAPTER 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION EAST OF 101 AREA LAND USE HISTORY The East of 101 Area was part of the first industrial development in South San Francisco over 100 years ago. The area has undergone many transformations as industrial uses, such as steel manufacturing, and meat packaging which gave way to industrial park, warehousing and distribution uses that came to dominate the area in the 1950s and 1960s. The City adopted the East of 101 Area Plan (July, 1994) to direct land use, design and resource conservation. In 1999, the City updated its General Plan and in 2010 its zoning ordinance. These documents reflect the third wave of development in the East of 101 Area: the emergence of modern office buildings and life science campuses, predominately north of East Grand Avenue. Older manufacturing uses, industrial park structures, warehousing, freight forwarding, car rental services and airport serving hotels and parking structures are predominately located south of East Grand Avenue, within the vicinity of the Project. Blocks throughout the East of 101 Area are generally very large in size and the area has a stark industrial look. Abandoned railroad spurs and dry docks are also present. Since the late 1990s, developers have preferred to redevelop the older industrial park blocks and construct new mixed office and research and development (R&D) developments north of East Grand Avenue. Development has resulted in the clean-up of old industrial sites (Brownfield sites), consistent with environmental practices associated with LEED and the Environmental Protection Agency principles and objectives. The East of 101 Area has and continues to witness expansion of R&D and airport- and visitor- serving land uses. R&D is anticipated to reach approximately 12 million square feet in the East of 101 Area by 2035, in addition to the 200 acre Genentech Research and Development Facility Master Plan.1 Office space not associated with R&D is anticipated to reach 1.23 million square feet, by 2035. Other land uses include or are anticipated to include by 2035 approximately 11.3 million square feet of manufacturing; 1 million square feet of commercial/retail/home center retail; and 3,650 hotel rooms. Water related uses include a ferry terminal and 716 berths for privately owned boats. DOWNTOWN STATION AREA PLAN A significant planning effort addressing the East of 101 Area south of East Grand Avenue is the Draft Downtown Station Area Plan which can be reviewed on the City’s website (http://www.ssfdowntownplan.org/background), or Google City of South San Francisco Official Website. The Draft Plan was released for public review July, 2014 and the EIR was released on October 10, 2014 for the 45-day public review period. The Project site is approximately 100 feet from the southeastern edge of the Draft Downtown Station Area Plan, in what is identified as the “Eastern Neighborhood” (See Figure 2 Draft Downtown Station Area Plan and Project Location). The Eastern Neighborhood is bounded by East Grand Avenue to the north; Gateway Boulevard to the east; South Airport Boulevard to the south; and the U.S. 101 to the west. The Eastern Neighborhood would experience land use changes 1 The East of 101 Traffic Model is based upon these R&D figures. The R&D figures reflect the recent Britannia Cove at Oyster Point and the 475 Eccles EIRs, and they represent a combination of entitled and built as well as entitled and un-built projects. Crane Transportation Group, August, 2014. CHAPTER 2: PROJECT DESCRIPTION 127 WEST HARRIS – CHAPTER 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION PAGE 2-3 Excerpted from Draft Downtown Station Area Plan Figure 3 of the Draft Downtown Station Area Plan, prepared by BMS Design Group and Atkins, 2013 and site location added by Knapp Consulting FIGURE 2 DRAFT DOWNTOWN STATION AREA PLAN AND PROJECT LOCATION . including re-designating and rezoning properties from Industrial to R&D if the Plan is adopted as shown in Figure 2. Abandoned rail spurs and the Colma Creek channel would be designated Open Space. Land currently designated as Business Commercial, Mixed Industrial and Auto-Oriented Commercial would become Office /R&D. An area along East Grand Avenue would include a ‘Retail Focus’. As a result, the East of 101 Area south of East Grand Avenue could witness an increase of R&D up to 1.185 million square feet (Table 1 Existing and Proposed Land Uses, South San Francisco Downtown Station Area, Initial Study, page 7, Atkins. 2013 and page 3.9 of the Draft Downtown Station Area Plan). LAND USE ADJACENT TO AND NEARBY THE PROJECT SITE The Project site is vacant. As noted the Project would construct a hotel on the site. Adjacent to and south of the site is the Focus Hotel and to the north a food wholesaler, CTC Food Industries, Inc. Properties in the area are developed with vacant and occupied office space, freight forwarding, building materials and food wholesalers. Land uses outside of West Harris Avenue are a mix of light industrial, manufacturing and R&D. CHAPTER 2: PROJECT DESCRIPTION PAGE 2-4 127 WEST HARRIS – CHAPTER 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The hill containing the “‘South San Francisco the Industrial City’” sign is visible to the northwest. The hill is known locally, as “Sign Hill” and is listed as a National Historic Resource (1996). Buildings along West Harris are one to three story structures. Denser development patterns including the Embassy Suites Hotel, R&D and office buildings located on Gateway Boulevard can be seen from the Project area. These buildings are two to eight stories in height. PROJECT SITE CONDITIONS The 64,117 square foot (1.47 acre) vacant site is approximately 13 feet above mean sea level. Historical information indicates that the site and surrounding area were submerged swamp land from the late 1890s to the early 1950s. The site has never been developed. Periodically the site was used for parking. The adjacent Focus Hotel was constructed in 1980. The site is covered with invasive and native grasses and shrubs. The site is relatively flat, with a slight surface gradient towards the east. Evidence of illegal dumping is present on the site. The materials include pipes, cardboard boxes, glass, tires, metal fencing and plastic oil bottles. These materials, consisting of approximately one dump truck in volume, have been removed from the site. Undocumented fill is present throughout the site and more pronounced in the middle of the site. There is approximately a nine foot layer of undocumented fill consisting of sandy, gravely, cobble and boulders on the site. The boulders are 12 to 42 inches in diameter (Geotechnical Engineering Report, Terracon, April 15, 2014). Bay Mud appears below the undocumented fill. Metal concentrations (arsenic and chromium) above California Environmental Screening Levels (ESLs) for shallow soils are present on the site. Additionally low levels of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH), polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) below ESLs are also present in shallow soils (Phase I ESA, Terracon, March 18, 2014 and Limited Stockpile Characterization and Sampling, Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites, 127 West Harris Avenue, South San Francisco, California. March 19, 2014. Terracon, see Figure 3, Boring and Sampling Locations). The additional testing found soil samples above the reporting limits for: TPH-ORO 8.8 mg/Kg, 19 mg/Kg and 7.8 mg/Kg from TP-1, SP-5 and SP-6, respectively; naphthalene concentration of 0.085 mg/Kg from TP-3, and phenanthrene concentrations of 0.061 mg/Kg and 0.12 mg/Kg from TP-3 and TP-4 respectively; and various metals from stockpiles soils, including: arsenic, barium, beryllium, chromium, cobalt, copper, lead, mercury, nickel, vanadium and zinc were at concentrations above the laboratory method reporting limits. The geologic formation is sandstone, shale and conglomerate. Groundwater was encountered at eight feet below ground surface (bgs). The hydrological gradient varies seasonally from southeast to southwest as does the level of groundwater (Phase I ESA, Terracon, March 18, 2014). 2.2 PROPOSED PROJECT PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Applicant proposes a 128 room limited-service hotel. The hotel would include an indoor swimming pool and breakfast area. All parking would be on surface in front of the building and along the south side and west side property lines. Two shuttle vans and 93 surface parking spaces CHAPTER 2: PROJECT DESCRIPTION 127 WEST HARRIS – CHAPTER 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION PAGE 2-5 are proposed. Site access would be via two 30 foot wide two-way driveways along the south and north property lines (see Figure 4 Site Plan). FIGURE 3 BORING AND SAMPLING LOCATIONS 2 The Project proposes a 1.02 floor area ratio (FAR). The building would be 63 feet in height and setback approximately 50 feet from the southern property line; 20 feet from the northern; 45 from the western; and 65 to 75 from the eastern property lines. The building would be fire sprinkled. There are three PG&E towers constructed in the southwest corner of the Focus Hotel parking area. The lines traverse in a relative north/south direction. The lines (in plan dimension) are approximately 120 to 140 feet from the western façade of the Project, and approximately 180 feet from the southwestern corner of the proposed building. The PG&E towers were emplaced in the 1940s (Phase I ESA, Terracon, March 18, 2014). 2 Excerpted from Terracon report to show location of sampling only. The full report is in Appendix A CHAPTER 2: PROJECT DESCRIPTION PAGE 2-6 127 WEST HARRIS – CHAPTER 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION LANDSCAPING Landscaping would include 57 trees consisting of Raywood Ash, Flowering Gum Eucalyptus, Date Palm, Mexican Fan Palm, Mediterranean Fan Palm and Cajeput trees. Additional landscaping includes seven varieties of shrubs and four varieties of groundcover and various placements of boulders to appear as rock outcroppings. The Raywood Ash trees may be replaced with London Plane Trees, Platanus acerifolia ‘Columbia’ or Ginkgo biloba trees as recommended by the City’s Design Review Board. Bioswales and retention areas are proposed on the north, east, and southern property lines. The front elevation would include more detailed landscaping framing the building and the entry walkway. Provided by Gerald R. Kessler, Architect FIGURE 4 SITE PLAN CHAPTER 2: PROJECT DESCRIPTION 127 WEST HARRIS – CHAPTER 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION PAGE 2-7 CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE The overall construction schedule is anticipated to take 15-16 months. The heaviest portion of construction, site clearing, grading, drilling, driving and emplacing piles, structural steel and foundation work would require approximately three months. Wood framing, rough plumbing, electrical and mechanical, emplacement of block walls, and roofing would require approximately 16 to 18 weeks (4.5 months). Interior work and finishes would require approximately 12 to 14 weeks. The stages of work overlap and are rounded up to provide a conservative construction schedule.3 In summary, the most intense part of site preparation and construction would require three months. 2.3 ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION MEASURES PROPOSED AS PART OF THE PROJECT The following measures are included as part of the Project, and are shown on the architectural drawings (sheet G0007) and in the Project application materials. These measures are in addition to the City’s standard requirements identified in Chapter 1. Therefore, the following measures are considered part of the Project for the CEQA evaluation, and omission of any of these measures may result in a significant environmental impact and may require further CEQA analysis. A. Archaeology A licensed archaeologist shall be on site during grading and pile driving to inspect site soils. Should site soils appear culturally significant the archaeologist shall call a halt to grading operations in the potentially affected areas until the potential significance of the find is evaluated. A mitigation program to preserve the cultural resource in situ, remove and preserve in a museum or university, photograph and catalogue, or other method(s) deemed appropriate by the archaeologist if warranted, shall occur. The protocols of Public Resources Code Section 210832.2 and section 15065.5(c)-(f), California Code of Regulations Title 14, Chapter 3 (CEQA Guidelines) shall be followed, as appropriate. B. Hazards and Hazardous Materials The Applicant retained Terracon to conduct a limited sampling soil on the Project site, as prompted by the Phase I ESA findings and the Limited Stockpile Characterization and Sampling (127 West Harris Avenue, South San Francisco, CA, March 19, 2014. Terracon). Activities consisted of the collection of representative samples from the test pits and stockpiles on March 3, 2014. See Figure 3 Boring and Sampling Locations, above. In summary, no odors, discoloration or staining was observed on the site. The soil samples were collected from bottom of the test pits TP-1, TP-2, TP-3 and TP-4 and composite soil samples were collected from the onsite stockpiles SP-5 and SP-6. The samples were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH), gasoline range organics (GRO), diesel range organics (DRO) and oil range organics (ORO) by United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 8015B, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by 3 Schedule is based upon information provided by Covent Construction, Inc., May 23, 2014 CHAPTER 2: PROJECT DESCRIPTION PAGE 2-8 127 WEST HARRIS – CHAPTER 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION EPA Method 8260B, PAHs (Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons) by EPA Method 8270C and Title-22 Metals by EPA Method 6010B. Based on laboratory analysis of the soil samples collected from test pits and stockpiled materials, the samples did not exhibit TPH or VOCs concentrations above the laboratory method reporting limits, except for a TPH-ORO concentrations of 8.8 mg/Kg, 19 mg/Kg and 7.8 mg/Kg from TP-1, SP-5 and SP-6, respectively. Additionally, the samples did not exhibit PAH compounds above the laboratory method reporting limits, except for naphthalene concentration of 0.085 mg/Kg from TP-3, and phenanthrene concentrations of 0.061 mg/Kg and 0.12 mg/Kg from TP-3 and TP-4 respectively. The stockpiled materials additionally exhibited various metals, including: arsenic, barium, beryllium, chromium, cobalt, copper, lead, mercury, nickel, vanadium and zinc at concentrations above the laboratory method reporting limits. The soil will be tested to determine the suitable disposal or reuse procedures pursuant to Hazards Table 1 (see blue shaded area). Permits from the San Mateo County Department of Environmental Health (SMCDEH), the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) and South San Francisco Fire Department will be secured. A soil management plan may be required and chain of custody shall be followed. HAZARDS TABLE 1 STANDARD REMEDIATION PRACTICES Media Hazardous Materials Approach Soil Remediation (ex-situ) Fuels • Reuse on Site (if concentration is less than 100 ppm). • Haul and Dispose at appropriate landfill. • Capping and vapor barrier. • Treat on site (see below). Soil Remediation (ex-situ) VOCs (gasoline fuels, solvents) • Consult the SMCEHD for requirements. • Haul and Dispose. • Aeration – requires a notification to BAAQMD, daily volumes are limited. • Vapor Stripping – apply vacuum system to covered piles, notify BAAQMD. • Bioremediation - apply bio-treatment materials, moisture and “work” soil piles. • Thermal Desorption – various vendors provide mobile treatment units. • Capping and vapor barrier. Soil Remediation (ex-situ) Inorganics (metals) • Consult BAAQMD and SMCEHD for requirements. • Haul and Dispose. • Chemical Stabilization. • Sorting – reduce waste volume by screening to target contaminant particle size. Soil Remediation (in-situ) VOCs • Consult SMCEHD for requirements. • Soil Vapor Extraction – apply vacuum to vapor wells, notify BAAQMD. • In-situ chemical oxidation. • In-Situ Vitrification – use electricity to melt waste and surrounding soils. CHAPTER 2: PROJECT DESCRIPTION 127 WEST HARRIS – CHAPTER 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION PAGE 2-9 Media Hazardous Materials Approach Soil Remediation (in-situ) SVOCs • Consult SMCEHD for requirements. • Bioremediation – saturate soils with bio-treatment materials. • Chemical Stabilization – saturate soils with chemicals to immobilize contaminants. • In-Situ Vitrification. • Capping . Groundwater - Investigation All • If contaminants are detected in the 20 foot below ground surface soil sample an additional boring should be completed to groundwater. • Analyze sample for contaminants detected in soil. • Report results to the SMCEHD and consult on remedial alternatives. Groundwater Remediation VOCs • Consult BAAQMD and SMCEHD for requirements. • Pump and Treat – pump from wells, treat and discharge treated water. • Air Sparging – inject air to volatilize contaminants and create aerobic groundwater conditions suitable for natural bioremediation. Generally applied in conjunction with Soil Vapor Extraction to control released volatiles. • Bioremediation – inject bio-treatment materials into affected groundwater. • Chemical Oxidation – inject oxidation chemicals into affected groundwater. Groundwater Remediation SVOCs • Consult BAAQMD for requirements. • Pump and Treat. • Bioremediation. • Chemical Oxidation. Groundwater Remediation Inorganics • Consult BAAQMD for requirements. • Pump and Treat. • Chemical Immobilization – inject chemicals to precipitate or chemically fix contaminants to soil particles. C. Geology and Soils 1. Geotechnical Clarifications and Plan Review The Project Geotechnical Consultant shall review and approve all geotechnical design aspects of the project construction plans. The Consultant shall also address the following items: o Consideration shall be given to the benefits of an indicator pile testing program to confirm driving capabilities, embedment depths, and pile capacity prior to selecting final pile depths. o Planned pre-drilling for the upper portions of piles may create voids that could impact lateral resistance. The Consultant shall consider appropriate measures to address voids prior to forming pile caps. CHAPTER 2: PROJECT DESCRIPTION PAGE 2-10 127 WEST HARRIS – CHAPTER 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION o Appropriate documentation to address the above will be submitted to the City for review by the City Engineer prior to issuance of permits for project construction. 2. Vibration Monitoring Vibration monitoring and pre- and post-construction monitoring of nearby structures shall be undertaken to evaluate and document vibration related impacts. A specific plan to address construction period vibrations should be submitted to the City for review by the City Engineer. 3. Geotechnical Construction Inspections The geotechnical consultant will inspect, test (as needed), and approve all geotechnical aspects of the project construction. The inspections should include, but not necessarily be limited to: site preparation and grading, site surface and subsurface drainage improvements, and excavations for foundations and retaining walls prior to the placement of steel and concrete. The results of these inspections and the as-built conditions of the project will be described by the geotechnical consultant in a letter and submitted to the City Engineer for review prior to final (as-built) project approval. The piles would extend to a minimum depth of 48 feet. The structural engineer may add some additional depth to obtain sufficient bearing. Due to the properties of strata below about 35 feet, it seems credible that piles may be in the range of 50 to 60 feet (Ted Sayre, Principal Engineering Geologist, Cotton Shires Associates, e-mail November 6, 2014). In summary, the geotechnical report (Terracon, October 7, 2014 and Cotton Shires Associates peer review October 16, 2014) states the pile holes would be pre-drilled, and consequently, the forces needed to drive piles will be reduced. Cast-in-place piles may not be feasible with the very weak, squeezing bay muds. A rigid pile would be inserted from the surface into pre-drilled holes. Because the holes would likely squeeze in after they are drilled, there is still a need to drive the piles to get them into place. It may be necessary to place additional compacted fill around the tops of the piles to address voids that may form near the tops of the pre-drilled holes after pile insertion and to obtain the design lateral resistance near the top of the piles. D. Noise and Vibration The Applicant includes the following as part of the Project to reduce the annoyance of construction noise and to comply with the city’s permitting requirements : 1. Emplace noise reduction technologies (such as sound blankets or other temporary noise barriers) to limit noise at the southern and northern and as needed on the western and eastern property lines to not greater than 90 dB. 2. Secure a waiver to permit more than 90 dB noise levels at the property line during grading and pile driving, in the event that the noise limit is momentarily exceeded. CHAPTER 2: PROJECT DESCRIPTION 127 WEST HARRIS – CHAPTER 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION PAGE 2-11 3. Notify property and business owners in writing within West Harris Avenue of the construction schedule and contact person for the Project for questions, complaints and comments. 4. Consider and to the extent feasible provide some periods during the day (i.e., lunch, breaks) when pile driving does not occur. 5. Instrumentation would be in place on nearby buildings to monitor vibrations during pile driving so that buildings are not exposed to harmful vibrations. Pile driving would need to be modified to reduce vibrations if measured accelerations exceed a designated threshold. Vibration reduction might include use of a smaller driving hammer, or reduced travel of the hammer to lesson impact vibrations caused by the hammer hitting the top of pile. This would be like switching to more extended shallow pounding instead of a shorter duration of more forceful pounding. 2.4 GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION The Project site is within the area subject to the provisions of the “East of 101” Planning Sub-Area of the City of South San Francisco’s General Plan. The General Plan designates the Project site “Business Commercial” (BC); a use intended for business and professional office and visitor service establishments and retail. Permitted uses include administrative, financial, business, professional, medical and public offices, and visitor-oriented and regional commercial activities. The General Plan (page 42) specifically notes: This category is intended for the emerging commercial and hotel district along South Airport, Gateway and Oyster Point Boulevards, and South Spruce Corridor. Maximum FAR for hotel developments shall be 1.2 with increases to a maximum total FAR of 2.0 for development meeting specified criteria. ZONING CLASSIFICATION The Project site is zoned Freeway Commercial (FC). The FC zoning is one of a group of four zoning districts identified under Chapter 20.110 Employment Districts. FC zoning is intended for regional-serving retail uses, commercial lodging, visitor services and similar uses that benefit from proximity to the Bayshore Freeway [i.e., U.S. 101]. Hotels are a permitted use within this zoning classification. The FC designation identifies a 1.2 FAR for hotels; a minimum lot size of one acre; minimum lot width of 50 feet and a minimum front setback of 20 feet. A complete list of permitted and conditional uses is identified in Chapter 20.110, Table 20.110.002 Land Use Regulations- Employment Districts of the South San Francisco Municipal Code (http://qcode.us/codes/southsanfrancisco/). CHAPTER 2: PROJECT DESCRIPTION PAGE 2-12 127 WEST HARRIS – CHAPTER 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.5 REQUIRED ENTITLEMENTS LEAD AGENCY REQUIREMENTS ADJUDICATIVE Conditional Use Permit. Design Review approval. MINISTERIAL Grading and Building permits. Encroachment permits to work in the public right-of-way. OTHER AGENCY REQUIRED PERMITS Local and State approval of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan. Bay Area Air Quality District. San Mateo County Department of Environmental Health. 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis Page 3-1 3 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST The following checklist is consistent with CEQA Guidelines, Appendix G. A “no impact” response indicates that the Project would not result in an environmental impact in a particular area of interest, either because the resource is not present, or the Project does not have the potential to cause an effect on the resource. A “less than significant” response indicates that, while there may be potential for an environmental impact, the significance of the impact would not exceed established thresholds and/or that there are standard procedures or regulations in place that would apply to the Project and hence no mitigation is required, or that, although there is the potential for a significant impact, feasible mitigation measures are available and have been agreed to and proposed by the Project to reduce the impact to a level of “less than significant.” A “potentially significant impact” indicates that the Project could exceed established thresholds, no mitigation is currently proposed or identified and therefore the impact will be analyzed in an environmental impact report. A “less than significant with mitigation” indicates that although the impact would be considered significant, measures are identified and required herein that will reduce the impact to less than significant. Citations for this chapter are contained within the relevant discussion. Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist Page 3-2 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis 3.1 AESTHETICS Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? X b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? X c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? X d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? X SETTING PROJECT SITE The Project site is located in the eastern area of the City of South San Francisco, known as the “East of 101 Planning Area,” south of East Grand Avenue and north of Mitchell Avenue at 127 West Harris Avenue. San Francisco International Airport (SFO) is approximately 0.8 miles south of the site. The Colma Creek channel is approximately 250 feet south and U.S. 101 is approximately 850 feet west of the site. Mitchell Avenue provides access to West Harris Avenue. Gateway Boulevard to the west and Harbor Way to the east provide access to Mitchell Avenue (See Figure 1 Project Location in Chapter 2). The Project site is vacant and covered with invasive and native grasses and shrubs. No trees are on the site. The site is relatively flat, with a slight surface gradient towards the east. Evidence of illegal dumping is present on the site. The 64,117 square foot (1.47 acre) site is approximately 13 feet above mean sea level. Historical information indicates that the site and surrounding area were submerged swamp land from the late 1890s to the early 1950s. The site has never been developed. Periodically the site was used for parking. Adjacent to and south of the site is the Focus Hotel and to the north is a food wholesaler, CTC Food Industries, Inc. Properties in the area are developed with vacant and occupied office space, freight forwarding, building materials and food wholesalers. Land uses outside of West Harris Avenue are a mix of light industrial, manufacturing and research and development. There are three PG&E towers constructed in the southwest corner of the Focus Hotel parking area. The lines traverse in a relative north/south direction. The lines (in plan dimension) are approximately 120 to 140 feet in distance from the western façade of the Project, and approximately 180 feet from the southwestern corner of the proposed building. Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis Page 3-3 The hill containing the “‘South San Francisco The Industrial City”’ sign is visible to the northwest. The hill is known locally, as “Sign Hill” and is listed as a National Historic Resource. Buildings along West Harris are one to three story structures. Denser development patterns such as the Embassy Suites Hotel and R&D and office buildings located on Gateway Boulevard can be seen from the Project area. These buildings are two to eight stories in height. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO South San Francisco’s urban character is one of contrasts within a visually well defined setting. San Bruno Mountain to the north, the ridge along Skyline Boulevard to the west, US 380 to the south, and the San Francisco Bay to the east provide the City with distinctive edges. The City is contained in almost a bowl like fashion by hills on two sides. The City’s terrain ranges from the flatlands along the water to hills east and north. Hills are visible from all parts of the City, and Sign Hill and San Bruno Mountain in the distance are visual landmarks. Much of the City’s topography is rolling, resulting in distant views from many neighborhoods. Geographically, the City is relatively small, extending approximately two miles in a north-south direction and about five miles from east to west. South San Francisco’s industrial roots are reflected in its urban character, especially in its eastern parts. EAST OF 101 AREA Land uses in the East of 101 Area have witnessed a change in land use over the years. The East of 101 area was part of the first industrial development in South San Francisco about 100 years ago. Since then, the area has undergone many transformations. Pioneering industrial uses, such as steel manufacturing, and meat packaging gave way to industrial parks, including warehousing and distribution uses that came to dominate the area in the 1950s and 1960s. The emergence of modern office buildings and life science campuses (R&D) in the 1980s marks the third major wave of land use change in the area. The Downtown Station Area Plan, if adopted, will usher in a new wave of land uses in the East of 101 Area south of Grand Avenue, as noted in the Project Description, Chapter 2. The Project site is approximately 100 feet from the southeastern edge of the Draft Downtown Station Area Plan area in what is identified as the “Eastern Neighborhood” (See Figure 2 Draft Downtown Station Area Plan and Project Location in Chapter 2). The Eastern Neighborhood would experience land use changes from Industrial to R&D if the Plan is adopted. Abandoned rail spurs and the Colma Creek channel would be designated open space. Land currently designated as Business Commercial, Mixed Industrial and Auto-Oriented Commercial would become Office R&D. PROPOSED PROJECT The Applicant proposes a 128 room limited-service hotel. The hotel would include an indoor swimming pool and breakfast area. All parking would be on surface in front of the building and along the south side and west side property lines. Two shuttle vans and 93 surface parking spaces are proposed. Site access would be via two 30 foot wide two-way driveways along the south and north property lines. Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist Page 3-4 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis The Project proposes a 1.02 floor area ratio (FAR). The building would be 63 feet in height and setback approximately 50 feet from the southern property line; 20 feet from the northern; 45 from the western; and 65 to 75 from the eastern property lines. Landscaping would include 57 trees consisting of Raywood Ash, Flowering Gum Eucalyptus, Date Palm, Mexican Fan Palm, Mediterranean Fan Palm and Cajeput trees. Additional landscaping includes seven varieties of shrubs and four varieties of groundcover and various placements of boulders to appear as rock outcroppings. Bioswales and retention areas are proposed on the north, east, and southern property lines. The front elevation (toward West Harris Avenue) would include more detailed landscaping framing the building and the entry walkway. The Raywood Ash trees may be replaced with London Plane Trees, Platanus acerifolia ‘Columbia’ or Ginkgo biloba trees as recommended by the Design Review Board and noted in Chapter 2 Project Description. REGULATORY FRAMEWORK SAN MATEO COUNTY Comprehensive Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan for the Environs of San Francisco International Airport (ALUP) The South San Francisco General Plan refers to the ALUP maximum height limits for structures within the San Francisco International Airport impact zone. The maximum permitted height for the Project is 150 feet.1 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO Design Review Board As identified in Chapter 1.5.1, the Project is required by law to undergo review by the City’s Design Review Board. Changes in design may be identified by the Board and may also be identified by the Planning Commission. Design review regulates signage, site layout, architecture, urban design and lighting. General Plan Scenic vistas and corridors are identified in the South San Francisco General Plan. The Project site is identified as a site that is visible from at least one viewpoint (Figure 2-4 Viewshed, South San Francisco General Plan, page 36 and General Plan Background Report). 1 Mr. Billy Gross of the South San Francisco Planning Division downloaded the height regulations for this initial study. Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis Page 3-5 East of 101 Area Plan Design Element In 1995, the East of 101 Area Plan established goals and policies for the East of 101 Area. The stated goals of the Area Plan’s design concept are to promote quality design, to promote a functional, safe and attractive environment, preserve the character of South San Francisco’s heritage, protect public investment and land values, protect the natural environment, and facilitate evaluation of individual development proposals through the use of the Area Plan’s design guidelines. IMPACTS a) Scenic Vistas Significance Criteria: For the purpose of assessing impacts of a proposed project on scenic vistas, the threshold of significance is exceeded when a project would result in the obstruction of a designated public vista, or in the placement of an arguably offensive or negative-appearing project within such a vista. Any clear conflict with a general plan policy or other adopted planning policy regarding scenic vistas would also be considered a potentially significant adverse environmental impact. The Project is not located within a formally designated public vista, nor would it result in the obstruction of a formally designated public vista. Additionally, the Project would not conflict with an adopted planning policy regarding scenic vistas. The West Harris area does have views of Sign Hill. The Project site is undeveloped which provides unobstructed views of Sign Hill. The proposed building setbacks at approximately 50 feet from the southern property line; 20 feet from the northern; 45 from the western; and 65 to 75 from the eastern property lines would provide view corridors to Sign Hill and San Bruno Mountain. The Project would have a less than significant impact with respect to scenic vistas. b) Scenic Resources and Scenic Routes Significance Criteria: For the purposes of assessing impacts of the Project on scenic resources, the threshold of significance is exceeded by any Project-related action that would substantially damage scenic resources (i.e., trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state [or local] scenic highway). There are no state or local scenic highways within the Project area. Additionally there are no rock outcroppings, trees or historic buildings within the Project area or on the Project site. Therefore by default there are no scenic resources or scenic route impacts associated with the Project as defined by the significance criteria. Project would not be visible from a state or local scenic highway. The Project site does not contain historic buildings, trees or significant rock outcroppings. The view of Sign Hill is addressed above in a, and as noted the building setbacks would allow views of Sign Hill. The Project would have no impact on scenic resources. Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist Page 3-6 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis c) Visual Character Significance Criteria: The Project would have a significant environmental impact if it were to substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings. The Project would be located in an area which is largely industrial. The property is fenced, and notwithstanding the locked gate, trespassers have managed to dump refuse on the site. The goals of the City are to provide visitor serving uses on the site and within the Project area. The Project would construct a building and house a use that is consistent with the City’s general plan. The landscaping proposed is consistent with the East of 101 Area Plan Design Guidelines to include street trees, enhance entryways, and provide visual interest. The building would be articulated, banded, and accentuated with arbor elements. The proposed landscaping and curvilinear entry would successfully enhance the entrance to the hotel. Therefore, the Project would have no impact on visual character or the quality of the site or its surroundings. d) Light or Glare Significance Criteria: Project related creation of any new source of substantial light or glare that would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area would be regarded as a significant environmental impact. The Project site is a built-out suburban area that is undergoing land use changes from industrial to R&D, retail and visitor serving lodging. The Project is not in an undeveloped area but within a mile of San Francisco International Airport and 850 feet of U.S. 101. Parking lot and building lighting would be downcast and task oriented as required by the South San Francisco Municipal Code (SSFMC) and described in Chapter 1 Introduction. As required to be constructed per law, the Project would not substantially increase of light in the area and would not produce glare. The Project would have a less than significant impact on light and glare impacts. Finding: The Project would not have an impact on the aesthetics or scenic quality on the site or in the area. The proposed building setbacks would provide a view corridor to Sign Hill and San Bruno Mountain. The Project would construct a building and house a use that is consistent with the City’s general plan. The landscaping proposed is consistent with the East of 101 Area Plan Design Guidelines to include street trees, enhance entryways, and provide visual interest. The building would be articulated, banded, and accentuated with arbor elements. The proposed landscaping and curvilinear entry would successfully enhance the entrance to the hotel. Therefore, the Project would have no impact on visual character or the quality of the site or its surroundings. There would be no individual or cumulative impacts with respect to aesthetic, visual quality or light and glare associated with the Project. Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis Page 3-7 SETTING The Project site is vacant and covered with invasive and native grasses and shrubs. No trees are on the site. The site is relatively flat, with a slight surface gradient towards the east. Evidence of illegal dumping is present on the site. The 64,117 square foot (1.47 acre) site is approximately 13 feet above mean sea level. Historical information indicates that the site and surrounding area 3.2 AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST RESOURCES Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact II. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state’s inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment Project; and the forest carbon measurement methodology provided in the Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural use? X b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? X c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in the Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526) or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section51104(g))? X d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? X e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? X Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist Page 3-8 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis were submerged swamp land from the late 1890s to the early 1950s. The site has never been developed. Periodically the site was used for parking. IMPACTS a, b and e) Farmland Impacts Significance Criteria: The Project would have a significant environmental impact if it would result in the conversion of farmland to non-agricultural use, conflict with current zoning for agricultural use or the provisions of a current Williamson Act contract, or involve any environmental changes that could result in the conversion of farmland currently in agricultural uses to non-agricultural uses. The Project site contains no farmland and as such would not involve the conversion of Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency. The Project site is not in Williamson Act Contract. The Project site is not nearby or adjacent to any agricultural use and as such would have no impact to farmland. c, d and e) Forest Land Impacts Significance Criteria: A significant impact would result in a conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in the Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined in Public Resources Code section 4526) or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104 (g)) or result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use. The site is not zoned for timberland production or in use as such, or in proximity to such a use. Use of the site for airport-related parking would not cause rezoning of forest land (as defined in the Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526) or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g)). The Project is not nearby or adjacent to timberland or forest lands and would have no impact on timberland production or resources or forest lands. Finding: The Project site has never been developed and until the early 1950s was submerged swamp land. The Project would not adversely affect any existing agricultural operations as none exist on the site. The Project would not impact agricultural resources individually or cumulatively and does not contain any Farmland, Unique Farmland, Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland) nor land in a Williamson Act Contract. The site is not zoned for timberland production or in use as such, and would not cause rezoning of forest land (as defined in the Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526) or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g)). Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis Page 3-9 3.3 AIR QUALITY Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? X b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? X c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions, which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? X d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? X e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? X SETTING METHODOLOGY This air quality analysis was performed using methodologies and assumptions recommended within the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) CEQA Air Quality Guidelines (dated June 2010, updated in May 2011, and revised in May 2012).2 This section describes existing air quality and air pollutant construction and operational impacts. Air Quality Conditions of Approval (as described in Chapter 1, Section 1.5.2) that are required to be 2 The Air District’s June 2010 adopted thresholds of significance were challenged in a lawsuit. On March 5, 2012 the Alameda County Superior Court issued a judgment finding that the Air District had failed to comply with CEQA when it adopted the thresholds. The court found that the adoption of the thresholds was a project under CEQA and ordered the Air District to examine whether the thresholds would have a significant impact on the environment under CEQA before recommending their use. The court did not determine whether the thresholds are or are not based on substantial evidence and thus valid on the merits. The court issued a writ of mandate ordering the District to set aside the thresholds and cease dissemination of them until the Air District had complied with CEQA. The court’s order permits the Air District to develop and disseminate these CEQA Guidelines, as long as they do not implement the thresholds of significance. Although the BAAQMD’s adoption of significance thresholds for air quality analysis has been subject to judicial actions, the City of South San Francisco has determined that BAAQMD’s Revised Draft Options and Justification Report (October 2009), provide substantial evidence to support the BAAQMD recommended thresholds. Therefore, the City of South San Francisco has determined the BAAQMD recommended thresholds are appropriate for use in this analysis. California’s First District Court of Appeal issued a decision in California Building Industry Association v. Bay Area Air Quality Management District (Case No. A134335, August 13, 2013), laying the groundwork for the reinstatement of the BAAQMD’s air quality thresholds, including for greenhouse gas emissions and toxic air contaminants. Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist Page 3-10 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis implemented as part of the Project pursuant to the City of South San Francisco’s project review process are also addressed. Analyzed air quality pollutants include: carbon monoxide (CO), reactive organic compounds (ROG), nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ), sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ), particulate matter equal to or less than 10 micrometers (coarse particulates or PM 10 ), and particulate matter equal to or less than 2.5 micrometers (fine particulates or PM 2.5 ). Diesel particulate matter (DPM) is also a concern with regard to health risk assessment. Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are addressed within Section 3.4. CLIMATE The peninsula region of the Bay Area Air Basin (Bay Area) extends from the area northwest of San Jose to the Golden Gate. The Santa Cruz Mountains extend up the center of the peninsula, with elevations exceeding 2,000 feet at the south end, and gradually decreasing to an elevation of 500 feet in South San Francisco, where it terminates. San Francisco is at the north end of the peninsula and because most of the topography of San Francisco is less than 200 feet, the marine layer is able to flow across most of the city, making its climate relatively cool and windy.3 However, the area of South San Francisco and San Francisco International Airport (SFO) experience lower winds and a greater frequency of calm winds, especially during the nighttime and cooler season, due to sheltering effect of terrain to the west. Meteorological data collected at the SFO, which is approximately two miles south of the Project site, are representative of general project conditions. Average maximum and minimum winter (i.e., January) temperatures at SFO are 56 and 42 ºF, respectively, while average summer (i.e., July) maximum and minimum temperatures are 72 and 54 ºF, respectively. Precipitation at SFO averages approximately 20 inches per year. 4 Annual average wind speeds range from five to 10 miles per hour (mph) throughout the peninsula. The east side of the mountains has a westerly wind pattern; however, it is influenced by local topographic features. That is, a few hundred feet rise in elevation will induce flow around that feature instead of over it during stable atmospheric conditions. This can change the wind pattern by as much as 90 degrees over short distances. On mornings without a strong pressure gradient, areas on the east side of the peninsula often experience eastern flow in the surface layer, induced by upslope flow on the east-facing slopes and by the bay breeze. The bay breeze is rarely seen in the afternoon because the stronger sea breeze dominates the flow pattern.5 3 Bay Area Air Quality Management District. October 4, 2010, Bay Area Climatology – Peninsula http://www.baaqmd.gov/Divisions/Communications-and-Outreach/Air-Quality-in-the-Bay-Area/Bay-Area- Climatology/Subregions/Peninsula.aspx. 4 Western Regional Climate Center, Local Climate Data Summaries for San Francisco International Airport, California. http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/cgi-bin/clilcd.pl?ca23234. 5 Bay Area Air Quality Management District. October 4, 2010, Bay Area Climatology – Peninsula http://www.baaqmd.gov/Divisions/Communications-and-Outreach/Air-Quality-in-the-Bay-Area/Bay-Area- Climatology/Subregions/Peninsula.aspx. Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis Page 3-11 SENSITIVE RECEPTORS People within the general population that are more susceptible to the effects of air pollution include children, elderly, and those that suffer from certain illnesses or disabilities. Therefore, schools, convalescent homes, and hospitals are considered to be sensitive receptors to air pollution. Residential areas are also considered sensitive to poor air quality because people usually stay home for extended periods of time, which results in greater exposure to localized air pollutants. The Project is located in the East of 101 Planning Area, south of East Grand Avenue and north of Mitchell Avenue. San Francisco International Airport is approximately 0.8 miles south of the site. The Colma Creek channel is approximately 250 feet south and U.S. 101 is approximately 850 feet west of the site. Mitchell Avenue provides access to West Harris Avenue. Gateway Boulevard to the west and Harbor Way to the east provide access to Mitchell Avenue. BAAQMD considers the relevant zone of influence for an assessment of air quality health risks to be those areas within 1,000 feet of the Project impact area. The adjacent properties are commercial land uses along Gateway Boulevard and Mitchell Avenue. The nearest residential land uses are approximately 1,800 feet to the northwest (west of US 101). The Early Years Preschool, Old Souls Catholic School, and Spruce Elementary School are located 3,700 feet to the northeast, 4,200 feet to the northwest, and 4,790 feet to the northwest of the Project site, respectively. REGULATORY FRAMEWORK CRITERIA POLLUTANTS The BAAQMD monitors and regulates air quality pursuant to the Federal Clean Air Act, as amended, and the California Clean Air Act. The BAAQMD adopts and enforces controls on stationary sources of air pollutants through its permit and inspection programs. Other BAAQMD responsibilities include monitoring air quality, preparation of clean air plans, and responding to citizen air quality complaints. The BAAQMD has also published CEQA Air Quality Guidelines, to assist lead agencies in evaluating air quality impacts of projects and plans proposed in the Bay Area. CURRENT AIR QUALITY The BAAQMD operates a regional monitoring network for ambient concentrations of six criteria pollutants. Currently, the criteria pollutants of most concern in the Bay Area are ozone and particulate matter. The monitoring station closest to the Project site is in San Francisco on Arkansas Street. This air quality monitoring station monitors levels of ozone, particulate matter in the form of PM 10 and PM 2.5 , CO, NO 2 , and SO 2 . Air Quality Table 1 summarizes the most recent three years of data published by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) for the San Francisco, Arkansas Street air monitoring station, which is approximately eight miles to the north of the Project site. The federal 24-hour PM 2.5 standard was exceeded twice in 2011. The State 24-hour PM 10 standard and federal 24-hour PM 2.5 standard were each exceeded once in 2012. The federal 1-hour nitrogen dioxide standard Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist Page 3-12 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis was exceeded once in 2012. The federal 24-hour PM 2.5 standard was exceeded twice in 2013. No other State or federal air quality standards were exceeded during the three year period. Notably, the Bay Area is currently designated “nonattainment” for state and national (1-hour and 8-hour) ozone standards, for the state PM 10 standards, and for state and national (annual average and 24-hour) PM 2.5 standards. The Bay Area is designated “attainment” or “unclassified” with respect to the other ambient air quality standards. AIR QUALITY TABLE 1 AIR QUALITY DATA SUMMARY SAN FRANCISCO, ARKANSAS STREET, CA, 2011 – 2013 Pollutant Standard Days Standard Exceeded 2011 2012 2013 Ozone State 1–Hour 0 0 0 Ozone Federal 8–Hour 0 0 0 Ozone State 8–Hour 0 0 0 PM 10 Federal 24–Hour 0 0 0 PM 10 State 24–Hour 0 1 0 PM 2.5 Federal 24–Hour 2 1 2 Carbon Monoxide State/Federal 8–Hour 0 0 0 Nitrogen Dioxide State 1–Hour 0 0 0 Nitrogen Dioxide Federal 1–Hour 0 1 0 Sulfur Dioxide State 24-Hour 0 0 0 Source: Bay Area Air Quality Management District, Annual Bay Area Air Quality Summaries, http://www.baaqmd.gov/Divisions/Communications-and-Outreach/Air-Quality-in-the-Bay-Area/Air-Quality- Summaries.aspx, 2014. IMPACTS a) Conflicts with the Current Air Quality Plan Significance Criteria: Any project that would not support the goals of the 2010 Bay Area Clean Air Plan (Bay Area CAP) would not be considered consistent with the 2010 Bay Area CAP. On September 15, 2010, the BAAQMD adopted the 2010 Bay Area CAP. The 2010 Bay Area CAP updates the Bay Area 2005 Ozone Strategy in accordance with the requirements of the California Clean Air Act (CCAA) to implement all feasible measures to reduce ozone; provide a control strategy to reduce ozone, particulate matter, air toxics, and GHG emissions in a single, integrated plan; and establish emission control measures to be adopted or implemented in the 2010 through 2012 timeframe. The primary goals of the 2010 Bay Area CAP are to: o Attain air quality standards; o Reduce population exposure and protect public health in the Bay Area; and o Reduce GHG emissions and protect the climate. Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis Page 3-13 The recommended measure for determining Project support of these goals is consistency with BAAQMD-approved CEQA thresholds of significance. Therefore, if approval of a project would not result in significant and unavoidable air quality impacts after the application of all feasible mitigation, the Project would be considered consistent with the 2010 Bay Area CAP. The Project would not result in a significant and unavoidable impact, as shown in the Air Quality Checklist Table 3.3, above, Greenhouse Gas Checklist in Section 3.4, below and the entirety of this analysis in particular b and c, directly below. Therefore as defined by the BAAQMD’s significance criteria the Project would be consistent with the 2010 Bay Area CAP, and thus, the impact is less than significant. b and c) Violation of Standards and a Cumulatively Considerable Net Increase Significance Criteria: The Project would have a significant environmental impact if it would exceed BAAQMD’s construction and/or operational mass emission thresholds for exhaust emissions and/or if appropriate air pollutant control measures are not implemented. The significance thresholds are designated to assess whether the Project would potentially violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation. Projects with impacts less than the significance thresholds with implementation of mitigation measures are presumed to not violate air quality standards. The BAAQMD CEQA Air Quality Guidelines recommend that cumulative air quality effects from criteria air pollutants also be addressed by comparison to the mass daily and annual thresholds. These thresholds were developed to identify a cumulatively considerable contribution to a significant regional air quality impact. Air quality impacts are associated with both construction and operation of a project. BAAQMD rules and regulations govern certain aspects of the construction phase of projects. BAAQMD regulations applicable to the construction of the Project relate to portable equipment (e.g., gasoline- or diesel-powered engines used for power generation, pumps, compressors, and cranes), architectural coatings, fugitive dust, and paving materials. Project construction and operation impacts are discussed within the following sections. Construction Related Impacts The Project site is 1.47 acres and the hotel would be 128 rooms. The 65,136 square foot hotel would be five stories in height and include 93 onsite parking spaces. Construction activities are assumed to require approximately 16 months to completion during 2015-16. Chapter 2 Project Description provides further information on Project phasing and construction characteristics. Project construction would generate short-term emissions of criteria pollutants, including fugitive dust and equipment exhaust emissions. The BAAQMD CEQA Air Quality Guidelines recommend quantification of construction-related exhaust emissions and comparison of those emissions to significance thresholds. Therefore, this analysis includes quantification of construction emissions and comparison of the emissions to the BAAQMD’s construction significance thresholds. The CalEEMod (California Emissions Estimator Model version 2013.2.2) was used to quantify Project construction emissions of criteria pollutants (see Appendix A for emissions estimate assumptions). Air Quality Table 2 provides the estimated short-term construction emissions that would be associated with the Project and compares those emissions to the BAAQMD’s thresholds for Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist Page 3-14 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis construction exhaust emissions. As the construction phases (i.e., grading, building construction, paving, etc.) are sequential, the average daily construction period emissions were compared to the BAAQMD significance thresholds. All construction-related emissions would be below the BAAQMD significance thresholds. AIR QUALITY TABLE 2 PROJECT CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA POLUTANT EMISSIONS (pounds per day) Emission Sources ROG NOx PM 10 PM 2.5 CO Construction 6.5 29.8 7.3 4.3 22.9 Significance Thresholds 54 54 82 54 --- Significant Impact? No No No No No Notes: Refer to Appendix A for all emission assumptions. BAAQMD’s CEQA Air Quality Guidelines provides a number of Construction Mitigation Measures (related to fugitive dust and exhaust emissions) for construction activities which are required of the Project through the City’s standard review and approval procedures (see Introduction, Chapter 1, Section 1.5.2). The Applicant would also use low ROG coatings and finishes, as required by the BAAQMD and implemented through the City Building Division. All construction emissions would be below the BAAQMD significance thresholds with the implementation of these measures that are required by law. Therefore, Project impacts that would be associated with construction related exhaust emissions would be less than significant with implementation of the measures the City requires by law. Operational Impacts The CalEEMod was also used to estimate emissions that would be associated with space heating, water heating, and landscape maintenance emissions expected to occur due to the implementation of the Project. Operational emissions associated with motor vehicles from employees, customers, and deliveries were also estimated. Estimated operational daily and annual emissions that would be associated with the Project are presented in Air Quality Tables 3 and 4 and are compared to BAAQMD’s thresholds of significance. As indicated, the estimated operational emissions that would be associated with the Project would be below the BAAQMD’s significance thresholds and would be less than significant. AIR QUALITY TABLE 3 PROJECT DAILY OPERATIONAL CRITERIA POLUTANT EMISSIONS (pounds per day) Emission Category ROG NOx PM 10 PM 2.5 CO Area 1.6 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Energy 0.1 0.7 0.1 0.1 0.6 Mobile 3.4 5.8 4.3 1.2 32.6 Total Project 5.1 6.5 4.4 1.3 33.2 Significance Thresholds 54 54 82 54 --- Significant Impact? No No No No No Notes: Refer to Appendix A for all emission assumptions. Values reflect rounding. Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis Page 3-15 AIR QUALITY TABLE 4 PROJECT ANNUAL OPERATIONAL CRITERIA POLUTANT EMISSIONS (tons per year) Emission Category ROG NOx PM 10 PM 2.5 CO Area 0.3 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Energy <0.1 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.1 Mobile 0.6 1.0 0.7 0.2 5.3 Total Project 0.9 1.1 0.7 0.2 5.4 Significance Thresholds 10 10 15 10 --- Significant Impact? No No No No No Notes: Refer to Appendix A for all emission assumptions. Values reflect rounding. The BAAQMD has identified preliminary screening criteria for determining whether CO emissions would be exceeded. The screening criteria provide a conservative indication of whether the implementation of the Project would result in CO emissions that are potentially significant. This methodology includes the following: 1. Project is consistent with an applicable congestion management program established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways, regional transportation plan, and local congestion management agency plans. 2. The Project traffic would increase traffic volumes at affected intersections to more than 44,000 vehicles per day. 3. The Project traffic would increase traffic volumes at affected intersections to more than 24,000 vehicles per day where vertical and/or horizontal mixing is substantially limited (e.g., tunnel, parking garage, bridge underpass, natural or urban street canyon, below-grade roadway). The Project would be 65,136 gross square feet in area. The daily traffic volumes would be 1,152 (Crane Transportation Group, September, 2014). Vehicular access to the site would not include going through any tunnels, parking garages, underpasses or natural or urban street canyons. The Project traffic would not cause the daily traffic volumes to exceed the screening criteria shown in items 1 through 3 based on the circulation infrastructure and the projected traffic volumes. Therefore, impacts that would be associated with long-term operational CO exhaust emissions would be less than significant. Cumulative Impacts The BAAQMD CEQA Air Quality Guidelines recommend that cumulative air quality effects from criteria air pollutants also be addressed by comparison to the BAAQMD’s mass daily and annual significance thresholds. As shown in Air Quality Tables 2 through 4, Project-related emissions would be below the thresholds with implementation of the measures the City requires by law (see Introduction, Chapter 1, Section 1.5.2). Therefore, the Project would not be cumulatively considerable and cumulative impacts would be less than significant. Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist Page 3-16 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis d) Impacts to Sensitive Receptors Significance Criteria: The significance of impact to sensitive receptors is dependent on the chance of contracting cancer from exposure to toxic air contaminants (TACs) such as DPM or of having adverse health effects from exposure to non-carcinogenic TACs. A project is considered to be significant if the incremental cancer risk at a receptor exceeds 10 in a million. For cumulative analysis of cancer risk, BAAQMD recommends that the risks from all sources within a 1,000 foot radius of the Project’s impact area (i.e., centered at the maximum exposed residence located to the northwest of the Project) be assessed and compared to a cumulative increased risk threshold of 100 in one million. The non-cancer hazard index significance threshold of 1.0 is defined in the BAAQMD CEQA Air Quality Guidelines. For cumulative analysis of non-cancer hazard index, BAAQMD requires that the hazards from all sources within a 1,000 foot radius of the Project’s impact area be assessed and compared to a cumulative hazard index threshold of 10. Emissions of PM 2.5 are associated with health risks. The BAAQMD has established a separate significance threshold for PM 2.5 to protect public health. For individual projects, the BAAQMD significant threshold for PM 2.5 impacts is an average annual increase of 0.3 micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m3). For cumulative analysis, BAAQMD recommends that the PM 2.5 concentrations from all sources within a 1,000 foot radius of the Project’s impact area be assessed and compared to a cumulative threshold of an average annual increase of 0.8 µg/m3. Cancer Risk Cancer risk is defined as the lifetime probability of developing cancer from exposure to carcinogenic substances. Cancer risks are expressed as the chances in one million of contracting cancer, for example, ten cancer cases among one million people exposed. Following HRA guidelines established by California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) and BAAQMD’s Health Risk Screening Analysis Guidelines, incremental cancer risks were calculated by applying toxicity factors to modeled TAC concentrations in order to determine the inhalation dose (milligrams per kilogram of body weight per day [mg/kg-day]). See Appendix A for details. Construction Related Impacts As a result of construction activities (with implementation of the measures the City requires by law), the maximum cancer risk for a residential-adult receptor would be 0.02 per million and for a residential-child would be 0.20 per million (based on a 70-year annual average DPM concentration of 0.0023 µg/m3 per dispersion modeling analysis and risk exposure calculation methodologies within Appendix A). The maximum cancer risk for a school child receptor would be less than 0.01 per million. Thus, the cancer risk due to construction activities is below the BAAQMD threshold of 10 per million and would be less than significant. Please see Appendix A for details on dispersion modeling and health risk assessment assumptions and methodologies. Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis Page 3-17 Operational Related Impacts The maximum cancer risks from the Project operations would be less than 0.01 per million for all receptors with implementation of the measures the City requires by law. Thus, the health impacts from Project operations would be below the BAAQMD threshold of 10 per million and less than significant. Non-Cancer Health Impacts Both acute (short-term) and chronic (long-term) adverse health impacts unrelated to cancer are measured against a hazard index (HI), which is defined as the ratio of the predicted incremental exposure concentration from the Project to a published reference exposure level (REL) that could cause adverse health effects. The RELs are published by OEHHA based on epidemiological research. The ratio (referred to as the Hazard Quotient [HQ]) of each non- carcinogenic substance that affects a certain organ system is added to produce an overall HI for that organ system. The overall HI is calculated for each organ system. The impact is considered to be significant if the overall HI for the highest-impacted organ system is greater than 1.0. The chronic reference exposure level for DPM was established by the California OEHHA 6 as 5 micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m3). Thus, the Project-related annual concentration of DPM cannot exceed 5.0 µg/m3; resulting in a chronic acute HI of greater than 1.0 (i.e., DPM annual concentration/5.0 µg/m3). There is no acute REL for DPM. However, diesel exhaust does contain acrolein and other compounds, which do have an acute REL. Based on BAAQMD’s DPM speciation data, acrolein emissions are approximately 1.3 percent of the total DPM emissions. The acute REL for acrolein was established by the California OEHHA7 as 2.5 µg/m3. Thus, the Project-related 1-hour concentration of acrolein cannot exceed 2.5 µg/m3; resulting in an acute HI of greater than 1.0 (i.e., acrolein 1-hour concentration/2.5 µg/m3). Please see Appendix A for details on dispersion modeling and health risk assessment assumptions and methodologies. The chronic HI would be less than 0.01, based on a project-related maximum annual diesel concentration of 0.006 µg/m3 (per dispersion modeling analysis) or 0.006 µg/m3/5.0 µg/m3, which is less than 0.01. The chronic HI would be well below the BAAQMD threshold of 1 and the impact of the Project would therefore be less than significant. The acute HI would be 0.03, based on a project-related maximum 1-hour diesel concentration of 5.14 µg/m3 (per dispersion modeling analysis) and acrolein speciation of 1.3 percent for DPM or 5.14 µg/m3/2.5 µg/m3 times 1.3 percent (acrolein per DPM), which is 0.03. The acute HI would be below the BAAQMD threshold of 1 and the impact of the Project would therefore be less than significant. 6 California Office of Environmental Health Hazards Assessment - Acute, 8-hour, and Chronic Reference Exposure Levels, June 2014, http://www.oehha.ca.gov/air/allrels.html 7 California Office of Environmental Health Hazards Assessment - Acute, 8-hour, and Chronic Reference Exposure Levels, June 2014, http://www.oehha.ca.gov/air/allrels.html Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist Page 3-18 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis PM2.5 Concentration Dispersion modeling was also used to estimate exposure of sensitive receptors to Project-related concentrations of PM 2.5 . Because emissions of PM 2.5 are associated with health risks, the BAAQMD has established a separate significance threshold to protect public health. For individual projects, the BAAQMD significant threshold for PM 2.5 impacts is an average annual increase of 0.3 µg/m3. The BAAQMD guidance requires inclusion of PM 2.5 exhaust emissions only in this analysis (i.e., fugitive dust emissions are addressed under BAAQMD dust control measures and are required by law to be implemented into Project construction, see Introduction, Chapter 1, Section 1.5.2). The maximum annual PM 2.5 concentration as a result of Project construction would be 0.01 µg/m3. The annual PM 2.5 concentration due to implementation of the Project would be below the BAAQMD threshold of 0.3 µg/m3, and hence is considered less than significant. Cumulative Impacts The BAAQMD’s CEQA Air Quality Guidelines include standards and methods for determining the significance of cumulative health risk impacts. The method for determining cumulative health risk requires the addition of the health risks from permitted sources and major roadways in the vicinity of a project (i.e., within a 1,000-foot radius of the source, also considered the zone of influence for a health risk analysis), then adding the health risks of the Project impacts to determine whether the cumulative health risk thresholds are exceeded. BAAQMD has developed a geo-referenced database of permitted emissions sources throughout the San Francisco Bay Area, and has developed the Stationary Source Risk & Hazard Analysis Tool (dated May, 2012) for estimating cumulative health risks from permitted sources. Nine permitted sources are located within 1,000 feet of the Project. BAAQMD has also developed a geo-referenced database of roadways throughout the San Francisco Bay Area and has developed the Highway Screening Analysis Tool (dated May, 2011) for estimating cumulative health risks from roadways. US 101 is included in this database and is within 1,000 feet of the Project. BAAQMD CEQA Air Quality Guidelines also require the inclusion of surface streets within 1,000 feet of the Project with annual average daily traffic (AADT) of 10,000 or greater. Upon review of nearby roadways, Airport Boulevard meets the criteria. 8 Air Quality Table 5 lists the BAAQMD-permitted facility and major roadways within 1,000 feet of the Project. Air Quality Table 5 also shows the cumulative cancer risk, hazard impact, and PM 2.5 concentrations (in µg/m3) associated with these facilities (developed by BAAQMD), as well as the Project. The cumulative impacts are below the BAAQMD significance thresholds. Secondly, given that the Project would not result in increased health impacts exceeding the Project‐level thresholds, the Project would also 8 BAAQMD County Surface Street Screening Tables, May 2011 and CEHTP Traffic Linkage Service Demonstration, http://www.ehib.org/traffic_tool.jsp with coordinates of -122.403841 longitude and 37.650199 latitude. Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis Page 3-19 not result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to localized health risk and hazard impacts, resulting in a less than significant cumulative air quality impact. AIR QUALITY TABLE 5 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS Site # Facility Type Address Cancer Risk Hazard Impact PM 2.5 Concentration 15132 NOD Autobody 206 Baden Ave - 0.01 - 15764 Autobahn Specialties 33 Linden Ave - - - 16753 E+S Ahuactzin Autobody 303 Commercial Ave - - - 4316 Wright Cleaners 316 Grand Ave 3.43 0.01 - G9214 Unocal Grand Mateo 221 Airport Blvd 0.40 <0.01 - G10695 South City Shell 123 Linden Ave 0.29 <0.01 - 16311 First Class Pupu's Autobody 136 Linden Ave - - - 11618 Carrera Autobody 99 Linden Ave - <0.01 - 18877 SSF Water Quality 27 South Linden Ave 1.53 <0.01 <0.01 Permitted Sources Total 5.65 0.02 <0.01 US 101 11.9 0.01 0.11 Airport Blvd 2.95 0.01 0.11 Project (adult/children) 0.02/0.20 0.03 0.01 Grand Total 20.5/20. 7 0.07 0.24 Significance Thresholds 100 10 0.8 Significant Impact? No No No e) Odor Impacts Significance Criteria: The BAAQMD’s significance criteria for odors are more subjective and are based on the number of odor complaints generated by a project. Generally, the BAAQMD considers any project with the potential to frequently expose members of the public to objectionable odors to cause a significant impact. Projects that would site a new odor source or a new receptor farther than the applicable BAAQMD-established screening distances from an existing receptor or odor source, respectively, would not likely result in a significant odor impact. An odor source with five more confirmed complaints per year averaged over three years is considered to have a significant impact on receptors within the screening distances. Typical odor sources of concern include wastewater treatment plants, sanitary landfills, transfer stations, composting facilities, petroleum refineries, asphalt batch plants, chemical manufacturing facilities, fiberglass manufacturing facilities, auto body shops, rendering plants, and coffee roasting facilities. Diesel-fueled construction equipment would generate some odors associated with diesel exhaust. However, these emissions typically dissipate quickly and would be unlikely to affect a substantial number of people. Therefore, odor impacts associated with construction and operation of the Project would be less than significant. Finding: The Project would not result in a significant impact to air quality and would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of criteria nonattainment pollutants (ozone precursors, PM 10 , and PM 2.5 ). The City’s building permit procedure captures the BAAQMD permitting regulations, as well as BAAQMD’s recommended emission control measures. The Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist Page 3-20 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis Project would not result in exceeding any Health Risk Screening Analysis Guidelines significance criteria. The Project would not introduce objectionable odors to the area. 3.4 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? X b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? X SETTING BACKGROUND AND DEFINITIONS Gases that trap heat in the atmosphere are referred to as greenhouse gases (GHGs) because they capture heat radiated from the sun as it is reflected back into the atmosphere, much like a greenhouse does. The accumulation of GHGs has been implicated as the driving force for global climate change. The primary GHGs are carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), methane (CH 4 ), and nitrous oxide (N 2 O), ozone, and water vapor. While the presence of the primary GHGs in the atmosphere are naturally occurring, CO 2 , CH 4 , and N 2 O are also emitted from human activities, accelerating the rate at which these compounds occur within earth’s atmosphere. Emissions of CO 2 are largely by-products of fossil fuel combustion, whereas methane results from off-gassing associated with agricultural practices and landfills. Other GHGs include hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons, and sulfur hexafluoride, and are generated in certain industrial processes. Greenhouse gases are typically reported in “carbon dioxide-equivalent” measures (CO 2 e).9 There is international scientific consensus that human-caused increases in GHGs have and will continue to contribute to global warming. Potential global warming impacts in California may include, but are not limited to, loss in snow pack, sea level rise, more extreme heat days per year, more high ozone days, more large forest fires, and more drought years. Secondary effects are likely to include a global rise in sea level, impacts to agriculture, changes in disease vectors, and changes in habitat and biodiversity.10 9 Because of the differential heat absorption potential of various GHGs, GHG emissions are frequently measured in “carbon dioxide-equivalents,” which present a weighted average based on each gas’s heat absorption (or “global warming”) potential. 10 2006 Final Climate Action Team Report to the Governor and Legislature, April 3, 2005, http://www.climatechange.ca.gov/climate_action_team/reports/2006report/2006-04-03_FINAL_CAT_REPORT.PDF Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis Page 3-21 CARB estimated that in 2011 California produced 459 million gross metric tons of CO 2 e (MMTCO 2 e).11 CARB found the transportation sector is the largest source of emissions, accounting for approximately 37 percent of the total emissions. On-road vehicles accounted for more than 90 percent of emissions in the transportation sector. Transportation related GHG emissions have dropped 11 percent since 2006. The industrial sector accounted for approximately 22 percent of the total emissions. Emissions from electricity generation were about 21 percent of total emissions, with higher contribution from in-state than from imported electricity.12 In the San Francisco Bay Area, fossil fuel consumption in the transportation sector (on-road motor vehicles, off-highway mobile sources, and aircraft) and the industrial and commercial sectors are the two largest sources of GHG emissions, each accounting for approximately 36 percent of the San Francisco Bay Area’s 95.8 MMTCO 2 e emitted in 2007.13 Electricity generation accounts for approximately 16 percent of the San Francisco Bay Area’s GHG emissions followed by residential fuel usage at 7 percent, off-road equipment at 3 percent and agriculture at 1 percent.14 The City of South San Francisco published a community-wide GHG emissions inventory for the year of 2005.15 The inventory attributed the two largest sources of GHG emissions to transportation (34.9 percent) and to commercial/industrial (34.7 percent). The City of South San Francisco emitted approximately 560,414 metric tons of CO 2 e in 2005. REGULATORY FRAMEWORK California has increased focus on the need to control GHG emissions, to mitigate their effects and to prepare for adapting to the effects of global climate change. The following summarizes prominent regulations and initiatives in California that address global climate change and GHGs: o Senate Bill 1771 (Sher, Chapter 1018, Statutes of 2000), signed on September 30, 2000, established the creation of the California Climate Action Registry (CCAR) as a non- profit organization. SB 1771 required the California Energy Commission (CEC) to update the state GHG emissions inventory and to develop data and information on climate change – and to provide certain entities and interest groups with information on the costs, technical feasibility, and demonstrated effectiveness of methods for reducing GHGs from in-state sources. SB 1771 required the inventory to be updated every five years. 11 California Air Resources Board (ARB), “California Greenhouse Gas Inventory for 2000-2012— by Category as Defined in the Scoping Plan.” May 2014. Available Online at http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/inventory/pubs/reports/ghg_inventory_00- 12_report.pdf. 12 Ibid. 13 Bay Area Air Quality Management District, Source Inventory of Bay Area Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Base Year 2007, Updated: February 2010. Available Online at: http://www.baaqmd.gov/~/media/Files/Planning%20and%20Research/Emission%20Inventory/regionalinventory2007_2_10.a shx. 14 Ibid. 15 City of South San Francisco, 2005 Community-wide Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory, January 2011. Available Online at: http://ca-southsanfrancisco.civicplus.com/DocumentCenter/Home/View/2472. Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist Page 3-22 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis o Senate Bill 527 (Sher, Chapter 769, Statutes of 2001), which amended SB 1771, was signed on October 11, 2001. The bill revised the functions and duties of the CCAR and required the CCAR, in coordination with the CEC to adopt third-party verification metrics, develop GHG emissions protocols and qualify third-party organizations to provide technical assistance and certification of emissions baselines and inventories. o Assembly Bill 32 (Núñez, Chapter 488, Statutes of 2006), the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, signed by Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger on September 27, 2006, required the CARB to lower GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020—a 25 percent reduction statewide, with mandatory caps for significant emissions sources. AB 32 directed CARB to develop discrete early actions to reduce GHG while also preparing a scoping plan (i.e., the Climate Change Scoping Plan) in order to identify how best to reach the 2020 limit. o Senate Bill 97 (Dutton, Chapter 187, Statutes of 2007), signed on August 24, 2007, directed the Governor's Office of Planning and Research (OPR) to develop guidelines to mitigate GHG emissions identified through the CEQA review process, including the effects associated with transportation and energy consumption. As directed by SB 97, the Natural Resources Agency adopted Amendments to the CEQA Guidelines for GHG on December 30, 2009. On February 16, 2010, the Office of Administrative Law approved the Amendments, and filed them with the Secretary of State for inclusion in the California Code of Regulations. The Amendments to the CEQA Guidelines implementing SB 97 became effective on March 18, 2010. CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD 2008 SCOPING PLAN CARB’s Scoping Plan is California’s GHG reduction strategy to achieve the state’s GHG emissions reduction target established by AB 32, which is 1990 levels by year 2020. To estimate the reductions necessary, CARB projected statewide 2020 business-as-usual (BAU) GHG emissions and identified that the state as a whole would be required to reduce GHG emissions by 28.5 percent from year 2020 BAU to achieve the targets of AB 32. Since release of the 2008 Scoping Plan, CARB has updated the 2020 GHG BAU forecast to reflect GHG emissions in light of the economic downturn and measures not previously considered within the 2008 Scoping Plan baseline inventory. The revised BAU 2020 forecast shows that the state would have to reduce GHG emissions by 21.6 percent from BAU without emissions standards enacted under Assembly Bill 1493 (Pavley) and the 33 percent Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) or 15.7 percent from the adjusted baseline (i.e., with Pavley and 33 percent RPS). Statewide strategies to reduce GHG emissions include the Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS),16 California 16 On December 29, 2011, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California issued several rulings in the federal lawsuits challenging the LCFS. One of the court’s rulings preliminarily enjoins the CARB from enforcing the regulation during the pendency of the litigation. In January 2012, CARB appealed the decision and on April 23, 2012, the Ninth Circuit Court granted CARB’s motion for a stay of the injunction while it continues to consider CARB’s appeal of the lower court’s decision. In a separate case, on July 15, 2013, the State of California Court of Appeal, Fifth Appellate District issued its opinion in POET, LLC v. California Air Resources Board. The Court held that the LCFS would remain in effect and that the CARB can continue Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis Page 3-23 Appliance Energy Efficiency regulations, RPS, changes in the corporate average fuel economy (CAFE) standards, and other early action measures that would ensure the state is on target to achieve the GHG emissions reduction goals of AB 32. In addition, newly constructed buildings are required to comply with the Building and Energy Efficiency Standards and California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen). The Project’s GHG emissions would be reduced by compliance with statewide measures that have been adopted since AB 32. Therefore, the Project would not have the potential to interfere with the State of California's GHG reduction goals and strategies. CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE On January 12, 2010, the State Building Standards Commission unanimously adopted updates to the California Green Building Standards Code, which went into effect on January 1, 2011. New CALGreen standards were adopted and became effective January 14, 2014. CALGreen is a comprehensive and uniform regulatory code for all residential, commercial and school buildings. CALGreen does not prevent a local jurisdiction from adopting a more stringent code as state law provides methods for local enhancements. CALGreen recognizes that many jurisdictions have developed existing construction and demolition ordinances, and defers to them as the ruling guidance provided they provide a minimum 50-percent diversion requirement. CALGreen also provides exemptions for areas not served by construction and demolition recycling infrastructure. State building code provides the minimum standard, which buildings are required to meet in order to be certified for occupancy. Enforcement is generally through the local building official. The development of CALGreen is intended to (1) cause a reduction in GHG emissions from buildings; (2) promote environmentally responsible, cost-effective, healthier places to live and work; (3) reduce energy and water consumption; and (4) respond to the directives by the Governor. In short, CALGreen is established to reduce construction waste; make buildings more efficient in the use of materials and energy; and reduce environmental impacts during and after construction. CALGreen contains requirements for construction site selection, storm water control during construction, construction waste reduction, indoor water use reduction, material selection, natural resource conservation, site irrigation conservation, and more. CALGreen provides for design options allowing the designer to determine how best to achieve compliance for a given site or building condition. CALGreen also requires building commissioning, which is a process for verifying that all building systems, like heating and cooling equipment and lighting systems, are functioning at their maximum efficiency. The following provides examples of CALGreen requirements: o Designated Parking. Provide designated parking in commercial projects for any combination of low-emitting, fuel-efficient and carpool/van pool vehicles. to implement and enforce the 2013 regulatory standards while it corrects certain aspects of the procedures by which the LCFS was originally adopted. Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist Page 3-24 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis o Recycling by Occupants. Provide readily accessible areas that serve the entire building and are identified for the depositing, storage and collection of nonhazardous materials for recycling. o Construction Waste. A minimum 50-percent diversion of construction and demolition waste from landfills, increasing voluntarily to 65 and-75 percent for new homes and 80- percent for commercial projects. All (100 percent) of trees, stumps, rocks and associated vegetation and soils resulting from land clearing shall be reused or recycled. o Wastewater Reduction. Each building shall reduce the generation of wastewater by one of the following methods: The installation of water-conserving fixtures or Using nonpotable water systems. o Water Use Savings. 20-percent mandatory reduction in indoor water use with voluntary goal standards for 30, 35, and 40-percent reductions. o Water Meters. Separate water meters for buildings in excess of 50,000 square feet or buildings projected to consume more than 1,000 gallons per day. o Irrigation Efficiency. Moisture-sensing irrigation systems for larger landscaped areas. o Materials Pollution Control. Low-pollutant emitting interior finish materials such as paints, carpet, vinyl flooring, and particleboard. o Building Commissioning. Mandatory inspections of energy systems (i.e. heat furnace, air conditioner, mechanical equipment) for nonresidential buildings over 10,000 square feet to ensure that all are working at their maximum capacity according to their design efficiencies. CALIFORNIA AIR POLLUTION CONTROL OFFICERS ASSOCIATION The California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), representing California's 35 local air districts, launched the CAPCOA Greenhouse Gas Reduction Exchange (GHG Rx).17 The Exchange provides a reliable, low-cost, secure platform to encourage locally generated, high quality GHG emission reduction credits that can be used to meet CEQA or other compliance requirements. The GHG Rx features locally generated and properly validated GHG emission reduction credits from voluntary projects within California and allow interaction between those who create the credits, potential buyers and funding organizations. 17 CAPCOA Greenhouse Gas Exchange, Available online at: http://xappprod.aqmd.gov/ghgrx Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis Page 3-25 BAY AREA AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT The BAAQMD is the primary agency responsible for air quality regulation in the nine county San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin. As part of its role in air quality regulation, BAAQMD has prepared CEQA air quality guidelines to assist lead agencies in evaluating air quality impacts of proposed projects and plans. The guidelines provide procedures for evaluating potential air quality impacts during the environmental review process consistent with CEQA requirements. The CEQA Air Quality Guidelines provide CEQA thresholds of significance for operational GHG emissions from land use projects for the first time. The BAAQMD has not defined GHG thresholds from construction activities, but recommends that significance be determined in relation to meeting AB 32 GHG reduction targets. OPR’s amendments to the CEQA Guidelines as well as BAAQMD’s CEQA Air Quality Guidelines and thresholds of significance have been incorporated into the analysis of potential GHG impacts associated with the Project. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO CLIMATE ACTION PLAN The City of South San Francisco prepared a Pedestrian Master Plan (PMP)18 and a Climate Action Plan (CAP).19 The City Council adopted the PMP and CAP on February 12, 2014. The CAP provides goals, policies, and programs to reduce GHG emissions, climate change adaptation and support the goals of AB 32 and SB 375. The PMP provides a community-wide plan providing for a network of sidewalks and paths to facilitate increased walking to local destinations. The PMP includes an inventory and assessment of the current pedestrian facilities, a gap analysis, to identify and prioritize needed improvements and provide goals, policies, and measurable implementation measures. A key focus area is the Downtown Area and residential neighborhoods. The CAP contains the following goals, measures, and actions to reduce GHG emissions (measures/actions of particular applicability to the Project): Goal LUT1: Reduce Emissions from Transportation. Measure 1.1: Expand active transportation alternatives by providing infrastructure and enhancing connectivity for bicycle and pedestrian access. Measure 1.2: Support expansion of public and private transit programs to reduce employee commutes. Measure 1.3: Integrate higher-density development and mixed-use development near transit facilities and community facilities, and reduce dependence on autos through smart parking practices. Goal LUT2: Improve Vehicle Efficiency Measure 2.1: Expand the use of alternative-fuel vehicles. 18 City of South San Francisco, Pedestrian Master Plan, February 13, 2014. http://www.ssf.net/1531/Pedestrian-Master-Plan. 19 City of South San Francisco, Climate Action Plan, February 13, 2014. http://www.ssf.net/1803/Climate-Action-Plan. Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist Page 3-26 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis Measure 2.2: Reduce emissions from off-road vehicle and equipment. Goal EE1: Increase Building Energy Efficiency Measure 3.1: Maximize energy efficiency in the built environment through standards and the plan review process. 1. Provide incentives to encourage new development to exceed Title 24 energy efficiency standards, such as expedited permitting and fee reductions, and promote utility- sponsored and statewide initiatives for energy efficiency in new construction and materials. 2. Encourage the use of CALGreen energy efficiency measures as preferred mitigation for CAP streamlining 3. Encourage the use of energy-efficient or smart-grid integrated appliances in new development. Measure 3.2: Support retrofits to existing residential structures. Measure 3.3: Encourage energy efficiency retrofits to the existing nonresidential building stock that reduce operating costs and increase industry competitiveness. Measure 3.4: Address heat island issues and expand the urban forest. 1. Encourage the use of high-albedo (reflective) surfaces and technologies, as identified in the CALGreen standards. 2. Continue to require tree planting in new development and encourage tree placement to maximize building shading. Measure 3.5: Promote energy information and sharing, and educate the community about energy-efficient behaviors and construction. Goal EE2: Increase Alternative Energy Options in South San Francisco Measure 4.1: Promote installation of alternative energy facilities 1. Require the construction of any new nonresidential conditioned space of 5,000 square feet or more, to comply with one of the following standards: a. Meet a minimum of 50 percent of modeled building electricity needs with on-site renewable energy sources. b. Participate in a power purchase agreement to offset a minimum of 50 percent of modeled building electricity use. c. Comply with CALGreen Tier 2 energy efficiency requirements to exceed mandatory energy efficiency requirements by 20 percent or more. 2. Require all new development to install conduit to accommodate wiring for solar. 3. Promote on-site renewable energy or distributed generation energy systems in new and existing and nonresidential projects. Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis Page 3-27 Measure 4.2: Reduce the cost of alternative energy installations. Measure 4.3: Support green industries. Goal W1: Reduce Waste Disposal Rates and Volumes Measure 5.1: Develop a waste reduction strategy to increase recycling and reuse of materials to achieve a 75 percent diversion of landfilled waste by 2020. 1. Continue to provide recycling and compost bins to all tenants. 2. Continue to enforce the existing construction and demolition recycling ordinance, requiring 100 percent of inert waste and 65 percent of non-inert waste to be recycled from all eligible projects. 3. Continue to establish new and innovative residential and commercial green waste recycling/composting services. Measure 5.2: Reduce landfill emissions. Goal WE1: Conserve Water Measure 6.1: Reduce water demand. 1. Continue to support implementation of the Urban Water Management Plan to reduce potable water use by 20 percent. 2. Revitalize implementation and enforcement of the Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance by undertaking the following: a. Establishing a variable-speed pump exchange for water features. b. Limiting turf area in commercial projects. c. Restricting hours of irrigation to occur between 3 am and two hours after sunrise. d. Installing irrigation controllers with rain sensors. e. Landscaping with native, water-efficient plants. f. Installing drip irrigation systems. g. Reducing impervious surfaces. Measure 6.2: Provide alternative water resources for irrigation. IMPACTS a) Generation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Significance Criteria: The BAAQMD CEQA Air Quality Guidelines identify a project specific threshold of either a brightline threshold of 1,100 metric tons of CO 2 e per year or an efficiency threshold of 4.6 metric tons of CO 2 e per year per service population (i.e., the number of residents plus the number of employees associated with a new development) as resulting in a cumulatively considerable contribution of GHG emissions and a cumulatively significant impact. Alternatively, a project that is found to be consistent with a Qualified CAP would have a less Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist Page 3-28 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis than significant impact to global climate change. This analysis applies the 1,100 metric tons of CO 2 e per year or 4.6 metric tons of CO 2 e per year per service population significance criterion while also reviewing the goals, policies, and measures within the South San Francisco CAP. CalEEMod was used to quantify GHG emissions associated with Project construction activities (for informational purposes), as well as long-term operations associated with natural gas space and water heating, electricity, landscape maintenance, and vehicles. CalEEMod incorporates local energy emission factors and mitigation measures based on the CAPCOA’s Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures 20 and the California Climate Action Registry General Reporting Protocol.21 Estimated construction GHG emissions that would be associated with the Project are presented in GHG Emissions Table 2. The estimated construction GHG emissions are 271 metric tons. As indicated, 30-year amortized annual construction related GHG emissions would be 9 metric tons. Of note, there is no BAAQMD CEQA significance threshold for construction-related GHG emissions. The GHG construction impacts would be 271 metric tons (9 metric tons amortized over 30 years), which is less than the BAAQMD GHG operational threshold of 1,100 metric tons. GHG Emissions Table 2 also provides the estimated operational GHG emissions that would be associated with the Project. The GHG operational (plus construction) impacts would be 1,099 metric tons per year, which is below the BAAQMD threshold of 1,100 metric tons and thus, less than significant. With implementation of the CalGreen standards and consistency with South San Francisco Climate Action Plan, the GHG operational (plus construction) impacts would be 1,071 metric tons per year. 20 CAPCOA, Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures, August 2010, http://www.capcoa.org/wp- content/uploads/2010/11/CAPCOA-Quantification-Report-9-14-Final.pdf 21 California Climate Action Registry General Reporting Protocol, May 2008, http://www.theclimateregistry.org/downloads/GRP.pdf Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis Page 3-29 GHG EMISSIONS TABLE 2 PROJECT RELATED GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS Emission Source GHG CO 2 e Metric Tons Per Year Construction (30-year amortized) 9 Operations Area Sources - Energy 306 Mobile 751 Solid Waste 32 Water 10 Total Emissions 1,099 Accounting for CalGreen Standard Reductions 28 Total Emissions with CalGreen & SSF CAP 1,071 BAAQMD Bright line Threshold 1,100 Potentially Significant? No Notes: Refer to Appendix A for all emission assumptions. b) Potential Conflicts with an Applicable Plan, Policy, or Regulation The City of South San Francisco has adopted a CAP regarding the reduction of GHG emissions. The City has established a baseline government and community-wide inventory of GHG emissions. The Project would result in a significant impact if it would be in conflict with AB 32 State goals and the goals, policies, and measures of the applicable CAP for reducing GHG emissions. The assumption is that AB 32 and the CAP will be successful in reducing GHG emissions and reducing the cumulative GHG emissions statewide by 2020. The City and State have taken these measures, because no project individually could have a major impact (either positively or negatively) on the global concentration of GHG. The Project has been reviewed relative to the AB 32 measures and South San Francisco CAP and it has been determined that the Project would not conflict with the goals of AB 32 and the applicable CAP. The principal State plan and policy adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions is AB 32. The quantitative goal of AB 32 is to reduce GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. Statewide plans and regulations such as GHG emissions standards for vehicles and the LCFS are being implemented at the statewide level, and compliance at the specific plan or project level is not addressed. Therefore, the Project does not conflict with these plans and regulations. The regulations, plans, and polices adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions that are directly applicable to the Project include Title 24 Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Nonresidential Buildings and the Title 24 California Green Building Standards Code. As previously discussed, the Project would be developed to exceed Title 24 Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Nonresidential Buildings by 15 percent and would be required to comply with Title 24 California Green Building Standards Code. Thus, the Project would be developed in compliance with the requirements of these regulations. Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist Page 3-30 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis In summary, the Project would not conflict with the plans, policies, and regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions. No impact would result and no mitigation is required. Finding: The Project would not result in an impact or contribute to a cumulative impact with respect to GHG emissions. The Project would not conflict with the plans, policies, and regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions. No impact would result and no mitigation is required. 3.5 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? X b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or US Fish and Wildlife Service? X c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? X d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? X e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? X f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? X Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis Page 3-31 SETTING INTRODUCTION The biological assessment used to inform this section was prepared by Michael Marangio of Marangio Biological Consulting. The complete assessment is in Appendix A. The purpose of this biological resource assessment was to review a site proposed for development in sufficient detail to determine if the Project may affect threatened, endangered, or other sensitive animal or plant species as well as important habitats such as wetlands. The biological assessment provides information that is intended for use in environmental documents under CEQA review and for Federal review of permits such as Army Corps of Engineers Nationwide Permits. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Project would include a five-story hotel building, anticipated to be approximately 13,000 square feet in plan area surrounded by asphalt and concrete pavements (geotechnical report by Terracon, 2014). The Project site is vacant. Due to the variable nature of the existing fill, which averages nine feet, the geotechnical report recommends that the fill materials within the footprint of the proposed building be removed to a minimum depth of three feet below the lowest foundation bearing level or five feet below existing site grades (whichever is deeper) and the excavation be thoroughly cleaned prior to backfill placement and/or construction (Terracon, 2014). REGULATORY FRAMEWORK Local, State, and federal regulations have been enacted to provide for the protection and management of sensitive biological and wetland resources. The following section outlines the key local, State, and federal regulations that apply to these resources. FEDERAL The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) is responsible for protection of terrestrial and freshwater organisms through implementation of the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA) and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA). The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) has primary responsibility for protecting wetlands under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA). The Corps also regulates navigable waters under Section 10 (33 U.S.C. 403) of the Rivers and Harbors Act. STATE The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) is responsible for administration of the California Endangered Species Act (CESA), and for protection of streams and water bodies through the Streambed Alteration Agreement process under Section 1600 of the California Fish and Game Code. Certification from the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) is also required when a proposed activity may result in discharge into navigable waters, pursuant to Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist Page 3-32 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis Section 401 of the CWA and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Section 404(b)(1) Guidelines. The RWQCB also has jurisdiction over waters of the State not regulated by the Corps under the Porter-Cologne Act. The following discusses in more detail how State and federal regulations address special-status species, wetlands and other sensitive natural communities. SPECIAL-STATUS SPECIES Special-status species are plants and animals that are legally protected under the State and/or federal ESAs, the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, the California Fish and Game Code (sections 3503, 3503.5, 3511, 3513, 3515, and 4700), or other regulations.22 In addition, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15380, special-status species also include other species that are considered rare enough by the scientific community and trustee agencies to warrant special consideration, particularly with regard to protection of isolated populations, nesting or denning locations, communal roosts and other essential habitat. Species with legal protection under the federal and State ESAs often represent major constraints to development; particularly when they are wide ranging or highly sensitive to habitat disturbance and where proposed development would result in a take of these species. WETLANDS AND OTHER WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES Although definitions vary to some degree, wetlands are generally considered to be areas that are periodically or permanently inundated by surface or ground water, and support vegetation adapted to life in saturated soil. Wetlands are recognized as important features on a regional and national level due to their high inherent value to fish and wildlife, use as storage areas for storm and flood waters, and water recharge, filtration and purification functions. The CDFW, Corps, and RWQCB have jurisdiction over modifications to river banks, lakes, stream channels and other wetland features. Technical standards for delineating wetlands have been developed by the Corps and the USFWS, which generally define wetlands through consideration of three criteria: hydrology, soils and vegetation. The CWA was enacted to address water pollution, establishing regulations and permit requirements regarding construction activities that affect storm water, dredge and fill material operations, and water quality standards. The regulatory program requires that discharges to surface waters be controlled under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit program which applies to sources of water runoff, private developments, and public facilities. 22 Special-status species include: designated (rare, threatened, or endangered) and candidate species for listing by the CDFW; designated (threatened or endangered) and candidate species for listing by the USFWS and NOAA Fisheries; species considered to be rare or endangered under the conditions of Section 15380 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, such as those identified on lists 1A, 1B, and 2 in the California Native Plant Society (CNPS) Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants of California (2001); and possibly other species which are considered sensitive due to limited distribution or lack of adequate information to permit listing or rejection for state or federal status, such as those included on list 3 in the CNPS Inventory or identified as “California Species of Special Concern (SSC)” by the CDFW. Species designated as a SSC have no legal protective status under the California Endangered Species Act but are of concern to the CDFW because of severe decline in breeding populations and other factors. Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis Page 3-33 Under Section 404 of the CWA, the Corps is responsible for regulating the discharge of fill material into waters of the United States. The term “waters” includes wetlands and non-wetland bodies of water that meet specific criteria as defined in the Code of Federal Regulations. All three of the identified technical criteria must be met for an area to be identified as a wetland under Corps jurisdiction, unless the area has been modified by human activity. In general, a permit must be obtained before fill can be placed in wetlands or other waters of the United States. The type of permit is determined by the Corps depending on the amount of acreage and the purpose of the proposed fill. Certain activities in wetlands or “other waters” are automatically authorized, or granted a nationwide permit which allows filling where impacts are considered minor. Eligibility for a nationwide permit simplifies the permit review process. Nationwide permits cover construction and fill of waters of the U.S. for a variety of routine activities such as minor road crossings, utility line crossings, streambank protection, recreational facilities and outfall structures. A project must demonstrate that it has no more than a minimal adverse effect on the aquatic ecosystem, including species listed under the ESA to qualify for a nationwide permit. Typically this means that there will be no net loss of either habitat acreage or habitat value, resulting in appropriate mitigation where fill activities are proposed. The Corps assumes discretionary approval over proposed projects where impacts are considered significant, requiring adequate mitigation and permit approval. To provide compliance with EPA Section 404(b)(1) Guidelines, an applicant must demonstrate that the proposed discharge is unavoidable and is the least environmentally damaging practicable alternative that will achieve the overall project purpose. The 1990 Memorandum of Agreement between the EPA and Corps concerning the Determination of Mitigation under the Guidelines prioritizes mitigation, with the first priority to avoid impacts, the second to minimize impacts, and the third to provide compensatory mitigation for unavoidable impacts. Jurisdictional authority of the CDFW over wetland areas is established under Section 1600 of the Fish and Wildlife Code, which pertains to activities that would disrupt the natural flow or alter the channel, bed, or bank of any lake, river, or stream. The Fish and Wildlife Code stipulates that it is unlawful to substantially divert or obstruct the natural flow or substantially change the bed, channel or bank of any river, stream or lake without notifying the CDFW, incorporating necessary mitigation, and obtaining a Streambed Alteration Agreement. The Wetlands Resources Policy of the CDFW states that the Fish and Wildlife Commission will strongly discourage development in or conversion of wetlands, unless, at a minimum, project mitigation assures there will be no net loss of either wetland habitat values or acreage. The CDFW is also responsible for commenting on projects requiring Corps permits under the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act of 1958. In addition, the RWQCB is responsible for upholding state water quality standards. Pursuant to Section 401 of the CWA, projects that apply for a Corps permit for discharge of dredge or fill material, and projects that qualify for a Nationwide Permit must obtain water quality certification from the RWQCB. The RWQCB is also responsible for regulating wetlands under the Porter- Cologne Act, which may include hydrologically isolated wetlands no longer regulated by the Corps under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Recent federal Supreme Court rulings have limited the limits of Corps jurisdiction, but the RWQCB in some cases continues to exercise jurisdiction over these features. Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist Page 3-34 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis SENSITIVE NATURAL COMMUNITIES Protecting habitat on an ecosystem-level is increasingly recognized as vital to the protection of natural diversity in the State, in addition to species-oriented management. Protecting habitat on an ecosystem-level is considered the most effective means of providing long-term protection of ecologically viable habitat, and can include whole watersheds, ecosystems and sensitive natural communities. Providing functional habitat connectivity between natural areas is essential to sustaining healthy wildlife populations and allowing for the continued dispersal of native plant and animal species. Although sensitive natural communities have no protected legal status under the State or federal Endangered Species Acts, they are provided some level of protection under CEQA. The CEQA Guidelines identify potential impacts on a sensitive natural community as one of six significance criteria. As an example, a discretionary project that is constructed on any riparian habitat, native grassland, valley oak woodland, or other sensitive natural community would normally be considered to have a significant effect on the environment. Further loss of a sensitive natural community could be interpreted as substantially diminishing habitat, depending on its relative abundance, quality and degree of past disturbance, and the anticipated impacts to the specific community type. Where determined to be significant under CEQA, the potential impact would require mitigation through avoidance, minimization of disturbance or loss, or some type of compensatory mitigation when unavoidable. LOCAL REGULATIONS Several policies in the City of South San Francisco General Plan and the East of 101 Area Plan pertain to the protection of sensitive biological and wetland resources. Following is a description of the key policy documents and regulations that are applicable to the site. City of South San Francisco General Plan The Open Space and Conservation Element of the City of South San Francisco General Plan contains a number of policies related to protection of sensitive biological and wetland resources that are applicable to the site. The following policies are excerpted from the City’s General Plan. o 7.1-G-1: Protect special status species and supporting habitats within South San Francisco, including species that are State or federally listed as Endangered, Threatened, or Rare. o 7.1-G-2: Protect and, where reasonable and feasible, restore salt marshes and wetlands. o 7.1-I-2: As part of the Park, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Master Plan update, institute an ongoing program to remove invasive plant species from ecologically sensitive areas, including Sign Hill Park, Colma Creek Linear Park, Bayfront Linear Park, and other City-owned open space, as depicted in Figure 7-1. o 7.1-I-3: As part of development approvals on sites that include ecologically sensitive habitat designated in Figure 7-2, require institution of an on-going program to remove and prevent the re-establishment of the invasive species and restore the native species. o 7.1-I-4: Require development on the wetlands delineated in figure 7-1 to complete assessments of biological resources. Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis Page 3-35 o 7.1-I-5: Work with private, non-profit conservation, and public groups to secure funding for wetland and marsh protection and restoration projects. East of 101 Area Plan The East of 101 Area Plan was adopted by the City of South San Francisco in July 1994. The Area Plan includes a Conservation Element that contains policies intended to protect and enhance natural resources in the East of 101 Area. The following policies relevant to the Project are excerpted from the East of 101 Area Plan: o Policy CON-1: Prior to construction of development projects on sensitive resource lands, the City shall require an applicant to conduct a formal wetlands delineation at the project site. The results of the wetlands delineation shall be made available to evaluate project specific impacts associated with sensitive habitats. o Policy CON-2: The City shall require that developments comply with all applicable State and federal laws and regulations regarding protection and replacement of wetlands. o Policy CON-4: The City shall take all feasible measures to preserve any sensitive plant and animal species that occur in the East of 101 Area. o Policy CON-5: Prior to receiving approval for construction activities or other disturbances on undeveloped land in the East of 101 Area project sponsors shall conduct environmental analyses to evaluate the site-specific status of sensitive plant and animal species. o Policy CON-6: If sensitive plant or animal species would be unavoidably affected by a proposed project the City shall require the project developer to implement appropriate mitigation measures. o Policy Con-7: New development adjacent to sensitive resource areas shall be required to incorporate the following measures into project design: o Shield lights to reduce off-site glare. o A buffer area of at least 100 feet in width shall be provided between known sensitive resources and development area. Encroachments into the 100-foot buffer area may be allowed on a case-by-case basis as follows: o Buildings which have a water oriented theme and which further the goals of allowing or encouraging public access to the Bay or inland waterways; o Development located adjacent to inland waterways; o Accessory parking from adjacent development; o Development on the “fingers’ portion of the planning area. Any encroachment into the 100-foot buffer must receive approval of the City, Bay Conservation and Development Commission (BCDC) and the California Department of Fish and Game,23 and shall only be permitted if supported by a site- specific biological assessment prepared by a qualified biologist. Mitigation measures 23 California Department of Fish and Game is now known as California Department of Fish and Wildlife. The City’s East of 101 Area Plan was drafted and adopted before the name change and this section is quoted directly from the East of 101 Area Plan. Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist Page 3-36 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis identified through the biological analysis shall be attached as conditions of any encroachment approvals. o Landscape all on-site buffer areas with native vegetation to screen habitat areas from adjacent land uses. o Restrict entry to habitat areas through devises such as fencing landscaping or signage. o Ensure that run-off from development does not adversely affect the biotic values of adjacent wetlands or other habitat areas. Municipal Code South San Francisco Municipal Code Section 13.30.020 defines a “Protected Tree” as one with a circumference of 48” or more when measured 54” above natural grade; a tree or stand of trees designated by the Director of Parks and Recreation as one of uniqueness, importance to the public due to its location or unusual appearance, historical significance or other factor; or a stand of trees that the Director of Parks and Recreation has determined each tree is dependent on the others for survival. FIELD AND LITERATURE STUDY Special Status Species On the basis of a review of the California Natural Diversity Data Base report from the CDFW for the project area (CNDDB, 2014; CNPS, Rare Plant Program, 2014 California Native Plant Society, 2001)24 and general knowledge of special status species of plants and animals in the San Francisco Bay area, a list was developed of the potential special status plants and animals known from the vicinity of the Project (Appendix A Table A). All listed potential animal species such as fishes requiring permanent aquatic habitats were eliminated from further impact analysis since suitable aquatic habitat is not present on the project site. Plants and animals requiring marshlands were also eliminated from further analysis because such habitats are not present on the Project site. Additionally, special status plant species that are large shrubs or trees were also eliminated from further analysis since the site contains only low-growing herbaceous species. Field Survey A field survey was conducted on May 27, 2014. Site location and features were reviewed using local street maps, USGS 7.5 minute quad sheets (San Francisco South), and Google Earth maps. The Project site is situated adjacent to a hotel. Much of the nearby built environment consists of hotel and industrial and commercial/warehouse establishments with associated parking lots and connecting roadways and driveways. 24 Inventory of rare and endangered plants of California (sixth edition). CNPS. Sacramento. x + 388pp. CNPS, Rare Plant Program. 2014. Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants (online edition, v8-02). California Native Plant Society, Sacramento, CA. Website http://www.rareplants.cnps.org [accessed 31 May 2014 CNDDB, 2014. CDFG. California Natural Diversity Data Base overlay for San Francisco South 7.5 minute quadrangle. Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis Page 3-37 Approximately 250 feet to the south of the Project is the Colma Creek channel. The width of the tidal channel in this vicinity is about 50-60 feet, depending on rainfall and tides. The channel margins are vegetated with pickleweed and sea-blite (Suaeda fruticosa), indicating presence of brackish water. The upper elevations of the stream banks support native gumplant (Grindelia sp.) and many introduced weeds. A three to four-foot flood wall runs east-west along Mitchell Avenue, limiting potential movement of many terrestrial animal species to and from stream channel habitat. The Project site is generally flat except for several mounds of soil 2-3 feet high. The site is vegetated mainly with introduced grasses and weeds and would be designated as a mixture of Non-Native Annual Grassland and Ruderal (disturbed) habitats. Plants that were observed include non-native annual grasses such as wild-oat (Avena barbata) ), Mediteranean barley (Hordeum marinum ssp. gussoneanum), pampas grass (Cortaderia jubata), annual fescue (Vulpia myuros), and ripgut brome (Bromus carinatus). Many additional introduced weeds and "escaped exotics" (garden horticultural plants) included English plantain (Plantago lanceolata), sea plantain (Plantago maritima), ice plant (Carpobrotus chilensis), fennel (Foeniculum vulgare), poison hemlock (Conium maculatum), cheeseweed (Malva sp.), Capeweed (Arctotheca calendula), Salsify (Tragopogon porrifolius), cotoneaster (Cotoneaster sp.), vetch (Vicia sp.), Italian thistle (Carduus pycnocephalus), Aeonium (Aeonium sp.), clover (Trifolium sp.), prickly lettuce (Lactuca serriola), redstem storksbill (Erodium cicutarium), deerweed (Acmiston glaber), pearly everlasting (Anaphalis margaritacea), field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis), and dock (Rumex sp.). Native plant species included Coyote Brush (Baccharis pilularis var. consanguinea), and California poppy (Eschscholtzia californica). Very little wildlife was seen on the Project site. Burrows of Botta pocket gopher (Thomomys bottae) were seen scattered sparsely over the site. Several house finches (Carpodacus mexicanus) were seen foraging on the ground, and a Turkey Vulture (Cathartes aura) and an American crow (Corvus brachyrhynchos) were seen flying over nearby adjacent properties. Scat of Canada Goose (Branta canadensis) were seen scattered within the Project site. (The list of plants and animals is not intended to be an exhaustive census of the plants and animals at the Project site.) No ponded surface water or channels were observed on the Project site nor was there any evidence for the pooling of water over the winter rainy season. An area at the southeast corner of this fenced site has been paved with several inches of gravel. Portions of the site contained mounds of soil or rock, likely the remains of geotechnical test pits and test borings, or undocumented dumping of soil. According to a geotechnical report (Terracon, 2014), the site is covered with nine feet of undocumented fill materials comprised of clayey sand with gravel, cobbles, and boulders, approximately 12 to 42 inches in dimension. These materials were underlain by organic clays and silts to depths of approximately 20 to 25 feet below existing site grades.” Biological Impact Assessment Plants The Project site is highly disturbed. The site may have been marsh land in the past, but that habitat is now under at least nine feet of soil and rock. Historic aerials going back to 1993 (Google, 2014 and Terracon, 2014) indicate conversion of the marshland occurred before that Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist Page 3-38 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis time. The plants that dominate the site consist mainly of introduced invasive annual plants, probably brought to the site in the soil that was dumped there or from nearby disturbed sites. A reconnaissance survey was conducted on May 28, 2014. No special status species of plants were observed and would not be expected because of the disturbed nature of the site. No sensitive plant species would be affected by the proposed project. Animals Observation of animals on the site was limited to several common birds including American Crow, Canada Goose, and House finch, all known to be adaptable to urban conditions. The dominance of introduced non-native annual plants limits the value of the habitat to only "generalist" species that can tolerate disturbed conditions and utilize common food sources. The Project site would be highly unlikely to support any special status as a result of the small size of the parcel (1.47acre), the soil disturbance, and the dominance of non-native annual plant species. Special species are generally "specialist" species that require certain plants for cover and food that are not present on the site. Birds would not be likely to nest at the site since important habitat requirements such as sources of water on the site do not exist, nor does nesting cover in the form of trees and shrubs. To provide a more thorough analysis, several wildlife species known within one to two miles of the Project or which are deemed to be potentially present in the Project vicinity are further discussed below. Burrowing Owl Burrowing owl (Athene cuniculata) is a State Species of Special Concern but has no protection under Federal laws except as a migratory bird. Burrowing owl is not known to be located in the general vicinity of the Project site. However, since they are often found in isolated and disturbed areas, this species was evaluated for potential habitat use of the Project site. Burrowing owls are usually associated with open, dry, perennial or annual grasslands and typically utilize burrows of other animals such as ground squirrels. This species is distributed over much of the state, but because of loss of habitat, its numbers are becoming much reduced. During the site reconnaissance, burrows were searched for that could be utilized by Burrowing owls. No sites were found. Most of the site contains grass and ruderal plants over 1.5 ft tall which are not preferred by this species. The site is therefore of very low value for Burrowing owls, and therefore, the species is not likely to use the site for roosting or nesting. There would be no impact to Burrowing owl as a result of Project construction or operation. California Clapper Rail The California clapper rail (Rallus longirostris obsoletus) is listed as Endangered by both the USFWS and CDFW. This species is found foraging in tidal marsh vegetation along brackish creeks, mudflats, and coastal areas. Suitable habitats are generally dominated by pickleweed and cordgrass. The nearest documented occurrence of the California clapper rail is located along the edge of San Francisco Bay and along the margins of Colma Creek where it flows into the Bay, which comes within 0.3 miles of the Project site. No suitable habitat is located on the Project site therefore clapper rails would not be expected to be present on the site. No significant impacts to this species would result from Project construction or operation. Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis Page 3-39 California red-legged frog The California red-legged frog (Rana draytonii) (CRLF) is listed by the USFWS as Threatened and is classified by the CDFW as a Species of Special Concern. The CRLF breeds primarily in ponds, but will also breed in slow moving streams, or deep pools in intermittent streams and is seldom found in brackish waters. Inhabited ponds are typically permanent, at least two feet (0.6 meters) in depth, and contain emergent and shoreline vegetation. Sufficient pond depth and shoreline cover are both critical, because they provide means of escape from predators for the frogs. CNDDB (2014) documents the presence of this protected species about 1.5 miles south of the Project site. Since no aquatic habitat is present on the Project site, nor is any suitable aquatic habitat nearby, the site would not provide suitable aquatic or upland habitat for the frog. There would be no impacts to the CRLF as a result from the proposed Project construction or operation. The San Francisco forktail damselfly The San Francisco forktail damselfly, (Ishnura gemina), has no protection under Federal or State statutes but is very localized in urban areas. Several small populations have gone extinct since their discovery. A documented location (CNDDB 2014) indicates its presence 1.5 miles south of the Project site. Historically some populations have been extirpated due to urbanization and some habitat has naturally converted from small shallow ponds to dry pond beds. The species is associated with marshy aquatic habitat, none of which is present at the Project site. Therefore the Project would not have any significant impact on this species. IMPACTS a) Special-Status Species and Nesting Habitat Significance Criteria: The Project would have a significant impact if were to result in a substantial adverse effect on special-status species, as identified in 3.5 Biological Resources a, above. The disturbed nature of the site that was caused by the placement of nine feet of fill soils, and the spread of invasive weed species to the site from outside and adjacent sources has resulted in the destruction of the original native vegetation, which probably consisted of tidal wetlands on saturated soils. The present vegetation has displaced the wetlands to non-native grassland and ruderal vegetation. The change in soil, hydrology, and spread of invasive weedy species that are competitive with native plants greatly reduces the potential for the presence of federal and state protected plants. The lack of native vegetative cover also greatly reduces the potential for the presence of federal and state protected animal life. In addition, the existing vegetation does not include any sensitive habitats. The Project would have no impact on special-species and nesting habitat. Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist Page 3-40 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis b) and c) Jurisdictional Habitat Significance Criteria: The Project would have a significant impact if it were to substantially impact sensitive natural communities or jurisdictional wetlands and Waters of the U.S. as identified in Biological Resources 3.5 b-c, above. The Project site is vegetated with a mixture of herbaceous plant species that are predominantly introduced, non-native annual grasses and forbs. Generally, wetlands are legally defined as areas that are suitable for retention or flow of water, have soils that indicate the presence of water, and have plants that mostly require the presence of water. A formal protocol for wetland analysis was not done as part of this investigation. However, general observations revealed that the ground surface of the Project site was disturbed but no suitable basins or other depressions were noted where water would likely pool during the winter rainy season. Soils appeared in most places to be fill soil from outside the site consisting mainly of subsoils, as indicated by their light color. Geotechnical studies (Terracon, 2014) indicate that approximately nine feet of fill soils have been used to cover an area that was probably marshland before the construction of buildings and roads in this vicinity. In addition, no distinct vegetation that was dominated by water-loving plants was observed. No indication of the presence of federal or state-protected wetlands was observed. Jurisdictional authority of the CDFW over wetland areas, established under Section 1600 of the Fish and Wildlife Code does not apply for this site. Further wetland analysis regarding jurisdictional evaluation is not required. The Project would have no impact on any sensitive natural communities or jurisdictional wetlands. d) Native Fish and Wildlife Movement Opportunities and Native Wildlife Nursery Sites. Significance Criteria: The Project would have a significant environmental impact if it were to interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites. Wildlife movements include migration (i.e., usually one way per season), inter-population movement (i.e., long-term genetic flow) and small travel pathways (i.e., daily movement within an animal’s territory). While small travel pathways usually facilitate movement for daily home range activities, such as foraging or escape from predators, they also provide connection between outlying populations and the main corridor, permitting an increase in gene flow among populations. These linkages among habitat types can extend for miles from primary habitat areas and occur on a large scale throughout California. Habitat linkages facilitate movement between populations located in small discrete areas and populations located within larger habitat areas. The mosaic of habitats found within a large-scale landscape results in wildlife populations that consist of discrete sub-populations comprising a large single population, which is often referred to as a meta-population. Even where patches of pristine habitat are fragmented, the movement between wildlife populations is facilitated through habitat linkages, migration corridors and movement corridors. Potentially low frequency genetic flow may lead to complete isolation and, if pressures are strong, potential extinction. Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis Page 3-41 The Project would result in the construction of a hotel on a 1.47 acre site surrounded by roadways, parking lots, and industrial and warehouse buildings. Although aquatic habitat and marsh vegetation is located within about 250 feet of the Project, other than for flying birds, there is functionally no connection between the non-native annual grassland/ruderal habitat on the Project site and the habitat associated with the Colma Creek channel. The presence of a 3-4 foot high flood wall between the creek and the Project site also inhibits movement of any wildlife that would attempt to utilize both sites except for an occasional raccoon or striped skunk, common animal species that would not be affected by construction of the Project. Therefore the project would have no impact on biological resources with regard to native wildlife movement opportunities or nursery sites. e) Local Policies and Ordinances Significance Criteria: The Project would have a significant environmental impact if it were to conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance. General Plan The Open Space and Conservation Element of the City of South San Francisco General Plan contains a number of policies related to protection of sensitive biological and wetland resources that are applicable to the site. These policies are implemented through the implementation of the biological assessment and this CEQA analysis. There are no biological or wetlands resources on the site. East of 101 Area Plan Policy CON-5 of the East of 101 Area Plan states: "Prior to receiving approval for construction activities or other disturbances on undeveloped land in the East of 101 Area, project sponsors shall conduct environmental analyses to evaluate the site-specific status of sensitive plant and animal species." The preparation of this report is consistent with this policy because a Biological Impact Assessment was prepared. The other policies of the plan would also be followed. Municipal Code Since there are no trees on the site, South San Francisco Municipal Code Section 13.30.020 covering "Protected Trees" will not need to be considered. There are no trees on the site that meet the City’s definition of protected tree, and no impacts are anticipated. Further, preparation of a biological assessment and analysis of potential impacts that the project may have on sensitive biological and wetlands resources is consistent with general plan and area plan policies. Therefore, the Project does no conflict with local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources. Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist Page 3-42 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis f) Conflict with any Habitat Conservation Plan or Community Conservation Plan. Significance Criteria: The Project would have a significant environmental impact if it were to conflict with a habitat or community conservation plan or other approved local, regional or state habitat conservation plan protecting biological resources. The Project site is not within a habitat conservation plan area and contains no habit suitable for conservation. The Project would not impact an adopted habitat conservation plan. Finding: After review of CNDDB reports and map overlays for the general Project area, and field evaluations of the site, the habitat was found to be highly disturbed and isolated from other areas containing sensitive habitat. As a result, the site is considered to be of very low value for plants and wildlife in general, and as well for sensitive species of plants and animals. No significant biological impacts would result from full development of the Project site. 3.6 CULTURAL RESOURCES Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5? X b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? X c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? X d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? X SETTING The 64,117 square foot (1.47 acre) site is approximately 13 feet above mean sea level. Historical information indicates that the site and surrounding area were submerged swamp land from the late 1890s to the early 1950s. The site has never been developed. The site is approximately 250 feet north of Colma Creek. REGULATORY FRAMEWORK The 64,117 square foot (1.47 acre) site is approximately 13 feet above mean sea level. Historical information indicates that the site and surrounding area were submerged swamp land from the late 1890s to the early 1950s. The site has never been developed. The site is approximately 250 feet north of Colma Creek. Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis Page 3-43 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK CEQA relies on the criteria identified in Title 14 California Code of Regulations, Public Resources Code Section 4852.1 to identify if a building is appropriate for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources (Determining the Significance of Impacts on Historical and Unique Archaeological Resources, Section 15064.5 Title 14, Chapter 3, California Code of Regulations). In summary, these criteria include consideration of whether the building: A. Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California history and cultural heritage; B. Is associated with the lives of persons important in our past; C. Embodies the distinctive characteristics of type, period, region or method of construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic values; or, D. Has yielded or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. A lead agency does not have to rely solely on the above criterion and may determine the appropriateness of a potential resource based upon age. Commonly 50 years of age is used as a basis by which to consider a structure’s potential historic significance under which a more detailed and rigorous analysis is required to determine actual or imagined significance (Determining the Significance of Impacts on Historical and Unique Archaeological Resources, Section 15064.5 Title 14, Chapter 3, California Code of Regulations). Archaeological resources are evaluated pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources. If it is determined that a project will cause damage to a unique archaeological resource the lead agency may require reasonable efforts to permit the resource to remain in situ. Plan construction to avoid the resource; deed the resource into a conservation easement; cap the resource with a layer of soil prior to building; and planning a park or open space to incorporate the resource are listed as appropriate measures in subsection (b). A mitigation plan is required if disturbance of the resource is not feasible (subsection (c)). Subsection (e) identifies not-to-exceed mitigation cost maximums for archaeological resources. IMPACTS a) Historic Resources Significance Criteria: The Project would have a significant environmental impact if it were to cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5. There are no structures on the site. There are no historical resources or structures on the Project site. The Project would have no impact on historic resources. Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist Page 3-44 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis b - d) Archaeological Resources Significance Criteria: The Project would have a significant environmental impact if it were to cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource as defined in §15064.5, directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or unique geologic feature, or disturb any human remains, including those interred outside formal cemeteries. The Project site is along historic Bay margins and 250 feet north of Colma Creek. Native Americans, over 5,000 years ago, typically settled along creek banks and the margins of San Francisco Bay. Archaeologist Miley Holman of Holman Associates states that the project area has a moderate possibility of containing cultural resources. Cultural resources have been located along the historic path of Colma Creek in South San Francisco, most notably closer to El Camino Real. The Project area has not been evaluated for cultural resources (telephone conversation Allison Knapp and Miley Holman, October 28, 2014). The Applicant is aware of this potential and has proposed as part of the Project to have an archaeologist on site during grading operations. As identified in Chapter 2 Project Description: A licensed archaeologist shall be on site during grading and pile drilling or driving to inspect site soils. Should site soils appear culturally significant, the archaeologist shall call a halt to grading operations in the potentially affected areas until the potential significance of the find is evaluated. A mitigation program to preserve the cultural resource in situ, remove and preserve in a museum or university, photograph and catalogue, or other method(s) deemed appropriate by the archaeologist if warranted, shall occur. The protocols of Public Resources Code Section 210832.2 and Section 15065.5(c)-(f), California Code of Regulations Title 14, Chapter 3 (CEQA Guidelines) shall be followed, as appropriate. The Project would have a less than significant impact on archaeological or paleontological resources. Finding: There are no structures on the Project site. There is a moderate chance that cultural resources may be present on the site. The project plans state that an archaeologist shall be present during site grading and pile driving. The archaeologist would follow the protocols of Public Resources Code Section 210832.2 and Section 15065.5(c)-(f), California Code of Regulations Title 14, Chapter 3 (CEQA Guidelines). The Project would have a less than significant impact on cultural resources. Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis Page 3-45 3.7 GEOLOGY AND SOILS Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. X ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? X iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? X iv) Landslides? X b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? X c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the Project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? X d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? X e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? X SETTING PROJECT SITE The Project site is undeveloped and according to historic records has never been developed. Moreover the site was submerged swamp land from the late 1890s to the early 1950s. The site is 13 feet above mean sea level. The site is the only parcel in the West Harris cul du sac that is undeveloped. Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist Page 3-46 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis The Project would construct a five story hotel. Supporting piles would be drilled or driven. Grading and export of soil is anticipated to be approximately 1,470 cubic yards. REGULATORY FRAMEWORK CONDITIONS OF PROJECT APPROVAL Chapter 1, Sections 4 and 5 outlines the City’s standard review process and conditions of project approval. The Engineering Division is requiring the following as conditions of Project approval (Mr. Andy Tam, Memorandum to Mr. Billy Gross, October 30, 2013) should the Project be approved. I. Standard Conditions The owner/applicant shall comply with the applicable conditions of approval for commercial projects, as detailed in the Engineering Division’s “Standard Conditions for Commercial and Industrial Developments”, contained in our “Standard Development Conditions” booklet, dated January 1998. This booklet is available at no cost to the applicant from the Engineering Division. II. Special Conditions A. A grading permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Division. The owner/applicant will be responsible for paying for all fees, bonds, plan checking and all associated fees for the grading permit. The owner/applicant will also place a cash deposit of $30,000 to pay for all onsite, SWPPP compliance, grading compliance and dust control inspections. B. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, a geotechnical report shall be submitted, reviewed and approved by the Engineering Division. The owner/applicant shall place a $5,000 cash deposit with the City for the peer review of the Geotechnical Report. C. The owner/applicant shall remove and replace any broken sidewalk fronting the project. The new sidewalk shall comply with the City standard detail and shall provide Caltrans standard handicap ramps. All work shall be done at no cost to the City. D. The owner/applicant shall provide the Engineering Division with a traffic study addressing egress/ingress to and from the site from intersection of Gateway Boulevard and West Harris Avenue. E. The drive aisles onsite shall be a minimum of 25’ wide. There are areas on the plan where the drive aisles are less than 25’ wide. There is an area which the drive aisle is 20’ and should be considered to be one-way, with proper striping and signage to be installed. Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis Page 3-47 F. The driveways shall have a grade no greater than 12%. The owner/applicant shall place “R-1” Stop Signs at all driveways exiting the site. G. The owner/applicant shall incorporate bio-grassy swales and other Best Management Practices as stormwater measures within the project and shall be approved by the Engineering Division and the Environmental Compliance Manager. The owner/applicant shall submit the stormwater calculations for review and approval by the Engineering Division. H. The owner/applicant shall install one correctly-sized sanitary sewer lateral from the site. A sanitary sewer manhole shall be installed as the lateral’s cleanout and shall be installed in the public right-of-way, near the property line, at no cost to the City. I. The owner/applicant shall coordinate work with California Water Service for all water utility work. J. Any light standards installed in the City’s right-of-way shall be the standard East of 101 light fixture. The owner/applicant shall provide the light fixture at no cost to the City. K. The owner/applicant shall obtain an encroachment permit for any work performed in the City’s right-of-way and pay all associated fees, deposit and/or bonds. The owner/applicant shall submit an Engineer’s estimate for all work performed in the City’s right-of-way and place a bond or cash deposit for said work. L. Prior to the issuance of Certificate of Occupancy, the owner/applicant shall complete all lot line adjustments. The owner/applicant shall pay for all plan reviews and recordation fees by placing a $5,000 deposit. Should the cost of plan review and recordation be more than the deposit, the City shall request additional funds from the owner/applicant to continue map checking work. (CEQA note: Project has been modified to include one lot only so this does not apply). M. Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit for the project, the applicant shall pay the various fees as detailed below. III. Oyster Point Overpass Contribution Fee Prior to receiving a Building Permit for the proposed new hotel, the Applicant shall pay the Oyster Point Overpass fee, as determined by the City Engineer, in accordance with City Council Resolutions 102-96 and 152-96. The fee will be calculated upon reviewing the information shown on the applicant's construction plans and the latest Engineering News Record San Francisco Construction Cost Index at the time of payment. The estimated fee for the entire subject 65,636 sq. feet hotel use is calculated below. (The number in the calculation, "10389.59", is the September 2013 Engineering News Record San Francisco construction cost index, which is revised each month to reflect local inflation changes in the construction industry.) Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist Page 3-48 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis Trip Calculation 65,636 gsf of hotel @ 10.50 trips per 1000 gsf = 689 new vehicle trips Contribution Calculation 689 trips X $154 X (10389.59/6552.16) = $ 168,292 IV. East of 101 Traffic Impact Fees Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit for any building within the proposed project, the Applicant shall pay the East of 101 Traffic Impact fee, In accordance with the resolution adopted by the City Council at their meeting of May 23, 2007, or as the fee may be amended in the future. Fee Calculation (effective July 2013)25 128 Hotel Rooms @ $1,214.32 per room = $ 155,433 Traffic Impact Fee = $ 155,433 V. Sewer System Capacity Study and Impact Fee The City of South San Francisco has identified the need to investigate the condition and capacity of the sewer system within the East of 101 area, downstream of the hotel. The existing sewer collection system was originally designed many years ago to accommodate warehouse and industrial use and is now proposed to accommodate uses, such as offices and biotech facilities, with a much greater sewage flow. These additional flows, plus groundwater infiltration into the existing sewers, due to ground settlement and the age of the system, have resulted in pumping and collection capacity constraints. A study and flow model is proposed to analyze the problem and recommend solutions and improvements. The Applicant shall pay the East of 101 Sewer Facility Development Impact Fee, as adopted by the City Council at their meeting of October 23, 2002. The adopted fee is $4.25 per gallon of discharge per day. The calculation is based upon the assumption that any use in the East of 101 generates 400 gallons per day per 1,000 square feet of development. Based upon this calculation, the potential fee would be, if paid this year: 0.4 g/sf (400 gpd/1000 sq. ft.) x $4.25 per gallon x 65,636 sq. ft. = $111,581. The sewer contribution shall be due and payable prior to receiving a building permit for each phase of the development. Total estimated fees: Oyster Point Overpass Fee $ 168,292 East of 101 Traffic Impact Fee $ 155,433 East of 101 Sewer Impact Fee $ 111,581 Total $ 435,306 25 The estimated fees were identified by the Public Works Department and may reflect variations due to rounding or square footage. The fees may also be different at the time of building permit issuance. Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis Page 3-49 GEOTECHNICAL REPORTS The City Engineering Division requires geotechnical reports as a part of the permit package for projects to be constructed on vacant land, demolition and rebuilding and additions to buildings that require grading and additional loading (see Chapter 1, Section 5) and as identified in condition of approval II A. B. above. Geotechnical reports are required to be prepared by a licensed geologist, geotechnical engineer or engineering geologist. The reports include a detailed site characterization study, an analysis of potential hazards and design specifications to mitigate the potential hazards. The reports identify design and construction specifications for (among other items) grading, site stabilization, drainage, utility and infrastructure design and placement, foundation design, retaining wall specifications and placement and soil compaction requirements. The reports are peer reviewed by the City’s geotechnical consultant and are often modified through this process. The final geotechnical report is required to incorporate the modifications recommended by the City’s consultant and the project is required to be built as identified through this process. The types of grading and construction methods that are required reduce geotechnical impacts (i.e., expansive soils, liquefaction, differential settlement, severe ground shaking, etc.) to the maximum extent technically feasible. The Applicant’s geotechnical consultant is Terracon and the City’s is Cotton Shires Associates. The Project geotechnical reports and peer review are listed below, used to analyze geologic and soils impacts and located in full in Appendix A. Terracon Reports o Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Fairfield Inn and Suites, 127 West Harris Avenue South San Francisco, California Terracon Project No. 60145004, April 15 2014. o Response to City of South San Francisco-Geotechnical Peer Review Proposed Fairfield Inn and Suites, 127 West Harris Avenue South San Francisco, California Terracon Project No. 60145004, August 21, 2014. o Geotechnical Engineering Addendum 1 Proposed Fairfield Inn and Suites, 127 West Harris Avenue South San Francisco, California Terracon Project No. 60145004, October 7, 2014. Cotton Shires Associates Peer Review o Geotechnical Peer Review, Kuber Development, Proposed Fairfield Inn and Suites 127 West Harris Project No. F5014, May 6, 2014. o Supplemental Geotechnical Peer Review, Kuber Development, Proposed Fairfield Inn and Suites 127 West Harris Project No. F5014A, September 2, 2014. o Supplemental Geotechnical Peer Review, Kuber Development, Proposed Fairfield Inn and Suites 127 West Harris Project No. F5014B, October 16, 2014. Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist Page 3-50 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis SITE GEOLOGIC CHARACTERIZATION The Project site is within the Coast Range Geomorphic Province of California. The materials on the site contain artificial fill overlying tidal flat deposits. The site is generally characterized by a relatively level graded pad surface. Portions of the property have been utilized for dumping of undocumented fill materials. These materials consist of boulders and cobbles ranging from 12 to 42 inches in diameter. The site has been temporarily utilized in the past for vehicle parking. Terracon advanced four test pits, two borings, and three Cone Penetrometer Tests (CPT) soundings. Sand was encountered with black peat seams at the maximum boring depth of 51.5 feet. This material is overlain by approximately 20 feet of medium dense to dense sand and silt (alluvium). The alluvium is in turn overlain by approximately 10 to 20 feet of very soft organic clay (Bay Mud) and nine feet of undocumented fill. Encountered Bay Mud materials typically have average blow counts of two or less. Groundwater was encountered in all test pits between eight and nine feet below ground surface (bgs). The San Andreas Fault is located approximately three miles southwest of the site. SEISMIC FAULTS No active earthquake faults have been recognized within the immediate site area. Although the site and vicinity is believed to be free of active faults, the San Francisco Bay Area is known to be within a seismically active region. The dominant fault in this area is the San Andreas Fault, located about 3 miles southwest of the site. Other active faults in the area include the San Gregorio fault located roughly 8.4 miles west-southwest, Monte Vista-Shannon is located 16.8 miles southeast, and the Hayward fault located on the order of 14.3 miles northeast. Additional faults in the area that are not considered active include the San Bruno and Sierra faults located roughly 2.2 and 3.3 miles southwest of the site, respectively. The Hillside fault, a northwesterly-trending escarpment aligned with a zone of sheared rocks on the knoll of Point San Bruno just south of Oyster Point, has also been mapped a short distance from the Project site. Until the late 1990’s this fault was considered active for planning purposes. Subsequent geophysical studies conducted in the late 1990’s using a more accurate high-powered deep-penetrating sonar system found no evidence suggesting that the Hillside fault is potentially active. Moreover, geologic observations of the Hillside fault exposed during recently graded cuts on San Bruno Mountain did not detect any recognizable offsets of units that would indicate a current fault rupture hazard. Therefore, there is no evidence that this fault has been active within geologically recent time; however, it may be possible for sympathetic movements to be imposed on this fault as a result of stress from major earthquakes on nearby faults, such as the San Andreas and Hayward faults. IMPACTS Seismic Hazards Seismic hazards are generally classified as two types, primary and secondary. Primary geologic hazards include surface fault rupture. Secondary geologic hazards include ground shaking, liquefaction, dynamic densification and seismically induced ground failure. Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis Page 3-51 i) Surface Fault Rupture Significance Criteria: The Project would have a significant environmental impact if it were to expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects associated with the surface rupture of a known earthquake fault. There are no active faults underlying the site and the nearest one is the San Andreas Fault, located about three miles southwest. The Hillside fault is located nearby, but there is no evidence that this fault has been active within geologically recent time. The Project would have no impact on exposing people or structures to danger from surface rupture of a known earthquake fault. ii) Strong Seismic Ground Shaking; iii) Liquefaction; c) Geologic Instability and d) Expansive Soils Significance Criteria: Strong Seismic Ground Shaking: The Project would have a significant environmental impact if it were to expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects associated with strong seismic ground shaking. Liquefaction: The Project would have a significant environmental impact if it were to expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects associated with seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction. Geologic Instability: The Project would have a significant environmental impact if located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the Project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse. Expansive Soils: The Project would have a significant environmental impact if located on expansive soil, creating substantial risks to life or property. Given that there are no active faults within the Project site, damage from a seismic event is most likely to occur from the secondary impact of strong seismic ground shaking originating on a nearby fault. Estimates of actual ground shaking intensity at a particular location are made according to the Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale, which accounts for variables such as the size and distance from the earthquake. For the Project site, Mercalli Intensity estimates indicate that earthquake-shaking intensity would vary depending upon where the seismic event originates. For the Maximum Credible Earthquakes (MCE) along the nearby San Andreas and San Gregorio faults (Richter Magnitude 7.9 and 7.4, respectively) the shaking intensities would be IX, “violent” and VIII, “very strong”, respectively, at the Project site (Association of Bay Area Governments, Seismic Hazard Maps). Liquefaction is a secondary seismic hazard involving saturated cohesionless sand and silty sand sediments located close to the ground surface. Liquefaction occurs when the strength of a soil decreases and pore pressure increases as a response to strong seismic shaking and cyclic loading. During the loss of strength, the soil becomes mobile, and can move both horizontally and Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist Page 3-52 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis vertically, if not confined. Soils most susceptible to liquefaction are loose, clean, saturated, uniformly-graded, fine-grained sands. The Project site geologic stability is further complicated by the presence of alluvial deposits and Bay Mud that would likely liquefy during an extreme seismic event (Association of Bay Area Governments, Seismic Hazard Maps). Expansive soils contain minerals such as smectite, bentonite, montmorillonite, beidellite, vermiculite, attapulgite, nontronite, illite and chlorite. There are also some sulfate salts that will expand with changes in temperature. When a soil contains a large amount of expansive minerals it has the potential of significant expansion. When the soil contains very little expansive minerals it has little expansive potential. The clays are capable of absorbing water and as they do so they increase in volume. The more water they absorb the more their volume increases. Expansions of ten percent or more are not uncommon. The change in volume can exert enough force on a building or other structure to cause damage. Cracked foundations, floors and basement walls are typical types of damage done by swelling soils. Damage to the upper floors of the building can occur when motion in the structure is significant. Expansive soils will also shrink when they dry out. This shrinkage can remove support from buildings or other structures and result in damaging subsidence. Fissures in the soil can also develop. These fissures can facilitate the deep penetration of water when moist conditions or runoff occurs. This produces a cycle of shrinkage and swelling that places repetitive stress on structures. The Project site would likely experience seismically induced liquefaction, settlement and differential settlement as the result of an extreme seismic event. The site could settle up to 2.25 inches in multiple areas across the site (page 7, Terracon, April 15, 2014). The City requires geologic site characterization, identification of construction methods, peer review and specified modifications (geotechnical reports and peer review) to reduce seismic related impacts to the maximum extent possible with available technology. As a result of this process, the Project is required to satisfy the following requirements identified by Cotton Shires Associates (October 16, 2014) prior to issuance of any grading or building permits. These requirements are also stated in Chapter 2 Project Description and will in addition to being proposed by the applicant will become conditions of Project as evidenced above by the Engineering Division Conditions of Approval II A. and B, above. In summary, the following modifications and clarifications are identified by CSA to reduce potential Project impacts related to geotechnical hazards to less than significant. The Applicant understands these requirements and has included them as part of the Project. 1. Geotechnical Clarifications and Plan Review The Project Geotechnical Consultant shall review and approve all geotechnical design aspects of the project construction plans. The Consultant shall also address the following items: o Consideration shall be given to the benefits of an indicator pile testing program to confirm driving capabilities, embedment depths, and pile capacity prior to selecting final pile depths. o Planned pre-drilling for the upper portions of piles may create voids that could impact lateral resistance. The Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis Page 3-53 Consultant shall consider appropriate measures to address voids prior to forming pile caps. o Appropriate documentation to address the above will be submitted to the City for review by the City Engineer prior to issuance of permits for project construction. 2. Vibration monitoring and pre- and post-construction monitoring of nearby structures shall be undertaken to evaluate and document vibration related impacts. A specific proposed plan to address construction period vibrations shall be submitted to the City for review and approval by the City Engineer. 3. The geotechnical consultant will inspect, test (as needed), and approve all geotechnical aspects of the project construction. The inspections shall include, but not necessarily be limited to: site preparation and grading, site surface and subsurface drainage improvements, and excavations for foundations and retaining walls prior to the placement of steel and concrete. The results of these inspections and the as-built conditions of the project will be described by the geotechnical consultant in a letter and submitted to the City Engineer for review prior to final (as-built) project approval. Terracon identified a maximum pile depth of 48 feet. CSA opines that piles up to 60 feet may be required considering the properties of strata below 35 feet. The on-site structural engineer would determine the maximum pile depth to obtain sufficient bearing. In summary, according to Ted Sayre (Principal Engineering Geologist, Cotton Shires Associates e-mail to Allison Knapp on November 6, 2014) it seems credible that piles may be in the range of 50 to 60 feet on the site to reduce liquefaction to less than significant. The geotechnical report (Terracon, October 7, 2014 and Cotton Shires Associates peer review October 16, 2014) states the pile holes would be pre-drilled and consequently the needed forces to drive piles would be reduced. Cast-in-place piles may not be feasible with the very weak, squeezing bay muds. A rigid pile would be inserted from the surface into pre-drilled holes as the holes would likely squeeze in after they are drilled so there is still a need to drive the piles to get them into place. To address voids that may form near the tops of the pre-drilled holes after pile insertion, additional compacted fill may need to be placed around the tops of the piles. This may be required to obtain the design lateral resistance near the top of the piles. These measures in addition to grading specifications and emplacing the over-excavation of fill soils one foot beneath the floor slabs and pile caps would reduce soil instability, liquefaction, strong seismic shaking and geologic instability to a less than significant impact. Instrumentation would be in place on nearby buildings to monitor vibrations during pile driving so that buildings are not exposed to harmful vibrations Pile driving would need to be modified to reduce vibrations if measured accelerations exceed a designated threshold. Vibration Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist Page 3-54 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis reduction might include use of a smaller driving hammer, or reduced travel of the hammer to lesson impact vibrations caused by the hammer hitting the top of pile. This would be like switching to more extended shallow pounding instead of a shorter duration of more forceful pounding. The Project would have less than significant impacts associated with a geologic unit becoming unstable by implementing the measures identified by the Project geotechnical engineer and as modified by the City’s geotechnical consultant. iv) Landslides Significance Criteria: The Project would have a significant environmental impact if it were to expose people or structures to substantial hazards from landslides. A landslide is a mass of rock, soil and debris displaced down slope by sliding, flowing or falling. The Project site is flat. There is no threat of landslides on the Project site; therefore the Project would have no impact with respect to landslides. b) Erosion or Loss of Topsoil Significance Criteria: The Project would result in a significant environmental impact if it were to result in substantial soil erosion or in the loss of topsoil. The Project would require grading, and export of soil as well as drilling and driving piles. The City’s requirements for a grading permit and material export (noted in conditions of approval II. A and B above) requires various vehicular and pedestrian safety measures as well as erosion control off site (such as soil on tires or falling out of dump trucks). In absence of the NPDES C-3 requirements implemented by the City as a condition of building and grading permit issuance the Project would have a potential to increase erosion during construction. The NPDES requirements are required and implemented by the City Engineering Division to reduce impacts associated with soil erosion and water pollution during both construction and operation of projects. These requirements are described in detail in Section 3.8: Hydrology and Water Quality and in Chapter 1, Section 5. Erosion control measures are required as a matter of law and as a result this impact is considered to be less than significant. e) Capability of Soils to Support Septic Tanks Significance Criteria: The Project would have a significant environmental impact if it involved construction of septic systems in soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems. The Project does not propose to build any new septic tank or alternate waste disposal systems. The Project site would be connected to the city’s sanitary sewer system. The Project would have no impact on soils due to septic systems as the Project would be connected to the City’s wastewater system. Finding: There are no active faults underlying the site and the nearest one is the San Andreas Fault, located about three miles southwest. Implementation of the geotechnical measures Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis Page 3-55 required by law (the City’s standard permitting requirements for peer review of all geotechnical reports and the final recommendations to become part of the Project) would reduce geologic instability to less than significant. The Project would have no impact on soils due to septic systems as the Project would be connected to the City’s wastewater system. 3.8 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? X b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? X c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? X d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? X e) For a Project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the Project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the Project area? X f) For a Project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the Project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the Project area? X g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? X h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? X Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist Page 3-56 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis SETTING SITE CONDITIONS The Project is located in the East of 101 Planning Area, south of East Grand Avenue and north of Mitchell Avenue. San Francisco International Airport is approximately 0.8 miles south of the site. The Colma Creek channel is approximately 250 feet south and U.S. 101 is approximately 850 feet west of the site. Mitchell Avenue provides access to West Harris Avenue. Gateway Boulevard to the west and Harbor Way to the east provide access to Mitchell Avenue. The 64,117 square foot (1.47 acre) site is approximately 13 feet above mean sea level. Historical information indicates that the site and surrounding area were submerged swamp land from the late 1890s to the early 1950s. The site has never been developed. Periodically the site was used for parking. The adjacent Focus Hotel was constructed in 1980. Two hazards studies were conducted to identify the conditions on the project site. The two studies are: o Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites, 127 West Harris Avenue, South San Francisco, California. March 18, 2014. Terracon. o Limited Stockpile Characterization and Sampling, Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites, 127 West Harris Avenue, South San Francisco, California. March 19, 2014. Terracon. There are three PG&E towers constructed in the southwest corner of the Focus Hotel parking area. The lines traverse in a relative north/south direction. The lines (in plan dimension) are approximately 120 to 140 feet in distance from the western façade of the Project, and approximately 180 feet from the southwestern corner of the proposed building. The towers were emplaced in the 1940s (Phase I ESA, Terracon, March 18, 2014). The site is covered with invasive and native grasses and shrubs. The site is relatively flat, with a slight surface gradient towards the east. Evidence of illegal dumping is present on the site. The materials include pipes, cardboard boxes, glass, tires, metal fencing and plastic oil bottles. These materials, consisting of approximately one dump truck in volume were removed from the site. Dumped fill is present in the middle of the site. Additionally, there is approximately nine feet of undocumented fill consisting of sandy, gravely, cobble and boulders. The boulders are 12 to 42 inches in diameter (Geotechnical Engineering Report, Terracon, April 15, 2014). Metal concentrations (arsenic and chromium) above California Environmental Screening Levels (ESLs) for shallow soils are present on the site. Additionally low levels of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH), polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) below ESLs are also present in shallow soils (Phase I ESA, Terracon, March 18, 2014). Terracon conducted a limited sampling soil on the Project site, as prompted by the Phase I ESA findings (Limited Stockpile Characterization and Sampling, 127 West Harris Avenue, South San Francisco, CA, March 19, 2014. Terracon). Activities consisted of the collection of representative samples from the test pits and stockpiles on March 3, 2014. No odors, discoloration or staining was observed associated with the observed materials. The soil samples were collected from bottom of the test pits TP-1, TP-2, TP-3 and TP-4 and Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis Page 3-57 composite soil samples were collected from the onsite stockpiles SP-5 and SP-6, as depicted in Chapter 2 Figure 3, Boring and Sampling Locations. The samples were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH), gasoline range organics (GRO), diesel range organics (DRO) and oil range organics (ORO) by United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Method 8015B, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260B, PAHs (Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons) by EPA Method 8270C and Title-22 Metals by EPA Method 6010B. The findings are summarized below and the full report is in Appendix A. Based on laboratory analysis of the soil samples collected from test pits and stockpiled materials, the samples did exhibit concentrations above the reporting limits for: o TPH-ORO 8.8 mg/Kg, 19 mg/Kg and 7.8 mg/Kg from TP-1, SP-5 and SP-6, respectively; o Naphthalene concentration of 0.085 mg/Kg from TP-3, and phenanthrene concentrations of 0.061 mg/Kg and 0.12 mg/Kg from TP-3 and TP-4 respectively; and. o Various metals from stockpiles soils, including: arsenic, barium, beryllium, chromium, cobalt, copper, lead, mercury, nickel, vanadium and zinc were at concentrations above the laboratory method reporting limits. The Applicant proposes to test the soil to determine suitable disposal or reuse procedures pursuant to Hazards Table 1 in Chapter 2 Project Description Permits from the San Mateo County Department of Environmental Health, the Bay Area Air Quality Management District and South San Francisco Fire Department shall be secured, as proposed by the Applicant. A soil management plan may be required and chain of custody shall be followed. The geologic formation is sandstone, shale and conglomerate. Bay Mud appears below the non- engineered fill. Groundwater was encountered at eight feet below ground surface (bgs). The hydrological gradient varies seasonally from southeast to southwest (Phase I ESA, Terracon, March 18, 2014). Depth of groundwater varies seasonally. Adjacent properties are commercial land uses along Gateway Boulevard and Mitchell Avenue. The nearest residential land uses are approximately 1,800 feet to the northwest (west of US 101). The Early Years Preschool, Old Souls Catholic School, and Spruce Elementary School are located 3,700 feet to the northeast, 4,200 feet to the northwest, and 4,790 feet to the northwest of the Project site, respectively. REGULATORY FRAMEWORK Hazardous materials use, storage, and disposal would be governed by the following standards and permits at both the federal and state level. Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist Page 3-58 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis FEDERAL o Toxic Substances Control Act, administered by the EPA, Regulation 40 CFR 720. o Hazardous Materials Transportation Act, administered by the Department of Transportation, Regulation 49 CFR 171-177. o Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) 4 USC 6901-6987. o Hazardous Waste Management Standards for Generators, Transporters, and Waste Facilities, administered by EPA, 40CFR 260-2625. STATE o California Hazardous Waste Control Act. California Health and Safety Code, Division 20, Chapter 6.5. o California Hazardous Waste Management Regulations. California Administrative Code, Title 22. Social Security, Division 4. Environmental Health, Chapter 30. o Occupation Safety and Health Act, 29 USC 651. o Workplace Exposure Limits, administered by Occupational Health and Safety Administration. 29CFR 1900-1910. o California Occupational Safety and Health Act. REGIONAL The San Mateo Department of Environmental Health (SMCDEH) largely serves as the lead permitting or remediation agency through various memoranda of understandings with federal, state, regional agencies and local government. Often the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) and /or the Bay Area Air Quality District (BAAQMD) take a lead or partnership in site remediation with the SMCDEH. Hazards Table 1 outlines the type of hazardous material impacts and standard and acceptable remediation measures. HAZARDS TABLE 1 STANDARD REMEDIATION PRACTICES Media Hazardous Materials Approach Soil Remediation (ex-situ) Fuels • Reuse on Site (if concentration is less than 100 ppm). • Haul and Dispose at appropriate landfill. • Capping and vapor barrier. • Treat on site (see below). Soil Remediation (ex-situ) VOCs (gasoline fuels, solvents) • Consult the SMCEHD for requirements. • Haul and Dispose. • Aeration – requires a notification to BAAQMD, daily volumes are limited. • Vapor Stripping – apply vacuum system to covered piles, notify BAAQMD. • Bioremediation - apply bio-treatment materials, moisture and “work” soil piles. • Thermal Desorption – various vendors provide mobile treatment units. • Capping and vapor barrier. Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis Page 3-59 Media Hazardous Materials Approach Soil Remediation (ex-situ) Inorganics (metals) • Consult BAAQMD and SMCEHD for requirements. • Haul and Dispose. • Chemical Stabilization. • Sorting – reduce waste volume by screening to target contaminant particle size. Soil Remediation (in-situ) VOCs • Consult SMCEHD for requirements. • Soil Vapor Extraction – apply vacuum to vapor wells, notify BAAQMD. • In-situ chemical oxidation. • In-Situ Vitrification – use electricity to melt waste and surrounding soils. Soil Remediation (in-situ) SVOCs • Consult SMCEHD for requirements. • Bioremediation – saturate soils with bio-treatment materials. • Chemical Stabilization – saturate soils with chemicals to immobilize contaminants. • In-Situ Vitrification. • Capping . Groundwater - Investigation All • If contaminants are detected in the 20 foot below ground surface soil sample an additional boring should be completed to groundwater. • Analyze sample for contaminants detected in soil. • Report results to the SMCEHD and consult on remedial alternatives. Groundwater Remediation VOCs • Consult BAAQMD and SMCEHD for requirements. • Pump and Treat – pump from wells, treat and discharge treated water. • Air Sparging – inject air to volatilize contaminants and create aerobic groundwater conditions suitable for natural bioremediation. Generally applied in conjunction with Soil Vapor Extraction to control released volatiles. • Bioremediation – inject bio-treatment materials into affected groundwater. • Chemical Oxidation – inject oxidation chemicals into affected groundwater. Groundwater Remediation SVOCs • Consult BAAQMD for requirements. • Pump and Treat. • Bioremediation. • Chemical Oxidation. Groundwater Remediation Inorganics • Consult BAAQMD for requirements. • Pump and Treat. • Chemical Immobilization – inject chemicals to precipitate or chemically fix contaminants to soil particles. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO The South San Francisco Fire Department (SSFFD) requires businesses using or transporting hazardous substances to provide a Hazardous Materials Business Plan (HMBP) for their review Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist Page 3-60 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis and approval. SSFFD reviews development and entitlement applications, levies and enforces code requirements for fire prevention and safety and conducts periodic inspections of business activities. The SSFFD identified the following conditions of approval for the Project should it be approved (Luis Da Silva, Fire Marshall memorandum to Billy Gross, August 28, 2013). 1. Install fire sprinkler system per NFPA 13/SSFFD requirements under separate fire plan check and permit for overhead and underground. 2. Fire sprinkler system shall be central station monitored per California Fire Code section 1003.3. 3. Install a standpipe system per NFPA 14/SSFFD requirements under separate fire plan check and permit. 4. Install exterior listed horn/strobe alarm device, not a bell. 5. Elevator if provided shall not contain shunt-trips. 6. At least one elevator shall be sized for a gurney the minimum size shall be in accordance with the California Fire Code. 7. Fire alarm plans shall be provided per NFPA 72 and the City of South San Francisco Municipal Code. 8. Buildings 4 stories or more will require a modified smoke control system. A rational analysis is required before building plans are approved. 9. Provide fire extinguishers throughout the building. 10. All Non parking space curbs to be painted red to local Fire Code Specifications 11. Access road shall have all weather driving capabilities and support the imposed load of 75,000 pounds. 12. Road gradient and vehicle turning widths shall not exceed maximum allowed by engineering department. 13. Provide fire flow in accordance with California Fire Code Appendix III-A. 14. Provide fire hydrants; location and number to be determined. 15) Provide fire hydrants with an average spacing of 400 feet between hydrants. 16) The fire hydrants shall have a minimum fire flow of 3000 gpm at 20 psi residual pressure for duration of 4 hours. 17) All buildings shall provide premise identification in accordance with SSF municipal code section 15.24.100. Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis Page 3-61 18) Provide Knox key box for each building with access keys to entry doors, electrical/mechanical rooms, elevators, and others to be determined. 19) The minimum road width is 20 feet per the California Fire Code. 20) Project must meet all applicable Local (SSF Municipal Code, Chapter 15.24 Fire Code), State and Federal Codes 21) All buildings shall have Emergency Responder Radio Coverage throughout in compliance with Section 510 of the California Fire Code. 22) The Fire Department reserves the right to make additional safety conditions, if necessary, upon receipt of detailed / revised building plans. 23) This new construction will be assessed a Public Safety Impact Fee. The amounts for Office/R & D are $0.13 per square foot for the Police Department and $0.29 per square foot for the Fire Department, or the total of the two ($0.42) for hotel development. IMPACTS a) and b) Hazardous Materials Significance Criteria: The Project would have a significant environmental impact if it were to create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials or if it were to create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment. The Project would not handle hazardous materials as a course of conducting business operations. There are no sensitive receptors within 1,000 feet of the Project boundary. Adjacent properties are commercial land uses along Gateway Boulevard and Mitchell Avenue. The nearest residential land uses are approximately 1,800 feet to the northwest (west of US 101). The Early Years Preschool, Old Souls Catholic School, and Spruce Elementary School are located 3,700 feet to the northeast, 4,200 feet to the northwest, and 4,790 feet to the northwest of the Project site, respectively. Operational Impacts Any hazardous materials incident on the site would first be responded to by the South San Francisco Fire Department. The South San Francisco Fire Department Fire Marshall reviewed the project plans. As shown in the Setting Section, Chief Da Silva identified 25 conditions for approval of the project and he did not identify any safety hazards. Operational impacts with respect to a release of hazardous substances or materials would be less than significant. Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist Page 3-62 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis There are three PG&E towers constructed in the southwest corner of the Focus Hotel parking area. The lines traverse in a relative north/south direction. The lines (in plan dimension) are approximately 120 to 140 feet in distance from the western façade of the Project, and approximately 180 feet from the southwestern corner of the proposed building. Electric and magnetic field (EMF) is a term used to describe electric and magnetic fields that are created by electric voltage (electric field) and electric current (magnetic field). Electric fields are present whenever voltage exists on a wire and are not dependent on current. The magnitude of the electric field is primarily a function of the configuration and operating voltage of the transmission line and decreases with the distance from the transmission line. Magnetic fields are present whenever current flows in a conductor and are not dependent on the voltage present on the conductor. The strength of these fields also decreases with distance from the source. The magnetic field levels of overhead transmission lines will vary depending upon customer power usage. Magnetic field strengths for typical transmission line loadings at the edge of rights- of-way are approximately 10 to 90 milligauss (mG). Under peak load conditions, the magnetic fields at the edge of the right-of-way would not likely exceed 150 mG. There are no long-term, health-based California or federal EMF exposure standards. State regulations for magnetic fields have been developed in New York and Florida (150 mG and 200 mG at the edge of the right-of- way). However, these are based on limiting exposure from new facilities to levels no greater than existing facilities. The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) and the California Department of Health Services (CDHS) have not concluded that exposure to magnetic fields from utility electric facilities is a potential health hazard. Many reports have concluded that the potential for health effects associated with EMF exposure is too speculative to allow the evaluation of impacts or the preparation of mitigation measures. Construction Construction related impacts could include removing hazardous containing materials in a manner not compliant with Hazards Table 1, above. The Hazards Setting Section notes metals and hydrocarbon elements present in the soil that are in excess of repotting limits. Chapter 2 Project Description notes the Applicant’s actions that are proposed as part of the Project. The Applicant proposes to obtain permits and test soils for re-use and/or disposal and based upon the results a Soil Management Plan will be prepared and followed as prescribed by law. The Project would be incompliance with testing re-use, removal, monitoring and permitting regulations identified and implemented to reduce hazards impacts to less than significant. c) and d) Hazardous Materials Presence Significance Criteria: The Project would have a significant environmental impact if it were to emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within a quarter mile of an existing or proposed school, or if it was located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 (“Cortese List”). Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis Page 3-63 There are no existing or proposed schools or day care centers or facilities within a quarter mile of the Project site. The site is not identified on a Cortese list (Phase I ESA, Terracon , March 18, 2014) As noted above, the Early Years Preschool, Old Souls Catholic School, and Spruce Elementary School are located 3,700 feet to the northeast, 4,200 feet to the northwest, and 4,790 feet to the northwest of the Project site, respectively. The Project would have no impact from the emission or handling of hazardous materials or wastes on schools or from any environmental contamination posed by the sites listed on the Cortese List. e) and f) Safety Hazards Due to Nearby Airport or Airstrip Significance Criteria: The Project would have a significant environmental impact if it were located within an airport land use plan (or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport), if it would result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the Project area; or if it were located within the vicinity of a private airstrip, if it would result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the Project area. San Francisco International Airport is approximately 0.8 miles south of the site and within the San Mateo County Airport Land Use Commission’s (ALUC) and ALUC Plan Area jurisdiction. The ALUC allows development within its plan boundaries, provided that development is below a prescribed height limit. The City, in concert with the ALUC and in coordination with Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), established height limits in the South San Francisco General Plan (1999) in compliance with the ALUC and FAA. SFO’s Interactive Airspace Tool identifies updated height information based upon the updated 2012 Airport Land Use Plan. The maximum height allowed at the Project site is 150 above msl. The maximum height of the Project would be 65 feet. The Project would be 85 feet below the maximum permitted height in order to avoid conflicts with aircraft operations. Potential safety impacts associated with airports and airstrips is considered to be less than significant. g) Conflict with Emergency Response Plan or Emergency Evacuation Plan Significance Criteria: The Project would have a significant environmental impact if it were to impair implementation of, or physically interfere with, an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. There are no emergency response or evacuation plans in effect in the Project vicinity. The Project would have no impact on the implementation of any adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. h) Exposure of People or Structures to Wildland Fires Significance Criteria: The Project would have a significant environmental impact if it were to expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires. There is no wildland in the vicinity of the Project site or area. The Project would have no impact with respect to wildland fires. Finding: The Project through the entitlement process and routine inspection is required as a matter of law to operate under all applicable, federal, state and local guidelines governing Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist Page 3-64 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis hazardous waste. The Project would have no impact from the emission or handling of hazardous materials or wastes on schools within a quarter of a mile or from any environmental contamination posed by the sites listed on the Cortese List. The impact of the Project with regards to hazardous materials would be less than significant with respect to operational activities. The Project as proposed would have a less than significant impact with respect to the release of hazardous materials during construction. There are no existing or proposed schools or day care centers or facilities within a quarter mile of the Project site. The Project would be 65 feet in height and 85 feet below the 150 foot maximum. The Project would be well under the maximum permitted height determined by the ALUC and FAA. There are no emergency response or evacuation plans in effect in the Project vicinity. Therefore the Project would have no impact on the implementation of any adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. The South San Francisco Fire Department is in the process of initiating a study to identify offensive capabilities in the Project area. The Project would be required through conditions of approval to provide a fair share financial contribution to the department’s study and improvements. There is no wildland in the vicinity of the Project site or area. The Project would have no impact with respect to wildland fires. Intentionally Left Blank Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis Page 3-65 3.9 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? X b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? X c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off- site? X d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off-site? X e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? X f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? X g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? X h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures, which would impede or redirect flood flows? X i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? X j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? X Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist Page 3-66 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis SETTING Colma Creek, the City’s main natural drainage system, is a perennial stream with a watershed of about 16.3 square miles that trends in a roughly southeasterly direction through the center of the City. The Colma Creek watershed is one of the three largest in the County. The basin is bounded on the northeast by San Bruno Mountain and on the west by a ridge traced by Skyline Boulevard. Dominant topographic features of the drainage basin include two relatively straight mountain ridges that diverge toward the southeast that are connected by a low ridge at the northern boundary of the area. The valley enclosed by the ridges widens toward the southeast where it drains into San Francisco Bay. Flooding potential is evaluated by use of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Community Maps. South San Francisco’s Community Panel Number is 0044E, Map #06081C00H4E, dated October 16, 2012. Flood risk is based upon a one percent (1%) annual chance of a 100 year flood, also known as the base flood, which is the flood that has a one percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year. The area that would be inundated by a 100 year flood is known as the Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA). SFHA areas include flood zones A, AE, AH, AO, AR, A99, V and VE. The base flood elevation is the water surface elevation of the one percent annual chance flood. The Project site is located in a Flood Zone C (minimal flooding), and no base flood elevation level has been determined (Community Panel Number is 0044E, Map #06081C00H4E, September 8, 2013). The site is adjacent to Flood Zone A0 with a two foot base flood level elevation at that location. The City’s Building Official is the Flood Administrator who is responsible for ensuring that construction complies with FEMA regulations. REGULATORY FRAMEWORK FEDERAL National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Storm Water Discharge Permit: As identified in Chapter 1 Section 5, the City of South San Francisco is a member of the San Mateo Countywide Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program (STOPPP), an organization of the City/County Association of Governments (C/CAG) of San Mateo County holding a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Storm Water Discharge permit. STOPPP's goal is to prevent polluted storm water from entering creeks, wetlands, and the San Francisco Bay. The City requires the implementation of Best Management Practices (BMP’s) and Low Impact Development (LID) measures for new development and construction as part of its storm water management program, as levied through standard City conditions of project approval. The City requires the implementation of BMP’s and LID measures to ensure the protection of water quality in storm runoff from the Project site. In brief, the measures presented in the BMP handbook address pollution control and management mechanisms for contractor activities, e.g. structure construction, material delivery and storage, solid waste management, employee and subcontractor training, etc. The handbook also provides direction for the control of erosion and sedimentation as well as the establishment of monitoring programs to ensure the effectiveness Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis Page 3-67 of the measures. The City also requires an agreement with the Applicant that ensures the permanent and on-going maintenance of water quality control improvements by the Applicant and/or project site owner(s). Refer to the Bay Area Storm Water Management Agencies Association (BASMAA) Start at the Source Design Guidance Manual for Storm Water Quality Protection (available from BASMAA) for a comprehensive listing of required measures. Typical storm water quality protection measures are identified in Chapter 1, Section 1.5.4 of this document. The City’s requirements are in compliance with state and federal laws and regulations that are designed to mitigate potential hydrological and stormwater impacts associated with project construction and on-going operational activities. STATE State Water Quality Control Board’s General Permitting Requirements: As identified above and in Chapter 1 Section 1.5.4, the City of South San Francisco requires through conditions of project approval, project compliance with the State Water Quality Control Board’s general permitting requirements which require the Applicant to secure a Construction Activities Storm Water General Permit, complete a Notice of Intent (NOI) and prepare and obtain approval of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The state issues a Waste Discharge Identification number within 10 days of receipt of a complete NOI and SWPPP. The Applicant is then required to submit copies of the NOI and SWPPP to the City of South San Francisco, Public Works Department Division of Water Quality, prior to issuance of building and/or grading permits. The conditions of approval identified in the Introduction Chapter 1 Section 1.5.4 apply to the Project as a matter of law. These measures are required in order to reduce water quality impacts to a less than significant level. SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO Chapter 1, Sections 4 and 5 outlines the City’s standard review process and conditions of project approval. Rob Lecal, Interim Environmental Compliance Coordinator reviewed the Project and identified the following conditions of approval (memorandum to Billy Gross, August 15, 2013). The following items must be included in the plans or are requirements of the Stormwater and/or Pretreatment programs and must be completed prior to the issuance of a permit: 1. If fire sprinklers are installed, the fire sprinkler system test/drainage valve shall be plumbed into the sanitary sewer system. This must be shown on the plans prior to issuance of a permit. 2. Install a grease interceptor for the food preparation area. 3. The interceptor must be connected to all wash sinks, mop sinks, and floor sinks and shall not be downstream from the domestic waste stream. Sizing of the interceptor must be in accordance with the uniform plumbing code. Connections must be shown on the plans prior to the issuance of a permit. 4. Sizing of the interceptor must be shown on the plans. Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist Page 3-68 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis 5. Cut sheet of the interceptor must be shown on the plans. 6. All condensate from refrigeration equipment shall be discharged to sanitary sewer. Show location of the condensate drain on the plans. 7. Garbage disposals are not allowed in commercial facilities. 8. Trash handling area must be covered, enclosed, be connected to the pretreatment system and must drain to sanitary sewer. This connection must be shown on the plans prior to issuance of a permit. 9. Submit a geotechnical report to show infeasibility (NOTE by CEQA preparer: The geotechnical report is fully vetted in Section 3.7 Geology and Soils. 10. Submit c.3 documents. 11. Boiler blow down must be discharged to the sanitary sewer. 12. Roof leaders cannot be directly connected to the storm drain system. 13. Runoff from all driveways must be diverted into bio-retention area. 14. The Applicant must submit a signed maintenance agreement for the stormwater pollution prevention devices installed. Each maintenance agreement will require the inclusion of the following exhibits: a. A letter-sized reduced-scale site plan that shows the locations of the treatment measures that will be subject to the agreement. b. A legal description of the property. c. A maintenance plan, including specific long-term maintenance tasks and a schedule. It is recommended that each property owner be required to develop its own maintenance plan, subject to the municipality’s approval. Resources that may assist property owners in developing their maintenance plans include: (i) The operation manual for any proprietary system purchased by the property owner. 15. The owner or his representative must file this agreement with the County of San Mateo and documentation that the County received it must be sent to the Technical Services Supervisor. 16. Roof leaders cannot be directly connected to the storm drain system. 17. Pool filter discharge must be routed to sanitary sewer. 18. Source Control Requirements. Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis Page 3-69 The Project must implement source control measures. Onsite that at a minimum shall include the following: (a) Minimization of stormwater pollutants of concern in urban runoff through measures that will include plumbing of the following discharges to the sanitary sewer, subject to the local sanitary sewer agency’s authority and standards: o Discharges from indoor floor mat/equipment/hood filter wash racks or covered outdoor wash racks for restaurants; o Discharges from covered outdoor wash areas for vehicles, equipment, and accessories; (b) Properly designed covers, drains, and storage precautions for outdoor material storage areas, loading docks, repair/maintenance bays, and fueling areas; (d) Landscaping that minimizes irrigation and runoff, promotes surface infiltration, minimizes the use of pesticides and fertilizers, and incorporates other appropriate sustainable landscaping practices and programs such as Bay-Friendly Landscaping; (e) Efficient irrigation systems; and (f) Storm drain system stenciling or signage. 19. Implement Site Design and Stormwater Treatment Requirements The Project must implement at least the following design strategies onsite: a. Limit disturbance of natural water bodies and drainage systems; minimize compaction of highly permeable soils; protect slopes and channels; and minimize impacts from stormwater and urban runoff on the biological integrity of natural drainage systems and water bodies; b. Conserve natural areas, including existing trees, other vegetation, and soils; c. Minimize impervious surfaces; d. Minimize disturbances to natural drainages; and e. Minimize stormwater runoff by implementing one or more of the following site design measures: o Direct roof runoff into cisterns or rain barrels for reuse. o Direct roof runoff onto vegetated areas. o Direct runoff from sidewalks, walkways, and/or patios onto vegetated areas. o Direct runoff from driveways and/or uncovered parking lots onto vegetated areas. o Construct sidewalks, walkways, and/or patios with permeable surfaces. o Construct driveways, bike lanes, and/or uncovered parking lots with permeable surfaces. 20. Applicant must pay sewer connection fee at a later time based on anticipated flow, Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) and Total Suspended Sediments(TSS) calculations. Please provide the number of existing fixture units and the total number of fixture units after the improvement. Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist Page 3-70 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis IMPACTS a) Violation of Water Quality Standards or Waste Discharge Requirements Significance Criteria: The Project would have a significant environmental impact if it were to result in any violation of existing water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. The Project as a matter of law is required to provide a SWPPP for approval by the City. The City requires the implementation of LIDs and BMPs for new development and construction as part of its storm water management program, as levied through standard City conditions of project approval by the Water Quality Control Division of the Public Works Department. Rob Lecel, Interim Environmental Compliance Manager for the City of South San Francisco reviewed the proposed plans and identified the conditions of approval (listed in the Setting Section, above). These measures are required by the City in compliance with their permitting authority and are designed to reduce potential water quality impacts to less than significant. The Project would present no impact with respect to violation of water quality standards or waste discharge standards as the result of the City’s permitting requirements which are in compliance with regional, state and federal laws designed to mitigate hydrological including stormwater impacts both on individual projects and as well as cumulative impacts. b) Deplete or Interfere Substantially with Groundwater Significance Criteria: The Project would have a significant environmental impact if it substantially depletes groundwater supplies or interferes substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level. The Project would not draw down groundwater but be connected to water supply infrastructure provided by California Water Service (CWS). Section 3.7 Geology and Soils, Setting Section identifies conditions of approval to comply with CWS permitting requirements. Please see Section 3.17 Public Utilities for a water supply evaluation. The Project would have no impact with regards to groundwater depletion. The Project would continue to receive its water supply from existing local infrastructure, not groundwater. The proposed bioswales would likely improve groundwater recharge as the swales would collect and filter water that would in turn filtrate into the soil. Current conditions include some filtration and sheet flow off the site into the street and storm drain. The Project would result in a less than significant impact with respect to groundwater recharge. c) Alter Existing Drainage Patterns/Erosion and Siltation Effects Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis Page 3-71 Significance Criteria: The Project would have a significant environmental impact if it were to substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation. The Project is required to comply with current NPDES and SWPPP measures, as noted in a and b, above and Section 3.7 Geology and Soils. The regulations mandate the Project to treat all stormwater runoff from the entire Project on-site; use plants that are suited for the site including insectary plants to attract beneficial insects and a diversity of plants among other items. There would be a less than significant impact related to altered drainage patterns or siltation at the Project site as a result of the NPDES and SWPPP measures required by the City. d) Alter Existing Drainage Patterns/Flooding Effects Significance Criteria: The Project would have a significant environmental impact if it were to substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner that would result in flooding on- or off-site. The Project would likely improve the existing drainage pattern of the site because the Project is required by law to implement NPDES and SWPPP measures (outlined in detail in the Setting Section above and Chapter 1 Introduction). The site currently does not include any of these measures including bioswales or any devices to filter and retain stormwater on site. The non- permitted dumping has altered the topography of the site and to some extent the direction of stormwater runoff. Under current conditions it is reasonable to assume that stormwater percolates on site and sheet flows across the site in an easterly direction (due to the gradient), into the street and the City’s storm drain system. The Project proposes bio-retention areas approximately one foot in depth along the eastern, southern, northern and a small portion of the western property lines. These bio-retention areas are designed to capture excess stormwater, and allow filtration on the Project site. SWPPP measures are implemented and identified in detail in the Setting Section, above and Chapter 1 Introduction to reduce and in many cases eliminate stormwater runoff and stormwater pollution. The Project would result in a less than significant impact related to an increased rate or amount of surface runoff. e) Runoff Exceeding Drainage System Capacity/Increase Polluted Runoff Significance Criteria: The Project would have a significant environmental impact if it were to create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. The Project, as a matter of law, is required to submit a SWPPP and an Erosion Control Plan to the City Engineer and the Water Quality Control Division prior to the commencement of any grading or construction of the proposed Project. The SWPPP as noted in the Chapter 1 Introduction Section 5 and the Setting Section and in a and d above, is required to include storm water pollution control devices to treat all stormwater on site and use stormwater onsite for landscaping to prevent pollutants from entering the City’s storm drain system and San Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist Page 3-72 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis Francisco Bay. The Plan shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer and the City’s Water Quality Control Plant coordinator. Water quality measures are required to be included in the building permit packet; therefore all contractors are as a matter of law made aware of the requirements. Additionally, the Engineering Division of the Public Works Department as well as the Water Quality Control Plant Compliance Inspector conducts routine site inspections to insure compliance. Failure to comply with the approved construction BMPs would result in the issuance of correction notices, citations and/or a Stop Work Order. Plans for the Project would as a matter of law include erosion control measures to prevent soil, dirt and debris from entering the storm drain system. Implementation of the measures required as a matter of law would reduce runoff impacts to less than significant. f) Otherwise Degrade Water Quality Significance Criteria: The Project would have a significant environmental impact if it were to degrade water quality. The Project, as required by law, would treat all stormwater and operational (i.e., hotel use) water. Hotel water must be diverted to sanitary sewer lines. Landscaping and storm water must be filtered bioswales and retained on site. The Project would result a less than significant impact on water quality from point source water pollution. g – i) Flood Hazards Significance Criteria: The Project would have a significant environmental impact if it were to place any housing units within a designated 100-year flood hazard area; if it placed any structures in a manner which would impede or redirect flood flows; or if it were to result in the exposure of people or structures to flooding hazards. Flood hazard areas identified on the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) are identified as a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA). SFHA are defined as the area that will be inundated by the flood event having a one-percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year. The one-percent annual chance flood is also referred to as the base flood or 100-year flood. SFHAs are labeled as Zone A, Zone AO, Zone AH, Zones A1-A30, Zone AE, Zone A99, Zone AR, Zone AR/AE, Zone AR/AO, Zone AR/A1-A30, Zone AR/A, Zone V, Zone VE, and Zones V1-V30. Moderate flood hazard areas, labeled Zone B or Zone X (shaded) are also shown on the FIRM, and are the areas between the limits of the base flood and the 0.2-percent-annual- chance (or 500-year) flood. The areas of minimal flood hazard, which are the areas outside the SFHA and higher than the elevation of the 0.2-percent-annual-chance flood, are labeled Zone C or Zone X (unshaded). Areas subject to inundation by the one-percent-annual-chance flood event are generally determined using approximate methodologies. Because detailed hydraulic analyses have not been performed, no Base Flood Elevations (BFEs) or flood depths are shown. Mandatory flood insurance purchase requirements and floodplain management standards apply. The Project site is located in a Flood Zone C (minimal flooding) and no base flood elevation Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis Page 3-73 level has been determined (Community Panel Number is 0044E, Map #06081C00H4E, September 8, 2013). The site is touches upon a very small portion of the Flood Zone A0 with a two foot base flood level elevation at this location. The A0 Flood Zone is associated with Colma Creek. The City’s Building Official is the Flood Administrator who is responsible for ensuring that construction complies with FEMA regulations. By law, the Project is required to be constructed one foot above base flood level, or three feet in elevation. The site meets this requirement and additional mitigation is not required. The Project would result in a less than significant impact with respect to flooding. j) Tsunami Hazards Significance Criteria: The Project would have a significant environmental impact if it were to result in the exposure of people or structures to inundation by seiche, tsunami or mudflow. The Project site is located approximately 3,400 feet (0.68 mile) from San Francisco Bay. An earthquake could cause tsunamis (tidal waves) and seiches (oscillating waves in enclosed water bodies) in the Bay. The City’s general plan estimates that potential wave run-up of a 100-year tsunami would be approximately 4.3 feet above mean sea level (msl) and approximately 6.0 feet above msl for a 500-year tsunami (Dyett and Bhatia, South San Francisco General Plan, adopted October 1999, page 250). The Project site is 13 feet above msl, would be outside the runup zone subject to inundation by a 500-year tsunami and would be outside the any potential tsunami hazard zone. The Project is not within an inundation zone; therefore, the impact of potential inundation by tsunami or seiche is considered to be less than significant. Finding: The City’s standard conditions of approval which implement state, federal and local regulations are required by law and are adequate to address any potential water quality impacts as a result of Project construction or occupation. The site is not within a flood zone or an area subject to seiche or tsunami inundation or run-up zones. No mitigation measures, above those required by the City as a matter of law, are identified in this Initial Study. The Project would not result in an impact or contribute to a cumulative impact to hydrology or water quality resources. Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist Page 3-74 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis 3. 10. LAND USE AND PLANNING Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Physically divide an established community? X b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the Project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? X c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? X SETTING The Project is in an area intended for freeway commercial land uses. The Focus Hotel is adjacent to the site and CTC Food Industries, Inc is north of the site. There are no biological resources on the site (see Section 3.5 Biological Resources). The Project site is vacant and the Project would construct a hotel. Properties in the area are developed with vacant and occupied office space, freight forwarding, building materials and food wholesalers. Land uses outside of West Harris Avenue are a mix of light industrial, manufacturing and research and development. Buildings along West Harris are one to three story structures. Denser development patterns such as the Embassy Suites Hotel and R&D and office buildings located on Gateway Boulevard can be seen from the Project area. These buildings are two to eight stories in height. The Project site is approximately 100 feet from the southeastern edge of the Draft Downtown Station Area Plan area, in what is identified as the “Eastern Neighborhood” (See Figure 2 Draft Downtown Station Area Plan and Project Location in Chapter 2). The Eastern Neighborhood is bounded by East Grand Avenue to the north; Gateway Boulevard to the east; South Airport Boulevard to the south; and the U.S. 101 to the west. The Eastern Neighborhood would experience land use changes from Industrial to R&D if the Plan is adopted as shown in Figure 2. Abandoned rail spurs and the Colma Creek channel would be designated open space. Land currently designated as Business Commercial, Mixed Industrial and Auto-Oriented Commercial would become Office and R&D. REGULATORY FRAMEWORK SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO GENERAL PLAN The General Plan designates the Project site “Business Commercial” (BC) a use intended for business and professional office and visitor service establishments and retail. Permitted uses Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis Page 3-75 include administrative, financial, business, professional, medical and public offices, and visitor- oriented and regional commercial activities. The 1999 General Plan (page 42) specifically notes: This category is intended for the emerging commercial and hotel district along South Airport, Gateway and Oyster Point [b]oulevards, and South Spruce Corridor. Maximum FAR for hotel developments shall be 1.2 with increases to a maximum total FAR of 2.0 for development meeting specified criteria. ZONING CLASSIFICATION The Project site is zoned Freeway Commercial (FC). The FC zoning is one of a group of four zoning districts identified under Chapter 20.110 Employment Districts. FC zoning is intended for regional-serving retail uses, commercial lodging, visitor services and similar uses that benefit from proximity to the Bayshore Freeway. Hotels are a permitted use within this zoning classification. The FC designation identifies a 1.2 FAR for hotels; a minimum lot size of one acre; minimum lot width of 50 feet and a minimum front setback of 20 feet. A complete list of permitted and conditional uses is identified in Chapter 20.110, Table 20.11.002 Land Use Regulations-Employment Districts of the South San Francisco Municipal Code (http://qcode.us/codes/southsanfrancisco). IMPACTS a and b) Division of an Established Community and Conflicts with Land Use Plan and Zoning Significance Criteria: The Project would have a significant environmental impact if it were to physically divide an established community and/or the Project would have a significant environmental impact if it were to result in a conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the Project adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. The project conforms to the general plan and zoning classifications for the site. The Project would also provide hotel services supporting the planned biotechnology uses in the Eastern Neighborhood. The Project would have no impact on dividing an established community and would continue to be consistent with City’s General Plan and zoning. The Project would conform to all applicable land use plans and zoning regulations and, therefore, would have no impact. c) Conflict with Conservation Plan Significance Criteria: The Project would have a significant environmental impact if it were to result in a conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan. There is no conservation or natural community conservation plans that govern the Project site (or area) as identified in Section 3.5, Biological Resources. Therefore, the Project would have no impact on conservation plans. Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist Page 3-76 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis Finding: The Project would not physically divide an established community. The site is planned for a hotel use and the Project is consistent with the planned uses. There are no conservation or natural community conservation plans that govern the Project site or area. The Project would not result in any individually or cumulatively considerable impacts. 3.11 MINERAL RESOURCES Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? X b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally- important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? X SETTING The Project is located in an area that has been historically a mixed industrial area. The site is vacant, has never been developed, and was submerged swampland until the 1950s. IMPACTS a) and b) Loss of Mineral Resources Significance Criteria: The Project would have a significant environmental impact if it were to result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state, or if it were to result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan. No mineral resources of value to the region and the residents of the state have been identified at the Project site. The Project site has not been delineated as a locally important mineral recovery site on the City of South San Francisco General Plan, on any specific plan, or on any other land use plan. Therefore, the Project would have no impact on any known mineral resource, or result in the loss of availability of any locally important resource recovery site. Finding: The Project site does not contain any local or regionally significant mineral resources. The Project would not result in an impact or contribute to a cumulative impact to mineral resources. Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis Page 3-77 3.12 NOISE Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? X b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? X c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the Project vicinity above levels existing without the Project? X d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the Project vicinity above levels existing without the Project? X e) For a Project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the Project expose people residing or working in the Project area to excessive noise levels? X f) For a Project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the Project expose people residing or working in the Project area to excessive noise levels? X SETTING The Project site is located in the southern area of the City, within an industrial area. SFO property is 0.80 miles south of the site. The area is dominated by aircraft and roadway noise. The site is within the 65-70 dB noise contour for roadway noise (Figure 9-2 Projected Rail and Road Noise, page 283, and below the 60 dB contour for airport-related noise exposure Figure 9-1 Aircraft Noise and Noise Insulation Program page 279, South San Francisco General Plan). SFO’s website shows the site below the 65 dB contour. The airport’s contours were updated in 2012 (Comprehensive Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan for the Environs of San Francisco International Airport, Ricondo Associates. 2012). NOISE DEFINED Noise is generally defined as unwanted sound. Whether a sound is unwanted depends on when and where it occurs, what the listener is doing when it occurs, characteristics of the sound (loudness, pitch and duration, speech or music content, irregularity) and how intrusive it is above background sound levels. In determining the daily level of environmental noise, it is important to account for the difference in response of people to daytime and nighttime noises. During nighttime, exterior background noises are generally lower than daytime levels. However, most Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist Page 3-78 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis household noise also decreases at night and exterior noise becomes more noticeable. Further, most people sleep at night and are very sensitive to nighttime noise intrusion. To quantify the noise over a 24-hour period, the Day/Night Average Sound level (DNL or Ldn) or Community Noise equivalent Level (CNEL) criteria are used. These noise descriptors include a 10 decibel (dB) penalty (addition to the actual measured levels) during nighttime hours (10 PM to 7AM) and a five dB penalty during evening hours (7 PM to 10 PM) for the CNEL to account for people’s sensitivity during these hours. The Leq is also included to demonstrate a more steady state of sound experienced at a particular location, not factoring in the weighting noted for the Ldn measurements. Noise is measured and quantified with an A-weighted filter which closely approximates the way the human ear hears sound; a de-emphasis of low-frequency and high-frequency sound. The resulting measurement is quantified as an A-weighted decibel or dBA. Noise attenuates (reduces) the further it travels from the source. Typically noise from a point source attenuates 6 dB per doubling distance in hard surface environments (paving, hardscape). The shell of a building (sometimes referred to as the envelope) attenuates noise 15 to 25 dBA depending on the type construction, number and type of doors and windows, and insulation contained therein. Noise can also be reduced by barriers that break the line of sight from the noise source to the receiver. For example, a building between a construction site and a park can reduce the noise levels reaching the park in addition to the attenuation afforded by distance. Projects can result in an increase in noise (unwanted sound) from demolition and construction and operational activities. Demolition and construction are typically short-term in nature depending upon the construction schedule. Construction impacts can be annoying, but are relatively short term and restricted to certain times of the day while “operational impacts” are not. Operational impacts run with the life of the project and largely result from increased traffic, ventilation systems and/or land use activities that are conducted external to a building. SENSITIVE RECEPTORS Residential, schools, child care facilities and convalescent facilities are typically considered noise sensitive land uses. There are no sensitive receptors within 1,000 feet of the Project boundary. The nearest residential land uses are approximately 1,800 feet to the northwest (west of US 101). The Early Years Preschool, Old Souls Catholic School, and Spruce Elementary School are located 3,700 feet to the northeast, 4,200 feet to the northwest, and 4,790 feet to the northwest of the Project site, respectively. Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis Page 3-79 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK FEDERAL U.S Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) USEPA’s “Protective Noise Levels” (November, 1978) identifies 75 dB, L eq as the level requisite to protect from hearing loss over a duration of 40 years assuming an eight hour a day exposure for 365 days a year. The 75 dB L eq is defined as a “noise equivalent level” and is not a decibel weighted metric like the Ldn or CNEL. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) OSHA requires protection for workers exposed to noise levels above 90 dB. Workers can be exposed to 90 dB for up to eight hours per day, but any exposure above 90 dB requires compliance with hearing protection guidelines. CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO General Plan The South San Francisco Noise Element (General Plan, 1999) contains land use criteria for noise as it pertains to various land uses. These criteria define the desirable maximum noise exposure of various land uses in addition to certain conditionally acceptable levels contingent upon the implementation of noise reduction measures. Noise levels over 85 dBA are acceptable for airport-related development only; less than 75 dBA is acceptable for industrial and open space land uses while 75-85 is conditionally acceptable; and less than 70 dBA is acceptable for commercial uses while 70 to 80 dBA is conditionally acceptable for commercial land uses (Table 9.2-1 Land Use Criteria for Noise Impacted Areas, South San Francisco General Plan, page 280). South San Francisco Municipal Code (SSFMC) The South San Francisco Noise Ordinance (Chapter 8.32, Section 8.32.050, SSFMC) restricts construction activities to the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on weekdays, 9:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on Saturdays, and 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on Sundays and holidays. The ordinance also limits noise generation of any individual piece of equipment to 90 dBA at 25 feet or at the property line. The Building Division enforces the noise limits at the time of building permit issuance by informing applicant’s of the requirement and if necessary requiring quieter equipment. The Building Division also conducts routine site inspections prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy or finalization of the building permit. The inspections monitor building and municipal code compliance. The Building Official has the discretion to waive certain construction related noise levels if conditions warrant such an action. Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist Page 3-80 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis IMPACTS a – d) Exposure of Persons to or Generation of Noise Levels in Excess of Standards, Exposure of Persons to or Generation of Excessive Groundborne Noise Levels, a Substantial Temporary or Permanent Increase in Ambient Noise Levels in the Project Vicinity above Levels Existing Without the Project. Significance Criteria: The Project would have a significant environmental impact if it were to result in exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the South San Francisco General Plan or the City’s Noise Ordinance. The noise standards are based upon the type of use they are designed to protect for the operational (i.e., occupancy and activity) phase of the project. Construction noise would have a significant environmental impact if it occurs outside the hours specified in the Noise Ordinance or generates noise levels greater than those specified in the Noise Ordinance. PROJECT DEMOLITION AND CONSTRUCTION Noise levels associated with various types of demolition and grading equipment, using the Leq sound metric at 50 feet, range from 87 to 86 dB for a hoe ram attachment, grader and scrapers; 84 dB for bulldozers; 83 dB for excavators; 80 to 81 dB for backhoes and loaders; 101 dB for pile drivers; and 85 to 98 dB for impact wrenches and rock drills. Generators and compressors can range from 72 to 87 dB at 50 feet. Water trucks and street sweepers can reach 77 dB at 50 feet. Back up warning alarms required on construction equipment (California Occupational Safety Health Administration or Cal OSHA) range from 87 to 112 dB at four feet (Federal Highway Administration, 2006) and quieter alarms for smaller sites are not as loud. Project construction is anticipated to take 15-16 months. The heaviest portion of construction, site clearing, grading, emplacing drilled piles, structural steel and foundation work would require approximately three months. Wood framing, rough plumbing, electrical and mechanical, emplacement of block walls, and roofing would require approximately 16 to 18 weeks (4.5 months). Interior work and finishes would require approximately 12 to 14 weeks. The stages of work overlap and are rounded up to provide a conservative construction schedule.26 In summary, the most intense part of site preparation and grading would require three months and noise levels could reach 101 dB at 50 feet from the pile driver. To comply with the quantitative noise limits in the Noise Ordinance, the Applicant would use noise reduction technologies (such as sound blankets or other temporary noise barriers 27) to limit noise at the property line to not greater than 90 dB. The three month period of heaviest construction would result in pile driving approximately 80 feet from the northern façade of the Focus Hotel and 45 feet from the southern façade of the industrial building (CTC Food Industries). The buildings across West Harris Avenue to the east would be 130 to 180 feet from the closest pile driving operations. The following interior and 26 Schedule is based upon information provided by Covent Construction, Inc., May 23, 2014) 27 Example temporary installation can be seen in http://www.construction-noise.com/BBC-ext-n.html and https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/noise/construction_noise/handbook/handbook07.cfm Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis Page 3-81 exterior noise levels would be experienced in the area assuming 25 dB attenuation afforded to the building envelope and a limit of 90 dB at the property line. ANTICIPATED NOISE LEVELS DURING PILE DRIVING Receptor Site28 Distance ft. Exterior dB 29 Interior dB Focus Hotel 80 90 65 CTC Food Industries 45 88 48 Businesses east of W. Harris Ave. 180 to 130 76-79 51-54 Hotel rooms further from the northern façade of the Focus Hotel would experience considerably less noise due to the distance from the source and the wall assembly of intervening rooms 30. The hotel is largely business and airport serving and as such most patrons would likely be out of their rooms by 8 AM, the earliest that construction is allowed to begin by City ordinance. Project related noise experienced inside CTC Food Industries would be less than 50 dB and would not affect normal conversation inside the building. The concrete construction attenuates noise more than wood construction materials, as an example concrete is often used for freeway sound barriers. The overall Project construction schedule is anticipated to take 15-16 months. The heaviest portion of construction, site clearing, grading, emplacing drilled piles, structural steel and foundation work would require approximately three months. Exterior noise levels nearby the Project during the pile driving and grading could be annoying at various places that would change based on the construction activities on any particular day. Depending on the receptor and type of building construction, nearby interior noise levels would be approximately 25-40 dB less than exterior levels during this phase, and less annoying. This period is temporary and expected to require three months, at most. Annoyance can be reduced by notifying the adjacent and nearby businesses of construction schedules and duration of activities. The Applicant is aware of these annoyances and has proposed the following as part of the Project: o Notify property and business owners in writing within West Harris Avenue of the construction schedule and contact person for the Project for questions, complaints and comments. o Consider and to the extent feasible provide some periods during the day (i.e., lunch, breaks) when pile driving does not occur. 28 Attenuation calculations assume that construction operation shall limit property-line noise levels from construction to no more than 90 dB. 29 The exterior to interior wall attenuations are assumed to be 25 dB for the Focus Hotel and businesses east of W. Harris Ave. and 40 dB for the tilt-up concrete wall (with no windows) on the CTC Food Industries building to the northeast. 30 Building envelope and “wall assemblies” attenuate sound. A wall assembly does include additional measures to reduce interior sound levels. The wall assembly is designed to reach the targeted interior noise levels to protect public health (i.e., against hearing loss, foster concentration) and provide for enjoyment of the activities inside the building. Residential buildings, schools and hospitals would likely have more sound attenuation built into the wall (given an excessive noise environment) than, for example, a warehouse or commercial building. Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist Page 3-82 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis o Provide sound attenuation blankets (outdoor noise curtains) or other temporary noise barriers to reduce typical noise from construction to be in compliance with the 90 dB property line noise level specified in the City Noise Ordinance. Noise curtains typically have a Sound Transmission Class (STC) rating of 27 dB or greater. The curtains can be moved around a construction site to the needed locations. Some construction activities could occasionally exceed 90 dB temporarily for short periods of time (i.e., at access points to the Project site along West Harris Avenue). Any construction activities in excess of 90 dB at property lines would be in violation of City ordinance in absence of a waiver being granted. The applicant is aware of this requirement and proposes to: o Secure a waiver to permit more than 90 dB noise levels at the property line during grading and pile driving. Properly installed sound attenuation blankets would reduce construction-related noise impacts to less than significant. The City’s waiver process provides a mechanism to approve noise in excess of the standards contained in the SSFMC for construction activities which are temporary in nature. Access to the site along West Harris Avenue could experience momentary higher noise levels along the property line. Exterior noise levels would, at the properties along the east side of West Harris be, approximately 76 to 79 dB and interior noise levels would be approximately 51-54 dB. Temporary construction noise impacts would be considered less than significant. Potential vibration impacts to nearby buildings would be less than significant with the instrumentation in place on the buildings and the monitoring both which are proposed as part of the Project and identified in Section 3.7 Geology and Soils and in Chapter 2 and restated in the following paragraph. o Vibration monitoring and pre- and post-construction monitoring of nearby structures shall be undertaken to evaluate and document vibration related impacts. A specific plan to address construction period vibrations should be submitted to the City for review by the City Engineer. o The geotechnical report (Terracon, October 7, 2014 and Cotton Shires Associates peer review October 16, 2014) indicates that the pile holes would be pre-drilled and consequently the needed forces to drive piles will be reduced. Cast-in-place piles may not be feasible with the very weak, squeezing bay muds. A rigid pile would be inserted from the surface into pre-drilled holes as the holes would likely squeeze in after they are drilled so there is still a need to drive the piles to get them into place. OPERATIONAL NOISE The operation of a project could increase ambient noise levels in two ways, through the creation of additional traffic on local roadways and the operation of exterior mechanical equipment. Typically, traffic volumes need to double in order to result in a barely perceptible increase in noise levels (i.e., 3-5 dB). Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis Page 3-83 The Project area is dominated by roadway traffic from U.S. 101 and Interstate 380, South Airport Boulevard and other surface streets. U.S. 101 is an eight-lane freeway that provides access to the Project area extending from downtown San Francisco and Northern California to Los Angeles and Southern California running in the north-south direction. U.S.101 is approximately 0.38 miles west of the Project site. In 2012, U.S. 101 carried an annual average daily traffic (ADT) volume of 220,000 vehicles south of Produce Avenue, 218,000 vehicles south of Oyster Point Boulevard, and 213,000 vehicles just north of Oyster Point Boulevard. A traffic study was prepared for the Project as a part of the scope of services for this Initial Study. The Project would likely generate about 1,152 daily two-way trips (576 in and 576 out), with 51 inbound and 36 outbound trips during the AM peak hour as well as 44 inbound and 47 outbound trips during the PM peak hour (Crane Transportation Group, October, 2014). The incremental increase of traffic in the Project area does not represent a doubling of background traffic volumes. Traffic to and from the site is not expected to increase noise levels by 3 dB. The Project site is under the 65 dB noise contour interval identified as acceptable for commercial land uses. The hotel is a freeway commercial land use. A 70 dB or less noise environment is acceptable for commercial uses while 70 to 80 dBA is conditionally acceptable for commercial land uses. The Project use would be in conformance with the noise standards identified in the City’s General Plan. Additionally, the California Building Code requires noise insulation assemblies in the walls of residential uses (such as hotel rooms and multifamily housing) to attenuate sound to a 45 dB maximum. Rooftop mechanical sound levels would be minimal. Rooftop mechanical sound levels would likely quieter than the mechanical equipment existing in the area due to newer technology. Most of the buildings in the area were constructed 30 plus years ago. The noise level associated with the increase in traffic to and from the Project site is not anticipated to be significant (i.e., increase the noise environment by 5 dB). Moreover, Project- related traffic would not result in a doubling of traffic volumes in the area so there would not be a 3 dB increase in noise levels. As previously noted, the Project site is under the 65 dB noise contour. The Project and the Focus Hotel adjacent to the site are commercial land uses. The Project would not significantly increase noise levels (i.e., 5 dB) in the area. Noise levels in the area would remain lower than 70 dB with the Project. The Project would not contribute to a cumulative noise impact. Noise impacts associated with the Project would be less than significant impact. e) and f) Aircraft Noise Significance Criteria: The Project would have a significant environmental impact if it were located within an airport land use plan (or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport) or in the vicinity of a private airstrip and were to expose people residing or working in the Project area to excessive noise levels. The site is located under the 65 dB contour, therefore under the 70 dB maximum permitted for commercial land uses. The interior ambient noise levels would likely be 20-25 dB less due to the Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist Page 3-84 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis construction assembly resulting in a noise level of 45 dB. The Project is not within two miles of a private airstrip. The Project would have a less than significant impact with respect to excessive aircraft noise exposure. Finding: With the applicant complying with noise limits in the City Noise Ordinance, construction related noise impacts would be less than significant. Traffic associated with the Project would not increase noise levels in the area. The Project would not contribute to a cumulative noise impact. Noise impacts associated with the Project would result a less than significant impact. The site is located under the 65 dB contour interval therefore 5 dB less than the 70 dBA maximum permitted (i.e., without additional mitigation) for commercial land uses. The Project would have a less than significant impact with respect to excessive aircraft noise exposure. The interior ambient noise levels would likely be 20-25 dB less (i.e., 45 dB) due to the exterior-to-interior noise reduction from the building walls. 3.13 POPULATION AND HOUSING Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? X b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? X c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? X SETTING The 64,117 square foot (1.47 acre) site is approximately 13 feet above mean sea level. Historical information indicates that the site and surrounding area were submerged swamp land from the late 1890s to the early 1950s. The site has never been developed. Periodically the site was used for parking. The adjacent Focus Hotel was constructed in 1980. IMPACTS a) Population Growth Significance Criteria: The Project would have a significant environmental impact if it were to induce either directly of indirectly substantial population growth. Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis Page 3-85 The Project site has been planned for a hotel use since the City adopted the 1999 General Plan. The site was analyzed in the East of 101 Traffic Model as containing a 25 room hotel. The Project would construct 128 rooms. The Applicant states there would be at least 52 employees for the Project and a total of three shifts. For CEQA purposes we assume 100 employees. The Project is not a large employer such as an office or industrial complex that would employ a hundreds of people. The Project would not add to the growth assumptions contained in the City’s General Plan and its impact on population growth would be less than significant. b) and c) Displacement of Housing or People Significance Criteria: The Project would have a significant environmental impact if it would result in the displacement of substantial numbers of existing housing units or people living at the project site. There are no residential units on the Project site. The Project would not require the displacement of any existing residential units or persons living on the site and therefore would have no impact on the displacement of housing or people. Finding: The Project site has been planned for a hotel use since the City adopted the 1999 General Plan. The site was analyzed in the East of 101 Traffic Model as containing a 25 room hotel. The Project would construct 128 rooms. The Applicant states there would be at least 52 employees for the Project and a total of three shifts. For CEQA purposes we assume 100 employees. The Project site does not include housing and would not displace housing units or residents. Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist Page 3-86 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis 3.14 PUBLIC SERVICES Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: i) Fire protection? X ii) Police protection? X iii) Schools? X iv) Parks? X v) Other public facilities? X SETTING The 64,117 square foot (1.47 acre) site is approximately 13 feet above mean sea level. Historical information indicates that the site and surrounding area were submerged swamp land from the late 1890s to the early 1950s. The site has never been developed. Periodically the site was used for parking. The adjacent Focus Hotel was constructed in 1980. IMPACTS a) Public Services Significance Criteria: The Project would have a significant environmental impact if it were to result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for fire protection, police protection, schools, parks and recreational facilities, or other government facilities. The Project is not anticipated to increase the City of South San Francisco’s population as identified as described above, in Section 3.10 Land Use and Planning and in Section 3.13 Population and Housing. School impact fees are required for new construction and paid for at the time of building permit issuance Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis Page 3-87 South San Francisco Police and Fire Departments commented on the Project through the City’s standard review process identified in Chapter 1 Sections 4 and 5. Fire Department requirements are identified in Section 3.8 Hazards and Hazardous Materials. Staffing and service issues were not identified with respect to site development. Fire extinguishers and sprinklers, radio coverage, road and parking standards and a safety impact fee to conduct a study of the East of 101 Area are identified conditions of Project approval. The Police Department reviewed the Project and identified the following conditions of approval (Sergeant Scott Campbell memorandum to Billy Gross, August 30, 2013). Municipal Code Compliance The Applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 15.48 of the Municipal Code; "Minimum Building Security Standards" Ordinance revised May 1995. The Police Department reserves the right to make additional security and safety conditions, if necessary, upon receipt of detailed/revised building plans. 1. Parking Lot / Lighting Parking lots, (including parking lots with carports), driveways, circulation areas, aisles, passageways, recesses and grounds contiguous to buildings shall be provided with high intensity discharge lighting with sufficient wattage to provide adequate illumination to make clearly visible the presence of any person on or about the premises during the hours of darkness and provide a safe, secure environment for all persons, property and vehicles on site. Such lighting shall be equipped with vandal-resistant covers. Exterior door, perimeter, parking area and canopy lights shall be controlled by photocell or timer and shall be left on during hours of darkness or diminished lighting. Parking lot lights shall remain on during the hours of darkness. 2. Alarm The front desk shall be equipped with a central station silent robbery alarm. 3. Security Camera System Building entrances, lobbies, front desk and main driveway shall be monitored by a closed circuit television camera system. Recordings must be maintained for a period of no less than 30 days. These cameras will be part of a digital surveillance system, which will be monitored on-site and accessible on the World Wide Web. This system must be of adequate resolution and color rendition to readily identify any person or vehicle in the event a crime is committed, anywhere on the premises. Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist Page 3-88 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis 4. Misc. Security Measures Commercial establishments having one hundred dollars or more in cash on the premises after closing hours shall lock such money in approved type money safe with a minimum rating of TL-15. 5. Public Safety Impact Fee This new construction will be assessed a Public Safety Impact Fee. The amounts for Office/R & D are $0.13 per square foot for the Police Department and $0.29 per square foot for the Fire Department. Hotel safety impact fees are $0.42 per foot. 6. Hotel Registration Compliance with Chapter 10.70 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code relating to the registration of hotel guests. Neither department identified staffing or service issues associated with redevelopment of and intensification of development on the site. Recreation and parks are discussed in the following section. Any increased demand for public services as a result of the Project would not require construction of new facilities and would be considered less than significant. Finding: The Project was reviewed by Police and Fire Department representatives and staffing or facility needs were not identified as insufficient. Development of the Project site would not increase the demand for public services individually or cumulatively. 3.15 RECREATION Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? X b) Include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? X SETTING The 64,117 square foot (1.47 acre) site is approximately 13 feet above mean sea level. Historical information indicates that the site and surrounding area were submerged swamp land from the Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis Page 3-89 late 1890s to the early 1950s. The site has never been developed. Periodically the site was used for parking. The adjacent Focus Hotel was constructed in 1980. IMPACTS a) and b) Recreation Significance Criteria: The Project would have a significant environmental impact if it were to result in an increase in the use of existing parks or recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of these facilities could be anticipated, or if it were to include recreational facilities, the construction of which might have adverse physical effects on the environment. The Project would be a freeway commercial land use, largely serving airport and business travel lodging needs. The Project would likely employ up to 100 persons and is not a major employer as identified in Section 3.13 Population and Housing, above. The Project impact on recreational facilities and the need to construct new facilities would be less than significant. Finding: The Project would not result in an individual or cumulatively considerable impact on parks and recreation. Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist Page 3-90 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis 3.16 TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into accounts all modes of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relative components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths and mass transit? X b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program including but not limited to the level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? X c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? X e) Result in inadequate emergency access? X g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? X Based upon a traffic and circulation study prepared by Crane Transportation group an EIR focusing on traffic and circulation shall be prepared analyzing potential traffic impacts largely due to U.S. 101 existing operating conditions. Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis Page 3-91 3.17 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? X b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? X c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? X d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the Project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? X e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider, which serves or may serve the Project that it has adequate capacity to serve the Project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments? X f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the Project’s solid waste disposal needs? X g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? X SETTING The 64,117 square foot (1.47 acre) site is approximately 13 feet above mean sea level. Historical information indicates that the site and surrounding area were submerged swamp land from the late 1890s to the early 1950s. The site has never been developed. Periodically the site was used for parking. The adjacent Focus Hotel was constructed in 1980. IMPACTS a) Regional Wastewater Treatment Standards Significance Criteria: The Project would have a significant environmental impact if it were to exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). The City’s storm drain outfalls operate under NPDES permits granted by the RWQCB. The South San Francisco Municipal Code (Title 14) contains regulations related to stormwater Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist Page 3-92 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis management. As identified in Chapter 1 Introduction Section 5 and in Section 3.9 Hydrology and Water Quality as a matter of law, projects are required to implement BMPs and LID measures and comply with SWPPP regulations. Mr. Lecel, Acting Environmental Compliance Manager for the City reviewed the Project, identified conditions of approval, and did not identify any extraordinary measures or significant impacts with respect to wastewater. The City is in compliance with its RWQCB permit. Therefore, the Project would not exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the RWQCB, resulting in a less than significant impact. b and e) Wastewater Treatment Facilities Significance Criteria: The Project would have a significant environmental impact if it were to result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which may serve the Project that it has inadequate capacity to serve the Project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments. All wastewater produced within the City of South San Francisco is treated at the City’s Water Quality Control Plant (WQCP), which is located at the end of Belle Air Road, near the edge of San Francisco Bay, south of the Project site. The WQCP is jointly owned by the Cities of South San Francisco and San Bruno, and it treats all wastewater generated within the two cities. The WQCP also has contracts to treat most of the wastewater produced by the City of Colma and a portion of the wastewater produced by the City of Daly City. The City of South San Francisco has a current allocation of 8.74 million gallon per day (MGD), is currently generating 5.6 MGD. As noted in the comments provided by the Engineering Division (see Section 3.7 Geology and Soils), the City of South San Francisco has identified the need to investigate the condition and capacity of the sewer system within the East of 101 area. The City’s wastewater treatment plant was upgraded in 2000-01. The sewer collection system was originally designed to accommodate warehouse and industrial use and is now proposed to accommodate uses with a much greater sewage flow, such as offices and biotechnology facilities. These additional flows, plus groundwater infiltration into the existing sewers, due to ground settlement and the age of the system, have resulted in pumping and collection capacity constraints. A study and flow model is proposed to analyze the problem and recommend solutions and improvements. The Applicant is required by ordinance to pay the East of 101 Sewer Facility Development Impact Fee (adopted by the City Council, October 23, 2002). The adopted fee is $4.25 per gallon of discharge per day. The calculation is based upon the assumption that any use in the East of 101 Area generates 400 gallons per day per 1,000 square feet of development. The Applicant would be required to pay a fee of approximately $111,581 (2013 dollars). The sewer contribution shall be due and payable prior to receiving a building permit for each phase of the development (Andy Tam, Engineering Division). Another condition of approval for the owner/applicant would be to install one correctly-sized sanitary sewer lateral from the site to the line in West Harris Avenue. A sanitary sewer manhole shall be installed as the lateral’s cleanout and shall be installed in the public right-of-way, near the property line, at no cost to the City. The Project site has been planned for a hotel use since the 1999 General Plan adoption. The City of South San Francisco has a current wastewater allocation of 8.74 million gallon per day (MGD), is currently generating 5.6 MGD. The wastewater treatment Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis Page 3-93 plant has capacity to treat Project and cumulative projected wastewater. The City is currently collecting fees to study future upgrades. Specific needs and upgrades are unknown at this time. The Project would have a less than significant impact with respect to wastewater treatment. c) Storm Water Drainage Facilities Significance Criteria: The Project would have a significant environmental impact if it were to require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or in the expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects. The Project would be required to connect to the stormwater facilities. As identified in the Introduction Chapter 1 Section 5 and Section 3.9 Hydrology and Water Quality stormwater is required to be filtered on site prior to being conveyed to manholes. The Project includes bioswales and water retention areas along three of the four property lines. The Project would not require the construction of new or expanded storm drainage facilities, resulting in a less than significant impact to stormwater facilities. b and d) Water Treatment Facilities and Supply Significance Criteria: The Project would have a significant environmental impact if it were to require additional water supply beyond that available from existing entitlements and resources. Senate Bill 610 (SB 610) was adopted in 2001 and became effective January 1, 2002. SB 610 requires cities to consider water supply assessments to determine whether projected water supplies can meet a project’s water demand. SB 610 and the CEQA Guidelines (Section 15083.5) identify residential projects generally exceeding 500 units and commercial or industrial projects employing more than 1,000 persons as potential impact thresholds. Potable water is provided for the City of South San Francisco by the California Water Service Company (CWSC) and the Westborough County Water District (WCWD). CWSC provides water to the area east of Interstate 280 (I-280) in South San Francisco, including the Project site, and its service areas includes the City of Colma and the Broadmoor area. WCWD serves the portion of South San Francisco west of I-280. CWCS receives water from the City and County of San Francisco, through the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission. CWSC drafted and adopted an Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) in 2006. The UWMP was established in accordance with the California Urban Water Management Planning Act, (Division 6 Part 2.6 of the Water Code, Section 10610-10656). Water Code Section 10910 subd. (c)(2) and Government Code, Section 66473.7, subd. (c)(1) note that it is acceptable to use the most recently adopted UWMP to assess water supply in accordance with the California Urban Water Management Planning Act and SB 610. Between sources guaranteed by a settlement agreement and the purchase of the Los Trancos County Water District, CWSC has a total Supply Assurance Allocation of 35.5 million gallons a day (MGD) of water indefinitely.31 The UWMP projected that the South San Francisco District population would increase from 55,024 in 2000 to 64,050 in 2020; an increase of approximately 0.8 percent per year. CWSC developed 31 CWSC, 2006 Urban Water Management Plan for South San Francisco, December 15, 2006. Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist Page 3-94 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis an Integrated Long Term Water Supply Plan (ILTWSP) for its three peninsula districts in 2010. The findings of the ILTWSP recommend continuing with conservation and further evaluating desalination and water transfers. The population of the CWSC service area is projected to be 64,050 by 2020 and 70,548 by 2040. South San Francisco’s total population is anticipated to be approximately 69,810 in 2020. The service area population projections for CWSC are approximately 82 percent of the entire population of South San Francisco. Therefore, in 2020 it is anticipated that the CWSC service population area will be 57,678 providing adequate water supply for existing and projected development 32; particularly in light of the conservation efforts identified below. The Project would also be required to comply with the California Green Building Code which identifies measures to reduce water consumption, reduce building construction waste, and energy consumption in both the construction and operation of buildings and for the life of the building (outlined in Chapter 1 Introduction). The regulations prescribe methods to test, report, maintain, and improve the measures employed to promote environmental sustainability. The significance threshold set by Title 14, Chapter 3 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 15083.5 identifies the addition of 1,000 employees as the threshold for additional assessment of potential water impacts. The Project would be a very small employer with office, maintenance and cleaning staff to support a 128 room hotel. The Applicant estimates 52 employees, and for purposes of CEQA, the assumed employee count is increased to 100, which is well below the 1,000 threshold of significance. The Project would have a less than significant impact with respect to water supply and would not result in a cumulatively considerable or Project related impacts. The Project would not result in a need to obtain new water allocations to serve existing, Project or the development projections contained in the South San Francisco General Plan. The Applicant estimates 52 employees, and for purposes of CEQA, the assumed employee count is increased to 100, which is well below the 1,000 threshold of significance. f and g) Solid Waste Significance Criteria: The Project would have a significant environmental impact if it were to be served by a landfill with inadequate permitted capacity to accommodate the Project's solid waste disposal needs, or if it were to fail to fully comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste. The California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB) manages the waste generation and disposal data for South San Francisco. Non-recyclable or non-compostable waste is disposed at Ox Mountain landfill near Half Moon Bay. The closure date of Ox Mountain is 2023. 32 UWMP, 2006 and South El Camino Real General Plan Amendment and EIR, City of South San Francisco, Dyatt and Bhatia, November, 2009, updated by Knapp Consulting October, 2012 in the 475 Eccles EIR and initial study. Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis Page 3-95 CIWMB notes South San Francisco’s solid waste generation is 7.76 pounds per resident per day. Solid waste projected at build-out (year 2020) is anticipated to be 276 tons per day. The Ox Mountain landfill has a maximum permitted disposal rate of 3,598 tons per day for South San Francisco. The total projected solid waste disposal needs for South San Francisco, based upon cumulative projections, is 7.7 percent of the daily permitted waste intake.33 The City requires constriction waste diversion as outlined in Chapter 1, Introduction as well as recycling and composting waste associated with Project operations. Construction and operation of the Project would generate a less than significant amount of solid waste, and operation of the Project would be in full compliance with all federal, state and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste. Finding: The City’s wastewater treatment plant was upgraded in 2000-01. The Project as a matter of law would be required to pay wastewater improvement fees to research the potential for future upgrades. The wastewater treatment plant has capacity to treat Project and cumulative projected wastewater. The UWMP, adopted in 2006, shows adequate water is available for the Project and projected cumulative development. CWSC developed an Integrated Long Term Water Supply Plan (ILTWSP) for its three peninsula districts in 2010. The findings of the ILTWSP recommend continuing with conservation and further evaluating desalination and water transfers. The Project would also be required to comply with the California Green Building Code which identifies measures to reduce water consumption, reduce building construction waste, and energy consumption in both the construction and operation of buildings and for the life of the building. The regulations prescribe methods to test, report, maintain, and improve the measures employed to promote environmental sustainability. The Project would not be a major employer (high estimate for CEQA is 100 persons), well below the threshold of significance of 1,000 employees for preparation of an Urban Water Management Plan. There is adequate capacity at Ox Mountain landfill for Project and cumulative solid waste and the City is meeting its 50 percent solid waste diversion mandate. Demolition, construction and operations of the Project would be required to incorporated LIDs and BMPs for stormwater treatment; an improvement over existing conditions. Stormwater is required to be treated on- site. The Project would not contribute individually or cumulatively to water, wastewater, solid waste, stormwater, or utility impacts. 33 South San Francisco’s existing and projected waste stream generation include an approximate 50 percent demonstrated diversion rate (South El Camino Real General Plan Amendment and EIR, City of South San Francisco, Dyatt and Bhatia, November, 2009, updated by Knapp Consulting, October, 2012 in the 475 Eccles EIR and initial study). . Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist Page 3-96 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis 3.18 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE Environmental Factors and Focused Questions for Determination of Environmental Impact Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact XVIII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE — a) Does the Project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? X b) Does the Project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a Project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past Projects, the effects of other current Projects, and the effects of probable future Projects.) X c) Does the Project have environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X a) Quality of the Environment All environmental impacts associated with aesthetics, agriculture and forest resources, air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, health risks, biological resources, cultural resources including important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory, geology and soils, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, land use and planning, mineral resources, noise, population and housing, public services, recreation and utilities and service systems are considered less than significant without additional mitigation measures. b) Cumulative Impacts The Project may have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable with respect to traffic and circulation; therefore an EIR focusing on traffic and circulation shall be prepared. c) Adverse Effects on Human Beings The Project would not have environmental effects that would cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis Page 3-97 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS: AESTHETICS: The Project would not have an impact on the aesthetics or scenic quality on the site or in the area. There would be no individual or cumulative impacts with respect to aesthetic, visual quality or light and glare associated with the Project. AGRICULTURAL AND TIMBER RESOURCES: The Project would not adversely affect any existing agricultural operations as none exist on the site. The Project would not impact agricultural resources individually or cumulatively and does not contain any Farmland, Unique Farmland, Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), or land in a Williamson Act Contract. The site is not zoned for timberland production or in use as such, and would not cause rezoning of forest land (as defined in the Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526) or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section51104(g)). AIR QUALITY/HAZARD RISKS: The maximum cancer risk for a residential-adult receptor would be 0.02 per million and for a residential-child would be 0.20 per million. The maximum cancer risk for a school child receptor would be less than 0.01per million. Thus, the cancer risk due to construction activities is below the BAAQMD threshold of 10 per million and would be less than significant. The health impacts from Project operations would be 0.01 below the BAAQMD threshold of 10 per million and less than significant. 0.01. The chronic HI would be less than 0.01. The chronic HI would be well below the BAAQMD threshold of 1 and the impact of the Project would therefore be less than significant. The acute HI would be 0.03. The acute HI would be below the BAAQMD threshold of 1 and the impact of the Project would therefore be less than significant. The annual PM 2.5 concentration due to implementation of the Project would be below the BAAQMD threshold of 0.3 µg/m3, and hence is considered less than significant. The cumulative impacts are below the BAAQMD significance thresholds. Secondly, given that the Project would not result in increased health impacts exceeding the Project‐level thresholds, the Project would also not result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to localized health risk and hazard impacts, resulting in a less than significant cumulative air quality impact. The Project would not result in a significant impact to air quality and would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of criteria nonattainment pollutants (ozone precursors, PM 10 , and PM 2.5 ). The City’s building permit procedure captures the BAAQMD permitting regulations, as well as BAAQMD’s recommended emission control measures. The Project would not result in exceeding any Health Risk Screening Analysis Guidelines significance criteria. The Project would not introduce objectionable odors to the area. GREENHOUSE GAS: The GHG construction impacts would be 1071 less than the BAAQMD GHG operational threshold of 1,100 metric tons. The Project has been reviewed relative to the AB 32 measures and South San Francisco Climate Action Plan and it has been determined that the Project would not conflict with the goals of AB 32 and the applicable Climate Action Plan. Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist Page 3-98 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis BIOLOGY: After review of CNDDB reports and map overlays for the general Project area, and field evaluations of the site, the habitat was found to be highly disturbed and isolated from other areas containing sensitive habitat. As a result, the site is considered to be of very low value for plants and wildlife in general, and as well for sensitive species of plants and animals. No significant biological impacts would result from full development of the Project site. CULTURAL RESOURCES: There are no structures on the Project site. There is a moderate chance that cultural resources may be present on the site. The project plans state that an archaeologist shall be present during site grading and pile driving. The archaeologist would follow the protocols of Public Resources Code Section 210832.2 and Section 15065.5(c)-(f), California Code of Regulations Title 14, Chapter 3 (CEQA Guidelines). The Project would have a less than significant impact on cultural resources. GEOLOGY AND SOILS: There are no active faults underlying the site and the nearest one is the San Andreas Fault, located about three miles southwest. Implementation of the geotechnical measures required by law (the City’s standard permitting requirements for peer review of all geotechnical reports and the final recommendations to become part of the Project) would reduce geologic instability to less than significant. The Project would have no impact on soils due to septic systems as the Project would be connected to the City’s wastewater system. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: The Project through the entitlement process and routine inspection is required as a matter of law to operate under all applicable, federal, state and local guidelines governing hazardous waste. The Project would have no impact from the emission or handling of hazardous materials or wastes on schools within a quarter of a mile or from any environmental contamination posed by the sites listed on the Cortese List. The impact of the Project with regards to hazardous materials would be less than significant with respect to operational activities. The Project as proposed would have a less than significant impact with respect to the release of hazardous materials during construction. There are no existing or proposed schools or day care centers or facilities within a quarter mile of the Project site. The Project would be 65 feet in height and 85 feet below the 150 foot maximum. The Project would be well under the maximum permitted height determined by the ALUC and FAA. There are no emergency response or evacuation plans in effect in the Project vicinity. Therefore the Project would have no impact on the implementation of any adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. The South San Francisco Fire Department is in the process of initiating a study to identify offensive capabilities in the Project area. The Project would be required through conditions of approval to provide a fair share financial contribution to the department’s study and improvements. There is no wildland in the vicinity of the Project site or area. The Project would have no impact with respect to wildland fires. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY: The City’s standard conditions of approval which implement state, federal and local regulations are required by law and are adequate to address any potential water quality impacts as a result of Project construction or occupation. The site is Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis Page 3-99 not within a flood zone or an area subject to seiche or tsunami inundation or run-up zones. No mitigation measures, above those required by the City as a matter of law, are identified in this Initial Study. The Project would not result in an impact or contribute to a cumulative impact to hydrology or water quality resources. LAND USE AND PLANNING: The Project would not physically divide an established community. The site is planned for a hotel use and the Project is consistent with the planned uses. There are no conservation or natural community conservation plans that govern the Project site or area. The Project would not result in any individually or cumulatively considerable impacts. MINERAL RESOURCES: The Project site does not contain any local or regionally significant mineral resources. The Project would not result in an impact or contribute to a cumulative impact to mineral resources. NOISE: With the applicant complying with noise limits in the City Noise Ordinance, construction related noise impacts would be less than significant. Traffic associated with the Project would not increase noise levels in the area. The Project would not contribute to a cumulative noise impact. Noise impacts associated with the Project would result a less than significant impact. The site is located under the 65 dB contour interval therefore 5 dB less than the 70 dBA maximum permitted (i.e., without additional mitigation) for commercial land uses. The Project would have a less than significant impact with respect to excessive aircraft noise exposure. The interior ambient noise levels would likely be 20-25 dB less (i.e., 45 dB) due to the exterior-to-interior noise reduction from the building walls. POPULATION AND HOUSING: The Project site has been planned for a hotel use since the City adopted the 1999 General Plan. The site was analyzed in the East of 101 Traffic Model as containing a 25 room hotel. The Project would construct 128 rooms. The Applicant states there would be at least 52 employees for the Project and a total of three shifts. For CEQA purposes we assume 100 employees. The Project site does not include housing and would not displace housing units or residents. PUBLIC SERVICES: The Project was reviewed by Police and Fire Department representatives and staffing or facility needs were not identified as insufficient. Development of the Project site would not increase the demand for public services individually or cumulatively. RECREATION: The Project would be a freeway commercial land use, largely serving airport and business travel lodging needs. The Project would likely employ up to 100 persons and is not a major employer as identified in Section 3.13 Population and Housing, above. The Project impact on recreational facilities and the need to construct new facilities would be less than significant. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION: Due to potential cumulative impacts associated with U.S. 101 an EIR shall be prepared focusing on traffic and circulation. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: The City’s wastewater treatment plant was upgraded in 2000-01. The Project as a matter of law would be required to pay wastewater improvement fees Chapter 3: Environmental Checklist Page 3-100 127 West Harris-Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis to research the potential for future upgrades. The wastewater treatment plant has capacity to treat Project and cumulative projected wastewater. The UWMP, adopted in 2006, shows adequate water is available for the Project and projected cumulative development. CWSC developed an Integrated Long Term Water Supply Plan (ILTWSP) for its three peninsula districts in 2010. The findings of the ILTWSP recommend continuing with conservation and further evaluating desalination and water transfers. The Project would also be required to comply with the California Green Building Code which identifies measures to reduce water consumption, reduce building construction waste, and energy consumption in both the construction and operation of buildings and for the life of the building. The regulations prescribe methods to test, report, maintain, and improve the measures employed to promote environmental sustainability. The Project would not be a major employer (high estimate for CEQA is 100 persons), well below the threshold of significance of 1,000 employees for preparation of an Urban Water Management Plan. There is adequate capacity at Ox Mountain landfill for Project and cumulative solid waste and the City is meeting its 50 percent solid waste diversion mandate. Demolition, construction and operations of the Project would be required to incorporated LIDs and BMPs for stormwater treatment; an improvement over existing conditions. Stormwater is required to be treated on- site. The Project would not contribute individually or cumulatively to water, wastewater, solid waste, stormwater, or utility impacts. APPENDIX A WEST HARRIS BACKGROUND REPORTS AIR QUALITY Air Quality Assumptions and Methodologies, Construction and Operational Emissions, CALEEMOD Output Files, June, 2014. RCH Group, Mike Ratte. BIOLOGY Biological Resource Assessment, 127 West Harris Street, South San Francisco, California, West Harris SSF.SMa, 21 April 2014. Marangio Biological Consulting, Michael Marangio. GEOLOGY AND SOILS Engineering Report, Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites, 127 West Harris Avenue, South San Francisco, California. April 15, August 21, and October 7, 2014. Terracon. Geotechnical Peer Review, Kuber Development Proposed Fairfield Inn and Suites. May 6, September 2, and October 16, 2014. Cotton Shires Associates. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites, 127 West Harris Avenue, South San Francisco, California. March 18, 2014. Terracon. Limited Stockpile Characterization and Sampling, Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites, 127 West Harris Avenue, South San Francisco, California. March 19, 2014. Terracon. Appendix A-1 Air Quality Assumptions and Methodologies Construction Activities The Project is located in the East of 101 Planning Area, south of East Grand Avenue and north of Mitchell Avenue. San Francisco International Airport is approximately 0.8 miles south of the site. The Colma Creek channel is approximately 330 feet south and U.S. 101 is approximately 850 feet west of the site. Mitchell Avenue provides access to West Harris Avenue. Gateway Boulevard to the west and Harbor Way to the east provide access to Mitchell Avenue. The Project site is 1.47 acres and the hotel would be 129 rooms. The 65,136 square foot hotel would be five stories in height and include 93 onsite parking spaces. Construction activities are assumed to require approximately 52 weeks to completion during 2015. Air quality assessment methodologies in this section generally conform to those identified by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) CEQA Air Quality Guidelines (dated June 2010, updated in May 2011, and revised in May 2012). Construction emissions were estimated using the CalEEMod (California Emissions Estimator Model version 2013.2.2). BAAQMD acknowledges CalEEMod as an appropriate tool for assessment of air quality impacts relative to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). This model was also used to calculate the effectiveness of proposed mitigation measures. Operations The CalEEMod was used to estimate emissions that would be associated with space heating, water heating, and landscape maintenance emissions expected to occur due to the implementation of the Project. Operational emissions associated with motor vehicles from employees, customers, and deliveries were also estimated. Health Risk Assessment A health risk assessment (HRA) is accomplished in four steps; hazards identification, exposure assessment, toxicity assessment, and risk characterization. These steps cover the estimation of air emissions, the estimation of the air concentrations resulting from a dispersion analysis, the incorporation of the toxicity of the pollutants emitted, and the characterization of the risk based on exposure parameters such as breathing rate, age adjustment factors, and exposure duration; each depending on receptor type. The HRA was conducted in accordance with technical guidelines developed by federal, state, and regional agencies, including U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA), California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Guidance1, and the BAAQMD’s Health Risk Screening Analysis Guidelines.2 According to CalEPA, a HRA should not be interpreted as the expected rates of cancer or other potential human health effects, but rather as estimates of potential risk or likelihood of adverse effects based on current knowledge, under a number of highly conservative assumptions and the best assessment tools currently available. TERMS AND DEFINITIONS As the practice of conducting a HRA is particularly complex and involves concepts that are not altogether familiar to most people, several terms and definitions are provided that are considered essential to the understanding of the approach, methodology and results: Acute effect – a health effect (non-cancer) produced within a short period of time (few minutes to several days) following an exposure to TACs. Cancer risk – the probability of an individual contracting cancer from a lifetime (i.e., 70 year) exposure to TAC in the ambient air. Chronic effect – a health effect (non-cancer) produced from a continuous exposure occurring over an extended period of time (weeks, months, years). Hazard Index (HI) – the unitless ratio of an exposure level over the acceptable reference dose (RfC). The HI can be applied to multiple compounds in an additive manner. Hazard Quotient (HQ) – the unitless ratio of an exposure level over the acceptable reference dose (RfC). The HQ is applied to individual compounds. Toxic air contaminants (TAC) – any air pollutant that is capable of causing short- term (acute) and/or long-term (chronic or carcinogenic, i.e., cancer causing) adverse human health effects (i.e., injury or illness). The current California list of TAC lists approximately 200 compounds, including particulate emissions from diesel-fueled engines. Human Health Effects – comprise disorders such as eye watering, respiratory or heart ailments, and other (i.e., non-cancer) related diseases. Health Risk Assessment (HRA) – an analysis designed to predict the generation and dispersion of TAC in the outdoor environment, evaluate the potential for exposure of human populations, and to assess and quantify both the individual and population-wide health risks associated with those levels of exposure. Incremental – under CEQA, the net difference (or change) in conditions or impacts when comparing the baseline to future year project conditions. 1 Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA), 2003. Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments, http://www.oehha.org/air/hot_spots/pdf/HRAguidefinal.pdf. 2 Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD), 2005. BAAQMD Health Risk Screening Analysis Guidelines (http://www.baaqmd.gov/pmt/air_toxics/risk_procedures_policies/hrsa_guidelines.pdf), June 2005 . Maximum exposed individual (MEI) – an individual assumed to be located at the point where the highest concentrations of TACs, and therefore, health risks are predicted to occur. Non-cancer risks – health risks such as eye watering, respiratory or heart ailments, and other non-cancer related diseases. Receptors – the locations where potential health impacts or risks are predicted (i.e., schools, residences, and recreational areas). LIMITATIONS AND UNCERTAINTIES There are a number of important limitations and uncertainties commonly associated with a HRA due to the wide variability of human exposures to TACs, the extended timeframes over which the exposures are evaluated and the inability to verify the results. Among these challenges are the following: The HRA exposure estimates do not take into account that people do not usually reside at the same location for 70 years and that other exposures (i.e., school children) are also of much shorter durations than was assumed in this analysis. Therefore, the results of the HRA are highly overstated for those cases. Other limitations and uncertainties associated with HRA and identified by the CalEPA include: (a.) lack of reliable monitoring data; (b.) extrapolation of toxicity data in animals to humans; (c.) estimation errors in calculating TACs emissions; (d.) concentration prediction errors with dispersion models; and (e.) the variability in lifestyles, fitness and other confounding factors of the human population. HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION TAC emissions associated with the Project would occur from the following Project activities: Off-road equipment and haul trucks during construction activities; and Employees, customers, and delivery operations along nearby roadways and at the facility. Diesel exhaust is a complex mixture of numerous individual gaseous and particulate compounds emitted from diesel-fueled combustion engines. Diesel particulate matter (DPM) is formed primarily through the incomplete combustion of diesel fuel. DPM is removed from the atmosphere through physical processes including atmospheric fall-out and washout by rain. Humans can be exposed to airborne DPM by deposition on water, soil, and vegetation; although the main pathway of exposure is inhalation. In August 1998, the California Air Resource Board (CARB) identified DPM as a TAC. The CARB developed the Risk Reduction Plan to Reduce Particulate Matter Emissions from Diesel- Fueled Engines and Vehicles and Risk Management Guidance for the Permitting of New Stationary Diesel-Fueled Engines and approved these documents on September 28, 2000. The documents represent proposals to reduce DPM emissions, with the goal of reducing emissions and the associated health risk by 75 percent in 2010 and by 85 percent in 2020. The program aimed to require the use of state-of-the-art catalyzed DPM filters and ultra-low-sulfur diesel fuel. In 2001, CARB assessed the state-wide health risks from exposure to diesel exhaust and to other toxic air contaminants. It is difficult to distinguish the health risks of diesel emissions from those of other air toxics, since diesel exhaust contains approximately 40 different TACs. The CARB study detected diesel exhaust by using ambient air carbon soot measurements as a surrogate for diesel emissions. The study reported that the state-wide cancer risk from exposure to diesel exhaust was about 540 per million population as compared to a total risk for exposure to all ambient air toxics of 760 per million. This estimate, which accounts for about 70 percent of the total risk from TACs, included both urban and rural areas in the state. The estimate can also be considered an average worst- case for the state, since it assumes constant exposure to outdoor concentrations of diesel exhaust and does not account for expected lower concentrations indoors, where most of time is spent. EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT Dispersion is the process by which atmospheric pollutants disseminate due to wind and vertical stability. The results of a dispersion analysis are used to assess pollutant concentrations at or near an emission source. The results of this analysis allow predicted concentrations of pollutants to be compared directly to air quality standards and other criteria such as health risks. Dispersion Modeling Approach This section presents the methodology used for the dispersion modeling analysis. This section addresses all of the fundamental components of an air dispersion modeling analysis including: Model selection and options Receptor locations Meteorological data Source release characteristics Model Selection and Options The AERMOD (Version 13350) was used for the dispersion analysis. AERMOD is the USEPA preferred dispersion model for general industrial sources. The model can simulate point, area, volume, and line sources. The AERMOD model is the appropriate model for this analysis based on the coverage of simple, intermediate, and complex terrain. It also predicts both short-term and long-term (annual) average concentrations. The model was executed using the regulatory default options (stack-tip downwash, buoyancy-induced dispersion, and final plume rise), default wind speed profile categories, default potential temperature gradients, and no pollutant decay. The selection of the appropriate dispersion coefficients depends on the land use within three kilometers (km) of the Project site. The land use typing was based on the classification method defined by Auer (1978); using pertinent United States Geological Survey (USGS) 1:24,000 scale (7.5 minute) topographic maps of the area. If the Auer land use types of heavy industrial, light-to-moderate industrial, commercial, and compact residential account for 50 percent or more of the total area, the USEPA Guideline on Air Quality Models recommends using urban dispersion coefficients; otherwise, the appropriate rural coefficients were used. Based on observation of the area surrounding the Project site, rural (urban is only designated within dense city centers such as San Francisco) dispersion coefficients were applied in the analysis. Receptor Locations Some receptors are considered more sensitive to air pollutants than others, because of preexisting health problems, proximity to the emissions source, or duration of exposure to air pollutants. Land uses such as primary and secondary schools, hospitals, and convalescent homes are considered to be relatively sensitive to poor air quality because the very young, the old, and the infirm are more susceptible to respiratory infections and other air quality-related health problems than the general public. Residential areas are also considered sensitive to poor air quality because people in residential areas are often at home for extended periods. Recreational land uses are moderately sensitive to air pollution; because vigorous exercise associated with recreation places have a high demand on respiratory system function. Sensitive receptors such as residences, schools, and outdoor recreational areas near the Project were chosen as the receptors to be analyzed. Receptors were placed at a height of 1.8 meters (typical breathing height). The adjacent properties are commercial land uses along Gateway Boulevard and Mitchell Avenue. The nearest residential land uses are approximately 1,800 feet to the northwest (west of US 101). The Early Years Preschool, Old Souls Catholic School, and Spruce Elementary School are located 3,700 feet to the northeast, 4,200 feet to the northwest, and 4,790 feet to the northwest of the Project site, respectively. Terrain elevations for receptor locations were used (i.e., complex terrain) based on available USGS information for the area. Exhibit 1 displays the location of the receptors used in the HRA. EXHIBIT 1 HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT RECEPTORS Meteorological Data Air quality is a function of both the rate and location of pollutant emissions under the influence of meteorological conditions and topographic features affecting pollutant movement and dispersal. Atmospheric conditions such as wind speed, wind direction, atmospheric stability, and air temperature gradients interact with the physical features of the landscape to determine the movement and dispersal of air pollutants, and consequently affect air quality. Hourly meteorological data from BAAQMD’s San Francisco International Airport (surface data), located approximately two and a half miles to the south of the Project, and Oakland International Airport (upper air) were used in the dispersion modeling analysis. The data from 2005 through 2009 were used. Exhibit 2 displays the wind rose during this period. Wind directions are predominately from the west and there is a high frequency of calm and low wind conditions. EXHIBIT 2 WINDROSE FOR SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Source Release Characteristics Construction equipment activities were treated as an area source. The release height of the off-road equipment exhaust was 3.05 meters. Haul trucks and employee trips were treated as a line source (i.e., volume sources placed at regular intervals) located along the access road. The haul trucks were assigned a release height of 3.05 meters and an initial vertical dimension of 4.15 meters, which accounts for dispersion from the movement of vehicles. Terrain elevations for emission source locations were used (i.e., complex terrain) based on available USGS DEM for the area. AERMAP (Version 11103) was used to develop the terrain elevations, although the Project site is generally flat. Dispersion Modeling Results Using AERMOD, the maximum annual and 70-year average annual concentrations were determined for DPM emissions for the emission sources of concern. These concentrations were estimated for a unit emission rate (1 gram per second) and adjusted based on the calculated Project-related emission rate. The HRA was conducted following methodologies in BAAQMD’s Health Risk Screening Analysis Guidelines3 and in the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Guidance.4 This was accomplished by applying the highest estimated concentrations at the receptors analyzed to the established cancer risk estimates and acceptable reference concentrations (RfC) for non- cancer health effects. The toxicity values used in this analysis were based on OEHHA guidance. These toxicity values are for carcinogenic effects and acute/chronic health impacts. The primary pathway for exposures was assumed to be inhalation and carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic effects were evaluated separately. The incremental risks were determined for each emission source of TAC and summed to obtain an estimated total incremental carcinogenic health risk. The 80th percentile adult breathing rate of 302 liters per kilogram per day (L/kg-day) was used to determine cancer risks to residents from exposure to TAC. The residential exposure frequency and duration was assumed to be 350 days per year and 70 years. For children, OEHHA recommends assuming a breathing rate of 581 L/kg-day to assess potential risk via the inhalation exposure pathway. This value represents the upper 95th percentile of daily breathing rates for children. The modeled TAC concentrations were used to represent the exposure concentrations in the air. The inhalation absorption factor was assumed to be 1. Cancer risk estimates also incorporate age sensitivity factors (ASFs). This approach provides updated calculation procedures that factor in the increased susceptibility of infants and children to carcinogens as compared to adults. OEHHA recommends that 3 Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD), 2005. BAAQMD Health Risk Screening Analysis Guidelines (http://www.baaqmd.gov/pmt/air_toxics/risk_procedures_policies/hrsa_guidelines.pdf), June 2005. 4 Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA), 2003. Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments, http://www.oehha.org/air/hot_spots/pdf/HRAguidefinal.pdf. cancer risks be weighted by a factor of 10 for exposures that occur from the third trimester of pregnancy to 2 years of age, and by a factor of 3 for exposures from 2 years through 15 years of age. For estimating cancer risks for residential receptors over a 70 year lifetime, the incorporation of the ASFs results in a cancer risk adjustment factor (CRAF) of 1.7. Table 1 presents the health risk assessment exposure parameters. Based on OEHHA recommendations, the cancer risk to residential receptors assumes exposure occurs 24 hours per day for 350 days per year. For children at school sites, exposure is assumed to occur 10 hours per day for 180 days (or 36 weeks) per year. Cancer risk to residential receptors based on a 70-year lifetime exposure. Cancer risk estimates for children at school sites are calculated based on 9 year exposure duration. TABLE 1 HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT EXPOSURE PARAMETERS Receptor Breathing Rate (DBR) Cancer Risk Adjustment Factor (CRAF) Daily Exposure Annual Exposure Exposure Duration (ED) Adult 302 1.7 24 hours 350 days 70 years Child 581 10 24 hours 350 days 3 years School 581 3 10 hours 180 days 9 years SOURCE: BAAQMD Health Risk Screening Analysis Guidelines, (http://www.baaqmd.gov/pmt/air_toxics/risk_procedures_policies/hrsa_guidelines.pdf), June 2005. RISK CHARACTERIZATION Cancer risk is defined as the lifetime probability of developing cancer from exposure to carcinogenic substances. Cancer risks are expressed as the chance in one million of getting cancer (i.e., number of cancer cases among one million people exposed). The cancer risks are assumed to occur exclusively through the inhalation pathway. The cancer risk can be estimated by using the cancer potency factor (milligrams per kilogram of body weight per day [mg/kg-day]), the 70-year annual average concentration (microgram per cubic meter [µg/m3]), and the lifetime exposure adjustment. Following guidelines established by OEHHA, the incremental cancer risks attributable to the Project were calculated by applying exposure parameters to modeled TAC concentrations in order to determine the inhalation dose (mg/kg-day) or the amount of pollutants inhaled per body weight mass per day. The cancer risks occur exclusively through the inhalation pathway; therefore, the cancer risks can be estimated from the following equation: Dose-inh = Cair * {DBR} * A * CRAF * EF * ED * 10-6 AT Where: Dose-inh = Dose of the toxic substance through inhalation in mg/kg-day 10-6 = Micrograms to milligrams conversion, Liters to cubic meters conversion Cair = Concentration in air (microgram (μg)/cubic meter (m3)) {DBR} = Daily breathing rate (liter (L)/kg body weight – day) A = Inhalation absorption factor CRAF = Cancer Risk Adjustment Factor, Age Sensitivity Factor EF = Exposure frequency (days/year) ED = Exposure duration (years) AT = Averaging time period over which exposure is averaged in days (25,550 days for a 70 year cancer risk) To determine incremental cancer risk, the estimated inhalation dose attributed to the Project was multiplied by the cancer potency slope factor (cancer risk per mg/kg-day). The cancer potency slope factor is the upper bound on the increased cancer risk from a lifetime exposure to a pollutant. These slope factors are based on epidemiological studies and are different values for different pollutants. This allows the estimated inhalation dose to be equated to a cancer risk. Non-cancer adverse health impacts, acute (short-term) and chronic (long-term), are measured against a hazard index (HI), which is defined as the ratio of the predicted incremental exposure concentration from the Project to a published reference exposure level (REL) that could cause adverse health effects as established by OEHHA. The ratio (referred to as the Hazard Quotient [HQ]) of each non-carcinogenic substance that affects a certain organ system is added to produce an overall HI for that organ system. The overall HI is calculated for each organ system. If the overall HI for the highest-impacted organ system is greater than one, then the impact is considered to be significant. The HI is an expression used for the potential for non-cancer health effects. The relationship for the non-cancer health effects is given by the annual concentration (in µg/m3) and the REL (in µg/m3). The acute hazard index was determined using the “simple” concurrent maximum approach, which tends to be conservative (i.e., overpredicts). The relationship for the non-cancer health effects is given by the following equation: HI = C/REL Where: HI = Hazard index; an expression of the potential for non-cancer health effects. C = Annual average concentration (g/m3) during the 70 year exposure period. REL = The concentration at which no adverse health effects are anticipated. The chronic REL for DPM was established by the California OEHHA 5 as 5 g/m3. There is no acute REL for DPM. However, diesel exhaust does contain acrolein and other compounds, which do have an acute REL. BAAQMD’s DPM speciation table (based on profile 4674 within the USEPA Speciate 4.2)6 was used to assess the acute impacts. 5 California Office of Environmental Health Hazards Assessment Toxicity Criteria Database, 2010, http://www.oehha.ca.gov//. 6 Provides for a speciation faction of 1.3 percent of acrolein per DPM emission rate , http://www.epa.gov////.html. Acrolein emissions are approximately 1.3 percent of the total emissions. The acute REL for acrolein was established by the California OEHHA7 as 2.5 g/m3. CUMULATIVE SOURCES The BAAQMD’s CEQA Air Quality Guidelines include standards and methods for determining the significance of cumulative health risk impacts. The method for determining cumulative health risk requires the tallying of health risk from permitted sources and major roadways in the vicinity of a project (i.e., within a 1,000-foot radius of the location of the Project’s maximum impact area), then adding the Project impacts to determine whether the cumulative health risk thresholds are exceeded. BAAQMD has developed a geo-referenced database of permitted emissions sources throughout the San Francisco Bay Area, and has developed the Stationary Source Risk & Hazard Analysis Tool (dated May 2012) for estimating cumulative health risks from permitted sources. Twelve permitted sources are located within 1,000 feet of the Project impact area. Table 2 provides the estimated screening cancer risk, hazard impacts, and the PM2.5 concentrations for the cumulative permitted source. Table 3 provides the estimated adjusted cancer risk, hazard impacts, and the PM2.5 concentrations for the cumulative permitted source. TABLE 2 CUMULATIVE HEALTH IMPACTS – PERMITTED SOURCES Adjustment Factors and Screening Data Facility # Facility Type Address Adjustment Factor Cancer Risk Hazard Impact PM2.5 Concentration 15132 NOD Autobody 206 Baden Ave 1 - 0.01 - 15764 Autobahn Specialties 33 Linden Ave 1 - - - 16753 E+S Ahuactzin Autobody 303 Commercial Ave 1 - - - 4316 Wright Cleaners 316 Grand Ave 0.17 20.2 0.05 - G9214 Unocal Grand Mateo 221 Airport Blvd 0.027 14.7 0.02 - G10695 South City Shell 123 Linden Ave 0.024 12.2 0.02 - 16311 First Class Pupu's Autobody 136 Linden Ave 1 - - - 11618 Carrera Autobody 99 Linden Ave 1 - <0.01 - 18877 SSF Water Quality 27 South Linden Ave 1 1.53 <0.01 <0.01 Information (cancer risks and chronic index) was adjusted for distance from source to receptor, based on BAAQMD’s Distance Adjustment Multiplier for Diesel Internal Combustion Engine and the Distance Adjustment Multiplier for Gasoline Dispensing Facilities. Table 2 provides the distance adjustment factors and the screening (unadjusted) cancer risk, hazard impacts, and the PM2.5 concentrations. Table 3 provides the adjusted cancer risk, hazard impacts, and the PM2.5 concentrations. 7 California Office of Environmental Health Hazards Assessment Toxicity Criteria Database, 2010, http://www.oehha.ca.gov//. TABLE 3 CUMULATIVE HEALTH IMPACTS – PERMITTED SOURCES Adjusted Data Facility # Facility Type Address Cancer Risk Hazard Impact PM2.5 Concentration 15132 NOD Autobody 206 Baden Ave - 0.01 - 15764 Autobahn Specialties 33 Linden Ave - - - 16753 E+S Ahuactzin Autobody 303 Commercial Ave - - - 4316 Wright Cleaners 316 Grand Ave 3.43 0.01 - G9214 Unocal Grand Mateo 221 Airport Blvd 0.40 <0.01 - G10695 South City Shell 123 Linden Ave 0.29 <0.01 - 16311 First Class Pupu's Autobody 136 Linden Ave - - - 11618 Carrera Autobody 99 Linden Ave - <0.01 - 18877 SSF Water Quality 27 South Linden Ave 1.53 <0.01 <0.01 BAAQMD has also developed a geo-referenced database of roadways throughout the San Francisco Bay Area and has developed the Highway Screening Analysis Tool (dated May 2011) for estimating cumulative health risks from roadways. US 101 is also included in this database and is within 1,000 feet of the Project. BAAQMD CEQA Air Quality Guidelines also require the inclusion of surface streets within 1,000 feet of the Project with annual average daily traffic (AADT) of 10,000 or greater8. Upon review of nearby roadways, Airport Boulevard meets the criteria. 8 BAAQMD County Surface Street Screening Tables, May 2011 and CEHTP Traffic Linkage Service Demonstration, http://www.ehib.org/traffic_tool.jsp. Project Characteristics - Land Use - Lot acreage and square feet per project description Architectural Coating - Low ROG coatings Area Mitigation - Energy Mitigation - Water Mitigation - San Mateo County, Annual 127 West Harris Hotel 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Hotel 129.00 Room 1.47 65,136.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Climate Zone Urban 5 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 70 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data 1.0 Project Characteristics Utility Company Pacific Gas & Electric Company 2016Operational Year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 641.35 0.029CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.006N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 3:01 PMPage 1 of 29 2.0 Emissions Summary Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 150.00 10.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Interior 100.00 10.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Residential_Exterior 150.00 10.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Residential_Interior 100.00 10.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 187,308.00 65,136.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 4.30 1.47 tblProjectCharacteristics OperationalYear 2014 2016 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 3:01 PMPage 2 of 29 2.1 Overall Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year tons/yr MT/yr 2015 0.4643 2.7557 2.1988 3.1400e- 003 0.0493 0.1788 0.2281 0.0171 0.1717 0.1888 0.0000 269.4298 269.4298 0.0537 0.0000 270.5578 Total 0.4643 2.7557 2.1988 3.1400e- 003 0.0493 0.1788 0.2281 0.0171 0.1717 0.1888 0.0000 269.4298 269.4298 0.0537 0.0000 270.5578 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year tons/yr MT/yr 2015 0.4643 2.7557 2.1988 3.1400e- 003 0.0493 0.1788 0.2281 0.0171 0.1717 0.1888 0.0000 269.4295 269.4295 0.0537 0.0000 270.5575 Total 0.4643 2.7557 2.1988 3.1400e- 003 0.0493 0.1788 0.2281 0.0171 0.1717 0.1888 0.0000 269.4295 269.4295 0.0537 0.0000 270.5575 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 3:01 PMPage 3 of 29 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Area 0.2885 1.0000e- 005 1.2200e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.3100e- 003 2.3100e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.4400e- 003 Energy 0.0134 0.1215 0.1021 7.3000e- 004 9.2300e- 003 9.2300e- 003 9.2300e- 003 9.2300e- 003 0.0000 304.6924 304.6924 0.0103 4.0400e- 003 306.1611 Mobile 0.5570 0.9642 5.2622 9.5200e- 003 0.7113 0.0126 0.7239 0.1908 0.0116 0.2024 0.0000 751.0373 751.0373 0.0355 0.0000 751.7821 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 14.3373 0.0000 14.3373 0.8473 0.0000 32.1307 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.0382 5.5212 6.5594 0.1069 2.5700e- 003 9.6003 Total 0.8588 1.0857 5.3655 0.0103 0.7113 0.0219 0.7332 0.1908 0.0208 0.2116 15.3754 1,061.253 2 1,076.628 6 1.0000 6.6100e- 003 1,099.676 7 Unmitigated Operational CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 3:01 PMPage 4 of 29 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Area 0.2885 1.0000e- 005 1.2200e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.3100e- 003 2.3100e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.4400e- 003 Energy 0.0123 0.1116 0.0938 6.7000e- 004 8.4800e- 003 8.4800e- 003 8.4800e- 003 8.4800e- 003 0.0000 278.6998 278.6998 9.4400e- 003 3.7000e- 003 280.0445 Mobile 0.5570 0.9642 5.2622 9.5200e- 003 0.7113 0.0126 0.7239 0.1908 0.0116 0.2024 0.0000 751.0373 751.0373 0.0355 0.0000 751.7821 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 14.3373 0.0000 14.3373 0.8473 0.0000 32.1307 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.8305 4.1468 4.9774 0.0855 2.0500e- 003 7.4091 Total 0.8577 1.0759 5.3572 0.0102 0.7113 0.0211 0.7324 0.1908 0.0201 0.2109 15.1678 1,033.886 3 1,049.054 1 0.9777 5.7500e- 003 1,071.368 8 Mitigated Operational 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.13 0.91 0.15 0.59 0.00 3.43 0.10 0.00 3.60 0.35 1.35 2.58 2.56 2.23 13.01 2.57 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 3:01 PMPage 5 of 29 Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 1/1/2015 1/28/2015 5 20 2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 1/29/2015 1/30/2015 5 2 3 Grading Grading 1/31/2015 2/5/2015 5 4 4 Building Construction Building Construction 2/6/2015 11/12/2015 5 200 5 Paving Paving 11/13/2015 11/26/2015 5 10 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 11/27/2015 12/10/2015 5 10 OffRoad Equipment Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 97,704; Non-Residential Outdoor: 32,568 (Architectural Coating – sqft) Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 1 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 1.5 Acres of Paving: 0 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 3:01 PMPage 6 of 29 Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 255 0.40 Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37 Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 174 0.41 Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 1 7.00 255 0.40 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Graders 1 6.00 174 0.41 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 6.00 255 0.40 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Cranes 1 6.00 226 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts 1 6.00 89 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 3 8.00 46 0.45 Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 6.00 9 0.56 Paving Pavers 1 6.00 125 0.42 Paving Paving Equipment 1 8.00 130 0.36 Paving Rollers 1 7.00 80 0.38 Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Trips and VMT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 3:01 PMPage 7 of 29 3.2 Demolition - 2015 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.0307 0.2968 0.2206 2.4000e- 004 0.0187 0.0187 0.0175 0.0175 0.0000 22.7618 22.7618 5.7700e- 003 0.0000 22.8829 Total 0.0307 0.2968 0.2206 2.4000e- 004 0.0187 0.0187 0.0175 0.0175 0.0000 22.7618 22.7618 5.7700e- 003 0.0000 22.8829 Unmitigated Construction On-Site 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 5 13.00 0.00 0.00 12.40 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 3 8.00 0.00 0.00 12.40 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 3 8.00 0.00 0.00 12.40 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 7 27.00 11.00 0.00 12.40 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 5 13.00 0.00 0.00 12.40 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 5.00 0.00 0.00 12.40 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 3:01 PMPage 8 of 29 3.2 Demolition - 2015 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 5.2000e- 004 8.0000e- 004 7.6500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.1700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.1800e- 003 3.1000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.2000e- 004 0.0000 1.0953 1.0953 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0966 Total 5.2000e- 004 8.0000e- 004 7.6500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.1700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.1800e- 003 3.1000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.2000e- 004 0.0000 1.0953 1.0953 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0966 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.0307 0.2968 0.2206 2.4000e- 004 0.0187 0.0187 0.0175 0.0175 0.0000 22.7618 22.7618 5.7700e- 003 0.0000 22.8829 Total 0.0307 0.2968 0.2206 2.4000e- 004 0.0187 0.0187 0.0175 0.0175 0.0000 22.7618 22.7618 5.7700e- 003 0.0000 22.8829 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 3:01 PMPage 9 of 29 3.2 Demolition - 2015 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 5.2000e- 004 8.0000e- 004 7.6500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.1700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.1800e- 003 3.1000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.2000e- 004 0.0000 1.0953 1.0953 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0966 Total 5.2000e- 004 8.0000e- 004 7.6500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.1700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.1800e- 003 3.1000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.2000e- 004 0.0000 1.0953 1.0953 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0966 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.3 Site Preparation - 2015 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 5.8000e- 003 0.0000 5.8000e- 003 2.9500e- 003 0.0000 2.9500e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.5400e- 003 0.0269 0.0170 2.0000e- 005 1.4700e- 003 1.4700e- 003 1.3500e- 003 1.3500e- 003 0.0000 1.6345 1.6345 4.9000e- 004 0.0000 1.6448 Total 2.5400e- 003 0.0269 0.0170 2.0000e- 005 5.8000e- 003 1.4700e- 003 7.2700e- 003 2.9500e- 003 1.3500e- 003 4.3000e- 003 0.0000 1.6345 1.6345 4.9000e- 004 0.0000 1.6448 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 3:01 PMPage 10 of 29 3.3 Site Preparation - 2015 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 3.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 4.7000e- 004 0.0000 7.0000e- 005 0.0000 7.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0674 0.0674 0.0000 0.0000 0.0675 Total 3.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 4.7000e- 004 0.0000 7.0000e- 005 0.0000 7.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0674 0.0674 0.0000 0.0000 0.0675 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 5.8000e- 003 0.0000 5.8000e- 003 2.9500e- 003 0.0000 2.9500e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.5400e- 003 0.0269 0.0170 2.0000e- 005 1.4700e- 003 1.4700e- 003 1.3500e- 003 1.3500e- 003 0.0000 1.6345 1.6345 4.9000e- 004 0.0000 1.6448 Total 2.5400e- 003 0.0269 0.0170 2.0000e- 005 5.8000e- 003 1.4700e- 003 7.2700e- 003 2.9500e- 003 1.3500e- 003 4.3000e- 003 0.0000 1.6345 1.6345 4.9000e- 004 0.0000 1.6448 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 3:01 PMPage 11 of 29 3.3 Site Preparation - 2015 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 3.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 4.7000e- 004 0.0000 7.0000e- 005 0.0000 7.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0674 0.0674 0.0000 0.0000 0.0675 Total 3.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 4.7000e- 004 0.0000 7.0000e- 005 0.0000 7.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0674 0.0674 0.0000 0.0000 0.0675 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Grading - 2015 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 9.8300e- 003 0.0000 9.8300e- 003 5.0500e- 003 0.0000 5.0500e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.1300e- 003 0.0439 0.0282 3.0000e- 005 2.3900e- 003 2.3900e- 003 2.2000e- 003 2.2000e- 003 0.0000 2.6849 2.6849 8.0000e- 004 0.0000 2.7017 Total 4.1300e- 003 0.0439 0.0282 3.0000e- 005 9.8300e- 003 2.3900e- 003 0.0122 5.0500e- 003 2.2000e- 003 7.2500e- 003 0.0000 2.6849 2.6849 8.0000e- 004 0.0000 2.7017 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 3:01 PMPage 12 of 29 3.4 Grading - 2015 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 6.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 0.0000 1.4000e- 004 0.0000 1.5000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.1348 0.1348 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.1350 Total 6.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 0.0000 1.4000e- 004 0.0000 1.5000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.1348 0.1348 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.1350 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 9.8300e- 003 0.0000 9.8300e- 003 5.0500e- 003 0.0000 5.0500e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.1300e- 003 0.0439 0.0282 3.0000e- 005 2.3900e- 003 2.3900e- 003 2.2000e- 003 2.2000e- 003 0.0000 2.6849 2.6849 8.0000e- 004 0.0000 2.7017 Total 4.1300e- 003 0.0439 0.0282 3.0000e- 005 9.8300e- 003 2.3900e- 003 0.0122 5.0500e- 003 2.2000e- 003 7.2500e- 003 0.0000 2.6849 2.6849 8.0000e- 004 0.0000 2.7017 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 3:01 PMPage 13 of 29 3.4 Grading - 2015 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 6.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 0.0000 1.4000e- 004 0.0000 1.5000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.1348 0.1348 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.1350 Total 6.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 0.0000 1.4000e- 004 0.0000 1.5000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.1348 0.1348 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.1350 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2015 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.3600 2.1564 1.5004 2.2000e- 003 0.1485 0.1485 0.1434 0.1434 0.0000 186.4831 186.4831 0.0430 0.0000 187.3864 Total 0.3600 2.1564 1.5004 2.2000e- 003 0.1485 0.1485 0.1434 0.1434 0.0000 186.4831 186.4831 0.0430 0.0000 187.3864 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 3:01 PMPage 14 of 29 3.5 Building Construction - 2015 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0160 0.1277 0.2040 2.6000e- 004 7.0200e- 003 1.9800e- 003 9.0100e- 003 2.0100e- 003 1.8200e- 003 3.8400e- 003 0.0000 23.5133 23.5133 2.1000e- 004 0.0000 23.5177 Worker 0.0108 0.0167 0.1589 2.9000e- 004 0.0244 2.1000e- 004 0.0246 6.4900e- 003 1.9000e- 004 6.6800e- 003 0.0000 22.7489 22.7489 1.3100e- 003 0.0000 22.7765 Total 0.0267 0.1444 0.3629 5.5000e- 004 0.0314 2.1900e- 003 0.0336 8.5000e- 003 2.0100e- 003 0.0105 0.0000 46.2622 46.2622 1.5200e- 003 0.0000 46.2941 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.3600 2.1564 1.5004 2.2000e- 003 0.1485 0.1485 0.1434 0.1434 0.0000 186.4829 186.4829 0.0430 0.0000 187.3862 Total 0.3600 2.1564 1.5004 2.2000e- 003 0.1485 0.1485 0.1434 0.1434 0.0000 186.4829 186.4829 0.0430 0.0000 187.3862 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 3:01 PMPage 15 of 29 3.5 Building Construction - 2015 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0160 0.1277 0.2040 2.6000e- 004 7.0200e- 003 1.9800e- 003 9.0100e- 003 2.0100e- 003 1.8200e- 003 3.8400e- 003 0.0000 23.5133 23.5133 2.1000e- 004 0.0000 23.5177 Worker 0.0108 0.0167 0.1589 2.9000e- 004 0.0244 2.1000e- 004 0.0246 6.4900e- 003 1.9000e- 004 6.6800e- 003 0.0000 22.7489 22.7489 1.3100e- 003 0.0000 22.7765 Total 0.0267 0.1444 0.3629 5.5000e- 004 0.0314 2.1900e- 003 0.0336 8.5000e- 003 2.0100e- 003 0.0105 0.0000 46.2622 46.2622 1.5200e- 003 0.0000 46.2941 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.6 Paving - 2015 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 7.0200e- 003 0.0730 0.0459 7.0000e- 005 4.4600e- 003 4.4600e- 003 4.1100e- 003 4.1100e- 003 0.0000 6.2708 6.2708 1.8400e- 003 0.0000 6.3094 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 7.0200e- 003 0.0730 0.0459 7.0000e- 005 4.4600e- 003 4.4600e- 003 4.1100e- 003 4.1100e- 003 0.0000 6.2708 6.2708 1.8400e- 003 0.0000 6.3094 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 3:01 PMPage 16 of 29 3.6 Paving - 2015 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.6000e- 004 4.0000e- 004 3.8300e- 003 1.0000e- 005 5.9000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 5.9000e- 004 1.6000e- 004 0.0000 1.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.5477 0.5477 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.5483 Total 2.6000e- 004 4.0000e- 004 3.8300e- 003 1.0000e- 005 5.9000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 5.9000e- 004 1.6000e- 004 0.0000 1.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.5477 0.5477 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.5483 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 7.0200e- 003 0.0730 0.0459 7.0000e- 005 4.4600e- 003 4.4600e- 003 4.1100e- 003 4.1100e- 003 0.0000 6.2708 6.2708 1.8400e- 003 0.0000 6.3094 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 7.0200e- 003 0.0730 0.0459 7.0000e- 005 4.4600e- 003 4.4600e- 003 4.1100e- 003 4.1100e- 003 0.0000 6.2708 6.2708 1.8400e- 003 0.0000 6.3094 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 3:01 PMPage 17 of 29 3.6 Paving - 2015 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.6000e- 004 4.0000e- 004 3.8300e- 003 1.0000e- 005 5.9000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 5.9000e- 004 1.6000e- 004 0.0000 1.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.5477 0.5477 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.5483 Total 2.6000e- 004 4.0000e- 004 3.8300e- 003 1.0000e- 005 5.9000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 5.9000e- 004 1.6000e- 004 0.0000 1.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.5477 0.5477 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.5483 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2015 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating 0.0302 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.0300e- 003 0.0129 9.5100e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.1000e- 003 1.1000e- 003 1.1000e- 003 1.1000e- 003 0.0000 1.2766 1.2766 1.7000e- 004 0.0000 1.2801 Total 0.0322 0.0129 9.5100e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.1000e- 003 1.1000e- 003 1.1000e- 003 1.1000e- 003 0.0000 1.2766 1.2766 1.7000e- 004 0.0000 1.2801 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 3:01 PMPage 18 of 29 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2015 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.0000e- 004 1.5000e- 004 1.4700e- 003 0.0000 2.3000e- 004 0.0000 2.3000e- 004 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.2106 0.2106 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.2109 Total 1.0000e- 004 1.5000e- 004 1.4700e- 003 0.0000 2.3000e- 004 0.0000 2.3000e- 004 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.2106 0.2106 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.2109 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating 0.0302 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.0300e- 003 0.0129 9.5100e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.1000e- 003 1.1000e- 003 1.1000e- 003 1.1000e- 003 0.0000 1.2766 1.2766 1.7000e- 004 0.0000 1.2801 Total 0.0322 0.0129 9.5100e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.1000e- 003 1.1000e- 003 1.1000e- 003 1.1000e- 003 0.0000 1.2766 1.2766 1.7000e- 004 0.0000 1.2801 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 3:01 PMPage 19 of 29 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated 0.5570 0.9642 5.2622 9.5200e- 003 0.7113 0.0126 0.7239 0.1908 0.0116 0.2024 0.0000 751.0373 751.0373 0.0355 0.0000 751.7821 Unmitigated 0.5570 0.9642 5.2622 9.5200e- 003 0.7113 0.0126 0.7239 0.1908 0.0116 0.2024 0.0000 751.0373 751.0373 0.0355 0.0000 751.7821 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2015 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.0000e- 004 1.5000e- 004 1.4700e- 003 0.0000 2.3000e- 004 0.0000 2.3000e- 004 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.2106 0.2106 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.2109 Total 1.0000e- 004 1.5000e- 004 1.4700e- 003 0.0000 2.3000e- 004 0.0000 2.3000e- 004 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.2106 0.2106 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.2109 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 3:01 PMPage 20 of 29 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Hotel 1,053.93 1,056.51 767.55 1,925,365 1,925,365 Total 1,053.93 1,056.51 767.55 1,925,365 1,925,365 Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Hotel 9.50 7.30 7.30 19.40 61.60 19.00 58 38 4 5.0 Energy Detail 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Exceed Title 24 Install High Efficiency Lighting Kilowatt Hours of Renewable Electricity Generated Install Energy Efficient Appliances 4.4 Fleet Mix LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH 0.579021 0.062765 0.176333 0.114336 0.029695 0.004181 0.015593 0.003984 0.002598 0.003702 0.006580 0.000230 0.000982 Historical Energy Use: N CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 3:01 PMPage 21 of 29 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Electricity Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 157.1891 157.1891 7.1100e- 003 1.4700e- 003 157.7943 Electricity Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 172.4342 172.4342 7.8000e- 003 1.6100e- 003 173.0980 NaturalGas Mitigated 0.0123 0.1116 0.0938 6.7000e- 004 8.4800e- 003 8.4800e- 003 8.4800e- 003 8.4800e- 003 0.0000 121.5107 121.5107 2.3300e- 003 2.2300e- 003 122.2502 NaturalGas Unmitigated 0.0134 0.1215 0.1021 7.3000e- 004 9.2300e- 003 9.2300e- 003 9.2300e- 003 9.2300e- 003 0.0000 132.2582 132.2582 2.5300e- 003 2.4200e- 003 133.0631 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Hotel 2.47842e +006 0.0134 0.1215 0.1021 7.3000e- 004 9.2300e- 003 9.2300e- 003 9.2300e- 003 9.2300e- 003 0.0000 132.2582 132.2582 2.5300e- 003 2.4200e- 003 133.0631 Total 0.0134 0.1215 0.1021 7.3000e- 004 9.2300e- 003 9.2300e- 003 9.2300e- 003 9.2300e- 003 0.0000 132.2582 132.2582 2.5300e- 003 2.4200e- 003 133.0631 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 3:01 PMPage 22 of 29 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Hotel 2.27702e +006 0.0123 0.1116 0.0938 6.7000e- 004 8.4800e- 003 8.4800e- 003 8.4800e- 003 8.4800e- 003 0.0000 121.5107 121.5107 2.3300e- 003 2.2300e- 003 122.2502 Total 0.0123 0.1116 0.0938 6.7000e- 004 8.4800e- 003 8.4800e- 003 8.4800e- 003 8.4800e- 003 0.0000 121.5107 121.5107 2.3300e- 003 2.2300e- 003 122.2502 Mitigated 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Electricity Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Hotel 592738 172.4342 7.8000e- 003 1.6100e- 003 173.0980 Total 172.4342 7.8000e- 003 1.6100e- 003 173.0980 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 3:01 PMPage 23 of 29 Use Low VOC Paint - Residential Interior Use Low VOC Paint - Residential Exterior Use Low VOC Paint - Non-Residential Interior Use Low VOC Paint - Non-Residential Exterior Use only Natural Gas Hearths 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.0 Area Detail 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Electricity Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Hotel 540333 157.1891 7.1100e- 003 1.4700e- 003 157.7943 Total 157.1891 7.1100e- 003 1.4700e- 003 157.7943 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 3:01 PMPage 24 of 29 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated 0.2885 1.0000e- 005 1.2200e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.3100e- 003 2.3100e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.4400e- 003 Unmitigated 0.2885 1.0000e- 005 1.2200e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.3100e- 003 2.3100e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.4400e- 003 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural Coating 0.0340 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.2544 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 1.2000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 1.2200e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.3100e- 003 2.3100e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.4400e- 003 Total 0.2885 1.0000e- 005 1.2200e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.3100e- 003 2.3100e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.4400e- 003 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 3:01 PMPage 25 of 29 Apply Water Conservation Strategy Use Water Efficient Irrigation System 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category MT/yr Mitigated 4.9774 0.0855 2.0500e- 003 7.4091 Unmitigated 6.5594 0.1069 2.5700e- 003 9.6003 7.0 Water Detail 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural Coating 0.0340 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.2544 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 1.2000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 1.2200e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.3100e- 003 2.3100e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.4400e- 003 Total 0.2885 1.0000e- 005 1.2200e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.3100e- 003 2.3100e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.4400e- 003 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 3:01 PMPage 26 of 29 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 7.2 Water by Land Use Indoor/Out door Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use Mgal MT/yr Hotel 3.27231 / 0.36359 6.5594 0.1069 2.5700e- 003 9.6003 Total 6.5594 0.1069 2.5700e- 003 9.6003 Unmitigated Indoor/Out door Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use Mgal MT/yr Hotel 2.61785 / 0.36359 4.9774 0.0855 2.0500e- 003 7.4091 Total 4.9774 0.0855 2.0500e- 003 7.4091 Mitigated 8.0 Waste Detail CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 3:01 PMPage 27 of 29 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e MT/yr Mitigated 14.3373 0.8473 0.0000 32.1307 Unmitigated 14.3373 0.8473 0.0000 32.1307 Category/Year 8.2 Waste by Land Use Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use tons MT/yr Hotel 70.63 14.3373 0.8473 0.0000 32.1307 Total 14.3373 0.8473 0.0000 32.1307 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 3:01 PMPage 28 of 29 10.0 Vegetation 8.2 Waste by Land Use Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use tons MT/yr Hotel 70.63 14.3373 0.8473 0.0000 32.1307 Total 14.3373 0.8473 0.0000 32.1307 Mitigated 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 3:01 PMPage 29 of 29 Project Characteristics - Land Use - Lot acreage and square feet per project description Architectural Coating - Low ROG coatings Area Mitigation - Energy Mitigation - Water Mitigation - San Mateo County, Summer 127 West Harris Hotel 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Hotel 129.00 Room 1.47 65,136.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Climate Zone Urban 5 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 70 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data 1.0 Project Characteristics Utility Company Pacific Gas & Electric Company 2016Operational Year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 641.35 0.029CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.006N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 3:03 PMPage 1 of 24 2.0 Emissions Summary Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 150.00 10.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Interior 100.00 10.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Residential_Exterior 150.00 10.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Residential_Interior 100.00 10.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 187,308.00 65,136.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 4.30 1.47 tblProjectCharacteristics OperationalYear 2014 2016 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 3:03 PMPage 2 of 24 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2015 6.4652 29.7483 22.8474 0.0276 5.8750 1.8661 7.3427 2.9737 1.7479 4.3240 0.0000 2,637.031 2 2,637.031 2 0.6427 0.0000 2,650.528 0 Total 6.4652 29.7483 22.8474 0.0276 5.8750 1.8661 7.3427 2.9737 1.7479 4.3240 0.0000 2,637.031 2 2,637.031 2 0.6427 0.0000 2,650.528 0 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2015 6.4652 29.7483 22.8474 0.0276 5.8750 1.8661 7.3427 2.9737 1.7479 4.3240 0.0000 2,637.031 2 2,637.031 2 0.6427 0.0000 2,650.528 0 Total 6.4652 29.7483 22.8474 0.0276 5.8750 1.8661 7.3427 2.9737 1.7479 4.3240 0.0000 2,637.031 2 2,637.031 2 0.6427 0.0000 2,650.528 0 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 3:03 PMPage 3 of 24 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 1.5813 1.3000e- 004 0.0135 0.0000 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 0.0282 0.0282 8.0000e- 005 0.0299 Energy 0.0732 0.6657 0.5592 3.9900e- 003 0.0506 0.0506 0.0506 0.0506 798.8476 798.8476 0.0153 0.0147 803.7093 Mobile 3.2334 5.1121 28.7362 0.0573 4.2493 0.0722 4.3216 1.1358 0.0664 1.2022 4,981.876 0 4,981.876 0 0.2242 4,986.583 9 Total 4.8879 5.7779 29.3089 0.0613 4.2493 0.1229 4.3722 1.1358 0.1170 1.2528 5,780.751 9 5,780.751 9 0.2396 0.0147 5,790.323 1 Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 1.5813 1.3000e- 004 0.0135 0.0000 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 0.0282 0.0282 8.0000e- 005 0.0299 Energy 0.0673 0.6116 0.5138 3.6700e- 003 0.0465 0.0465 0.0465 0.0465 733.9321 733.9321 0.0141 0.0135 738.3987 Mobile 3.2334 5.1121 28.7362 0.0573 4.2493 0.0722 4.3216 1.1358 0.0664 1.2022 4,981.876 0 4,981.876 0 0.2242 4,986.583 9 Total 4.8820 5.7238 29.2635 0.0610 4.2493 0.1188 4.3681 1.1358 0.1129 1.2487 5,715.836 3 5,715.836 3 0.2383 0.0135 5,725.012 5 Mitigated Operational CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 3:03 PMPage 4 of 24 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 1/1/2015 1/28/2015 5 20 2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 1/29/2015 1/30/2015 5 2 3 Grading Grading 1/31/2015 2/5/2015 5 4 4 Building Construction Building Construction 2/6/2015 11/12/2015 5 200 5 Paving Paving 11/13/2015 11/26/2015 5 10 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 11/27/2015 12/10/2015 5 10 OffRoad Equipment ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.12 0.94 0.16 0.52 0.00 3.34 0.09 0.00 3.51 0.33 0.00 1.12 1.12 0.52 8.12 1.13 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 97,704; Non-Residential Outdoor: 32,568 (Architectural Coating – sqft) Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 1 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 1.5 Acres of Paving: 0 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 3:03 PMPage 5 of 24 Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 255 0.40 Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37 Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 174 0.41 Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 1 7.00 255 0.40 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Graders 1 6.00 174 0.41 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 6.00 255 0.40 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Cranes 1 6.00 226 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts 1 6.00 89 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 3 8.00 46 0.45 Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 6.00 9 0.56 Paving Pavers 1 6.00 125 0.42 Paving Paving Equipment 1 8.00 130 0.36 Paving Rollers 1 7.00 80 0.38 Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Trips and VMT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 3:03 PMPage 6 of 24 3.2 Demolition - 2015 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 3.0666 29.6778 22.0566 0.0245 1.8651 1.8651 1.7469 1.7469 2,509.059 9 2,509.059 9 0.6357 2,522.410 4 Total 3.0666 29.6778 22.0566 0.0245 1.8651 1.8651 1.7469 1.7469 2,509.059 9 2,509.059 9 0.6357 2,522.410 4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 5 13.00 0.00 0.00 12.40 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 3 8.00 0.00 0.00 12.40 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 3 8.00 0.00 0.00 12.40 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 7 27.00 11.00 0.00 12.40 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 5 13.00 0.00 0.00 12.40 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 5.00 0.00 0.00 12.40 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 3:03 PMPage 7 of 24 3.2 Demolition - 2015 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0532 0.0706 0.7908 1.4600e- 003 0.1226 1.0000e- 003 0.1236 0.0325 9.2000e- 004 0.0334 127.9713 127.9713 6.9700e- 003 128.1176 Total 0.0532 0.0706 0.7908 1.4600e- 003 0.1226 1.0000e- 003 0.1236 0.0325 9.2000e- 004 0.0334 127.9713 127.9713 6.9700e- 003 128.1176 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 3.0666 29.6778 22.0566 0.0245 1.8651 1.8651 1.7469 1.7469 0.0000 2,509.059 9 2,509.059 9 0.6357 2,522.410 4 Total 3.0666 29.6778 22.0566 0.0245 1.8651 1.8651 1.7469 1.7469 0.0000 2,509.059 9 2,509.059 9 0.6357 2,522.410 4 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 3:03 PMPage 8 of 24 3.2 Demolition - 2015 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0532 0.0706 0.7908 1.4600e- 003 0.1226 1.0000e- 003 0.1236 0.0325 9.2000e- 004 0.0334 127.9713 127.9713 6.9700e- 003 128.1176 Total 0.0532 0.0706 0.7908 1.4600e- 003 0.1226 1.0000e- 003 0.1236 0.0325 9.2000e- 004 0.0334 127.9713 127.9713 6.9700e- 003 128.1176 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.3 Site Preparation - 2015 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 5.7996 0.0000 5.7996 2.9537 0.0000 2.9537 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.5362 26.8886 17.0107 0.0171 1.4671 1.4671 1.3497 1.3497 1,801.744 0 1,801.744 0 0.5379 1,813.039 8 Total 2.5362 26.8886 17.0107 0.0171 5.7996 1.4671 7.2666 2.9537 1.3497 4.3034 1,801.744 0 1,801.744 0 0.5379 1,813.039 8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 3:03 PMPage 9 of 24 3.3 Site Preparation - 2015 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0327 0.0434 0.4866 9.0000e- 004 0.0754 6.2000e- 004 0.0761 0.0200 5.6000e- 004 0.0206 78.7516 78.7516 4.2900e- 003 78.8416 Total 0.0327 0.0434 0.4866 9.0000e- 004 0.0754 6.2000e- 004 0.0761 0.0200 5.6000e- 004 0.0206 78.7516 78.7516 4.2900e- 003 78.8416 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 5.7996 0.0000 5.7996 2.9537 0.0000 2.9537 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.5362 26.8886 17.0107 0.0171 1.4671 1.4671 1.3497 1.3497 0.0000 1,801.744 0 1,801.744 0 0.5379 1,813.039 8 Total 2.5362 26.8886 17.0107 0.0171 5.7996 1.4671 7.2666 2.9537 1.3497 4.3034 0.0000 1,801.744 0 1,801.744 0 0.5379 1,813.039 8 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 3:03 PMPage 10 of 24 3.3 Site Preparation - 2015 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0327 0.0434 0.4866 9.0000e- 004 0.0754 6.2000e- 004 0.0761 0.0200 5.6000e- 004 0.0206 78.7516 78.7516 4.2900e- 003 78.8416 Total 0.0327 0.0434 0.4866 9.0000e- 004 0.0754 6.2000e- 004 0.0761 0.0200 5.6000e- 004 0.0206 78.7516 78.7516 4.2900e- 003 78.8416 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Grading - 2015 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 4.9143 0.0000 4.9143 2.5256 0.0000 2.5256 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.0666 21.9443 14.0902 0.0141 1.1968 1.1968 1.1011 1.1011 1,479.800 0 1,479.800 0 0.4418 1,489.077 4 Total 2.0666 21.9443 14.0902 0.0141 4.9143 1.1968 6.1110 2.5256 1.1011 3.6267 1,479.800 0 1,479.800 0 0.4418 1,489.077 4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 3:03 PMPage 11 of 24 3.4 Grading - 2015 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0327 0.0434 0.4866 9.0000e- 004 0.0754 6.2000e- 004 0.0761 0.0200 5.6000e- 004 0.0206 78.7516 78.7516 4.2900e- 003 78.8416 Total 0.0327 0.0434 0.4866 9.0000e- 004 0.0754 6.2000e- 004 0.0761 0.0200 5.6000e- 004 0.0206 78.7516 78.7516 4.2900e- 003 78.8416 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 4.9143 0.0000 4.9143 2.5256 0.0000 2.5256 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.0666 21.9443 14.0902 0.0141 1.1968 1.1968 1.1011 1.1011 0.0000 1,479.800 0 1,479.800 0 0.4418 1,489.077 4 Total 2.0666 21.9443 14.0902 0.0141 4.9143 1.1968 6.1110 2.5256 1.1011 3.6267 0.0000 1,479.800 0 1,479.800 0 0.4418 1,489.077 4 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 3:03 PMPage 12 of 24 3.4 Grading - 2015 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0327 0.0434 0.4866 9.0000e- 004 0.0754 6.2000e- 004 0.0761 0.0200 5.6000e- 004 0.0206 78.7516 78.7516 4.2900e- 003 78.8416 Total 0.0327 0.0434 0.4866 9.0000e- 004 0.0754 6.2000e- 004 0.0761 0.0200 5.6000e- 004 0.0206 78.7516 78.7516 4.2900e- 003 78.8416 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2015 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 3.6000 21.5642 15.0041 0.0220 1.4851 1.4851 1.4344 1.4344 2,055.624 7 2,055.624 7 0.4741 2,065.581 2 Total 3.6000 21.5642 15.0041 0.0220 1.4851 1.4851 1.4344 1.4344 2,055.624 7 2,055.624 7 0.4741 2,065.581 2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 3:03 PMPage 13 of 24 3.5 Building Construction - 2015 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1423 1.2316 1.6463 2.5800e- 003 0.0728 0.0197 0.0925 0.0208 0.0181 0.0389 260.0397 260.0397 2.2800e- 003 260.0877 Worker 0.1104 0.1465 1.6424 3.0300e- 003 0.2546 2.0900e- 003 0.2567 0.0675 1.9100e- 003 0.0694 265.7865 265.7865 0.0145 266.0904 Total 0.2527 1.3782 3.2887 5.6100e- 003 0.3274 0.0218 0.3492 0.0883 0.0201 0.1083 525.8262 525.8262 0.0168 526.1781 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 3.6000 21.5642 15.0041 0.0220 1.4851 1.4851 1.4344 1.4344 0.0000 2,055.624 7 2,055.624 7 0.4741 2,065.581 2 Total 3.6000 21.5642 15.0041 0.0220 1.4851 1.4851 1.4344 1.4344 0.0000 2,055.624 7 2,055.624 7 0.4741 2,065.581 2 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 3:03 PMPage 14 of 24 3.5 Building Construction - 2015 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1423 1.2316 1.6463 2.5800e- 003 0.0728 0.0197 0.0925 0.0208 0.0181 0.0389 260.0397 260.0397 2.2800e- 003 260.0877 Worker 0.1104 0.1465 1.6424 3.0300e- 003 0.2546 2.0900e- 003 0.2567 0.0675 1.9100e- 003 0.0694 265.7865 265.7865 0.0145 266.0904 Total 0.2527 1.3782 3.2887 5.6100e- 003 0.3274 0.0218 0.3492 0.0883 0.0201 0.1083 525.8262 525.8262 0.0168 526.1781 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.6 Paving - 2015 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.4041 14.5959 9.1695 0.0133 0.8919 0.8919 0.8215 0.8215 1,382.470 3 1,382.470 3 0.4054 1,390.982 6 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.4041 14.5959 9.1695 0.0133 0.8919 0.8919 0.8215 0.8215 1,382.470 3 1,382.470 3 0.4054 1,390.982 6 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 3:03 PMPage 15 of 24 3.6 Paving - 2015 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0532 0.0706 0.7908 1.4600e- 003 0.1226 1.0000e- 003 0.1236 0.0325 9.2000e- 004 0.0334 127.9713 127.9713 6.9700e- 003 128.1176 Total 0.0532 0.0706 0.7908 1.4600e- 003 0.1226 1.0000e- 003 0.1236 0.0325 9.2000e- 004 0.0334 127.9713 127.9713 6.9700e- 003 128.1176 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.4041 14.5959 9.1695 0.0133 0.8919 0.8919 0.8215 0.8215 0.0000 1,382.470 3 1,382.470 3 0.4054 1,390.982 6 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.4041 14.5959 9.1695 0.0133 0.8919 0.8919 0.8215 0.8215 0.0000 1,382.470 3 1,382.470 3 0.4054 1,390.982 6 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 3:03 PMPage 16 of 24 3.6 Paving - 2015 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0532 0.0706 0.7908 1.4600e- 003 0.1226 1.0000e- 003 0.1236 0.0325 9.2000e- 004 0.0334 127.9713 127.9713 6.9700e- 003 128.1176 Total 0.0532 0.0706 0.7908 1.4600e- 003 0.1226 1.0000e- 003 0.1236 0.0325 9.2000e- 004 0.0334 127.9713 127.9713 6.9700e- 003 128.1176 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2015 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 6.0381 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.4066 2.5703 1.9018 2.9700e- 003 0.2209 0.2209 0.2209 0.2209 281.4481 281.4481 0.0367 282.2177 Total 6.4447 2.5703 1.9018 2.9700e- 003 0.2209 0.2209 0.2209 0.2209 281.4481 281.4481 0.0367 282.2177 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 3:03 PMPage 17 of 24 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2015 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0205 0.0271 0.3042 5.6000e- 004 0.0472 3.9000e- 004 0.0475 0.0125 3.5000e- 004 0.0129 49.2197 49.2197 2.6800e- 003 49.2760 Total 0.0205 0.0271 0.3042 5.6000e- 004 0.0472 3.9000e- 004 0.0475 0.0125 3.5000e- 004 0.0129 49.2197 49.2197 2.6800e- 003 49.2760 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 6.0381 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.4066 2.5703 1.9018 2.9700e- 003 0.2209 0.2209 0.2209 0.2209 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0367 282.2177 Total 6.4447 2.5703 1.9018 2.9700e- 003 0.2209 0.2209 0.2209 0.2209 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0367 282.2177 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 3:03 PMPage 18 of 24 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 3.2334 5.1121 28.7362 0.0573 4.2493 0.0722 4.3216 1.1358 0.0664 1.2022 4,981.876 0 4,981.876 0 0.2242 4,986.583 9 Unmitigated 3.2334 5.1121 28.7362 0.0573 4.2493 0.0722 4.3216 1.1358 0.0664 1.2022 4,981.876 0 4,981.876 0 0.2242 4,986.583 9 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2015 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0205 0.0271 0.3042 5.6000e- 004 0.0472 3.9000e- 004 0.0475 0.0125 3.5000e- 004 0.0129 49.2197 49.2197 2.6800e- 003 49.2760 Total 0.0205 0.0271 0.3042 5.6000e- 004 0.0472 3.9000e- 004 0.0475 0.0125 3.5000e- 004 0.0129 49.2197 49.2197 2.6800e- 003 49.2760 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 3:03 PMPage 19 of 24 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Hotel 1,053.93 1,056.51 767.55 1,925,365 1,925,365 Total 1,053.93 1,056.51 767.55 1,925,365 1,925,365 Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Hotel 9.50 7.30 7.30 19.40 61.60 19.00 58 38 4 5.0 Energy Detail 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Exceed Title 24 Install High Efficiency Lighting Kilowatt Hours of Renewable Electricity Generated Install Energy Efficient Appliances 4.4 Fleet Mix LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH 0.579021 0.062765 0.176333 0.114336 0.029695 0.004181 0.015593 0.003984 0.002598 0.003702 0.006580 0.000230 0.000982 Historical Energy Use: N CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 3:03 PMPage 20 of 24 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas Mitigated 0.0673 0.6116 0.5138 3.6700e- 003 0.0465 0.0465 0.0465 0.0465 733.9321 733.9321 0.0141 0.0135 738.3987 NaturalGas Unmitigated 0.0732 0.6657 0.5592 3.9900e- 003 0.0506 0.0506 0.0506 0.0506 798.8476 798.8476 0.0153 0.0147 803.7093 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Hotel 6790.2 0.0732 0.6657 0.5592 3.9900e- 003 0.0506 0.0506 0.0506 0.0506 798.8476 798.8476 0.0153 0.0147 803.7093 Total 0.0732 0.6657 0.5592 3.9900e- 003 0.0506 0.0506 0.0506 0.0506 798.8476 798.8476 0.0153 0.0147 803.7093 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 3:03 PMPage 21 of 24 Use Low VOC Paint - Residential Interior Use Low VOC Paint - Residential Exterior Use Low VOC Paint - Non-Residential Interior Use Low VOC Paint - Non-Residential Exterior Use only Natural Gas Hearths 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.0 Area Detail 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Hotel 6.23842 0.0673 0.6116 0.5138 3.6700e- 003 0.0465 0.0465 0.0465 0.0465 733.9321 733.9321 0.0141 0.0135 738.3987 Total 0.0673 0.6116 0.5138 3.6700e- 003 0.0465 0.0465 0.0465 0.0465 733.9321 733.9321 0.0141 0.0135 738.3987 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 3:03 PMPage 22 of 24 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 1.5813 1.3000e- 004 0.0135 0.0000 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 0.0282 0.0282 8.0000e- 005 0.0299 Unmitigated 1.5813 1.3000e- 004 0.0135 0.0000 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 0.0282 0.0282 8.0000e- 005 0.0299 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.1861 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 1.3939 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 1.3200e- 003 1.3000e- 004 0.0135 0.0000 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 0.0282 0.0282 8.0000e- 005 0.0299 Total 1.5813 1.3000e- 004 0.0135 0.0000 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 0.0282 0.0282 8.0000e- 005 0.0299 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 3:03 PMPage 23 of 24 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Apply Water Conservation Strategy Use Water Efficient Irrigation System 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.0 Water Detail 8.0 Waste Detail 10.0 Vegetation 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.1861 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 1.3939 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 1.3200e- 003 1.3000e- 004 0.0135 0.0000 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 0.0282 0.0282 8.0000e- 005 0.0299 Total 1.5813 1.3000e- 004 0.0135 0.0000 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 0.0282 0.0282 8.0000e- 005 0.0299 Mitigated 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 3:03 PMPage 24 of 24 Project Characteristics - Land Use - Lot acreage and square feet per project description Architectural Coating - Low ROG coatings Energy Mitigation - Area Mitigation - San Mateo County, Winter 127 West Harris Hotel 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Hotel 129.00 Room 1.47 65,136.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Climate Zone Urban 5 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 70 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data 1.0 Project Characteristics Utility Company Pacific Gas & Electric Company 2016Operational Year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 641.35 0.029CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.006N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 2:41 PMPage 1 of 24 2.0 Emissions Summary Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 150.00 10.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Interior 100.00 10.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Residential_Exterior 150.00 10.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Residential_Interior 100.00 10.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 187,308.00 65,136.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 4.30 1.47 tblProjectCharacteristics OperationalYear 2014 2016 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 2:41 PMPage 2 of 24 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2015 6.4663 29.7650 22.8558 0.0274 5.8750 1.8661 7.3427 2.9737 1.7479 4.3240 0.0000 2,629.353 4 2,629.353 4 0.6427 0.0000 2,642.850 3 Total 6.4663 29.7650 22.8558 0.0274 5.8750 1.8661 7.3427 2.9737 1.7479 4.3240 0.0000 2,629.353 4 2,629.353 4 0.6427 0.0000 2,642.850 3 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2015 6.4663 29.7650 22.8558 0.0274 5.8750 1.8661 7.3427 2.9737 1.7479 4.3240 0.0000 2,629.353 4 2,629.353 4 0.6427 0.0000 2,642.850 3 Total 6.4663 29.7650 22.8558 0.0274 5.8750 1.8661 7.3427 2.9737 1.7479 4.3240 0.0000 2,629.353 4 2,629.353 4 0.6427 0.0000 2,642.850 3 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 2:41 PMPage 3 of 24 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 1.5813 1.3000e- 004 0.0135 0.0000 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 0.0282 0.0282 8.0000e- 005 0.0299 Energy 0.0732 0.6657 0.5592 3.9900e- 003 0.0506 0.0506 0.0506 0.0506 798.8476 798.8476 0.0153 0.0147 803.7093 Mobile 3.4484 5.7862 32.6495 0.0544 4.2493 0.0727 4.3220 1.1358 0.0668 1.2026 4,731.183 9 4,731.183 9 0.2243 4,735.893 5 Total 5.1029 6.4520 33.2222 0.0584 4.2493 0.1233 4.3726 1.1358 0.1174 1.2532 5,530.059 7 5,530.059 7 0.2397 0.0147 5,539.632 7 Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 1.5813 1.3000e- 004 0.0135 0.0000 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 0.0282 0.0282 8.0000e- 005 0.0299 Energy 0.0673 0.6116 0.5138 3.6700e- 003 0.0465 0.0465 0.0465 0.0465 733.9321 733.9321 0.0141 0.0135 738.3987 Mobile 3.4484 5.7862 32.6495 0.0544 4.2493 0.0727 4.3220 1.1358 0.0668 1.2026 4,731.183 9 4,731.183 9 0.2243 4,735.893 5 Total 5.0970 6.3979 33.1768 0.0581 4.2493 0.1192 4.3685 1.1358 0.1133 1.2491 5,465.144 2 5,465.144 2 0.2384 0.0135 5,474.322 1 Mitigated Operational CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 2:41 PMPage 4 of 24 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 1/1/2015 1/28/2015 5 20 2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 1/29/2015 1/30/2015 5 2 3 Grading Grading 1/31/2015 2/5/2015 5 4 4 Building Construction Building Construction 2/6/2015 11/12/2015 5 200 5 Paving Paving 11/13/2015 11/26/2015 5 10 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 11/27/2015 12/10/2015 5 10 OffRoad Equipment ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.12 0.84 0.14 0.55 0.00 3.33 0.09 0.00 3.50 0.33 0.00 1.17 1.17 0.52 8.12 1.18 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 97,704; Non-Residential Outdoor: 32,568 (Architectural Coating – sqft) Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 1 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 1.5 Acres of Paving: 0 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 2:41 PMPage 5 of 24 Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 255 0.40 Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37 Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 174 0.41 Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 1 7.00 255 0.40 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Graders 1 6.00 174 0.41 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 6.00 255 0.40 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Cranes 1 6.00 226 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts 1 6.00 89 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 3 8.00 46 0.45 Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 6.00 9 0.56 Paving Pavers 1 6.00 125 0.42 Paving Paving Equipment 1 8.00 130 0.36 Paving Rollers 1 7.00 80 0.38 Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Trips and VMT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 2:41 PMPage 6 of 24 3.2 Demolition - 2015 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 3.0666 29.6778 22.0566 0.0245 1.8651 1.8651 1.7469 1.7469 2,509.059 9 2,509.059 9 0.6357 2,522.410 4 Total 3.0666 29.6778 22.0566 0.0245 1.8651 1.8651 1.7469 1.7469 2,509.059 9 2,509.059 9 0.6357 2,522.410 4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 5 13.00 0.00 0.00 12.40 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 3 8.00 0.00 0.00 12.40 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 3 8.00 0.00 0.00 12.40 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 7 27.00 11.00 0.00 12.40 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 5 13.00 0.00 0.00 12.40 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 5.00 0.00 0.00 12.40 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 2:41 PMPage 7 of 24 3.2 Demolition - 2015 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0560 0.0872 0.7992 1.3700e- 003 0.1226 1.0000e- 003 0.1236 0.0325 9.2000e- 004 0.0334 120.2935 120.2935 6.9700e- 003 120.4399 Total 0.0560 0.0872 0.7992 1.3700e- 003 0.1226 1.0000e- 003 0.1236 0.0325 9.2000e- 004 0.0334 120.2935 120.2935 6.9700e- 003 120.4399 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 3.0666 29.6778 22.0566 0.0245 1.8651 1.8651 1.7469 1.7469 0.0000 2,509.059 9 2,509.059 9 0.6357 2,522.410 4 Total 3.0666 29.6778 22.0566 0.0245 1.8651 1.8651 1.7469 1.7469 0.0000 2,509.059 9 2,509.059 9 0.6357 2,522.410 4 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 2:41 PMPage 8 of 24 3.2 Demolition - 2015 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0560 0.0872 0.7992 1.3700e- 003 0.1226 1.0000e- 003 0.1236 0.0325 9.2000e- 004 0.0334 120.2935 120.2935 6.9700e- 003 120.4399 Total 0.0560 0.0872 0.7992 1.3700e- 003 0.1226 1.0000e- 003 0.1236 0.0325 9.2000e- 004 0.0334 120.2935 120.2935 6.9700e- 003 120.4399 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.3 Site Preparation - 2015 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 5.7996 0.0000 5.7996 2.9537 0.0000 2.9537 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.5362 26.8886 17.0107 0.0171 1.4671 1.4671 1.3497 1.3497 1,801.744 0 1,801.744 0 0.5379 1,813.039 8 Total 2.5362 26.8886 17.0107 0.0171 5.7996 1.4671 7.2666 2.9537 1.3497 4.3034 1,801.744 0 1,801.744 0 0.5379 1,813.039 8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 2:41 PMPage 9 of 24 3.3 Site Preparation - 2015 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0345 0.0537 0.4918 8.4000e- 004 0.0754 6.2000e- 004 0.0761 0.0200 5.6000e- 004 0.0206 74.0268 74.0268 4.2900e- 003 74.1169 Total 0.0345 0.0537 0.4918 8.4000e- 004 0.0754 6.2000e- 004 0.0761 0.0200 5.6000e- 004 0.0206 74.0268 74.0268 4.2900e- 003 74.1169 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 5.7996 0.0000 5.7996 2.9537 0.0000 2.9537 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.5362 26.8886 17.0107 0.0171 1.4671 1.4671 1.3497 1.3497 0.0000 1,801.744 0 1,801.744 0 0.5379 1,813.039 8 Total 2.5362 26.8886 17.0107 0.0171 5.7996 1.4671 7.2666 2.9537 1.3497 4.3034 0.0000 1,801.744 0 1,801.744 0 0.5379 1,813.039 8 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 2:41 PMPage 10 of 24 3.3 Site Preparation - 2015 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0345 0.0537 0.4918 8.4000e- 004 0.0754 6.2000e- 004 0.0761 0.0200 5.6000e- 004 0.0206 74.0268 74.0268 4.2900e- 003 74.1169 Total 0.0345 0.0537 0.4918 8.4000e- 004 0.0754 6.2000e- 004 0.0761 0.0200 5.6000e- 004 0.0206 74.0268 74.0268 4.2900e- 003 74.1169 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Grading - 2015 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 4.9143 0.0000 4.9143 2.5256 0.0000 2.5256 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.0666 21.9443 14.0902 0.0141 1.1968 1.1968 1.1011 1.1011 1,479.800 0 1,479.800 0 0.4418 1,489.077 4 Total 2.0666 21.9443 14.0902 0.0141 4.9143 1.1968 6.1110 2.5256 1.1011 3.6267 1,479.800 0 1,479.800 0 0.4418 1,489.077 4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 2:41 PMPage 11 of 24 3.4 Grading - 2015 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0345 0.0537 0.4918 8.4000e- 004 0.0754 6.2000e- 004 0.0761 0.0200 5.6000e- 004 0.0206 74.0268 74.0268 4.2900e- 003 74.1169 Total 0.0345 0.0537 0.4918 8.4000e- 004 0.0754 6.2000e- 004 0.0761 0.0200 5.6000e- 004 0.0206 74.0268 74.0268 4.2900e- 003 74.1169 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 4.9143 0.0000 4.9143 2.5256 0.0000 2.5256 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.0666 21.9443 14.0902 0.0141 1.1968 1.1968 1.1011 1.1011 0.0000 1,479.800 0 1,479.800 0 0.4418 1,489.077 4 Total 2.0666 21.9443 14.0902 0.0141 4.9143 1.1968 6.1110 2.5256 1.1011 3.6267 0.0000 1,479.800 0 1,479.800 0 0.4418 1,489.077 4 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 2:41 PMPage 12 of 24 3.4 Grading - 2015 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0345 0.0537 0.4918 8.4000e- 004 0.0754 6.2000e- 004 0.0761 0.0200 5.6000e- 004 0.0206 74.0268 74.0268 4.2900e- 003 74.1169 Total 0.0345 0.0537 0.4918 8.4000e- 004 0.0754 6.2000e- 004 0.0761 0.0200 5.6000e- 004 0.0206 74.0268 74.0268 4.2900e- 003 74.1169 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2015 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 3.6000 21.5642 15.0041 0.0220 1.4851 1.4851 1.4344 1.4344 2,055.624 7 2,055.624 7 0.4741 2,065.581 2 Total 3.6000 21.5642 15.0041 0.0220 1.4851 1.4851 1.4344 1.4344 2,055.624 7 2,055.624 7 0.4741 2,065.581 2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 2:41 PMPage 13 of 24 3.5 Building Construction - 2015 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1769 1.2942 2.3778 2.5700e- 003 0.0728 0.0200 0.0927 0.0208 0.0184 0.0391 258.0155 258.0155 2.3400e- 003 258.0646 Worker 0.1163 0.1811 1.6598 2.8500e- 003 0.2546 2.0900e- 003 0.2567 0.0675 1.9100e- 003 0.0694 249.8404 249.8404 0.0145 250.1444 Total 0.2932 1.4753 4.0377 5.4200e- 003 0.3274 0.0221 0.3494 0.0883 0.0203 0.1086 507.8559 507.8559 0.0168 508.2090 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 3.6000 21.5642 15.0041 0.0220 1.4851 1.4851 1.4344 1.4344 0.0000 2,055.624 7 2,055.624 7 0.4741 2,065.581 2 Total 3.6000 21.5642 15.0041 0.0220 1.4851 1.4851 1.4344 1.4344 0.0000 2,055.624 7 2,055.624 7 0.4741 2,065.581 2 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 2:41 PMPage 14 of 24 3.5 Building Construction - 2015 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1769 1.2942 2.3778 2.5700e- 003 0.0728 0.0200 0.0927 0.0208 0.0184 0.0391 258.0155 258.0155 2.3400e- 003 258.0646 Worker 0.1163 0.1811 1.6598 2.8500e- 003 0.2546 2.0900e- 003 0.2567 0.0675 1.9100e- 003 0.0694 249.8404 249.8404 0.0145 250.1444 Total 0.2932 1.4753 4.0377 5.4200e- 003 0.3274 0.0221 0.3494 0.0883 0.0203 0.1086 507.8559 507.8559 0.0168 508.2090 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.6 Paving - 2015 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.4041 14.5959 9.1695 0.0133 0.8919 0.8919 0.8215 0.8215 1,382.470 3 1,382.470 3 0.4054 1,390.982 6 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.4041 14.5959 9.1695 0.0133 0.8919 0.8919 0.8215 0.8215 1,382.470 3 1,382.470 3 0.4054 1,390.982 6 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 2:41 PMPage 15 of 24 3.6 Paving - 2015 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0560 0.0872 0.7992 1.3700e- 003 0.1226 1.0000e- 003 0.1236 0.0325 9.2000e- 004 0.0334 120.2935 120.2935 6.9700e- 003 120.4399 Total 0.0560 0.0872 0.7992 1.3700e- 003 0.1226 1.0000e- 003 0.1236 0.0325 9.2000e- 004 0.0334 120.2935 120.2935 6.9700e- 003 120.4399 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.4041 14.5959 9.1695 0.0133 0.8919 0.8919 0.8215 0.8215 0.0000 1,382.470 3 1,382.470 3 0.4054 1,390.982 6 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.4041 14.5959 9.1695 0.0133 0.8919 0.8919 0.8215 0.8215 0.0000 1,382.470 3 1,382.470 3 0.4054 1,390.982 6 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 2:41 PMPage 16 of 24 3.6 Paving - 2015 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0560 0.0872 0.7992 1.3700e- 003 0.1226 1.0000e- 003 0.1236 0.0325 9.2000e- 004 0.0334 120.2935 120.2935 6.9700e- 003 120.4399 Total 0.0560 0.0872 0.7992 1.3700e- 003 0.1226 1.0000e- 003 0.1236 0.0325 9.2000e- 004 0.0334 120.2935 120.2935 6.9700e- 003 120.4399 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2015 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 6.0381 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.4066 2.5703 1.9018 2.9700e- 003 0.2209 0.2209 0.2209 0.2209 281.4481 281.4481 0.0367 282.2177 Total 6.4447 2.5703 1.9018 2.9700e- 003 0.2209 0.2209 0.2209 0.2209 281.4481 281.4481 0.0367 282.2177 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 2:41 PMPage 17 of 24 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2015 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0215 0.0335 0.3074 5.3000e- 004 0.0472 3.9000e- 004 0.0475 0.0125 3.5000e- 004 0.0129 46.2668 46.2668 2.6800e- 003 46.3230 Total 0.0215 0.0335 0.3074 5.3000e- 004 0.0472 3.9000e- 004 0.0475 0.0125 3.5000e- 004 0.0129 46.2668 46.2668 2.6800e- 003 46.3230 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 6.0381 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.4066 2.5703 1.9018 2.9700e- 003 0.2209 0.2209 0.2209 0.2209 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0367 282.2177 Total 6.4447 2.5703 1.9018 2.9700e- 003 0.2209 0.2209 0.2209 0.2209 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0367 282.2177 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 2:41 PMPage 18 of 24 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 3.4484 5.7862 32.6495 0.0544 4.2493 0.0727 4.3220 1.1358 0.0668 1.2026 4,731.183 9 4,731.183 9 0.2243 4,735.893 5 Unmitigated 3.4484 5.7862 32.6495 0.0544 4.2493 0.0727 4.3220 1.1358 0.0668 1.2026 4,731.183 9 4,731.183 9 0.2243 4,735.893 5 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2015 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0215 0.0335 0.3074 5.3000e- 004 0.0472 3.9000e- 004 0.0475 0.0125 3.5000e- 004 0.0129 46.2668 46.2668 2.6800e- 003 46.3230 Total 0.0215 0.0335 0.3074 5.3000e- 004 0.0472 3.9000e- 004 0.0475 0.0125 3.5000e- 004 0.0129 46.2668 46.2668 2.6800e- 003 46.3230 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 2:41 PMPage 19 of 24 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Hotel 1,053.93 1,056.51 767.55 1,925,365 1,925,365 Total 1,053.93 1,056.51 767.55 1,925,365 1,925,365 Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Hotel 9.50 7.30 7.30 19.40 61.60 19.00 58 38 4 5.0 Energy Detail 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Exceed Title 24 Install High Efficiency Lighting Kilowatt Hours of Renewable Electricity Generated Install Energy Efficient Appliances 4.4 Fleet Mix LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH 0.579021 0.062765 0.176333 0.114336 0.029695 0.004181 0.015593 0.003984 0.002598 0.003702 0.006580 0.000230 0.000982 Historical Energy Use: N CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 2:41 PMPage 20 of 24 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas Mitigated 0.0673 0.6116 0.5138 3.6700e- 003 0.0465 0.0465 0.0465 0.0465 733.9321 733.9321 0.0141 0.0135 738.3987 NaturalGas Unmitigated 0.0732 0.6657 0.5592 3.9900e- 003 0.0506 0.0506 0.0506 0.0506 798.8476 798.8476 0.0153 0.0147 803.7093 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Hotel 6790.2 0.0732 0.6657 0.5592 3.9900e- 003 0.0506 0.0506 0.0506 0.0506 798.8476 798.8476 0.0153 0.0147 803.7093 Total 0.0732 0.6657 0.5592 3.9900e- 003 0.0506 0.0506 0.0506 0.0506 798.8476 798.8476 0.0153 0.0147 803.7093 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 2:41 PMPage 21 of 24 Use Low VOC Paint - Residential Interior Use Low VOC Paint - Residential Exterior Use Low VOC Paint - Non-Residential Interior Use Low VOC Paint - Non-Residential Exterior Use only Natural Gas Hearths 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.0 Area Detail 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Hotel 6.23842 0.0673 0.6116 0.5138 3.6700e- 003 0.0465 0.0465 0.0465 0.0465 733.9321 733.9321 0.0141 0.0135 738.3987 Total 0.0673 0.6116 0.5138 3.6700e- 003 0.0465 0.0465 0.0465 0.0465 733.9321 733.9321 0.0141 0.0135 738.3987 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 2:41 PMPage 22 of 24 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 1.5813 1.3000e- 004 0.0135 0.0000 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 0.0282 0.0282 8.0000e- 005 0.0299 Unmitigated 1.5813 1.3000e- 004 0.0135 0.0000 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 0.0282 0.0282 8.0000e- 005 0.0299 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.1861 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 1.3939 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 1.3200e- 003 1.3000e- 004 0.0135 0.0000 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 0.0282 0.0282 8.0000e- 005 0.0299 Total 1.5813 1.3000e- 004 0.0135 0.0000 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 0.0282 0.0282 8.0000e- 005 0.0299 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 2:41 PMPage 23 of 24 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.0 Water Detail 8.0 Waste Detail 10.0 Vegetation 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.1861 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 1.3939 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 1.3200e- 003 1.3000e- 004 0.0135 0.0000 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 0.0282 0.0282 8.0000e- 005 0.0299 Total 1.5813 1.3000e- 004 0.0135 0.0000 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 0.0282 0.0282 8.0000e- 005 0.0299 Mitigated 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 4/23/2014 2:41 PMPage 24 of 24 Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites 127 West Harris Avenue South San Francisco, California Biological Resources Assessment for Allison Knapp Wollam Consulting prepared by Michael Marangio Biological Consultant 5446 Sutter Avenue Richmond, CA 94804 June 16, 2014 Introduction The purpose of this biological resource assessment is to review a site proposed for development in sufficient detail to determine if the proposed project (Project) may affect threatened, endangered, or other sensitive animal or plant species as well as important habitats such as wetlands. The Project location is at 127 West Harris Avenue in South San Francisco, California (see Figure 1). This biological assessment provides information that is intended for use in environmental documents under CEQA review and for Federal review of permits such as Army Corps of Engineers Nationwide Permits. Description of the Proposed Action The proposed Project would include a five-story hotel building, anticipated to be approximately 13,000 square feet in plan area surrounded by asphalt and concrete pavements (geotechnical report by Terracon, 2014). The Project site covers 1.47 acres. Because of the variable nature of the existing fill, which averages 9 feet, the geotechnical report recommends that the fill materials within the footprint of the proposed building be removed to a minimum depth of 3 feet below the lowest foundation bearing level or 5 feet below existing site grades (whichever is deeper) and the excavation be thoroughly cleaned prior to backfill placement and/or construction (Terracon, 2014). REGULATORY FRAMEWORK Local, State, and federal regulations have been enacted to provide for the protection and management of sensitive biological and wetland resources. The following section outlines the key local, State, and federal regulations that apply to these resources. FEDERAL The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) is responsible for protection of terrestrial and freshwater organisms through implementation of the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA) and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA). The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) has primary responsibility for protecting wetlands under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA). The Corps also regulates navigable waters under Section 10 (33 U.S.C. 403) of the Rivers and Harbors Act. STATE The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) is responsible for administration of the California Endangered Species Act (CESA), and for protection of streams and water bodies through the Streambed Alteration Agreement process under Section 1600 of the California Fish and Game Code. Certification from the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) is also required when a proposed activity may result in discharge into navigable waters, pursuant to Section 401 of the CWA and EPA Section 404(b)(1) Guidelines. The RWQCB also has jurisdiction over waters of the State not regulated by the Corps under the Porter-Cologne Act. The following discusses in more detail how State and federal regulations address special-status species, wetlands and other sensitive natural communities. SPECIAL-STATUS SPECIES Special-status species are plants and animals that are legally protected under the State and/or federal ESAs, the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, the California Fish and Game Code (sections 3503, 3503.5, 3511, 3513, 3515, and 4700), or other regulations.1 In addition, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15380, special-status species also include other species that are considered rare enough by the scientific community and trustee agencies to warrant special consideration, particularly with regard to protection of isolated populations, nesting or denning locations, communal roosts and other essential habitat. Species with legal protection under the federal and State ESAs often represent major constraints to development; particularly when they are wide ranging or highly sensitive to habitat disturbance and where proposed development would result in a take of these species. 1 Special-status species include: designated (rare, threatened, or endangered) and candidate species for listing by the CDFW; designated (threatened or endangered) and candidate species for listing by the USFWS and NOAA Fisheries; species considered to be rare or endangered under the conditions of Section 15380 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, such as those identified on lists 1A, 1B, and 2 in the California Native Plant Society (CNPS) Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants of California (2001); and possibly other species which are considered sensitive due to limited distribution or lack of adequate information to permit listing or rejection for state or federal status, such as those included on list 3 in the CNPS Inventory or identified as “California Species of Special Concern (SSC) by the CDFW. Species designated as a SSC have no legal protective status under the California Endangered Species Act but are of concern to the CDFW because of severe decline in breeding populations and other factors. WETLANDS AND OTHER WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES Although definitions vary to some degree, wetlands are generally considered to be areas that are periodically or permanently inundated by surface or ground water, and support vegetation adapted to life in saturated soil. Wetlands are recognized as important features on a regional and national level due to their high inherent value to fish and wildlife, use as storage areas for storm and flood waters, and water recharge, filtration and purification functions. The CDFW, Corps, and RWQCB have jurisdiction over modifications to river banks, lakes, stream channels and other wetland features. Technical standards for delineating wetlands have been developed by the Corps and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), which generally define wetlands through consideration of three criteria: hydrology, soils and vegetation. The CWA was enacted to address water pollution, establishing regulations and permit requirements regarding construction activities that affect storm water, dredge and fill material operations, and water quality standards. The regulatory program requires that discharges to surface waters be controlled under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit program which applies to sources of water runoff, private developments, and public facilities. Under Section 404 of the CWA, the Corps is responsible for regulating the discharge of fill material into waters of the United States. The term “waters” includes wetlands and non- wetland bodies of water that meet specific criteria as defined in the Code of Federal Regulations. All three of the identified technical criteria must be met for an area to be identified as a wetland under Corps jurisdiction, unless the area has been modified by human activity. In general, a permit must be obtained before fill can be placed in wetlands or other waters of the United States. The type of permit is determined by the Corps depending on the amount of acreage and the purpose of the proposed fill. Certain activities in wetlands or “other waters” are automatically authorized, or granted a nationwide permit which allows filling where impacts are considered minor. Eligibility for a nationwide permit simplifies the permit review process. Nationwide permits cover construction and fill of waters of the U.S. for a variety of routine activities such as minor road crossings, utility line crossings, streambank protection, recreational facilities and outfall structures. A project must demonstrate that it has no more than a minimal adverse effect on the aquatic ecosystem, including species listed under the ESA to qualify for a nationwide permit. Typically this means that there will be no net loss of either habitat acreage or habitat value, resulting in appropriate mitigation where fill activities are proposed. The Corps assumes discretionary approval over proposed projects where impacts are considered significant, requiring adequate mitigation and permit approval. To provide compliance with the Environmental Protection Agency's Section 404(b)(1) Guidelines, an applicant must demonstrate that the proposed discharge is unavoidable and is the least environmentally damaging practicable alternative that will achieve the overall project purpose. The 1990 Memorandum of Agreement between the EPA and Corps concerning the Determination of Mitigation under the Guidelines prioritizes mitigation, with the first priority to avoid impacts, the second to minimize impacts, and the third to provide compensatory mitigation for unavoidable impacts. Jurisdictional authority of the CDFW over wetland areas is established under Section 1600 of the Fish and Wildlife Code, which pertains to activities that would disrupt the natural flow or alter the channel, bed, or bank of any lake, river, or stream. The Fish and Wildlife Code stipulates that it is unlawful to substantially divert or obstruct the natural flow or substantially change the bed, channel or bank of any river, stream or lake without notifying the CDFW, incorporating necessary mitigation, and obtaining a Streambed Alteration Agreement. The Wetlands Resources Policy of the CDFW states that the Fish and Wildlife Commission will strongly discourage development in or conversion of wetlands, unless, at a minimum, project mitigation assures there will be no net loss of either wetland habitat values or acreage. The CDFW is also responsible for commenting on projects requiring Corps permits under the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act of 1958. In addition, the RWQCB is responsible for upholding state water quality standards. Pursuant to Section 401 of the CWA, projects that apply for a Corps permit for discharge of dredge or fill material, and projects that qualify for a Nationwide Permit must obtain water quality certification from the RWQCB. The RWQCB is also responsible for regulating wetlands under the Porter-Cologne Act, which may include hydrologically isolated wetlands no longer regulated by the Corps under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Recent federal Supreme Court rulings have limited the limits of Corps jurisdiction, but the RWQCB in some cases continues to exercise jurisdiction over these features. SENSITIVE NATURAL COMMUNITIES Protecting habitat on an ecosystem-level is increasingly recognized as vital to the protection of natural diversity in the State, in addition to species-oriented management. Protecting habitat on an ecosystem-level is considered the most effective means of providing long-term protection of ecologically viable habitat, and can include whole watersheds, ecosystems and sensitive natural communities. Providing functional habitat connectivity between natural areas is essential to sustaining healthy wildlife populations and allowing for the continued dispersal of native plant and animal species. Although sensitive natural communities have no protected legal status under the State or federal Endangered Species Acts, they are provided some level of protection under CEQA. The CEQA Guidelines identify potential impacts on a sensitive natural community as one of six significance criteria. As an example, a discretionary project that is constructed on any riparian habitat, native grassland, valley oak woodland, or other sensitive natural community would normally be considered to have a significant effect on the environment. Further loss of a sensitive natural community could be interpreted as substantially diminishing habitat, depending on its relative abundance, quality and degree of past disturbance, and the anticipated impacts to the specific community type. Where determined to be significant under CEQA, the potential impact would require mitigation through avoidance, minimization of disturbance or loss, or some type of compensatory mitigation when unavoidable. LOCAL REGULATIONS Several policies in the City of South San Francisco General Plan and the East of 101 Area Plan pertain to the protection of sensitive biological and wetland resources. Following is a description of the key policy documents and regulations that are applicable to the site. City of South San Francisco General Plan The Open Space and Conservation Element of the City of South San Francisco General Plan contains a number of policies related to protection of sensitive biological and wetland resources that are applicable to the site. The policies are: • 7.1-G-1: Protect special status species and supporting habitats within South San Francisco, including species that are State or federally listed as Endangered, Threatened, or Rare. • 7.1-G-2: Protect and, where reasonable and feasible, restore salt marshes and wetlands. • 7.1-I-2: As part of the Park, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Master Plan update, institute an ongoing program to remove invasive plant species from ecologically sensitive areas, including Sign Hill Park, Colma Creek Linear Park, Bayfront Linear Park, and other City-owned open space, as depicted in Figure 7-1. • 7.1-I-3: As part of development approvals on sites that include ecologically sensitive habitat designated in Figure 7-2, require institution of an on-going program to remove and prevent the re-establishment of the invasive species and restore the native species. • 7.1-I-4: Require development on the wetlands delineated in figure 7-1 to complete assessments of biological resources. • 7.1-I-5: Work with private, non-profit conservation, and public groups to secure funding for wetland and marsh protection and restoration projects. East of 101 Area Plan The East of 101 Area Plan was adopted by the City of South San Francisco in July 1994. The Area Plan includes a Conservation Element that contains policies intended to protect and enhance natural resources in the East of 101 Area. Policies relevant to the site are: • Policy CON-1: Prior to construction of development projects on sensitive resource lands the City shall require an applicant to conduct a formal wetlands delineation at the project site. The results of the wetlands delineation shall be made available to evaluate project specific impacts associated with sensitive habitats • Policy CON-2: The City shall require that developments comply with all applicable State and federal laws and regulations regarding protection and replacement of wetlands. • Policy CON-4: The City shall take all feasible measures to preserve any sensitive plant and animal species that occur in the East of 101 Area. • Policy CON-5: Prior to receiving approval for construction activities or other disturbances on undeveloped land in the East of 101 Area project sponsors shall conduct environmental analyses to evaluate the site-specific status of sensitive plant and animal species • Policy CON-6: If sensitive plant or animal species would be unavoidably affected by a proposed project the City shall require the project developer to implement appropriate mitigation measures • Policy Con-7: New development adjacent to sensitive resource areas shall be required to incorporate the following measures into project design: • Shield lights to reduce off-site glare. • A buffer area of at least 100 feet in width shall be provided between known sensitive resources and development area. Encroachments into the 100-foot buffer area may be allowed on a case-by-case basis as follows: o Buildings which have a water oriented theme and which further the goals of allowing or encouraging public access to the Bay or inland waterways; o Development located adjacent to inland waterways; o Accessory parking from adjacent development; o Development on the “fingers’ portion of the planning area. Any encroachment into the 100-foot buffer must receive approval of the City, Bay Conservation and Development Commission (BCDC) and the California Department of Fish and Game, and shall only be permitted if supported by a site-specific biological assessment prepared by a qualified biologist. Mitigation measures identified through the biological analysis shall be attached as conditions of any encroachment approvals. • Landscape all on-site buffer areas with native vegetation to screen habitat areas from adjacent land uses. • Restrict entry to habitat areas through devises such as fencing landscaping or signage. • Ensure that run-off from development does not adversely affect the biotic values of adjacent wetlands or other habitat areas. Municipal Code South San Francisco Municipal Code Section 13.30.020 defines a “Protected Tree” as one with a circumference of 48” or more when measured 54” above natural grade; a tree or stand of trees designated by the Director of Parks and Recreation as one of uniqueness, importance to the public due to its location or unusual appearance, historical significance or other factor; or a stand of trees that the Director of Parks and Recreation has determined each tree is dependent on the others for survival. Special Status Species On the basis of a review of the California Natural Diversity Data Base report from the California Department of Fish and Game for the project area (CNDDB, 2014; CNPS, Rare Plant Program, 2014) and general knowledge of special status species of plants and animals in the San Francisco Bay area, a list was developed of the potential special status plants and animals known from the vicinity of the Project (Appendix Table A). All listed potential animal species such as fishes requiring permanent aquatic habitats were eliminated from further impact analysis since suitable aquatic habitat is not present on the project site. Plants and animals requiring marshlands were also eliminated from further analysis because such habitats are not present on the Project site. Additionally, special status plant species that are large shrubs or trees were also eliminated from further analysis since the site contains only low-growing herbaceous species. Field Survey A field survey was conducted on May 27, 2014. Site location and features were reviewed using local street maps, USGS 7.5 minute quad sheets (San Francisco South), and Google Earth maps. The Project site is situated adjacent to a hotel. Much of the nearby built environment consists of multi-family and industrial and commercial/warehouse establishments with associated parking lots and connecting roadways and driveways. Approximately 250 ft to the south of the Project is the Colma Creek channel. The width of the tidal channel in this vicinity is about 50-60 feet, depending on rainfall and tides. The channel margins are vegetated with pickleweed and sea-blite (Suaeda fruticosa), indicating presence of brackish water. The upper elevations of the stream banks support native gumplant (Grindelia sp.) and many introduced weeds. A three to four-foot flood wall runs east-west along Mitchell Avenue, limiting potential movement of many terrestrial animal species to and from stream channel habitat. The Project site is generally flat except for several mounds of soil 2-3 feet high. The site is vegetated mainly with introduced grasses and weeds (Photo 1), and would be designated as a mixture of Non-Native Annual Grassland and Ruderal (disturbed) habitats. Plants that were observed include non-native annual grasses such as wild-oat (Avena barbata) ), Mediteranean barley (Hordeum marinum ssp. gussoneanum), pampas grass (Cortaderia jubata), annual fescue (Vulpia myuros), and ripgut brome (Bromus carinatus). Many additional introduced weeds and "escaped exotics" (garden horticultural plants) included English plantain (Plantago lanceolata), sea plantain (Plantago maritima), ice plant (Carpobrotus chilensis), fennel (Foeniculum vulgare), poison hemlock (Conium maculatum), cheeseweed (Malva sp.), Capeweed (Arctotheca calendula), Salsify (Tragopogon porrifolius), cotoneaster (Cotoneaster sp.), vetch (Vicia sp.), Italian thistle (Carduus pycnocephalus), Aeonium (Aeonium sp.), clover (Trifolium sp.), prickly lettuce (Lactuca serriola), redstem storksbill (Erodium cicutarium), deerweed (Acmiston glaber), pearly everlasting (Anaphalis margaritacea), field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis), and dock (Rumex sp.). Native plant species included Coyote Brush (Baccharis pilularis var. consanguinea), and California poppy (Eschscholtzia californica). Very little wildlife was seen on the Project site. Burrows of Botta pocket gopher (Thomomys bottae) were seen scattered sparsely over the site. Several house finches (Carpodacus mexicanus) were seen foraging on the ground, and a Turkey Vulture (Cathartes aura) and an American crow (Corvus brachyrhynchos) were seen flying over nearby adjacent properties. Scat of Canada Goose (Branta canadensis) were seen scattered within the Project site. (The list of plants and animals is not intended to be an exhaustive census of the plants and animals at the Project site.) No ponded surface water or channels were observed on the Project site nor was there any evidence for the pooling of water over the winter rainy season. An area at the southeast corner of this fenced site has been paved with several inches of gravel. Portions of the site contained mounds of soil or rock, likely the remains of geotechnical test pits and test borings, or undocumented dumping of soil. According to a geotechnical report (Terracon, 2014), the site is covered with 9 feet of undocumented fill materials comprised of clayey sand with gravel, cobbles, and boulders, approximately 12 to 42 inches in dimension. These materials were underlain by organic clays and silts to depths of approximately 20 to 25 feet below existing site grades...". Biological Impact Assessment Plants The Project site is highly disturbed. The site may have been marsh land in the past, but that habitat is now under at least 9 feet of soil and rock. Historic aerials going back to 1993 (Google, 2014 and Terracon, 2014) indicate conversion of the marshland to have occurred before that time. The plants that dominate the site consist mainly of introduced invasive annual plants, probably brought to the site in the soil that was dumped there or from nearby disturbed sites. A reconnaissance survey was conducted on May 28, 2014. No special status species of plants were observed and would not be expected because of the disturbed nature of the site. No sensitive plant species would be affected by the proposed project. Animals Observation of animals on the site was limited to several common birds including American Crow, Canada Goose, and House finch, all known to be adaptable to urban conditions. The dominance of introduced non-native annual plants limits the value of the habitat to only "generalist" species that can tolerate disturbed conditions and utilize common food sources. The Project site would be highly unlikely to support any special status as a result of the small size of the parcel (1.47acre), the soil disturbance, and the dominance of non-native annual plant species. Special species are generally "specialist" species that require certain plants for cover and food that are not present on the site. Birds would not be likely to nest at the site since important habitat requirements such as sources of water on the site do not exist, nor does nesting cover in the form of trees and shrubs. To provide a more thorough analysis, several wildlife species known within 1-2 mile of the Project or which are deemed to be potentially present in the Project vicinity are further discussed below. Burrowing Owl Burrowing owl (Athene cuniculata) is a State Species of Special Concern but has no protection under Federal laws except as a migratory bird. Burrowing owl is not known to be located in the general vicinity of the Project site. However, since they are often found in isolated and disturbed areas, this species was evaluated for potential habitat use of the Project site. Burrowing owls are usually associated with open, dry, perennial or annual grasslands and typically utilize burrows of other animals such as ground squirrels. This species is distributed over much of the state, but because of loss of habitat, its numbers are becoming much reduced. During the site reconnaissance, burrows were searched for that could be utilized by Burrowing owls. No sites were found. Most of the site contains grass and ruderal plants over 1.5 ft tall which are not preferred by this species. The site is therefore of very low value for Burrowing owls and would therefore not likely to ever use the site for roosting or nesting. There would be no impact to Burrowing owl as a result of Project construction or operation. California Clapper Rail The California clapper rail (Rallus longirostris obsoletus) is listed as both Federal and State Endangered. This species is found foraging in tidal marsh vegetation along brackish creeks, mudflats, and coastal areas. Suitable habitats are generally dominated by pickleweed and cordgrass. The nearest documented occurrence of the California clapper rail is located along the edge of San Francisco Bay and along the margins of Colma Creek where it flows into the Bay, which comes within 0.3 mi of the Project site. No suitable habitat is located on the Project site therefore clapper rails would not be expected to be present on the site. No significant impacts to this species would result from Project construction or operation. California red-legged frog The California red-legged frog (Rana draytonii) (CRLF) is listed by the USFWS as Threatened and is classified by the CDFW as a Species of Special Concern. The CRLF breeds primarily in ponds, but will also breed in slow moving streams, or deep pools in intermittent streams and is seldom found in brackish waters. Inhabited ponds are typically permanent, at least 2 feet (0.6 meters) in depth, and contain emergent and shoreline vegetation. Sufficient pond depth and shoreline cover are both critical, because they provide means of escape from predators for the frogs. CNDDB (2014) documents the presence of this protected species about 1.5 miles south. Since no aquatic habitat is present on the Project site, nor is any suitable aquatic habitat nearby, the site would not provide suitable aquatic or upland habitat for the frog. There would be no impacts to the CRLF as a result result from the proposed Project construction or operation. The San Francisco forktail damselfly The San Francisco forktail damselfly, (Ishnura gemina), has no protection under Federal or State statutes but is very localized in urban areas. Several small populations have gone extinct since their discovery. A documented location (CNDDB 2014) indicates its presence 1.5 mi south of the Project site. Historically some populations have been extirpated due to urbanization and some habitat has naturally converted from small shallow ponds to dry pond beds. The species is associated with marshy aquatic habitat, none of which is present at the Project site. Therefore the Project would not have any significant impact on this species. Regulatory Framework - Impacts Federal and State Special Status Species and Sensitive Habitats The disturbed nature of the site that was caused by the placement of 9 feet of fill soils, and the spread of invasive weed species to the site from outside and adjacent sources has resulted in the destruction of the original native vegetation, which probably consisted of tidal wetlands on saturated soils. The present vegetation has displaced the wetlands to non-native grassland and ruderal vegetation. The change in soil, hydrology, and spread of invasive weedy species that are competitive with native plants greatly reduces the potential for the presence of federal and state protected plants. The lack of native vegetative cover also greatly reduces the potential for the presence of federal and state protected animal life. In addition, the existing vegetation does not include any sensitive habitats. Federal and State Wetlands The project site is vegetated with a mixture of herbaceous plant species that are predominantly introduced, non-native annual grasses and forbs. Generally speaking, wetlands are legally defined as areas that are suitable for retention or flow of water, have soils that indicate the presence of water, and have plants that mostly require the presence of water. A formal protocol for wetland analysis was not done as part of this investigation. However, general observations revealed that the ground surface of the Project site was disturbed but no suitable basins or other depressions were noted where water would likely pool during the winter rainy season. Soils appeared in most places to be fill from outside the site consisting mainly of subsoils, as indicated by their light color. Geotechnical studies (Terracon, 2014) indicate that approximately 9 feet of fill soils have been used to cover an area that was probably marshland before the construction of buildings and roads in this vicinity. In addition, no distinct vegetation that was dominated by water-loving plants was observed. No indication for the presence of federal or state-protected wetlands were observed. Jurisdictional authority of the CDFW over wetland areas, established under Section 1600 of the Fish and Wildlife Code does not apply for this site. Further wetland analysis regarding jurisdictional evaluation is not required. Local The Open Space and Conservation Element of the City of South San Francisco General Plan contains a number of policies related to protection of sensitive biological and wetland resources that are applicable to the site. All of these policies would be followed. Policy CON-5 of the East of 101 Area Plan states: "Prior to receiving approval for construction activities or other disturbances on undeveloped land in the East of 101Area project sponsors shall conduct environmental analyses to evaluate the site-specific status of sensitive plant and animal species." The preparation of this report is consistent with this policy. The other policies of the plan would also be followed. Municipal Code Since there are no trees on the site, South San Francisco Municipal Code Section 13.30.020 covering "Protected Trees" will not need to be considered. WILDLIFE MOVEMENT CORRIDORS Wildlife movements include migration (i.e., usually one way per season), inter-population movement (i.e., long-term genetic flow) and small travel pathways (i.e., daily movement within an animal’s territory). While small travel pathways usually facilitate movement for daily home range activities, such as foraging or escape from predators, they also provide connection between outlying populations and the main corridor, permitting an increase in gene flow among populations. These linkages among habitat types can extend for miles from primary habitat areas and occur on a large scale throughout California. Habitat linkages facilitate movement between populations located in small discrete areas and populations located within larger habitat areas. The mosaic of habitats found within a large-scale landscape results in wildlife populations that consist of discrete sub-populations comprising a large single population, which is often referred to as a meta-population. Even where patches of pristine habitat are fragmented, the movement between wildlife populations is facilitated through habitat linkages, migration corridors and movement corridors. Potentially low frequency genetic flow may lead to complete isolation and, if pressures are strong, potential extinction. The proposed Project would result in the construction of a hotel on a 1.47acre site surrounded with roadways, parking lots, and industrial and warehouse buildings. Although aquatic habitat and marsh vegetation is located within about 250 feet of the Project, other than for flying birds, there is functionally no connection between the non-native annual grassland/ruderal habitat on the Project site with the habitat associated with the Colma Creek channel. The presence of a 3-4 ft high flood wall between the creek and the Project site also inhibits movement of any wildlife that would attempt to utilize both sites except for an occasional raccoon or striped skunk, common animal species that would not be affected by construction of the project. Therefore the project would have no significant impact on biological resources with regard to movement corridors. Summary and Conclusions To ascertain impacts to sensitive biological resources, a site assessment was made to evaluate their potential presence at a proposed development site at 127 W Harris Avenue in South San Francisco. After review of CNDDB reports and map overlays for the general project area, and field evaluations of the site, the habitat was found to be highly disturbed and isolated from other areas containing sensitive habitat. As a result, the site is considered to be of very low value for plants and wildlife in general, and as well for sensitive species of plants and animals. No significant biological impacts would result from full development of the Project site. Literature Cited California Native Plant Society, 2001. Inventory of rare and endangered plants of California (sixth edition). CNPS. Sacramento. x + 388pp. CNPS, Rare Plant Program. 2014. Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants (online edition, v8-02). California Native Plant Society, Sacramento, CA. Website http://www.rareplants.cnps.org [accessed 31 May 2014 CNDDB, 2014. CDFG. California Natural Diversity Data Base overlay for San Francisco South 7.5 minute quadrangle. Terracon, 2014. Geotechnical Engineering Report, Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites 127 West Harris Avenue South San Francisco, California Terracon Project No. 60145004 Prepared by: Terracon Consultants, Inc. Irvine, California Figure 1. Project location map APPENDIX A List of special status species of plants and animals known from the Project vicinity. Plants Acanthomintha duttonii San Mateo thorn-mint Allium peninsulare var. franciscanum Franciscan onion Amsinckia lunaris bent-flowered fiddleneck Arenaria paludicola marsh sandwort Astragalus pycnostachyus var. pycnostachyus coastal marsh milk-vetch Astragalus tener var. tener alkali milk-vetch California macrophylla round-leaved macrophylla Carex comosa bristly sedge Centromadia parryi ssp. parryi pappose tarplant Chloropyron maritimum ssp. palustre Point Reyes bird's beak Chorizanthe cuspidata var. cuspidata San Francisco Bay spineflower Chorizanthe robusta var. robusta Robust spineflower Chorizanthe valida Sonoma spineflower Cirsium andrewsi Franciscan thistle Cirsiun fontinale var. fontinale Crystal Springs fountain thistle Cirsium occidentale var. compactum compact cobwebby thistle Clarkia franciscana Presidio clarkia Collinsia corymbosa round-headed Chinese-houses Collinsia multicolor San FranciscoCollinsia Eriophyllum latilobum San Mateo woolly sunflower Fritillaria biflora var ineziana Hillsborough chocolate lily Fritillaria lanceolata var. tristulis Marin checker lily Fritillaria liliacea fragrant fritillary Gilia capitata ssp. chamissonis blue coast gilia Gilia millefoliata dark-eyed gilia Grindelia hirsutula var. maritima San Francisco gumplant Hemizonia congesta ssp. congesta white seaside tarplant Hesperevax sparsiflora var. brevifolia short leaved evax Hesperolinon gongestum Marin western flax Heteranthera dubia water star-grass Holocarpha macradenia Santa Cruz tarplant Horkelia cuneata var. sericea Kellogg's horkelia Horkelia marinensis Point Reyes horkelia Layia carnosa beach layia Leptosiphon croceus coast yellow leptosiphon Leptosiphon rosaceus rose leptosiphon Lessingia arachnoidea Crystal SpringsLessingia Lessingia germanorum San Francisco lessingia Lilium maritimum coast lily Limnanthes douglassii var ornduffii Ornduff's meadow foam Microseris paludosa marsh microseris Monardella sinuata var. nigrescens northern curly-leaved monardella Monolopia gracilens woodland woollythreads Pentachaeta bellidifera white-rayed pentachaeta Plagiobothrys chorisianus var. chorisianus Choris' popcornflower Plagiobothrys diffusus San Francisco popcorn flower Polemonium carneum Oregon polemonium Potentilla hickmanii Hickman's cinqufoil Sanicula maritima adobe sanicle Silene verecunda ssp. verecunda San Francisco campion Stebbinsoseris decipiens Santa Cruz microseris Sueda californica California seablite Triquetrella california coastal triquetrella Trifolium amoenum two-fork clover Trifolium hydrophilum saline clover Tryphysaria floribunda San Francisco owl's clover Animals Adela oplerella Opler's longhorn moth Athene cunicularia Burrowing Owl Banksula incredula incredible harvestman Caecidotea tomalensis Tomales isopod Callophrys mossii bayensis San Bruno elfin butterfly Cicindela hirticollis gravida sandy beach tiger beetle Dufourea stagei Stage's dufourine bee Emys marmorata Western pond turtle Eucyclobius newberryi tidewater goby Euphydryas editha bayensis Bay checkerspot butterfly Geothlypis trichas sinuosa Saltmarsh common yellowthroat Hydroporus leechi Leech's skyline diving beetle Ischnura gemina San Francisco forktail damselfly Lasiurus cinereus hoary bat Laterallus jamaicensis coturniculus California black rail Lichnanthe ursina bumblebee scarab beetle Melospiza melodia pusillula Alameda song sparrow Phalacrocorax auritus double crested cormorant Plebejus icarioides missionensis Mission blue butterfly Rallus longirostris obsoletus California clapper rail Rana draytonii California red-legged frog Riparia riparia bank swallow Speyeria callippe callippe Callipe silverspot butterfly Thamnophis sirtalis tetrataenia San Francisco garter snake Trachusa gummifera San Francisco leaf-cutter bee Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites 127 West Harris Avenue South San Francisco, California April 15, 2014 Terracon Project No. 60145004 Prepared for: Kuber Development Company Tempe, Arizona Prepared by: Terracon Consultants, Inc. Irvine, California Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites ■ South San Francisco, California April 15, 2014 ■ Terracon Project No. 60145004 Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................... i 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 1 2.0 PROJECT INFORMATION ............................................................................................... 1 2.1 Project Description ................................................................................................ 1 2.2 Site Location and Description ................................................................................ 2 2.3 Background ........................................................................................................... 2 3.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS .......................................................................................... 2 3.1 Site Geology .......................................................................................................... 2 3.2 Typical Subsurface Profile ..................................................................................... 3 3.3 Groundwater .......................................................................................................... 3 3.4 Faulting and Estimated Ground Motions ............................................................... 4 3.5 Liquefaction Potential ............................................................................................ 4 3.6 Seismic Considerations ......................................................................................... 5 3.7 Corrosion Potential ................................................................................................ 6 3.8 Percolation Test Results ....................................................................................... 6 4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION ....................................... 7 4.1 Geotechnical Considerations................................................................................. 7 4.2 Earthwork .............................................................................................................. 8 4.2.1 Site Preparation ......................................................................................... 8 4.2.2 Subgrade Preparation ................................................................................ 9 4.2.3 Fill Materials and Placement ...................................................................... 9 4.2.4 Compaction Requirements ...................................................................... 10 4.2.5 Grading and Drainage ............................................................................. 10 4.2.6 Exterior Slab Design and Construction .................................................... 11 4.2.7 Utility Trenches ........................................................................................ 11 4.2.8 Construction Considerations .................................................................... 11 4.3 Foundations ......................................................................................................... 12 4.3.1 Mat Foundation Design Parameters ........................................................ 12 4.3.2 Spread Footing Design Parameters......................................................... 13 4.3.3 Foundation Design Considerations .......................................................... 14 4.4 Lateral Earth Pressures ....................................................................................... 14 4.5 Pavements .......................................................................................................... 15 4.5.1 Design Recommendations ....................................................................... 15 4.5.2 Construction Considerations .................................................................... 16 5.0 GENERAL COMMENTS ................................................................................................. 16 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites ■ South San Francisco, California April 15, 2014 ■ Terracon Project No. 60145004 Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) APPENDIX A – FIELD EXPLORATION Exhibit A-1 Site Location Plan Exhibit A-2 Boring Location Diagram Exhibit A-3 Field Exploration Description Exhibits A-4 thru A-7 Boring Logs Exhibits A-8 thru A-11 Test Pit Logs Exhibits A-12 thru A-14 CPT Sounding Data APPENDIX B – LABORATORY TESTING Exhibit B-1 Laboratory Test Description Exhibit B-2 Atterberg Limits Test Results Exhibit B-3 Grain Size Distribution Exhibit B-4 and B-5 Swell/Consolidation Test Results Exhibit B-6 Results of Corrosivity Analysis APPENDIX C – SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS Exhibit C-1 General Notes Exhibit C-2 Unified Soil Classification APPENDIX D – LIQUEFACTION ANALYSIS Exhibit D-1 Liquefaction Analysis Summary and Chart (B-1) Exhibit D-2 Liquefaction Analysis Summary and Chart (B-2) Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites ■ South San Francisco, California April 15, 2014 ■ Terracon Project No. 60145004 Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A geotechnical exploration has been performed for the proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites to be located at 127 West Harris Avenue in South San Francisco, California. Terracon’s geotechnical scope of work included the excavation of four (4) test pits, advancement of two (2) test borings and two (2) Cone Penetrometer Test (CPT) soundings to approximate depths ranging between 23 to 50 feet below existing site grades (bgs). Additionally, two (2) percolation test borings were performed to an approximate depth of 5 feet bgs. Based on the information obtained from our subsurface exploration, the site is considered suitable for development of the proposed project provided the geotechnical engineering recommendations contained in this report are implemented in the design and construction of the project. The following geotechnical considerations were identified: The on-site soils generally consisted of approximately 9 feet of undocumented fill materials comprised of clayey sand with gravel, cobbles, and boulders, approximately 12 to 42 inches in dimension. These materials were underlain by organic clays and silts to depths of approximately 20 to 25 feet below existing site grades (bgs). Sandy materials with varying amounts of silt and clay were encountered below the organic clays and silts to the boring termination depth of approximately 50 feet bgs. We assume that the fill materials encountered in the test pits and borings were placed during the development of the surrounding areas. Terracon does not have any documentation to show if the fill placement or grading operations were inspected and if fill compaction was tested. The hotel building may be supported on a mat foundation with a minimum embedment of 2 feet below final grade and supported on a minimum of 3 feet of engineered fill. Onsite fill materials may be used as engineered fill provided the oversized particles (>3 inches) are removed and the materials meet the requirements set forth in this report. Construction of floor slabs directly on engineered fill consisting of approved materials is considered acceptable for the project. Recommended minimum pavement section thicknesses are as follows: Automobile parking areas – 3” AC over 4” AB or 5” PCC over 4” AB compacted materials On-site driveways – 3” AC over 6” AB or 6” PCC over 4” AB compacted materials. The 2013 California Building Code (CBC) seismic site classification for this site is F. Earthwork on the project should be observed and evaluated by Terracon. The evaluation of earthwork should include observation and testing of engineered fill, subgrade preparation, foundation bearing soils, and other geotechnical conditions exposed during construction. Additionally, during over-excavation of the building foundations, Terracon recommends an engineer or representative of the engineer be present to observe the Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites ■ South San Francisco, California April 15, 2014 ■ Terracon Project No. 60145004 Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable i excavated materials and the bottom of excavation to confirm the homogeneity and suitability of the fill materials across the site, assumed in this report. This geotechnical executive summary should be used in conjunction with the entire report for design and/or construction purposes. It should be recognized that specific details were not included or fully developed in this section, and the report must be read in its entirety for a comprehensive understanding of the items contained herein. The section titled General Comments should be read for an understanding of the report limitations. Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 1 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT PROPOSED FAIRFIELD INN & SUITES 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA Terracon Project No. 60145004 April 15, 2014 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of our geotechnical engineering services performed for the proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites to be located at 127 West Harris Avenue in South San Francisco, California. The Site Location Plan (Exhibit A-1) is included in Appendix A of this report. The purpose of these services is to provide information and geotechnical engineering recommendations relative to: subsurface soil conditions groundwater conditions earthwork foundation design and construction seismic considerations pavement design and construction Our geotechnical engineering scope of work for this project included the advancement of four (4) test pits, two (2) borings and three (3) Cone Penetrometer Test (CPT) soundings to depths of approximately 23 to 50 feet below existing site grades. Additionally, two borings drilled to 5 feet bgs were used to perform percolation testing. Logs of the borings along with a Boring Location Diagram (Exhibit A-2) are included in Appendix A of this report. The results of the laboratory testing performed on soil samples obtained from the site during the field exploration are included in Appendix B of this report. Descriptions of the field exploration and laboratory testing are included in their respective appendices. 2.0 PROJECT INFORMATION 2.1 Project Description ITEM DESCRIPTION Site layout Refer to the Site Location Plan (Exhibit A-1) Structures The project will include a five-story hotel building. The building is anticipated to be approximately 13,000 square feet in plan area and will be surrounded by asphalt concrete and portland cement concrete pavements. The building is assumed to be of steel frame construction. Finished floor elevation We assume the majority of the hotel building will be within one foot of existing grades. Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites ■ South San Francisco, California April 15, 2014 ■ Terracon Project No. 60145004 Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 2 ITEM DESCRIPTION Maximum loads Provided maximum loads are as follows: Structure Columns: 100 kips Building Walls: 2 klf Floor Loads: 150 psf max Grading Grading will include over-excavation and backfill to bring the site to grade. Traffic loading Assumed Design Traffic Index (TI’s): Automobile Parking Areas………………………..………..4.5 Automobile Driving Lanes.………………….…….…….....5.5 2.2 Site Location and Description Item Description Location This project is located at 127 West Harris Avenue in South San Francisco, San Mateo County, California. Existing Improvements The project site is currently undeveloped. Surrounding improvements appear to consist of multi-family and commercial/warehouse buildings. Current ground cover Exposed soils and grassy vegetation. Existing topography Relatively level project site with the exception of 2 to 3 foot high soil piles on the western portion of the site. 2.3 Background The majority of the site is currently graded to a relatively level configuration with the exception of a cluster of soil piles located in the western half of the site. Aerial photographs indicate that the site has remained undeveloped for at least 10 years prior to our site exploration. The site is currently underlain with approximately 9 feet of undocumented fill. Terracon does not have any documentation indication if any grading operations were monitored, and if the backfill activities were controlled, inspected, or tested. If such documentation exists, Terracon should be notified and the recommendations in this report may be appropriately modified. 3.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 3.1 Site Geology The project area is situated within the Coast Range geomorphic province of California. The materials underlying the site are considered to be artificial fill overlying tidal flat deposits as Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites ■ South San Francisco, California April 15, 2014 ■ Terracon Project No. 60145004 Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 3 described on the “Preliminary Geologic Map of the San Francisco South 7.5’ quadrangle, San Francisco Bay area, California,” (Bonilla, 1998; scale: 1:24,000) by the United States Geological Survey (USGS). According to the USGS map, the surficial deposits are Quaternary in age (duration about 2.6 million years ago to present) and consist of “clay, silt, sand, rock fragments, organic matter, and man-made debris, placed over tidal flats.” The total thickness of the tidal sediments at this location was determined to be between 10 and 15 feet under which older alluvial deposits were encountered. 3.2 Typical Subsurface Profile During our initial field exploration at the site; multiple borings encountered refusal approximately 2 to 5 feet below existing site grades in a layer of fill containing boulders and cobbles. During our second trip to the site, a large excavator was used to excavate test pits through this layer of fill and expose the organic clay layer underneath. The test pits were then backfilled with on-site materials excluding the cobbles and boulders. During our third trip to the site, two borings and three CPT soundings were performed in the areas previously explored by test pits in order to obtain subsurface data and samples of the underlying materials. The following paragraphs describe the subsurface profile of the site based on the information obtained from all of our exploration methods. Specific conditions encountered at the test locations are indicated on the individual logs. Stratification boundaries on the boring logs represent the approximate location of changes in soil types; in-situ, the transition between materials may be gradual. Details for the borings, test pits, and CPT soundings can be found on the logs included in Appendix A. Based on the results of the borings, subsurface conditions on the project site can be generalized as follows: Description Approximate Depth to Bottom of Stratum Material Encountered Consistency/Density Stratum 1 9 feet Fill: Clayey Sand with gravel, cobbles, and boulders -- Stratum 2 20½ to 25 feet Organic Clay Very Soft to Soft Stratum 3 51½ feet Sand with variable amounts of silt and clay Loose to Very Dense Laboratory tests were conducted on selected soil samples and the test results are presented in Appendix B. Laboratory test results indicate that the organic clay material has high plasticity characteristics. 3.3 Groundwater Groundwater measurements were taken both during exploration (at first observation) and again after explorations were completed. During test pit excavations, groundwater was observed in all test pits at depths ranging between 8 and 9 feet bgs. During drilling, initial groundwater levels were Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites ■ South San Francisco, California April 15, 2014 ■ Terracon Project No. 60145004 Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 4 noted after sampling at a depth of 10 feet bgs. Details for groundwater levels in each of the borings can be found on the boring logs in Appendix A of this report. Groundwater level fluctuations occur due to seasonal variations in the amount of rainfall, runoff, tides, and other factors not evident at the time the borings were performed. Therefore, groundwater levels during construction or at other times in the life of the structure may be higher or lower than the levels indicated on the boring logs. The possibility of groundwater level fluctuations should be considered when developing the design and construction plans for the project. 3.4 Faulting and Estimated Ground Motions The site is located in the San Francisco Peninsula, which is a seismically active area. The intensity of ground shaking at the site is largely dependent on the distance to causative faults, and the magnitude of the seismic event. The distance to nearby fault zones, having the greatest contribution during a seismic event, was calculated using the USGS Earthquake Hazard Program 2002 interactive deaggregations. The San Andreas fault – Santa Cruz & Peninsula, which is located approximately 4.2 kilometers from the project site is considered to have the most significant effect at the site from a design standpoint. Based on the USGS Design Maps Summary Report, using the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE 7-10) standard, the peak ground acceleration at the project site is expected to be about 0.795 g with a Modal magnitude of 7.88. The site is not located within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone based on our review of the State Fault Hazard Maps.1 Therefore, the risk of fault rupture at the site is considered low. 3.5 Liquefaction Potential Liquefaction is a mode of ground failure that results from the generation of high pore water pressures during earthquake ground shaking, causing loss of shear strength. Liquefaction is typically a hazard where loose sandy soils exist below groundwater. The CGS has designated certain areas within northern California as potential liquefaction hazard zones. These are areas considered at a risk of liquefaction-related ground failure during a seismic event, based upon mapped surficial deposits and the presence of a relatively shallow water table. The project site is not located within a mapped potential liquefaction hazard zone as designated by the CGS. Materials encountered at the project site generally consisted of granular fill material overlying cohesive and granular soils. Groundwater was encountered in test boring B-1 at an approximate depth of 8 feet bgs at the time of field exploration. 1. California Department of Conservation Division of Mines and Geology (CDMG), “Digital Images of Official Maps of Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zones of California”, CDMG Compact Disc 2000-003, 2000. Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites ■ South San Francisco, California April 15, 2014 ■ Terracon Project No. 60145004 Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 5 Liquefaction analyses for the site was performed in general accordance with the DMG Special Publication 117. The liquefaction study utilized the software “LiquefyPro” by CivilTech Software. This analysis was based on the soils data from the soil borings. Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) of 0.795g was used. Calculations utilized the encountered groundwater depths. Settlement analysis used the Tokimatsu, M-correction method. Fines were corrected for liquefaction using the modified Stark/Olsen et al method. Two liquefaction potential analyses were calculated from a depth of 0 to 50 feet below the ground surface. The sites were represented by B-1 and B-2. Liquefaction potential analysis is attached in Appendix D of this report. The factor of safety for soils extending from the surface to a depth of 50 feet bgs was greater than 1.2 with the exception of multiple zones between depths of 20 to 50 feet bgs. Based on our analyses and test results we have concluded that there is a potential for liquefaction hazard at the site. Based on the calculation results, total seismically-induced settlement is estimated to be between ¾ to 2¼ inches and differential settlement is estimated to be between ½ inch and 1½ inches. 3.6 Seismic Considerations DESCRIPTION VALUE 2013 California Building Code Site Classification (CBC) 1 F2,3 Site Latitude N 37.650° Site Longitude W 122.403° Ss Spectral Acceleration for a Short Period 2.027g S1 Spectral Acceleration for a 1-Second Period 0.956g Fa Site Coefficient for a Short Period (Class E) 3 0.9 Fv Site Coefficient for a 1-Second Period (Class E) 3 2.4 1 Note: The 2013 California Building Code (CBC) requires a site soil profile determination extending to a depth of 100 feet for seismic site classification. The current scope does not include the required 100 foot soil profile determination. Borings extended to a maximum depth of 50 feet, and this seismic site class definition considers that dense soil continues below the maximum depth of the subsurface exploration. 2 Per CBC Table 1613.5.2, any profile containing highly organic clays soils (H>10 ft) and/or materials vulnerable to potential failure or collapse under seismic loading such as liquefiable soils. 3 For structures with fundamental periods of vibration less than 0.5 seconds, Section 20.3.1 of ASCE 7-05 allows the site coefficients (Fa and Fv) to be determined assuming that liquefaction does not occur (i.e., Site Class D). The structure’s fundamental period should be verified by the structural engineer. Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites ■ South San Francisco, California April 15, 2014 ■ Terracon Project No. 60145004 Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 6 3.7 Corrosion Potential Results of soluble sulfate testing indicate that ASTM Type I/II Portland cement can be used for all concrete on and below grade. Foundation concrete may be designed for low sulfate exposure in accordance with the provisions of the ACI Design Manual, Section 318, Chapter 4. Laboratory test results indicate the on-site soils have a pH of 8.4, a minimum resistivity of 2,037 ohm-centimeters, and a chloride content of 75 ppm, as shown on the attached Summary of Laboratory Results sheet. These values should be used to evaluate corrosive potential of the on-site soils to underground ferrous metals. Refer to the Summary of Laboratory Results in Appendix B for the complete results of the corrosivity testing conducted in conjunction with this geotechnical exploration. 3.8 Percolation Test Results Two (2) in-situ percolation tests (falling head borehole permeability) were performed to approximate depths of approximately 5 feet bgs. A 2-inch thick layer of gravel was placed in the bottom of each boring after the borings were drilled to evaluate the soil profile. A 3-inch diameter perforated pipe was installed on top of the gravel layer in each boring. Gravel was used to backfill between the perforated pipes and the boring sidewall. The borings were then filled with water for a pre-soak period. Testing began after the entire amount of water added to the borings had infiltrated into the ground. At the beginning of each test, the pipes were refilled with water and readings were taken at 5-minute time intervals. As the water level dropped at the end of each interval, the borings were refilled for the next test. Percolation rates are provided in the table below. TEST RESULTS Test Location (depth) Percolation Rate, in/hr Correlated Infiltration Rate*, in/hr Water Head, in P-1 3 0.10 41 P-2 15 0.59 37 *Infiltration rates were calculated based on conversion of measured percolation rates using the Porchet Method If the proposed infiltration systems will mainly rely on vertical downward seepage, the correlated infiltration rates should be used. These field test results are not intended to be design rates. They represent the result of our tests at the depths and locations indicated, as described above. The design rate should be determined by the designer by applying an appropriate factor of safety. With time, the bottom of infiltration systems tend to plug with organics, sediments, and other debris. Long term maintenance will likely be required to remove these deleterious materials to help reduce decreases in actual percolation rates. In addition, the infiltration rate may be affected by the following factors, which should be considered when selecting the factor of safety: Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites ■ South San Francisco, California April 15, 2014 ■ Terracon Project No. 60145004 Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 7 Test Procedures: Percolation during the test likely included seepage out of the boring both vertically and laterally, whereas seepage from storm water infiltration systems may primarily flow vertically downward, depending on the geometry and details of the systems. Water Quality: The percolation test was performed with clear water, whereas the storm water will likely not be clear, but may contain organics, fines, and grease/oil. The presence of these deleterious materials will tend to decrease the rate that water percolates from the infiltration systems. Design of the storm water infiltration systems should account for the presence of these materials and should incorporate structures/devices to remove these deleterious materials. Soil Variability: Based on the soils and variable fill materials encountered in our borings, we expect the percolation rates of the soils could be different than measured in the field due to variations in fines content. The design elevation and size of the proposed infiltration system should account for this expected variability in infiltration rates. Infiltration testing should be performed after construction of the infiltration system to verify the design infiltration rates. It should be noted that siltation and vegetation growth along with other factors may affect the infiltration rates of the infiltration areas. The actual infiltration rate may vary from the values reported here. Infiltration systems should be located at least 10 feet from any existing or proposed foundation system. 4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION 4.1 Geotechnical Considerations The site appears suitable for the proposed construction based upon geotechnical conditions encountered in the test borings provided the geotechnical engineering recommendations contained in this report are implemented in the design and construction of the project. Our analysis has concluded that the soils are liquefiable at multiple zones between depths of 20 to 50 feet bgs with the potential of seismic induced settlement of ¾ to 2¼ inches and differential settlement of ½ inch and 1½ inch. Due to the liquefaction hazard potential we recommend the proposed building be supported on a mat foundation. The structural design of the foundations and building should consider the anticipated seismic settlement and mitigate the liquefaction hazard structurally to improve the proposed building support. Due to the presence of undocumented fill consisting of boulders and cobbles encountered in our explorations throughout the site, the proposed mat foundation should be supported on a minimum of 3 feet of engineered fill placed below the bottom of the lowest foundation level, or 5 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites ■ South San Francisco, California April 15, 2014 ■ Terracon Project No. 60145004 Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 8 feet below existing site grades whichever is deeper. The materials in the undocumented fill may be used as engineered fill provided the oversized particles (>3 inches) are removed and the materials meet the requirements set forth in this report. Geotechnical engineering recommendations for foundation systems and other earth connected phases of the project are outlined below. The recommendations contained in this report are based upon the results of field and laboratory testing (which are presented in Appendices A and B), engineering analyses, and our current understanding of the proposed project. 4.2 Earthwork The following presents recommendations for site preparation, excavation, subgrade preparation and placement of engineered fills on the project. The recommendations presented for the design and construction of earth supported elements including, foundations, slabs, and pavements, are contingent upon following the recommendations outlined in this section. All grading for the structure should incorporate the limits of the proposed structure plus a minimum lateral distance of five feet beyond the edges. Earthwork on the project should be observed and evaluated by Terracon. The evaluation of earthwork should include observation and testing of engineered fill, subgrade preparation, foundation bearing soils, and other geotechnical conditions exposed during the construction of the project. 4.2.1 Site Preparation Strip and remove existing fill, vegetation, and other deleterious materials from proposed building and pavement areas. Stripped materials consisting of vegetation and organic materials should be wasted from the site or used to re-vegetate landscaped areas or exposed slopes after completion of grading operations. Exposed surfaces should be free of mounds and depressions which could prevent uniform compaction. Our explorations indicate the site has approximately 9 feet of existing fill materials across the site. The fill soils consist of sand and gravel materials with large cobbles and boulders. Because of the variable nature of the fill, we recommend that the fill materials within the footprint of the proposed building be removed to a minimum depth of 3 feet below the lowest foundation bearing level or 5 feet below existing site grades (whichever is deeper) and the excavation be thoroughly cleaned prior to backfill placement and/or construction. Although evidence of utilities or underground facilities such as septic tanks, cesspools, basements, and utilities was not observed during the site reconnaissance, such features could be encountered during construction. If unexpected fills or underground facilities are encountered, such features should be removed and the excavation thoroughly cleaned prior to backfill placement and/or construction. Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites ■ South San Francisco, California April 15, 2014 ■ Terracon Project No. 60145004 Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 9 4.2.2 Subgrade Preparation Due to the presence of undocumented fill with large boulders and cobbles, foundations and floor slabs should be supported on a minimum depth of 3 feet of engineered fill composed of on-site fill materials provided the oversized particles (greater than 3 inches) are removed and the soils are placed and compacted in accordance with the parameters provided in this report. The over-excavated area should tbe backfilled up to the footing base elevation with engineered fill placed in lifts of 8 inches or less in loose thickness and should be moisture conditioned and compacted following the recommendations in section 4.2.4 of this report. Care should be taken to prevent wetting or drying of the bearing materials during construction. Wet, dry, or loose/disturbed material in the bottom of the footing excavations should be removed before foundation concrete is placed. Subsequent to surface clearing and grubbing, subgrade soils beneath exterior slabs and pavements should be scarified, moisture conditioned, and compacted to a minimum depth of 10 inches. The moisture content and compaction of subgrade soils should be maintained until slab or pavement construction. Subgrade soils should be proofrolled and approved by the Engineer prior to the placement of engineered fill and/or aggregate base. Any soft spots, where the Contractor may have difficulty in obtaining the desired compaction, should be removed and replaced with compacted backfill as described in this report. 4.2.3 Fill Materials and Placement The on-site soils are considered suitable for use as engineered fill in all areas of the site, provided the oversized particles (>3 inches) are removed and the resulting soils meet the recommendations provided in this section. All fill materials should be inorganic soils free of vegetation, debris, and fragments larger than three inches in size. Pea gravel or other similar non-cementitious, poorly-graded materials should not be used as fill or backfill without the prior approval of the geotechnical engineer. Approved onsite soil materials may be used as fill material for the following: interior floor slab areas foundation backfill foundation areas exterior slab areas general site grading pavement areas Onsite soils for use as fill material within proposed building and structure areas should conform to low volume change materials as indicated in the following specifications: Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites ■ South San Francisco, California April 15, 2014 ■ Terracon Project No. 60145004 Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 10 Percent Finer by Weight Gradation (ASTM C 136) 3” ........................................................................................................... 100 No. 4 Sieve ......................................................................................... 50-75 No. 200 Sieve ................................................................................ 40 (max) Liquid Limit......................................................................... 30 (max) Plasticity Index ................................................................... 15 (max) Maximum expansive index* ............................................... 20 (max) *ASTM D 4829 Engineered fill should be placed and compacted in horizontal lifts, using equipment and procedures that will produce recommended moisture contents and densities throughout the lift. Fill lifts should not exceed eight inches loose thickness. 4.2.4 Compaction Requirements Recommended compaction and moisture content criteria for engineered fill materials are as follows: Material Type and Location Per the Modified Proctor Test (ASTM D 1557) Minimum Compaction Requirement Range of Moisture Contents for Compaction Above Optimum Minimum Maximum On-site native soils: Beneath foundations: 95% 0% +4% Utility trenches:90% 0% +4% Beneath pavements: 95% 0% +4% Miscellaneous backfill:90% 0% +4% Aggregate base (beneath pavements):95% -2% +3% 4.2.5 Grading and Drainage Positive drainage should be provided during construction and maintained throughout the life of the development. Infiltration of water into utility trenches or foundation excavations should be prevented during construction. Backfill against footings and in utility trenches should be well compacted and free of all construction debris to reduce the possibility of moisture infiltration. Roof drainage should discharge into splash blocks or extensions when the ground surface beneath such features is not protected by exterior slabs or paving. Sprinkler systems and landscaped irrigation should not be installed within 5 feet of foundation walls. Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites ■ South San Francisco, California April 15, 2014 ■ Terracon Project No. 60145004 Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 11 4.2.6 Exterior Slab Design and Construction Exterior slabs-on-grade, exterior architectural features, and utilities founded on, or in backfill may experience some movement due to the volume change of the backfill. To reduce the potential for damage caused by movement, we recommend: minimizing moisture increases in the backfill; controlling moisture-density during placement of backfill; placing engineered fill beneath these slabs in the same manner as specified for the foundation system. using designs which allow vertical movement between the exterior features and adjoining structural elements; placing effective control joints on relatively close centers. 4.2.7 Utility Trenches It is anticipated that the on-site soils will provide suitable support for underground utilities and piping that may be installed. Any soft and/or unsuitable material encountered at the bottom of excavations should be removed and be replaced with an adequate bedding material. A non- expansive granular material with a sand equivalent greater than 30 should be used for bedding and shading of utilities, unless otherwise specified by the utility manufacturer. On-site granular materials are considered suitable for backfill of utility and pipe trenches from one foot above the top of the pipe to the final ground surface, provided the material is free of organic matter, deleterious substances, and oversized materials. Trench backfill should be mechanically placed and compacted as discussed earlier in this report. Compaction of initial lifts should be accomplished with hand-operated tampers or other lightweight compactors. Where trenches are placed beneath slabs or footings, the backfill should satisfy the gradation and expansion index requirements of engineered fill discussed in this report. Flooding or jetting for placement and compaction of backfill is not recommended. 4.2.8 Construction Considerations It is anticipated that excavations for the proposed construction can be accomplished with conventional earthmoving equipment. Some additional effort may be necessary to extract boulder sized materials, particularly in deep narrow excavations such as utility trenches. Consideration should be given to obtaining a unit price for difficult excavation in the contract documents for the project. Based upon the subsurface conditions determined from the geotechnical exploration, subgrade soils exposed during construction are anticipated to be relatively stable. However, the stability of the subgrade may be affected by precipitation, repetitive construction traffic or other factors. If unstable conditions develop, workability may be improved by scarifying and drying. During Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites ■ South San Francisco, California April 15, 2014 ■ Terracon Project No. 60145004 Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 12 and after periods of heavy rain, over excavation of wet zones and replacement with granular materials may be necessary. Groundwater seepage should be anticipated for excavations approaching the level of the organic clay layer. Pumping from sumps may be utilized to control water within the excavations. Well points may be required for significant groundwater flow, or where excavations penetrate groundwater to a significant depth. Oversized materials such as boulders and cobbles, exposed in the sides of excavations may create unstable slopes and should be removed from the lateral extent of the trenches and pits. The individual contractor(s) is responsible for designing and constructing stable, temporary excavations as required to maintain stability of both the excavation sides and bottom. Excavations should be sloped or shored in the interest of safety following local and federal regulations, including current OSHA excavation and trench safety standards. 4.3 Foundations 4.3.1 Mat Foundation Design Parameters DESIGN ITEM DESIGN RECOMENDATION Foundation Type Mat foundations Bearing Material Engineered fill extending to a minimum depth of 3 feet below foundations or 5 feet below existing grades, whichever is deper. Maximum Allowable Bearing Pressure 500 psf Minimum Embedment below grade 2 feet Based on a mat foundation with an embodiment of 24 inches and a contact pressure of 500 psf, settlement calculations were performed utilizing Westergard and Hough's methods5. The estimated settlement will vary with the size of the mat as shown in the following graph. 5 FHWA Geotechnical Engineering Circular No. 6 – Shallow Foundations, FHWA-SA-02-054. Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites ■ South San Francisco, California April 15, 2014 ■ Terracon Project No. 60145004 Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 13 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.5 1.75 2 40.045.050.055.060.065.070.0 Se t t l m e n t (i n ) Mat Foundation Width (ft) Pressure = 500 psf Since there are several factors that will control the design of mat foundations besides vertical load, Terracon should be consulted when the final foundation depth and width are determined to assist the structural designer in the evaluation of anticipated settlement. For structural design of mat foundations, a modulus of subgrade reaction (Kv1) of 200 pounds per cubic inch (pci) may be used for the foundation supported on engineered fill. Other details including treatment of loose foundation soils, superstructure reinforcement and observation of foundation excavations as outlined in the Earthwork section of this report are applicable for the design and construction of a mat foundation at the site. The subgrade modulus (Kv) for the mat is affected by the size of the mat foundation and would vary according the following equation: Kv = Kv1 x (B+1)2 /4B2 Where: Kv is the modulus for the size footing being analyzed B is the width of the mat foundation. 4.3.2 Spread Footing Design Parameters DESCRIPTION RECOMENDATION Structures Minor structures with foundation width less than 5 feet such as trash enclosures, equipment pads, and low retaining walls. Foundation Type Conventional Shallow Spread Footings Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites ■ South San Francisco, California April 15, 2014 ■ Terracon Project No. 60145004 Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 14 DESCRIPTION RECOMENDATION Bearing Material Engineered fill extending to a minimum depth of 2 feet below foundations. Allowable Bearing Pressure 2,000 psf Minimum Footing Dimensions Walls: 18 inches; Columns: 24 inches Minimum Embedment Depth Below Finished Grade 18 inches Estimated Static Settlement 1 inch Estimated Differential Static Settlement ½ inch in 40 feet. The allowable foundation bearing pressures provided in this report apply to dead loads plus design live load conditions. The design bearing pressure may be increased by one-third when considering total loads that include wind or seismic conditions. The weight of the foundation concrete below grade may be neglected in dead load computations. 4.3.3 Foundation Design Considerations Foundations should be reinforced as necessary to reduce the potential for distress caused by differential foundation movement. Finished grade is defined as the lowest adjacent grade within five feet of the foundation for perimeter (or exterior) footings. Foundation excavations should be observed by the geotechnical engineer. If the soil conditions encountered differ significantly from those presented in this report, supplemental recommendations may be required. 4.4 Lateral Earth Pressures For onsite processed materials or imported low volume change fill materials above any free water surface, recommended equivalent fluid pressures for foundation elements are: ITEM VALUE1,2 Active Case 40 psf/ft Passive Case 360 psf/ft At-Rest Case 60 psf/ft Surcharge Pressure 0.33*(Surcharge) Coefficient of Friction 0.40 1 Note: Ignore passive pressure in the upper 18 inches because of soil disturbance. 2 Note: Reduce to 0.30 when used in conjunction with passive pressure. Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites ■ South San Francisco, California April 15, 2014 ■ Terracon Project No. 60145004 Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 15 The lateral earth pressures herein do not include any factor of safety and are not applicable for submerged soils/hydrostatic loading. Additional recommendations may be necessary if such conditions are to be included in the design. Adequate drainage should be provided behind the below-grade walls to collect water from irrigation, landscaping, surface runoff, or other sources, to achieve a free-draining backfill condition. The wall back drain should consist of Class 2 permeable materials that are placed behind the entire wall height to within 18 inches of ground surface at the top of the wall. As a minimum, the width of Class 2 permeable materials behind the wall should be two feet. Water collected by the back drain should be directed to an appropriate outlet, such as weep holes or perforated pipes, for disposal. 4.5 Pavements 4.5.1 Design Recommendations Based on the engineering properties of the near surface materials, a correlated design R-Value was used to calculate the Asphalt Concrete (AC) pavement thickness sections and an estimated modulus of subgrade reaction value was used in calculating the Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) pavement sections for the project. R-value testing should be completed prior to pavement construction to verify the design R-value. Assuming the pavement subgrades will be prepared as recommended within this report, the following pavement sections should be considered as minimum for this project for the traffic indices assumed in the table below. As more specific traffic information becomes available, we should be contacted to reevaluate the pavement calculations. Recommended Pavement Section Thickness (inches)* Light (Automobile) Parking Assumed Traffic Index (TI) = 4.5 On-site Driveways and Delivery Areas Assumed TI = 6.0 Section I Portland Cement Concrete (600 psi Flexural Strength) 5.0” PCC over 4” Class II Aggregate Base over 10” of scarified, moisture conditioned, and compacted materials 6.0” PCC over 4” Class II Aggregate Base over 10” of scarified, moisture conditioned, and compacted materials Section II Asphaltic Concrete 3” AC over 4” Class II Aggregate Base over 10” of scarified, moisture conditioned, and compacted materials 3” AC over 6” Class II Aggregate Base over 10” of scarified, moisture conditioned, and compacted materials * All materials should meet the CALTRANS Standard Specifications for Highway Construction. These pavement sections are considered minimal sections based upon the expected traffic and the existing subgrade conditions. However, they are expected to function with periodic maintenance and overlays if good drainage is provided and maintained. All concrete for rigid pavements should have a minimum flexural strength of 600 psi, and be placed with a maximum slump of four inches. Proper joint spacing will also be required to Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites ■ South San Francisco, California April 15, 2014 ■ Terracon Project No. 60145004 Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 16 prevent excessive slab curling and shrinkage cracking. All joints should be sealed to prevent entry of foreign material and dowelled where necessary for load transfer. Preventative maintenance should be planned and provided for through an on-going pavement management program in order to enhance future pavement performance. Preventative maintenance activities are intended to slow the rate of pavement deterioration, and to preserve the pavement investment. Preventative maintenance consists of both localized maintenance (e.g. crack sealing and patching) and global maintenance (e.g. surface sealing). Preventative maintenance is usually the first priority when implementing a planned pavement maintenance program and provides the highest return on investment for pavements. 4.5.2 Construction Considerations Materials and construction of pavements for the project should be in accordance with the requirements and specifications of the State of California Department of Transportation, or other approved local governing specifications. Base course or pavement materials should not be placed when the surface is wet. Surface drainage should be provided away from the edge of paved areas to minimize lateral moisture transmission into the subgrade. 5.0 GENERAL COMMENTS Terracon should be retained to review the final design plans and specifications so comments can be made regarding interpretation and implementation of our geotechnical recommendations in the design and specifications. Terracon also should be retained to provide observation and testing services during grading, excavation, foundation construction and other earth-related construction phases of the project. The analysis and recommendations presented in this report are based upon the data obtained from the borings, test pits, and CPT soundings performed at the indicated locations and from other information discussed in this report. This report does not reflect variations that may occur between explorations, across the site, or due to the modifying effects of construction or weather. The nature and extent of such variations may not become evident until during or after construction. If variations appear, we should be immediately notified so that further evaluation and supplemental recommendations can be provided. The scope of services for this project does not include either specifically or by implication any environmental or biological (e.g., mold, fungi, bacteria) assessment of the site or identification or prevention of pollutants, hazardous materials or conditions. If the owner is concerned about the potential for such contamination or pollution, other studies should be undertaken. Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites ■ South San Francisco, California April 15, 2014 ■ Terracon Project No. 60145004 Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 17 This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of our client for specific application to the project discussed and has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices. No warranties, either express or implied, are intended or made. Site safety, excavation support, and dewatering requirements are the responsibility of others. In the event that changes in the nature, design, or location of the project as outlined in this report are planned, the conclusions and recommendations contained in this report shall not be considered valid unless Terracon reviews the changes and either verifies or modifies the conclusions of this report in writing. APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATION DIAGRAM IS FOR GENERAL LOCATION ONLY, AND IS NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES 2817 McGaw Avenue Irvine, California 92614 PH. (949) 261-0051 FAX. (949) 261-6110 A-1 Exhibit Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites Project Manager: Drawn by: Checked by: Approved by: FH TH FH FH Project No. Scale: File Name: Date: 60145004 AS SHOWN A-1 03/27/14 137 West Harris Avenue South San Francisco, California SITE LOCATION PLAN Site REFERENCE: USGS SAN FRANCISCO SOUTH, CALIFORNIA, 7.5-MINUTE QUADRANGLE (dated 1981) BORING AND TEST LOCATION DIAGRAM Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites 127 West Harris Avenue South San Fransisco, California A-2 2817 McGaw Avenue Irvine, CA 92614 PH. (949) 261-0051 FAX. (949) 261-6110 60145004 03/27/14 FH TH FH FH 1 in. ~ 80 ft. Project Manager: Drawn by: Checked by: Approved by: Project No. Scale: File Name: Date: Exhibit A-2 DIAGRAM IS FOR GENERAL LOCATION ONLY, AND IS NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES B-1 APPROXIMATE BORING LOCATION LEGEND WEST HARRIS AVENUE TP-1 APPROXIMATE BORING LOCATION TP-1 TP-2 TP-3 TP-4 B-1 B-2 CPT-1 APPROXIMATE CONE PENETRATION TEST LOCATION P-1 APPROXIMATE PERCOLATION TEST LOCATION CPT-1 CPT-2 P-2 P-1 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites ■ South San Francisco, California April 15, 2014 ■ Terracon Project No. 60145004 Exhibit A-3 Field Exploration Description The field exploration program included three separate trips to the project site and included the advancement of four (4) test pits, four (4) test borings and three (3) Cone Penetrometer Test (CPT) soundings. The borings and CPT soundings were performed in areas previously excavated as test pits to explore the existing fill layer. A large excavator was used to perform the test pits. The borings and soundings were extended to approximate depths ranging between 23 to 51½ feet below existing site grades. The CPT and Borings were performed at the site on March 7, 2014. The drilled test borings were advanced with a truck-mounted CME-55 drill rig utilizing 6-inch diameter hollow-stem auger. CPT soundings were advanced with a 20-ton truck providing the reaction weight for pushing the cone assembly into the ground at a constant rate of 20-mm per second (approximately four feet per minute). The cone tip resistance and sleeve friction resistance were recorded every 2-cm (approximately ¾-inch) and stored in digital form. The borings were located in the field by using the proposed site plan, an aerial photograph of the site, and a GPS handheld device. The accuracy of boring locations should only be assumed to the level implied by the method used. The location of the borings and CPT soundings are shown on the attached Boring Location Diagram, Exhibit A-2. Continuous lithologic logs of the borings were recorded by the field engineer during the drilling operations. At selected intervals, samples of the subsurface materials were taken by driving split-spoon or ring-barrel samplers. Bulk samples of subsurface materials were also obtained. Groundwater conditions were evaluated in the borings at the time of site exploration. Penetration resistance measurements were obtained by driving the split-spoon and ring-barrel samplers into the subsurface materials with a 140-pound automatic hammer falling 30 inches. The penetration resistance value is a useful index in estimating the consistency or relative density of materials encountered. An automatic hammer was used to advance the split-barrel sampler in the borings performed on this site. A significantly greater efficiency is achieved with the automatic hammer compared to the conventional safety hammer operated with a cathead and rope. This higher efficiency has an appreciable effect on the SPT-N value. The effect of the automatic hammer's efficiency has been considered in the interpretation and analysis of the subsurface information for this report. The samples were tagged for identification, sealed to reduce moisture loss, and taken to our laboratory for further examination, testing, and classification. Information provided on the boring logs in this appendix includes soil descriptions, consistency evaluations, boring depths, sampling intervals, and groundwater conditions. The borings were backfilled with auger cuttings prior to the drill crew leaving the site. 9.0 FILL - CLAYEY GRAVEL WITH SAND, gray to brown orange to brown, boulders to 24 inches in dimension ORGANIC CLAY (OH), blue to gray, very soft to soft, with black peat seams decomposing odor at 15 feet depth The estimated depth of the fill materials should not be considered exact due to the similarity of lithology, color, and densities of the graded materials and native soils. 1-1-3 1-0-0 N=0 WOH 52 86-48-3878 Latitude: 37.650028° Longitude: -122.403997° All coordinates are approximate. Hammer Type: AutomaticStratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual. LOCATION DEPTH GR A P H I C L O G TH I S B O R I N G L O G I S N O T V A L I D I F S E P A R A T E D F R O M O R I G I N A L R E P O R T . T E R R A C O N S M A R T L O G - N O W E L L 6 0 1 4 5 0 0 4 - S S F B O R I N G L O G S . G P J T E R R A C O N 2 0 1 2 . G D T 3 / 2 8 / 1 4 Groundwater encountered at 10' depth while drilling WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS Page 1 of 3 Advancement Method: Hollow Stem Auger Abandonment Method: tremie backfilled with neat cement upon completion 2817 McGaw Avenue Irvine, California Notes: Project No.: 60145004 Drill Rig: CME-55 Boring Started: 3/7/2014 BORING LOG NO. B-1 Kuber Development CompanyCLIENT: 1550 S 52nd St See Exhibit A-3 for description of field procedures. Driller: Technicon Boring Completed: 3/7/2014 Exhibit: Tempe, AZ 85281 PROJECT: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites SITE: See Appendix B for description of laboratory procedures and additional data, (if any). See Appendix C for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. A-4 127 West Harris Avenue South San Francisco, California PE R C E N T F I N E S FI E L D T E S T RE S U L T S SA M P L E T Y P E WA T E R L E V E L OB S E R V A T I O N S DE P T H ( f t ) 5 10 15 20 DR Y U N I T WE I G H T ( p c f ) ATTERBERG LIMITS LL-PL-PI UN C O N F I N E D CO M P R E S S I V E ST R E N G T H ( p s f ) WA T E R CO N T E N T ( % ) 25.0 30.0 ORGANIC CLAY (OH), blue to gray, very soft to soft, with black peat seams (continued) SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), fine to medium grained sand, black, very soft POORLY GRADED SAND WITH SILT (SP-SM), fine to medium grained sand, gray, medium dense brown to orange, moderate cementation, very dense, from 35 to 41.5 feet depth 0-1-2 1-0-0 N=0 WOH 7-19-31 15-25-37 N=62 44 88 93 19 Latitude: 37.650028° Longitude: -122.403997° All coordinates are approximate. Hammer Type: AutomaticStratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual. LOCATION DEPTH GR A P H I C L O G TH I S B O R I N G L O G I S N O T V A L I D I F S E P A R A T E D F R O M O R I G I N A L R E P O R T . T E R R A C O N S M A R T L O G - N O W E L L 6 0 1 4 5 0 0 4 - S S F B O R I N G L O G S . G P J T E R R A C O N 2 0 1 2 . G D T 3 / 2 8 / 1 4 Groundwater encountered at 10' depth while drilling WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS Page 2 of 3 Advancement Method: Hollow Stem Auger Abandonment Method: tremie backfilled with neat cement upon completion 2817 McGaw Avenue Irvine, California Notes: Project No.: 60145004 Drill Rig: CME-55 Boring Started: 3/7/2014 BORING LOG NO. B-1 Kuber Development CompanyCLIENT: 1550 S 52nd St See Exhibit A-3 for description of field procedures. Driller: Technicon Boring Completed: 3/7/2014 Exhibit: Tempe, AZ 85281 PROJECT: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites SITE: See Appendix B for description of laboratory procedures and additional data, (if any). See Appendix C for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. A-4 127 West Harris Avenue South San Francisco, California PE R C E N T F I N E S FI E L D T E S T RE S U L T S SA M P L E T Y P E WA T E R L E V E L OB S E R V A T I O N S DE P T H ( f t ) 25 30 35 40 DR Y U N I T WE I G H T ( p c f ) ATTERBERG LIMITS LL-PL-PI UN C O N F I N E D CO M P R E S S I V E ST R E N G T H ( p s f ) WA T E R CO N T E N T ( % ) 45.0 50.0 51.5 POORLY GRADED SAND WITH SILT (SP-SM), fine to medium grained sand, gray, medium dense (continued) SILTY SAND (SM), fine sand, reddish-brown to light gray, medium dense POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to medium grained sand, brown to orange, medium dense, with black peat seams Boring Terminated at 51.5 Feet 7-25-47 4-6-8 N=14 12-13-20 115 114 17 17 Latitude: 37.650028° Longitude: -122.403997° All coordinates are approximate. Hammer Type: AutomaticStratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual. LOCATION DEPTH GR A P H I C L O G TH I S B O R I N G L O G I S N O T V A L I D I F S E P A R A T E D F R O M O R I G I N A L R E P O R T . T E R R A C O N S M A R T L O G - N O W E L L 6 0 1 4 5 0 0 4 - S S F B O R I N G L O G S . G P J T E R R A C O N 2 0 1 2 . G D T 3 / 2 8 / 1 4 Groundwater encountered at 10' depth while drilling WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS Page 3 of 3 Advancement Method: Hollow Stem Auger Abandonment Method: tremie backfilled with neat cement upon completion 2817 McGaw Avenue Irvine, California Notes: Project No.: 60145004 Drill Rig: CME-55 Boring Started: 3/7/2014 BORING LOG NO. B-1 Kuber Development CompanyCLIENT: 1550 S 52nd St See Exhibit A-3 for description of field procedures. Driller: Technicon Boring Completed: 3/7/2014 Exhibit: Tempe, AZ 85281 PROJECT: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites SITE: See Appendix B for description of laboratory procedures and additional data, (if any). See Appendix C for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. A-4 127 West Harris Avenue South San Francisco, California PE R C E N T F I N E S FI E L D T E S T RE S U L T S SA M P L E T Y P E WA T E R L E V E L OB S E R V A T I O N S DE P T H ( f t ) 45 50 DR Y U N I T WE I G H T ( p c f ) ATTERBERG LIMITS LL-PL-PI UN C O N F I N E D CO M P R E S S I V E ST R E N G T H ( p s f ) WA T E R CO N T E N T ( % ) 5.0 9.0 FILL - SILTY GRAVEL WITH SAND, orange to brown, cobbles and boulders to 42 inches in dimension, derived from sandstone rock fragments FILL - LEAN CLAY WITH GRAVEL, dark gray, occasional boulders to 12 inches in dimension, older fill ORGANIC CLAY (OH), dark blue to gray, very soft, with black peat seams and decomposing plant matter The estimated depth of the fill materials should not be considered exact due to the similarity of lithology, color, and densities of the graded materials and native soils. 1-1-1 1-0-0 N=0 WOH 53 82-45-37 75 Latitude: 37.650272° Longitude: -122.40372° All coordinates are approximate. Hammer Type: AutomaticStratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual. LOCATION DEPTH GR A P H I C L O G TH I S B O R I N G L O G I S N O T V A L I D I F S E P A R A T E D F R O M O R I G I N A L R E P O R T . T E R R A C O N S M A R T L O G - N O W E L L 6 0 1 4 5 0 0 4 - S S F B O R I N G L O G S . G P J T E R R A C O N 2 0 1 2 . G D T 3 / 2 8 / 1 4 Groundwater encountered at 10' depth while drilling WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS Page 1 of 3 Advancement Method: Hollow Stem Auger Abandonment Method: tremie backfilled with neat cement upon completion 2817 McGaw Avenue Irvine, California Notes: Project No.: 60145004 Drill Rig: CME-55 Boring Started: 3/7/2014 BORING LOG NO. B-2 Kuber Development CompanyCLIENT: 1550 S 52nd St See Exhibit A-3 for description of field procedures. Driller: Technicon Boring Completed: 3/7/2014 Exhibit: Tempe, AZ 85281 PROJECT: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites SITE: See Appendix B for description of laboratory procedures and additional data, (if any). See Appendix C for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. A-5 127 West Harris Avenue South San Francisco, California PE R C E N T F I N E S FI E L D T E S T RE S U L T S SA M P L E T Y P E WA T E R L E V E L OB S E R V A T I O N S DE P T H ( f t ) 5 10 15 20 DR Y U N I T WE I G H T ( p c f ) ATTERBERG LIMITS LL-PL-PI UN C O N F I N E D CO M P R E S S I V E ST R E N G T H ( p s f ) WA T E R CO N T E N T ( % ) 20.5 29.0 35.0 sandy, from 20 to 20.5 feet depth POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), gray, loose to medium dense, 2 inch clayey lenses from 20.5 to 25 feet depth SILTY SAND (SM), fine grained sand, light brown to gray, loose POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), brown to reddish brown, moderate cementation, hard 4-4-9 11-18-11 N=29 4-6-8 16-25-36 N=61 106 109 18 24 Latitude: 37.650272° Longitude: -122.40372° All coordinates are approximate. Hammer Type: AutomaticStratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual. LOCATION DEPTH GR A P H I C L O G TH I S B O R I N G L O G I S N O T V A L I D I F S E P A R A T E D F R O M O R I G I N A L R E P O R T . T E R R A C O N S M A R T L O G - N O W E L L 6 0 1 4 5 0 0 4 - S S F B O R I N G L O G S . G P J T E R R A C O N 2 0 1 2 . G D T 3 / 2 8 / 1 4 Groundwater encountered at 10' depth while drilling WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS Page 2 of 3 Advancement Method: Hollow Stem Auger Abandonment Method: tremie backfilled with neat cement upon completion 2817 McGaw Avenue Irvine, California Notes: Project No.: 60145004 Drill Rig: CME-55 Boring Started: 3/7/2014 BORING LOG NO. B-2 Kuber Development CompanyCLIENT: 1550 S 52nd St See Exhibit A-3 for description of field procedures. Driller: Technicon Boring Completed: 3/7/2014 Exhibit: Tempe, AZ 85281 PROJECT: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites SITE: See Appendix B for description of laboratory procedures and additional data, (if any). See Appendix C for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. A-5 127 West Harris Avenue South San Francisco, California PE R C E N T F I N E S FI E L D T E S T RE S U L T S SA M P L E T Y P E WA T E R L E V E L OB S E R V A T I O N S DE P T H ( f t ) 25 30 35 40 DR Y U N I T WE I G H T ( p c f ) ATTERBERG LIMITS LL-PL-PI UN C O N F I N E D CO M P R E S S I V E ST R E N G T H ( p s f ) WA T E R CO N T E N T ( % ) 50.7 POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), brown to reddish brown, moderate cementation, hard (continued) medium dense to dense, from 40 to 50 feet depth dark gray to black, hard, from 50 to 51.5 feet Boring Terminated at 50.7 Feet 10-13-19 11-10-6 N=16 7-10-6 N=16 13-50/2"11916 Latitude: 37.650272° Longitude: -122.40372° All coordinates are approximate. Hammer Type: AutomaticStratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual. LOCATION DEPTH GR A P H I C L O G TH I S B O R I N G L O G I S N O T V A L I D I F S E P A R A T E D F R O M O R I G I N A L R E P O R T . T E R R A C O N S M A R T L O G - N O W E L L 6 0 1 4 5 0 0 4 - S S F B O R I N G L O G S . G P J T E R R A C O N 2 0 1 2 . G D T 3 / 2 8 / 1 4 Groundwater encountered at 10' depth while drilling WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS Page 3 of 3 Advancement Method: Hollow Stem Auger Abandonment Method: tremie backfilled with neat cement upon completion 2817 McGaw Avenue Irvine, California Notes: Project No.: 60145004 Drill Rig: CME-55 Boring Started: 3/7/2014 BORING LOG NO. B-2 Kuber Development CompanyCLIENT: 1550 S 52nd St See Exhibit A-3 for description of field procedures. Driller: Technicon Boring Completed: 3/7/2014 Exhibit: Tempe, AZ 85281 PROJECT: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites SITE: See Appendix B for description of laboratory procedures and additional data, (if any). See Appendix C for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. A-5 127 West Harris Avenue South San Francisco, California PE R C E N T F I N E S FI E L D T E S T RE S U L T S SA M P L E T Y P E WA T E R L E V E L OB S E R V A T I O N S DE P T H ( f t ) 45 50 DR Y U N I T WE I G H T ( p c f ) ATTERBERG LIMITS LL-PL-PI UN C O N F I N E D CO M P R E S S I V E ST R E N G T H ( p s f ) WA T E R CO N T E N T ( % ) 5.0 FILL - CLAYEY GRAVEL, with cobbles, brown Boring Terminated at 5 Feet Latitude: 37.6501° Longitude: -122.4042° All coordinates are approximate. Hammer Type: AutomaticStratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual. LOCATION DEPTH GR A P H I C L O G TH I S B O R I N G L O G I S N O T V A L I D I F S E P A R A T E D F R O M O R I G I N A L R E P O R T . T E R R A C O N S M A R T L O G - N O W E L L 6 0 1 4 5 0 0 4 - S S F B O R I N G L O G S . G P J T E R R A C O N 2 0 1 2 . G D T 3 / 2 8 / 1 4 Groundwater not encountered WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS Page 1 of 1 Advancement Method: Hollow Stem Auger Abandonment Method: Installed 6" diameter perforated pipe upon completion 2817 McGaw Avenue Irvine, California Notes: Project No.: 60145004 Drill Rig: CME-55 Boring Started: 2/14/2014 BORING LOG NO. P-1 Kuber Development CompanyCLIENT: 1550 S 52nd St See Exhibit A-3 for description of field procedures. Driller: Technicon Boring Completed: 2/14/2014 Exhibit: Tempe, AZ 85281 PROJECT: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites SITE: See Appendix B for description of laboratory procedures and additional data, (if any). See Appendix C for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. A-6 127 West Harris Avenue South San Francisco, California PE R C E N T F I N E S FI E L D T E S T RE S U L T S SA M P L E T Y P E WA T E R L E V E L OB S E R V A T I O N S DE P T H ( f t ) 5 DR Y U N I T WE I G H T ( p c f ) ATTERBERG LIMITS LL-PL-PI UN C O N F I N E D CO M P R E S S I V E ST R E N G T H ( p s f ) WA T E R CO N T E N T ( % ) 5.0 FILL - CLAYEY GRAVEL, with cobbles, brown Boring Terminated at 5 Feet Latitude: 37.6501° Longitude: -122.4036° All coordinates are approximate. Hammer Type: AutomaticStratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual. LOCATION DEPTH GR A P H I C L O G TH I S B O R I N G L O G I S N O T V A L I D I F S E P A R A T E D F R O M O R I G I N A L R E P O R T . T E R R A C O N S M A R T L O G - N O W E L L 6 0 1 4 5 0 0 4 - S S F B O R I N G L O G S . G P J T E R R A C O N 2 0 1 2 . G D T 3 / 2 8 / 1 4 Groundwater not encountered WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS Page 1 of 1 Advancement Method: Hollow Stem Auger Abandonment Method: Installed 6" diameter perforated pipe upon completion 2817 McGaw Avenue Irvine, California Notes: Project No.: 60145004 Drill Rig: CME-55 Boring Started: 2/14/2014 BORING LOG NO. P-2 Kuber Development CompanyCLIENT: 1550 S 52nd St See Exhibit A-3 for description of field procedures. Driller: Technicon Boring Completed: 2/14/2014 Exhibit: Tempe, AZ 85281 PROJECT: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites SITE: See Appendix B for description of laboratory procedures and additional data, (if any). See Appendix C for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. A-7 127 West Harris Avenue South San Francisco, California PE R C E N T F I N E S FI E L D T E S T RE S U L T S SA M P L E T Y P E WA T E R L E V E L OB S E R V A T I O N S DE P T H ( f t ) 5 DR Y U N I T WE I G H T ( p c f ) ATTERBERG LIMITS LL-PL-PI UN C O N F I N E D CO M P R E S S I V E ST R E N G T H ( p s f ) WA T E R CO N T E N T ( % ) 9.0 10.0 FILL - CLAYEY GRAVEL WITH SAND, gray to brown ORGANIC CLAY (OH), blue to gray, peat seams Test Pit Terminated at 10 Feet The estimated depth of the fill materials should not be considered exact due to the similarity of lithology, color, and densities of the graded materials and native soils. 25-15-10 Latitude: 37.650028° Longitude: -122.403997° All coordinates are approximate. Stratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual. LOCATION DEPTH GR A P H I C L O G TH I S B O R I N G L O G I S N O T V A L I D I F S E P A R A T E D F R O M O R I G I N A L R E P O R T . T E R R A C O N S M A R T L O G - N O W E L L 6 0 1 4 5 0 0 4 - S S F B O R I N G L O G S . G P J T E R R A C O N 2 0 1 2 . G D T 3 / 2 8 / 1 4 elevation taken at 10:40am elevation taken at 12:45am WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS Page 1 of 1 Advancement Method: Abandonment Method: Test pit backfilled with soil cuttings upon completion 2817 McGaw Avenue Irvine, California Notes: Project No.: 60145004 Excavator: PC150 Excavator Test Pit Started: 2/24/2014 TEST PIT LOG NO. TP-1 Kuber Development CompanyCLIENT: 1550 S 52nd St See Exhibit A-3 for description of field procedures. Operator: Daryl Meuller Excavation Exhibit: Tempe, AZ 85281 PROJECT: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites SITE: See Appendix B for description of laboratory procedures and additional data, (if any). See Appendix C for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. A-8 127 West Harris Avenue South San Francisco, California PE R C E N T F I N E S FI E L D T E S T RE S U L T S SA M P L E T Y P E WA T E R L E V E L OB S E R V A T I O N S DE P T H ( f t ) 5 10 DR Y U N I T WE I G H T ( p c f ) ATTERBERG LIMITS LL-PL-PI UN C O N F I N E D CO M P R E S S I V E ST R E N G T H ( p s f ) WA T E R CO N T E N T ( % ) 9.0 10.0 FILL - SILTY GRAVEL WITH SAND, orange to brown, cobbles and boulders to 32-inches in dimension dark brown, cobbles and occasional boulders to 12 inches in dimension, decay odor, older fill ORGANIC CLAY (OH), blue to gray, with occasional peat seams Test Pit Terminated at 10 Feet The estimated depth of the fill materials should not be considered exact due to the similarity of lithology, color, and densities of the graded materials and native soils. Latitude: 37.650257° Longitude: -122.403995° All coordinates are approximate. Stratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual. LOCATION DEPTH GR A P H I C L O G TH I S B O R I N G L O G I S N O T V A L I D I F S E P A R A T E D F R O M O R I G I N A L R E P O R T . T E R R A C O N S M A R T L O G - N O W E L L 6 0 1 4 5 0 0 4 - S S F B O R I N G L O G S . G P J T E R R A C O N 2 0 1 2 . G D T 3 / 2 8 / 1 4 elevation taken at 11:10am elevation taken at 12:58pm WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS Page 1 of 1 Advancement Method: Abandonment Method: Test pit backfilled with soil cuttings upon completion 2817 McGaw Avenue Irvine, California Notes: Project No.: 60145004 Excavator: PC150 Excavator Test Pit Started: 2/24/2014 TEST PIT LOG NO. TP-2 Kuber Development CompanyCLIENT: 1550 S 52nd St See Exhibit A-3 for description of field procedures. Operator: Daryl Meuller Excavation Exhibit: Tempe, AZ 85281 PROJECT: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites SITE: See Appendix B for description of laboratory procedures and additional data, (if any). See Appendix C for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. A-9 127 West Harris Avenue South San Francisco, California PE R C E N T F I N E S FI E L D T E S T RE S U L T S SA M P L E T Y P E WA T E R L E V E L OB S E R V A T I O N S DE P T H ( f t ) 5 10 DR Y U N I T WE I G H T ( p c f ) ATTERBERG LIMITS LL-PL-PI UN C O N F I N E D CO M P R E S S I V E ST R E N G T H ( p s f ) WA T E R CO N T E N T ( % ) 5.0 9.0 10.0 FILL - SILTY GRAVEL WITH SAND, orange to brown, cobbles and boulders to 42 inches in dimension, derived from sandstone rock fragments FILL - LEAN CLAY WITH GRAVEL, dark gray, occasional boulders to 12 inches in dimension, older fill ORGANIC CLAY (OH), dark blue to gray, with black peat seams Test Pit Terminated at 10 Feet The estimated depth of the fill materials should not be considered exact due to the similarity of lithology, color, and densities of the graded materials and native soils. Latitude: 37.650272° Longitude: -122.40372° All coordinates are approximate. Stratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual. LOCATION DEPTH GR A P H I C L O G TH I S B O R I N G L O G I S N O T V A L I D I F S E P A R A T E D F R O M O R I G I N A L R E P O R T . T E R R A C O N S M A R T L O G - N O W E L L 6 0 1 4 5 0 0 4 - S S F B O R I N G L O G S . G P J T E R R A C O N 2 0 1 2 . G D T 3 / 2 8 / 1 4 elevation taken at 12:20pm elevation taken at 1:00pm WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS Page 1 of 1 Advancement Method: Abandonment Method: Test pit backfilled with soil cuttings upon completion 2817 McGaw Avenue Irvine, California Notes: Project No.: 60145004 Excavator: PC150 Excavator Test Pit Started: 2/24/2014 TEST PIT LOG NO. TP-3 Kuber Development CompanyCLIENT: 1550 S 52nd St See Exhibit A-3 for description of field procedures. Operator: Daryl Meuller Excavation Exhibit: Tempe, AZ 85281 PROJECT: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites SITE: See Appendix B for description of laboratory procedures and additional data, (if any). See Appendix C for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. A-10 127 West Harris Avenue South San Francisco, California PE R C E N T F I N E S FI E L D T E S T RE S U L T S SA M P L E T Y P E WA T E R L E V E L OB S E R V A T I O N S DE P T H ( f t ) 5 10 DR Y U N I T WE I G H T ( p c f ) ATTERBERG LIMITS LL-PL-PI UN C O N F I N E D CO M P R E S S I V E ST R E N G T H ( p s f ) WA T E R CO N T E N T ( % ) 9.0 10.0 FILL - SILTY GRAVEL WITH SAND, orange to brown, cobbles and boulders to 40 inches in dimension, derived from sandstone rock fragments dark gray, cobbles and boulders to 18 inches in dimension, strong decay odor, older fill ORGANIC CLAY (OH), dark blue to gray, with black peat seams Test Pit Terminated at 10 Feet The estimated depth of the fill materials should not be considered exact due to the similarity of lithology, color, and densities of the graded materials and native soils. Latitude: 37.650458° Longitude: -122.403769° All coordinates are approximate. Stratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual. LOCATION DEPTH GR A P H I C L O G TH I S B O R I N G L O G I S N O T V A L I D I F S E P A R A T E D F R O M O R I G I N A L R E P O R T . T E R R A C O N S M A R T L O G - N O W E L L 6 0 1 4 5 0 0 4 - S S F B O R I N G L O G S . G P J T E R R A C O N 2 0 1 2 . G D T 3 / 2 8 / 1 4 elevation taken at 12:25pm elevation taken at 1:03pm WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS Page 1 of 1 Advancement Method: Abandonment Method: Test pit backfilled with soil cuttings upon completion 2817 McGaw Avenue Irvine, California Notes: Project No.: 60145004 Excavator: PC150 Excavator Test Pit Started: 2/24/2014 TEST PIT LOG NO. TP-4 Kuber Development CompanyCLIENT: 1550 S 52nd St See Exhibit A-3 for description of field procedures. Operator: Daryl Meuller Excavation Exhibit: Tempe, AZ 85281 PROJECT: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites SITE: See Appendix B for description of laboratory procedures and additional data, (if any). See Appendix C for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. A-11 127 West Harris Avenue South San Francisco, California PE R C E N T F I N E S FI E L D T E S T RE S U L T S SA M P L E T Y P E WA T E R L E V E L OB S E R V A T I O N S DE P T H ( f t ) 5 10 DR Y U N I T WE I G H T ( p c f ) ATTERBERG LIMITS LL-PL-PI UN C O N F I N E D CO M P R E S S I V E ST R E N G T H ( p s f ) WA T E R CO N T E N T ( % ) 0 100 200 qc [T/ft^2] 0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 De p t h [ f t ] 0 1.0 2.0 3.0 fs [T/ft^2] 0 20 40 60 u2 [lb/in^2] 0 1.00 2.00 Su(qc) [T/ft^2] 0 10 20 30 40 50 N60 [blows/ft] Test no: CPT-1 Project ID: 60145004 Client: Terracon Project: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites Position:Location: South San Francisco, California Ground level: Date: 3/7/2014 Scale: 1 : 40 Page: 1/1 Fig: File: CPT-1.cpd U2 Sleeve area [cm2]: 150 Tip area [cm2]: 10 Cone No: 4141 Classification by Robertson 1986 Sensitive fine grained (1) Silty clay to clay (4) Sensitive fine grained (1) Silty clay to clay (4) Sensitive fine grained (1) Clayey silt to silty clay (5) Sandy silt to clayey silt (6) Clayey silt to silty clay (5) Sandy silt to clayey silt (6) Clayey silt to silty clay (5) Sandy silt to clayey silt (6) Clayey silt to silty clay (5) 0 100 200 qc [T/ft^2] 0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 De p t h [ f t ] 0 1.0 2.0 3.0 fs [T/ft^2] 0 20 40 60 u2 [lb/in^2] 0 1.00 2.00 Su(qc) [T/ft^2] 0 10 20 30 40 50 N60 [blows/ft] Test no: CPT-2 Project ID: 60145004 Client: Terracon Project: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites Position:Location: South San Francisco, California Ground level: Date: 3/7/2014 Scale: 1 : 40 Page: 1/1 Fig: File: CPT-2.cpd U2 Sleeve area [cm2]: 150 Tip area [cm2]: 10 Cone No: 4141 Classification by Robertson 1986 Sensitive fine grained (1) Silty sand to sandy silt (7) Clay (3) Sensitive fine grained (1) Sandy silt to clayey silt (6) Clayey silt to silty clay (5) Sandy silt to clayey silt (6) Very stiff fine grained (11) 0 100 200 qc [T/ft^2] 0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 De p t h [ f t ] 0 1.0 2.0 3.0 fs [T/ft^2] 0 20 40 60 u2 [lb/in^2] 0 1.00 2.00 Su(qc) [T/ft^2] 0 10 20 30 40 50 N60 [blows/ft] Test no: CPT-3 Project ID: 60145004 Client: Terracon Project: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites Position:Location: South San Francisco, California Ground level: Date: 3/7/2014 Scale: 1 : 40 Page: 1/1 Fig: File: CPT-3.cpd U2 Sleeve area [cm2]: 150 Tip area [cm2]: 10 Cone No: 4141 Classification by Robertson 1986 Sensitive fine grained (1) Sandy silt to clayey silt (6)Silty sand to sandy silt (7) Sensitive fine grained (1) Sandy silt to clayey silt (6) Clayey silt to silty clay (5) Silty sand to sandy silt (7) Sandy silt to clayey silt (6) APPENDIX B LABORATORY TESTING Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites ■ South San Francisco, California April 15, 2014 ■ Terracon Project No. 60145004 Exhibit B-1 Laboratory Testing Samples retrieved during the field exploration were taken to the laboratory for further observation by the project geotechnical engineer and were classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) described in Appendix C. At that time, the field descriptions were confirmed or modified as necessary and an applicable laboratory testing program was formulated to determine engineering properties of the subsurface materials. Laboratory tests were conducted on selected soil samples and the test results are presented in this appendix. The laboratory test results were used for the geotechnical engineering analyses, and the development of foundation and earthwork recommendations. Laboratory tests were performed in general accordance with the applicable ASTM, local or other accepted standards. Selected soil samples obtained from the site were tested for the following engineering properties: In-situ Dry Density In-situ Water Content Soluble Chlorides Soluble Sulfates pH Minimum Resistivity Grain Size Distribution Atterberg Limits Consolidation/Collapse Potential 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 0 20 40 60 80 100 CH o r O H CL o r O L ML or OL MH or OH PLPI 10.0 15.0 6.0 Boring ID Depth Description ORGANIC CLAY ORGANIC CLAY CLAYEY GRAVEL WITH SAND OH OH GC Fines P L A S T I C I T Y I N D E X LIQUID LIMIT "U" L i n e "A" L i n e 86 82 25 48 45 15 38 37 10 99 96 19 LL USCS B-1 B-2 TP-1 ATTERBERG LIMITS RESULTS ASTM D4318 2817 McGaw Avenue Irvine, California PROJECT NUMBER: 60145004PROJECT: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites SITE: 127 West Harris Avenue South San Francisco, California CLIENT: Kuber Development Company 1550 S 52nd St EXHIBIT: B-2 LA B O R A T O R Y T E S T S A R E N O T V A L I D I F S E P A R A T E D F R O M O R I G I N A L R E P O R T . A T T E R B E R G L I M I T S 6 0 1 4 5 0 0 4 - S S F B O R I N G L O G S . G P J T E R R A C O N 2 0 1 2 . G D T 3 / 2 8 / 1 4 CL-ML 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 0.0010.010.1110100 16 20 30 40 501.5 2006810 7.1 19.0 0.0 42.5 0.081 14 LLPLPI %Clay%Silt 413/4 1/2 60 fine HYDROMETERU.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS 1510 1.14 D100 CcCu SILT OR CLAY 4 %Sand%GravelD30D10 B-1 TP-1 POORLY GRADED SAND WITH SILT CLAYEY GRAVEL WITH SAND 25 0.139 0.263 0.21 5.26 4 25 B-1 TP-1 2.5935.0 6.0 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS PE R C E N T F I N E R B Y W E I G H T coarsefine GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION 3/8 3 100 14032 COBBLES GRAVEL SAND USCS Classification 92.9 38.5 D60 coarsemedium 35.0 6.0 Boring ID Depth Boring ID Depth 6 ASTM D422 2817 McGaw Avenue Irvine, California PROJECT NUMBER: 60145004PROJECT: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites SITE: 127 West Harris Avenue South San Francisco, California CLIENT: Kuber Development Company 1550 S 52nd St EXHIBIT: B-3 LA B O R A T O R Y T E S T S A R E N O T V A L I D I F S E P A R A T E D F R O M O R I G I N A L R E P O R T . S W _ G R A I N S I Z E : U S C S - 2 6 0 1 4 5 0 0 4 - S S F B O R I N G L O G S . G P J T E R R A C O N 2 0 1 2 . G D T 3 / 2 8 / 1 4 -40 -35 -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 100 1,000 10,000 AX I A L S T R A I N , % PRESSURE, psf SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST ASTM D4546 NOTES: Specimen Identification 20.0 ft Classification , pcf B-1 93 WC, % ORGANIC CLAY 44 2817 McGaw Avenue Irvine, California PROJECT NUMBER: 60145004PROJECT: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites SITE: 127 West Harris Avenue South San Francisco, California CLIENT: Kuber Development Company 1550 S 52nd St EXHIBIT: B-4 LA B O R A T O R Y T E S T S A R E N O T V A L I D I F S E P A R A T E D F R O M O R I G I N A L R E P O R T . S W _ C O N S O L _ S T R A I N - U S C S 6 0 1 4 5 0 0 4 - S S F B O R I N G L O G S . G P J T E R R A C O N 2 0 1 2 . G D T 3 / 2 8 / 1 4 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 100 1,000 10,000 AX I A L S T R A I N , % PRESSURE, psf SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST ASTM D4546 NOTES: Specimen Identification 10.0 ft Classification , pcf B-2 75 WC, % ORGANIC CLAY 53 2817 McGaw Avenue Irvine, California PROJECT NUMBER: 60145004PROJECT: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites SITE: 127 West Harris Avenue South San Francisco, California CLIENT: Kuber Development Company 1550 S 52nd St EXHIBIT: B-5 LA B O R A T O R Y T E S T S A R E N O T V A L I D I F S E P A R A T E D F R O M O R I G I N A L R E P O R T . S W _ C O N S O L _ S T R A I N - U S C S 6 0 1 4 5 0 0 4 - S S F B O R I N G L O G S . G P J T E R R A C O N 2 0 1 2 . G D T 3 / 2 8 / 1 4 Project Number: Service Date: Report Date: Task: Client Date Received: B-1 0.0 8.42 138 Nil +545 650 75 2037 Services: Terracon Rep: Reported To: Contractor: Reviewed By: CHEMICAL LABORATORY TEST REPORT Kurt D. Ergun pH Analysis, AWWA 4500 H Water Soluble Sulfate (SO4), AWWA 4500 E (mg/kg) Sulfides, AWWA 4500-S D, (mg/kg) Red-Ox, AWWA 2580, (mV) Total Salts, AWWA 2510, (mg/kg) Chlorides, AWWA 4500 Cl B, (mg/kg) Resistivity, ASTM G-57, (ohm-cm) Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites 03/28/14 750 Pilot Road, Suite F Las Vegas, Nevada 89119 (702) 597-9393 Project Lab No.: 14-0146 Analyzed By: Kurt D. Ergun Sample Number Sample Location Sample Depth (in.) The tests were performed in general accordance with applicable ASTM, AASHTO, or DOT test methods. This report is exclusively for the use of the client indicated above and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written consent of our company. Test results transmitted herein are only applicable to the actual samples tested at the location(s) referenced and are not necessarily indicative of the properties of other apparently similar or identical materials. 60145004 Terracon (60)Sample Submitted By:3/27/2014 Results of Corrosivity Analysis Chemist 03/28/14 APPENDIX C SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS Trace With Modifier Water Level After a Specified Period of Time GRAIN SIZE TERMINOLOGYRELATIVE PROPORTIONS OF SAND AND GRAVEL Trace With Modifier Standard Penetration or N-Value Blows/Ft. Descriptive Term (Consistency) Loose Very Stiff Exhibit C-1 Standard Penetration or N-Value Blows/Ft. Ring Sampler Blows/Ft. Ring Sampler Blows/Ft. Medium Dense Dense Very Dense 0 - 1 < 3 4 - 9 2 - 4 3 - 4 Medium-Stiff 5 - 9 30 - 50 WA T E R L E V E L Auger Shelby TubeSplit Spoon Rock Core 8 - 15 PLASTICITY DESCRIPTION Term < 15 15 - 29 > 30 Descriptive Term(s) of other constituents Water Initially Encountered Water Level After a Specified Period of Time Major Component of SamplePercent of Dry Weight (More than 50% retained on No. 200 sieve.) Density determined by Standard Penetration Resistance Includes gravels, sands and silts. Hard Very Loose 0 - 3 0 - 6Very Soft 7 - 18 Soft 10 - 29 19 - 58 59 - 98 Stiff less than 500 500 to 1,000 1,000 to 2,000 Macro Core 2,000 to 4,000 4,000 to 8,000> 99 LOCATION AND ELEVATION NOTES SA M P L I N G FI E L D T E S T S DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS Descriptive Term (Density) Non-plastic Low Medium High Boulders Cobbles Gravel Sand Silt or Clay 10 - 18 > 50 15 - 30 19 - 42 > 30 > 42 _ CONSISTENCY OF FINE-GRAINED SOILS Hand Penetrometer Torvane Standard Penetration Test (blows per foot) N value Photo-Ionization Detector Organic Vapor Analyzer (HP) (T) (b/f) N (PID) (OVA) (50% or more passing the No. 200 sieve.) Consistency determined by laboratory shear strength testing, field visual-manual procedures or standard penetration resistance DESCRIPTIVE SOIL CLASSIFICATION > 8,000 Unless otherwise noted, Latitude and Longitude are approximately determined using a hand-held GPS device. The accuracy of such devices is variable. Surface elevation data annotated with +/- indicates that no actual topographical survey was conducted to confirm the surface elevation. Instead, the surface elevation was approximately determined from topographic maps of the area. Soil classification is based on the Unified Soil Classification System. Coarse Grained Soils have more than 50% of their dry weight retained on a #200 sieve; their principal descriptors are: boulders, cobbles, gravel or sand. Fine Grained Soils have less than 50% of their dry weight retained on a #200 sieve; they are principally described as clays if they are plastic, and silts if they are slightly plastic or non-plastic. Major constituents may be added as modifiers and minor constituents may be added according to the relative proportions based on grain size. In addition to gradation, coarse-grained soils are defined on the basis of their in-place relative density and fine-grained soils on the basis of their consistency. Plasticity Index 0 1 - 10 11 - 30 > 30 RELATIVE PROPORTIONS OF FINES Descriptive Term(s) of other constituents Percent of Dry Weight < 5 5 - 12 > 12 RELATIVE DENSITY OF COARSE-GRAINED SOILS Particle Size Over 12 in. (300 mm) 12 in. to 3 in. (300mm to 75mm) 3 in. to #4 sieve (75mm to 4.75 mm) #4 to #200 sieve (4.75mm to 0.075mm Passing #200 sieve (0.075mm) ST R E N G T H T E R M S Unconfined Compressive Strength, Qu, psf 4 - 8 GENERAL NOTES Modified California Ring Sampler Grab Sample Modified Dames & Moore Ring Sampler No Recovery Water levels indicated on the soil boring logs are the levels measured in the borehole at the times indicated. Groundwater level variations will occur over time. In low permeability soils, accurate determination of groundwater levels is not possible with short term water level observations. Exhibit C-2 UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM Criteria for Assigning Group Symbols and Group Names Using Laboratory Tests A Soil Classification Group Symbol Group Name B Coarse Grained Soils: More than 50% retained on No. 200 sieve Gravels: More than 50% of coarse fraction retained on No. 4 sieve Clean Gravels: Less than 5% fines C Cu t 4 and 1 d Cc d 3 E GW Well-graded gravel F Cu 4 and/or 1 ! Cc ! 3 E GP Poorly graded gravel F Gravels with Fines: More than 12% fines C Fines classify as ML or MH GM Silty gravel F,G,H Fines classify as CL or CH GC Clayey gravel F,G,H Sands: 50% or more of coarse fraction passes No. 4 sieve Clean Sands: Less than 5% fines D Cu t 6 and 1 d Cc d 3 E SW Well-graded sand I Cu 6 and/or 1 ! Cc ! 3 E SP Poorly graded sand I Sands with Fines: More than 12% fines D Fines classify as ML or MH SM Silty sand G,H,I Fines classify as CL or CH SC Clayey sand G,H,I Fine-Grained Soils: 50% or more passes the No. 200 sieve Silts and Clays: Liquid limit less than 50 Inorganic: PI ! 7 and plots on or above “A” line J CL Lean clay K,L,M PI 4 or plots below “A” line J ML Silt K,L,M Organic: Liquid limit - oven dried 0.75 OL Organic clay K,L,M,N Liquid limit - not dried Organic silt K,L,M,O Silts and Clays: Liquid limit 50 or more Inorganic: PI plots on or above “A” line CH Fat clay K,L,M PI plots below “A” line MH Elastic Silt K,L,M Organic: Liquid limit - oven dried 0.75 OH Organic clay K,L,M,P Liquid limit - not dried Organic silt K,L,M,Q Highly organic soils: Primarily organic matter, dark in color, and organic odor PT Peat A Based on the material passing the 3-inch (75-mm) sieve B If field sample contained cobbles or boulders, or both, add “with cobbles or boulders, or both” to group name. C Gravels with 5 to 12% fines require dual symbols: GW-GM well-graded gravel with silt, GW-GC well-graded gravel with clay, GP-GM poorly graded gravel with silt, GP-GC poorly graded gravel with clay. D Sands with 5 to 12% fines require dual symbols: SW-SM well-graded sand with silt, SW-SC well-graded sand with clay, SP-SM poorly graded sand with silt, SP-SC poorly graded sand with clay E Cu = D60/D10 Cc = 6010 2 30 DxD )(D F If soil contains t 15% sand, add “with sand” to group name. G If fines classify as CL-ML, use dual symbol GC-GM, or SC-SM. H If fines are organic, add “with organic fines” to group name. I If soil contains t 15% gravel, add “with gravel” to group name. J If Atterberg limits plot in shaded area, soil is a CL-ML, silty clay. K If soil contains 15 to 29% plus No. 200, add “with sand” or “with gravel,” whichever is predominant. L If soil contains t 30% plus No. 200 predominantly sand, add “sandy” to group name. M If soil contains t 30% plus No. 200, predominantly gravel, add “gravelly” to group name. N PI t 4 and plots on or above “A” line. O PI 4 or plots below “A” line. P PI plots on or above “A” line. Q PI plots below “A” line. APPENDIX D LIQUEFACTION ANALYSIS Exhibit D-1 LIQUEFACTION ANALYSIS SUMMARY Input File Name: N:\Projects\2014\60145004\Working Files\Liquefaction\B-1.liq Title: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites Subtitle: 60145004 Input Data: Surface Elev.=100 Hole No.=B-1 Depth of Hole=51.50 ft Water Table during Earthquake= 8.00 ft Water Table during In-Situ Testing= 8.00 ft Max. Acceleration=0.8 g Earthquake Magnitude=7.88 No-Liquefiable Soils: CL, OL are Non-Liq. Soil 1. SPT or BPT Calculation. 2. Settlement Analysis Method: Tokimatsu, M-correction 3. Fines Correction for Liquefaction: Modify Stark/Olson 4. Fine Correction for Settlement: During Liquefaction* 5. Settlement Calculation in: All zones* 6. Hammer Energy Ratio, Ce = 1.25 7. Borehole Diameter, Cb= 1.05 8. Sampling Method, Cs= 1.2 9. User request factor of safety (apply to CSR) , User= 1.2 Plot two CSR (fs1=User, fs2=1) 10. Use Curve Smoothing: Yes* * Recommended Options In-Situ Test Data: Depth SPT gamma Fines ft pcf % ____________________________________ 3.00 50.00 120.00 20.00 8.00 50.00 120.00 20.00 10.00 1.00 92.30 NoLiq 15.00 1.00 85.10 NoLiq 20.00 1.00 85.10 NoLiq 25.00 1.00 85.10 NoLiq 30.00 32.00 103.80 NoLiq 35.00 62.00 103.80 4.00 40.00 46.00 134.90 4.00 45.00 14.00 110.00 14.00 50.00 21.00 133.40 4.00 ____________________________________ Output Results: Settlement of Saturated Sands=0.95 in. Settlement of Unsaturated Sands=0.02 in. Total Settlement of Saturated and Unsaturated Sands=0.97 in. Differential Settlement=0.486 to 0.642 in. Exhibit D-2 LIQUEFACTION ANALYSIS SUMMARY Input File Name: N:\Projects\2014\60145004\Working Files\Liquefaction\B-2.liq Title: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites Subtitle: 60145004 Input Data: Surface Elev.=100 Hole No.=B-2 Depth of Hole=51.50 ft Water Table during Earthquake= 10.00 ft Water Table during In-Situ Testing= 10.00 ft Max. Acceleration=0.72 g Earthquake Magnitude=7.88 No-Liquefiable Soils: CL, OL are Non-Liq. Soil 1. SPT or BPT Calculation. 2. Settlement Analysis Method: Tokimatsu, M-correction 3. Fines Correction for Liquefaction: Modify Stark/Olson 4. Fine Correction for Settlement: During Liquefaction* 5. Settlement Calculation in: All zones* 6. Hammer Energy Ratio, Ce = 1.25 7. Borehole Diameter, Cb= 1.05 8. Sampling Method, Cs= 1.2 9. User request factor of safety (apply to CSR) , User= 1.2 Plot two CSR (fs1=User, fs2=1) 10. Use Curve Smoothing: Yes* * Recommended Options In-Situ Test Data: Depth SPT gamma Fines ft pcf % ____________________________________ 10.00 1.00 93.30 NoLiq 15.00 1.00 93.30 NoLiq 20.00 7.00 124.30 NoLiq 25.00 29.00 123.00 4.00 30.00 8.00 135.30 14.00 35.00 61.00 138.00 4.00 40.00 20.00 123.00 4.00 41.50 16.00 123.00 4.00 45.00 16.00 123.00 4.00 50.00 57.00 138.30 4.00 ____________________________________ Output Results: Settlement of Saturated Sands=1.55 in. Settlement of Unsaturated Sands=0.00 in. Total Settlement of Saturated and Unsaturated Sands=1.55 in. Differential Settlement=0.773 to 1.021 in. Terracon Consultants, Inc. 2817 McGaw Avenue Irvine, California 92614 P [949] 261.0051 F [949] 261.6110 terracon.com August 21, 2014 Kuber Development Company 1550 S 52nd Street Tempe, AZ 85281 Attn: Mr. Shane Kuber P: (480) 968-4500 E: shanekuber@gmail.com Re: Response to City of South San Francisco – Geotechnical Peer Review Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites 127 West Harris Avenue South San Francisco, California Terracon Project No. 60145004 Dear Mr. Kuber: The following is Terracon’s response to the peer review of Terracon’s Geotechnical Engineering Report for the above referenced project. The geotechnical peer review was performed by Cotton, Shires and Associates, Inc. (CSA) for the City of South San Francisco and comments were provided in their letter dated May 6, 2014. CSA concluded that the proposed foundation is constrained by existing undocumented fill materials, weak subsurface materials potentially subject to consolidation, liquefaction, and strong seismic ground shaking. CSA recommended that the Geotechnical Consultant clarify multiple items. This response letter addresses each item outlined by CSA and provides supplemental design and analysis information, where necessary. Item 1: Discuss sampling methods used to obtain samples for consolidation testing and the disturbance effects likely resulting from the sampling method. Response 1: The sampling methods used to obtain samples for consolidation testing was performed using a Modified Dames & Moore Ring Sampler. The sampler is a thin walled tube with a nominal diameter of 60 mm (~2.4 inches). The ring is driven into the ground using a 140- pound automatic hammer falling 30 inches. Based on the relatively low penetration resistance (i.e. blowcounts of 1 to 3 blows per foot) recorded during the sampling event of the subgrade materials, we do not believe that the sampler blows have disturbed the sampled soils. However, to further address this issue, Terracon has completed supplemental soil borings at the site and utilized Shelby tubes to obtain representative samples of the softer subsurface materials. Additionally, laboratory consolidation testing has been completed on these recent Response to City of South San Francisco Peer Review Comments Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites ■ South San Francisco, California August 21, 2014 ■ Terracon Project No. 60145004 Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 2 soils samples obtained from these supplemental test borings. Soil samples were delivered to the closest laboratory upon completion of the supplemental test boring and field exploration activities and the consolidation testing was initiated on relatively undisturbed samples obtained from the site. The results of that testing and the impact to our recommendations are subsequently discussed in this response letter. Item 2: The Project Geotechnical Consultant should provide consolidation analysis of Bay Mud and any other subsurface materials that may be subject to consolidation. This work should include providing the Compression Index Ratio (Cce), Recompression Index (Cre), Preconsolidation stress, and Over-Consolidation Ratio. Estimated new loading of compressible materials should be defined. Estimated ongoing consolidation should also be addressed. Response 2: Results of our initial consolidation testing were provided in Appendix B of the original Terracon geotechnical engineering report for the project. The results of the recent supplemental testing of soil samples obtained from the site are illustrated on the consolidation graphs attached to this letter. The testing was performed on samples of the Bay Mud stratum at various depths ranging between 10 feet and 20 feet bgs. The compression strain index (Cc), the re-compression strain index (Cr), over-consolidation ratios, and estimated consolidation settlement are included in the attached calculation sheets. The new loading was defined as a contact pressure of 500 psf at the bottom of the proposed mat foundation system at a level of 4 feet bgs. The effective stress transferred to lower soil strata was based on Westergaard stress distribution method. Furthermore, placing the mat foundation at 4 feet bgs will essentially provide full compensation of the mat foundation at the recommended design bearing pressure of 500 psf. Historical aerial photographs indicate that the existing fill soils have been placed onsite since the 1980’s. Ongoing consolidation due to the existing fill materials may be considered minimal given the time period the existing fill has been present on-site. Item 3: Discuss the impacts of leaving up to 4 feet of undocumented fill in-place beneath the shallow foundations. Response 3: Support of structures and pavements on or above existing fill materials was discussed in the original Terracon report for the project. However, even with the recommended construction testing services, there remains an inherent risk for the owner that compressible fill or unsuitable material within or buried by the fill will not be discovered. This risk of unforeseen conditions cannot be eliminated without completely removing the existing fill. However, our design and construction recommendations include provisions that a representative of the geotechnical engineer be called to observe the conditions exposed at foundation subgrade elevation during construction. This will afford the opportunity to visually observe and evaluate the consistency of the exiting fill materials versus what can be observed from borings alone, and Response to City of South San Francisco Peer Review Comments Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites ■ South San Francisco, California August 21, 2014 ■ Terracon Project No. 60145004 Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 3 to determine if any other ground improvement or treatment of existing fill materials is necessary before the foundation is constructed. Item 4: Clarification should be provided regarding the analysis of the liquefaction potential of the silty sand layer between 29 and 35 feet. Response 4: Liquefaction potential analysis was calculated for Borings B-1 and B-2. CPT data was not available to use in the analysis because of the CPT refusal on relatively dense layer encountered at about 25 feet bgs. However in our borings this dense layer of granular material was underlain by a loose to medium dense layer, which has a potential for liquefaction hazard during a seismic event. Further information of the parameters, methods, and calculations used in our engineering analyses regarding liquefaction are attached to this letter. Item 5: Consideration should be given to re-investigating the site with a rotary wash drill rig and thin-wall sampling tube capabilities to obtain undisturbed Bay Mud samples for consolidation testing and CPT data collection down to 50 feet to better characterize the liquefaction potential below 25 feet. Response 5: Our original exploration of the site included sampling and testing of the Bay Mud samples. It is our professional opinion that the samples retrieved from this layer were relatively undisturbed and the results of consolidation testing are representative of the in-situ conditions. Furthermore, CPT soundings were not extended further than 25 feet due to refusal of the dense layer of sand encountered at this depth. Therefore our liquefaction potential calculations utilized information obtained from the borings and Standard Penetration Test results. However, in the interest of addressing this item, Terracon has completed supplemental test borings and laboratory evaluation of samples from the site as previously outlined in this response letter. The combination of our original borings and laboratory test data, and the data generated from our recent supplemental field and laboratory work has been used to conduct additional engineering analyses which is reflected in the revised design recommendations and settlement predictions outlined in this response letter. Item 6: The consultant should consider the benefits of a deep foundation bearing below highly compressible Bay Mud. Response 6: During our engineering analyses regarding the subsurface conditions at this site, deep foundations were considered. However due to the liquefiable layer below the compressible Bay Mud and the effects of down drag on a deep foundation system, the capacity of the deep foundations within the upper 50 feet was not considered suitable to support the proposed building. If deep foundations are to be used for this facility, subsurface conditions below a depth of 50 feet would need to be evaluated with additional field explorations to develop 9.0 22.3 FILL - CLAYEY GRAVEL WITH SAND , sandy, gray to brown orange to brown, boulders to 24 inches in dimension ORGANIC CLAY (OH), black to gray, with black peat seams Boring Terminated at 22.25 Feet The estimated depth of the fill materials should not be considered exact due to the similarity of lithology, color, and densities of the graded materials and native soils. Hammer Type: Automatic SPT HammerStratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual. LOCATION DEPTH GR A P H I C L O G See Exhibit A-2 TH I S B O R I N G L O G I S N O T V A L I D I F S E P A R A T E D F R O M O R I G I N A L R E P O R T . G E O S M A R T L O G - N O W E L L 6 0 1 4 5 0 0 4 - S S F B O R I N G L O G S . G P J T E M P L A T E U P D A T E 3 - 3 1 - 1 4 . G P J 8 / 1 9 / 1 4 127 West Harris Avenue South San Francisco, California SITE: Page 1 of 1 Advancement Method: 8 inch hollow stem auger Abandonment Method: tremie backfilled with neat cement upon completion , Notes: Project No.: 60145004 Drill Rig: CME-75 Boring Started: 8/1/2014 BORING LOG NO. B-1 Kuber Development CompanyCLIENT: 1550 S 52nd St Driller: NOA Boring Completed: 8/1/2014 Exhibit: Tempe, AZ 85281 A-3 See Exhibit A-3 for description of field procedures. See Appendix B for description of laboratory procedures and additional data (if any). See Appendix C for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. PROJECT: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites DE P T H ( F t . ) 5 10 15 20 SA M P L E T Y P E WA T E R L E V E L OB S E R V A T I O N S WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS 5.0 9.0 19.8 FILL - POORLY GRADED SAND WITH GRAVEL , orange to brown, cobbles and boulders to 42 inches in dimension, derived from sandstone rock fragments FILL - CLAYEY SAND WITH GRAVEL , dark gray, occasional boulders to 12 inches in dimension, older fill ORGANIC CLAY (OH), dark blue to gray, very soft, with black peat seams and decomposing plant matter Boring Terminated at 19.75 Feet The estimated depth of the fill materials should not be considered exact due to the similarity of lithology, color, and densities of the graded materials and native soils. Hammer Type: Automatic SPT HammerStratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual. LOCATION DEPTH GR A P H I C L O G See Exhibit A-2 TH I S B O R I N G L O G I S N O T V A L I D I F S E P A R A T E D F R O M O R I G I N A L R E P O R T . G E O S M A R T L O G - N O W E L L 6 0 1 4 5 0 0 4 - S S F B O R I N G L O G S . G P J T E M P L A T E U P D A T E 3 - 3 1 - 1 4 . G P J 8 / 1 9 / 1 4 127 West Harris Avenue South San Francisco, California SITE: Page 1 of 1 Advancement Method: 8 inch hollow stem auger Abandonment Method: tremie backfilled with neat cement upon completion , Notes: Project No.: 60145004 Drill Rig: CME-75 Boring Started: 8/1/2014 BORING LOG NO. B-2 Kuber Development CompanyCLIENT: 1550 S 52nd St Driller: NOA Boring Completed: 8/1/2014 Exhibit: Tempe, AZ 85281 A-4 See Exhibit A-3 for description of field procedures. See Appendix B for description of laboratory procedures and additional data (if any). See Appendix C for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. PROJECT: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites DE P T H ( F t . ) 5 10 15 SA M P L E T Y P E WA T E R L E V E L OB S E R V A T I O N S WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS Purpose of Program: Method of Analysis: 3. Subdivide subsurface soil profile into layers based on stratigraphy. 4. Calculate the effective vertical stress at the midpoint of each layer and the C' value for that layer. 5. Calculate the increase in stress at the midpoint of each layer. 6. Calculate the settlement in each layer, ǻH, under the applied load using the following formula 7. Sum the incremental settlements to determine the total settlement. - Settlement in cohesive soils is determined using consolidation equations (depending on pressures). - Stress distribution can be calculated using Boussinesq or Westergaard methods. Key Assumptions/Points: - C' is automatically determined by this spreadsheet based on soil type and N-value. - CHc and CHr are strain based. That is, there is no void ratio involved. - Soil layers are horizontal. Input Designation: Cells that are shaded gray (like this one) designate those fields where the user can provide input. The tabs in this spreadsheet are also color coded. In general, gray tabs designate input, white designates output. FHWA"GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING CIRCULAR NO. 6 - Shallow Foundations." FHWA-SA-02-054. See pages 89-91. Key Assumptions - The Hough method is applicable only for normally consolidated cohesionless soils. - Note that 1/C' is equal to CHc (compression ratio). References 2. Determine bearing capacity index (Cƍ) using corrected N-values (Nƍ), determined in Step 1 using the chart below. Shallow Foundation Settlement Program Overview and Equations Calculate settlement for shallow foundations in both cohesionless and cohesive soils. Settlement in cohesionless soils is calculated using Hough's method, which consists of the following steps: 1. Correct SPT blow counts for overburden stress. o f cCHHV V Hlog ' o f rCHHV V Hlog ' ¸¸ ¹ · ¨¨ © § ' p f c o p r CCHH V V V V HHloglog Project Project No. Notes/Location Date Symbol Value Units Description Bmin 40.00ft Minimum Footing Width Bmax 60.00ft Maximum Footing Width L/B Ratio 4.00 none Length to Width (L/B) Ratio Df 4.00 ft Depth of Footing (from ground surface) Gw 8.00 ft Depth to Groundwater (from ground surface) Pressure 500 psf Design bearing pressure Perform Analysis Stress Distribution Method: Selected Analysis Method: Definition of Footing Variables Footing Input Parameters 8/19/2014 Footing length defined by: Shallow Foundation Settlement PROJECT INFORMATION Fairfield Inn & Suites 60145004 Df B Ground Surface Gw Ground Surface Fixed Footing Length Fixed Length to Width (L/B) Ratio Click to Perform Analysis PROJECT INFORMATION Footing is 4 feet below the ground surface. Groundwater is 8 feet below the ground surface. Top (ft) Bottom (ft) J moist (pcf)Method N-Value (corrected)Hough Type CHcCHr OCR 0.04.5 120 Hough 50 Well graded fine to medium SILTY SAND 4.59.0 130 Hough 50 Well graded silty SAND & GRAVEL 9.0 12.5 92 Direct1 Sandy CLAY 0.2570.045 1.457726 12.515.0 92 Direct1 Sandy CLAY 0.37 0.0761 15.017.5 92 Direct1 Sandy CLAY 0.3520.061 1.483792 17.520.0 92 Direct1 Sandy CLAY 0.3060.073 1.476732 20.025.0 85 Direct1 Sandy CLAY 0.3820.068 1.298961 25.030.0 85 Hough1 Sandy CLAY 30.035.0 104 Hough59.2360304 Clean well graded fine to coarse SAND 35.040.0 104 Hough69.5310151 Clean well graded fine to coarse SAND 40.045.0 135 Hough76.8508337 Well graded fine to medium SILTY SAND 45.050.0 133 Hough14.2858659 Clean well graded fine to coarse SAND 50.051.5 133 Hough32.3123539 Clean well graded fine to coarse SAND Shallow Foundation Settlement Depth of Footing and Depth to Groundwater Soil Input Parameters Project Project No. Notes/Location Date Fairfield Inn & Suites 60145004 8/19/2014 Click to Analyze Project Project No. Notes/Location Date Width (ft)Length (ft)Pressure (psf)Settlement (in) 40 160 500 2.7 41 164 500 2.7 42 168 500 2.7 43 172 500 2.8 44 176 500 2.8 45 180 500 2.8 46 184 500 2.8 47 188 500 2.8 48 192 500 2.8 49 196 500 2.8 50 200 500 2.9 51 204 500 2.9 52 208 500 2.9 53 212 500 2.9 Dimensions, Pressure, and Settlement Settlement Results PROJECT INFORMATION Fairfield Inn & Suites 60145004 8/19/2014 Westergaard Stress Distribution Method 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 40.0 45.0 50.0 55.0 60.0 Se t t l m e n t ( i n ) Footing Width (ft) Pressure = 500 psf Project:Notes Number:Date: Width (ft)Length (ft)Mid Point Depth (ft)Vo' (psf)Vp' (psf)'V' (psf)Vf' (psf)Settlement (in) 40.0160.04.25 5105104971007 0.0 40.0160.06.75 8338334681301 0.1 40.0160.010.75111416244231537 0.3 40.0160.013.75120312033911594 1.4 40.0160.016.25127718953661643 0.2 40.0160.018.75135119953421693 0.2 40.0160.022.50144518773091754 0.3 40.0160.027.50155815582711829 0.2 40.0160.032.50171817182391958 0.0 40.0160.037.50192619262122138 0.0 40.0160.042.50221222121892401 0.0 40.0160.047.50257025701702740 0.0 40.0160.050.75279927991592958 0.0 Westergaard Total=2.7 41.0164.04.25 5105104971007 0.0 41.0164.06.75 8338334691301 0.1 41.0164.010.75111416244251539 0.3 41.0164.013.75120312033931597 1.4 41.0164.016.25127718953691646 0.2 41.0164.018.75135119953451696 0.2 41.0164.022.50144518773131758 0.3 41.0164.027.50155815582751833 0.2 41.0164.032.50171817182431962 0.0 41.0164.037.50192619262162143 0.0 41.0164.042.50221222121932405 0.0 41.0164.047.50257025701742743 0.0 41.0164.050.75279927991632962 0.0 Westergaard Total=2.7 42.0168.04.25 5105104971007 0.0 42.0168.06.75 8338334701302 0.1 42.0168.010.75111416244271541 0.3 42.0168.013.75120312033961599 1.4 42.0168.016.25127718953711649 0.2 42.0168.018.75135119953481700 0.2 42.0168.022.50144518773171761 0.4 42.0168.027.50155815582791837 0.2 42.0168.032.50171817182481966 0.0 42.0168.037.50192619262202147 0.0 42.016842.50221222121972409 0.0 42.016847.50257025701782747 0.0 Stress and Settlement Calculation Output Fairfield Inn & Suites 60145004 8/19/2014 42.016850.75279927991662965 0.0 Westergaard Total=2.7 43.0172 4.25 5105104971007 0.0 43.0172 6.75 8338334701303 0.1 43.017210.75111416244281543 0.3 43.017213.75120312033981601 1.4 43.017216.25127718953741651 0.2 43.017218.75135119953521703 0.2 43.017222.50144518773201765 0.4 43.0172 27.5155815582831841 0.2 43.0172 32.5171817182511970 0.0 43.0172 37.5192619262242151 0.0 43.0172 42.5221222122012413 0.0 43.0172 47.5257025701812751 0.0 43.017250.75279927991702969 0.0 Westergaard Total=2.8 44.0176 4.25 5105104971007 0.0 44.0176 6.75 8338334711304 0.1 44.017610.75111416244301544 0.3 44.017613.75120312034001603 1.4 44.017616.25127718953771654 0.2 44.017618.75135119953541706 0.2 44.0176 22.5144518773241768 0.4 44.0176 27.5155815582871845 0.2 44.0176 32.5171817182551974 0.0 44.0176 37.5192619262282154 0.0 44.0176 42.5221222122052417 0.0 44.0176 47.5257025701852755 0.0 44.017650.75279927991742973 0.0 Westergaard Total=2.8 45.0180 4.25 5105104971007 0.0 45.0180 6.75 8338334721304 0.1 45.018010.75111416244311546 0.3 45.018013.75120312034021606 1.4 45.018016.25127718953791656 0.2 45.018018.75135119953571709 0.2 45.0180 22.5144518773271771 0.4 45.0180 27.5155815582901848 0.2 45.0180 32.5171817182591977 0.0 45.0180 37.5192619262322158 0.0 45.0180 42.5221222122092420 0.0 45.0180 47.5257025701892758 0.0 45.018050.75279927991772976 0.0 Westergaard Total=2.8 46.0184 4.25 5105104971007 0.0 46.0184 6.75 8338334721305 0.1 46.018410.75111416244331547 0.3 46.018413.75120312034041608 1.4 46.018416.25127718953821659 0.2 46.018418.75135119953601711 0.2 46.0184 22.5144518773301775 0.4 46.0184 27.5155815582941852 0.2 46.0184 32.5171817182631981 0.0 46.0184 37.5192619262362162 0.0 46.0184 42.5221222122122424 0.0 46.0184 47.5257025701922762 0.0 46.018450.75279927991812980 0.0 Westergaard Total=2.8 47.0188 4.25 5105104981008 0.0 47.0188 6.75 8338334731305 0.1 47.018810.75111416244341549 0.3 47.018813.75120312034061610 1.4 47.018816.25127718953841661 0.2 47.018818.75135119953631714 0.2 47.0188 22.5144518773331778 0.4 47.0188 27.5155815582971855 0.2 47.0188 32.5171817182661984 0.0 47.0188 37.5192619262392165 0.0 47.0188 42.5221222122162428 0.0 47.0188 47.5257025701962765 0.0 47.018850.75279927991842983 0.0 Westergaard Total=2.8 48.0192 4.25 5105104981008 0.0 48.0192 6.75 8338334731306 0.1 48.019210.75111416244361550 0.3 48.019213.75120312034081611 1.4 48.019216.25127718953861663 0.2 48.019218.75135119953651716 0.2 48.0192 22.5144518773361781 0.4 48.0192 27.5155815583011858 0.2 48.0192 32.5171817182701988 0.0 48.0192 37.5192619262432169 0.0 48.0192 42.5221222122192431 0.0 48.0192 47.5257025701992769 0.0 48.019250.75279927991872987 0.0 Westergaard Total=2.8 49.0196 4.25 5105104981008 0.0 49.0196 6.75 8338334741307 0.1 49.019610.75111416244371551 0.3 49.019613.75120312034101613 1.4 49.019616.25127718953881666 0.2 49.019618.75135119953681719 0.2 49.0196 22.5144518773391783 0.4 49.0196 27.5155815583041861 0.2 49.0196 32.5171817182731991 0.0 49.0196 37.5192619262462172 0.0 49.0196 42.5221222122232435 0.0 49.0196 47.5257025702032772 0.0 49.019650.75279927991912990 0.0 Westergaard Total=2.8 50.0200 4.25 5105104981008 0.0 50.0200 6.75 8338334751307 0.1 50.020010.75111416244381552 0.3 50.020013.75120312034121615 1.4 50.020016.25127718953901668 0.2 50.020018.75135119953701721 0.2 50.0200 22.5144518773411786 0.4 50.0200 27.5155815583071865 0.2 50.0200 32.5171817182761995 0.0 50.0200 37.5192619262502176 0.0 50.0200 42.5221222122262438 0.0 50.0200 47.5257025702062776 0.0 50.020050.75279927991942993 0.0 Westergaard Total=2.9 51.0204 4.25 5105104981008 0.0 51.0204 6.75 8338334751308 0.1 51.020410.75111416244391554 0.3 51.020413.75120312034131617 1.4 51.020416.25127718953921670 0.2 51.020418.75135119953721724 0.2 51.0204 22.5144518773441789 0.4 51.0204 27.5155815583101868 0.2 51.0204 32.5171817182801998 0.0 51.0204 37.5192619262532179 0.0 51.0204 42.5221222122302441 0.0 51.0204 47.5257025702092779 0.0 51.020450.75279927991972997 0.0 Westergaard Total=2.9 52.0208 4.25 5105104981008 0.0 52.0208 6.75 8338334761308 0.1 52.020810.75111416244401555 0.3 52.020813.75120312034151618 1.4 52.020816.25127718953941672 0.2 52.020818.75135119953751726 0.2 52.0208 22.5144518773471791 0.4 52.0208 27.5155815583131871 0.2 52.0208 32.5171817182832001 0.0 52.0208 37.5192619262562182 0.0 52.0208 42.5221222122332445 0.0 52.0208 47.5257025702122782 0.0 52.020850.75279927992013000 0.0 Westergaard Total=2.9 53.0212 4.25 5105104981008 0.0 53.0212 6.75 8338334761308 0.1 53.021210.75111416244421556 0.3 53.021213.75120312034161620 1.4 53.021216.25127718953961673 0.2 53.021218.75135119953771728 0.2 53.0212 22.5144518773491794 0.4 53.0212 27.5155815583161873 0.2 53.0212 32.5171817182862004 0.0 53.0212 37.5192619262592186 0.0 53.0212 42.5221222122362448 0.0 53.0212 47.5257025702162785 0.0 53.021250.75279927992043003 0.0 Westergaard Total=2.9 54.0216 4.25 5105104981008 0.0 54.0216 6.75 8338334761309 0.1 54.021610.75111416244431557 0.3 54.021613.75120312034181621 1.4 54.021616.25127718953981675 0.2 54.021618.75135119953791730 0.2 54.0216 22.5144518773521796 0.4 54.0216 27.5155815583181876 0.2 54.0216 32.5171817182892007 0.0 54.0216 37.5192619262622189 0.0 54.0216 42.5221222122392451 0.0 54.0216 47.5257025702192788 0.0 54.021650.75279927992073006 0.0 Westergaard Total=2.9 55.0220 4.25 5105104981008 0.0 55.0220 6.75 8338334771309 0.1 55.022010.75111416244441558 0.3 55.022013.75120312034191623 1.4 55.022016.25127718954001677 0.2 55.022018.75135119953811732 0.2 55.0220 22.5144518773541799 0.4 55.0220 27.5155815583211879 0.2 55.0220 32.5171817182922010 0.0 55.0220 37.5192619262652192 0.0 55.0220 42.5221222122422454 0.0 55.0220 47.5257025702222792 0.0 55.022050.75279927992103009 0.0 Westergaard Total=2.9 56.0224 4.25 5105104981008 0.0 56.0224 6.75 8338334771310 0.1 56.022410.75111416244451559 0.3 56.022413.75120312034211624 1.4 56.022416.25127718954011679 0.2 56.022418.75135119953831734 0.2 56.0224 22.5144518773561801 0.4 56.0224 27.5155815583241881 0.2 56.0224 32.5171817182952013 0.0 56.0224 37.5192619262682195 0.0 56.0224 42.5221222122452457 0.0 56.0224 47.5257025702252795 0.0 56.022450.75279927992133012 0.0 Westergaard Total=2.9 57.0228 4.25 5105104981008 0.0 57.0228 6.75 8338334781310 0.1 57.022810.75111416244461560 0.3 57.022813.75120312034221625 1.4 57.022816.25127718954031680 0.2 57.022818.75135119953851736 0.2 57.0228 22.5144518773591803 0.4 57.0228 27.5155815583261884 0.2 57.0228 32.5171817182972016 0.0 57.0228 37.5192619262712198 0.0 57.0228 42.5221222122482460 0.0 57.0228 47.5257025702282798 0.0 57.022850.75279927992163015 0.0 Westergaard Total=2.9 58.0232 4.25 5105104981008 0.0 58.0232 6.75 8338334781311 0.1 58.023210.75111416244461561 0.3 58.023213.75120312034231627 1.5 58.023216.25127718954051682 0.2 58.023218.75135119953871738 0.2 58.0232 22.5144518773611805 0.4 58.0232 27.5155815583291887 0.2 58.0232 32.5171817183002018 0.0 58.0232 37.5192619262742200 0.0 58.0232 42.5221222122512463 0.0 58.0232 47.5257025702312800 0.0 58.023250.75279927992193018 0.0 Westergaard Total=3.0 59.0236 4.25 5105104981008 0.0 59.0236 6.75 8338334781311 0.1 59.023610.75111416244471562 0.3 59.023613.75120312034251628 1.5 59.023616.25127718954061683 0.2 59.023618.75135119953881740 0.2 59.0236 22.5144518773631808 0.4 59.0236 27.5155815583311889 0.2 59.0236 32.5171817183032021 0.0 59.0236 37.5192619262772203 0.0 59.0236 42.5221222122542466 0.0 59.0236 47.5257025702342803 0.0 59.023650.75279927992223021 0.0 Westergaard Total=3.0 60.0240 4.25 5105104981008 0.0 60.0240 6.75 8338334791311 0.1 60.024010.75111416244481563 0.3 60.024013.75120312034261629 1.5 60.024016.25127718954081685 0.2 60.024018.75135119953901741 0.2 60.0240 22.5144518773651810 0.4 60.0240 27.5155815583341891 0.2 60.0240 32.5171817183052023 0.0 60.0240 37.5192619262802206 0.0 60.0240 42.5221222122572469 0.0 60.0240 47.5257025702362806 0.0 60.024050.75279927992243024 0.0 Westergaard Total=3.0 Job No.:Boring:Run By:MD Client:Sample:Reduced:PJ Project:Depth, ft.:Checked:PJ/DC Soil Type:Date:8/13/2014 Assumed Gs 2.7 Initial Final 88.8 62.0 48.4 63.0 2.486 1.675 96.5 100.0% Saturation: Dry Density, pcf: Moisture %: B-1 10(Tip-6")60145004 Terracon 725-003 Greenish Gray CLAY w/ organics (Bay Mud) Void Ratio: -5.0 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 10 100 1000 10000 100000 St r a i n , % Effective Stress, psf Strain-Log-P Curve Consolidation Test ASTM D2435 Remarks: This sample exhibited a slight tendency to swell. Job No.:Boring:Run By:MD Client:Sample:Reduced:PJ Project:Depth, ft.:Checked:PJ/DC Soil Type:Date:8/13/2014 Assumed Gs 2.75 Initial Final 96.6 64.6 45.9 61.8 2.740 1.778 97.0 100.0% Saturation: Dry Density, pcf: Moisture %: B-1 2060145004 Terracon 725-003 Dark Greenish Gray CLAY (Bay Mud) Void Ratio: -5.0 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 10 100 1000 10000 100000 St r a i n , % Effective Stress, psf Strain-Log-P Curve Consolidation Test ASTM D2435 Remarks: Job No.:Boring:Run By:MD Client:Sample:Reduced:PJ Project:Depth, ft.:Checked:PJ/DC Soil Type:Date:8/15/2014 Assumed Gs 2.75 Initial Final 108.9 61.6 41.3 63.7 3.158 1.694 94.8 100.0% Saturation: Dry Density, pcf: Moisture %: B-2 12.5(Tip-3.5")60145004 Terracon 722-003 Dark Greenish Gray CLAY w/ organics (Bay Mud) Void Ratio: 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 10 100 1000 10000 100000 St r a i n , % Effective Stress, psf Strain-Log-P Curve Consolidation Test ASTM D2435 Remarks: Job No.:Boring:Run By:MD Client:Sample:Reduced:PJ Project:Depth, ft.:Checked:PJ/DC Soil Type:Date:8/18/2014 Assumed Gs 2.75 Initial Final 91.0 64.8 48.1 61.7 2.572 1.782 97.3 100.0 Void Ratio: % Saturation: Dry Density, pcf: Moisture %: B-2 1560145004 Terracon 725-003 Greenish Gray CLAY (Bay Mud) 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 10 100 1000 10000 100000 St r a i n , % Effective Stress, psf Strain-Log-P Curve Consolidation Test ASTM D2435 Remarks: Job No.:Boring:Run By:MD Client:Sample:Reduced:PJ Project:Depth, ft.:Checked:PJ/DC Soil Type:Date:8/14/2014 Assumed Gs 2.7 Initial Final 86.0 60.1 49.8 64.2 2.387 1.624 97.3 100.0% Saturation: Dry Density, pcf: Moisture %: B-2 17.5(Tip-6.5")60145004 Terracon 725-003 Very Dark Gray Oranic SILT/ change to Greenish Gray CLAY w/ organics (Bay Mud) Void Ratio: -5.0 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 10 100 1000 10000 100000 St r a i n , % Effective Stress, psf Strain-Log-P Curve Consolidation Test ASTM D2435 Remarks: new avg B-2.sum ************************************************************************************ ******************* LIQUEFACTION ANALYSIS SUMMARY Copyright by CivilTech Software www.civiltechsoftware.com ************************************************************************************ ******************* Font: Courier New, Regular, Size 8 is recommended for this report. Licensed to , 6/16/2014 11:34:18 AM Input File Name: N:\Projects\2014\60145004\Working Files\Liquefaction\NEW LIQ\new avg B-2.liq Title: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites Subtitle: 60145004 Surface Elev.=100 Hole No.=B-2 Depth of Hole= 51.50 ft Water Table during Earthquake= 8.00 ft Water Table during In-Situ Testing= 8.00 ft Max. Acceleration= 0.8 g Earthquake Magnitude= 7.88 Input Data: Surface Elev.=100 Hole No.=B-2 Depth of Hole=51.50 ft Water Table during Earthquake= 8.00 ft Water Table during In-Situ Testing= 8.00 ft Max. Acceleration=0.8 g Earthquake Magnitude=7.88 No-Liquefiable Soils: CL, OL are Non-Liq. Soil 1. SPT or BPT Calculation. 2. Settlement Analysis Method: Tokimatsu, M-correction 3. Fines Correction for Liquefaction: Modify Stark/Olson 4. Fine Correction for Settlement: During Liquefaction* 5. Settlement Calculation in: All zones* 6. Hammer Energy Ratio, Ce = 1.25 7. Borehole Diameter, Cb= 1.05 8. Sampling Method, Cs= 1.2 9. User request factor of safety (apply to CSR) , User= 1.2 Plot two CSR (fs1=User, fs2=1) 10. Use Curve Smoothing: Yes* * Recommended Options In-Situ Test Data: DepthSPTgammaFines ft pcf% ____________________________________ 3.0050.00130.0020.00 9.0050.00130.0020.00 10.001.0093.30NoLiq 20.001.0093.30NoLiq 20.507.00124.304.00 26.0029.00123.004.00 31.008.00135.3014.00 36.0061.00138.004.00 41.0020.00123.004.00 Page 1 new avg B-2.sum 42.5016.00123.004.00 46.0016.00123.004.00 51.0057.00138.304.00 ____________________________________ Output Results: Settlement of Saturated Sands=2.26 in. Settlement of Unsaturated Sands=0.01 in. Total Settlement of Saturated and Unsaturated Sands=2.27 in. Differential Settlement=1.134 to 1.497 in. DepthCRRmCSRfsF.S.S_sat.S_dryS_all ft in.in.in. _______________________________________________________ 3.001.760.625.002.260.012.27 3.051.760.625.002.260.012.27 3.101.760.625.002.260.012.27 3.151.760.625.002.260.012.27 3.201.760.625.002.260.012.27 3.251.760.625.002.260.012.27 3.301.760.625.002.260.012.27 3.351.760.625.002.260.012.27 3.401.760.625.002.260.012.27 3.451.760.625.002.260.002.27 3.501.760.625.002.260.002.27 3.551.760.615.002.260.002.27 3.601.760.615.002.260.002.27 3.651.760.615.002.260.002.27 3.701.760.615.002.260.002.27 3.751.760.615.002.260.002.27 3.801.760.615.002.260.002.27 3.851.760.615.002.260.002.26 3.901.760.615.002.260.002.26 3.951.760.615.002.260.002.26 4.001.760.615.002.260.002.26 4.051.760.615.002.260.002.26 4.101.760.615.002.260.002.26 4.151.760.615.002.260.002.26 4.201.760.615.002.260.002.26 4.251.760.615.002.260.002.26 4.301.760.615.002.260.002.26 4.351.760.615.002.260.002.26 4.401.760.615.002.260.002.26 4.451.760.615.002.260.002.26 4.501.760.615.002.260.002.26 4.551.760.615.002.260.002.26 4.601.760.615.002.260.002.26 4.651.760.615.002.260.002.26 4.701.760.615.002.260.002.26 4.751.760.615.002.260.002.26 4.801.760.615.002.260.002.26 4.851.760.615.002.260.002.26 4.901.760.615.002.260.002.26 4.951.760.615.002.260.002.26 5.002.000.615.002.260.002.26 5.052.000.615.002.260.002.26 5.102.000.615.002.260.002.26 5.152.000.615.002.260.002.26 5.202.000.615.002.260.002.26 5.252.000.615.002.260.002.26 5.302.000.615.002.260.002.26 5.352.000.615.002.260.002.26 5.402.000.615.002.260.002.26 Page 2 new avg B-2.sum 5.452.000.615.002.260.002.26 5.502.000.615.002.260.002.26 5.552.000.615.002.260.002.26 5.602.000.615.002.260.002.26 5.652.000.615.002.260.002.26 5.702.000.615.002.260.002.26 5.752.000.615.002.260.002.26 5.802.000.615.002.260.002.26 5.852.000.615.002.260.002.26 5.902.000.615.002.260.002.26 5.952.000.615.002.260.002.26 6.002.000.615.002.260.002.26 6.052.000.615.002.260.002.26 6.102.000.615.002.260.002.26 6.152.000.615.002.260.002.26 6.202.000.615.002.260.002.26 6.252.000.615.002.260.002.26 6.302.000.615.002.260.002.26 6.352.000.615.002.260.002.26 6.402.000.615.002.260.002.26 6.452.000.615.002.260.002.26 6.502.000.615.002.260.002.26 6.552.000.615.002.260.002.26 6.602.000.615.002.260.002.26 6.652.000.615.002.260.002.26 6.702.000.615.002.260.002.26 6.752.000.615.002.260.002.26 6.802.000.615.002.260.002.26 6.852.000.615.002.260.002.26 6.902.000.615.002.260.002.26 6.952.000.615.002.260.002.26 7.002.000.615.002.260.002.26 7.052.000.615.002.260.002.26 7.102.000.615.002.260.002.26 7.152.000.615.002.260.002.26 7.202.000.615.002.260.002.26 7.252.000.615.002.260.002.26 7.302.000.615.002.260.002.26 7.352.000.615.002.260.002.26 7.402.000.615.002.260.002.26 7.452.000.615.002.260.002.26 7.502.000.615.002.260.002.26 7.552.000.615.002.260.002.26 7.602.000.615.002.260.002.26 7.652.000.615.002.260.002.26 7.702.000.615.002.260.002.26 7.752.000.615.002.260.002.26 7.802.000.615.002.260.002.26 7.852.000.615.002.260.002.26 7.902.000.615.002.260.002.26 7.952.000.615.002.260.002.26 8.002.000.615.002.260.002.26 8.052.000.615.002.260.002.26 8.102.000.615.002.260.002.26 8.152.000.615.002.260.002.26 8.202.000.625.002.260.002.26 8.252.000.625.002.260.002.26 8.302.000.625.002.260.002.26 8.352.000.625.002.260.002.26 8.402.000.625.002.260.002.26 8.452.000.625.002.260.002.26 8.502.000.635.002.260.002.26 8.552.000.635.002.260.002.26 Page 3 new avg B-2.sum 8.602.000.635.002.260.002.26 8.652.000.635.002.260.002.26 8.702.000.635.002.260.002.26 8.752.000.635.002.260.002.26 8.802.000.645.002.260.002.26 8.852.000.645.002.260.002.26 8.902.000.645.002.260.002.26 8.952.000.645.002.260.002.26 9.001.760.642.752.260.002.26 9.051.760.642.742.260.002.26 9.101.760.642.732.260.002.26 9.151.760.652.732.260.002.26 9.201.760.652.722.260.002.26 9.251.760.652.722.260.002.26 9.301.760.652.712.260.002.26 9.351.760.652.702.260.002.26 9.401.760.652.702.260.002.26 9.451.760.652.692.260.002.26 9.501.760.662.682.260.002.26 9.551.760.662.682.260.002.26 9.601.760.662.672.260.002.26 9.651.760.662.672.260.002.26 9.701.760.662.662.260.002.26 9.751.760.662.652.260.002.26 9.801.760.672.652.260.002.26 9.851.760.672.642.260.002.26 9.901.760.672.642.260.002.26 9.950.310.670.46*2.260.002.26 10.002.000.675.002.250.002.25 10.052.000.675.002.250.002.25 10.102.000.675.002.250.002.25 10.152.000.685.002.250.002.25 10.202.000.685.002.250.002.25 10.252.000.685.002.250.002.25 10.302.000.685.002.250.002.25 10.352.000.685.002.250.002.25 10.402.000.685.002.250.002.25 10.452.000.685.002.250.002.25 10.502.000.695.002.250.002.25 10.552.000.695.002.250.002.25 10.602.000.695.002.250.002.25 10.652.000.695.002.250.002.25 10.702.000.695.002.250.002.25 10.752.000.695.002.250.002.25 10.802.000.695.002.250.002.25 10.852.000.705.002.250.002.25 10.902.000.705.002.250.002.25 10.952.000.705.002.250.002.25 11.002.000.705.002.250.002.25 11.052.000.705.002.250.002.25 11.102.000.705.002.250.002.25 11.152.000.705.002.250.002.25 11.202.000.705.002.250.002.25 11.252.000.715.002.250.002.25 11.302.000.715.002.250.002.25 11.352.000.715.002.250.002.25 11.402.000.715.002.250.002.25 11.452.000.715.002.250.002.25 11.502.000.715.002.250.002.25 11.552.000.715.002.250.002.25 11.602.000.725.002.250.002.25 11.652.000.725.002.250.002.25 11.702.000.725.002.250.002.25 Page 4 new avg B-2.sum 11.752.000.725.002.250.002.25 11.802.000.725.002.250.002.25 11.852.000.725.002.250.002.25 11.902.000.725.002.250.002.25 11.952.000.725.002.250.002.25 12.002.000.735.002.250.002.25 12.052.000.735.002.250.002.25 12.102.000.735.002.250.002.25 12.152.000.735.002.250.002.25 12.202.000.735.002.250.002.25 12.252.000.735.002.250.002.25 12.302.000.735.002.250.002.25 12.352.000.745.002.250.002.25 12.402.000.745.002.250.002.25 12.452.000.745.002.250.002.25 12.502.000.745.002.250.002.25 12.552.000.745.002.250.002.25 12.602.000.745.002.250.002.25 12.652.000.745.002.250.002.25 12.702.000.745.002.250.002.25 12.752.000.755.002.250.002.25 12.802.000.755.002.250.002.25 12.852.000.755.002.250.002.25 12.902.000.755.002.250.002.25 12.952.000.755.002.250.002.25 13.002.000.755.002.250.002.25 13.052.000.755.002.250.002.25 13.102.000.755.002.250.002.25 13.152.000.755.002.250.002.25 13.202.000.765.002.250.002.25 13.252.000.765.002.250.002.25 13.302.000.765.002.250.002.25 13.352.000.765.002.250.002.25 13.402.000.765.002.250.002.25 13.452.000.765.002.250.002.25 13.502.000.765.002.250.002.25 13.552.000.765.002.250.002.25 13.602.000.775.002.250.002.25 13.652.000.775.002.250.002.25 13.702.000.775.002.250.002.25 13.752.000.775.002.250.002.25 13.802.000.775.002.250.002.25 13.852.000.775.002.250.002.25 13.902.000.775.002.250.002.25 13.952.000.775.002.250.002.25 14.002.000.785.002.250.002.25 14.052.000.785.002.250.002.25 14.102.000.785.002.250.002.25 14.152.000.785.002.250.002.25 14.202.000.785.002.250.002.25 14.252.000.785.002.250.002.25 14.302.000.785.002.250.002.25 14.352.000.785.002.250.002.25 14.402.000.785.002.250.002.25 14.452.000.795.002.250.002.25 14.502.000.795.002.250.002.25 14.552.000.795.002.250.002.25 14.602.000.795.002.250.002.25 14.652.000.795.002.250.002.25 14.702.000.795.002.250.002.25 14.752.000.795.002.250.002.25 14.802.000.795.002.250.002.25 14.852.000.795.002.250.002.25 Page 5 new avg B-2.sum 14.902.000.805.002.250.002.25 14.952.000.805.002.250.002.25 15.002.000.805.002.250.002.25 15.052.000.805.002.250.002.25 15.102.000.805.002.250.002.25 15.152.000.805.002.250.002.25 15.202.000.805.002.250.002.25 15.252.000.805.002.250.002.25 15.302.000.805.002.250.002.25 15.352.000.815.002.250.002.25 15.402.000.815.002.250.002.25 15.452.000.815.002.250.002.25 15.502.000.815.002.250.002.25 15.552.000.815.002.250.002.25 15.602.000.815.002.250.002.25 15.652.000.815.002.250.002.25 15.702.000.815.002.250.002.25 15.752.000.815.002.250.002.25 15.802.000.815.002.250.002.25 15.852.000.825.002.250.002.25 15.902.000.825.002.250.002.25 15.952.000.825.002.250.002.25 16.002.000.825.002.250.002.25 16.052.000.825.002.250.002.25 16.102.000.825.002.250.002.25 16.152.000.825.002.250.002.25 16.202.000.825.002.250.002.25 16.252.000.825.002.250.002.25 16.302.000.825.002.250.002.25 16.352.000.835.002.250.002.25 16.402.000.835.002.250.002.25 16.452.000.835.002.250.002.25 16.502.000.835.002.250.002.25 16.552.000.835.002.250.002.25 16.602.000.835.002.250.002.25 16.652.000.835.002.250.002.25 16.702.000.835.002.250.002.25 16.752.000.835.002.250.002.25 16.802.000.835.002.250.002.25 16.852.000.845.002.250.002.25 16.902.000.845.002.250.002.25 16.952.000.845.002.250.002.25 17.002.000.845.002.250.002.25 17.052.000.845.002.250.002.25 17.102.000.845.002.250.002.25 17.152.000.845.002.250.002.25 17.202.000.845.002.250.002.25 17.252.000.845.002.250.002.25 17.302.000.845.002.250.002.25 17.352.000.855.002.250.002.25 17.402.000.855.002.250.002.25 17.452.000.855.002.250.002.25 17.502.000.855.002.250.002.25 17.552.000.855.002.250.002.25 17.602.000.855.002.250.002.25 17.652.000.855.002.250.002.25 17.702.000.855.002.250.002.25 17.752.000.855.002.250.002.25 17.802.000.855.002.250.002.25 17.852.000.865.002.250.002.25 17.902.000.865.002.250.002.25 17.952.000.865.002.250.002.25 18.002.000.865.002.250.002.25 Page 6 new avg B-2.sum 18.052.000.865.002.250.002.25 18.102.000.865.002.250.002.25 18.152.000.865.002.250.002.25 18.202.000.865.002.250.002.25 18.252.000.865.002.250.002.25 18.302.000.865.002.250.002.25 18.352.000.865.002.250.002.25 18.402.000.875.002.250.002.25 18.452.000.875.002.250.002.25 18.502.000.875.002.250.002.25 18.552.000.875.002.250.002.25 18.602.000.875.002.250.002.25 18.652.000.875.002.250.002.25 18.702.000.875.002.250.002.25 18.752.000.875.002.250.002.25 18.802.000.875.002.250.002.25 18.852.000.875.002.250.002.25 18.902.000.875.002.250.002.25 18.952.000.885.002.250.002.25 19.002.000.885.002.250.002.25 19.052.000.885.002.250.002.25 19.102.000.885.002.250.002.25 19.152.000.885.002.250.002.25 19.202.000.885.002.250.002.25 19.252.000.885.002.250.002.25 19.302.000.885.002.250.002.25 19.352.000.885.002.250.002.25 19.402.000.885.002.250.002.25 19.452.000.885.002.250.002.25 19.502.000.885.002.250.002.25 19.552.000.895.002.250.002.25 19.602.000.895.002.250.002.25 19.652.000.895.002.250.002.25 19.702.000.895.002.250.002.25 19.752.000.895.002.250.002.25 19.802.000.895.002.250.002.25 19.852.000.895.002.250.002.25 19.902.000.895.002.250.002.25 19.952.000.895.002.250.002.25 20.002.000.895.002.250.002.25 20.050.230.890.26*2.250.002.25 20.100.220.890.24*2.240.002.24 20.150.200.900.23*2.240.002.24 20.200.190.900.21*2.230.002.23 20.250.180.900.20*2.220.002.22 20.300.160.900.18*2.210.002.21 20.350.150.900.17*2.200.002.20 20.400.140.900.16*2.190.002.19 20.450.130.900.14*2.180.002.18 20.500.120.900.13*2.160.002.16 20.550.120.900.14*2.150.002.15 20.600.130.900.14*2.140.002.14 20.650.130.900.14*2.120.002.12 20.700.130.900.15*2.110.002.11 20.750.140.900.15*2.100.002.10 20.800.140.900.15*2.090.002.09 20.850.140.900.16*2.080.002.08 20.900.140.900.16*2.060.002.06 20.950.150.900.16*2.050.002.05 21.000.150.900.17*2.040.002.04 21.050.150.900.17*2.030.002.03 21.100.160.910.17*2.020.002.02 21.150.160.910.18*2.010.002.01 Page 7 new avg B-2.sum 21.200.160.910.18*2.000.002.00 21.250.170.910.18*1.990.001.99 21.300.170.910.19*1.980.001.98 21.350.170.910.19*1.970.001.97 21.400.180.910.19*1.960.001.96 21.450.180.910.20*1.950.001.95 21.500.180.910.20*1.940.001.94 21.550.190.910.20*1.930.001.93 21.600.190.910.21*1.920.001.92 21.650.190.910.21*1.910.001.91 21.700.200.910.22*1.900.001.90 21.750.200.910.22*1.890.001.89 21.800.200.910.22*1.880.001.88 21.850.210.910.23*1.880.001.88 21.900.210.910.23*1.870.001.87 21.950.210.910.23*1.860.001.86 22.000.220.910.24*1.850.001.85 22.050.220.910.24*1.840.001.84 22.100.220.910.25*1.830.001.83 22.150.230.910.25*1.830.001.83 22.200.230.910.25*1.820.001.82 22.250.240.920.26*1.810.001.81 22.300.240.920.26*1.800.001.80 22.350.250.920.27*1.800.001.80 22.400.250.920.27*1.790.001.79 22.450.250.920.28*1.780.001.78 22.500.260.920.28*1.780.001.78 22.550.260.920.29*1.770.001.77 22.600.270.920.29*1.760.001.76 22.650.280.920.30*1.750.001.75 22.700.280.920.31*1.750.001.75 22.750.290.920.31*1.740.001.74 22.800.290.920.32*1.740.001.74 22.850.300.920.33*1.730.001.73 22.900.310.920.33*1.720.001.72 22.950.320.920.34*1.720.001.72 23.000.330.920.35*1.710.001.71 23.050.340.920.37*1.710.001.71 23.100.350.920.38*1.700.001.70 23.150.380.920.41*1.700.001.70 23.200.430.920.47*1.690.001.69 23.251.760.921.911.690.001.69 23.301.760.921.911.680.001.68 23.351.760.921.911.680.001.68 23.401.760.921.911.680.001.68 23.451.760.921.911.670.001.67 23.501.760.921.901.670.001.67 23.551.760.931.901.670.001.67 23.601.760.931.901.660.001.66 23.651.760.931.901.660.001.66 23.701.760.931.901.660.001.66 23.751.760.931.901.660.001.66 23.801.760.931.901.660.001.66 23.851.760.931.901.660.001.66 23.901.760.931.901.650.001.65 23.951.760.931.901.650.001.65 24.001.760.931.901.650.001.65 24.051.760.931.901.650.001.65 24.101.760.931.901.650.001.65 24.151.760.931.901.650.001.65 24.201.760.931.891.650.001.65 24.251.760.931.891.650.001.65 24.301.760.931.891.650.001.65 Page 8 new avg B-2.sum 24.351.760.931.891.650.001.65 24.401.760.931.891.650.001.65 24.451.760.931.891.650.001.65 24.501.760.931.891.650.001.65 24.551.760.931.891.650.001.65 24.601.760.931.891.650.001.65 24.651.760.931.891.650.001.65 24.701.760.931.891.650.001.65 24.751.760.931.891.650.001.65 24.801.760.931.891.650.001.65 24.851.760.931.891.650.001.65 24.901.760.931.891.650.001.65 24.951.760.931.891.650.001.65 25.001.760.931.881.650.001.65 25.051.760.941.881.650.001.65 25.101.760.941.881.650.001.65 25.151.760.941.881.650.001.65 25.201.760.941.881.650.001.65 25.251.760.941.881.650.001.65 25.301.760.941.881.650.001.65 25.351.760.941.881.650.001.65 25.401.760.941.881.650.001.65 25.451.760.941.881.650.001.65 25.501.760.941.881.650.001.65 25.551.760.941.881.650.001.65 25.601.760.941.881.650.001.65 25.651.760.941.881.650.001.65 25.701.760.941.881.650.001.65 25.751.760.941.881.650.001.65 25.801.760.941.871.650.001.65 25.851.760.941.871.650.001.65 25.901.760.941.871.650.001.65 25.951.760.941.871.650.001.65 26.001.760.941.871.650.001.65 26.051.760.941.871.650.001.65 26.101.760.941.871.650.001.65 26.151.760.941.871.650.001.65 26.201.760.941.871.650.001.65 26.251.760.941.871.650.001.65 26.301.760.941.871.650.001.65 26.351.760.941.871.650.001.65 26.401.760.941.871.650.001.65 26.451.760.941.871.650.001.65 26.501.760.941.871.650.001.65 26.551.760.941.871.650.001.65 26.601.760.941.871.650.001.65 26.651.760.941.871.650.001.65 26.701.760.941.871.650.001.65 26.751.760.941.861.650.001.65 26.801.760.951.861.650.001.65 26.851.760.951.861.650.001.65 26.901.760.951.861.650.001.65 26.951.760.951.861.650.001.65 27.001.760.951.861.650.001.65 27.051.760.951.861.650.001.65 27.101.760.951.861.650.001.65 27.151.760.951.861.650.001.65 27.201.760.951.861.650.001.65 27.251.760.951.861.650.001.65 27.301.760.951.861.650.001.65 27.351.760.951.861.650.001.65 27.401.760.951.861.650.001.65 27.451.760.951.861.650.001.65 Page 9 new avg B-2.sum 27.501.760.951.861.650.001.65 27.551.760.951.861.650.001.65 27.601.760.951.861.650.001.65 27.651.760.951.861.640.001.64 27.701.760.951.861.640.001.64 27.751.760.951.861.640.001.64 27.801.760.951.861.640.001.64 27.851.760.951.861.640.001.64 27.901.760.951.851.640.001.64 27.951.760.951.851.640.001.64 28.001.760.951.851.640.001.64 28.051.760.951.851.640.001.64 28.101.760.951.851.640.001.64 28.151.760.951.851.630.001.63 28.201.760.951.851.630.001.63 28.251.760.951.851.630.001.63 28.301.760.951.851.630.001.63 28.351.760.951.851.630.001.63 28.401.760.951.851.620.001.62 28.451.760.951.851.620.001.62 28.501.760.951.851.620.001.62 28.551.760.951.851.610.001.61 28.601.760.951.851.610.001.61 28.650.410.950.43*1.610.001.61 28.700.360.950.38*1.600.001.60 28.750.340.950.36*1.600.001.60 28.800.330.950.35*1.590.001.59 28.850.320.950.33*1.590.001.59 28.900.310.950.33*1.580.001.58 28.950.300.950.32*1.580.001.58 29.000.290.950.31*1.570.001.57 29.050.290.950.30*1.560.001.56 29.100.280.950.29*1.560.001.56 29.150.270.950.29*1.550.001.55 29.200.270.950.28*1.540.001.54 29.250.260.950.28*1.540.001.54 29.300.260.950.27*1.530.001.53 29.350.250.950.27*1.520.001.52 29.400.250.950.26*1.520.001.52 29.450.240.950.26*1.510.001.51 29.500.240.950.25*1.500.001.50 29.550.240.950.25*1.490.001.49 29.600.230.960.24*1.490.001.49 29.650.230.960.24*1.480.001.48 29.700.220.960.23*1.470.001.47 29.750.220.960.23*1.460.001.46 29.800.220.960.23*1.460.001.46 29.850.210.960.22*1.450.001.45 29.900.210.960.22*1.440.001.44 29.950.200.960.21*1.430.001.43 30.000.200.960.21*1.420.001.42 30.050.200.960.21*1.410.001.41 30.100.190.960.20*1.410.001.41 30.150.190.960.20*1.400.001.40 30.200.190.950.20*1.390.001.39 30.250.180.950.19*1.380.001.38 30.300.180.950.19*1.370.001.37 30.350.180.950.19*1.360.001.36 30.400.180.950.18*1.350.001.35 30.450.170.950.18*1.340.001.34 30.500.170.950.18*1.330.001.33 30.550.170.950.17*1.320.001.32 30.600.160.950.17*1.310.001.31 Page 10 new avg B-2.sum 30.650.160.950.17*1.300.001.30 30.700.160.950.16*1.290.001.29 30.750.150.950.16*1.280.001.28 30.800.150.950.16*1.270.001.27 30.850.150.950.16*1.260.001.26 30.900.150.950.15*1.240.001.24 30.950.140.950.15*1.230.001.23 31.000.140.950.15*1.220.001.22 31.050.150.950.15*1.210.001.21 31.100.150.950.16*1.200.001.20 31.150.160.950.17*1.190.001.19 31.200.170.950.18*1.180.001.18 31.250.180.950.19*1.170.001.17 31.300.180.950.19*1.160.001.16 31.350.190.950.20*1.150.001.15 31.400.200.950.21*1.140.001.14 31.450.210.950.22*1.130.001.13 31.500.220.950.23*1.120.001.12 31.550.230.950.24*1.110.001.11 31.600.240.950.25*1.110.001.11 31.650.250.950.26*1.100.001.10 31.700.260.950.27*1.090.001.09 31.750.270.950.28*1.080.001.08 31.800.280.950.30*1.080.001.08 31.850.300.950.32*1.070.001.07 31.900.320.950.34*1.070.001.07 31.950.350.950.37*1.060.001.06 32.001.760.951.861.050.001.05 32.051.760.951.861.050.001.05 32.101.760.951.861.050.001.05 32.151.760.951.861.040.001.04 32.201.760.951.861.040.001.04 32.251.760.951.861.040.001.04 32.301.760.941.861.040.001.04 32.351.760.941.861.040.001.04 32.401.760.941.871.040.001.04 32.451.760.941.871.040.001.04 32.501.760.941.871.040.001.04 32.551.760.941.871.040.001.04 32.601.760.941.871.040.001.04 32.651.760.941.871.040.001.04 32.701.760.941.871.040.001.04 32.751.760.941.871.040.001.04 32.801.760.941.871.040.001.04 32.851.760.941.871.040.001.04 32.901.760.941.871.040.001.04 32.951.760.941.871.040.001.04 33.001.760.941.871.040.001.04 33.051.760.941.871.040.001.04 33.101.760.941.871.040.001.04 33.151.760.941.871.040.001.04 33.201.760.941.871.040.001.04 33.251.760.941.871.040.001.04 33.301.760.941.871.040.001.04 33.351.760.941.881.040.001.04 33.401.760.941.881.040.001.04 33.451.760.941.881.040.001.04 33.501.760.941.881.040.001.04 33.551.760.941.881.040.001.04 33.601.760.941.881.040.001.04 33.651.760.941.881.040.001.04 33.701.760.941.881.040.001.04 33.751.760.941.881.040.001.04 Page 11 new avg B-2.sum 33.801.760.941.881.040.001.04 33.851.760.941.881.040.001.04 33.901.760.941.881.040.001.04 33.951.760.941.881.040.001.04 34.001.760.941.881.040.001.04 34.051.760.941.881.040.001.04 34.101.760.941.881.040.001.04 34.151.760.931.881.040.001.04 34.201.760.931.891.040.001.04 34.251.760.931.891.040.001.04 34.301.760.931.891.040.001.04 34.351.760.931.891.040.001.04 34.401.760.931.891.040.001.04 34.451.760.931.891.040.001.04 34.501.760.931.891.040.001.04 34.551.760.931.891.040.001.04 34.601.760.931.891.040.001.04 34.651.760.931.891.040.001.04 34.701.760.931.891.040.001.04 34.751.760.931.891.040.001.04 34.801.760.931.891.040.001.04 34.851.760.931.891.040.001.04 34.901.760.931.891.040.001.04 34.951.760.931.891.040.001.04 35.001.760.931.891.040.001.04 35.051.760.931.901.040.001.04 35.101.760.931.901.040.001.04 35.151.760.931.901.040.001.04 35.201.760.931.901.040.001.04 35.251.760.931.901.040.001.04 35.301.760.931.901.040.001.04 35.351.760.931.901.040.001.04 35.401.760.931.901.040.001.04 35.451.760.931.901.040.001.04 35.501.760.931.901.040.001.04 35.551.760.931.901.040.001.04 35.601.760.931.901.040.001.04 35.651.760.931.901.040.001.04 35.701.760.931.901.040.001.04 35.751.760.931.901.040.001.04 35.801.760.921.901.040.001.04 35.851.760.921.911.040.001.04 35.901.760.921.911.040.001.04 35.951.760.921.911.040.001.04 36.001.760.921.911.040.001.04 36.051.760.921.911.040.001.04 36.101.760.921.911.040.001.04 36.151.760.921.911.040.001.04 36.201.760.921.911.040.001.04 36.251.760.921.911.040.001.04 36.301.760.921.911.040.001.04 36.351.760.921.911.040.001.04 36.401.760.921.911.040.001.04 36.451.760.921.911.040.001.04 36.501.760.921.911.040.001.04 36.551.760.921.911.040.001.04 36.601.760.921.921.040.001.04 36.651.760.921.921.040.001.04 36.701.760.921.921.040.001.04 36.751.760.921.921.040.001.04 36.801.760.921.921.040.001.04 36.851.760.921.921.040.001.04 36.901.760.921.921.040.001.04 Page 12 new avg B-2.sum 36.951.760.921.921.040.001.04 37.001.760.921.921.040.001.04 37.051.760.921.921.040.001.04 37.101.760.921.921.040.001.04 37.151.760.921.921.040.001.04 37.201.760.921.921.040.001.04 37.251.760.921.921.040.001.04 37.301.760.921.921.040.001.04 37.351.760.921.921.040.001.04 37.401.760.911.931.040.001.04 37.451.760.911.931.040.001.04 37.501.760.911.931.040.001.04 37.551.760.911.931.040.001.04 37.601.760.911.931.040.001.04 37.651.760.911.931.040.001.04 37.701.760.911.931.040.001.04 37.751.760.911.931.040.001.04 37.801.760.911.931.040.001.04 37.851.760.911.931.040.001.04 37.901.760.911.931.040.001.04 37.951.760.911.931.040.001.04 38.001.760.911.931.040.001.04 38.051.760.911.931.040.001.04 38.101.760.911.931.040.001.04 38.151.760.911.931.040.001.04 38.201.760.911.941.040.001.04 38.251.760.911.941.040.001.04 38.301.760.911.941.040.001.04 38.351.760.911.941.040.001.04 38.401.760.911.941.040.001.04 38.451.760.911.941.040.001.04 38.501.760.911.941.040.001.04 38.551.760.911.941.040.001.04 38.601.760.911.941.040.001.04 38.651.760.911.941.040.001.04 38.701.760.911.941.040.001.04 38.751.760.911.941.040.001.04 38.801.760.911.941.040.001.04 38.851.760.911.941.040.001.04 38.901.760.911.941.040.001.04 38.951.760.911.941.040.001.04 39.001.760.911.951.040.001.04 39.051.760.911.951.040.001.04 39.101.760.911.951.040.001.04 39.151.760.901.951.040.001.04 39.201.760.901.951.040.001.04 39.251.760.901.951.040.001.04 39.301.760.901.951.040.001.04 39.351.760.901.951.040.001.04 39.401.760.901.951.040.001.04 39.451.760.901.951.040.001.04 39.501.760.901.951.040.001.04 39.551.760.901.951.040.001.04 39.601.760.901.951.040.001.04 39.651.760.901.951.040.001.04 39.701.760.901.951.040.001.04 39.751.760.901.951.040.001.04 39.801.760.901.951.040.001.04 39.851.760.901.961.040.001.04 39.901.760.901.961.040.001.04 39.951.760.901.961.040.001.04 40.001.760.901.961.040.001.04 40.051.760.901.961.040.001.04 Page 13 new avg B-2.sum 40.101.760.901.961.040.001.04 40.151.760.901.961.040.001.04 40.201.760.901.961.040.001.04 40.251.760.901.961.040.001.04 40.301.760.901.961.030.001.03 40.351.760.901.961.030.001.03 40.401.760.901.961.030.001.03 40.451.760.901.961.030.001.03 40.501.760.901.961.030.001.03 40.551.760.901.961.030.001.03 40.601.760.901.961.030.001.03 40.651.760.901.961.020.001.02 40.701.760.901.971.020.001.02 40.750.390.900.43*1.010.001.01 40.800.340.900.38*1.010.001.01 40.850.320.900.36*1.000.001.00 40.900.310.900.34*1.000.001.00 40.950.290.900.33*0.990.000.99 41.000.280.890.32*0.990.000.99 41.050.280.890.31*0.980.000.98 41.100.280.890.31*0.970.000.97 41.150.270.890.30*0.970.000.97 41.200.270.890.30*0.960.000.96 41.250.270.890.30*0.950.000.95 41.300.260.890.29*0.950.000.95 41.350.260.890.29*0.940.000.94 41.400.260.890.29*0.930.000.93 41.450.250.890.28*0.930.000.93 41.500.250.890.28*0.920.000.92 41.550.250.890.28*0.910.000.91 41.600.250.890.27*0.910.000.91 41.650.240.890.27*0.900.000.90 41.700.240.890.27*0.890.000.89 41.750.240.890.27*0.880.000.88 41.800.230.890.26*0.880.000.88 41.850.230.890.26*0.870.000.87 41.900.230.890.26*0.860.000.86 41.950.230.890.26*0.850.000.85 42.000.230.890.25*0.850.000.85 42.050.220.890.25*0.840.000.84 42.100.220.890.25*0.830.000.83 42.150.220.890.25*0.820.000.82 42.200.220.890.24*0.810.000.81 42.250.210.890.24*0.810.000.81 42.300.210.890.24*0.800.000.80 42.350.210.890.24*0.790.000.79 42.400.210.890.23*0.780.000.78 42.450.210.890.23*0.770.000.77 42.500.200.890.23*0.760.000.76 42.550.200.890.23*0.760.000.76 42.600.200.890.23*0.750.000.75 42.650.200.890.23*0.740.000.74 42.700.200.890.23*0.730.000.73 42.750.200.890.23*0.720.000.72 42.800.200.890.23*0.710.000.71 42.850.200.880.23*0.710.000.71 42.900.200.880.23*0.700.000.70 42.950.200.880.23*0.690.000.69 43.000.200.880.23*0.680.000.68 43.050.200.880.23*0.670.000.67 43.100.200.880.23*0.660.000.66 43.150.200.880.23*0.650.000.65 43.200.200.880.23*0.650.000.65 Page 14 new avg B-2.sum 43.250.200.880.23*0.640.000.64 43.300.200.880.23*0.630.000.63 43.350.200.880.23*0.620.000.62 43.400.200.880.23*0.610.000.61 43.450.200.880.23*0.600.000.60 43.500.200.880.23*0.590.000.59 43.550.200.880.23*0.590.000.59 43.600.200.880.23*0.580.000.58 43.650.200.880.23*0.570.000.57 43.700.200.880.23*0.560.000.56 43.750.200.880.23*0.550.000.55 43.800.200.880.23*0.540.000.54 43.850.200.880.23*0.530.000.53 43.900.200.880.23*0.520.000.52 43.950.200.880.23*0.520.000.52 44.000.200.880.23*0.510.000.51 44.050.200.880.23*0.500.000.50 44.100.200.880.23*0.490.000.49 44.150.200.880.23*0.480.000.48 44.200.200.880.23*0.470.000.47 44.250.200.880.23*0.460.000.46 44.300.200.880.23*0.460.000.46 44.350.200.880.23*0.450.000.45 44.400.200.880.23*0.440.000.44 44.450.200.880.23*0.430.000.43 44.500.200.880.23*0.420.000.42 44.550.200.870.23*0.410.000.41 44.600.200.870.23*0.400.000.40 44.650.200.870.23*0.390.000.39 44.700.200.870.23*0.390.000.39 44.750.200.870.23*0.380.000.38 44.800.200.870.23*0.370.000.37 44.850.200.870.23*0.360.000.36 44.900.200.870.23*0.350.000.35 44.950.200.870.23*0.340.000.34 45.000.200.870.23*0.330.000.33 45.050.200.870.23*0.330.000.33 45.100.200.870.23*0.320.000.32 45.150.200.870.23*0.310.000.31 45.200.200.870.23*0.300.000.30 45.250.200.870.23*0.290.000.29 45.300.200.870.23*0.280.000.28 45.350.200.870.23*0.270.000.27 45.400.200.870.23*0.260.000.26 45.450.200.870.23*0.260.000.26 45.500.200.870.23*0.250.000.25 45.550.200.870.23*0.240.000.24 45.600.200.870.23*0.230.000.23 45.650.200.870.23*0.220.000.22 45.700.200.870.23*0.210.000.21 45.750.200.870.23*0.200.000.20 45.800.200.870.23*0.190.000.19 45.850.200.870.23*0.180.000.18 45.900.200.870.23*0.180.000.18 45.950.200.870.23*0.170.000.17 46.000.200.870.23*0.160.000.16 46.050.200.870.23*0.150.000.15 46.100.210.870.24*0.140.000.14 46.150.210.870.25*0.130.000.13 46.200.220.870.25*0.120.000.12 46.250.220.860.26*0.120.000.12 46.300.230.860.27*0.110.000.11 46.350.240.860.28*0.100.000.10 Page 15 new avg B-2.sum 46.400.240.860.28*0.090.000.09 46.450.250.860.29*0.090.000.09 46.500.260.860.30*0.080.000.08 46.550.270.860.31*0.070.000.07 46.600.280.860.32*0.070.000.07 46.650.290.860.33*0.060.000.06 46.700.300.860.34*0.050.000.05 46.750.310.860.36*0.050.000.05 46.800.320.860.38*0.040.000.04 46.850.340.860.40*0.040.000.04 46.900.380.860.44*0.030.000.03 46.951.760.862.050.030.000.03 47.001.760.862.050.020.000.02 47.051.760.862.050.020.000.02 47.101.760.862.050.010.000.01 47.151.760.862.050.010.000.01 47.201.760.862.050.010.000.01 47.251.760.862.050.010.000.01 47.301.770.862.070.010.000.01 47.351.770.862.070.000.000.00 47.401.770.862.070.000.000.00 47.451.770.862.070.000.000.00 47.501.770.862.070.000.000.00 47.551.770.862.070.000.000.00 47.601.770.862.070.000.000.00 47.651.770.862.070.000.000.00 47.701.770.862.070.000.000.00 47.751.770.852.070.000.000.00 47.801.770.852.070.000.000.00 47.851.770.852.070.000.000.00 47.901.770.852.070.000.000.00 47.951.770.852.070.000.000.00 48.001.770.852.070.000.000.00 48.051.770.852.070.000.000.00 48.101.770.852.070.000.000.00 48.151.770.852.080.000.000.00 48.201.770.852.080.000.000.00 48.251.770.852.080.000.000.00 48.301.770.852.080.000.000.00 48.351.770.852.080.000.000.00 48.401.770.852.080.000.000.00 48.451.770.852.080.000.000.00 48.501.770.852.080.000.000.00 48.551.770.852.080.000.000.00 48.601.770.852.080.000.000.00 48.651.760.852.080.000.000.00 48.701.760.852.080.000.000.00 48.751.760.852.080.000.000.00 48.801.760.852.080.000.000.00 48.851.760.852.080.000.000.00 48.901.760.852.080.000.000.00 48.951.760.852.080.000.000.00 49.001.760.852.080.000.000.00 49.051.760.852.090.000.000.00 49.101.760.842.090.000.000.00 49.151.760.842.090.000.000.00 49.201.760.842.090.000.000.00 49.251.760.842.090.000.000.00 49.301.760.842.090.000.000.00 49.351.760.842.090.000.000.00 49.401.760.842.090.000.000.00 49.451.760.842.090.000.000.00 49.501.760.842.090.000.000.00 Page 16 new avg B-2.sum 49.551.760.842.090.000.000.00 49.601.760.842.090.000.000.00 49.651.760.842.090.000.000.00 49.701.760.842.090.000.000.00 49.751.760.842.090.000.000.00 49.801.760.842.090.000.000.00 49.851.760.842.090.000.000.00 49.901.760.842.100.000.000.00 49.951.760.842.100.000.000.00 50.001.760.842.100.000.000.00 50.051.760.842.100.000.000.00 50.101.760.842.100.000.000.00 50.151.760.842.100.000.000.00 50.201.760.842.100.000.000.00 50.251.760.842.100.000.000.00 50.301.750.842.100.000.000.00 50.351.750.842.100.000.000.00 50.401.750.832.100.000.000.00 50.451.750.832.100.000.000.00 50.501.750.832.100.000.000.00 50.551.750.832.100.000.000.00 50.601.750.832.100.000.000.00 50.651.750.832.100.000.000.00 50.701.750.832.110.000.000.00 50.751.750.832.110.000.000.00 50.801.750.832.110.000.000.00 50.851.750.832.110.000.000.00 50.901.750.832.110.000.000.00 50.951.750.832.110.000.000.00 51.001.750.832.110.000.000.00 51.051.750.832.110.000.000.00 51.101.750.832.110.000.000.00 51.151.750.832.110.000.000.00 51.201.750.832.110.000.000.00 51.251.750.832.110.000.000.00 51.301.750.832.110.000.000.00 51.351.750.832.110.000.000.00 51.401.750.832.110.000.000.00 51.451.750.832.120.000.000.00 51.501.750.832.120.000.000.00 _______________________________________________________ * F.S.<1, Liquefaction Potential Zone (F.S. is limited to 5,CRR is limited to 2,CSR is limited to 2) Units:Unit: qc, fs, Stress or Pressure = atm (1.0581tsf); Unit Weight = pcf; Depth = ft; Settlement = in. ____________________________________________________________________________________ 1 atm (atmosphere) = 1 tsf (ton/ft2) CRRm Cyclic resistance ratio from soils CSRsf Cyclic stress ratio induced by a given earthquake (with user request factor of safety) F.S. Factor of Safety against liquefaction, F.S.=CRRm/CSRsf S_sat Settlement from saturated sands S_dry Settlement from Unsaturated Sands S_all Total Settlement from Saturated and Unsaturated Sands NoLiq No-Liquefy Soils Page 17 new B-1.sum ************************************************************************************ ******************* LIQUEFACTION ANALYSIS SUMMARY Copyright by CivilTech Software www.civiltechsoftware.com ************************************************************************************ ******************* Font: Courier New, Regular, Size 8 is recommended for this report. Licensed to , 6/16/2014 11:31:27 AM Input File Name: N:\Projects\2014\60145004\Working Files\Liquefaction\NEW LIQ\new B-1.liq Title: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites Subtitle: 60145004 Surface Elev.=100 Hole No.=B-1 Depth of Hole= 51.50 ft Water Table during Earthquake= 8.00 ft Water Table during In-Situ Testing= 8.00 ft Max. Acceleration= 0.8 g Earthquake Magnitude= 7.88 Input Data: Surface Elev.=100 Hole No.=B-1 Depth of Hole=51.50 ft Water Table during Earthquake= 8.00 ft Water Table during In-Situ Testing= 8.00 ft Max. Acceleration=0.8 g Earthquake Magnitude=7.88 No-Liquefiable Soils: CL, OL are Non-Liq. Soil 1. SPT or BPT Calculation. 2. Settlement Analysis Method: Tokimatsu, M-correction 3. Fines Correction for Liquefaction: Modify Stark/Olson 4. Fine Correction for Settlement: During Liquefaction* 5. Settlement Calculation in: All zones* 6. Hammer Energy Ratio, Ce = 1.25 7. Borehole Diameter, Cb= 1.05 8. Sampling Method, Cs= 1.2 9. User request factor of safety (apply to CSR) , User= 1.2 Plot two CSR (fs1=User, fs2=1) 10. Use Curve Smoothing: Yes* * Recommended Options In-Situ Test Data: DepthSPTgammaFines ft pcf% ____________________________________ 3.0040.00120.00NoLiq 6.0040.00120.00NoLiq 9.001.0092.30NoLiq 16.001.0085.10NoLiq 21.001.0085.10NoLiq 26.001.0085.10NoLiq 31.0032.00103.80NoLiq 36.0062.00103.804.00 41.0046.00134.904.00 Page 1 new B-1.sum 46.0014.00110.0014.00 51.0021.00133.404.00 ____________________________________ Output Results: Settlement of Saturated Sands=0.82 in. Settlement of Unsaturated Sands=0.00 in. Total Settlement of Saturated and Unsaturated Sands=0.82 in. Differential Settlement=0.411 to 0.543 in. DepthCRRmCSRfsF.S.S_sat.S_dryS_all ft in.in.in. _______________________________________________________ 3.002.000.625.000.820.000.82 3.052.000.625.000.820.000.82 3.102.000.625.000.820.000.82 3.152.000.625.000.820.000.82 3.202.000.625.000.820.000.82 3.252.000.625.000.820.000.82 3.302.000.625.000.820.000.82 3.352.000.625.000.820.000.82 3.402.000.625.000.820.000.82 3.452.000.625.000.820.000.82 3.502.000.625.000.820.000.82 3.552.000.615.000.820.000.82 3.602.000.615.000.820.000.82 3.652.000.615.000.820.000.82 3.702.000.615.000.820.000.82 3.752.000.615.000.820.000.82 3.802.000.615.000.820.000.82 3.852.000.615.000.820.000.82 3.902.000.615.000.820.000.82 3.952.000.615.000.820.000.82 4.002.000.615.000.820.000.82 4.052.000.615.000.820.000.82 4.102.000.615.000.820.000.82 4.152.000.615.000.820.000.82 4.202.000.615.000.820.000.82 4.252.000.615.000.820.000.82 4.302.000.615.000.820.000.82 4.352.000.615.000.820.000.82 4.402.000.615.000.820.000.82 4.452.000.615.000.820.000.82 4.502.000.615.000.820.000.82 4.552.000.615.000.820.000.82 4.602.000.615.000.820.000.82 4.652.000.615.000.820.000.82 4.702.000.615.000.820.000.82 4.752.000.615.000.820.000.82 4.802.000.615.000.820.000.82 4.852.000.615.000.820.000.82 4.902.000.615.000.820.000.82 4.952.000.615.000.820.000.82 5.002.000.615.000.820.000.82 5.052.000.615.000.820.000.82 5.102.000.615.000.820.000.82 5.152.000.615.000.820.000.82 5.202.000.615.000.820.000.82 5.252.000.615.000.820.000.82 5.302.000.615.000.820.000.82 5.352.000.615.000.820.000.82 5.402.000.615.000.820.000.82 5.452.000.615.000.820.000.82 Page 2 new B-1.sum 5.502.000.615.000.820.000.82 5.552.000.615.000.820.000.82 5.602.000.615.000.820.000.82 5.652.000.615.000.820.000.82 5.702.000.615.000.820.000.82 5.752.000.615.000.820.000.82 5.802.000.615.000.820.000.82 5.852.000.615.000.820.000.82 5.902.000.615.000.820.000.82 5.952.000.615.000.820.000.82 6.002.000.615.000.820.000.82 6.052.000.615.000.820.000.82 6.102.000.615.000.820.000.82 6.152.000.615.000.820.000.82 6.202.000.615.000.820.000.82 6.252.000.615.000.820.000.82 6.302.000.615.000.820.000.82 6.352.000.615.000.820.000.82 6.402.000.615.000.820.000.82 6.452.000.615.000.820.000.82 6.502.000.615.000.820.000.82 6.552.000.615.000.820.000.82 6.602.000.615.000.820.000.82 6.652.000.615.000.820.000.82 6.702.000.615.000.820.000.82 6.752.000.615.000.820.000.82 6.802.000.615.000.820.000.82 6.852.000.615.000.820.000.82 6.902.000.615.000.820.000.82 6.952.000.615.000.820.000.82 7.002.000.615.000.820.000.82 7.052.000.615.000.820.000.82 7.102.000.615.000.820.000.82 7.152.000.615.000.820.000.82 7.202.000.615.000.820.000.82 7.252.000.615.000.820.000.82 7.302.000.615.000.820.000.82 7.352.000.615.000.820.000.82 7.402.000.615.000.820.000.82 7.452.000.615.000.820.000.82 7.502.000.615.000.820.000.82 7.552.000.615.000.820.000.82 7.602.000.615.000.820.000.82 7.652.000.615.000.820.000.82 7.702.000.615.000.820.000.82 7.752.000.615.000.820.000.82 7.802.000.615.000.820.000.82 7.852.000.615.000.820.000.82 7.902.000.615.000.820.000.82 7.952.000.615.000.820.000.82 8.002.000.615.000.820.000.82 8.052.000.615.000.820.000.82 8.102.000.615.000.820.000.82 8.152.000.615.000.820.000.82 8.202.000.625.000.820.000.82 8.252.000.625.000.820.000.82 8.302.000.625.000.820.000.82 8.352.000.625.000.820.000.82 8.402.000.625.000.820.000.82 8.452.000.635.000.820.000.82 8.502.000.635.000.820.000.82 8.552.000.635.000.820.000.82 8.602.000.635.000.820.000.82 Page 3 new B-1.sum 8.652.000.635.000.820.000.82 8.702.000.635.000.820.000.82 8.752.000.645.000.820.000.82 8.802.000.645.000.820.000.82 8.852.000.645.000.820.000.82 8.902.000.645.000.820.000.82 8.952.000.645.000.820.000.82 9.002.000.655.000.820.000.82 9.052.000.655.000.820.000.82 9.102.000.655.000.820.000.82 9.152.000.655.000.820.000.82 9.202.000.655.000.820.000.82 9.252.000.655.000.820.000.82 9.302.000.665.000.820.000.82 9.352.000.665.000.820.000.82 9.402.000.665.000.820.000.82 9.452.000.665.000.820.000.82 9.502.000.665.000.820.000.82 9.552.000.675.000.820.000.82 9.602.000.675.000.820.000.82 9.652.000.675.000.820.000.82 9.702.000.675.000.820.000.82 9.752.000.675.000.820.000.82 9.802.000.675.000.820.000.82 9.852.000.685.000.820.000.82 9.902.000.685.000.820.000.82 9.952.000.685.000.820.000.82 10.002.000.685.000.820.000.82 10.052.000.685.000.820.000.82 10.102.000.685.000.820.000.82 10.152.000.695.000.820.000.82 10.202.000.695.000.820.000.82 10.252.000.695.000.820.000.82 10.302.000.695.000.820.000.82 10.352.000.695.000.820.000.82 10.402.000.695.000.820.000.82 10.452.000.705.000.820.000.82 10.502.000.705.000.820.000.82 10.552.000.705.000.820.000.82 10.602.000.705.000.820.000.82 10.652.000.705.000.820.000.82 10.702.000.705.000.820.000.82 10.752.000.715.000.820.000.82 10.802.000.715.000.820.000.82 10.852.000.715.000.820.000.82 10.902.000.715.000.820.000.82 10.952.000.715.000.820.000.82 11.002.000.715.000.820.000.82 11.052.000.725.000.820.000.82 11.102.000.725.000.820.000.82 11.152.000.725.000.820.000.82 11.202.000.725.000.820.000.82 11.252.000.725.000.820.000.82 11.302.000.725.000.820.000.82 11.352.000.725.000.820.000.82 11.402.000.735.000.820.000.82 11.452.000.735.000.820.000.82 11.502.000.735.000.820.000.82 11.552.000.735.000.820.000.82 11.602.000.735.000.820.000.82 11.652.000.735.000.820.000.82 11.702.000.745.000.820.000.82 11.752.000.745.000.820.000.82 Page 4 new B-1.sum 11.802.000.745.000.820.000.82 11.852.000.745.000.820.000.82 11.902.000.745.000.820.000.82 11.952.000.745.000.820.000.82 12.002.000.745.000.820.000.82 12.052.000.755.000.820.000.82 12.102.000.755.000.820.000.82 12.152.000.755.000.820.000.82 12.202.000.755.000.820.000.82 12.252.000.755.000.820.000.82 12.302.000.755.000.820.000.82 12.352.000.755.000.820.000.82 12.402.000.765.000.820.000.82 12.452.000.765.000.820.000.82 12.502.000.765.000.820.000.82 12.552.000.765.000.820.000.82 12.602.000.765.000.820.000.82 12.652.000.765.000.820.000.82 12.702.000.775.000.820.000.82 12.752.000.775.000.820.000.82 12.802.000.775.000.820.000.82 12.852.000.775.000.820.000.82 12.902.000.775.000.820.000.82 12.952.000.775.000.820.000.82 13.002.000.775.000.820.000.82 13.052.000.785.000.820.000.82 13.102.000.785.000.820.000.82 13.152.000.785.000.820.000.82 13.202.000.785.000.820.000.82 13.252.000.785.000.820.000.82 13.302.000.785.000.820.000.82 13.352.000.785.000.820.000.82 13.402.000.795.000.820.000.82 13.452.000.795.000.820.000.82 13.502.000.795.000.820.000.82 13.552.000.795.000.820.000.82 13.602.000.795.000.820.000.82 13.652.000.795.000.820.000.82 13.702.000.795.000.820.000.82 13.752.000.795.000.820.000.82 13.802.000.805.000.820.000.82 13.852.000.805.000.820.000.82 13.902.000.805.000.820.000.82 13.952.000.805.000.820.000.82 14.002.000.805.000.820.000.82 14.052.000.805.000.820.000.82 14.102.000.805.000.820.000.82 14.152.000.815.000.820.000.82 14.202.000.815.000.820.000.82 14.252.000.815.000.820.000.82 14.302.000.815.000.820.000.82 14.352.000.815.000.820.000.82 14.402.000.815.000.820.000.82 14.452.000.815.000.820.000.82 14.502.000.815.000.820.000.82 14.552.000.825.000.820.000.82 14.602.000.825.000.820.000.82 14.652.000.825.000.820.000.82 14.702.000.825.000.820.000.82 14.752.000.825.000.820.000.82 14.802.000.825.000.820.000.82 14.852.000.825.000.820.000.82 14.902.000.835.000.820.000.82 Page 5 new B-1.sum 14.952.000.835.000.820.000.82 15.002.000.835.000.820.000.82 15.052.000.835.000.820.000.82 15.102.000.835.000.820.000.82 15.152.000.835.000.820.000.82 15.202.000.835.000.820.000.82 15.252.000.835.000.820.000.82 15.302.000.845.000.820.000.82 15.352.000.845.000.820.000.82 15.402.000.845.000.820.000.82 15.452.000.845.000.820.000.82 15.502.000.845.000.820.000.82 15.552.000.845.000.820.000.82 15.602.000.845.000.820.000.82 15.652.000.845.000.820.000.82 15.702.000.855.000.820.000.82 15.752.000.855.000.820.000.82 15.802.000.855.000.820.000.82 15.852.000.855.000.820.000.82 15.902.000.855.000.820.000.82 15.952.000.855.000.820.000.82 16.002.000.855.000.820.000.82 16.052.000.855.000.820.000.82 16.102.000.865.000.820.000.82 16.152.000.865.000.820.000.82 16.202.000.865.000.820.000.82 16.252.000.865.000.820.000.82 16.302.000.865.000.820.000.82 16.352.000.865.000.820.000.82 16.402.000.865.000.820.000.82 16.452.000.865.000.820.000.82 16.502.000.875.000.820.000.82 16.552.000.875.000.820.000.82 16.602.000.875.000.820.000.82 16.652.000.875.000.820.000.82 16.702.000.875.000.820.000.82 16.752.000.875.000.820.000.82 16.802.000.875.000.820.000.82 16.852.000.875.000.820.000.82 16.902.000.885.000.820.000.82 16.952.000.885.000.820.000.82 17.002.000.885.000.820.000.82 17.052.000.885.000.820.000.82 17.102.000.885.000.820.000.82 17.152.000.885.000.820.000.82 17.202.000.885.000.820.000.82 17.252.000.885.000.820.000.82 17.302.000.895.000.820.000.82 17.352.000.895.000.820.000.82 17.402.000.895.000.820.000.82 17.452.000.895.000.820.000.82 17.502.000.895.000.820.000.82 17.552.000.895.000.820.000.82 17.602.000.895.000.820.000.82 17.652.000.895.000.820.000.82 17.702.000.895.000.820.000.82 17.752.000.905.000.820.000.82 17.802.000.905.000.820.000.82 17.852.000.905.000.820.000.82 17.902.000.905.000.820.000.82 17.952.000.905.000.820.000.82 18.002.000.905.000.820.000.82 18.052.000.905.000.820.000.82 Page 6 new B-1.sum 18.102.000.905.000.820.000.82 18.152.000.905.000.820.000.82 18.202.000.915.000.820.000.82 18.252.000.915.000.820.000.82 18.302.000.915.000.820.000.82 18.352.000.915.000.820.000.82 18.402.000.915.000.820.000.82 18.452.000.915.000.820.000.82 18.502.000.915.000.820.000.82 18.552.000.915.000.820.000.82 18.602.000.915.000.820.000.82 18.652.000.925.000.820.000.82 18.702.000.925.000.820.000.82 18.752.000.925.000.820.000.82 18.802.000.925.000.820.000.82 18.852.000.925.000.820.000.82 18.902.000.925.000.820.000.82 18.952.000.925.000.820.000.82 19.002.000.925.000.820.000.82 19.052.000.925.000.820.000.82 19.102.000.935.000.820.000.82 19.152.000.935.000.820.000.82 19.202.000.935.000.820.000.82 19.252.000.935.000.820.000.82 19.302.000.935.000.820.000.82 19.352.000.935.000.820.000.82 19.402.000.935.000.820.000.82 19.452.000.935.000.820.000.82 19.502.000.935.000.820.000.82 19.552.000.945.000.820.000.82 19.602.000.945.000.820.000.82 19.652.000.945.000.820.000.82 19.702.000.945.000.820.000.82 19.752.000.945.000.820.000.82 19.802.000.945.000.820.000.82 19.852.000.945.000.820.000.82 19.902.000.945.000.820.000.82 19.952.000.945.000.820.000.82 20.002.000.945.000.820.000.82 20.052.000.955.000.820.000.82 20.102.000.955.000.820.000.82 20.152.000.955.000.820.000.82 20.202.000.955.000.820.000.82 20.252.000.955.000.820.000.82 20.302.000.955.000.820.000.82 20.352.000.955.000.820.000.82 20.402.000.955.000.820.000.82 20.452.000.955.000.820.000.82 20.502.000.965.000.820.000.82 20.552.000.965.000.820.000.82 20.602.000.965.000.820.000.82 20.652.000.965.000.820.000.82 20.702.000.965.000.820.000.82 20.752.000.965.000.820.000.82 20.802.000.965.000.820.000.82 20.852.000.965.000.820.000.82 20.902.000.965.000.820.000.82 20.952.000.965.000.820.000.82 21.002.000.975.000.820.000.82 21.052.000.975.000.820.000.82 21.102.000.975.000.820.000.82 21.152.000.975.000.820.000.82 21.202.000.975.000.820.000.82 Page 7 new B-1.sum 21.252.000.975.000.820.000.82 21.302.000.975.000.820.000.82 21.352.000.975.000.820.000.82 21.402.000.975.000.820.000.82 21.452.000.975.000.820.000.82 21.502.000.975.000.820.000.82 21.552.000.985.000.820.000.82 21.602.000.985.000.820.000.82 21.652.000.985.000.820.000.82 21.702.000.985.000.820.000.82 21.752.000.985.000.820.000.82 21.802.000.985.000.820.000.82 21.852.000.985.000.820.000.82 21.902.000.985.000.820.000.82 21.952.000.985.000.820.000.82 22.002.000.985.000.820.000.82 22.052.000.995.000.820.000.82 22.102.000.995.000.820.000.82 22.152.000.995.000.820.000.82 22.202.000.995.000.820.000.82 22.252.000.995.000.820.000.82 22.302.000.995.000.820.000.82 22.352.000.995.000.820.000.82 22.402.000.995.000.820.000.82 22.452.000.995.000.820.000.82 22.502.000.995.000.820.000.82 22.552.000.995.000.820.000.82 22.602.001.005.000.820.000.82 22.652.001.005.000.820.000.82 22.702.001.005.000.820.000.82 22.752.001.005.000.820.000.82 22.802.001.005.000.820.000.82 22.852.001.005.000.820.000.82 22.902.001.005.000.820.000.82 22.952.001.005.000.820.000.82 23.002.001.005.000.820.000.82 23.052.001.005.000.820.000.82 23.102.001.005.000.820.000.82 23.152.001.015.000.820.000.82 23.202.001.015.000.820.000.82 23.252.001.015.000.820.000.82 23.302.001.015.000.820.000.82 23.352.001.015.000.820.000.82 23.402.001.015.000.820.000.82 23.452.001.015.000.820.000.82 23.502.001.015.000.820.000.82 23.552.001.015.000.820.000.82 23.602.001.015.000.820.000.82 23.652.001.015.000.820.000.82 23.702.001.025.000.820.000.82 23.752.001.025.000.820.000.82 23.802.001.025.000.820.000.82 23.852.001.025.000.820.000.82 23.902.001.025.000.820.000.82 23.952.001.025.000.820.000.82 24.002.001.025.000.820.000.82 24.052.001.025.000.820.000.82 24.102.001.025.000.820.000.82 24.152.001.025.000.820.000.82 24.202.001.025.000.820.000.82 24.252.001.035.000.820.000.82 24.302.001.035.000.820.000.82 24.352.001.035.000.820.000.82 Page 8 new B-1.sum 24.402.001.035.000.820.000.82 24.452.001.035.000.820.000.82 24.502.001.035.000.820.000.82 24.552.001.035.000.820.000.82 24.602.001.035.000.820.000.82 24.652.001.035.000.820.000.82 24.702.001.035.000.820.000.82 24.752.001.035.000.820.000.82 24.802.001.035.000.820.000.82 24.852.001.045.000.820.000.82 24.902.001.045.000.820.000.82 24.952.001.045.000.820.000.82 25.002.001.045.000.820.000.82 25.052.001.045.000.820.000.82 25.102.001.045.000.820.000.82 25.152.001.045.000.820.000.82 25.202.001.045.000.820.000.82 25.252.001.045.000.820.000.82 25.302.001.045.000.820.000.82 25.352.001.045.000.820.000.82 25.402.001.045.000.820.000.82 25.452.001.055.000.820.000.82 25.502.001.055.000.820.000.82 25.552.001.055.000.820.000.82 25.602.001.055.000.820.000.82 25.652.001.055.000.820.000.82 25.702.001.055.000.820.000.82 25.752.001.055.000.820.000.82 25.802.001.055.000.820.000.82 25.852.001.055.000.820.000.82 25.902.001.055.000.820.000.82 25.952.001.055.000.820.000.82 26.002.001.055.000.820.000.82 26.052.001.055.000.820.000.82 26.102.001.065.000.820.000.82 26.152.001.065.000.820.000.82 26.202.001.065.000.820.000.82 26.252.001.065.000.820.000.82 26.302.001.065.000.820.000.82 26.352.001.065.000.820.000.82 26.402.001.065.000.820.000.82 26.452.001.065.000.820.000.82 26.502.001.065.000.820.000.82 26.552.001.065.000.820.000.82 26.602.001.065.000.820.000.82 26.652.001.065.000.820.000.82 26.702.001.065.000.820.000.82 26.752.001.075.000.820.000.82 26.802.001.075.000.820.000.82 26.852.001.075.000.820.000.82 26.902.001.075.000.820.000.82 26.952.001.075.000.820.000.82 27.002.001.075.000.820.000.82 27.052.001.075.000.820.000.82 27.102.001.075.000.820.000.82 27.152.001.075.000.820.000.82 27.202.001.075.000.820.000.82 27.252.001.075.000.820.000.82 27.302.001.075.000.820.000.82 27.352.001.075.000.820.000.82 27.402.001.075.000.820.000.82 27.452.001.075.000.820.000.82 27.502.001.085.000.820.000.82 Page 9 new B-1.sum 27.552.001.085.000.820.000.82 27.602.001.085.000.820.000.82 27.652.001.085.000.820.000.82 27.702.001.085.000.820.000.82 27.752.001.085.000.820.000.82 27.802.001.085.000.820.000.82 27.852.001.085.000.820.000.82 27.902.001.085.000.820.000.82 27.952.001.085.000.820.000.82 28.002.001.085.000.820.000.82 28.052.001.085.000.820.000.82 28.102.001.085.000.820.000.82 28.152.001.085.000.820.000.82 28.202.001.085.000.820.000.82 28.252.001.085.000.820.000.82 28.302.001.095.000.820.000.82 28.352.001.095.000.820.000.82 28.402.001.095.000.820.000.82 28.452.001.095.000.820.000.82 28.502.001.095.000.820.000.82 28.552.001.095.000.820.000.82 28.602.001.095.000.820.000.82 28.652.001.095.000.820.000.82 28.702.001.095.000.820.000.82 28.752.001.095.000.820.000.82 28.802.001.095.000.820.000.82 28.852.001.095.000.820.000.82 28.902.001.095.000.820.000.82 28.952.001.095.000.820.000.82 29.002.001.095.000.820.000.82 29.052.001.095.000.820.000.82 29.102.001.095.000.820.000.82 29.152.001.095.000.820.000.82 29.202.001.095.000.820.000.82 29.252.001.105.000.820.000.82 29.302.001.105.000.820.000.82 29.352.001.105.000.820.000.82 29.402.001.105.000.820.000.82 29.452.001.105.000.820.000.82 29.502.001.105.000.820.000.82 29.552.001.105.000.820.000.82 29.602.001.105.000.820.000.82 29.652.001.105.000.820.000.82 29.702.001.105.000.820.000.82 29.752.001.105.000.820.000.82 29.802.001.105.000.820.000.82 29.852.001.105.000.820.000.82 29.902.001.105.000.820.000.82 29.952.001.105.000.820.000.82 30.002.001.105.000.820.000.82 30.052.001.105.000.820.000.82 30.102.001.105.000.820.000.82 30.152.001.105.000.820.000.82 30.202.001.105.000.820.000.82 30.252.001.105.000.820.000.82 30.302.001.105.000.820.000.82 30.352.001.105.000.820.000.82 30.402.001.105.000.820.000.82 30.452.001.105.000.820.000.82 30.502.001.105.000.820.000.82 30.552.001.105.000.820.000.82 30.602.001.105.000.820.000.82 30.652.001.105.000.820.000.82 Page 10 new B-1.sum 30.702.001.105.000.820.000.82 30.752.001.105.000.820.000.82 30.802.001.105.000.820.000.82 30.852.001.105.000.820.000.82 30.902.001.105.000.820.000.82 30.952.001.105.000.820.000.82 31.002.001.105.000.820.000.82 31.051.761.101.600.820.000.82 31.101.761.101.600.820.000.82 31.151.761.101.600.820.000.82 31.201.761.101.600.820.000.82 31.251.761.101.600.820.000.82 31.301.761.101.600.820.000.82 31.351.761.101.600.820.000.82 31.401.761.101.600.820.000.82 31.451.761.101.600.820.000.82 31.501.761.101.600.820.000.82 31.551.761.101.600.820.000.82 31.601.761.101.600.820.000.82 31.651.761.101.600.820.000.82 31.701.761.101.600.820.000.82 31.751.761.101.600.820.000.82 31.801.761.101.600.820.000.82 31.851.761.101.600.820.000.82 31.901.761.101.600.820.000.82 31.951.761.101.600.820.000.82 32.001.761.101.600.820.000.82 32.051.761.101.600.820.000.82 32.101.761.101.600.820.000.82 32.151.761.101.600.820.000.82 32.201.761.101.600.820.000.82 32.251.761.101.600.820.000.82 32.301.761.101.600.820.000.82 32.351.761.101.600.820.000.82 32.401.761.101.600.820.000.82 32.451.761.101.600.820.000.82 32.501.761.101.600.820.000.82 32.551.761.101.600.820.000.82 32.601.761.101.600.820.000.82 32.651.761.101.600.820.000.82 32.701.761.101.600.820.000.82 32.751.761.101.600.820.000.82 32.801.761.101.600.820.000.82 32.851.761.101.600.820.000.82 32.901.761.101.600.820.000.82 32.951.761.101.600.820.000.82 33.001.761.101.600.820.000.82 33.051.761.101.600.820.000.82 33.101.761.101.600.820.000.82 33.151.761.101.600.820.000.82 33.201.761.101.600.820.000.82 33.251.761.101.600.820.000.82 33.301.761.101.600.820.000.82 33.351.761.101.600.820.000.82 33.401.761.101.600.820.000.82 33.451.761.101.600.820.000.82 33.501.761.101.610.820.000.82 33.551.761.101.610.820.000.82 33.601.761.101.610.820.000.82 33.651.761.101.610.820.000.82 33.701.761.101.610.820.000.82 33.751.761.101.610.820.000.82 33.801.761.101.610.820.000.82 Page 11 new B-1.sum 33.851.761.101.610.820.000.82 33.901.761.101.610.820.000.82 33.951.761.101.610.820.000.82 34.001.761.101.610.820.000.82 34.051.761.101.610.820.000.82 34.101.761.101.610.820.000.82 34.151.761.101.610.820.000.82 34.201.761.101.610.820.000.82 34.251.761.101.610.820.000.82 34.301.761.101.610.820.000.82 34.351.761.101.610.820.000.82 34.401.761.101.610.820.000.82 34.451.761.101.610.820.000.82 34.501.761.101.610.820.000.82 34.551.761.091.610.820.000.82 34.601.761.091.610.820.000.82 34.651.761.091.610.820.000.82 34.701.761.091.610.820.000.82 34.751.761.091.610.820.000.82 34.801.761.091.610.820.000.82 34.851.761.091.610.820.000.82 34.901.761.091.610.820.000.82 34.951.761.091.610.820.000.82 35.001.761.091.610.820.000.82 35.051.761.091.610.820.000.82 35.101.761.091.610.820.000.82 35.151.761.091.610.820.000.82 35.201.761.091.610.820.000.82 35.251.761.091.610.820.000.82 35.301.761.091.610.820.000.82 35.351.761.091.610.820.000.82 35.401.761.091.610.820.000.82 35.451.761.091.610.820.000.82 35.501.761.091.610.820.000.82 35.551.761.091.610.820.000.82 35.601.761.091.610.820.000.82 35.651.761.091.610.820.000.82 35.701.761.091.610.820.000.82 35.751.761.091.610.820.000.82 35.801.761.091.610.820.000.82 35.851.761.091.610.820.000.82 35.901.761.091.620.820.000.82 35.951.761.091.620.820.000.82 36.001.761.091.620.820.000.82 36.051.761.091.620.820.000.82 36.101.761.091.620.820.000.82 36.151.761.091.620.820.000.82 36.201.761.091.620.820.000.82 36.251.761.091.620.820.000.82 36.301.761.091.620.820.000.82 36.351.761.091.620.820.000.82 36.401.761.091.620.820.000.82 36.451.761.091.620.820.000.82 36.501.761.091.620.820.000.82 36.551.761.091.620.820.000.82 36.601.761.091.620.820.000.82 36.651.761.091.620.820.000.82 36.701.761.091.620.820.000.82 36.751.761.091.620.820.000.82 36.801.761.091.620.820.000.82 36.851.761.091.620.820.000.82 36.901.761.091.620.820.000.82 36.951.761.091.620.820.000.82 Page 12 new B-1.sum 37.001.761.091.620.820.000.82 37.051.761.091.620.820.000.82 37.101.761.091.620.820.000.82 37.151.761.081.620.820.000.82 37.201.761.081.620.820.000.82 37.251.761.081.620.820.000.82 37.301.761.081.630.820.000.82 37.351.761.081.630.820.000.82 37.401.761.081.630.820.000.82 37.451.761.081.630.820.000.82 37.501.761.081.630.820.000.82 37.551.761.081.630.820.000.82 37.601.761.081.630.820.000.82 37.651.761.081.630.820.000.82 37.701.761.081.630.820.000.82 37.751.761.081.630.820.000.82 37.801.761.081.630.820.000.82 37.851.761.081.630.820.000.82 37.901.761.081.630.820.000.82 37.951.761.081.630.820.000.82 38.001.761.081.630.820.000.82 38.051.761.081.630.820.000.82 38.101.761.081.630.820.000.82 38.151.761.081.630.820.000.82 38.201.761.081.640.820.000.82 38.251.761.081.640.820.000.82 38.301.761.081.640.820.000.82 38.351.761.081.640.820.000.82 38.401.761.081.640.820.000.82 38.451.761.081.640.820.000.82 38.501.761.071.640.820.000.82 38.551.761.071.640.820.000.82 38.601.761.071.640.820.000.82 38.651.761.071.640.820.000.82 38.701.761.071.640.820.000.82 38.751.761.071.640.820.000.82 38.801.761.071.640.820.000.82 38.851.761.071.640.820.000.82 38.901.761.071.640.820.000.82 38.951.761.071.650.820.000.82 39.001.761.071.650.820.000.82 39.051.761.071.650.820.000.82 39.101.761.071.650.820.000.82 39.151.761.071.650.820.000.82 39.201.761.071.650.820.000.82 39.251.761.071.650.820.000.82 39.301.761.071.650.820.000.82 39.351.761.071.650.820.000.82 39.401.761.071.650.820.000.82 39.451.761.071.650.820.000.82 39.501.761.071.650.820.000.82 39.551.761.061.650.820.000.82 39.601.761.061.660.820.000.82 39.651.761.061.660.820.000.82 39.701.761.061.660.820.000.82 39.751.761.061.660.820.000.82 39.801.761.061.660.820.000.82 39.851.761.061.660.820.000.82 39.901.761.061.660.820.000.82 39.951.761.061.660.820.000.82 40.001.761.061.660.820.000.82 40.051.761.061.660.820.000.82 40.101.761.061.660.820.000.82 Page 13 new B-1.sum 40.151.761.061.670.820.000.82 40.201.761.061.670.820.000.82 40.251.761.061.670.820.000.82 40.301.761.061.670.820.000.82 40.351.761.061.670.820.000.82 40.401.761.051.670.820.000.82 40.451.761.051.670.820.000.82 40.501.761.051.670.820.000.82 40.551.761.051.670.820.000.82 40.601.761.051.670.820.000.82 40.651.761.051.670.820.000.82 40.701.761.051.680.820.000.82 40.751.761.051.680.820.000.82 40.801.761.051.680.820.000.82 40.851.761.051.680.820.000.82 40.901.761.051.680.820.000.82 40.951.761.051.680.820.000.82 41.001.761.051.680.820.000.82 41.051.761.051.680.820.000.82 41.101.761.051.680.820.000.82 41.151.761.051.680.820.000.82 41.201.761.041.690.820.000.82 41.251.761.041.690.820.000.82 41.301.761.041.690.820.000.82 41.351.761.041.690.820.000.82 41.401.761.041.690.820.000.82 41.451.761.041.690.820.000.82 41.501.761.041.690.820.000.82 41.551.761.041.690.820.000.82 41.601.761.041.690.820.000.82 41.651.761.041.690.820.000.82 41.701.761.041.700.820.000.82 41.751.761.041.700.820.000.82 41.801.761.041.700.820.000.82 41.851.761.041.700.820.000.82 41.901.761.041.700.820.000.82 41.951.761.041.700.820.000.82 42.001.761.041.700.820.000.82 42.051.761.031.700.820.000.82 42.101.761.031.700.820.000.82 42.151.761.031.700.820.000.82 42.201.761.031.710.820.000.82 42.251.761.031.710.820.000.82 42.301.761.031.710.820.000.82 42.351.761.031.710.820.000.82 42.401.761.031.710.820.000.82 42.451.761.031.710.820.000.82 42.501.761.031.710.820.000.82 42.551.761.031.710.820.000.82 42.601.761.031.710.820.000.82 42.651.761.031.710.820.000.82 42.701.761.031.710.820.000.82 42.751.761.031.720.820.000.82 42.801.761.031.720.820.000.82 42.851.761.031.720.820.000.82 42.901.761.031.720.820.000.82 42.951.761.021.720.820.000.82 43.001.761.021.720.820.000.82 43.051.761.021.720.820.000.82 43.101.761.021.720.820.000.82 43.151.761.021.720.820.000.82 43.201.761.021.720.820.000.82 43.251.761.021.720.820.000.82 Page 14 new B-1.sum 43.301.761.021.720.820.000.82 43.351.761.021.730.820.000.82 43.401.761.021.730.820.000.82 43.451.761.021.730.820.000.82 43.501.761.021.730.820.000.82 43.551.761.021.730.820.000.82 43.601.761.021.730.820.000.82 43.651.761.021.730.820.000.82 43.701.761.021.730.820.000.82 43.751.761.021.730.820.000.82 43.801.761.021.730.820.000.82 43.851.761.021.730.820.000.82 43.901.761.021.730.820.000.82 43.951.761.021.740.820.000.82 44.001.761.011.740.820.000.82 44.051.761.011.740.820.000.82 44.101.761.011.740.820.000.82 44.151.761.011.740.820.000.82 44.201.761.011.740.820.000.82 44.251.761.011.740.820.000.82 44.301.761.011.740.820.000.82 44.351.761.011.740.820.000.82 44.401.761.011.740.820.000.82 44.451.761.011.740.820.000.82 44.501.761.011.740.820.000.82 44.551.761.011.740.820.000.82 44.601.761.011.750.820.000.82 44.651.761.011.750.820.000.82 44.701.761.011.750.820.000.82 44.751.761.011.750.820.000.82 44.801.761.011.750.820.000.82 44.851.761.011.750.820.000.82 44.901.761.011.750.820.000.82 44.951.761.011.750.820.000.82 45.001.761.011.750.810.000.81 45.051.761.011.750.810.000.81 45.101.761.011.750.810.000.81 45.151.761.001.750.810.000.81 45.201.761.001.750.800.000.80 45.251.761.001.750.800.000.80 45.300.371.000.37*0.790.000.79 45.350.341.000.34*0.790.000.79 45.400.321.000.32*0.780.000.78 45.450.311.000.31*0.780.000.78 45.500.301.000.30*0.770.000.77 45.550.291.000.29*0.770.000.77 45.600.281.000.28*0.760.000.76 45.650.271.000.27*0.750.000.75 45.700.261.000.26*0.750.000.75 45.750.261.000.26*0.740.000.74 45.800.251.000.25*0.730.000.73 45.850.241.000.24*0.730.000.73 45.900.241.000.24*0.720.000.72 45.950.231.000.23*0.710.000.71 46.000.221.000.22*0.700.000.70 46.050.231.000.23*0.700.000.70 46.100.231.000.23*0.690.000.69 46.150.231.000.23*0.680.000.68 46.200.231.000.23*0.670.000.67 46.250.231.000.23*0.670.000.67 46.300.231.000.23*0.660.000.66 46.350.231.000.23*0.650.000.65 46.400.231.000.23*0.640.000.64 Page 15 new B-1.sum 46.450.231.000.23*0.630.000.63 46.500.230.990.23*0.630.000.63 46.550.230.990.24*0.620.000.62 46.600.230.990.24*0.610.000.61 46.650.240.990.24*0.600.000.60 46.700.240.990.24*0.600.000.60 46.750.240.990.24*0.590.000.59 46.800.240.990.24*0.580.000.58 46.850.240.990.24*0.570.000.57 46.900.240.990.24*0.570.000.57 46.950.240.990.24*0.560.000.56 47.000.240.990.24*0.550.000.55 47.050.240.990.25*0.550.000.55 47.100.240.990.25*0.540.000.54 47.150.240.990.25*0.530.000.53 47.200.250.990.25*0.520.000.52 47.250.250.990.25*0.520.000.52 47.300.250.990.25*0.510.000.51 47.350.250.990.25*0.500.000.50 47.400.250.990.25*0.490.000.49 47.450.250.990.25*0.490.000.49 47.500.250.990.25*0.480.000.48 47.550.250.990.26*0.470.000.47 47.600.250.990.26*0.470.000.47 47.650.250.990.26*0.460.000.46 47.700.260.980.26*0.450.000.45 47.750.260.980.26*0.450.000.45 47.800.260.980.26*0.440.000.44 47.850.260.980.26*0.430.000.43 47.900.260.980.26*0.420.000.42 47.950.260.980.26*0.420.000.42 48.000.260.980.27*0.410.000.41 48.050.260.980.27*0.400.000.40 48.100.260.980.27*0.400.000.40 48.150.260.980.27*0.390.000.39 48.200.270.980.27*0.380.000.38 48.250.270.980.27*0.380.000.38 48.300.270.980.27*0.370.000.37 48.350.270.980.27*0.360.000.36 48.400.270.980.28*0.360.000.36 48.450.270.980.28*0.350.000.35 48.500.270.980.28*0.340.000.34 48.550.270.980.28*0.340.000.34 48.600.270.980.28*0.330.000.33 48.650.270.980.28*0.320.000.32 48.700.280.980.28*0.320.000.32 48.750.280.970.28*0.310.000.31 48.800.280.970.29*0.300.000.30 48.850.280.970.29*0.300.000.30 48.900.280.970.29*0.290.000.29 48.950.280.970.29*0.280.000.28 49.000.280.970.29*0.280.000.28 49.050.280.970.29*0.270.000.27 49.100.290.970.29*0.270.000.27 49.150.290.970.30*0.260.000.26 49.200.290.970.30*0.250.000.25 49.250.290.970.30*0.250.000.25 49.300.290.970.30*0.240.000.24 49.350.290.970.30*0.230.000.23 49.400.290.970.30*0.230.000.23 49.450.290.970.30*0.220.000.22 49.500.290.970.31*0.220.000.22 49.550.300.970.31*0.210.000.21 Page 16 new B-1.sum 49.600.300.970.31*0.200.000.20 49.650.300.970.31*0.200.000.20 49.700.300.960.31*0.190.000.19 49.750.300.960.31*0.190.000.19 49.800.300.960.31*0.180.000.18 49.850.300.960.32*0.170.000.17 49.900.310.960.32*0.170.000.17 49.950.310.960.32*0.160.000.16 50.000.310.960.32*0.160.000.16 50.050.310.960.32*0.150.000.15 50.100.310.960.32*0.140.000.14 50.150.310.960.33*0.140.000.14 50.200.310.960.33*0.130.000.13 50.250.320.960.33*0.130.000.13 50.300.320.960.33*0.120.000.12 50.350.320.960.33*0.120.000.12 50.400.320.960.34*0.110.000.11 50.450.320.960.34*0.100.000.10 50.500.320.960.34*0.100.000.10 50.550.330.960.34*0.090.000.09 50.600.330.950.35*0.090.000.09 50.650.330.950.35*0.080.000.08 50.700.340.950.35*0.080.000.08 50.750.340.950.36*0.070.000.07 50.800.340.950.36*0.070.000.07 50.850.350.950.36*0.060.000.06 50.900.350.950.37*0.060.000.06 50.950.360.950.37*0.050.000.05 51.000.360.950.38*0.050.000.05 51.050.360.950.38*0.040.000.04 51.100.360.950.38*0.040.000.04 51.150.360.950.38*0.030.000.03 51.200.360.950.38*0.030.000.03 51.250.350.950.37*0.020.000.02 51.300.350.950.37*0.020.000.02 51.350.350.950.37*0.010.000.01 51.400.350.950.37*0.010.000.01 51.450.350.940.37*0.000.000.00 51.500.350.940.37*0.000.000.00 _______________________________________________________ * F.S.<1, Liquefaction Potential Zone (F.S. is limited to 5,CRR is limited to 2,CSR is limited to 2) Units:Unit: qc, fs, Stress or Pressure = atm (1.0581tsf); Unit Weight = pcf; Depth = ft; Settlement = in. ____________________________________________________________________________________ 1 atm (atmosphere) = 1 tsf (ton/ft2) CRRm Cyclic resistance ratio from soils CSRsf Cyclic stress ratio induced by a given earthquake (with user request factor of safety) F.S. Factor of Safety against liquefaction, F.S.=CRRm/CSRsf S_sat Settlement from saturated sands S_dry Settlement from Unsaturated Sands S_all Total Settlement from Saturated and Unsaturated Sands NoLiq No-Liquefy Soils Page 17 Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 1 October 7, 2014 Kuber Development Company 1550 S 52nd Street Tempe, AZ 85281 Attn: Mr. Shane Kuber P: (480) 968-4500 E: shanekuber@gmail.com Re: Geotechnical Engineering Addendum 1 Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites 127 West Harris Avenue South San Francisco, California Terracon Project No. 60145004 Dear Mr. Kuber: The following letter provides supplemental information to our referenced geotechnical engineering report. The objective to this letter is to provide geotechnical engineering recommendations for the design of deep foundations to support the proposed building. The selection of the deep foundations was based on our communications with Cotton, Shires and Associates, Inc. (CSA) who were retained by the City of South San Francisco to review our geotechnical report for the referenced project Due to the presence of existing undocumented fill materials, weak subsurface materials potentially subject to consolidation, liquefaction, and strong seismic ground shaking, an alternative foundation system consisting of driven piles can be used to support the proposed building. Based on our additional engineering analyses of these proposed foundation system , we recommend that the piles extend to a minimum depth of 48 feet below the existing ground surface at the site (bgs). The piles should be located beneath the proposed column foundations. Due to the anticipated downdrag forces acting on the piles from the presence of soft saturated soils during a seismic event, the piles should be grouped in a minimum of four (4) piles distributed in a square fashion beneath a pile cap supporting the proposed structural columns. Based on our engineering analyses, we recommend that 14-in square pre-stressed concrete piles be used to comprise each pile group. The allowable axial and uplift pile capacities of each pile group were determined using both end bearing and side friction components of resistance. Based on a group of four (4) pre-stressed Geotechnical Engineering Addendum 1 Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites ■ South San Francisco, California October 7, 2014 ■ Terracon Project No. 60145004 Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 2 concrete 14-inch square piles distributed in a square fashion with 2.5 diameter spacings (i.e. 35 inches), axial capacity was calculated to be on the order of 350 kips, while uplift capacity is on the order of 135 kips. Calculations for allowable axial and uplift capacity calculations using CivilTech AllPile V7.15b software are attached to this letter. The allowable axial capacities consider ultimate down-drag forces in the upper 48 feet of the pile group. The allowable uplift capacities are based on the side friction of the piles and weight of the piles. The allowable axial and uplift capacities are based on a minimum factor of safety of 2.5 for axial loading conditions. Due to the relatively high density of the undocumented granular materials encountered within the upper 9 feet of the site, it is our opinion that the fill materials should be pre-drilled to allow for installation of individual piles prior to commencing pile driving operations. The contractor should select a driving hammer and cushion combination which is capable of installing the selected piling without overstressing the pile material. The contractor should submit the pile driving plan and the pile hammer-cushion combination to the engineer for evaluation of the driving stresses in advance of pile installation. The pile driving system should be analyzed using the wave equation to evaluate the potential for overstressing the pile materials during driving. Dynamic analysis may also be used to evaluate the driving resistance required to obtain the predicted design load. Some ground heave may be experienced as a result of pile driving at each site. Therefore, it is recommended that the top elevations of the initial piles driven be surveyed. If any heave is noted after the driving of subsequent piles, the piles should be re-driven to their original top elevation. This problem can be particularly acute in pile groups. The pile hammer should be operated at the manufacturer's recommended stroke when measuring penetration resistance. All piles should be provided with driving shoes to protect the pile tip from damage when penetrating the dense granular soils. A representative of the geotechnical engineer should observe pile driving operations on a full-time basis. Each pile should be observed and checked for buckling, crimping and alignment in addition to recording penetration resistance, depth of embedment, and general pile driving operations. Recommended soil parameters for lateral load analysis of pile foundations have been developed for use in the LPILE and GROUP computer programs. Based upon the review of the logs of borings for the project and the Standard Penetration Test (SPT) results, engineering properties have been estimated for the soil conditions as shown in the following table. Top Depth Bottom Depth Unit Weight (pcf) L-Pile Soil Type* Internal Friction / Cohesion Modulus of Horizontal Subgrade Reaction Ks (pci) 2 100 SAND* 26o 25 9 Ph ase I Envirronme South ental Pr San Fran Site A roposed 127 ncisco, S Terra Kuber D Terr Asses Fairfield 7 West Ha an Mateo M acon Projec Developm Te racon Con Irvi ssme Inn & Su arris Ave o County, March 18, 2 ct No. 60147 Prepared ent Comp mpe, Ariz Prepared nsultants, ne, Califo ent uites enue , CA 2014 7707 d for: pany zona d by: Inc. ornia TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................... i Findings ............................................................................................................................................. i Conclusions ...................................................................................................................................... iii Recommendations ........................................................................................................................... iii 1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Site Description ................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Scope of Services ............................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Standard of Care ................................................................................................................. 1 1.4 Additional Scope Limitations, ASTM Deviations and Significant Data Gaps ...................... 2 1.5 Reliance .............................................................................................................................. 3 1.6 Client Provided Information ................................................................................................. 3 2.0 PHYSICAL SETTING ...................................................................................................................... 4 3.0 HISTORICAL USE INFORMATION ................................................................................................ 5 3.1 Historical Topographic Maps .............................................................................................. 5 3.2 Historical Aerial Photographs .............................................................................................. 6 3.3 Historical City Directories .................................................................................................... 7 3.4 Historical Fire Insurance Maps ........................................................................................... 7 3.5 Site Ownership .................................................................................................................... 8 3.6 Title Search ......................................................................................................................... 8 3.7 Environmental Liens............................................................................................................ 8 3.8 Interviews Regarding Current and Historical Uses ............................................................. 8 3.9 Historical Use Information Summary .................................................................................. 9 4.0 RECORDS REVIEW ...................................................................................................................... 10 4.1 Federal and State/Tribal Databases ................................................................................. 10 4.2 Local Agency Inquiries ...................................................................................................... 16 4.2.1 Health Department/Environmental Division ......................................................... 16 4.2.2 Department of Toxic Substances Control ............................................................ 16 4.2.3 Fire Department ................................................................................................... 16 4.2.4 Public Works Department .................................................................................... 17 4.2.5 Local/Regional Pollution Control Agency ............................................................. 17 4.2.6 Local/Regional Water Quality Control Agency ..................................................... 17 4.3 Records Review Summary ............................................................................................... 17 5.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE ............................................................................................................ 17 5.1 General Site Information ................................................................................................... 17 5.2 Overview of Current Site Occupants and Operations ....................................................... 18 5.3 Site Observations .............................................................................................................. 18 5.4 Site Reconnaissance Summary ........................................................................................ 20 6.0 ADJOINING PROPERTY RECONNAISSANCE ........................................................................... 21 7.0 DECLARATION ............................................................................................................................. 22 TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) APPENDICES APPENDIX A Exhibit 1 - Topographic Map, Exhibit 2 – Site Diagram APPENDIX B Description of Terms and Acronyms APPENDIX C Historical Documentation and User Questionnaire APPENDIX D Environmental Database Information APPENDIX E Site Photographs APPENDIX F Credentials Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) was performed in accordance with Terracon Proposal No. P80140002 dated January 13, 2014, and was conducted consistent with the procedures included in ASTM E 1527-13, Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process. The ESA was conducted under the supervision or responsible charge of Oak J. Bastian, Environmental Professional. Oak J. Bastian performed the site reconnaissance on January 28, 2014. Findings A summary of findings is provided below. It should be recognized that details were not included or fully developed in this section, and the report must be read in its entirety for a comprehensive understanding of the items contained herein. Site Description and Use The site is located at 127 West Harris Avenue, approximately 150 feet north of the intersection of Mitchell Avenue and West Harris Avenue in South San Francisco, San Mateo County, California. The site consists of a 1.47-acre tract of vacant land covered with native grass and brushes. Historical Information Based on a review of the historical information, the site and surrounding properties consisted of submerged marsh or swamp land from as early as 1899 until the early 1940s. The site appears to have been vacant and/or undeveloped land from the mid-1950s through the present, except for a brief time in the late 2000’s when it was used for parking purposes. Based on a review of historical information including topographic maps and aerial photographs, the site consisted of submerged marsh or swamp land from the late 1890s through the early 1950s. From the 1950s through the present the site appeared as vacant land or used for parking purposes. Based on geotechnical exploration activities conducted by Terracon on February 25, 2014, subsurface soils at the site consisted of undocumented sandy, gravely, cobble, boulders, and fill materials to a depth of nine (9) feet below ground surface followed by dark blue gray bay mud. A limited site investigation was performed to evaluate the fill and dumped material observed at the site for the presence of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH), polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and metals above laboratory reporting limits. Based on the findings of the limited site investigation, metals concentrations (arsenic and chromium) above the California Environmental Screening Levels (ESLs) for shallow soil were reported. The metals concentrations appear to be similar to background concentrations in the area, but in order to determine background concentrations, an additional study would be required. Although not above regulatory screening levels, low level concentrations of PAH compounds (naphthalene and phenanthrene) and TPH – oil-range was Phase I E Proposed March 18 Respons reported, presentin Surround through commerc through t site to t southwes 1980s w through t Records Selected and loca database (NPL) f (ENVIRO Historica setting a facilities Site Reco During t observed Terracon hydrocar above. T Adjoining CTS Foo followed abuts th Avenue, Harris Av followed asphalt-p observed Environmenta Fairfield Inn , 2014 ■ Terr ive ■ Resour , and appea ng the limited ding propert the early 19 cial structure the present. the southea st was deve as develope the present. Review federal and al regulatory es. The reg facilities, 16 OSTOR) fac l Undergrou nd/or facility do not const onnaissance the site rec d throughou n performed rbons in the The limited si g Properties od Internatio by Tom Duf e site to so Nakura Inc. venue. Hote by Mitchell A paved parki d with the ad al Site Asses & Suites ■ So acon Project rceful ■ Relia ar to be ass d site invest ties consiste 950s. adjoin es from at From the e ast followed eloped with ed with the d state enviro y agencies ulatory revie 6 RCRA ilities, 114 L und Storage y characteris titute RECs e connaissanc ut site, dum d a limited e dumped fi ite investigat onal Inc. loc ffy Company outheast fo located at 1 el Focus loc Avenue. The ng lot follo djoining prop ssment outh San Fra No. 6014770 able sociated wit igation findin ed of subm ning properti least the la early 1960s by the ex three PG&E existing hot onmental re were review ew identified facilities, o Leaking Und Tank (HIST stics, and in in connectio ce, two pol ped fill dirt site inves ill material o tion letter re cated at 131 y Wholesale llowed by m 110 W. Harr cated at 11 e properties wed by Ga perties. ncisco, CA 07 h possible a ngs is prese erged mars es to the n ate 1960’s a through the xisting comm E transmissio tel building a egulatory dat wed. The si d two CERC one RCRA derground S T UST) facili nquiry results on with the s le-mounted , and concr stigation to observed on eport is prese 1 W. Harris e Flooring bu multi-tenant ris Avenue, a 1 Mitchell A to the adjac ateway Bou asphalt deb ented under a sh or swam ortheast we and has rem present, W mercial buil on lines in t and has rem tabases as w ite was not CLIS facilitie A Generato Storage Tan ities. Based s from the l site at this tim transforme rete piles w evaluate t n-site, which ented under Avenue abu uilding (215 office spac and Time Cl Avenue abut cent northwe ulevard. Indi bris in the fi a separate c p land from ere develope mained relat West Harris A dings. The the early 19 mained relat well as resp identified i es, six Nati ors facility, nk (LUST) fa d on distanc ocal agenci me. rs, trash a were also o the presenc h was prev a separate uts the site Harris Court ces located lock repair lo ts the site t est of the site ications of ll. A letter r cover. m the late 1 ed with app tively uncha Avenue abut property to 940s and in tively uncha ponses from in the regul onal Priority 26 Enviro acilities, and ce, environm es, the iden and debris observed on ce of petro viously discu cover. to the north t). Harris Av at 139 Mi ocated at 12 to the south e consisted RECs were ii report 1890s parent anged ts the o the early anged state latory y List oStor d two mental ntified were n-site. oleum ussed heast venue tchell 20 W. hwest of an e not Phase I E Proposed March 18 Respons Conclus We have and limit approxim Mateo C described topograp land from appeared activities undocum below gr performe hydrocar (VOCs), investiga Screenin be simila concentr levels, lo oil-range Recomm Based o Terracon grading managem removed Environmenta Fairfield Inn , 2014 ■ Terr ive ■ Resour sions e performed tations of A mately 1.74– County, Cal d in Section phic maps a m the late 18 d as vacant conducted mented sand round surfac ed to evalu rbons (TPH) and metals ation, metals ng Levels (E ar to backg rations, an a ow level conc e was reporte mendation n the scope n, if the iden operations, ment plan d from the sit al Site Asses & Suites ■ So acon Project rceful ■ Relia a Phase I E ASTM Pract acres that is ifornia. Any n 1.4 of this nd aerial ph 890s through t land or us by Terracon dy, gravely, ce followed ate the fill ), polynuclea above labo concentrati ESLs) for sha round conce dditional stu centrations o ed, and appe ns e of services ntified fill and and are to developed to te. ssment outh San Fra No. 6014770 able Environment tice E 1527 s located at y exceptions s report. Ba hotographs, h the early 1 sed for park n on Februar cobble, bou by dark blu observed ar aromatic oratory repor ons (arsenic allow soil w entrations in udy would be of PAH comp ear to be ass s, limitations d dumped m be remove o manage th ncisco, CA 07 tal Site Asse 7-05 of the 127 West H s to, or de ased on a re the site con 1950s. From king purpos ry 25, 2014, ulders, and f ue gray bay at the site hydrocarbo rting limits. B c and chrom ere reported n the area, e required. A pounds (nap sociated wit s, and finding materials are d from the he proper d essment in e parcel (AP arris Avenue eletions from eview of his nsisted of s m the 1950s ses. Based subsurface fill materials y mud. A lim e for the p ons (PAHs), Based on th mium) above d. The meta but in orde Although not phthalene an h possible a gs of this as e not suitabl site, Terrac disposition o conformanc PNs: 015-1 e, South Sa m, the AST storical infor submerged m s through the on geotech e soils at the s to a depth mited site i resence of volatile org he findings o the Californ als concentr er to determ t above regu nd phenanth asphalt debri ssessment, le for reuse con recomm of any excav ce with the s 23-600), tot n Francisco TM practice rmation inclu marsh or sw e present the hnical explor site consist h of nine (9) nvestigation total petro ganic compo of the limited nia Environm rations appe mine backgr ulatory scree hrene) and T is in the fill. in the opini as part of f mends that a vated soils t iii scope taling , San e are uding wamp e site ration ted of ) feet n was oleum ounds d site mental ear to round ening TPH – on of future a soil to be Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 1 PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT PROPOSED FAIRFIELD INN & SUITES 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, SAN MATEO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Terracon Project No. 60147707 March 18, 2014 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Site Description Site Name Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites Site Location/Address 127 West Harris Avenue, South San Francisco, San Mateo County, California Land Area Approximately 1.47-acres Site Improvements Vacant land. The site location is depicted on Exhibit 1 of Appendix A, which was reproduced from a portion of the USGS 7.5-minute series topographic map. A Site Diagram of the site and adjoining properties is included as Exhibit 2 of Appendix A. Acronyms and terms used in this report are described in Appendix B. 1.2 Scope of Services This Phase I ESA was performed in accordance with Terracon Proposal No. P80140002 dated January 13, 2014, and was conducted consistent with the procedures included in ASTM E 1527-13, Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process. The purpose of this ESA was to assist the client in developing information to identify RECs in connection with the site as reflected by the scope of this report. This purpose was undertaken through user-provided information, a regulatory database review, historical and physical records review, interviews, including local government inquiries, as applicable, user- provided information, and a visual noninvasive reconnaissance of the site and adjoining properties. Limitations, ASTM deviations, and significant data gaps (if identified) are noted in the applicable sections of the report. 1.3 Standard of Care This ESA was performed in accordance with generally accepted practices of this profession, undertaken in similar studies at the same time and in the same geographical area. We have endeavored to meet this standard of care, but may be limited by conditions encountered during performance, a client-driven scope of work, or inability to review information not received by the Phase I E Proposed March 18 Respons report da evaluatio Phase I E cannot e have bee conductin public re documen regarding intended warrantie when the uses the – throug research 1.4 A Based u invasive evaluatio evaluatio company upon req reference within th informati obtained nonethel hereunde An evalu findings discusse significan evaluatio our conc obtained services, or opinio provided Environmenta Fairfield Inn , 2014 ■ Terr ive ■ Resour ate. Where a on of their sig ESAs, such eliminate the en released ng the limite cords were nted in publi g the potent to reduce es, express o e user of this report for an h additional or assessm Additional S pon the agr assessmen on of the pre ons, or other y (Statemen quest. Pertin e section ha e scope an on requeste for this ES ess, the au er. ation of the has been c ed in the tex nt data gaps on of informa clusions, rec or discover , regardless ns in the rep by the clien al Site Asses & Suites ■ So acon Project rceful ■ Relia appropriate, gnificance w as the one p e potential t at the site ed scope of not reviewe c records th tial for RECs , but not e or implied, a s report form ny other pur research o ment options Scope Lim reed-on sco nts, vapor in esence of v r services no t of Qualific nent docume as not been i nd time con ed is not, or w SA was rec uthenticity o significance onducted, a xt of the re s is based on ation receive commendatio red by us aft of whether t port. This dis nt. ssment outh San Fra No. 6014770 able these limita with respect t performed a hat hazardo beyond wha f services de d. It should hat were not s in connect eliminate, u are intended mulates opini rpose. These or assessme that may be mitations, A ope of servi ntrusion ass vapors within ot particularly cations) have ents are ref included. Re nstraints set was not, rec ceived from or reliability e of these lim and where a port. Howev n the informa ed after the ons, or opin ter the issua the informat sclaimer spe ncisco, CA 07 ations are dis to our finding t this site, ar ous, toxic, o at is identifi escribed her be recogniz reviewed. N tion with a p uncertainty r or made. Th ions as to ris e risks may ent. We will, e available a ASTM Devia ces, this ES sessments o n a building y identified a e not been ferred to in easonable at t forth by th eived by the m several so of these mitations and appropriate, ver, it shou ation availab report issua nions. We ha ance date of ion would af ecifically app scussed in t gs has been re of limited or petroleum ed by the li rein, certain zed that env No ESA can property. Pe regarding th he limitation sks associat be further ev upon reque and associat ations and SA did not or indoor a structure), and discuss included in the text of ttempts were he client; ho e issuance d ources that sources ca d missing in significant d ld be recog ble at the tim ance date m ave no oblig f the report, ffect any con plies to any i the text of th n conducted. scope, are m substance imited scope n sources of vironmental c n wholly elim erformance o he potentia ns herein mu ted with the valuated – b est, advise ed costs. d Significan include sub air quality a business en sed herein. C this report this report, e made to o owever, in date of the re we believe nnot and is formation w data gaps a gnized that me of report may result in gation to pro or to perfor nclusions, re nformation t he report, an . noninvasive s are prese e of this ES f information concerns ma minate uncert of this pract l for RECs ust be consid site or othe but not elimin you of addit nt Data Ga bsurface or ssessments nvironmenta Credentials o but are ava and a sep obtain inform some insta eport. Inform e to be rel s not warra with respect t are identified an evaluatio issuance, an n an alterati ovide inform rm any addit ecommendat that has not 2 nd an e, and ent or SA. In n and ay be tainty ice is s. No dered rwise nated tional aps other s (i.e. al risk of the ilable parate mation nces, mation iable; anted to our d and on of nd an on of mation tional tions, been Phase I E Proposed March 18 Respons This rep documen the site’s other act presence unobserv become not to be 1.5 R This ESA Use or r Developm Reliance condition limitation client and Continue will be u prepared E 1527-1 1.6 C Prior to following Aware of Actual Kn Limitation Aware of site or nea Actual Kn of hazardo Environmenta Fairfield Inn , 2014 ■ Terr ive ■ Resour port represe nt; its text ma s current util tivities descr e of hazardo vable, or no observable e construed a Reliance A report is pr reliance by ment Compa e on the ES ns and limita n of liability d d all relying ed viability of used by a d d, the third 13. Client Prov the site vis user questi Cl any Environm owledge of E s (AULs) that any Specializ arby propertie owledge of a ous substanc al Site Asses & Suites ■ So acon Project rceful ■ Relia nts our ser ay not be alt ization, info ribed herein; ous substanc ot present d (such as aft as legal inter repared for t any other any and Terr SA by the c ations stated defined in th parties. f this report ifferent use party must ided Inform sit, Mr. Sha onnaire info Cli ient Questio mental Cleanu Environmental t may encumb zed Knowledg es. Significantly ces or petrole ssment outh San Fra No. 6014770 able rvice to you tered after fi rmation deri ; such inform ces or petro uring the m ter site reno rpretation or the exclusive party is pro racon Consu client and a d in the prop he Agreemen is subject to r (third party also satisfy mation ane Kuber, rmation as d ent Questi nnaire Item up Liens agai l Liens or Act ber the site. ge or Experien Lower Purch um products. ncisco, CA 07 u as of the inal issuance ived from th mation is sub oleum produ most recent ovation or de r advice. e use and re ohibited with ultants, Inc. all authorize posal, ESA nt is the agg o ASTM E 1 y) than the y the user’s client’s rep described in ionnaire R nst the site. ivity Use nce related to ase Price bec e report dat e. Findings e most rece bject to chan ucts may hav reconnaissa evelopment) eliance of Ku hout the wr (Terracon). d parties w report, and gregate limit 527-13 Sec user for wh s responsibi resentative, ASTM E 15 esponses Cli o the cause te and cons in this repor ent reconnai nge. Certain ve been late ance and m . Further, th uber Develop ritten author will be subje Terracon’s t of Terraco ctions 4.6 an hom the ES lities in Sec was asked 527-13 Secti ient Did Not Respond stitutes our rt are based ssance and n indicators o ent, inacces may subsequ hese service pment Comp rization of K ect to the te Agreement n’s liability t nd 4.8. If the SA was orig ction 6 of A d to provide ion 6. Client Respon Yes 3 final upon from of the sible, uently es are pany. Kuber erms, . The to the ESA ginally ASTM e the t’s nse No X X X X Phase I E Proposed March 18 Respons Commonl material to Obvious I Terracon site. A co 2.0 P Site Elev Surface Topogra Closest S Soil Type Descript Formatio Descript Estimate Occurren Groundw *Hydroge * The groun seasonal va surveyed to Environmenta Fairfield Inn , 2014 ■ Terr ive ■ Resour y Known or R o a release in ndicators of C n considerat opy of the AS HYSICAL Ph Topog vation Runoff/ phic Gradien Surface Wate e ion on ion ed Depth to F nce of water eologic Gradi ndwater flow dire ariations in rainf a datum, ground al Site Asses & Suites ■ So acon Project rceful ■ Relia Reasonably A n connection w Contamination ions of the STM-1527-1 L SETTIN hysical Settin graphy (Refe Approx t Genera surface er Colma south o Urban Undocu boulde ground blue gr Sandst Sandst irst Eight (8 ient Varies based recharg ection and the de fall and other hy dwater depth and ssment outh San Fra No. 6014770 able Ascertainable with the site. n at the site. client respo 13 questionn G ng Informatio r to Appendix ximately 13 fe ally flat with e runoff towar Creek, app of the site. Soil C Land umented san rs, fill mate d surface (bg ray bay mud. Geolog tone, shale, c tone, shale, c 8) feet bgs at from sout on region ge patterns. epth to shallow, ydrogeological f d flow direction b ncisco, CA 07 Information th onses did no naire is inclu on x A for an exc eet (NGVD) a slight top rds the east proximately 2 Characteristi ndy, gravely, erarls 9 fee gs) followed gy/Hydrogeo conglomerate conglomerate t the site. heast to s nal discharg unconfined grou features. Withou beneath the site c hat is ot identify R ded in Appe cerpt of the To pographic 250 feet ics b , cobble, et below by dark logy p outhwest rge and T undwater, if pres ut the benefit of cannot be directl RECs in con endix C. S opographic M USGS Topog Francisco So Topo Onsite geo investigatio February 25, y Terracon at Project N “Geologic M Francisco Quadrangle” USGS Wa Investigations Onsite geo erformed con Project N Troyer Autom 162 West Ha State o (http://g waterboa sent, would likely f on-site ground y ascertained. nnection wit ource Map) graphic Map, outh Quadran Date 1995 otechnical fie on performed 2014, perfor t the site, Ter No. 60145004 Map of the Sa o – San Jose (CDM&G, 19 ater Resource s Report 93-4 otechnical stud ncurrently Ter No. 60145004 matic Doors, In arris Avenue, of California geotracker. ards.ca.gov/) y vary dependin water monitoring 4 X X h the San ngle, ld on med rracon 4 an e 990); es 4019 dy rracon 4 nc. at CA ng upon g wells Phase I E Proposed March 18 Respons 3.0 HIS Terracon the site a of selecte 3.1 H Readily developm below. Directio Site North East South West Environmenta Fairfield Inn , 2014 ■ Terr ive ■ Resour STORICA n reviewed t and surround ed historical Historical T available h ment in conn San San San San San (1”:24 San San on The si undeve Francis h Subme 1915), 1950), 1980), Subme develo house 1995). h Subme a high 1980), t Subme followe multipl of Sou al Site Asses & Suites ■ So acon Project rceful ■ Relia L USE IN he following ding area, in documents Topograph historical U nection with Mateo, Calif Mateo, Calif Mateo, Calif Francisco S Francisco S 4,000’) Francisco S Francisco S H ite appears to eloped land sco (1993-19 erged marsh submerged developed w and appears erged marsh oped with mu omission tint erged marsh hway (1947-1 appears as a erged marsh ed by a high e large comm th San Franc ssment outh San Fra No. 6014770 able FORMAT g historical s n order to he are included ic Maps USGS topog the site. Rev fornia, 1899 fornia, 1915 fornia, 1947, outh, Califor South, Calif outh, Califor outh, Califor Historical T o be submer (1956-1980) 995). or swamp la marsh or swa with multiple la s as a house o or swamp l ultiple large c t of South Sa or swamp lan 1950), develo a house omis or swamp way then So mercial structu cisco (1993-19 ncisco, CA 07 TION sources to d elp identify pa d in Append graphic ma viewed histo (1”:62,500’) (1”:62,500’) , (1”:50,000’ rnia, 1950 (1 fornia, 1956 rnia, 1993 (1 rnia, 1995 (1 Topograph Descri rged marsh o ), appears a and followed amp land follo arge commer omission tint and followed commercial s an Francisco nd (1899-1950 oped with m sion tint of So land (1899-1 outhern Pacif ures (1956-19 995). evelop a his ast uses for dix C. aps were r orical topogr ) ) ) 1”:24,000’) 6, photorevi 1”:24,000’) 1”:24,000’) hic Maps ption or swamp lan as a house by vacant an owed by Sou rcial structure of South San d by the San structures (19 followed by 0), submerge ultiple large outh San Fran 1950), subm fic Rail Road 980), and ap story of the r indications reviewed to raphic maps sed 1968, nd (1899-195 omission tin nd/or undeve uthern Pacific es north of the n Francisco (1 n Francisco 968-1980), a the San Fran ed marsh or s commercial ncisco (1993- erged marsh d (1947-1950 pears as a ho previous us of RECs. Co o evaluate s are summa 1973, and 50), vacant a nt of South loped land (1 Rail Road (1 e rail roads (1 1993-1995). Bay (1899-1 and appears ncisco Bay (1 wamp followe structures (1 -1995). h or swamp 0), developed ouse omissio 5 ses of opies land arized 1980 nd/or San 1899- 1947- 1956- 956), as a 1993- ed by 1956- land with on tint Phase I E Proposed March 18 Respons Based on the site c 1950s. parking February cobble, b dark blue dumped polynucle above la concentr (ESLs) f backgrou additiona a separa PAH com appear t limited si 3.2 H Selected States G reviewed concerni limited by Direct Site Northe Southe Environmenta Fairfield Inn , 2014 ■ Terr ive ■ Resour n a review o consisted of From the 1 purposes. B y 25, 2014, boulders, an e gray bay material obs ear aromatic boratory rep rations (arse for shallow und concent al study wou ate cover. A mpounds (n o be associ te investigat Historical A historical a Geological S d at approxi ng the histo y a photo’s q Aero, Jack A Clyde USGS EDR, tion e Vaca (2010 east Vaca 2012 east Vaca comm al Site Asses & Suites ■ So acon Project rceful ■ Relia of historical i f submerged 950s throug Based on g subsurface d fill materia mud. A lim served at th c hydrocarb porting limits enic and chr soil were r rations in the ld be require lthough not naphthalene iated with p tion findings Aerial Phot aerial photo Survey (USG mately 10 t ry of develo quality and s 1943, 1”=50 Ammann, 19 Sunderland S, 1968, 197 1993, 2005 H ant land (194 0-2012). ant land (194 ). ant land (1943 mercial structu ssment outh San Fra No. 6014770 able nformation i d marsh or gh the pres geotechnical soils at the als to a dept mited site inv he site for th bons (PAHs) s. Based on romium) abo reported. Th e area, but i ed. The limit above regu and phena ossible asp is presente tographs ographs from GS), and En to 15 year pment on an scale. Select 00’ 946, 1”=500’ d, 1956, 1”=5 74, 1982, and , 2006, 2009 Historical A 43-2006); mu 43-1956); dev 3-1956); Wes ures (1968-20 ncisco, CA 07 including top swamp land sent the site l exploration e site consi th of nine (9 vestigation he presence ), volatile or the findings ove the Cal he metals c n order to d ted site inve ulatory scree anthrene) an halt debris d under a se m Aero, Jac nvironmental intervals, if nd near the ted photogra ’ 500’ d 1998, 1”=5 9, 2010, and Aerial Phot Descri ultiple vehicle veloped with st Harris Aven 012). pographic m d from the l e appeared n activities isted of und 9) feet below was perform of total pet rganic comp s of the limit lifornia Envi concentratio etermine ba estigation let ening levels nd TPH – o in the fill. A eparate cove ck Ammann l Database readily ava site. Evalua aphs are sum 500’ d 2012, 1”=5 ographs ption es observed h apparent c nue abuts the maps and ae ate 1890s t as vacant conducted documented w ground sur med to eval roleum hydr pounds (VO ted site inve ronmental S ons appear ackground co tter report is , low level c oil-range wa A letter repo er. n, Clyde Su Resources, ailable, to o ation of thes mmarized be 500’ on-site (200 commercial s e site followed erial photogra through the land or use by Terraco d sandy, gra rface followe luate the fil rocarbons (T OCs), and m estigation, m Screening L to be simil oncentration presented u concentratio as reported, rt presentin nderland, U Inc. (EDR) btain inform se aerials ma elow. 09); vacant l tructures (19 d by the exis 6 aphs, early ed for on on avely, ed by l and TPH), metals metals evels ar to ns, an under ons of , and g the United )were mation ay be and 968- sting Phase I E Proposed March 18 Respons Direct Southw Northw 3.3 H The EDR Services reviewed the site w Directi Site Northe Southe Southw Northw CTC Foo position present. detail in S 3.4 H Historica EDR to e Based up site. A c summari Environmenta Fairfield Inn , 2014 ■ Terr ive ■ Resour tion west Vaca follow (1982 west Vaca Historical C R city direc and Haine d at approxim was identified ion 127 W ast 131 W Interna 215 H east 139 M 110 W (1999- 120 W Rohos west 111 M San F west 177 So od Internatio relative to t This facility Section 4.1. Historical F l fire insura evaluate pas pon inquiries copy of the zed below: al Site Asses & Suites ■ So acon Project rceful ■ Relia ant land follo wed by a two 2-2012). ant land (1943 City Directo tories used es Criss-Cro mate five-ye d as 127 We West Harris A West Harris ational (2003- arris Court: Mitchell Aven West Harris A -2008) West Harris A sky (1980), C Mitchell Aven rancisco Airp outh Airport onal located he site, was was also list Fire Insuran nce maps p st uses and s to the abov Sanborn m ssment outh San Fra No. 6014770 able owed by app o-lane road (1 3-1956), deve ories in this stud oss Directory ear intervals est Harris Av Historical Avenue – No Avenue – O -2013). ue, – Multiten Avenue – Ho Avenue – Am incinnati Time nue –Motel 6, port (2013) Boulevard – adjacent to s identified i ted in the re nce Maps produced by relevant ch ve-listed San maps is prov ncisco, CA 07 Descri parent powe 1956-1974), d eloped with co dy were ma y (selected , if readily a venue. l City Direc Descript listings (2013 Oriental Trad nant office bu ouse of Wreck algmtd Mt Ct e, Time Clock Super 8 Lod – No listings o the northe in city direct egulatory dat y the Sanbo haracteristics nborn provid vided in App ption er line tower developed w ommercial str ade availab years revie available. Th ctories tion 3). ing Company uilding (1977-2 kers (1990), r (1977), Dom k Sales & Ser dge (1985-200 ast and in a tories from tabase revie orn Map Com s of the site der, Sanborn pendix C. Re rs (1943-194 ith the existin uctures (1968 le through ewed: 1977- he current s y (1977-1999 2013) Nakura Japa minguez Asso rvice CO INC 08), Motel 6, a topograph the early 20 ew and is fur mpany were and surrou n maps were eviewed his 6), vacant l ng hotel build 8-2012). Cole Inform -2013) and street addres 9); CTC Foo nese Antique ociates, John (1985-2013) Vagabond In hic cross-gra 000s throug rther discuss e requested nding prope e available fo storical maps 7 and ding mation were ss for od es J nn adient h the sed in from erties. or the s are Phase I E Proposed March 18 Respons Direct Site Northe Southe Southw Northw 3.5 S Based on the curre Copper C 3.6 T At the di Unless n scope of 3.7 E At the d scope of informati 3.8 In The follo Inter Oak J Ba Subsequ interview Environmenta Fairfield Inn , 2014 ■ Terr ive ■ Resour Sanbo tion e Vaca east Vaca east West struct west Vaca west PG&E Site Owners n a review o ent site own CA Realty In Title Search rection of th notified othe this report. Environmen irection of t f services. on outside t nterviews R wing individ rviewer astian uent to the s wed. Mr. Kub al Site Asses & Suites ■ So acon Project rceful ■ Relia orn maps 19 Hi ant land (1961 ant land (1961 t Harris Ave tures (1961-1 ant land (1961 E high voltage ship of informatio ner is Shyam nc. h he client, a rwise, we a ntal Liens he client, a Unless noti he scope of Regarding uals were in Interview Mr. Shane K (602) 768-70 site reconna ber indicate ssment outh San Fra No. 6014770 able 961 and 197 storical Sa -1970). ); developed enue abuts t 970). -1970). e transmissio on obtained m Lodging G title search ssume that n environme ified otherw this report. Current a nterviewed re Inte wee/Phone # Kuber 000 aissance, Mr d no knowle ncisco, CA 07 0 anborn Ma Descrip with multiple the site follo on right-of-way from the Co Group II, LL was not inc the client is ental liens s wise, we ass nd Historic egarding the erviewees Principa Hotels, r. Shane Ku edge of form p Review ption e medium to la owed by sev y (1961-1970 ounty of San LC who obt cluded as pa s evaluating search was sume that t cal Uses e current and Title al of Kube Inc. uber Principa mer or curr arge structure veral small t 0). n Mateo ass tained the s art of the sc this informa not include the client is d historical u D er January 2:30PM al of Kuber rent structur es (1970). to medium s sessor’s rec site in 1998 cope of serv ation outsid ed as part o s evaluating use of the sit Date/Time 29, 2014 Hotels, Inc. res, septic ta 8 size cords, from vices. e the of the g this te. 4 / . was anks, Phase I E Proposed March 18 Respons water we that have site, Mr. environm site. In a site vicin 3.9 H Based on submerg to have b for a brie Based on the site c 1950s. parking February cobble, b dark blue dumped polynucle above la concentr (ESLs) f backgrou additiona a separa PAH com appear t limited si Surround through commerc through t site to t southwes 1980s w through t Environmenta Fairfield Inn , 2014 ■ Terr ive ■ Resour ells, grease t e been locat Kuber was mental litigat addition, Mr. ity. Historical U n a review o ed marsh or been vacant ef time in the n a review o consisted of From the 1 purposes. B y 25, 2014, boulders, an e gray bay material obs ear aromatic boratory rep rations (arse for shallow und concent al study wou ate cover. A mpounds (n o be associ te investigat ding propert the early 19 cial structure the present. the southea st was deve as develope the present. al Site Asses & Suites ■ So acon Project rceful ■ Relia traps, sand ted and/or p not aware ion, adminis Kuber was Use Inform of the historic r swamp lan t and/or und e late 2000’s of historical i f submerged 950s throug Based on g subsurface d fill materia mud. A lim served at th c hydrocarb porting limits enic and chr soil were r rations in the ld be require lthough not naphthalene iated with p tion findings ties consiste 950s. adjoin es from at From the e ast followed eloped with ed with the ssment outh San Fra No. 6014770 able traps, samp placed on the of their orig strative proc not aware o ation Sum cal informati nd from as e developed la when it was nformation i d marsh or gh the pres geotechnical soils at the als to a dept mited site inv he site for th bons (PAHs) s. Based on romium) abo reported. Th e area, but i ed. The limit above regu and phena possible asp is presente ed of subm ning properti least the la early 1960s by the ex three PG&E existing hot ncisco, CA 07 pling wells, s e site. When gins. Mr. Ku eedings or g of any envir mary ion, the site early as 1899 and from the s used for pa including top swamp land sent the site l exploration e site consi th of nine (9 vestigation he presence ), volatile or the findings ove the Cal he metals c n order to d ted site inve ulatory scree anthrene) an phalt debris d under a se erged mars es to the n ate 1960’s a through the xisting comm E transmissio tel building a solvent baths n queried ab uber stated government ronmental co and surroun 9 until the ea e mid-1950s arking purpo pographic m d from the l e appeared n activities isted of und 9) feet below was perform of total pet rganic comp s of the limit lifornia Envi concentratio etermine ba estigation let ening levels nd TPH – o in the fill. A eparate cove sh or swam ortheast we and has rem present, W mercial buil on lines in t and has rem s, pipelines bout the soil that he is n t notices on oncerns on nding prope arly 1940s. through the oses. maps and ae ate 1890s t as vacant conducted documented w ground sur med to eval roleum hydr pounds (VO ted site inve ronmental S ons appear ackground co tter report is , low level c oil-range wa A letter repo er. p land from ere develope mained relat West Harris A dings. The the early 19 mained relat or UST’s / A l piles locate not aware o or regardin the site or i rties consist The site app e present, ex erial photogra through the land or use by Terraco d sandy, gra rface followe luate the fil rocarbons (T OCs), and m estigation, m Screening L to be simil oncentration presented u concentratio as reported, rt presenting m the late 1 ed with app tively uncha Avenue abut property to 940s and in tively uncha 9 AST’s ed on of any g the n the ted of pears xcept aphs, early ed for on on avely, ed by l and TPH), metals metals evels lar to ns, an under ons of , and g the 1890s parent anged ts the o the early anged Phase I E Proposed March 18 Respons 4.0 R Regulato company Informati services not includ In some refer to t flow dire upon sea benefit o flow direc 4.1 F Listed be ASTM-re descriptio Databa CERC CERCL NFRA ERN IC / E Environmenta Fairfield Inn , 2014 ■ Terr ive ■ Resour RECORDS ory databas y. The purpo on in this s company a de confirmat of the follow the topograp ection and th asonal varia of on-site gro ction beneat Federal and elow are the equired sear ons, and the ase LIS The C the E relea pursu LIS / AP CERC remo sites. NS The E listing petro water EC A list in pl groun prope requi rema as p forms meth subst al Site Asses & Suites ■ So acon Project rceful ■ Relia S REVIEW e informatio ose of the re section is su nd the date tion of facilit wing subsec phic gradien he depth to ations in rai oundwater m th the site ca d State/Trib e facility list rch distance e database s CERCLIS da EPA has inve se or threat uant to the CE CLIS/NFRAP oved and arc . Emergency R g compiled oleum and ha r. ing of sites w ace. IC inc ndwater use erty use re rements inten aining on site. art of the in s of caps, bu ods to cre tances to en ssment outh San Fra No. 6014770 able W on was pro ecords revie ubject to the at which th ies listed as ctions, the w nt in relation shallow gro infall and th monitoring w annot be dire bal Databa ings identifie es from the search repor Federa Descri atabase is a c estigated or is tened releas ERCLA of 198 P refers to chived from E Response Not by the EPA zardous subs with institutiona clude admini e restrictions estrictions, a nded to preve . Deed restr nstitutional co uilding found ate pathway ter environm ncisco, CA 07 ovided by ew was to id e accuracy o he informatio "unmappab words up-gra n to the site oundwater, he depth to wells survey ectly ascerta ases ed on feder approximat rt are include al Databas ption compilation o s currently in e of hazard 80. facilities th EPA's invent tification Syst A on report stances to th al and/or eng istrative mea s, construct and post re ent exposure ictions are ge ontrols. EC dations, liners y elimination ental media EDR, a co dentify RECs of the data on is update ble" by regula adient, cross . As stated if present, w the soil/bed yed to a dat ained. ral and state te site boun ed in Append ses of facilities wh nvestigating fo dous substan hat have b tory of CERC tem (ERNS) ted releases e air, soil an gineering cont asures, such tion restrictio emediation c to contamina enerally requ include vari s, and treatm n for regula or effect hum ontract infor s in connect provided by ed, and the atory databa s-gradient an previously, would likely drock interfa tum, ground e/tribal data ndaries. Dat dix D. Radi (mile hich or a nces 0.5 been CLA 0.5 is a s of d/or Site trols h as ons, care ants uired ious ment ated man Site rmation ser tion with the y the inform scope herei ases. nd down-gra the groundw y vary depen ace. Withou dwater depth abases withi tabase defin us es) Listin 5 2 5 6 e 0 e 0 10 rvices e site. mation in did adient water nding ut the h and n the nition, ngs Phase I E Proposed March 18 Respons Databa NPL NPL (Delist RCR CORRA TSD RCR Genera RCRA N CORRA TSD Databa RESPO CALSIT (AWP Environmenta Fairfield Inn , 2014 ■ Terr ive ■ Resour ase healt L The aban for pr L ted) The remo RA ACTS/ D The assoc haza “corre relea enviro RA ators The lists f norm large (CES acute haza acute less t Non- ACTS/ D The comp trans Unlik Non- facilit ase ONSE The (DTS inform with uncha probl high “fund Priori Reus “CalS inform prope haza TES P) The equiv al Site Asses & Suites ■ So acon Project rceful ■ Relia h. NPL is the doned hazard riority remedia NPL (Delist oved from the EPA maint ciated with tr rdous waste ective action” se of haza onment from RCRA Gene facilities that al business p (LQG), s SQG). LQG ely hazardou rdous waste. ely hazardous than 100 kg/m RCRA N pilation by th portation, tre e the RCRA CORRACTS/ ties where co California D SC) has deve mation about hazardous aracterized p ems. These c potential ris ed” or Resp ity List (NPL) se Program Sites,” is us mational too erties that m rdous substa California DT valent NPL a ssment outh San Fra No. 6014770 able Descri e EPA’s da dous waste f al actions und ted) refers t NPL. tains a dat reatment, sto that are unde ” order is iss ardous waste a RCRA facil rators databa generate haz practices. G mall (SQG) produce at l us waste o SQG produc s waste. CES month of non- on-CORRAC e EPA of fa eatment, or d A CORRACTS /TSD databa rrective action State/Tr Descri epartment o loped an ele sites that ar substances roperties whe confirmed sit sk, and incl ponsible Par sites. The S Database ( sed primarily ol to evalua ay have bee nces. TSC has co active sites ncisco, CA 07 ption atabase of facilities that der the Super to facilities t tabase of orage, and di ergoing “corre sued when th e or constit lity. ase, maintain zardous waste enerators are , or condit least 1000 k or 1 kg/mo ce 100-1000 k SQG are tho -acutely haza CTS/TSD Da acilities which disposal of ha S/TSD datab ase does not n is required. ribal Datab ption of Toxic Sub ctronic datab re known to b as well as ere further stu es are gener ude military rty (RP) lead Site Mitigation (SMBRPD), y by DTSC ate and trac en affected b ompiled a da known as A uncontrolled have been lis rfund Program that have b RCRA facil isposal (TSD ective action. here has bee tuents into ned by the E e as part of t e listed as ei tionally exe kg/month of n onth of acu kg/month of n ose that gene rdous waste. atabase is h report stora azardous wa base, the RC t include RC bases bstances Con base system w be contamina information udies may rev rally high prio facilities, s d, and Natio and Brownfie also known C’s staff as ck activities y the release atabase of s Annual Workp Radi (mile or sted m. 1.0 been 0.5 ities D) of ” A en a the 1.0 EPA, their ther empt non- utely non- erate Site a adjoin proper a age, aste. CRA CRA 0.5 Radi (mile ntrol with ated on veal ority, state onal elds as an at e of 1.0 state plan 1.0 us es) Listin 0 0 5 0 0 4 and ning rties 1 5 0 us es) Listin 0 6 0 0 11 ngs ngs Phase I E Proposed March 18 Respons Databa LUS SWF/ UST VCP Enviros In additio and prop database The site summari for identi proximity Environmenta Fairfield Inn , 2014 ■ Terr ive ■ Resour ase Prope confir reme T State tanks /LF State within facilit opera T State the S locati P State Progr stor The Site (SMB know reaso follow Priori Facili Scho inform addit ident been deed inapp inform healt on to the ab prietary data es is include address w zes the site- fied facilities y to the site. al Site Asses & Suites ■ So acon Project rceful ■ Relia erties (AWP), rmed release ediate, either i e and/or Triba s in the state o e and/or Triba n California. ty name, c ational life, an e and/or Triba State of Calif ion of the tan e and/or Triba ram sites. Department Mitigation BRP’s) Enviro wn contamina ons to invest wing site typ ities List (NP ities and Sta ool sites. Env mation that w ional site in ification of fo released fo restrictions propriate la mation that is h and the env bove ASTM- abases prov d in the regu was not iden -specific info s. Facilities w Additional d ssment outh San Fra No. 6014770 able Descri , and as State e sites where n a lead or su al database of of California. al database o The database class, operat nd owner. al database o fornia which ks. al facilities in of Toxic Su and Brow oStor databa ation or site tigate further pes: Federa PL)); State ate Superfun iroStor provid was available formation, in ormerly-conta or reuse, pro s have be nd uses, used to asse vironment at c -required list vided by the ulatory datab ntified in the ormation pro within appro discussion fo ncisco, CA 07 ption e Superfund DTSC is ac upport capaci f leaking unde of solid waste e information tion type, a of registered may include cluded as Vo bstances Co wnfields Re ase identifes es for which . The databa l Superfund Response, in nd; Voluntary des similar in e in CalSite ncluding, but minated prop perties wher een recorde and risk ess potential contaminated tings, Terrac e database base report e regulatory ovided by the oximately 58 or selected fa Sites. These ctively working ity. erground stor facilities loca n may include area, estima storage tank e the owner oluntary Clea ontrol’s (DTS use Progra sites that h there may ase includes sites (Natio ncluding Mili y Cleanup; nformation to s, and provi t not limited perties that h re environme ed to prev characteriza impacts to pu d sites. con reviewe firm. A list included in A y database e database a 80 feet from acilities follo Radi (mile are g to rage 0.5 ated e the ated 0.5 ks in and Site a adjoin proper anup 0.5 C’s) am’s have be the onal itary and the ides to, have ental vent ation ublic 1 ed other fed t of the add Appendix D. review. The and/or gathe the site are ows the sum us es) Listin 5 114 5 0 and ning rties 0 5 3 26 eral, state, ditional revie . e following ered by this o listed in ord mary table. 12 ngs 4 6 local, ewed table office der of Phase I E Proposed March 18 Respons Facili CTC Foo 131 Wes Internatio Nakura, 110 Wes Budget R 177 Sou Ajax Ren Business 145 Mitc Taylor F 221 Wes Bay Brid Godar & Pentago Essence 151 Mitc Verizon SSF Civ 117 Gate KB Sout Forrest F 175 Sylv Troyer A 162 Wes CTC Foo CTC Foo position Undergro Storage T the LUST gasoline Environmenta Fairfield Inn , 2014 ■ Terr ive ■ Resour ity Name And od Internation st Harris Aven onal Roasting INC st Harris Aven Rent A Car th Airport Bou nt A Car s chell Avenue reezers of Ca st Harris Cour dge Hardware & Hossenlopp n Light / e Printing chell Avenue Wireless / vic Center eway Bouleva h San Francis Faulknor & So vester Road Auto Matic Do st Harris Aven od Internatio od Internatio relative to ound Storag Tank (RGA T database contaminati al Site Asses & Suites ■ So acon Project rceful ■ Relia d Location nal nue g Systems / nue ulevard alifornia rt e Supply / Printing Co / ard sco / ons ors, INC / nue nal (131 We onal located the site. Th ge Tank (LU LUST), and , this facility ion affecting ssment outh San Fra No. 6014770 able Liste Dista Adjoin Adjoining 170 f 200 feet / 210 fee 260 feet / 340 f 380 f 580 fe est Harris Av adjacent to his facility i UST), Reco Historical C y had a LU g groundwat ncisco, CA 07 ed Facilitie Estimate ance/Directio ning / Northea gradien / Southeast / feet / West / U / Southeast / et / North / Cr / Southeast / feet / West / U feet / North / U eet / East / Do venue) o the northe s listed in overed Gove Cortese (HIS ST case op ter other tha es ed on/Gradient ast / Cross- nt / Down-gradie Up-gradient Down-gradie ross-gradient Down-gradie Up-gradient Up-gradient own-gradient ast and in a the regulato ernment Arc ST CORTESE pened on M an drinking w Data LUST, R C ent San RGA SQG CORT FID US Co. C SWE ANGE San ent SWEE UST, S C San ent HIST C RGA UST, RCRA- EMI, S San RGA L LUS a topograph ory databas chive Leaki E) site. Base May 7th, 199 water. The f abase Listing RGA LUST, H CORTESE Mateo Co. B A LUST, RCR G, FINDS, HIS TESE, LUST, ST, Sacrame CS, HIST UST EPS UST, LO ELES CO. HM Mateo Co. B EPS UST, HIS San Mateo Co CA FID UST Mateo Co. B CORTESE, LU LUST, CA F SWEEPS US -SQG, HAZN San Mateo Co Mateo Co. B UST, San Ma Co. BI, ST, RGA LUST hic cross-gra se as a Lea ng Undergr ed on a revie 98 for a pote facility under 13 gs HIST BI RA ST CA nto T, OS MS, BI ST o. BI, BI UST, ID ST, ET, o. BI BI ateo T adient aking round ew of ential rwent Phase I E Proposed March 18 Respons regulator Oversigh Based o relative t connectio Internatio Internatio the east regulator facility pr informati site, this Budget R This faci up-gradie observed also obs Archive L (RCRA-S CORTES Undergro Storage Storage ANGELE listings, t reported. size from was equ used for facility ha activities on Septe facility do Verizon W This faci gradient Mateo C included Environmenta Fairfield Inn , 2014 ■ Terr ive ■ Resour ry action an ht Program ( n the facilit to the site, t on with the s onal Roastin onal Roastin and in a ry database roduces less on is provid facility does Rent A Car lity is locate ent position d to be occu served. This Leaking Und SQG), Facilit SE), Leaking ound Storag Tank (HIST Tank (SW ES CO. HMS the facility is . Based on m 550-gallon ipped with s storing was ad a gasolin starting July ember 13, 20 oes not appe Wireless / S ility is locat position rela o. BI facility fuel, waste al Site Asses & Suites ■ So acon Project rceful ■ Relia nd was gra LOP) on Aug y’s the regu the CTC Foo site. ng Systems / ng Systems topographic review as a s than 27 ga ded in the E s not appear d at 177 So relative to t upied by He facility is li derground S ty Index Sys g Undergrou ge Tank (C UST), State EEPS UST S), and San s listed as a a review of n to 12,000- six 12,000-g ste oil; all in e release, w y 28, 1993, 002. Based o ear to consti SF Civic Ce ed at 117 G ative to the s y. Based on oils, and ot ssment outh San Fra No. 6014770 able anted a reg gust 10, 200 ulatory closu od Internatio / Nakura, Inc / Nakura, In down-grad a San Mate allons a yea DR report. B to constitute outh Airport he site. At t ertz car renta isted in the Storage Tank stem/Facility nd Storage CA FID US ewide Enviro T), Los Ang n Mateo Co. a small quan the SWEEP gallon. Base gallon USTs stalled in 19 which was di and was clo on the facilit tute a REC nter Gateway Bo site. This fac a review of ther unspec ncisco, CA 07 gulatory clos 00. ure status a onal facility c. nc. located a ient position o Co. BI sit ar of recycled Based on th e a REC in c Boulevard, 2 the time of t al. Evidence regulatory k (RGA LUS y Registry Sy Tank (LUST T), Sacram onmental Ev geles Coun BI facility. ntities gener PS UST listi ed on a rev s used for s 976. Based iscovered on osed for com ty’s regulato in connectio oulevard, 34 cility was lis f the listing, cified hazard sure by the and cross-g does not ap at 110 West n relative to te. Based on d waste oils he down-gra connection w 200 feet nor the site reco e of canopy database as ST), RCRA – ystem (FIND T), California mento Co. C valuation Pla ty Health M Based on rator in the ing, the faci view of the H storing gaso on a review n January 22 mpletion, by ry closure st on with the s 40 feet wes sted in the re waste strea dous waste. e San Mate radient topo ppear to con t Harris Ave o the site w n a review o s and solven adient positio with the site rthwest and onnaissance and fuelling s a Recove – Small Qua DS), Historic a Facility Inv CS, Historic anning Syst Managemen a review of year 1996 w lity had ten HIST UST l line and on w of the LUS 2, 1987, und the San Ma tatus, the Bu site. st and in a egulatory da ams generat No addition eo County ographic po nstitute a RE enue, adjace was identifie of the listing nts. No addit on relative t at this time. in a topogra e, this facility g operations ered Govern antities Gene cal Cortese ( ventory Data cal Undergr em Undergr nt System the RCRA- without viola tanks rangi isting, the fa 550-gallon ST database derwent rem ateo County udget Rent A topographic atabase as a ted at this fa nal informati 14 Local sition EC in ent to ed in g, the tional to the aphic y was s was nment erator (HIST abase round round (LOS -SQG ations ing in acility UST e, the medial LOP, A Car c up- a San acility ion is Phase I E Proposed March 18 Respons provided Wireless site at th KB South KB Sout north and the regul review of storing h release w removal impacted Mateo C status, a Faulknor time. The rema to the si distance Unmappe evaluate unmappe assessm These fa Environmenta Fairfield Inn , 2014 ■ Terr ive ■ Resour in the reg / SSF Civic is time. h San Franc h San Fran d in a topog latory databa f the listing, azardous m was discove of a 1,100 d soil was re County LOP, and the topo r & Sons fac aining identi te at this ti from the site ed facilities the facility ed section. D ment; howeve cilities are li al Site Asses & Suites ■ So acon Project rceful ■ Relia gulatory data c Center fac cisco / Forres cisco / Forr graphic cross ase as a Sa the facility materials. Bas ered with p 0-gallon dies moved and on March ographic cro cility does no ified facilities me based u e. are those t listing loca Determining er, none of t sted in the d ssment outh San Fra No. 6014770 able abase repo ility does no st Faulknor & rest Faulkno s-gradient p an Mateo Co produces le sed on a rev otential imp sel UST. A disposed of 11, 2010. B oss-gradient ot appear to s listed in th upon regula hat do not c tions relativ the location these facilitie database rep ncisco, CA 07 rt. Based ot appear to & Sons or & Sons lo position relat o. BI facility ess than 27 view of the R pacts to gro According to f offsite. The Based on th t position, t constitute a e database atory status, contain suffi ve to the sit n of unmapp es were iden port in Appe on the fac constitute a ocated at 17 tive to the s and RGA L gallons a ye RGA LUST oundwater o o the listing case was c he facility’s the KB Sou a REC in co report do no , apparent t icient addre te. The repo ped facilities ntified as the ndix D. cility’s distan a REC in con 75 Sylvester site. This fac UST databa ear of hazar listing, the f on July 31, , approxima closed for co distance, re uth San Fra onnection wi ot appear to topographic ss or locatio ort listed 20 s is beyond e site or adj nce, the Ve nnection wit r Road, 380 cility was list ases. Based rdous waste facility a gas 2006 during ately 24 ton ompletion, by egulatory clo ancisco / Fo th the site a o represent R gradient, a on informati 0 facilities in the scope o acent prope 15 erizon th the 0 feet ted in on a e, and soline g the ns of y San osure orrest at this RECs and/or on to n the of this erties. Phase I E Proposed March 18 Respons 4.2 L Local Ag San Mat of En Services South Departm PG&E South Departm Bay A Managem 4.2.1 H The San by fax o environm received 4.2.2 D The Dep records o Terracon indicating 4.2.3 F The City regarding 2014, in informati Environmenta Fairfield Inn , 2014 ■ Terr ive ■ Resour Local Agen gency teo County nvironmenta San Franc ent San ent of Public Area Air ment District Health Depa Mateo Cou on January mental conce . Department artment of T or informatio n received an g no records Fire Depart of South Sa g environme ndicating tha on without a al Site Asses & Suites ■ So acon Project rceful ■ Relia ncy Inquirie Department l Health cisco Fire Francisco, c Works r Quality t artment/En unty Departm y 24, 2014, erns for the t of Toxic S Toxic Substa on indicating n email from s were availa ment an Francisco ental records at the City authorization ssment outh San Fra No. 6014770 able es Contact I Phone : (6 Fax : (650 Email : inf Phone : (6 Fax : (650 Email : we Phone : 1 Phone : (6 Fax : (650 Email : we Phone : (4 Fax : (415 nvironmen ment of Env , regarding site. At the Substance ances Contro environmen m Jan Papara able for the s o Fire Depar s for the site of South n from the Co ncisco, CA 07 nformation 650) 372-62 0) 627-8244 fo@smhealt 650) 829-39 0) 829-3954 eb-fd@ssf.n -800-743-50 650) 877-85 0) 877-8665 eb-pw@ssf.n 415) 771-60 5) 928-8560 ntal Divisio vironmental environme e issuance o es Control ol was conta ntal concerns aro of the De site. rtment was c e. Jo Davis San Franci ounty of San n 00 th.org 50 et 000 50 net 00 on Health Serv ental record of this repor acted by ema s for the site epartment of contacted by was contac isco Fire D n Mateo. vices (DEHS ds or inform rt, a respon ail regarding e. On Februa f Toxic Subs y fax, on Jan ted by phon Department S) was conta mation indic se has not g environme ary 7, 2014, stance Contr nuary 24th, 2 ne on Febru will not re 16 acted cating been ntal rol 2014, ary 7 lease Phase I E Proposed March 18 Respons 4.2.4 P The City 24, 2014 has not b 4.2.5 L The Bay regarding been rec 4.2.6 L The Bay regarding Melinda Bay Wat documen online da 4.3 R Selected and loca database (NPL) f (ENVIRO Historica setting a facilities 5.0 S 5.1 G Informati walking t site. Exh time of t planning Environmenta Fairfield Inn , 2014 ■ Terr ive ■ Resour Public Work of South S , regarding e been receive Local/Regio y Area Air Q g environme ceived. Local/Regio Area Regio g environme Wong, a re ter Board, re nts for the fo atabase (Geo Records Re federal and al regulatory es. The reg facilities, 16 OSTOR) fac l Undergrou nd/or facility do not const ITE RECO General Sit on containe through the ibit 2 in App the visual re and conduc al Site Asses & Suites ■ So acon Project rceful ■ Relia ks Departm an Francisc environment ed. onal Pollut Quality Mana ental records onal Water onal Water Q ental records epresentative esponded by ollowing site o-Tracker), r eview Sum d state enviro y agencies ulatory revie 6 RCRA ilities, 114 L und Storage y characteris titute RECs ONNAISS e Informat ed in this s site and the pendix A is a econnaissan cting the site ssment outh San Fra No. 6014770 able ment co Public Wo tal records fo tion Contro agement Dis s for the site r Quality C Quality Cont s or informa e for the Ma y email on location tha records asso mmary onmental re were review ew identified facilities, o Leaking Und Tank (HIST stics, and in in connectio SANCE tion ection is ba e accessible a Site Diagra nce is provi e visit are inc ncisco, CA 07 orks Departm or the site. A ol Agency strict was c e. At the issu ontrol Age trol Board w ation indicati anagement February 12 t you reques ociated with egulatory dat wed. The si d two CERC one RCRA derground S T UST) facili nquiry results on with the s ased on a v e interior are am of the site ided in App cluded in Ap ment was c At the issuan contacted by uance of this ency was contacte ing environm Services Di 2, 2014 with sted”. Based the site wer tabases as w ite was not CLIS facilitie A Generato Storage Tan ities. Based s from the l site at this tim visual recon eas of struc e. Photo doc pendix E. C pendix F. contacted by nce of this re y fax, on Ja s report, a r ed by fax, Ja mental conc ivision of th h “we find no d on a review re not identif well as resp identified i es, six Nati ors facility, nk (LUST) fa d on distanc ocal agenci me. nnaissance ctures, if any cumentation redentials o y fax, on Jan eport, a resp anuary 24, 2 response ha anuary 24, 2 cerns for the e San Fran o records o w of the RW fied. ponses from in the regul onal Priority 26 Enviro acilities, and ce, environm es, the iden conducted y, located o n of the site a of the individ 17 nuary ponse 2014, as not 2014, e site. cisco r any WQCB state latory y List oStor d two mental ntified while n the at the duals Phase I E Proposed March 18 Respons Site Rec Field Reco Weat Site C 5.2 O The site of Mitche California 5.3 S The follo (designa Ca Site O Proc Eq Abo Ch Was Environmenta Fairfield Inn , 2014 ■ Terr ive ■ Resour connaissanc Personnel onnaissance D ther Condition Contact/Title Overview o is located a ell Avenue a. The site c Site Observ owing table ted by an “X ategory Operations, esses, and quipment oveground emical or ste Storage al Site Asses & Suites ■ So acon Project rceful ■ Relia ce Date ns f Current S at 127 West and West consists of a vations summarize X”) are discu Emerge Elevato Air com Hydraul Dry clea Photo p Ventilat Waste t systems Heating Other p Aboveg Drums, MSDS ssment outh San Fra No. 6014770 able General S Oak J. Bas January 28 Sunny, 70° Mr. Shane Site Occup Harris Aven Harris Aven a 1.47-acre t es site obs ssed in more Site Ch Item o ency generato rs pressors lic lifts aning processing ion hoods an treatment sys s g and/or coolin rocesses or e round storage barrels and/o ncisco, CA 07 Site Inform stian 8, 2014 °F Kuber / Princ pants and O nue, approxi nue in Sout tract of vaca servations a e detail follo haracterist or Feature ors d/or incinerat stems and/or ng systems equipment e tanks or containers mation cipal of Kube Operations mately 150 th San Fra nt land cove and interview owing the tab tics tors water treatme 5 gallons r Developme s feet north o ncisco, San ered with nat ws. Affirm ble. Ob Otherw ent nt, Inc. of the interse n Mateo Co tive grasses mative respo bserved or wise Identifie 18 ection ounty, s. onses ed Phase I E Proposed March 18 Respons Ca Und Ch Wast Dra Co S E Tran Re Potent Other F Electrica Transform During T & Electr informati contain m contamin Environmenta Fairfield Inn , 2014 ■ Terr ive ■ Resour ategory derground emical or te Storage, ainage or ollection Systems lectrical nsformers/ PCBs leases or tial Releases Notable Site eatures al Transform mers and/or erracon’s sit ric (PG&E) on with rega mineral oil w nated” (PCB al Site Asses & Suites ■ So acon Project rceful ■ Relia Undergr equipme Sumps, Grease Septic t Oil/wate Pipeline Interior Transfo Other e Stresse Stained Stained Leachat Trash, d Dumpin Constru dirt Surface free floa Strong, Exterior discharg Surface Quarrie Wells mers/ PCBs r capacitors te visit, two p were obse ard to PCB which may c content of 5 ssment outh San Fra No. 6014770 able Item o round storag ent cisterns, catc traps anks and/or l er separators e markers floor drains rmers and/or quipment d vegetation soil pavement or te and/or was debris and/or ng or disposal uction/demolit e water discol ating product pungent or n r pipe discha ges e water bodies s or pits s pole-mounte erved on th content of t contain mino 50-500 ppm) ncisco, CA 07 or Feature ge tanks or ch basins and each fields capacitors r similar surfa ste seeps other waste m areas tion debris an loration, odor oxious odors arges and/or s ed transform he northeas the transform or amounts ). ancillary U d/or dry wells ace materials nd/or dumped r, sheen, and r other efflue mer’s, owned stern portion mer fluids w of PCB and Ob Otherw ST s d fill d/or ent d and service n of the s was observe d could be c bserved or wise Identifie X X X ed by Pacific ite howeve d. Transfor considered 19 ed c Gas r, no rmers “PCB Phase I E Proposed March 18 Respons PG&E m contamin release i vicinity o not cons Release Trash, de Trash an on visua which co metal fen observed materials Construc Dumped amount o dumped concrete appeared the site presence to Sectio under a s 5.4 S During t observed Terracon hydrocar additiona cover. Environmenta Fairfield Inn , 2014 ■ Terr ive ■ Resour maintains re nated,” the is identified. f the electric idered a RE es or Poten ebris and/or nd debris we l observatio onsisted of m ncing were o d during the s observed d ction/Demolit fill dirt was of dirt was a near the no was dumpe d within this reconnaiss e of petroleu on 3.9 for ad separate cov Site Reconn the site rec d throughou n performed rbons in the al informatio al Site Asses & Suites ■ So acon Project rceful ■ Relia esponsibility utility comp . However, cal equipme C for the site ntial Relea other waste re observed n (only of su metal pipes observed. L visual reco do not consti tion Debris a observed n approximate orth east po ed south of t dumped dir ance. Terra um hydrocar dditional info ver. naissance connaissanc ut site, dum d a limited e dumped f n. The limite ssment outh San Fra No. 6014770 able for the tr pany is not no evidenc nt during the e at this time ses e materials d along the s urface mate , cardboard Leakage, spi onnaissance itute a REC and/or Dump near the cen ely20 cubic y ortion of the he fill dirt. B rt. No notabl acon perfor rbons in the ormation. Th Summary ce, two pol ped fill dirt site inves fill material ed site inves ncisco, CA 07 ansformers, required to ce of curren e site recon e. site boundary erials) approx boxes, gla ills or other . Based on in connectio ped Fill Dirt nter of the s yards. Four e fill dirt. Ap ased upon v le odors wer rmed a limi dumped fill e limited sit le-mounted , and concr stigation to observed o stigation lett and if the o replace th nt or prior re naissance. y during the ximately one ass bottles, releases fro n site observ on with the s site during th wheelbarrow pproximately visual surfac re apparent ited site inv material ob te investigat transforme rete piles w evaluate t on-site. Plea ter report is e transform he transform elease was Therefore t site reconna e dump truc plastic oil b om these m vations, the site. he site reco ws full of co y one cubic ce observatio from this ar vestigation bserved on-s ion letter re rs, trash a were also o the presenc ase refer to presented u mers were “ mer fluids u observed i he transform aissance. B ck load of de bottles, tires aterials wer trash and d onnaissance oncrete mix yard of cru ons, no mate rea at the tim to evaluate site. Please port is prese and debris observed on ce of petro Section 3. under a sep 20 “PCB ntil a n the mer is Based ebris, , and re not debris . The were ushed erials me of e the refer ented were n-site. oleum 9 for parate Phase I E Proposed March 18 Respons 6.0 A Visual ob Dire Nort Sout Sout North CTS Foo database Environmenta Fairfield Inn , 2014 ■ Terr ive ■ Resour ADJOININ bservations o ection heast T In theast T 1 C hwest T a hwest T lo od Internatio e review and al Site Asses & Suites ■ So acon Project rceful ■ Relia G PROPE of adjoining The property t nternational, The property t 39 Mitchell A Clock repair a The property t at 111 Mitchel The property t ot located at 1 onal, Inc. loc d was previo ssment outh San Fra No. 6014770 able ERTY RE properties (f Adjoini to the adjacen Inc. located a to the adjacen Avenue, Naku nd service sh to the adjacen ll Avenue follo to the adjacen 180 Gateway cated adjace usly discuss ncisco, CA 07 ECONNAIS from site bo ing Proper Descri nt northeast w at 131 W. Har nt southeast c ra Inc. locate hop, located a nt southwest w owed by Mitch nt northwest c Boulevard fo ent to the no sed in detail SSANCE undaries) ar rties iption was occupied rris Avenue. consisted of o ed at 110 W. H at 120 W. Har was occupied hell Avenue. consisted of a ollowed by Ga ortheast wa in Section 4 E re summariz by CTS Food office spaces Harris Avenue rris Avenue. d by Hotel Fo an asphalt-pa ateway Boule as identified 4.1. zed below. d located at e, and Time ocus located aved parking vard. in the regul 21 latory APPENDIX A EXHIBIT 1 – TOPOGRAPHIC MAP EXHIBIT 2 – SITE DIAGRAM USGS TOPOGRAPHIC QUADRANGLE MAP Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites San Francisco South, California Dated: 1995 SCALE: 1" = 2,000'South San Francisco, San Mateo County, CA PROJECT NO. 60147707 N EXHIBIT 1: TOPOGRAPHIC MAP 127 West Harris Avenue APPENDIX B DESCRIPTION OF TERMS AND ACRONYMS Description of Selected General Terms and Acronyms Term/Acronym Description ACM Asbestos Containing Material. Asbestos is a naturally occurring mineral, three varieties of which (chrysotile, amosite, crocidolite) have been commonly used as fireproofing or binding agents in construction materials. Exposure to asbestos, as well as ACM, has been documented to cause lung diseases including asbestosis (scarring of the lung), lung cancer and mesothelioma (a cancer of the lung lining). Regulatory agencies have generally defined ACM as a material containing greater that one (1) percent asbestos, however some states (e.g. California) define ACM as materials having 0.1% asbestos. In order to define a homogenous material as non-ACM, a minimum number of samples must be collected from the material dependent upon its type and quantity. Homogenous materials defined as non-ACM must either have 1) no asbestos identified in all of its samples or 2) an identified asbestos concentration below the appropriate regulatory threshold. Asbestos concentrations are generally determined using polarized light microscopy or transmission electron microscopy. Point counting is an analytical method to statistically quantify the percentage of asbestos in a sample. The asbestos component of ACM may either be friable or non-friable. Friable materials, when dry, can be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure and have a higher potential for a fiber release than non-friable ACM. Non-friable ACM are materials that are firmly bound in a matrix by plastic, cement, etc. and, if handled carefully, will not become friable. Federal and state regulations require that either all suspect building materials be presumed ACM or that an asbestos survey be performed prior to renovation, dismantling, demolition, or other activities that may disturb potential ACM. Notifications are required prior to demolition and/or renovation activities that may impact the condition of ACM in a building. ACM removal may be required if the ACM is likely to be disturbed or damaged during the demolition or renovation. Abatement of friable or potentially friable ACM must be performed by a licensed abatement contractor in accordance with state rules and NESHAP. Additionally, OSHA regulations for work classification, worker training and worker protection will apply. AHERA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act AST Above Ground Storage Tanks. ASTs are generally described as storage tanks less than 10% of which are below ground (i.e., buried). Tanks located in a basement, but not buried, are also considered ASTs. Whether, and the extent to which, an AST is regulated, is determined on a case-by-case basis and depends upon tank size, its contents and the jurisdiction of its location. BGS Below Ground Surface BTEX Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, and Xylenes. BTEX are VOC components found in gasoline and commonly used as analytical indicators of a petroleum hydrocarbon release. CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (a.k.a. Superfund). CERCLA is the federal act that regulates abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous waste sites. Under this Act, joint and several liability may be imposed on potentially responsible parties for cleanup-related costs. CERCLIS Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System. An EPA compilation of sites having suspected or actual releases of hazardous substances to the environment. CERCLIS also contains information on site inspections, preliminary assessments and remediation of hazardous waste sites. These sites are typically reported to EPA by states and municipalities or by third parties pursuant to CERCLA Section 103. CESQG Conditionally exempt small quantity generators. CFR Code of Federal Regulations DOT U.S. Department of Transportation Description of Selected General Terms and Acronyms (cont.) Term/Acronym Description EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ERNS Emergency Response Notification System. An EPA-maintained federal database which stores information on notifications of oil discharges and hazardous substance releases in quantities greater than the applicable reportable quantity under CERCLA. ERNS is a cooperative data- sharing effort between EPA, DOT, and the National Response Center. ESA Environmental Site Assessment FRP Fiberglass Reinforced Plastic Hazardous Substance As defined under CERCLA, this is (A) any substance designated pursuant to section 1321(b)(2)(A) of Title 33, (B) any element, compound, mixture, solution, or substance designated pursuant to section 9602 of this title; (C) any hazardous waste having characteristics identified under or listed pursuant to section 3001 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act (with some exclusions); (D) any toxic pollutant listed under section 1317(a) of Title 33; (E) any hazardous air pollutant listed under section 112 of the Clear Air Act; and (F) any imminently hazardous chemical substance or mixture with respect to which the EPA Administrator has taken action under section 2606 of Title 15. This term does not include petroleum, including crude oil or any fraction thereof which is not otherwise listed as a hazardous substance under subparagraphs (A) through (F) above, and the term include natural gas, or synthetic gas usable for fuel (or mixtures of natural gas and such synthetic gas). Hazardous Waste This is defined as having characteristics identified or listed under section 3001 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act (with some exceptions). RCRA, as amended by the Solid Waste Disposal Act of 1980, defines this term as a “solid waste, or combination of solid wastes, which because of its quantity, concentration, or physical, chemical, or infectious characteristics may (A) cause, or significantly contribute to an increase in mortality or an increase in serious irreversible, or incapacitating reversible illness; or (B) pose a substantial present or potential hazard to human health or the environment when improperly treated, stored, transported, or disposed of, or otherwise managed.” ILP Innocent Landowner/Operator Program LQG Large quantity generators. LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tank. This is a federal term set forth under RCRA for leaking USTs. Some states also utilize this term. MCL Maximum Contaminant Level. This Safe Drinking Water concept (and also used by many states as a ground water cleanup criteria) refers to the limit on drinking water contamination that determines whether a supplier can deliver water from a specific source without treatment. MSDS Material Safety Data Sheets. Written/printed forms prepared by chemical manufacturers, importers and employers which identify the physical and chemical traits of hazardous chemicals under OSHA’s Hazard Communication Standard. NESHAP National Emissions Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (Federal Clean Air Act). This part of the Clean Air Act regulates emissions of hazardous air pollutants. NFRAP Facilities where there is “No Further Remedial Action Planned,” as more particularly described under the Records Review section of this report. NOV Notice of Violation. A notice of violation or similar citation issued to an entity, company or individual by a state or federal regulatory body indicating a violation of applicable rule or regulations has been identified. NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (Clean Water Act). The federal permit system for discharges of polluted water. NPL National Priorities List, as more particularly described under the Records Review section of this report. OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration or Occupational Safety and Health Act PACM Presumed Asbestos-Containing Material. A material that is suspected of containing or presumed to contain asbestos but which has not been analyzed to confirm the presence or absence of asbestos. Description of Selected General Terms and Acronyms (cont.) Term/Acronym Description PCB Polychlorinated Biphenyl. A halogenated organic compound commonly in the form of a viscous liquid or resin, a flowing yellow oil, or a waxy solid. This compound was historically used as dielectric fluid in electrical equipment (such as electrical transformers and capacitors, electrical ballasts, hydraulic and heat transfer fluids), and for numerous heat and fire sensitive applications. PCB was preferred due to its durability, stability (even at high temperatures), good chemical resistance, low volatility, flammability, and conductivity. PCBs, however, do not break down in the environment and are classified by the EPA as a suspected carcinogen. 1978 regulations, under the Toxic Substances Control Act, prohibit manufacturing of PCB-containing equipment; however, some of this equipment may still be in use today. pCi/l Pico Curies per Liter of Air. Unit of measurement for Radon and similar radioactive materials. PLM Polarized Light Microscopy (see ACM section of the report, if included in the scope of services) PST Petroleum Storage Tank. An AST or UST that contains a petroleum product. Radon A radioactive gas resulting from radioactive decay of naturally-occurring radioactive materials in rocks and soils containing uranium, granite, shale, phosphate, and pitchblende. Radon concentrations are measured in Pico Curies per Liter of Air. Exposure to elevated levels of radon creates a risk of lung cancer; this risk generally increases as the level of radon and the duration of exposure increases. Outdoors, radon is diluted to such low concentrations that it usually does not present a health concern. However, radon can accumulate in building basements or similar enclosed spaces to levels that can pose a risk to human health. Indoor radon concentrations depend primarily upon the building's construction, design and the concentration of radon in the underlying soil and ground water. The EPA recommended annual average indoor “action level” concentration for residential structures is 4.0 pCi/l. RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. Federal act regulating solid and hazardous wastes from point of generation to time of disposal (‘cradle to grave”). 42 U.S.C. 6901 et seq. RCRA Generators The RCRA generators list is part of the RCRIS database maintained by EPA and lists facilities that generate hazardous waste as part of their normal business operations, as more particularly defined under Section 4.1 of this report. RCRA CORRACTS/TS Ds The USEPA maintains a database of RCRA facilities associated with treatment, storage, and disposal (TSD) of hazardous materials which are undergoing “corrective action”. A “corrective action” order is issued when there is a release of hazardous waste or constituents into the environment from a RCRA facility. RCRA Non- CORRACTS/TS Ds The RCRA Non-CORRACTS/TSD Database is a compilation by the USEPA of facilities which report storage, transportation, treatment, or disposal of hazardous waste. Unlike the RCRA CORRACTS/TSD database, the RCRA Non-CORRACTS/TSD database does not include RCRA facilities where corrective action is required. RCRA Violators List RAATS. RCRA Administrative Actions Taken. RAATS information is now contained in the RCRIS database and includes records of administrative enforcement actions against facilities for noncompliance. RCRIS Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System, as defined in the Records Review section of this report. REC Recognized Environmental Conditions” are defined by ASTM E1527-05 as “the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products on a property under conditions that indicate an existing release, a past release, or a material threat of release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products into structures on the property or into the ground, ground water, or surface water of the property. The term includes hazardous substances or petroleum products even under conditions of compliance with laws. The term is not intended to include de minimis conditions that generally do not present a threat to human health or the environment and that generally would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies.” SCL State “CERCLIS” List (see SPL /State Priority List, below). Description of Selected General Terms and Acronyms (cont.) Term/Acronym Description SPCC Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasures. SPCC plans are required under federal law (Clean Water Act and Oil Pollution Act) for any facility storing petroleum in tanks and/or containers of 55-gallons or more that when taken in aggregate exceed 1,320 gallons. SPCC plans are also required for facilities with underground petroleum storage tanks with capacities of over 42,000 gallons. Many states have similar spill prevention programs, which may have additional requirements. SPL State Priority List. State list of confirmed sites having contamination in which the state is actively involved in clean up activities or is actively pursuing potentially responsible parties for clean up. Sometimes referred to as a State “CERCLIS” List. SQG Small quantity generator. SWF Solid Waste Facility TPH Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons TRI Toxic Release Inventory. Routine EPA report on releases of toxic chemicals to the environment based upon information submitted by entities subject to reporting under the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act. TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act. A federal law regulating manufacture, import, processing and distribution of chemical substances not specifically regulated by other federal laws (such as asbestos, PCBs, lead-based paint and radon). 15 U.S.C 2601 et seq. USACE United States Army Corps of Engineers USC United States Code USGS United States Geological Survey USNRCS United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resource Conservation Service UST Underground Storage Tank. Most federal and state regulations, as well as ASTM E1527-05, define this as any tank, incl., underground piping connected to the tank, that is or has been used to contain hazardous substances or petroleum products and the volume of which is 10% or more beneath the surface of the ground (i.e., buried). VCP Voluntary Cleanup Program VOC Volatile Organic Compound Wetlands Areas that are typically saturated with surface or ground water that creates an environment supportive of wetland vegetation (i.e., swamps, marshes, bogs). The Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (Technical Report Y-87-1) defines wetlands as areas inundated or saturated by surface or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. For an area to be considered a jurisdictional wetland, it must meet the following criteria: more than 50 percent of the dominant plant species must be categorized as Obligate, Facultative Wetland, or Facultative on lists of plant species that occur in wetlands; the soil must be hydric; and, wetland hydrology must be present. The federal Clean Water Act which regulates “waters of the US,” also regulates wetlands, a program jointly administered by the USACE and the EPA. Waters of the U.S. are defined as: (1) waters used in interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters subject to the ebb and flow of tides; (2) all interstate waters including interstate wetlands; (3) all other waters such as intrastate lakes, rivers, streams (including intermittent streams), mudflats, sandflats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadows, playa lakes, or natural ponds, etc., which the use, degradation, or destruction could affect interstate/ foreign commerce; (4) all impoundments of waters otherwise defined as waters of the U. S., (5) tributaries of waters identified in 1 through 4 above; (6) the territorial seas; and (7) wetlands adjacent to waters identified in 1 through 6 above. Only the USACE has the authority to make a final wetlands jurisdictional determination. APPENDIX C HISTORICAL DOCUMENTATION AND USER QUESTIONNAIRE DATED:1928 Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites SOURCE: Fairchild 127 West Harris Avenue SCALE: 1"=500'N South San Francisco, San Mateo County, CA PROJECT NO. 60147707 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH DATED: 2012 Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites SOURCE: EDR 127 West Harris Avenue SCALE: 1"=500'N South San Francisco, San Mateo County, CA PROJECT NO. 60147707 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH Certified Sanborn® Map Report Phase I Enviromental Site Assessment 127 West Harris Avenue South San Francisco, CA 94080 Inquiry Number: 3837232.3 January 23, 2014 Certified Sanborn® Map Report 1/23/14 Site Name: Phase I Enviromental Site 127 West Harris Avenue South San Francisco, CA Client Name: Terracon 3140 Gold Camp Drive Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 Contact:Oak BastianEDR Inquiry #3837232.3 The Sanborn Library has been searched by EDR and maps covering the target property location as provided by Terracon were identified for the years listed below. The Sanborn Library is the largest, most complete collection of fire insurance maps. The collection includes maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris & Browne, Hopkins, Barlow, and others. Only Environmental Data Resources Inc. (EDR) is authorized to grant rights for commercial reproduction of maps by the Sanborn Library LLC, the copyright holder for the collection. Results can be authenticated by visiting www.edrnet.com/sanborn. The Sanborn Library is continually enhanced with newly identified map archives. This report accesses all maps in the collection as of the day this report was generated. Certified Sanborn Results: Site Name:Phase I Enviromental Site Assessment Address:127 West Harris Avenue City, State, Zip:South San Francisco, CA 94080 Cross Street: P.O. #NA Project:60147707 Certification #DEBC-431B-A42E Library of Congress University Publications of America EDR Private Collection The Sanborn Library LLC Since 1866™ The Sanborn Library includes more than 1.2 million fire insurance maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris & Browne, Hopkins, Barlow and others which track historical property usage in approximately 12,000 American cities and towns. Collections searched: Sanborn® Library search results Certification # DEBC-431B-A42E Maps Provided: 1970 1961 Limited Permission To Make Copies Terracon (the client) is permitted to make up to THREE photocopies of this Sanborn Map transmittal and each fire insurance map accompanying this report solely for the limited use of its customer. No one other than the client is authorized to make copies. Upon request made directly to an EDR Account Executive, the client may be permitted to make a limited number of additional photocopies. This permission is conditioned upon compliance by the client, its customer and their agents with EDR's copyright policy; a copy of which is available upon request. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2014 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. 3837232 - 3 page 2 Sanborn Sheet Thumbnails This Certified Sanborn Map Report is based upon the following Sanborn Fire Insurance map sheets. 1970 Source Sheets Volume 1, Sheet 37 Volume 1, Sheet 42 1961 Source Sheets Volume 1, Sheet 42 3837232 - 3 page 3 1970 Certified Sanborn Map DE B C - 4 3 1 B - A 4 2 E Order Date: EDR Inquiry: Client: Site Name: Address: City, ST, ZIP: Certification # Copyright:1970 1/23/2014 6:34:01 PM 3837232.3 Terracon Phase I Enviromental Site Assessment 127 West Harris Avenue South San Francisco CA 94080 DEBC-431B-A42E This Certified Sanborn Map combines the following sheets. Outlined areas indicate map sheets within the collection. Volume 1, Sheet 37 Volume 1, Sheet 42 0 Feet165 330 660 3837232 - 3 page 4 1961 Certified Sanborn Map DE B C - 4 3 1 B - A 4 2 E Order Date: EDR Inquiry: Client: Site Name: Address: City, ST, ZIP: Certification # Copyright:1961 1/23/2014 6:34:01 PM 3837232.3 Terracon Phase I Enviromental Site Assessment 127 West Harris Avenue South San Francisco CA 94080 DEBC-431B-A42E This Certified Sanborn Map combines the following sheets. Outlined areas indicate map sheets within the collection. Volume 1, Sheet 42 0 Feet165 330 660 3837232 - 3 page 5 Phase I Enviromental Site Assessment 127 W est Harris Avenue South San Francisco, CA 94080 Inquiry Number: 3837232.5 January 23, 2014 The EDR-City Directory Image Report 440 Wheelers Farms Road Milford, CT 06461 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.comEnvironmental Data Resources IncEnvironmental Data Resources IncEnvironmental Data Resources IncEnvironmental Data Resources Inc TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION Executive Summary Findings City Directory Images Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction orforecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2013 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DESCRIPTION Environmental Data Resources, Inc.’s (EDR) City Directory Report is a screening tool designed to assist environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR’s City Directory Report includes a search of available city directory data at 5 year intervals. RESEARCH SUMMARY The following research sources were consulted in the preparation of this report. A check mark indicates where information was identified in the source and provided in this report. Year Target Street Cross Street Source 2013 Cole Information Services 2008 Cole Information Services 2003 Cole Information Services 1999 Cole Information Services 1995 Haines Criss-Cross Directory 1990 Haines Criss-Cross Directory 1985 Haines Criss-Cross Directory 1980 Haines Criss-Cross Directory 1977 Haines Criss-Cross Directory RECORD SOURCES EDR is licensed to reproduce certain City Directory works by the copyright holders of those works. The purchaser of this EDR City Directory Report may include it in report(s) delivered to a customer. Reproduction of City Directories without permission of the publisher or licensed vendor may be a violation of copyright. 3837232-5 Page 1 FINDINGS TARGET PROPERTY STREET 127 W est Harris Avenue South San Francisco, CA 94080 Year CD Image Source W HARRIS AVE 2013 pg A1 Cole Information Services 2008 pg A5 Cole Information Services 2003 pg A9 Cole Information Services 1999 pg A13 Cole Information Services 1995 pg A17 Haines Criss-Cross Directory 1990 pg A22 Haines Criss-Cross Directory 1985 pg A26 Haines Criss-Cross Directory 1980 pg A30 Haines Criss-Cross Directory 1980 pg A31 Haines Criss-Cross Directory 1977 pg A35 Haines Criss-Cross Directory 3837232-5 Page 2 FINDINGS CROSS STREETS Year CD Image Source EL CAMINO REAL 2013 pg. A2 Cole Information Services 2008 pg. A6 Cole Information Services 2003 pg. A10 Cole Information Services 1999 pg. A14 Cole Information Services 1995 pg. A18 Haines Criss-Cross Directory 1995 pg. A19 Haines Criss-Cross Directory 1990 pg. A23 Haines Criss-Cross Directory 1990 pg. A24 Haines Criss-Cross Directory 1985 pg. A27 Haines Criss-Cross Directory 1985 pg. A28 Haines Criss-Cross Directory 1980 pg. A32 Haines Criss-Cross Directory 1977 pg. A36 Haines Criss-Cross Directory 1977 pg. A37 Haines Criss-Cross Directory MITCHELL AVE 2013 pg. A4 Cole Information Services 2008 pg. A8 Cole Information Services 2003 pg. A12 Cole Information Services 1999 pg. A16 Cole Information Services 1995 pg. A20 Haines Criss-Cross Directory 1995 pg. A21 Haines Criss-Cross Directory 1990 pg. A25 Haines Criss-Cross Directory 1985 pg. A29 Haines Criss-Cross Directory 1980 pg. A33 Haines Criss-Cross Directory 1980 pg. A34 Haines Criss-Cross Directory 1977 pg. A38 Haines Criss-Cross Directory 1977 pg. A39 Haines Criss-Cross Directory 3837232-5 Page 3 City Directory Images - W HARRIS AVE Cole Information Services 3837232.5 Page: A1 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2013 120CINCINNATI TIME 131CTC FOOD INTERNATIONAL CTC FOODS INTERNATIONAL INC DBA ORIE ORIENTAL TRADING CO 138MEYERS SHEET METAL 144INTERNATIONAL MAIL EXPRESS ITAD SOLUTIONS 150PARADIGM HOTELS 156CRYOSPEC INC 159SELECT APPLIANCE SALES 162SLAKEY BROTHERS 163APPLIED ELASTOMERICS INC - EL CAMINO REAL Cole Information Services 3837232.5 Page: A2 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2013 150SLEEP TRAIN VERIZON WIRELESS 171ENTERPRISE RENTACAR 180BALLY TOTAL FITNESS 184BEDROOM EXPRESS 186CVS PHARMACY 190FIRESTONE COMPLETE AUTO CARE 209BRENTWOOD SERVICE STATION 210SEES CANDIES 233MARBLE & CERAMIC CENTER 237BRENTWOOD BOWL 269BORACAY GARDEN & GRILL 291JACKSON CHARLES 301COLOR TILE 321GOTELLI SPEED SHOP & AUTO SUPPLY 333JON JONES STATE FARM INSURANCE AGE POLETTI REALTY WALGREENS 343CALIFORNIA STAFFING SERVICE FOURWAY TRADE RG DENTAL 359TOM KEVIN DDS 363ACCOUNTING & TAX GUY HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH KATHERINE JENNIFER PARAS ALLSTATE LOPEZ EDGARDO LAW OFFICES OF LUI ELAINE DDS MEDICAL CARE PROFESSIONALS RULEHIM COM S F BOWLING ASSOCIATION INC SIERRA PACIFIC MORTGAGE SPEECH GOALS SPEECH THERAPY INC 367BUTERA DONALD M DC 399WALGREENS 415LAZBOY FURNITURE 435EL FARO MEXICAN FOODS 455AARON HUI CALIFORNIA BUSINESS COMPUTING CHRISTIAN MARQUEZ DAYI SU H FRANCISCUS JENNIFER TAM JOHN MOTT JULIO SANCHEZ JUSTINE LU KETAN PATEL KRISTOFFER LARSEN LIBERATO JOSE LIMIN HUANG LYDIA CAMBA (Cont'd) - EL CAMINO REAL Cole Information Services 3837232.5 Page: A3 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2013 455MARIA LEI MARIO TELLO MARY AMMIRATI MERLE HEALER RYAN MANZANA SOFRONIO LIBOON SYLVIA ZHOU TAK CHEUNG THEO ASTORGA VERONICA BARTOLOME WAI TANG 465TACO BELL 475DOMINIC LAI 551ROYAL DONUTS 553EASTWOOD INSURANCE PIZZA HUT TITAN AUTO INSURANCE 555DOLLAR TREE - MITCHELL AVE Cole Information Services 3837232.5 Page: A4 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2013 111MOTEL 6 SAN FRANCISCO AIRPORT VAGABOND INN SAN FRANCISCO AIRPORT N 1393L INTERNATIONAL CO AIR MARKET EXPRESS LTD ALFA INTERNATIONAL LOGISTICS CAROLINE ENTERPRISES INC EXCEL AIR TRANSPORT INC EXPRESS LINE CORPORATION FLEMING E J & ASSOCIATES INC HENRY HONG HONG HENRY CPA HUSHER CONSTRUCTION INTERNATIONAL TR J C W FREIGHT SYSTEMS J H WEST MASTER BUILDERS INC NEO GLOBAL SYSTEMS INTEGRATION ORIOX CUSTOMS BROKER COMPANY PARKER & ASSOCIATES Q W EXPRESS QIAO YU USA INC RAPID TRANSPORTATION REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT PENINSULA ROYAL PRESTIGE OF SILICON VALLEY TERRA FERMA LANDSCAPES TERRA NOVA TRADE SERVICES TRANSPORT SERVICES LOGISTICS TRANSTAR EXPRESS TRINTERNATIONAL INC 143PRIMARY EXPORT INTERNATIONAL 15124 HOUR LOCKSMITH DRAGON CITY INC 165WEST COAST POWDER COATING 173KENKO FREIGHT SYSTEMS INC - W HARRIS AVE Cole Information Services 3837232.5 Page: A5 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2008 110NAKURA JAPANESE ANTIQUES 120TIME CLOCK SALES & SERVICE CO INC 131CROWN IMPORTS CO INC CTC FOOD INTERNATIONAL INC CTC INC ORIENTAL TRADING CO 138CAL EAST REALTORS INC MPS MULTIMEDIA INC 144INTERNATIONAL MAIL EXPRESS INC 150NORCAL FLOORING INC STANDARD ELECTRIC & ENGINEERING CO 156CRYOSPEC INC 159SELECT APPLIANCE 162ALVIN D TROYER & ASSOCIATES TROYER MUSCLE CARS 163APPLIED ELASTOMERS INC 164COSTERS INC 168GARY TROYER - EL CAMINO REAL Cole Information Services 3837232.5 Page: A6 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2008 140JACQUELINE BAGNANI 150OCCUPANT UNKNOWN SLEEP TRAIN SLEEP TRAIN MATTRESS CENTERS VERIZON WIRELESS VERIZON WIRELESS INC 161QUALITY KITCHEN CABINETS INC 170SAFEWAY FOOD & DRUG 171ENTERPRISE 180BALLY TOTAL FITNESS CHINA GARDEN LANDSCAPING CO 184BEDROOM EXPRESS EVERGREEN SAN CARLOS WATERBEDS 186LONGS DRUG STORE LONGS PHARMACY 266 190FIRESTONE 195CHICAGO TITLE 209BERTOUD AUTO REPAIR BRENTWOOD SERVICE STATION 210SEES CANDIES INC SEES CANDIES INC 49 SEES CANDIES INC 02118 TEMPORARY STO 233BUENA ORLANDO MARBLE & CERAMIC CENTER MCC CONSTRUCTION CO 235TRIBU GRILL 237BOBS PRO SHOP BRENTWOOD BOWL BRENTWOOD BOWL COFFEE SHOP 269FIESTA ISLANDS RESTAURANT INTERNATIONAL HOUSE OF BBQ 291JACKSON CHARLES 301COLOR TILE LEAL TRADING CORP 321GOTELLI AUTO SUPPLY 333JAMES TEVINI & ASSOCIATES JONES INSURANCE JONES JON CLU CHFC POLETTA FARMS INC RLP INVESTMENTS LLC STATE FARM AGENT 343ASSURED AUTO MOVERS CALIFORNIA STAFFING SERVICE FOURWAY TRADE FRONTIER ADJUSTERS OF SAN MATEO SSF JULIAN REALTY LGO INVESTMENT INC NATIONAL SECURITY SERVICES 359TOM KEVIN DDS WESTBOROUGH DENTAL (Cont'd) - EL CAMINO REAL Cole Information Services 3837232.5 Page: A7 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2008 363BUYERS & SELLERS FIRST CHOICE REAL CANYON WOODS INTERNATIONAL INC CHAUHAN INSURANCE AGENCY DAUGHTERS OF THE ELDERLY KJP & ASSOCS INSURANCE KJP INSURANCE & FINANCIAL SERVICES MEDICAL CARE PROFESSIONALS SIERRA PACIFIC MORTGAGE CORP 367DONALD M BUTERA DC 383PACIFIC STAR REALTY 399WALGREEN DRUG STORES WALGREENS 415LA Z BOY 455CHEONG CHOI DAYI SU FEMIL BRACAMONTE FRED DREHER HELEN CHANG JOHN MOTT JOSE QUEIROS JUDY ZENG JULIO SANCHEZ KETAN PATEL LINDSAY CHU LISA LI LYDIA CAMBA M AMMIRATI MARIA LEI MARIO TELLO MERLE HEALER NANCY VU NESTOR MENDOZA RICARDO PEREZ SAI COMPUTERS SOFRONIO LIBOON SUSAN HENNUM VERONICA BARTOLOME 465TACO BELL 551ROYAL DONUTS 553EASTWOOD INSURANCE SERVICES PIZZA HUT - MITCHELL AVE Cole Information Services 3837232.5 Page: A8 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2008 111MOTEL 6 SUPER 8 LODGE TIBURON HOSPITALITY LLC 1393L INTERNATIONAL CO AAA AUTOMATED AUTO TRANSPORT CAROLINE ENTERPRISES INC CERTIFIED ACCOUNTING SERVICES CORP DON GIOVANNIS CONSTRUCTION E J FLEMING & ASSOCIATES INC EXPEDITIONS EXPRESS INC GRAND USA H & FRIENDS FREIGHT INC HOUSING LEADERSHIP COUNCIL OF SAN MA INTERNATIONAL CARGO SERVICES INC J H WEST JOHN KILMARTIN MARLEN CHRISTINA ROSALES CPA MARLEN ROSALES Q W EXPRESS SAN FRANCISCO FREIGHT SYSTEMS INC SEQUOIA SALES INC SHIP WELL OVERSEAS TRANSPORT SKYHIWAYS SPEEDO FREIGHT SYSTEM TERRA FERMA LANDSCAPES INC TERRA NOVA TRADE SERVICES TRINTERNATIONAL INC UNISOURCE DISCOVERY 143PRIMARY EXPORT INTERNATIONAL 165CUSTOM CULTURE CYCLES WEST COAST POWDER COATING 170CALIFORNIA FINE FOODS INC NEW ENGLAND LOBSTER CO INC 173FORWARD INTERMODAL SYSTEMS INC KENKO FREIGHT SYSTEMS INC - W HARRIS AVE Cole Information Services 3837232.5 Page: A9 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2003 110FOLK A NAKURA OCCUPANT UNKNOWN 120CINCINNATI TIME OCCUPANT UNKNOWN TIME CLOCK SALES & SERVICE CO 126CROSSROADS EXPRESS INC 131CTC FOOD INTERNATIONAL 138OCCUPANT UNKNOWN 144AAA TRANSPORTATION GROUP INTERNATIONAL MAIL EXPRESS 150OCCUPANT UNKNOWN 154OCCUPANT UNKNOWN 156M & S CENTRAL WAREHOUSE SUSHI ROBOTICS INC 159MIRANDA LEUNG 163APPLIED ELASTOMERICS INC OCCUPANT UNKNOWN 164COSTERS INC OCCUPANT UNKNOWN 168GARY TROYER - EL CAMINO REAL Cole Information Services 3837232.5 Page: A10 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2003 140JACQUELINE BAGNANI 150SAN MATEO CREDIT UNION SLEEP TRAIN MATTRESS CENTERS VERIZON WIRELESS 161QUALITY KITCHEN CABINETS 170SFWY FOOD & DRUG SOUTH SAN FRN 171DAVID GAYNOR 182CAMERA CRAZY INC OCCUPANT UNKNOWN 184BEDROOM EXPRESS OCCUPANT UNKNOWN SAN CARLOS WATERBEDS 186JOES CHRISTMAS TREES 19024 HOURS EMERGENCY OCCUPANT UNKNOWN 209BRENTWOOD SERVICE STATION RAJ SAMI 210OCCUPANT UNKNOWN SEES CANDIES 233MARBLE & CERAMIC CTR OCCUPANT UNKNOWN 237BRENTWOOD BOWL 269FIESTA ISLANDS RESTAURANT OCCUPANT UNKNOWN 301OCCUPANT UNKNOWN 321GOTELLI AUTO SPLY & SPEED SHOP GOTELLI AUTO SUPPLY OCCUPANT UNKNOWN 333POLETTI REALTY RICHARD POLETTI SPP INC WLGRN DRUG STR SAN BRUNO STORE YOUNGS LIMOUSINE 343AAL LB ROBERT D GROVES ASSURED AUTO MOVERS NATIONAL SECURITY SERVICES ROSALIND S AAL 345GRACE HONDA SALES & SERVICE 359TOM DDS KEVIN F TOM KEVIN DDS 363ABRHM BROWN LAW OFC OF BROWN AMERICAN NATIONAL INSURANCE CO ANNABELLE PUEY BROWN & ASSOCS DIANA SCOTT CHIROPRACTIC COR FAR EAST WOODS INC FILIPINAS MAGAZINE GEORGE BARNES GUARDIAN REALTY INTELLIBIOS INC (Cont'd) - EL CAMINO REAL Cole Information Services 3837232.5 Page: A11 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2003 363JAMES A KAESTNER L & K INSURANCE SERVICES MALTI PRASAD MEDICAL CARE PROFESSIONALS MR VIDEO II MULTI SERVICES CO PACIFIC STAR REALTY RIMCO RIMCO MORTGAGE ROSITA SCHREFFLER SF BOWLING ASSOCIATION INC SIERRA PACIFIC MORTGAGE CORP 367DONALD M BUTERA DC OCCUPANT UNKNOWN 399WALGREEN DRUG STORES 400JULIANE GALLAGHER 415LA Z BOY FURNITURE GLRY 435OCCUPANT UNKNOWN 455ALEX VARO AMOY INJO AMY CHAN ANTHONY POON BLANCA RODRIGUEZ BONNIE TSE CALIFORNIA BUSINESS COMPUTING INC IVY CASTRO JEANNE TAZAWA JOANNA MARASCO JULIO SANCHEZ LINDSAY CHU LYDIA CAMBA MARISSA RUIZ MELANIE CARVALHO PACIFIC WEST PLUMBING PATRICK CHENG RICARDO FERNANDEZ THEO ASTORGA 465OCCUPANT UNKNOWN TACO BELL CORP 551HIEN GIP 553EASTWOOD INSURANCE SERVICES PIZZA HUT 555BREUNERS HOME FURNISHINGS OCCUPANT UNKNOWN - MITCHELL AVE Cole Information Services 3837232.5 Page: A12 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2003 111MOTEL 6 139AAA AUTOMATED AUTO TRANSPORT ADCOM WORLDWIDE AMERICA SANLIAN SAN FRANCISCO INC AMPAC FREIGHT SERVICE B & D INTERNATIONAL CORP BEATRICE TAO BERGER JORG C & A BROWN CO CAROLINE ENTERPRISES INC CENTRAX INTERNATIONAL INC DYNARAND LLC EAST WEST INTERNATIONAL ECON FREIGHT INTERNATIONAL ESL EXPRESS INC EUPHORIA LEISURE FLEMING E J & ASSOCS INC FRACHT FWO INC GRAND USA GREYTRIX INC HELEN LEE INTERNATIONAL CMDTY ENTRPRS JAMES BOYLE KANGAROO TECHNOLOGIES CORP KOCH INVESTMENT CO PAN WESTERN CORP PAXIM POLENTA CO ROOKE & ASSOCS SKYHIWAYS TERRA FERMA LANDSCAPES TR INTERNATIONAL INC TUNAMERICA INC 151BURLINGAME SUPERPRINT ESSENCE PRINTING OCCUPANT UNKNOWN PRINTICA 165KUSTOM CULTURE CYCLES OCCUPANT UNKNOWN UPHOLSTERY SOLUTIONS WEST COAST POWDER INC 170CALIFORNIA FINE FOODS INC FINE CALIFORNIA NEW ENGLAND LOBSTER 173FORWARD TRANSPORTATION INC KENKO FREIGHT SYSTEMS INC OCCUPANT UNKNOWN - W HARRIS AVE Cole Information Services 3837232.5 Page: A13 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1999 110NAKURA JAPANESE ANTIQUES 120AMANO CINCINNATI INCORPORATED AMANO CLOCK SALES & SERVICE CALCULAGRAPH TIME CLOCK SALES & SERVICE TIME CLOCK SALES & SERVICE COMPANY 131ORIENTAL TRADING COMPANY 138ALL ABOARD SALES TUPPERWARE HOME PARTIES 144AAA TRANSPORTATION GROUP INTERNATIONAL MAIL EXPRESS PRO-SERVICE FORWARDING COMPANY INCORPORATED 150SPINDLER TEXTILES 162DOOR CONTROL SPECIALTY COMPANY TROYER ALVIN D & ASSOCIATES TROYERS DOOR CONTROL INCORPORATED 163APPLIED ELASTOMERICS INCORPORATED 164COSTERS INCORPORATED 168DAN TROYER - EL CAMINO REAL Cole Information Services 3837232.5 Page: A14 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1999 140JACQUELINE BAGNANI 150OCCUPANT UNKNOWN 161QUALITY KITCHEN CABINETS 170SAFEWAY FOOD & DRUG SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 180SERVICE MERCHANDISE 182LASEINE CONTINENTAL BAKERY 184BEDROOM EXPRESS SAN CARLOS WATERBEDS 186LONGS DRUG STORES SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 209BRENTWOOD SERVICE STATION 210SEES CANDIES SEES CANDIES GENERAL OFFICES 233MARBLE & CERAMIC CENTER 237BRENTWOOD BOWL BRENTWOOD BOWL COFFEE SHOP 269FIESTA ISLANDS RESTAURANT 291JACKSON CHARLES 301COLOR TILE SUPERMART 321GOTELLI AUTO SUPPLY & SPEED SHOP 333ABC DRIVING SCHOOL COSENTINO FRANK INS AGENCY INCORPORATED JONES JON CLU CHFC POLETTI REALTY STAT FRM INS COMPANIES AGENTS SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO WALGREEN DRUG STORES SAN BRUNO STORE 343COSENTINO FRANK INS AGENCY INCORPORATED FROM SAN FRANCISCO FRONTIER ADJUSTERS OF SOUTH SAN FRANCIS COMPANY MAGDALENA MIRANDA TED PASCUAL 359LABOR READY 363AB XPRESS INCORPORATED ADVANCED BUSINESS COMMUNICATIONS AERO TECHNICAL SERVICES BOLLA FREIGHT LINES BUSTICHI HARVEY INS DUNBAR STEPHEN H INSURANCE FARMERS INSURANCE GROUP AGENTS (CONTD) MEDICAL CARE PROFESSIONALS PROCOMMUNICATIONS INCORPORATED S F BOWLING ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED 367BUTERA DONALD M DC 399WALGREEN DRUG STORES SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO STORE WALGRN DRUG STRS SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO STORE 415LAZYBOY FURNITURE GALLERIES 435EL FAROS MEXICAN FOOD 455CHEONG CHOI DAYI SU FRED DREHER HELEN CHANG J LINDSAY (Cont'd) - EL CAMINO REAL Cole Information Services 3837232.5 Page: A15 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1999 455JIN LILISA JOHN MOTT JOSE QUEIROS KETAN PATEL KRISTINE ASPORGA LYDIA CAMBA M AMMIRATI MARIA LEI MARIO TELLO MEN ZENG MERLE HEALER NESTOR MENDOZA RICARDO PEREZ SOFRONIO LIBOON SUSAN HENNUM VERONICA BARTOLOME 465TACO BELL 501ROYAL DONUTS 520HENRIOULLE STEVAN J ATTORNEY 553EASTWOOD INSURANCE SERVICES PIZZA HUT 554U-HAUL COMPANY INDEPENDENT DEALERS 555FIRE DEPARTMENT SAN BRUNO THOMASVILLE HOME FURNISHINGS - MITCHELL AVE Cole Information Services 3837232.5 Page: A16 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1999 139A BEST LIMOUSINE SERVICE AA UNITED LIMOUSINE & GROUND TRANSPORTATION AMPAC FREIGHT SERVICE BAYSHORE CUSTOMHOUSE BROKER BERGER JORG BLUE PEACOCK COMPANY BOYLE JAMES J & COMPANY BROWN C & A COMPANY BROWN J J COMPANY C & A BROWN COMPANY CARGO INCORPORATED CHIU WEN YIN CHIANG D C M INTERNATL FLEMING E J & ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED FRACHT FWO INCORPORATED GOIKE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY GRAND USA H & FRIENDS FREIGHT INCORPORATED HANG LEE INCORPORATED INTERNATIONAL CARGO SERVICES INCORPORATED INTERNATIONAL COMMODITY ENTERPRISE JIA NAN ENTERPRISES USA INCORPORATED JK LIMOUSINES KOCH INVESTMENT COMPANY MERCED ENGINEERING CORPORATION NR III INTERNATIONAL ORIOX CUSTOMS BROKER COMPANY PAN WESTERN CORPORATION PHOENIX INTERNATL FREIGHT SERVICES POLENTA COMPANY ROOKE & ASSOCIATES SEQUOIA SALES SHIPCO TRANSPORT INCORPORATED TR INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED WORLD CARGO SERVICES 143PRIMARY EXPORT INTERNATIONAL 151BAY BRIDGE HARDWARE SUPPLY INCORPORATED 165WEST COAST POWDER COATING & SANDBLASTING 170NEW ENGLAND LOBSTER 173FORWARD TRANSPORTATION INCORPORATED H K TRUCKING KENKO FREIGHT SYSTEMS INCORPORATED ULTRA ENGINEERING INCORPORATED US XIYAN INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION - W HARRIS AVE Haines Criss-Cross Directory 3837232.5 Page: A17 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1995 - EL CAMINO REAL Haines Criss-Cross Directory 3837232.5 Page: A18 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1995 - EL CAMINO REAL Haines Criss-Cross Directory 3837232.5 Page: A19 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1995 - MITCHELL AVE Haines Criss-Cross Directory 3837232.5 Page: A20 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1995 - MITCHELL AVE Haines Criss-Cross Directory 3837232.5 Page: A21 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1995 - W HARRIS AVE Haines Criss-Cross Directory 3837232.5 Page: A22 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1990 - EL CAMINO REAL Haines Criss-Cross Directory 3837232.5 Page: A23 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1990 - EL CAMINO REAL Haines Criss-Cross Directory 3837232.5 Page: A24 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1990 - MITCHELL AVE Haines Criss-Cross Directory 3837232.5 Page: A25 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1990 - W HARRIS AVE Haines Criss-Cross Directory 3837232.5 Page: A26 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1985 - EL CAMINO REAL Haines Criss-Cross Directory 3837232.5 Page: A27 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1985 - EL CAMINO REAL Haines Criss-Cross Directory 3837232.5 Page: A28 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1985 - MITCHELL AVE Haines Criss-Cross Directory 3837232.5 Page: A29 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1985 - W HARRIS AVE Haines Criss-Cross Directory 3837232.5 Page: A30 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1980 - W HARRIS AVE Haines Criss-Cross Directory 3837232.5 Page: A31 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1980 - EL CAMINO REAL Haines Criss-Cross Directory 3837232.5 Page: A32 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1980 - MITCHELL AVE Haines Criss-Cross Directory 3837232.5 Page: A33 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1980 - MITCHELL AVE Haines Criss-Cross Directory 3837232.5 Page: A34 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1980 - W HARRIS AVE Haines Criss-Cross Directory 3837232.5 Page: A35 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1977 - EL CAMINO REAL Haines Criss-Cross Directory 3837232.5 Page: A36 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1977 - EL CAMINO REAL Haines Criss-Cross Directory 3837232.5 Page: A37 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1977 - MITCHELL AVE Haines Criss-Cross Directory 3837232.5 Page: A38 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1977 - MITCHELL AVE Haines Criss-Cross Directory 3837232.5 Page: A39 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1977 APPENDIX D ENVIRONMENTAL DATABASE INFORMATION FORM-LBC-KXG ®kcehCoeG htiw tropeR ™paM suidaR RDE ehT 440 Wheelers Farms Road Milford, CT 06461 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com Phase I Enviromental Site Assessment 127 West Harris Avenue South San Francisco, CA 94080 Inquiry Number: 3837232.2s January 22, 2014 SECTION PAGE Executive Summary ES1 Overview Map 2 Detail Map 3 Map Findings Summary 4 Map Findings 8 Orphan Summary 580 Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking GR-1 GEOCHECK ADDENDUM Physical Setting Source Addendum A-1 Physical Setting Source Summary A-2 Physical Setting SSURGO Soil Map A-7 Physical Setting Source Map A-9 Physical Setting Source Map Findings A-11 Physical Setting Source Records Searched A-22 TC3837232.2s Page 1 Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2014 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC3837232.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR). The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA’s Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-13) or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate. TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 COORDINATES 37.6503000 - 37˚ 39’ 1.08’’Latitude (North): 122.4039000 - 122˚ 24’ 14.04’’Longitude (West): Zone 10Universal Tranverse Mercator: 552585.1UTM X (Meters): 4166978.5UTM Y (Meters): 27 ft. above sea levelElevation: USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY 37122-F4 SAN FRANCISCO SOUTH, CATarget Property Map: 1999Most Recent Revision: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT 2012Photo Year: USDASource: TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR. DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES No mapped sites were found in EDR’s search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the following databases: STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPLNational Priority List EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC3837232.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 Proposed NPL Proposed National Priority List Sites NPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens Federal Delisted NPL site list Delisted NPLNational Priority List Deletions Federal CERCLIS list FEDERAL FACILITYFederal Facility Site Information listing Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDFRCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries US ENG CONTROLSEngineering Controls Sites List US INST CONTROLSites with Institutional Controls LUCIS Land Use Control Information System Federal ERNS list ERNSEmergency Response Notification System State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LFSolid Waste Information System State and tribal leaking storage tank lists INDIAN LUSTLeaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land State and tribal registered storage tank lists USTActive UST Facilities INDIAN UST Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land FEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites INDIAN VCPVoluntary Cleanup Priority Listing ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDSA Listing of Brownfields Sites Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites DEBRIS REGION 9Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations ODI Open Dump Inventory WMUDS/SWAT Waste Management Unit Database EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC3837232.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 HAULERS Registered Waste Tire Haulers Listing INDIAN ODI Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US CDLClandestine Drug Labs SCH School Property Evaluation Program CDL Clandestine Drug Labs US HIST CDL National Clandestine Laboratory Register Local Land Records LIENS 2CERCLA Lien Information LIENS Environmental Liens Listing Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRSHazardous Materials Information Reporting System CHMIRS California Hazardous Material Incident Report System LDS Land Disposal Sites Listing MCS Military Cleanup Sites Listing SPILLS 90 SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch Other Ascertainable Records RCRA NonGen / NLRRCRA - Non Generators DOT OPS Incident and Accident Data DOD Department of Defense Sites FUDS Formerly Used Defense Sites CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees ROD Records Of Decision UMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings Sites US MINES Mines Master Index File TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act FTTS FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) HIST FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing SSTS Section 7 Tracking Systems ICIS Integrated Compliance Information System PADS PCB Activity Database System MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System RADINFO Radiation Information Database FINDS Facility Index System/Facility Registry System RAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System RMP Risk Management Plans UIC UIC Listing NPDES NPDES Permits Listing CUPA Listings CUPA Resources List DRYCLEANERS Cleaner Facilities WIP Well Investigation Program Case List ENF Enforcement Action Listing HAZNET Facility and Manifest Data EMI Emissions Inventory Data INDIAN RESERV Indian Reservations EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC3837232.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 SCRD DRYCLEANERSState Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing 2020 COR ACTION2020 Corrective Action Program List LEAD SMELTERS Lead Smelter Sites WDS Waste Discharge System US AIRS Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem PRP Potentially Responsible Parties PROC Certified Processors Database MWMP Medical Waste Management Program Listing HWT Registered Hazardous Waste Transporter Database COAL ASH DOE Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data US FIN ASSUR Financial Assurance Information COAL ASH EPA Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List PCB TRANSFORMERPCB Transformer Registration Database Financial AssuranceFinancial Assurance Information Listing EPA WATCH LIST EPA WATCH LIST EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGPEDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants EDR US Hist CleanersEDR Exclusive Historic Dry Cleaners SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases. Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property. Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed data on individual sites can be reviewed. Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases. Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis. STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal CERCLIS list CERCLIS: The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA). CERCLIS contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. A review of the CERCLIS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 04/26/2013 has revealed that there are 2 CERCLIS sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ _____________________________ NEW ENGLAND LOBSTER 191 MITCHELL AVEESE 0 - 1/8 (0.123 mi.)4753 CALISTOGA WATER 57 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUEWSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.439 mi.)AO276387 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC3837232.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site List CERC-NFRAP: Archived sites are sites that have been removed and archived from the inventory of CERCLIS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA’s knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list this site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. This decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that, based upon available information, the location is not judged to be a potential NPL site. A review of the CERC-NFRAP list, as provided by EDR, and dated 04/26/2013 has revealed that there are 6 CERC-NFRAP sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ _____________________________ SUN CHEMICAL 20-40 S LINDEN AVEW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.398 mi.)AD237303 BASAPCO INC 27 S LINDEN AVEW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.405 mi.)AJ243318 PACIFIC PLASTICS PRODUCTS INC 405 S AIRPORT BLVDS 1/4 - 1/2 (0.444 mi.)AM279390 DECCA XAGON 338 N CANAL STW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.448 mi.)AJ284397 EXIDE SAN FRANCISCO SERV CTR 286 LAWRENCE AVEE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.456 mi.)AQ290413 KEM MFG CORP 78 S LINDEN AVEWSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.478 mi.)AO295435 Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS: CORRACTS is a list of handlers with RCRA Corrective Action Activity. This report shows which nationally-defined corrective action core events have occurred for every handler that has had corrective action activity. A review of the CORRACTS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 09/10/2013 has revealed that there are 4 CORRACTS sites within approximately 1 mile of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ _____________________________ EXIDE SAN FRANCISCO SERV CTR 286 LAWRENCE AVEE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.456 mi.)AQ290413 INTERNATIONAL PAINT CO (CALIF) 220 S LINDEN AVESW 1/2 - 1 (0.708 mi.)AW322485 AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE CENTER 160 S. LINDEN AVE.SW 1/2 - 1 (0.764 mi.)AY328521 THE OBRIEN CORP. 450 E GRAND AVE UNIT AE 1/2 - 1 (0.949 mi.)AZ340559 Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. A review of the RCRA-LQG list, as provided by EDR, and dated 09/10/2013 has revealed that there are 4 RCRA-LQG sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ _____________________________ ALAN BAKER CO INC 160 170 180 SYLVESTER RNNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.134 mi.)F5157 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ _____________________________ EXELIXIS, INC 169 HARBOR WAYNE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.237 mi.)O138141 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC3837232.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ _____________________________ EXELIXIS NC. 170 HARBOR WAYNE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.240 mi.)O141159 CHEVRON 97875 300 S AIRPORT BLVD.SSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.248 mi.)S153174 RCRA-SQG: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. A review of the RCRA-SQG list, as provided by EDR, and dated 09/10/2013 has revealed that there are 12 RCRA-SQG sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ _____________________________ BUDGET RENT A CAR 177 S AIRPORT BLVDWSW 0 - 1/8 (0.078 mi.)D3335 CALTRANS SSF BLET RAILWAY OH AT NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.222 mi.)125130 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ _____________________________ COSTERS FURNITURE REFINISHING, 164 W HARRIS AVEE 0 - 1/8 (0.070 mi.)C2320 GODAR AND HOSSENLOPP PRINTING 151 MITCHELL AVEESE 0 - 1/8 (0.076 mi.)B2729 SHELL SERVICE STATION 248 S AIRPORT BLVDSSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.161 mi.)G6473 TRADITIONAL WOODWORKS INC 184 HARBOR WAYENE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.169 mi.)I6677 AVIS CAR RENTAL 230 HARBOR WAYE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.173 mi.)K7888 SHELL OIL CO 140 PRODUCESW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.189 mi.)M90107 SHORE LINE DIESEL MAINT INC 207 HARBOR WAYENE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.191 mi.)I98114 COLORCRAFT CORPORATION 103 WONDERCOLOR LANESSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.220 mi.)L120128 CALTRANS DISTRICT 4 166 HARBOR WAYNE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.226 mi.)O131137 THRESHOLD PHARMACEUTICALS INC 170 HARBOR WAYNE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.240 mi.)O140156 RCRA-CESQG: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Conditionally exempt small quantity generators (CESQGs) generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. A review of the RCRA-CESQG list, as provided by EDR, and dated 09/10/2013 has revealed that there is 1 RCRA-CESQG site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ _____________________________ NELLA OIL #219 TEXACO 176 GATEWAY BOULEVARDNE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.140 mi.)5566 State- and tribal - equivalent NPL RESPONSE: Identifies confirmed release sites where DTSC is involved in remediation, either in a lead or oversight capacity. These confirmed release sites are generally high-priority and high potential risk. A review of the RESPONSE list, as provided by EDR, and dated 11/06/2013 has revealed that there are 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC3837232.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 RESPONSE sites within approximately 1 mile of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ _____________________________ CALTRANS/SSF MAINTENANCE STATI 166 HARBOR WAYNE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.226 mi.)O130133 SUN CHEMICAL CORPORATION 20 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUEW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.398 mi.)AD236296 VIROLOGIC INC 270 E GRAND AVE STE AENE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.471 mi.)294426 REICHOLD CHEMICALS, INC 120 SOUTH LINDENWSW 1/2 - 1 (0.600 mi.)317474 E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS 160 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUESW 1/2 - 1 (0.764 mi.)AY326510 HIGHWAY 101/OYSTER POINT HIGHWAY 101 AT OYSTER PNNE 1/2 - 1 (0.776 mi.)331530 State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS ENVIROSTOR: The Department of Toxic Substances Control’s (DTSC’s) Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program’s (SMBRP’s) EnviroStor database identifes sites that have known contamination or sites for which there may be reasons to investigate further. The database includes the following site types: Federal Superfund sites (National Priorities List (NPL)); State Response, including Military Facilities and State Superfund; Voluntary Cleanup; and School sites. EnviroStor provides similar information to the information that was available in CalSites, and provides additional site information, including, but not limited to, identification of formerly-contaminated properties that have been released for reuse, properties where environmental deed restrictions have been recorded to prevent inappropriate land uses, and risk characterization information that is used to assess potential impacts to public health and the environment at contaminated sites. A review of the ENVIROSTOR list, as provided by EDR, and dated 11/06/2013 has revealed that there are 26 ENVIROSTOR sites within approximately 1 mile of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ _____________________________ POETSCH AND PETERSON TANNERS 325 SOUTH MAPLE AVENUESW 1/2 - 1 (0.919 mi.)336546 Status: Refer: RWQCB PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ _____________________________ CALTRANS/SSF MAINTENANCE STATI 166 HARBOR WAYNE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.226 mi.)O130133 Status: Backlog UPRR LINDEN (AKA UNION PACIFIC EAST OF 27 SOUTH LINDENW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.327 mi.)203234 Status: Active SUN CHEMICAL CORPORATION 20 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUEW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.398 mi.)AD236296 Status: Certified O&M - Land Use Restrictions Only BASAPCO, INC. 27-S. LINDENWNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.401 mi.)AI239304 Status: Certified / Operation & Maintenance PACIFIC PLASTIC PRODUCTS, INC 405 SOUTH AIRPORT BOULES 1/4 - 1/2 (0.444 mi.)AM280391 Status: Refer: RWQCB UNION PACIFIC - SITE ADJACENT EAST OF 69 S. LINDEN AVWSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.448 mi.)AO283394 Status: Active EXIDE CORP 286 LAWRENCE AVEE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.456 mi.)AQ291421 Status: No Further Action EXIDE SAN FRANCISCO SERVICE CE 286 LAWRENCE AVENUEE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.462 mi.)AQ292424 Status: No Further Action VIROLOGIC INC 270 E GRAND AVE STE AENE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.471 mi.)294426 Status: Certified KEN MANUFACTURING COMPANY 78 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUEWSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.478 mi.)AO296436 Status: Refer: Other Agency EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC3837232.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ _____________________________ CAL WEST ELECTRIC, INC 1341 SAN MATEO AVENUESW 1/2 - 1 (0.569 mi.)314467 Status: Refer: Other Agency REICHOLD CHEMICALS, INC 120 SOUTH LINDENWSW 1/2 - 1 (0.600 mi.)317474 Status: Certified COSTCO WHOLESALE NO 422 451 S AIRPORT BLVDSSE 1/2 - 1 (0.657 mi.)319480 Status: Inactive - Needs Evaluation INTERNATIONAL PAINT COMPANY 220 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUESW 1/2 - 1 (0.708 mi.)AW321484 Status: Refer: RCRA INTERNATIONAL PAINT CO (CALIF) 220 S LINDEN AVESW 1/2 - 1 (0.708 mi.)AW322485 Status: Refer: RWQCB HOMART DEVELOPMENT CORP. 801 GATEWAY BOULEVARDNNE 1/2 - 1 (0.731 mi.)AX324493 Status: Certified O&M - Land Use Restrictions Only E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS 160 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUESW 1/2 - 1 (0.764 mi.)AY326510 Status: Certified WEST COAST AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE 160 S LINDEN AVESW 1/2 - 1 (0.764 mi.)AY327520 Status: Inactive - Needs Evaluation SHELL OIL PROD US EQUILON SF D 135 N ACCESS RDSSE 1/2 - 1 (0.770 mi.)330528 Status: Inactive - Needs Evaluation HIGHWAY 101/OYSTER POINT HIGHWAY 101 AT OYSTER PNNE 1/2 - 1 (0.776 mi.)331530 Status: No Further Action PHASE II CORP 1229 MONTGOMERYSSW 1/2 - 1 (0.820 mi.)333533 Status: Inactive - Needs Evaluation U.S. STEEL CORP. 105 OYSTER POINT BLVDNNE 1/2 - 1 (0.883 mi.)334543 Status: Refer: RWQCB OYSTER POINT DUMP OYSTER POINT BLVD AT OYNNE 1/2 - 1 (0.917 mi.)335544 Status: Refer: RWQCB CYCLE SHACK INC 1104 SAN MATEO AVESSW 1/2 - 1 (0.945 mi.)337547 Status: Inactive - Needs Evaluation O’BRIEN CORPORATION THE 450 EAST GRAND AVENUEE 1/2 - 1 (0.949 mi.)AZ339553 Status: Certified O&M - Land Use Restrictions Only State and tribal leaking storage tank lists LUST: The Leaking Underground Storage Tank Incident Reports contain an inventory of reported leaking underground storage tank incidents. The data come from the State Water Resources Control Board Leaking Underground Storage Tank Information System. A review of the LUST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 12/16/2013 has revealed that there are 114 LUST sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ _____________________________ BUDGET RENT A CAR 177 S AIRPORT BLVDWSW 0 - 1/8 (0.078 mi.)D3335 BUDGET RENT-A-CAR 177 SOUTH AIRPORT BOULEWSW 0 - 1/8 (0.078 mi.)D3442 Status: Completed - Case Closed KB SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 175 SYLVESTERNNW 0 - 1/8 (0.118 mi.)F4448 Status: Completed - Case Closed EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC3837232.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ _____________________________ ALAN BAKER COMPANY 160 SYLVESTER RDNNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.134 mi.)F5054 Status: Completed - Case Closed PONY EXPRESS 108 SYLVESTERNNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.172 mi.)J7283 Status: Completed - Case Closed AGUNDIS TIRE SHOP 110 LINDENWNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.415 mi.)AL255345 Status: Completed - Case Closed CHEVRON 9-7640 124 LINDEN AVEWNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.420 mi.)AL262353 CHEVRON 9-7640 124 LINDENWNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.420 mi.)AL263354 Status: Completed - Case Closed MIZRA/SETO PROPERTY 165 S LINDEN AVENW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.426 mi.)AL270366 SHELL OIL CO 123 LINDEN AVENW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.434 mi.)AL274378 Status: Open - Eligible for Closure SHELL OIL 123 LINDEN AVENW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.434 mi.)AL275386 WRIGHT CLEANERS 316 GRAND AVENW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.485 mi.)302442 OLYMPIC AUTO SERVICE 401 LINDENNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.493 mi.)AU309452 Status: Open - Eligible for Closure PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ _____________________________ CTC FOOD INTERNATIONAL 131 WEST HARRIS AVENUEENE 0 - 1/8 (0.011 mi.)A18 Status: Completed - Case Closed Not reported 131 HARRISENE 0 - 1/8 (0.013 mi.)A29 CTC FOOD INTERNATIONAL 131 HARRISENE 0 - 1/8 (0.013 mi.)A39 TROYER AUTO MATIC DOORS, INC 162 W HARRIS AVEE 0 - 1/8 (0.068 mi.)C2015 Not reported 162 WEST HARRIS AVENUEE 0 - 1/8 (0.068 mi.)C2116 Status: Completed - Case Closed BAY BRIDGE HARDWARE SUPPL 151 MITCHELLESE 0 - 1/8 (0.076 mi.)B2425 Status: Completed - Case Closed BAY BRIDGE HARDWARE SUPPLY 151 MITCHELL AVEESE 0 - 1/8 (0.076 mi.)B2627 OLYMPIAN GATEWAY 176 GATEWAY BLVDNNE 0 - 1/8 (0.089 mi.)E3845 Status: Completed - Case Closed SHELL SERVICE STATION 248 SOUTH AIRPORT BOULESSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.139 mi.)G5461 Status: Completed - Case Closed COLOR CRAFT 255 S AIRPORT BLVDSSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.154 mi.)G5868 SHELL SERVICE STATION 248 S AIRPORT BLVDSSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.161 mi.)G6473 TRADITIONAL WOODWORKS INC 184 HARBOR WAYENE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.169 mi.)I6677 Status: Completed - Case Closed TRADITIONAL WOOD WORKS 184 HARBOR WYENE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.169 mi.)I7082 AVIS CAR RENTAL 230 HARBOR WAYE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.173 mi.)K7888 Status: Completed - Case Closed COLOR CRAFT 255 AIRPORTSSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.178 mi.)L84101 Status: Completed - Case Closed EQUILON ENTERPRISES 140 PRODUCESW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.189 mi.)M89104 Status: Completed - Case Closed SHELL OIL 140 PRODUCE AVESW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.189 mi.)M93110 KEN FUNK PROPERTY 264 AIRPORTSSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.196 mi.)L100116 Status: Completed - Case Closed SEWAGE PUMP STATION #4 249 HARBORESE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.201 mi.)N102118 Status: Completed - Case Closed EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC3837232.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 10 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ _____________________________ SEWAGE PUMP STATION #4 249 HARBOR WYESE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.201 mi.)N111124 Not reported 300 AIRPORTSSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.248 mi.)S151172 CHEVRON 9-7875 300 SOUTH AIRPORT BOULESSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.248 mi.)S152172 Status: Completed - Case Closed CHEVRON 9-7875 300 S AIRPORT BLVDSSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.248 mi.)S154176 AIRBORNE EXPRESS CORP OYS 274 WATTIS WAYSSE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.254 mi.)R157178 Status: Completed - Case Closed MONROE SCHNEIDER ASSOC. 274 WATTIS WYSSE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.254 mi.)R158181 HARMON SHRAGGE CO 280 WATTISSSE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.259 mi.)R162183 Status: Completed - Case Closed DONS AUTO WRECKERS 137 HARBORNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.267 mi.)T164185 Status: Completed - Case Closed OLYMPIAN 186 EAST GRAND AVENUENNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.269 mi.)U166187 Status: Completed - Case Closed OLYMPIAN 186 E GRAND AVENNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.270 mi.)U167188 OLYMPIC EAST GRAND CARDTOL 190 E GRAND AVENNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.278 mi.)U169189 OLYMPIC EAST GRAND CARDTOL 190 EAST GRAND AVENUENNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.278 mi.)U170189 Status: Completed - Case Closed Not reported 190 GRANDNNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.278 mi.)U172195 SAM TRANS (VACANT) 196 PRODUCE AVESSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.285 mi.)V174196 SAMTRANS VACANT 196 PRODUCESSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.285 mi.)V175197 Status: Completed - Case Closed U-FREIGHT AMERICA INC 320 COREY WYSSE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.297 mi.)W178199 U FREIGHT AMERICA INC 320 COREYSSE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.297 mi.)W179199 Status: Completed - Case Closed SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO TIRE SERVI 114 HARBOR WAYNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.298 mi.)T180201 Status: Completed - Case Closed Not reported 114 HARBORNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.298 mi.)T181205 GOLDEN GATE PETROLEUM 114- 126 HARBOR WYNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.298 mi.)T182206 Status: Completed - Case Closed DIADOTI CONSTRUCTION 1461 SAN MATEOWSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.300 mi.)X184209 Status: Completed - Case Closed BRITANNIA DEVELOPMENTS 115-185 HARBOR WYNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.302 mi.)T186211 BINKS MANUFACTURING CO 1459 SAN MATEOWSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.305 mi.)X187212 AIRPORT BLVD SERVICE STN 190 AIRPORT BLVDNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.309 mi.)Y189213 AIRPORT BLVD SERVICE STA 190 AIRPORTNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.309 mi.)Y190214 Status: Completed - Case Closed GREYHOUND EXPOSITION SERVICES 100 UTAH AVES 1/4 - 1/2 (0.314 mi.)Z191215 GREYHOUND EXPOSITION SERVICES 100 UTAH AVES 1/4 - 1/2 (0.314 mi.)Z193216 Status: Completed - Case Closed ESCHELBACH PROPERTIES 100 BADENNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.321 mi.)Y196219 Status: Completed - Case Closed PRODUCE MARKET KEYLOCK/OLYMPIA 131 TERMINAL CTSSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.321 mi.)V197222 Status: Open - Verification Monitoring GELCO TRUCK LEASING 1395 LOWRIE AVEWSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.325 mi.)X199230 GELCO TRUCK LEASING DIV. GELCO 1395 LOWRIE AVEWSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.325 mi.)X200231 Status: Completed - Case Closed BELL ELECTRICAL SUPPLY 208 EAST GRAND AVENUENE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.348 mi.)AB205241 Status: Completed - Case Closed EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC3837232.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 11 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ _____________________________ UNOCAL #1020 221 AIRPORT BLVDNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.352 mi.)AA206243 UNOCAL STATION #1020 221 AIRPORT BOULEVARDNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.352 mi.)AA207244 Status: Open - Site Assessment Status: Completed - Case Closed SOUTH CITY FORD 315 AIRPORT BLVDNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.354 mi.)AA208257 Status: Completed - Case Closed BELL ELECTRICAL SUPPLY 208 E GRAND AVENE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.356 mi.)AB210262 FIRE STATION #1 201 BADEN AVENW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.357 mi.)AC211262 FIRE STATION #1 201 BADENNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.357 mi.)AC212263 Status: Completed - Case Closed MATTISON & SHIDLER 205 E GRAND AVENE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.360 mi.)AB214264 UNION CARBIDE CORP. 7 S LINDEN AVEW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.367 mi.)AD217265 Not reported 7 LINDENW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.367 mi.)AD218266 UNION CARBIDE CORP. 7 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUEW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.367 mi.)AD219266 Status: Open - Remediation SUPER CROWN CATERING 1381 LOWRIEWSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.373 mi.)AE220274 Status: Completed - Case Closed MATTISON & SHIDLER 205 GRANDNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.373 mi.)AB222283 Status: Completed - Case Closed OLYMPIAN 186 GRANDNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.374 mi.)AA223285 CODON (GRAND/ROEBLING INV) 213 E GRAND AVENE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.376 mi.)AB224286 CODON (GRAND/ROEBLING INV) 213 EAST GRAND AVENUENE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.378 mi.)AB225286 Status: Completed - Case Closed CHEVRON 9-0645 401 AIRPORT BLVDNNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.387 mi.)AF226287 CHEVRON 401 AIRPORTNNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.387 mi.)AF227288 Status: Completed - Case Closed BELL ELECTRICAL SUPPLY 208 GRANDNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.388 mi.)AG229290 CODON GRAND ROEBLING INV 213 GRANDNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.390 mi.)AG230290 KEN FUNK PROPERTY 264 S AIRPORT BLVDNNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.399 mi.)AF238303 LA MARK TRANSPORTATION 26 LINDENW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.403 mi.)AJ242315 Status: Completed - Case Closed LOPEZ PROPERTY 34-36 S LINDEN AVEW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.410 mi.)AJ246319 FOUR STAR AUTOMOTIVE II 1405 SAN MATEOSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.410 mi.)AK247319 Status: Completed - Case Closed OLYMPIAN 35 LINDENW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.412 mi.)AJ249322 Status: Completed - Case Closed Status: Open - Site Assessment SOUTH LINDEN CARDLOCK 35 S LINDEN AVEW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.412 mi.)AJ250334 CALTRANS MAINTENANCE STATION 296 AIRPORT BOULEVARDNNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.412 mi.)AF251339 Status: Open - Verification Monitoring Not reported 249 GRANDNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.415 mi.)AG256347 PEKING HANDICRAFT 1388 SAN MATEOSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.417 mi.)AK259349 Status: Completed - Case Closed CALEGARI PROPERTY 40 LINDENW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.420 mi.)261351 Status: Completed - Case Closed GROSVENOR AIRPORT ASSOCIATES 380 SO AIRPORT BLVDS 1/4 - 1/2 (0.422 mi.)AM266356 Status: Completed - Case Closed Not reported 600-79 DUBUQUENNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.423 mi.)AN267358 BRESSIE & CO. 600-790 DUBUQUENNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.423 mi.)AN268358 Status: Completed - Case Closed Status: Open - Site Assessment EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC3837232.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 12 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ _____________________________ SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO SCAVENGER 69 S LINDEN AVEWSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.428 mi.)AO271367 SOUTH CITY SCAVENGERS 69 LINDENWSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.428 mi.)AO272369 Status: Completed - Case Closed Not reported 515 AIRPORTNNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.442 mi.)AN277388 SHELL 515 AIRPORTNNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.442 mi.)AN278389 Status: Completed - Case Closed PENSKE TRUCK LEASING II 62 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUEWSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.450 mi.)AO285398 Status: Completed - Case Closed GEORGIA PACIFIC 249 EAST GRAND AVENUEENE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.454 mi.)AP286405 Status: Completed - Case Closed GEORGIA PACIFIC 249 E GRAND AVEENE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.454 mi.)AP287408 BLANDINI TRUST 545 AIRPORT BLVDNNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.455 mi.)AN288411 Status: Completed - Case Closed GROSVENOR AIRPORT INN 380 S AIRPORT BLVDNNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.469 mi.)AN293425 LUCCA PACKING CORP. 360 HARBOR WYSSE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.481 mi.)AR297437 LUCCA PACKING CORPORATION 360 HARBORSSE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.481 mi.)AR298437 Status: Completed - Case Closed RPM RENT A CAR 410 S AIRPORT BLVDS 1/4 - 1/2 (0.484 mi.)AS300439 RPM RENT A CAR 410 S AIRPORT BLVDS 1/4 - 1/2 (0.484 mi.)AS301440 Status: Completed - Case Closed CORTANA CORPORATION 468 LITTLEFIELDE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.491 mi.)AT303443 Status: Completed - Case Closed SAGE TRANSPORTATION INC. 408 LITTLEFIELD AVEE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.491 mi.)AQ305446 Status: Completed - Case Closed SAGE TRANSPORTATION INC 408 LITTLEFIELD AVEE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.491 mi.)AQ306447 TULARIK INC 317 ROEBLING RDNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.492 mi.)308449 SIMEON PROPERTIES 290 UTAHESE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.496 mi.)AV311462 Status: Completed - Case Closed SLIC: SLIC Region comes from the California Regional Water Quality Control Board. A review of the SLIC list, as provided by EDR, and dated 12/16/2013 has revealed that there are 16 SLIC sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ _____________________________ ASSOCIATED ROAD PARCEL 0 ASSOCIATED ROADNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.157 mi.)H6169 Facility Status: Open - Site Assessment CHEVRON AST FACILITY (FORMER) 103 SOUTH LINDEN STREETWNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.416 mi.)AL258348 Facility Status: Completed - Case Closed WRIGHT CLEANERS 316 GRAND AVENW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.485 mi.)302442 Facility Status: Open - Site Assessment PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ _____________________________ BRITANNIA DEVELOPMENTS 115-185 HARBORNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.299 mi.)T183208 Facility Status: Open - Verification Monitoring BINKS MANUFACTURING CO 1459 SAN MATEOWSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.305 mi.)X187212 Facility Status: Completed - Case Closed EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC3837232.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 13 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ _____________________________ PARKING CORPORATION OF AMERICA 120 TERMINALSSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.318 mi.)V194218 Facility Status: Completed - Case Closed SFIA - SAN FRANCISCO AIRPORT T TAXIWAY F OF SFIANW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.342 mi.)AA204241 Facility Status: Completed - Case Closed MATTISON & SHIDLER 205 EAST GRAND AVENUENE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.363 mi.)AB215265 Facility Status: Completed - Case Closed SUN CHEMICAL 20 LINDEN AVE SWNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.403 mi.)AI240313 Facility Status: Completed - Case Closed LOPEZ PROPERTY 34-36 SOUTH LINDEN AVENW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.413 mi.)AJ252344 Facility Status: Completed - Case Closed BRESSIE & CO. 600-790 DUBUQUENNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.423 mi.)AN268358 Facility Status: Completed - Case Closed UNION PACIFIC ADJACENT 69 SOUTH LINDEWSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.428 mi.)AO273377 Facility Status: Open - Site Assessment W C PROPERTIES 250 EAST GRAND AVENUEENE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.445 mi.)AP282393 Facility Status: Open - Inactive GEORGIA PACIFIC 249 EAST GRAND AVENUEENE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.454 mi.)AP286405 Facility Status: Open - Assessment & Interim Remedial Action Facility Status: Completed - Case Closed EXIDE CORP 286 LAWRENCE AVEE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.456 mi.)AQ291421 Facility Status: Completed - Case Closed TULARIK INC 317 ROEBLING RDNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.492 mi.)308449 Facility Status: Open - Site Assessment State and tribal registered storage tank lists AST: A listing of aboveground storage tank petroleum storage tank locations. A review of the AST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 08/01/2009 has revealed that there is 1 AST site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ _____________________________ HERTZ EQUIPMENT RENTAL 266 HARBORSE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.223 mi.)N128133 State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites VCP: Contains low threat level properties with either confirmed or unconfirmed releases and the project proponents have request that DTSC oversee investigation and/or cleanup activities and have agreed to provide coverage for DTSC’s costs. A review of the VCP list, as provided by EDR, and dated 11/06/2013 has revealed that there are 3 VCP sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ _____________________________ UPRR LINDEN (AKA UNION PACIFIC EAST OF 27 SOUTH LINDENW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.327 mi.)203234 BASAPCO, INC. 27-S. LINDENWNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.401 mi.)AI239304 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC3837232.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 14 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ _____________________________ UNION PACIFIC - SITE ADJACENT EAST OF 69 S. LINDEN AVWSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.448 mi.)AO283394 ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites SWRCY: A listing of recycling facilities in California. A review of the SWRCY list, as provided by EDR, and dated 12/16/2013 has revealed that there is 1 SWRCY site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ _____________________________ ZARC INTERNATIONAL LLC 26 S LINDEN AVEW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.403 mi.)AJ241314 Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites HIST Cal-Sites: Formerly known as ASPIS, this database contains both known and potential hazardous substance sites. The source is the California Department of Toxic Substance Control. No longer updated by the state agency. It has been replaced by ENVIROSTOR. A review of the HIST Cal-Sites list, as provided by EDR, and dated 08/08/2005 has revealed that there are 4 HIST Cal-Sites sites within approximately 1 mile of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ _____________________________ SUN CHEMICAL CORPORATION 20 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUEW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.398 mi.)AD235292 VIROLOGIC INC 270 E GRAND AVE STE AENE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.471 mi.)294426 REICHOLD CHEMICALS, INC 120 SOUTH LINDENWSW 1/2 - 1 (0.600 mi.)317474 E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS 160 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUESW 1/2 - 1 (0.764 mi.)AY329525 Toxic Pits: The Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Sites database identifies sites suspected of containing hazardous substances where cleanup has not yet been completed. The data come from the State Water Resources Control Board. A review of the Toxic Pits list, as provided by EDR, and dated 07/01/1995 has revealed that there is 1 Toxic Pits site within approximately 1 mile of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ _____________________________ FULLER O’BRIEN 450 E GRAND AVENUENW 1/2 - 1 (0.712 mi.)323493 Closure Date: 04/22/91 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC3837232.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 15 Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks CA FID UST: The Facility Inventory Database contains active and inactive underground storage tank locations. The source is the State Water Resource Control Board. A review of the CA FID UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/31/1994 has revealed that there are 10 CA FID UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ _____________________________ BUDGET RENT A CAR 177 S AIRPORT BLVDWSW 0 - 1/8 (0.078 mi.)D3335 ALAN BAKER CO INC 160 170 180 SYLVESTER RNNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.134 mi.)F5157 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ _____________________________ BUSINESS 145 MITCHELLSE 0 - 1/8 (0.063 mi.)B1915 BAY BRIDGE HARDWARE 151 MITCHELL AVEESE 0 - 1/8 (0.076 mi.)B2527 HAMPTONS SERVICE INC 248 S AIRPORT BLVDSSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.161 mi.)G6371 TRADITIONAL WOODWORKS INC 184 HARBOR WAYENE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.169 mi.)I6677 AVIS RENT-A-CAR SYSTEM 230 HARBOR WAYE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.173 mi.)K7787 PRODUCE SHELL 140 PRODUCE AVESW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.189 mi.)M95111 FIRE STATION NO 2 249 HARBOR WAYESE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.201 mi.)N103121 QUALEX-DBA COLOR CRAFT 103 WONDER COLOR LNSSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.220 mi.)L118126 HIST UST: Historical UST Registered Database. A review of the HIST UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/15/1990 has revealed that there are 14 HIST UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ _____________________________ BUDGET RENT A CAR 177 S AIRPORT BLVDWSW 0 - 1/8 (0.078 mi.)D3335 ALAN BAKER CO INC 160 170 180 SYLVESTER RNNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.134 mi.)F5157 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ _____________________________ AJAX RENT A CAR 145 MITCHELL AVESE 0 - 1/8 (0.063 mi.)B1714 H.B. FULLER CO. 164 W HARRIS AVEE 0 - 1/8 (0.070 mi.)C2219 IMELAD HAMPTON 248 S AIRPORT BLVDSSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.161 mi.)G6270 HAMPTON’S SERVICE, INC. 248 S AIRPORT BLVDSSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.161 mi.)G6576 AVIS CAR RENTAL 230 HARBOR WAYE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.173 mi.)K7888 RONS SHELL SERVICE 140 PRODUCE AVESW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.189 mi.)M91109 SHORELINE DIESEL MAINT. INC. 207 HARBOR WAYENE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.191 mi.)I96113 GENERAL RENT A CAR (LEASEE) 264 S AIRPORT BLVDSSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.196 mi.)L99115 BAYSHORE SELF SERVE 264 S AIRPORT BLVDSSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.196 mi.)L101118 FIRE STATION #2 249 HARBOR WAYESE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.201 mi.)N104121 BERKEY/COLORCRAFT 103 WONDERCOLOR LNSSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.220 mi.)L119127 97875 300 SO. AIRPORT BLVDSSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.248 mi.)S150171 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC3837232.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 16 SWEEPS UST: Statewide Environmental Evaluation and Planning System. This underground storage tank listing was updated and maintained by a company contacted by the SWRCB in the early 1990’s. The listing is no longer updated or maintained. The local agency is the contact for more information on a site on the SWEEPS list. A review of the SWEEPS UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 06/01/1994 has revealed that there are 14 SWEEPS UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ _____________________________ BUDGET RENT A CAR 177 S AIRPORT BLVDWSW 0 - 1/8 (0.078 mi.)D3335 ALAN BAKER COMPANY INC 160 - 180 SYLVESTER RDNNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.134 mi.)F5361 SAN FRANCISCO SPICE CO., INC 103 ASSOCIATED RDNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.157 mi.)H6068 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ _____________________________ BUSINESS 145 MITCHELLSE 0 - 1/8 (0.063 mi.)B1614 BAY BRIDGE HARDWARE SUPPLY 151 MITCHELL AVEESE 0 - 1/8 (0.076 mi.)B2627 HAMPTONS SERVICE INC 248 S AIRPORT BLVDSSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.161 mi.)G6371 TRADITIONAL WOODWORKS INC 184 HARBOR WAYENE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.169 mi.)I6982 AVIS RENT-A-CAR SYSTEM 230 HARBOR WAYE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.173 mi.)K7686 BUD OSWALD 229 HARBOR WAYE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.176 mi.)K82100 PRODUCE SHELL 140 PRODUCE AVESW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.189 mi.)M95111 FIRE STATION NO 2 249 HARBOR WAYESE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.201 mi.)N105122 HARBOR WAY SEWAGE PUMP STATION 249 HARBOR WAYESE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.201 mi.)N106122 QUALEX-DBA COLOR CRAFT 103 WONDER COLOR LNSSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.220 mi.)L118126 CHEVRON 9-7875 300 S AIRPORT BLVDSSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.248 mi.)S154176 Local Land Records DEED: The use of recorded land use restrictions is one of the methods the DTSC uses to protect the public from unsafe exposures to hazardous substances and wastes . A review of the DEED list, as provided by EDR, and dated 12/09/2013 has revealed that there are 4 DEED sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ _____________________________ U-SAVE PLUMBING HARDWARE 108 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUEWNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.414 mi.)AL253344 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ _____________________________ SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO TIRE SERVI 114 HARBOR WAYNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.298 mi.)T180201 SUN CHEMICAL CORPORATION 20 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUEW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.398 mi.)AD236296 BASAPCO, INC. 27-S. LINDENWNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.401 mi.)AI239304 Other Ascertainable Records CA BOND EXP. PLAN: Department of Health Services developed a site-specific expenditure plan as the basis for an appropriation of Hazardous Substance Cleanup Bond Act funds. It is not updated. A review of the CA BOND EXP. PLAN list, as provided by EDR, and dated 01/01/1989 has revealed that EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC3837232.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 17 there are 2 CA BOND EXP. PLAN sites within approximately 1 mile of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ _____________________________ SUN CHEMICAL CORPORATION 20 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUEW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.398 mi.)AD233291 HOMART DEVELOPMENT CORP/EDWARD 480 INDUSTRIAL WAYNNE 1/2 - 1 (0.777 mi.)AX332533 Cortese: The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board (LUST), the Integrated Waste Board (SWF/LS), and the Department of Toxic Substances Control (Cal-Sites). A review of the Cortese list, as provided by EDR, and dated 09/30/2013 has revealed that there is 1 Cortese site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ _____________________________ CALTRANS/SSF MAINTENANCE STATI 166 HARBOR WAYNE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.226 mi.)O130133 HIST CORTESE: The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board [LUST], the Integrated Waste Board [SWF/LS], and the Department of Toxic Substances Control [CALSITES]. This listing is no longer updated by the state agency. A review of the HIST CORTESE list, as provided by EDR, and dated 04/01/2001 has revealed that there are 59 HIST CORTESE sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ _____________________________ BUDGET RENT A CAR 177 S AIRPORT BLVDWSW 0 - 1/8 (0.078 mi.)D3335 BUDGET RENT-A-CAR 177 SOUTH AIRPORT BOULEWSW 0 - 1/8 (0.078 mi.)D3442 ALAN BAKER COMPANY 160 SYLVESTER RDNNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.134 mi.)F5054 PONY EXPRESS 108 SYLVESTERNNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.172 mi.)J7283 FACILITY 10745 TANK #2 (A 50 LINDENWNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.405 mi.)AI244319 UNKNOWN 58 LINDENWNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.406 mi.)AI245319 AGUNDIS TIRE SHOP 110 LINDENWNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.415 mi.)AL255345 CHEVRON 9-7640 124 LINDENWNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.420 mi.)AL263354 SHELL OIL CO 123 LINDEN AVENW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.434 mi.)AL274378 OLYMPIC AUTO SERVICE 401 LINDENNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.493 mi.)AU309452 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ _____________________________ CTC FOOD INTERNATIONAL 131 HARRISENE 0 - 1/8 (0.013 mi.)A39 BAY BRIDGE HARDWARE SUPPL 151 MITCHELLESE 0 - 1/8 (0.076 mi.)B2425 TRADITIONAL WOODWORKS INC 184 HARBOR WAYENE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.169 mi.)I6677 AVIS CAR RENTAL 230 HARBOR WAYE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.173 mi.)K7888 COLOR CRAFT 255 AIRPORTSSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.178 mi.)L84101 SHELL OIL CO 140 PRODUCESW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.189 mi.)M90107 KEN FUNK PROPERTY 264 AIRPORTSSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.196 mi.)L100116 SEWAGE PUMP STATION #4 249 HARBORESE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.201 mi.)N102118 CALTRANS/SSF MAINTENANCE STATI 166 HARBOR WAYNE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.226 mi.)O130133 CHEVRON 9-7875 300 SOUTH AIRPORT BOULESSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.248 mi.)S152172 AIRBORNE EXPRESS CORP OYS 274 WATTIS WAYSSE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.254 mi.)R157178 HARMON SHRAGGE CO 280 WATTISSSE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.259 mi.)R162183 DONS AUTO WRECKERS 137 HARBORNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.267 mi.)T164185 EAST GRAND OLYMPIC CARDTO 190 GRANDNNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.278 mi.)U171195 SAMTRANS VACANT 196 PRODUCESSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.285 mi.)V175197 U FREIGHT AMERICA INC 320 COREYSSE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.297 mi.)W179199 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO TIRE SERVI 114 HARBOR WAYNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.298 mi.)T180201 DIADOTI CONSTRUCTION 1461 SAN MATEOWSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.300 mi.)X184209 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC3837232.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 18 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ _____________________________ AIRPORT BLVD SERVICE STA 190 AIRPORTNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.309 mi.)Y190214 GREYHOUND EXPOSITION SERVICES 100 UTAH AVES 1/4 - 1/2 (0.314 mi.)Z193216 ESCHELBACH PROPERTIES 100 BADENNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.321 mi.)Y196219 GELCO TRUCK LEASING DIV. GELCO 1395 LOWRIE AVEWSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.325 mi.)X200231 UNOCAL STATION #1020 221 AIRPORT BOULEVARDNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.352 mi.)AA207244 SOUTH CITY FORD 315 AIRPORT BLVDNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.354 mi.)AA208257 FIRE STATION #1 201 BADENNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.357 mi.)AC212263 UNION CARBIDE CORP 7 LINDENW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.367 mi.)AD216265 SUPER CROWN CATERING 1381 LOWRIEWSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.373 mi.)AE220274 MATTISON & SHIDLER 205 GRANDNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.373 mi.)AB222283 OLYMPIAN 186 GRANDNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.374 mi.)AA223285 CHEVRON 401 AIRPORTNNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.387 mi.)AF227288 BELL ELECTRICAL SUPPLY 208 GRANDNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.388 mi.)AG229290 CODON GRAND ROEBLING INV 213 GRANDNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.390 mi.)AG230290 LA MARK TRANSPORTATION 26 LINDENW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.403 mi.)AJ242315 FOUR STAR AUTOMOTIVE II 1405 SAN MATEOSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.410 mi.)AK247319 OLYMPIAN 35 LINDENW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.412 mi.)AJ249322 GEORGIA PACIFIC CORP 249 GRANDNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.415 mi.)AG257348 PEKING HANDICRAFT 1388 SAN MATEOSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.417 mi.)AK259349 CALEGARI PROPERTY 40 LINDENW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.420 mi.)261351 GROSVENOR AIRPORT ASSOCIATES 380 SO AIRPORT BLVDS 1/4 - 1/2 (0.422 mi.)AM266356 SOUTH CITY SCAVENGERS 69 LINDENWSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.428 mi.)AO272369 SHELL 515 AIRPORTNNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.442 mi.)AN278389 PACIFIC PLASTIC PRODUCTS, INC 405 SOUTH AIRPORT BOULES 1/4 - 1/2 (0.444 mi.)AM280391 PENSKE TRUCK LEASING II 62 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUEWSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.450 mi.)AO285398 EXIDE CORP 286 LAWRENCE AVEE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.456 mi.)AQ291421 LUCCA PACKING CORPORATION 360 HARBORSSE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.481 mi.)AR298437 RPM RENT A CAR 410 S AIRPORT BLVDS 1/4 - 1/2 (0.484 mi.)AS301440 CORTANA CORPORATION 468 LITTLEFIELDE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.491 mi.)AT303443 SAGE TRANSPORTATION INC. 408 LITTLEFIELD AVEE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.491 mi.)AQ305446 SIMEON PROPERTIES 290 UTAHESE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.496 mi.)AV311462 Notify 65: Listings of all Proposition 65 incidents reported to counties by the State Water Resources Control Board and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. This database is no longer updated by the reporting agency. A review of the Notify 65 list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/21/1993 has revealed that there are 5 Notify 65 sites within approximately 1 mile of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ _____________________________ VACENT LOT 108 SYLVESTER ROADNNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.172 mi.)J7385 UNOCAL 901 AIRPORTN 1/2 - 1 (0.750 mi.)325505 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ _____________________________ GELCO TRUCK LEASING 1395 LOWRIE AVENUEWSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.325 mi.)X198230 GRANITE ROCK COMPANY 1321 LOWRIE AVENUESW 1/2 - 1 (0.575 mi.)315468 SWIFT INDEPENDENT 429 CABOT ROADENE 1/2 - 1 (0.597 mi.)316474 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC3837232.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 19 Hazardous Materials Business Plan, Hazardous Waste Generator, Underground Storage tanks A review of the San Mateo Co. BI list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/01/2013 has revealed that there are 69 San Mateo Co. BI sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ _____________________________ VERIZON WIRELESS- SSF CIVIC CE 117 GATEWAYW 0 - 1/8 (0.034 mi.)610 UST SITE 175 SYLVESTERNNW 0 - 1/8 (0.118 mi.)F4348 FORREST FAULKNOR & SONS 175 SYLVESTERNNW 0 - 1/8 (0.118 mi.)F4552 WR PRODUCTS 180 SYLVESTERNNW 0 - 1/8 (0.119 mi.)F4652 ALAN BAKER CO INC 160-180 SYLVESTERNNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.134 mi.)F4854 ALAN BAKER CO INC 160 SYLVESTERNNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.134 mi.)F4954 BP GLOBAL SPECIAL PRODUCTS INC 145 SYLVESTERNNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.141 mi.)F5667 MINA PRODUCTS 145 SYLVESTERNNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.141 mi.)F5768 SAN FRANCISCO SPICE CO 103 ASSOCIATEDNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.157 mi.)H5968 SOMERSET STUDIOS 108 SYLVESTERNNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.172 mi.)J7183 JAPAN PARTS LTD 102 SYLVESTERNNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.177 mi.)J83101 LA QUINTA INN 20 AIRPORTWNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.186 mi.)87104 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ _____________________________ INTERNATIONAL ROASTING SYSTEMS 110 HARRISESE 0 - 1/8 (0.020 mi.)A410 NAKURA, INC 110 HARRISESE 0 - 1/8 (0.020 mi.)A510 TAYLOR FREEZERS OF CALIFORNIA 221 HARRISENE 0 - 1/8 (0.054 mi.)A711 CENTURY TECHNOLOGY INC 225 HARRISENE 0 - 1/8 (0.054 mi.)A811 TORANI / R TORRE & CO 233 HARRISENE 0 - 1/8 (0.055 mi.)A911 GIUSTOS SPECIALTY FOODS INC 241 HARRISENE 0 - 1/8 (0.056 mi.)A1012 B & O MANUFACTURING INC 245 HARRISENE 0 - 1/8 (0.056 mi.)A1112 JC PAPER 230 HARRISENE 0 - 1/8 (0.057 mi.)A1212 253 INC 253 HARRISENE 0 - 1/8 (0.057 mi.)A1313 O. BALTOR & SONS 265 HARRISENE 0 - 1/8 (0.059 mi.)A1413 FIRST AUTOMOTIVE DISTRIBUTORS 267-273 HARRISENE 0 - 1/8 (0.059 mi.)A1513 EMPTY BUILDING 145 MITCHELLSE 0 - 1/8 (0.063 mi.)B1815 BAY BRIDGE HARDWARE SUPPLY INC 151 MITCHELLSE 0 - 1/8 (0.077 mi.)B2834 GODAR & HOSSENLOPP 151 MITCHELLSE 0 - 1/8 (0.077 mi.)B2934 PENTAGON LIGHT 151 MITCHELLSE 0 - 1/8 (0.077 mi.)B3034 ESSENCE PRINTING 151 MITCHELLSE 0 - 1/8 (0.077 mi.)B3134 FLYERS #219 176 GATEWAYNNE 0 - 1/8 (0.089 mi.)E3544 G & S TRUCK WASH 176 GATEWAYNNE 0 - 1/8 (0.089 mi.)E3644 MG TRUCK WASH 176 GATEWAYNNE 0 - 1/8 (0.089 mi.)E3744 WEST COAST POWDER COATING 165 MITCHELLSE 0 - 1/8 (0.105 mi.)B4047 KUSTOM CULTURE CYCLES 165A MITCHELLSE 0 - 1/8 (0.105 mi.)B4148 MARCHETTI, JOE 184 HARBORENE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.169 mi.)I6781 TRADITIONAL WOODWORKS INC 184 HARBORENE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.169 mi.)I6881 AVIS RENT A CAR SYSTEM 230 HARBORE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.173 mi.)K7999 T MOBILE WEST CORPORATION SF03 177 GATEWAYNNE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.176 mi.)8099 OSWALD MACHINE & EQUIPT INC 229 HARBORE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.176 mi.)K81100 EG & P 233 HARBORE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.178 mi.)K85103 TRUX TRANSPORT 237-239 HARBORESE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.182 mi.)K86103 PRODUCE SHELL 140 PRODUCESW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.189 mi.)M88104 PRODUCE SHELL #136134 140 PRODUCESW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.189 mi.)M92110 SHORELINE DIESEL INC 207 HARBORENE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.191 mi.)I97113 SSF SEWAGE PUMP STATION #4 249 HARBORESE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.201 mi.)N107122 FIRE STATION #2 249 HARBORESE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.201 mi.)N110123 CALPICO INC 185 HARBORENE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.208 mi.)I114125 ARS INC 255 HARBORESE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.210 mi.)N115125 160 PRODUCE AVENUE 160 PRODUCE AVENUESW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.215 mi.)M116125 SIMONDS MACHINERY 259 HARBORESE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.217 mi.)N117126 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC3837232.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 20 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ _____________________________ THRESHOLD PHARMACEUTICALS INC 170 HARBORNE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.222 mi.)O121129 QUINTARA BIOSCIENCES INC 170 HARBORNE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.222 mi.)O122129 NODALITY INC 170 HARBORNE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.222 mi.)O123130 EXELIXIS 170 HARBORNE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.222 mi.)O124130 HERTZ EQUIPMENT RENTAL 266 HARBORSE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.223 mi.)N126132 D P NICOLI 266 HARBORSE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.223 mi.)N127133 WESTERN PAINTING CO 21 AIRPORTW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.227 mi.)P132139 LIFE CARE SOLUTIONS INC 31 AIRPORTW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.231 mi.)P133139 PLATINUM THERMOGRAPHERS 31 AIRPORTW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.231 mi.)P134140 PLATINUM THERMOGRAPHERS 31 AIRPORTW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.231 mi.)P135140 SUN HING FOODS 271 HARBORSE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.235 mi.)Q136140 LDR FORREST 274 HARBORSE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.237 mi.)Q137140 RIZZETTO WELDING & METAL SALES 169 HARBORNE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.237 mi.)O139156 GENOTYPES 61 AIRPORTW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.241 mi.)P142168 HERMES BIOSCIENCES, INC 61 AIRPORTW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.241 mi.)P143168 SAN FRANCISCO DELUXE TOURS 259 WATTIS AVE - ADJ BASSE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.243 mi.)R144168 SAMSON PRESS 261 WATTISSSE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.244 mi.)R145168 ROY BRIZIO STREET RODS 263 WATTISSSE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.246 mi.)R148170 VALENCIA BROS 150 HARBORNE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.247 mi.)O149171 DESIGN IMAGERY 267 WATTISSSE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.248 mi.)R155177 HWP: Detailed information on permitted hazardous waste facilities and corrective action ("cleanups") tracked in EnviroStor. A review of the HWP list, as provided by EDR, and dated 11/25/2013 has revealed that there are 6 HWP sites within approximately 1 mile of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ _____________________________ EXIDE CORP 286 LAWRENCE AVEE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.456 mi.)AQ291421 MERRY X-RAY CORP 131 SOUTH MAPLE #1W 1/2 - 1 (0.551 mi.)313465 DENNIS X RAY CO 301 ALLERTON AVEE 1/2 - 1 (0.608 mi.)318479 WEST COAST AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE 160 S LINDEN AVESW 1/2 - 1 (0.706 mi.)320483 INTERNATIONAL PAINT CO (CALIF) 220 S LINDEN AVESW 1/2 - 1 (0.708 mi.)AW322485 O’BRIEN CORPORATION THE 450 EAST GRAND AVENUEE 1/2 - 1 (0.949 mi.)AZ338551 EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR US Hist Auto Stat: EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station, filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. A review of the EDR US Hist Auto Stat list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 2 EDR US EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC3837232.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 21 Hist Auto Stat sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ _____________________________ Not reported 11 AIRPORT BLVDW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.224 mi.)P129133 Not reported 300 S AIRPORT BLVDSSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.245 mi.)S147169 EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives RGA LF: The EDR Recovered Government Archive Landfill database provides a list of landfills derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. A review of the RGA LF list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there is 1 RGA LF site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ _____________________________ Not reported 110 LINDEN AVENUEWNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.415 mi.)AL254345 RGA LUST: The EDR Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank database provides a list of LUST incidents derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. A review of the RGA LUST list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 144 RGA LUST sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ _____________________________ Not reported 177 S AIRPORT BLVDWSW 0 - 1/8 (0.078 mi.)D3235 BUDGET RENT A CAR 177 S AIRPORT BLVDWSW 0 - 1/8 (0.078 mi.)D3335 BUDGET RENT-A-CAR 177 SOUTH AIRPORT BOULEWSW 0 - 1/8 (0.078 mi.)D3442 Not reported 175 SYLVESTER ROADNNW 0 - 1/8 (0.118 mi.)F4248 KB SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 175 SYLVESTERNNW 0 - 1/8 (0.118 mi.)F4448 ALAN BAKER COMPANY 160 SYLVESTER RDNNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.134 mi.)F5054 Not reported 160 SYLVESTER RDNNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.134 mi.)F5261 PONY EXPRESS 108 SYLVESTERNNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.172 mi.)J7283 Not reported 108 SYLVESTER RDNNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.172 mi.)J7485 AGUNDIS TIRE SHOP 110 LINDENWNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.415 mi.)AL255345 CHEVRON 9-7640 124 LINDEN AVEWNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.420 mi.)AL262353 CHEVRON 9-7640 124 LINDENWNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.420 mi.)AL263354 Not reported 124 LINDEN AVEWNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.420 mi.)AL264355 Not reported 123 LINDEN AVEWNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.422 mi.)AL265355 MIZRA/SETO PROPERTY 165 S LINDEN AVENW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.426 mi.)AL270366 SHELL OIL CO 123 LINDEN AVENW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.434 mi.)AL274378 SHELL OIL 123 LINDEN AVENW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.434 mi.)AL275386 WRIGHT CLEANERS 316 GRAND AVENW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.485 mi.)302442 OLYMPIC AUTO SERVICE 401 LINDENNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.493 mi.)AU309452 Not reported 401 LINDEN AVENW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.493 mi.)AU310462 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ _____________________________ CTC FOOD INTERNATIONAL 131 WEST HARRIS AVENUEENE 0 - 1/8 (0.011 mi.)A18 Not reported 131 HARRISENE 0 - 1/8 (0.013 mi.)A29 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC3837232.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 22 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ _____________________________ Not reported 162 WEST HARRIS AVENUEE 0 - 1/8 (0.068 mi.)C2116 BAY BRIDGE HARDWARE SUPPL 151 MITCHELLESE 0 - 1/8 (0.076 mi.)B2425 BAY BRIDGE HARDWARE SUPPLY 151 MITCHELL AVEESE 0 - 1/8 (0.076 mi.)B2627 OLYMPIAN GATEWAY 176 GATEWAY BLVDNNE 0 - 1/8 (0.089 mi.)E3845 Not reported 176 GATEWAY BOULEVARDNNE 0 - 1/8 (0.089 mi.)E3947 SHELL SERVICE STATION 248 SOUTH AIRPORT BOULESSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.139 mi.)G5461 TRADITIONAL WOODWORKS INC 184 HARBOR WAYENE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.169 mi.)I6677 TRADITIONAL WOOD WORKS 184 HARBOR WYENE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.169 mi.)I7082 Not reported 230 HARBOR WYE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.173 mi.)K7586 AVIS CAR RENTAL 230 HARBOR WAYE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.173 mi.)K7888 COLOR CRAFT 255 AIRPORTSSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.178 mi.)L84101 EQUILON ENTERPRISES 140 PRODUCESW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.189 mi.)M89104 SHELL OIL 140 PRODUCE AVESW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.189 mi.)M93110 Not reported 140 PRODUCE AVESW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.189 mi.)M94111 KEN FUNK PROPERTY 264 AIRPORTSSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.196 mi.)L100116 SEWAGE PUMP STATION #4 249 HARBORESE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.201 mi.)N102118 Not reported 249 HARBOR WAYESE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.201 mi.)N108123 Not reported 249 HARBOR WYESE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.201 mi.)N109123 SEWAGE PUMP STATION #4 249 HARBOR WYESE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.201 mi.)N111124 Not reported 184 HARBOR WAYENE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.206 mi.)I112124 Not reported 184 HARBOR WYENE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.206 mi.)I113125 Not reported 300 S AIRPORT BLVDSSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.245 mi.)S146169 Not reported 300 AIRPORTSSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.248 mi.)S151172 CHEVRON 9-7875 300 SOUTH AIRPORT BOULESSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.248 mi.)S152172 Not reported 274 WATTIS WAYSSE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.254 mi.)R156177 AIRBORNE EXPRESS CORP OYS 274 WATTIS WAYSSE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.254 mi.)R157178 MONROE SCHNEIDER ASSOC. 274 WATTIS WYSSE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.254 mi.)R158181 Not reported 274 WATTIS WYSSE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.254 mi.)R159182 Not reported 280 WATTIS WYSSE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.259 mi.)R160182 Not reported 280 WATTIS WAYSSE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.259 mi.)R161182 HARMON SHRAGGE CO 280 WATTISSSE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.259 mi.)R162183 Not reported 137 HARBOR WAYNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.267 mi.)T163185 DONS AUTO WRECKERS 137 HARBORNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.267 mi.)T164185 Not reported 186 E GRAND AVENNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.269 mi.)U165187 OLYMPIAN 186 EAST GRAND AVENUENNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.269 mi.)U166187 Not reported 190 E GRAND AVENNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.277 mi.)U168188 OLYMPIC EAST GRAND CARDTOL 190 EAST GRAND AVENUENNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.278 mi.)U170189 Not reported 190 GRANDNNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.278 mi.)U172195 Not reported 196 PRODUCE AVESSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.285 mi.)V173196 SAM TRANS (VACANT) 196 PRODUCE AVESSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.285 mi.)V174196 SAMTRANS VACANT 196 PRODUCESSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.285 mi.)V175197 Not reported 320 COREY WAYSSE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.297 mi.)W176198 Not reported 320 COREY WYSSE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.297 mi.)W177198 U-FREIGHT AMERICA INC 320 COREY WYSSE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.297 mi.)W178199 U FREIGHT AMERICA INC 320 COREYSSE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.297 mi.)W179199 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO TIRE SERVI 114 HARBOR WAYNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.298 mi.)T180201 Not reported 114 HARBORNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.298 mi.)T181205 GOLDEN GATE PETROLEUM 114- 126 HARBOR WYNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.298 mi.)T182206 DIADOTI CONSTRUCTION 1461 SAN MATEOWSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.300 mi.)X184209 Not reported 1461 SAN MATEO AVEWSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.300 mi.)X185211 BRITANNIA DEVELOPMENTS 115-185 HARBOR WYNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.302 mi.)T186211 BINKS MANUFACTURING CO 1459 SAN MATEOWSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.305 mi.)X187212 Not reported 190 AIRPORT BLVDNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.309 mi.)Y188213 AIRPORT BLVD SERVICE STN 190 AIRPORT BLVDNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.309 mi.)Y189213 AIRPORT BLVD SERVICE STA 190 AIRPORTNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.309 mi.)Y190214 GREYHOUND EXPOSITION SERVICES 100 UTAH AVES 1/4 - 1/2 (0.314 mi.)Z191215 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC3837232.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 23 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ _____________________________ Not reported 100 UTAH AVES 1/4 - 1/2 (0.314 mi.)Z192216 GREYHOUND EXPOSITION SERVICES 100 UTAH AVES 1/4 - 1/2 (0.314 mi.)Z193216 Not reported 100 BADEN AVENW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.321 mi.)Y195219 ESCHELBACH PROPERTIES 100 BADENNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.321 mi.)Y196219 PRODUCE MARKET KEYLOCK/OLYMPIA 131 TERMINAL CTSSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.321 mi.)V197222 GELCO TRUCK LEASING 1395 LOWRIE AVEWSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.325 mi.)X199230 GELCO TRUCK LEASING DIV. GELCO 1395 LOWRIE AVEWSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.325 mi.)X200231 Not reported 1395 LOWRIE AVEWSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.325 mi.)X201233 Not reported 221 AIRPORT BLVDNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.325 mi.)Y202234 BELL ELECTRICAL SUPPLY 208 EAST GRAND AVENUENE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.348 mi.)AB205241 UNOCAL #1020 221 AIRPORT BLVDNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.352 mi.)AA206243 UNOCAL STATION #1020 221 AIRPORT BOULEVARDNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.352 mi.)AA207244 SOUTH CITY FORD 315 AIRPORT BLVDNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.354 mi.)AA208257 Not reported 315 AIRPORT BLVDNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.354 mi.)AA209261 FIRE STATION #1 201 BADEN AVENW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.357 mi.)AC211262 FIRE STATION #1 201 BADENNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.357 mi.)AC212263 Not reported 201 BADEN AVENW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.357 mi.)AC213264 Not reported 7 LINDENW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.367 mi.)AD218266 UNION CARBIDE CORP. 7 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUEW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.367 mi.)AD219266 SUPER CROWN CATERING 1381 LOWRIEWSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.373 mi.)AE220274 Not reported 1381 LOWRIE AVEWSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.373 mi.)AE221283 MATTISON & SHIDLER 205 GRANDNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.373 mi.)AB222283 OLYMPIAN 186 GRANDNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.374 mi.)AA223285 CODON (GRAND/ROEBLING INV) 213 EAST GRAND AVENUENE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.378 mi.)AB225286 CHEVRON 9-0645 401 AIRPORT BLVDNNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.387 mi.)AF226287 CHEVRON 401 AIRPORTNNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.387 mi.)AF227288 Not reported 401 AIRPORT BLVDNNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.387 mi.)AF228289 BELL ELECTRICAL SUPPLY 208 GRANDNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.388 mi.)AG229290 CODON GRAND ROEBLING INV 213 GRANDNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.390 mi.)AG230290 Not reported 360 HARBOR WAYSE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.397 mi.)AH231291 Not reported 360 HARBOR WYSE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.397 mi.)AH232291 Not reported 20 S LINDEN AVEW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.398 mi.)AD234292 KEN FUNK PROPERTY 264 S AIRPORT BLVDNNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.399 mi.)AF238303 LA MARK TRANSPORTATION 26 LINDENW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.403 mi.)AJ242315 FOUR STAR AUTOMOTIVE II 1405 SAN MATEOSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.410 mi.)AK247319 Not reported 1405 SAN MATEO AVESW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.410 mi.)AK248321 OLYMPIAN 35 LINDENW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.412 mi.)AJ249322 CALTRANS MAINTENANCE STATION 296 AIRPORT BOULEVARDNNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.412 mi.)AF251339 Not reported 249 GRANDNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.415 mi.)AG256347 PEKING HANDICRAFT 1388 SAN MATEOSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.417 mi.)AK259349 Not reported 1388 SAN MATEO AVESW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.417 mi.)AK260351 CALEGARI PROPERTY 40 LINDENW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.420 mi.)261351 GROSVENOR AIRPORT ASSOCIATES 380 SO AIRPORT BLVDS 1/4 - 1/2 (0.422 mi.)AM266356 Not reported 600-79 DUBUQUENNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.423 mi.)AN267358 BRESSIE & CO. 600-790 DUBUQUENNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.423 mi.)AN268358 Not reported 600-79 DUBUQUE AVENNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.423 mi.)AN269366 SOUTH CITY SCAVENGERS 69 LINDENWSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.428 mi.)AO272369 Not reported 515 AIRPORTNNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.442 mi.)AN277388 SHELL 515 AIRPORTNNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.442 mi.)AN278389 Not reported 250 EAST GRAND AVEENE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.445 mi.)AP281393 PENSKE TRUCK LEASING II 62 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUEWSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.450 mi.)AO285398 GEORGIA PACIFIC 249 EAST GRAND AVENUEENE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.454 mi.)AP286405 BLANDINI TRUST 545 AIRPORT BLVDNNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.455 mi.)AN288411 Not reported 545 AIRPORT BLVDNNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.455 mi.)AN289413 GROSVENOR AIRPORT INN 380 S AIRPORT BLVDNNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.469 mi.)AN293425 LUCCA PACKING CORP. 360 HARBOR WYSSE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.481 mi.)AR297437 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC3837232.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 24 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ _____________________________ LUCCA PACKING CORPORATION 360 HARBORSSE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.481 mi.)AR298437 Not reported 410 S AIRPORT BLVDS 1/4 - 1/2 (0.484 mi.)AS299439 RPM RENT A CAR 410 S AIRPORT BLVDS 1/4 - 1/2 (0.484 mi.)AS301440 CORTANA CORPORATION 468 LITTLEFIELDE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.491 mi.)AT303443 Not reported 468 LITTLEFIELD AVEE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.491 mi.)AT304445 SAGE TRANSPORTATION INC. 408 LITTLEFIELD AVEE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.491 mi.)AQ305446 SAGE TRANSPORTATION INC 408 LITTLEFIELD AVEE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.491 mi.)AQ306447 Not reported 408 LITTLEFIELD AVEE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.491 mi.)AQ307448 SIMEON PROPERTIES 290 UTAHESE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.496 mi.)AV311462 Not reported 290 UTAH AVEESE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.496 mi.)AV312465 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC3837232.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 25 Due to poor or inadequate address information, the following sites were not mapped. Count: 20 records. Site Name Database(s)____________ ____________ RGA LUST SCR-SF AIRPRT TERMNL TANK HIST CORTESE HIGHWAY 101/OYSTER POINT HIST CORTESE HOMART DEVELOPMENT CORP. HIST CORTESE SCR-114, 120 & 128 HARBOR HIST CORTESE SAN MATEO AVENUE SEWAGE/PUMP STATI SWEEPS UST SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL DUMP CERC-NFRAP TEXACO INC CERC-NFRAP I T B SOUTH - SFIA AST I T B NORTH -SFIA AST US STEEL SHEARWATER SITE HAZNET TOSCO CORP SITE 30575 RCRA-SQG USCG AIR STATION SAN FRANCISCO RCRA-SQG PG & E EAST GRAND SUBSTATION RCRA-SQG, FINDS SSF HWY 280 RCRA-SQG PROTEOLIX RCRA-SQG U S STEEL SHEARWATER SITE RCRA-SQG, FINDS O’BRIAN CORP SITE FINDS OYSTER PT INTERCHANGE San Mateo Co. BI AMR COMBS RAMP San Mateo Co. BI EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 200 2 4056020 0 5 20480440 4 4 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 3 6 0 2 0 0 3 2 0280 2 40 2 40 2 0 0 200 0 0 0 1 2 0 8 0 1 60 12080 40 4 0 4 0 40 1 6 0 160 160 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 80 8 0 8 0 8 4 0 40 40 EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. 0 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total DatabaseProperty(Miles)< 1/81/8 - 1/41/4 - 1/21/2 - 1> 1Plotted STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000NPL 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Proposed NPL 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPNPL LIENS Federal Delisted NPL site list 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Delisted NPL Federal CERCLIS list 2 NR NR 1 0 1 0.500CERCLIS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500FEDERAL FACILITY Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site List 6 NR NR 6 0 0 0.500CERC-NFRAP Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list 4 NR 3 1 0 0 1.000CORRACTS Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500RCRA-TSDF Federal RCRA generators list 4 NR NR NR 4 0 0.250RCRA-LQG 12 NR NR NR 9 3 0.250RCRA-SQG 1 NR NR NR 1 0 0.250RCRA-CESQG Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US ENG CONTROLS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US INST CONTROL 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LUCIS Federal ERNS list 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPERNS State- and tribal - equivalent NPL 6 NR 3 2 1 0 1.000RESPONSE State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS 26 NR 16 9 1 0 1.000ENVIROSTOR State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SWF/LF State and tribal leaking storage tank lists 114 NR NR 86 17 11 0.500LUST TC3837232.2s Page 4 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total DatabaseProperty(Miles)< 1/81/8 - 1/41/4 - 1/21/2 - 1> 1Plotted 16 NR NR 15 1 0 0.500SLIC 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN LUST State and tribal registered storage tank lists 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250UST 1 NR NR NR 1 0 0.250AST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250INDIAN UST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FEMA UST State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites 3 NR NR 3 0 0 0.500VCP 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN VCP ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US BROWNFIELDS Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500DEBRIS REGION 9 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500ODI 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500WMUDS/SWAT 1 NR NR 1 0 0 0.500SWRCY 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPHAULERS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN ODI Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS CDL 4 NR 2 2 0 0 1.000HIST Cal-Sites 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250SCH 1 NR 1 0 0 0 1.000Toxic Pits 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPCDL 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS HIST CDL Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks 10 NR NR NR 7 3 0.250CA FID UST 14 NR NR NR 11 3 0.250HIST UST 14 NR NR NR 11 3 0.250SWEEPS UST Local Land Records 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPLIENS 2 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPLIENS 4 NR NR 4 0 0 0.500DEED Records of Emergency Release Reports 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPHMIRS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPCHMIRS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPLDS TC3837232.2s Page 5 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total DatabaseProperty(Miles)< 1/81/8 - 1/41/4 - 1/21/2 - 1> 1Plotted 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPMCS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSPILLS 90 Other Ascertainable Records 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA NonGen / NLR 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPDOT OPS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000DOD 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUDS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CONSENT 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000ROD 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500UMTRA 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250US MINES 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPTRIS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPTSCA 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPFTTS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPHIST FTTS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSSTS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPICIS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPADS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPMLTS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRADINFO 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPFINDS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRAATS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRMP 2 NR 1 1 0 0 1.000CA BOND EXP. PLAN 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUIC 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPNPDES 1 NR NR 0 1 0 0.500Cortese 59 NR NR 45 10 4 0.500HIST CORTESE 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250CUPA Listings 5 NR 3 1 1 0 1.000Notify 65 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250DRYCLEANERS 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250WIP 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPENF 69 NR NR NR 44 25 0.250San Mateo Co. BI 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPHAZNET 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPEMI 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000INDIAN RESERV 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SCRD DRYCLEANERS 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.2502020 COR ACTION 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPLEAD SMELTERS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPWDS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS AIRS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPRP 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500PROC 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250MWMP 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250HWT 6 NR 5 1 0 0 1.000HWP 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPCOAL ASH DOE 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS FIN ASSUR 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500COAL ASH EPA TC3837232.2s Page 6 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total DatabaseProperty(Miles)< 1/81/8 - 1/41/4 - 1/21/2 - 1> 1Plotted 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPCB TRANSFORMER 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPFinancial Assurance 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPEPA WATCH LIST EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000EDR MGP 2 NR NR NR 2 0 0.250EDR US Hist Auto Stat 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250EDR US Hist Cleaners EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives 1 NR NR 1 0 0 0.500RGA LF 144 NR NR 109 23 12 0.500RGA LUST NOTES: TP = Target Property NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance Sites may be listed in more than one database TC3837232.2s Page 7 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608101023Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 08/10/2000Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608101023Global Id: 05/07/1998Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608101023Global Id: Status History: 6503726298Phone Number: jmadden@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: JACOB MADDENContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608101023Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: nkatyl@waterboards.ca.govEmail: OAKLANDCity: 1515 CLAY STREETAddress: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: NANCY KATYLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608101023Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: Local Agency WarehouseFile Location: 550155LOC Case Number: 41-1113RB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: JMCase Worker: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 08/10/2000Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.403331Longitude: 37.650892Latitude: T0608101023Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 58 ft.Site 1 of 14 in cluster A 0.011 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 25 ft. < 1/8SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ENE RGA LUST131 WEST HARRIS AVENUE N/A A1 LUSTCTC FOOD INTERNATIONAL S109285641 TC3837232.2s Page 8 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2008 CTC FOOD INTERNATIONAL 131 WEST HARRIS AVENUE 2009 CTC FOOD INTERNATIONAL 131 WEST HARRIS AVENUE 2010 CTC FOOD INTERNATIONAL 131 WEST HARRIS AVENUE 2011 CTC FOOD INTERNATIONAL 131 WEST HARRIS AVENUE 2012 CTC FOOD INTERNATIONAL 131 WEST HARRIS AVENUE RGA LUST: Notice of Responsibility - #1Action: 06/30/1998Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608101023Global Id: CTC FOOD INTERNATIONAL (Continued)S109285641 2003 CTC FOOD INTERNATIONAL 131 HARRIS 2005 CTC FOOD INTERNATIONAL 131 HARRIS 2006 CTC FOOD INTERNATIONAL 131 HARRIS 2007 CTC FOOD INTERNATIONAL 131 HARRIS RGA LUST: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remediation Action Underway: Not reportedPollution Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedPollution Characterization Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assesment Began: Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: OMHow Discovered: 550155Case Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: LUST REG 2: 69 ft.Site 2 of 14 in cluster A 0.013 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 25 ft. < 1/8S SAN FRANCISCO, CA ENE RGA LUST131 HARRIS N/A A2 LUSTS103396269 41-1113Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 41Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 69 ft.Site 3 of 14 in cluster A 0.013 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 25 ft. < 1/8SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ENE LUST131 HARRIS N/A A3 HIST CORTESECTC FOOD INTERNATIONAL S104912724 TC3837232.2s Page 9 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: 015123490APN Number: T0608101023Global ID: 9- Case ClosedFacility Status: 550155Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUST: CTC FOOD INTERNATIONAL (Continued)S104912724 GENERATES & RECYCLES WASTE OIL/SOLVENTDescription: PR0011634Record Id: GENERATES and RECYCLES WASTE OIL/SOLVENTProg Element Code: FA0016053Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 105 ft.Site 4 of 14 in cluster A 0.020 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 24 ft. < 1/8S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ESE110 HARRIS N/A A4 San Mateo Co. BIINTERNATIONAL ROASTING SYSTEMSS113756181 GENERATES <27 GAL/YEARDescription: PR0037691Record Id: GENERATES <27 GAL/YEARProg Element Code: FA0026131Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 105 ft.Site 5 of 14 in cluster A 0.020 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 24 ft. < 1/8S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ESE110 HARRIS N/A A5 San Mateo Co. BINAKURA, INC S113757450 STORES MV FUELS OR WASTE ONLYDescription: PR0068461Record Id: STORES MV FUELS OR WASTE ONLYProg Element Code: FA0050029Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 178 ft. 0.034 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 28 ft. < 1/8S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 West117 GATEWAY N/A 6 San Mateo Co. BIVERIZON WIRELESS- SSF CIVIC CENTERS113758976 TC3837232.2s Page 10 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation USED TIRE PROGRAM - GENERALDescription: PR0066921Record Id: USED TIRE PROGRAM - GENERALProg Element Code: FA0033746Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: STORES HAZ MAT <219GAL,1,999LB, 879CFDescription: PR0052492Record Id: STORES HAZ MAT <219GAL,1,999LB, 879FT3Prog Element Code: FA0033746Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 284 ft.Site 6 of 14 in cluster A 0.054 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 23 ft. < 1/8S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ENE221 HARRIS N/A A7 San Mateo Co. BITAYLOR FREEZERS OF CALIFORNIAS113758310 STORES MV FUELS OR WASTE ONLYDescription: PR0054316Record Id: STORES MV FUELS OR WASTE ONLYProg Element Code: FA0037542Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: GENERATES & RECYCLES WASTE OIL/SOLVENTDescription: PR0054317Record Id: GENERATES and RECYCLES WASTE OIL/SOLVENTProg Element Code: FA0037542Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 286 ft.Site 7 of 14 in cluster A 0.054 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 23 ft. < 1/8S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ENE225 HARRIS N/A A8 San Mateo Co. BICENTURY TECHNOLOGY INC S113758426 STORES HAZ MAT <219GAL,1,999LB, 879CFDescription: PR0051670Record Id: STORES HAZ MAT <219GAL,1,999LB, 879FT3Prog Element Code: FA0031286Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: GENERATES & RECYCLES WASTE OIL/SOLVENTDescription: PR0051671Record Id: GENERATES and RECYCLES WASTE OIL/SOLVENTProg Element Code: FA0031286Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 290 ft.Site 8 of 14 in cluster A 0.055 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 23 ft. < 1/8S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ENE233 HARRIS N/A A9 San Mateo Co. BITORANI / R TORRE & CO S113758253 TC3837232.2s Page 11 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation UNDERGROUND TANK - GENERALDescription: PR0022628Record Id: UNDERGROUND TANK - GENERALProg Element Code: FA0017747Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 295 ft.Site 9 of 14 in cluster A 0.056 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 23 ft. < 1/8S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ENE241 HARRIS N/A A10 San Mateo Co. BIGIUSTOS SPECIALTY FOODS INC S113756502 STORES HAZ MAT <1,199GAL,9,999LB,4,799CFDescription: PR0044904Record Id: STORES HAZ MAT <1,199GAL,9,999LB,4,799FT3Prog Element Code: FA0027800Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: GENERATES & RECYCLES WASTE OIL/SOLVENTDescription: PR0044905Record Id: GENERATES and RECYCLES WASTE OIL/SOLVENTProg Element Code: FA0027800Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 297 ft.Site 10 of 14 in cluster A 0.056 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 23 ft. < 1/8S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ENE245 HARRIS N/A A11 San Mateo Co. BIB & O MANUFACTURING INC S113757856 STORES MV FUELS OR WASTE ONLYDescription: PR0051611Record Id: STORES MV FUELS OR WASTE ONLYProg Element Code: FA0031163Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: GENERATES & RECYCLES WASTE OIL/SOLVENTDescription: PR0051612Record Id: GENERATES and RECYCLES WASTE OIL/SOLVENTProg Element Code: FA0031163Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 299 ft.Site 11 of 14 in cluster A 0.057 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 22 ft. < 1/8S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ENE230 HARRIS N/A A12 San Mateo Co. BIJC PAPER S113758249 TC3837232.2s Page 12 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation STORES HAZ MAT <1,199GAL,9,999LB,4,799CFDescription: PR0055996Record Id: STORES HAZ MAT <1,199GAL,9,999LB,4,799FT3Prog Element Code: FA0040087Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: GENERATES & RECYCLES WASTE OIL/SOLVENTDescription: PR0055997Record Id: GENERATES and RECYCLES WASTE OIL/SOLVENTProg Element Code: FA0040087Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 303 ft.Site 12 of 14 in cluster A 0.057 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 23 ft. < 1/8S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ENE253 HARRIS N/A A13 San Mateo Co. BI253 INC S113758515 STORES MV FUELS OR WASTE ONLYDescription: PR0038572Record Id: STORES MV FUELS OR WASTE ONLYProg Element Code: FA0026591Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 311 ft.Site 13 of 14 in cluster A 0.059 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 22 ft. < 1/8S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ENE265 HARRIS N/A A14 San Mateo Co. BIO. BALTOR & SONS S113757524 SAN MATEORegion: STORES HAZ MAT <15999GAL, 111999LB, 5599CFDescription: PR0027313Record Id: STORES HAZ MAT <15999GAL, 111999LB, 5599FT^3Prog Element Code: FA0023581Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: GENERATES & RECYCLES WASTE OIL/SOLVENTDescription: PR0040091Record Id: GENERATES and RECYCLES WASTE OIL/SOLVENTProg Element Code: FA0023581Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: ABOVE GROUND TANK/SPCCDescription: PR0036120Record Id: ABOVE GROUND TANK/SPCCProg Element Code: FA0023581Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 313 ft.Site 14 of 14 in cluster A 0.059 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 22 ft. < 1/8S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ENE267-273 HARRIS N/A A15 San Mateo Co. BIFIRST AUTOMOTIVE DISTRIBUTORSS113756953 TC3837232.2s Page 13 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation TANK STOR CAP => 10,000 AND <100,000 GALDescription: PR0067307Record Id: 2354Prog Element Code: FA0023581Facility ID: FIRST AUTOMOTIVE DISTRIBUTORS (Continued)S113756953 1Number Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PRODUCTStg: M.V. FUELTank Use: 4000Capacity: Not reportedActv Date: 41-000-550121-000001Swrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedTank Status: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 550121Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: SWEEPS UST: 331 ft.Site 1 of 14 in cluster B 0.063 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 19 ft. < 1/8S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 SE145 MITCHELL N/A B16 SWEEPS USTBUSINESS S106923680 Stock InventorLeak Detection: Not reportedTank Construction: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00004000Tank Capacity: 1980Year Installed: 1-4000Container Num: 001Tank Num: LOS ANGELES, CA 90067Owner City,St,Zip: 1801 CENTURY PARK EASTOwner Address: AJAX RENT A CAROwner Name: 4158710540Telephone: MICHAEL RAYContact Name: 0001Total Tanks: CAR RENTALOther Type: OtherFacility Type: 00000009532Facility ID: STATERegion: HIST UST: 331 ft.Site 2 of 14 in cluster B 0.063 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 19 ft. < 1/8SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 SE145 MITCHELL AVE N/A B17 HIST USTAJAX RENT A CAR U001594729 TC3837232.2s Page 14 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation UNDERGROUND TANK - GENERALDescription: PR0022652Record Id: UNDERGROUND TANK - GENERALProg Element Code: FA0013656Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 331 ft.Site 3 of 14 in cluster B 0.063 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 19 ft. < 1/8S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 SE145 MITCHELL N/A B18 San Mateo Co. BIEMPTY BUILDING S113755950 InactiveStatus: Not reportedComments: Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: SO. SAN FRANCISCO 94080Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: 1580 TARTANS TRAIL RD.Mailing Address: Not reportedMail To: 8183457517Facility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: Not reportedRegulated ID: UTNKIRegulated By: 41002311Facility ID: CA FID UST: 331 ft.Site 4 of 14 in cluster B 0.063 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 19 ft. < 1/8SO. SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 SE145 MITCHELL N/A B19 CA FID USTBUSINESS S101593897 SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: 015123380APN Number: T0608151779Global ID: 9- Case ClosedFacility Status: 550199Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUST: 361 ft.Site 1 of 4 in cluster C 0.068 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 22 ft. < 1/8S SAN FRANCISCO, CA East162 W HARRIS AVE N/A C20 LUSTTROYER AUTO MATIC DOORS, INC S109117807 TC3837232.2s Page 15 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Open - Verification MonitoringStatus: T0608151779Global Id: 04/10/2008Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0608151779Global Id: 04/03/2008Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608151779Global Id: Status History: Not reportedPhone Number: nkatyl@waterboards.ca.govEmail: OAKLANDCity: 1515 CLAY STREETAddress: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: NANCY KATYLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608151779Global Id: 6503726298Phone Number: jmadden@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: JACOB MADDENContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608151779Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: or any professional interpretations made in the referenced report. does not take responsibility for the accuracy of the statements made Mateo County offices if submitted prior to 2005, San Mateo County Can be extracted from most recent report in Geotracker or at SanSite History: Stoddard solvent / Mineral Spriits / DistillatesPotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: Local AgencyFile Location: 550199LOC Case Number: Not reportedRB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: JMCase Worker: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 07/18/2012Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.401236444712Longitude: 37.6503252108887Latitude: T0608151779Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 361 ft.Site 2 of 4 in cluster C 0.068 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 22 ft. < 1/8SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA East RGA LUST162 WEST HARRIS AVENUE N/A C21 LUSTS109285791 TC3837232.2s Page 16 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Staff Letter - #20090319Action: 03/19/2009Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608151779Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608151779Global Id: Staff Letter - #20080917Action: 09/17/2008Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608151779Global Id: Staff Letter - #20091209Action: 12/09/2009Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608151779Global Id: Staff Letter - #20090930Action: 09/30/2009Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608151779Global Id: Staff Letter - #20090923Action: 09/23/2009Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608151779Global Id: Notification - Fee Title Owners Notice - #20111027Action: 10/27/2011Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608151779Global Id: Preliminary Site Assessment ReportAction: 08/14/2009Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608151779Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608151779Global Id: Staff Letter - #20100608Action: 06/08/2010Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608151779Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 07/18/2012Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608151779Global Id: 08/31/2011Status Date: (Continued)S109285791 TC3837232.2s Page 17 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608151779Global Id: Site Assessment ReportAction: 05/21/2010Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608151779Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 02/28/2010Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608151779Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation WorkplanAction: 02/28/2010Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608151779Global Id: Preliminary Site Assessment WorkplanAction: 01/22/2009Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608151779Global Id: Letter - Notice - #20120724Action: 07/24/2012Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608151779Global Id: Other WorkplanAction: 09/24/2010Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608151779Global Id: Staff Letter - #20090714Action: 07/14/2009Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608151779Global Id: Staff Letter - #20100922Action: 09/22/2010Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608151779Global Id: Notice of Responsibility - #20090303Action: 03/03/2009Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608151779Global Id: Final Remedial Action Report / Corrective Action ReportAction: 01/28/2011Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608151779Global Id: Staff Letter - #20120105Action: 01/05/2012Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608151779Global Id: (Continued)S109285791 TC3837232.2s Page 18 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2008 TROYER AUTOMATIC DOORS, INC 162 WEST HARRIS AVENUE 2009 TROYER AUTOMATIC DOORS, INC 162 WEST HARRIS AVENUE 2010 TROYER AUTOMATIC DOORS, INC 162 WEST HARRIS AVENUE 2011 TROYER AUTOMATIC DOORS, INC 162 WEST HARRIS AVENUE 2012 TROYER AUTOMATIC DOORS, INC 162 WEST HARRIS AVENUE RGA LUST: Well Destruction ReportAction: 06/22/2012Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608151779Global Id: Closure/No Further Action Letter - #20120718Action: 07/18/2012Date: (Continued)S109285791 NoneLeak Detection: Not reportedTank Construction: Not reportedType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00001000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 002Container Num: 002Tank Num: NoneLeak Detection: Not reportedTank Construction: Not reportedType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00001000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 1Container Num: 001Tank Num: ST. PAUL, MN 55108Owner City,St,Zip: 2400 KASOTA AVE.Owner Address: H.B. FULLER CO.Owner Name: 4155884636Telephone: Not reportedContact Name: 0002Total Tanks: WAREHOUSE/DISTRIBUTIOther Type: OtherFacility Type: 00000000188Facility ID: STATERegion: HIST UST: 371 ft.Site 3 of 4 in cluster C 0.070 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 22 ft. < 1/8SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 East164 W HARRIS AVE N/A C22 HIST USTH.B. FULLER CO.U001594784 TC3837232.2s Page 19 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: COSTER FURNITURE REFINISHING, INCOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (415) 589-1559Contact telephone: USContact country: SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 164 W HARRIS AVEContact address: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGERContact: CAD981163124EPA ID: SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 164 W HARRIS AVEFacility address: COSTERS FURNITURE REFINISHING, INCFacility name: 11/15/1985Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 371 ft.Site 4 of 4 in cluster C 0.070 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 22 ft. < 1/8 EMISOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 East FINDS164 W HARRIS AVE CAD981163124 C23 RCRA-SQGCOSTERS FURNITURE REFINISHING, INC1000403615 TC3837232.2s Page 20 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 1Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 1Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: BAY AREA AQMDAir District Name: 7641SIC Code: BAAir District Name: 11513Facility ID: SFAir Basin: 41County Code: 1999Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 1Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 1Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: BAY AREA AQMDAir District Name: 7641SIC Code: BAAir District Name: 11513Facility ID: SFAir Basin: 41County Code: 1998Year: EMI: CRITERIA AND HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANT INVENTORY corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource their precursors, as well as hazardous air pollutants (HAPs). on stationary and mobile sources that emit criteria air pollutants and The NEI (National Emissions Inventory) database contains information Environmental Interest/Information System 110002679450Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: COSTERS FURNITURE REFINISHING, INC (Continued)1000403615 TC3837232.2s Page 21 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2003Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 0Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: BAY AREA AQMDAir District Name: 7641SIC Code: BAAir District Name: 11513Facility ID: SFAir Basin: 41County Code: 2002Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 0Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: BAY AREA AQMDAir District Name: 7641SIC Code: BAAir District Name: 11513Facility ID: SFAir Basin: 41County Code: 2001Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 1Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 1Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: BAY AREA AQMDAir District Name: 7641SIC Code: BAAir District Name: 11513Facility ID: SFAir Basin: 41County Code: 2000Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: COSTERS FURNITURE REFINISHING, INC (Continued)1000403615 TC3837232.2s Page 22 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation BAY AREA AQMDAir District Name: 7641SIC Code: BAAir District Name: 11513Facility ID: SFAir Basin: 41County Code: 2006Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: .3344466Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: .389Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: BAY AREA AQMDAir District Name: 7641SIC Code: BAAir District Name: 11513Facility ID: SFAir Basin: 41County Code: 2005Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0.3344466Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 0.389Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: BAY AREA AQMDAir District Name: 7641SIC Code: BAAir District Name: 11513Facility ID: SFAir Basin: 41County Code: 2004Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 0Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: BAY AREA AQMDAir District Name: 7641SIC Code: BAAir District Name: 11513Facility ID: SFAir Basin: 41County Code: COSTERS FURNITURE REFINISHING, INC (Continued)1000403615 TC3837232.2s Page 23 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0.42743039999999999Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 0.50700000000000001Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: BAY AREA AQMDAir District Name: 7641SIC Code: BAAir District Name: 11513Facility ID: SFAir Basin: 41County Code: 2009Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: .4274304Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: .507Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: BAY AREA AQMDAir District Name: 7641SIC Code: BAAir District Name: 11513Facility ID: SFAir Basin: 41County Code: 2008Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: .4274304Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: .507Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: BAY AREA AQMDAir District Name: 7641SIC Code: BAAir District Name: 11513Facility ID: SFAir Basin: 41County Code: 2007Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: .4274304Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: .507Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: COSTERS FURNITURE REFINISHING, INC (Continued)1000403615 TC3837232.2s Page 24 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0.42743039999999999Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 0.50700000000000001Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: BAY AREA AQMDAir District Name: 7641SIC Code: BAAir District Name: 11513Facility ID: SFAir Basin: 41County Code: 2010Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: COSTERS FURNITURE REFINISHING, INC (Continued)1000403615 SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: JACOB MADDENContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100650Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: Local AgencyFile Location: 550108LOC Case Number: 41-0684RB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: JMCase Worker: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 06/06/1995Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.403355Longitude: 37.6492Latitude: T0608100650Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 41-0684Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 41Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 403 ft.Site 5 of 14 in cluster B 0.076 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 18 ft. < 1/8 RGA LUSTSOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA ESE LUST151 MITCHELL N/A B24 HIST CORTESEBAY BRIDGE HARDWARE SUPPL 1000729935 TC3837232.2s Page 25 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Notice of Responsibility - #1Action: 01/12/1993Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100650Global Id: Pump & Treat (P&T) GroundwaterAction: 01/01/1950Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0608100650Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100650Global Id: Free Product RemovalAction: 01/01/1950Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0608100650Global Id: ExcavationAction: 01/01/1950Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0608100650Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100650Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 06/06/1995Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608100650Global Id: 11/18/1992Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608100650Global Id: Status History: Not reportedPhone Number: nkatyl@waterboards.ca.govEmail: OAKLANDCity: 1515 CLAY STREETAddress: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: NANCY KATYLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100650Global Id: 6503726298Phone Number: jmadden@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: BAY BRIDGE HARDWARE SUPPL (Continued)1000729935 TC3837232.2s Page 26 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1993 HYSTER & YALE MATERIALS 151 MITCHELL AVE 1994 HYSTER & YALE MATERIALS 151 MITCHELL AVE 1995 HYSTER & YALE MATERIALS 151 MITCHELL AVE 1996 HYSTER & YALE MATERIALS 151 MITCHELL AVE 1997 HYSTER & YALE MATERIALS 151 MITCHELL AVE 1998 HYSTER & YALE MATERIALS 151 MITCHELL AVE 2000 BAY BRIDGE HARDWARE SUPPLY 151 MITCHELL AVE 2001 BAY BRIDGE HARDWARE SUPPLY 151 MITCHELL AVE 2002 BAY BRIDGE HARDWARE SUPPLY 151 MITCHELL AVE 2008 BAY BRIDGE HARDWARE SUPPLY 151 MITCHELL 2009 BAY BRIDGE HARDWARE SUPPLY 151 MITCHELL 2010 BAY BRIDGE HARDWARE SUPPLY 151 MITCHELL AVENUE 2011 BAY BRIDGE HARDWARE SUPPLY 151 MITCHELL AVENUE 2012 BAY BRIDGE HARDWARE SUPPLY 151 MITCHELL AVENUE RGA LUST: BAY BRIDGE HARDWARE SUPPL (Continued)1000729935 InactiveStatus: Not reportedComments: Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: SSF 94080Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: 10 HIDDEN VALLEY DRMailing Address: Not reportedMail To: Not reportedFacility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: Not reportedRegulated ID: UTNKIRegulated By: 41000620Facility ID: CA FID UST: 403 ft.Site 6 of 14 in cluster B 0.076 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 18 ft. < 1/8SSF, CA 94080 ESE151 MITCHELL AVE N/A B25 CA FID USTBAY BRIDGE HARDWARE S101593808 Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: OMHow Discovered: 550108Case Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: LUST REG 2: 403 ft.Site 7 of 14 in cluster B 0.076 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 18 ft. < 1/8 RGA LUSTS SAN FRANCISCO, CA ESE SWEEPS UST151 MITCHELL AVE N/A B26 LUSTBAY BRIDGE HARDWARE SUPPLY S104494261 TC3837232.2s Page 27 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 550192Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PRODUCTStg: M.V. FUELTank Use: 750Capacity: Not reportedActv Date: 41-000-550192-000002Swrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedTank Status: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 550192Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: 4Number Of Tanks: Not reportedContent: PRODUCTStg: Not reportedTank Use: 500Capacity: Not reportedActv Date: 41-000-550192-000001Swrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedTank Status: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 550192Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: SWEEPS UST: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: 015123410APN Number: T0608100650Global ID: 9- Case ClosedFacility Status: 550108Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUST: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remediation Action Underway: Not reportedPollution Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedPollution Characterization Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assesment Began: Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: BAY BRIDGE HARDWARE SUPPLY (Continued)S104494261 TC3837232.2s Page 28 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2003 BAY BRIDGE HARDWARE SUPPLY 151 MITCHELL 2005 BAY BRIDGE HARDWARE SUPPLY 151 MITCHELL 2006 BAY BRIDGE HARDWARE SUPPLY 151 MITCHELL 2007 BAY BRIDGE HARDWARE SUPPLY 151 MITCHELL RGA LUST: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: Not reportedContent: PRODUCTStg: UNKNOWNTank Use: 250Capacity: Not reportedActv Date: 41-000-550192-000004Swrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedTank Status: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 550192Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: Not reportedContent: PRODUCTStg: Not reportedTank Use: 350Capacity: Not reportedActv Date: 41-000-550192-000003Swrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedTank Status: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: BAY BRIDGE HARDWARE SUPPLY (Continued)S104494261 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (415) 583-5900Contact telephone: USContact country: S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 151 MITCHELL AVEContact address: PATRICK MCCARTYContact: S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 MITCHELL AVEMailing address: CAD983666900EPA ID: S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 151 MITCHELL AVEFacility address: GODAR AND HOSSENLOPP PRINTING COFacility name: 05/03/1993Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 403 ft.Site 8 of 14 in cluster B 0.076 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 18 ft. < 1/8 EMIS SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ESE HAZNET151 MITCHELL AVE CAD983666900 B27 RCRA-SQGGODAR AND HOSSENLOPP PRINTING CO1000857278 TC3837232.2s Page 29 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 6505835900Telephone: A M HOSSENLOPPContact: CAD983666900Gepaid: 1999Year: San MateoFacility County: .6880Tons: RecyclerDisposal Method: Photochemicals/photoprocessing wasteWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAD003963592TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: SAN FRANCISCO, CA 941246007Mailing City,St,Zip: 15 DORMAN AVEMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 6505835900Telephone: A M HOSSENLOPPContact: CAD983666900Gepaid: 1999Year: HAZNET: No violations foundViolation Status: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 583-5900Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 151 MITCHELL AVEOwner/operator address: A M HOSSENLOPPOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: GODAR AND HOSSENLOPP PRINTING CO (Continued)1000857278 TC3837232.2s Page 30 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation San MateoFacility County: 1.7510Tons: RecyclerDisposal Method: Photochemicals/photoprocessing wasteWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAD003963592TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: SAN FRANCISCO, CA 941246007Mailing City,St,Zip: 15 DORMAN AVEMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 6505835900Telephone: A M HOSSENLOPPContact: CAD983666900Gepaid: 1997Year: San MateoFacility County: 3.5020Tons: RecyclerDisposal Method: Photochemicals/photoprocessing wasteWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAD003963592TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: SAN FRANCISCO, CA 941246007Mailing City,St,Zip: 15 DORMAN AVEMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 6505835900Telephone: A M HOSSENLOPPContact: CAD983666900Gepaid: 1998Year: San MateoFacility County: .1876Tons: Not reportedDisposal Method: Photochemicals/photoprocessing wasteWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAD003963592TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: SAN FRANCISCO, CA 941246007Mailing City,St,Zip: 15 DORMAN AVEMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 6505835900Telephone: A M HOSSENLOPPContact: CAD983666900Gepaid: 1998Year: San MateoFacility County: .1251Tons: Not reportedDisposal Method: Photochemicals/photoprocessing wasteWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAD003963592TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: SAN FRANCISCO, CA 941246007Mailing City,St,Zip: 15 DORMAN AVEMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: GODAR AND HOSSENLOPP PRINTING CO (Continued)1000857278 TC3837232.2s Page 31 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 41County Code: 1998Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 1Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 1Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: BAY AREA AQMDAir District Name: 2752SIC Code: BAAir District Name: 8991Facility ID: SFAir Basin: 41County Code: 1997Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 2Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 2Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: BAY AREA AQMDAir District Name: 2752SIC Code: BAAir District Name: 8991Facility ID: SFAir Basin: 41County Code: 1996Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 3Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 3Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: BAY AREA AQMDAir District Name: 2752SIC Code: BAAir District Name: 8991Facility ID: SFAir Basin: 41County Code: 1995Year: EMI: 8 additional CA_HAZNET: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access GODAR AND HOSSENLOPP PRINTING CO (Continued)1000857278 TC3837232.2s Page 32 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 2Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 2Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: BAY AREA AQMDAir District Name: 2752SIC Code: BAAir District Name: 8991Facility ID: SFAir Basin: 41County Code: 2000Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 2Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 2Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: BAY AREA AQMDAir District Name: 2752SIC Code: BAAir District Name: 8991Facility ID: SFAir Basin: 41County Code: 1999Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 2Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 2Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: BAY AREA AQMDAir District Name: 2752SIC Code: BAAir District Name: 8991Facility ID: SFAir Basin: GODAR AND HOSSENLOPP PRINTING CO (Continued)1000857278 TC3837232.2s Page 33 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation UNDERGROUND TANK - GENERALDescription: PR0022687Record Id: UNDERGROUND TANK - GENERALProg Element Code: FA0012721Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 404 ft.Site 9 of 14 in cluster B 0.077 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 18 ft. < 1/8S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 SE151 MITCHELL N/A B28 San Mateo Co. BIBAY BRIDGE HARDWARE SUPPLY INCS113755842 GENERATES & RECYCLES WASTE OIL/SOLVENTDescription: PR0011761Record Id: GENERATES and RECYCLES WASTE OIL/SOLVENTProg Element Code: FA0014925Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 404 ft.Site 10 of 14 in cluster B 0.077 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 18 ft. < 1/8S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 SE151 MITCHELL N/A B29 San Mateo Co. BIGODAR & HOSSENLOPP S113756074 GENERATES & RECYCLES WASTE OIL/SOLVENTDescription: PR0055299Record Id: GENERATES and RECYCLES WASTE OIL/SOLVENTProg Element Code: FA0039035Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 404 ft.Site 11 of 14 in cluster B 0.077 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 18 ft. < 1/8S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 SE151 MITCHELL N/A B30 San Mateo Co. BIPENTAGON LIGHT S113758491 STORES HAZ MAT <219GAL,1,999LB, 879CFDescription: PR0046223Record Id: STORES HAZ MAT <219GAL,1,999LB, 879FT3Prog Element Code: FA0028091Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: GENERATES & RECYCLES WASTE OIL/SOLVENTDescription: PR0046224Record Id: GENERATES and RECYCLES WASTE OIL/SOLVENTProg Element Code: FA0028091Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 404 ft.Site 12 of 14 in cluster B 0.077 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 18 ft. < 1/8S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 SE151 MITCHELL N/A B31 San Mateo Co. BIESSENCE PRINTING S113757927 TC3837232.2s Page 34 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1992 BUDGET RENT-A-CAR 177 S AIRPORT BLVD RGA LUST: 410 ft.Site 1 of 3 in cluster D 0.078 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 28 ft. < 1/8SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA WSW177 S AIRPORT BLVD N/A D32 RGA LUSTS114206508 Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: BUDGET RENT A CAROwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: Not reportedContact telephone: Not reportedContact country: Not reported Not reportedContact address: Not reportedContact: CAD982038259EPA ID: SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 177 S AIRPORT BLVDFacility address: BUDGET RENT A CARFacility name: 09/01/1996Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: RGA LUST LOS ANGELES CO. HMS SWEEPS UST HIST UST Sacramento Co. CS 410 ft.CA FID USTSite 2 of 3 in cluster D 0.078 mi.LUST Relative: Higher Actual: 28 ft. < 1/8 HIST CORTESESOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 WSW FINDS177 S AIRPORT BLVD CAD982038259 D33 RCRA-SQGBUDGET RENT A CAR 1000234334 TC3837232.2s Page 35 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: OMHow Discovered: 550006Case Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: LUST REG 2: 340934Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 34Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System 110002784719Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: BUDGET RENT A CARFacility name: 09/28/1987Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: BUDGET RENT A CAR (Continued)1000234334 TC3837232.2s Page 36 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation BUDGET RENT A CAR CORPORATIONOwner Name: 4158774452Telephone: PAUL CHRISTENSENContact Name: 0007Total Tanks: CAR RENTAL AGENCYOther Type: OtherFacility Type: 00000052675Facility ID: STATERegion: HIST UST: Not reportedDate Closed: Not reportedCase Closed: Other ground water affectedCase Type: RO0000340Facility Id: 06/09/1994Date Reported: Automotive(motor gasoline and additives)Substance: Not reportedRemedial Action Taken: HMLead Agency: Marcus, B.Lead Staff: Not reportedState Site Number: Sacramento Co. CS: ActiveStatus: Not reportedComments: Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: SO. SAN FRANCISCO 94080Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: P O BOXMailing Address: Not reportedMail To: 4158757540Facility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: Not reportedRegulated ID: UTNKARegulated By: 41000120Facility ID: CA FID UST: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: 015123730APN Number: T0608100087Global ID: 9- Case ClosedFacility Status: 550006Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUST: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remediation Action Underway: Not reportedPollution Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedPollution Characterization Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assesment Began: BUDGET RENT A CAR (Continued)1000234334 TC3837232.2s Page 37 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Visual, Stock InventorLeak Detection: 1/4 inchesTank Construction: DIESELType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00012000Tank Capacity: 1976Year Installed: 6Container Num: 006Tank Num: Visual, Stock InventorLeak Detection: 1/4 inchesTank Construction: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00012000Tank Capacity: 1976Year Installed: 5Container Num: 005Tank Num: Visual, Stock InventorLeak Detection: 1/4 inchesTank Construction: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00012000Tank Capacity: 1976Year Installed: 4Container Num: 004Tank Num: Visual, Stock InventorLeak Detection: 1/4 inchesTank Construction: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00012000Tank Capacity: 1976Year Installed: 3Container Num: 003Tank Num: Visual, Stock InventorLeak Detection: 1/4 inchesTank Construction: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00012000Tank Capacity: 1976Year Installed: 2Container Num: 002Tank Num: Visual, Stock InventorLeak Detection: 1/4 inchesTank Construction: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00012000Tank Capacity: 1976Year Installed: 1Container Num: 001Tank Num: CHICAGO, IL 60601Owner City,St,Zip: 200 NO. MICHIGAN AVE.Owner Address: BUDGET RENT A CAR (Continued)1000234334 TC3837232.2s Page 38 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation M.V. FUELTank Use: 12000Capacity: Not reportedActv Date: 41-000-550061-000003Swrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedTank Status: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 550061Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PRODUCTStg: M.V. FUELTank Use: 12000Capacity: Not reportedActv Date: 41-000-550061-000002Swrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedTank Status: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 550061Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: 10Number Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PRODUCTStg: M.V. FUELTank Use: 12000Capacity: Not reportedActv Date: 41-000-550061-000001Swrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedTank Status: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 550061Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: SWEEPS UST: Visual, Stock InventorLeak Detection: 1/4 inchesTank Construction: WASTE OILType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00000500Tank Capacity: 1976Year Installed: ZONE 7Container Num: 007Tank Num: BUDGET RENT A CAR (Continued)1000234334 TC3837232.2s Page 39 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 550061Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: DIESELContent: PRODUCTStg: M.V. FUELTank Use: 12000Capacity: Not reportedActv Date: 41-000-550061-000006Swrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedTank Status: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 550061Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PRODUCTStg: M.V. FUELTank Use: 12000Capacity: Not reportedActv Date: 41-000-550061-000005Swrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedTank Status: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 550061Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PRODUCTStg: M.V. FUELTank Use: 12000Capacity: Not reportedActv Date: 41-000-550061-000004Swrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedTank Status: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 550061Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PRODUCTStg: BUDGET RENT A CAR (Continued)1000234334 TC3837232.2s Page 40 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedTank Status: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 550061Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: PREMIUM UNLEContent: PRODUCTStg: UNKNOWNTank Use: 12000Capacity: Not reportedActv Date: 41-000-550061-000009Swrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedTank Status: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 550061Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PRODUCTStg: M.V. FUELTank Use: 12000Capacity: Not reportedActv Date: 41-000-550061-000008Swrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedTank Status: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 550061Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: OTHERContent: PRODUCTStg: OILTank Use: 550Capacity: Not reportedActv Date: 41-000-550061-000007Swrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedTank Status: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: BUDGET RENT A CAR (Continued)1000234334 TC3837232.2s Page 41 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2003 BUDGET RENT-A-CAR 177 AIRPORT 2005 BUDGET RENT-A-CAR 177 AIRPORT 2006 BUDGET RENT-A-CAR 177 AIRPORT 2007 BUDGET RENT-A-CAR 177 AIRPORT RGA LUST: RemovedPermit Status: 000078619Permit Number: 7AArea: RemovedFacility Status: T0Facility Type: 016270-021369Facility Id: LARegion: LOS ANGELES CO. HMS: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: DIESELContent: PRODUCTStg: UNKNOWNTank Use: 12000Capacity: Not reportedActv Date: 41-000-550061-000010Swrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: BUDGET RENT A CAR (Continued)1000234334 Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: Local AgencyFile Location: 550006LOC Case Number: 41-0092RB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: JMCase Worker: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 09/13/2002Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.405387Longitude: 37.650802Latitude: T0608100087Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 41-0092Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 41Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 410 ft.Site 3 of 3 in cluster D 0.078 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 28 ft. < 1/8 RGA LUSTSOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 WSW LUST177 SOUTH AIRPORT BOULEVARD N/A D34 HIST CORTESEBUDGET RENT-A-CAR S110060396 TC3837232.2s Page 42 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2009 BUDGET RENT-A-CAR 177 SOUTH AIRPORT BOULEVARD 2010 BUDGET RENT-A-CAR 177 SOUTH AIRPORT BOULEVARD 2011 BUDGET RENT-A-CAR 177 SOUTH AIRPORT BOULEVARD 2012 BUDGET RENT-A-CAR 177 SOUTH AIRPORT BOULEVARD RGA LUST: Notice of Responsibility - #1Action: 09/22/1992Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100087Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100087Global Id: ExcavationAction: 01/01/1950Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0608100087Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100087Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 09/13/2002Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608100087Global Id: 01/22/1987Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608100087Global Id: Status History: Not reportedPhone Number: nkatyl@waterboards.ca.govEmail: OAKLANDCity: 1515 CLAY STREETAddress: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: NANCY KATYLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100087Global Id: 6503726298Phone Number: jmadden@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: JACOB MADDENContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100087Global Id: Contact: BUDGET RENT-A-CAR (Continued)S110060396 TC3837232.2s Page 43 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2008 BUDGET RENT-A-CAR 177 SOUTH AIRPORT BOULEVARD BUDGET RENT-A-CAR (Continued)S110060396 UNDERGROUND TANK - GENERALDescription: PR0028247Record Id: UNDERGROUND TANK - GENERALProg Element Code: FA0024001Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: STORES HAZ MAT <1,199GAL,9,999LB,4,799CFDescription: PR0029285Record Id: STORES HAZ MAT <1,199GAL,9,999LB,4,799FT3Prog Element Code: FA0024001Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: GENERATES & RECYCLES WASTE OIL/SOLVENTDescription: PR0039675Record Id: GENERATES and RECYCLES WASTE OIL/SOLVENTProg Element Code: FA0024001Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 468 ft.Site 1 of 5 in cluster E 0.089 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 21 ft. < 1/8S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 NNE176 GATEWAY N/A E35 San Mateo Co. BIFLYERS #219 S113757049 STORES HAZ MAT <219GAL,1,999LB, 879CFDescription: PR0053731Record Id: STORES HAZ MAT <219GAL,1,999LB, 879FT3Prog Element Code: FA0036755Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 468 ft.Site 2 of 5 in cluster E 0.089 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 21 ft. < 1/8S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 NNE176 GATEWAY N/A E36 San Mateo Co. BIG & S TRUCK WASH S113758368 STORES HAZ MAT <219GAL,1,999LB, 879CFDescription: PR0056349Record Id: STORES HAZ MAT <219GAL,1,999LB, 879FT3Prog Element Code: FA0040316Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 468 ft.Site 3 of 5 in cluster E 0.089 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 21 ft. < 1/8S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 NNE176 GATEWAY N/A E37 San Mateo Co. BIMG TRUCK WASH S113758538 TC3837232.2s Page 44 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation T0608149730Global Id: 08/20/2003Status Date: Open - Verification MonitoringStatus: T0608149730Global Id: 06/28/2002Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0608149730Global Id: 06/28/2002Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608149730Global Id: Status History: Not reportedPhone Number: nkatyl@waterboards.ca.govEmail: OAKLANDCity: 1515 CLAY STREETAddress: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: NANCY KATYLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608149730Global Id: 6503726298Phone Number: jmadden@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: JACOB MADDENContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608149730Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: DieselPotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: Local Agency WarehouseFile Location: 550174LOC Case Number: Not reportedRB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: JMCase Worker: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 02/26/2004Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.401976Longitude: 37.65248Latitude: T0608149730Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 468 ft.Site 4 of 5 in cluster E 0.089 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 21 ft. < 1/8S SAN FRANCISCO, CA NNE RGA LUST176 GATEWAY BLVD N/A E38 LUSTOLYMPIAN GATEWAY S106117989 TC3837232.2s Page 45 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: OMHow Discovered: 550174Case Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: LUST REG 2: Leak DiscoveryAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608149730Global Id: Electronic Reporting Submittal DueAction: 10/29/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608149730Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation ReportAction: 06/18/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608149730Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608149730Global Id: Staff Letter - #20021218Action: 12/18/2002Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608149730Global Id: Notice of Responsibility - #1Action: 07/17/2002Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608149730Global Id: Staff Letter - #20030820Action: 08/20/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608149730Global Id: Closure/No Further Action Letter - #20040226Action: 02/26/2004Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608149730Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 02/26/2004Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: OLYMPIAN GATEWAY (Continued)S106117989 TC3837232.2s Page 46 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2005 OLYMPIAN GATEWAY 176 GATEWAY 2006 OLYMPIAN GATEWAY 176 GATEWAY 2007 OLYMPIAN GATEWAY 176 GATEWAY 2008 OLYMPIAN GATEWAY 176 GATEWAY 2009 OLYMPIAN GATEWAY 176 GATEWAY 2010 OLYMPIAN GATEWAY 176 GATEWAY 2011 OLYMPIAN GATEWAY 176 GATEWAY 2012 OLYMPIAN GATEWAY 176 GATEWAY RGA LUST: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: 015031230APN Number: T0608149730Global ID: 9- Case ClosedFacility Status: 550174Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUST: 8/20/2003Date Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remediation Action Underway: Not reportedPollution Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedPollution Characterization Began: 1/1/1965Preliminary Site Assesment Began: OLYMPIAN GATEWAY (Continued)S106117989 2003 GATEWAY TEXACO 176 GATEWAY BOULEVARD RGA LUST: 468 ft.Site 5 of 5 in cluster E 0.089 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 21 ft. < 1/8SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA NNE176 GATEWAY BOULEVARD N/A E39 RGA LUSTS114206397 STORES MV FUELS OR WASTE ONLYDescription: PR0046212Record Id: STORES MV FUELS OR WASTE ONLYProg Element Code: FA0028086Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: GENERATES & RECYCLES WASTE OIL/SOLVENTDescription: PR0046213Record Id: GENERATES and RECYCLES WASTE OIL/SOLVENTProg Element Code: FA0028086Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 553 ft.Site 13 of 14 in cluster B 0.105 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 17 ft. < 1/8S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 SE165 MITCHELL N/A B40 San Mateo Co. BIWEST COAST POWDER COATING S113757925 TC3837232.2s Page 47 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation GENERATES <27 GAL/YEARDescription: PR0046215Record Id: GENERATES <27 GAL/YEARProg Element Code: FA0028087Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 553 ft.Site 14 of 14 in cluster B 0.105 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 17 ft. < 1/8S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 SE165A MITCHELL N/A B41 San Mateo Co. BIKUSTOM CULTURE CYCLES S113757926 2006 KB SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 175 SYLVESTER ROAD RGA LUST: 625 ft.Site 1 of 13 in cluster F 0.118 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 28 ft. < 1/8SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA NNW175 SYLVESTER ROAD N/A F42 RGA LUSTS114206269 UNDERGROUND TANK - GENERALDescription: PR0052134Record Id: UNDERGROUND TANK - GENERALProg Element Code: FA0033245Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 625 ft.Site 2 of 13 in cluster F 0.118 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 28 ft. < 1/8S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 NNW175 SYLVESTER N/A F43 San Mateo Co. BIUST SITE S113758282 DieselPotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: Local AgencyFile Location: 550193LOC Case Number: Not reportedRB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: JMCase Worker: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 03/11/2010Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.403928041458Longitude: 37.6526611871329Latitude: T0608128052Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 625 ft.Site 3 of 13 in cluster F 0.118 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 28 ft. < 1/8SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 NNW RGA LUST175 SYLVESTER N/A F44 LUSTKB SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO S109285831 TC3837232.2s Page 48 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation T0608128052Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608128052Global Id: Other (Use Description Field)Action: 01/01/1950Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0608128052Global Id: Other Report / DocumentAction: 10/24/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608128052Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 03/11/2010Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608128052Global Id: 03/03/2010Status Date: Open - Verification MonitoringStatus: T0608128052Global Id: 08/16/2006Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0608128052Global Id: 07/31/2006Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608128052Global Id: Status History: Not reportedPhone Number: nkatyl@waterboards.ca.govEmail: OAKLANDCity: 1515 CLAY STREETAddress: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: NANCY KATYLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608128052Global Id: 6503726298Phone Number: jmadden@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: JACOB MADDENContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608128052Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: KB SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO (Continued)S109285831 TC3837232.2s Page 49 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 08/29/2006Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608128052Global Id: Notice of Violation - #20070215Action: 02/15/2007Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608128052Global Id: Staff Letter - #20070912Action: 09/12/2007Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608128052Global Id: Notice of Responsibility - #20060831Action: 08/31/2006Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608128052Global Id: Well Destruction ReportAction: 02/25/2010Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608128052Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation ReportAction: 10/21/2008Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608128052Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation WorkplanAction: 12/15/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608128052Global Id: Staff Letter - #20090716Action: 07/15/2009Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608128052Global Id: Tank Removal Report / UST Sampling ReportAction: 12/19/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608128052Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608128052Global Id: Staff Letter - #20100108Action: 01/08/2010Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608128052Global Id: Staff Letter - #20090930Action: 09/30/2009Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: KB SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO (Continued)S109285831 TC3837232.2s Page 50 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2010 KB SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 175 SYLVESTER 2011 KB SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 175 SYLVESTER 2012 KB SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 175 SYLVESTER RGA LUST: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: 015-031-080APN Number: T0608128052Global ID: 9- Case ClosedFacility Status: 550193Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUST: Tank Removal Report / UST Sampling ReportAction: 02/15/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608128052Global Id: Electronic Reporting Submittal DueAction: 10/12/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608128052Global Id: Closure/No Further Action Letter - #20100310Action: 03/10/2010Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608128052Global Id: Staff Letter - #20090415Action: 04/15/2009Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608128052Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 07/15/2009Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608128052Global Id: Staff Letter - #20060919Action: 09/19/2006Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608128052Global Id: Staff Letter - #20070912Action: 09/12/2007Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608128052Global Id: Staff Letter - #20080603Action: 06/03/2008Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608128052Global Id: Staff Letter - #20060829Action: KB SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO (Continued)S109285831 TC3837232.2s Page 51 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2007 KB SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 175 SYLVESTER 2008 KB SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 175 SYLVESTER 2009 KB SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 175 SYLVESTER KB SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO (Continued)S109285831 STORES HAZ MAT <219GAL,1,999LB, 879CFDescription: PR0052310Record Id: STORES HAZ MAT <219GAL,1,999LB, 879FT3Prog Element Code: FA0033407Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: LESS THAN 500 TIRESDescription: PR0052309Record Id: LESS THAN 500 TIRESProg Element Code: FA0033407Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: GENERATES <27 GAL/YEARDescription: PR0052311Record Id: GENERATES <27 GAL/YEARProg Element Code: FA0033407Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 625 ft.Site 4 of 13 in cluster F 0.118 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 28 ft. < 1/8S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 NNW175 SYLVESTER N/A F45 San Mateo Co. BIFORREST FAULKNOR & SONS S113758301 STORES HAZ MAT <219GAL,1,999LB, 879CFDescription: PR0051856Record Id: STORES HAZ MAT <219GAL,1,999LB, 879FT3Prog Element Code: FA0032089Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: GENERATES <27 GAL/YEARDescription: PR0056219Record Id: GENERATES <27 GAL/YEARProg Element Code: FA0032089Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 629 ft.Site 5 of 13 in cluster F 0.119 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 28 ft. < 1/8S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 NNW180 SYLVESTER N/A F46 San Mateo Co. BIWR PRODUCTS S113758267 TC3837232.2s Page 52 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation PrimaryPlanning Status: Responsible PartyPrimary Responsibility: SITEWIDEOperable Unit: Cleaned upPriority Level: 09/17/12Date Completed: 09/17/12Date Started: POTENTIALLY RESPONSIBLE PARTY EMERGENCY REMOVALAction: 001Action Code: CERCLIS Assessment History: Not reportedSite Description: Not reportedAlias Comments: Not reportedContact Email: On-Scene Coordinator (OSC)Contact Title: Not reportedContact Tel: Not reportedContact Name: 9270825.00000Contact ID: CERCLIS Site Contact Name(s): Not reportedSite FUDS Flag: Not reportedAlias EPA ID: Not reportedCC Concurrence FY: / /CC Concurrence Date: 06081Site Fips Code: 10/05/12Non NPL Status Date: Removal Only Site (No Site Assessment Work Needed)Non NPL Status: Not reportedRResp Fed Agency Code: Not reportedRBRAC Code: Not reportedDMNSN Unit Code: Not on the NPLNPL Status: Not reportedSite Settings Code: AbandonedClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedRST Code: Not reportedParent ID: Not reportedNFRAP Flag: RSite Init By Prog: Not reportedUSGS Quadrangle: Not reportedRCRA ID: Not reportedSite Orphan Flag: 0.00000DMNSN Number: Not a Federal FacilityFederal Facility: Not reportedUSGC Hydro Unit: Not reportedSMSA Number: Not reportedIFMS ID: Not reportedCongressional District: NEW ENGLAND LOBSTERShort Name: SAN MATEOFacility County: CAN000909504EPA ID: 0909504Site ID: CERCLIS: 652 ft. 0.123 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 17 ft. < 1/8SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ESE191 MITCHELL AVE CAN000909504 47 CERCLISNEW ENGLAND LOBSTER 1015730694 TC3837232.2s Page 53 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedAction Anomaly: EmergencyUrgency Indicator: NEW ENGLAND LOBSTER (Continued)1015730694 STORES MV FUELS OR WASTE ONLYDescription: PR0004307Record Id: STORES MV FUELS OR WASTE ONLYProg Element Code: FA0017798Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: GENERATES <27 GAL/YEARDescription: PR0043973Record Id: GENERATES <27 GAL/YEARProg Element Code: FA0017798Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 707 ft.Site 6 of 13 in cluster F 0.134 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 28 ft. 1/8-1/4S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 NNW160-180 SYLVESTER N/A F48 San Mateo Co. BIALAN BAKER CO INC S113756534 UNDERGROUND TANK - GENERALDescription: PR0022579Record Id: UNDERGROUND TANK - GENERALProg Element Code: FA0017675Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 707 ft.Site 7 of 13 in cluster F 0.134 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 28 ft. 1/8-1/4S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 NNW160 SYLVESTER N/A F49 San Mateo Co. BIALAN BAKER CO INC S113756447 LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.404987514019Longitude: 37.6528098376798Latitude: T0608100012Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 41-0012Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 41Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 707 ft.Site 8 of 13 in cluster F 0.134 mi.WDS Relative: Higher Actual: 28 ft. 1/8-1/4 RGA LUSTSOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94083 NNW LUST160 SYLVESTER RD N/A F50 HIST CORTESEALAN BAKER COMPANY S100234227 TC3837232.2s Page 54 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Notice of Responsibility - #1Action: 04/09/1992Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100012Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100012Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100012Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 10/25/2000Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608100012Global Id: 11/20/1989Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608100012Global Id: Status History: Not reportedPhone Number: nkatyl@waterboards.ca.govEmail: OAKLANDCity: 1515 CLAY STREETAddress: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: NANCY KATYLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100012Global Id: 6503726298Phone Number: jmadden@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: JACOB MADDENContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100012Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: Local Agency WarehouseFile Location: 550059LOC Case Number: 41-0012RB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: JMCase Worker: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 10/25/2000Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: ALAN BAKER COMPANY (Continued)S100234227 TC3837232.2s Page 55 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSIC Code 2: 0SIC Code: Not reportedAgency Type: Not reportedAgency Telephone: Not reportedAgency Contact: 0Agency City,St,Zip: Not reportedAgency Address: ALAN BAKER COMPANYAgency Name: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedFacility Telephone: 2Subregion: are assigned by the Regional Board CAS000001 The 1st 2 characters designate the state. The remaining 7NPDES Number: under Waste Discharge Requirements. Active - Any facility with a continuous or seasonal discharge that isFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Type: San Francisco Bay 41I010715Facility ID: CA WDS: 2003 ALLAN BAKER COMPANY 160 SYLVESTER 2005 ALLAN BAKER COMPANY 160 SYLVESTER 2006 ALLAN BAKER COMPANY 160 SYLVESTER 2007 ALLAN BAKER COMPANY 160 SYLVESTER 2008 ALLAN BAKER COMPANY 160 SYLVESTER 2009 ALLAN BAKER COMPANY 160 SYLVESTER ROAD 2010 ALLAN BAKER COMPANY 160 SYLVESTER ROAD 2011 ALLAN BAKER COMPANY 160 SYLVESTER ROAD 2012 ALLAN BAKER COMPANY 160 SYLVESTER ROAD RGA LUST: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: 015031150APN Number: T0608100012Global ID: 9- Case ClosedFacility Status: 550059Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUST: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remediation Action Underway: Not reportedPollution Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedPollution Characterization Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assesment Began: Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: OMHow Discovered: 550059Case Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: LUST REG 2: ALAN BAKER COMPANY (Continued)S100234227 TC3837232.2s Page 56 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation dairy waste ponds. dischargers having waste storage systems with land disposal such as disposal systems, such as septic systems with subsurface disposal, or management practices, facilities with passive waste treatment and cooling water dischargers or thosewho must comply through best Category C - Facilities having no waste treatment systems, such asComplexity: represent no threat to water quality. Level. A Zero (0) may be used to code those NURDS that are found to considered a minor threat to water quality unless coded at a higher to a major or minor threat. Not: All nurds without a TTWQ will be should cause a relatively minor impairment of beneficial uses compared Minor Threat to Water Quality. A violation of a regional board orderTreat To Water: Not reportedPOTW: Not reportedReclamation: 0Baseline Flow: 0Design Flow: Not reportedSecondary Waste Type: Not reportedSecondary Waste: Not reportedPrimary Waste Type: Not reportedPrimary Waste: ALAN BAKER COMPANY (Continued)S100234227 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: 100 kg of that material at any time hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting kg of acutely hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1 waste during any calendar month; or generates 1 kg or less of acutely cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely hazardous residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from the during any calendar month; or generates more than 100 kg of any calendar month; or generates more than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste Handler: generates 1,000 kg or more of hazardous waste during anyDescription: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: PrivateLand type: 09EPA Region: MARK@ALANBAKER.COMContact email: (650) 589-5515Contact telephone: Not reportedContact country: Not reported Not reportedContact address: MARK BAKERContact: CAD980895858EPA ID: SO SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 160 SYLVESTER ROADFacility address: ALAN BAKER CO. INC.Facility name: 06/16/2008Date form received by agency: RCRA-LQG: 707 ft.Site 9 of 13 in cluster F 0.134 mi.HIST UST Relative: Higher Actual: 28 ft. 1/8-1/4 CA FID USTSOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA NNW FINDS160 170 180 SYLVESTER RD CAD980895858 F51 RCRA-LQGALAN BAKER CO INC 1000304145 TC3837232.2s Page 57 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 09/01/1992Owner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: Not reported Not reportedOwner/operator address: MARK BAKEROwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 06/21/2007Owner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: SO SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 160 SYLVESTER ROADOwner/operator address: NORMA BAKEROwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: ALAN BAKER CO INC (Continued)1000304145 TC3837232.2s Page 58 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource facilities. generators, transporters, and treatment, storage, and disposal provides California with information on hazardous waste shipments for California Hazardous Waste Tracking System - Datamart (HWTS-DATAMART) Environmental Interest/Information System 110002676925Registry ID: FINDS: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 01/29/1986Evaluation date: Evaluation Action Summary: No violations foundViolation Status: DISPOSED, THE WASTE WOULD BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. THESE CAUSTIC OR ACID SOLUTIONS BECOME CONTAMINATED AND MUST BE USED BY MANY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN METAL PARTS PRIOR TO PAINTING. WHEN OR DEGREASE PARTS. HYDROCHLORIC ACID, A SOLUTION WITH A LOW PH, IS CAUSTIC SOLUTION WITH A HIGH PH, IS OFTEN USED BY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN CONSIDERED TO BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. SODIUM HYDROXIDE, A A WASTE WHICH HAS A PH OF LESS THAN 2 OR GREATER THAN 12.5 ISWaste name: D002Waste code: WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OFWaste name: D001Waste code: Hazardous Waste Summary: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: ALAN BAKER CO INCSite name: ALAN BAKER CO. INC.Facility name: 12/21/1984Date form received by agency: Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: ALAN BAKER CO INCSite name: ALAN BAKER CO. INC.Facility name: 09/01/1996Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: ALAN BAKER CO INC (Continued)1000304145 TC3837232.2s Page 59 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation None, 10Leak Detection: 4 inchesTank Construction: Not reportedType of Fuel: WASTETank Used for: 00000150Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 2Container Num: 002Tank Num: VisualLeak Detection: Not reportedTank Construction: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00000550Tank Capacity: 1966Year Installed: 1Container Num: 001Tank Num: SO. SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080Owner City,St,Zip: 160 SYLVESTER RDOwner Address: ALAN BAKER CO.Owner Name: 4155895515Telephone: ALAN BAKERContact Name: 0002Total Tanks: WHOLESALE DISTRIBUTOOther Type: OtherFacility Type: 00000053606Facility ID: STATERegion: HIST UST: ActiveStatus: Not reportedComments: Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: SO. SAN FRANCISCO 94080Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: P O BOXMailing Address: Not reportedMail To: 4150000000Facility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: Not reportedRegulated ID: UTNKARegulated By: 41004911Facility ID: CA FID UST: HAZARDOUS WASTE BIENNIAL REPORTER ALAN BAKER CO INC (Continued)1000304145 TC3837232.2s Page 60 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1992 ALLAN BAKER COMPANY 160 SYLVESTER RD 1993 ALLAN BAKER COMPANY 160 SYLVESTER RD 1994 ALLAN BAKER COMPANY 160 SYLVESTER RD 1995 ALLAN BAKER COMPANY 160 SYLVESTER RD 1996 ALLAN BAKER COMPANY 160 SYLVESTER RD 1997 ALLAN BAKER COMPANY 160 SYLVESTER RD 1998 ALLAN BAKER COMPANY 160 SYLVESTER RD 2000 ALLAN BAKER COMPANY 160 SYLVESTER RD 2002 ALLAN BAKER COMPANY 160 SYLVESTER RD RGA LUST: 707 ft.Site 10 of 13 in cluster F 0.134 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 28 ft. 1/8-1/4SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA NNW160 SYLVESTER RD N/A F52 RGA LUSTS114203800 0Number Of Tanks: Not reportedContent: Not reportedStg: Not reportedTank Use: Not reportedCapacity: Not reportedActv Date: Not reportedSwrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedTank Status: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 550006Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: SWEEPS UST: 707 ft.Site 11 of 13 in cluster F 0.134 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 28 ft. 1/8-1/4S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 NNW160 - 180 SYLVESTER RD N/A F53 SWEEPS USTALAN BAKER COMPANY INC S106922504 SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: MMCase Worker: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 08/29/2006Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.405886054039Longitude: 37.6478744804683Latitude: T0608153743Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 736 ft.Site 1 of 6 in cluster G 0.139 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 24 ft. 1/8-1/4SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 SSW RGA LUST248 SOUTH AIRPORT BOULEVARD N/A G54 LUSTSHELL SERVICE STATION S106499141 TC3837232.2s Page 61 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Closure/No Further Action Letter - #20110509Action: 05/09/2011Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608153743Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 08/29/2006Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0608153743Global Id: 08/29/2006Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608153743Global Id: 02/01/2005Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0608153743Global Id: 12/06/2004Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0608153743Global Id: 07/26/2004Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608153743Global Id: Status History: Not reportedPhone Number: nkatyl@waterboards.ca.govEmail: OAKLANDCity: 1515 CLAY STREETAddress: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: NANCY KATYLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608153743Global Id: 6503726289Phone Number: mmullaney@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: MARC MULLANEYContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608153743Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: or any professional interpretations made in the referenced report. does not take responsibility for the accuracy of the statements made Mateo County offices if submitted prior to 2005, San Mateo County Can be extracted from most recent report in Geotracker or at SanSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: Local AgencyFile Location: 550186LOC Case Number: Not reportedRB Case Number: SHELL SERVICE STATION (Continued)S106499141 TC3837232.2s Page 62 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0608153743Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation ReportAction: 01/10/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608153743Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation WorkplanAction: 08/30/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608153743Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 02/15/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608153743Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 02/15/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608153743Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 11/15/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608153743Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 11/15/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608153743Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 08/15/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608153743Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 08/15/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608153743Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 05/15/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608153743Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 05/15/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608153743Global Id: Preliminary Site Assessment WorkplanAction: 02/02/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608153743Global Id: SHELL SERVICE STATION (Continued)S106499141 TC3837232.2s Page 63 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 05/15/2009Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608153743Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 08/15/2009Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608153743Global Id: Monitoring Report - Semi-AnnuallyAction: 02/15/2010Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608153743Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 12/15/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608153743Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608153743Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 08/15/2008Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608153743Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation WorkplanAction: 04/15/2009Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608153743Global Id: Staff Letter - #20081120Action: 11/20/2008Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608153743Global Id: Staff Letter - #20090702Action: 07/02/2009Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608153743Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 11/15/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608153743Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608153743Global Id: ExcavationAction: 01/01/1950Date: SHELL SERVICE STATION (Continued)S106499141 TC3837232.2s Page 64 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2008 SHELL SERVICE STATION 248 SOUTH AIRPORT BOULEVARD 2009 SHELL SERVICE STATION 248 SOUTH AIRPORT BOULEVARD 2010 SHELL SERVICE STATION 248 SOUTH AIRPORT BOULEVARD 2011 SHELL SERVICE STATION 248 SOUTH AIRPORT BOULEVARD 2012 SHELL SERVICE STATION 248 SOUTH AIRPORT BOULEVARD RGA LUST: Staff Letter - #2006/0705Action: 07/05/2006Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608153743Global Id: Staff Letter - #20060912Action: 09/12/2006Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608153743Global Id: Notice of Responsibility - #20041202Action: 12/02/2004Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608153743Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 02/15/2009Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608153743Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 05/15/2008Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608153743Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 11/15/2008Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608153743Global Id: Staff Letter - #20101006Action: 10/06/2010Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608153743Global Id: Leak StoppedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608153743Global Id: SHELL SERVICE STATION (Continued)S106499141 TC3837232.2s Page 65 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 07/01/2002Owner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: AUBURN, CA 95602 2349 RICKENBACKER WAYOwner/operator address: NELLA OIL COMPANYOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 07/01/2002Owner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: Not reported Not reportedOwner/operator address: NELLA OIL COMPANY, LLCOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from time: 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste; or 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates at any from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting land or water, of acutely hazardous waste; or generates 100 kg or less other debris resulting from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any waste; or 100 kg or less of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or month, and accumulates at any time: 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous or generates 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste per calendar month, and accumulates 1000 kg or less of hazardous waste at any time; Handler: generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste per calendarDescription: Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: BARBARAW@NELLAOIL.COMContact email: 3059Telephone ext.: (530) 885-0401Contact telephone: Not reportedContact country: Not reported Not reportedContact address: BARBARA M WOZNIAKContact: AUBURN, CA 95602 2349 RICKENBACKER WAYMailing address: CAL000261545EPA ID: SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 176 GATEWAY BOULEVARDFacility address: NELLA OIL #219 TEXACOFacility name: 03/22/2004Date form received by agency: RCRA-CESQG: 737 ft. 0.140 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 13 ft. 1/8-1/4SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 NE176 GATEWAY BOULEVARD CAL000261545 55 RCRA-CESQGNELLA OIL #219 TEXACO 1008194677 TC3837232.2s Page 66 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No violations foundViolation Status: WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OFWaste name: D001Waste code: Hazardous Waste Summary: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: YesTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: NELLA OIL #219 TEXACO (Continued)1008194677 STORES HAZ MAT <3,499GAL,27,999LB,13,999CFDescription: PR0043962Record Id: STORES HAZ MAT <3,499GAL,27,999LB,13,999FT3Prog Element Code: FA0013150Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: STORES HAZ MAT <1,199GAL,9,999LB,4,799CFDescription: PR0004558Record Id: STORES HAZ MAT <1,199GAL,9,999LB,4,799FT3Prog Element Code: FA0013150Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: GENERATES <27 GAL/YEARDescription: PR0043961Record Id: GENERATES <27 GAL/YEARProg Element Code: FA0013150Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 746 ft.Site 12 of 13 in cluster F 0.141 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 28 ft. 1/8-1/4S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 NNW145 SYLVESTER N/A F56 San Mateo Co. BIBP GLOBAL SPECIAL PRODUCTS INCS113755912 TC3837232.2s Page 67 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation STORES HAZ MAT <219GAL,1,999LB, 879CFDescription: PR0051860Record Id: STORES HAZ MAT <219GAL,1,999LB, 879FT3Prog Element Code: FA0032197Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 746 ft.Site 13 of 13 in cluster F 0.141 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 28 ft. 1/8-1/4S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 NNW145 SYLVESTER N/A F57 San Mateo Co. BIMINA PRODUCTS S113758268 SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: 015124160APN Number: T0608100411Global ID: 9- Case ClosedFacility Status: 550045Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUST: 814 ft.Site 2 of 6 in cluster G 0.154 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 23 ft. 1/8-1/4S SAN FRANCISCO, CA SSW255 S AIRPORT BLVD N/A G58 LUSTCOLOR CRAFT S105073392 UNDERGROUND TANK - GENERALDescription: PR0026644Record Id: UNDERGROUND TANK - GENERALProg Element Code: FA0023210Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 828 ft.Site 1 of 3 in cluster H 0.157 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 28 ft. 1/8-1/4S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 NW103 ASSOCIATED N/A H59 San Mateo Co. BISAN FRANCISCO SPICE CO S113756917 1Owner Tank Id: ATank Status: 05-10-91Created Date: 02-03-94Action Date: 02-03-94Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 9Number: 550181Comp Number: ActiveStatus: SWEEPS UST: 828 ft.Site 2 of 3 in cluster H 0.157 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 28 ft. 1/8-1/4S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 NW103 ASSOCIATED RD N/A H60 SWEEPS USTSAN FRANCISCO SPICE CO., INC S106931798 TC3837232.2s Page 68 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1Number Of Tanks: LEADEDContent: PStg: M.V. FUELTank Use: 2000Capacity: 05-10-91Actv Date: 41-000-550181-000001Swrcb Tank Id: SAN FRANCISCO SPICE CO., INC (Continued)S106931798 buildings. Both buildings are predominantly used for warehouse respectively, both of which are developed with warehouse-type consists of two land parcels at 160 and 180 Sylvester Road, Associated Road and 160 Sylvester Road). The Alan Baker property warehouse transfer operations between neighboring sites (105 currently used for the parking and storage of trailers, as well as to a private individual for equipment storage. The Parcel is Parcel. Mr. Patel later leased the Parcel in approximately 2004-2005 site personnel stated that the company also washed buses at the 1997 through 201 for vehicle parking. A prior report and adjacent Tours, a charter bus company, leased the Parcel from approximately is accessed), west of the intersection with Sylvester Road. S&S of approximately 30 feet along Associated Road (from which the Parcel No street address is linked to the Parcel; street frontage consists asphalt-paved area islocated at the entrance located at the south). currently vacant and undeveloped, and is generally unpaved (a small below. The Associated Road parcel (approximately 1.02 acres) is Road. Development and known historical uses of the site are discussed Associated Road Parcel, the Alan Baker property, and 105 Associated Avenue. The site consists of approximately 3 acres, divided into the south-southwest of the intersection of Sylvester Road and East Grand San Francisco and Highway 101, and approximately 400 feet area of South San Francisco on Point San Bruno east of downtown South referenced report. The site is located in a commercial and industrial statements made or any professional interpretations made in the County does not take responsibility for the accuracy of the Report and May 21, 2010 Work Plan for Vapor Intrusion, San Mateo Extracted from Environ’s November 20, 2009 Remedial InvestigationSite History: * SolventsPotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affected: Local AgencyFile Location: Not reportedRB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: JMCase Worker: Cleanup Program SiteCase Type: -122.40569293499Longitude: 37.6529372521975Latitude: 559192Lead Agency Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: SL0608174279Global Id: 10/26/2007Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentFacility Status: STATERegion: SLIC: 830 ft.Site 3 of 3 in cluster H 0.157 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 28 ft. 1/8-1/4SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 NW0 ASSOCIATED ROAD N/A H61 SLICASSOCIATED ROAD PARCEL S108086696 TC3837232.2s Page 69 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: groundwater. These chemicals were dete trans-1,2-dichloroethene, and vinyl chloride in soil gas and/or their breakdown products cis-1,2-dichloroethene, organic compounds, chiefly tetrachloroethene, trichloroethene, and chemicals of concern at the site appear to be chlorinated volatile 2006, October 2006, June 2007, and October 2009. The primary groundwater, and/or soil gas investigations conducted in February and 105 Associated Road property completed in 2006 and several soil, Phase II environmental site assessments of the Associated Road Parcel investigations at the site conducted by Environ included Phase I and for relatively short periods during the 1980s. Previous auction warehouse and a furniture assembly and upholstery facility 1989. The eastern portion of the building was occupied by an auto distribution facility in 1977, and took over the entire building in portion of the building for use as a food product manufacturing and tenant, San Francisco Spice Company, initially occupied the western a distribution company, and various sales operations. The current safety products), a refrigeration company, an auto part assembly and fixture manufacturing company, and also a subsidiary of Kidde fire including the Morris Manufacturing Company (reportedly a store relatively short periods by a variety of light industrial tenants, Between approximately 1956 and 1978, the building was occupied for Road, approximately 29,900 square feet, was constructed in 1955. products retailer and manufacturer. The building at 105 Associated occupied by Weapon-R Competition Products, an automotive aftermarket food products). 180 Sylvester Road (approximately 0.36 acres) is neighboring business for the storage of dry goods (e.g. spices, dry personnel, the warehouse appears to be primarily used by a Based on Environ’s observations and understanding from Alan Baker which operates a storage and distribution warehouse at the property. (approximately 0.87 acres) is occupied by the Alan Baker Company, footage) that is used as office space. 160 Sylvester Road storage space, and include a small percentage (of the overall square ASSOCIATED ROAD PARCEL (Continued)S108086696 00010000Tank Capacity: 1982Year Installed: 1Container Num: 001Tank Num: ANHEIM, CA 92803Owner City,St,Zip: P.O. BOX 4848Owner Address: SHELL OIL COMPANYOwner Name: 4155832324Telephone: IMELDA HAMPTONContact Name: 0004Total Tanks: Not reportedOther Type: Gas StationFacility Type: 00000020097Facility ID: STATERegion: HIST UST: 848 ft.Site 3 of 6 in cluster G 0.161 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 20 ft. 1/8-1/4SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 SSW248 S AIRPORT BLVD N/A G62 HIST USTIMELAD HAMPTON U001594789 TC3837232.2s Page 70 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Stock Inventor, Groundwater Monitoring Well, 10Leak Detection: 1/4 inchesTank Construction: DIESELType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00010000Tank Capacity: 1982Year Installed: 4Container Num: 004Tank Num: Stock Inventor, Groundwater Monitoring Well, 10Leak Detection: 1/4 inchesTank Construction: PREMIUMType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00010000Tank Capacity: 1982Year Installed: 3Container Num: 003Tank Num: Stock Inventor, Groundwater Monitoring Well, 10Leak Detection: 1/4 inchesTank Construction: REGULARType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00010000Tank Capacity: 1982Year Installed: 2Container Num: 002Tank Num: Stock Inventor, Groundwater Monitoring Well, 10Leak Detection: 1/4 inchesTank Construction: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: IMELAD HAMPTON (Continued)U001594789 ActiveStatus: Not reportedComments: Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: SO. SAN FRANCISCO 94080Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: P.O. BOX 5500Mailing Address: Not reportedMail To: 4156921408Facility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: Not reportedRegulated ID: UTNKARegulated By: 41004922Facility ID: CA FID UST: 848 ft.Site 4 of 6 in cluster G 0.161 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 20 ft. 1/8-1/4SO. SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 SSW SWEEPS UST248 S AIRPORT BLVD N/A G63 CA FID USTHAMPTONS SERVICE INC S101623120 TC3837232.2s Page 71 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 04-20-94Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 2Number: 550100Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PStg: M.V. FUELTank Use: 10000Capacity: 04-20-94Actv Date: 41-000-550100-000003Swrcb Tank Id: 3Owner Tank Id: ATank Status: 10-13-88Created Date: 04-20-94Action Date: 04-20-94Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 2Number: 550100Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PStg: M.V. FUELTank Use: 10000Capacity: 04-20-94Actv Date: 41-000-550100-000002Swrcb Tank Id: 2Owner Tank Id: ATank Status: 10-13-88Created Date: 04-20-94Action Date: 04-20-94Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 2Number: 550100Comp Number: ActiveStatus: 4Number Of Tanks: LEADEDContent: PStg: M.V. FUELTank Use: 10000Capacity: 04-20-94Actv Date: 41-000-550100-000001Swrcb Tank Id: 1Owner Tank Id: ATank Status: 10-13-88Created Date: 04-20-94Action Date: 04-20-94Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 2Number: 550100Comp Number: ActiveStatus: SWEEPS UST: HAMPTONS SERVICE INC (Continued)S101623120 TC3837232.2s Page 72 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: DIESELContent: PStg: M.V. FUELTank Use: 10000Capacity: 04-20-94Actv Date: 41-000-550100-000004Swrcb Tank Id: 4Owner Tank Id: ATank Status: 10-13-88Created Date: 04-20-94Action Date: HAMPTONS SERVICE INC (Continued)S101623120 NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (713) 241-5036Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: HOUSTON, TX 77252 P O BOX 2648Owner/operator address: EQUILON ENTERP DBA SHELL OILOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (713) 241-5036Contact telephone: USContact country: HOUSTON, TX 772522648 P O BOX 2648Contact address: SONDRA BIENVENUContact: HOUSTON, TX 772522648 P O BOX 2648Mailing address: CAR000114066EPA ID: S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 S A P 136130 248 S AIRPORT BLVDFacility address: SHELL SERVICE STATIONFacility name: 03/19/2002Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 848 ft.Site 5 of 6 in cluster G 0.161 mi.HAZNET Relative: Lower Actual: 20 ft. 1/8-1/4 LUSTSOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA SSW FINDS248 S AIRPORT BLVD CAR000114066 G64 RCRA-SQGSHELL SERVICE STATION 1005415647 TC3837232.2s Page 73 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 7132416992Telephone: JEANNE TRAYLORContact: CAR000114066Gepaid: 2012Year: HAZNET: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: 015220070APN Number: T0608153743Global ID: 9- Case ClosedFacility Status: 550186Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUST: corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource facilities. generators, transporters, and treatment, storage, and disposal provides California with information on hazardous waste shipments for California Hazardous Waste Tracking System - Datamart (HWTS-DATAMART) Environmental Interest/Information System 110012249744Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OFWaste name: D001Waste code: Hazardous Waste Summary: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: SHELL SERVICE STATION (Continued)1005415647 TC3837232.2s Page 74 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0.126Tons: (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--No Treatment/ReoveryDisposal Method: Aqueous solution with total organic residues less than 10 percentWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAD059494310TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: HOUSTON, TX 772530000Mailing City,St,Zip: PO BOX 3127Mailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7132416992Telephone: JEANNE TRAYLORContact: CAR000114066Gepaid: 2010Year: San MateoFacility County: 0.021Tons: (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--No Treatment/ReoveryDisposal Method: Aqueous solution with total organic residues less than 10 percentWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAD059494310TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: HOUSTON, TX 772530000Mailing City,St,Zip: PO Box 3127Mailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7132416992Telephone: J. Traylor/ENV REPORTING ANALYSTContact: CAR000114066Gepaid: 2011Year: San MateoFacility County: 0.02Tons: Incineration--Thermal Destruction Other Than Use As A FuelDisposal Method: Not reportedWaste Category: 99TSD County: UTD981552177TSD EPA ID: San MateoGen County: HOUSTON, TX 772530000Mailing City,St,Zip: PO BOX 3127Mailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7132416992Telephone: JEANNE TRAYLORContact: CAR000114066Gepaid: 2012Year: San MateoFacility County: 0.042Tons: (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--No Treatment/ReoveryDisposal Method: Not reportedWaste Category: Santa ClaraTSD County: CAD059494310TSD EPA ID: San MateoGen County: HOUSTON, TX 772530000Mailing City,St,Zip: PO BOX 3127Mailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: SHELL SERVICE STATION (Continued)1005415647 TC3837232.2s Page 75 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 7 additional CA_HAZNET: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access San MateoFacility County: 0.04Tons: (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--No Treatment/ReoveryDisposal Method: Other organic solidsWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAD008302903TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: Houston, TX 770670000Mailing City,St,Zip: 12700 NORTHBOROUGH DR 300G03Mailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 2818742224Telephone: R HULL/ENV. REPORTING ANALYSTContact: CAR000114066Gepaid: 2009Year: San MateoFacility County: SHELL SERVICE STATION (Continued)1005415647 003Tank Num: Visual, Stock InventorLeak Detection: Not reportedTank Construction: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00010000Tank Capacity: 1982Year Installed: TWOContainer Num: 002Tank Num: Visual, Stock InventorLeak Detection: Not reportedTank Construction: DIESELType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00010000Tank Capacity: 1982Year Installed: ONEContainer Num: 001Tank Num: SO SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080Owner City,St,Zip: 248 SO. AIRPORT BLVD.Owner Address: HAMPTON’S SERVICE, INC.Owner Name: 4155832324Telephone: RUSSELL J. HAMPTONContact Name: 0004Total Tanks: Not reportedOther Type: Gas StationFacility Type: 00000044025Facility ID: STATERegion: HIST UST: 848 ft.Site 6 of 6 in cluster G 0.161 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 20 ft. 1/8-1/4SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 SSW248 S AIRPORT BLVD N/A G65 HIST USTHAMPTON’S SERVICE, INC.U001594785 TC3837232.2s Page 76 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoneLeak Detection: Not reportedTank Construction: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00010000Tank Capacity: 1982Year Installed: FOURContainer Num: 004Tank Num: NoneLeak Detection: Not reportedTank Construction: REGULARType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00010000Tank Capacity: 1982Year Installed: THREEContainer Num: HAMPTON’S SERVICE, INC. (Continued)U001594785 Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: JOE MARCHETTIOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (415) 761-7272Contact telephone: USContact country: SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 184 HARBOR WAYContact address: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGERContact: SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 HARBOR WAYMailing address: CAD981993439EPA ID: SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 184 HARBOR WAYFacility address: TRADITIONAL WOODWORKS INCFacility name: 02/26/1987Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: RGA LUST HAZNET 892 ft.CA FID USTSite 1 of 11 in cluster I 0.169 mi.LUST Relative: Lower Actual: 13 ft. 1/8-1/4 HIST CORTESESOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA ENE FINDS184 HARBOR WAY CAD981993439 I66 RCRA-SQGTRADITIONAL WOODWORKS INC 1000189676 TC3837232.2s Page 77 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 06/27/2001Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.400761Longitude: 37.6519369Latitude: T0608100548Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 41-0574Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 41Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System 110001164178Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator name: TRADITIONAL WOODWORKS INC (Continued)1000189676 TC3837232.2s Page 78 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Notice of Responsibility - #1Action: 05/11/1989Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100548Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100548Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100548Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 06/27/2001Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608100548Global Id: 04/13/1989Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608100548Global Id: Status History: 6503726298Phone Number: jmadden@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: JACOB MADDENContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100548Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: nkatyl@waterboards.ca.govEmail: OAKLANDCity: 1515 CLAY STREETAddress: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: NANCY KATYLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100548Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: Local Agency WarehouseFile Location: 550033LOC Case Number: 41-0574RB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: JMCase Worker: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: TRADITIONAL WOODWORKS INC (Continued)1000189676 TC3837232.2s Page 79 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 184 HARBOR WAYMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 0000000000Telephone: TRADITIONAL WOODWORKS INCContact: CAD981993439Gepaid: 1993Year: San FranciscoFacility County: .2085Tons: RecyclerDisposal Method: Unspecified solvent mixtureWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAD009452657TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 940800000Mailing City,St,Zip: 184 HARBOR WAYMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 0000000000Telephone: TRADITIONAL WOODWORKS INCContact: CAD981993439Gepaid: 1994Year: San FranciscoFacility County: .2293Tons: RecyclerDisposal Method: Unspecified solvent mixtureWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAD009452657TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 940800000Mailing City,St,Zip: 184 HARBOR WAYMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 0000000000Telephone: TRADITIONAL WOODWORKS INCContact: CAD981993439Gepaid: 1996Year: HAZNET: ActiveStatus: Not reportedComments: Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: SO. SAN FRANCISCO 94080Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: 184 HARBOR WAYMailing Address: Not reportedMail To: 4153437898Facility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: Not reportedRegulated ID: UTNKARegulated By: 41000533Facility ID: CA FID UST: TRADITIONAL WOODWORKS INC (Continued)1000189676 TC3837232.2s Page 80 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2008 TRADITIONAL WOOD WORKS 184 HARBOR 2009 TRADITIONAL WOOD WORKS 184 HARBOR 2010 TRADITIONAL WOOD WORKS 184 HARBOR 2011 TRADITIONAL WOOD WORKS 184 HARBOR 2012 TRADITIONAL WOOD WORKS 184 HARBOR RGA LUST: San FranciscoFacility County: 0.22509999999Tons: Disposal, OtherDisposal Method: Unspecified solvent mixtureWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAD009452657TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 940800000Mailing City,St,Zip: TRADITIONAL WOODWORKS INC (Continued)1000189676 UGT SERVICES PER HOUR RATEDescription: PR0022614Record Id: UGT SERVICES/HRProg Element Code: FA0017728Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 892 ft.Site 2 of 11 in cluster I 0.169 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 13 ft. 1/8-1/4S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ENE184 HARBOR N/A I67 San Mateo Co. BIMARCHETTI, JOE S113756485 STORES HAZ MAT <219GAL,1,999LB, 879CFDescription: PR0004348Record Id: STORES HAZ MAT <219GAL,1,999LB, 879FT3Prog Element Code: FA0003612Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: GENERATES <27 GAL/YEARDescription: PR0011611Record Id: GENERATES <27 GAL/YEARProg Element Code: FA0003612Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 892 ft.Site 3 of 11 in cluster I 0.169 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 13 ft. 1/8-1/4S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ENE184 HARBOR N/A I68 San Mateo Co. BITRADITIONAL WOODWORKS INC S113755261 TC3837232.2s Page 81 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0Number Of Tanks: Not reportedContent: Not reportedStg: Not reportedTank Use: Not reportedCapacity: Not reportedActv Date: Not reportedSwrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedTank Status: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 550067Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: SWEEPS UST: 892 ft.Site 4 of 11 in cluster I 0.169 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 13 ft. 1/8-1/4S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ENE184 HARBOR WAY N/A I69 SWEEPS USTTRADITIONAL WOODWORKS INC S106933088 2006 TRADITIONAL WOOD WORKS 184 HARBOR 2007 TRADITIONAL WOOD WORKS 184 HARBOR RGA LUST: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: 015032050APN Number: T0608100548Global ID: 9- Case ClosedFacility Status: 550033Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUST: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remediation Action Underway: Not reportedPollution Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedPollution Characterization Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assesment Began: Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: OMHow Discovered: 550033Case Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: LUST REG 2: 892 ft.Site 5 of 11 in cluster I 0.169 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 13 ft. 1/8-1/4S SAN FRANCISCO, CA ENE RGA LUST184 HARBOR WY N/A I70 LUSTTRADITIONAL WOOD WORKS S104494211 TC3837232.2s Page 82 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2003 TRADITIONAL WOOD WORKS 184 HARBOR 2005 TRADITIONAL WOOD WORKS 184 HARBOR TRADITIONAL WOOD WORKS (Continued)S104494211 GENERATES <27 GAL/YEARDescription: PR0038360Record Id: GENERATES <27 GAL/YEARProg Element Code: FA0026463Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 910 ft.Site 1 of 5 in cluster J 0.172 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 28 ft. 1/8-1/4S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 NNW108 SYLVESTER N/A J71 San Mateo Co. BISOMERSET STUDIOS S113757506 jmadden@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: JACOB MADDENContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100402Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: Local AgencyFile Location: 550047LOC Case Number: 41-0423RB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: JMCase Worker: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 03/16/2000Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.404Longitude: 37.653555Latitude: T0608100402Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 41-0423Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 41Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 910 ft.Site 2 of 5 in cluster J 0.172 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 28 ft. 1/8-1/4 RGA LUSTSOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 NNW LUST108 SYLVESTER N/A J72 HIST CORTESEPONY EXPRESS S101303300 TC3837232.2s Page 83 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation SAN MATEO CO. LUST: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remediation Action Underway: Not reportedPollution Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedPollution Characterization Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assesment Began: Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: OMHow Discovered: 550047Case Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: LUST REG 2: Notice of Responsibility - #1Action: 07/06/1989Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100402Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100402Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100402Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 03/16/2000Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608100402Global Id: 12/30/1988Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608100402Global Id: Status History: Not reportedPhone Number: nkatyl@waterboards.ca.govEmail: OAKLANDCity: 1515 CLAY STREETAddress: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: NANCY KATYLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100402Global Id: 6503726298Phone Number: PONY EXPRESS (Continued)S101303300 TC3837232.2s Page 84 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2003 PONY EXPRESS 108 SYLVESTER 2005 PONY EXPRESS 108 SYLVESTER 2006 PONY EXPRESS 108 SYLVESTER 2007 PONY EXPRESS 108 SYLVESTER 2008 PONY EXPRESS 108 SYLVESTER 2009 PONY EXPRESS 108 SYLVESTER 2010 PONY EXPRESS 108 SYLVESTER 2011 PONY EXPRESS 108 SYLVESTER 2012 PONY EXPRESS 108 SYLVESTER RGA LUST: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: Not reportedAPN Number: T0608100402Global ID: 9- Case ClosedFacility Status: 550047Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: PONY EXPRESS (Continued)S101303300 94080Incident Description: Not reportedDischarge Date: Not reportedFacility Type: Not reportedBoard File Number: Not reportedStaff Initials: Not reportedDate Reported: Notify 65: 910 ft.Site 3 of 5 in cluster J 0.172 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 28 ft. 1/8-1/4SOUTH SAN FRANCI, CA 94080 NNW108 SYLVESTER ROAD N/A J73 Notify 65VACENT LOT S100179788 1992 PONY EXPRESS 108 SYLVESTER RD 1993 PONY EXPRESS 108 SYLVESTER RD 1994 PONY EXPRESS 108 SYLVESTER RD 1995 PONY EXPRESS 108 SYLVESTER RD 1996 PONY EXPRESS 108 SYLVESTER RD 1997 PONY EXPRESS 108 SYLVESTER RD 1998 PONY EXPRESS 108 SYLVESTER RD 2000 PONY EXPRESS 108 SYLVESTER RD 2002 PONY EXPRESS 108 SYLVESTER RD RGA LUST: 910 ft.Site 4 of 5 in cluster J 0.172 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 28 ft. 1/8-1/4SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA NNW108 SYLVESTER RD N/A J74 RGA LUSTS114193013 TC3837232.2s Page 85 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1997 AVIS RENT A CAR 230 HARBOR WY 1998 AVIS RENT A CAR 230 HARBOR WY 2000 AVIS RENT A CAR 230 HARBOR WY 2002 AVIS RENT A CAR 230 HARBOR WY RGA LUST: 913 ft.Site 1 of 9 in cluster K 0.173 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 14 ft. 1/8-1/4SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA East230 HARBOR WY N/A K75 RGA LUSTS114213218 10-13-88Created Date: 04-22-94Action Date: 04-22-94Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 9Number: 550041Comp Number: ActiveStatus: 3Number Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PStg: M.V. FUELTank Use: 10000Capacity: 04-22-94Actv Date: 41-000-550041-000002Swrcb Tank Id: 002Owner Tank Id: ATank Status: 10-13-88Created Date: 04-22-94Action Date: 04-22-94Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 9Number: 550041Comp Number: ActiveStatus: 1Number Of Tanks: WASTE OILContent: WASTEStg: OILTank Use: 550Capacity: Not reportedActv Date: 41-000-550041-000001Swrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedTank Status: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 550041Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: SWEEPS UST: 913 ft.Site 2 of 9 in cluster K 0.173 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 14 ft. 1/8-1/4S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 East230 HARBOR WAY N/A K76 SWEEPS USTAVIS RENT-A-CAR SYSTEM S106923003 TC3837232.2s Page 86 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: WASTE OILContent: WStg: OILTank Use: 550Capacity: 04-22-94Actv Date: 41-000-550041-000004Swrcb Tank Id: 004Owner Tank Id: ATank Status: 10-13-88Created Date: 04-22-94Action Date: 04-22-94Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 9Number: 550041Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PStg: M.V. FUELTank Use: 10000Capacity: 04-22-94Actv Date: 41-000-550041-000003Swrcb Tank Id: 003Owner Tank Id: ATank Status: AVIS RENT-A-CAR SYSTEM (Continued)S106923003 ActiveStatus: Not reportedComments: Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: SO. SAN FRANCISCO 94080Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: 230 HARBOR WAYMailing Address: Not reportedMail To: 4150000000Facility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: Not reportedRegulated ID: UTNKARegulated By: 41004914Facility ID: CA FID UST: 913 ft.Site 3 of 9 in cluster K 0.173 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 14 ft. 1/8-1/4SO. SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 East230 HARBOR WAY N/A K77 CA FID USTAVIS RENT-A-CAR SYSTEM S101594071 TC3837232.2s Page 87 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: PV HOLDING COOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: Not reportedContact telephone: Not reportedContact country: Not reported Not reportedContact address: Not reportedContact: CAD981442858EPA ID: SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 230 HARBOR WAYFacility address: AVIS CAR RENTALFacility name: 09/01/1996Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: RGA LUST 913 ft.HIST USTSite 4 of 9 in cluster K 0.173 mi.LUST Relative: Lower Actual: 14 ft. 1/8-1/4 HIST CORTESESOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA East FINDS230 HARBOR WAY CAD981442858 K78 RCRA-SQGAVIS CAR RENTAL 1000374181 TC3837232.2s Page 88 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 14, 2009 Sub-Slab Soil Gas Investigation Report, San Mateo County A summary of the site history is included in Tetra Tech’s DecemberSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: Local AgencyFile Location: 550184LOC Case Number: Not reportedRB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: JMCase Worker: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 07/08/2010Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.40073621273Longitude: 37.6506331392346Latitude: T0608125206Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 41-0951Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 41Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource facilities. generators, transporters, and treatment, storage, and disposal provides California with information on hazardous waste shipments for California Hazardous Waste Tracking System - Datamart (HWTS-DATAMART) Environmental Interest/Information System 110009536671Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: AVIS CAR RENTALFacility name: 09/09/1986Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: AVIS CAR RENTAL (Continued)1000374181 TC3837232.2s Page 89 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 07/01/2010Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608125206Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 07/08/2010Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608125206Global Id: 07/01/2010Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608125206Global Id: 03/03/2010Status Date: Open - Verification MonitoringStatus: T0608125206Global Id: 11/24/2004Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0608125206Global Id: 07/20/2004Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0608125206Global Id: 08/06/2003Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0608125206Global Id: 07/11/2003Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608125206Global Id: Status History: 6503726298Phone Number: jmadden@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: JACOB MADDENContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608125206Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: nkatyl@waterboards.ca.govEmail: OAKLANDCity: 1515 CLAY STREETAddress: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: NANCY KATYLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608125206Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: or any professional interpretations made in the referenced report. does not take responsibility for the accuracy of the statements made AVIS CAR RENTAL (Continued)1000374181 TC3837232.2s Page 90 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Soil and Water Investigation ReportAction: 11/22/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608125206Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608125206Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 01/15/2008Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608125206Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 10/15/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608125206Global Id: Staff Letter - #20081120Action: 11/20/2008Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608125206Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation Workplan - AddendumAction: 07/31/2009Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608125206Global Id: Staff Letter - #20090714Action: 07/14/2009Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608125206Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 04/15/2008Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608125206Global Id: Site Assessment ReportAction: 12/18/2009Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608125206Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608125206Global Id: In Situ Physical/Chemical Treatment (other than SVE)Action: 01/01/1950Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0608125206Global Id: Closure/No Further Action Letter - #20100701Action: AVIS CAR RENTAL (Continued)1000374181 TC3837232.2s Page 91 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608125206Global Id: Staff Letter - #20090506Action: 05/06/2009Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608125206Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 02/15/2010Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608125206Global Id: Final Remedial Action Report / Corrective Action ReportAction: 10/26/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608125206Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation ReportAction: 05/14/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608125206Global Id: Corrective Action Plan / Remedial Action PlanAction: 12/19/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608125206Global Id: Corrective Action Plan / Remedial Action PlanAction: 12/19/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608125206Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation WorkplanAction: 12/19/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608125206Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation ReportAction: 08/15/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608125206Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation ReportAction: 03/27/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608125206Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 05/15/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608125206Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 02/15/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608125206Global Id: AVIS CAR RENTAL (Continued)1000374181 TC3837232.2s Page 92 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Notice of Responsibility - #1Action: 08/25/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608125206Global Id: Staff Letter - #20040812BAction: 08/12/2004Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608125206Global Id: Staff Letter - #20040113Action: 01/13/2004Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608125206Global Id: Staff Letter - #20060919CAction: 09/19/2006Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608125206Global Id: Staff Letter - #20070206BAction: 02/06/2007Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608125206Global Id: Staff Letter - #20051202Action: 12/02/2005Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608125206Global Id: Staff Letter - #20060919BAction: 09/19/2006Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608125206Global Id: Staff Letter - #20060411Action: 04/11/2006Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608125206Global Id: Staff Letter - #20070206AAction: 02/06/2007Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608125206Global Id: Staff Letter - #20060919AAction: 09/19/2006Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608125206Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 11/15/2009Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608125206Global Id: Staff Letter - #20090909Action: 09/09/2009Date: AVIS CAR RENTAL (Continued)1000374181 TC3837232.2s Page 93 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation RESPONSEAction Type: T0608125206Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 08/15/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608125206Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 02/15/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608125206Global Id: Other Report / DocumentAction: 03/30/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608125206Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation WorkplanAction: 07/07/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608125206Global Id: Electronic Reporting Submittal DueAction: 02/13/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608125206Global Id: Preliminary Site Assessment ReportAction: 02/10/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608125206Global Id: Preliminary Site Assessment ReportAction: 08/26/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608125206Global Id: Electronic Reporting Submittal DueAction: 05/11/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608125206Global Id: Staff Letter - #20040414Action: 04/14/2004Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608125206Global Id: Staff Letter - #20040812AAction: 08/12/2004Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608125206Global Id: Staff Letter - #20030806AAction: 08/06/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608125206Global Id: AVIS CAR RENTAL (Continued)1000374181 TC3837232.2s Page 94 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Staff Letter - #20090602Action: 06/02/2009Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608125206Global Id: Staff Letter - #20030806BAction: 08/06/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608125206Global Id: Staff Letter - #20060411Action: 04/11/2006Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608125206Global Id: Staff Letter - #20100303Action: 03/03/2010Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608125206Global Id: Well Destruction ReportAction: 05/25/2010Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608125206Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation WorkplanAction: 03/23/2009Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608125206Global Id: Leak StoppedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608125206Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 05/15/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608125206Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 08/15/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608125206Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 02/15/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608125206Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 11/15/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608125206Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 11/15/2004Date: AVIS CAR RENTAL (Continued)1000374181 TC3837232.2s Page 95 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 08/05/2003Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608100873Global Id: 01/26/1988Status Date: Open - Verification MonitoringStatus: T0608100873Global Id: 01/26/1988Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608100873Global Id: Status History: 6503726298Phone Number: jmadden@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: JACOB MADDENContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100873Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: nkatyl@waterboards.ca.govEmail: OAKLANDCity: 1515 CLAY STREETAddress: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: NANCY KATYLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100873Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: Waste Oil / Motor / Hydraulic / LubricatingPotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: Local Agency WarehouseFile Location: 550143LOC Case Number: 41-0951RB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: JMCase Worker: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 08/05/2003Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.40062Longitude: 37.650402Latitude: T0608100873Global Id: STATERegion: Site Assessment ReportAction: 12/18/2009Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608125206Global Id: AVIS CAR RENTAL (Continued)1000374181 TC3837232.2s Page 96 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remediation Action Underway: Not reportedPollution Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedPollution Characterization Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assesment Began: 8/6/2003Prelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: Tank ClosureHow Discovered: 550184Case Number: Preliminary site assessment workplan submittedFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: 1/1/1965Date Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remediation Action Underway: Not reportedPollution Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedPollution Characterization Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assesment Began: Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: OMHow Discovered: 550143Case Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: LUST REG 2: Closure/No Further Action Letter - #2Action: 08/05/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100873Global Id: Notice of Responsibility - #1Action: 06/28/1995Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100873Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100873Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100873Global Id: Regulatory Activities: AVIS CAR RENTAL (Continued)1000374181 TC3837232.2s Page 97 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Stock InventorLeak Detection: Not reportedTank Construction: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00010000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 003Container Num: 003Tank Num: Stock InventorLeak Detection: Not reportedTank Construction: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00010000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 002Container Num: 002Tank Num: Stock InventorLeak Detection: Not reportedTank Construction: WASTE OILType of Fuel: WASTETank Used for: 00000500Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 001Container Num: 001Tank Num: GARDEN CITY, NY 111530Owner City,St,Zip: 900 OLD COUNTRY ROADOwner Address: AVIS RENT A CAR SYSTEMOwner Name: 4158776722Telephone: BILL HUMPHREYContact Name: 0003Total Tanks: RENTAL CAR CO.Other Type: Not reportedFacility Type: 00000043072Facility ID: STATERegion: HIST UST: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: 015123270APN Number: T0608125206Global ID: 9- Case ClosedFacility Status: 550184Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: 015123270APN Number: T0608100873Global ID: 9- Case ClosedFacility Status: 550143Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUST: AVIS CAR RENTAL (Continued)1000374181 TC3837232.2s Page 98 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1996 AVIS RENT A CAR SYSTEM 230 HARBOR WAY 2003 AVIS RENT A CAR SYSTEM 230 HARBOR 2005 AVIS RENT A CAR SYSTEM 230 HARBOR 2006 AVIS RENT A CAR SYSTEM 230 HARBOR 2007 AVIS RENT A CAR SYSTEM 230 HARBOR 2007 AVIS RENT A CAR SYSTEM 230 HARBOR 2008 AVIS RENT-A-CAR SYSTEM 230 HARBOR WAY 2008 AVIS RENT A CAR SYSTEM 230 HARBOR 2009 AVIS RENT A CAR SYSTEM 230 HARBOR WAY 2010 AVIS RENT A CAR SYSTEM 230 HARBOR WAY 2011 AVIS RENT A CAR SYSTEM 230 HARBOR WAY 2012 AVIS RENT A CAR SYSTEM 230 HARBOR WAY RGA LUST: AVIS CAR RENTAL (Continued)1000374181 UNDERGROUND TANK - GENERALDescription: PR0022597Record Id: UNDERGROUND TANK - GENERALProg Element Code: FA0017704Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: STORES MV FUELS OR WASTE ONLYDescription: PR0023565Record Id: STORES MV FUELS OR WASTE ONLYProg Element Code: FA0017704Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: GENERATES <27 GAL/YEARDescription: PR0011655Record Id: GENERATES <27 GAL/YEARProg Element Code: FA0017704Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 913 ft.Site 5 of 9 in cluster K 0.173 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 14 ft. 1/8-1/4S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 East230 HARBOR N/A K79 San Mateo Co. BIAVIS RENT A CAR SYSTEM S113756468 STORES HAZ MAT <219GAL,1,999LB, 879CFDescription: PR0058947Record Id: STORES HAZ MAT <219GAL,1,999LB, 879FT3Prog Element Code: FA0045325Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 928 ft. 0.176 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 16 ft. 1/8-1/4S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 NNE177 GATEWAY N/A 80 San Mateo Co. BIT MOBILE WEST CORPORATION SF03180AS113758724 TC3837232.2s Page 99 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation UNDERGROUND TANK - GENERALDescription: PR0022688Record Id: UNDERGROUND TANK - GENERALProg Element Code: FA0013244Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: STORES HAZ MAT <219GAL,1,999LB, 879CFDescription: PR0004560Record Id: STORES HAZ MAT <219GAL,1,999LB, 879FT3Prog Element Code: FA0013244Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: GENERATES & RECYCLES WASTE OIL/SOLVENTDescription: PR0024214Record Id: GENERATES and RECYCLES WASTE OIL/SOLVENTProg Element Code: FA0013244Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 929 ft.Site 6 of 9 in cluster K 0.176 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 14 ft. 1/8-1/4S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 East229 HARBOR N/A K81 San Mateo Co. BIOSWALD MACHINE & EQUIPT INC S113755916 Not reportedActv Date: 41-000-550196-000002Swrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedTank Status: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 550196Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: 2Number Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PRODUCTStg: M.V. FUELTank Use: 1000Capacity: Not reportedActv Date: 41-000-550196-000001Swrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedTank Status: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 550196Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: SWEEPS UST: 929 ft.Site 7 of 9 in cluster K 0.176 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 14 ft. 1/8-1/4S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 East229 HARBOR WAY N/A K82 SWEEPS USTBUD OSWALD S106923622 TC3837232.2s Page 100 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PRODUCTStg: M.V. FUELTank Use: 500Capacity: BUD OSWALD (Continued)S106923622 STORES HAZ MAT <219GAL,1,999LB, 879CFDescription: PR0004338Record Id: STORES HAZ MAT <219GAL,1,999LB, 879FT3Prog Element Code: FA0008831Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: GENERATES & RECYCLES WASTE OIL/SOLVENTDescription: PR0011635Record Id: GENERATES and RECYCLES WASTE OIL/SOLVENTProg Element Code: FA0008831Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 934 ft.Site 5 of 5 in cluster J 0.177 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 28 ft. 1/8-1/4S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 NNW102 SYLVESTER N/A J83 San Mateo Co. BIJAPAN PARTS LTD S113755445 Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: Local AgencyFile Location: 550045LOC Case Number: 41-0432RB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: JMCase Worker: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 01/02/2001Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.407666Longitude: 37.655292Latitude: T0608100411Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 41-0432Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 41Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 939 ft.Site 1 of 7 in cluster L 0.178 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 19 ft. 1/8-1/4 RGA LUSTSOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA SSW LUST255 AIRPORT N/A L84 HIST CORTESECOLOR CRAFT S102428219 TC3837232.2s Page 101 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: LUST REG 2: Notice of Responsibility - #1Action: 02/28/1989Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100411Global Id: Pump & Treat (P&T) GroundwaterAction: 01/01/1950Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0608100411Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100411Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100411Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 01/02/2001Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608100411Global Id: 02/23/1989Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608100411Global Id: Status History: Not reportedPhone Number: nkatyl@waterboards.ca.govEmail: OAKLANDCity: 1515 CLAY STREETAddress: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: NANCY KATYLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100411Global Id: 6503726298Phone Number: jmadden@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: JACOB MADDENContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100411Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: COLOR CRAFT (Continued)S102428219 TC3837232.2s Page 102 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2003 COLOR CRAFT 255 AIRPORT 2005 COLOR CRAFT 255 AIRPORT 2006 COLOR CRAFT 255 AIRPORT 2007 COLOR CRAFT 255 AIRPORT 2008 COLOR CRAFT 255 SOUTH AIRPORT BOULEVARD 2009 COLOR CRAFT 255 SOUTH AIRPORT BOULEVARD 2010 COLOR CRAFT 255 SOUTH AIRPORT BOULEVARD 2011 COLOR CRAFT 255 SOUTH AIRPORT BOULEVARD 2012 COLOR CRAFT 255 SOUTH AIRPORT BOULEVARD RGA LUST: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remediation Action Underway: Not reportedPollution Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedPollution Characterization Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assesment Began: Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: OMHow Discovered: 550045Case Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: COLOR CRAFT (Continued)S102428219 STORES HAZ MAT <219GAL,1,999LB, 879CFDescription: PR0004347Record Id: STORES HAZ MAT <219GAL,1,999LB, 879FT3Prog Element Code: FA0010672Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: GENERATES & RECYCLES WASTE OIL/SOLVENTDescription: PR0011654Record Id: GENERATES and RECYCLES WASTE OIL/SOLVENTProg Element Code: FA0010672Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 942 ft.Site 8 of 9 in cluster K 0.178 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 12 ft. 1/8-1/4S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 East233 HARBOR N/A K85 San Mateo Co. BIEG & P S113755568 STORES HAZ MAT <219GAL,1,999LB, 879CFDescription: PR0045879Record Id: STORES HAZ MAT <219GAL,1,999LB, 879FT3Prog Element Code: FA0027939Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 963 ft.Site 9 of 9 in cluster K 0.182 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 12 ft. 1/8-1/4S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ESE237-239 HARBOR N/A K86 San Mateo Co. BITRUX TRANSPORT S113757892 TC3837232.2s Page 103 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedDescription: PR0058731Record Id: Not reportedProg Element Code: FA0027939Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: TRUX TRANSPORT (Continued)S113757892 GENERATES & RECYCLES WASTE OIL/SOLVENTDescription: PR0055346Record Id: GENERATES and RECYCLES WASTE OIL/SOLVENTProg Element Code: FA0039083Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 980 ft. 0.186 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 28 ft. 1/8-1/4S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 WNW20 AIRPORT N/A 87 San Mateo Co. BILA QUINTA INN S113758494 UNDERGROUND TANK - GENERALDescription: PR0022618Record Id: UNDERGROUND TANK - GENERALProg Element Code: FA0017734Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: STORES HAZ MAT <219GAL,1,999LB, 879CFDescription: PR0024167Record Id: STORES HAZ MAT <219GAL,1,999LB, 879FT3Prog Element Code: FA0017734Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: GENERATES <27 GAL/YEARDescription: PR0042756Record Id: GENERATES <27 GAL/YEARProg Element Code: FA0017734Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 998 ft.Site 1 of 9 in cluster M 0.189 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 24 ft. 1/8-1/4S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 SW140 PRODUCE N/A M88 San Mateo Co. BIPRODUCE SHELL S113756490 Environmental Interest/Information System 110018999690Registry ID: FINDS: 998 ft.Site 2 of 9 in cluster M 0.189 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 24 ft. 1/8-1/4 RGA LUSTSOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA SW LUST140 PRODUCE N/A M89 FINDSEQUILON ENTERPRISES 1007739203 TC3837232.2s Page 104 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 01/06/1987Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608100465Global Id: Status History: 6503726289Phone Number: mmullaney@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: MARC MULLANEYContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100465Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: nkatyl@waterboards.ca.govEmail: OAKLANDCity: 1515 CLAY STREETAddress: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: NANCY KATYLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100465Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: DieselPotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: Local Agency WarehouseFile Location: 550017LOC Case Number: 41-0489RB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: MMCase Worker: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 06/24/2005Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.4063Longitude: 37.6485Latitude: T0608100465Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource facilities. generators, transporters, and treatment, storage, and disposal provides California with information on hazardous waste shipments for California Hazardous Waste Tracking System - Datamart (HWTS-DATAMART) EQUILON ENTERPRISES (Continued)1007739203 TC3837232.2s Page 105 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 09/17/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100465Global Id: Notice of Responsibility - #1Action: 09/17/1987Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100465Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 11/15/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100465Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 05/15/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100465Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 11/15/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100465Global Id: Other Report / DocumentAction: 10/03/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100465Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100465Global Id: Other Report / DocumentAction: 01/12/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100465Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100465Global Id: Site Assessment ReportAction: 04/27/2012Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100465Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 06/24/2005Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608100465Global Id: 01/06/1987Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0608100465Global Id: EQUILON ENTERPRISES (Continued)1007739203 TC3837232.2s Page 106 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2008 SHELL OIL 140 PRODUCE 2009 SHELL OIL 140 PRODUCE 2010 SHELL OIL 140 PRODUCE 2011 SHELL OIL 140 PRODUCE 2012 SHELL OIL 140 PRODUCE RGA LUST: Staff Letter - #20020111Action: 01/11/2002Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100465Global Id: Staff Letter - #20030805Action: 08/05/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100465Global Id: Closure/No Further Action Letter - #20050624Action: 06/24/2005Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100465Global Id: Staff Letter - #20030917Action: EQUILON ENTERPRISES (Continued)1007739203 HOUSTON, TX 77210 P O BOX 4453Owner/operator address: EQUILON ENTERPRISES LLCOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (713) 241-2258Contact telephone: USContact country: HOUSTON, TX 772104453 P O BOX 4453Contact address: SONDRA BIENVENUContact: HOUSTON, TX 772104453 P O BOX 4453Mailing address: CAD981401623EPA ID: SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 140 PRODUCEFacility address: SHELL OIL COFacility name: 04/08/1998Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 998 ft.Site 3 of 9 in cluster M 0.189 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 24 ft. 1/8-1/4SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 SW HIST CORTESE140 PRODUCE CAD981401623 M90 RCRA-SQGSHELL OIL CO 1000288610 TC3837232.2s Page 107 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation BENZENEWaste name: D018Waste code: WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OFWaste name: D001Waste code: Hazardous Waste Summary: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: SHELL OIL COMPANYSite name: SHELL OIL COFacility name: 03/09/1994Date form received by agency: Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: SHELL OIL COFacility name: 09/01/1996Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: SHELL OIL CO (Continued)1000288610 TC3837232.2s Page 108 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 41-0489Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 41Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: No violations foundViolation Status: SHELL OIL CO (Continued)1000288610 WASTETank Used for: 00000550Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 4Container Num: 004Tank Num: Stock InventorLeak Detection: Not reportedTank Construction: PREMIUMType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00000000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 3Container Num: 003Tank Num: Stock InventorLeak Detection: Not reportedTank Construction: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00000008Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 2Container Num: 002Tank Num: Stock InventorLeak Detection: Not reportedTank Construction: REGULARType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00000000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 1Container Num: 001Tank Num: SAN BRUNO, CA 94066Owner City,St,Zip: BOX 5500Owner Address: SHELL OIL COMPANYOwner Name: 4158714131Telephone: RON MOSINIAKContact Name: 0004Total Tanks: Not reportedOther Type: Gas StationFacility Type: 00000059397Facility ID: STATERegion: HIST UST: 998 ft.Site 4 of 9 in cluster M 0.189 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 24 ft. 1/8-1/4SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 SW140 PRODUCE AVE N/A M91 HIST USTRONS SHELL SERVICE U001594815 TC3837232.2s Page 109 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Stock InventorLeak Detection: Not reportedTank Construction: WASTE OILType of Fuel: RONS SHELL SERVICE (Continued)U001594815 UNDERGROUND TANK - GENERALDescription: PR0067674Record Id: UNDERGROUND TANK - GENERALProg Element Code: FA0049479Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: STORES HAZ MAT <219GAL,1,999LB, 879CFDescription: PR0067670Record Id: STORES HAZ MAT <219GAL,1,999LB, 879FT3Prog Element Code: FA0049479Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: GENERATES <27 GAL/YEARDescription: PR0067671Record Id: GENERATES <27 GAL/YEARProg Element Code: FA0049479Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 998 ft.Site 5 of 9 in cluster M 0.189 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 24 ft. 1/8-1/4S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 SW140 PRODUCE N/A M92 San Mateo Co. BIPRODUCE SHELL #136134 S113758947 9- Case ClosedFacility Status: 550017Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUST: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remediation Action Underway: Not reportedPollution Remediation Plan Submitted: 1/1/1965Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assesment Began: Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: OMHow Discovered: 550017Case Number: Pollution CharacterizationFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: LUST REG 2: 998 ft.Site 6 of 9 in cluster M 0.189 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 24 ft. 1/8-1/4S SAN FRANCISCO, CA SW RGA LUST140 PRODUCE AVE N/A M93 LUSTSHELL OIL S105194451 TC3837232.2s Page 110 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2003 SHELL OIL 140 PRODUCE 2005 SHELL OIL 140 PRODUCE 2006 SHELL OIL 140 PRODUCE 2007 SHELL OIL 140 PRODUCE RGA LUST: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: 015113320APN Number: T0608100465Global ID: SHELL OIL (Continued)S105194451 1992 SHELL 140 PRODUCE AVE 1993 SHELL 140 PRODUCE AVE 1994 SHELL 140 PRODUCE AVE 1995 SHELL 140 PRODUCE AVE 1996 SHELL 140 PRODUCE AVE 1997 SHELL 140 PRODUCE AVE 1998 SHELL 140 PRODUCE AVE 2000 SHELL 140 PRODUCE AVE 2002 SHELL 140 PRODUCE AVE RGA LUST: 998 ft.Site 7 of 9 in cluster M 0.189 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 24 ft. 1/8-1/4SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA SW140 PRODUCE AVE N/A M94 RGA LUSTS114200121 Not reportedStatus: SWEEPS UST: ActiveStatus: Not reportedComments: Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: S SAN FRANCISCO 94080Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: P O BOX 5500Mailing Address: Not reportedMail To: 4159922900Facility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: Not reportedRegulated ID: UTNKARegulated By: 41000480Facility ID: CA FID UST: 998 ft.Site 8 of 9 in cluster M 0.189 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 24 ft. 1/8-1/4S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 SW SWEEPS UST140 PRODUCE AVE N/A M95 CA FID USTPRODUCE SHELL S101593771 TC3837232.2s Page 111 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 10-13-88Created Date: 05-13-94Action Date: 05-13-94Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 2Number: 550074Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PStg: M.V. FUELTank Use: 8000Capacity: 04-26-94Actv Date: 41-000-550074-000002Swrcb Tank Id: 74160809-1-RU1Owner Tank Id: ATank Status: 10-13-88Created Date: 05-13-94Action Date: 05-13-94Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 2Number: 550074Comp Number: ActiveStatus: 3Number Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PStg: M.V. FUELTank Use: 10000Capacity: 04-26-94Actv Date: 41-000-550074-000001Swrcb Tank Id: 74160809-EREG1Owner Tank Id: ATank Status: 10-13-88Created Date: 05-13-94Action Date: 05-13-94Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 2Number: 550074Comp Number: ActiveStatus: 1Number Of Tanks: WASTE OILContent: WASTEStg: OILTank Use: 500Capacity: Not reportedActv Date: 41-000-550074-000004Swrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedTank Status: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 550074Comp Number: PRODUCE SHELL (Continued)S101593771 TC3837232.2s Page 112 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PStg: M.V. FUELTank Use: 10000Capacity: 04-26-94Actv Date: 41-000-550074-000003Swrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: ATank Status: PRODUCE SHELL (Continued)S101593771 Stock InventorLeak Detection: Not reportedTank Construction: DIESELType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00000550Tank Capacity: 1968Year Installed: 2Container Num: 002Tank Num: Stock InventorLeak Detection: Not reportedTank Construction: REGULARType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00000550Tank Capacity: 1968Year Installed: 1Container Num: 001Tank Num: SO. SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080Owner City,St,Zip: 207 HARBOR WAY, SO. SAN FRANCIOwner Address: SHORELINE DIESEL MAINT., INC.Owner Name: 4155885643Telephone: SIMON J. YRAGUIContact Name: 0002Total Tanks: DIESEL ENGINE REPAIROther Type: OtherFacility Type: 00000036014Facility ID: STATERegion: HIST UST: 1007 ft.Site 6 of 11 in cluster I 0.191 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 13 ft. 1/8-1/4SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ENE207 HARBOR WAY N/A I96 HIST USTSHORELINE DIESEL MAINT. INC.U001594826 GENERATES <27 GAL/YEARProg Element Code: FA0010679Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 1007 ft.Site 7 of 11 in cluster I 0.191 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 13 ft. 1/8-1/4S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ENE207 HARBOR N/A I97 San Mateo Co. BISHORELINE DIESEL INC S113755570 TC3837232.2s Page 113 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation UNDERGROUND TANK - GENERALDescription: PR0051973Record Id: UNDERGROUND TANK - GENERALProg Element Code: FA0010679Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: STORES HAZ MAT <219GAL,1,999LB, 879CFDescription: PR0004351Record Id: STORES HAZ MAT <219GAL,1,999LB, 879FT3Prog Element Code: FA0010679Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: GENERATES <27 GAL/YEARDescription: PR0011657Record Id: SHORELINE DIESEL INC (Continued)S113755570 NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 761-3615Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 207 HARBOR WAYOwner/operator address: SIMON YRAGUIOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (415) 761-3615Contact telephone: USContact country: SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 207 HARBOR WAYContact address: SIMON YRAGUIContact: CAD983606823EPA ID: SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 207 HARBOR WAYFacility address: SHORE LINE DIESEL MAINT INCFacility name: 09/20/1991Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 1007 ft.Site 8 of 11 in cluster I 0.191 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 13 ft. 1/8-1/4SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA ENE FINDS207 HARBOR WAY CAD983606823 I98 RCRA-SQGSHORE LINE DIESEL MAINT INC 1000596706 TC3837232.2s Page 114 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System 110002861699Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: SHORE LINE DIESEL MAINT INC (Continued)1000596706 00000000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 2Container Num: 002Tank Num: Stock InventorLeak Detection: Not reportedTank Construction: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00010000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 1Container Num: 001Tank Num: SAN MATEO, CA 94403Owner City,St,Zip: 2121 S. EL CAMINO REAL #505Owner Address: KEN FUNKOwner Name: 4159524896Telephone: MIKE JOHNSONContact Name: 0004Total Tanks: CAR RENTALOther Type: Not reportedFacility Type: 00000053513Facility ID: STATERegion: HIST UST: 1033 ft.Site 2 of 7 in cluster L 0.196 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 19 ft. 1/8-1/4SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 SSW264 S AIRPORT BLVD N/A L99 HIST USTGENERAL RENT A CAR (LEASEE)U001594772 TC3837232.2s Page 115 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoneLeak Detection: Not reportedTank Construction: WASTE OILType of Fuel: WASTETank Used for: 00000250Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 4Container Num: 004Tank Num: Stock InventorLeak Detection: Not reportedTank Construction: REGULARType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00000000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 3Container Num: 003Tank Num: Stock InventorLeak Detection: Not reportedTank Construction: DIESELType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: GENERAL RENT A CAR (LEASEE) (Continued)U001594772 Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100188Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: Local AgencyFile Location: 550042LOC Case Number: 41-0197RB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: JMCase Worker: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 12/03/1998Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.407096Longitude: 37.654344Latitude: T0608100188Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 41-0197Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 41Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 1033 ft.Site 3 of 7 in cluster L 0.196 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 19 ft. 1/8-1/4 RGA LUSTSOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 SSW LUST264 AIRPORT N/A L100 HIST CORTESEKEN FUNK PROPERTY S103064757 TC3837232.2s Page 116 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2008 KEN FUNK PROPERTY 264 SOUTH AIRPORT BOULEVARD 2009 KEN FUNK PROPERTY 264 SOUTH AIRPORT BOULEVARD 2010 KEN FUNK PROPERTY 264 SOUTH AIRPORT BOULEVARD 2011 KEN FUNK PROPERTY 264 SOUTH AIRPORT BOULEVARD 2012 KEN FUNK PROPERTY 264 SOUTH AIRPORT BOULEVARD RGA LUST: Notice of Responsibility - #1Action: 03/09/1989Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100188Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100188Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100188Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 12/03/1998Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608100188Global Id: 10/28/1987Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608100188Global Id: Status History: Not reportedPhone Number: nkatyl@waterboards.ca.govEmail: OAKLANDCity: 1515 CLAY STREETAddress: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: NANCY KATYLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100188Global Id: 6503726298Phone Number: jmadden@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: JACOB MADDENContact Name: KEN FUNK PROPERTY (Continued)S103064757 TC3837232.2s Page 117 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoneLeak Detection: Not reportedTank Construction: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00010000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 3Container Num: 003Tank Num: NoneLeak Detection: Not reportedTank Construction: REGULARType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00008000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 2Container Num: 002Tank Num: Stock InventorLeak Detection: Not reportedTank Construction: DIESELType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00005000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 1Container Num: 001Tank Num: OAKBROOK, IL 60521Owner City,St,Zip: MAC DONALDS PLAZAOwner Address: MAC DONALDS CORPORATIONOwner Name: 4158375916Telephone: RUSSELL C. SOLOMONContact Name: 0003Total Tanks: Not reportedOther Type: Gas StationFacility Type: 00000014628Facility ID: STATERegion: HIST UST: 1033 ft.Site 4 of 7 in cluster L 0.196 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 19 ft. 1/8-1/4SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 SSW264 S AIRPORT BLVD N/A L101 HIST USTBAYSHORE SELF SERVE U001594736 STATERegion: LUST: 41-0824Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 41Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 1061 ft.Site 1 of 15 in cluster N 0.201 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 13 ft. 1/8-1/4 RGA LUSTSOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ESE LUST249 HARBOR N/A N102 HIST CORTESESEWAGE PUMP STATION #4 S102436722 TC3837232.2s Page 118 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation T0608100772Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100772Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 08/21/2003Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608100772Global Id: 06/15/1994Status Date: Open - Verification MonitoringStatus: T0608100772Global Id: 06/15/1994Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608100772Global Id: Status History: 6503726298Phone Number: jmadden@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: JACOB MADDENContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100772Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: nkatyl@waterboards.ca.govEmail: OAKLANDCity: 1515 CLAY STREETAddress: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: NANCY KATYLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100772Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: Local Agency WarehouseFile Location: 550130LOC Case Number: 41-0824RB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: JMCase Worker: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 08/21/2003Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.399066Longitude: 37.649683Latitude: T0608100772Global Id: SEWAGE PUMP STATION #4 (Continued)S102436722 TC3837232.2s Page 119 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2008 SEWAGE PUMP STATION #4 249 HARBOR 2009 SEWAGE PUMP STATION #4 249 HARBOR 2010 SEWAGE PUMP STATION #4 249 HARBOR 2011 SEWAGE PUMP STATION #4 249 HARBOR 2012 SEWAGE PUMP STATION #4 249 HARBOR RGA LUST: Staff Letter - #20030509Action: 05/09/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100772Global Id: Closure/No Further Action Letter - #4Action: 08/21/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100772Global Id: Staff Letter - #20030407Action: 04/07/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100772Global Id: Notice of Responsibility - #1Action: 06/15/1994Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100772Global Id: Leak StoppedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100772Global Id: UnknownAction: 08/09/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100772Global Id: Request for ClosureAction: 05/07/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100772Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100772Global Id: ExcavationAction: 01/01/1950Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0608100772Global Id: Pump & Treat (P&T) GroundwaterAction: 01/01/1950Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: SEWAGE PUMP STATION #4 (Continued)S102436722 TC3837232.2s Page 120 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ActiveStatus: Not reportedComments: Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: SO SAN FRANCISCO 94080Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: P. O. BOX 711Mailing Address: Not reportedMail To: 4158778962Facility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: Not reportedRegulated ID: UTNKARegulated By: 41004927Facility ID: CA FID UST: 1061 ft.Site 2 of 15 in cluster N 0.201 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 13 ft. 1/8-1/4SO SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ESE249 HARBOR WAY N/A N103 CA FID USTFIRE STATION NO 2 S101594077 NoneLeak Detection: Not reportedTank Construction: PREMIUMType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00001000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 2Container Num: 001Tank Num: SO. SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080Owner City,St,Zip: 400 GRAND AVENUEOwner Address: CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCOOwner Name: 4158778950Telephone: RUSSELL LEE, ASSIST FIRE CHIEFContact Name: 0001Total Tanks: FIRE STATIONOther Type: OtherFacility Type: 00000030247Facility ID: STATERegion: HIST UST: 1061 ft.Site 3 of 15 in cluster N 0.201 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 13 ft. 1/8-1/4SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ESE249 HARBOR WAY N/A N104 HIST USTFIRE STATION #2 U001594763 TC3837232.2s Page 121 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1Number Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PStg: M.V. FUELTank Use: 1000Capacity: 04-22-94Actv Date: 41-000-550165-000001Swrcb Tank Id: 10Owner Tank Id: ATank Status: 05-10-91Created Date: 05-11-94Action Date: 05-11-94Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 4Number: 550165Comp Number: ActiveStatus: SWEEPS UST: 1061 ft.Site 4 of 15 in cluster N 0.201 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 13 ft. 1/8-1/4S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ESE249 HARBOR WAY N/A N105 SWEEPS USTFIRE STATION NO 2 S106926208 1Number Of Tanks: DIESELContent: PStg: M.V. FUELTank Use: 520Capacity: 04-22-94Actv Date: 41-000-550171-000001Swrcb Tank Id: 6Owner Tank Id: ATank Status: 07-09-92Created Date: 05-11-94Action Date: 05-11-94Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 4Number: 550171Comp Number: ActiveStatus: SWEEPS UST: 1061 ft.Site 5 of 15 in cluster N 0.201 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 13 ft. 1/8-1/4S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ESE249 HARBOR WAY N/A N106 SWEEPS USTHARBOR WAY SEWAGE PUMP STATIONS106927073 GENERATES <27 GAL/YEARProg Element Code: FA0008508Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 1061 ft.Site 6 of 15 in cluster N 0.201 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 13 ft. 1/8-1/4S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ESE249 HARBOR N/A N107 San Mateo Co. BISSF SEWAGE PUMP STATION #4 S113755431 TC3837232.2s Page 122 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation UNDERGROUND TANK - GENERALDescription: PR0022677Record Id: UNDERGROUND TANK - GENERALProg Element Code: FA0008508Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: STORES HAZ MAT <1,199GAL,9,999LB,4,799CFDescription: PR0027251Record Id: STORES HAZ MAT <1,199GAL,9,999LB,4,799FT3Prog Element Code: FA0008508Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: GENERATES <27 GAL/YEARDescription: PR0048012Record Id: SSF SEWAGE PUMP STATION #4 (Continued)S113755431 1994 SEWAGE PUMP STATION 249 HARBOR WAY 1995 SEWAGE PUMP STATION 249 HARBOR WAY 1996 SEWAGE PUMP STATION #4 249 HARBOR WAY RGA LUST: 1061 ft.Site 7 of 15 in cluster N 0.201 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 13 ft. 1/8-1/4SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA ESE249 HARBOR WAY N/A N108 RGA LUSTS114215115 1997 SEWAGE PUMP STATION #4 249 HARBOR WY 1998 SOUTH SF SEWAGE PUMP STN #4 249 HARBOR WY 2000 SEWAGE PUMP STATION #4 249 HARBOR WY 2002 SEWAGE PUMP STATION #4 249 HARBOR WY RGA LUST: 1061 ft.Site 8 of 15 in cluster N 0.201 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 13 ft. 1/8-1/4SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA ESE249 HARBOR WY N/A N109 RGA LUSTS114215117 PR0026526Record Id: UNDERGROUND TANK - GENERALProg Element Code: FA0023177Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: STORES HAZ MAT <219GAL,1,999LB, 879CFDescription: PR0027250Record Id: STORES HAZ MAT <219GAL,1,999LB, 879FT3Prog Element Code: FA0023177Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 1061 ft.Site 9 of 15 in cluster N 0.201 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 13 ft. 1/8-1/4S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ESE249 HARBOR N/A N110 San Mateo Co. BIFIRE STATION #2 S113756912 TC3837232.2s Page 123 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation UNDERGROUND TANK - GENERALDescription: FIRE STATION #2 (Continued)S113756912 2003 SEWAGE PUMP STATION #4 249 HARBOR 2005 SEWAGE PUMP STATION #4 249 HARBOR 2006 SEWAGE PUMP STATION #4 249 HARBOR 2007 SEWAGE PUMP STATION #4 249 HARBOR RGA LUST: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: Not reportedAPN Number: T0608100772Global ID: 9- Case ClosedFacility Status: 550130Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUST: 1/1/1965Date Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remediation Action Underway: Not reportedPollution Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedPollution Characterization Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assesment Began: Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: UMHow Discovered: 550130Case Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: LUST REG 2: 1061 ft.Site 10 of 15 in cluster N 0.201 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 13 ft. 1/8-1/4S SAN FRANCISCO, CA ESE RGA LUST249 HARBOR WY N/A N111 LUSTSEWAGE PUMP STATION #4 S104494213 1992 TRADITIONAL WOOD WORKS 184 HARBOR WAY 1993 TRADITIONAL WOOD WORKS 184 HARBOR WAY 1994 TRADITIONAL WOOD WORKS 184 HARBOR WAY 1995 TRADITIONAL WOOD WORKS 184 HARBOR WAY 1996 TRADITIONAL WOOD WORKS 184 HARBOR WAY RGA LUST: 1090 ft.Site 9 of 11 in cluster I 0.206 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 13 ft. 1/8-1/4SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA ENE184 HARBOR WAY N/A I112 RGA LUSTS114207449 TC3837232.2s Page 124 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1997 TRADITIONAL WOOD WORKS 184 HARBOR WY 1998 TRADITIONAL WOOD WORKS 184 HARBOR WY 2000 TRADITIONAL WOOD WORKS 184 HARBOR WY 2002 TRADITIONAL WOODWORKS 184 HARBOR WY RGA LUST: 1090 ft.Site 10 of 11 in cluster I 0.206 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 13 ft. 1/8-1/4SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA ENE184 HARBOR WY N/A I113 RGA LUSTS114207451 STORES HAZ MAT <1,199GAL,9,999LB,4,799CFDescription: PR0004274Record Id: STORES HAZ MAT <1,199GAL,9,999LB,4,799FT3Prog Element Code: FA0017810Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 1098 ft.Site 11 of 11 in cluster I 0.208 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 13 ft. 1/8-1/4S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ENE185 HARBOR N/A I114 San Mateo Co. BICALPICO INC S113756541 STORES HAZ MAT <3,499GAL,27,999LB,13,999CFDescription: PR0060542Record Id: STORES HAZ MAT <3,499GAL,27,999LB,13,999FT3Prog Element Code: FA0045658Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 1111 ft.Site 11 of 15 in cluster N 0.210 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 16 ft. 1/8-1/4S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ESE255 HARBOR N/A N115 San Mateo Co. BIARS INC S113758780 11/12/2013Effective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: ConstructionProgram Type: 2 41C368208WDID: Not reportedPlace Id: EnrolleeRegulatory Measure Type: 2009-0009-DWQOrder No: 442588Regulatory Measure Id: 2Region: 0Agency Id: ActiveFacility Status: CAS000002Npdes Number: NPDES: 1134 ft.Site 9 of 9 in cluster M 0.215 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 24 ft. 1/8-1/4SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 SW San Mateo Co. BI160 PRODUCE AVENUE N/A M116 NPDES160 PRODUCE AVENUE S113755733 TC3837232.2s Page 125 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation STORES HAZ MAT <3,499GAL,27,999LB,13,999CFDescription: PR0004468Record Id: STORES HAZ MAT <3,499GAL,27,999LB,13,999FT3Prog Element Code: FA0011842Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: GENERATES & RECYCLES WASTE OIL/SOLVENTDescription: PR0011766Record Id: GENERATES and RECYCLES WASTE OIL/SOLVENTProg Element Code: FA0011842Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 30327Discharge Zip: GeorgiaDischarge State: AtlantaDischarge City: 2060 Mount Paran Road NWDischarge Address: PNF SFO LLCDischarge Name: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: 160 PRODUCE AVENUE (Continued)S113755733 STORES MV FUELS OR WASTE ONLYDescription: PR0049847Record Id: STORES MV FUELS OR WASTE ONLYProg Element Code: FA0028134Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: GENERATES <27 GAL/YEARDescription: PR0046337Record Id: GENERATES <27 GAL/YEARProg Element Code: FA0028134Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 1144 ft.Site 12 of 15 in cluster N 0.217 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 18 ft. 1/8-1/4S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ESE259 HARBOR N/A N117 San Mateo Co. BISIMONDS MACHINERY S113757932 Not reportedMailing Address 2: 103 WONDER COLOR LNMailing Address: Not reportedMail To: Not reportedFacility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: Not reportedRegulated ID: UTNKARegulated By: 41000199Facility ID: CA FID UST: 1163 ft.Site 5 of 7 in cluster L 0.220 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 19 ft. 1/8-1/4S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 SSW SWEEPS UST103 WONDER COLOR LN N/A L118 CA FID USTQUALEX-DBA COLOR CRAFT S101593702 TC3837232.2s Page 126 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1Number Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PRODUCTStg: M.V. FUELTank Use: 7500Capacity: Not reportedActv Date: 41-000-000507-000001Swrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedTank Status: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 507Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: SWEEPS UST: ActiveStatus: Not reportedComments: Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: S SAN FRANCISCO 94080Mailing City,St,Zip: QUALEX-DBA COLOR CRAFT (Continued)S101593702 NoneLeak Detection: Unkown inchesTank Construction: 1Type of Fuel: WASTETank Used for: 00007500Tank Capacity: 1969Year Installed: 1Container Num: 001Tank Num: DURHAM, NC 27705Owner City,St,Zip: 3000 CROASDAILE ROADOwner Address: COLORCRAFT CORPORATIONOwner Name: 4158736060Telephone: Not reportedContact Name: 0001Total Tanks: FILM PROCESSINGOther Type: OtherFacility Type: 00000066042Facility ID: STATERegion: HIST UST: 1163 ft.Site 6 of 7 in cluster L 0.220 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 19 ft. 1/8-1/4SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 SSW103 WONDERCOLOR LN N/A L119 HIST USTBERKEY/COLORCRAFT U001594738 TC3837232.2s Page 127 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: COLORCRAFT CORPOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (415) 873-6060Contact telephone: USContact country: SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 103 WONDERCOLOR LANEContact address: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGERContact: SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 WONDERCOLOR LANEMailing address: CAD982322828EPA ID: SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 103 WONDERCOLOR LANEFacility address: COLORCRAFT CORPORATIONFacility name: 03/16/1988Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 1163 ft.Site 7 of 7 in cluster L 0.220 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 19 ft. 1/8-1/4SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 SSW FINDS103 WONDERCOLOR LANE CAD982322828 L120 RCRA-SQGCOLORCRAFT CORPORATION 1000341119 TC3837232.2s Page 128 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System 110002794094Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: COLORCRAFT CORPORATION (Continued)1000341119 STORES HAZ MAT <219GAL,1,999LB, 879CFDescription: PR0068560Record Id: STORES HAZ MAT <219GAL,1,999LB, 879FT3Prog Element Code: FA0050094Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: GEN <1 TONS HAZ WASTE/YRDescription: PR0068561Record Id: GEN <1 TONS HAZ WASTE/YRProg Element Code: FA0050094Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 1170 ft.Site 1 of 11 in cluster O 0.222 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 13 ft. 1/8-1/4S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 NE170 HARBOR N/A O121 San Mateo Co. BITHRESHOLD PHARMACEUTICALS INCS113758981 FA0052550Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: GENERATES & RECYCLES WASTE OIL/SOLVENTDescription: PR0072858Record Id: GENERATES and RECYCLES WASTE OIL/SOLVENTProg Element Code: FA0052550Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 1170 ft.Site 2 of 11 in cluster O 0.222 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 13 ft. 1/8-1/4S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 NE170 HARBOR N/A O122 San Mateo Co. BIQUINTARA BIOSCIENCES INC S113759091 TC3837232.2s Page 129 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation STORES HAZ MAT <219GAL,1,999LB, 879CFDescription: PR0072857Record Id: STORES HAZ MAT <219GAL,1,999LB, 879FT3Prog Element Code: QUINTARA BIOSCIENCES INC (Continued)S113759091 STORES HAZ MAT <219GAL,1,999LB, 879CFDescription: PR0070321Record Id: STORES HAZ MAT <219GAL,1,999LB, 879FT3Prog Element Code: FA0050663Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: GEN <1 TONS HAZ WASTE/YRDescription: PR0070322Record Id: GEN <1 TONS HAZ WASTE/YRProg Element Code: FA0050663Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 1170 ft.Site 3 of 11 in cluster O 0.222 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 13 ft. 1/8-1/4S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 NE170 HARBOR N/A O123 San Mateo Co. BINODALITY INC S113759006 STORES HAZ MAT <1,199GAL,9,999LB,4,799CFDescription: PR0038503Record Id: STORES HAZ MAT <1,199GAL,9,999LB,4,799FT3Prog Element Code: FA0026552Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: GEN 1-5 TONS HAZ WASTE/YR - RCRADescription: PR0038504Record Id: 2232Prog Element Code: FA0026552Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 1170 ft.Site 4 of 11 in cluster O 0.222 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 13 ft. 1/8-1/4S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 NE170 HARBOR N/A O124 San Mateo Co. BIEXELIXIS S113757518 P.O. BOX SEVENTH THOUSAND THIRMailing address: CAD982408312EPA ID: SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 SSF BLET RAILWAY OH AT 101Facility address: CALTRANSFacility name: 09/01/1996Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 1170 ft. 0.222 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 28 ft. 1/8-1/4SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 NW FINDSSSF BLET RAILWAY OH AT 101 CAD982408312 125 RCRA-SQGCALTRANS 1000419540 TC3837232.2s Page 130 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CALTRANSFacility name: 04/04/1988Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: MunicipalLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: MunicipalLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: CALTRANSOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: Not reportedContact telephone: Not reportedContact country: Not reported Not reportedContact address: Not reportedContact: SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94120 CALTRANS (Continued)1000419540 TC3837232.2s Page 131 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System 110008277337Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: CALTRANS (Continued)1000419540 USED TIRE PROGRAM - GENERALDescription: PR0066821Record Id: USED TIRE PROGRAM - GENERALProg Element Code: FA0015448Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: STORES HAZ MAT <3,499GAL,27,999LB,13,999CFDescription: PR0037415Record Id: STORES HAZ MAT <3,499GAL,27,999LB,13,999FT3Prog Element Code: FA0015448Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: GENERATES & RECYCLES WASTE OIL/SOLVENTDescription: PR0033841Record Id: GENERATES and RECYCLES WASTE OIL/SOLVENTProg Element Code: FA0015448Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: ABOVE GROUND TANK/SPCCDescription: PR0004581Record Id: ABOVE GROUND TANK/SPCCProg Element Code: FA0015448Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 1178 ft.Site 13 of 15 in cluster N 0.223 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 19 ft. 1/8-1/4S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 SE266 HARBOR N/A N126 San Mateo Co. BIHERTZ EQUIPMENT RENTAL S113756118 TC3837232.2s Page 132 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation STORES HAZ MAT <219GAL,1,999LB, 879CFDescription: PR0070183Record Id: STORES HAZ MAT <219GAL,1,999LB, 879FT3Prog Element Code: FA0050603Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: LESS THAN 500 TIRESDescription: PR0074208Record Id: LESS THAN 500 TIRESProg Element Code: FA0050603Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 1178 ft.Site 14 of 15 in cluster N 0.223 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 19 ft. 1/8-1/4S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 SE266 HARBOR N/A N127 San Mateo Co. BID P NICOLI S113758999 San MateoCertified Unified Program Agencies: 1,320Total Gallons: Not reportedOwner: AST: 1178 ft.Site 15 of 15 in cluster N 0.223 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 19 ft. 1/8-1/4S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 SE266 HARBOR N/A N128 ASTHERTZ EQUIPMENT RENTAL A100339068 11 AIRPORT BLVDAddress: 2006Year: KENT AUTO SERVICE INCName: EDR Historical Auto Stations: 1183 ft.Site 1 of 7 in cluster P 0.224 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 24 ft. 1/8-1/4SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 West11 AIRPORT BLVD N/A P129 EDR US Hist Auto Stat1015150287 Not reportedOwner: -122.40100Longitude: 37.652393Latitude: 200875Site Code: 04/26/2006Status Date: BACKLOGCleanup Status: STATE RESPONSESite/Facility Type: 41280108Envirostor Id: CORTESERegion: CORTESE: 1194 ft.Site 5 of 11 in cluster O 0.226 mi.ENVIROSTOR Relative: Lower Actual: 13 ft. 1/8-1/4 RESPONSES SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 NE HIST CORTESE166 HARBOR WAY N/A O130 CorteseCALTRANS/SSF MAINTENANCE STATIONS105026698 TC3837232.2s Page 133 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 200875Alias Name: EPA (FRS #)Alias Type: 110033618315Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 015032040Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 015-032-040Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: WESTERN DRUMAlias Name: OTH, SOILPotential Description: hydrocarbons (PAHs TPH-diesel Copper and compounds Arsenic Lead Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs Polynuclear aromaticConfirmed COC: hydrocarbons (PAHs TPH-diesel Copper and compounds Arsenic Lead Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs Polynuclear aromaticPotential COC : RECYCLING - DRUM, VEHICLE MAINTENANCE MANUFACTURING - INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY, MANUFACTURING - METAL,Past Use: 015-032-040, 015032040APN: -122.4010Longitude: 37.65239Latitude: Responsible PartyFunding: NORestricted Use: 04/26/2006Status Date: BacklogStatus: Voluntary Cleanup ProgramSpecial Program Status: 13Senate: 22Assembly: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.: 200875Site Code: Cleanup BerkeleyDivision Branch: Denise TsujiSupervisor: Not reportedProject Manager: DTSC - Site Cleanup ProgramLead Agency Description: SMBRPCleanup Oversight Agencies: NONational Priorities List: 2.1Acres: State Response or NPLSite Type Detail: State ResponseSite Type: 41280108Facility ID: RESPONSE: 41280108Reg Id: CALSIReg By: 41Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: Not reportedWaste Management Uit Name: Not reportedSolid Waste Id No: Not reportedWID Id: Not reportedRegion 2: Not reportedEffective Date: Not reportedWaste Discharge System No: Not reportedOrder No: exportFlag: Not reportedSwat R: Not reportedEnf Type: CALTRANS/SSF MAINTENANCE STATION (Continued)S105026698 TC3837232.2s Page 134 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 200875Site Code: 41280108Facility ID: Cleanup BerkeleyDivision Branch: Denise TsujiSupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: SMBRPLead Agency: SMBRPRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: 2.1Acres: State Response or NPLSite Type Detailed: State ResponseSite Type: ENVIROSTOR: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: VCA Termination letter submitted by Caltrans.Comments: 05/26/2005Completed Date: Voluntary Cleanup Agreement Termination NotificationCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 05/08/1987Completed Date: Site ScreeningCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 01/22/1996Completed Date: Site ScreeningCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 08/01/1980Completed Date: * DiscoveryCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: VCA with the State of CA, Department of Transportation.Comments: 02/23/2001Completed Date: Voluntary Cleanup AgreementCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 41280108Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: CALTRANS/SSF MAINTENANCE STATION (Continued)S105026698 TC3837232.2s Page 135 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedComments: 05/08/1987Completed Date: Site ScreeningCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 01/22/1996Completed Date: Site ScreeningCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 08/01/1980Completed Date: * DiscoveryCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: VCA with the State of CA, Department of Transportation.Comments: 02/23/2001Completed Date: Voluntary Cleanup AgreementCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 41280108Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 200875Alias Name: EPA (FRS #)Alias Type: 110033618315Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 015032040Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 015-032-040Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: WESTERN DRUMAlias Name: OTH, SOILPotential Description: (PAHs, TPH-diesel, Copper and compounds Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs, Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons hydrocarbons (PAHs, TPH-diesel, Copper and compounds, Arsenic, Lead, Arsenic, Lead, Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs, Polynuclear aromaticConfirmed COC: hydrocarbons (PAHs, TPH-diesel, Copper and compounds Arsenic, Lead, Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs, Polynuclear aromaticPotential COC: RECYCLING - DRUM, VEHICLE MAINTENANCE MANUFACTURING - INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY, MANUFACTURING - METAL,Past Use: 015-032-040, 015032040APN: -122.4010Longitude: 37.65239Latitude: Responsible PartyFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.: NORestricted Use: 04/26/2006Status Date: BacklogStatus: Voluntary Cleanup ProgramSpecial Program: 13Senate: 22Assembly: CALTRANS/SSF MAINTENANCE STATION (Continued)S105026698 TC3837232.2s Page 136 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: VCA Termination letter submitted by Caltrans.Comments: 05/26/2005Completed Date: Voluntary Cleanup Agreement Termination NotificationCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: CALTRANS/SSF MAINTENANCE STATION (Continued)S105026698 VILLALBA H. SR. VILLALBA H. JR. MOSTO C.Owner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (510) 286-6375Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: OAKLAND, CA 94612 111 GRAND AVE 14TH FLOOROwner/operator address: CALTRANS OFC OF ENV ENGOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: PrivateLand type: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (510) 286-6375Contact telephone: USContact country: OAKLAND, CA 946230660 P O BOX 23660 M5 8AContact address: FRANK MELEContact: OAKLAND, CA 946230660 P O BOX 23660Mailing address: CAD087210399EPA ID: SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 166 HARBOR WAYFacility address: CALTRANS DISTRICT 4Facility name: 12/02/1999Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 1194 ft.Site 6 of 11 in cluster O 0.226 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 13 ft. 1/8-1/4SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 NE FINDS166 HARBOR WAY CAD087210399 O131 RCRA-SQGCALTRANS DISTRICT 4 1000403170 TC3837232.2s Page 137 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 09/22/1992Evaluation date: Evaluation Action Summary: No violations foundViolation Status: LEADWaste name: D008Waste code: Not DefinedWaste name: D000Waste code: Hazardous Waste Summary: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: WESTERN DRUMS INCSite name: CALTRANS DISTRICT 4Facility name: 04/13/1990Date form received by agency: Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: CALTRANS DISTRICT 4Facility name: 09/01/1996Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: CONTAINER MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLCSite name: CALTRANS DISTRICT 4Facility name: 03/04/1999Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: CALTRANS DISTRICT 4 (Continued)1000403170 TC3837232.2s Page 138 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System 110002662422Registry ID: FINDS: State Contractor/GranteeEvaluation lead agency: CALTRANS DISTRICT 4 (Continued)1000403170 STORES HAZ MAT <219GAL,1,999LB, 879CFDescription: PR0044400Record Id: STORES HAZ MAT <219GAL,1,999LB, 879FT3Prog Element Code: FA0027652Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: GENERATES <27 GAL/YEARDescription: PR0044401Record Id: GENERATES <27 GAL/YEARProg Element Code: FA0027652Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 1198 ft.Site 2 of 7 in cluster P 0.227 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 24 ft. 1/8-1/4S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 West21 AIRPORT N/A P132 San Mateo Co. BIWESTERN PAINTING CO S113757817 STORES MV FUELS OR WASTE ONLYDescription: PR0073720Record Id: STORES MV FUELS OR WASTE ONLYProg Element Code: FA0053271Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 1220 ft.Site 3 of 7 in cluster P 0.231 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 22 ft. 1/8-1/4S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 West31 AIRPORT N/A P133 San Mateo Co. BILIFE CARE SOLUTIONS INC S113759146 TC3837232.2s Page 139 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation GENERATES & RECYCLES WASTE OIL/SOLVENTDescription: PR0011697Record Id: GENERATES and RECYCLES WASTE OIL/SOLVENTProg Element Code: FA0011909Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 1220 ft.Site 4 of 7 in cluster P 0.231 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 22 ft. 1/8-1/4S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 West31 AIRPORT N/A P134 San Mateo Co. BIPLATINUM THERMOGRAPHERS S113755745 GENERATES <27 GAL/YEARDescription: PR0037808Record Id: GENERATES <27 GAL/YEARProg Element Code: FA0026208Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 1220 ft.Site 5 of 7 in cluster P 0.231 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 22 ft. 1/8-1/4S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 West31 AIRPORT N/A P135 San Mateo Co. BIPLATINUM THERMOGRAPHERS S113757463 STORES HAZ MAT <219GAL,1,999LB, 879CFDescription: PR0053133Record Id: STORES HAZ MAT <219GAL,1,999LB, 879FT3Prog Element Code: FA0035315Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 1243 ft.Site 1 of 2 in cluster Q 0.235 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 18 ft. 1/8-1/4S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 SE271 HARBOR N/A Q136 San Mateo Co. BISUN HING FOODS S113758333 STORES HAZ MAT <3,499GAL,27,999LB,13,999CFDescription: PR0004582Record Id: STORES HAZ MAT <3,499GAL,27,999LB,13,999FT3Prog Element Code: FA0015449Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 1250 ft.Site 2 of 2 in cluster Q 0.237 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 18 ft. 1/8-1/4S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 SE274 HARBOR N/A Q137 San Mateo Co. BILDR FORREST S113756119 TC3837232.2s Page 140 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1939 HARRISON ST., SUITE 175Owner/operator address: BRITTANIA DEVELOPMENTOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 04/04/2001Owner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: Not reported Not reportedOwner/operator address: EXELIXIS, INC.Owner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 05/12/1999Owner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: Not reported Not reportedOwner/operator address: EXELIXIS INCOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: 100 kg of that material at any time hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting kg of acutely hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1 waste during any calendar month; or generates 1 kg or less of acutely cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely hazardous residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from the during any calendar month; or generates more than 100 kg of any calendar month; or generates more than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste Handler: generates 1,000 kg or more of hazardous waste during anyDescription: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: PrivateLand type: 09EPA Region: MSAKAI@EXELIXIS.COMContact email: (650) 837-7129Contact telephone: Not reportedContact country: SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 E. GRAND AVEContact address: MATTHEW SAKAIContact: SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 E. GRAND AVEMailing address: CAR000092601EPA ID: SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 169 HARBOR WAYFacility address: EXELIXIS, INCFacility name: 03/02/2012Date form received by agency: RCRA-LQG: 1254 ft.Site 7 of 11 in cluster O 0.237 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 13 ft. 1/8-1/4SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 NE169 HARBOR WAY CAR000092601 O138 RCRA-LQGEXELIXIS, INC 1004677045 TC3837232.2s Page 141 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Historical Generators: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 05/12/1996Owner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: OAKLAND, CA 94607 555 12TH ST STE 1650Owner/operator address: BRITTANIA MNGMT SVCSOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 12/01/2007Owner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (562) 733-5100Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: LONG BEACH, CA 90806 KILROY AIRPORT WAY STE 300Owner/operator address: HCP LIFE SCIENCE REIT, INCOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 05/07/2000Owner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (562) 733-5100Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: LONG BEACH, CA 90806 KILROY AIRPORT WASY STE 300Owner/operator address: EXELIXIS, INC.Owner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 12/03/1998Owner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: OAKLAND, CA 94612 EXELIXIS, INC (Continued)1004677045 TC3837232.2s Page 142 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation THESE CAUSTIC OR ACID SOLUTIONS BECOME CONTAMINATED AND MUST BE USED BY MANY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN METAL PARTS PRIOR TO PAINTING. WHEN OR DEGREASE PARTS. HYDROCHLORIC ACID, A SOLUTION WITH A LOW PH, IS CAUSTIC SOLUTION WITH A HIGH PH, IS OFTEN USED BY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN CONSIDERED TO BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. SODIUM HYDROXIDE, A A WASTE WHICH HAS A PH OF LESS THAN 2 OR GREATER THAN 12.5 ISWaste name: D002Waste code: WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OFWaste name: D001Waste code: Hazardous Waste Summary: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: EXELIXIS, INC.Site name: EXELIXIS, INCFacility name: 02/06/2002Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: EXELIXIS INCSite name: EXELIXIS, INCFacility name: 02/11/2002Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: EXELIXIS, INC.Site name: EXELIXIS, INCFacility name: 02/26/2004Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: EXELIXIS INCSite name: EXELIXIS, INCFacility name: 10/01/2004Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: EXELIXIS, INC.Site name: EXELIXIS, INCFacility name: 02/27/2006Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: EXELIXIS INCSite name: EXELIXIS, INCFacility name: 03/31/2006Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: EXELIXIS, INC.Site name: EXELIXIS, INCFacility name: 02/20/2008Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: EXELIXIS NC.Site name: EXELIXIS, INCFacility name: 06/17/2010Date form received by agency: EXELIXIS, INC (Continued)1004677045 TC3837232.2s Page 143 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, ORTHO-DICHLOROBENZENE, TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE, AND CHLOROBENZENE, 1,1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE, METHYLENE CHLORIDE, TRICHLOROETHYLENE, 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE, THE FOLLOWING SPENT HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TETRACHLOROETHYLENE,Waste name: F002Waste code: 2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOLWaste name: D042Waste code: TETRACHLOROETHYLENEWaste name: D039Waste code: PYRIDINEWaste name: D038Waste code: NITROBENZENEWaste name: D036Waste code: 1,2-DICHLOROETHANEWaste name: D028Waste code: CHLOROFORMWaste name: D022Waste code: CARBON TETRACHLORIDEWaste name: D019Waste code: BENZENEWaste name: D018Waste code: SILVERWaste name: D011Waste code: SELENIUMWaste name: D010Waste code: MERCURYWaste name: D009Waste code: CHROMIUMWaste name: D007Waste code: BARIUMWaste name: D005Waste code: ARSENICWaste name: D004Waste code: OF SUCH WASTE WOULD BY WASTE GUNPOWDER. DETONATION OR EXPLOSION WHEN EXPOSED TO HEAT OR A FLAME. ONE EXAMPLE WHEN EXPOSED TO WATER OR CORROSIVE MATERIALS, OR IF IT IS CAPABLE OF NORMALLY UNSTABLE, REACTS VIOLENTLY WITH WATER, GENERATES TOXIC GASES A MATERIAL IS CONSIDERED TO BE A REACTIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE IF IT ISWaste name: D003Waste code: DISPOSED, THE WASTE WOULD BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. EXELIXIS, INC (Continued)1004677045 TC3837232.2s Page 144 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation P048Waste code: 1,2-BENZENEDIOL, 4-[1-HYDROXY-2-(METHYLAMINO)ETHYL]-, (R)-Waste name: P042Waste code: CYANIDES (SOLUBLE CYANIDE SALTS), NOT OTHERWISE SPECIFIEDWaste name: P030Waste code: COPPER CYANIDEWaste name: P029Waste code: ARSENIC OXIDE AS2O3Waste name: P012Waste code: ALLYL ALCOHOLWaste name: P005Waste code: PREPURIFIED 2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL AS THE SOLE COMPONENT). INCLUDE FORMULATIONS CONTAINING HEXACHLOROPHENE SYTHESIZED FROM COMPOUNDS DERIVED FROM THESE CHLOROPHENOLS. (THIS LISTING DOES NOT PENTACHLOROPHENOL OR DISCARDED UNUSED FORMULATIONS CONTAINING DISCARDED UNUSED FORMULATIONS CONTAINING TRI-, TETRA-, ORWaste name: F027Waste code: THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. LISTED IN F001, F002, OR F004; AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE SOLVENTS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF 2-ETHOXYETHANOL, AND 2-NITROPROPANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS KETONE, CARBON DISULFIDE, ISOBUTANOL, PYRIDINE, BENZENE, THE FOLLOWING SPENT NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TOLUENE, METHYL ETHYLWaste name: F005Waste code: SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. F001, F002, AND F005; AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE OF THE ABOVE NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR MORE ACID, AND NITROBENZENE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, THE FOLLOWING SPENT NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: CRESOLS AND CRESYLICWaste name: F004Waste code: MIXTURES. BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MORE OF THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F002, F004, AND F005, AND STILL SOLVENTS, AND, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NON-HALOGENATED NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS; AND ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONLY THE ABOVE SPENT ALCOHOL, CYCLOHEXANONE, AND METHANOL; ALL SPENT SOLVENT ACETATE, ETHYL BENZENE, ETHYL ETHER, METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE, N-BUTYL THE FOLLOWING SPENT NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: XYLENE, ACETONE, ETHYLWaste name: F003Waste code: SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. F005, AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND OF THE ABOVE HALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE LISTED IN F001, F004, OR BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR MORE EXELIXIS, INC (Continued)1004677045 TC3837232.2s Page 145 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation U115Waste code: DIMETHYLAMINE (I)Waste name: U092Waste code: METHANE, DICHLORO-Waste name: U080Waste code: 2-BUTENE, 1,4-DICHLORO- (I,T)Waste name: U074Waste code: 1,2-BENZENEDICARBOXYLIC ACID, DIBUTYL ESTERWaste name: U069Waste code: CHLOROMETHYL METHYL ETHERWaste name: U046Waste code: CHLOROFORMWaste name: U044Waste code: BENZIDINEWaste name: U021Waste code: BENZENESULFONIC ACID CHLORIDE (C,R)Waste name: U020Waste code: AMITROLEWaste name: U011Waste code: ACRYLAMIDEWaste name: U007Waste code: ACETONE (I)Waste name: U002Waste code: SODIUM CYANIDEWaste name: P106Waste code: SODIUM AZIDEWaste name: P105Waste code: POTASSIUM CYANIDEWaste name: P098Waste code: PHENYLTHIOUREAWaste name: P093Waste code: OSMIUM OXIDE OSO4, (T-4)-Waste name: P087Waste code: HYDRAZINE, METHYL-Waste name: P068Waste code: AZIRIDINE, 2-METHYL-Waste name: P067Waste code: 2,4-DINITROPHENOLWaste name: EXELIXIS, INC (Continued)1004677045 TC3837232.2s Page 146 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation TETRASODIUM SALT DIMETHYL[1,1’-BIPHENYL]-4,4’-DIYL)BIS(AZO)BIS[5-AMINO-4-HYDROXY]-, 2,7-NAPHTHALENEDISULFONIC ACID, 3,3’-[(3,3’-Waste name: U236Waste code: BENZENE, METHYL-Waste name: U220Waste code: THIOUREAWaste name: U219Waste code: ETHENE, TETRACHLORO-Waste name: U210Waste code: 1,3-BENZENEDIOLWaste name: U201Waste code: P-BENZOQUINONEWaste name: U197Waste code: 1-PROPANAMINE (I,T)Waste name: U194Waste code: PHENOLWaste name: U188Waste code: 1-NAPHTHALENAMINEWaste name: U167Waste code: METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE (I)Waste name: U161Waste code: METHANOL (I)Waste name: U154Waste code: 2,5-FURANDIONEWaste name: U147Waste code: METHANE, IODO-Waste name: U138Waste code: HYDRAZINE (R,T)Waste name: U133Waste code: FORMIC ACID (C,T)Waste name: U123Waste code: FORMALDEHYDEWaste name: U122Waste code: ETHYL METHANESULFONATEWaste name: U119Waste code: ETHANE, 1,1’-OXYBIS-(I)Waste name: U117Waste code: ETHYLENE OXIDE (I,T)Waste name: EXELIXIS, INC (Continued)1004677045 TC3837232.2s Page 147 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation MIXTURES. BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MORE OF THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F002, F004, AND F005, AND STILL SOLVENTS, AND, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NON-HALOGENATED NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS; AND ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONLY THE ABOVE SPENT ALCOHOL, CYCLOHEXANONE, AND METHANOL; ALL SPENT SOLVENT ACETATE, ETHYL BENZENE, ETHYL ETHER, METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE, N-BUTYL THE FOLLOWING SPENT NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: XYLENE, ACETONE, ETHYLWaste name: F003Waste code: SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. F005, AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND OF THE ABOVE HALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE LISTED IN F001, F004, OR BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR MORE 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, ORTHO-DICHLOROBENZENE, TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE, AND CHLOROBENZENE, 1,1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE, METHYLENE CHLORIDE, TRICHLOROETHYLENE, 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE, THE FOLLOWING SPENT HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TETRACHLOROETHYLENE,Waste name: F002Waste code: CHLOROFORMWaste name: D022Waste code: OF SUCH WASTE WOULD BY WASTE GUNPOWDER. DETONATION OR EXPLOSION WHEN EXPOSED TO HEAT OR A FLAME. ONE EXAMPLE WHEN EXPOSED TO WATER OR CORROSIVE MATERIALS, OR IF IT IS CAPABLE OF NORMALLY UNSTABLE, REACTS VIOLENTLY WITH WATER, GENERATES TOXIC GASES A MATERIAL IS CONSIDERED TO BE A REACTIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE IF IT ISWaste name: D003Waste code: DISPOSED, THE WASTE WOULD BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. THESE CAUSTIC OR ACID SOLUTIONS BECOME CONTAMINATED AND MUST BE USED BY MANY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN METAL PARTS PRIOR TO PAINTING. WHEN OR DEGREASE PARTS. HYDROCHLORIC ACID, A SOLUTION WITH A LOW PH, IS CAUSTIC SOLUTION WITH A HIGH PH, IS OFTEN USED BY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN CONSIDERED TO BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. SODIUM HYDROXIDE, A A WASTE WHICH HAS A PH OF LESS THAN 2 OR GREATER THAN 12.5 ISWaste name: D002Waste code: WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OFWaste name: D001Waste code: ETHANAMINE, N,N-DIETHYL- (OR) TRIETHYLAMINEWaste name: U404Waste code: BENZENE, DIMETHYL- (I,T)Waste name: U239Waste code: EXELIXIS, INC (Continued)1004677045 TC3837232.2s Page 148 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 38792Amount (Lbs): WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OFWaste name: D001Waste code: Annual Waste Handled: Last Biennial Reporting Year: 2013 Biennial Reports: MIXTURES. BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MORE OF THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F002, F004, AND F005, AND STILL SOLVENTS, AND, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NON-HALOGENATED NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS; AND ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONLY THE ABOVE SPENT ALCOHOL, CYCLOHEXANONE, AND METHANOL; ALL SPENT SOLVENT ACETATE, ETHYL BENZENE, ETHYL ETHER, METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE, N-BUTYL THE FOLLOWING SPENT NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: XYLENE, ACETONE, ETHYLWaste name: F003Waste code: SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. F005, AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND OF THE ABOVE HALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE LISTED IN F001, F004, OR BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR MORE 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, ORTHO-DICHLOROBENZENE, TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE, AND CHLOROBENZENE, 1,1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE, METHYLENE CHLORIDE, TRICHLOROETHYLENE, 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE, THE FOLLOWING SPENT HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TETRACHLOROETHYLENE,Waste name: F002Waste code: 1,2-DICHLOROETHANEWaste name: D028Waste code: DISPOSED, THE WASTE WOULD BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. THESE CAUSTIC OR ACID SOLUTIONS BECOME CONTAMINATED AND MUST BE USED BY MANY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN METAL PARTS PRIOR TO PAINTING. WHEN OR DEGREASE PARTS. HYDROCHLORIC ACID, A SOLUTION WITH A LOW PH, IS CAUSTIC SOLUTION WITH A HIGH PH, IS OFTEN USED BY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN CONSIDERED TO BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. SODIUM HYDROXIDE, A A WASTE WHICH HAS A PH OF LESS THAN 2 OR GREATER THAN 12.5 ISWaste name: D002Waste code: WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OFWaste name: D001Waste code: EXELIXIS, INC (Continued)1004677045 TC3837232.2s Page 149 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 9175Amount (Lbs): 1,2-DICHLOROETHANEWaste name: D028Waste code: 12878Amount (Lbs): CHLOROFORMWaste name: D022Waste code: 181Amount (Lbs): CARBON TETRACHLORIDEWaste name: D019Waste code: 120Amount (Lbs): BENZENEWaste name: D018Waste code: 4034Amount (Lbs): SILVERWaste name: D011Waste code: 3853Amount (Lbs): SELENIUMWaste name: D010Waste code: 26Amount (Lbs): MERCURYWaste name: D009Waste code: 2946Amount (Lbs): CHROMIUMWaste name: D007Waste code: 3853Amount (Lbs): BARIUMWaste name: D005Waste code: 94Amount (Lbs): ARSENICWaste name: D004Waste code: 4188Amount (Lbs): OF SUCH WASTE WOULD BY WASTE GUNPOWDER. DETONATION OR EXPLOSION WHEN EXPOSED TO HEAT OR A FLAME. ONE EXAMPLE WHEN EXPOSED TO WATER OR CORROSIVE MATERIALS, OR IF IT IS CAPABLE OF NORMALLY UNSTABLE, REACTS VIOLENTLY WITH WATER, GENERATES TOXIC GASES A MATERIAL IS CONSIDERED TO BE A REACTIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE IF IT ISWaste name: D003Waste code: 28184Amount (Lbs): DISPOSED, THE WASTE WOULD BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. THESE CAUSTIC OR ACID SOLUTIONS BECOME CONTAMINATED AND MUST BE USED BY MANY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN METAL PARTS PRIOR TO PAINTING. WHEN OR DEGREASE PARTS. HYDROCHLORIC ACID, A SOLUTION WITH A LOW PH, IS CAUSTIC SOLUTION WITH A HIGH PH, IS OFTEN USED BY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN CONSIDERED TO BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. SODIUM HYDROXIDE, A A WASTE WHICH HAS A PH OF LESS THAN 2 OR GREATER THAN 12.5 ISWaste name: D002Waste code: EXELIXIS, INC (Continued)1004677045 TC3837232.2s Page 150 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation LISTED IN F001, F002, OR F004; AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE SOLVENTS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF 2-ETHOXYETHANOL, AND 2-NITROPROPANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS KETONE, CARBON DISULFIDE, ISOBUTANOL, PYRIDINE, BENZENE, THE FOLLOWING SPENT NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TOLUENE, METHYL ETHYLWaste name: F005Waste code: 181Amount (Lbs): SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. F001, F002, AND F005; AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE OF THE ABOVE NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR MORE ACID, AND NITROBENZENE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, THE FOLLOWING SPENT NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: CRESOLS AND CRESYLICWaste name: F004Waste code: 36717Amount (Lbs): MIXTURES. BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MORE OF THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F002, F004, AND F005, AND STILL SOLVENTS, AND, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NON-HALOGENATED NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS; AND ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONLY THE ABOVE SPENT ALCOHOL, CYCLOHEXANONE, AND METHANOL; ALL SPENT SOLVENT ACETATE, ETHYL BENZENE, ETHYL ETHER, METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE, N-BUTYL THE FOLLOWING SPENT NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: XYLENE, ACETONE, ETHYLWaste name: F003Waste code: 16346Amount (Lbs): SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. F005, AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND OF THE ABOVE HALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE LISTED IN F001, F004, OR BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR MORE 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, ORTHO-DICHLOROBENZENE, TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE, AND CHLOROBENZENE, 1,1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE, METHYLENE CHLORIDE, TRICHLOROETHYLENE, 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE, THE FOLLOWING SPENT HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TETRACHLOROETHYLENE,Waste name: F002Waste code: 181Amount (Lbs): 2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOLWaste name: D042Waste code: 2946Amount (Lbs): TETRACHLOROETHYLENEWaste name: D039Waste code: 94Amount (Lbs): PYRIDINEWaste name: D038Waste code: 181Amount (Lbs): NITROBENZENEWaste name: D036Waste code: EXELIXIS, INC (Continued)1004677045 TC3837232.2s Page 151 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation SODIUM AZIDEWaste name: P105Waste code: 94Amount (Lbs): POTASSIUM CYANIDEWaste name: P098Waste code: 181Amount (Lbs): PHENYLTHIOUREAWaste name: P093Waste code: 181Amount (Lbs): OSMIUM OXIDE OSO4, (T-4)-Waste name: P087Waste code: 94Amount (Lbs): HYDRAZINE, METHYL-Waste name: P068Waste code: 94Amount (Lbs): AZIRIDINE, 2-METHYL-Waste name: P067Waste code: 94Amount (Lbs): 2,4-DINITROPHENOLWaste name: P048Waste code: 181Amount (Lbs): 1,2-BENZENEDIOL, 4-[1-HYDROXY-2-(METHYLAMINO)ETHYL]-, (R)-Waste name: P042Waste code: 134Amount (Lbs): CYANIDES (SOLUBLE CYANIDE SALTS), NOT OTHERWISE SPECIFIEDWaste name: P030Waste code: 94Amount (Lbs): COPPER CYANIDEWaste name: P029Waste code: 94Amount (Lbs): ARSENIC OXIDE AS2O3Waste name: P012Waste code: 181Amount (Lbs): ALLYL ALCOHOLWaste name: P005Waste code: 181Amount (Lbs): PREPURIFIED 2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL AS THE SOLE COMPONENT). INCLUDE FORMULATIONS CONTAINING HEXACHLOROPHENE SYTHESIZED FROM COMPOUNDS DERIVED FROM THESE CHLOROPHENOLS. (THIS LISTING DOES NOT PENTACHLOROPHENOL OR DISCARDED UNUSED FORMULATIONS CONTAINING DISCARDED UNUSED FORMULATIONS CONTAINING TRI-, TETRA-, ORWaste name: F027Waste code: 3066Amount (Lbs): THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. EXELIXIS, INC (Continued)1004677045 TC3837232.2s Page 152 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2946Amount (Lbs): ETHANE, 1,1’-OXYBIS-(I)Waste name: U117Waste code: 42Amount (Lbs): ETHYLENE OXIDE (I,T)Waste name: U115Waste code: 2988Amount (Lbs): DIMETHYLAMINE (I)Waste name: U092Waste code: 3127Amount (Lbs): METHANE, DICHLORO-Waste name: U080Waste code: 2946Amount (Lbs): 2-BUTENE, 1,4-DICHLORO- (I,T)Waste name: U074Waste code: 2946Amount (Lbs): 1,2-BENZENEDICARBOXYLIC ACID, DIBUTYL ESTERWaste name: U069Waste code: 2946Amount (Lbs): CHLOROMETHYL METHYL ETHERWaste name: U046Waste code: 2946Amount (Lbs): CHLOROFORMWaste name: U044Waste code: 2946Amount (Lbs): BENZIDINEWaste name: U021Waste code: 907Amount (Lbs): BENZENESULFONIC ACID CHLORIDE (C,R)Waste name: U020Waste code: 2946Amount (Lbs): AMITROLEWaste name: U011Waste code: 2946Amount (Lbs): ACRYLAMIDEWaste name: U007Waste code: 490Amount (Lbs): ACETONE (I)Waste name: U002Waste code: 94Amount (Lbs): SODIUM CYANIDEWaste name: P106Waste code: 275Amount (Lbs): EXELIXIS, INC (Continued)1004677045 TC3837232.2s Page 153 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation U219Waste code: 2946Amount (Lbs): ETHENE, TETRACHLORO-Waste name: U210Waste code: 2946Amount (Lbs): 1,3-BENZENEDIOLWaste name: U201Waste code: 947Amount (Lbs): P-BENZOQUINONEWaste name: U197Waste code: 2946Amount (Lbs): 1-PROPANAMINE (I,T)Waste name: U194Waste code: 3853Amount (Lbs): PHENOLWaste name: U188Waste code: 2946Amount (Lbs): 1-NAPHTHALENAMINEWaste name: U167Waste code: 490Amount (Lbs): METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE (I)Waste name: U161Waste code: 490Amount (Lbs): METHANOL (I)Waste name: U154Waste code: 2946Amount (Lbs): 2,5-FURANDIONEWaste name: U147Waste code: 2946Amount (Lbs): METHANE, IODO-Waste name: U138Waste code: 3853Amount (Lbs): HYDRAZINE (R,T)Waste name: U133Waste code: 907Amount (Lbs): FORMIC ACID (C,T)Waste name: U123Waste code: 2946Amount (Lbs): FORMALDEHYDEWaste name: U122Waste code: 2946Amount (Lbs): ETHYL METHANESULFONATEWaste name: U119Waste code: EXELIXIS, INC (Continued)1004677045 TC3837232.2s Page 154 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reported Enforcement action: EPAViolation lead agency: 10/21/2005Date achieved compliance: 09/07/2005Date violation determined: Generators - Pre-transportArea of violation: Not reportedRegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: EPA Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 10/21/2005 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: EPAViolation lead agency: 10/21/2005Date achieved compliance: 09/07/2005Date violation determined: Generators - Pre-transportArea of violation: Not reportedRegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 05/13/2008 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 05/21/2008Date achieved compliance: 05/13/2008Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: Not reportedRegulation violated: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: 2946Amount (Lbs): ETHANAMINE, N,N-DIETHYL- (OR) TRIETHYLAMINEWaste name: U404Waste code: 490Amount (Lbs): BENZENE, DIMETHYL- (I,T)Waste name: U239Waste code: 2946Amount (Lbs): TETRASODIUM SALT DIMETHYL[1,1’-BIPHENYL]-4,4’-DIYL)BIS(AZO)BIS[5-AMINO-4-HYDROXY]-, 2,7-NAPHTHALENEDISULFONIC ACID, 3,3’-[(3,3’-Waste name: U236Waste code: 2946Amount (Lbs): BENZENE, METHYL-Waste name: U220Waste code: 2946Amount (Lbs): THIOUREAWaste name: EXELIXIS, INC (Continued)1004677045 TC3837232.2s Page 155 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation EPAEvaluation lead agency: 10/21/2005Date achieved compliance: Generators - Pre-transportArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 09/07/2005Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: 05/21/2008Date achieved compliance: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 05/13/2008Evaluation date: Evaluation Action Summary: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: EPA Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 10/04/2005 Enforcement action date: EXELIXIS, INC (Continued)1004677045 STORES HAZ MAT <219GAL,1,999LB, 879CFDescription: PR0029119Record Id: STORES HAZ MAT <219GAL,1,999LB, 879FT3Prog Element Code: FA0024442Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 1254 ft.Site 8 of 11 in cluster O 0.237 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 13 ft. 1/8-1/4S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 NE169 HARBOR N/A O139 San Mateo Co. BIRIZZETTO WELDING & METAL SALESS113757141 waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: 650-474-8200Contact telephone: USContact country: SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 170 HARBOR WAY STE 300Contact address: CHARLES HARTContact: CAR000221762EPA ID: SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 STE 300 170 HARBOR WAYFacility address: THRESHOLD PHARMACEUTICALS INCFacility name: 09/19/2011Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 1268 ft.Site 9 of 11 in cluster O 0.240 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 13 ft. 1/8-1/4SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 NE170 HARBOR WAY CAR000221762 O140 RCRA-SQGTHRESHOLD PHARMACEUTICALS INC1014915695 TC3837232.2s Page 156 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 791Waste code: 551Waste name: 551Waste code: 352Waste name: 352Waste code: 214Waste name: 214Waste code: 181Waste name: 181Waste code: Hazardous Waste Summary: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 01/01/2000Owner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: 650-474-8200Owner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 170 HARBOR WAY STE 300Owner/operator address: THRESHOLD PHARAMCEUTICALS INCOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 01/01/2000Owner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: Not reported Not reportedOwner/operator address: THRESHOLD PHARMACEUTICALS INCOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous THRESHOLD PHARMACEUTICALS INC (Continued)1014915695 TC3837232.2s Page 157 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS; AND ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONLY THE ABOVE SPENT ALCOHOL, CYCLOHEXANONE, AND METHANOL; ALL SPENT SOLVENT ACETATE, ETHYL BENZENE, ETHYL ETHER, METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE, N-BUTYL THE FOLLOWING SPENT NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: XYLENE, ACETONE, ETHYLWaste name: F003Waste code: SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. F005, AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND OF THE ABOVE HALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE LISTED IN F001, F004, OR BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR MORE 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, ORTHO-DICHLOROBENZENE, TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE, AND CHLOROBENZENE, 1,1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE, METHYLENE CHLORIDE, TRICHLOROETHYLENE, 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE, THE FOLLOWING SPENT HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TETRACHLOROETHYLENE,Waste name: F002Waste code: SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. IN F002, F004, AND F005, AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE HALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF FLUOROCARBONS; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS USED IN DEGREASING 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE, CARBON TETRACHLORIDE, AND CHLORINATED TETRACHLOROETHYLENE, TRICHLOROETHYLENE, METHYLENE CHLORIDE, THE FOLLOWING SPENT HALOGENATED SOLVENTS USED IN DEGREASING:Waste name: F001Waste code: CHLOROFORMWaste name: D022Waste code: OF SUCH WASTE WOULD BY WASTE GUNPOWDER. DETONATION OR EXPLOSION WHEN EXPOSED TO HEAT OR A FLAME. ONE EXAMPLE WHEN EXPOSED TO WATER OR CORROSIVE MATERIALS, OR IF IT IS CAPABLE OF NORMALLY UNSTABLE, REACTS VIOLENTLY WITH WATER, GENERATES TOXIC GASES A MATERIAL IS CONSIDERED TO BE A REACTIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE IF IT ISWaste name: D003Waste code: DISPOSED, THE WASTE WOULD BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. THESE CAUSTIC OR ACID SOLUTIONS BECOME CONTAMINATED AND MUST BE USED BY MANY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN METAL PARTS PRIOR TO PAINTING. WHEN OR DEGREASE PARTS. HYDROCHLORIC ACID, A SOLUTION WITH A LOW PH, IS CAUSTIC SOLUTION WITH A HIGH PH, IS OFTEN USED BY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN CONSIDERED TO BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. SODIUM HYDROXIDE, A A WASTE WHICH HAS A PH OF LESS THAN 2 OR GREATER THAN 12.5 ISWaste name: D002Waste code: WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OFWaste name: D001Waste code: 791Waste name: THRESHOLD PHARMACEUTICALS INC (Continued)1014915695 TC3837232.2s Page 158 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No violations foundViolation Status: THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. LISTED IN F001, F002, OR F004; AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE SOLVENTS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF 2-ETHOXYETHANOL, AND 2-NITROPROPANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS KETONE, CARBON DISULFIDE, ISOBUTANOL, PYRIDINE, BENZENE, THE FOLLOWING SPENT NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TOLUENE, METHYL ETHYLWaste name: F005Waste code: MIXTURES. BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MORE OF THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F002, F004, AND F005, AND STILL SOLVENTS, AND, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NON-HALOGENATED THRESHOLD PHARMACEUTICALS INC (Continued)1014915695 USOwner/operator country: LOS ANGELES, CA 90074 FILE 51142Owner/operator address: HCP LIFE SCIENCE REIT, INC.Owner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: 100 kg of that material at any time hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting kg of acutely hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1 waste during any calendar month; or generates 1 kg or less of acutely cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely hazardous residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from the during any calendar month; or generates more than 100 kg of any calendar month; or generates more than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste Handler: generates 1,000 kg or more of hazardous waste during anyDescription: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: PrivateLand type: 09EPA Region: MSAKAI@EXELIXIS.COMContact email: (650) 837-7129Contact telephone: USContact country: SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 249 EAST GRAND AVE.Contact address: MATT SAKAIContact: SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94083 PO BOX 511Mailing address: CAR000072132EPA ID: SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 170 HARBOR WAYFacility address: EXELIXIS NC.Facility name: 06/17/2010Date form received by agency: RCRA-LQG: 1268 ft.Site 10 of 11 in cluster O 0.240 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 13 ft. 1/8-1/4SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 NE CHMIRS170 HARBOR WAY CAR000072132 O141 RCRA-LQGEXELIXIS NC.1001967696 TC3837232.2s Page 159 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation YesGenerated waste on-site: YesAccumulated waste on-site: ThermostatsWaste type: YesGenerated waste on-site: YesAccumulated waste on-site: LampsWaste type: YesGenerated waste on-site: YesAccumulated waste on-site: BatteriesWaste type: Universal Waste Summary: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 01/01/0001Owner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (510) 834-7716Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: OAKLAND, CA 94612 1939 HARRISON ST STE 175Owner/operator address: BRITTANIA MNGMT SERVICESOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 05/07/2000Owner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: Not reported Not reportedOwner/operator address: EXELIXIS INC.Owner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 12/01/2007Owner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: EXELIXIS NC. (Continued)1001967696 TC3837232.2s Page 160 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation D006Waste code: ARSENICWaste name: D004Waste code: OF SUCH WASTE WOULD BY WASTE GUNPOWDER. DETONATION OR EXPLOSION WHEN EXPOSED TO HEAT OR A FLAME. ONE EXAMPLE WHEN EXPOSED TO WATER OR CORROSIVE MATERIALS, OR IF IT IS CAPABLE OF NORMALLY UNSTABLE, REACTS VIOLENTLY WITH WATER, GENERATES TOXIC GASES A MATERIAL IS CONSIDERED TO BE A REACTIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE IF IT ISWaste name: D003Waste code: DISPOSED, THE WASTE WOULD BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. THESE CAUSTIC OR ACID SOLUTIONS BECOME CONTAMINATED AND MUST BE USED BY MANY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN METAL PARTS PRIOR TO PAINTING. WHEN OR DEGREASE PARTS. HYDROCHLORIC ACID, A SOLUTION WITH A LOW PH, IS CAUSTIC SOLUTION WITH A HIGH PH, IS OFTEN USED BY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN CONSIDERED TO BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. SODIUM HYDROXIDE, A A WASTE WHICH HAS A PH OF LESS THAN 2 OR GREATER THAN 12.5 ISWaste name: D002Waste code: WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OFWaste name: D001Waste code: Hazardous Waste Summary: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: EXELIXIS, INC. 170 HARBORSite name: EXELIXIS NC.Facility name: 02/06/2002Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: EXELIXIS INCSite name: EXELIXIS NC.Facility name: 02/11/2002Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: EXELIXIS, INC.Site name: EXELIXIS NC.Facility name: 02/26/2004Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: EXELIXIS, INC.Site name: EXELIXIS NC.Facility name: 02/27/2006Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: EXELIXIS, INC.Site name: EXELIXIS NC.Facility name: 02/20/2008Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: EXELIXIS NC. (Continued)1001967696 TC3837232.2s Page 161 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation P030Waste code: THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. LISTED IN F001, F002, OR F004; AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE SOLVENTS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF 2-ETHOXYETHANOL, AND 2-NITROPROPANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS KETONE, CARBON DISULFIDE, ISOBUTANOL, PYRIDINE, BENZENE, THE FOLLOWING SPENT NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TOLUENE, METHYL ETHYLWaste name: F005Waste code: MIXTURES. BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MORE OF THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F002, F004, AND F005, AND STILL SOLVENTS, AND, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NON-HALOGENATED NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS; AND ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONLY THE ABOVE SPENT ALCOHOL, CYCLOHEXANONE, AND METHANOL; ALL SPENT SOLVENT ACETATE, ETHYL BENZENE, ETHYL ETHER, METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE, N-BUTYL THE FOLLOWING SPENT NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: XYLENE, ACETONE, ETHYLWaste name: F003Waste code: SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. F005, AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND OF THE ABOVE HALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE LISTED IN F001, F004, OR BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR MORE 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, ORTHO-DICHLOROBENZENE, TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE, AND CHLOROBENZENE, 1,1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE, METHYLENE CHLORIDE, TRICHLOROETHYLENE, 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE, THE FOLLOWING SPENT HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TETRACHLOROETHYLENE,Waste name: F002Waste code: SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. IN F002, F004, AND F005, AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE HALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF FLUOROCARBONS; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS USED IN DEGREASING 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE, CARBON TETRACHLORIDE, AND CHLORINATED TETRACHLOROETHYLENE, TRICHLOROETHYLENE, METHYLENE CHLORIDE, THE FOLLOWING SPENT HALOGENATED SOLVENTS USED IN DEGREASING:Waste name: F001Waste code: CHLOROFORMWaste name: D022Waste code: BENZENEWaste name: D018Waste code: MERCURYWaste name: D009Waste code: CHROMIUMWaste name: D007Waste code: CADMIUMWaste name: EXELIXIS NC. (Continued)1001967696 TC3837232.2s Page 162 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation U404Waste code: BENZENAMINE, 2-METHYL-Waste name: U328Waste code: BENZENE, DIMETHYL- (I,T)Waste name: U239Waste code: FURAN, TETRAHYDRO-(I)Waste name: U213Waste code: PYRIDINEWaste name: U196Waste code: PHENOLWaste name: U188Waste code: HYDROGEN SULFIDEWaste name: U135Waste code: FORMIC ACID (C,T)Waste name: U123Waste code: ETHANE, 1,1’-OXYBIS-(I)Waste name: U117Waste code: DIMETHYL SULFATEWaste name: U103Waste code: DIMETHYLAMINE (I)Waste name: U092Waste code: METHANE, DICHLORO-Waste name: U080Waste code: CHLOROFORMWaste name: U044Waste code: BENZENEBUTANOIC ACID, 4-[BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL)AMINO]-Waste name: U035Waste code: AZASERINEWaste name: U015Waste code: ACRYLAMIDEWaste name: U007Waste code: ACETONE (I)Waste name: U002Waste code: SODIUM CYANIDEWaste name: P106Waste code: SODIUM AZIDEWaste name: P105Waste code: CYANIDES (SOLUBLE CYANIDE SALTS), NOT OTHERWISE SPECIFIEDWaste name: EXELIXIS NC. (Continued)1001967696 TC3837232.2s Page 163 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OFWaste name: D001Waste code: 791Waste name: 791Waste code: 725Waste name: 725Waste code: 551Waste name: 551Waste code: 352Waste name: 352Waste code: 331Waste name: 331Waste code: 214Waste name: 214Waste code: MIXTURES. BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MORE OF THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F002, F004, AND F005, AND STILL SOLVENTS, AND, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NON-HALOGENATED NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS; AND ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONLY THE ABOVE SPENT ALCOHOL, CYCLOHEXANONE, AND METHANOL; ALL SPENT SOLVENT ACETATE, ETHYL BENZENE, ETHYL ETHER, METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE, N-BUTYL THE FOLLOWING SPENT NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: XYLENE, ACETONE, ETHYLWaste name: F003Waste code: CHLOROFORMWaste name: D022Waste code: DISPOSED, THE WASTE WOULD BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. THESE CAUSTIC OR ACID SOLUTIONS BECOME CONTAMINATED AND MUST BE USED BY MANY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN METAL PARTS PRIOR TO PAINTING. WHEN OR DEGREASE PARTS. HYDROCHLORIC ACID, A SOLUTION WITH A LOW PH, IS CAUSTIC SOLUTION WITH A HIGH PH, IS OFTEN USED BY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN CONSIDERED TO BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. SODIUM HYDROXIDE, A A WASTE WHICH HAS A PH OF LESS THAN 2 OR GREATER THAN 12.5 ISWaste name: D002Waste code: WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OFWaste name: D001Waste code: ETHANAMINE, N,N-DIETHYL- (OR) TRIETHYLAMINEWaste name: EXELIXIS NC. (Continued)1001967696 TC3837232.2s Page 164 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 02/18/2009 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 03/18/2009Date achieved compliance: 02/18/2009Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: Not reportedRegulation violated: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: PHENOLWaste name: U188Waste code: ETHANE, 1,2-DIBROMO-Waste name: U067Waste code: CHLOROFORMWaste name: U044Waste code: OSMIUM OXIDE OSO4, (T-4)-Waste name: P087Waste code: MIXTURES. BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MORE OF THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F002, F004, AND F005, AND STILL SOLVENTS, AND, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NON-HALOGENATED NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS; AND ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONLY THE ABOVE SPENT ALCOHOL, CYCLOHEXANONE, AND METHANOL; ALL SPENT SOLVENT ACETATE, ETHYL BENZENE, ETHYL ETHER, METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE, N-BUTYL THE FOLLOWING SPENT NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: XYLENE, ACETONE, ETHYLWaste name: F003Waste code: CHLOROFORMWaste name: D022Waste code: MERCURYWaste name: D009Waste code: DISPOSED, THE WASTE WOULD BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. THESE CAUSTIC OR ACID SOLUTIONS BECOME CONTAMINATED AND MUST BE USED BY MANY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN METAL PARTS PRIOR TO PAINTING. WHEN OR DEGREASE PARTS. HYDROCHLORIC ACID, A SOLUTION WITH A LOW PH, IS CAUSTIC SOLUTION WITH A HIGH PH, IS OFTEN USED BY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN CONSIDERED TO BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. SODIUM HYDROXIDE, A A WASTE WHICH HAS A PH OF LESS THAN 2 OR GREATER THAN 12.5 ISWaste name: D002Waste code: WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, EXELIXIS NC. (Continued)1001967696 TC3837232.2s Page 165 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedOthers Number Of Fatalities: Not reportedOthers Number Of Injuries: Not reportedOthers Number Of Decontaminated: Not reportedResponding Agency Personel # Of Fatalities: Not reportedResponding Agency Personel # Of Injuries: Not reportedResp Agncy Personel # Of Decontaminated: Not reportedMore Than Two Substances Involved?: Not reportedSpecial Studies 6: Not reportedSpecial Studies 5: Not reportedSpecial Studies 4: Not reportedSpecial Studies 3: Not reportedSpecial Studies 2: Not reportedSpecial Studies 1: Not reportedProperty Management: Not reportedEstimated Temperature: Not reportedSurrounding Area: Not reportedTime Completed: Not reportedTime Notified: Not reportedAgency Incident Number: Not reportedAgency Id Number: Not reportedProperty Use: Not reportedDate Completed: Not reportedIncident Date: Not reportedOES Time: Not reportedOES Date: 12/14/1999OES notification: 99-5291OES Incident Number: CHMIRS: EPAEvaluation lead agency: 10/04/2005Date achieved compliance: Generators - Pre-transportArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 09/07/2005Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: 03/18/2009Date achieved compliance: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 02/18/2009Evaluation date: Evaluation Action Summary: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: EPA Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 10/04/2005 Enforcement action date: Not reported Enforcement action: EPAViolation lead agency: 10/04/2005Date achieved compliance: 09/07/2005Date violation determined: Generators - Pre-transportArea of violation: Not reportedRegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: EXELIXIS NC. (Continued)1001967696 TC3837232.2s Page 166 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation was under control Fifty people in the surrounding area were evacuated until situation Backhoe was digging and punctured a 4" main on a construction site.Description: 0Number of Fatalities: 0Number of Injuries: 50Evacuations: 0Unknown: 0Tons: 0Sheen: 0Quarts: 0Pints: 0Ounces: 0Liters: 0Pounds: 0Grams: 0Gallons: 9CUFT: 0Cups: 0BBLS: Not reportedQuantity Released: Natural GasSubstance: Not reportedE Date: OtherSite Type: YesContained: Not reportedAmount: Not reportedAdmin Agency: 12/14/199912:00:00 AMIncident Date: South San Francisco FDAgency: 1999Year: Not reportedDate/Time: Not reportedOther: Not reportedMeasure: Not reportedType: Not reportedWhat Happened: Not reportedContainment: n/aCleanup By: Not reportedSpill Site: Not reportedWaterway: NoWaterway Involved: Not reportedFacility Telephone: Not reportedComments: Not reportedReport Date: Not reportedReporting Officer Name/ID: Not reportedCompany Name: Not reportedCA/DOT/PUC/ICC Number: Not reportedVehicle Id Number: Not reportedVehicle State: Not reportedVehicle License Number: Not reportedVehicle Make/year: EXELIXIS NC. (Continued)1001967696 TC3837232.2s Page 167 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation GENERATES & RECYCLES WASTE OIL/SOLVENTDescription: PR0024220Record Id: GENERATES and RECYCLES WASTE OIL/SOLVENTProg Element Code: FA0014603Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 1272 ft.Site 6 of 7 in cluster P 0.241 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 22 ft. 1/8-1/4S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 West61 AIRPORT N/A P142 San Mateo Co. BIGENOTYPES S113756030 GENERATES & RECYCLES WASTE OIL/SOLVENTDescription: PR0037493Record Id: GENERATES and RECYCLES WASTE OIL/SOLVENTProg Element Code: FA0026018Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: BUSINESS PLAN - GENERALDescription: PR0067607Record Id: BUSINESS PLAN - GENERALProg Element Code: FA0026018Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 1272 ft.Site 7 of 7 in cluster P 0.241 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 22 ft. 1/8-1/4S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 West61 AIRPORT N/A P143 San Mateo Co. BIHERMES BIOSCIENCES, INC S113757427 GENERATES & RECYCLES WASTE OIL/SOLVENTDescription: PR0057654Record Id: GENERATES and RECYCLES WASTE OIL/SOLVENTProg Element Code: FA0045073Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 1283 ft.Site 1 of 11 in cluster R 0.243 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 20 ft. 1/8-1/4S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 SSE259 WATTIS AVE - ADJ BACKLOT N/A R144 San Mateo Co. BISAN FRANCISCO DELUXE TOURS S113758675 GENERATES & RECYCLES WASTE OIL/SOLVENTDescription: PR0011781Record Id: GENERATES and RECYCLES WASTE OIL/SOLVENTProg Element Code: FA0015764Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 1290 ft.Site 2 of 11 in cluster R 0.244 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 20 ft. 1/8-1/4S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 SSE261 WATTIS N/A R145 San Mateo Co. BISAMSON PRESS S113756146 TC3837232.2s Page 168 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation STORES HAZ MAT <219GAL,1,999LB, 879CFDescription: PR0004591Record Id: STORES HAZ MAT <219GAL,1,999LB, 879FT3Prog Element Code: FA0015764Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: LESS THAN 500 TIRESDescription: PR0045228Record Id: LESS THAN 500 TIRESProg Element Code: FA0015764Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAMSON PRESS (Continued)S113756146 1996 CHEVRON 9.7875 300 S AIRPORT BLVD RGA LUST: 1296 ft.Site 1 of 7 in cluster S 0.245 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 19 ft. 1/8-1/4SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA SSW300 S AIRPORT BLVD N/A S146 RGA LUSTS114219099 300 S AIRPORT BLVDAddress: 2005Year: AIRPORT CHEVRONName: 300 S AIRPORT BLVDAddress: 2004Year: AIRPORT CHEVRONName: 300 S AIRPORT BLVDAddress: 2003Year: AIRPORT CHEVRONName: 300 S AIRPORT BLVDAddress: 2002Year: GREINER SERVICE STATIONS INCName: 300 S AIRPORT BLVDAddress: 2001Year: GREINER SERVICE STATIONS INCName: 300 S AIRPORT BLVDAddress: 2000Year: CHEVRON STATIONS SOUTH SAN FRANCISCOName: 300 S AIRPORT BLVDAddress: 1999Year: CHEVRON STATIONS SOUTH SAN FRANCISCOName: EDR Historical Auto Stations: 1296 ft.Site 2 of 7 in cluster S 0.245 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 19 ft. 1/8-1/4SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 SSW300 S AIRPORT BLVD N/A S147 EDR US Hist Auto Stat1015400366 TC3837232.2s Page 169 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 300 S AIRPORT BLVDAddress: 2012Year: CHEVRONName: 300 S AIRPORT BLVDAddress: 2011Year: CHEVRONName: 300 S AIRPORT BLVDAddress: 2010Year: CHEVRONName: 300 S AIRPORT BLVDAddress: 2009Year: CHEVRON STATIONSName: 300 S AIRPORT BLVDAddress: 2008Year: CHEVRONName: 300 S AIRPORT BLVDAddress: 2007Year: AIRPORT CHEVRONName: 300 S AIRPORT BLVDAddress: 2006Year: AIRPORT CHEVRONName: (Continued)1015400366 STORES HAZ MAT <1,199GAL,9,999LB,4,799CFDescription: PR0004341Record Id: STORES HAZ MAT <1,199GAL,9,999LB,4,799FT3Prog Element Code: FA0003587Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: GENERATES & RECYCLES WASTE OIL/SOLVENTDescription: PR0011610Record Id: GENERATES and RECYCLES WASTE OIL/SOLVENTProg Element Code: FA0003587Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 1298 ft.Site 3 of 11 in cluster R 0.246 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 20 ft. 1/8-1/4S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 SSE263 WATTIS N/A R148 San Mateo Co. BIROY BRIZIO STREET RODS S113755259 TC3837232.2s Page 170 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation GENERATES & RECYCLES WASTE OIL/SOLVENTDescription: PR0024221Record Id: GENERATES and RECYCLES WASTE OIL/SOLVENTProg Element Code: FA0014634Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 1302 ft.Site 11 of 11 in cluster O 0.247 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 13 ft. 1/8-1/4S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 NE150 HARBOR N/A O149 San Mateo Co. BIVALENCIA BROS S113756039 4Container Num: 004Tank Num: Stock InventorLeak Detection: 0000250 unknownTank Construction: Not reportedType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00010000Tank Capacity: 1971Year Installed: 3Container Num: 003Tank Num: Stock InventorLeak Detection: 0000250 unknownTank Construction: Not reportedType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00005000Tank Capacity: 1971Year Installed: 2Container Num: 002Tank Num: Stock InventorLeak Detection: 0000250 unknownTank Construction: Not reportedType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00010000Tank Capacity: 1971Year Installed: 1Container Num: 001Tank Num: SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105Owner City,St,Zip: 575 MARKETOwner Address: CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.Owner Name: 4155833251Telephone: GREINER,FRANKContact Name: 0004Total Tanks: Not reportedOther Type: Gas StationFacility Type: 00000063045Facility ID: STATERegion: HIST UST: 1311 ft.Site 3 of 7 in cluster S 0.248 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 19 ft. 1/8-1/4SO SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 SSW300 SO. AIRPORT BLVD N/A S150 HIST UST97875 U001594726 TC3837232.2s Page 171 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Stock InventorLeak Detection: 0000130 unknownTank Construction: Not reportedType of Fuel: WASTETank Used for: 00001000Tank Capacity: 1956Year Installed: 97875 (Continued)U001594726 2003 CHEVRON 9-7875 300 AIRPORT 2005 CHEVRON 9-7875 300 AIRPORT 2006 CHEVRON 9-7875 300 AIRPORT 2007 CHEVRON 9-7875 300 AIRPORT RGA LUST: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remediation Action Underway: Not reportedPollution Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedPollution Characterization Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assesment Began: Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: OMHow Discovered: 550134Case Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: LUST REG 2: 1311 ft.Site 4 of 7 in cluster S 0.248 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 19 ft. 1/8-1/4S SAN FRANCISCO, CA SSW RGA LUST300 AIRPORT N/A S151 LUSTS105030448 Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.404449Longitude: 37.645985Latitude: T0608100864Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 41-0939Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 41Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 1311 ft.Site 5 of 7 in cluster S 0.248 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 19 ft. 1/8-1/4 RGA LUSTSOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 SSW LUST300 SOUTH AIRPORT BOULEVARD N/A S152 HIST CORTESECHEVRON 9-7875 S110060527 TC3837232.2s Page 172 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2011 CHEVRON 9-7875 300 SOUTH AIRPORT BOULEVARD 2012 CHEVRON 9-7875 300 SOUTH AIRPORT BOULEVARD RGA LUST: Notice of Responsibility - #1Action: 09/29/1994Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100864Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100864Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 12/11/2002Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608100864Global Id: 09/20/1994Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608100864Global Id: Status History: Not reportedPhone Number: nkatyl@waterboards.ca.govEmail: OAKLANDCity: 1515 CLAY STREETAddress: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: NANCY KATYLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100864Global Id: 6503726295Phone Number: cice@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: CHARLES ICEContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100864Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: Local Agency WarehouseFile Location: 550134LOC Case Number: 41-0939RB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: CLICase Worker: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 12/11/2002Status Date: CHEVRON 9-7875 (Continued)S110060527 TC3837232.2s Page 173 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2008 CHEVRON 9-7875 300 SOUTH AIRPORT BOULEVARD 2009 CHEVRON 9-7875 300 SOUTH AIRPORT BOULEVARD 2010 CHEVRON 9-7875 300 SOUTH AIRPORT BOULEVARD CHEVRON 9-7875 (Continued)S110060527 OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: SAN RAMON, CA 94583 PO BOX 6004Owner/operator address: CHEVRON PRODUCTS CO.Owner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 08/27/1971Owner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: Not reported Not reportedOwner/operator address: CHEVRON PRODUCTS CO.Owner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: 100 kg of that material at any time hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting kg of acutely hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1 waste during any calendar month; or generates 1 kg or less of acutely cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely hazardous residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from the during any calendar month; or generates more than 100 kg of any calendar month; or generates more than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste Handler: generates 1,000 kg or more of hazardous waste during anyDescription: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: NAWTDESK@CHEVRON.COMContact email: (925) 842-5931Contact telephone: Not reportedContact country: Not reported Not reportedContact address: KATHY L NORRISContact: SAN RAMON, CA 94583 PO BOX 6004Mailing address: CAR000125302EPA ID: SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 300 S AIRPORT BLVD.Facility address: CHEVRON 97875Facility name: 02/19/2008Date form received by agency: RCRA-LQG: 1311 ft.Site 6 of 7 in cluster S 0.248 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 19 ft. 1/8-1/4SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 SSW300 S AIRPORT BLVD.CAR000125302 S153 RCRA-LQGCHEVRON 97875 1006805267 TC3837232.2s Page 174 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No violations foundViolation Status: BENZENEWaste name: D018Waste code: WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OFWaste name: D001Waste code: Hazardous Waste Summary: Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: CHEVRON STATION NO 97875Site name: CHEVRON 97875Facility name: 06/17/2002Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: CHEVRON 97875Facility name: 02/24/2004Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: CHEVRON 97875Facility name: 02/16/2006Date form received by agency: Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: CHEVRON 97875Facility name: 02/16/2006Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 02/27/1971Owner/Op start date: CHEVRON 97875 (Continued)1006805267 TC3837232.2s Page 175 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedOwner Tank Id: ATank Status: 10-13-88Created Date: 04-20-94Action Date: 04-20-94Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 2Number: 550049Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: PREMIUM UNLEContent: PStg: M.V. FUELTank Use: 5000Capacity: 04-20-94Actv Date: 41-000-550049-000002Swrcb Tank Id: UNKNOWNOwner Tank Id: ATank Status: 10-13-88Created Date: 04-20-94Action Date: 04-20-94Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 2Number: 550049Comp Number: ActiveStatus: 4Number Of Tanks: PRM UNLEADEDContent: PStg: M.V. FUELTank Use: 10000Capacity: 04-20-94Actv Date: 41-000-550049-000001Swrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: ATank Status: 10-13-88Created Date: 04-20-94Action Date: 04-20-94Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 2Number: 550049Comp Number: ActiveStatus: SWEEPS UST: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: 015141270APN Number: T0608100864Global ID: 9- Case ClosedFacility Status: 550134Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUST: 1311 ft.Site 7 of 7 in cluster S 0.248 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 19 ft. 1/8-1/4S SAN FRANCISCO, CA SSW SWEEPS UST300 S AIRPORT BLVD N/A S154 LUSTCHEVRON 9-7875 S104494146 TC3837232.2s Page 176 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: WASTE OILContent: WStg: OILTank Use: 1000Capacity: 04-20-94Actv Date: 41-000-550049-000004Swrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: ATank Status: 10-13-88Created Date: 04-20-94Action Date: 04-20-94Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 2Number: 550049Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PStg: M.V. FUELTank Use: 10000Capacity: 04-20-94Actv Date: 41-000-550049-000003Swrcb Tank Id: CHEVRON 9-7875 (Continued)S104494146 STORES HAZ MAT <219GAL,1,999LB, 879CFDescription: PR0054536Record Id: STORES HAZ MAT <219GAL,1,999LB, 879FT3Prog Element Code: FA0037661Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 1312 ft.Site 4 of 11 in cluster R 0.248 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 19 ft. 1/8-1/4S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 SSE267 WATTIS N/A R155 San Mateo Co. BIDESIGN IMAGERY S113758436 1993 MONROE SCHNEIDER ASSOC. 274 WATTIS WAY 1994 MONROE SCHNEIDER ASSOC. 274 WATTIS WAY 1995 MONROE SCHNEIDER ASSOC. 274 WATTIS WAY 1996 MONROE SCHNEIDER ASSOC. 274 WATTIS WAY RGA LUST: 1343 ft.Site 5 of 11 in cluster R 0.254 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 19 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA SSE274 WATTIS WAY N/A R156 RGA LUSTS114217236 TC3837232.2s Page 177 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 05/06/1992Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608100351Global Id: 05/08/1991Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608100351Global Id: Status History: Not reportedPhone Number: nkatyl@waterboards.ca.govEmail: OAKLANDCity: 1515 CLAY STREETAddress: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: NANCY KATYLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100351Global Id: 6503726298Phone Number: jmadden@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: JACOB MADDENContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100351Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: XylenePotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: Local AgencyFile Location: 550077LOC Case Number: 41-0369RB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: JMCase Worker: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 05/06/1992Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.403276Longitude: 37.647374Latitude: T0608100351Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 41-0369Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 41Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 1343 ft.WDSSite 6 of 11 in cluster R 0.254 mi.RGA LUST Relative: Lower Actual: 19 ft. 1/4-1/2 CHMIRSSOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 SSE LUST274 WATTIS WAY N/A R157 HIST CORTESEAIRBORNE EXPRESS CORP OYS S103648668 TC3837232.2s Page 178 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoWaterway Involved: Not reportedFacility Telephone: Not reportedComments: Not reportedReport Date: Not reportedReporting Officer Name/ID: Not reportedCompany Name: Not reportedCA/DOT/PUC/ICC Number: Not reportedVehicle Id Number: Not reportedVehicle State: Not reportedVehicle License Number: Not reportedVehicle Make/year: Not reportedOthers Number Of Fatalities: Not reportedOthers Number Of Injuries: Not reportedOthers Number Of Decontaminated: Not reportedResponding Agency Personel # Of Fatalities: Not reportedResponding Agency Personel # Of Injuries: Not reportedResp Agncy Personel # Of Decontaminated: Not reportedMore Than Two Substances Involved?: Not reportedSpecial Studies 6: Not reportedSpecial Studies 5: Not reportedSpecial Studies 4: Not reportedSpecial Studies 3: Not reportedSpecial Studies 2: Not reportedSpecial Studies 1: Not reportedProperty Management: Not reportedEstimated Temperature: Not reportedSurrounding Area: Not reportedTime Completed: Not reportedTime Notified: Not reportedAgency Incident Number: Not reportedAgency Id Number: Not reportedProperty Use: Not reportedDate Completed: Not reportedIncident Date: Not reportedOES Time: Not reportedOES Date: 10/17/2000OES notification: 00-4802OES Incident Number: CHMIRS: Notice of Responsibility - #1Action: 05/08/1991Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100351Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100351Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100351Global Id: Regulatory Activities: AIRBORNE EXPRESS CORP OYS (Continued)S103648668 TC3837232.2s Page 179 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation pumping. repairing, oil production, storage and disposal operations, water washing, geothermal operations, air conditioning, ship building and processing operation of whatever nature, including mining, gravel semisolid wastes from any servicing, producing, manufacturing or Industrial - Facility that treats and/or disposes of liquid orFacility Type: San Francisco Bay 41I016290Facility ID: CA WDS: 2008 MONROE SCHNEIDER ASSOC. 274 WATTIS 2009 MONROE SCHNEIDER ASSOC. 274 WATTIS 2010 MONROE SCHNEIDER ASSOC. 274 WATTIS 2011 MONROE SCHNEIDER ASSOC. 274 WATTIS 2012 MONROE SCHNEIDER ASSOC. 274 WATTIS RGA LUST: were able to assist in the cleaning of the second incident.. at 274 Wattis Way and ended at the S.F. aairport. Airport personnel tank on the bridge. The second incident happened at 1525, and started hour later at the same location, a different truck also hit it saddle Truck hit saddle tank on a bridge which caused the truck to leak. AnDescription: 0Number of Fatalities: 0Number of Injuries: 0Evacuations: 0Unknown: 0Tons: 0Sheen: 0Quarts: 0Pints: 0Ounces: 0Liters: 0Pounds: 0Grams: 75Gallons: 0CUFT: 0Cups: 0BBLS: Not reportedQuantity Released: DieselSubstance: Not reportedE Date: RoadSite Type: YesContained: Not reportedAmount: San Mateo County Environmental HealthAdmin Agency: 10/17/200012:00:00 AMIncident Date: South City Fire Dept. S.F.Agency: 2000Year: Not reportedDate/Time: Not reportedOther: Not reportedMeasure: Not reportedType: Not reportedWhat Happened: Not reportedContainment: Safety Clean & SFFDCleanup By: Not reportedSpill Site: Not reportedWaterway: AIRBORNE EXPRESS CORP OYS (Continued)S103648668 TC3837232.2s Page 180 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation dairy waste ponds. dischargers having waste storage systems with land disposal such as disposal systems, such as septic systems with subsurface disposal, or management practices, facilities with passive waste treatment and cooling water dischargers or thosewho must comply through best Category C - Facilities having no waste treatment systems, such asComplexity: represent no threat to water quality. Level. A Zero (0) may be used to code those NURDS that are found to considered a minor threat to water quality unless coded at a higher to a major or minor threat. Not: All nurds without a TTWQ will be should cause a relatively minor impairment of beneficial uses compared Minor Threat to Water Quality. A violation of a regional board orderTreat To Water: Not reportedPOTW: Not reportedReclamation: 0Baseline Flow: 0Design Flow: Not reportedSecondary Waste Type: Not reportedSecondary Waste: Not reportedPrimary Waste Type: Not reportedPrimary Waste: Not reportedSIC Code 2: 0SIC Code: PrivateAgency Type: 2068303831Agency Telephone: SMITH PAULAgency Contact: Seattle 981211044Agency City,St,Zip: 3131 Elliott AveAgency Address: AIRBORNE FREIGHT CORPAgency Name: THOMAS JEFFFacility Contact: 6505889880Facility Telephone: 2Subregion: are assigned by the Regional Board CAS000001 The 1st 2 characters designate the state. The remaining 7NPDES Number: under Waste Discharge Requirements. Active - Any facility with a continuous or seasonal discharge that isFacility Status: AIRBORNE EXPRESS CORP OYS (Continued)S103648668 Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remediation Action Underway: Not reportedPollution Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedPollution Characterization Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assesment Began: Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: OMHow Discovered: 550077Case Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: LUST REG 2: 1343 ft.Site 7 of 11 in cluster R 0.254 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 19 ft. 1/4-1/2S SAN FRANCISCO, CA SSE RGA LUST274 WATTIS WY N/A R158 LUSTMONROE SCHNEIDER ASSOC.S103890780 TC3837232.2s Page 181 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2003 MONROE SCHNEIDER ASSOC. 274 WATTIS 2005 MONROE SCHNEIDER ASSOC. 274 WATTIS 2006 MONROE SCHNEIDER ASSOC. 274 WATTIS 2007 MONROE SCHNEIDER ASSOC. 274 WATTIS RGA LUST: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: 015124080APN Number: T0608100351Global ID: 9- Case ClosedFacility Status: 550077Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUST: MONROE SCHNEIDER ASSOC. (Continued)S103890780 1997 MONROE SCHNEIDER ASSOC 274 WATTIS WY 1998 MONROE SCHNEIDER ASSOC 274 WATTIS WY 2000 MONROE SCHNEIDER ASSOCIATES 274 WATTIS WY 2002 MONROE SCHNEIDER ASSOCIATES 274 WATTIS WY RGA LUST: 1343 ft.Site 8 of 11 in cluster R 0.254 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 19 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA SSE274 WATTIS WY N/A R159 RGA LUSTS114217238 1997 HARMON SCHRAGGE CO 280 WATTIS WY 1998 HARMON SCHRAGGE COMPANY 280 WATTIS WY 2000 HARMON SCHRAGGE COMAPNY 280 WATTIS WY 2002 HARMON SCHRAGGE COMAPNY 280 WATTIS WY RGA LUST: 1366 ft.Site 9 of 11 in cluster R 0.259 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 18 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA SSE280 WATTIS WY N/A R160 RGA LUSTS114217584 1993 HARMON SCHRAGGE & CO 280 WATTIS WAY 1994 HARMON SCHRAGGE & CO 280 WATTIS WAY 1995 HARMON SCHRAGGE & CO 280 WATTIS WAY 1996 HARMON SCHRAGGE & CO 280 WATTIS WAY RGA LUST: 1366 ft.Site 10 of 11 in cluster R 0.259 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 18 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA SSE280 WATTIS WAY N/A R161 RGA LUSTS114217582 TC3837232.2s Page 182 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 08/22/1996Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608100252Global Id: 09/28/1990Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608100252Global Id: Status History: 6503726298Phone Number: jmadden@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: JACOB MADDENContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100252Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: nkatyl@waterboards.ca.govEmail: OAKLANDCity: 1515 CLAY STREETAddress: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: NANCY KATYLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100252Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: Local AgencyFile Location: 550076LOC Case Number: 41-0264RB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: JMCase Worker: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 08/22/1996Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.403305Longitude: 37.646702Latitude: T0608100252Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 41-0264Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 41Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 1366 ft.Site 11 of 11 in cluster R 0.259 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 18 ft. 1/4-1/2 RGA LUSTSOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 SSE LUST280 WATTIS N/A R162 HIST CORTESEHARMON SHRAGGE CO S103472882 TC3837232.2s Page 183 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2003 HARMON SHRAGGE CO 280 WATTIS 2005 HARMON SHRAGGE CO 280 WATTIS 2006 HARMON SHRAGGE CO 280 WATTIS 2007 HARMON SHRAGGE CO 280 WATTIS 2008 HARMON SHRAGGE CO 280 WATTIS 2009 HARMON SHRAGGE CO 280 WATTIS 2010 HARMON SHRAGGE CO 280 WATTIS 2011 HARMON SHRAGGE CO 280 WATTIS 2012 HARMON SHRAGGE CO 280 WATTIS RGA LUST: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: 015124070APN Number: T0608100252Global ID: 9- Case ClosedFacility Status: 550076Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUST: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remediation Action Underway: Not reportedPollution Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedPollution Characterization Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assesment Began: Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: OMHow Discovered: 550076Case Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: LUST REG 2: Notice of Responsibility - #1Action: 11/15/1990Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100252Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100252Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100252Global Id: Regulatory Activities: HARMON SHRAGGE CO (Continued)S103472882 TC3837232.2s Page 184 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1997 DON’S AUTO WRECKERS 137 HARBOR WAY 1998 DON’S AUTO WRECKERS 137 HARBOR WAY RGA LUST: 1410 ft.Site 1 of 7 in cluster T 0.267 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 13 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA NE137 HARBOR WAY N/A T163 RGA LUSTS114199675 Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0608100945Global Id: 10/07/1996Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608100945Global Id: Status History: 6503726298Phone Number: jmadden@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: JACOB MADDENContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100945Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: Under InvestigationPotential Media Affect: Not reportedFile Location: 559010LOC Case Number: 41-1032RB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: Not reportedCase Worker: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Lead Agency: 01/22/1997Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.399923Longitude: 37.653401Latitude: T0608100945Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 41-1032Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 41Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 1410 ft.Site 2 of 7 in cluster T 0.267 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 13 ft. 1/4-1/2 RGA LUSTSOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 NE LUST137 HARBOR N/A T164 HIST CORTESEDONS AUTO WRECKERS S104494210 TC3837232.2s Page 185 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2000 DONS AUTO WRECKERS 137 HARBOR WY 2001 DONS AUTO WRECKERS 137 HARBOR WY 2002 DONS AUTO WRECKERS 137 HARBOR WY 2003 DONS AUTO WRECKERS 137 HARBOR WY 2005 DONS AUTO WRECKERS 137 HARBOR WY 2006 DONS AUTO WRECKERS 137 HARBOR WY 2007 DONS AUTO WRECKERS 137 HARBOR WY 2008 DONS AUTO WRECKERS 137 HARBOR WY 2009 DONS AUTO WRECKERS 137 HARBOR WY 2010 DONS AUTO WRECKERS 137 HARBOR WY 2011 DONS AUTO WRECKERS 137 HARBOR WY 2012 DONS AUTO WRECKERS 137 HARBOR WY RGA LUST: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remediation Action Underway: Not reportedPollution Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedPollution Characterization Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assesment Began: Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: 10/29/1996Date Leak Confirmed: UNKLeak Source: UNKLeak Cause: Tank ClosureHow Discovered: 559010Case Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: 41-1032Facility Id: 2Region: LUST REG 2: Leak StoppedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100945Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100945Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100945Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 01/22/1997Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608100945Global Id: 10/29/1996Status Date: DONS AUTO WRECKERS (Continued)S104494210 TC3837232.2s Page 186 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1992 OLYMPIAN 186 E GRAND AVE RGA LUST: 1421 ft.Site 1 of 8 in cluster U 0.269 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 14 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA NNE186 E GRAND AVE N/A U165 RGA LUSTS114207701 T0608100363Global Id: 03/28/1990Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608100363Global Id: Status History: Not reportedPhone Number: nkatyl@waterboards.ca.govEmail: OAKLANDCity: 1515 CLAY STREETAddress: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: NANCY KATYLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100363Global Id: 6503726298Phone Number: jmadden@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: JACOB MADDENContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100363Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: Local AgencyFile Location: 550070LOC Case Number: 41-0382RB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: JMCase Worker: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 02/23/1996Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.4010449Longitude: 37.6543847Latitude: T0608100363Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 1421 ft.Site 2 of 8 in cluster U 0.269 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 14 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 NNE RGA LUST186 EAST GRAND AVENUE N/A U166 LUSTOLYMPIAN S109285592 TC3837232.2s Page 187 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2008 OLYMPIAN 186 EAST GRAND AVENUE 2009 OLYMPIAN 186 EAST GRAND AVENUE 2010 OLYMPIAN 186 EAST GRAND AVENUE 2011 OLYMPIAN 186 EAST GRAND AVENUE 2012 OLYMPIAN 186 EAST GRAND AVENUE RGA LUST: Notice of Responsibility - #1Action: 04/19/1990Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100363Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100363Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100363Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 02/23/1996Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: OLYMPIAN (Continued)S109285592 SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: Not reportedAPN Number: T0608100363Global ID: 9- Case ClosedFacility Status: 550070Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUST: 1425 ft.Site 3 of 8 in cluster U 0.270 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 14 ft. 1/4-1/2S SAN FRANCISCO, CA NNE186 E GRAND AVE N/A U167 LUSTOLYMPIAN S104494202 1992 EAST GRAND OLYMPIC CARDTOL 190 E GRAND AVE RGA LUST: 1465 ft.Site 4 of 8 in cluster U 0.277 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 16 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA NNE190 E GRAND AVE N/A U168 RGA LUSTS114208058 TC3837232.2s Page 188 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: Not reportedContent: Not reportedStg: Not reportedTank Use: Not reportedCapacity: Not reportedActv Date: Not reportedSwrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedTank Status: 10-13-88Created Date: 04-22-94Action Date: 04-22-94Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 9Number: 550030Comp Number: ActiveStatus: SWEEPS UST: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: 015031210APN Number: T0608100194Global ID: 9- Case ClosedFacility Status: 550025Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUST: 1468 ft.Site 5 of 8 in cluster U 0.278 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 17 ft. 1/4-1/2S SAN FRANCISCO, CA NNE SWEEPS UST190 E GRAND AVE N/A U169 LUSTOLYMPIC EAST GRAND CARDTOL S105073396 Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: Not reportedFile Location: 550025LOC Case Number: 41-0204RB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: JMCase Worker: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 04/23/2009Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.400573395Longitude: 37.654318358Latitude: T0608100194Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 1468 ft.Site 6 of 8 in cluster U 0.278 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 17 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 NNE RGA LUST190 EAST GRAND AVENUE N/A U170 LUSTOLYMPIC EAST GRAND CARDTOL S109285532 TC3837232.2s Page 189 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100194Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100194Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 04/23/2009Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608100194Global Id: 07/22/2008Status Date: Open - Verification MonitoringStatus: T0608100194Global Id: 07/23/2005Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0608100194Global Id: 07/22/2005Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T0608100194Global Id: 07/13/2004Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T0608100194Global Id: 04/29/1987Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0608100194Global Id: 04/29/1987Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608100194Global Id: Status History: Not reportedPhone Number: nkatyl@waterboards.ca.govEmail: OAKLANDCity: 1515 CLAY STREETAddress: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: NANCY KATYLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100194Global Id: 6503726298Phone Number: jmadden@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: JACOB MADDENContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100194Global Id: Contact: OLYMPIC EAST GRAND CARDTOL (Continued)S109285532 TC3837232.2s Page 190 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Electronic Reporting Submittal DueAction: 02/15/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100194Global Id: CAP/RAP - Feasibility Study ReportAction: 09/09/9999Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100194Global Id: Other WorkplanAction: 09/28/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100194Global Id: CAP/RAP - Feasibility Study ReportAction: 09/28/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100194Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation ReportAction: 09/04/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100194Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 08/15/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100194Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 08/15/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100194Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 05/15/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100194Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 05/15/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100194Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 02/15/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100194Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 11/15/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100194Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 11/15/2004Date: OLYMPIC EAST GRAND CARDTOL (Continued)S109285532 TC3837232.2s Page 191 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100194Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100194Global Id: Well Destruction ReportAction: 12/31/2008Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100194Global Id: In Situ Physical/Chemical Treatment (other than SVE)Action: 01/01/1950Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0608100194Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 08/15/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100194Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 05/15/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100194Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 02/15/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100194Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 08/15/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100194Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 09/06/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100194Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation ReportAction: 10/29/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100194Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation WorkplanAction: 05/24/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100194Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation WorkplanAction: 04/19/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100194Global Id: OLYMPIC EAST GRAND CARDTOL (Continued)S109285532 TC3837232.2s Page 192 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Staff Letter - #20040713Action: 07/13/2004Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100194Global Id: Notice of Responsibility - #1Action: 03/19/1990Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100194Global Id: Staff Letter - #20020604BAction: 06/04/2002Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100194Global Id: Staff Letter - #20050119AAction: 01/19/2005Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100194Global Id: Notice of Violation - #20051026Action: 10/26/2005Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100194Global Id: Notice of Violation - #20050719Action: 07/19/2005Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100194Global Id: Staff Letter - #20031125Action: 11/25/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100194Global Id: * Historical Enforcement - #20060221Action: 02/21/2006Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100194Global Id: Staff Letter - #20030612Action: 06/12/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100194Global Id: Staff Letter - #20020604AAction: 06/04/2002Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100194Global Id: Staff Letter - #20050119BAction: 01/19/2005Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100194Global Id: Closure/No Further Action Letter - #20090423Action: 04/23/2009Date: OLYMPIC EAST GRAND CARDTOL (Continued)S109285532 TC3837232.2s Page 193 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100194Global Id: Electronic Reporting Submittal DueAction: 10/26/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100194Global Id: Electronic Reporting Submittal DueAction: 07/19/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100194Global Id: Electronic Reporting Submittal DueAction: 02/21/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100194Global Id: Staff Letter - #20070217AAction: 02/15/2007Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100194Global Id: Notification - Public Notice of Case ClosureAction: 09/25/2008Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100194Global Id: Staff Letter - #200080722Action: 07/22/2008Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100194Global Id: Staff Letter - #20050119CAction: 01/19/2005Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100194Global Id: Staff Letter - #20070608Action: 06/08/2007Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100194Global Id: Staff Letter - #20040930Action: 09/30/2004Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100194Global Id: Clean Up Fund - 5-Year Review Summary - Regulator RespondedAction: 02/02/2009Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100194Global Id: Staff Letter - #20081120Action: 11/20/2008Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100194Global Id: OLYMPIC EAST GRAND CARDTOL (Continued)S109285532 TC3837232.2s Page 194 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2008 OLYMPIC EAST GRAND CARDTOL 190 EAST GRAND AVENUE 2009 OLYMPIC EAST GRAND CARDTOL 190 EAST GRAND AVENUE 2010 OLYMPIC EAST GRAND CARDTOL 190 EAST GRAND AVENUE 2011 OLYMPIC EAST GRAND CARDTOL 190 EAST GRAND AVENUE 2012 OLYMPIC EAST GRAND CARDTOL 190 EAST GRAND AVENUE RGA LUST: Monitoring Report - Semi-AnnuallyAction: 02/15/2008Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100194Global Id: Well Installation ReportAction: 06/04/2003Date: OLYMPIC EAST GRAND CARDTOL (Continued)S109285532 41-0204Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 41Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 1468 ft.Site 7 of 8 in cluster U 0.278 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 17 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA NNE190 GRAND N/A U171 HIST CORTESEEAST GRAND OLYMPIC CARDTO S104161803 2005 OLYMPIC EAST GRAND CARDTOL 190 GRAND 2006 OLYMPIC EAST GRAND CARDTOL 190 GRAND 2007 OLYMPIC EAST GRAND CARDTOL 190 GRAND RGA LUST: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remediation Action Underway: 7/13/2004Pollution Remediation Plan Submitted: 1/1/1965Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assesment Began: Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: OMHow Discovered: 550025Case Number: Remediation PlanFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: LUST REG 2: 1468 ft.Site 8 of 8 in cluster U 0.278 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 17 ft. 1/4-1/2S SAN FRANCISCO, CA NNE RGA LUST190 GRAND N/A U172 LUSTS105035997 TC3837232.2s Page 195 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2003 OLYMPIC EAST GRAND CARDTOL 190 GRAND (Continued)S105035997 1992 SAM TRANS 196 PRODUCE AVE 1993 SAM TRANS 196 PRODUCE AVE 1994 SAM TRANS 196 PRODUCE AVE 1995 SAM TRANS 196 PRODUCE AVE 1996 SAM TRANS 196 PRODUCE AVE 1997 SAMTRANS 196 PRODUCE AVE 1998 SAMTRANS 196 PRODUCE AVE 2000 SAMTRANS VACANT 196 PRODUCE AVE 2002 SAMTRANS VACANT 196 PRODUCE AVE RGA LUST: 1503 ft.Site 1 of 5 in cluster V 0.285 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 22 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA SSW196 PRODUCE AVE N/A V173 RGA LUSTS114208844 2005 SAM TRANS (VACANT) 196 PRODUCE 2006 SAM TRANS (VACANT) 196 PRODUCE 2007 SAM TRANS (VACANT) 196 PRODUCE RGA LUST: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: Not reportedAPN Number: T0608100436Global ID: 9- Case ClosedFacility Status: 550024Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUST: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remediation Action Underway: Not reportedPollution Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedPollution Characterization Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assesment Began: Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: OMHow Discovered: 550024Case Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: LUST REG 2: 1503 ft.Site 2 of 5 in cluster V 0.285 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 22 ft. 1/4-1/2S SAN FRANCISCO, CA SSW RGA LUST196 PRODUCE AVE N/A V174 LUSTSAM TRANS (VACANT)S103472872 TC3837232.2s Page 196 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2003 SAM TRANS (VACANT) 196 PRODUCE SAM TRANS (VACANT) (Continued)S103472872 10/09/1985Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608100436Global Id: Status History: 6503726298Phone Number: jmadden@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: JACOB MADDENContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100436Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: nkatyl@waterboards.ca.govEmail: OAKLANDCity: 1515 CLAY STREETAddress: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: NANCY KATYLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100436Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: Local AgencyFile Location: 550024LOC Case Number: 41-0460RB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: JMCase Worker: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 04/10/2000Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.407803Longitude: 37.647138Latitude: T0608100436Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 41-0460Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 41Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 1503 ft.Site 3 of 5 in cluster V 0.285 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 22 ft. 1/4-1/2 RGA LUSTSOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 SSW LUST196 PRODUCE N/A V175 HIST CORTESESAMTRANS VACANT S102436291 TC3837232.2s Page 197 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2008 SAM TRANS (VACANT) 196 PRODUCE 2009 SAM TRANS (VACANT) 196 PRODUCE 2010 SAM TRANS (VACANT) 196 PRODUCE 2011 SAM TRANS (VACANT) 196 PRODUCE 2012 SAM TRANS (VACANT) 196 PRODUCE RGA LUST: ExcavationAction: 01/01/1950Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0608100436Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100436Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100436Global Id: Notice of Responsibility - #1Action: 01/26/1989Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100436Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 04/10/2000Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608100436Global Id: SAMTRANS VACANT (Continued)S102436291 1993 U-FREIGHT AMERICA INC 320 COREY WAY 1994 U-FREIGHT AMERICA INC 320 COREY WAY 1995 U-FREIGHT AMERICA INC 320 COREY WAY 1996 U-FREIGHT AMERICA INC 320 COREY WAY RGA LUST: 1569 ft.Site 1 of 4 in cluster W 0.297 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 18 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA SSE320 COREY WAY N/A W176 RGA LUSTS114220791 1998 U FREIGHT AMERICA INC 320 COREY WY 2000 U FREIGHT AMERICA INC 320 COREY WY 2002 U FREIGHT AMERICA INC 320 COREY WY RGA LUST: 1569 ft.Site 2 of 4 in cluster W 0.297 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 18 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA SSE320 COREY WY N/A W177 RGA LUSTS114220793 TC3837232.2s Page 198 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1997 U FREIGHT AMERICA INC 320 COREY WY (Continued)S114220793 2003 U-FREIGHT AMERICA INC 320 COREY 2005 U-FREIGHT AMERICA INC 320 COREY 2006 U-FREIGHT AMERICA INC 320 COREY 2007 U-FREIGHT AMERICA INC 320 COREY RGA LUST: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: 015142070APN Number: T0608100554Global ID: 9- Case ClosedFacility Status: 550094Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUST: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remediation Action Underway: Not reportedPollution Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedPollution Characterization Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assesment Began: Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: OMHow Discovered: 550094Case Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: LUST REG 2: 1569 ft.Site 3 of 4 in cluster W 0.297 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 18 ft. 1/4-1/2S SAN FRANCISCO, CA SSE RGA LUST320 COREY WY N/A W178 LUSTU-FREIGHT AMERICA INC S103893245 T0608100554Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 41-0580Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 41Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 1569 ft.Site 4 of 4 in cluster W 0.297 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 18 ft. 1/4-1/2 RGA LUSTSOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 SSE LUST320 COREY N/A W179 HIST CORTESEU FREIGHT AMERICA INC S102439367 TC3837232.2s Page 199 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation T0608100554Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100554Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100554Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 06/26/2001Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608100554Global Id: 08/21/1991Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608100554Global Id: Status History: 6503726298Phone Number: jmadden@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: JACOB MADDENContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100554Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: nkatyl@waterboards.ca.govEmail: OAKLANDCity: 1515 CLAY STREETAddress: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: NANCY KATYLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100554Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: Local AgencyFile Location: 550094LOC Case Number: 41-0580RB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: JMCase Worker: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 06/26/2001Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.401881Longitude: 37.645728Latitude: U FREIGHT AMERICA INC (Continued)S102439367 TC3837232.2s Page 200 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2008 U-FREIGHT AMERICA INC 320 COREY 2009 U-FREIGHT AMERICA INC 320 COREY 2010 U-FREIGHT AMERICA INC 320 COREY 2011 U-FREIGHT AMERICA INC 320 COREY 2012 U-FREIGHT AMERICA INC 320 COREY RGA LUST: Notice of Responsibility - #1Action: 05/19/1992Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: U FREIGHT AMERICA INC (Continued)S102439367 NANCY KATYLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100865Global Id: 6503726298Phone Number: jmadden@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: JACOB MADDENContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100865Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: Local Agency WarehouseFile Location: 550135LOC Case Number: 41-0940RB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: JMCase Worker: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 08/21/2003Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.4001368Longitude: 37.6537046Latitude: T0608100865Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 41-0940Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 41Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 1574 ft.RGA LUSTSite 3 of 7 in cluster T 0.298 mi.DEED Relative: Lower Actual: 13 ft. 1/4-1/2 HIST USTSOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 NE LUST114 HARBOR WAY N/A T180 HIST CORTESESOUTH SAN FRANCISCO TIRE SERVIU001594838 TC3837232.2s Page 201 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation T0608100865Global Id: Other Report / DocumentAction: 04/24/1996Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100865Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 05/28/1997Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100865Global Id: Pump & Treat (P&T) GroundwaterAction: 01/01/1950Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0608100865Global Id: ExcavationAction: 01/01/1950Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0608100865Global Id: Not reportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0608100865Global Id: Technical Correspondence / Assistance / OtherAction: 01/28/1997Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100865Global Id: Other Report / DocumentAction: 08/26/1997Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100865Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 08/21/2003Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608100865Global Id: 05/05/1994Status Date: Open - Verification MonitoringStatus: T0608100865Global Id: 05/05/1994Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608100865Global Id: Status History: Not reportedPhone Number: nkatyl@waterboards.ca.govEmail: OAKLANDCity: 1515 CLAY STREETAddress: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO TIRE SERVI (Continued)U001594838 TC3837232.2s Page 202 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 08/21/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100865Global Id: UnknownAction: 06/18/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100865Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 05/07/1997Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100865Global Id: Other WorkplanAction: 04/24/1996Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100865Global Id: Technical Correspondence / Assistance / OtherAction: 06/19/2002Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100865Global Id: Letter - NoticeAction: 04/01/1997Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100865Global Id: Letter - NoticeAction: 08/03/1996Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100865Global Id: Notification - PreclosureAction: 06/18/2002Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100865Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100865Global Id: Other Report / DocumentAction: 04/06/2001Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100865Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 03/19/1998Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100865Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 08/29/1997Date: RESPONSEAction Type: SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO TIRE SERVI (Continued)U001594838 TC3837232.2s Page 203 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO TIRE SERVIOwner Name: 4155884596Telephone: ROBERT L. REIDContact Name: 0001Total Tanks: TIRE SERVICE & SALESOther Type: OtherFacility Type: 00000054066Facility ID: STATERegion: HIST UST: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: Not reportedAPN Number: T0608100865Global ID: 9- Case ClosedFacility Status: 550135Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUST: Notice of Public Hearing / Board ActionAction: 05/17/2002Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100865Global Id: Staff Letter - #20020618Action: 06/18/2002Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100865Global Id: Closure/No Further Action Letter - #3Action: 08/21/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100865Global Id: Clean-up and Abatement OrderAction: 05/15/1996Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100865Global Id: Letter - NoticeAction: 06/12/1997Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100865Global Id: Letter - NoticeAction: 08/03/1996Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100865Global Id: Notice of Responsibility - #1Action: 09/28/1994Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100865Global Id: Deed Restriction / Land Use Restriction / CovenantAction: SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO TIRE SERVI (Continued)U001594838 TC3837232.2s Page 204 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1996 SOUTH SF TIRE SERVICE 114 HARBOR 1997 SOUTH S F TIRE SERVICE 114 HARBOR 1998 SOUTH SF TIRE SERVICE 114 HARBOR 2000 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO TIRE SERVI 114 HARBOR 2001 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO TIRE SERVICE 114 HARBOR 2002 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO TIRE SERVICE 114 HARBOR 2008 SO. SAN FRANCISCO TIRE SERVICE 114 HARBOR 2009 SO. SAN FRANCISCO TIRE SERVICE 114 HARBOR 2010 SO. SAN FRANCISCO TIRE SERVICE 114 HARBOR 2011 SO. SAN FRANCISCO TIRE SERVICE 114 HARBOR 2012 SO. SAN FRANCISCO TIRE SERVICE 114 HARBOR RGA LUST: T0608100865EDR Link ID: 08/21/2003Deed Date(s): YCovenant Uploaded: SWRCBAgency: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSEDStatus: LUFTSite Type: Not reportedSub Area: Not reportedArea: DEED: Stock Inventor, NoneLeak Detection: Not reportedTank Construction: REGULARType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00008000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 1Container Num: 001Tank Num: SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080Owner City,St,Zip: 114 HARBOR WAYOwner Address: SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO TIRE SERVI (Continued)U001594838 1/1/1965Date Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remediation Action Underway: Not reportedPollution Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedPollution Characterization Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assesment Began: Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: OMHow Discovered: 550135Case Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: LUST REG 2: 1574 ft.Site 4 of 7 in cluster T 0.298 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 13 ft. 1/4-1/2S SAN FRANCISCO, CA NE RGA LUST114 HARBOR N/A T181 LUSTS103879287 TC3837232.2s Page 205 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2003 SO. SAN FRANCISCO TIRE SERVICE 114 HARBOR 2005 SO. SAN FRANCISCO TIRE SERVICE 114 HARBOR 2006 SO. SAN FRANCISCO TIRE SERVICE 114 HARBOR 2007 SO. SAN FRANCISCO TIRE SERVICE 114 HARBOR RGA LUST: (Continued)S103879287 T10000003495Global Id: 11/10/2011Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T10000003495Global Id: Status History: Not reportedPhone Number: nkatyl@waterboards.ca.govEmail: OAKLANDCity: 1515 CLAY STREETAddress: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: NANCY KATYLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T10000003495Global Id: 6503726298Phone Number: jmadden@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: JACOB MADDENContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T10000003495Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Site opened 1/19/2012 Site Closed 1/15/2013Site History: DieselPotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water), SoilPotential Media Affect: Stored electronically as an E-fileFile Location: 550209LOC Case Number: Not reportedRB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: JMCase Worker: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 01/15/2013Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.400889098644Longitude: 37.6535679508404Latitude: T10000003495Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 1574 ft.Site 5 of 7 in cluster T 0.298 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 13 ft. 1/4-1/2S SAN FRANCISCO, CA NE RGA LUST114- 126 HARBOR WY N/A T182 LUSTGOLDEN GATE PETROLEUM S111417791 TC3837232.2s Page 206 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Leak DiscoveryAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T10000003495Global Id: Staff Letter - #20120613Action: 06/12/2012Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T10000003495Global Id: Closure/No Further Action Letter - #20130115Action: 01/15/2013Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T10000003495Global Id: Verbal CommunicationAction: 02/23/2012Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T10000003495Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T10000003495Global Id: Site Assessment Report - Regulator RespondedAction: 09/21/2012Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T10000003495Global Id: Preliminary Site Assessment Workplan - Regulator RespondedAction: 05/04/2012Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T10000003495Global Id: Notice of ResponsibilityAction: 01/25/2012Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T10000003495Global Id: Staff Letter - #20120229Action: 02/29/2012Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T10000003495Global Id: Staff Letter - #20120119Action: 01/19/2012Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T10000003495Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 01/15/2013Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T10000003495Global Id: 01/19/2012Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: GOLDEN GATE PETROLEUM (Continued)S111417791 TC3837232.2s Page 207 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2012 GOLDEN GATE PETROLEUM 114-126 HARBOR WAY RGA LUST: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: 015032070APN Number: TI0000003495Global ID: 9- Case ClosedFacility Status: 550209Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUST: GOLDEN GATE PETROLEUM (Continued)S111417791 Figure 2) to a depth of 6 feet below ground surface (bgs). Soil and included advancing five direct push soil borings (B-1 through B-5; conducted in the area of the UST and OIWS. Phase I1 activities at the site. A limited Phase I1 investigation was subsequently oil/water separator (OWIS) were identified as environmental concerns of Phase I activities, two underground storage tanks (USTs) and an the site in October and November 1997 on behalf of Britannia. As part Phase I and Phase II site assessment of environmental conditions at occupied at the time this work was performed. Geomatrix conducted a structures and paved parking areas. The facility was not been biotechnology operations. The facility grounds consist of multi-level Sugen III facility, a commercial/industrial facility suitable for warehouse. The site was re-developed in 2002 by Britannia into the office space, a clothing wholesaler, and an electrical supply distributor, a customs house, a Christmas tree supply warehouse, Additional site operations included a well drilling equipment construction equipment rental business since at least 1970. In brief, the majority of the site was historically occupied by a site use is presented in the Phase I report, prepared by Geomatrix. referenced report. A more comprehensive description of the former statements made or any professional interpretations made in the San Mateo County does not take responsibility for the accuracy of the Extracted from Geomatrix’s May 5, 2004 Confirmation Sampling Report,Site History: LeadPotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affected: Not reportedFile Location: Not reportedRB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: JMCase Worker: Cleanup Program SiteCase Type: -122.398440241814Longitude: 37.6534766379005Latitude: 559180Lead Agency Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: T0608195324Global Id: 06/07/2004Status Date: Open - Verification MonitoringFacility Status: STATERegion: SLIC: 1580 ft.Site 6 of 7 in cluster T 0.299 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 13 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 NE115-185 HARBOR N/A T183 SLICBRITANNIA DEVELOPMENTS S106916347 TC3837232.2s Page 208 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: commercial/industrial facility. health and the environment under the current site use as a hydrocarbons at the site should not pose a significant risk to human source; Geomatrix concluded that that concentrations of petroleum shallow groundwater beneath the site will be used as drinking water the footprint of the existing building and the low likelihood that Considering the location of B-1 within the paved parking area outside (residential use) to 6.4 ug/l (commercial/industrial use). from benzene in groundwater, this criterion ranges from 530pgtl the screening criteria used to evaluate potential indoor air impacts grab groundwater sample collected from B-1 (185 ug/l) is less than applicable screening criteria. The concentration of benzene in the constituents in soil samples are less than or slightly greater than 0.38 mg/kg, respectively. Concentrations of other petroleum the residential and commercial screening criteria of 0.18 mg/kg and soil sample collected from B-1 (0.97 mg/kg) is slightly greater than Quality Control Board (RWQCB, 2003) indicates that benzene in the Screening Criteria compiled by the San Francisco Bay Regional Water II and UST and OWIS removal activities to applicable Environmental hydrocarbons detected in soil samples collected as part of the Phase excavations. A comparison of the concentration of petroleum bottom (approximately 8 to 9 feet bgs) of the UST and OLWS a Geomatrix field geologist collected soil and water samples from the of San Mateo County Environmental Health Department representatives, UST) and the OLWS. On behalf of Britannia, and under the supervision the two USTs (one 1000-gallon diesel UST and one 500-gallon gasoline In December 1998 and January 1999, Geomatrix observed the removal of Geomatrix recommended to Britannia that the USTs and OIWS be removed. soil and groundwater in the investigation area, and, as such, TI investigation identified petroleum constituents (e.g. benzene) in constituents and volatile organic compounds. The results of the Phase groundwater samples were collected and analyzed for petroleum BRITANNIA DEVELOPMENTS (Continued)S106916347 JMCase Worker: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 11/10/1998Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.409735Longitude: 37.648539Latitude: T0608100828Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 41-0891Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 41Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 1585 ft.Site 1 of 7 in cluster X 0.300 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 25 ft. 1/4-1/2 RGA LUSTSOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA WSW LUST1461 SAN MATEO N/A X184 HIST CORTESEDIADOTI CONSTRUCTION S102428792 TC3837232.2s Page 209 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation OMHow Discovered: 550139Case Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: LUST REG 2: Notice of Responsibility - #1Action: 09/28/1994Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100828Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100828Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 11/10/1998Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608100828Global Id: 08/13/1986Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608100828Global Id: Status History: 6503726298Phone Number: jmadden@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: JACOB MADDENContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100828Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: nkatyl@waterboards.ca.govEmail: OAKLANDCity: 1515 CLAY STREETAddress: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: NANCY KATYLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100828Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: Local Agency WarehouseFile Location: 550139LOC Case Number: 41-0891RB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: DIADOTI CONSTRUCTION (Continued)S102428792 TC3837232.2s Page 210 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2003 DIADOTI CONSTRUCTION 1461 SAN MATEO 2005 DIADOTI CONSTRUCTION 1461 SAN MATEO 2006 DIADOTI CONSTRUCTION 1461 SAN MATEO 2007 DIADOTI CONSTRUCTION 1461 SAN MATEO 2008 DIADOTI CONSTRUCTION 1461 SAN MATEO 2009 DIADOTI CONSTRUCTION 1461 SAN MATEO 2010 DIADOTI CONSTRUCTION 1461 SAN MATEO 2011 DIADOTI CONSTRUCTION 1461 SAN MATEO 2012 DIADOTI CONSTRUCTION 1461 SAN MATEO RGA LUST: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: 015115530APN Number: T0608100828Global ID: 9- Case ClosedFacility Status: 550139Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUST: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remediation Action Underway: Not reportedPollution Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedPollution Characterization Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assesment Began: Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: DIADOTI CONSTRUCTION (Continued)S102428792 1995 DIADOTI CONSTRUCTION 1461 SAN MATEO AVE 1996 DIADOTI CONSTRUCTION 1461 SAN MATEO AVE 1997 DIADOTI CONSTRUCTION 1461 SAN MATEO AVE 1998 DIADOTI CONSTRUCTION 1461 SAN MATEO AVE 2000 DIADOTI CONSTRUCTION 1461 SAN MATEO AVE 2002 DIADOTI CONSTRUCTION 1461 SAN MATEO AVE RGA LUST: 1585 ft.Site 2 of 7 in cluster X 0.300 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 25 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA WSW1461 SAN MATEO AVE N/A X185 RGA LUSTS114201514 8- Verification Monitoring UnderwayFacility Status: 559180Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUST: 1594 ft.Site 7 of 7 in cluster T 0.302 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 13 ft. 1/4-1/2S SAN FRANCISCO, CA NE RGA LUST115-185 HARBOR WY N/A T186 LUSTBRITANNIA DEVELOPMENTS S106966988 TC3837232.2s Page 211 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2005 BRITANNIA DEVELOPMENTS 115-185 HARBOR RGA LUST: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: Not reportedAPN Number: T0608195324Global ID: BRITANNIA DEVELOPMENTS (Continued)S106966988 2005 BINKS MANUFACTURING CO 1459 SAN MATEO RGA LUST: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: Not reportedPotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affected: Local Agency WarehouseFile Location: Not reportedRB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: JMCase Worker: Cleanup Program SiteCase Type: -122.411613Longitude: 37.667879Latitude: 559009Lead Agency Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: T0608148945Global Id: 12/16/1997Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedFacility Status: STATERegion: SLIC: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: Not reportedAPN Number: T0608148945Global ID: 9- Case ClosedFacility Status: 559009Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUST: 1609 ft.Site 3 of 7 in cluster X 0.305 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 24 ft. 1/4-1/2 RGA LUSTSOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 WSW SLIC1459 SAN MATEO N/A X187 LUSTBINKS MANUFACTURING CO S103817345 TC3837232.2s Page 212 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1994 AIRPORT BLVD SERVICE STATION 190 AIRPORT BLVD 1995 AIRPORT BLVD SERVICE STATION 190 AIRPORT BLVD 1996 AIRPORT BLVD SERVICE STATION 190 AIRPORT BLVD 1997 AIRPORT BLVD SERVICE STN 190 AIRPORT BLVD 1998 AIRPORT BLVD SERVICE STN 190 AIRPORT BLVD 2000 AIRPORT BLVD SERVICE STA 190 AIRPORT BLVD 2002 AIRPORT BLVD SERVICE STA 190 AIRPORT BLVD RGA LUST: 1631 ft.Site 1 of 6 in cluster Y 0.309 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 24 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA NW190 AIRPORT BLVD N/A Y188 RGA LUSTS114208046 2003 AIRPORT BLVD SERVICE STN 190 AIRPORT 2005 AIRPORT BLVD SERVICE STN 190 AIRPORT 2006 AIRPORT BLVD SERVICE STN 190 AIRPORT 2007 AIRPORT BLVD SERVICE STN 190 AIRPORT RGA LUST: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: 012338060APN Number: T0608100791Global ID: 9- Case ClosedFacility Status: 550132Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUST: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remediation Action Underway: Not reportedPollution Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedPollution Characterization Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assesment Began: Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: OMHow Discovered: 550132Case Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: LUST REG 2: 1631 ft.Site 2 of 6 in cluster Y 0.309 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 24 ft. 1/4-1/2S SAN FRANCISCO, CA NW RGA LUST190 AIRPORT BLVD N/A Y189 LUSTAIRPORT BLVD SERVICE STN S102423770 TC3837232.2s Page 213 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 08/12/1997Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608100791Global Id: 08/15/1994Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608100791Global Id: Status History: 6503726298Phone Number: jmadden@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: JACOB MADDENContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100791Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: nkatyl@waterboards.ca.govEmail: OAKLANDCity: 1515 CLAY STREETAddress: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: NANCY KATYLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100791Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: Local AgencyFile Location: 550132LOC Case Number: 41-0845RB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: JMCase Worker: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 08/12/1997Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.407972812653Longitude: 37.6532982588103Latitude: T0608100791Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 41-0845Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 41Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 1631 ft.Site 3 of 6 in cluster Y 0.309 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 24 ft. 1/4-1/2 RGA LUSTSOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 NW LUST190 AIRPORT N/A Y190 HIST CORTESEAIRPORT BLVD SERVICE STA S102423771 TC3837232.2s Page 214 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2008 AIRPORT BLVD SERVICE STN 190 AIRPORT 2009 AIRPORT BOULEVARD SERVICE STATION 190 AIRPORT BOULEVARD 2010 AIRPORT BOULEVARD SERVICE STATION 190 AIRPORT BOULEVARD 2011 AIRPORT BOULEVARD SERVICE STATION 190 AIRPORT BOULEVARD 2012 AIRPORT BOULEVARD SERVICE STATION 190 AIRPORT BOULEVARD RGA LUST: Notice of Responsibility - #1Action: 08/23/1994Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100791Global Id: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 08/12/1997Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100791Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100791Global Id: ExcavationAction: 01/01/1950Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0608100791Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100791Global Id: Regulatory Activities: AIRPORT BLVD SERVICE STA (Continued)S102423771 Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remediation Action Underway: Not reportedPollution Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedPollution Characterization Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assesment Began: Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: OMHow Discovered: 550090Case Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: LUST REG 2: 1659 ft.Site 1 of 3 in cluster Z 0.314 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 19 ft. 1/4-1/2S SAN FRANCISCO, CA South RGA LUST100 UTAH AVE N/A Z191 LUSTGREYHOUND EXPOSITION SERVICESS103963665 TC3837232.2s Page 215 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2003 GREYHOUND EXPOSITION SERVICES 100 UTAH 2005 GREYHOUND EXPOSITION SERVICES 100 UTAH 2006 GREYHOUND EXPOSITION SERVICES 100 UTAH 2007 GREYHOUND EXPOSITION SERVICES 100 UTAH RGA LUST: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: 015142080APN Number: T0608100244Global ID: 9- Case ClosedFacility Status: 550090Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUST: GREYHOUND EXPOSITION SERVICES (Continued)S103963665 1993 GREYHOUND EXPOSITION SERVICES 100 UTAH AVE 1994 GREYHOUND EXPOSITION SERVICES 100 UTAH AVE 1995 GREYHOUND EXPOSITION SERVICES 100 UTAH AVE 1996 GREYHOUND EXPOSITION SERVICES 100 UTAH AVE 1997 GREYHOUND EXPOSITION SERVICES 100 UTAH AVE 1998 GREYHOUND EXPOSITION SERVICES 100 UTAH AVE 2000 GREYHOUND EXPOSITION SERVICES 100 UTAH AVE 2002 GREYHOUND EXPOSITION SERVICES 100 UTAH AVE RGA LUST: 1659 ft.Site 2 of 3 in cluster Z 0.314 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 19 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA South100 UTAH AVE N/A Z192 RGA LUSTS114190587 41-0256RB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: JMCase Worker: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 07/28/2000Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.403328Longitude: 37.645077Latitude: T0608100244Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 41-0256Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 41Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 1659 ft.Site 3 of 3 in cluster Z 0.314 mi.RGA LUST Relative: Lower Actual: 19 ft. 1/4-1/2 HIST USTSOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 South LUST100 UTAH AVE N/A Z193 HIST CORTESEGREYHOUND EXPOSITION SERVICESU001594780 TC3837232.2s Page 216 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 00000009479Facility ID: STATERegion: HIST UST: Leak DiscoveryAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100244Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100244Global Id: Notice of Responsibility - #1Action: 09/24/1991Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100244Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 07/28/2000Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608100244Global Id: 10/19/1990Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608100244Global Id: Status History: 6503726298Phone Number: jmadden@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: JACOB MADDENContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100244Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: nkatyl@waterboards.ca.govEmail: OAKLANDCity: 1515 CLAY STREETAddress: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: NANCY KATYLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100244Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: Local AgencyFile Location: 550090LOC Case Number: GREYHOUND EXPOSITION SERVICES (Continued)U001594780 TC3837232.2s Page 217 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2008 GREYHOUND EXPOSITION SERVICES 100 UTAH 2009 GREYHOUND EXPOSITION SERVICES 100 UTAH 2010 GREYHOUND EXPOSITION SERVICES 100 UTAH 2011 GREYHOUND EXPOSITION SERVICES 100 UTAH 2012 GREYHOUND EXPOSITION SERVICES 100 UTAH RGA LUST: Stock InventorLeak Detection: Not reportedTank Construction: PREMIUMType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00001000Tank Capacity: 1973Year Installed: 002-EASTContainer Num: 002Tank Num: Stock InventorLeak Detection: Not reportedTank Construction: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00001000Tank Capacity: 1975Year Installed: 001-WESTContainer Num: 001Tank Num: SO. SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080Owner City,St,Zip: 100 UTAH AVEOwner Address: GREYHOUND EXPOSITION SERVICES,Owner Name: 4157610333Telephone: JOHN SAUTER, GEN’L MGRContact Name: 0002Total Tanks: CONVENTION DECORATOROther Type: OtherFacility Type: GREYHOUND EXPOSITION SERVICES (Continued)U001594780 Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affected: Local AgencyFile Location: Not reportedRB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: JMCase Worker: Cleanup Program SiteCase Type: -122.407428Longitude: 37.646763Latitude: 559187Lead Agency Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: SL0608187305Global Id: 05/26/2010Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedFacility Status: STATERegion: SLIC: 1677 ft.Site 4 of 5 in cluster V 0.318 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 21 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 SSW120 TERMINAL N/A V194 SLICPARKING CORPORATION OF AMERICAS106875186 TC3837232.2s Page 218 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: PARKING CORPORATION OF AMERICA (Continued)S106875186 1992 ESCHELBACH PROPERTIES 100 BADEN AVE 1993 ESCHELBACH PROPERTIES 100 BADEN AVE 1994 ESCHELBACH PROPERTIES 100 BADEN AVE 1995 ESCHELBACH PROPERTIES 100 BADEN AVE 1996 ESCHELBACH PROPERTIES 100 BADEN AVE 1997 ESCHELBACH PROPERTIES 100 BADEN AVE 1998 ESCHELBACH PROPERTIES 100 BADEN AVE 2000 ESCHELBACH PROPERTIES 100 BADEN AVE 2002 ESCHELBACH PROPERTIES 100 BADEN AVE RGA LUST: 1695 ft.Site 4 of 6 in cluster Y 0.321 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 21 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA NW100 BADEN AVE N/A Y195 RGA LUSTS114190381 JACOB MADDENContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100199Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: Local AgencyFile Location: 550074LOC Case Number: 41-0209RB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: JMCase Worker: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 06/12/2001Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.408361Longitude: 37.6537387Latitude: T0608100199Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 41-0209Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 41Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 1695 ft.Site 5 of 6 in cluster Y 0.321 mi.RGA LUST Relative: Lower Actual: 21 ft. 1/4-1/2 SWEEPS USTSOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 NW LUST100 BADEN N/A Y196 HIST CORTESEESCHELBACH PROPERTIES S102429265 TC3837232.2s Page 219 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: OMHow Discovered: 550074Case Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: LUST REG 2: Notice of Responsibility - #1Action: 01/10/1991Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100199Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100199Global Id: Not reportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0608100199Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100199Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 06/12/2001Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608100199Global Id: 02/09/1990Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608100199Global Id: Status History: Not reportedPhone Number: nkatyl@waterboards.ca.govEmail: OAKLANDCity: 1515 CLAY STREETAddress: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: NANCY KATYLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100199Global Id: 6503726298Phone Number: jmadden@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: ESCHELBACH PROPERTIES (Continued)S102429265 TC3837232.2s Page 220 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedReferral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 550095Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PRODUCTStg: M.V. FUELTank Use: 10000Capacity: Not reportedActv Date: 41-000-550095-000002Swrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedTank Status: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 550095Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: 4Number Of Tanks: LEADEDContent: PRODUCTStg: M.V. FUELTank Use: 8000Capacity: Not reportedActv Date: 41-000-550095-000001Swrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedTank Status: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 550095Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: SWEEPS UST: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: Not reportedAPN Number: T0608100199Global ID: 9- Case ClosedFacility Status: 550074Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUST: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remediation Action Underway: Not reportedPollution Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedPollution Characterization Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assesment Began: Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: ESCHELBACH PROPERTIES (Continued)S102429265 TC3837232.2s Page 221 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2003 ESCHELBACH PROPERTIES 100 BADEN 2005 ESCHELBACH PROPERTIES 100 BADEN 2006 ESCHELBACH PROPERTIES 100 BADEN 2007 ESCHELBACH PROPERTIES 100 BADEN 2008 ESCHELBACH PROPERTIES 100 BADEN 2009 ESCHELBACH PROPERTIES 100 BADEN 2010 ESCHELBACH PROPERTIES 100 BADEN 2011 ESCHELBACH PROPERTIES 100 BADEN 2012 ESCHELBACH PROPERTIES 100 BADEN RGA LUST: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: WASTE OILContent: WASTEStg: OILTank Use: 1000Capacity: Not reportedActv Date: 41-000-550095-000004Swrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedTank Status: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 550095Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: DIESELContent: PRODUCTStg: M.V. FUELTank Use: 6000Capacity: Not reportedActv Date: 41-000-550095-000003Swrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedTank Status: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: ESCHELBACH PROPERTIES (Continued)S102429265 SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: JMCase Worker: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 09/20/2012Status Date: Open - Verification MonitoringStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.407863306Longitude: 37.645819061Latitude: T0608126439Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 1696 ft.Site 5 of 5 in cluster V 0.321 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 21 ft. 1/4-1/2 RGA LUSTS SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 SSW SWEEPS UST131 TERMINAL CT N/A V197 LUSTPRODUCE MARKET KEYLOCK/OLYMPIAN DEVELOPMENTS105073398 TC3837232.2s Page 222 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 05/15/2009Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608126439Global Id: Monitoring Report - AnnuallyAction: 05/15/2012Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608126439Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 09/20/2012Status Date: Open - Verification MonitoringStatus: T0608126439Global Id: 10/16/2003Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T0608126439Global Id: 10/15/2003Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T0608126439Global Id: 10/23/1998Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608126439Global Id: Status History: 6503726298Phone Number: jmadden@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: JACOB MADDENContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608126439Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: cprowell@waterboards.ca.govEmail: OaklandCity: 1515 Clay Street, Suite 1400Address: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: Cheryl L. ProwellContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608126439Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: or any professional interpretations made in the referenced report. does not take responsibility for the accuracy of the statements made Mateo County offices if submitted prior to 2005, San Mateo County Can be extracted from most recent report in Geotracker or at SanSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: Not reportedFile Location: 550158LOC Case Number: 41-4032RB Case Number: PRODUCE MARKET KEYLOCK/OLYMPIAN DEVELOPMENT (Continued)S105073398 TC3837232.2s Page 223 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Final Remedial Action Report / Corrective Action ReportAction: 09/30/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608126439Global Id: Staff Letter - #20081209Action: 12/09/2008Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608126439Global Id: CAP/RAP - Feasibility Study ReportAction: 07/07/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608126439Global Id: Pilot Study/ Treatability ReportAction: 03/20/2009Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608126439Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation WorkplanAction: 05/31/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608126439Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608126439Global Id: Staff Letter - #20120815Action: 08/15/2012Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608126439Global Id: In Situ Physical/Chemical Treatment (other than SVE)Action: 01/01/1950Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0608126439Global Id: Staff Letter - #20130306Action: 03/06/2013Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608126439Global Id: Staff Letter - #20110721Action: 07/21/2011Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608126439Global Id: Monitoring Report - AnnuallyAction: 05/15/2010Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608126439Global Id: Monitoring Report - Semi-AnnuallyAction: PRODUCE MARKET KEYLOCK/OLYMPIAN DEVELOPMENT (Continued)S105073398 TC3837232.2s Page 224 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation RESPONSEAction Type: T0608126439Global Id: Electronic Reporting Submittal DueAction: 02/15/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608126439Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 08/15/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608126439Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 05/15/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608126439Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 02/15/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608126439Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 02/15/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608126439Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 11/15/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608126439Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 05/15/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608126439Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 08/15/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608126439Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 01/21/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608126439Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 08/15/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608126439Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 02/15/2008Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608126439Global Id: PRODUCE MARKET KEYLOCK/OLYMPIAN DEVELOPMENT (Continued)S105073398 TC3837232.2s Page 225 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Technical Correspondence / Assistance / Other - #20100302Action: 03/02/2010Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608126439Global Id: Monitoring Report - Semi-AnnuallyAction: 01/15/2009Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608126439Global Id: Staff Letter - #20100121Action: 01/21/2010Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608126439Global Id: UnknownAction: 10/07/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608126439Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 05/30/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608126439Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 11/15/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608126439Global Id: Electronic Reporting Submittal DueAction: 07/19/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608126439Global Id: Other Report / DocumentAction: 12/22/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608126439Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 11/15/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608126439Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608126439Global Id: Monitoring Report - Semi-AnnuallyAction: 07/15/2008Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608126439Global Id: Electronic Reporting Submittal DueAction: 01/08/2006Date: PRODUCE MARKET KEYLOCK/OLYMPIAN DEVELOPMENT (Continued)S105073398 TC3837232.2s Page 226 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608126439Global Id: Staff Letter - #20030722Action: 07/22/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608126439Global Id: Staff Letter - #20031117Action: 11/17/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608126439Global Id: Notice of Responsibility - #1Action: 11/13/1998Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608126439Global Id: Staff Letter - #20021118Action: 11/18/2002Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608126439Global Id: Staff Letter - #20051208Action: 12/08/2005Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608126439Global Id: Staff Letter - #20050120Action: 01/20/2005Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608126439Global Id: Notice of Violation - #20050719Action: 07/19/2005Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608126439Global Id: Staff Letter - #20030414Action: 04/14/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608126439Global Id: Other Workplan - Regulator RespondedAction: 06/24/2011Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608126439Global Id: CAP/RAP - Final Remediation / Design Plan - Regulator RespondedAction: 06/15/2012Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608126439Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation WorkplanAction: 01/08/2010Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608126439Global Id: PRODUCE MARKET KEYLOCK/OLYMPIAN DEVELOPMENT (Continued)S105073398 TC3837232.2s Page 227 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2Region: LUST REG 2: Staff Letter - #20100610Action: 06/10/2010Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608126439Global Id: Staff Letter - #20090618Action: 06/18/2009Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608126439Global Id: Monitoring Report - Semi-Annually - Regulator RespondedAction: 09/20/2013Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608126439Global Id: Responded Final Remedial Action Report / Corrective Action Report - RegulatorAction: 01/11/2013Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608126439Global Id: Monitoring Report - AnnuallyAction: 05/15/2011Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608126439Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation ReportAction: 08/05/2008Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608126439Global Id: Staff Letter - #20090715Action: 07/15/2009Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608126439Global Id: Site Assessment ReportAction: 05/28/2010Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608126439Global Id: Staff Letter - #20030507Action: 05/07/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608126439Global Id: Staff Letter - #20070222Action: 02/22/2007Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608126439Global Id: Staff Letter - #20041007Action: 10/07/2004Date: PRODUCE MARKET KEYLOCK/OLYMPIAN DEVELOPMENT (Continued)S105073398 TC3837232.2s Page 228 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation PStg: M.V. FUELTank Use: 10000Capacity: 04-26-94Actv Date: 41-000-550045-000002Swrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: ATank Status: 10-13-88Created Date: 04-26-94Action Date: 04-26-94Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 3Number: 550045Comp Number: ActiveStatus: 3Number Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PStg: M.V. FUELTank Use: 10000Capacity: 04-26-94Actv Date: 41-000-550045-000001Swrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: ATank Status: 10-13-88Created Date: 04-26-94Action Date: 04-26-94Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 3Number: 550045Comp Number: ActiveStatus: SWEEPS UST: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: 015113210APN Number: T0608126439Global ID: 7- Remedial Action UnderwayFacility Status: 550158Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUST: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: 1/1/1965Date Remediation Action Underway: Not reportedPollution Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedPollution Characterization Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assesment Began: Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: PipingLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: UMHow Discovered: 550158Case Number: Remedial action (cleanup) UnderwayFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: PRODUCE MARKET KEYLOCK/OLYMPIAN DEVELOPMENT (Continued)S105073398 TC3837232.2s Page 229 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2003 OLYMPIAN PRODUCE MKT CARD LOCK 131 TERMINAL 2005 OLYMPIAN PRODUCE MKT CARD LOCK 131 TERMINAL 2006 OLYMPIAN PRODUCE MKT CARD LOCK 131 TERMINAL 2007 OLYMPIAN PRODUCE MKT CARD LOCK 131 TERMINAL 2008 OLYMPIAN PRODUCE MKT CARD LOCK 131 TERMINAL 2009 OLYMPIAN PRODUCE MKT CARD LOCK 131 TERMINAL 2010 OLYMPIAN PRODUCE MKT CARD LOCK 131 TERMINAL 2011 OLYMPIAN PRODUCE MKT CARD LOCK 131 TERMINAL 2012 OLYMPIAN PRODUCE MKT CARD LOCK 131 TERMINAL RGA LUST: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PStg: M.V. FUELTank Use: 6000Capacity: 04-26-94Actv Date: 41-000-550045-000003Swrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: ATank Status: 10-13-88Created Date: 04-26-94Action Date: 04-26-94Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 3Number: 550045Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PRODUCE MARKET KEYLOCK/OLYMPIAN DEVELOPMENT (Continued)S105073398 94080Incident Description: Not reportedDischarge Date: Not reportedFacility Type: Not reportedBoard File Number: Not reportedStaff Initials: Not reportedDate Reported: Notify 65: 1714 ft.Site 4 of 7 in cluster X 0.325 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 25 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCI, CA 94080 WSW1395 LOWRIE AVENUE N/A X198 Notify 65GELCO TRUCK LEASING U000052890 550013Case Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: LUST REG 2: 1714 ft.Site 5 of 7 in cluster X 0.325 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 25 ft. 1/4-1/2S SAN FRANCISCO, CA WSW RGA LUST1395 LOWRIE AVE N/A X199 LUSTGELCO TRUCK LEASING S105035854 TC3837232.2s Page 230 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2003 GELCO TRUCK LEASING 1395 LOWRIE 2005 GELCO TRUCK LEASING 1395 LOWRIE 2006 GELCO TRUCK LEASING 1395 LOWRIE 2007 GELCO TRUCK LEASING 1395 LOWRIE RGA LUST: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: 015115340APN Number: T0608100231Global ID: 9- Case ClosedFacility Status: 550013Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUST: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remediation Action Underway: Not reportedPollution Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedPollution Characterization Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assesment Began: Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: OMHow Discovered: GELCO TRUCK LEASING (Continued)S105035854 Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: Local Agency WarehouseFile Location: 550013LOC Case Number: 41-0243RB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: JMCase Worker: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 08/04/1992Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.409869Longitude: 37.646558Latitude: T0608100231Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 41-0243Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 41Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 1714 ft.Site 6 of 7 in cluster X 0.325 mi.RGA LUST Relative: Lower Actual: 25 ft. 1/4-1/2 HIST USTSOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 WSW LUST1395 LOWRIE AVE N/A X200 HIST CORTESEGELCO TRUCK LEASING DIV. GELCOU001594770 TC3837232.2s Page 231 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 4155891642Telephone: CLYDE THORINGTON-DISTRICT MGR.Contact Name: 0004Total Tanks: TRUCK LEASINGOther Type: OtherFacility Type: 00000056584Facility ID: STATERegion: HIST UST: Notice of Responsibility - #1Action: 06/22/1992Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100231Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100231Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100231Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 08/04/1992Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608100231Global Id: 03/02/1987Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608100231Global Id: Status History: 6503726298Phone Number: jmadden@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: JACOB MADDENContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100231Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: nkatyl@waterboards.ca.govEmail: OAKLANDCity: 1515 CLAY STREETAddress: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: NANCY KATYLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100231Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: GELCO TRUCK LEASING DIV. GELCO (Continued)U001594770 TC3837232.2s Page 232 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2008 GELCO TRUCK LEASING 1395 LOWRIE 2009 GELCO TRUCK LEASING 1395 LOWRIE 2010 GELCO TRUCK LEASING 1395 LOWRIE 2011 GELCO TRUCK LEASING 1395 LOWRIE 2012 GELCO TRUCK LEASING 1395 LOWRIE RGA LUST: Stock InventorLeak Detection: Not reportedTank Construction: DIESELType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00008000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 4Container Num: 004Tank Num: Stock InventorLeak Detection: Not reportedTank Construction: DIESELType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00010000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 3Container Num: 003Tank Num: Stock InventorLeak Detection: Not reportedTank Construction: REGULARType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00008000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 2Container Num: 002Tank Num: Stock InventorLeak Detection: Not reportedTank Construction: REGULARType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00010000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 1Container Num: 001Tank Num: SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080Owner City,St,Zip: 1395 LOWRIE AVENUEOwner Address: GELCO TRUCK LEASING DIVISION GOwner Name: GELCO TRUCK LEASING DIV. GELCO (Continued)U001594770 1998 GELCO TRUCK LEASING 1395 LOWRIE AVE 2000 GELCO TRUCK LEASING 1395 LOWRIE AVE 2002 GELCO TRUCK LEASING 1395 LOWRIE AVE RGA LUST: 1714 ft.Site 7 of 7 in cluster X 0.325 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 25 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA WSW1395 LOWRIE AVE N/A X201 RGA LUSTS114200025 TC3837232.2s Page 233 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1992 GELCO TRUCK LEASING 1395 LOWRIE AVE 1993 GELCO TRUCK LEASING 1395 LOWRIE AVE 1994 GELCO TRUCK LEASING 1395 LOWRIE AVE 1995 GELCO TRUCK LEASING 1395 LOWRIE AVE 1996 GELCO TRUCK LEASING 1395 LOWRIE AVE 1997 GELCO TRUCK LEASING 1395 LOWRIE AVE (Continued)S114200025 1992 UNOCAL 221 AIRPORT BLVD 1993 UNOCAL 221 AIRPORT BLVD 1994 UNOCAL 221 AIRPORT BLVD 1995 UNOCAL 221 AIRPORT BLVD 1996 UNOCAL 221 AIRPORT BLVD 1997 UNOCAL 221 AIRPORT BLVD 1998 UNOCAL 221 AIRPORT BLVD 2000 UNOCAL 221 AIRPORT BLVD 2002 UNOCAL 221 AIRPORT BLVD RGA LUST: 1718 ft.Site 6 of 6 in cluster Y 0.325 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 19 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA NW221 AIRPORT BLVD N/A Y202 RGA LUSTS114212315 30024,30025,30550,3002502,30593,305251-NO,30013Confirmed COC: 30013, 30024, 30025, 3002502, 305251, 30550, 30593Potential COC: BATTERY MANUFACTURING, BATTERY RECLAMATION, BATTERY STORAGEPast Use: 872-41-27CAPN: 37.64993 / -122.4104Lat/Long: Responsible PartyFunding: NORestricted Use: 07/29/2009Status Date: ActiveStatus: Voluntary Cleanup ProgramSpecial Programs Code: 13Senate: 22Assembly: 201847Site Code: Cleanup BerkeleyDivision Branch: Denise TsujiSupervisor: George ChowProject Manager: DTSC - Site Cleanup ProgramLead Agency Description: SMBRPLead Agency: SMBRPCleanup Oversight Agencies: NONational Priorities List: 1Acres: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.: Voluntary CleanupSite Type Detail: Voluntary CleanupSite Type: 60001136Facility ID: VCP: 1724 ft. 0.327 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 26 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 West ENVIROSTOREAST OF 27 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUE N/A 203 VCPUPRR LINDEN (AKA UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD LINDEN)S109821384 TC3837232.2s Page 234 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 09/23/2011Completed Date: Annual Oversight Cost EstimateCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Hand delivered to nearby businesses.Comments: 10/02/2012Completed Date: Work NoticeCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 05/21/2012Completed Date: Remedial Investigation ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed 5/24/2012.Comments: 05/24/2012Completed Date: Public NoticeCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: document is required at this stage. The soil sampling was conducted during the third week of May. NoComments: 05/20/2011Completed Date: FieldworkCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: to further define the lead impacted soil volumes for removal. proposed 41 soil borings on a 25 foot spacing within the fenced area the RP draft which was resubmitted on 6/16/2011.The Sample Addendum The final Approval letter was done May 13, 2011 with no changes toComments: 06/16/2011Completed Date: Remedial Investigation WorkplanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: advance payment within 10 days. RP signed VCA received and processed. UPRR will be submitting theComments: 12/10/2009Completed Date: Voluntary Cleanup AgreementCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 60001136Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 201847Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 872-41-27CAlias Name: OTH, SOILPotential Description: UPRR LINDEN (AKA UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD LINDEN) (Continued)S109821384 TC3837232.2s Page 235 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation water run-on and run-off. Additional remediation required to address lead in surface soil andComments: 04/12/2011Completed Date: Site Characterization ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Obtained two grab geoundwater samples.Comments: 03/23/2010Completed Date: FieldworkCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: temporary wells to analyze 2 more filtered grab GW samples. Acceped Subsurface Investigation Work Plan proposed 2 additionalComments: 02/24/2010Completed Date: Site Characterization WorkplanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: assist the investigation. 2000 with BASAPCO locations of former operation & suspected USTs to Provided to UPRR a BASAPCO, Inc. UST Search Report dated Sept. 29,Comments: 02/24/2010Completed Date: Technical ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: VCA Application.Comments: 07/09/2008Completed Date: ApplicationCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Cost Estimate Letter is uploadedComments: 10/26/2012Completed Date: Annual Oversight Cost EstimateCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Supporting documentation uploaded.Comments: 09/20/2012Completed Date: CorrespondenceCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: ending June 30, 2014. at the UPRR Linden Site for the fiscal year starting July 1, 2013 and This letter transmits DTSC’s cost estimate for oversight activitiesComments: 09/05/2013Completed Date: Annual Oversight Cost EstimateCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed 6/28/2012.Comments: 06/28/2012Completed Date: CEQA - Notice of ExemptionCompleted Document Type: UPRR LINDEN (AKA UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD LINDEN) (Continued)S109821384 TC3837232.2s Page 236 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation SMBRPLead Agency: SMBRPRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: 1Acres: Voluntary CleanupSite Type Detailed: Voluntary CleanupSite Type: ENVIROSTOR: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: 03/30/2014Schedule Due Date: Land Use RestrictionSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDESchedule Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: 03/31/2014Schedule Due Date: CertificationSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDESchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Community Profile for BASAPCO Site will be used.Comments: 10/04/2011Completed Date: Community ProfileCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Fact Sheet Completed 5/21/2012.Comments: 05/21/2012Completed Date: Fact SheetsCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: trash, and debris was removed and disposed of off-site. Removal Action Workplan. A total of 4,825 tons of soil, vegetation, lead-contaminated soil in accordance with the remedy selected in the The Removal Action Completion Report (RACR) documents the removal ofComments: 04/23/2013Completed Date: Removal Action Completion ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: 13. Linden Avenue in So. San Francisco was completed on Thursday December The excavation and disposal fieldwork for the UPRR site at 27 S.Comments: 12/13/2012Completed Date: FieldworkCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 06/28/2012Completed Date: Removal Action WorkplanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: UPRR LINDEN (AKA UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD LINDEN) (Continued)S109821384 TC3837232.2s Page 237 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 05/24/2012Completed Date: Public NoticeCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: document is required at this stage. The soil sampling was conducted during the third week of May. NoComments: 05/20/2011Completed Date: FieldworkCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: to further define the lead impacted soil volumes for removal. proposed 41 soil borings on a 25 foot spacing within the fenced area the RP draft which was resubmitted on 6/16/2011.The Sample Addendum The final Approval letter was done May 13, 2011 with no changes toComments: 06/16/2011Completed Date: Remedial Investigation WorkplanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: advance payment within 10 days. RP signed VCA received and processed. UPRR will be submitting theComments: 12/10/2009Completed Date: Voluntary Cleanup AgreementCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 60001136Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 201847Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 872-41-27CAlias Name: OTH, SOILPotential Description: 305251-NO, Lead Xylenes, TPH-diesel, TPH-gas, Toluene, TPH-MOTOR OIL, Xylenes, Lead, TPH-diesel, TPH-gas, TPH-MOTOR OIL, Sulfuric Acid, Toluene,Confirmed COC: Xylenes Lead, TPH-diesel, TPH-gas, TPH-MOTOR OIL, Sulfuric Acid, Toluene,Potential COC: BATTERY MANUFACTURING, BATTERY RECLAMATION, BATTERY STORAGEPast Use: 872-41-27CAPN: -122.4104Longitude: 37.64993Latitude: Responsible PartyFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.: NORestricted Use: 07/29/2009Status Date: ActiveStatus: Voluntary Cleanup ProgramSpecial Program: 13Senate: 22Assembly: 201847Site Code: 60001136Facility ID: Cleanup BerkeleyDivision Branch: Denise TsujiSupervisor: George ChowProgram Manager: UPRR LINDEN (AKA UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD LINDEN) (Continued)S109821384 TC3837232.2s Page 238 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Provided to UPRR a BASAPCO, Inc. UST Search Report dated Sept. 29,Comments: 02/24/2010Completed Date: Technical ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: VCA Application.Comments: 07/09/2008Completed Date: ApplicationCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Cost Estimate Letter is uploadedComments: 10/26/2012Completed Date: Annual Oversight Cost EstimateCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Supporting documentation uploaded.Comments: 09/20/2012Completed Date: CorrespondenceCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: ending June 30, 2014. at the UPRR Linden Site for the fiscal year starting July 1, 2013 and This letter transmits DTSC’s cost estimate for oversight activitiesComments: 09/05/2013Completed Date: Annual Oversight Cost EstimateCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed 6/28/2012.Comments: 06/28/2012Completed Date: CEQA - Notice of ExemptionCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 09/23/2011Completed Date: Annual Oversight Cost EstimateCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Hand delivered to nearby businesses.Comments: 10/02/2012Completed Date: Work NoticeCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 05/21/2012Completed Date: Remedial Investigation ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed 5/24/2012.Comments: UPRR LINDEN (AKA UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD LINDEN) (Continued)S109821384 TC3837232.2s Page 239 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Community Profile for BASAPCO Site will be used.Comments: 10/04/2011Completed Date: Community ProfileCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Fact Sheet Completed 5/21/2012.Comments: 05/21/2012Completed Date: Fact SheetsCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: trash, and debris was removed and disposed of off-site. Removal Action Workplan. A total of 4,825 tons of soil, vegetation, lead-contaminated soil in accordance with the remedy selected in the The Removal Action Completion Report (RACR) documents the removal ofComments: 04/23/2013Completed Date: Removal Action Completion ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: 13. Linden Avenue in So. San Francisco was completed on Thursday December The excavation and disposal fieldwork for the UPRR site at 27 S.Comments: 12/13/2012Completed Date: FieldworkCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 06/28/2012Completed Date: Removal Action WorkplanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: water run-on and run-off. Additional remediation required to address lead in surface soil andComments: 04/12/2011Completed Date: Site Characterization ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Obtained two grab geoundwater samples.Comments: 03/23/2010Completed Date: FieldworkCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: temporary wells to analyze 2 more filtered grab GW samples. Acceped Subsurface Investigation Work Plan proposed 2 additionalComments: 02/24/2010Completed Date: Site Characterization WorkplanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: assist the investigation. 2000 with BASAPCO locations of former operation & suspected USTs to UPRR LINDEN (AKA UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD LINDEN) (Continued)S109821384 TC3837232.2s Page 240 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: 03/30/2014Schedule Due Date: Land Use RestrictionSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDESchedule Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: 03/31/2014Schedule Due Date: CertificationSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDESchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: UPRR LINDEN (AKA UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD LINDEN) (Continued)S109821384 Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: AviationPotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affected: Not reportedFile Location: Not reportedRB Case Number: Not reportedLocal Agency: RLCase Worker: Cleanup Program SiteCase Type: -122.4077498Longitude: 37.654656Latitude: Not reportedLead Agency Case Number: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Lead Agency: T10000003522Global Id: 08/09/2011Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedFacility Status: STATERegion: SLIC: 1806 ft.Site 1 of 6 in cluster AA 0.342 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 14 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94128 NWTAXIWAY F OF SFIA N/A AA204 SLICSFIA - SAN FRANCISCO AIRPORT TAXIWAY F SPILL CLEANUPS111711556 SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 07/31/1995Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.39949Longitude: 37.654129Latitude: T0608100863Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 1837 ft.Site 1 of 7 in cluster AB 0.348 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 13 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 NE RGA LUST208 EAST GRAND AVENUE N/A AB205 LUSTBELL ELECTRICAL SUPPLY S109285676 TC3837232.2s Page 241 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2009 BELL ELECTRICAL SUPPLY 208 EAST GRAND AVENUE 2010 BELL ELECTRICAL SUPPLY 208 EAST GRAND AVENUE 2011 BELL ELECTRICAL SUPPLY 208 EAST GRAND AVENUE 2012 BELL ELECTRICAL SUPPLY 208 EAST GRAND AVENUE RGA LUST: Notice of Responsibility - #1Action: 11/17/1994Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100863Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100863Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 07/31/1995Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608100863Global Id: 04/14/1986Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608100863Global Id: Status History: Not reportedPhone Number: nkatyl@waterboards.ca.govEmail: OAKLANDCity: 1515 CLAY STREETAddress: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: NANCY KATYLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100863Global Id: 6503726298Phone Number: jmadden@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: JACOB MADDENContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100863Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: Local AgencyFile Location: 550136LOC Case Number: 41-0938RB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: JMCase Worker: BELL ELECTRICAL SUPPLY (Continued)S109285676 TC3837232.2s Page 242 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1996 BELL ELECTRICAL SUPPLY 208 EAST GRAND AVE 2008 BELL ELECTRICAL SUPPLY 208 EAST GRAND AVENUE BELL ELECTRICAL SUPPLY (Continued)S109285676 2003 TOSCO - FACILITY #1020 221 AIRPORT 2005 TOSCO #1020 (FORMER UNOCAL) 221 AIRPORT 2006 TOSCO #1020 (FORMER UNOCAL) 221 AIRPORT 2007 TOSCO #1020 (FORMER UNOCAL) 221 AIRPORT RGA LUST: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: 012319020APN Number: T0608100579Global ID: 9- Case ClosedFacility Status: 550004Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: 012319020APN Number: TI0000002842Global ID: 3B- Preliminary Assessment UnderwayFacility Status: 550206Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUST: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remediation Action Underway: Not reportedPollution Remediation Plan Submitted: 1/1/1965Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assesment Began: Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: OMHow Discovered: 550004Case Number: Pollution CharacterizationFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: LUST REG 2: 1856 ft.Site 2 of 6 in cluster AA 0.352 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 14 ft. 1/4-1/2S SAN FRANCISCO, CA NW RGA LUST221 AIRPORT BLVD N/A AA206 LUSTUNOCAL #1020 S104494137 TC3837232.2s Page 243 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation T10000002842Global Id: Status History: Not reportedPhone Number: cprowell@waterboards.ca.govEmail: OaklandCity: 1515 Clay Street, Suite 1400Address: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: Cheryl L. ProwellContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T10000002842Global Id: 6503726292Phone Number: dmilano@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: DENO MILANOContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T10000002842Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: excavation in 2000. ConocoPhillips removed the waste oil UST and performed some remedial which was likely poured into the well by station personnel), and 3.28 feet of NAPL was noted in MW-2 during the early 1990s (some of Unocal in 1987, sheen was noted on adjacent MW-2 during 1987, up to to the waste oil release. In brief, waste oil UST was replaced by Refer to historical reports under LOP Case #550004 for work relatedSite History: Waste Oil / Motor / Hydraulic / LubricatingPotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: Local AgencyFile Location: 550206LOC Case Number: 550206RB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: DGMCase Worker: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 02/17/2011Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.408275902271Longitude: 37.6545076181754Latitude: T10000002842Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 41-0607Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 41Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 1856 ft.RGA LUSTSite 3 of 6 in cluster AA 0.352 mi.SWEEPS UST Relative: Lower Actual: 14 ft. 1/4-1/2 HIST USTSOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 NW LUST221 AIRPORT BOULEVARD N/A AA207 HIST CORTESEUNOCAL STATION #1020 1000167163 TC3837232.2s Page 244 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Technical Correspondence / Assistance / Other - #20130131Action: 01/31/2013Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T10000002842Global Id: Staff Letter - #20110223BAction: 02/23/2011Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T10000002842Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 02/15/2013Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T10000002842Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 11/15/2012Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T10000002842Global Id: Staff Letter - #20120521Action: 05/21/2012Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T10000002842Global Id: Staff Letter - #20111215Action: 12/15/2011Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T10000002842Global Id: Technical Correspondence / Assistance / Other - #20110919Action: 09/19/2011Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T10000002842Global Id: Technical Correspondence / Assistance / Other - #20111019Action: 10/19/2011Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T10000002842Global Id: Well Installation ReportAction: 03/14/2012Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T10000002842Global Id: CorrespondenceAction: 06/22/2012Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T10000002842Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 02/17/2011Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T10000002842Global Id: 08/02/1987Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: UNOCAL STATION #1020 (Continued)1000167163 TC3837232.2s Page 245 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T10000002842Global Id: Corrective Action Plan / Remedial Action Plan - Regulator RespondedAction: 11/30/2012Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T10000002842Global Id: Staff Letter - #20120130Action: 01/30/2012Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T10000002842Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation ReportAction: 06/21/2011Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T10000002842Global Id: Technical Correspondence / Assistance / Other - #20110928Action: 09/28/2011Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T10000002842Global Id: Staff Letter - #20111110Action: 11/10/2011Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T10000002842Global Id: Technical Correspondence / Assistance / Other - #20131202Action: 12/02/2013Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T10000002842Global Id: Staff Letter - #20110223Action: 02/23/2011Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T10000002842Global Id: Notice of Responsibility - #20110302Action: 03/02/2011Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T10000002842Global Id: Notice of Violation - #20120724Action: 07/24/2012Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T10000002842Global Id: Notice to Comply - #20130312Action: 03/12/2013Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T10000002842Global Id: Staff Letter - #20130430Action: 04/30/2013Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T10000002842Global Id: UNOCAL STATION #1020 (Continued)1000167163 TC3837232.2s Page 246 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Free Product RemovalAction: 01/01/1950Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T10000002842Global Id: Free Product RemovalAction: 01/01/1950Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T10000002842Global Id: Free Product RemovalAction: 01/01/1950Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T10000002842Global Id: Technical Correspondence / Assistance / Other - #20120710Action: 07/10/2012Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T10000002842Global Id: Petition Submitted for ReviewAction: 08/25/2011Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T10000002842Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T10000002842Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation Workplan - Regulator RespondedAction: 08/01/2013Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T10000002842Global Id: Corrective Action Plan / Remedial Action Plan - Regulator RespondedAction: 02/28/2013Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T10000002842Global Id: CorrespondenceAction: 08/26/2011Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T10000002842Global Id: Electronic Reporting Submittal DueAction: 02/28/2013Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T10000002842Global Id: Staff Letter - #20120723Action: 07/23/2012Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T10000002842Global Id: Technical Correspondence / Assistance / Other - #20131013Action: 10/03/2013Date: UNOCAL STATION #1020 (Continued)1000167163 TC3837232.2s Page 247 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation STATERegion: Leak DiscoveryAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T10000002842Global Id: Staff Letter - #20110907Action: 09/07/2011Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T10000002842Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 05/15/2013Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T10000002842Global Id: Final Remedial Action Report / Corrective Action ReportAction: 03/31/2014Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T10000002842Global Id: Monitoring Report - OtherAction: 11/15/2011Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T10000002842Global Id: Staff Letter - #20131015Action: 10/15/2013Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T10000002842Global Id: Staff Letter - #20130806Action: 08/06/2013Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T10000002842Global Id: Staff Letter - #20130129Action: 01/29/2013Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T10000002842Global Id: Monitoring Report - Semi-AnnuallyAction: 05/15/2012Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T10000002842Global Id: Free Product RemovalAction: 01/01/1950Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T10000002842Global Id: ExcavationAction: 01/01/1950Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T10000002842Global Id: UNOCAL STATION #1020 (Continued)1000167163 TC3837232.2s Page 248 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Technical Correspondence / Assistance / Other - #20111019Action: 10/19/2011Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100579Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 04/16/2012Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608100579Global Id: 09/01/1991Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0608100579Global Id: 08/11/1987Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608100579Global Id: Status History: 6503726292Phone Number: dmilano@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: DENO MILANOContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100579Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: nkatyl@waterboards.ca.govEmail: OAKLANDCity: 1515 CLAY STREETAddress: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: NANCY KATYLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100579Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Dispenser release reported in 4/96 and Resna MW-8) and possibly a cathodic protection well and MW-2. NAPL was dumped into at least two monitoring wells (Eddie Neal MW-8Site History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: Local AgencyFile Location: 550004LOC Case Number: 41-0607RB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: DGMCase Worker: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 04/16/2012Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.408165931702Longitude: 37.654529915222Latitude: T0608100579Global Id: UNOCAL STATION #1020 (Continued)1000167163 TC3837232.2s Page 249 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100579Global Id: Monitoring Report - AnnuallyAction: 05/15/2008Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100579Global Id: Notification - Public Notice of Case Closure - #20111110Action: 11/10/2011Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100579Global Id: Staff Letter - #20060619Action: 06/19/2006Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100579Global Id: Staff Letter - #20060718Action: 07/18/2006Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100579Global Id: Staff Letter - #20080226Action: 02/26/2008Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100579Global Id: Staff Letter - #20071115Action: 11/15/2007Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100579Global Id: CorrespondenceAction: 12/31/2010Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100579Global Id: Closure/No Further Action Letter - #20120416Action: 04/16/2012Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100579Global Id: Staff Letter - #20111109Action: 11/09/2011Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100579Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100579Global Id: Staff Letter - #20110907Action: 09/07/2011Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100579Global Id: UNOCAL STATION #1020 (Continued)1000167163 TC3837232.2s Page 250 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Staff Letter - #20101214Action: 12/14/2010Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100579Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100579Global Id: Monitoring Report - AnnuallyAction: 05/15/2009Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100579Global Id: Corrective Action Plan / Remedial Action PlanAction: 07/03/2009Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100579Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation WorkplanAction: 08/10/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100579Global Id: Other Report / DocumentAction: 08/10/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100579Global Id: Other Report / DocumentAction: 08/10/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100579Global Id: Monitoring Report - Semi-AnnuallyAction: 11/14/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100579Global Id: Monitoring Report - Semi-AnnuallyAction: 11/15/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100579Global Id: Monitoring Report - Semi-AnnuallyAction: 05/15/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100579Global Id: Monitoring Report - Semi-AnnuallyAction: 05/16/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100579Global Id: Electronic Reporting Submittal DueAction: 01/16/2009Date: UNOCAL STATION #1020 (Continued)1000167163 TC3837232.2s Page 251 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100579Global Id: Staff Letter - #20081217Action: 12/17/2008Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100579Global Id: Pump & Treat (P&T) GroundwaterAction: 01/01/1950Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0608100579Global Id: Monitoring Report - AnnuallyAction: 05/15/2011Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100579Global Id: Staff Letter - #20120130Action: 01/30/2012Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100579Global Id: Staff Letter - #20111215Action: 12/15/2011Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100579Global Id: Electronic Reporting Submittal DueAction: 09/16/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100579Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation ReportAction: 06/19/2008Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100579Global Id: Electronic Reporting Submittal DueAction: 01/05/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100579Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation ReportAction: 10/09/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100579Global Id: Electronic Reporting Submittal DueAction: 08/10/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100579Global Id: Staff Letter - #20110223Action: 02/23/2011Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100579Global Id: UNOCAL STATION #1020 (Continued)1000167163 TC3837232.2s Page 252 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Well Destruction ReportAction: 03/14/2012Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100579Global Id: Staff Letter - #20101122Action: 11/22/2010Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100579Global Id: Respond to PetitionAction: 08/26/2011Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100579Global Id: Monitoring Report - AnnuallyAction: 05/15/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100579Global Id: Staff Letter - #20110223Action: 02/23/2011Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100579Global Id: Staff Letter - #20011210Action: 12/10/2001Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100579Global Id: Staff Letter - #20051205Action: 12/05/2005Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100579Global Id: Staff Letter - #20070716Action: 07/16/2007Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100579Global Id: Notice of Responsibility - #19870811Action: 08/11/1987Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100579Global Id: Staff Letter - #20050504Action: 05/04/2005Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100579Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation ReportAction: 06/21/2011Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100579Global Id: Technical Correspondence / Assistance / Other - #20110123Action: 01/23/2011Date: UNOCAL STATION #1020 (Continued)1000167163 TC3837232.2s Page 253 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 00010000Tank Capacity: 1976Year Installed: 1020-1-1Container Num: 001Tank Num: SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111Owner City,St,Zip: 1 CALIFORNIA ST. SUITE 2700Owner Address: UNION OIL CO.Owner Name: 4155880538Telephone: MARINA & SILVAS SERVICE INC.Contact Name: 0003Total Tanks: Not reportedOther Type: Gas StationFacility Type: 00000031718Facility ID: STATERegion: HIST UST: Monitoring Report - AnnuallyAction: 05/15/2010Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100579Global Id: ExcavationAction: 01/01/1950Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0608100579Global Id: Pump & Treat (P&T) GroundwaterAction: 01/01/1950Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0608100579Global Id: Staff Letter - #20100426Action: 04/26/2010Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100579Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation WorkplanAction: 07/03/2009Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100579Global Id: Staff Letter - #20090723Action: 07/23/2009Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100579Global Id: Staff Letter - #20110510Action: 05/10/2011Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100579Global Id: Staff Letter - #20060710Action: 07/10/2006Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100579Global Id: UNOCAL STATION #1020 (Continued)1000167163 TC3837232.2s Page 254 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 10-13-88Created Date: 04-20-94Action Date: 04-20-94Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 1Number: 550090Comp Number: ActiveStatus: 6Number Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PStg: M.V. FUELTank Use: 12000Capacity: 06-19-90Actv Date: 41-000-550090-000001Swrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: ATank Status: 10-13-88Created Date: 04-20-94Action Date: 04-20-94Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 1Number: 550090Comp Number: ActiveStatus: SWEEPS UST: VisualLeak Detection: 6 inchesTank Construction: Not reportedType of Fuel: WASTETank Used for: 00000000Tank Capacity: 1962Year Installed: 1Container Num: 004Tank Num: Stock Inventor, 10Leak Detection: Not reportedTank Construction: WASTE OILType of Fuel: WASTETank Used for: 00000280Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 1020-4-1Container Num: 003Tank Num: Stock Inventor, 10Leak Detection: Not reportedTank Construction: PREMIUMType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00010000Tank Capacity: 1976Year Installed: 1020-2-1Container Num: 002Tank Num: Stock Inventor, 10Leak Detection: Not reportedTank Construction: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: UNOCAL STATION #1020 (Continued)1000167163 TC3837232.2s Page 255 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation M.V. FUELTank Use: 12000Capacity: 04-20-94Actv Date: 41-000-550090-000005Swrcb Tank Id: 1020-SU-1Owner Tank Id: ATank Status: 10-13-88Created Date: 04-20-94Action Date: 04-20-94Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 1Number: 550090Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PStg: M.V. FUELTank Use: 12000Capacity: 04-20-94Actv Date: 41-000-550090-000004Swrcb Tank Id: 1020-RU-1Owner Tank Id: ATank Status: 10-13-88Created Date: 04-20-94Action Date: 04-20-94Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 1Number: 550090Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PStg: M.V. FUELTank Use: 12000Capacity: 06-19-90Actv Date: 41-000-550090-000003Swrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: ATank Status: 10-13-88Created Date: 04-20-94Action Date: 04-20-94Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 1Number: 550090Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: WASTE OILContent: WStg: OILTank Use: 520Capacity: 06-19-90Actv Date: 41-000-550090-000002Swrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: ATank Status: UNOCAL STATION #1020 (Continued)1000167163 TC3837232.2s Page 256 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2008 TOSCO #1020 (FORMER UNOCAL) 221 AIRPORT 2009 TOSCO #1020 (FORMER UNOCAL) 221 AIRPORT BOULEVARD 2010 TOSCO #1020 (FORMER UNOCAL) 221 AIRPORT BOULEVARD 2011 UNOCAL STATION #1020 221 AIRPORT BOULEVARD 2011 UNOCAL #1020 221 AIRPORT BOULEVARD 2012 UNOCAL STATION #1020 221 AIRPORT BOULEVARD 2012 UNOCAL #1020 221 AIRPORT BOULEVARD RGA LUST: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: WASTE OILContent: WStg: OILTank Use: 1Capacity: 04-20-94Actv Date: 41-000-550090-000006Swrcb Tank Id: 1020-WO-1Owner Tank Id: ATank Status: 10-13-88Created Date: 04-20-94Action Date: 04-20-94Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 1Number: 550090Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PStg: UNOCAL STATION #1020 (Continued)1000167163 Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: Local AgencyFile Location: 550081LOC Case Number: 41-0529RB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: JMCase Worker: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 08/09/2001Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.407901Longitude: 37.655437Latitude: T0608100505Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 41-0529Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 41Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 1871 ft.RGA LUSTSite 4 of 6 in cluster AA 0.354 mi.SWEEPS UST Relative: Lower Actual: 14 ft. 1/4-1/2 CA FID USTS SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 NW LUST315 AIRPORT BLVD N/A AA208 HIST CORTESESOUTH CITY FORD 1000405658 TC3837232.2s Page 257 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation OMHow Discovered: 550081Case Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: LUST REG 2: Notice of Responsibility - #1Action: 07/23/1991Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100505Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100505Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100505Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 08/09/2001Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608100505Global Id: 06/19/1991Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608100505Global Id: Status History: 6503726298Phone Number: jmadden@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: JACOB MADDENContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100505Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: nkatyl@waterboards.ca.govEmail: OAKLANDCity: 1515 CLAY STREETAddress: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: NANCY KATYLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100505Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: SOUTH CITY FORD (Continued)1000405658 TC3837232.2s Page 258 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1Number Of Tanks: WASTE OILContent: WASTEStg: OILTank Use: 300Capacity: Not reportedActv Date: 41-000-550107-000006Swrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedTank Status: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: 44-025360Board Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 550107Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: SWEEPS UST: ActiveStatus: Not reportedComments: Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: S SAN FRANCISCO 94080Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: 315 AIRPORT BLVDMailing Address: Not reportedMail To: Not reportedFacility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: Not reportedRegulated ID: UTNKARegulated By: 41000496Facility ID: CA FID UST: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: 012318080APN Number: T0608100505Global ID: 9- Case ClosedFacility Status: 550081Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUST: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remediation Action Underway: Not reportedPollution Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedPollution Characterization Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assesment Began: Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: SOUTH CITY FORD (Continued)1000405658 TC3837232.2s Page 259 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 04-20-94Action Date: 04-20-94Referral Date: 44-025360Board Of Equalization: 9Number: 550107Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PStg: M.V. FUELTank Use: 550Capacity: 04-20-94Actv Date: 41-000-550107-000003Swrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: ATank Status: 10-13-88Created Date: 04-20-94Action Date: 04-20-94Referral Date: 44-025360Board Of Equalization: 9Number: 550107Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: WASTE OILContent: WStg: OILTank Use: 100Capacity: 04-20-94Actv Date: 41-000-550107-000002Swrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: ATank Status: 10-13-88Created Date: 04-20-94Action Date: 04-20-94Referral Date: 44-025360Board Of Equalization: 9Number: 550107Comp Number: ActiveStatus: 5Number Of Tanks: WASTE OILContent: WStg: OILTank Use: 300Capacity: 04-20-94Actv Date: 41-000-550107-000001Swrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: ATank Status: 10-13-88Created Date: 04-20-94Action Date: 04-20-94Referral Date: 44-025360Board Of Equalization: 9Number: 550107Comp Number: ActiveStatus: SOUTH CITY FORD (Continued)1000405658 TC3837232.2s Page 260 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2003 SOUTH CITY FORD 315 AIRPORT 2005 SOUTH CITY FORD 315 AIRPORT 2006 SOUTH CITY FORD 315 AIRPORT 2007 SOUTH CITY FORD 315 AIRPORT 2008 SOUTH CITY FORD 315 AIRPORT 2009 SOUTH CITY FORD 315 AIRPORT 2010 SOUTH CITY FORD 315 AIRPORT 2011 SOUTH CITY FORD 315 AIRPORT 2012 SOUTH CITY FORD 315 AIRPORT RGA LUST: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PStg: M.V. FUELTank Use: 550Capacity: 04-20-94Actv Date: 41-000-550107-000005Swrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: ATank Status: 10-13-88Created Date: 04-20-94Action Date: 04-20-94Referral Date: 44-025360Board Of Equalization: 9Number: 550107Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PStg: M.V. FUELTank Use: 550Capacity: 04-20-94Actv Date: 41-000-550107-000004Swrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: ATank Status: 10-13-88Created Date: SOUTH CITY FORD (Continued)1000405658 1993 SOUTH CITY FORD 315 AIRPORT BLVD 1994 SOUTH CITY FORD 315 AIRPORT BLVD 1995 SOUTH CITY FORD 315 AIRPORT BLVD 1996 SOUTH CITY FORD 315 AIRPORT BLVD 1997 SOUTH CITY FORD 315 AIRPORT BLVD 1998 SOUTH CITY FORD 315 AIRPORT BLVD 2000 SOUTH CITY FORD 315 AIRPORT BLVD 2002 SOUTH CITY FORD 315 AIRPORT BLVD RGA LUST: 1871 ft.Site 5 of 6 in cluster AA 0.354 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 14 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA NW315 AIRPORT BLVD N/A AA209 RGA LUSTS114220495 TC3837232.2s Page 261 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: Not reportedAPN Number: T0608100863Global ID: 9- Case ClosedFacility Status: 550136Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUST: 1880 ft.Site 2 of 7 in cluster AB 0.356 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 13 ft. 1/4-1/2S SAN FRANCISCO, CA NE208 E GRAND AVE N/A AB210 LUSTBELL ELECTRICAL SUPPLY S105033317 2003 FIRE STATION #1 201 BADEN 2005 FIRE STATION #1 201 BADEN 2006 FIRE STATION #1 201 BADEN 2007 FIRE STATION #1 201 BADEN RGA LUST: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: Not reportedAPN Number: T0608101008Global ID: 9- Case ClosedFacility Status: 550153Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUST: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remediation Action Underway: Not reportedPollution Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedPollution Characterization Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assesment Began: Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: OMHow Discovered: 550153Case Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: LUST REG 2: 1887 ft.Site 1 of 3 in cluster AC 0.357 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 23 ft. 1/4-1/2S SAN FRANCISCO, CA NW RGA LUST201 BADEN AVE N/A AC211 LUSTFIRE STATION #1 S103879302 TC3837232.2s Page 262 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 06/27/2001Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608101008Global Id: 03/05/1998Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608101008Global Id: Status History: 6503726298Phone Number: jmadden@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: JACOB MADDENContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608101008Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: nkatyl@waterboards.ca.govEmail: OAKLANDCity: 1515 CLAY STREETAddress: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: NANCY KATYLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608101008Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: DieselPotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: Local AgencyFile Location: 550153LOC Case Number: 41-1098RB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: JMCase Worker: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 06/27/2001Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.4089228Longitude: 37.6538258Latitude: T0608101008Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 41-1098Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 41Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 1887 ft.Site 2 of 3 in cluster AC 0.357 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 23 ft. 1/4-1/2 RGA LUSTSOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 NW LUST201 BADEN N/A AC212 HIST CORTESEFIRE STATION #1 S103890629 TC3837232.2s Page 263 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2008 FIRE STATION #1 201 BADEN 2009 FIRE STATION #1 201 BADEN 2010 FIRE STATION #1 201 BADEN 2011 FIRE STATION #1 201 BADEN 2012 FIRE STATION #1 201 BADEN RGA LUST: Notice of Responsibility - #1Action: 04/05/1998Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608101008Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608101008Global Id: Regulatory Activities: FIRE STATION #1 (Continued)S103890629 2000 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO FIRE STA # 201 BADEN AVE 2002 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO FIRE STA #1 201 BADEN AVE RGA LUST: 1887 ft.Site 3 of 3 in cluster AC 0.357 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 23 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA NW201 BADEN AVE N/A AC213 RGA LUSTS114209753 SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: Not reportedAPN Number: SL0608116110Global ID: 9- Case ClosedFacility Status: 559002Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUST: 1901 ft.Site 3 of 7 in cluster AB 0.360 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 14 ft. 1/4-1/2S SAN FRANCISCO, CA NE205 E GRAND AVE N/A AB214 LUSTMATTISON & SHIDLER S107410885 TC3837232.2s Page 264 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: Not reportedPotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affected: Local Agency WarehouseFile Location: 41-0835RB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: JMCase Worker: Cleanup Program SiteCase Type: -122.396814823151Longitude: 37.6547592558838Latitude: 559002Lead Agency Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: SL0608116110Global Id: 11/29/1995Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedFacility Status: STATERegion: SLIC: 1916 ft.Site 4 of 7 in cluster AB 0.363 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 14 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 NE205 EAST GRAND AVENUE N/A AB215 SLICMATTISON & SHIDLER S109277173 41-0584Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 41Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 1937 ft.Site 1 of 9 in cluster AD 0.367 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 25 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA West7 LINDEN N/A AD216 HIST CORTESEUNION CARBIDE CORP S102361365 SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: 014074010APN Number: T0608100558Global ID: 5R- Remediation PlanFacility Status: 550001Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUST: 1937 ft.Site 2 of 9 in cluster AD 0.367 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 25 ft. 1/4-1/2S SAN FRANCISCO, CA West7 S LINDEN AVE N/A AD217 LUSTUNION CARBIDE CORP.S104912726 TC3837232.2s Page 265 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2003 UNION CARBIDE CORP. 7 LINDEN 2005 UNION CARBIDE CORP. 7 LINDEN 2006 UNION CARBIDE CORP. 7 LINDEN 2007 UNION CARBIDE CORP. 7 LINDEN RGA LUST: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remediation Action Underway: Not reportedPollution Remediation Plan Submitted: 1/1/1965Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assesment Began: Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: VLeak Source: Structure FailureLeak Cause: Tank ClosureHow Discovered: 550001Case Number: Pollution CharacterizationFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: LUST REG 2: 1937 ft.Site 3 of 9 in cluster AD 0.367 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 25 ft. 1/4-1/2S SAN FRANCISCO, CA West RGA LUST7 LINDEN N/A AD218 LUSTS103893367 Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: or any professional interpretations made in the referenced report. does not take responsibility for the accuracy of the statements made Mateo County offices if submitted prior to 2005, San Mateo County Can be extracted from most recent report in Geotracker or at SanSite History: Gasoline Acetone, Other Chlorinated Hydrocarbons, Vinyl chloride, Diesel,Potential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: Not reportedFile Location: 550001LOC Case Number: 41-0584RB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: JMCase Worker: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 12/21/2005Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.411331Longitude: 37.651185434Latitude: T0608100558Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 1937 ft.Site 4 of 9 in cluster AD 0.367 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 25 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 West RGA LUST7 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUE N/A AD219 LUSTUNION CARBIDE CORP.S111760444 TC3837232.2s Page 266 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 01/07/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 05/15/2013Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 08/15/2012Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 05/15/2012Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 12/21/2005Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T0608100558Global Id: 01/10/1987Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0608100558Global Id: 01/10/1987Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608100558Global Id: Status History: 6503726298Phone Number: jmadden@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: JACOB MADDENContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100558Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: cprowell@waterboards.ca.govEmail: OaklandCity: 1515 Clay Street, Suite 1400Address: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: Cheryl L. ProwellContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100558Global Id: Contact: UNION CARBIDE CORP. (Continued)S111760444 TC3837232.2s Page 267 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Corrective Action Plan / Remedial Action PlanAction: 04/19/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation WorkplanAction: 03/21/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: Electronic Reporting Submittal DueAction: 01/21/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: Risk Assessment ReportAction: 10/28/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: CAP/RAP - Feasibility Study ReportAction: 10/28/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation ReportAction: 05/18/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: Electronic Reporting Submittal DueAction: 11/19/2008Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: Warning Letter - #20081009Action: 10/09/2008Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation ReportAction: 02/28/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: Electronic Reporting Submittal DueAction: 09/21/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation ReportAction: UNION CARBIDE CORP. (Continued)S111760444 TC3837232.2s Page 268 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 08/15/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: Monitoring Report - Semi-AnnuallyAction: 02/15/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 02/15/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 02/15/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: Monitoring Report - Semi-AnnuallyAction: 11/15/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: Electronic Reporting Submittal DueAction: 08/20/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation WorkplanAction: 09/30/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: Risk Assessment ReportAction: 03/03/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation ReportAction: 08/29/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: Corrective Action Plan / Remedial Action PlanAction: 12/29/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: Risk Assessment ReportAction: 03/21/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: UNION CARBIDE CORP. (Continued)S111760444 TC3837232.2s Page 269 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Staff Letter - #20050705AAction: 07/05/2005Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: Staff Letter - #20051221DAction: 12/21/2005Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: Staff Letter - #20040810AAction: 08/10/2004Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: Staff Letter - #20041007Action: 10/07/2004Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: Monitoring Report - Semi-AnnuallyAction: 04/15/2010Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: Staff Letter - #20120620Action: 06/20/2012Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 03/08/2011Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 11/15/2012Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation WorkplanAction: 10/05/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 02/15/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 08/15/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: Monitoring Report - Semi-AnnuallyAction: 05/15/2007Date: UNION CARBIDE CORP. (Continued)S111760444 TC3837232.2s Page 270 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: Staff Letter - #20051221CAction: 12/21/2005Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: Staff Letter - #20060427AAction: 04/27/2006Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: Staff Letter - #20051221BAction: 12/21/2005Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: Staff Letter - #20060427BAction: 04/27/2006Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 11/15/2013Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: Monitoring Report - Semi-AnnuallyAction: 05/15/2009Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: Leak StoppedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: Notice of Responsibility - #19881209Action: 12/09/1988Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: Staff Letter - #20030812Action: 08/12/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: Staff Letter - #20040810BAction: 08/10/2004Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: Staff Letter - #20030611Action: 06/11/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: UNION CARBIDE CORP. (Continued)S111760444 TC3837232.2s Page 271 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Staff Letter - #20050419Action: 04/19/2005Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: In Situ Physical/Chemical Treatment (other than SVE)Action: 01/01/1950Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: Monitoring Report - Semi-AnnuallyAction: 02/15/2013Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: Well Destruction Workplan - Regulator RespondedAction: 07/22/2013Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 07/15/2011Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 11/15/2011Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 02/15/2012Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: Monitoring Report - Semi-AnnuallyAction: 11/15/2009Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: Staff Letter - #20030422Action: 04/22/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: Staff Letter - #20031001Action: 10/01/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: Staff Letter - #20050705BAction: 07/05/2005Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: Staff Letter - #20030113Action: 01/13/2003Date: UNION CARBIDE CORP. (Continued)S111760444 TC3837232.2s Page 272 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2008 UNION CARBIDE CORP. 7 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUE 2009 UNION CARBIDE CORP. 7 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUE 2010 UNION CARBIDE CORP. 7 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUE 2011 UNION CARBIDE CORP. 7 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUE 2012 UNION CARBIDE CORP. 7 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUE RGA LUST: Pump & Treat (P&T) GroundwaterAction: 01/01/1950Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: ExcavationAction: 01/01/1950Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: Pump & Treat (P&T) GroundwaterAction: 01/01/1950Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: ExcavationAction: 01/01/1950Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 08/15/2013Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: Monitoring Report - Semi-AnnuallyAction: 11/15/2008Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: Staff Letter - #20090715Action: 07/15/2009Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: Staff Letter - #20051221AAction: 12/21/2005Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100558Global Id: UNION CARBIDE CORP. (Continued)S111760444 TC3837232.2s Page 273 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 07/23/1990Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0608100526Global Id: 07/23/1990Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608100526Global Id: Status History: Not reportedPhone Number: ralambert@waterboards.ca.govEmail: OAKLANDCity: 1515 CLAY ST. SUITE 1500Address: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: RALPH LAMBERTContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100526Global Id: 6503726298Phone Number: jmadden@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: JACOB MADDENContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100526Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: Regional BoardFile Location: 550073LOC Case Number: 41-1309RB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: RELCase Worker: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Lead Agency: 06/12/2009Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.410707Longitude: 37.647948988Latitude: T0608100526Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 41-0551Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 41Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 1968 ft.Site 1 of 2 in cluster AE 0.373 mi.RGA LUST Relative: Lower Actual: 25 ft. 1/4-1/2 SWEEPS USTSOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 WSW LUST1381 LOWRIE N/A AE220 HIST CORTESESUPER CROWN CATERING S100234195 TC3837232.2s Page 274 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: Monitoring Report - Semi-AnnuallyAction: 05/25/2009Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation WorkplanAction: 08/11/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation ReportAction: 07/02/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: Not reportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: Well Installation ReportAction: 04/07/2008Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 06/12/2009Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608100526Global Id: 10/23/2008Status Date: Open - Verification MonitoringStatus: T0608100526Global Id: 05/26/2008Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T0608100526Global Id: 01/02/2008Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T0608100526Global Id: 01/01/2008Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T0608100526Global Id: 03/16/2004Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T0608100526Global Id: SUPER CROWN CATERING (Continued)S100234195 TC3837232.2s Page 275 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Staff Letter - #20060124BAction: 01/24/2006Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: Staff Letter - #20031119Action: 11/19/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: 13267 Monitoring ProgramAction: 12/08/2008Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: Electronic Reporting Submittal DueAction: 06/23/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 03/30/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 02/15/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 02/15/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation ReportAction: 11/17/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 05/30/2008Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: Remedial Progress ReportAction: 03/24/2008Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: Corrective Action Plan / Remedial Action PlanAction: 12/31/2007Date: SUPER CROWN CATERING (Continued)S100234195 TC3837232.2s Page 276 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: Staff Letter - #20040817Action: 08/17/2004Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: Staff Letter - #20030602Action: 06/02/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: Staff Letter - #20030811Action: 08/11/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: Notice of Violation - #20060927Action: 09/27/2006Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: Notice of Responsibility - #19970505Action: 05/05/1997Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: Staff Letter - #20050303Action: 03/03/2005Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: Staff Letter - #20021016Action: 10/16/2002Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: Staff Letter - #20050810BAction: 08/10/2005Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: Staff Letter - #20070523Action: 05/23/2007Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: Staff Letter - #20040316Action: 03/16/2004Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: Staff Letter - #20070104Action: 01/04/2007Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: SUPER CROWN CATERING (Continued)S100234195 TC3837232.2s Page 277 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation In Situ Physical/Chemical Treatment (other than SVE)Action: 01/01/1950Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: 13267 RequirementAction: 10/22/2007Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: 13267 Monitoring ProgramAction: 10/22/2007Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: Staff LetterAction: 02/19/2008Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 06/12/2009Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: Other Report / DocumentAction: 02/11/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: Staff Letter - #20030117Action: 01/17/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: Staff Letter - #20061214AAction: 12/14/2006Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: Staff Letter - #20060124CAction: 01/24/2006Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: Staff Letter - #20061214BAction: 12/14/2006Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: Staff Letter - #20060124AAction: 01/24/2006Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: Staff Letter - #20050810AAction: 08/10/2005Date: SUPER CROWN CATERING (Continued)S100234195 TC3837232.2s Page 278 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 06/15/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 08/15/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 08/15/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 08/15/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 05/15/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 05/15/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 04/30/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 05/15/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 02/15/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: Site Visit / Inspection / SamplingAction: 11/15/2007Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: 13267 RequirementAction: 11/15/2007Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: SUPER CROWN CATERING (Continued)S100234195 TC3837232.2s Page 279 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Corrective Action Plan / Remedial Action PlanAction: 11/30/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: CAP/RAP - Feasibility Study ReportAction: 07/06/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: CAP/RAP - Feasibility Study ReportAction: 10/26/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: CAP/RAP - Feasibility Study ReportAction: 07/06/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 05/15/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 09/09/9999Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 09/09/9999Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 08/15/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: Corrective Action Plan / Remedial Action PlanAction: 09/27/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 08/15/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 11/15/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 11/15/2005Date: SUPER CROWN CATERING (Continued)S100234195 TC3837232.2s Page 280 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: Remedial Progress ReportAction: 05/14/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: Remedial Progress ReportAction: 04/14/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: Remedial Progress ReportAction: 03/14/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: Remedial Progress ReportAction: 02/14/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: Remedial Progress ReportAction: 01/14/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 01/14/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: CAP/RAP - Feasibility Study ReportAction: 03/22/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: Risk Assessment ReportAction: 04/18/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: Other Report / DocumentAction: 04/18/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: Remedial Progress ReportAction: 09/09/9999Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: Electronic Reporting Submittal DueAction: 09/10/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: SUPER CROWN CATERING (Continued)S100234195 TC3837232.2s Page 281 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2007 SUPER CROWN CATERING 1381 LOWRIE 2008 SUPER CROWN CATERING 1381 LOWRIE 2009 SUPER CROWN CATERING 1381 LOWRIE 2010 SUPER CROWN CATERING 1381 LOWRIE 2011 SUPER CROWN CATERING 1381 LOWRIE 2012 SUPER CROWN CATERING 1381 LOWRIE RGA LUST: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: Not reportedContent: Not reportedStg: Not reportedTank Use: Not reportedCapacity: Not reportedActv Date: Not reportedSwrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedTank Status: 10-13-88Created Date: 02-03-94Action Date: 02-03-94Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 9Number: 550008Comp Number: ActiveStatus: SWEEPS UST: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remediation Action Underway: 3/16/2004Pollution Remediation Plan Submitted: 1/1/1965Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assesment Began: Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: OMHow Discovered: 550073Case Number: Remediation PlanFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: LUST REG 2: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 08/05/2008Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: Other Report / DocumentAction: 12/07/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100526Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 02/28/2008Date: SUPER CROWN CATERING (Continued)S100234195 TC3837232.2s Page 282 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2003 SUPER CROWN CATERING 1381 LOWRIE 2005 SUPER CROWN CATERING 1381 LOWRIE 2006 SUPER CROWN CATERING 1381 LOWRIE SUPER CROWN CATERING (Continued)S100234195 1992 SUPER CROWN CATERING 1381 LOWRIE AVE 1993 SUPER CROWN CATERING 1381 LOWRIE AVE 1994 SUPER CROWN CATERING 1381 LOWRIE AVE 1995 SUPER CROWN CATERING 1381 LOWRIE AVE 1996 SUPER CROWN CATERING 1381 LOWRIE AVE 1997 SUPER CROWN CATERING 1381 LOWRIE AVE 1998 SUPER CROWN CATERING 1381 LOWRIE AVE 2000 SUPER CROWN CATERING 1381 LOWRIE AVE 2002 SUPER CROWN CATERING 1381 LOWRIE AVE RGA LUST: 1968 ft.Site 2 of 2 in cluster AE 0.373 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 25 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA WSW1381 LOWRIE AVE N/A AE221 RGA LUSTS114199856 Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100782Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: Not reportedFile Location: 559002LOC Case Number: 41-0835RB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: Not reportedCase Worker: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Lead Agency: 11/29/1995Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.396922111511Longitude: 37.6548441966899Latitude: T0608100782Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 41-0835Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 41Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 1972 ft.Site 5 of 7 in cluster AB 0.373 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 14 ft. 1/4-1/2 RGA LUSTSOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA NE LUST205 GRAND N/A AB222 HIST CORTESEMATTISON & SHIDLER S102433103 TC3837232.2s Page 283 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation RGA LUST: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remediation Action Underway: Not reportedPollution Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedPollution Characterization Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assesment Began: Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: 8/10/1994Date Leak Confirmed: UNKLeak Source: UNKLeak Cause: Tank ClosureHow Discovered: 559002Case Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: 41-0835Facility Id: 2Region: LUST REG 2: Leak StoppedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100782Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100782Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100782Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 11/29/1995Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608100782Global Id: 08/10/1994Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0608100782Global Id: 07/19/1994Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608100782Global Id: Status History: 6503726298Phone Number: jmadden@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: JACOB MADDENContact Name: MATTISON & SHIDLER (Continued)S102433103 TC3837232.2s Page 284 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1994 MATTISON & SHIDLER 205 GRAND AVE E 1995 MATTISON & SHIDLER 205 GRAND AVE E 1996 MATTISON & SHIDLER 205 GRAND AVE E 1997 MATTISON & SHIDLER 205 GRAND AVE E 1998 MATTISON & SHIDLER 205 GRAND AVE E 2000 MATTISON & SHIDLER 205 GRAND AVE E 2001 MATTISON & SHIDLER 205 GRAND AVE E 2002 MATTISON & SHIDLER 205 GRAND AVE E 2003 MATTISON & SHIDLER 205 GRAND AVE E 2005 MATTISON & SHIDLER 205 GRAND AVE E 2006 MATTISON & SHIDLER 205 GRAND AVE E 2007 MATTISON & SHIDLER 205 GRAND AVE E 2008 MATTISON & SHIDLER 205 GRAND AVE E 2009 MATTISON & SHIDLER 205 GRAND AVE E 2010 MATTISON & SHIDLER 205 GRAND AVE E 2011 MATTISON & SHIDLER 205 GRAND AVE E 2012 MATTISON & SHIDLER 205 GRAND AVE E MATTISON & SHIDLER (Continued)S102433103 2003 OLYMPIAN 186 GRAND 2005 OLYMPIAN 186 GRAND 2006 OLYMPIAN 186 GRAND 2007 OLYMPIAN 186 GRAND RGA LUST: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remediation Action Underway: Not reportedPollution Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedPollution Characterization Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assesment Began: Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: OMHow Discovered: 550070Case Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: LUST REG 2: 41-0382Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 41Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 1973 ft.Site 6 of 6 in cluster AA 0.374 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 17 ft. 1/4-1/2 RGA LUSTSOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94030 NW LUST186 GRAND N/A AA223 HIST CORTESEOLYMPIAN S102434673 TC3837232.2s Page 285 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: Not reportedAPN Number: T0608100165Global ID: 9- Case ClosedFacility Status: 550039Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUST: 1984 ft.Site 6 of 7 in cluster AB 0.376 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 14 ft. 1/4-1/2S SAN FRANCISCO, CA NE213 E GRAND AVE N/A AB224 LUSTCODON (GRAND/ROEBLING INV)S104494206 Not reportedPhone Number: nkatyl@waterboards.ca.govEmail: OAKLANDCity: 1515 CLAY STREETAddress: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: NANCY KATYLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100165Global Id: 6503726298Phone Number: jmadden@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: JACOB MADDENContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100165Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: Local Agency WarehouseFile Location: 550039LOC Case Number: 41-0173RB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: JMCase Worker: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 11/13/1991Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.400015Longitude: 37.654691Latitude: T0608100165Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 1996 ft.Site 7 of 7 in cluster AB 0.378 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 14 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 NE RGA LUST213 EAST GRAND AVENUE N/A AB225 LUSTCODON (GRAND/ROEBLING INV)S109285591 TC3837232.2s Page 286 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2008 CODON (GRAND/ROEBLING INV) 213 EAST GRAND AVENUE 2009 CODON (GRAND/ROEBLING INV) 213 EAST GRAND AVENUE 2010 CODON (GRAND/ROEBLING INV) 213 EAST GRAND AVENUE 2011 CODON (GRAND/ROEBLING INV) 213 EAST GRAND AVENUE 2012 CODON (GRAND/ROEBLING INV) 213 EAST GRAND AVENUE RGA LUST: Notice of Responsibility - #1Action: 11/13/1991Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100165Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100165Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100165Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 11/13/1991Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608100165Global Id: 03/23/1987Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608100165Global Id: Status History: CODON (GRAND/ROEBLING INV) (Continued)S109285591 Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remediation Action Underway: Not reportedPollution Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedPollution Characterization Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assesment Began: Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: OMHow Discovered: 550011Case Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: LUST REG 2: 2043 ft.Site 1 of 5 in cluster AF 0.387 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 16 ft. 1/4-1/2S SAN FRANCISCO, CA NNW RGA LUST401 AIRPORT BLVD N/A AF226 LUSTCHEVRON 9-0645 S105030518 TC3837232.2s Page 287 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2003 CHEVRON 9-0645 401 AIRPORT 2005 CHEVRON 9-0645 401 AIRPORT 2006 CHEVRON 9-0645 401 AIRPORT 2007 CHEVRON 9-0645 401 AIRPORT RGA LUST: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: 012317110APN Number: T0608100137Global ID: 9- Case ClosedFacility Status: 550011Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUST: CHEVRON 9-0645 (Continued)S105030518 Not reportedPhone Number: nkatyl@waterboards.ca.govEmail: OAKLANDCity: 1515 CLAY STREETAddress: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: NANCY KATYLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100137Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: Local AgencyFile Location: 550011LOC Case Number: 41-0144RB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: CLICase Worker: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 01/18/2001Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.4073976Longitude: 37.6556747Latitude: T0608100137Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 41-0144Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 41Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 2043 ft.Site 2 of 5 in cluster AF 0.387 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 16 ft. 1/4-1/2 RGA LUSTSOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA NNW LUST401 AIRPORT N/A AF227 HIST CORTESECHEVRON S110060555 TC3837232.2s Page 288 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2008 CHEVRON 9-0645 401 AIRPORT 2009 CHEVRON 9-0645 401 AIRPORT 2010 CHEVRON 9-0645 401 AIRPORT 2011 CHEVRON 9-0645 401 AIRPORT 2012 CHEVRON 9-0645 401 AIRPORT RGA LUST: Notice of Responsibility - #1Action: 02/27/1989Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100137Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100137Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100137Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 01/18/2001Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608100137Global Id: 02/27/1989Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608100137Global Id: Status History: 6503726295Phone Number: cice@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: CHARLES ICEContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100137Global Id: CHEVRON (Continued)S110060555 1994 CHEVRON 401 AIRPORT BLVD 1995 CHEVRON 401 AIRPORT BLVD 1996 CHEVRON 401 AIRPORT BLVD 1997 CHEVRON 401 AIRPORT BLVD 1998 CHEVRON 401 AIRPORT BLVD 2000 CHEVRON 401 AIRPORT BLVD 2002 CHEVRON 401 AIRPORT BLVD RGA LUST: 2043 ft.Site 3 of 5 in cluster AF 0.387 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 16 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA NNW401 AIRPORT BLVD N/A AF228 RGA LUSTS114225266 TC3837232.2s Page 289 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1992 CHEVRON 401 AIRPORT BLVD 1993 CHEVRON 401 AIRPORT BLVD (Continued)S114225266 2003 BELL ELECTRICAL SUPPLY 208 GRAND 2005 BELL ELECTRICAL SUPPLY 208 GRAND 2006 BELL ELECTRICAL SUPPLY 208 GRAND 2007 BELL ELECTRICAL SUPPLY 208 GRAND RGA LUST: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remediation Action Underway: Not reportedPollution Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedPollution Characterization Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assesment Began: Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: OMHow Discovered: 550136Case Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: LUST REG 2: 41-0938Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 41Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 2051 ft.Site 1 of 4 in cluster AG 0.388 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 20 ft. 1/4-1/2 RGA LUSTSOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA NW LUST208 GRAND N/A AG229 HIST CORTESEBELL ELECTRICAL SUPPLY S104161823 550039Case Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: LUST REG 2: 41-0173Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 41Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 2059 ft.Site 2 of 4 in cluster AG 0.390 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 20 ft. 1/4-1/2 RGA LUSTSOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 NW LUST213 GRAND N/A AG230 HIST CORTESECODON GRAND ROEBLING INV S103472863 TC3837232.2s Page 290 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2003 CODON (GRAND/ROEBLING INV) 213 GRAND 2005 CODON (GRAND/ROEBLING INV) 213 GRAND 2006 CODON (GRAND/ROEBLING INV) 213 GRAND 2007 CODON (GRAND/ROEBLING INV) 213 GRAND RGA LUST: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remediation Action Underway: Not reportedPollution Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedPollution Characterization Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assesment Began: Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: OMHow Discovered: CODON GRAND ROEBLING INV (Continued)S103472863 1993 LUCCA PACKING 360 HARBOR WAY 1994 LUCCA PACKING 360 HARBOR WAY 1995 LUCCA PACKING 360 HARBOR WAY 1996 LUCCA PACKING CORP. 360 HARBOR WAY RGA LUST: 2096 ft.Site 1 of 2 in cluster AH 0.397 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 18 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA SE360 HARBOR WAY N/A AH231 RGA LUSTS114223262 1997 LUCCA PACKING CORP 360 HARBOR WY 1998 LUCCA PACKING CORP 360 HARBOR WY 2000 LUCCA PACKING CORPORATION 360 HARBOR WY 2002 LUCCA PACKING CORPORATION 360 HARBOR WY RGA LUST: 2096 ft.Site 2 of 2 in cluster AH 0.397 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 18 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA SE360 HARBOR WY N/A AH232 RGA LUSTS114223264 Sun Chemical and U.A. Local 38 Pension Trust Funds are the responsible parties.Project Revenue Source Desc: Not reportedProject Revenue Source City,St,Zip: Not reportedProject Revenue Source Addr: Not reportedProject Revenue Source Company: COST RECOVERY/OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE SITEReponsible Party: CA BOND EXP. PLAN: 2100 ft.Site 5 of 9 in cluster AD 0.398 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 25 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 West20 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUE N/A AD233 CA BOND EXP. PLANSUN CHEMICAL CORPORATION S100833558 TC3837232.2s Page 291 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1987. DHS certified that the site was remediated in November, 1987. and piping in the early part of 1986. The site was fully characterized in mid The responsible parties conducted removal of the liquids and sludges and sumpsSite Activity Status: following limited pumping of one well to remove the remaining ink. September, 1987. The monitoring wells were destroyed in December, 1987, drinking water requirements. Ground water monitoring sampling continued until Peak concentrations of contaminants in the ground water are below applicableThreat To Public Health & Env: from the site. surfaces of the building; and excavation and redisposal of contaminated soils removal of tanks, sumpsand piping; cleanup of residues on floors and other contaminants have been eliminated by removal of the liquids and sludges; present in sumps and soils. The hazards associated with these wastes and Heavy metals including lead, zinc and barium, as well as cyanide comple1xes areHazardous Waste Desc: onsite. been identified onsite. Tanks and sumps containing oily and ink wastes are also This site is a former print ink manufacturing facility. Soil contamination hasSite Description: project. recovery for its direct costs including staff costs and overhead related to the Bond funds were used for oversight of the RP’s activities. DHS will seek cost The RPs funded the characterization and remedial action at this site. State SUN CHEMICAL CORPORATION (Continued)S100833558 1992 SUN CHEMICAL 20 S LINDEN AVE RGA LUST: 2100 ft.Site 6 of 9 in cluster AD 0.398 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 25 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA West20 S LINDEN AVE N/A AD234 RGA LUSTS114209299 Not reportedHazardous Ranking Score: Not reportedCortese: Not reportedAccess: MANU - CHEMICALS & ALLIED PRODUCTSSIC Name: 28SIC Code: Not ListedNPL: RESPONSIBLE PARTYType Name: RPFacility Type: DEPT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROLLead Agency: DTSCLead Agency: CERTIFIEDStatus Name: CERTIFIED AS HAVING BEEN REMEDIED SATISFACTORILY UNDER DTSC OVERSIGHTStatus: 11301987State Senate District: Not reportedFile Name: NORTH COASTBranch Name: NCBranch: BERKELEYRegion Name: 2Region: 41280103Facility ID: Calsite: 2100 ft.Site 7 of 9 in cluster AD 0.398 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 25 ft. 1/4-1/2S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 West20 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUE N/A AD235 HIST Cal-SitesSUN CHEMICAL CORPORATION S100269751 TC3837232.2s Page 292 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0For Commercial Reuse: Not reportedActivity Comments: Not reportedRemoval Action Certification: Not reportedAction Included Fencing: Not reportedWell Decommissioned: Not reportedAction Included Capping: 0Liquids Treated (Gals): 0Liquids Removed (Gals): CERTIFIEDDefinition of Status: CERTActivity Status: Not reportedRequest to Delete Activity: Not reportedEstimated Size: 0Est Person-Yrs to complete: 08011980Comments Date: Not reportedRevised Due Date: Not reportedAWP Completion Date: 0Proposed Budget: Not reportedAWP Code: DISCOVERYActivity Name: DISCActivity: 41280103Facility ID: 0Unknown Type: 0For Residential Reuse: 0For Industrial Reuse: 0For Commercial Reuse: Not reportedActivity Comments: Not reportedRemoval Action Certification: Not reportedAction Included Fencing: Not reportedWell Decommissioned: Not reportedAction Included Capping: 0Liquids Treated (Gals): 0Liquids Removed (Gals): CERTIFIEDDefinition of Status: CERTActivity Status: Not reportedRequest to Delete Activity: Not reportedEstimated Size: 0Est Person-Yrs to complete: 11041987Comments Date: Not reportedRevised Due Date: Not reportedAWP Completion Date: 0Proposed Budget: Not reportedAWP Code: DEED RESTRICTIONSActivity Name: DEEDActivity: 41280103Facility ID: 08State Senate District Code: 19State Assembly District Code: Not reportedLat/Long Description: Not reportedLat/long Method: 0 0 0 / 0 0 0Lat/Long (dms): Not reportedLat/Long Direction: SAN FRANCISCO BAYRegion Water Control Board Name: SFRegion Water Control Board: Not reportedSupervisor Responsible for Site: Not reportedStaff Member Responsible for Site: SuspectedGroundwater Contamination: Not reportedDate Site Hazard Ranked: SUN CHEMICAL CORPORATION (Continued)S100269751 TC3837232.2s Page 293 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedAWP Completion Date: 0Proposed Budget: SETTLAWP Code: COST RECOVERYActivity Name: COSTActivity: 41280103Facility ID: 0Unknown Type: 0For Residential Reuse: 0For Industrial Reuse: 0For Commercial Reuse: Not reportedActivity Comments: Not reportedRemoval Action Certification: Not reportedAction Included Fencing: Not reportedWell Decommissioned: Not reportedAction Included Capping: 0Liquids Treated (Gals): 0Liquids Removed (Gals): CERTIFIEDDefinition of Status: CERTActivity Status: Not reportedRequest to Delete Activity: Not reportedEstimated Size: 0Est Person-Yrs to complete: 11301987Comments Date: Not reportedRevised Due Date: Not reportedAWP Completion Date: 0Proposed Budget: Not reportedAWP Code: CERTIFICATIONActivity Name: CERTActivity: 41280103Facility ID: 0Unknown Type: 0For Residential Reuse: 0For Industrial Reuse: 0For Commercial Reuse: Not reportedActivity Comments: Not reportedRemoval Action Certification: Not reportedAction Included Fencing: Not reportedWell Decommissioned: Not reportedAction Included Capping: 0Liquids Treated (Gals): 0Liquids Removed (Gals): CERTIFIEDDefinition of Status: CERTActivity Status: Not reportedRequest to Delete Activity: Not reportedEstimated Size: 0Est Person-Yrs to complete: 01221987Comments Date: Not reportedRevised Due Date: Not reportedAWP Completion Date: 0Proposed Budget: Not reportedAWP Code: SITE SCREENINGActivity Name: SSActivity: 41280103Facility ID: 0Unknown Type: 0For Residential Reuse: 0For Industrial Reuse: SUN CHEMICAL CORPORATION (Continued)S100269751 TC3837232.2s Page 294 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Completed Site Screening. Site inspection samplings in 1981Comments: 01221987Comments Date: Sun Chemical manufactured printing ink at the site from 1927 to Pension Trust Funds in 1981. Trucks. The property ownership was transferred to U.A. Local in 1979, who subsequently sold the property to Rental City contaminated soil. The property was sold to Berman Corporation and sumps, spillages on the main building floor, and in ink vehicles and pigments found as liquids and sludges in tanks 1978, resulting in hazardous materials consisting of mixed inks,Background Info: S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080Alternate City,St,Zip: 20 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUEAlternate Address: S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080Alternate City,St,Zip: 20-40 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUEAlternate Address: 0Unknown Type: 0For Residential Reuse: 0For Industrial Reuse: 0For Commercial Reuse: ASSOCIATED PIPING WAS REMOVED. IN ADDITION TO THE SOIL AND LIQUIDS REMOVED, 10 TANKS AND 1400 FEETOFActivity Comments: NRemoval Action Certification: Not reportedAction Included Fencing: Not reportedWell Decommissioned: Not reportedAction Included Capping: 0Liquids Treated (Gals): 300Liquids Removed (Gals): CERTIFIEDDefinition of Status: CERTActivity Status: Not reportedRequest to Delete Activity: Not reportedEstimated Size: 0Est Person-Yrs to complete: 06251986Comments Date: Not reportedRevised Due Date: Not reportedAWP Completion Date: 0Proposed Budget: Not reportedAWP Code: REMOVAL ACTIONActivity Name: RAActivity: 41280103Facility ID: 0Unknown Type: 0For Residential Reuse: 0For Industrial Reuse: 0For Commercial Reuse: Not reportedActivity Comments: Not reportedRemoval Action Certification: Not reportedAction Included Fencing: Not reportedWell Decommissioned: Not reportedAction Included Capping: 0Liquids Treated (Gals): 0Liquids Removed (Gals): CERTIFIEDDefinition of Status: CERTActivity Status: Not reportedRequest to Delete Activity: Not reportedEstimated Size: 0Est Person-Yrs to complete: 12021991Comments Date: Not reportedRevised Due Date: SUN CHEMICAL CORPORATION (Continued)S100269751 TC3837232.2s Page 295 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSpecial Programs Name: Not reportedSpecial Programs Code: CHEMICAL CORPORATION SUN CHEMICAL CORPORATIONRENTAL CITY TRUCKSUN CHEMICAL - RENTAL CITY TRUCKSSUNAlternate Name: CAD980817506ID Value: EPA IDENTIFICATION NUMBERID Name: P21059ID Value: BEP DATABASE PCODEID Name: 200095ID Value: CALSTARS CODEID Name: Completed Cost Recovery.Comments: 12021991Comments Date: Certified Site.Comments: 11301987Comments Date: Recorded Deed Restriction limiting site to industrial use only.Comments: 11041987Comments Date: removed from the site.Comments: 06251986Comments Date: gallons of hazardous liquids, 10 steel tanks and piping wereComments: 06251986Comments Date: tanks and piping. 279 yards of contaminated soil, 10,404Comments: 06251986Comments Date: contaminated soil, hazardous fluids, contaminated debris, steelComments: 06251986Comments Date: Completed RA. The RA consisted of excavation and disposal ofComments: 06251986Comments Date: (ASP) staff. 11 samples were collected.Comments: 06081981Comments Date: Site inspection was conducted by the Abandoned Site ProjectComments: 06081981Comments Date: standards.Comments: 01221987Comments Date: analyses did not indicate any contamination above drinking waterComments: 01221987Comments Date: revealed elevated levels of lead, cyanide and zinc. GroundwaterComments: 01221987Comments Date: SUN CHEMICAL CORPORATION (Continued)S100269751 State Response or NPLSite Type Detail: State ResponseSite Type: 41280103Facility ID: RESPONSE: 41280103EDR Link ID: 11/04/1987Deed Date(s): Not reportedCovenant Uploaded: Not reportedAgency: CERTIFIED O&M - LAND USE RESTRICTIONS ONLYStatus: STATE RESPONSESite Type: Not reportedSub Area: PROJECT WIDEArea: DEED: 2100 ft.Site 8 of 9 in cluster AD 0.398 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 25 ft. 1/4-1/2 ENVIROSTORS SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 West RESPONSE20 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUE N/A AD236 DEEDSUN CHEMICAL CORPORATION S106981240 TC3837232.2s Page 296 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Land Use RestrictionCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 08/01/1980Completed Date: * DiscoveryCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Certified Site.Comments: 11/30/1987Completed Date: CertificationCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 41280103Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 200095Alias Name: PCodeAlias Type: P21059Alias Name: EPA (FRS #)Alias Type: 110033618841Alias Name: EPA Identification NumberAlias Type: CAD980817506Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 101341120Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: SUN CHEMICAL - RENTAL CITY TRUCKSAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: RENTAL CITY TRUCKAlias Name: SOILPotential Description: Cyanide (free Lead 10097-NO ZincConfirmed COC: UNSPECIFIED SOLVENT MIXTURES Lead Cyanide (free Zinc SOIL * Sludge - Paint * UNSPECIFIED OIL CONTAINING WASTE * * ORGANIC LIQUIDS WITH METALS * OXYGENATED SOLVENTS * CONTAMINATEDPotential COC : MANUFACTURING - OTHERPast Use: 101341120APN: -122.4120Longitude: 37.65140Latitude: Responsible PartyFunding: YESRestricted Use: 11/30/1987Status Date: Certified O&M - Land Use Restrictions OnlyStatus: Not reportedSpecial Program Status: 13Senate: 22Assembly: DAY, ELD, HOS, SCH, RESSite Mgmt. Req.: 200095Site Code: Cleanup BerkeleyDivision Branch: Mark PirosSupervisor: Claude JemisonProject Manager: DTSC - Site Cleanup ProgramLead Agency Description: SMBRPCleanup Oversight Agencies: NONational Priorities List: 1.69Acres: SUN CHEMICAL CORPORATION (Continued)S106981240 TC3837232.2s Page 297 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 03/01/1987Completed Date: Other ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 05/01/1987Completed Date: Remedial Action PlanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 05/01/1987Completed Date: Public Participation Plan / Community Relations PlanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: not indicate any contamination above drinking water standards. elevated levels of lead, cyanide and zinc. Groundwater analyses did Completed Site Screening. Site inspection samplings in 1981 revealedComments: 01/22/1987Completed Date: Site ScreeningCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: site. hazardous liquids, 10 steel tanks and piping were removed from the and piping. 279 yards of contaminated soil, 10,404 gallons of contaminated soil, hazardous fluids, contaminated debris, steel tanks Completed RA. The RA consisted of excavation and disposal ofComments: 06/25/1986Completed Date: Removal Action Completion ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Land Use Covenant. cracking. There was no evidence of any activities prohibited by the of the pavement was in very good condition with only minor of restrictions and requirements of the Land Use Covenant. The surface pavement over contaminated soil and to verify compliance with the DTSC conducted its annual site visit to check the condition of theComments: 02/23/2012Completed Date: Land Use Restriction - Site Inspection/VisitCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Cracks observed during the inspection should be repaired immediately.Comments: 03/14/2008Completed Date: Land Use Restriction - Site Inspection/VisitCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Recorded Deed Restriction limiting site to industrial use only.Comments: 11/04/1987Completed Date: SUN CHEMICAL CORPORATION (Continued)S106981240 TC3837232.2s Page 298 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation State ResponseSite Type: ENVIROSTOR: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: prohibited by the Deed Restriction. minor of cracking. There was no evidence of any activities The surface of the concrete was in very good condition with onlyComments: 05/16/2011Completed Date: Land Use Restriction - Site Inspection/VisitCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: of any activities prohibited by the Deed Restriction. good condition with only minor of cracking. There was no evidence lot. It was observed that the surface of the concrete was in very oindustrial/warehouseo condominiums and a concrete surface parking The Site has been subdivided into 12 separate parcels and houses 12Comments: 09/30/2010Completed Date: Land Use Restriction - Site Inspection/VisitCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: No problems noted.Comments: 02/02/2007Completed Date: Land Use Restriction - Site Inspection/VisitCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: should be repaired. the cracks observed during the inspection will only become worse and activities prohibited by the Deed Restriction. It is recommended that concrete surface was observed. There was no evidence of any During the inspection of the parking lot some cracking of theComments: 05/07/2009Completed Date: Land Use Restriction - Site Inspection/VisitCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Cost Recovery.Comments: 12/02/1991Completed Date: * Cost Recovery Settlements/DecreesCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 02/28/2012Completed Date: 5 Year Review ReportsCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: SUN CHEMICAL CORPORATION (Continued)S106981240 TC3837232.2s Page 299 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 08/01/1980Completed Date: * DiscoveryCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Certified Site.Comments: 11/30/1987Completed Date: CertificationCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 41280103Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 200095Alias Name: PCodeAlias Type: P21059Alias Name: EPA (FRS #)Alias Type: 110033618841Alias Name: EPA Identification NumberAlias Type: CAD980817506Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 101341120Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: SUN CHEMICAL - RENTAL CITY TRUCKSAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: RENTAL CITY TRUCKAlias Name: SOILPotential Description: (free, Lead, 10097-NO, Zinc UNSPECIFIED SOLVENT MIXTURES, Lead, Cyanide (free, Zinc, Cyanide SOIL, * Sludge - Paint, * UNSPECIFIED OIL CONTAINING WASTE, * * ORGANIC LIQUIDS WITH METALS, * OXYGENATED SOLVENTS, * CONTAMINATEDConfirmed COC: UNSPECIFIED SOLVENT MIXTURES, Lead, Cyanide (free, Zinc SOIL, * Sludge - Paint, * UNSPECIFIED OIL CONTAINING WASTE, * * ORGANIC LIQUIDS WITH METALS, * OXYGENATED SOLVENTS, * CONTAMINATEDPotential COC: MANUFACTURING - OTHERPast Use: 101341120APN: -122.4120Longitude: 37.65140Latitude: Responsible PartyFunding: DAY, ELD, HOS, SCH, RESSite Mgmt. Req.: YESRestricted Use: 11/30/1987Status Date: Certified O&M - Land Use Restrictions OnlyStatus: Not reportedSpecial Program: 13Senate: 22Assembly: 200095Site Code: 41280103Facility ID: Cleanup BerkeleyDivision Branch: Mark PirosSupervisor: Claude JemisonProgram Manager: SMBRPLead Agency: SMBRPRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: 1.69Acres: State Response or NPLSite Type Detailed: SUN CHEMICAL CORPORATION (Continued)S106981240 TC3837232.2s Page 300 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 05/01/1987Completed Date: Remedial Action PlanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 05/01/1987Completed Date: Public Participation Plan / Community Relations PlanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: not indicate any contamination above drinking water standards. elevated levels of lead, cyanide and zinc. Groundwater analyses did Completed Site Screening. Site inspection samplings in 1981 revealedComments: 01/22/1987Completed Date: Site ScreeningCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: site. hazardous liquids, 10 steel tanks and piping were removed from the and piping. 279 yards of contaminated soil, 10,404 gallons of contaminated soil, hazardous fluids, contaminated debris, steel tanks Completed RA. The RA consisted of excavation and disposal ofComments: 06/25/1986Completed Date: Removal Action Completion ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Land Use Covenant. cracking. There was no evidence of any activities prohibited by the of the pavement was in very good condition with only minor of restrictions and requirements of the Land Use Covenant. The surface pavement over contaminated soil and to verify compliance with the DTSC conducted its annual site visit to check the condition of theComments: 02/23/2012Completed Date: Land Use Restriction - Site Inspection/VisitCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Cracks observed during the inspection should be repaired immediately.Comments: 03/14/2008Completed Date: Land Use Restriction - Site Inspection/VisitCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Recorded Deed Restriction limiting site to industrial use only.Comments: 11/04/1987Completed Date: Land Use RestrictionCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: SUN CHEMICAL CORPORATION (Continued)S106981240 TC3837232.2s Page 301 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: prohibited by the Deed Restriction. minor of cracking. There was no evidence of any activities The surface of the concrete was in very good condition with onlyComments: 05/16/2011Completed Date: Land Use Restriction - Site Inspection/VisitCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: of any activities prohibited by the Deed Restriction. good condition with only minor of cracking. There was no evidence lot. It was observed that the surface of the concrete was in very oindustrial/warehouseo condominiums and a concrete surface parking The Site has been subdivided into 12 separate parcels and houses 12Comments: 09/30/2010Completed Date: Land Use Restriction - Site Inspection/VisitCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: No problems noted.Comments: 02/02/2007Completed Date: Land Use Restriction - Site Inspection/VisitCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: should be repaired. the cracks observed during the inspection will only become worse and activities prohibited by the Deed Restriction. It is recommended that concrete surface was observed. There was no evidence of any During the inspection of the parking lot some cracking of theComments: 05/07/2009Completed Date: Land Use Restriction - Site Inspection/VisitCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Cost Recovery.Comments: 12/02/1991Completed Date: * Cost Recovery Settlements/DecreesCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 02/28/2012Completed Date: 5 Year Review ReportsCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 03/01/1987Completed Date: Other ReportCompleted Document Type: SUN CHEMICAL CORPORATION (Continued)S106981240 TC3837232.2s Page 302 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: SUN CHEMICAL CORPORATION (Continued)S106981240 Not reportedPriority Level: 03/01/83Date Completed: / /Date Started: DISCOVERYAction: Not reportedPriority Level: 12/01/87Date Completed: / /Date Started: ARCHIVE SITEAction: NFRAP-Site does not qualify for the NPL based on existing informationPriority Level: 12/01/87Date Completed: 12/01/85Date Started: PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENTAction: CERCLIS-NFRAP Assessment History: 13004003.00000Person ID: 13300026.00000Contact Sequence ID: 13003858.00000Person ID: 13294168.00000Contact Sequence ID: 13003854.00000Person ID: 13288573.00000Contact Sequence ID: 9271184.00000Person ID: 13055735.00000Contact Sequence ID: CERCLIS-NFRAP Site Contact Details: NFRAP-Site does not qualify for the NPL based on existing informationNon NPL Status: Not on the NPLNPL Status: Not a Federal FacilityFederal Facility: 0902080Site ID: CERC-NFRAP: 2100 ft.Site 9 of 9 in cluster AD 0.398 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 25 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 West20-40 S LINDEN AVE CAD980817506 AD237 CERC-NFRAPSUN CHEMICAL 1003878681 550042Case Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: LUST REG 2: 2109 ft.Site 4 of 5 in cluster AF 0.399 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 14 ft. 1/4-1/2S SAN FRANCISCO, CA NNW RGA LUST264 S AIRPORT BLVD N/A AF238 LUSTKEN FUNK PROPERTY S103472857 TC3837232.2s Page 303 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2003 KEN FUNK PROPERTY 264 AIRPORT 2005 KEN FUNK PROPERTY 264 AIRPORT 2006 KEN FUNK PROPERTY 264 AIRPORT 2007 KEN FUNK PROPERTY 264 AIRPORT RGA LUST: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: 015122060APN Number: T0608100188Global ID: 9- Case ClosedFacility Status: 550042Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUST: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remediation Action Underway: Not reportedPollution Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedPollution Characterization Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assesment Began: Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: OMHow Discovered: KEN FUNK PROPERTY (Continued)S103472857 Cleanup BerkeleyDivision Branch: Denise TsujiSupervisor: Robert BoggsProject Manager: DTSC - Site Cleanup ProgramLead Agency Description: SMBRPLead Agency: SMBRP, RWQCB 2 - San Francisco Bay, SAN MATEO COUNTYCleanup Oversight Agencies: NONational Priorities List: 0.5Acres: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.: Voluntary CleanupSite Type Detail: Voluntary CleanupSite Type: 41360069Facility ID: VCP: 41360069EDR Link ID: 02/19/2009Deed Date(s): Not reportedCovenant Uploaded: Not reportedAgency: CERTIFIED / OPERATION & MAINTENANCEStatus: VOLUNTARY CLEANUPSite Type: Not reportedSub Area: PROJECT WIDEArea: DEED: 2117 ft.Site 1 of 4 in cluster AI 0.401 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 22 ft. 1/4-1/2 ENVIROSTORSOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 WNW VCP27-S. LINDEN N/A AI239 DEEDBASAPCO, INC.S107735888 TC3837232.2s Page 304 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation FACILITY IDENTIFIED ID FROM ERRISComments: 10/12/1983Completed Date: * DiscoveryCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: DTSC approves the lead cleanup number.Comments: 11/07/2006Completed Date: Risk Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: soils. which as found as high as 160,000 milligrams per kilogram in surface The soil is contaminated with hazardous substances, including leadComments: 05/18/1987Completed Date: Site ScreeningCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Site Certification completed. O&M and LUC are in place for the Site.Comments: 03/19/2009Completed Date: CertificationCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 41360069Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 201561Alias Name: EPA (FRS #)Alias Type: 110033617101Alias Name: EPA Identification NumberAlias Type: CAD068843796Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 014074020Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 014-074-020Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: FORMER BASAPCO, INC. PROPERTYAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: BATTERY SALES AND PROCESSING COMPANYAlias Name: SOILPotential Description: 30013,3002502Confirmed COC: 30013, 3002502Potential COC: BATTERY RECLAMATION, VEHICLE MAINTENANCEPast Use: 014-074-020, 014074020APN: 37.65023 / -122.4112Lat/Long: Responsible PartyFunding: YESRestricted Use: 03/19/2009Status Date: Certified / Operation & MaintenanceStatus: Polanco Redevelopment MOASpecial Programs Code: 13Senate: 22Assembly: 201561Site Code: BASAPCO, INC. (Continued)S107735888 TC3837232.2s Page 305 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Removal Action WorkplanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 01/25/2007Completed Date: Community ProfileCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: respectively. water and soil sediment samples from Colma Creek and the creek bed, On September 29, 2004, DTSC staff collected and analyzed surfaceComments: 11/02/2004Completed Date: Site Characterization ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: of Drinking Water Policy, Resolution No. 88-63. South Linden Avenue meets the exemption criteria in the SWRCB Sources San Francisco RWQCB concurred that the shallow groundwater at 27Comments: 08/08/2005Completed Date: Other ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Report prepared for USEPAComments: 03/07/1994Completed Date: Site ScreeningCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: soil. requires the excavation and off-site disposal of lead contaminated No comments were received on the Removal Action Workplan. The planComments: 03/30/2007Completed Date: Removal Action WorkplanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 01/25/2007Completed Date: Fact SheetsCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: CompletedComments: 01/05/2009Completed Date: Operation & Maintenance Order/AgreementCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: FACILITY IDENTIFIED ACTIVE SITE I.D.’D IND. OF DRIVE BY *EQRComments: 08/01/1980Completed Date: * DiscoveryCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: BASAPCO, INC. (Continued)S107735888 TC3837232.2s Page 306 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 05/25/2010Completed Date: Operations and Maintenance ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Cap Inspection Report approved.Comments: 05/26/2009Completed Date: Operations and Maintenance ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: OMP approvedComments: 11/25/2008Completed Date: Operations and Maintenance PlanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: received. The ESD was approved. were received from the NMFS and responded to. No other comments were ESD Public Comment Period was completed on August 20, 2008. CommentsComments: 09/04/2008Completed Date: Other ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: of the Site requiring a cap. was removed, reducing and area of residual contamination and the area Since the ESD was approved additional soil east of the pump stationComments: 09/23/2008Completed Date: Removal Action Completion ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Comments were received and responded to.Comments: 07/21/2008Completed Date: Public NoticeCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 07/14/2008Completed Date: Public NoticeCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 07/14/2008Completed Date: Fact SheetsCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 06/13/2008Completed Date: BASAPCO, INC. (Continued)S107735888 TC3837232.2s Page 307 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 03/30/2007Completed Date: CEQA - Notice of ExemptionCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: South San Francisco. Executed LUC sent to San Mateo County for recording by the City ofComments: 02/19/2009Completed Date: Land Use RestrictionCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Annual Cap inspection and report - remedy functioning as designed.Comments: 11/06/2012Completed Date: Land Use Restriction - Site Inspection/VisitCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 11/16/2012Completed Date: Annual Oversight Cost EstimateCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Demand letter #1Comments: 11/18/2011Completed Date: Letter - DemandCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 07/14/2006Completed Date: Environmental Oversight AgreementCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Demand letter #2Comments: 12/21/2011Completed Date: Letter - DemandCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 09/09/2013Completed Date: Operations and Maintenance ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Annual CAP Inspection and Report - remedy functioning as designed.Comments: 11/06/2012Completed Date: Operations and Maintenance ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 05/31/2011Completed Date: Operations and Maintenance ReportCompleted Document Type: BASAPCO, INC. (Continued)S107735888 TC3837232.2s Page 308 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 201561Alias Name: EPA (FRS #)Alias Type: 110033617101Alias Name: EPA Identification NumberAlias Type: CAD068843796Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 014074020Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 014-074-020Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: FORMER BASAPCO, INC. PROPERTYAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: BATTERY SALES AND PROCESSING COMPANYAlias Name: SOILPotential Description: Lead, TPH-MOTOR OIL, Lead, TPH-MOTOR OILConfirmed COC: Lead, TPH-MOTOR OILPotential COC: BATTERY RECLAMATION, VEHICLE MAINTENANCEPast Use: 014-074-020, 014074020APN: -122.4112Longitude: 37.65023Latitude: Responsible PartyFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.: YESRestricted Use: 03/19/2009Status Date: Certified / Operation & MaintenanceStatus: Polanco Redevelopment MOASpecial Program: 13Senate: 22Assembly: 201561Site Code: 41360069Facility ID: Cleanup BerkeleyDivision Branch: Denise TsujiSupervisor: Robert BoggsProgram Manager: SMBRPLead Agency: SMBRP, RWQCB 2 - San Francisco Bay, SAN MATEO COUNTYRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: 0.5Acres: Voluntary CleanupSite Type Detailed: Voluntary CleanupSite Type: ENVIROSTOR: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: 2014Future Due Date: Operations and Maintenance ReportFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDEFuture Area Name: 2014Future Due Date: 5 Year Review ReportsFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDEFuture Area Name: No comments received on the NOE.Comments: BASAPCO, INC. (Continued)S107735888 TC3837232.2s Page 309 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: soil. requires the excavation and off-site disposal of lead contaminated No comments were received on the Removal Action Workplan. The planComments: 03/30/2007Completed Date: Removal Action WorkplanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 01/25/2007Completed Date: Fact SheetsCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: CompletedComments: 01/05/2009Completed Date: Operation & Maintenance Order/AgreementCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: FACILITY IDENTIFIED ACTIVE SITE I.D.’D IND. OF DRIVE BY *EQRComments: 08/01/1980Completed Date: * DiscoveryCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: FACILITY IDENTIFIED ID FROM ERRISComments: 10/12/1983Completed Date: * DiscoveryCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: DTSC approves the lead cleanup number.Comments: 11/07/2006Completed Date: Risk Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: soils. which as found as high as 160,000 milligrams per kilogram in surface The soil is contaminated with hazardous substances, including leadComments: 05/18/1987Completed Date: Site ScreeningCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Site Certification completed. O&M and LUC are in place for the Site.Comments: 03/19/2009Completed Date: CertificationCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 41360069Alias Name: BASAPCO, INC. (Continued)S107735888 TC3837232.2s Page 310 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation of the Site requiring a cap. was removed, reducing and area of residual contamination and the area Since the ESD was approved additional soil east of the pump stationComments: 09/23/2008Completed Date: Removal Action Completion ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Comments were received and responded to.Comments: 07/21/2008Completed Date: Public NoticeCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 07/14/2008Completed Date: Public NoticeCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 07/14/2008Completed Date: Fact SheetsCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 06/13/2008Completed Date: Removal Action WorkplanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 01/25/2007Completed Date: Community ProfileCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: respectively. water and soil sediment samples from Colma Creek and the creek bed, On September 29, 2004, DTSC staff collected and analyzed surfaceComments: 11/02/2004Completed Date: Site Characterization ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: of Drinking Water Policy, Resolution No. 88-63. South Linden Avenue meets the exemption criteria in the SWRCB Sources San Francisco RWQCB concurred that the shallow groundwater at 27Comments: 08/08/2005Completed Date: Other ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Report prepared for USEPAComments: 03/07/1994Completed Date: Site ScreeningCompleted Document Type: BASAPCO, INC. (Continued)S107735888 TC3837232.2s Page 311 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 07/14/2006Completed Date: Environmental Oversight AgreementCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Demand letter #2Comments: 12/21/2011Completed Date: Letter - DemandCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 09/09/2013Completed Date: Operations and Maintenance ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Annual CAP Inspection and Report - remedy functioning as designed.Comments: 11/06/2012Completed Date: Operations and Maintenance ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 05/31/2011Completed Date: Operations and Maintenance ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 05/25/2010Completed Date: Operations and Maintenance ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Cap Inspection Report approved.Comments: 05/26/2009Completed Date: Operations and Maintenance ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: OMP approvedComments: 11/25/2008Completed Date: Operations and Maintenance PlanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: received. The ESD was approved. were received from the NMFS and responded to. No other comments were ESD Public Comment Period was completed on August 20, 2008. CommentsComments: 09/04/2008Completed Date: Other ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: BASAPCO, INC. (Continued)S107735888 TC3837232.2s Page 312 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: 2014Future Due Date: Operations and Maintenance ReportFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDEFuture Area Name: 2014Future Due Date: 5 Year Review ReportsFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDEFuture Area Name: No comments received on the NOE.Comments: 03/30/2007Completed Date: CEQA - Notice of ExemptionCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: South San Francisco. Executed LUC sent to San Mateo County for recording by the City ofComments: 02/19/2009Completed Date: Land Use RestrictionCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Annual Cap inspection and report - remedy functioning as designed.Comments: 11/06/2012Completed Date: Land Use Restriction - Site Inspection/VisitCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 11/16/2012Completed Date: Annual Oversight Cost EstimateCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Demand letter #1Comments: 11/18/2011Completed Date: Letter - DemandCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: BASAPCO, INC. (Continued)S107735888 37.651408Latitude: 550032Lead Agency Case Number: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Lead Agency: T0608191578Global Id: 01/01/1990Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedFacility Status: STATERegion: SLIC: 2128 ft.Site 2 of 4 in cluster AI 0.403 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 24 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 WNW20 LINDEN AVE S N/A AI240 SLICSUN CHEMICAL S101641919 TC3837232.2s Page 313 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: 2/23/1987Date Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedDate Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedDate Preliminary Site Assessment Began: Not reportedDate Prelim Site Assmnt Workplan Submitted: Not reportedDate Confirmed: UNKLeak Source: UNKLeak Cause: Tank ClosureHow Discovered: Not reportedLocal Case #: Not reportedDate Closed: Remediation PlanFacility Status: 41S0007Facility ID: 2Region: SLIC REG 2: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: Waste Oil / Motor / Hydraulic / LubricatingPotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affected: Not reportedFile Location: 41S0007RB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: UUUCase Worker: Cleanup Program SiteCase Type: -122.412003Longitude: SUN CHEMICAL (Continued)S101641919 8:00 am - 5:30 pm; Closed 12:00 pm - 1:00 pmFriday Hours Of Operation: 8:00 am - 5:30 pm; Closed 12:00 pm - 1:00 pmThursday Hours Of Operation: 8:00 am - 5:30 pm; Closed 12:00 pm - 1:00 pmWednesday Hours Of Operation: 8:00 am - 5:30 pm; Closed 12:00 pm - 1:00 pmTuesday Hours Of Operation: 8:00 am - 5:30 pm; Closed 12:00 pm - 1:00 pmMonday Hours Of Operation: N/AAgency: YBimetal: YPlastic: YGlass: YAluminium: 02/18/2009Operation Begin Date: NRural: NGrand Father: (415) 215-8059Phone Number: Not reportedWebsite: 94080Mailing Zip Code: CAMailing State: South San FranciscoMailing City: 26 S Linden AveMailing Address: RC14202Cert Id: 31887Reg Id: SWRCY: 2130 ft.Site 1 of 8 in cluster AJ 0.403 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 24 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 West26 S LINDEN AVE N/A AJ241 SWRCYZARC INTERNATIONAL LLC S109348895 TC3837232.2s Page 314 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedOperation End Date: N/AAgency Reg ID: ZARC International LLCOrganization Name: 31887Organization ID: OperationalCert Status: CLOSEDSunday Hours Of Operation: 8:00 am - 5:30 pm; Closed 12:00 pm - 1:00 pmSaturday Hours Of Operation: ZARC INTERNATIONAL LLC (Continued)S109348895 6503726298Phone Number: jmadden@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: JACOB MADDENContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100300Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: nkatyl@waterboards.ca.govEmail: OAKLANDCity: 1515 CLAY STREETAddress: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: NANCY KATYLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100300Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: Local Agency WarehouseFile Location: 550086LOC Case Number: 41-0315RB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: JMCase Worker: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 01/02/2003Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.412215Longitude: 37.650709Latitude: T0608100300Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 41-0315Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 41Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 2130 ft.Site 2 of 8 in cluster AJ 0.403 mi.RGA LUST Relative: Lower Actual: 24 ft. 1/4-1/2 SWEEPS USTSOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 West LUST26 LINDEN N/A AJ242 HIST CORTESELA MARK TRANSPORTATION S101303284 TC3837232.2s Page 315 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: 014072040APN Number: T0608100300Global ID: 9- Case ClosedFacility Status: 550086Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUST: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remediation Action Underway: Not reportedPollution Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedPollution Characterization Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assesment Began: Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: OMHow Discovered: 550086Case Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: LUST REG 2: Notice of Responsibility - #1Action: 08/29/1991Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100300Global Id: Closure/No Further Action Letter - #20030102Action: 01/02/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100300Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100300Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100300Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 01/02/2003Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608100300Global Id: 07/09/1991Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608100300Global Id: Status History: LA MARK TRANSPORTATION (Continued)S101303284 TC3837232.2s Page 316 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2003 LA MARK TRANSPORTATION 26 LINDEN 2005 LA MARK TRANSPORTATION 26 LINDEN 2006 LA MARK TRANSPORTATION 26 LINDEN 2007 LA MARK TRANSPORTATION 26 LINDEN 2008 LA MARK TRANSPORTATION 26 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUE 2009 LA MARK TRANSPORTATION 26 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUE 2010 LA MARK TRANSPORTATION 26 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUE 2011 LA MARK TRANSPORTATION 26 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUE 2012 LA MARK TRANSPORTATION 26 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUE RGA LUST: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: DIESELContent: PRODUCTStg: M.V. FUELTank Use: 10000Capacity: Not reportedActv Date: 41-000-550183-000002Swrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedTank Status: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 550183Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: 2Number Of Tanks: LEADEDContent: PRODUCTStg: M.V. FUELTank Use: 10000Capacity: Not reportedActv Date: 41-000-550183-000001Swrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedTank Status: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 550183Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: SWEEPS UST: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: LA MARK TRANSPORTATION (Continued)S101303284 TC3837232.2s Page 317 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedPriority Level: 03/29/94Date Completed: / /Date Started: ARCHIVE SITEAction: NFRAP-Site does not qualify for the NPL based on existing informationPriority Level: 07/02/90Date Completed: / /Date Started: SITE INSPECTIONAction: Not reportedPriority Level: 01/01/79Date Completed: / /Date Started: DISCOVERYAction: Low priority for further assessmentPriority Level: 08/01/84Date Completed: / /Date Started: PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENTAction: Higher priority for further assessmentPriority Level: 08/01/84Date Completed: / /Date Started: SITE INSPECTIONAction: CERCLIS-NFRAP Assessment History: CA Not reportedAlias Address: BATTERY SALES & PROCESSING CO\\Alias Name: CERCLIS-NFRAP Site Alias Name(s): 13004003.00000Person ID: 13301489.00000Contact Sequence ID: 13003858.00000Person ID: 13295631.00000Contact Sequence ID: 13003854.00000Person ID: 13290036.00000Contact Sequence ID: 9271184.00000Person ID: 13051046.00000Contact Sequence ID: CERCLIS-NFRAP Site Contact Details: NFRAP-Site does not qualify for the NPL based on existing informationNon NPL Status: Not on the NPLNPL Status: Not a Federal FacilityFederal Facility: 0901535Site ID: CERC-NFRAP: 2139 ft.Site 3 of 8 in cluster AJ 0.405 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 26 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 West27 S LINDEN AVE CAD068843796 AJ243 CERC-NFRAPBASAPCO INC 1002850686 TC3837232.2s Page 318 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2754Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 41Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 2141 ft.Site 3 of 4 in cluster AI 0.405 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 29 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 WNW50 LINDEN N/A AI244 HIST CORTESEFACILITY 10745 TANK #2 (A S105026701 41-0802Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 41Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 2144 ft.Site 4 of 4 in cluster AI 0.406 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 30 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 WNW58 LINDEN N/A AI245 HIST CORTESEUNKNOWN S110060929 SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: 014102010APN Number: T0608110422Global ID: 9- Case ClosedFacility Status: 559173Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUST: 2166 ft.Site 4 of 8 in cluster AJ 0.410 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 25 ft. 1/4-1/2S SAN FRANCISCO, CA West34-36 S LINDEN AVE N/A AJ246 LUSTLOPEZ PROPERTY S106966989 -122.410361Longitude: 37.646151Latitude: T0608100794Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 41-0848Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 41Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 2167 ft.Site 1 of 4 in cluster AK 0.410 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 21 ft. 1/4-1/2 RGA LUSTSOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 SW LUST1405 SAN MATEO N/A AK247 HIST CORTESEFOUR STAR AUTOMOTIVE II S102430413 TC3837232.2s Page 319 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation LUST REG 2: Notice of Responsibility - #1Action: 08/26/1994Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100794Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100794Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 06/12/1995Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608100794Global Id: 05/24/1994Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608100794Global Id: Status History: 6503726298Phone Number: jmadden@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: JACOB MADDENContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100794Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: nkatyl@waterboards.ca.govEmail: OAKLANDCity: 1515 CLAY STREETAddress: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: NANCY KATYLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100794Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: Local Agency WarehouseFile Location: 550131LOC Case Number: 41-0848RB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: JMCase Worker: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 06/12/1995Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: FOUR STAR AUTOMOTIVE II (Continued)S102430413 TC3837232.2s Page 320 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2003 FOUR STAR AUTOMOTIVE II 1405 SAN MATEO 2005 FOUR STAR AUTOMOTIVE II 1405 SAN MATEO 2006 FOUR STAR AUTOMOTIVE II 1405 SAN MATEO 2007 FOUR STAR AUTOMOTIVE II 1405 SAN MATEO 2008 FOUR STAR AUTOMOTIVE II 1405 SAN MATEO 2009 FOUR STAR AUTOMOTIVE II 1405 SAN MATEO 2010 FOUR STAR AUTOMOTIVE II 1405 SAN MATEO 2011 FOUR STAR AUTOMOTIVE II 1405 SAN MATEO 2012 FOUR STAR AUTOMOTIVE II 1405 SAN MATEO RGA LUST: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: 015112590APN Number: T0608100794Global ID: 9- Case ClosedFacility Status: 550131Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUST: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remediation Action Underway: Not reportedPollution Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedPollution Characterization Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assesment Began: Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: OMHow Discovered: 550131Case Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: FOUR STAR AUTOMOTIVE II (Continued)S102430413 1995 FOUR STAR AUTOMOTIVE II 1405 SAN MATEO AVE 1996 FOUR STAR AUTOMOTIVE II 1405 SAN MATEO AVE 1997 FOUR STAR AUTOMOTIVE II 1405 SAN MATEO AVE 1998 FOUR STAR AUTOMOTIVE II 1405 SAN MATEO AVE 2000 FOUR STAR AUTOMOTIVE II 1405 SAN MATEO AVE 2002 FOUR STAR AUTOMOTIVE II 1405 SAN MATEO AVE RGA LUST: 2167 ft.Site 2 of 4 in cluster AK 0.410 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 21 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA SW1405 SAN MATEO AVE N/A AK248 RGA LUSTS114200493 TC3837232.2s Page 321 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 06/09/1989Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608106256Global Id: Status History: 6503726298Phone Number: jmadden@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: JACOB MADDENContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608106256Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: cprowell@waterboards.ca.govEmail: OaklandCity: 1515 Clay Street, Suite 1400Address: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: Cheryl L. ProwellContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608106256Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: or any professional interpretations made in the referenced report. does not take responsibility for the accuracy of the statements made Mateo County offices if submitted prior to 2005, San Mateo County Can be extracted from most recent report in Geotracker or at SanSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: Not reportedFile Location: 550053LOC Case Number: 41-0004RB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: JMCase Worker: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 02/14/2013Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.411472084Longitude: 37.649740677Latitude: T0608106256Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 41-0004Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 41Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 2173 ft.Site 5 of 8 in cluster AJ 0.412 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 25 ft. 1/4-1/2 RGA LUSTSOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA West LUST35 LINDEN N/A AJ249 HIST CORTESEOLYMPIAN S102434676 TC3837232.2s Page 322 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation RESPONSEAction Type: T0608106256Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation ReportAction: 08/12/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608106256Global Id: Electronic Reporting Submittal DueAction: 01/31/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608106256Global Id: Electronic Reporting Submittal DueAction: 07/19/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608106256Global Id: Monitoring Report - Semi-AnnuallyAction: 08/15/2010Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608106256Global Id: Monitoring Report - Semi-AnnuallyAction: 02/15/2012Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608106256Global Id: Well Destruction ReportAction: 11/09/2012Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608106256Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 02/14/2013Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608106256Global Id: 01/20/2012Status Date: Open - Verification MonitoringStatus: T0608106256Global Id: 08/15/2006Status Date: Open - Assessment & Interim Remedial ActionStatus: T0608106256Global Id: 01/19/2005Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T0608106256Global Id: 03/25/2004Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T0608106256Global Id: 06/09/1989Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0608106256Global Id: OLYMPIAN (Continued)S102434676 TC3837232.2s Page 323 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 05/15/2008Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608106256Global Id: Staff Letter - #20081022Action: 10/22/2008Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608106256Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 08/15/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608106256Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 05/15/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608106256Global Id: Staff Letter - #20090813Action: 08/13/2009Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608106256Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 02/15/2010Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608106256Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608106256Global Id: In Situ Physical/Chemical Treatment (other than SVE)Action: 01/01/1950Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0608106256Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 01/15/2009Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608106256Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 06/27/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608106256Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 02/15/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608106256Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 08/15/2007Date: OLYMPIAN (Continued)S102434676 TC3837232.2s Page 324 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608106256Global Id: Notice of Violation - #20050719Action: 07/19/2005Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608106256Global Id: Staff Letter - #20040325Action: 03/25/2004Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608106256Global Id: Staff Letter - #20050119CAction: 01/19/2005Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608106256Global Id: Monitoring Report - Semi-AnnuallyAction: 02/15/2011Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608106256Global Id: Staff LetterAction: 08/22/2012Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608106256Global Id: Staff Letter - #20120503Action: 05/03/2012Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608106256Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608106256Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation WorkplanAction: 07/31/2009Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608106256Global Id: CAP/RAP - Feasibility Study ReportAction: 10/16/2009Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608106256Global Id: CorrespondenceAction: 11/25/2008Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608106256Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 10/15/2008Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608106256Global Id: OLYMPIAN (Continued)S102434676 TC3837232.2s Page 325 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 07/15/2009Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608106256Global Id: Staff Letter - #20090714Action: 07/14/2009Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608106256Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 08/15/2008Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608106256Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 04/15/2009Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608106256Global Id: Staff Letter - #20090422Action: 04/22/2009Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608106256Global Id: Monitoring Report - Semi-AnnuallyAction: 08/15/2011Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608106256Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 11/15/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608106256Global Id: Closure/No Further Action Letter - #20130212Action: 02/12/2013Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608106256Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 02/15/2008Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608106256Global Id: Staff Letter - #20051025Action: 10/25/2005Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608106256Global Id: Staff Letter - #20050119AAction: 01/19/2005Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608106256Global Id: Notice of Violation - #20060131Action: 01/31/2006Date: OLYMPIAN (Continued)S102434676 TC3837232.2s Page 326 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation RESPONSEAction Type: T0608106256Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 08/15/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608106256Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 06/01/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608106256Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 02/15/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608106256Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 11/15/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608106256Global Id: Staff Letter - #20030307Action: 03/07/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608106256Global Id: Staff Letter - #20041005BAction: 10/05/2004Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608106256Global Id: Staff Letter - #20041005AAction: 10/05/2004Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608106256Global Id: Notice of Responsibility - #1Action: 09/20/1989Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608106256Global Id: Staff Letter - #20050119BAction: 01/19/2005Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608106256Global Id: Staff Letter - #20061109Action: 11/09/2006Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608106256Global Id: Staff Letter - #20030404Action: 04/04/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608106256Global Id: OLYMPIAN (Continued)S102434676 TC3837232.2s Page 327 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 37.649692759Latitude: T0608100005Global Id: STATERegion: Request for ClosureAction: 01/18/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608106256Global Id: Electronic Reporting Submittal DueAction: 12/25/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608106256Global Id: Interim Remedial Action PlanAction: 04/19/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608106256Global Id: Electronic Reporting Submittal DueAction: 02/15/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608106256Global Id: Other Report / DocumentAction: 12/22/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608106256Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation ReportAction: 11/01/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608106256Global Id: CAP/RAP - Feasibility Study ReportAction: 09/29/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608106256Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 11/15/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608106256Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 05/15/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608106256Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 02/15/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608106256Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 05/15/2007Date: OLYMPIAN (Continued)S102434676 TC3837232.2s Page 328 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100005Global Id: Monitoring Report - Semi-AnnuallyAction: 02/15/2012Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100005Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 11/08/2006Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0608100005Global Id: 05/18/2002Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608100005Global Id: Status History: Not reportedPhone Number: cprowell@waterboards.ca.govEmail: OaklandCity: 1515 Clay Street, Suite 1400Address: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: Cheryl L. ProwellContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100005Global Id: 6503726298Phone Number: jmadden@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: JACOB MADDENContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100005Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: or any professional interpretations made in the referenced report. does not take responsibility for the accuracy of the statements made Mateo County offices if submitted prior to 2005, San Mateo County Can be extracted from most recent report in Geotracker or at SanSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: Local AgencyFile Location: 550194LOC Case Number: Not reportedRB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: JMCase Worker: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 11/08/2006Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.411787Longitude: OLYMPIAN (Continued)S102434676 TC3837232.2s Page 329 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100005Global Id: Staff Letter - #20101117Action: 11/17/2010Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100005Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation ReportAction: 12/01/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100005Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 02/15/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100005Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 11/15/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100005Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 08/15/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100005Global Id: CAP/RAP - Feasibility Study ReportAction: 01/18/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100005Global Id: Electronic Reporting Submittal DueAction: 04/15/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100005Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 05/15/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100005Global Id: Staff Letter - #20110526Action: 05/26/2011Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100005Global Id: Final Remedial Action Report / Corrective Action ReportAction: 02/15/2012Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100005Global Id: Staff Letter - #20100615Action: 06/15/2010Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100005Global Id: OLYMPIAN (Continued)S102434676 TC3837232.2s Page 330 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Pilot Study/ Treatability ReportAction: 10/16/2009Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100005Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 02/15/2011Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100005Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 11/15/2010Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100005Global Id: Monitoring Report - Semi-AnnuallyAction: 08/15/2012Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100005Global Id: Staff Letter - #20091203Action: 12/03/2009Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100005Global Id: Staff Letter - #20090813Action: 08/13/2009Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100005Global Id: Staff Letter - #20090422Action: 04/22/2009Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100005Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100005Global Id: Site Assessment ReportAction: 01/25/2010Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100005Global Id: CAP/RAP - Feasibility Study ReportAction: 10/08/2010Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100005Global Id: Staff Letter - #20081022Action: 10/22/2008Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100005Global Id: Pilot Study / Treatability WorkplanAction: 02/19/2010Date: OLYMPIAN (Continued)S102434676 TC3837232.2s Page 331 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100005Global Id: Staff Letter - #20070315AAction: 03/15/2007Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100005Global Id: Staff Letter - #20070315BAction: 03/15/2007Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100005Global Id: Staff Letter - #20041005Action: 10/05/2004Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100005Global Id: Notice of Responsibility - #20061113Action: 11/13/2006Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100005Global Id: Monitoring Report - Semi-AnnuallyAction: 08/15/2011Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100005Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 05/15/2011Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100005Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 02/15/2008Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100005Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 01/15/2009Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100005Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 08/15/2008Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100005Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 05/15/2010Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100005Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 07/15/2009Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100005Global Id: OLYMPIAN (Continued)S102434676 TC3837232.2s Page 332 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 05/15/2008Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100005Global Id: Monitoring Report - Semi-AnnuallyAction: 08/15/2013Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100005Global Id: CorrespondenceAction: 11/25/2008Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100005Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 04/15/2009Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100005Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 08/15/2010Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100005Global Id: Monitoring Report - Semi-AnnuallyAction: 02/15/2013Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100005Global Id: Staff Letter - #20100317Action: 03/17/2010Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100005Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 11/15/2009Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100005Global Id: Staff Letter - #20090714Action: 07/14/2009Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100005Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 10/15/2008Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100005Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 01/30/2010Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100005Global Id: Staff Letter - #20061113Action: 11/13/2006Date: OLYMPIAN (Continued)S102434676 TC3837232.2s Page 333 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2003 OLYMPIAN 35 LINDEN 2005 OLYMPIAN SSF TERMINAL 35 LINDEN 2006 OLYMPIAN SSF TERMINAL 35 LINDEN 2007 OLYMPIAN SSF TERMINAL 35 LINDEN 2007 OLYMPIAN SSF TERMINAL 35 LINDEN 2008 OLYMPIAN SSF TERMINAL 35 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUE 2009 OLYMPIAN SSF TERMINAL 35 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUE 2010 OLYMPIAN SSF TERMINAL 35 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUE 2011 OLYMPIAN SSF TERMINAL 35 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUE 2012 OLYMPIAN SSF TERMINAL 35 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUE RGA LUST: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remediation Action Underway: 3/25/2004Pollution Remediation Plan Submitted: 1/1/1965Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assesment Began: Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: Subsurface MonitoringHow Discovered: 550053Case Number: Remediation PlanFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: LUST REG 2: Soil and Water Investigation WorkplanAction: 07/31/2009Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100005Global Id: OLYMPIAN (Continued)S102434676 SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: 014103020APN Number: T0608106256Global ID: 9- Case ClosedFacility Status: 550053Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: 014103020APN Number: T0608100005Global ID: 5C- Pollution CharacterizationFacility Status: 550194Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUST: 2173 ft.Site 6 of 8 in cluster AJ 0.412 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 25 ft. 1/4-1/2 SWEEPS USTS SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 West CA FID UST35 S LINDEN AVE N/A AJ250 LUSTSOUTH LINDEN CARDLOCK S101593654 TC3837232.2s Page 334 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 550028Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: LEADEDContent: PStg: M.V. FUELTank Use: 12000Capacity: 04-22-94Actv Date: 41-000-550028-000002Swrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: ATank Status: 10-13-88Created Date: 04-22-94Action Date: 04-22-94Referral Date: 44-025358Board Of Equalization: 3Number: 550028Comp Number: ActiveStatus: 12Number Of Tanks: DIESELContent: PStg: M.V. FUELTank Use: 12000Capacity: 04-22-94Actv Date: 41-000-550028-000001Swrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: ATank Status: 10-13-88Created Date: 04-22-94Action Date: 04-22-94Referral Date: 44-025358Board Of Equalization: 3Number: 550028Comp Number: ActiveStatus: SWEEPS UST: ActiveStatus: Not reportedComments: Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: S SAN FRANCISCO 94080Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: 260 MICHELLE CTMailing Address: Not reportedMail To: Not reportedFacility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: Not reportedRegulated ID: UTNKARegulated By: 41000046Facility ID: CA FID UST: SOUTH LINDEN CARDLOCK (Continued)S101593654 TC3837232.2s Page 335 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ATank Status: 10-13-88Created Date: 04-22-94Action Date: 04-22-94Referral Date: 44-025358Board Of Equalization: 3Number: 550028Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: KEROSENEContent: PStg: PETROLEUMTank Use: 10000Capacity: 04-22-94Actv Date: 41-000-550028-000005Swrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: ATank Status: 10-13-88Created Date: 04-22-94Action Date: 04-22-94Referral Date: 44-025358Board Of Equalization: 3Number: 550028Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PStg: M.V. FUELTank Use: 12000Capacity: 04-22-94Actv Date: 41-000-550028-000004Swrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: ATank Status: 10-13-88Created Date: 04-22-94Action Date: 04-22-94Referral Date: 44-025358Board Of Equalization: 3Number: 550028Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PStg: M.V. FUELTank Use: 12000Capacity: 04-22-94Actv Date: 41-000-550028-000003Swrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: ATank Status: 10-13-88Created Date: 04-22-94Action Date: 04-22-94Referral Date: 44-025358Board Of Equalization: 3Number: SOUTH LINDEN CARDLOCK (Continued)S101593654 TC3837232.2s Page 336 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation PStg: M.V. FUELTank Use: 12000Capacity: 04-22-94Actv Date: 41-000-550028-000009Swrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: ATank Status: 10-13-88Created Date: 04-22-94Action Date: 04-22-94Referral Date: 44-025358Board Of Equalization: 3Number: 550028Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PStg: M.V. FUELTank Use: 12000Capacity: 04-22-94Actv Date: 41-000-550028-000008Swrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: ATank Status: 10-13-88Created Date: 04-22-94Action Date: 04-22-94Referral Date: 44-025358Board Of Equalization: 3Number: 550028Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: DIESELContent: PStg: CHEMICALTank Use: 8000Capacity: 04-22-94Actv Date: 41-000-550028-000007Swrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: ATank Status: 10-13-88Created Date: 04-22-94Action Date: 04-22-94Referral Date: 44-025358Board Of Equalization: 3Number: 550028Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: SOLVENTSContent: PStg: CHEMICALTank Use: 10000Capacity: 04-22-94Actv Date: 41-000-550028-000006Swrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: SOUTH LINDEN CARDLOCK (Continued)S101593654 TC3837232.2s Page 337 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 9Number: 550029Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: LEADEDContent: PStg: M.V. FUELTank Use: 55Capacity: 08-15-89Actv Date: 41-000-550028-000012Swrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: ATank Status: 10-13-88Created Date: 04-22-94Action Date: 04-22-94Referral Date: 44-025358Board Of Equalization: 3Number: 550028Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: WASTE OILContent: WStg: OILTank Use: 300Capacity: 08-15-89Actv Date: 41-000-550028-000011Swrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: ATank Status: 10-13-88Created Date: 04-22-94Action Date: 04-22-94Referral Date: 44-025358Board Of Equalization: 3Number: 550028Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PStg: M.V. FUELTank Use: 10000Capacity: 04-22-94Actv Date: 41-000-550028-000010Swrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: ATank Status: 10-13-88Created Date: 04-22-94Action Date: 04-22-94Referral Date: 44-025358Board Of Equalization: 3Number: 550028Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: SOUTH LINDEN CARDLOCK (Continued)S101593654 TC3837232.2s Page 338 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: Not reportedContent: Not reportedStg: Not reportedTank Use: Not reportedCapacity: Not reportedActv Date: Not reportedSwrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedTank Status: 10-13-88Created Date: 02-03-94Action Date: 02-03-94Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: SOUTH LINDEN CARDLOCK (Continued)S101593654 both the abandoned facility and airspace parcels, and recommended Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) at the subject site, including east-southeast of the site. In 2007, TEC Accutite completed a Phase I water is San Francisco Bay, approximately 1,200 feet (ft) approximately 19 ft above mean sea level and the nearest surface gently slopes east, towards San Francisco Bay. Site elevation is areas west of San Francisco Bay in San Mateo County. Site topography yard for impounded vehicles. The site is located on the low lying site was most recently leased to Bob Jrs Towing and used as a storage and, presumably, the former service station (unknown capacity). The associated with the former Caltrans station (2,000 gallon capacity) underground storage tank (UST) systems have likely existed onsite, Fire Maps as Gas and Oils, an apparent former service station. Two facilities on the site consist of a building identified on Sanborn unoccupied one story office and auto-service building. Historic site is a former Caltrans maintenance station, consisting of an Francisco, California. Railroad lines are adjacent to the east. The is located in a light industrial/commercial area of South San professional interpretations made in the referenced report. The site take responsibility for the accuracy of the statements made or any Investigation and Site Conceptual Model, San Mateo County does not Extracted from TEC Accutite’s November 25, 2008 SubsurfaceSite History: DieselPotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: Stored electronically as an E-fileFile Location: 550198LOC Case Number: Not reportedRB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: JMCase Worker: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 06/15/2012Status Date: Open - Verification MonitoringStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.407532930374Longitude: 37.654283585574Latitude: T0608102301Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 2173 ft.Site 5 of 5 in cluster AF 0.412 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 15 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 NNW RGA LUST296 AIRPORT BOULEVARD N/A AF251 LUSTCALTRANS MAINTENANCE STATIONS106982141 TC3837232.2s Page 339 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 07/09/2008Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0608102301Global Id: 04/21/2008Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0608102301Global Id: 06/30/2007Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608102301Global Id: Status History: 6503726298Phone Number: jmadden@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: JACOB MADDENContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608102301Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: cprowell@waterboards.ca.govEmail: OaklandCity: 1515 Clay Street, Suite 1400Address: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: Cheryl L. ProwellContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608102301Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: City of South San Francisco and Caltrans. plan will be finalized pending completion of negotiations between the evaluation of appropriate remedial technologies and a remedial action remediation. This report addresses the first of these three goals. An alternative; Develop a recommended course of action for site remedial technologies to determine the best remedial action environmental remediation would be appropriate and evaluate available facility parcel and immediately offsite; Determine whether hydrocarbons and metals in soil and groundwater on the abandoned investigate the lateral and horizontal distribution of petroleum Accutite conducted the current investigation in order to: Further rerouting of the major utility lines that run through the site. TEC which include the construction of a pedestrian underpass requiring prepared by HNTB, the primary contractor for station construction, as a new Caltrain station. Plans for this development have been intends to develop both the abandoned facility and airspace parcels for a discussion of ESL selection). The City of South San Francisco Bay RWQCB) Environmental Screening Levels (ESLs) (see Section 4.4.3 applicable San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (SF identified concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons and metals above of 12 soil borings at the site in December 2007 and May 2008 and soil testing as part of a Phase II ESA. TEC Accutite advanced a total CALTRANS MAINTENANCE STATION (Continued)S106982141 TC3837232.2s Page 340 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608102301Global Id: Staff Letter - #20100901Action: 09/01/2010Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608102301Global Id: Staff Letter - #20110106Action: 01/06/2011Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608102301Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608102301Global Id: Staff Letter - #20101019Action: 10/19/2010Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608102301Global Id: Letter - Notice - #20100915Action: 09/15/2010Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608102301Global Id: Pilot Study / Treatability WorkplanAction: 12/17/2010Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608102301Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608102301Global Id: Not reportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0608102301Global Id: Other Report / DocumentAction: 05/23/2008Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608102301Global Id: Staff Letter - #20080421Action: 04/21/2008Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608102301Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 06/15/2012Status Date: Open - Verification MonitoringStatus: T0608102301Global Id: CALTRANS MAINTENANCE STATION (Continued)S106982141 TC3837232.2s Page 341 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 07/03/2012Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608102301Global Id: Notice of Responsibility - #20100930Action: 09/30/2010Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608102301Global Id: Staff Letter - #20080709Action: 07/09/2008Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608102301Global Id: Well Installation Report - Regulator RespondedAction: 02/15/2013Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608102301Global Id: Well Installation Workplan - Regulator RespondedAction: 09/14/2012Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608102301Global Id: Responded Final Remedial Action Report / Corrective Action Report - RegulatorAction: 10/21/2011Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608102301Global Id: Site Assessment Report - Regulator RespondedAction: 04/29/2011Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608102301Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation ReportAction: 11/26/2008Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608102301Global Id: Staff Letter - #20090226Action: 02/26/2009Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608102301Global Id: Leak StoppedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608102301Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 05/15/2013Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608102301Global Id: Staff Letter - #20120222Action: 02/22/2012Date: CALTRANS MAINTENANCE STATION (Continued)S106982141 TC3837232.2s Page 342 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2008 CALTRANS MAINTENANCE STATION 296 AIRPORT BOULEVARD 2009 CALTRANS MAINTENANCE STATION 296 AIRPORT BOULEVARD 2010 CALTRANS MAINTENANCE STATION 296 AIRPORT BOULEVARD 2011 CALTRANS MAINTENANCE STATION 296 AIRPORT BOULEVARD 2012 CALTRANS MAINTENANCE STATION 296 AIRPORT BOULEVARD RGA LUST: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: Not reportedAPN Number: T0608102301Global ID: 3B- Preliminary Assessment UnderwayFacility Status: 550198Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUST: Notification - Preclosure - #20131107Action: 11/07/2013Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608102301Global Id: Staff Letter - #20120830Action: 08/30/2012Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608102301Global Id: Well Installation ReportAction: 08/15/2012Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608102301Global Id: Staff Letter - #20130109Action: 01/09/2013Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608102301Global Id: Risk Assessment ReportAction: 06/10/2009Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608102301Global Id: Staff Letter - #20090709Action: 07/09/2009Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608102301Global Id: Staff Letter - #20110526Action: 05/26/2011Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608102301Global Id: Staff Letter - #20120703Action: CALTRANS MAINTENANCE STATION (Continued)S106982141 TC3837232.2s Page 343 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: LeadPotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affected: Local Agency WarehouseFile Location: Not reportedRB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: JMCase Worker: Cleanup Program SiteCase Type: -122.410798Longitude: 37.653164Latitude: 559173Lead Agency Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: T0608110422Global Id: 01/17/2003Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedFacility Status: STATERegion: SLIC: 2182 ft.Site 7 of 8 in cluster AJ 0.413 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 25 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 West34-36 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUE N/A AJ252 SLICLOPEZ PROPERTY S109277167 STORES HAZ MAT <219GAL,1,999LB, 879CFDescription: PR0044045Record Id: STORES HAZ MAT <219GAL,1,999LB, 879FT3Prog Element Code: FA0027540Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: GENERATES & RECYCLES WASTE OIL/SOLVENTDescription: PR0044044Record Id: GENERATES and RECYCLES WASTE OIL/SOLVENTProg Element Code: FA0027540Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: T0608194029EDR Link ID: 02/21/2003Deed Date(s): YCovenant Uploaded: SWRCBAgency: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSEDStatus: LUFTSite Type: Not reportedSub Area: Not reportedArea: DEED: 2185 ft.Site 1 of 11 in cluster AL 0.414 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 36 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 WNW San Mateo Co. BI108 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUE N/A AL253 DEEDU-SAVE PLUMBING HARDWARE S113757772 TC3837232.2s Page 344 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1997 AGUNDIS TIRE SHOP 110 LINDEN AVENUE 1998 AGUNDIS TIRE SHOP 110 LINDEN AVENUE 1999 AGUNDIS TIRE SHOP 110 LINDEN AVENUE 2000 AGUNDIS TIRE SHOP 110 LINDEN AVENUE 2001 AGUNDIS TIRE SHOP 110 LINDEN AVENUE 2002 AGUNDIS TIRE SHOP 110 LINDEN AVENUE 2003 AGUNDIS TIRE SHOP 110 LINDEN AVENUE 2004 AGUNDIS TIRE SHOP 110 LINDEN AVENUE RGA LF: 2189 ft.Site 2 of 11 in cluster AL 0.415 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 36 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA WNW110 LINDEN AVENUE N/A AL254 RGA LFS114492121 NANCY KATYLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100841Global Id: 6503726298Phone Number: jmadden@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: JACOB MADDENContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100841Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: Waste Oil / Motor / Hydraulic / LubricatingPotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: Local AgencyFile Location: 550142LOC Case Number: 41-0913RB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: JMCase Worker: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 11/28/2000Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.410483360291Longitude: 37.6534086840119Latitude: T0608100841Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 41-0913Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 41Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 2189 ft.Site 3 of 11 in cluster AL 0.415 mi.RGA LUST Relative: Higher Actual: 36 ft. 1/4-1/2 HAULERSSOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 WNW LUST110 LINDEN N/A AL255 HIST CORTESEAGUNDIS TIRE SHOP S102423750 TC3837232.2s Page 345 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation SAN MATEO CO. LUST: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remediation Action Underway: Not reportedPollution Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedPollution Characterization Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assesment Began: Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: OMHow Discovered: 550142Case Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: LUST REG 2: Notice of Responsibility - #1Action: 05/15/1995Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100841Global Id: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 11/28/2000Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100841Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100841Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100841Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 11/28/2000Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608100841Global Id: 04/20/1995Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608100841Global Id: Status History: Not reportedPhone Number: nkatyl@waterboards.ca.govEmail: OAKLANDCity: 1515 CLAY STREETAddress: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: AGUNDIS TIRE SHOP (Continued)S102423750 TC3837232.2s Page 346 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1995 AGUNDIS TIRE SHOP 110 LINDEN AVE 1996 AGUNDIS TIRE SHOP 110 LINDEN AVE 1997 AGUNDIS TIRE SHOP 110 LINDEN AVE 1998 AGUNDIS TIRE SHOP 110 LINDEN AVE 2000 AGUNDIS TIRE SHOP 110 LINDEN AVE 2001 AGUNDIS TIRE SHOP 110 LINDEN AVE 2002 AGUNDIS TIRE SHOP 110 LINDEN AVE 2003 AGUNDIS TIRE SHOP 110 LINDEN 2005 AGUNDIS TIRE SHOP 110 LINDEN 2006 AGUNDIS TIRE SHOP 110 LINDEN 2007 AGUNDIS TIRE SHOP 110 LINDEN 2008 AGUNDIS TIRE SHOP 110 LINDEN 2009 AGUNDIS TIRE SHOP 110 LINDEN AVENUE 2010 AGUNDIS TIRE SHOP 110 LINDEN AVENUE 2011 AGUNDIS TIRE SHOP 110 LINDEN AVENUE 2012 AGUNDIS TIRE SHOP 110 LINDEN AVENUE RGA LUST: No Permit record for this business.Waste Tire Permit Summary: Small Quantity, RegisteredCurrent Role Status: Generator, HaulerCurrent Role: (650) 834-4653Mailing Phone: San MateoMailing County: 94080Mailing Zip: CAMailing State: South San FranciscoMailing City: 110 Linden AveMailing Address: Jesus AcevedoContact Person: Not reportedBusiness Email Address: (650) 834-4653Facility Phone: 1687847Facility ID: HAULERS: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: 012335130APN Number: T0608100841Global ID: 9- Case ClosedFacility Status: 550142Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: AGUNDIS TIRE SHOP (Continued)S102423750 LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: OMHow Discovered: 550104Case Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: LUST REG 2: 2191 ft.Site 3 of 4 in cluster AG 0.415 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 25 ft. 1/4-1/2S SAN FRANCISCO, CA NW RGA LUST249 GRAND N/A AG256 LUSTS103893289 TC3837232.2s Page 347 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2003 GEORGIA PACIFIC 249 GRAND 2005 GEORGIA PACIFIC 249 GRAND 2006 GEORGIA PACIFIC 249 GRAND 2007 GEORGIA PACIFIC 249 GRAND RGA LUST: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remediation Action Underway: Not reportedPollution Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedPollution Characterization Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assesment Began: Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: (Continued)S103893289 41-0245Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 41Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 2191 ft.Site 4 of 4 in cluster AG 0.415 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 25 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 NW249 GRAND N/A AG257 HIST CORTESEGEORGIA PACIFIC CORP S101303276 Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: Lead, DieselPotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affected: Local AgencyFile Location: Not reportedRB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: CLICase Worker: Cleanup Program SiteCase Type: -122.412886619568Longitude: 37.6464175954634Latitude: 559201Lead Agency Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: T10000000968Global Id: 02/16/2010Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedFacility Status: STATERegion: SLIC: 2194 ft.Site 4 of 11 in cluster AL 0.416 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 36 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 WNW103 SOUTH LINDEN STREET N/A AL258 SLICCHEVRON AST FACILITY (FORMER)S109931098 TC3837232.2s Page 348 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 08/18/1998Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608100837Global Id: 04/05/1995Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608100837Global Id: Status History: Not reportedPhone Number: nkatyl@waterboards.ca.govEmail: OAKLANDCity: 1515 CLAY STREETAddress: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: NANCY KATYLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100837Global Id: 6503726298Phone Number: jmadden@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: JACOB MADDENContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100837Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: Local Agency WarehouseFile Location: 550141LOC Case Number: 41-0908RB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: JMCase Worker: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 08/18/1998Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.409562Longitude: 37.645449Latitude: T0608100837Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 41-0908Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 41Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 2204 ft.Site 3 of 4 in cluster AK 0.417 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 21 ft. 1/4-1/2 RGA LUSTSOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA SW LUST1388 SAN MATEO N/A AK259 HIST CORTESEPEKING HANDICRAFT S102435056 TC3837232.2s Page 349 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2003 PEKING HANDICRAFT 1388 SAN MATEO 2005 PEKING HANDICRAFT 1388 SAN MATEO 2006 PEKING HANDICRAFT 1388 SAN MATEO 2007 PEKING HANDICRAFT 1388 SAN MATEO 2008 PEKING HANDICRAFT 1388 SAN MATEO 2009 PEKING HANDICRAFT 1388 SAN MATEO 2010 PEKING HANDICRAFT 1388 SAN MATEO 2011 PEKING HANDICRAFT 1388 SAN MATEO 2012 PEKING HANDICRAFT 1388 SAN MATEO RGA LUST: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: 015114530APN Number: T0608100837Global ID: 9- Case ClosedFacility Status: 550141Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUST: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remediation Action Underway: Not reportedPollution Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedPollution Characterization Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assesment Began: Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: OMHow Discovered: 550141Case Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: LUST REG 2: Notice of Responsibility - #1Action: 04/17/1995Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100837Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100837Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100837Global Id: Regulatory Activities: PEKING HANDICRAFT (Continued)S102435056 TC3837232.2s Page 350 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1995 PEKING HANDICRAFT 1388 SAN MATEO AVE 1996 PEKING HANDICRAFT 1388 SAN MATEO AVE 1997 PEKING HANDICRAFT 1388 SAN MATEO AVE 1998 PEKING HANDICRAFT 1388 SAN MATEO AVE 2000 PEKING HANDICRAFT 1388 SAN MATEO AVE 2002 PEKING HANDICRAFT 1388 SAN MATEO AVE RGA LUST: 2204 ft.Site 4 of 4 in cluster AK 0.417 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 21 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA SW1388 SAN MATEO AVE N/A AK260 RGA LUSTS114199915 SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: NANCY KATYLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100905Global Id: 6503726298Phone Number: jmadden@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: JACOB MADDENContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100905Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: Local AgencyFile Location: 550149LOC Case Number: 41-0990RB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: JMCase Worker: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 06/29/2000Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.412546Longitude: 37.649701Latitude: T0608100905Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 41-0990Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 41Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 2216 ft. 0.420 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 21 ft. 1/4-1/2 RGA LUSTSOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 West LUST40 LINDEN N/A 261 HIST CORTESECALEGARI PROPERTY S102426103 TC3837232.2s Page 351 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUST: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remediation Action Underway: Not reportedPollution Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedPollution Characterization Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assesment Began: Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: OMHow Discovered: 550149Case Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: LUST REG 2: Notice of Responsibility - #1Action: 06/05/1996Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100905Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100905Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100905Global Id: Free Product RemovalAction: 01/01/1950Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0608100905Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 06/29/2000Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608100905Global Id: 04/25/1996Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608100905Global Id: Status History: Not reportedPhone Number: nkatyl@waterboards.ca.govEmail: OAKLANDCity: 1515 CLAY STREETAddress: CALEGARI PROPERTY (Continued)S102426103 TC3837232.2s Page 352 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2003 CALEGARI PROPERTY 40 LINDEN 2005 CALEGARI PROPERTY 40 LINDEN 2006 CALEGARI PROPERTY 40 LINDEN 2007 CALEGARI PROPERTY 40 LINDEN 2008 CALEGARI PROPERTY 40 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUE 2009 CALEGARI PROPERTY 40 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUE 2010 CALEGARI PROPERTY 40 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUE 2011 CALEGARI PROPERTY 40 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUE 2012 CALEGARI PROPERTY 40 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUE RGA LUST: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: 014102020APN Number: T0608100905Global ID: 9- Case ClosedFacility Status: 550149Facility ID: CALEGARI PROPERTY (Continued)S102426103 2003 CHEVRON 9-7640 124 LINDEN 2005 CHEVRON 9-7640 124 LINDEN 2006 CHEVRON 9-7640 124 LINDEN 2007 CHEVRON 9-7640 124 LINDEN RGA LUST: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: Not reportedAPN Number: T0608100115Global ID: 9- Case ClosedFacility Status: 550009Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUST: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remediation Action Underway: Not reportedPollution Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedPollution Characterization Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assesment Began: Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: OMHow Discovered: 550009Case Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: LUST REG 2: 2217 ft.Site 5 of 11 in cluster AL 0.420 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 32 ft. 1/4-1/2S SAN FRANCISCO, CA WNW RGA LUST124 LINDEN AVE N/A AL262 LUSTCHEVRON 9-7640 S105030263 TC3837232.2s Page 353 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 12/05/2001Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608100115Global Id: 02/28/1986Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608100115Global Id: Status History: Not reportedPhone Number: nkatyl@waterboards.ca.govEmail: OAKLANDCity: 1515 CLAY STREETAddress: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: NANCY KATYLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100115Global Id: 6503726295Phone Number: cice@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: CHARLES ICEContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100115Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: Local AgencyFile Location: 550009LOC Case Number: 41-0122RB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: CLICase Worker: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 12/05/2001Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.4105794Longitude: 37.6537128Latitude: T0608100115Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 41-0122Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 41Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 2217 ft.Site 6 of 11 in cluster AL 0.420 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 32 ft. 1/4-1/2 RGA LUSTSOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 WNW LUST124 LINDEN N/A AL263 HIST CORTESECHEVRON 9-7640 S110060439 TC3837232.2s Page 354 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2008 CHEVRON 9-7640 124 LINDEN 2009 CHEVRON 9-7640 124 LINDEN 2010 CHEVRON 9-7640 124 LINDEN 2011 CHEVRON 9-7640 124 LINDEN 2012 CHEVRON 9-7640 124 LINDEN RGA LUST: Notice of Responsibility - #1Action: 02/27/1989Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100115Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100115Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100115Global Id: Regulatory Activities: CHEVRON 9-7640 (Continued)S110060439 1992 CHEVRON 124 LINDEN AVE 1993 CHEVRON 124 LINDEN AVE 1994 CHEVRON 124 LINDEN AVE 1995 CHEVRON 124 LINDEN AVE 1996 CHEVRON 124 LINDEN AVE 1997 CHEVRON 124 LINDEN AVE 1998 CHEVRON 124 LINDEN AVE 2000 CHEVRON 124 LINDEN AVE 2002 CHEVRON 124 LINDEN AVE RGA LUST: 2217 ft.Site 7 of 11 in cluster AL 0.420 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 32 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA WNW124 LINDEN AVE N/A AL264 RGA LUSTS114197092 1994 SHELL 123 LINDEN AVE 1995 SHELL 123 LINDEN AVE 1996 SHELL 123 LINDEN AVE 1997 SHELL 123 LINDEN AVE 1998 SHELL 123 LINDEN AVE 2000 SHELL 123 LINDEN AVE 2002 SHELL 123 LINDEN AVE RGA LUST: 2227 ft.Site 8 of 11 in cluster AL 0.422 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 33 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA WNW123 LINDEN AVE N/A AL265 RGA LUSTS114196873 TC3837232.2s Page 355 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1993 SHELL 123 LINDEN AVE (Continued)S114196873 05/22/1998Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608101013Global Id: Status History: 6503726298Phone Number: jmadden@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: JACOB MADDENContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608101013Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: nkatyl@waterboards.ca.govEmail: OAKLANDCity: 1515 CLAY STREETAddress: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: NANCY KATYLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608101013Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: Local AgencyFile Location: 550154LOC Case Number: 41-1103RB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: JMCase Worker: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 06/26/2001Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.404261Longitude: 37.644532Latitude: T0608101013Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 41-1103Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 41Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 2227 ft.Site 1 of 3 in cluster AM 0.422 mi.RGA LUST Relative: Lower Actual: 17 ft. 1/4-1/2 HIST USTSO. SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 South LUST380 SO AIRPORT BLVD N/A AM266 HIST CORTESEGROSVENOR AIRPORT ASSOCIATESU001594781 TC3837232.2s Page 356 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2008 GROSVENOR AIRPORT INN 380 SOUTH AIRPORT BOULEVARD 2009 GROSVENOR AIRPORT INN 380 SOUTH AIRPORT BOULEVARD 2010 GROSVENOR AIRPORT INN 380 SOUTH AIRPORT BOULEVARD 2011 GROSVENOR AIRPORT INN 380 SOUTH AIRPORT BOULEVARD 2012 GROSVENOR AIRPORT INN 380 SOUTH AIRPORT BOULEVARD RGA LUST: Not reportedLeak Detection: Not reportedTank Construction: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00004000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 2Container Num: 002Tank Num: NoneLeak Detection: Not reportedTank Construction: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00004000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: #1Container Num: 001Tank Num: SO. SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080Owner City,St,Zip: 380 SO AIRPORT BLVDOwner Address: GROSVENOR AIRPORT ASSOCIATESOwner Name: 4158733200Telephone: MGR - MARC LE MIEUXContact Name: 0002Total Tanks: HOTELOther Type: OtherFacility Type: 00000064272Facility ID: STATERegion: HIST UST: Notice of Responsibility - #1Action: 06/03/1998Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608101013Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608101013Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 06/26/2001Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608101013Global Id: GROSVENOR AIRPORT ASSOCIATES (Continued)U001594781 TC3837232.2s Page 357 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2003 BRESSIE & CO. 600-79 DUBUQUE 2005 BRESSIE & CO. 600-79 DUBUQUE 2006 BRESSIE & CO. 600-79 DUBUQUE RGA LUST: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remediation Action Underway: Not reportedPollution Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedPollution Characterization Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assesment Began: Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: OMHow Discovered: 550020Case Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: LUST REG 2: 2234 ft.Site 1 of 8 in cluster AN 0.423 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 14 ft. 1/4-1/2S SAN FRANCISCO, CA NNW RGA LUST600-79 DUBUQUE N/A AN267 LUSTS106162506 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: JACOB MADDENContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100081Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: Local Agency WarehouseFile Location: 550020LOC Case Number: 41-0086RB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: JMCase Worker: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 06/11/2001Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.4001758Longitude: 37.6620289Latitude: T0608100081Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 2234 ft.Site 2 of 8 in cluster AN 0.423 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 14 ft. 1/4-1/2 RGA LUSTSOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 NNW SLIC600-790 DUBUQUE N/A AN268 LUSTBRESSIE & CO.S109285766 TC3837232.2s Page 358 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Site Characterization, San Mateo County does not take responsibility Extracted from AllWest’s March 10, 2010 Revised Workplan AdditionalSite History: DieselPotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: Local AgencyFile Location: 550197LOC Case Number: Not reportedRB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: JMCase Worker: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 07/25/2007Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.403616905212Longitude: 37.6593544139261Latitude: T0608152226Global Id: STATERegion: Notice of Responsibility - #1Action: 05/24/1990Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100081Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100081Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100081Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 06/11/2001Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608100081Global Id: 01/15/1988Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608100081Global Id: Status History: Not reportedPhone Number: nkatyl@waterboards.ca.govEmail: OAKLANDCity: 1515 CLAY STREETAddress: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: NANCY KATYLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100081Global Id: 6503726298Phone Number: jmadden@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: BRESSIE & CO. (Continued)S109285766 TC3837232.2s Page 359 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation were found in the vicinity of the tank. The tank was clean. The tank have been discarded. No fuel lines, backfill or other signs of use was a crushed tank approximately 3 feet by 6 feet and appeared to property. Tank-3 located in the north central portion of the property building. Two additional USTs were discovered during trenching at the mid-2007 from grading activities for construction of the Lowes tons of soil were excavated and removed from the subject site during groundwater is not a drinking water resource. Approximately 30,000 Francisco Bay Region for Commercial/Industrial Land Use where established by the Regional Water Quality Control Board, San concentrations exceed Environmental Screening Levels (ESLs) per kilogram (mg/kg), 18,000 mg/kg and 15,000 mg/kg. These excavation soil samples at maximum concentrations of 570 milligrams hydrocarbons as motor oil (TPH-mo) were detected in confirmatory petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel (TPH-d) and total petroleum removals. Total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPH-g), total gallons of petroleum product and water removed during the UST 21, 2007. Approximately 520 tons of soil was excavated and 15,000 successfully excavated and removed from the property on May 18 and 1925 Sanborn map of the property. The two 10,000-gallon USTs were discovered during grading activities are likely those depicted in a line. A review of historical documentation indicates the two USTs northwest section of the property during removal of an inactive sewer with the former foundry were discovered on May 3, 2007 in the 2005. Two 10,000 gallon fuel oil USTs (Tank-1 and Tank-2) associated Phase 2 Subsurface Environmental Site Assessment dated December 23, the Consolidated Engineering Laboratories (CEL) report titled Limited Report, dated March 22, 1991, the SMCEH Case Closure Memorandum, and investigations were summarized in AllWests Subsurface Investigation the SMCEH. The monitoring wells were abandoned in 2001. Past Case Closure Memorandum for the UST was issued on March 8, 2001 by 1990 and 1991, and groundwater monitoring was conducted until 1999. A the property. Eleven groundwater monitoring wells were installed in underground storage tank (UST) in 1990 from the central portion of monitoring wells and the removal of a 2,000-gallon gasoline groundwater sampling, installation and sampling of groundwater least 1988. The work included historical research, soil and subsurface investigations and remedial work at the property since at tanks (Tank-1 and Tank-2). Various investigators have performed interpreted as above ground tanks were actually underground storage However, based on recent work, two of the tanks originally interpreted the drawings as representing four above ground tanks. at the northern end of the foundry building. Initial investigators map notes the location of four 10,000 gallon fuel oil storage tanks the location or existence of tanks or chemical use. A 1925 Sanborn and other historical documents provide limited information regarding chemicals at the property is known. Sanborn maps, aerial photographs Limited information regarding the history, age and use of the industrial district of the City of South San Francisco, California. main tracks of the Southern Pacific Rail Road in a commercial and located north of Grand Avenue, east of Highway 101 and west of the building used for retail marine sales (West Maine). The property is facility and an approximate 13,200 square foot single story retail commercial building occupied by a Lowes Home Improvement retail is developed with an approximate 125,607 square foot single-story interpretations made in the referenced report. The subject property for the accuracy of the statements made or any professional BRESSIE & CO. (Continued)S109285766 TC3837232.2s Page 360 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 12/01/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608152226Global Id: Other Report / DocumentAction: 08/24/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608152226Global Id: Other Report / DocumentAction: 09/07/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608152226Global Id: Staff Letter - #20120724Action: 07/24/2012Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608152226Global Id: CAP/RAP - Feasibility Study ReportAction: 11/30/2012Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608152226Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 07/25/2007Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0608152226Global Id: 05/16/2007Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608152226Global Id: Status History: 6503726298Phone Number: jmadden@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: JACOB MADDENContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608152226Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: cprowell@waterboards.ca.govEmail: OaklandCity: 1515 Clay Street, Suite 1400Address: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: Cheryl L. ProwellContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608152226Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: 2007. Du was removed and properly disposed from this location on August 30, BRESSIE & CO. (Continued)S109285766 TC3837232.2s Page 361 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Soil and Water Investigation ReportAction: 09/24/2010Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608152226Global Id: Leak StoppedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608152226Global Id: Staff Letter - #20110303Action: 03/03/2011Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608152226Global Id: Notice of Violation - #20090507Action: 05/07/2009Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608152226Global Id: Staff Letter - #20101027Action: 10/27/2010Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608152226Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608152226Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608152226Global Id: Monitoring Report - Semi-AnnuallyAction: 08/15/2013Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608152226Global Id: Monitoring Report - Semi-AnnuallyAction: 08/15/2012Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608152226Global Id: Not reportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0608152226Global Id: Staff Letter - #20111005Action: 10/05/2011Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608152226Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation WorkplanAction: BRESSIE & CO. (Continued)S109285766 TC3837232.2s Page 362 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608152226Global Id: Monitoring Report - Semi-AnnuallyAction: 02/15/2013Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608152226Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation Workplan - AddendumAction: 07/09/2010Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608152226Global Id: Notice of Responsibility - #20070807Action: 08/07/2007Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608152226Global Id: Staff Letter - #20070725Action: 07/25/2007Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608152226Global Id: Correspondence - Regulator RespondedAction: 05/29/2013Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608152226Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 02/15/2012Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608152226Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 08/15/2011Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608152226Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 05/15/2011Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608152226Global Id: Site Assessment Report - Regulator RespondedAction: 02/17/2012Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608152226Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation Workplan - Regulator RespondedAction: 07/15/2011Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608152226Global Id: Monitoring Report - Quarterly - Regulator RespondedAction: 02/15/2011Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608152226Global Id: BRESSIE & CO. (Continued)S109285766 TC3837232.2s Page 363 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation STATERegion: SLIC: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: 015021090APN Number: T0608100081Global ID: 9- Case ClosedFacility Status: 550020Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: 015021090APN Number: T0608152226Global ID: 3B- Preliminary Assessment UnderwayFacility Status: 550197Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: 015021090APN Number: T10000000282Global ID: 9- Case ClosedFacility Status: 559200Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUST: Staff Letter - #20070808Action: 08/08/2007Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608152226Global Id: Staff Letter - #20100520Action: 05/20/2010Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608152226Global Id: Staff Letter - #20100427Action: 04/27/2010Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608152226Global Id: Staff Letter - #20121031Action: 10/31/2012Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608152226Global Id: Staff Letter - #20090709Action: 07/09/2009Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608152226Global Id: Warning Letter - #20080702Action: 07/02/2008Date: BRESSIE & CO. (Continued)S109285766 TC3837232.2s Page 364 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation gallons of petroleum product and water removed during the UST 21, 2007. Approximately 520 tons of soil was excavated and 15,000 successfully excavated and removed from the property on May 18 and 1925 Sanborn map of the property. The two 10,000-gallon USTs were discovered during grading activities are likely those depicted in a line. A review of historical documentation indicates the two USTs northwest section of the property during removal of an inactive sewer with the former foundry were discovered on May 3, 2007 in the 2005. Two 10,000 gallon fuel oil USTs (Tank-1 and Tank-2) associated Phase 2 Subsurface Environmental Site Assessment dated December 23, the Consolidated Engineering Laboratories (CEL) report titled Limited Report, dated March 22, 1991, the SMCEH Case Closure Memorandum, and investigations were summarized in AllWests Subsurface Investigation the SMCEH. The monitoring wells were abandoned in 2001. Past Case Closure Memorandum for the UST was issued on March 8, 2001 by 1990 and 1991, and groundwater monitoring was conducted until 1999. A the property. Eleven groundwater monitoring wells were installed in underground storage tank (UST) in 1990 from the central portion of monitoring wells and the removal of a 2,000-gallon gasoline groundwater sampling, installation and sampling of groundwater least 1988. The work included historical research, soil and subsurface investigations and remedial work at the property since at tanks (Tank-1 and Tank-2). Various investigators have performed interpreted as above ground tanks were actually underground storage However, based on recent work, two of the tanks originally interpreted the drawings as representing four above ground tanks. at the northern end of the foundry building. Initial investigators map notes the location of four 10,000 gallon fuel oil storage tanks the location or existence of tanks or chemical use. A 1925 Sanborn and other historical documents provide limited information regarding chemicals at the property is known. Sanborn maps, aerial photographs Limited information regarding the history, age and use of the industrial district of the City of South San Francisco, California. main tracks of the Southern Pacific Rail Road in a commercial and located north of Grand Avenue, east of Highway 101 and west of the building used for retail marine sales (West Maine). The property is facility and an approximate 13,200 square foot single story retail commercial building occupied by a Lowes Home Improvement retail is developed with an approximate 125,607 square foot single-story interpretations made in the referenced report. The subject property for the accuracy of the statements made or any professional Site Characterization, San Mateo County does not take responsibility Extracted from AllWest’s March 10, 2010 Revised Workplan AdditionalSite History: * SolventsPotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affected: Local AgencyFile Location: Not reportedRB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: JMCase Worker: Cleanup Program SiteCase Type: -122.404834628105Longitude: 37.6573753881197Latitude: 559200Lead Agency Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: T10000000282Global Id: 03/15/2011Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedFacility Status: BRESSIE & CO. (Continued)S109285766 TC3837232.2s Page 365 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2007 BRESSIE & CO. 600-790 DUBUQUE 2007 BRESSIE & CO. 600-790 DUBUQUE 2008 BRESSIE & CO. 600-790 DUBUQUE 2009 BRESSIE & CO. 600-790 DUBUQUE 2010 BRESSIE & CO. 600-790 DUBUQUE 2011 BRESSIE & CO. 600-790 DUBUQUE 2012 BRESSIE & CO. 600-790 DUBUQUE RGA LUST: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: 2007. Du was removed and properly disposed from this location on August 30, were found in the vicinity of the tank. The tank was clean. The tank have been discarded. No fuel lines, backfill or other signs of use was a crushed tank approximately 3 feet by 6 feet and appeared to property. Tank-3 located in the north central portion of the property building. Two additional USTs were discovered during trenching at the mid-2007 from grading activities for construction of the Lowes tons of soil were excavated and removed from the subject site during groundwater is not a drinking water resource. Approximately 30,000 Francisco Bay Region for Commercial/Industrial Land Use where established by the Regional Water Quality Control Board, San concentrations exceed Environmental Screening Levels (ESLs) per kilogram (mg/kg), 18,000 mg/kg and 15,000 mg/kg. These excavation soil samples at maximum concentrations of 570 milligrams hydrocarbons as motor oil (TPH-mo) were detected in confirmatory petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel (TPH-d) and total petroleum removals. Total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPH-g), total BRESSIE & CO. (Continued)S109285766 1996 BRESSIE & CO. 600-79 DUBUQUE AVE 1998 BRESSIE & CO 600-79 DUBUQUE AVE RGA LUST: 2234 ft.Site 3 of 8 in cluster AN 0.423 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 14 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA NNW600-79 DUBUQUE AVE N/A AN269 RGA LUSTS114233560 LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: OMHow Discovered: 550030Case Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: LUST REG 2: 2249 ft.Site 9 of 11 in cluster AL 0.426 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 28 ft. 1/4-1/2S SAN FRANCISCO, CA NW RGA LUST165 S LINDEN AVE N/A AL270 LUSTMIZRA/SETO PROPERTY S103472869 TC3837232.2s Page 366 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2003 MIZRA/SETO PROPERTY 165 LINDEN 2005 MIZRA/SETO PROPERTY 165 LINDEN 2006 MIZRA/SETO PROPERTY 165 LINDEN 2007 MIZRA/SETO PROPERTY 165 LINDEN RGA LUST: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: 014212110APN Number: T0608100318Global ID: 9- Case ClosedFacility Status: 550030Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUST: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remediation Action Underway: Not reportedPollution Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedPollution Characterization Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assesment Began: Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: MIZRA/SETO PROPERTY (Continued)S103472869 Not reportedStatus: 3Number Of Tanks: DIESELContent: PRODUCTStg: M.V. FUELTank Use: 10000Capacity: Not reportedActv Date: 41-000-550039-000001Swrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedTank Status: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 550039Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: SWEEPS UST: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: 014103090APN Number: T0608100721Global ID: 9- Case ClosedFacility Status: 550121Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUST: 2258 ft.Site 1 of 8 in cluster AO 0.428 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 21 ft. 1/4-1/2S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 WSW SWEEPS UST69 S LINDEN AVE N/A AO271 LUSTSOUTH SAN FRANCISCO SCAVENGERS104494237 TC3837232.2s Page 367 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: Not reportedContent: Not reportedStg: Not reportedTank Use: Not reportedCapacity: Not reportedActv Date: Not reportedSwrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedTank Status: 10-13-88Created Date: 02-03-94Action Date: 02-03-94Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 9Number: 550039Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: WASTE OILContent: WASTEStg: OILTank Use: 1000Capacity: Not reportedActv Date: 41-000-550039-000003Swrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedTank Status: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 550039Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PRODUCTStg: M.V. FUELTank Use: 2000Capacity: Not reportedActv Date: 41-000-550039-000002Swrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedTank Status: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 550039Comp Number: SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO SCAVENGER (Continued)S104494237 TC3837232.2s Page 368 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 06/22/1993Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608100721Global Id: Status History: 6503726298Phone Number: jmadden@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: JACOB MADDENContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100721Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: nkatyl@waterboards.ca.govEmail: OAKLANDCity: 1515 CLAY STREETAddress: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: NANCY KATYLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100721Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: or any professional interpretations made in the referenced report. does not take responsibility for the accuracy of the statements made Mateo County offices if submitted prior to 2005, San Mateo County Can be extracted from most recent report in Geotracker or at SanSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: Not reportedFile Location: 550121LOC Case Number: 41-0762RB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: JMCase Worker: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 04/19/2011Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.41247059Longitude: 37.647316559Latitude: T0608100721Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 41-0762Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 41Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 2258 ft.Site 2 of 8 in cluster AO 0.428 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 21 ft. 1/4-1/2 RGA LUSTSOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 WSW LUST69 LINDEN N/A AO272 HIST CORTESESOUTH CITY SCAVENGERS S101303286 TC3837232.2s Page 369 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation T0608100721Global Id: Interim Remedial Action PlanAction: 06/12/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation WorkplanAction: 07/17/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Electronic Reporting Submittal DueAction: 08/18/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Monitoring Report - Semi-AnnuallyAction: 02/15/2011Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: CorrespondenceAction: 03/06/2009Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Monitoring Report - Semi-AnnuallyAction: 05/15/2010Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 04/19/2011Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608100721Global Id: 06/24/2009Status Date: Open - Verification MonitoringStatus: T0608100721Global Id: 02/13/2007Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T0608100721Global Id: 01/10/2006Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T0608100721Global Id: 06/22/1993Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0608100721Global Id: SOUTH CITY SCAVENGERS (Continued)S101303286 TC3837232.2s Page 370 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 11/08/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation ReportAction: 09/17/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 05/15/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 08/15/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 05/15/2008Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 11/15/2008Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Letter - Notice - #20101109Action: 11/09/2010Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: ExcavationAction: 01/01/1950Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Well Destruction ReportAction: 05/15/2011Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 02/15/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 02/15/2008Date: RESPONSEAction Type: SOUTH CITY SCAVENGERS (Continued)S101303286 TC3837232.2s Page 371 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CAP/RAP - Feasibility Study ReportAction: 10/19/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: CAP/RAP - Feasibility Study ReportAction: 08/26/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Other Report / DocumentAction: 07/22/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation WorkplanAction: 03/25/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Interim Remedial Action ReportAction: 10/08/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 08/15/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 08/15/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 08/15/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Closure/No Further Action Letter - #20110419Action: 04/19/2011Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Staff Letter - #20100121Action: 01/21/2010Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Technical Correspondence / Assistance / OtherAction: 03/10/2009Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Corrective Action Plan / Remedial Action PlanAction: SOUTH CITY SCAVENGERS (Continued)S101303286 TC3837232.2s Page 372 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 11/15/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 02/15/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 05/15/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 11/15/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 11/15/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 11/15/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 02/15/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 02/15/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 08/29/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Corrective Action Plan / Remedial Action PlanAction: 07/10/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Electronic Reporting Submittal DueAction: 08/27/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: SOUTH CITY SCAVENGERS (Continued)S101303286 TC3837232.2s Page 373 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Staff Letter - #20091118Action: 11/18/2009Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 08/15/2008Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Staff Letter - #20050727AAction: 07/27/2005Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Staff Letter - #20060110Action: 01/10/2006Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Notice of Responsibility - #1Action: 08/24/1993Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Staff Letter - #20030403CAction: 04/03/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Staff Letter - #20050727BAction: 07/27/2005Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Staff Letter - #20060718Action: 07/18/2006Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Staff Letter - #20031204AAction: 12/04/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 05/15/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 05/15/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 11/15/2004Date: SOUTH CITY SCAVENGERS (Continued)S101303286 TC3837232.2s Page 374 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Staff Letter - #20081024Action: 10/24/2008Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Pump & Treat (P&T) GroundwaterAction: 01/01/1950Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Staff Letter - #20101118Action: 11/18/2010Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Staff Letter - #20090715Action: 07/15/2009Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Other Report / DocumentAction: 05/15/2010Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Staff Letter - #20030403AAction: 04/03/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Staff Letter - #20030617BAction: 06/17/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Staff Letter - #20030403BAction: 04/03/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Staff Letter - #20030617Action: 06/17/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Clean Up Fund - 5-Year Review Summary - Regulator RespondedAction: 12/16/2010Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Clean Up Fund - 5-Year Review Summary - Regulator RespondedAction: 09/16/2009Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: SOUTH CITY SCAVENGERS (Continued)S101303286 TC3837232.2s Page 375 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CAP/RAP - Feasibility Study ReportAction: 12/29/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Staff Letter - #20061129Action: 11/29/2006Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Staff Letter - #20070213AAction: 02/13/2007Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Staff Letter - #20070213BAction: 02/13/2007Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Staff Letter - #20060719Action: 07/19/2006Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Staff Letter - #20031204BAction: 12/04/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: In Situ Physical/Chemical Treatment (other than SVE)Action: 01/01/1950Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Other WorkplanAction: 01/08/2010Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 05/15/2009Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Staff Letter - #20091013Action: 10/13/2009Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 02/15/2009Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Staff Letter - #20040401Action: 04/01/2004Date: SOUTH CITY SCAVENGERS (Continued)S101303286 TC3837232.2s Page 376 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2003 SOUTH CITY SCAVENGER 69 LINDEN 2005 SOUTH CITY SCAVENGER 69 LINDEN 2006 SOUTH CITY SCAVENGER 69 LINDEN 2007 SOUTH CITY SCAVENGER 69 LINDEN 2008 SOUTH CITY SCAVENGER 69 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUE 2009 SOUTH CITY SCAVENGER 69 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUE 2010 SOUTH CITY SCAVENGER 69 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUE 2011 SOUTH CITY SCAVENGER 69 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUE 2012 SOUTH CITY SCAVENGER 69 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUE RGA LUST: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remediation Action Underway: Not reportedPollution Remediation Plan Submitted: 1/1/1965Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assesment Began: Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: OMHow Discovered: 550121Case Number: Pollution CharacterizationFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: LUST REG 2: Remedial Progress ReportAction: 08/15/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Remedial Progress ReportAction: 08/14/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: Remedial Progress ReportAction: 11/30/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100721Global Id: SOUTH CITY SCAVENGERS (Continued)S101303286 60001636Lead Agency Case Number: DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROLLead Agency: SL0608137279Global Id: 02/14/2007Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentFacility Status: STATERegion: SLIC: 2258 ft.Site 3 of 8 in cluster AO 0.428 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 21 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 WSWADJACENT 69 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUE N/A AO273 SLICUNION PACIFIC S109277270 TC3837232.2s Page 377 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: or any professional interpretations made in the referenced report. does not take responsibility for the accuracy of the statements made Mateo County offices if submitted prior to 2005, San Mateo County Can be extracted from most recent report in Geotracker or at SanSite History: * SolventsPotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affected: Stored electronically as an E-fileFile Location: Not reportedRB Case Number: DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROLLocal Agency: Not reportedCase Worker: Cleanup Program SiteCase Type: -122.412028312683Longitude: 37.647131175363Latitude: UNION PACIFIC (Continued)S109277270 P O BOX 4453Owner/operator address: EQUILON ENTERPRISES LLCOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (713) 241-2258Contact telephone: USContact country: HOUSTON, TX 772104453 P O BOX 4453Contact address: SONDRA BIENVENUContact: HOUSTON, TX 772104453 P O BOX 4453Mailing address: CAD981401748EPA ID: SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 123 LINDEN AVEFacility address: SHELL OIL COFacility name: 04/08/1998Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 2293 ft.Site 10 of 11 in cluster AL 0.434 mi.RGA LUST Relative: Higher Actual: 27 ft. 1/4-1/2 LUSTSOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 NW HIST CORTESE123 LINDEN AVE CAD981401748 AL274 RCRA-SQGSHELL OIL CO 1000288615 TC3837232.2s Page 378 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation -122.410791814327Longitude: 37.654066984691Latitude: T0608100461Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 41-0485Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 41Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: No violations foundViolation Status: BENZENEWaste name: D018Waste code: WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OFWaste name: D001Waste code: Hazardous Waste Summary: Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: SHELL OIL COFacility name: 09/01/1996Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (713) 241-2258Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: HOUSTON, TX 77210 SHELL OIL CO (Continued)1000288615 TC3837232.2s Page 379 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation T0608100461Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 08/15/2012Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100461Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 05/13/2013Status Date: Open - Eligible for ClosureStatus: T0608100461Global Id: 02/06/2001Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T0608100461Global Id: 06/01/1987Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608100461Global Id: Status History: 6503726289Phone Number: mmullaney@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: MARC MULLANEYContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100461Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: cprowell@waterboards.ca.govEmail: OaklandCity: 1515 Clay Street, Suite 1400Address: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: Cheryl L. ProwellContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100461Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: or any professional interpretations made in the referenced report. does not take responsibility for the accuracy of the statements made Mateo County offices if submitted prior to 2005, San Mateo County Can be extracted from most recent report in Geotracker or at SanSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: Local AgencyFile Location: 550068LOC Case Number: 41-0485RB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: MMCase Worker: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 05/13/2013Status Date: Open - Eligible for ClosureStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: SHELL OIL CO (Continued)1000288615 TC3837232.2s Page 380 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 02/15/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100461Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 10/15/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100461Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100461Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 08/15/2008Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100461Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 05/15/2009Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100461Global Id: Staff Letter - #20110818Action: 08/18/2011Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100461Global Id: Staff Letter - #20120425Action: 04/25/2012Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100461Global Id: ExcavationAction: 01/01/1950Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0608100461Global Id: ExcavationAction: 01/01/1950Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0608100461Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 11/15/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100461Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 05/15/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100461Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: SHELL OIL CO (Continued)1000288615 TC3837232.2s Page 381 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 05/15/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100461Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 02/15/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100461Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 11/15/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100461Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 08/15/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100461Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 05/15/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100461Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 02/15/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100461Global Id: Staff Letter - #20110318Action: 03/18/2011Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100461Global Id: Monitoring Report - Semi-AnnuallyAction: 05/15/2011Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100461Global Id: Monitoring Report - Semi-AnnuallyAction: 11/15/2010Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100461Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 02/15/2010Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100461Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 11/15/2009Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100461Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: SHELL OIL CO (Continued)1000288615 TC3837232.2s Page 382 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100461Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 08/15/2009Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100461Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 11/15/2008Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100461Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation ReportAction: 04/02/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100461Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation WorkplanAction: 11/27/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100461Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 05/15/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100461Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 11/15/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100461Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 08/15/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100461Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 05/15/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100461Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 02/15/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100461Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 11/15/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100461Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 08/15/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100461Global Id: SHELL OIL CO (Continued)1000288615 TC3837232.2s Page 383 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 02/15/2009Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100461Global Id: Monitoring Report - Semi-AnnuallyAction: 05/15/2010Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100461Global Id: Staff Letter - #20100218Action: 02/18/2010Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100461Global Id: Well Installation ReportAction: 02/19/2009Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100461Global Id: Leak StoppedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100461Global Id: Staff Letter - #20061206Action: 12/06/2006Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100461Global Id: Staff Letter - #20060926Action: 09/26/2006Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100461Global Id: Staff Letter - #19991230Action: 12/30/1999Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100461Global Id: Notice of Responsibility - #1Action: 09/25/1990Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100461Global Id: Soil Vapor Extraction (SVE)Action: 01/01/1950Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0608100461Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 02/15/2013Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100461Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 11/15/2012Date: SHELL OIL CO (Continued)1000288615 TC3837232.2s Page 384 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0608100461Global Id: Monitoring Report - Semi-AnnuallyAction: 05/15/2013Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100461Global Id: Staff Letter - #20090702Action: 07/02/2009Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100461Global Id: Staff Letter - #20081003Action: 10/03/2008Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100461Global Id: Monitoring Report - Semi-AnnuallyAction: 05/15/2012Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100461Global Id: Monitoring Report - Semi-AnnuallyAction: 11/15/2011Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100461Global Id: Request for Closure - Regulator RespondedAction: 05/15/2013Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100461Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation Report - Regulator RespondedAction: 01/15/2012Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100461Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation Workplan - Regulator RespondedAction: 08/08/2011Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100461Global Id: Conceptual Site Model - Regulator RespondedAction: 07/08/2010Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100461Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 11/15/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100461Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 02/15/2008Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100461Global Id: SHELL OIL CO (Continued)1000288615 TC3837232.2s Page 385 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2008 SHELL OIL 123 LINDEN 2009 SHELL OIL 123 LINDEN 2010 SHELL OIL 123 LINDEN 2011 SHELL OIL 123 LINDEN 2012 SHELL OIL 123 LINDEN RGA LUST: Notification - Preclosure - #20130822Action: 08/22/2013Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100461Global Id: Soil Vapor Extraction (SVE)Action: 01/01/1950Date: SHELL OIL CO (Continued)1000288615 2003 SHELL OIL 123 LINDEN 2005 SHELL OIL 123 LINDEN 2006 SHELL OIL 123 LINDEN 2007 SHELL OIL 123 LINDEN RGA LUST: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: 012332340APN Number: T0608100461Global ID: 7- Remedial Action UnderwayFacility Status: 550068Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUST: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: 1/1/1965Date Remediation Action Underway: Not reportedPollution Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedPollution Characterization Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assesment Began: Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: OMHow Discovered: 550068Case Number: Remedial action (cleanup) UnderwayFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: LUST REG 2: 2293 ft.Site 11 of 11 in cluster AL 0.434 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 27 ft. 1/4-1/2S SAN FRANCISCO, CA NW RGA LUST123 LINDEN AVE N/A AL275 LUSTSHELL OIL S105194448 TC3837232.2s Page 386 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 13004003.00000Contact ID: Not reportedContact Email: Site Assessment Manager (SAM)Contact Title: Not reportedContact Tel: Not reportedContact Name: 13003858.00000Contact ID: Not reportedContact Email: Site Assessment Manager (SAM)Contact Title: Not reportedContact Tel: Not reportedContact Name: 13003854.00000Contact ID: Not reportedContact Email: Site Assessment Manager (SAM)Contact Title: Not reportedContact Tel: Not reportedContact Name: 9271184.00000Contact ID: CERCLIS Site Contact Name(s): Not reportedSite FUDS Flag: Not reportedAlias EPA ID: Not reportedCC Concurrence FY: / /CC Concurrence Date: 06081Site Fips Code: 01/10/02Non NPL Status Date: Removal Only Site (No Site Assessment Work Needed)Non NPL Status: Not reportedRResp Fed Agency Code: Not reportedRBRAC Code: Not reportedDMNSN Unit Code: Not on the NPLNPL Status: Not reportedSite Settings Code: Not reportedClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedRST Code: Not reportedParent ID: Not reportedNFRAP Flag: SSite Init By Prog: Not reportedUSGS Quadrangle: Not reportedRCRA ID: Not reportedSite Orphan Flag: 0.00000DMNSN Number: Not a Federal FacilityFederal Facility: Not reportedUSGC Hydro Unit: Not reportedSMSA Number: Not reportedIFMS ID: Not reportedCongressional District: CALISTOGA WATERShort Name: SAN MATEOFacility County: CAN000905641EPA ID: 0905641Site ID: CERCLIS: 2317 ft.Site 4 of 8 in cluster AO 0.439 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 21 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA WSW FINDS57 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUE CAN000905641 AO276 CERCLISCALISTOGA WATER 1005440843 TC3837232.2s Page 387 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation and financial information. including an inventory of sites, planned and actual site activities, system contains information on all aspects of hazardous waste sites, to support management in all phases of the Superfund program. The Liability Information System) is the Superfund database that is used CERCLIS (Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Environmental Interest/Information System 110013806060Registry ID: FINDS: Not reportedAction Anomaly: Not reportedUrgency Indicator: Not reportedPlanning Status: EPA Fund-FinancedPrimary Responsibility: SITEWIDEOperable Unit: Not reportedPriority Level: 08/03/00Date Completed: / /Date Started: PRE-CERCLIS SCREENINGAction: 001Action Code: CERCLIS Assessment History: Not reportedSite Description: Not reportedAlias Comments: S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 57 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUEAlias Address: H. B. FULLER COMPANYAlias Name: 101Alias ID: CERCLIS Site Alias Name(s): Not reportedContact Email: Site Assessment Manager (SAM)Contact Title: Not reportedContact Tel: Not reportedContact Name: CALISTOGA WATER (Continued)1005440843 Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: OMHow Discovered: 550171Case Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: LUST REG 2: 2332 ft.Site 4 of 8 in cluster AN 0.442 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 18 ft. 1/4-1/2S SAN FRANCISCO, CA NNW RGA LUST515 AIRPORT N/A AN277 LUSTS102269176 TC3837232.2s Page 388 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2003 SHELL 515 AIRPORT 2005 SHELL 515 AIRPORT 2006 SHELL 515 AIRPORT 2007 SHELL 515 AIRPORT RGA LUST: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remediation Action Underway: Not reportedPollution Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedPollution Characterization Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assesment Began: (Continued)S102269176 NANCY KATYLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608117395Global Id: 6503726289Phone Number: mmullaney@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: MARC MULLANEYContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608117395Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: Local AgencyFile Location: 550171LOC Case Number: 41-0510RB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: MMCase Worker: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 01/26/1995Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.407099Longitude: 37.657068Latitude: T0608117395Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 41-0510Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 41Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 2332 ft.Site 5 of 8 in cluster AN 0.442 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 18 ft. 1/4-1/2 RGA LUSTSOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA NNW LUST515 AIRPORT N/A AN278 HIST CORTESESHELL S102437187 TC3837232.2s Page 389 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2008 SHELL 515 SOUTH AIRPORT BOULEVARD 2009 SHELL 515 SOUTH AIRPORT BOULEVARD 2010 SHELL 515 SOUTH AIRPORT BOULEVARD 2011 SHELL 515 SOUTH AIRPORT BOULEVARD 2012 SHELL 515 SOUTH AIRPORT BOULEVARD RGA LUST: Notice of Responsibility - #1Action: 01/02/1986Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608117395Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608117395Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608117395Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 01/26/1995Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608117395Global Id: 01/02/1986Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608117395Global Id: Status History: Not reportedPhone Number: nkatyl@waterboards.ca.govEmail: OAKLANDCity: 1515 CLAY STREETAddress: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: SHELL (Continued)S102437187 13287593.00000Contact Sequence ID: 9271184.00000Person ID: 13054536.00000Contact Sequence ID: CERCLIS-NFRAP Site Contact Details: NFRAP-Site does not qualify for the NPL based on existing informationNon NPL Status: Not on the NPLNPL Status: Not a Federal FacilityFederal Facility: 0903162Site ID: CERC-NFRAP: 2342 ft.Site 2 of 3 in cluster AM 0.444 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 18 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 South405 S AIRPORT BLVD CAD982359093 AM279 CERC-NFRAPPACIFIC PLASTICS PRODUCTS INC 1003879300 TC3837232.2s Page 390 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NFRAP-Site does not qualify for the NPL based on existing informationPriority Level: 07/24/89Date Completed: / /Date Started: PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENTAction: Not reportedPriority Level: 07/24/89Date Completed: / /Date Started: ARCHIVE SITEAction: Not reportedPriority Level: 12/01/87Date Completed: / /Date Started: DISCOVERYAction: CERCLIS-NFRAP Assessment History: 13004003.00000Person ID: 13299046.00000Contact Sequence ID: 13003858.00000Person ID: 13293188.00000Contact Sequence ID: 13003854.00000Person ID: PACIFIC PLASTICS PRODUCTS INC (Continued)1003879300 37.64348Latitude: Not reportedFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.: NORestricted Use: 05/31/1989Status Date: Refer: RWQCBStatus: * CERC2Special Program: 13Senate: 22Assembly: Not reportedSite Code: 41300009Facility ID: Cleanup BerkeleyDivision Branch: Referred - Not AssignedSupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: NONE SPECIFIEDLead Agency: NONE SPECIFIEDRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: Not reportedAcres: * HistoricalSite Type Detailed: HistoricalSite Type: ENVIROSTOR: 41300009Reg Id: CALSIReg By: 41Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 2342 ft.Site 3 of 3 in cluster AM 0.444 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 18 ft. 1/4-1/2S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 South ENVIROSTOR405 SOUTH AIRPORT BOULEVARD N/A AM280 HIST CORTESEPACIFIC PLASTIC PRODUCTS, INC S105026696 TC3837232.2s Page 391 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: SITE SCREENING DONE RATIONALE FOR PA: NEED MORE INFORMATION.Comments: 05/28/1987Completed Date: Site ScreeningCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: DHS RECOM- MENDS A SITE INSPECTION NOT AN NPL CANDIDATE PRELIM ASSESS DONE DUE TO ONSITE CONTAMINATION, SUBMIT TO EPA NFA FOR EPA BASED ON AVAILABLE INFO; FACILITY ISComments: 05/31/1989Completed Date: Preliminary Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: FACILITY IDENTIFIED INACTIVE SITE I.D’D IN INITIAL RESEARCHComments: 08/01/1980Completed Date: * DiscoveryCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 41300009Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 015142130Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: WINDSURF WAREHOUSEAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: NEW HORIZON FOOD COMPANYAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: MESE HSIN TUNG YANGAlias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: Chromium VI, NONE SPECIFIED * ORGANIC LIQUIDS WITH METALS, * AQUEOUS SOLUTION WITH METALS, Lead,Confirmed COC: Chromium VI * ORGANIC LIQUIDS WITH METALS, * AQUEOUS SOLUTION WITH METALS, Lead,Potential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: 015142130APN: -122.4027Longitude: PACIFIC PLASTIC PRODUCTS, INC (Continued)S105026696 TC3837232.2s Page 392 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1995 250 EAST GRAND AVE 1996 250 EAST GRAND AVE RGA LUST: 2347 ft.Site 1 of 4 in cluster AP 0.445 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 18 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA ENE250 EAST GRAND AVE N/A AP281 RGA LUSTS114215245 Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedDate Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedDate Preliminary Site Assessment Began: Not reportedDate Prelim Site Assmnt Workplan Submitted: Not reportedDate Confirmed: Not reportedLeak Source: Not reportedLeak Cause: Not reportedHow Discovered: Not reportedLocal Case #: Not reportedDate Closed: Not reportedFacility Status: SL20251869Facility ID: 2Region: SLIC REG 2: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: Not reportedPotential Contaminants of Concern: Not reportedPotential Media Affected: Not reportedFile Location: SL20251869RB Case Number: Not reportedLocal Agency: UNACase Worker: Cleanup Program SiteCase Type: -122.39621817981Longitude: 37.6530372458043Latitude: Not reportedLead Agency Case Number: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Lead Agency: SL20251869Global Id: 03/20/1995Status Date: Open - InactiveFacility Status: STATERegion: SLIC: 2347 ft.Site 2 of 4 in cluster AP 0.445 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 18 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA ENE250 EAST GRAND AVENUE N/A AP282 SLICW C PROPERTIES S106235216 TC3837232.2s Page 393 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation starting July 1, 2013 and ending June 30, 2014. Pacific Site Adjacent to 69 S Linden Avenue for the fiscal year This letter transmits DTSC’s oversight cost estimate for the UnionComments: 09/05/2013Completed Date: Annual Oversight Cost EstimateCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Oversight Cost Estimate included as an Exhibit in the VCA.Comments: 08/30/2012Completed Date: Annual Oversight Cost EstimateCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 08/30/2012Completed Date: Voluntary Cleanup AgreementCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 60001636Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 201931Alias Name: GeoTracker Global IDAlias Type: SL0608137279Alias Name: OTH, SOIL, SV, UEPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: 30001, 30013, 30022, 30027, 30028, 30195Potential COC: RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY, UNKNOWNPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: 37.64756 / -122.4120Lat/Long: Responsible PartyFunding: NORestricted Use: 03/06/2012Status Date: ActiveStatus: Not reportedSpecial Programs Code: 13Senate: 22Assembly: 201931Site Code: Cleanup BerkeleyDivision Branch: Denise TsujiSupervisor: George ChowProject Manager: DTSC - Site Cleanup ProgramLead Agency Description: SMBRPLead Agency: SMBRPCleanup Oversight Agencies: NONational Priorities List: 2.97Acres: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.: Voluntary CleanupSite Type Detail: Voluntary CleanupSite Type: 60001636Facility ID: VCP: 2364 ft.Site 5 of 8 in cluster AO 0.448 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 21 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 WSW ENVIROSTOREAST OF 69 S. LINDEN AVENUE N/A AO283 VCPUNION PACIFIC - SITE ADJACENT TO 69 S. LINDEN AVENUE S111464702 TC3837232.2s Page 394 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Arsenic, Lead, Tetrachloroethylene (PCE, Trichloroethylene (TCE,Confirmed COC: Vinyl chloride, 1,2-Dichloroethylene (cis Arsenic, Lead, Tetrachloroethylene (PCE, Trichloroethylene (TCE,Potential COC: RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY, UNKNOWNPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -122.4120Longitude: 37.64756Latitude: Responsible PartyFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.: NORestricted Use: 03/06/2012Status Date: ActiveStatus: Not reportedSpecial Program: 13Senate: 22Assembly: 201931Site Code: 60001636Facility ID: Cleanup BerkeleyDivision Branch: Denise TsujiSupervisor: George ChowProgram Manager: SMBRPLead Agency: SMBRPRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: 2.97Acres: Voluntary CleanupSite Type Detailed: Voluntary CleanupSite Type: ENVIROSTOR: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: 2014Future Due Date: Site Characterization ReportFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDEFuture Area Name: comments, and made recommendations for future site investigations. associated with the Site. DTSC reviewed these reports, provided Union Pacific submitted to DTSC all previous environmental reportsComments: 11/01/2012Completed Date: Site Characterization ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Fieldword took place 6/17/2013 to 7/11/2013Comments: 07/11/2013Completed Date: FieldworkCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 05/08/2013Completed Date: Site Characterization WorkplanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: UNION PACIFIC - SITE ADJACENT TO 69 S. LINDEN AVENUE (Continued)S111464702 TC3837232.2s Page 395 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: 2014Future Due Date: Site Characterization ReportFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDEFuture Area Name: comments, and made recommendations for future site investigations. associated with the Site. DTSC reviewed these reports, provided Union Pacific submitted to DTSC all previous environmental reportsComments: 11/01/2012Completed Date: Site Characterization ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Fieldword took place 6/17/2013 to 7/11/2013Comments: 07/11/2013Completed Date: FieldworkCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 05/08/2013Completed Date: Site Characterization WorkplanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: starting July 1, 2013 and ending June 30, 2014. Pacific Site Adjacent to 69 S Linden Avenue for the fiscal year This letter transmits DTSC’s oversight cost estimate for the UnionComments: 09/05/2013Completed Date: Annual Oversight Cost EstimateCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Oversight Cost Estimate included as an Exhibit in the VCA.Comments: 08/30/2012Completed Date: Annual Oversight Cost EstimateCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 08/30/2012Completed Date: Voluntary Cleanup AgreementCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 60001636Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 201931Alias Name: GeoTracker Global IDAlias Type: SL0608137279Alias Name: OTH, SOIL, SV, UEPotential Description: Vinyl chloride, 1,2-Dichloroethylene (cis, NONE SPECIFIED UNION PACIFIC - SITE ADJACENT TO 69 S. LINDEN AVENUE (Continued)S111464702 TC3837232.2s Page 396 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: UNION PACIFIC - SITE ADJACENT TO 69 S. LINDEN AVENUE (Continued)S111464702 Not reportedPriority Level: 09/01/88Date Completed: / /Date Started: ARCHIVE SITEAction: NFRAP-Site does not qualify for the NPL based on existing informationPriority Level: 09/01/88Date Completed: / /Date Started: PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENTAction: Low priority for further assessmentPriority Level: 11/01/84Date Completed: / /Date Started: PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENTAction: Not reportedPriority Level: 11/01/79Date Completed: / /Date Started: DISCOVERYAction: CERCLIS-NFRAP Assessment History: 13004003.00000Person ID: 13296645.00000Contact Sequence ID: 13003858.00000Person ID: 13290787.00000Contact Sequence ID: 13003854.00000Person ID: 13285192.00000Contact Sequence ID: 9271184.00000Person ID: 13054428.00000Contact Sequence ID: CERCLIS-NFRAP Site Contact Details: NFRAP-Site does not qualify for the NPL based on existing informationNon NPL Status: Not on the NPLNPL Status: Not a Federal FacilityFederal Facility: 0901729Site ID: CERC-NFRAP: 2367 ft.Site 8 of 8 in cluster AJ 0.448 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 25 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 West338 N CANAL ST CAD980390272 AJ284 CERC-NFRAPDECCA XAGON 1003878411 TC3837232.2s Page 397 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 08/13/1992Status Date: Open - Verification MonitoringStatus: T0608100238Global Id: 08/13/1992Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608100238Global Id: Status History: Not reportedPhone Number: nkatyl@waterboards.ca.govEmail: OAKLANDCity: 1515 CLAY STREETAddress: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: NANCY KATYLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100238Global Id: 6503726298Phone Number: jmadden@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: JACOB MADDENContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100238Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: Local Agency WarehouseFile Location: 550106LOC Case Number: 41-0250RB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: JMCase Worker: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 01/17/2003Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.413063Longitude: 37.648014867Latitude: T0608100238Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 41-0250Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 41Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 2375 ft.RGA LUSTSite 6 of 8 in cluster AO 0.450 mi.CHMIRS Relative: Lower Actual: 21 ft. 1/4-1/2 SWEEPS USTSOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 WSW LUST62 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUE N/A AO285 HIST CORTESEPENSKE TRUCK LEASING II S101303285 TC3837232.2s Page 398 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation OAKLANDCity: 1515 CLAY STREETAddress: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: NANCY KATYLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608199177Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: Local Agency WarehouseFile Location: 550166LOC Case Number: 41-0250RB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: JMCase Worker: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 01/17/2003Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.410791Longitude: 37.653182Latitude: T0608199177Global Id: STATERegion: ExcavationAction: 01/01/1950Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0608100238Global Id: Notice of Responsibility - #1Action: 09/02/1992Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100238Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100238Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100238Global Id: Closure/No Further Action Letter - #2Action: 01/17/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100238Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 01/17/2003Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608100238Global Id: PENSKE TRUCK LEASING II (Continued)S101303285 TC3837232.2s Page 399 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedPollution Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedPollution Characterization Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assesment Began: Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: OMHow Discovered: 550106Case Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: LUST REG 2: Closure/No Further Action Letter - #2Action: 01/17/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608199177Global Id: Notice of Responsibility - #1Action: 05/08/2000Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608199177Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608199177Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 01/17/2003Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608199177Global Id: 04/17/2000Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0608199177Global Id: 04/17/2000Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608199177Global Id: Status History: 6503726298Phone Number: jmadden@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: JACOB MADDENContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608199177Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: nkatyl@waterboards.ca.govEmail: PENSKE TRUCK LEASING II (Continued)S101303285 TC3837232.2s Page 400 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 550105Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: 3Number Of Tanks: PETROLEUMContent: WASTEStg: PETROLEUMTank Use: 1000Capacity: Not reportedActv Date: 41-000-550105-000004Swrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedTank Status: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 550105Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: SWEEPS UST: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: 014102070APN Number: T0608100238Global ID: 9- Case ClosedFacility Status: 550106Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: 014102070APN Number: T0608199177Global ID: 9- Case ClosedFacility Status: 550166Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUST: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remediation Action Underway: Not reportedPollution Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedPollution Characterization Began: 1/1/1965Preliminary Site Assesment Began: Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: OMHow Discovered: 550166Case Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: 1/1/1965Date Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remediation Action Underway: PENSKE TRUCK LEASING II (Continued)S101303285 TC3837232.2s Page 401 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ATank Status: 10-13-88Created Date: 04-22-94Action Date: 04-22-94Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 9Number: 550105Comp Number: ActiveStatus: 5Number Of Tanks: DIESELContent: PStg: M.V. FUELTank Use: 12000Capacity: 07-07-92Actv Date: 41-000-550105-000001Swrcb Tank Id: 2(685-6)Owner Tank Id: ATank Status: 10-13-88Created Date: 04-22-94Action Date: 04-22-94Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 9Number: 550105Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: WASTE OILContent: WASTEStg: OILTank Use: 1000Capacity: Not reportedActv Date: 41-000-550105-000008Swrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedTank Status: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 550105Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: WASTE OILContent: WASTEStg: OILTank Use: 1000Capacity: Not reportedActv Date: 41-000-550105-000007Swrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedTank Status: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: PENSKE TRUCK LEASING II (Continued)S101303285 TC3837232.2s Page 402 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation PStg: M.V. FUELTank Use: 10000Capacity: 04-22-94Actv Date: 41-000-550105-000006Swrcb Tank Id: UNKOwner Tank Id: ATank Status: 10-13-88Created Date: 04-22-94Action Date: 04-22-94Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 9Number: 550105Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: DIESELContent: PStg: M.V. FUELTank Use: 12000Capacity: 04-22-94Actv Date: 41-000-550105-000005Swrcb Tank Id: UNKOwner Tank Id: ATank Status: 10-13-88Created Date: 04-22-94Action Date: 04-22-94Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 9Number: 550105Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: WASTE OILContent: WStg: PETROLEUMTank Use: 1000Capacity: 07-07-92Actv Date: 41-000-550105-000003Swrcb Tank Id: 3(685-7)Owner Tank Id: ATank Status: 10-13-88Created Date: 04-22-94Action Date: 04-22-94Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 9Number: 550105Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PStg: M.V. FUELTank Use: 10000Capacity: 07-07-92Actv Date: 41-000-550105-000002Swrcb Tank Id: 1(685-5)Owner Tank Id: PENSKE TRUCK LEASING II (Continued)S101303285 TC3837232.2s Page 403 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation YesContained: Not reportedAmount: San Mateo County Environmental HealthAdmin Agency: 2/24/2012Incident Date: ERTSAgency: 2012Year: 845Date/Time: Not reportedOther: Gal(s)Measure: Not reportedType: Not reportedWhat Happened: Not reportedContainment: ContractorCleanup By: Merchant/BusinessSpill Site: Not reportedWaterway: NoWaterway Involved: Not reportedFacility Telephone: Not reportedComments: Not reportedReport Date: Not reportedReporting Officer Name/ID: Not reportedCompany Name: Not reportedCA/DOT/PUC/ICC Number: Not reportedVehicle Id Number: Not reportedVehicle State: Not reportedVehicle License Number: Not reportedVehicle Make/year: Not reportedOthers Number Of Fatalities: Not reportedOthers Number Of Injuries: Not reportedOthers Number Of Decontaminated: Not reportedResponding Agency Personel # Of Fatalities: Not reportedResponding Agency Personel # Of Injuries: Not reportedResp Agncy Personel # Of Decontaminated: Not reportedMore Than Two Substances Involved?: Not reportedSpecial Studies 6: Not reportedSpecial Studies 5: Not reportedSpecial Studies 4: Not reportedSpecial Studies 3: Not reportedSpecial Studies 2: Not reportedSpecial Studies 1: Not reportedProperty Management: Not reportedEstimated Temperature: Not reportedSurrounding Area: Not reportedTime Completed: Not reportedTime Notified: Not reportedAgency Incident Number: Not reportedAgency Id Number: Not reportedProperty Use: Not reportedDate Completed: Not reportedIncident Date: Not reportedOES Time: Not reportedOES Date: 02/24/2012OES notification: ’12-1076OES Incident Number: CHMIRS: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PENSKE TRUCK LEASING II (Continued)S101303285 TC3837232.2s Page 404 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2003 PENSKE TRUCK LEASING II 62 LINDEN 2005 PENSKE TRUCK LEASING II 62 LINDEN 2006 PENSKE TRUCK LEASING II 62 LINDEN 2007 PENSKE TRUCK LEASING II 62 LINDEN 2007 PENSKE TRUCK LEASING II 62 LINDEN 2008 PENSKE TRUCK LEASING II 62 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUE 2009 PENSKE TRUCK LEASING II 62 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUE 2010 PENSKE TRUCK LEASING II 62 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUE 2011 PENSKE TRUCK LEASING II 62 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUE 2012 PENSKE TRUCK LEASING II 62 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUE RGA LUST: has been contained and a contractor is enroute to complete clean up. in the release of 50 gallons of diesel over a 30ftx10ft area. Release RP states that a truck at a Penske terminal malfunctioned resultingDescription: Not reportedNumber of Fatalities: Not reportedNumber of Injuries: Not reportedEvacuations: Not reportedUnknown: Not reportedTons: Not reportedSheen: Not reportedQuarts: Not reportedPints: Not reportedOunces: Not reportedLiters: Not reportedPounds: Not reportedGrams: Not reportedGallons: Not reportedCUFT: Not reportedCups: Not reportedBBLS: 50Quantity Released: DieselSubstance: Not reportedE Date: Not reportedSite Type: PENSKE TRUCK LEASING II (Continued)S101303285 Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: Local AgencyFile Location: 550104LOC Case Number: 41-0245RB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: JMCase Worker: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 11/10/1998Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.393531799316Longitude: 37.6541646675204Latitude: T0608100233Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 2395 ft.Site 3 of 4 in cluster AP 0.454 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 19 ft. 1/4-1/2 RGA LUSTSOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ENE SLIC249 EAST GRAND AVENUE N/A AP286 LUSTGEORGIA PACIFIC S103646006 TC3837232.2s Page 405 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Lead Agency: T10000001104Global Id: 05/07/2009Status Date: Open - Assessment & Interim Remedial ActionFacility Status: STATERegion: SLIC: Notice of Responsibility - #1Action: 07/28/1982Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100233Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100233Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100233Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 11/10/1998Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608100233Global Id: 07/28/1982Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608100233Global Id: Status History: 6503726298Phone Number: jmadden@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: JACOB MADDENContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100233Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: nkatyl@waterboards.ca.govEmail: OAKLANDCity: 1515 CLAY STREETAddress: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: NANCY KATYLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100233Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: GEORGIA PACIFIC (Continued)S103646006 TC3837232.2s Page 406 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation roadway and the former on-site wells, the identification of two bay margin and the elevation difference between the East Grand Avenue southerly direction. Further, given the proximity to the historical are hydraulically connected and may trend toward convergence in the this work plan, the information reviewed also suggests these zones two shallow groundwater-bearing zones near the area of interest of the site and a nearby site to the northeast suggests the presence of south-southeast. Although information from prior investigations at site suggests that groundwater flow is generally to the Historical groundwater monitoring data at the southeast corner of the depths ranging from approximately seven to twelve feet bgs. the vicinity of the removed pipeline segment is likely present at groundwater investigations, shallow groundwater beneath the site in including marsh deposits and Bay Mud. Based on previous soil and some gravel. Underlying the fill are fine-grained sediments, artificial fill comprised primarily of silty sands and clays, with Shallow soil along the southern site boundary generally consists of approximately along East Grand Avenue in the vicinity of the site). San Francisco Bay (according to historical maps, located the southern side of Point San Bruno along the historical margin of southwesterly direction away from the site. The site is located on A supply or distribution line extends from the valve in a approximately 300 feet northwest of the southeast corner of the site. proximity to a "T"-junction valve in the pipeline located 2007. Maximum concentrations detected appear to be found in close conducted on a sample of oil collected from the pipeline in December are generally consistent with the initial fuel fingerprint analysis in several soil samples at negligible concentrations. There results of benzene. However, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes were detected surface. Soil samples analysis results did not indicate the presence approximate depth of three and a half to four feet below ground TPH as motor oil remains on-site in a horizon generally at an hydrocarbons, including total petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel and southern site boundary. Soil impacted with residual heavy range approximately 500 linear feet along the central portion of the the former pipeline, with the primary area of impact limited to immediately surrounding soil at various locations along the length of impacts are present in soil at the site. Oil appears to have impacted analysis of samples collected following pipeline removal, residual site boundary immediately adjacent to East Grand Avenue. Based on the discovered during site construction was removed from the southern approximately 1,000-foot section of an abandoned oil pipeline activities took place between January 22 and May 21, 2008. An made in the referenced report. Pipeline removal and related accuracy of the statements made or any professional interpretations Work Plan, San Mateo County does not take responsibility for the Extracted from Environ’s March 18, 2010 Preliminary Site AssessmentSite History: Heating Oil / Fuel OilPotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water), SoilPotential Media Affected: Not reportedFile Location: Not reportedRB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: CLPCase Worker: Cleanup Program SiteCase Type: -122.394679784775Longitude: 37.6531878334444Latitude: Not reportedLead Agency Case Number: GEORGIA PACIFIC (Continued)S103646006 TC3837232.2s Page 407 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2008 GEORGIA PACIFIC 249 EAST GRAND AVENUE 2009 GEORGIA PACIFIC 249 EAST GRAND AVENUE 2010 GEORGIA PACIFIC 249 EAST GRAND AVENUE 2011 GEORGIA PACIFIC 249 EAST GRAND AVENUE 2012 GEORGIA PACIFIC 249 EAST GRAND AVENUE RGA LUST: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: Tetrachloroethylene (PCE)Potential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affected: Local AgencyFile Location: Not reportedRB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: JMCase Worker: Cleanup Program SiteCase Type: -122.394623Longitude: 37.654103Latitude: 559188Lead Agency Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: SL0608128898Global Id: 12/22/2009Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedFacility Status: STATERegion: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: TDS concentrations generally in excess of 3,9000 mg/L. is not considered to be a potential drinking water source based on conducted at the site by others, shallow groundwater beneath the site designation by SWRCB. Based on historical groundwater sampling may allow for exemption of groundwater from "beneficial use" concentrations greater than 3,000 mg/L is one of four criteria that Policy (Sources Policy), total dissolved solids (TDS) at Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Sources of Drinking Water approximately 10 feet bgs is not anticipated. According to the State distinct groundwater-bearing zones at depths shallower than GEORGIA PACIFIC (Continued)S103646006 9- Case ClosedFacility Status: 559188Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: 015050440APN Number: T0608100233Global ID: 9- Case ClosedFacility Status: 550104Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUST: 2395 ft.Site 4 of 4 in cluster AP 0.454 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 19 ft. 1/4-1/2S SAN FRANCISCO, CA ENE SWEEPS UST249 E GRAND AVE N/A AP287 LUSTGEORGIA PACIFIC S104494207 TC3837232.2s Page 408 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedTank Status: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 550073Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: DIESELContent: PRODUCTStg: M.V. FUELTank Use: 10000Capacity: Not reportedActv Date: 41-000-550073-000003Swrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedTank Status: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 550073Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: 5Number Of Tanks: DIESELContent: PRODUCTStg: PETROLEUMTank Use: 10000Capacity: Not reportedActv Date: 41-000-550073-000002Swrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedTank Status: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 550073Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: SWEEPS UST: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: 015050440APN Number: TI0000001104Global ID: 9- Case ClosedFacility Status: 559202Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: 015050440APN Number: SL0608128898Global ID: GEORGIA PACIFIC (Continued)S104494207 TC3837232.2s Page 409 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedContent: PStg: UNKNOWNTank Use: 10000Capacity: 07-07-92Actv Date: 41-000-550073-000001Swrcb Tank Id: BOILERWEST1Owner Tank Id: ATank Status: 10-13-88Created Date: 02-03-94Action Date: 02-03-94Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 9Number: 550073Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: DIESELContent: PRODUCTStg: PETROLEUMTank Use: 7500Capacity: Not reportedActv Date: 41-000-550073-000006Swrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedTank Status: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 550073Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PRODUCTStg: M.V. FUELTank Use: 10000Capacity: Not reportedActv Date: 41-000-550073-000005Swrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedTank Status: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 550073Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: Not reportedContent: PRODUCTStg: Not reportedTank Use: 500Capacity: Not reportedActv Date: 41-000-550073-000004Swrcb Tank Id: GEORGIA PACIFIC (Continued)S104494207 TC3837232.2s Page 410 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1Number Of Tanks: GEORGIA PACIFIC (Continued)S104494207 Regulatory Activities: 09/28/2001Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608194008Global Id: 11/24/1998Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608194008Global Id: Status History: Not reportedPhone Number: nkatyl@waterboards.ca.govEmail: OAKLANDCity: 1515 CLAY STREETAddress: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: NANCY KATYLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608194008Global Id: 6503726298Phone Number: jmadden@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: JACOB MADDENContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608194008Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: Local AgencyFile Location: 550159LOC Case Number: 41-1275RB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: JMCase Worker: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 09/28/2001Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.407045Longitude: 37.6563561Latitude: T0608194008Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 2402 ft.Site 6 of 8 in cluster AN 0.455 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 19 ft. 1/4-1/2S SAN FRANCISCO, CA NNW RGA LUST545 AIRPORT BLVD N/A AN288 LUSTBLANDINI TRUST S104494140 TC3837232.2s Page 411 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2003 BLANDINI TRUST 545 AIRPORT 2005 BLANDINI TRUST 545 AIRPORT 2006 BLANDINI TRUST 545 AIRPORT 2007 BLANDINI TRUST 545 AIRPORT 2008 BLANDINI TRUST 545 AIRPORT 2009 BLANDINI TRUST 545 AIRPORT 2010 BLANDINI TRUST 545 AIRPORT 2011 BLANDINI TRUST 545 AIRPORT 2012 BLANDINI TRUST 545 AIRPORT RGA LUST: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: Not reportedAPN Number: T0608194008Global ID: 9- Case ClosedFacility Status: 550159Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUST: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remediation Action Underway: Not reportedPollution Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedPollution Characterization Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assesment Began: Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: OMHow Discovered: 550159Case Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: LUST REG 2: Notice of Responsibility - #1Action: 01/20/1999Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608194008Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608194008Global Id: ExcavationAction: 01/01/1950Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0608194008Global Id: BLANDINI TRUST (Continued)S104494140 TC3837232.2s Page 412 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2002 BLANDINI TRUST 545 AIRPORT BLVD RGA LUST: 2402 ft.Site 7 of 8 in cluster AN 0.455 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 19 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA NNW545 AIRPORT BLVD N/A AN289 RGA LUSTS114231669 09EPA Region: CAD046000931EPA ID: CORRACTS: Not reportedPriority Level: 01/23/96Date Completed: / /Date Started: ARCHIVE SITEAction: Deferred to RCRA (Subtitle C)Priority Level: 10/21/91Date Completed: / /Date Started: PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENTAction: Not reportedPriority Level: 04/01/91Date Completed: / /Date Started: DISCOVERYAction: CERCLIS-NFRAP Assessment History: RCRA Deferral - Lead ConfirmedDescription: Program Priority: 13004003.00000Person ID: 13299576.00000Contact Sequence ID: 13003858.00000Person ID: 13293718.00000Contact Sequence ID: 13003854.00000Person ID: 13288123.00000Contact Sequence ID: 9271184.00000Person ID: 13052326.00000Contact Sequence ID: CERCLIS-NFRAP Site Contact Details: Deferred to RCRANon NPL Status: Not on the NPLNPL Status: Not a Federal FacilityFederal Facility: 0903273Site ID: CERC-NFRAP: 2408 ft.2020 COR ACTIONSite 1 of 6 in cluster AQ 0.456 mi.FINDS Relative: Lower Actual: 9 ft. 1/4-1/2 RCRA-SQGSOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 East CORRACTS286 LAWRENCE AVE CAD046000931 AQ290 CERC-NFRAPEXIDE SAN FRANCISCO SERV CTR 1000185668 TC3837232.2s Page 413 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ENTIRE FACILITYArea Name: 09EPA Region: CAD046000931EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: Not reportedOriginal schedule date: Other Personal and Household Goods Repair and Maintenance Storage Battery Manufacturing 335911 42161 81149NAICS Code(s): corrective action priority CA075HI - CA Prioritization, Facility or area was assigned a highAction: 19911003Actual Date: ENTIRE FACILITYArea Name: 09EPA Region: CAD046000931EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: Not reportedOriginal schedule date: Other Personal and Household Goods Repair and Maintenance Storage Battery Manufacturing 335911 42161 81149NAICS Code(s): CA049PAAction: 19911003Actual Date: ENTIRE FACILITYArea Name: 09EPA Region: CAD046000931EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: Not reportedOriginal schedule date: Other Personal and Household Goods Repair and Maintenance Storage Battery Manufacturing 335911 42161 81149NAICS Code(s): CA029EPAction: 19911003Actual Date: ENTIRE FACILITYArea Name: 09EPA Region: CAD046000931EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: Not reportedOriginal schedule date: Other Personal and Household Goods Repair and Maintenance Storage Battery Manufacturing 335911 42161 81149NAICS Code(s): CA100 - RFI ImpositionAction: 19930101Actual Date: ENTIRE FACILITYArea Name: 09EPA Region: CAD046000931EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: Not reportedOriginal schedule date: Other Personal and Household Goods Repair and Maintenance Storage Battery Manufacturing 335911 42161 81149NAICS Code(s): CA650 - Stabilization Construction CompletedAction: 19930401Actual Date: ENTIRE FACILITYArea Name: EXIDE SAN FRANCISCO SERV CTR (Continued)1000185668 TC3837232.2s Page 414 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ENTIRE FACILITYArea Name: 09EPA Region: CAD046000931EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: 20000417Original schedule date: Other Personal and Household Goods Repair and Maintenance Storage Battery Manufacturing 335911 42161 81149NAICS Code(s): Migration of Contaminated Groundwater Under Control has been verified CA750YE - Migration of Contaminated Groundwater under Control, Yes,Action: 20000417Actual Date: ENTIRE FACILITYArea Name: 09EPA Region: CAD046000931EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: Not reportedOriginal schedule date: Other Personal and Household Goods Repair and Maintenance Storage Battery Manufacturing 335911 42161 81149NAICS Code(s): Migration of Contaminated Groundwater Under Control has been verified CA750YE - Migration of Contaminated Groundwater under Control, Yes,Action: 20000417Actual Date: ENTIRE FACILITYArea Name: 09EPA Region: CAD046000931EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: Not reportedOriginal schedule date: Other Personal and Household Goods Repair and Maintenance Storage Battery Manufacturing 335911 42161 81149NAICS Code(s): CA050RF - RFA Completed, Assessment was an RFAAction: 20010108Actual Date: ENTIRE FACILITYArea Name: 09EPA Region: CAD046000931EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: 20010108Original schedule date: Other Personal and Household Goods Repair and Maintenance Storage Battery Manufacturing 335911 42161 81149NAICS Code(s): CA070NO - RFA Determination Of Need For An RFI, RFI is Not NecessaryAction: 20010108Actual Date: ENTIRE FACILITYArea Name: 09EPA Region: CAD046000931EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: 20010108Original schedule date: Other Personal and Household Goods Repair and Maintenance Storage Battery Manufacturing 335911 42161 81149NAICS Code(s): CA050 - RFA CompletedAction: 20010108Actual Date: EXIDE SAN FRANCISCO SERV CTR (Continued)1000185668 TC3837232.2s Page 415 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CAD046000931EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: 20130630Original schedule date: Other Personal and Household Goods Repair and Maintenance Storage Battery Manufacturing 335911 42161 81149NAICS Code(s): CA550RCAction: 20120620Actual Date: ENTIRE FACILITYArea Name: 09EPA Region: CAD046000931EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: Not reportedOriginal schedule date: Other Personal and Household Goods Repair and Maintenance Storage Battery Manufacturing 335911 42161 81149NAICS Code(s): Exposures Under Control has been verified CA725YE - Current Human Exposures Under Control, Yes, Current HumanAction: 19990318Actual Date: ENTIRE FACILITYArea Name: 09EPA Region: CAD046000931EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: Not reportedOriginal schedule date: Other Personal and Household Goods Repair and Maintenance Storage Battery Manufacturing 335911 42161 81149NAICS Code(s): Migration of Contaminated Groundwater Under Control has been verified CA750YE - Migration of Contaminated Groundwater under Control, Yes,Action: 19990318Actual Date: ENTIRE FACILITYArea Name: 09EPA Region: CAD046000931EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: Not reportedOriginal schedule date: Other Personal and Household Goods Repair and Maintenance Storage Battery Manufacturing 335911 42161 81149NAICS Code(s): Exposures Under Control has been verified CA725YE - Current Human Exposures Under Control, Yes, Current HumanAction: 20000417Actual Date: ENTIRE FACILITYArea Name: 09EPA Region: CAD046000931EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: 20000417Original schedule date: Other Personal and Household Goods Repair and Maintenance Storage Battery Manufacturing 335911 42161 81149NAICS Code(s): Exposures Under Control has been verified CA725YE - Current Human Exposures Under Control, Yes, Current HumanAction: 20000417Actual Date: EXIDE SAN FRANCISCO SERV CTR (Continued)1000185668 TC3837232.2s Page 416 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ESB INCORPORATEDOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (215) 972-8000Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: CITY NOT REPORTED, PA 99999 PO BOX 8109Owner/operator address: ESB INCORPORATEDOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: Facility is not located on Indian land. Additional information is not known.Land type: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: Not reportedContact telephone: Not reportedContact country: Not reported Not reportedContact address: Not reportedContact: CAD046000931EPA ID: SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 286 LAWRENCE AVEFacility address: EXIDE SAN FRANCISCO SERV CTRFacility name: 09/01/1996Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: Not reportedSchedule end date: Not reportedOriginal schedule date: Other Personal and Household Goods Repair and Maintenance Storage Battery Manufacturing 335911 42161 81149NAICS Code(s): corrective action priority CA075HI - CA Prioritization, Facility or area was assigned a highAction: 19920327Actual Date: ENTIRE FACILITYArea Name: 09EPA Region: CAD046000931EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: Not reportedOriginal schedule date: Other Personal and Household Goods Repair and Maintenance Storage Battery Manufacturing 335911 42161 81149NAICS Code(s): corrective action priority CA075LO - CA Prioritization, Facility or area was assigned a lowAction: 19940224Actual Date: ENTIRE FACILITYArea Name: 09EPA Region: EXIDE SAN FRANCISCO SERV CTR (Continued)1000185668 TC3837232.2s Page 417 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation action priority. CA Prioritization, Facility or area was assigned a low correctiveEvent: 02/24/1994Event date: Stabilization Construction CompletedEvent: 04/01/1993Event date: RFI ImpositionEvent: 01/01/1993Event date: action priority. CA Prioritization, Facility or area was assigned a high correctiveEvent: 03/27/1992Event date: action priority. CA Prioritization, Facility or area was assigned a high correctiveEvent: 10/03/1991Event date: CA049PAEvent: 10/03/1991Event date: CA029EPEvent: 10/03/1991Event date: Corrective Action Summary: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: EXIDE SAN FRANCISCO SERV CTRFacility name: 08/05/1980Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (215) 972-8000Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: PHILADELPHIA, PA 19101 PO BOX 8109Owner/operator address: EXIDE SAN FRANCISCO SERV CTR (Continued)1000185668 TC3837232.2s Page 418 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Under Control has been verified. Based on a review of information Current Human Exposures under Control, Yes, Current Human ExposuresEvent: 04/17/2000Event date: changes at the facility. re-evaluated when the Agency/State becomes aware of significant reasonably expected conditions. This determination will be expected to be under control at the facility under current and contained in the EI determination, current human exposures are Under Control has been verified. Based on a review of information Current Human Exposures under Control, Yes, Current Human ExposuresEvent: 04/17/2000Event date: significant changes at the facility. determination will be re-evaluated when the Agency becomes aware of remains within the existing area of contaminated groundwater. This monitoring will be conducted to confirm that contaminated groundwater migration of contaminated groundwater is under control, and that at the facility. Specifically, this determination indicates that the determined that migration of contaminated groundwater is under control review of information contained in the EI determination, it has been Contaminated Groundwater Under Control has been verified. Based on a Igration of Contaminated Groundwater under Control, Yes, Migration ofEvent: 04/17/2000Event date: significant changes at the facility. determination will be re-evaluated when the Agency becomes aware of remains within the existing area of contaminated groundwater. This monitoring will be conducted to confirm that contaminated groundwater migration of contaminated groundwater is under control, and that at the facility. Specifically, this determination indicates that the determined that migration of contaminated groundwater is under control review of information contained in the EI determination, it has been Contaminated Groundwater Under Control has been verified. Based on a Igration of Contaminated Groundwater under Control, Yes, Migration ofEvent: 04/17/2000Event date: changes at the facility. re-evaluated when the Agency/State becomes aware of significant reasonably expected conditions. This determination will be expected to be under control at the facility under current and contained in the EI determination, current human exposures are Under Control has been verified. Based on a review of information Current Human Exposures under Control, Yes, Current Human ExposuresEvent: 03/18/1999Event date: significant changes at the facility. determination will be re-evaluated when the Agency becomes aware of remains within the existing area of contaminated groundwater. This monitoring will be conducted to confirm that contaminated groundwater migration of contaminated groundwater is under control, and that at the facility. Specifically, this determination indicates that the determined that migration of contaminated groundwater is under control review of information contained in the EI determination, it has been Contaminated Groundwater Under Control has been verified. Based on a Igration of Contaminated Groundwater under Control, Yes, Migration ofEvent: 03/18/1999Event date: EXIDE SAN FRANCISCO SERV CTR (Continued)1000185668 TC3837232.2s Page 419 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation EPA Contractor/GranteeEvaluation lead agency: 01/01/2001Date achieved compliance: TSD - Financial RequirementsArea of violation: FINANCIAL RECORD REVIEWEvaluation: 03/23/1992Evaluation date: Evaluation Action Summary: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 04/16/1989 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 05/01/1989Date achieved compliance: 04/06/1988Date violation determined: TSD - Financial RequirementsArea of violation: Not reportedRegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: Not reported Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: Not reported Enforcement action date: Not reported Enforcement action: EPAViolation lead agency: 01/01/2001Date achieved compliance: 01/01/2001Date violation determined: TSD - Financial RequirementsArea of violation: Not reportedRegulation violated: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: CA550RCEvent: 06/20/2012Event date: RFA Completed, Assessment was an RFA.Event: 01/08/2001Event date: RFA Determination Of Need For An RFI, RFI is Not Necessary;Event: 01/08/2001Event date: RFA CompletedEvent: 01/08/2001Event date: RFA Completed, Assessment was an RFA.Event: 01/08/2001Event date: changes at the facility. re-evaluated when the Agency/State becomes aware of significant reasonably expected conditions. This determination will be expected to be under control at the facility under current and contained in the EI determination, current human exposures are EXIDE SAN FRANCISCO SERV CTR (Continued)1000185668 TC3837232.2s Page 420 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedAction: 9Region: CAD046000931EPA ID: 2020 COR ACTION: corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System 110000609574Registry ID: FINDS: StateEvaluation lead agency: 05/01/1989Date achieved compliance: TSD - Financial RequirementsArea of violation: FINANCIAL RECORD REVIEWEvaluation: 04/06/1988Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 04/28/1988Evaluation date: EXIDE SAN FRANCISCO SERV CTR (Continued)1000185668 Not reportedPotential Media Affected: Not reportedFile Location: 41S0021RB Case Number: Not reportedLocal Agency: UUUCase Worker: Cleanup Program SiteCase Type: -122.396419Longitude: 37.649185Latitude: Not reportedLead Agency Case Number: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Lead Agency: SLT2O322213Global Id: 01/01/1970Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedFacility Status: STATERegion: SLIC: 41290004Reg Id: CALSIReg By: 41Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 2408 ft.Site 2 of 6 in cluster AQ 0.456 mi.HWP Relative: Lower Actual: 9 ft. 1/4-1/2 ENVIROSTORSOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA East SLIC286 LAWRENCE AVE N/A AQ291 HIST CORTESEEXIDE CORP S100861654 TC3837232.2s Page 421 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 80001392Alias Name: EPA (FRS #)Alias Type: 110000609574Alias Name: EPA Identification NumberAlias Type: CAD046000931Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 015-135-090Alias Name: SOILPotential Description: Lead, LeadConfirmed COC: LeadPotential COC: ABOVE GROUND STORAGE TANKS, BATTERY RECLAMATION, BATTERY STORAGEPast Use: 015-135-090APN: -122.3945Longitude: 37.64920Latitude: Not reportedFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.: NORestricted Use: 07/30/2010Status Date: No Further ActionStatus: Not reportedSpecial Program: 13Senate: 22Assembly: Not reportedSite Code: 80001392Facility ID: Cleanup BerkeleyDivision Branch: Denise TsujiSupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: WMLead Agency: SMBRPRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: 2.04Acres: Corrective ActionSite Type Detailed: Corrective ActionSite Type: ENVIROSTOR: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedDate Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedDate Preliminary Site Assessment Began: Not reportedDate Prelim Site Assmnt Workplan Submitted: Not reportedDate Confirmed: Not reportedLeak Source: Not reportedLeak Cause: Not reportedHow Discovered: Not reportedLocal Case #: Not reportedDate Closed: Leak being confirmedFacility Status: 41S0021Facility ID: 2Region: SLIC REG 2: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: Not reportedPotential Contaminants of Concern: EXIDE CORP (Continued)S100861654 TC3837232.2s Page 422 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CAD046000931EPA Id: HWP: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: 01/01/1993Completed Date: Consent OrderCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: RCRA Facility Assessment Completed 1/08/2001Comments: 01/08/2001Completed Date: RCRA Facility Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 04/17/2000Completed Date: Human Exposure ControlledCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 10/03/1991Completed Date: Preliminary Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 04/01/1993Completed Date: Interim Measures Implementation ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 04/17/2000Completed Date: Groundwater Migration ControlledCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 06/20/2012Completed Date: Remedy ConstructedCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: EXIDE CORP (Continued)S100861654 TC3837232.2s Page 423 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 110000609574Alias: FRSAlias Type: Historical - Non-OperatingFacility Type: CAD046000931EPA Id: Alias: 04/06/1995Actual Date: Closure Final - ISSUE CLOSURE VERIFICATIONEvent Description: TANKSTR1, TANKTRT1Unit Names: Historical - Non-OperatingFacility Type: CAD046000931EPA Id: 04/06/1995Actual Date: Closure Final - RECEIVE CLOSURE CERTIFICATIONEvent Description: TANKSTR1, TANKTRT1Unit Names: Historical - Non-OperatingFacility Type: CAD046000931EPA Id: Closure: Not reportedPublic Information Officer: 13Senate District: 22Assembly District: Not reportedSite Code: Not reportedSupervisor: Not reportedTeam: Not reportedFacility Size: Historical - Non-OperatingFacility Type: -122.3945Longitude: 37.64920Latitude: CLOSEDCleanup Status: EXIDE CORP (Continued)S100861654 Not reportedFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.: NORestricted Use: 12/12/2002Status Date: No Further ActionStatus: Not reportedSpecial Program: 13Senate: 22Assembly: Not reportedSite Code: 41290004Facility ID: Cleanup BerkeleyDivision Branch: Karen TothSupervisor: Katharine HilfProgram Manager: HWMPLead Agency: HWMP, SMBRP, US EPA, SAN MATEO COUNTYRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: 0.15Acres: EvaluationSite Type Detailed: EvaluationSite Type: ENVIROSTOR: 2437 ft.Site 3 of 6 in cluster AQ 0.462 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 9 ft. 1/4-1/2S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94089 East286 LAWRENCE AVENUE N/A AQ292 ENVIROSTOREXIDE SAN FRANCISCO SERVICE CENTERS100453853 TC3837232.2s Page 424 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Groundwater results were below action levels for lead. soil is below 200 mg/kg and covered with four feet of fill. The site has been cleaned up and certified. The remaining lead in theComments: 12/13/2002Completed Date: Site ScreeningCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 41290004Alias Name: SOILPotential Description: Lead, Sulfuric Acid, 305251-NO, LeadConfirmed COC: Lead, Sulfuric AcidPotential COC: BATTERY MANUFACTURING, BATTERY RECLAMATION, BATTERY STORAGEPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -122.3952Longitude: 37.64888Latitude: EXIDE SAN FRANCISCO SERVICE CENTER (Continued)S100453853 015141222APN Number: T0608101013Global ID: 9- Case ClosedFacility Status: 550154Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUST: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remediation Action Underway: Not reportedPollution Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedPollution Characterization Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assesment Began: Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: OMHow Discovered: 550154Case Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: LUST REG 2: 2474 ft.Site 8 of 8 in cluster AN 0.469 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 19 ft. 1/4-1/2 RGA LUSTS SAN FRANCISCO, CA NNW SWEEPS UST380 S AIRPORT BLVD N/A AN293 LUSTGROSVENOR AIRPORT INN S105036193 TC3837232.2s Page 425 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2003 GROSVENOR AIRPORT INN 380 AIRPORT 2005 GROSVENOR AIRPORT INN 380 AIRPORT 2006 GROSVENOR AIRPORT INN 380 AIRPORT 2007 GROSVENOR AIRPORT INN 380 AIRPORT RGA LUST: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PStg: M.V. FUELTank Use: 4000Capacity: 04-20-94Actv Date: 41-000-550116-000002Swrcb Tank Id: UNKOwner Tank Id: ATank Status: 10-13-88Created Date: 04-20-94Action Date: 04-20-94Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 3Number: 550116Comp Number: ActiveStatus: 2Number Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PStg: M.V. FUELTank Use: 4000Capacity: 04-20-94Actv Date: 41-000-550116-000001Swrcb Tank Id: UNKOwner Tank Id: ATank Status: 10-13-88Created Date: 04-20-94Action Date: 04-20-94Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 3Number: 550116Comp Number: ActiveStatus: SWEEPS UST: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: GROSVENOR AIRPORT INN (Continued)S105036193 Not reportedContact: CAD054603824EPA ID: SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 270 E GRAND AVE STE AFacility address: VIROLOGIC INCFacility name: 09/01/1996Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 2489 ft.ENVIROSTOR 0.471 mi.RESPONSE Relative: Lower Actual: 13 ft. 1/4-1/2 HIST Cal-SitesSOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA ENE FINDS270 E GRAND AVE STE A CAD054603824 294 RCRA-SQGVIROLOGIC INC 1000298667 TC3837232.2s Page 426 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: VIROLOGIC INCFacility name: 07/19/1996Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 358-8600Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: FOSTER CITY, CA 94404 393 VINTAGE DR STE 200Owner/operator address: NC LAND ASSOCIATESOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (201) 499-7800Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: CITY NOT REPORTED, NJ 99999 719 RARITAN ROADOwner/operator address: AMERICAN CAN COMPANYOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: Not reportedContact telephone: Not reportedContact country: Not reported Not reportedContact address: VIROLOGIC INC (Continued)1000298667 TC3837232.2s Page 427 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedEstimated Size: 0Est Person-Yrs to complete: 06011986Comments Date: Not reportedRevised Due Date: Not reportedAWP Completion Date: 0Proposed Budget: Not reportedAWP Code: CERTIFICATIONActivity Name: CERTActivity: 41340077Facility ID: 08State Senate District Code: 19State Assembly District Code: Not reportedLat/Long Description: Not reportedLat/long Method: 0 0 0 / 0 0 0Lat/Long (dms): Not reportedLat/Long Direction: SAN FRANCISCO BAYRegion Water Control Board Name: SFRegion Water Control Board: Not reportedSupervisor Responsible for Site: HATIQEEStaff Member Responsible for Site: Not reportedGroundwater Contamination: Not reportedDate Site Hazard Ranked: Not reportedHazardous Ranking Score: Not reportedCortese: Not reportedAccess: MANU - FABRICATED METAL PRODUCTSSIC Name: 34SIC Code: Not reportedNPL: RESPONSIBLE PARTYType Name: RPFacility Type: N/ALead Agency: Not reportedLead Agency: CERTIFIEDStatus Name: CERTIFIED AS HAVING BEEN REMEDIED SATISFACTORILY UNDER DTSC OVERSIGHTStatus: 06011986State Senate District: Not reportedFile Name: NORTH COASTBranch Name: NCBranch: BERKELEYRegion Name: 2Region: 41340077Facility ID: Calsite: corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System 110002649830Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: VIROLOGIC INC (Continued)1000298667 TC3837232.2s Page 428 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Land Associates purchased the Site in 1987. Britannia Point generated in the detinning process were also stored on-site. NC for the collection of plant effluent. Large piles of scrap steel plant operations, a two-acre evaporation pond existed on-site which purchased the plant and its owner, MRI Corporation. During of owners, the last of which was Tinmet Corporation (Tinmet), prior to 1922 are unknown. The plant operated under a succession 1922 until operations ceased in 1982. Operations at the Site steel from scrap tinplate. The plant had been in existence from the location of a processing plant for the recovery of tin and and the rest of Brittania Point Grand. The Site was formerly the east by Littlefield Avenue, and to the west by Harbor Way north by East Grand Avenue, to the south by railroad tracks, to the essential features of the Site. The Site is bounded to the companies. Office buildings, parking areas, and landscaping are Grand, a commercial park occupied by a number of biotechnology This approximately 20-acre Site is currently Brittania PointBackground Info: S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080Alternate City,St,Zip: 270 EAST GRAND AVENUEAlternate Address: 0Unknown Type: 0For Residential Reuse: 0For Industrial Reuse: 0For Commercial Reuse: Not reportedActivity Comments: Not reportedRemoval Action Certification: Not reportedAction Included Fencing: Not reportedWell Decommissioned: Not reportedAction Included Capping: 0Liquids Treated (Gals): 0Liquids Removed (Gals): CERTIFIEDDefinition of Status: CERTActivity Status: Not reportedRequest to Delete Activity: Not reportedEstimated Size: 0Est Person-Yrs to complete: 09251987Comments Date: Not reportedRevised Due Date: Not reportedAWP Completion Date: 0Proposed Budget: Not reportedAWP Code: SITE SCREENINGActivity Name: SSActivity: 41340077Facility ID: 0Unknown Type: 0For Residential Reuse: 0For Industrial Reuse: 0For Commercial Reuse: Not reportedActivity Comments: Not reportedRemoval Action Certification: Not reportedAction Included Fencing: Not reportedWell Decommissioned: Not reportedAction Included Capping: 0Liquids Treated (Gals): 0Liquids Removed (Gals): CERTIFIEDDefinition of Status: CERTActivity Status: Not reportedRequest to Delete Activity: VIROLOGIC INC (Continued)1000298667 TC3837232.2s Page 429 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 08191991Comments Date: drive-by.Comments: 08011980Comments Date: Facility identified: Inactive site identified independent ofComments: 08011980Comments Date: site.Comments: 06011986Comments Date: at the adjacent SP right-of-way, DHS certified closure of theComments: 06011986Comments Date: high as 3,950 ppm. Following completion of remedial activitiesComments: 06011986Comments Date: concentrations of lead remained in areas of the right-of-way asComments: 06011986Comments Date: containing elevated lead concentrations. However,Comments: 06011986Comments Date: contact between surface water runoff from the site and soilsComments: 06011986Comments Date: soil remediation program on the SP right-of-way was to eliminateComments: 06011986Comments Date: were backfilled with clean imported soil. The objective of theComments: 06011986Comments Date: area, the trench, and a drainage ditch in the SP right-of-wayComments: 06011986Comments Date: of six inches and disposed as hazardous waste. The excavatedComments: 06011986Comments Date: than 1,000 ppm of lead at the surface were excavated to a depthComments: 06011986Comments Date: Southern Pacific (SP) Railroad right-of-way containing greaterComments: 06011986Comments Date: containing elevated levels of lead were removed from an adjacentComments: 06011986Comments Date: monitoring at the site during closure. In late 1985, soilsComments: 06011986Comments Date: Water Quality Control Board oversaw surface and groundwaterComments: 06011986Comments Date: average concentration of 500 ppm total lead. The SF RegionalComments: 06011986Comments Date: groundwater were lead and zinc. Soils were removed to anComments: 06011986Comments Date: chemicals of concern in soil, sludge, surface water, andComments: 06011986Comments Date: closure plan was overseen and approved by DHS. The primaryComments: 06011986Comments Date: storage tanks, and liquid from the evaporation pond. TheComments: 06011986Comments Date: sludges from various areas, shredder residue, two undergroundComments: 06011986Comments Date: on-site commercial waste products, contaminated soils andComments: 06011986Comments Date: October 1985. Closure activities consisted of the removal ofComments: 06011986Comments Date: plan to DHS. Closure was carried out from July 1982 throughComments: 06011986Comments Date: Certified site. In June of 1982, Tinmet submitted a closureComments: 06011986Comments Date: redevelopmed it to its current commercial use. Grand purchased the Site from NC Land Associates in 1997 and VIROLOGIC INC (Continued)1000298667 TC3837232.2s Page 430 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSite Code: Cleanup BerkeleyDivision Branch: Denise TsujiSupervisor: Denise TsujiProject Manager: DTSC - Site Cleanup ProgramLead Agency Description: SMBRPCleanup Oversight Agencies: NONational Priorities List: 20Acres: State Response or NPLSite Type Detail: State ResponseSite Type: 41340077Facility ID: RESPONSE: Not reportedSpecial Programs Name: Not reportedSpecial Programs Code: TINMET CORPORATION/MRIMRI TINMETM R IAlternate Name: Not reportedID Value: Not reportedID Name: Facility Drive-by: Pond on site.Comments: 12181980Comments Date: Recommend No Further Action based on drive-by results.Comments: 10061981Comments Date: recorded.Comments: 09251987Comments Date: and if declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions isComments: 09251987Comments Date: uses if site will be covered with one foot cap of fill materialComments: 09251987Comments Date: ppm Lead). DHS allowed development of the site for industrialComments: 09251987Comments Date: its sale, levels exceeding closure criteria were found (650-1020Comments: 09251987Comments Date: facility for 60 years. DHS certified closure in 1986. DuringComments: 09251987Comments Date: Completed Site Screening. The site was a metal recyclingComments: 09251987Comments Date: one-foot layer of clean soil cap was installed and maintained.Comments: 08191991Comments Date: provided that the deed restriction was recorded, and theComments: 08191991Comments Date: clean soil cap. DTSC allowed development at the site in 1987Comments: 08191991Comments Date: non-residential uses and requiring maintenance of the one-footComments: 08191991Comments Date: deed restriction was placed limiting development at the site toComments: 08191991Comments Date: site. When NC Land Associates purchased the site in 1987, aComments: 08191991Comments Date: issue, a one-foot cap of clean soil was placed over the wholeComments: 08191991Comments Date: concentrations as high as 5,300 ppm. In order to adress thisComments: 08191991Comments Date: lead in soils, with an average concentration of 1,000 ppm, andComments: 08191991Comments Date: potential buyer for the site in 1987 found elevated levels ofComments: 08191991Comments Date: Completed Site Screening. Investigations performed by aComments: VIROLOGIC INC (Continued)1000298667 TC3837232.2s Page 431 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation soils containing elevated lead concentrations. However, to eliminate contact between surface water runoff from the site and objective of the soil remediation program on the SP right-of-way was SP right-of-way were backfilled with clean imported soil. The waste. The excavated area, the trench, and a drainage ditch in the were excavated to a depth of six inches and disposed as hazardous right-of-way containing greater than 1,000 ppm of lead at the surface lead were removed from an adjacent Southern Pacific (SP) Railroad during closure. In late 1985, soils containing elevated levels of Control Board oversaw surface and groundwater monitoring at the site concentration of 500 ppm total lead. The SF Regional Water Quality groundwater were lead and zinc. Soils were removed to an average The primary chemicals of concern in soil, sludge, surface water, and evaporation pond. The closure plan was overseen and approved by DHS. shredder residue, two underground storage tanks, and liquid from the waste products, contaminated soils and sludges from various areas, Closure activities consisted of the removal of on-site commercial DHS. Closure was carried out from July 1982 through October 1985. Certified site. In June of 1982, Tinmet submitted a closure plan toComments: 06/01/1986Completed Date: CertificationCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 41340077Alias Name: EPA (FRS #)Alias Type: 110033619920Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 015042220Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 015-042-230Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 015-042-220Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 015-042-210Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 015-042-200Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: MRI TINMETAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: M R IAlias Name: SOIL, SOILPotential Description: LeadConfirmed COC: LeadPotential COC : METAL RECLAMATION, METAL RECLAMATIONPast Use: 015-042-200, 015-042-210, 015-042-220, 015-042-230, 015042220APN: -122.3965Longitude: 37.65262Latitude: Responsible PartyFunding: NORestricted Use: 06/01/1986Status Date: CertifiedStatus: Not reportedSpecial Program Status: 13Senate: 22Assembly: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.: VIROLOGIC INC (Continued)1000298667 TC3837232.2s Page 432 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Lead, LeadConfirmed COC: LeadPotential COC: METAL RECLAMATION, METAL RECLAMATIONPast Use: 015-042-200, 015-042-210, 015-042-220, 015-042-230, 015042220APN: -122.3965Longitude: 37.65262Latitude: Responsible PartyFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.: NORestricted Use: 06/01/1986Status Date: CertifiedStatus: Not reportedSpecial Program: 13Senate: 22Assembly: Not reportedSite Code: 41340077Facility ID: Cleanup BerkeleyDivision Branch: Denise TsujiSupervisor: Denise TsujiProgram Manager: SMBRPLead Agency: SMBRPRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: 20Acres: State Response or NPLSite Type Detailed: State ResponseSite Type: ENVIROSTOR: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: 03/30/2011Schedule Due Date: Land Use RestrictionSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDESchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: 03/21/2008Completed Date: FieldworkCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: covenants, conditions and restrictions is recorded. be covered with one foot cap of fill material and if declaration of DHS allowed development of the site for industrial uses if site will levels exceeding closure criteria were found (650-1020 ppm Lead). for 60 years. DHS certified closure in 1986. During its sale, Completed Site Screening. The site was a metal recycling facilityComments: 09/25/1987Completed Date: Site ScreeningCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: adjacent SP right-of-way, DHS certified closure of the site. as 3,950 ppm. Following completion of remedial activities at the concentrations of lead remained in areas of the right-of-way as high VIROLOGIC INC (Continued)1000298667 TC3837232.2s Page 433 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation covenants, conditions and restrictions is recorded. be covered with one foot cap of fill material and if declaration of DHS allowed development of the site for industrial uses if site will levels exceeding closure criteria were found (650-1020 ppm Lead). for 60 years. DHS certified closure in 1986. During its sale, Completed Site Screening. The site was a metal recycling facilityComments: 09/25/1987Completed Date: Site ScreeningCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: adjacent SP right-of-way, DHS certified closure of the site. as 3,950 ppm. Following completion of remedial activities at the concentrations of lead remained in areas of the right-of-way as high soils containing elevated lead concentrations. However, to eliminate contact between surface water runoff from the site and objective of the soil remediation program on the SP right-of-way was SP right-of-way were backfilled with clean imported soil. The waste. The excavated area, the trench, and a drainage ditch in the were excavated to a depth of six inches and disposed as hazardous right-of-way containing greater than 1,000 ppm of lead at the surface lead were removed from an adjacent Southern Pacific (SP) Railroad during closure. In late 1985, soils containing elevated levels of Control Board oversaw surface and groundwater monitoring at the site concentration of 500 ppm total lead. The SF Regional Water Quality groundwater were lead and zinc. Soils were removed to an average The primary chemicals of concern in soil, sludge, surface water, and evaporation pond. The closure plan was overseen and approved by DHS. shredder residue, two underground storage tanks, and liquid from the waste products, contaminated soils and sludges from various areas, Closure activities consisted of the removal of on-site commercial DHS. Closure was carried out from July 1982 through October 1985. Certified site. In June of 1982, Tinmet submitted a closure plan toComments: 06/01/1986Completed Date: CertificationCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 41340077Alias Name: EPA (FRS #)Alias Type: 110033619920Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 015042220Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 015-042-230Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 015-042-220Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 015-042-210Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 015-042-200Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: MRI TINMETAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: M R IAlias Name: SOIL, SOILPotential Description: VIROLOGIC INC (Continued)1000298667 TC3837232.2s Page 434 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: 03/30/2011Schedule Due Date: Land Use RestrictionSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDESchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: 03/21/2008Completed Date: FieldworkCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: VIROLOGIC INC (Continued)1000298667 NFRAP-Site does not qualify for the NPL based on existing informationPriority Level: 03/01/86Date Completed: / /Date Started: SITE INSPECTIONAction: Not reportedPriority Level: 03/01/86Date Completed: / /Date Started: ARCHIVE SITEAction: Not reportedPriority Level: 07/01/84Date Completed: / /Date Started: DISCOVERYAction: CERCLIS-NFRAP Assessment History: 13004003.00000Person ID: 13297768.00000Contact Sequence ID: 13003858.00000Person ID: 13291910.00000Contact Sequence ID: 13003854.00000Person ID: 13286315.00000Contact Sequence ID: 9271184.00000Person ID: 13052934.00000Contact Sequence ID: CERCLIS-NFRAP Site Contact Details: NFRAP-Site does not qualify for the NPL based on existing informationNon NPL Status: Not on the NPLNPL Status: Not a Federal FacilityFederal Facility: 0902128Site ID: CERC-NFRAP: 2522 ft.Site 7 of 8 in cluster AO 0.478 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 21 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 WSW78 S LINDEN AVE CAD980883375 AO295 CERC-NFRAPKEM MFG CORP 1003878712 TC3837232.2s Page 435 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Low priority for further assessmentPriority Level: 09/01/84Date Completed: / /Date Started: PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENTAction: KEM MFG CORP (Continued)1003878712 Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: LACK OF INFORMATION. SITE SCREENING DONE RECOMMEND PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT (LOW) BASED ONComments: 06/01/1988Completed Date: Site ScreeningCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 41280135Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 014102100Alias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIED, NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: 014102100APN: -122.4134Longitude: 37.64721Latitude: Not reportedFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.: NORestricted Use: 06/01/1988Status Date: Refer: Other AgencyStatus: Not reportedSpecial Program: 13Senate: 22Assembly: Not reportedSite Code: 41280135Facility ID: Cleanup BerkeleyDivision Branch: Referred - Not AssignedSupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: NONE SPECIFIEDLead Agency: NONE SPECIFIEDRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: Not reportedAcres: * HistoricalSite Type Detailed: HistoricalSite Type: ENVIROSTOR: 2522 ft.Site 8 of 8 in cluster AO 0.478 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 21 ft. 1/4-1/2S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 WSW78 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUE N/A AO296 ENVIROSTORKEN MANUFACTURING COMPANY S106797917 TC3837232.2s Page 436 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: KEN MANUFACTURING COMPANY (Continued)S106797917 2003 LUCCA PACKING CORP. 360 HARBOR 2005 LUCCA PACKING CORP. 360 HARBOR 2006 LUCCA PACKING CORP. 360 HARBOR 2007 LUCCA PACKING CORP. 360 HARBOR RGA LUST: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: 015143080APN Number: T0608100313Global ID: 9- Case ClosedFacility Status: 550050Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUST: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remediation Action Underway: Not reportedPollution Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedPollution Characterization Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assesment Began: Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: OMHow Discovered: 550050Case Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: LUST REG 2: 2538 ft.Site 1 of 2 in cluster AR 0.481 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 19 ft. 1/4-1/2S SAN FRANCISCO, CA SSE RGA LUST360 HARBOR WY N/A AR297 LUSTLUCCA PACKING CORP.S105033249 STATERegion: LUST: 41-0328Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 41Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 2538 ft.Site 2 of 2 in cluster AR 0.481 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 19 ft. 1/4-1/2 RGA LUSTSOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 SSE LUST360 HARBOR N/A AR298 HIST CORTESELUCCA PACKING CORPORATION S104161809 TC3837232.2s Page 437 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Leak DiscoveryAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100313Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100313Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 08/16/2001Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608100313Global Id: 11/15/1989Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608100313Global Id: Status History: Not reportedPhone Number: nkatyl@waterboards.ca.govEmail: OAKLANDCity: 1515 CLAY STREETAddress: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: NANCY KATYLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100313Global Id: 6503726298Phone Number: jmadden@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: JACOB MADDENContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100313Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: DieselPotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: Local Agency WarehouseFile Location: 550050LOC Case Number: 41-0328RB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: JMCase Worker: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 08/16/2001Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.399295Longitude: 37.643724Latitude: T0608100313Global Id: LUCCA PACKING CORPORATION (Continued)S104161809 TC3837232.2s Page 438 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2008 LUCCA PACKING CORP. 360 HARBOR 2009 LUCCA PACKING CORP. 360 HARBOR 2010 LUCCA PACKING CORP. 360 HARBOR 2011 LUCCA PACKING CORP. 360 HARBOR 2012 LUCCA PACKING CORP. 360 HARBOR RGA LUST: Notice of Responsibility - #1Action: 06/05/1990Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100313Global Id: Pump & Treat (P&T) GroundwaterAction: 01/01/1950Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0608100313Global Id: ExcavationAction: 01/01/1950Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0608100313Global Id: LUCCA PACKING CORPORATION (Continued)S104161809 1992 RPM RENT-A-CAR 410 S AIRPORT BLVD RGA LUST: 2554 ft.Site 1 of 3 in cluster AS 0.484 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 18 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA South410 S AIRPORT BLVD N/A AS299 RGA LUSTS114225841 Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 5161Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: SWEEPS UST: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: 015141150APN Number: T0608100431Global ID: 9- Case ClosedFacility Status: 550058Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUST: 2554 ft.Site 2 of 3 in cluster AS 0.484 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 18 ft. 1/4-1/2S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 South SWEEPS UST410 S AIRPORT BLVD N/A AS300 LUSTRPM RENT A CAR S104494148 TC3837232.2s Page 439 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0Number Of Tanks: Not reportedContent: Not reportedStg: Not reportedTank Use: Not reportedCapacity: Not reportedActv Date: Not reportedSwrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedTank Status: RPM RENT A CAR (Continued)S104494148 OAKLANDCity: 1515 CLAY STREETAddress: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: NANCY KATYLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100431Global Id: 6503726298Phone Number: jmadden@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: JACOB MADDENContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100431Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: DieselPotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: Local AgencyFile Location: 550058LOC Case Number: 41-0455RB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: JMCase Worker: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 10/25/1995Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.4035054Longitude: 37.6427946Latitude: T0608100431Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 41-0455Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 41Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 2554 ft.Site 3 of 3 in cluster AS 0.484 mi.RGA LUST Relative: Lower Actual: 18 ft. 1/4-1/2 CA FID USTSO. SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 South LUST410 S AIRPORT BLVD N/A AS301 HIST CORTESERPM RENT A CAR S101593753 TC3837232.2s Page 440 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedRegulated ID: UTNKARegulated By: 41000432Facility ID: CA FID UST: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remediation Action Underway: Not reportedPollution Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedPollution Characterization Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assesment Began: Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: OMHow Discovered: 550058Case Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: LUST REG 2: ExcavationAction: 01/01/1950Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0608100431Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100431Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100431Global Id: Notice of Responsibility - #1Action: 10/12/1989Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100431Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 10/25/1995Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608100431Global Id: 10/12/1989Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608100431Global Id: Status History: Not reportedPhone Number: nkatyl@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RPM RENT A CAR (Continued)S101593753 TC3837232.2s Page 441 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2003 RPM RENT-A-CAR 410 AIRPORT 2005 RPM RENT-A-CAR 410 AIRPORT 2006 RPM RENT-A-CAR 410 AIRPORT 2007 RPM RENT-A-CAR 410 AIRPORT 2008 RPM RENT-A-CAR 410 SOUTH AIRPORT BOULEVARD 2009 RPM RENT-A-CAR 410 SOUTH AIRPORT BOULEVARD 2010 RPM RENT-A-CAR 410 SOUTH AIRPORT BOULEVARD 2011 RPM RENT-A-CAR 410 SOUTH AIRPORT BOULEVARD 2012 RPM RENT-A-CAR 410 SOUTH AIRPORT BOULEVARD RGA LUST: ActiveStatus: Not reportedComments: Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: SO. SAN FRANCISCO 94080Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: 410 S AIRPORT BLVDMailing Address: Not reportedMail To: 4150000000Facility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: RPM RENT A CAR (Continued)S101593753 Tetrachloroethylene (PCE), * Alkylethoxtethanol, * *Potential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affected: Local AgencyFile Location: Not reportedRB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: JMCase Worker: Cleanup Program SiteCase Type: -122.410529Longitude: 37.655558Latitude: 559172Lead Agency Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: T0608175868Global Id: 03/04/2004Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentFacility Status: STATERegion: SLIC: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: 012312210APN Number: T0608175868Global ID: 5C- Pollution CharacterizationFacility Status: 559172Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUST: 2559 ft. 0.485 mi.RGA LUST Relative: Higher Actual: 38 ft. 1/4-1/2 DRYCLEANERSSOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 NW SLIC316 GRAND AVE N/A 302 LUSTWRIGHT CLEANERS S100878529 TC3837232.2s Page 442 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2005 WRIGHT CLEANERS 316 GRAND RGA LUST: 6505881918Contact Telephone: Not reportedContact Address 2: 316 GRAND AVEContact Address: YONG P JOUNContact Name: 6505881918Owner Telephone: Not reportedOwner Address 2: 316 GRAND AVEOwner Address: YONG P & CHUN JOUNOwner Name: Not reportedFacility Addr2: Not reportedInactive Date: YesFacility Active: 07/03/1987Create Date: Power Laundries, Family and CommercialSIC Description: 7211SIC Code: Drycleaning and Laundry Services (except Coin-Operated)NAICS Description: 81232NAICS Code: CAD981634926EPA Id: DRYCLEANERS: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: or any professional interpretations made in the referenced report. does not take responsibility for the accuracy of the statements made Mateo County offices if submitted prior to 2005, San Mateo County Can be extracted from most recent report in Geotracker or at SanSite History: Alkylethoxtethanol WRIGHT CLEANERS (Continued)S100878529 Local Agency WarehouseFile Location: 550079LOC Case Number: 41-0181RB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: JMCase Worker: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 02/17/1993Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.394089698792Longitude: 37.6513785329098Latitude: T0608100172Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 41-0181Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 41Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 2594 ft.Site 1 of 2 in cluster AT 0.491 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 17 ft. 1/4-1/2 RGA LUSTSOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA East LUST468 LITTLEFIELD N/A AT303 HIST CORTESECORTANA CORPORATION S104494248 TC3837232.2s Page 443 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 550079Case Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: LUST REG 2: Notice of Responsibility - #1Action: 01/10/1993Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100172Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100172Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100172Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 02/17/1993Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608100172Global Id: 05/12/1991Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608100172Global Id: Status History: 6503726298Phone Number: jmadden@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: JACOB MADDENContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100172Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: nkatyl@waterboards.ca.govEmail: OAKLANDCity: 1515 CLAY STREETAddress: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: NANCY KATYLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100172Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: CORTANA CORPORATION (Continued)S104494248 TC3837232.2s Page 444 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2003 CORTANA CORPORATION 468 LITTLEFIELD 2005 CORTANA CORPORATION 468 LITTLEFIELD 2006 CORTANA CORPORATION 468 LITTLEFIELD 2007 CORTANA CORPORATION 468 LITTLEFIELD 2008 CORTANA CORPORATION 468 LITTLEFIELD 2009 CORTANA CORPORATION 468 LITTLEFIELD 2010 CORTANA CORPORATION 468 LITTLEFIELD 2011 CORTANA CORPORATION 468 LITTLEFIELD 2012 CORTANA CORPORATION 468 LITTLEFIELD RGA LUST: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: 015063220APN Number: T0608100172Global ID: 9- Case ClosedFacility Status: 550079Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUST: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remediation Action Underway: Not reportedPollution Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedPollution Characterization Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assesment Began: Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: OMHow Discovered: CORTANA CORPORATION (Continued)S104494248 1993 CORTANA CORPORATION 468 LITTLEFIELD AVE 1994 CORTANA CORPORATION 468 LITTLEFIELD AVE 1995 CORTANA CORPORATION 468 LITTLEFIELD AVE 1996 CORTANA CORPORATION 468 LITTLEFIELD AVE 1997 CORTANA CORPORATION 468 LITTLEFIELD AVE 1998 CORTANA CORPORATION 468 LITTLEFIELD AVE 2000 CORTANA CORPORATION 468 LITTLEFIELD AVE 2002 CORTANA CORPORATION 468 LITTLEFIELD AVE RGA LUST: 2594 ft.Site 2 of 2 in cluster AT 0.491 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 17 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA East468 LITTLEFIELD AVE N/A AT304 RGA LUSTS114228427 TC3837232.2s Page 445 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 06/27/2001Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608100434Global Id: 07/19/1991Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608100434Global Id: Status History: 6503726298Phone Number: jmadden@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: JACOB MADDENContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100434Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: nkatyl@waterboards.ca.govEmail: OAKLANDCity: 1515 CLAY STREETAddress: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: NANCY KATYLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100434Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: DieselPotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: Local Agency WarehouseFile Location: 550083LOC Case Number: 41-0458RB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: JMCase Worker: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 06/27/2001Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.3944055Longitude: 37.6499978Latitude: T0608100434Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 41-0458Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 41Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 2594 ft.Site 4 of 6 in cluster AQ 0.491 mi.RGA LUST Relative: Lower Actual: 9 ft. 1/4-1/2 HIST USTSOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 East LUST408 LITTLEFIELD AVE N/A AQ305 HIST CORTESESAGE TRANSPORTATION INC.U001594819 TC3837232.2s Page 446 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2008 SAGE TRANSPORTATION 408 LITTLEFIELD 2009 SAGE TRANSPORTATION 408 LITTLEFIELD 2010 SAGE TRANSPORTATION 408 LITTLEFIELD 2011 SAGE TRANSPORTATION 408 LITTLEFIELD 2012 SAGE TRANSPORTATION 408 LITTLEFIELD RGA LUST: NoneLeak Detection: Not reportedTank Construction: DIESELType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00004000Tank Capacity: 1979Year Installed: 1Container Num: 001Tank Num: SO SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080Owner City,St,Zip: 408 LITTLEFIELD AVEOwner Address: SAGE TRANSPORTATION INC.Owner Name: 4158719174Telephone: STANLEY SAGEContact Name: 0001Total Tanks: Not reportedOther Type: OtherFacility Type: 00000014001Facility ID: STATERegion: HIST UST: Leak DiscoveryAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100434Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100434Global Id: Notice of Responsibility - #1Action: 07/19/1991Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100434Global Id: Regulatory Activities: SAGE TRANSPORTATION INC. (Continued)U001594819 550083Case Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: LUST REG 2: 2594 ft.Site 5 of 6 in cluster AQ 0.491 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 9 ft. 1/4-1/2 RGA LUSTS SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 East SWEEPS UST408 LITTLEFIELD AVE N/A AQ306 LUSTSAGE TRANSPORTATION INC S105033504 TC3837232.2s Page 447 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2003 SAGE TRANSPORTATION 408 LITTLEFIELD 2005 SAGE TRANSPORTATION 408 LITTLEFIELD 2006 SAGE TRANSPORTATION 408 LITTLEFIELD 2007 SAGE TRANSPORTATION 408 LITTLEFIELD RGA LUST: 1Number Of Tanks: DIESELContent: PRODUCTStg: M.V. FUELTank Use: 4000Capacity: Not reportedActv Date: 41-000-550011-000001Swrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedTank Status: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 550011Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: SWEEPS UST: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: Not reportedAPN Number: T0608100434Global ID: 9- Case ClosedFacility Status: 550083Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUST: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remediation Action Underway: Not reportedPollution Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedPollution Characterization Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assesment Began: Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: OMHow Discovered: SAGE TRANSPORTATION INC (Continued)S105033504 1997 SAGE TRANSPORTATION 408 LITTLEFIELD AVE 1998 SAGE TRANSPORTATION 408 LITTLEFIELD AVE 2000 SAGE TRANSPORTATION 408 LITTLEFIELD AVE 2002 SAGE TRANSPORTATION 408 LITTLEFIELD AVE RGA LUST: 2594 ft.Site 6 of 6 in cluster AQ 0.491 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 9 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA East408 LITTLEFIELD AVE N/A AQ307 RGA LUSTS114225734 TC3837232.2s Page 448 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1993 SAGE TRANSPORTATION 408 LITTLEFIELD AVE 1994 SAGE TRANSPORTATION 408 LITTLEFIELD AVE 1995 SAGE TRANSPORTATION 408 LITTLEFIELD AVE 1996 SAGE TRANSPORTATION 408 LITTLEFIELD AVE (Continued)S114225734 NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 543-1898Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104 1 SANSOME ST STE 2100Owner/operator address: GRAND ROEBLING INVESTMENT COOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (650) 825-7340Contact telephone: USContact country: S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 317 ROEBLING RDContact address: KAMERON BALZERContact: S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 2 CORPORATE DRMailing address: CAR000105171EPA ID: S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 317 ROEBLING RDFacility address: TULARIK INCFacility name: 09/12/2001Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 2597 ft. 0.492 mi.SLIC Relative: Lower Actual: 25 ft. 1/4-1/2 LUSTSOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA NE FINDS317 ROEBLING RD CAR000105171 308 RCRA-SQGTULARIK INC 1004678109 TC3837232.2s Page 449 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF 2-ETHOXYETHANOL, AND 2-NITROPROPANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS KETONE, CARBON DISULFIDE, ISOBUTANOL, PYRIDINE, BENZENE, THE FOLLOWING SPENT NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TOLUENE, METHYL ETHYLWaste name: F005Waste code: MIXTURES. BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MORE OF THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F002, F004, AND F005, AND STILL SOLVENTS, AND, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NON-HALOGENATED NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS; AND ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONLY THE ABOVE SPENT ALCOHOL, CYCLOHEXANONE, AND METHANOL; ALL SPENT SOLVENT ACETATE, ETHYL BENZENE, ETHYL ETHER, METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE, N-BUTYL THE FOLLOWING SPENT NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: XYLENE, ACETONE, ETHYLWaste name: F003Waste code: SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. F005, AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND OF THE ABOVE HALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE LISTED IN F001, F004, OR BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR MORE 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, ORTHO-DICHLOROBENZENE, TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE, AND CHLOROBENZENE, 1,1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE, METHYLENE CHLORIDE, TRICHLOROETHYLENE, 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE, THE FOLLOWING SPENT HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TETRACHLOROETHYLENE,Waste name: F002Waste code: SILVERWaste name: D011Waste code: DISPOSED, THE WASTE WOULD BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. THESE CAUSTIC OR ACID SOLUTIONS BECOME CONTAMINATED AND MUST BE USED BY MANY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN METAL PARTS PRIOR TO PAINTING. WHEN OR DEGREASE PARTS. HYDROCHLORIC ACID, A SOLUTION WITH A LOW PH, IS CAUSTIC SOLUTION WITH A HIGH PH, IS OFTEN USED BY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN CONSIDERED TO BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. SODIUM HYDROXIDE, A A WASTE WHICH HAS A PH OF LESS THAN 2 OR GREATER THAN 12.5 ISWaste name: D002Waste code: WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OFWaste name: D001Waste code: Not DefinedWaste name: D000Waste code: Hazardous Waste Summary: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: TULARIK INC (Continued)1004678109 TC3837232.2s Page 450 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: referenced report. statements made or any professional interpretations made in the County does not take responsibility for the accuracy of the Additional Subsurface Investigations report in Geotracker, San Mateo Can be extracted from Environ’s October 6, 2005 Workplan forSite History: Tetrachloroethylene (PCE)Potential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affected: Local AgencyFile Location: Not reportedRB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: JMCase Worker: Cleanup Program SiteCase Type: -122.398059368134Longitude: 37.6553878155481Latitude: 559189Lead Agency Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: SL0608111084Global Id: 10/05/2005Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentFacility Status: STATERegion: SLIC: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: 015041300APN Number: SL0608111084Global ID: 3B- Preliminary Assessment UnderwayFacility Status: 559189Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUST: corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource facilities. generators, transporters, and treatment, storage, and disposal provides California with information on hazardous waste shipments for California Hazardous Waste Tracking System - Datamart (HWTS-DATAMART) Environmental Interest/Information System 110012232011Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. LISTED IN F001, F002, OR F004; AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE SOLVENTS TULARIK INC (Continued)1004678109 TC3837232.2s Page 451 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 08/15/1991Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608100369Global Id: Status History: 6503726298Phone Number: jmadden@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: JACOB MADDENContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100369Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: cprowell@waterboards.ca.govEmail: OaklandCity: 1515 Clay Street, Suite 1400Address: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: Cheryl L. ProwellContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100369Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: or any professional interpretations made in the referenced report. does not take responsibility for the accuracy of the statements made Mateo County offices if submitted prior to 2005, San Mateo County Can be extracted from most recent report in Geotracker or at SanSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: Not reportedFile Location: 550091LOC Case Number: 41-0388RB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: JMCase Worker: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 06/18/2013Status Date: Open - Eligible for ClosureStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.409957Longitude: 37.656409301Latitude: T0608100369Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 41-0388Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 41Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 2603 ft.Site 1 of 2 in cluster AU 0.493 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 38 ft. 1/4-1/2 RGA LUSTSOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA NW LUST401 LINDEN N/A AU309 HIST CORTESEOLYMPIC AUTO SERVICE S101308791 TC3837232.2s Page 452 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Staff Letter - #20131107Action: 11/07/2013Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Well Destruction ReportAction: 05/15/2014Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: CAP/RAP - Feasibility Study ReportAction: 06/11/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Corrective Action Plan / Remedial Action PlanAction: 11/30/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Electronic Reporting Submittal DueAction: 07/13/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Electronic Reporting Submittal DueAction: 04/08/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Notice of Violation - #20111102Action: 11/02/2011Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Staff Letter - #20080218Action: 02/18/2008Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 06/18/2013Status Date: Open - Eligible for ClosureStatus: T0608100369Global Id: 03/31/2003Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T0608100369Global Id: 08/15/1991Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T0608100369Global Id: OLYMPIC AUTO SERVICE (Continued)S101308791 TC3837232.2s Page 453 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 02/15/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 08/15/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 02/15/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 05/15/2008Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Other Report / DocumentAction: 03/08/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation ReportAction: 04/26/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Remedial Progress ReportAction: 04/05/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Electronic Reporting Submittal DueAction: 04/26/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Risk Assessment ReportAction: 08/14/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Monitoring Report - Semi-AnnuallyAction: 11/15/2008Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Staff Letter - #2008092008Action: 12/09/2008Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: OLYMPIC AUTO SERVICE (Continued)S101308791 TC3837232.2s Page 454 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Remedial Progress ReportAction: 05/15/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Remedial Progress ReportAction: 05/15/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Remedial Progress ReportAction: 05/15/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Remedial Progress ReportAction: 11/15/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 08/15/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 02/15/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 02/28/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 02/15/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 11/15/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 11/15/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 11/15/2005Date: OLYMPIC AUTO SERVICE (Continued)S101308791 TC3837232.2s Page 455 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Electronic Reporting Submittal DueAction: 01/07/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Electronic Reporting Submittal DueAction: 10/26/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Final Remedial Action Report / Corrective Action ReportAction: 09/15/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation ReportAction: 09/15/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Risk Assessment ReportAction: 07/30/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation WorkplanAction: 05/12/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Other Report / DocumentAction: 06/02/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Risk Assessment ReportAction: 04/09/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Remedial Progress ReportAction: 08/15/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Remedial Progress ReportAction: 04/05/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Remedial Progress ReportAction: 08/15/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: OLYMPIC AUTO SERVICE (Continued)S101308791 TC3837232.2s Page 456 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Remedial Progress ReportAction: 11/15/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Remedial Progress ReportAction: 10/20/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 08/15/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 02/15/2008Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 08/15/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 08/15/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 05/15/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 05/15/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 05/15/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 08/15/2011Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 11/15/2010Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 08/15/2010Date: OLYMPIC AUTO SERVICE (Continued)S101308791 TC3837232.2s Page 457 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Staff Letter - #20060308AAction: 03/08/2006Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Staff Letter - #20060308BAction: 03/08/2006Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Notice of Violation - #20070611Action: 06/11/2007Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Staff Letter - #20030212CAction: 02/12/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Final Remedial Action Report / Corrective Action ReportAction: 07/17/2009Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Remedial Progress ReportAction: 02/15/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Remedial Progress ReportAction: 02/15/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Remedial Progress ReportAction: 02/15/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Remedial Progress ReportAction: 02/15/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Remedial Progress ReportAction: 04/05/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Remedial Progress ReportAction: 11/30/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: OLYMPIC AUTO SERVICE (Continued)S101308791 TC3837232.2s Page 458 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Staff Letter - #20030615BAction: 06/15/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Notice of Violation - #20061130Action: 11/30/2006Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Notice of Responsibility - #19920603Action: 06/03/1992Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Staff Letter - #20050118AAction: 01/18/2005Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Staff Letter - #20030212DAction: 02/12/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Staff Letter - #20030615AAction: 06/15/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Staff Letter - #20020212CAction: 02/12/2002Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Staff Letter - #20051207Action: 12/07/2005Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Staff Letter - #20050914Action: 09/14/2005Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Staff Letter - #20031202Action: 12/02/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Staff Letter - #20060613Action: 06/13/2006Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Staff Letter - #20060308Action: 03/08/2006Date: OLYMPIC AUTO SERVICE (Continued)S101308791 TC3837232.2s Page 459 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Corrective Action Plan / Remedial Action PlanAction: 06/09/2008Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Corrective Action Plan / Remedial Action PlanAction: 05/09/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Corrective Action Plan / Remedial Action PlanAction: 05/31/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Notice of Violation - #20110316Action: 03/16/2011Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Warning Letter - #20060906Action: 09/06/2006Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Staff Letter - #20070206Action: 02/06/2007Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Staff Letter - #20030212BAction: 02/12/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Staff Letter - #20030409Action: 04/09/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Staff Letter - #20030212AAction: 02/12/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Staff Letter - #20031218Action: 12/18/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Staff Letter - #20050118BAction: 01/18/2005Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: OLYMPIC AUTO SERVICE (Continued)S101308791 TC3837232.2s Page 460 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: OMHow Discovered: 550091Case Number: Remedial action (cleanup) UnderwayFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: LUST REG 2: Notification - Public Notice of Case Closure - #20130808Action: 08/08/2013Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Monitoring Report - Semi-AnnuallyAction: 02/15/2013Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Monitoring Report - Semi-AnnuallyAction: 08/15/2012Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Monitoring Report - Semi-AnnuallyAction: 02/15/2012Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Soil Vapor Extraction (SVE)Action: 01/01/1950Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: In Situ Physical/Chemical Treatment (other than SVE)Action: 01/01/1950Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Soil Vapor Extraction (SVE)Action: 01/01/1950Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Free Product RemovalAction: 01/01/1950Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Staff Letter - #20090715Action: 07/15/2009Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100369Global Id: Corrective Action Plan / Remedial Action PlanAction: 10/06/2006Date: OLYMPIC AUTO SERVICE (Continued)S101308791 TC3837232.2s Page 461 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2003 OLYMPIC AUTO SERVICE 401 LINDEN 2005 OLYMPIC AUTO SERVICE 401 LINDEN 2006 OLYMPIC AUTO SERVICE 401 LINDEN 2007 OLYMPIC AUTO SERVICE 401 LINDEN 2008 OLYMPIC AUTO SERVICE 401 LINDEN 2009 OLYMPIC AUTO SERVICE 401 LINDEN 2010 OLYMPIC AUTO SERVICE 401 LINDEN 2011 OLYMPIC AUTO SERVICE 401 LINDEN 2012 OLYMPIC AUTO SERVICE 401 LINDEN RGA LUST: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: 012311200APN Number: T0608100369Global ID: 7- Remedial Action UnderwayFacility Status: 550091Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUST: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: 3/31/2003Date Remediation Action Underway: 1/1/1965Pollution Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedPollution Characterization Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assesment Began: Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: OLYMPIC AUTO SERVICE (Continued)S101308791 1993 OLYMPIC AUTO SERVICE 401 LINDEN AVE 1994 OLYMPIC AUTO SERVICE 401 LINDEN AVE 1995 OLYMPIC AUTO SERVICE 401 LINDEN AVE 1996 OLYMPIC AUTO SERVICE 401 LINDEN AVE 1997 OLYMPIC AUTO SERVICE 401 LINDEN AVE 1998 OLYMPIC AUTO SERVICE 401 LINDEN AVE 2000 OLYMPIC AUTO SERVICE 401 LINDEN AVE 2002 OLYMPIC AUTO SERVICE 401 LINDEN AVE RGA LUST: 2603 ft.Site 2 of 2 in cluster AU 0.493 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 38 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA NW401 LINDEN AVE N/A AU310 RGA LUSTS114225326 LTNKAReg By: 41Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 2618 ft.Site 1 of 2 in cluster AV 0.496 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 11 ft. 1/4-1/2 RGA LUSTSOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA ESE LUST290 UTAH N/A AV311 HIST CORTESESIMEON PROPERTIES S101308815 TC3837232.2s Page 462 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100498Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 02/24/2000Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608100498Global Id: 10/15/1986Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608100498Global Id: Status History: Not reportedPhone Number: nkatyl@waterboards.ca.govEmail: OAKLANDCity: 1515 CLAY STREETAddress: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: NANCY KATYLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100498Global Id: 6503726298Phone Number: jmadden@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: JACOB MADDENContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100498Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: DieselPotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: Local Agency WarehouseFile Location: 550015LOC Case Number: 41-0522RB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: JMCase Worker: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 02/24/2000Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.3953268Longitude: 37.6471538Latitude: T0608100498Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 41-0522Reg Id: SIMEON PROPERTIES (Continued)S101308815 TC3837232.2s Page 463 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2003 SIMEON PROPERTIES 290 UTAH 2005 SIMEON PROPERTIES 290 UTAH 2006 SIMEON PROPERTIES 290 UTAH 2007 SIMEON PROPERTIES 290 UTAH 2008 SIMEON PROPERTIES 290 UTAH 2009 SIMEON PROPERTIES 290 UTAH 2010 SIMEON PROPERTIES 290 UTAH 2011 SIMEON PROPERTIES 290 UTAH 2012 SIMEON PROPERTIES 290 UTAH RGA LUST: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: Not reportedAPN Number: T0608100498Global ID: 9- Case ClosedFacility Status: 550015Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUST: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remediation Action Underway: Not reportedPollution Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedPollution Characterization Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assesment Began: Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: OMHow Discovered: 550015Case Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: LUST REG 2: Notice of Responsibility - #1Action: 02/10/1989Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100498Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100498Global Id: SIMEON PROPERTIES (Continued)S101308815 TC3837232.2s Page 464 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1992 SIMEON PROPERTIES 290 UTAH AVE 1993 SIMEON PROPERTIES 290 UTAH AVE 1994 SIMEON PROPERTIES 290 UTAH AVE 1995 SIMEON PROPERTIES 290 UTAH AVE 1996 SIMEON PROPERTIES 290 UTAH AVE 1997 SIMEON PROPERTIES 290 UTAH AVE 1998 SIMEON PROPERTIES 290 UTAH AVE 2000 SIMEON PROPERTIES 290 UTAH AVE 2002 SIMEON PROPERTIES 290 UTAH AVE RGA LUST: 2618 ft.Site 2 of 2 in cluster AV 0.496 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 11 ft. 1/4-1/2SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA ESE290 UTAH AVE N/A AV312 RGA LUSTS114218232 NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: YesTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 726-0160Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: HALF MOON BAY, CA 94019 P O BOX 1111Owner/operator address: PEDRICK PROPERTIESOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: Handler: Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous wasteDescription: Non-GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (415) 742-6630Contact telephone: USContact country: SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 131 S MAPLE AVE UNIT 1Contact address: JON NETTLETONContact: SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 S MAPLE AVE UNIT 1Mailing address: CAD983656844EPA ID: SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 131 S MAPLE AVE UNIT 1Facility address: MERRY X RAY CHEMICAL CORPFacility name: 01/06/1993Date form received by agency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 2907 ft. 0.551 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 22 ft. 1/2-1 HWPSOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA West FINDS131 SOUTH MAPLE #1 CAD983656844 313 RCRA NonGen / NLRMERRY X-RAY CORP 1000819687 TC3837232.2s Page 465 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 01/01/1999Actual Date: Closure Administrative - ISSUE CLOSURE VERIFICATIONEvent Description: Silver RecoveryUnit Names: Historical - Non-OperatingFacility Type: CAL000051065EPA Id: Closure: Not reportedPublic Information Officer: 13Senate District: 22Assembly District: Not reportedSite Code: Not reportedSupervisor: Not reportedTeam: Not reportedFacility Size: Historical - Non-OperatingFacility Type: -122.4144Longitude: 37.64948Latitude: CLOSEDCleanup Status: CAL000051065EPA Id: HWP: HAZARDOUS WASTE BIENNIAL REPORTER corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System 110002890667Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: MERRY X-RAY CORP (Continued)1000819687 TC3837232.2s Page 466 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation SITE SCREENING DONE RENTS GENERATORS AND DIESEL ENGINES.Comments: 05/18/1987Completed Date: Site ScreeningCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: OCCURRED MINOR SPILLS OF ETHYLENE GLYCOL, LUBRICATING OILS, AND SOLVENTS INSPECTION LOW PRIORITY RECOMMENDED DUE TO INDICATION BY OWNER THAT ANY OBSERVABLE PUBLIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH THREAT; SITE PRELIM ASSESS DONE CURRENTLY CAL WEST ELECTRIC, INC; DOES NOT POSEComments: 07/31/1989Completed Date: Preliminary Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 41360099Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 015112400Alias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: Not reported SOLVENT MIXTURES, * WASTE OIL & MIXED OIL, Chromium VI, NONE SPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED ACID SOLUTION, * UNSPECIFIED SLUDGE WASTE, * UNSPECIFIED * OIL/WATER SEPARATION SLUDGE, * ACID SOLUTION 2>PH WITH METALS, *Confirmed COC: SOLVENT MIXTURES, * WASTE OIL & MIXED OIL, Chromium VI UNSPECIFIED ACID SOLUTION, * UNSPECIFIED SLUDGE WASTE, * UNSPECIFIED * OIL/WATER SEPARATION SLUDGE, * ACID SOLUTION 2>PH WITH METALS, *Potential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: 015112400APN: -122.4110Longitude: 37.64368Latitude: Not reportedFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.: NORestricted Use: 07/27/1994Status Date: Refer: Other AgencyStatus: * CERC2Special Program: 13Senate: 22Assembly: Not reportedSite Code: 41360099Facility ID: Cleanup BerkeleyDivision Branch: Referred - Not AssignedSupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: NONE SPECIFIEDLead Agency: NONE SPECIFIEDRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: Not reportedAcres: * HistoricalSite Type Detailed: HistoricalSite Type: ENVIROSTOR: 3002 ft. 0.569 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 22 ft. 1/2-1S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 SW1341 SAN MATEO AVENUE N/A 314 ENVIROSTORCAL WEST ELECTRIC, INC S100184190 TC3837232.2s Page 467 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: FACILITY IDENTIFIED ACTIVE SITE ID’D FROM SANBORN MAPSComments: 06/01/1981Completed Date: * DiscoveryCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: CAL WEST ELECTRIC, INC (Continued)S100184190 Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: BAY AREA AQMDAir District Name: 2951SIC Code: BAAir District Name: 1579Facility ID: SFAir Basin: 41County Code: 1990Year: 6Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 10Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 5NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 1Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 1Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: BAY AREA AQMDAir District Name: 2951SIC Code: BAAir District Name: 1579Facility ID: SFAir Basin: 41County Code: 1987Year: EMI: 92262Incident Description: Not reportedDischarge Date: Not reportedFacility Type: Not reportedBoard File Number: Not reportedStaff Initials: Not reportedDate Reported: Notify 65: 3037 ft. 0.575 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 22 ft. 1/2-1SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94101 SW EMI1321 LOWRIE AVENUE N/A 315 Notify 65GRANITE ROCK COMPANY S100178892 TC3837232.2s Page 468 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 5Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 3NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 1Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 1Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: BAY AREA AQMDAir District Name: 2951SIC Code: BAAir District Name: 1579Facility ID: SFAir Basin: 41County Code: 1996Year: 2Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 5Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 3NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 1Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 0Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: BAY AREA AQMDAir District Name: 2951SIC Code: BAAir District Name: 1579Facility ID: SFAir Basin: 41County Code: 1995Year: 5Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 9Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 6NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 1Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 1Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 1Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: BAY AREA AQMDAir District Name: 2951SIC Code: BAAir District Name: 1579Facility ID: SFAir Basin: 41County Code: 1993Year: 6Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 10Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 5NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 1Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 1Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: GRANITE ROCK COMPANY (Continued)S100178892 TC3837232.2s Page 469 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1579Facility ID: SFAir Basin: 41County Code: 2000Year: 14Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 23Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 6NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 2Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 2Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 2Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: BAY AREA AQMDAir District Name: 2951SIC Code: BAAir District Name: 1579Facility ID: SFAir Basin: 41County Code: 1999Year: 2Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 6Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 5NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 1Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 1Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 1Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: BAY AREA AQMDAir District Name: 2951SIC Code: BAAir District Name: 1579Facility ID: SFAir Basin: 41County Code: 1998Year: 3Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 6Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 5NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 1Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 2Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 2Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: BAY AREA AQMDAir District Name: 2951SIC Code: BAAir District Name: 1579Facility ID: SFAir Basin: 41County Code: 1997Year: 2Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: GRANITE ROCK COMPANY (Continued)S100178892 TC3837232.2s Page 470 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: BAY AREA AQMDAir District Name: 2951SIC Code: BAAir District Name: 1579Facility ID: SFAir Basin: 41County Code: 2003Year: 6Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 11Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 10NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 51Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 1Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 1Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: BAY AREA AQMDAir District Name: 2951SIC Code: BAAir District Name: 1579Facility ID: SFAir Basin: 41County Code: 2002Year: 4Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 7Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 6NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 30Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 2Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 2Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: YCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: BAY AREA AQMDAir District Name: 2951SIC Code: BAAir District Name: 1579Facility ID: SFAir Basin: 41County Code: 2001Year: 14Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 23Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 6NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 2Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 2Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 2Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: BAY AREA AQMDAir District Name: 2951SIC Code: BAAir District Name: GRANITE ROCK COMPANY (Continued)S100178892 TC3837232.2s Page 471 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2.506827Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 4.527Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: .02SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 4.898NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 25.013Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 1.099413Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 1.665Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: BAY AREA AQMDAir District Name: 2951SIC Code: BAAir District Name: 1579Facility ID: SFAir Basin: 41County Code: 2006Year: 2.598733Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 4.636Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: .019SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 4.667NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 23.833Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: .016126Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: .11Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: BAY AREA AQMDAir District Name: 2951SIC Code: BAAir District Name: 1579Facility ID: SFAir Basin: 41County Code: 2005Year: 2.598733Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 4.636Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0.019SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 4.667NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 23.833Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0.016126Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 0.11Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: BAY AREA AQMDAir District Name: 2951SIC Code: BAAir District Name: 1579Facility ID: SFAir Basin: 41County Code: 2004Year: 2Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 4Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 5NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 23Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 1Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: GRANITE ROCK COMPANY (Continued)S100178892 TC3837232.2s Page 472 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2951SIC Code: BAAir District Name: 1579Facility ID: SFAir Basin: 41County Code: 2010Year: 1.8002119999999999Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 3.3889999999999998Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 1.7999999999999999E-2SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 4.476NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 22.821000000000002Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 1.0368516000000001Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 1.698Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: BAY AREA AQMDAir District Name: 2951SIC Code: BAAir District Name: 1579Facility ID: SFAir Basin: 41County Code: 2009Year: 2.244538Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 4.147Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: .019SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 4.69NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 23.913Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 1.1606936Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 1.804Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: BAY AREA AQMDAir District Name: 2951SIC Code: BAAir District Name: 1579Facility ID: SFAir Basin: 41County Code: 2008Year: 3.687201Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 6.669Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: .029SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 7.185NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 36.635Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 1.6348276Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 2.474Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: BAY AREA AQMDAir District Name: 2951SIC Code: BAAir District Name: 1579Facility ID: SFAir Basin: 41County Code: 2007Year: GRANITE ROCK COMPANY (Continued)S100178892 TC3837232.2s Page 473 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 3.0988020000000001Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 6.5791020260491999Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 2.1000000000000001E-2SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 5.1609999999999996NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 26.315999999999999Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 1.1157736Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 1.8440000000000001Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: BAY AREA AQMDAir District Name: GRANITE ROCK COMPANY (Continued)S100178892 92262Incident Description: Not reportedDischarge Date: Not reportedFacility Type: Not reportedBoard File Number: Not reportedStaff Initials: Not reportedDate Reported: Notify 65: 3154 ft. 0.597 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 22 ft. 1/2-1SOUTH SAN FRANCI, CA 92262 ENE429 CABOT ROAD N/A 316 Notify 65SWIFT INDEPENDENT U000052961 Not reportedRegion Water Control Board: Not reportedSupervisor Responsible for Site: GWHITEStaff Member Responsible for Site: Not reportedGroundwater Contamination: Not reportedDate Site Hazard Ranked: Not reportedHazardous Ranking Score: Not reportedCortese: Not reportedAccess: MANU - CHEMICALS & ALLIED PRODUCTSSIC Name: 28SIC Code: Not reportedNPL: RESPONSIBLE PARTYType Name: RPFacility Type: N/ALead Agency: Not reportedLead Agency: CERTIFIEDStatus Name: CERTIFIED AS HAVING BEEN REMEDIED SATISFACTORILY UNDER DTSC OVERSIGHTStatus: 08011986State Senate District: Not reportedFile Name: NORTH COASTBranch Name: NCBranch: BERKELEYRegion Name: 2Region: 41280096Facility ID: Calsite: 3169 ft. 0.600 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 21 ft. 1/2-1 ENVIROSTORS SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 WSW RESPONSE120 SOUTH LINDEN N/A 317 HIST Cal-SitesREICHOLD CHEMICALS, INC S101482205 TC3837232.2s Page 474 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080Alternate City,St,Zip: 120 SOUTH LINDENAlternate Address: 0Unknown Type: 0For Residential Reuse: 0For Industrial Reuse: 0For Commercial Reuse: Not reportedActivity Comments: Not reportedRemoval Action Certification: Not reportedAction Included Fencing: Not reportedWell Decommissioned: Not reportedAction Included Capping: 0Liquids Treated (Gals): 0Liquids Removed (Gals): CERTIFIEDDefinition of Status: CERTActivity Status: Not reportedRequest to Delete Activity: Not reportedEstimated Size: 0Est Person-Yrs to complete: 08011986Comments Date: Not reportedRevised Due Date: Not reportedAWP Completion Date: 0Proposed Budget: Not reportedAWP Code: CERTIFICATIONActivity Name: CERTActivity: 41280096Facility ID: 0Unknown Type: 0For Residential Reuse: 0For Industrial Reuse: 0For Commercial Reuse: Not reportedActivity Comments: Not reportedRemoval Action Certification: Not reportedAction Included Fencing: Not reportedWell Decommissioned: Not reportedAction Included Capping: 0Liquids Treated (Gals): 0Liquids Removed (Gals): CERTIFIEDDefinition of Status: CERTActivity Status: Not reportedRequest to Delete Activity: Not reportedEstimated Size: 0Est Person-Yrs to complete: 08011980Comments Date: Not reportedRevised Due Date: Not reportedAWP Completion Date: 0Proposed Budget: Not reportedAWP Code: DISCOVERYActivity Name: DISCActivity: 41280096Facility ID: 08State Senate District Code: 19State Assembly District Code: Not reportedLat/Long Description: Not reportedLat/long Method: 0 0 0 / 0 0 0Lat/Long (dms): Not reportedLat/Long Direction: Not reportedRegion Water Control Board Name: REICHOLD CHEMICALS, INC (Continued)S101482205 TC3837232.2s Page 475 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 02092003Comments Date: from the Department of Health Services (DHS), Toxic SubstancesComments: 02092003Comments Date: February 1985, the site was officially closed with oversightComments: 02092003Comments Date: and base compounds. The results were all non-detect. InComments: 02092003Comments Date: was performed on the asphalt and cement pads for PCBs, acids,Comments: 02092003Comments Date: Federal Regulations, Part 761. In December 1984, wipe samplingComments: 02092003Comments Date: residential/commercial surfaces specified by Title 40 Code ofComments: 02092003Comments Date: square centimeters clean-up level for high-contactComments: 02092003Comments Date: square centimeters, which is less than the 0.1 milligram/100Comments: 02092003Comments Date: PCBs were found at a concentration less than 0.01 milligram/100Comments: 02092003Comments Date: polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), acids, and base compounds.Comments: 02092003Comments Date: collected in the drum storage area and analyzed forComments: 02092003Comments Date: before shipment. In April 1984, composite wipe samples wereComments: 02092003Comments Date: Hills, California. The tanks and containers were decontaminatedComments: 02092003Comments Date: offsite for disposal at facilities in Benicia and KettlemanComments: 02092003Comments Date: the time of closure, all hazardous wastes were transportedComments: 02092003Comments Date: 55-gallon drums, for shipment to Class I or II landfills. AtComments: 02092003Comments Date: at the facility, including paint resin and thinner was placed inComments: 02092003Comments Date: Management Operation Plan prepared in 1983, the waste generatedComments: 02092003Comments Date: is needed at the site. According to the Hazardous WasteComments: 02092003Comments Date: Site screening conducted which confirmed that no further actionComments: 02092003Comments Date: Facility drive-by. No evidence of waste.Comments: 01161981Comments Date: products using emulsion, phenol, alkyd, and urea resins. Inc. owned and operated the site. Reichold manufactured paint by San Mateo County. From 1937 to 1984, Reichhold Chemicals The Reichold Chemical site is a registered historical landmark music studios, auto repair shops and restoration facilities. currently occupied by a number of different tenants, including site is now zoned for light industrial use. The property is Joseph W. Welch & Investors purchased the site in 1984. The located in an industrial area and is adjacent to a tire company. around the buildings are paved or landscaped. The site is and a warehouse, which is used for automotive storage. Areas west by South Maple Avenue. The site is comprised of a building by Tanforan Avenue, to the east by railroad tracks, and to the The Site is bounded to the north by Victory Avenue, to the southBackground Info: REICHOLD CHEMICALS, INC (Continued)S101482205 TC3837232.2s Page 476 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation * DiscoveryCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Certified Site.Comments: 08/01/1986Completed Date: CertificationCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 41280096Alias Name: EPA (FRS #)Alias Type: 110033606471Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 014211050Alias Name: CSSPotential Description: 30451-NO No Contaminants foundConfirmed COC: PhenolPotential COC : PAINT MANUFACTURINGPast Use: 014211050APN: -122.4141Longitude: 37.64512Latitude: Responsible PartyFunding: NORestricted Use: 08/01/1986Status Date: CertifiedStatus: Not reportedSpecial Program Status: 13Senate: 22Assembly: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.: Not reportedSite Code: Cleanup BerkeleyDivision Branch: Mark PirosSupervisor: Not reportedProject Manager: DTSC - Hazardous Waste Management ProgramLead Agency Description: HWMPCleanup Oversight Agencies: NONational Priorities List: 0.5Acres: State Response or NPLSite Type Detail: State ResponseSite Type: 41280096Facility ID: RESPONSE: Not reportedSpecial Programs Name: Not reportedSpecial Programs Code: REICHOLD CHEMICALS, INCAlternate Name: Not reportedID Value: Not reportedID Name: Records Search: Site Certified in August 1986.Comments: 08191991Comments Date: Certified Site.Comments: 08011986Comments Date: Site Discovery. Facility was identified during a drive-by.Comments: 08011980Comments Date: Control Division, predecessor to DTSC.Comments: REICHOLD CHEMICALS, INC (Continued)S101482205 TC3837232.2s Page 477 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 41280096Alias Name: EPA (FRS #)Alias Type: 110033606471Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 014211050Alias Name: CSSPotential Description: Phenol, 30451-NO, No Contaminants foundConfirmed COC: PhenolPotential COC: PAINT MANUFACTURINGPast Use: 014211050APN: -122.4141Longitude: 37.64512Latitude: Responsible PartyFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.: NORestricted Use: 08/01/1986Status Date: CertifiedStatus: Not reportedSpecial Program: 13Senate: 22Assembly: Not reportedSite Code: 41280096Facility ID: Cleanup BerkeleyDivision Branch: Mark PirosSupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: HWMPLead Agency: HWMPRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: 0.5Acres: State Response or NPLSite Type Detailed: State ResponseSite Type: ENVIROSTOR: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: site screening recommended no further action. No existing evidence of release of hazardous substances found andComments: 02/06/2003Completed Date: Site ScreeningCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Site Discovery. Facility was identified during a drive-by.Comments: 08/01/1980Completed Date: REICHOLD CHEMICALS, INC (Continued)S101482205 TC3837232.2s Page 478 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: site screening recommended no further action. No existing evidence of release of hazardous substances found andComments: 02/06/2003Completed Date: Site ScreeningCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Site Discovery. Facility was identified during a drive-by.Comments: 08/01/1980Completed Date: * DiscoveryCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Certified Site.Comments: 08/01/1986Completed Date: CertificationCompleted Document Type: REICHOLD CHEMICALS, INC (Continued)S101482205 01/01/1999Actual Date: Closure Administrative - ISSUE CLOSURE VERIFICATIONEvent Description: Silver RecoveryUnit Names: Historical - Non-OperatingFacility Type: CAL000073292EPA Id: Closure: Not reportedPublic Information Officer: 13Senate District: 22Assembly District: Not reportedSite Code: Not reportedSupervisor: Not reportedTeam: Not reportedFacility Size: Historical - Non-OperatingFacility Type: -122.3923Longitude: 37.65186Latitude: CLOSEDCleanup Status: CAL000073292EPA Id: HWP: 3211 ft. 0.608 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 20 ft. 1/2-1SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 East301 ALLERTON AVE N/A 318 HWPDENNIS X RAY CO S103650853 TC3837232.2s Page 479 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (425) 313-8100Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: ISSAQUAH, WA 98027 999 LAKE DROwner/operator address: COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATIONOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (425) 313-6275Contact telephone: USContact country: ISSAQUAH, WA 98027 999 LAKE DR ATTN LICENSINGContact address: LISA SIMPSONContact: ISSAQUAH, WA 98027 ATTN LICENSING 999 LAKE DRMailing address: CAR000103341EPA ID: S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 451 S AIRPORT BLVDFacility address: COSTCO WHOLESALE NO 422Facility name: 08/20/2001Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 3470 ft. 0.657 mi.ENVIROSTOR Relative: Lower Actual: 19 ft. 1/2-1 HAZNETS SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 SSE FINDS451 S AIRPORT BLVD CAR000103341 319 RCRA-SQGCOSTCO WHOLESALE NO 422 1004677951 TC3837232.2s Page 480 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation San MateoFacility County: 0.005Tons: Not reportedDisposal Method: Not reportedWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: INR000110197TSD EPA ID: San MateoGen County: SEATTLE, WA 981240000Mailing City,St,Zip: PO BOX 35005Mailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 4253136275Telephone: LISA SIMPSONContact: CAR000103341Gepaid: 2012Year: San MateoFacility County: 0.3235Tons: (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--No Treatment/ReoveryDisposal Method: Not reportedWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: INR000110197TSD EPA ID: San MateoGen County: SEATTLE, WA 981240000Mailing City,St,Zip: PO BOX 35005Mailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 4253136275Telephone: LISA SIMPSONContact: CAR000103341Gepaid: 2012Year: HAZNET: CRITERIA AND HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANT INVENTORY corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource facilities. generators, transporters, and treatment, storage, and disposal provides California with information on hazardous waste shipments for California Hazardous Waste Tracking System - Datamart (HWTS-DATAMART) Environmental Interest/Information System 110012221522Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: SILVERWaste name: D011Waste code: Hazardous Waste Summary: COSTCO WHOLESALE NO 422 (Continued)1004677951 TC3837232.2s Page 481 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedProgram Manager: NONE SPECIFIEDLead Agency: NONE SPECIFIEDRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: Not reportedAcres: Tiered PermitSite Type Detailed: Tiered PermitSite Type: ENVIROSTOR: 62 additional CA_HAZNET: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access San MateoFacility County: 0.375Tons: Include On-Site Treatment And/Or Stabilization) Landfill Or Surface Impoundment That Will Be Closed As Landfill( ToDisposal Method: Not reportedWaste Category: 99TSD County: NVT330010000TSD EPA ID: San MateoGen County: SEATTLE, WA 981240000Mailing City,St,Zip: PO BOX 35005Mailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 4253136275Telephone: LISA SIMPSONContact: CAR000103341Gepaid: 2012Year: San MateoFacility County: 0.175Tons: Fuel Blending Prior To Energy Recovery At Another SiteDisposal Method: Not reportedWaste Category: 99TSD County: TXD077603371TSD EPA ID: San MateoGen County: SEATTLE, WA 981240000Mailing City,St,Zip: PO BOX 35005Mailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 4253136275Telephone: LISA SIMPSONContact: CAR000103341Gepaid: 2012Year: San MateoFacility County: 0.165Tons: Fuel Blending Prior To Energy Recovery At Another SiteDisposal Method: Not reportedWaste Category: 99TSD County: TXD077603371TSD EPA ID: San MateoGen County: SEATTLE, WA 981240000Mailing City,St,Zip: PO BOX 35005Mailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 4253136275Telephone: LISA SIMPSONContact: CAR000103341Gepaid: 2012Year: COSTCO WHOLESALE NO 422 (Continued)1004677951 TC3837232.2s Page 482 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: Not reportedCompleted Date: Not reportedCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: Not reportedCompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 71003270Alias Name: EPA Identification NumberAlias Type: CAL000063561Alias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIED, NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -122.4010Longitude: 37.64223Latitude: Not reportedFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.: NORestricted Use: Not reportedStatus Date: Inactive - Needs EvaluationStatus: Not reportedSpecial Program: 13Senate: 22Assembly: Not reportedSite Code: 71003270Facility ID: Cleanup BerkeleyDivision Branch: Not reportedSupervisor: COSTCO WHOLESALE NO 422 (Continued)1004677951 Not reportedTSD County: CAD028409019TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 941343309Mailing City,St,Zip: 150 EXECUTIVE PARK BLVD STE 4400Mailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 4155597639Telephone: BRANDON MCLOUGHLIN - FOREMANContact: CAL000181670Gepaid: 2000Year: HAZNET: 3728 ft. 0.706 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 24 ft. 1/2-1SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 SW HWP160 S LINDEN AVE N/A 320 HAZNETWEST COAST AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE CENTERS113096331 TC3837232.2s Page 483 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedPublic Information Officer: 13Senate District: 22Assembly District: Not reportedSite Code: Not reportedSupervisor: Not reportedTeam: Not reportedFacility Size: Historical - Non-OperatingFacility Type: -122.4118Longitude: 37.65065Latitude: UNKNOWNCleanup Status: CAD009206855EPA Id: HWP: San MateoFacility County: 0.2Tons: Transfer StationDisposal Method: Unspecified oil-containing wasteWaste Category: WEST COAST AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE CENTER (Continued)S113096331 (NONSOLVENTS) WITH HALOGENS * HALOGENATED SOLVENTS, * HYDROCARBON SOLVENTS, * ORGANIC LIQUIDSPotential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: 014-242-010, 014242010APN: -122.4125Longitude: 37.64145Latitude: Not reportedFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.: NORestricted Use: 03/04/1993Status Date: Refer: RCRAStatus: Not reportedSpecial Program: 13Senate: 22Assembly: Not reportedSite Code: 38280291Facility ID: Cleanup BerkeleyDivision Branch: Referred - Not AssignedSupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: NONE SPECIFIEDLead Agency: NONE SPECIFIEDRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: Not reportedAcres: * HistoricalSite Type Detailed: HistoricalSite Type: ENVIROSTOR: 38280291Reg Id: CALSIReg By: 38Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 3737 ft.Site 1 of 2 in cluster AW 0.708 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 23 ft. 1/2-1S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 SW ENVIROSTOR220 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUE N/A AW321 HIST CORTESEINTERNATIONAL PAINT COMPANY S103893462 TC3837232.2s Page 484 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: Not reportedCompleted Date: Not reportedCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: Not reportedCompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 38280291Alias Name: GeoTracker Global IDAlias Type: SLT2O324940Alias Name: Former Project IDAlias Type: 80001592Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 014242010Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 014-242-010Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: L & D EQUIPMENT CO INCAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: INTERNATIONAL PAINT CO.Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: Courtaulds CoatingAlias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: (NONSOLVENTS) WITH HALOGENS, NONE SPECIFIED * HALOGENATED SOLVENTS, * HYDROCARBON SOLVENTS, * ORGANIC LIQUIDSConfirmed COC: INTERNATIONAL PAINT COMPANY (Continued)S103893462 13003854.00000Person ID: 13290387.00000Contact Sequence ID: 9271184.00000Person ID: 13055135.00000Contact Sequence ID: CERCLIS-NFRAP Site Contact Details: NFRAP-Site does not qualify for the NPL based on existing informationNon NPL Status: Not on the NPLNPL Status: Not a Federal FacilityFederal Facility: 0903309Site ID: CERC-NFRAP: HWP ENVIROSTOR SLIC 3737 ft.HIST CORTESESite 2 of 2 in cluster AW 0.708 mi.FINDS Relative: Lower Actual: 23 ft. 1/2-1 RCRA-SQGSOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 SW CORRACTS220 S LINDEN AVE CAD009114240 AW322 CERC-NFRAPINTERNATIONAL PAINT CO (CALIF) INC1000217022 TC3837232.2s Page 485 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Paint and Coating Manufacturing 32551NAICS Code(s): corrective action priority CA075LO - CA Prioritization, Facility or area was assigned a lowAction: 19920330Actual Date: ENTIRE FACILITYArea Name: 09EPA Region: CAD009114240EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: Not reportedOriginal schedule date: Paint and Coating Manufacturing 32551NAICS Code(s): corrective action priority CA075LO - CA Prioritization, Facility or area was assigned a lowAction: 19900627Actual Date: ENTIRE FACILITYArea Name: 09EPA Region: CAD009114240EPA ID: CORRACTS: Not reportedPriority Level: 07/28/89Date Completed: / /Date Started: DISCOVERYAction: Deferred to RCRA (Subtitle C)Priority Level: 06/27/90Date Completed: / /Date Started: PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENTAction: Not reportedPriority Level: 01/23/96Date Completed: / /Date Started: ARCHIVE SITEAction: Deferred to RCRA (Subtitle C)Priority Level: 02/21/91Date Completed: / /Date Started: SITE INSPECTIONAction: CERCLIS-NFRAP Assessment History: RCRA Deferral - Further Superfund AssessmentDescription: RCRA Deferral - New DecisionDescription: RCRA Deferral AuditDescription: Program Priority: 13004003.00000Person ID: 13301840.00000Contact Sequence ID: 13003858.00000Person ID: 13295982.00000Contact Sequence ID: INTERNATIONAL PAINT CO (CALIF) INC (Continued)1000217022 TC3837232.2s Page 486 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 588-8663Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: CITY NOT REPORTED, CA 99999 220 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUEOwner/operator address: INTERNATIONAL PAINT CO (CALIF) INC,Owner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 588-8663Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 220 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUEOwner/operator address: INTERNATIONAL PAINT CO (CALIF) INC,Owner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: Facility is not located on Indian land. Additional information is not known.Land type: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: Not reportedContact telephone: Not reportedContact country: Not reported Not reportedContact address: Not reportedContact: CAD009114240EPA ID: SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 220 S LINDEN AVEFacility address: INTERNATIONAL PAINT CO (CALIF) INCFacility name: 09/01/1996Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: Not reportedSchedule end date: Not reportedOriginal schedule date: INTERNATIONAL PAINT CO (CALIF) INC (Continued)1000217022 TC3837232.2s Page 487 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 09/21/1988Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: FR - 262.50-60Regulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: Not reported Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: Not reported Enforcement action date: Not reported Enforcement action: EPAViolation lead agency: 09/21/1993Date achieved compliance: 09/21/1988Date violation determined: Transporters - GeneralArea of violation: FR - 263Regulation violated: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: CA03192Event: Not reportedEvent date: CA048SFEvent: Not reportedEvent date: action priority. CA Prioritization, Facility or area was assigned a low correctiveEvent: 03/30/1992Event date: CA049SIEvent: 02/21/1991Event date: RFA Completed, Assessment was an RFA.Event: 02/02/1991Event date: action priority. CA Prioritization, Facility or area was assigned a low correctiveEvent: 06/27/1990Event date: CA049PAEvent: 06/27/1990Event date: CA029WQEvent: 06/27/1990Event date: Corrective Action Summary: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: INTERNATIONAL PAINT CO (CALIF) INCFacility name: 08/14/1980Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: INTERNATIONAL PAINT CO (CALIF) INC (Continued)1000217022 TC3837232.2s Page 488 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedLead Agency Case Number: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Lead Agency: SLT2O324940Global Id: 11/22/2002Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedFacility Status: STATERegion: SLIC: 41-0875Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 41Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource and settlements. regions and states with cooperative agreements, enforcement actions, Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). The system tracks inspections in Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and the NCDB (National Compliance Data Base) supports implementation of the Environmental Interest/Information System 110002635006Registry ID: FINDS: EPAEvaluation lead agency: 09/21/1993Date achieved compliance: Transporters - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 09/21/1988Evaluation date: EPAEvaluation lead agency: 09/21/1993Date achieved compliance: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 09/21/1988Evaluation date: Evaluation Action Summary: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: Not reported Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: Not reported Enforcement action date: Not reported Enforcement action: EPAViolation lead agency: 09/21/1993Date achieved compliance: INTERNATIONAL PAINT CO (CALIF) INC (Continued)1000217022 TC3837232.2s Page 489 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedLeak Source: Not reportedLeak Cause: Not reportedHow Discovered: Not reportedLocal Case #: Not reportedDate Closed: Leak being confirmedFacility Status: 41S0030Facility ID: 2Region: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: 4/8/1991Date Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedDate Preliminary Site Assessment Began: Not reportedDate Prelim Site Assmnt Workplan Submitted: Not reportedDate Confirmed: UNKLeak Source: UNKLeak Cause: Tank ClosureHow Discovered: Not reportedLocal Case #: Not reportedDate Closed: Pollution CharacterizationFacility Status: 41S0030Facility ID: 2Region: SLIC REG 2: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: * SolventsPotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affected: Not reportedFile Location: 41S0030RB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: UUUCase Worker: Cleanup Program SiteCase Type: -122.410049880951Longitude: 37.6550465390591Latitude: Not reportedLead Agency Case Number: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Lead Agency: T0608191588Global Id: 06/04/2009Status Date: Open - InactiveFacility Status: STATERegion: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: Not reportedPotential Contaminants of Concern: Not reportedPotential Media Affected: Regional BoardFile Location: 41S0030RB Case Number: Not reportedLocal Agency: RLCase Worker: Cleanup Program SiteCase Type: -122.412815Longitude: 37.641983Latitude: INTERNATIONAL PAINT CO (CALIF) INC (Continued)1000217022 TC3837232.2s Page 490 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 80001592Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 551110Alias Name: GeoTracker Global IDAlias Type: 324940 http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=SLT2Alias Name: GeoTracker Global IDAlias Type: SLT2O324940Alias Name: Former Project IDAlias Type: 38280291Alias Name: EPA Identification NumberAlias Type: CAD009114240Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 014242010Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 014-242-010Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: International PaintAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: Courtaulds CoatingAlias Name: OTH, SOILPotential Description: Ethylbenzene, Toluene, Xylenes, Trichloroethylene (TCE Trichloroethylene (TCE, Ethylbenzene, Toluene, Xylenes,Confirmed COC: Trichloroethylene (TCE, Ethylbenzene, Toluene, XylenesPotential COC: PAINT MANUFACTURINGPast Use: 014-242-010, 014242010APN: -122.4123Longitude: 37.64132Latitude: Not reportedFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.: NORestricted Use: 05/10/2011Status Date: Refer: RWQCBStatus: Not reportedSpecial Program: 13Senate: 22Assembly: 551110Site Code: 80001592Facility ID: Cleanup BerkeleyDivision Branch: Denise TsujiSupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: RWQCB 2 - San Francisco BayLead Agency: SMBRP, RWQCB 2 - San Francisco BayRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: 2.29Acres: Corrective ActionSite Type Detailed: Corrective ActionSite Type: ENVIROSTOR: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedDate Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedDate Preliminary Site Assessment Began: Not reportedDate Prelim Site Assmnt Workplan Submitted: Not reportedDate Confirmed: INTERNATIONAL PAINT CO (CALIF) INC (Continued)1000217022 TC3837232.2s Page 491 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation -122.4127Longitude: 37.64811Latitude: UNKNOWNCleanup Status: CAD009114240EPA Id: HWP: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: 05/10/1991Completed Date: RCRA Facility Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 11/22/2002Completed Date: *Correspondence - ReceivedCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: (Superfund/RCRA) Program. under CERCLA only because it was being evaluated under the EPA EPA’s RCRA Facility Assessment (RFA) concluded no further actionComments: 03/04/1993Completed Date: Other ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 06/27/1990Completed Date: Preliminary Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 02/21/1991Completed Date: Preliminary Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: prepared in FEb 1991. Rizgar Ghazi was created to facilitate uploading the RFA. The original RFA was This RFA was uploaded by the FAST team on 11/16/2009. This activityComments: 02/02/1991Completed Date: RCRA Facility Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: INTERNATIONAL PAINT CO (CALIF) INC (Continued)1000217022 TC3837232.2s Page 492 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedPublic Information Officer: 13Senate District: 22Assembly District: Not reportedSite Code: Not reportedSupervisor: Not reportedTeam: Not reportedFacility Size: Historical - Non-OperatingFacility Type: INTERNATIONAL PAINT CO (CALIF) INC (Continued)1000217022 07/11/88Final Hydro Geological Assessment Review Completed: / /Hydro Geological Assessment Report Due: CLOSEDStatus: 04/22/91Closure Completed: 01/01/88Closure Due: 10/01/86Cease Discharge Complete: 01/01/89Cease Discharge Due: 3Num. of Pits: N1/2 Mi Limit: THE O’BRIEN CORPORATIONOwner: 82007Task #: 02Region: Toxic Pits: 3761 ft. 0.712 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 86 ft. 1/2-1S SAN FRANCISCO, CA NW450 E GRAND AVENUE N/A 323 Toxic PitsFULLER O’BRIEN S100676266 Not reportedSub Area: PROJECT WIDEArea: 41330007EDR Link ID: 03/29/1991Deed Date(s): Not reportedCovenant Uploaded: Not reportedAgency: CERTIFIED O&M - LAND USE RESTRICTIONS ONLYStatus: VOLUNTARY CLEANUPSite Type: Not reportedSub Area: PROJECT WIDEArea: 41330007EDR Link ID: 08/07/1984Deed Date(s): Not reportedCovenant Uploaded: Not reportedAgency: CERTIFIED O&M - LAND USE RESTRICTIONS ONLYStatus: VOLUNTARY CLEANUPSite Type: Not reportedSub Area: PROJECT WIDEArea: DEED: 3862 ft.Site 1 of 2 in cluster AX 0.731 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 25 ft. 1/2-1 ENVIROSTORSOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 NNE VCP801 GATEWAY BOULEVARD N/A AX324 DEEDHOMART DEVELOPMENT CORP.S106499154 TC3837232.2s Page 493 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 41330007Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 200115Alias Name: PCodeAlias Type: P23008Alias Name: GeoTracker Global IDAlias Type: SLT2O326216Alias Name: EPA (FRS #)Alias Type: 110033614925Alias Name: EPA (FRS #)Alias Type: 110002955516Alias Name: EPA Identification NumberAlias Type: CAT080029812Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 015-024-450-7Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: HOMART DEVELOPMENT CORP/LOT 9Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: EDWARDS WIRE & ROPE - HOMART DEVELOPMENTAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: BETHLEHEM STEEL - HOMART DEVELOPMENTAlias Name: SOILPotential Description: 30018,30152,30407,30013,3002502,30594Confirmed COC: 30013, 30018, 3002502, 30152, 30407, 30594Potential COC: MANUFACTURING - METALPast Use: 015-024-450-7APN: 37.6525 / -122.4027Lat/Long: Responsible PartyFunding: YESRestricted Use: 11/08/2000Status Date: Certified O&M - Land Use Restrictions OnlyStatus: Voluntary Cleanup ProgramSpecial Programs Code: 13Senate: 22Assembly: 200115Site Code: Cleanup BerkeleyDivision Branch: Mark PirosSupervisor: Claude JemisonProject Manager: DTSC - Site Cleanup ProgramLead Agency Description: SMBRPLead Agency: SMBRPCleanup Oversight Agencies: NONational Priorities List: 16.8Acres: SCH, FOOD, RES DAY, ELD, HOS, NOWN, SCH, FOOD, RES, DAY, ELD, HOS, LUC, NOWN, NSUB,Site Mgmt. Req.: Voluntary CleanupSite Type Detail: Voluntary CleanupSite Type: 41330007Facility ID: VCP: 41330007EDR Link ID: 11/08/2000Deed Date(s): Not reportedCovenant Uploaded: Not reportedAgency: CERTIFIED O&M - LAND USE RESTRICTIONS ONLYStatus: VOLUNTARY CLEANUPSite Type: HOMART DEVELOPMENT CORP. (Continued)S106499154 TC3837232.2s Page 494 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedComments: 11/16/2004Completed Date: Site Inspections/Visit (Non LUR)Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 08/07/1984Completed Date: Land Use RestrictionCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 10/07/2010Completed Date: Land Use Restriction Monitoring ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Site Discovery.Comments: 08/01/1980Completed Date: * DiscoveryCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: 2,4, 5, 6 & 7 and Parcels 3A, 3C and 8A and 8B. Re-recorded Deed Restriction filed on August 14, 1984 for Lots 1,Comments: 03/29/1991Completed Date: Land Use Restriction - AmendmentCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Certified Site.Comments: 04/26/1991Completed Date: CertificationCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: subject to the land use covenants. (deed restrictions). This resulted in the re-evaluation of the areas fewer parcels than originally included in the 1991 land use covenants development that resulted in contamination being consolidated onto Signed VCA. In the late 1990s, the site went through extensiveComments: 01/26/1998Completed Date: Voluntary Cleanup AgreementCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: from the land use covenants. of lot 9 and parcel 1 of lot 1) and removing the rest of the parcels Modified Deed Restriction to restrict only two areas (parcels 4 and 5Comments: 11/08/2000Completed Date: Land Use Restriction - AmendmentCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 41330052Alias Name: HOMART DEVELOPMENT CORP. (Continued)S106499154 TC3837232.2s Page 495 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Preliminary Assessment prepared by DHS.Comments: 03/01/1988Completed Date: Preliminary Endangerment Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Remedial Design WorkplanComments: 01/04/1985Completed Date: Design/Implementation WorkplanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: deterioration. very good condition, with no visible signs of cracking or surrounding walkways and asphalt parking lot were observed to be in park. Upon inspectionby DTSC, the perimeter of the building, and adjacent walkways and asphalt parking lot located in a business The capped area is currently the location of a commercial building,Comments: 11/01/2010Completed Date: 5 Year Review ReportsCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed RA.Comments: 09/07/1982Completed Date: Removal Action Completion ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: for several months, the pH of the groundwater returned to neutral. soil was placed on affected parcels of the site. After monitoring contaminated soils, a minimum of one-foot permeable, clean, compacted equipment. In order to prevent further transport of metal Homart removed and disposed soil and above-ground structures andComments: 04/12/1989Completed Date: Remedial Action Completion ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Approved RAP.Comments: 03/04/1991Completed Date: Remedial Action PlanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: DTSC approved the Five Year Review Report.Comments: 01/11/2006Completed Date: 5 Year Review ReportsCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 10/09/2001Completed Date: Land Use Restriction - Release/RescissionCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: HOMART DEVELOPMENT CORP. (Continued)S106499154 TC3837232.2s Page 496 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation historical certification information. Many of the sites on this list completed. This Auditor General list became the basis for our the Department was involved in the cleanup and the cleanup had been audit of the Department’s records to confirm a list of sites where prepared by the Auditor General. The Auditor General conducted an and Maintenance (O&M). This certification was confirmed by a report routinely monitors it and has classified it as a site in Operation removed. Althought this site has been certified, the Department Certified Site. An unspecified amount of contaminated soil wasComments: 11/01/1983Completed Date: CertificationCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 01/10/2007Completed Date: Land Use Restriction - Site Inspection/VisitCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 01/12/2011Completed Date: Public NoticeCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: restrictions Soil sampling analysis as part of re-evalation of need for land useComments: 07/10/1998Completed Date: Other ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Letter Report for construction activities at 681 Gateway Blvd.Comments: 06/13/2006Completed Date: Other ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Gateway Phase I Environmental Site Assessment for Lot 9 and Parcel 2B, TheComments: 06/27/1997Completed Date: Other ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Phasee II Investigation for 3.5 acre portion of 5/5A Gateway ParcelComments: 08/23/1989Completed Date: Remedial Investigation ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 01/13/2003Completed Date: Other ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: HOMART DEVELOPMENT CORP. (Continued)S106499154 TC3837232.2s Page 497 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Voluntary Cleanup ConsultationCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: condition, with no visible signs of cracking or deterioration. walkways and asphalt parking lot appeared to be in very good park. Upon inspection, the perimeter of the building, surrounding and adjacent walkways and asphalt parking lot located in a business The capped area is currently the location of a commercial building ,Comments: 03/23/2009Completed Date: Land Use Restriction - Site Inspection/VisitCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: 1998 Voluntary Cleanup Agreement with DTSC. Letter on behalf of Sears Development Co. terminating January 26,Comments: 04/26/2002Completed Date: CorrespondenceCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: required. to the land use restrictions and conveying that no further action was DTSC send a letter clarifying the status of Lot 1 after modificationsComments: 04/09/2002Completed Date: CorrespondenceCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: deterioration. in very good condition, with no visible signs of cracking or asphalt parking lot east of the 681 Gateway building appeared to be restriction. The perimeter of the building, surrounding walkways and cap over contaminated soil and to verify compliance with the deed DTSC conducted its annual site visit to check the condition of theComments: 02/27/2012Completed Date: Land Use Restriction - Site Inspection/VisitCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: good condition, with no visible signs of cracking or deterioration. surrounding walkways and asphalt parking lot appeared to be in very park. Upon inspection by DTSC staff, the perimeter of the building, and adjacent walkways and asphalt parking lot located in a business The capped area is currently the location of a commercial building,Comments: 10/07/2010Completed Date: Land Use Restriction - Site Inspection/VisitCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: earliest statute of limitations. 11/1983. We have used the date 11/01/1983 because this gives us the indicate the actual date this site was certified. Our records show immediate problem and not the entire facility. Our records do not industry and the response action may have only addressed the work was in response to complaints from the public or reports from were handled by our Surveillance and Enforcement Staff. Much of this HOMART DEVELOPMENT CORP. (Continued)S106499154 TC3837232.2s Page 498 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Lead, TPH-MOTOR OIL, Zinc Nickel, Zinc, Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs, Chromium III, Nickel, Lead, Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs, TPH-MOTOR OIL, Chromium III,Confirmed COC: Nickel, Zinc Lead, Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs, TPH-MOTOR OIL, Chromium III,Potential COC: MANUFACTURING - METALPast Use: 015-024-450-7APN: -122.4027Longitude: 37.6525Latitude: Responsible PartyFunding: SCH, FOOD, RES DAY, ELD, HOS, NOWN, SCH, FOOD, RES, DAY, ELD, HOS, LUC, NOWN, NSUB,Site Mgmt. Req.: YESRestricted Use: 11/08/2000Status Date: Certified O&M - Land Use Restrictions OnlyStatus: Voluntary Cleanup ProgramSpecial Program: 13Senate: 22Assembly: 200115Site Code: 41330007Facility ID: Cleanup BerkeleyDivision Branch: Mark PirosSupervisor: Claude JemisonProgram Manager: SMBRPLead Agency: SMBRPRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: 16.8Acres: Voluntary CleanupSite Type Detailed: Voluntary CleanupSite Type: ENVIROSTOR: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: 2015Future Due Date: 5 Year Review ReportsFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDEFuture Area Name: required. to the land use restrictions and conveying that no further action was DTSC send a letter clarifying the status of Lot 9 after modificationsComments: 04/09/2002Completed Date: CorrespondenceCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: The cap is in good condition.Comments: 12/24/2007Completed Date: Land Use Restriction - Site Inspection/VisitCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 02/09/1999Completed Date: HOMART DEVELOPMENT CORP. (Continued)S106499154 TC3837232.2s Page 499 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2,4, 5, 6 & 7 and Parcels 3A, 3C and 8A and 8B. Re-recorded Deed Restriction filed on August 14, 1984 for Lots 1,Comments: 03/29/1991Completed Date: Land Use Restriction - AmendmentCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Certified Site.Comments: 04/26/1991Completed Date: CertificationCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: subject to the land use covenants. (deed restrictions). This resulted in the re-evaluation of the areas fewer parcels than originally included in the 1991 land use covenants development that resulted in contamination being consolidated onto Signed VCA. In the late 1990s, the site went through extensiveComments: 01/26/1998Completed Date: Voluntary Cleanup AgreementCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: from the land use covenants. of lot 9 and parcel 1 of lot 1) and removing the rest of the parcels Modified Deed Restriction to restrict only two areas (parcels 4 and 5Comments: 11/08/2000Completed Date: Land Use Restriction - AmendmentCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 41330052Alias Name: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 41330007Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 200115Alias Name: PCodeAlias Type: P23008Alias Name: GeoTracker Global IDAlias Type: SLT2O326216Alias Name: EPA (FRS #)Alias Type: 110033614925Alias Name: EPA (FRS #)Alias Type: 110002955516Alias Name: EPA Identification NumberAlias Type: CAT080029812Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 015-024-450-7Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: HOMART DEVELOPMENT CORP/LOT 9Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: EDWARDS WIRE & ROPE - HOMART DEVELOPMENTAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: BETHLEHEM STEEL - HOMART DEVELOPMENTAlias Name: SOILPotential Description: HOMART DEVELOPMENT CORP. (Continued)S106499154 TC3837232.2s Page 500 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Completed RA.Comments: 09/07/1982Completed Date: Removal Action Completion ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: for several months, the pH of the groundwater returned to neutral. soil was placed on affected parcels of the site. After monitoring contaminated soils, a minimum of one-foot permeable, clean, compacted equipment. In order to prevent further transport of metal Homart removed and disposed soil and above-ground structures andComments: 04/12/1989Completed Date: Remedial Action Completion ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Approved RAP.Comments: 03/04/1991Completed Date: Remedial Action PlanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: DTSC approved the Five Year Review Report.Comments: 01/11/2006Completed Date: 5 Year Review ReportsCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 10/09/2001Completed Date: Land Use Restriction - Release/RescissionCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 11/16/2004Completed Date: Site Inspections/Visit (Non LUR)Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 08/07/1984Completed Date: Land Use RestrictionCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 10/07/2010Completed Date: Land Use Restriction Monitoring ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Site Discovery.Comments: 08/01/1980Completed Date: * DiscoveryCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: HOMART DEVELOPMENT CORP. (Continued)S106499154 TC3837232.2s Page 501 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: restrictions Soil sampling analysis as part of re-evalation of need for land useComments: 07/10/1998Completed Date: Other ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Letter Report for construction activities at 681 Gateway Blvd.Comments: 06/13/2006Completed Date: Other ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Gateway Phase I Environmental Site Assessment for Lot 9 and Parcel 2B, TheComments: 06/27/1997Completed Date: Other ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Phasee II Investigation for 3.5 acre portion of 5/5A Gateway ParcelComments: 08/23/1989Completed Date: Remedial Investigation ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 01/13/2003Completed Date: Other ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Preliminary Assessment prepared by DHS.Comments: 03/01/1988Completed Date: Preliminary Endangerment Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Remedial Design WorkplanComments: 01/04/1985Completed Date: Design/Implementation WorkplanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: deterioration. very good condition, with no visible signs of cracking or surrounding walkways and asphalt parking lot were observed to be in park. Upon inspectionby DTSC, the perimeter of the building, and adjacent walkways and asphalt parking lot located in a business The capped area is currently the location of a commercial building,Comments: 11/01/2010Completed Date: 5 Year Review ReportsCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: HOMART DEVELOPMENT CORP. (Continued)S106499154 TC3837232.2s Page 502 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation DTSC send a letter clarifying the status of Lot 1 after modificationsComments: 04/09/2002Completed Date: CorrespondenceCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: deterioration. in very good condition, with no visible signs of cracking or asphalt parking lot east of the 681 Gateway building appeared to be restriction. The perimeter of the building, surrounding walkways and cap over contaminated soil and to verify compliance with the deed DTSC conducted its annual site visit to check the condition of theComments: 02/27/2012Completed Date: Land Use Restriction - Site Inspection/VisitCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: good condition, with no visible signs of cracking or deterioration. surrounding walkways and asphalt parking lot appeared to be in very park. Upon inspection by DTSC staff, the perimeter of the building, and adjacent walkways and asphalt parking lot located in a business The capped area is currently the location of a commercial building,Comments: 10/07/2010Completed Date: Land Use Restriction - Site Inspection/VisitCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: earliest statute of limitations. 11/1983. We have used the date 11/01/1983 because this gives us the indicate the actual date this site was certified. Our records show immediate problem and not the entire facility. Our records do not industry and the response action may have only addressed the work was in response to complaints from the public or reports from were handled by our Surveillance and Enforcement Staff. Much of this historical certification information. Many of the sites on this list completed. This Auditor General list became the basis for our the Department was involved in the cleanup and the cleanup had been audit of the Department’s records to confirm a list of sites where prepared by the Auditor General. The Auditor General conducted an and Maintenance (O&M). This certification was confirmed by a report routinely monitors it and has classified it as a site in Operation removed. Althought this site has been certified, the Department Certified Site. An unspecified amount of contaminated soil wasComments: 11/01/1983Completed Date: CertificationCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 01/10/2007Completed Date: Land Use Restriction - Site Inspection/VisitCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 01/12/2011Completed Date: Public NoticeCompleted Document Type: HOMART DEVELOPMENT CORP. (Continued)S106499154 TC3837232.2s Page 503 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: 2015Future Due Date: 5 Year Review ReportsFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDEFuture Area Name: required. to the land use restrictions and conveying that no further action was DTSC send a letter clarifying the status of Lot 9 after modificationsComments: 04/09/2002Completed Date: CorrespondenceCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: The cap is in good condition.Comments: 12/24/2007Completed Date: Land Use Restriction - Site Inspection/VisitCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 02/09/1999Completed Date: Voluntary Cleanup ConsultationCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: condition, with no visible signs of cracking or deterioration. walkways and asphalt parking lot appeared to be in very good park. Upon inspection, the perimeter of the building, surrounding and adjacent walkways and asphalt parking lot located in a business The capped area is currently the location of a commercial building ,Comments: 03/23/2009Completed Date: Land Use Restriction - Site Inspection/VisitCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: 1998 Voluntary Cleanup Agreement with DTSC. Letter on behalf of Sears Development Co. terminating January 26,Comments: 04/26/2002Completed Date: CorrespondenceCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: required. to the land use restrictions and conveying that no further action was HOMART DEVELOPMENT CORP. (Continued)S106499154 TC3837232.2s Page 504 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 11/29/1989Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608100593Global Id: Status History: 6503726292Phone Number: dmilano@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: DENO MILANOContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100593Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: nkatyl@waterboards.ca.govEmail: OAKLANDCity: 1515 CLAY STREETAddress: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: NANCY KATYLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100593Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: or any professional interpretations made in the referenced report. does not take responsibility for the accuracy of the statements made Mateo County offices if submitted prior to 2005. San Mateo County Can be extracted from most recent report in Geotracker or at SanSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: Local AgencyFile Location: 550005LOC Case Number: 41-0621RB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: DGMCase Worker: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 07/07/2011Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.404063155Longitude: 37.661530364Latitude: T0608100593Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 41-0621Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 41Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 3959 ft. 0.750 mi.RGA LUST Relative: Higher Actual: 44 ft. 1/2-1 Notify 65SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA North LUST901 AIRPORT N/A 325 HIST CORTESEUNOCAL S100179821 TC3837232.2s Page 505 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 09/29/2008Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100593Global Id: Electronic Reporting Submittal DueAction: 09/12/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100593Global Id: Electronic Reporting Submittal DueAction: 06/07/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100593Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation ReportAction: 08/28/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100593Global Id: Other Report / DocumentAction: 08/04/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100593Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100593Global Id: ExcavationAction: 01/01/1950Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0608100593Global Id: CorrespondenceAction: 12/31/2010Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100593Global Id: Closure/No Further Action Letter - #20110707Action: 07/07/2011Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100593Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100593Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 07/07/2011Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608100593Global Id: 11/29/1989Status Date: Open - Verification MonitoringStatus: T0608100593Global Id: UNOCAL (Continued)S100179821 TC3837232.2s Page 506 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Staff Letter - #20060508Action: 05/08/2006Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100593Global Id: Staff Letter - #20050418Action: 04/18/2005Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100593Global Id: Monitoring Report - AnnuallyAction: 05/15/2011Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100593Global Id: Well Destruction ReportAction: 06/10/2011Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100593Global Id: Staff Letter - #20100809Action: 08/09/2010Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100593Global Id: Technical Correspondence / Assistance / Other - #20100111Action: 01/11/2010Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100593Global Id: Staff Letter - #20041102Action: 11/02/2004Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100593Global Id: Notice of Responsibility - #19900223Action: 02/23/1990Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100593Global Id: Staff Letter - #20070509Action: 05/09/2007Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100593Global Id: Verbal EnforcementAction: 05/16/2007Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100593Global Id: Staff Letter - #20090506Action: 05/06/2009Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100593Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation WorkplanAction: UNOCAL (Continued)S100179821 TC3837232.2s Page 507 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100593Global Id: Staff Letter - #20110504Action: 05/04/2011Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100593Global Id: Monitoring Report - AnnuallyAction: 05/15/2010Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100593Global Id: Staff Letter - #20101122Action: 11/22/2010Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100593Global Id: Monitoring Report - AnnuallyAction: 05/15/2009Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100593Global Id: NPDES / WDR ReportsAction: 04/11/2008Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100593Global Id: Staff Letter - #20051101Action: 11/01/2005Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100593Global Id: Staff Letter - #20050908Action: 09/08/2005Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100593Global Id: Monitoring Report - OtherAction: 02/15/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100593Global Id: Staff Letter - #20110315Action: 03/15/2011Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100593Global Id: Monitoring Report - AnnuallyAction: 05/15/2008Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100593Global Id: Staff Letter - #20080312Action: 03/12/2008Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100593Global Id: UNOCAL (Continued)S100179821 TC3837232.2s Page 508 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Other Report / DocumentAction: 08/10/2010Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100593Global Id: Tank Removal Report / UST Sampling ReportAction: 08/10/2010Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100593Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation ReportAction: 08/08/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100593Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation WorkplanAction: 01/31/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100593Global Id: Staff Letter - #20040512Action: 05/12/2004Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100593Global Id: Pump & Treat (P&T) GroundwaterAction: 01/01/1950Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0608100593Global Id: Pump & Treat (P&T) GroundwaterAction: 01/01/1950Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0608100593Global Id: ExcavationAction: 01/01/1950Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0608100593Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation ReportAction: 12/21/2009Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100593Global Id: Staff Letter - #20090723Action: 07/23/2009Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100593Global Id: Staff Letter - #20110504Action: 05/04/2011Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100593Global Id: Technical Correspondence / Assistance / Other - #20110616Action: 06/16/2011Date: UNOCAL (Continued)S100179821 TC3837232.2s Page 509 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2008 TOSCO #4524 (FORMER UNOCAL) 901 AIRPORT 2009 TOSCO #4524 (FORMER UNOCAL) 901 AIRPORT BOULEVARD 2010 TOSCO #4524 (FORMER UNOCAL) 901 AIRPORT BOULEVARD 2011 UNOCAL STATION #4524 (FORMER) 901 AIRPORT BOULEVARD 2012 UNOCAL STATION #4524 (FORMER) 901 AIRPORT BOULEVARD RGA LUST: 94080Incident Description: Not reportedDischarge Date: Not reportedFacility Type: Not reportedBoard File Number: Not reportedStaff Initials: Not reportedDate Reported: Notify 65: CAP/RAP - Other ReportAction: 08/10/2010Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100593Global Id: UNOCAL (Continued)S100179821 41-0692Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 41Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 94080Discharge Zip: CaliforniaDischarge State: South San FranciscoDischarge City: 160 South Linden AvenueDischarge Address: Veolia TransportationDischarge Name: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: 02/01/2013Effective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: IndustrialProgram Type: 2 41I024053WDID: Not reportedPlace Id: EnrolleeRegulatory Measure Type: 97-03-DWQOrder No: 434637Regulatory Measure Id: 2Region: 0Agency Id: ActiveFacility Status: CAS000001Npdes Number: NPDES: RGA LUST 4034 ft.ENVIROSTORSite 1 of 4 in cluster AY 0.764 mi.RESPONSE Relative: Lower Actual: 26 ft. 1/2-1 LUSTS SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 SW HIST CORTESE160 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUE N/A AY326 NPDESE.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS 1000925659 TC3837232.2s Page 510 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation analytical results from this investigation showed the presence of activities. Soil samples were collected from each boring. The soil were advanced at locations selected after a review of historical site Environmental Assessment of the Site in 1991. Eleven soil borings Environmental Remediation Services (DERS) performed a limited conditions. Groundwater monitoring is ongoing at the Site. DuPont and groundwater beneath the Site and to assess the hydrogeologic investigations were designed to evaluate the extent of impacted soils quality, and hydrogeologic conditions. In general, these been conducted at the Site to characterize its soil, groundwater properties in the vicinity of the Site. Several investigations have extend north, west, and south from the Site. There are no residential commercial properties. Industrial and commercial properties also eastward to San Francisco Bay is developed as industrial and gradient of 0.013 feet per foot. The entire area from the Site groundwater flow for that date was to the northeast at an average 14, 2007 ranged from 5.38 to 8.57 feet bgs. The average direction of to groundwater at the Site during the latest monitoring event on June Bay, younger alluvium and bay mud overlie the Colma Formation. Depth is composed of sand, sandy clay, and silty sand. Toward San Francisco shown as being underlain by the Quaternary age Colma Formation, which San Francisco Bay. On the U.S. Geological Survey map the Site is begin about 500 feet northeast of the site and extend to the edge of shows that old marshlands, that have been covered with man-made fill, gently northwestward. A map prepared by the U.S. Geological Survey located at an elevation of about 20 feet above sea level and slopes a bay plain about 1.5 miles west of San Francisco Bay. The Site is currently being used for commercial occupancy. The Site is located on remaining parcel (160 South Linden Avenue) from DuPont. The Site is 2000, Intrinsic Ventures LLC of Menlo Park, California, purchased the South Linden Avenue) to Bay Cities Building Materials. In September Fremont, California. In 1985, DuPont sold one of its parcels (150 testing of bulk paints that were shipped to the NUMMI plant in facility was used mainly for warehousing paints and quality control 1982, operations were reduced, and from 1982 until September 2000 the the plant occurred in 1955, when employment reached 250 workers. In manufacturing operation from 1934 through 1982. Peak production at former DuPont plant in South San Francisco was an active paint professional interpretations made in the referenced reports. The responsibility for the accuracy of the statements made or any Extracted from URS documents San Mateo County does not takeSite History: Arsenic, Stoddard solvent / Mineral Spriits / DistillatesPotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: Not reportedFile Location: 550117LOC Case Number: 41-0692RB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: JMCase Worker: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 10/06/2011Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.414492Longitude: 37.643406602Latitude: T0608100658Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS (Continued)1000925659 TC3837232.2s Page 511 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 07/01/2000Status Date: Open - Verification MonitoringStatus: T0608100658Global Id: 10/01/1999Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T0608100658Global Id: 03/01/1999Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0608100658Global Id: 04/24/1987Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608100658Global Id: Status History: Not reportedPhone Number: nkatyl@waterboards.ca.govEmail: OAKLANDCity: 1515 CLAY STREETAddress: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: NANCY KATYLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100658Global Id: 6503726298Phone Number: jmadden@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: JACOB MADDENContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100658Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: remedial investigation at the Site in July 1999. Among other tas request and submitted with the Phase II ESA Report. URS performed a prepared for several future use scenarios in response to a County groundwater samples. Site Specific Target Levels (SSTLs) were semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) were detected in Site BTEX, acetone, 2-butanone, 1,2-dichloroethane, and several naphthalene were detected in soil samples from the tank farm area. half of the soil samples. Benzo(a)pyrene, di-n-butylphthalate, and petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel (TPH-diesel) were detected in over other locations. Toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes, TPH-gas, and total boring. In addition, shallow soil samples were collected at five activities. Soil and groundwater samples were collected at each results of the DERS investigation and a historical review of Site Eleven more soil borings were advanced at locations based on the performed a Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) at the Site. di-nbutylphthlate. In October 1998, URS Greiner Woodward-Clyde including acetone, 2-butanone, hexanone, methylene chloride, and impacted with BTEX and other volatile organic compounds (VOCs), impacted soils in the area of the former tank farm. Soils were E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS (Continued)1000925659 TC3837232.2s Page 512 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Leak DiscoveryAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100658Global Id: Site Assessment ReportAction: 03/26/2010Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100658Global Id: Notification - Fee Title Owners Notice - #20110216Action: 02/16/2011Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100658Global Id: CorrespondenceAction: 12/16/2010Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100658Global Id: Staff Letter - #20091111Action: 11/11/2009Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100658Global Id: Closure/No Further Action Letter - #20111006Action: 10/06/2011Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100658Global Id: Other WorkplanAction: 09/25/2009Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100658Global Id: CorrespondenceAction: 04/15/2009Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100658Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100658Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 10/06/2011Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608100658Global Id: 10/08/2007Status Date: Open - Verification MonitoringStatus: T0608100658Global Id: 09/14/2005Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0608100658Global Id: E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS (Continued)1000925659 TC3837232.2s Page 513 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100658Global Id: Notice of Responsibility - #1Action: 05/03/1993Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100658Global Id: Notice of Responsibility - #20060907Action: 09/07/2006Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100658Global Id: Staff Letter - #20080328Action: 03/28/2008Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100658Global Id: Staff Letter - #20020610Action: 06/10/2002Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100658Global Id: Staff Letter - #20060906Action: 05/31/2007Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100658Global Id: Staff Letter - #20030910AAction: 09/10/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100658Global Id: Well Destruction ReportAction: 08/15/2011Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100658Global Id: Verbal EnforcementAction: 03/17/2009Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100658Global Id: Staff Letter - #20090526Action: 05/26/2009Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100658Global Id: Other Report / DocumentAction: 03/10/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100658Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 08/15/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100658Global Id: E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS (Continued)1000925659 TC3837232.2s Page 514 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 08/15/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100658Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 02/15/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100658Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 02/15/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100658Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 02/15/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100658Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 02/15/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100658Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 02/15/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100658Global Id: Staff Letter - #20030910BAction: 09/10/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100658Global Id: Staff Letter - #20060608Action: 06/08/2006Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100658Global Id: Staff Letter - #20060906Action: 09/06/2006Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100658Global Id: Staff Letter - #20050914Action: 09/14/2005Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100658Global Id: Staff Letter - #20021008Action: 10/08/2002Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100658Global Id: Staff Letter - #20030728Action: 07/28/2003Date: E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS (Continued)1000925659 TC3837232.2s Page 515 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100658Global Id: Staff Letter - #20110216Action: 02/16/2011Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100658Global Id: Electronic Reporting Submittal DueAction: 06/30/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100658Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation ReportAction: 09/27/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100658Global Id: Risk Assessment ReportAction: 08/08/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100658Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation ReportAction: 07/07/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100658Global Id: Electronic Reporting Submittal DueAction: 10/10/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100658Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation ReportAction: 08/11/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100658Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation ReportAction: 04/19/2002Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100658Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 08/15/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100658Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 08/15/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100658Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 08/15/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100658Global Id: E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS (Continued)1000925659 TC3837232.2s Page 516 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 13Senate: 22Assembly: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.: 200394Site Code: Cleanup BerkeleyDivision Branch: Mark PirosSupervisor: Not reportedProject Manager: Not reportedLead Agency Description: NONE SPECIFIEDCleanup Oversight Agencies: NONational Priorities List: Not reportedAcres: State Response or NPLSite Type Detail: State ResponseSite Type: 41280049Facility ID: RESPONSE: 7/1/2000Date Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: 10/1/1999Date Remediation Action Underway: Not reportedPollution Remediation Plan Submitted: 3/1/1999Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assesment Began: Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: OMHow Discovered: 550117Case Number: Post remedial action monitoringFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: LUST REG 2: Staff Letter - #20100805Action: 08/05/2010Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100658Global Id: ExcavationAction: 01/01/1950Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0608100658Global Id: ExcavationAction: 01/01/1950Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0608100658Global Id: Monitoring Report - Semi-AnnuallyAction: 12/15/2008Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608100658Global Id: Staff Letter - #20090714Action: 07/14/2009Date: E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS (Continued)1000925659 TC3837232.2s Page 517 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Mark PirosSupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: NONE SPECIFIEDLead Agency: NONE SPECIFIEDRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: Not reportedAcres: State Response or NPLSite Type Detailed: State ResponseSite Type: ENVIROSTOR: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Inc, (#41360066). independent of drive-by; same address as Koningsberg Electronics, Site Discovery. Facility was identified as an active siteComments: 08/01/1980Completed Date: * DiscoveryCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: the earliest statute of limitations date. and day information was available. January 1 chosen because it gives Certified Site. 1600 tons of hazardous waste was removed. No monthComments: 01/01/1983Completed Date: CertificationCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 41280049Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 200394Alias Name: EPA (FRS #)Alias Type: 110033618645Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: DUPONT DE NEMOURS & COMPANYAlias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential COC : NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -122.4148Longitude: 37.64256Latitude: Responsible PartyFunding: NORestricted Use: 01/01/1983Status Date: CertifiedStatus: Not reportedSpecial Program Status: E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS (Continued)1000925659 TC3837232.2s Page 518 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2011 DUPONT 160 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUE 2012 DUPONT 160 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUE RGA LUST: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Inc, (#41360066). independent of drive-by; same address as Koningsberg Electronics, Site Discovery. Facility was identified as an active siteComments: 08/01/1980Completed Date: * DiscoveryCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: the earliest statute of limitations date. and day information was available. January 1 chosen because it gives Certified Site. 1600 tons of hazardous waste was removed. No monthComments: 01/01/1983Completed Date: CertificationCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 41280049Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 200394Alias Name: EPA (FRS #)Alias Type: 110033618645Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: DUPONT DE NEMOURS & COMPANYAlias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIED, NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -122.4148Longitude: 37.64256Latitude: Responsible PartyFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.: NORestricted Use: 01/01/1983Status Date: CertifiedStatus: Not reportedSpecial Program: 13Senate: 22Assembly: 200394Site Code: 41280049Facility ID: Cleanup BerkeleyDivision Branch: E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS (Continued)1000925659 TC3837232.2s Page 519 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2003 DUPONT 160 LINDEN 2005 DUPONT 160 LINDEN 2006 DUPONT 160 LINDEN 2007 DUPONT 160 LINDEN 2008 DUPONT 160 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUE 2009 DUPONT 160 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUE 2010 DUPONT 160 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUE E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS (Continued)1000925659 No action under CERCLA, but ongoing work needed to addressComments: 03/31/2004Completed Date: Preliminary Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 09/19/1991Completed Date: Preliminary Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 80001622Alias Name: EPA Identification NumberAlias Type: CAD009206855Alias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIED, NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -122.4118Longitude: 37.65065Latitude: Not reportedFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.: NORestricted Use: 03/30/2011Status Date: Inactive - Needs EvaluationStatus: Not reportedSpecial Program: 13Senate: 22Assembly: Not reportedSite Code: 80001622Facility ID: Cleanup BerkeleyDivision Branch: Mark PirosSupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: NONE SPECIFIEDLead Agency: NONE SPECIFIEDRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: 0Acres: Corrective ActionSite Type Detailed: Corrective ActionSite Type: ENVIROSTOR: 4034 ft.Site 2 of 4 in cluster AY 0.764 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 26 ft. 1/2-1SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 SW160 S LINDEN AVE N/A AY327 ENVIROSTORWEST COAST AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE CENTERS100948238 TC3837232.2s Page 520 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: contamination. WEST COAST AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE CENTER (Continued)S100948238 Not reportedContact Email: Site Assessment Manager (SAM)Contact Title: Not reportedContact Tel: Not reportedContact Name: 9271184.00000Contact ID: CERCLIS Site Contact Name(s): Not reportedSite FUDS Flag: Not reportedAlias EPA ID: Not reportedCC Concurrence FY: / /CC Concurrence Date: 06081Site Fips Code: 09/23/04Non NPL Status Date: NFRAP-Site does not qualify for the NPL based on existing informationNon NPL Status: Not reportedRResp Fed Agency Code: Not reportedRBRAC Code: Not reportedDMNSN Unit Code: Not on the NPLNPL Status: Not reportedSite Settings Code: Not reportedClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedRST Code: Not reportedParent ID: Not reportedNFRAP Flag: Not reportedSite Init By Prog: Not reportedUSGS Quadrangle: ERCRA ID: NSite Orphan Flag: 0.00000DMNSN Number: Not a Federal FacilityFederal Facility: 18050004USGC Hydro Unit: 7360SMSA Number: Not reportedIFMS ID: 11Congressional District: AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE CENTERShort Name: SAN MATEOFacility County: CAD009206855EPA ID: 0903899Site ID: CERCLIS: 4034 ft.Site 3 of 4 in cluster AY 0.764 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 26 ft. 1/2-1 RCRA NonGen / NLRSOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 SW CORRACTS160 S. LINDEN AVE.CAD009206855 AY328 CERCLISAUTOMOTIVE SERVICE CENTER 1000335044 TC3837232.2s Page 521 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedAction Anomaly: Not reportedUrgency Indicator: Not reportedPlanning Status: EPA In-HousePrimary Responsibility: SITEWIDEOperable Unit: Not reportedPriority Level: 01/23/96Date Completed: / /Date Started: ARCHIVE SITEAction: 001Action Code: Not reportedAction Anomaly: Not reportedUrgency Indicator: Not reportedPlanning Status: EPA Fund-FinancedPrimary Responsibility: SITEWIDEOperable Unit: Deferred to RCRA (Subtitle C)Priority Level: 09/24/91Date Completed: / /Date Started: PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENTAction: 001Action Code: Not reportedAction Anomaly: Not reportedUrgency Indicator: Not reportedPlanning Status: EPA Fund-FinancedPrimary Responsibility: SITEWIDEOperable Unit: Not reportedPriority Level: 05/21/91Date Completed: / /Date Started: DISCOVERYAction: 001Action Code: CERCLIS Assessment History: Returned from RCRASite Description: Not reportedAlias Comments: Not reportedContact Email: Site Assessment Manager (SAM)Contact Title: Not reportedContact Tel: Not reportedContact Name: 13004003.00000Contact ID: Not reportedContact Email: Site Assessment Manager (SAM)Contact Title: Not reportedContact Tel: Not reportedContact Name: 13003858.00000Contact ID: Not reportedContact Email: Site Assessment Manager (SAM)Contact Title: Not reportedContact Tel: Not reportedContact Name: 13003854.00000Contact ID: AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE CENTER (Continued)1000335044 TC3837232.2s Page 522 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation WILMINGTON, DE 19898 1007 MARKET STREETOwner/operator address: EI DU PONT DE NEMOURS & COMPANY INC.Owner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (302) 774-3891Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: CITY NOT REPORTED, DE 99999 1007 MARKET STREETOwner/operator address: EI DU PONT DE NEMOURS & COMPANY INC.Owner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: Handler: Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous wasteDescription: Non-GeneratorClassification: Other land typeLand type: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (925) 776-1177Contact telephone: USContact country: OAKLEY, CA 94561 6004 BRIDGEHEAD RDContact address: GENE RUSSELLContact: CAD009206855EPA ID: SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 160 S LINDEN AVEFacility address: DUPONT/ KANSAI AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE CTRFacility name: 11/09/2000Date form received by agency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: Not reportedSchedule end date: Not reportedOriginal schedule date: Not reportedNAICS Code(s): corrective action priority CA075ME - CA Prioritization, Facility or area was assigned a mediumAction: 19910919Actual Date: ENTIRE FACILITYArea Name: 09EPA Region: CAD009206855EPA ID: CORRACTS: Not reportedAction Anomaly: Not reportedUrgency Indicator: Not reportedPlanning Status: State, Fund FinancedPrimary Responsibility: SITEWIDEOperable Unit: NFRAP-Site does not qualify for the NPL based on existing informationPriority Level: 09/23/04Date Completed: 07/01/03Date Started: SITE REASSESSMENTAction: 001Action Code: AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE CENTER (Continued)1000335044 TC3837232.2s Page 523 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation action priority. CA Prioritization, Facility or area was assigned a medium correctiveEvent: 09/19/1991Event date: CA029EPEvent: 09/19/1991Event date: Corrective Action Summary: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: DU PONT/KANSAI-AUTOMOTIVE COATINGSSite name: DUPONT/ KANSAI AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE CTRFacility name: 02/22/1994Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: DU PONT - KANSAISite name: DUPONT/ KANSAI AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE CTRFacility name: 02/14/1996Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: DUPONT/ KANSAI AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE CTRFacility name: 09/01/1996Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: DUPONT/KANSAISite name: DUPONT/ KANSAI AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE CTRFacility name: 03/04/1999Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: DUPONT/KANSAISite name: DUPONT/ KANSAI AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE CTRFacility name: 10/12/2000Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (302) 774-3891Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE CENTER (Continued)1000335044 TC3837232.2s Page 524 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation State Contractor/GranteeEvaluation lead agency: 03/12/1991Date achieved compliance: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 03/12/1986Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: FOCUSED COMPLIANCE INSPECTIONEvaluation: 07/25/2002Evaluation date: Evaluation Action Summary: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: Not reported Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: Not reported Enforcement action date: Not reported Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 03/12/1991Date achieved compliance: 03/12/1986Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: FR - 262.10-12.ARegulation violated: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: CA049PAEvent: 09/19/1991Event date: AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE CENTER (Continued)1000335044 Not reportedDate Site Hazard Ranked: Not reportedHazardous Ranking Score: Not reportedCortese: Not reportedAccess: MANU - CHEMICALS & ALLIED PRODUCTSSIC Name: 28SIC Code: Not reportedNPL: RESPONSIBLE PARTYType Name: RPFacility Type: N/ALead Agency: Not reportedLead Agency: CERTIFIEDStatus Name: CERTIFIED AS HAVING BEEN REMEDIED SATISFACTORILY UNDER DTSC OVERSIGHTStatus: 01011983State Senate District: Not reportedFile Name: NORTH COASTBranch Name: NCBranch: BERKELEYRegion Name: 2Region: 41280049Facility ID: Calsite: 4034 ft.Site 4 of 4 in cluster AY 0.764 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 26 ft. 1/2-1S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 SW160 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUE N/A AY329 HIST Cal-SitesE.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS S100714698 TC3837232.2s Page 525 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0For Industrial Reuse: 0For Commercial Reuse: Not reportedActivity Comments: Not reportedRemoval Action Certification: Not reportedAction Included Fencing: Not reportedWell Decommissioned: Not reportedAction Included Capping: 0Liquids Treated (Gals): 0Liquids Removed (Gals): CERTIFIEDDefinition of Status: CERTActivity Status: Not reportedRequest to Delete Activity: Not reportedEstimated Size: 0Est Person-Yrs to complete: 01011983Comments Date: Not reportedRevised Due Date: Not reportedAWP Completion Date: 0Proposed Budget: Not reportedAWP Code: CERTIFICATIONActivity Name: CERTActivity: 41280049Facility ID: 0Unknown Type: 0For Residential Reuse: 0For Industrial Reuse: 0For Commercial Reuse: Not reportedActivity Comments: Not reportedRemoval Action Certification: Not reportedAction Included Fencing: Not reportedWell Decommissioned: Not reportedAction Included Capping: 0Liquids Treated (Gals): 0Liquids Removed (Gals): CERTIFIEDDefinition of Status: CERTActivity Status: Not reportedRequest to Delete Activity: Not reportedEstimated Size: 0Est Person-Yrs to complete: 08011980Comments Date: Not reportedRevised Due Date: Not reportedAWP Completion Date: 0Proposed Budget: Not reportedAWP Code: DISCOVERYActivity Name: DISCActivity: 41280049Facility ID: 08State Senate District Code: 19State Assembly District Code: Not reportedLat/Long Description: Not reportedLat/long Method: 0 0 0 / 0 0 0Lat/Long (dms): Not reportedLat/Long Direction: Not reportedRegion Water Control Board Name: Not reportedRegion Water Control Board: Not reportedSupervisor Responsible for Site: GWHITEStaff Member Responsible for Site: Not reportedGroundwater Contamination: E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS (Continued)S100714698 TC3837232.2s Page 526 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 11212002Comments Date: Agency (SMCHSA), the lead agency for the Site, issued a noComments: 11212002Comments Date: between 2.1 and 762 ppm. The San Mateo County Health ServicesComments: 11212002Comments Date: 20 ppm and concentrations of lead remaining in the soil wereComments: 11212002Comments Date: and arsenic was detected at concentrations ranging from 1.2 toComments: 11212002Comments Date: Confirmation samples were collected from the excavated areasComments: 11212002Comments Date: to industrial standards and disposed at an appropriate facility.Comments: 11212002Comments Date: in three areas on the property. Contaminated soil was excavatedComments: 11212002Comments Date: screening levels. In 2000, hot spot soil removal was conductedComments: 11212002Comments Date: were detected in soil at concentrations that exceeded industrialComments: 11212002Comments Date: The results indicated that lead, toluene, xylene and benzeneComments: 11212002Comments Date: organic compounds, total petroleum hydrocarbons and some metals.Comments: 11212002Comments Date: and analyzed for volatile organic compounds, semi-volatileComments: 11212002Comments Date: Site Discovery. Facility was identified as an active siteComments: 08011980Comments Date: Recommend NFA based on Drive-by.Comments: 01181981Comments Date: Facility drive-by: No evidence of waste.Comments: 01161981Comments Date: because it gives the earliest statute of limitations date.Comments: 01011983Comments Date: month and day information was available. January 1 chosenComments: 01011983Comments Date: Certified Site. 1600 tons of hazardous waste was removed. NoComments: 01011983Comments Date: Completed Site Screening. In 1991, soil samples were collectedComments: 11212002Comments Date: Electronics, Inc, (#41360066).Comments: 08011980Comments Date: independent of drive-by; same address as KoningsbergComments: 08011980Comments Date: office park. Site in September 2000 and plans to develop it as a Class A products until 1990. Deerfield Realty Corporation acquired the and varnishes until 1982, and warehoused and distributed their (DuPont) owned the Site. DuPont manufactured automotive paints inactive AT&T vehicles. From 1935 to 2000, DuPont de Nemours pallet company and another portion is used for storage of automotive storage. A portion of the Site is leased to a wood building and a warehouse on the Site, which is used for The Site is located in an industrial area. There is a one-storyBackground Info: S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080Alternate City,St,Zip: 160 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUEAlternate Address: 0Unknown Type: 0For Residential Reuse: E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS (Continued)S100714698 TC3837232.2s Page 527 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSpecial Programs Name: Not reportedSpecial Programs Code: DUPONT DE NEMOURS & COMPANYE.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURSAlternate Name: 200394ID Value: CALSTARS CODEID Name: monitoring at the Site.Comments: 11212002Comments Date: installed. SMCHSA is currently overseeing quarterly groundwaterComments: 11212002Comments Date: contamination source) was removed, four monitoring wells wereComments: 11212002Comments Date: the underground storage tank (believed to be the groundwaterComments: 11212002Comments Date: included TPH as gasoline, benzene, toluene and xylene. AfterComments: 11212002Comments Date: The groundwater contaminants detected during the Phase 1 ESAComments: 11212002Comments Date: further action letter with respect to the contaminated soil.Comments: E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS (Continued)S100714698 71002127Facility ID: Cleanup BerkeleyDivision Branch: Not reportedSupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: NONE SPECIFIEDLead Agency: NONE SPECIFIEDRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: Not reportedAcres: Tiered PermitSite Type Detailed: Tiered PermitSite Type: ENVIROSTOR: 95203Discharge Zip: CaliforniaDischarge State: StocktonDischarge City: 3515 Navy DrDischarge Address: Shell Oil Products USDischarge Name: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: 02/11/1999Effective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: IndustrialProgram Type: 2 41I014943WDID: Not reportedPlace Id: EnrolleeRegulatory Measure Type: 97-03-DWQOrder No: 182943Regulatory Measure Id: 2Region: 0Agency Id: ActiveFacility Status: CAS000001Npdes Number: NPDES: 4063 ft. 0.770 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 22 ft. 1/2-1 WDSSOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 SSE ENVIROSTOR135 N ACCESS RD N/A 330 NPDESSHELL OIL PROD US EQUILON SF DS106089273 TC3837232.2s Page 528 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation JORDAN CARLTONAgency Contact: CARSON 907496249Agency City,St,Zip: 20945 S WILMINGTON AVEAgency Address: SHELL OIL PROD USAgency Name: BOZZO KRISTIFacility Contact: 6507611424Facility Telephone: 2Subregion: are assigned by the Regional Board CAS000001 The 1st 2 characters designate the state. The remaining 7NPDES Number: under Waste Discharge Requirements. Active - Any facility with a continuous or seasonal discharge that isFacility Status: pumping. repairing, oil production, storage and disposal operations, water washing, geothermal operations, air conditioning, ship building and processing operation of whatever nature, including mining, gravel semisolid wastes from any servicing, producing, manufacturing or Industrial - Facility that treats and/or disposes of liquid orFacility Type: San Francisco Bay 41I014943Facility ID: CA WDS: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: Not reportedCompleted Date: Not reportedCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: Not reportedCompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 71002127Alias Name: EPA Identification NumberAlias Type: CAD000631440Alias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIED, NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -122.3990Longitude: 37.64029Latitude: Not reportedFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.: NORestricted Use: Not reportedStatus Date: Inactive - Needs EvaluationStatus: Not reportedSpecial Program: 13Senate: 22Assembly: Not reportedSite Code: SHELL OIL PROD US EQUILON SF D (Continued)S106089273 TC3837232.2s Page 529 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation dairy waste ponds. dischargers having waste storage systems with land disposal such as disposal systems, such as septic systems with subsurface disposal, or management practices, facilities with passive waste treatment and cooling water dischargers or thosewho must comply through best Category C - Facilities having no waste treatment systems, such asComplexity: represent no threat to water quality. Level. A Zero (0) may be used to code those NURDS that are found to considered a minor threat to water quality unless coded at a higher to a major or minor threat. Not: All nurds without a TTWQ will be should cause a relatively minor impairment of beneficial uses compared Minor Threat to Water Quality. A violation of a regional board orderTreat To Water: Not reportedPOTW: Not reportedReclamation: 0Baseline Flow: 0Design Flow: Not reportedSecondary Waste Type: Not reportedSecondary Waste: Not reportedPrimary Waste Type: Not reportedPrimary Waste: Not reportedSIC Code 2: 0SIC Code: PrivateAgency Type: 3108162060Agency Telephone: SHELL OIL PROD US EQUILON SF D (Continued)S106089273 NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: compounds * Metals - Sludge * ACID SOLUTION 2>PH WITH METALS Lead Mercury andPotential COC : NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -122.3983Longitude: 37.66394Latitude: Responsible PartyFunding: NORestricted Use: 01/30/1995Status Date: No Further ActionStatus: Not reportedSpecial Program Status: 13Senate: 22Assembly: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.: 200152Site Code: Cleanup BerkeleyDivision Branch: Not reportedSupervisor: Not reportedProject Manager: * DTSCLead Agency Description: DTSCCleanup Oversight Agencies: NONational Priorities List: Not reportedAcres: State Response or NPLSite Type Detail: State ResponseSite Type: 41330051Facility ID: RESPONSE: 4097 ft. 0.776 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 22 ft. 1/2-1S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 NNE ENVIROSTORHIGHWAY 101 AT OYSTER POINT BLVD N/A 331 RESPONSEHIGHWAY 101/OYSTER POINT S100270033 TC3837232.2s Page 530 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No Further ActionStatus: Not reportedSpecial Program: 13Senate: 22Assembly: 200152Site Code: 41330051Facility ID: Cleanup BerkeleyDivision Branch: Not reportedSupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: DTSCLead Agency: DTSCRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: Not reportedAcres: State Response or NPLSite Type Detailed: State ResponseSite Type: ENVIROSTOR: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: an approved removal action. 1000 pp and petroleum hydrocarbons. The piles weill be removed via excavation for characterization. One pile contained lead just over Bay. The covered pile of soil were stored north of the Oyster Point lead-contaminated soil from a ditch draining into the San Francisco preparation for construction of the Oyster Pt. overcrossing, removed Lead and TPH above the TTLC are in the stored soil. CalTrans, inComments: 10/10/1991Completed Date: Preliminary Endangerment Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 01/30/1995Completed Date: Removal Action Completion ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 41330051Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 200152Alias Name: EPA (FRS #)Alias Type: 110033613962Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: OYSTER PT/HIGHWAY 101Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: CALTRANS OYSTER POINT OVERCROSSINGAlias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: HIGHWAY 101/OYSTER POINT (Continued)S100270033 TC3837232.2s Page 531 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: an approved removal action. 1000 pp and petroleum hydrocarbons. The piles weill be removed via excavation for characterization. One pile contained lead just over Bay. The covered pile of soil were stored north of the Oyster Point lead-contaminated soil from a ditch draining into the San Francisco preparation for construction of the Oyster Pt. overcrossing, removed Lead and TPH above the TTLC are in the stored soil. CalTrans, inComments: 10/10/1991Completed Date: Preliminary Endangerment Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 01/30/1995Completed Date: Removal Action Completion ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 41330051Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 200152Alias Name: EPA (FRS #)Alias Type: 110033613962Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: OYSTER PT/HIGHWAY 101Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: CALTRANS OYSTER POINT OVERCROSSINGAlias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: and compounds, NONE SPECIFIED * Metals - Sludge, * ACID SOLUTION 2>PH WITH METALS, Lead, MercuryConfirmed COC: and compounds * Metals - Sludge, * ACID SOLUTION 2>PH WITH METALS, Lead, MercuryPotential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -122.3983Longitude: 37.66394Latitude: Responsible PartyFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.: NORestricted Use: 01/30/1995Status Date: HIGHWAY 101/OYSTER POINT (Continued)S100270033 TC3837232.2s Page 532 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation parcel of the property. onsite. In 1984, Homart isolated and treated lead contaminated soil on one During 1981 and 1982, Homart investigated and mitigated PCB contaminated areasSite Activity Status: excavation for site development. to the San Francisco Bay and direct contact with metal-contaminated soil during The major pathways of exposure are through migration of the acidic ground waterThreat To Public Health & Env: contaminated with lead still remains. ground water. Most of the PCB and oil-contaminated soil has been removed. Soil Contaminants include polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), lead (Pb) and acidicHazardous Waste Desc: the San Francisco Bay. various railroad carunloading areas. The site is approximately 1000 feet from areas, oil shed areas, oil tanks, acid sewage basin, acid sewage pond, and took place. Contaminated areas include heavy metal contaminated soil and slag The property is composed of a number of subareas where different activitiesSite Description: date. Homart Development Co. owns the property and has paid for all cleanup costs toProject Revenue Source Desc: Not reportedProject Revenue Source City,St,Zip: Not reportedProject Revenue Source Addr: Not reportedProject Revenue Source Company: COST RECOVERY/OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE SITEReponsible Party: CA BOND EXP. PLAN: 4102 ft.Site 2 of 2 in cluster AX 0.777 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 25 ft. 1/2-1SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 NNE480 INDUSTRIAL WAY N/A AX332 CA BOND EXP. PLANHOMART DEVELOPMENT CORP/EDWARDS WIRE & ROPES100833559 hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: Facility is not located on Indian land. Additional information is not known.Land type: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (650) 737-8400Contact telephone: Not reportedContact country: Not reported Not reportedContact address: JAQUIM PORTUGALContact: CAD056188212EPA ID: SAN BRUNO, CA 94066 1229 MONTGOMERYFacility address: PHASE IISite name: PHASE II CORPFacility name: 03/04/1999Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: ENVIROSTOR HAZNET San Mateo Co. BI ENF 4329 ft.SWEEPS UST 0.820 mi.HIST UST Relative: Lower Actual: 20 ft. 1/2-1 SLICSAN BRUNO, CA 94066 SSW CA FID UST1229 MONTGOMERY CAD056188212 333 RCRA-SQGPHASE II CORP 1000379055 TC3837232.2s Page 533 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation UTNKARegulated By: 41004984Facility ID: CA FID UST: State Contractor/GranteeEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 10/21/1994Evaluation date: Evaluation Action Summary: No violations foundViolation Status: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: PHASE II CORPFacility name: 10/03/1980Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: PHASE II CORPFacility name: 02/27/1992Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: PHASE IISite name: PHASE II CORPFacility name: 03/18/1994Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: PHASE IISite name: PHASE II CORPFacility name: 02/28/1996Date form received by agency: Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: PHASE II CORPFacility name: 09/01/1996Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: PHASE II CORPFacility name: 09/01/1996Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: PHASE II CORP (Continued)1000379055 TC3837232.2s Page 534 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 00000000Tank Capacity: 1984Year Installed: 1Container Num: 001Tank Num: SAN BRUNO, CA 94066Owner City,St,Zip: 1229 MONTGOMERY AVOwner Address: PHASE IIOwner Name: 4155897709Telephone: Not reportedContact Name: 0002Total Tanks: MFG PRINTED WIRING BOther Type: OtherFacility Type: 00000016543Facility ID: STATERegion: HIST UST: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: require achieving drinking water standards. groundwater used for drinking water, although the cleanup will via the Hetch Hetchy/SFPUC. This site is not impacting the San Bruno does use some groundwater to supplement the water suppliedSite History: (TCE) Benzene, Other Solvent or Non-Petroleum Hydrocarbon, TrichloroethylenePotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water), Soil, Soil VaporPotential Media Affected: Regional BoardFile Location: 41S0155RB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: CLPCase Worker: Cleanup Program SiteCase Type: -122.412673591Longitude: 37.640136894Latitude: Not reportedLead Agency Case Number: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Lead Agency: SL0608187730Global Id: 10/31/2007Status Date: Open - RemediationFacility Status: STATERegion: SLIC: ActiveStatus: Not reportedComments: Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: SAN BRUNO 94066Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: 1229 MONTGOMERY AVEMailing Address: Not reportedMail To: 4155897709Facility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: Not reportedRegulated ID: PHASE II CORP (Continued)1000379055 TC3837232.2s Page 535 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSIC Desc 2: Not reportedSIC Code 2: Not reportedSIC Desc 1: Not reportedSIC Code 1: -122.41245Place Longitude: 37.639996Place Latitude: 1# Of Agencies: Privately-Owned BusinessAgency Type: IndustrialFacility Type: Not reportedPlace Subtype: FacilityPlace Type: San Bruno Investment Co. Inc.Agency Name: 226250Facility Id: 2Region: ENF: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: Not reportedContent: Not reportedStg: Not reportedTank Use: Not reportedCapacity: Not reportedActv Date: Not reportedSwrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedTank Status: 10-13-88Created Date: 04-11-94Action Date: 04-11-94Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 9Number: 880049Comp Number: ActiveStatus: SWEEPS UST: VisualLeak Detection: 0.5 inchesTank Construction: Not reportedType of Fuel: WASTETank Used for: 00000550Tank Capacity: 1984Year Installed: 0000000001Container Num: 002Tank Num: NoneLeak Detection: Unkown centimetersTank Construction: 6UType of Fuel: WASTETank Used for: 00000000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 1Container Num: 001Tank Num: VisualLeak Detection: 5 inchesTank Construction: Not reportedType of Fuel: Not reportedTank Used for: PHASE II CORP (Continued)1000379055 TC3837232.2s Page 536 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedTermination Date: Not reportedAchieve Date: Not reportedAdoption/Issuance Date: 12/07/2001Effective Date: 13267 LetterEnforcement Action Type: UNKNOWNOrder / Resolution Number: 2Region: 239297Enforcement Id(EID): PassiveDirection/Voice: Not reportedFee Code: IIndividual/General: NStatus Enrollee: Not reportedWDR Review - Planned: Not reportedWDR Review - Pending: Not reportedWDR Review - No Action Required: Not reportedWDR Review - Rescind: Not reportedWDR Review - Revise/Renew: Not reportedWDR Review - Amend: Not reportedTermination Date: Not reportedExpiration/Review Date: Not reportedEffective Date: 02/21/2013Status Date: Never ActiveStatus: Not reportedApplication Fee Amt Received: Not reported301H: Not reportedDredge Fill Fee: Not reportedReclamation: Not reportedNpdes Type: Not reportedMajor-Minor: Not reportedNpdes# CA#: Not reportedOrder #: 2Region: UnregulatedReg Measure Type: 169588Reg Measure Id: 2 41S0155WDID: 1# Of Programs: UNREGSProgram Category2: UNREGSProgram Category1: UNREGSProgram: Not reportedFacility Waste Type 4: Not reportedFacility Waste Type 3: Not reportedFacility Waste Type 2: Not reportedFacility Waste Type: Not reportedPretreatment: Not reportedComplexity: Not reportedThreat To Water Quality: Not reportedDesign Flow: Reg MeasSource Of Facility: 1# Of Places: Not reportedNAICS Desc 3: Not reportedNAICS Code 3: Not reportedNAICS Desc 2: Not reportedNAICS Code 2: Not reportedNAICS Desc 1: Not reportedNAICS Code 1: Not reportedSIC Desc 3: Not reportedSIC Code 3: PHASE II CORP (Continued)1000379055 TC3837232.2s Page 537 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2Region: UnregulatedReg Measure Type: 169588Reg Measure Id: 2 41S0155WDID: 1# Of Programs: UNREGSProgram Category2: UNREGSProgram Category1: UNREGSProgram: Not reportedFacility Waste Type 4: Not reportedFacility Waste Type 3: Not reportedFacility Waste Type 2: Not reportedFacility Waste Type: Not reportedPretreatment: Not reportedComplexity: Not reportedThreat To Water Quality: Not reportedDesign Flow: Reg MeasSource Of Facility: 1# Of Places: Not reportedNAICS Desc 3: Not reportedNAICS Code 3: Not reportedNAICS Desc 2: Not reportedNAICS Code 2: Not reportedNAICS Desc 1: Not reportedNAICS Code 1: Not reportedSIC Desc 3: Not reportedSIC Code 3: Not reportedSIC Desc 2: Not reportedSIC Code 2: Not reportedSIC Desc 1: Not reportedSIC Code 1: -122.41245Place Longitude: 37.639996Place Latitude: 1# Of Agencies: Privately-Owned BusinessAgency Type: IndustrialFacility Type: Not reportedPlace Subtype: FacilityPlace Type: San Bruno Investment Co. Inc.Agency Name: 226250Facility Id: 2Region: 0Total $ Paid/Completed Amount: 0Project $ Completed: 0Liability $ Paid: 0Project $ Amount: 0Liability $ Amount: 0Initial Assessed Amount: 0Total Assessment Amount: 1# Of Programs1: Not reportedLatest Milestone Completion Date: ENF13267Program: investigation Request for site history and workplan for additionalDescription: Enforcement - 2 41S0155Title: ActiveStatus: Not reportedEPL Issuance Date: Not reportedACL Issuance Date: PHASE II CORP (Continued)1000379055 TC3837232.2s Page 538 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation COND EXEMPT - SPECIAL WASTESProg Element Code: FA0018250Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: UNDERGROUND TANK - GENERALDescription: PR0022964Record Id: UNDERGROUND TANK - GENERALProg Element Code: FA0006530Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: San Mateo Co. BI: 0Total $ Paid/Completed Amount: 0Project $ Completed: 0Liability $ Paid: 0Project $ Amount: 0Liability $ Amount: 0Initial Assessed Amount: 0Total Assessment Amount: 1# Of Programs1: Not reportedLatest Milestone Completion Date: ENF13267Program: Not reportedDescription: Enforcement - 2 41S0155Title: ActiveStatus: Not reportedEPL Issuance Date: Not reportedACL Issuance Date: Not reportedTermination Date: Not reportedAchieve Date: Not reportedAdoption/Issuance Date: 02/28/2002Effective Date: 13267 LetterEnforcement Action Type: UNKNOWNOrder / Resolution Number: 2Region: 239500Enforcement Id(EID): PassiveDirection/Voice: Not reportedFee Code: IIndividual/General: NStatus Enrollee: Not reportedWDR Review - Planned: Not reportedWDR Review - Pending: Not reportedWDR Review - No Action Required: Not reportedWDR Review - Rescind: Not reportedWDR Review - Revise/Renew: Not reportedWDR Review - Amend: Not reportedTermination Date: Not reportedExpiration/Review Date: Not reportedEffective Date: 02/21/2013Status Date: Never ActiveStatus: Not reportedApplication Fee Amt Received: Not reported301H: Not reportedDredge Fill Fee: Not reportedReclamation: Not reportedNpdes Type: Not reportedMajor-Minor: Not reportedNpdes# CA#: Not reportedOrder #: PHASE II CORP (Continued)1000379055 TC3837232.2s Page 539 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation STORES HAZ MAT <219GAL,1,999LB, 879CFDescription: PR0053064Record Id: STORES HAZ MAT <219GAL,1,999LB, 879FT3Prog Element Code: FA0035253Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: GENERATES & RECYCLES WASTE OIL/SOLVENTDescription: PR0053065Record Id: GENERATES and RECYCLES WASTE OIL/SOLVENTProg Element Code: FA0035253Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: STORES HAZ MAT <219GAL,1,999LB, 879CFDescription: PR0048893Record Id: STORES HAZ MAT <219GAL,1,999LB, 879FT3Prog Element Code: FA0028959Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: GENERATES <27 GAL/YEARDescription: PR0048894Record Id: GENERATES <27 GAL/YEARProg Element Code: FA0028959Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: STORES MV FUELS OR WASTE ONLYDescription: PR0050390Record Id: STORES MV FUELS OR WASTE ONLYProg Element Code: FA0025500Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: GENERATES & RECYCLES WASTE OIL/SOLVENTDescription: PR0034071Record Id: GENERATES and RECYCLES WASTE OIL/SOLVENTProg Element Code: FA0025500Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: BUSINESS PLAN - GENERALDescription: PR0034072Record Id: BUSINESS PLAN - GENERALProg Element Code: FA0025500Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: STORES HAZ MAT <15999GAL, 111999LB, 5599CFDescription: PR0004970Record Id: STORES HAZ MAT <15999GAL, 111999LB, 5599FT^3Prog Element Code: FA0018250Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: GEN 51-250 TONS HAZ WASTE/YRDescription: PR0012180Record Id: GEN 51-250 TONS HAZ WASTE/YRProg Element Code: FA0018250Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: COND EXEMPT - SPECIAL WASTESDescription: PR0030028Record Id: PHASE II CORP (Continued)1000379055 TC3837232.2s Page 540 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation San MateoFacility County: .2293Tons: Transfer StationDisposal Method: Alkaline solution without metals pH >= 12.5Waste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAD028409019TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: SAN BRUNO, CA 940660000Mailing City,St,Zip: 1245 MONTGOMERY STMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 6507378400Telephone: PHASE IIContact: CAD056188212Gepaid: 1999Year: San MateoFacility County: .4170Tons: Not reportedDisposal Method: Liquids with pH <= 2 with metalsWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: NVD980895338TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: SAN BRUNO, CA 940660000Mailing City,St,Zip: 1245 MONTGOMERY STMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 6507378400Telephone: PHASE IIContact: CAD056188212Gepaid: 1999Year: San MateoFacility County: 12.09Tons: RecyclerDisposal Method: Waste oil and mixed oilWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAD980887418TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: SAN BRUNO, CA 940660000Mailing City,St,Zip: 1229 MONTGOMERYMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 6507378400Telephone: JAQUIM PORTUGALContact: CAD056188212Gepaid: 2000Year: HAZNET: STORES HAZ MAT <219GAL,1,999LB, 879CFDescription: PR0055911Record Id: STORES HAZ MAT <219GAL,1,999LB, 879FT3Prog Element Code: FA0039905Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: GENERATES & RECYCLES WASTE OIL/SOLVENTDescription: PR0055912Record Id: GENERATES and RECYCLES WASTE OIL/SOLVENTProg Element Code: FA0039905Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: PHASE II CORP (Continued)1000379055 TC3837232.2s Page 541 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -122.4125Longitude: 37.63978Latitude: Not reportedFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.: NORestricted Use: Not reportedStatus Date: Inactive - Needs EvaluationStatus: Not reportedSpecial Program: 13Senate: 22Assembly: Not reportedSite Code: 71002470Facility ID: Cleanup BerkeleyDivision Branch: Not reportedSupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: NONE SPECIFIEDLead Agency: NONE SPECIFIEDRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: Not reportedAcres: Tiered PermitSite Type Detailed: Tiered PermitSite Type: ENVIROSTOR: 92 additional CA_HAZNET: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access San MateoFacility County: .0625Tons: Treatment, TankDisposal Method: Off-specification, aged or surplus organicsWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: WAD991281767TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: SAN BRUNO, CA 940660000Mailing City,St,Zip: 1245 MONTGOMERY STMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 6507378400Telephone: PHASE IIContact: CAD056188212Gepaid: 1999Year: San MateoFacility County: 1.6054Tons: Transfer StationDisposal Method: solution (pH >= 12.5) with metals)) Aqueous solution with metals (< restricted levels and (AlkalineWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAD028409019TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: SAN BRUNO, CA 940660000Mailing City,St,Zip: 1245 MONTGOMERY STMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 6507378400Telephone: PHASE IIContact: CAD056188212Gepaid: 1999Year: PHASE II CORP (Continued)1000379055 TC3837232.2s Page 542 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: Not reportedCompleted Date: Not reportedCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: Not reportedCompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 71002470Alias Name: EPA Identification NumberAlias Type: CAD056188212Alias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIED, NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: PHASE II CORP (Continued)1000379055 Not reportedFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.: NORestricted Use: 03/21/1995Status Date: Refer: RWQCBStatus: Not reportedSpecial Program: 13Senate: 22Assembly: Not reportedSite Code: 41330044Facility ID: Cleanup BerkeleyDivision Branch: Referred - Not AssignedSupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: NONE SPECIFIEDLead Agency: NONE SPECIFIEDRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: Not reportedAcres: * HistoricalSite Type Detailed: HistoricalSite Type: ENVIROSTOR: 41330044Reg Id: CALSIReg By: 41Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 4661 ft. 0.883 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 18 ft. 1/2-1S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 NNE ENVIROSTOR105 OYSTER POINT BLVD N/A 334 HIST CORTESEU.S. STEEL CORP.S105026703 TC3837232.2s Page 543 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: SITE SCREENING DONEComments: 05/14/1987Completed Date: Site ScreeningCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: SITE SCREENING DONE PA MED. CONTAMINATION SUSPECTEDComments: 05/31/1989Completed Date: Site ScreeningCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: FACILITY IDENTIFIED ACTIVE SITE I.D.’D IND. OF DRIVE BYComments: 08/01/1980Completed Date: * DiscoveryCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 41330044Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: SHEARWATER PROJECTAlias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: Containing Materials (ACM, Chromium VI, Nickel, NONE SPECIFIED * ORGANIC LIQUIDS WITH METALS, * CONTAMINATED SOIL, AsbestosConfirmed COC: Containing Materials (ACM, Chromium VI, Nickel * ORGANIC LIQUIDS WITH METALS, * CONTAMINATED SOIL, AsbestosPotential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -122.3969Longitude: 37.66276Latitude: U.S. STEEL CORP. (Continued)S105026703 Referred - Not AssignedSupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: NONE SPECIFIEDLead Agency: NONE SPECIFIEDRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: Not reportedAcres: * HistoricalSite Type Detailed: HistoricalSite Type: ENVIROSTOR: 4840 ft. 0.917 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 18 ft. 1/2-1S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 NNEOYSTER POINT BLVD AT OYSTER POINT MARINA N/A 335 ENVIROSTOROYSTER POINT DUMP 1000730188 TC3837232.2s Page 544 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation FACILITY IDENTIFIED ACTIVE SITE I.D.’D IND. OF DRIVE BYComments: 08/01/1980Completed Date: * DiscoveryCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: SITE SCREENING DONE SITE IS ON EPA’S CERCLA FIT IS CONDUCTING SIComments: 05/26/1987Completed Date: Site ScreeningCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: FACILITY IDENTIFIED ID FROM ERRISComments: 10/12/1983Completed Date: * DiscoveryCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 41490033Alias Name: HWTS Identification CodeAlias Type: CAD980636989Alias Name: EPA Identification NumberAlias Type: CAD980636989Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: OYSTER POINT MARINAAlias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: SPECIFIED POLYMERIC RESIN WASTE, Lead, Chromium VI, Cyanide (free, NONE & MIXED OIL, * FLY ASH, BOTTOM ASH & RETORT ASH, * LATEX WASTE, * UNSPECIFIED SLUDGE WASTE, * UNSPECIFIED SOLVENT MIXTURES, * WASTE OIL UNSPECIFIED ACID SOLUTION, * UNSPECIFIED ALKALINE SOLUTIONS, * ORGANIC SOLIDS, * OXYGENATED SOLVENTS, * Sludge - Paint, * METALS, * ORGANIC MONOMER WASTE, INCLUDING UNREACTED RESINS, * OTHER * HOUSEHOLD WASTES, * HYDROCARBON SOLVENTS, * ORGANIC LIQUIDS WITHConfirmed COC: POLYMERIC RESIN WASTE, Lead, Chromium VI, Cyanide (free & MIXED OIL, * FLY ASH, BOTTOM ASH & RETORT ASH, * LATEX WASTE, * UNSPECIFIED SLUDGE WASTE, * UNSPECIFIED SOLVENT MIXTURES, * WASTE OIL UNSPECIFIED ACID SOLUTION, * UNSPECIFIED ALKALINE SOLUTIONS, * ORGANIC SOLIDS, * OXYGENATED SOLVENTS, * Sludge - Paint, * METALS, * ORGANIC MONOMER WASTE, INCLUDING UNREACTED RESINS, * OTHER * HOUSEHOLD WASTES, * HYDROCARBON SOLVENTS, * ORGANIC LIQUIDS WITHPotential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: 0Longitude: 0Latitude: Not reportedFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.: NORestricted Use: 08/01/1985Status Date: Refer: RWQCBStatus: * Site Char & Assess Grant (CERCLA 104)Special Program: Not reportedSenate: Not reportedAssembly: Not reportedSite Code: 41490033Facility ID: Cleanup BerkeleyDivision Branch: OYSTER POINT DUMP (Continued)1000730188 TC3837232.2s Page 545 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: OYSTER POINT DUMP (Continued)1000730188 Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: FACILITY IDENTIFIED ACTIVE SITE I.D.’D IND. OF DRIVE BYComments: 08/01/1980Completed Date: * DiscoveryCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 41310004Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 014232030Alias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: * Metals - Sludge, NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: * Metals - SludgePotential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: 014232030APN: -122.4169Longitude: 37.64236Latitude: Not reportedFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.: NORestricted Use: 06/08/1994Status Date: Refer: RWQCBStatus: Not reportedSpecial Program: 13Senate: 22Assembly: Not reportedSite Code: 41310004Facility ID: Cleanup BerkeleyDivision Branch: Referred - Not AssignedSupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: NONE SPECIFIEDLead Agency: NONE SPECIFIEDRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: Not reportedAcres: * HistoricalSite Type Detailed: HistoricalSite Type: ENVIROSTOR: 4851 ft. 0.919 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 28 ft. 1/2-1S SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 SW325 SOUTH MAPLE AVENUE N/A 336 ENVIROSTORPOETSCH AND PETERSON TANNERSS106798271 TC3837232.2s Page 546 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: POETSCH AND PETERSON TANNERS (Continued)S106798271 jmadden@smcgov.orgEmail: SAN MATEOCity: 2000 ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGASAddress: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: JACOB MADDENContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100727Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: nkatyl@waterboards.ca.govEmail: OAKLANDCity: 1515 CLAY STREETAddress: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: NANCY KATYLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608100727Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: Local AgencyFile Location: 550123LOC Case Number: 41-0768RB Case Number: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: JMCase Worker: SAN MATEO COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 11/13/2000Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -122.411478Longitude: 37.6374266Latitude: T0608100727Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 41-0768Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 41Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: RGA LUST ENVIROSTOR 4991 ft.SWEEPS UST 0.945 mi.HIST UST Relative: Lower Actual: 20 ft. 1/2-1 CA FID USTSO. SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 SSW LUST1104 SAN MATEO AVE N/A 337 HIST CORTESECYCLE SHACK INC 1000279463 TC3837232.2s Page 547 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remediation Action Underway: Not reportedPollution Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedPollution Characterization Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assesment Began: Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: OMHow Discovered: 550123Case Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: LUST REG 2: ExcavationAction: 01/01/1950Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0608100727Global Id: Notice of Responsibility - #1Action: 10/12/1994Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608100727Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100727Global Id: ExcavationAction: 01/01/1950Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0608100727Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1950Date: OtherAction Type: T0608100727Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 11/13/2000Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608100727Global Id: 06/11/1993Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608100727Global Id: Status History: 6503726298Phone Number: CYCLE SHACK INC (Continued)1000279463 TC3837232.2s Page 548 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedReferral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 550059Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: SWEEPS UST: NoneLeak Detection: 12 gaugeTank Construction: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00001000Tank Capacity: 1978Year Installed: #1Container Num: 001Tank Num: SO. SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080Owner City,St,Zip: 1104 SAN MATEO AVE.Owner Address: C&S PROPERTIESOwner Name: 4155837014Telephone: BUZZ DYERContact Name: 0001Total Tanks: LIGHT MANUFACTURINGOther Type: OtherFacility Type: 00000009926Facility ID: STATERegion: HIST UST: ActiveStatus: Not reportedComments: Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: SO. SAN FRANCISCO 94080Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: 1104 SAN MATEO AVEMailing Address: Not reportedMail To: 4155837014Facility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: Not reportedRegulated ID: UTNKARegulated By: 41000034Facility ID: CA FID UST: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTEDR Link ID: SAN MATEO CO. LUSTCase Type: Not reportedAPN Number: T0608100727Global ID: 9- Case ClosedFacility Status: 550123Facility ID: SAN MATEORegion: SAN MATEO CO. LUST: CYCLE SHACK INC (Continued)1000279463 TC3837232.2s Page 549 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: Not reportedCompleted Date: Not reportedCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: Not reportedCompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 71002485Alias Name: EPA (FRS #)Alias Type: 110021006294Alias Name: EPA Identification NumberAlias Type: CAD058402173Alias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIED, NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -122.4114Longitude: 37.63742Latitude: Not reportedFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.: NORestricted Use: Not reportedStatus Date: Inactive - Needs EvaluationStatus: Not reportedSpecial Program: 13Senate: 22Assembly: Not reportedSite Code: 71002485Facility ID: Cleanup BerkeleyDivision Branch: Not reportedSupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: NONE SPECIFIEDLead Agency: NONE SPECIFIEDRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: Not reportedAcres: Tiered PermitSite Type Detailed: Tiered PermitSite Type: ENVIROSTOR: 1Number Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PRODUCTStg: M.V. FUELTank Use: 1000Capacity: Not reportedActv Date: 41-000-550059-000001Swrcb Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedTank Status: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: CYCLE SHACK INC (Continued)1000279463 TC3837232.2s Page 550 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2003 CYCLE SHACK,INC 1104 SAN MATEO 2005 CYCLE SHACK,INC 1104 SAN MATEO 2006 CYCLE SHACK,INC 1104 SAN MATEO 2007 CYCLE SHACK,INC 1104 SAN MATEO 2008 CYCLE SHACK,INC 1104 SAN MATEO 2009 CYCLE SHACK,INC 1104 SAN MATEO 2010 CYCLE SHACK,INC 1104 SAN MATEO 2011 CYCLE SHACK,INC 1104 SAN MATEO 2012 CYCLE SHACK,INC 1104 SAN MATEO RGA LUST: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: CYCLE SHACK INC (Continued)1000279463 Historical - Non-OperatingFacility Type: CAD005130455EPA Id: 09/27/1987Actual Date: New Operating Permit - FINAL PERMIT - WITHDRAWAL REQUEST ACKNOWLEDGEDEvent Description: SURFSTR1 (GPRA Unit)Unit Names: Historical - Non-OperatingFacility Type: CAD005130455EPA Id: 11/19/1980Actual Date: New Operating Permit - APPLICATION PART A RECEIVEDEvent Description: SURFSTR1 (GPRA Unit)Unit Names: Historical - Non-OperatingFacility Type: CAD005130455EPA Id: 11/19/1980Actual Date: New Operating Permit - CALL-IN LETTER ISSUEDEvent Description: SURFSTR1 (GPRA Unit)Unit Names: Historical - Non-OperatingFacility Type: CAD005130455EPA Id: Activities: Not reportedPublic Information Officer: 13Senate District: 22Assembly District: 200292Site Code: Not reportedSupervisor: Not reportedTeam: Not reportedFacility Size: Historical - Non-OperatingFacility Type: -122.3873Longitude: 37.65130Latitude: CLOSEDCleanup Status: CAD005130455EPA Id: HWP: 5013 ft.Site 1 of 3 in cluster AZ 0.949 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 10 ft. 1/2-1SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 East450 EAST GRAND AVENUE N/A AZ338 HWPO’BRIEN CORPORATION THE S111865966 TC3837232.2s Page 551 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Closure - CLOSURE PLAN RECEIVEDEvent Description: SURFSTR1 (GPRA Unit)Unit Names: Historical - Non-OperatingFacility Type: CAD005130455EPA Id: 04/15/1994Actual Date: Closure Final - PUBLIC COMMENT (BEGIN)Event Description: CONTAIN1Unit Names: Historical - Non-OperatingFacility Type: CAD005130455EPA Id: 08/30/1987Actual Date: Closure - PUBLIC COMMENT (END)Event Description: SURFSTR1 (GPRA Unit)Unit Names: Historical - Non-OperatingFacility Type: CAD005130455EPA Id: 05/15/1994Actual Date: Closure Final - PUBLIC COMMENT (END)Event Description: CONTAIN1Unit Names: Historical - Non-OperatingFacility Type: CAD005130455EPA Id: 05/27/1994Actual Date: Closure Final - CLOSURE PLAN APPROVEDEvent Description: CONTAIN1Unit Names: Historical - Non-OperatingFacility Type: CAD005130455EPA Id: 09/28/1987Actual Date: Closure - CLOSURE PLAN APPROVEDEvent Description: SURFSTR1 (GPRA Unit)Unit Names: Historical - Non-OperatingFacility Type: CAD005130455EPA Id: 07/31/1987Actual Date: Closure - PUBLIC COMMENT (BEGIN)Event Description: SURFSTR1 (GPRA Unit)Unit Names: Historical - Non-OperatingFacility Type: CAD005130455EPA Id: 06/21/1994Actual Date: Closure Final - RECEIVE CLOSURE CERTIFICATIONEvent Description: CONTAIN1Unit Names: Historical - Non-OperatingFacility Type: CAD005130455EPA Id: Closure: 03/05/1985Actual Date: New Operating Permit - FINAL PERMIT - WITHDRAWAL REQUEST RECEIVEDEvent Description: SURFSTR1 (GPRA Unit)Unit Names: Historical - Non-OperatingFacility Type: CAD005130455EPA Id: 03/17/1984Actual Date: New Operating Permit - FINAL PERMIT - WITHDRAWAL REQUEST ACKNOWLEDGEDEvent Description: SURFSTR1 (GPRA Unit)Unit Names: O’BRIEN CORPORATION THE (Continued)S111865966 TC3837232.2s Page 552 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Fuller O’BrienAlias: Alternate NameAlias Type: Historical - Non-OperatingFacility Type: CAD005130455EPA Id: Britannia East GrandAlias: Alternate NameAlias Type: Historical - Non-OperatingFacility Type: CAD005130455EPA Id: 200292Alias: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: Historical - Non-OperatingFacility Type: CAD005130455EPA Id: Alias: 03/28/1994Actual Date: Closure Final - CLOSURE PLAN RECEIVEDEvent Description: CONTAIN1Unit Names: Historical - Non-OperatingFacility Type: CAD005130455EPA Id: 06/30/1994Actual Date: Closure Final - ISSUE CLOSURE VERIFICATIONEvent Description: CONTAIN1Unit Names: Historical - Non-OperatingFacility Type: CAD005130455EPA Id: 07/18/1988Actual Date: Closure - ISSUE CLOSURE VERIFICATIONEvent Description: SURFSTR1 (GPRA Unit)Unit Names: Historical - Non-OperatingFacility Type: CAD005130455EPA Id: 07/18/1988Actual Date: Closure - RECEIVE CLOSURE CERTIFICATIONEvent Description: SURFSTR1 (GPRA Unit)Unit Names: Historical - Non-OperatingFacility Type: CAD005130455EPA Id: 03/05/1985Actual Date: O’BRIEN CORPORATION THE (Continued)S111865966 37.6502572541162Latitude: Not reportedLead Agency Case Number: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Lead Agency: SL18341761Global Id: 07/06/2009Status Date: Open - Verification MonitoringFacility Status: STATERegion: SLIC: 5013 ft.Site 2 of 3 in cluster AZ 0.949 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 10 ft. 1/2-1 ENVIROSTORSOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 East DEED450 EAST GRAND AVENUE N/A AZ339 SLICO’BRIEN CORPORATION THE S111464725 TC3837232.2s Page 553 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedAgency: CERTIFIED O&M - LAND USE RESTRICTIONS ONLYStatus: CORRECTIVE ACTIONSite Type: Not reportedSub Area: PROJECT WIDEArea: 80001530EDR Link ID: 04/23/2008Deed Date(s): Not reportedCovenant Uploaded: Not reportedAgency: CERTIFIED O&M - LAND USE RESTRICTIONS ONLYStatus: CORRECTIVE ACTIONSite Type: SOILSSub Area: Not reportedArea: DEED: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: 2008. Deed Restriction Amendment was recorded with the county on May 7, Operation and Maintenance Agreement with DTSC on March 25, 2008. A under the property. HCP purchased the property and entered an which most likely produced by decaying marine biota in the bay mud Slough also implemented a Methane Mitigation system to vent methane the site and clean soil being imported to build a day care center. allow contaminated soil being excavated from the northwest portion of be leased by Genentech. DTSC approved the revised soil remedy to redeveloping the site into a biotech campus, Britannia East Grand, to (RFI), which determined no further action was necessary. Slough was investigation was documented in the 2005 RCRA Facility Investigation groundwater investigation. The entire property’s groundwater purchased the property from Cherokee. Cherokee continued the Consent Agreement (CACA) with DTSC. In late 2001, Slough LLC industrial use. In March 2001, Cherokee signed a Corrective Action a Deed Restriction with San Mateo County to restrict the property to Partners (Cherokee) purchased the property and In October 2000 filed overseeing groundwater investigation in 2000. Cherokee Investment removal, capping, and land use restrictions. DTSC took the lead in groundwater. USEPA in April 2000 approved soil remedy including soil separated the site investigation into two parts: soil and volatile organic compounds, and semi-volatile compounds. The U.S. EPA constituent of concern was lead; other constituents were metals, areas of concern (AOCs). The main hazardous waste and hazardous waste identified nineteen solid waste management units (SWMUs) and six Assessment (RFA) was completed by USEPA contractors . The RFA December 1987, a Resource Conservation Recovery Act (RCRA) Facility drums, tanks and surface impoundments under an interim status. In O’Brien was a paint manufacturer and managed its hazardous waste inSite History: Other Chlorinated Hydrocarbons, Arsenic, LeadPotential Contaminants of Concern: Surface water Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water), Sediments, Soil,Potential Media Affected: DTSCFile Location: 41S0073RB Case Number: Not reportedLocal Agency: MBRCase Worker: Cleanup Program SiteCase Type: -122.383189201355Longitude: O’BRIEN CORPORATION THE (Continued)S111464725 TC3837232.2s Page 554 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 200292Alias Name: EPA Identification NumberAlias Type: CAD005130455Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: Fuller O’BrienAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: Britannia East GrandAlias Name: OTH, SED, SOIL, SV, IA, OTH, SOIL, SV, SOIL, SV, OTH, SOIL, OTH, SEDPotential Description: 30484-NO, Nickel, 30550-NO, Lead Methane, , 30067-NO, 30067-NO, Nickel, Lead, Methane, , 30484-NO, Methane, , 30025-NO, 30025-NO, 30067-NO, 30484-NO, Nickel, Lead, Methane, , 30024-NO, 30024-NO, 30484-NO, Nickel, 30550-NO, Lead, Nickel, Lead, Nickel, Naphthalene, Toluene, 30024-NO, Nickel, Lead, compounds, Nickel, Naphthalene, Lead, Methane, Barium and compounds, Nickel, Naphthalene, Toluene, Lead, Methane, TPH-gas, Barium and Lead, Methane, TPH-diesel, Nickel, Lead, Methane, TPH-diesel,Confirmed COC: Nickel, Lead, Nickel, Naphthalene, Toluene compounds, Nickel, Naphthalene, Lead, Methane, Barium and compounds, Nickel, Naphthalene, Toluene, Lead, Methane, TPH-gas, Barium and Lead, Methane, TPH-diesel, Nickel, Lead, Methane, TPH-diesel,Potential COC: WATER PONDS WASTE TREATMENT, MANUFACTURING - CERAMICS, PAINT MANUFACTURING, WASTE WATER PONDS, HAZARDOUS WASTE STORAGE - TANKS/CONTAINERS, HAZARDOUS WASTE TREATMENT, MANUFACTURING - CERAMICS, PAINT MANUFACTURING, WASTE WASTE - SEWAGE TREATMENT PONDS, ABOVE GROUND STORAGE TANKS, HAZARDOUS TANKS/CONTAINERS, MANUFACTURING - CERAMICS, PAINT MANUFACTURING, PAINT MANUFACTURING, WASTE WATER PONDS, HAZARDOUS WASTE STORAGE - TREATMENT, LDF, LANDFILL - HAZARDOUS WASTE, MANUFACTURING - CERAMICS, - CERAMICS, PAINT MANUFACTURING, WASTE WATER PONDS, HAZARDOUS WASTE ABOVE GROUND STORAGE TANKS, HAZARDOUS WASTE TREATMENT, MANUFACTURINGPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -122.3819Longitude: 37.65103Latitude: Not reportedFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.: YESRestricted Use: 08/12/2008Status Date: Certified O&M - Land Use Restrictions OnlyStatus: Not reportedSpecial Program: 13Senate: 22Assembly: 200292Site Code: 80001530Facility ID: Cleanup SacramentoDivision Branch: Noel ShrumSupervisor: John BystraProgram Manager: WMLead Agency: SMBRPRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: 26Acres: Corrective ActionSite Type Detailed: Corrective ActionSite Type: ENVIROSTOR: 80001530EDR Link ID: 10/04/2000Deed Date(s): Not reportedCovenant Uploaded: O’BRIEN CORPORATION THE (Continued)S111464725 TC3837232.2s Page 555 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Complete CMS ReportComments: 06/28/2006Completed Date: Corrective Measures Study ReportCompleted Document Type: SOILSCompleted Sub Area Name: Sites With No Operable UnitCompleted Area Name: Clean soil cap and new bldg foundationsComments: 06/28/2002Completed Date: Interim Measures WorkplanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: GROUNDWATER, SOILSCompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 06/28/2002Completed Date: Corrective Measures Study WorkplanCompleted Document Type: SOILSCompleted Sub Area Name: Sites With No Operable UnitCompleted Area Name: RFI Report Approval and supporting documents. LA 12/9/08Comments: 12/07/2006Completed Date: RFI ReportCompleted Document Type: GROUNDWATERCompleted Sub Area Name: Sites With No Operable UnitCompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 06/30/2006Completed Date: Design/Implementation WorkplanCompleted Document Type: SOILSCompleted Sub Area Name: Sites With No Operable UnitCompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 09/30/1991Completed Date: RFI WorkplanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Remedy Selection. LA 12/12/08Comments: 12/07/2006Completed Date: Remedy Selection and Statement of BasisCompleted Document Type: SOILSCompleted Sub Area Name: Sites With No Operable UnitCompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 05/19/1991Completed Date: Unilateral Order (I/SE, RAO, CAO, EPA AO)Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 04/25/2000Completed Date: Consent OrderCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 80001530Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: O’BRIEN CORPORATION THE (Continued)S111464725 TC3837232.2s Page 556 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedComments: 12/01/1997Completed Date: Human Exposure ControlledCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 05/31/1992Completed Date: Interim Measures Implementation ReportCompleted Document Type: BREAKWATERCompleted Sub Area Name: Sites With No Operable UnitCompleted Area Name: FURTHER INFORMATION. TKELLY 200010 PROPERTY. SEE CHEROKEE’S CORRECTIVE MEASURES COMPLETION REPORT FOR EXCAVATED. THE AREA RAN ALONG NEARLY THE ENTIRE EASTERN EDGE OF THE OXYGEN RELEASE COMPOUNDS WERE ADDED TO THE AREA WHERE SOIL WASComments: 09/18/2000Completed Date: Interim Measures WorkplanCompleted Document Type: GROUNDWATERCompleted Sub Area Name: Sites With No Operable UnitCompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 09/18/2000Completed Date: RFI ReportCompleted Document Type: SOILSCompleted Sub Area Name: Sites With No Operable UnitCompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 04/25/2000Completed Date: Corrective Measures Study ReportCompleted Document Type: SOILSCompleted Sub Area Name: Sites With No Operable UnitCompleted Area Name: Public Notice. LA 12/09/08Comments: 06/05/2007Completed Date: Public NoticeCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 07/24/2000Completed Date: Corrective Measure Implementation WorkplanCompleted Document Type: SOILSCompleted Sub Area Name: Sites With No Operable UnitCompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 05/19/1991Completed Date: Interim Measures WorkplanCompleted Document Type: BREAKWATERCompleted Sub Area Name: Sites With No Operable UnitCompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 09/18/2000Completed Date: Remedy Constructed: Operating Properly & SuccessfullyCompleted Document Type: SOILSCompleted Sub Area Name: Sites With No Operable UnitCompleted Area Name: O’BRIEN CORPORATION THE (Continued)S111464725 TC3837232.2s Page 557 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedComments: 02/13/1991Completed Date: Interim Measures QuestionnaireCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Soils for daycare center. ps 8/14/08 LA 11/25/08. Original LUC dated 6/14/07. Amended LUC on 4/23/08 for the original LUC date. I don’t know where this 6/14/07 LUC exists. DELETE. This ameneded LUC should go under the 10/04/00 LUC which wasComments: 04/23/2008Completed Date: Land Use RestrictionCompleted Document Type: SOILSCompleted Sub Area Name: Sites With No Operable UnitCompleted Area Name: and LUC inspections. ps 8/12/08 CA terminated for Groundwater. Controls are Operation & MaintenanceComments: 08/08/2008Completed Date: Corrective Action Completion DeterminationCompleted Document Type: GROUNDWATERCompleted Sub Area Name: Sites With No Operable UnitCompleted Area Name: LUC and Amendment to remove restriction of one acre child center.Comments: 10/04/2000Completed Date: Land Use RestrictionCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 08/23/2000Completed Date: Groundwater Migration ControlledCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 09/27/2004Completed Date: Groundwater Migration ControlledCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 09/13/2011Completed Date: Operations and Maintenance ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 09/25/2008Completed Date: * Remedy SelectedCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 08/23/2000Completed Date: Human Exposure ControlledCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: O’BRIEN CORPORATION THE (Continued)S111464725 TC3837232.2s Page 558 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: RCRA Facility AssessmentComments: 12/18/1987Completed Date: RCRA Facility Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed.Comments: 07/22/2013Completed Date: Annual Oversight Cost EstimateCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 04/25/2000Completed Date: Remedy Selection and Statement of BasisCompleted Document Type: SOILSCompleted Sub Area Name: Sites With No Operable UnitCompleted Area Name: O’BRIEN CORPORATION THE (Continued)S111464725 OBRIEN CORP THEOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: waste Handler is engaged in the treatment, storage or disposal of hazardousDescription: TSDFClassification: PrivateLand type: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (303) 771-9200Contact telephone: USContact country: ENGLEWOOD, CO 80111 5445 D T C PARKWAY STE 900Contact address: MICHAEL BERTRANDContact: ENGLEWOOD, CO 80111 5445 D T C PARKWAY STE 900Mailing address: CAD005130455EPA ID: SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 450 E GRAND AVE UNIT AFacility address: THE OBRIEN CORP.Facility name: 06/14/2000Date form received by agency: RCRA-TSDF: 2020 COR ACTION 5013 ft.RAATSSite 3 of 3 in cluster AZ 0.949 mi.US INST CONTROL Relative: Lower Actual: 10 ft. 1/2-1 RCRA-SQGSOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 East CORRACTS450 E GRAND AVE UNIT A CAD005130455 AZ340 RCRA-TSDFTHE OBRIEN CORP.1000361611 TC3837232.2s Page 559 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 02/24/1994Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: THE OBRIEN CORP.Facility name: 09/01/1996Date form received by agency: Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: THE OBRIEN CORP.Facility name: 06/14/2000Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (303) 771-9200Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: ENGLEWOOD, CO 80111 5445 D T C PARKWAY STE 900Owner/operator address: CHEROKEE SAN FRANCISCOOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 761-2300Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: CITY NOT REPORTED, CA 99999 450 EAST GRAND AVENUEOwner/operator address: O’BRIEN CORPORATION THEOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 254-8970Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94043 1101 SAN ANTONIO RD STE 303Owner/operator address: THE OBRIEN CORP. (Continued)1000361611 TC3837232.2s Page 560 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation RFI Workplan ApprovedEvent: 09/30/1991Event date: treatment, off-site treatment). and/or treatment (e.g., soil or waste excavation, in-situ soil Stabilization Measures Implemented, Primary measure is source removalEvent: 05/19/1991Event date: RFI ImpositionEvent: 05/19/1991Event date: treatment, off-site treatment). and/or treatment (e.g., soil or waste excavation, in-situ soil Stabilization Measures Implemented, Primary measure is source removalEvent: 05/19/1991Event date: CMS ImpositionEvent: 05/19/1991Event date: considerations and administrative considerations. at the facility, technical factors, the degree of risk, timing stabilization activity based on the status of corrective action work Stabilization Measures Evaluation,This facility is amenable toEvent: 02/13/1991Event date: considerations and administrative considerations. at the facility, technical factors, the degree of risk, timing stabilization activity based on the status of corrective action work Stabilization Measures Evaluation,This facility is amenable toEvent: 02/13/1991Event date: CA022Event: 02/24/1989Event date: RFA Completed, Assessment was an RFA.Event: 12/18/1987Event date: RFA CompletedEvent: 12/18/1987Event date: RFA Determination Of Need For An RFI, RFI is Necessary;Event: 12/18/1987Event date: Corrective Action Summary: LEADWaste name: D008Waste code: Hazardous Waste Summary: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: FULLER-O’BRIEN PAINTSSite name: THE OBRIEN CORP.Facility name: 01/22/1992Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: FULLER-O’BRIEN PAINTSSite name: THE OBRIEN CORP.Facility name: THE OBRIEN CORP. (Continued)1000361611 TC3837232.2s Page 561 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 09/18/2000Event date: Stabilization Measures Implemented, Other ActivityEvent: 09/18/2000Event date: CMS Report ReceivedEvent: 09/11/2000Event date: is needed to make a determination. Igration of Contaminated Groundwater under Control, More informationEvent: 08/23/2000Event date: changes at the facility. re-evaluated when the Agency/State becomes aware of significant reasonably expected conditions. This determination will be expected to be under control at the facility under current and contained in the EI determination, current human exposures are Under Control has been verified. Based on a review of information Current Human Exposures under Control, Yes, Current Human ExposuresEvent: 08/23/2000Event date: CMI Workplan ApprovedEvent: 07/24/2000Event date: CMI Workplan ApprovedEvent: 07/24/2000Event date: CMS ApprovedEvent: 04/25/2000Event date: CMS ApprovedEvent: 04/25/2000Event date: Date For Remedy Selection (CM Imposed)Event: 04/25/2000Event date: under control. Current Human Exposures under Control, Current human exposures are NOTEvent: 12/01/1997Event date: is needed to make a determination. Igration of Contaminated Groundwater under Control, More informationEvent: 12/01/1997Event date: under control. Current Human Exposures under Control, Current human exposures are NOTEvent: 12/01/1997Event date: Stabilization Construction CompletedEvent: 05/31/1992Event date: action priority. CA Prioritization, Facility or area was assigned a medium correctiveEvent: 01/21/1992Event date: RFI Workplan ApprovedEvent: 09/30/1991Event date: THE OBRIEN CORP. (Continued)1000361611 TC3837232.2s Page 562 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation at the facility. Specifically, this determination indicates that the determined that migration of contaminated groundwater is under control review of information contained in the EI determination, it has been Contaminated Groundwater Under Control has been verified. Based on a Igration of Contaminated Groundwater under Control, Yes, Migration ofEvent: 09/27/2004Event date: significant changes at the facility. determination will be re-evaluated when the Agency becomes aware of remains within the existing area of contaminated groundwater. This monitoring will be conducted to confirm that contaminated groundwater migration of contaminated groundwater is under control, and that at the facility. Specifically, this determination indicates that the determined that migration of contaminated groundwater is under control review of information contained in the EI determination, it has been Contaminated Groundwater Under Control has been verified. Based on a Igration of Contaminated Groundwater under Control, Yes, Migration ofEvent: 09/27/2004Event date: CMS Workplan ApprovedEvent: 06/28/2002Event date: Stabilization Measures Implemented, Other ActivityEvent: 06/28/2002Event date: RFI ImpositionEvent: 03/29/2001Event date: CA772EPEvent: 10/04/2000Event date: CA772GCEvent: 10/04/2000Event date: changes at the facility. re-evaluated when the Agency/State becomes aware of significant reasonably expected conditions. This determination will be expected to be under control at the facility under current and contained in the EI determination, current human exposures are Under Control has been verified. Based on a review of information Current Human Exposures under Control, Yes, Current Human ExposuresEvent: 09/29/2000Event date: is needed to make a determination. Igration of Contaminated Groundwater under Control, More informationEvent: 09/29/2000Event date: Certification Of Remedy Completion Or Construction CompletionEvent: 09/18/2000Event date: RFI ApprovedEvent: 09/18/2000Event date: Stabilization Measures Implemented, Other ActivityEvent: 09/18/2000Event date: RFI ApprovedEvent: THE OBRIEN CORP. (Continued)1000361611 TC3837232.2s Page 563 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 09/12/1995 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 10/13/1995Date achieved compliance: 09/12/1995Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: FR - 262.20-23.BRegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 09/13/1995 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 10/13/1995Date achieved compliance: 09/13/1995Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: FR - 262.10-12.ARegulation violated: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: Date For Remedy Selection (CM Imposed)Event: 09/25/2008Event date: Date For Remedy Selection (CM Imposed)Event: 09/25/2008Event date: Corrective Action Process Terminated, Remedial Activities CompletedEvent: 08/08/2008Event date: CA772GCEvent: 04/23/2008Event date: Date For Public Notice On Proposed RemedyEvent: 06/05/2007Event date: RFI ApprovedEvent: 12/07/2006Event date: Date For Remedy Selection (CM Imposed)Event: 12/07/2006Event date: CMS ApprovedEvent: 06/28/2006Event date: significant changes at the facility. determination will be re-evaluated when the Agency becomes aware of remains within the existing area of contaminated groundwater. This monitoring will be conducted to confirm that contaminated groundwater migration of contaminated groundwater is under control, and that THE OBRIEN CORP. (Continued)1000361611 TC3837232.2s Page 564 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 04/20/1993 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 02/11/1994Date achieved compliance: 04/12/1993Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: FR - 262.40-43.DRegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 04/20/1993 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 02/11/1994Date achieved compliance: 04/12/1993Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: FR - 262.20-23.BRegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 09/12/1995 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 10/13/1995Date achieved compliance: 09/12/1995Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: FR - 262.30-34.CRegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 09/12/1995 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 10/13/1995Date achieved compliance: 09/12/1995Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: FR - 262.50-60Regulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: THE OBRIEN CORP. (Continued)1000361611 TC3837232.2s Page 565 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation FR - 264.170-177.IRegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 04/20/1993 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 02/11/1994Date achieved compliance: 04/12/1993Date violation determined: TSD - GeneralArea of violation: FR - 264.10-18.BRegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 04/20/1993 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 02/11/1994Date achieved compliance: 04/12/1993Date violation determined: LDR - GeneralArea of violation: FR - 268.7Regulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 04/20/1993 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 02/11/1994Date achieved compliance: 04/12/1993Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: FR - 262.50-60Regulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 04/20/1993 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 02/11/1994Date achieved compliance: 04/12/1993Date violation determined: TSD - Financial RequirementsArea of violation: FR - 264.140-150.HRegulation violated: THE OBRIEN CORP. (Continued)1000361611 TC3837232.2s Page 566 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation TSD - Financial RequirementsArea of violation: FR - 264.140-150.HRegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 09/12/1995 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 01/22/1993Date achieved compliance: 06/24/1992Date violation determined: TSD - Financial RequirementsArea of violation: FR - 264.140-150.HRegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 04/20/1993 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 02/11/1994Date achieved compliance: 04/12/1993Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: FR - 262.10-12.ARegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 04/20/1993 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 02/11/1994Date achieved compliance: 04/12/1993Date violation determined: TSD - Closure/Post-ClosureArea of violation: F - 264.110-120.GRegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 04/20/1993 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 02/11/1994Date achieved compliance: 04/12/1993Date violation determined: TSD - GeneralArea of violation: THE OBRIEN CORP. (Continued)1000361611 TC3837232.2s Page 567 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 07/11/1988Date violation determined: TSD IS-Ground-Water MonitoringArea of violation: FR - 264.90-94.FRegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 09/16/1988 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 08/16/1990Date achieved compliance: 07/11/1988Date violation determined: TSD IS-Ground-Water MonitoringArea of violation: FR - 264.90-94.FRegulation violated: 4500 Paid penalty amount: 26000 Final penalty amount: 26000 Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 03/31/1989 Enforcement action date: INITIAL 3008(A) COMPLIANCE Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 08/22/1990Date achieved compliance: 07/10/1989Date violation determined: TSD - Financial RequirementsArea of violation: FR - 264.140-150.HRegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 08/09/1990 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 08/16/1990Date achieved compliance: 07/18/1990Date violation determined: TSD - GeneralArea of violation: FR - 270Regulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 08/06/1990 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 11/21/1990Date achieved compliance: 07/31/1990Date violation determined: THE OBRIEN CORP. (Continued)1000361611 TC3837232.2s Page 568 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 08/16/1990Date achieved compliance: 04/12/1988Date violation determined: LDR - GeneralArea of violation: FR - 268.7Regulation violated: 4500 Paid penalty amount: 26000 Final penalty amount: 26000 Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 03/31/1989 Enforcement action date: INITIAL 3008(A) COMPLIANCE Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 08/16/1990Date achieved compliance: 04/12/1988Date violation determined: LDR - GeneralArea of violation: FR - 268 ALLRegulation violated: 4500 Paid penalty amount: 26000 Final penalty amount: 26000 Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 03/31/1989 Enforcement action date: INITIAL 3008(A) COMPLIANCE Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 08/16/1990Date achieved compliance: 04/12/1988Date violation determined: LDR - GeneralArea of violation: FR - 268.7Regulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 09/16/1988 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 08/16/1990Date achieved compliance: 04/12/1988Date violation determined: LDR - GeneralArea of violation: FR - 268 ALLRegulation violated: 4500 Paid penalty amount: 26000 Final penalty amount: 26000 Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 03/31/1989 Enforcement action date: INITIAL 3008(A) COMPLIANCE Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 08/16/1990Date achieved compliance: THE OBRIEN CORP. (Continued)1000361611 TC3837232.2s Page 569 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation StateViolation lead agency: 10/29/1986Date achieved compliance: 10/29/1986Date violation determined: TSD - Financial RequirementsArea of violation: FR - 264.140-150.HRegulation violated: 4500 Paid penalty amount: 26000 Final penalty amount: 26000 Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 03/31/1989 Enforcement action date: INITIAL 3008(A) COMPLIANCE Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 08/16/1990Date achieved compliance: 04/07/1988Date violation determined: TSD - Financial RequirementsArea of violation: FR - 264.140-150.HRegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 04/26/1988 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 08/16/1990Date achieved compliance: 04/07/1988Date violation determined: TSD - Financial RequirementsArea of violation: FR - 264.140-150.HRegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 09/16/1988 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 08/06/1990Date achieved compliance: 04/12/1988Date violation determined: TSD - GeneralArea of violation: FR - 270Regulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 09/16/1988 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: THE OBRIEN CORP. (Continued)1000361611 TC3837232.2s Page 570 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: FINANCIAL RECORD REVIEWEvaluation: 01/22/1993Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: 02/11/1994Date achieved compliance: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 03/08/1993Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: 02/11/1994Date achieved compliance: TSD - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 03/08/1993Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: 02/11/1994Date achieved compliance: TSD - Closure/Post-ClosureArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 03/08/1993Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: 02/11/1994Date achieved compliance: TSD - Financial RequirementsArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 03/08/1993Evaluation date: EPAEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 03/08/1993Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: 02/11/1994Date achieved compliance: LDR - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 03/08/1993Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: 10/13/1995Date achieved compliance: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 09/12/1995Evaluation date: Evaluation Action Summary: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 04/28/1986 Enforcement action date: INITIAL 3008(A) COMPLIANCE Enforcement action: THE OBRIEN CORP. (Continued)1000361611 TC3837232.2s Page 571 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation LDR - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 04/12/1988Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: 08/06/1990Date achieved compliance: TSD - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 04/12/1988Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: 08/16/1990Date achieved compliance: TSD IS-Ground-Water MonitoringArea of violation: GROUNDWATER MONITORING EVALUATIONEvaluation: 07/11/1988Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: 08/22/1990Date achieved compliance: TSD - Financial RequirementsArea of violation: FINANCIAL RECORD REVIEWEvaluation: 07/10/1989Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 09/26/1989Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: 08/16/1990Date achieved compliance: TSD - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 07/18/1990Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: 11/21/1990Date achieved compliance: TSD - Financial RequirementsArea of violation: FINANCIAL RECORD REVIEWEvaluation: 07/31/1990Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE INSPECTIONEvaluation: 10/15/1991Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 11/21/1991Evaluation date: EPA Contractor/GranteeEvaluation lead agency: 01/22/1993Date achieved compliance: TSD - Financial RequirementsArea of violation: FINANCIAL RECORD REVIEWEvaluation: 06/24/1992Evaluation date: THE OBRIEN CORP. (Continued)1000361611 TC3837232.2s Page 572 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CAD005130455EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: 20001004Original schedule date: Not reportedNAICS Code(s): CA772EPAction: 20001004Actual Date: ENTIRE FACILITYArea Name: 09EPA Region: CAD005130455EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: Not reportedOriginal schedule date: Not reportedNAICS Code(s): information is needed to make a determination CA750IN - Migration of Contaminated Groundwater under Control, MoreAction: 19971201Actual Date: GROUNDWATERArea Name: 09EPA Region: CAD005130455EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: 19971201Original schedule date: Not reportedNAICS Code(s): exposures are NOT under control CA725NO - Current Human Exposures Under Control, Current humanAction: 19971201Actual Date: ENTIRE FACILITYArea Name: 09EPA Region: CAD005130455EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: Not reportedOriginal schedule date: Not reportedNAICS Code(s): exposures are NOT under control CA725NO - Current Human Exposures Under Control, Current humanAction: 19971201Actual Date: SOILSArea Name: 09EPA Region: CAD005130455EPA ID: CORRACTS: StateEvaluation lead agency: 10/29/1986Date achieved compliance: TSD - Financial RequirementsArea of violation: FINANCIAL RECORD REVIEWEvaluation: 10/29/1986Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: 08/16/1990Date achieved compliance: TSD - Financial RequirementsArea of violation: FINANCIAL RECORD REVIEWEvaluation: 04/07/1988Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: 08/16/1990Date achieved compliance: THE OBRIEN CORP. (Continued)1000361611 TC3837232.2s Page 573 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule end date: 19910213Original schedule date: Not reportedNAICS Code(s): timing considerations and administrative considerations action work at the facility, technical factors, the degree of risk, amenable to stabilization activity based on the, status of corrective CA225YE - Stabilization Measures Evaluation, This facility ,isAction: 19910213Actual Date: ENTIRE FACILITYArea Name: 09EPA Region: CAD005130455EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: Not reportedOriginal schedule date: Not reportedNAICS Code(s): CA340 - CMS Report ReceivedAction: 20000911Actual Date: SOILSArea Name: 09EPA Region: CAD005130455EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: 20080808Original schedule date: Not reportedNAICS Code(s): Completed CA999RM - Corrective Action Process Terminated, Remedial ActivitiesAction: 20080808Actual Date: GROUNDWATERArea Name: 09EPA Region: CAD005130455EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: Not reportedOriginal schedule date: Not reportedNAICS Code(s): CA200 - RFI ApprovedAction: 20061207Actual Date: GROUNDWATERArea Name: 09EPA Region: CAD005130455EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: Not reportedOriginal schedule date: Not reportedNAICS Code(s): CA400 - Date For Remedy Selection (CM Imposed)Action: 20061207Actual Date: SOILSArea Name: 09EPA Region: CAD005130455EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: Not reportedOriginal schedule date: Not reportedNAICS Code(s): CA380 - Date For Public Notice On Proposed RemedyAction: 20070605Actual Date: ENTIRE FACILITYArea Name: 09EPA Region: THE OBRIEN CORP. (Continued)1000361611 TC3837232.2s Page 574 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 09EPA Region: CAD005130455EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: Not reportedOriginal schedule date: Not reportedNAICS Code(s): source removal and/or treatment CA600SR - Stabilization Measures Implemented, Primary measure isAction: 19910519Actual Date: BREAKWATERArea Name: 09EPA Region: CAD005130455EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: Not reportedOriginal schedule date: Not reportedNAICS Code(s): CA200 - RFI ApprovedAction: 20000918Actual Date: SOILSArea Name: 09EPA Region: CAD005130455EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: Not reportedOriginal schedule date: Not reportedNAICS Code(s): CA550 - Certification Of Remedy Completion Or Construction CompletionAction: 20000918Actual Date: SOILSArea Name: 09EPA Region: CAD005130455EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: Not reportedOriginal schedule date: Not reportedNAICS Code(s): CA600T - Stabilization Measures Implemented, Other activityAction: 20000918Actual Date: GROUNDWATERArea Name: 09EPA Region: CAD005130455EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: 19871218Original schedule date: Not reportedNAICS Code(s): CA050 - RFA CompletedAction: 19871218Actual Date: ENTIRE FACILITYArea Name: 09EPA Region: CAD005130455EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: 19871218Original schedule date: Not reportedNAICS Code(s): CA070YE - RFA Determination Of Need For An RFI, RFI is NecessaryAction: 19871218Actual Date: ENTIRE FACILITYArea Name: 09EPA Region: CAD005130455EPA ID: THE OBRIEN CORP. (Continued)1000361611 TC3837232.2s Page 575 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ENTIRE FACILITYArea Name: 09EPA Region: CAD005130455EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: Not reportedOriginal schedule date: Not reportedNAICS Code(s): CA350 - CMS ApprovedAction: 20000425Actual Date: SOILSArea Name: 09EPA Region: CAD005130455EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: Not reportedOriginal schedule date: Not reportedNAICS Code(s): CA400 - Date For Remedy Selection (CM Imposed)Action: 20000425Actual Date: SOILSArea Name: 09EPA Region: CAD005130455EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: Not reportedOriginal schedule date: Not reportedNAICS Code(s): CA500 - CMI Workplan ApprovedAction: 20000724Actual Date: SOILSArea Name: 09EPA Region: CAD005130455EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: 20000823Original schedule date: Not reportedNAICS Code(s): Exposures Under Control has been verified CA725YE - Current Human Exposures Under Control, Yes, Current HumanAction: 20000823Actual Date: ENTIRE FACILITYArea Name: 09EPA Region: CAD005130455EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: 20000823Original schedule date: Not reportedNAICS Code(s): information is needed to make a determination CA750IN - Migration of Contaminated Groundwater under Control, MoreAction: 20000823Actual Date: ENTIRE FACILITYArea Name: 09EPA Region: CAD005130455EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: 20080423Original schedule date: Not reportedNAICS Code(s): CA772GCAction: 20080423Actual Date: SOILSArea Name: THE OBRIEN CORP. (Continued)1000361611 TC3837232.2s Page 576 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 20020628Actual Date: GROUNDWATERArea Name: 09EPA Region: CAD005130455EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: Not reportedOriginal schedule date: Not reportedNAICS Code(s): Migration of Contaminated Groundwater Under Control has been verified CA750YE - Migration of Contaminated Groundwater under Control, Yes,Action: 20040927Actual Date: GROUNDWATERArea Name: 09EPA Region: CAD005130455EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: 20040927Original schedule date: Not reportedNAICS Code(s): Migration of Contaminated Groundwater Under Control has been verified CA750YE - Migration of Contaminated Groundwater under Control, Yes,Action: 20040927Actual Date: ENTIRE FACILITYArea Name: 09EPA Region: CAD005130455EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: Not reportedOriginal schedule date: Not reportedNAICS Code(s): CA400 - Date For Remedy Selection (CM Imposed)Action: 20080925Actual Date: GROUNDWATERArea Name: 09EPA Region: CAD005130455EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: Not reportedOriginal schedule date: Not reportedNAICS Code(s): CA400 - Date For Remedy Selection (CM Imposed)Action: 20080925Actual Date: SOILSArea Name: 09EPA Region: CAD005130455EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: Not reportedOriginal schedule date: Not reportedNAICS Code(s): CA400 - Date For Remedy Selection (CM Imposed)Action: 20080925Actual Date: BREAKWATERArea Name: 09EPA Region: CAD005130455EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: 20080925Original schedule date: Not reportedNAICS Code(s): CA400 - Date For Remedy Selection (CM Imposed)Action: 20080925Actual Date: THE OBRIEN CORP. (Continued)1000361611 TC3837232.2s Page 577 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 450 E GRAND AVE UNIT AAddress: Not reportedAction Name: THE OBRIEN CORP.Name: Not reportedSite ID: CAD005130455EPA ID: US INST CONTROL: Not reportedSchedule end date: Not reportedOriginal schedule date: Not reportedNAICS Code(s): CA650 - Stabilization Construction CompletedAction: 19920531Actual Date: BREAKWATERArea Name: 09EPA Region: CAD005130455EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: Not reportedOriginal schedule date: Not reportedNAICS Code(s): CA150 - RFI Workplan ApprovedAction: 19910930Actual Date: ENTIRE FACILITYArea Name: 09EPA Region: CAD005130455EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: Not reportedOriginal schedule date: Not reportedNAICS Code(s): CA350 - CMS ApprovedAction: 20060628Actual Date: SOILSArea Name: 09EPA Region: CAD005130455EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: Not reportedOriginal schedule date: Not reportedNAICS Code(s): CA300 - CMS Workplan ApprovedAction: 20020628Actual Date: SOILSArea Name: 09EPA Region: CAD005130455EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: Not reportedOriginal schedule date: Not reportedNAICS Code(s): CA600T - Stabilization Measures Implemented, Other activityAction: 20020628Actual Date: SOILSArea Name: 09EPA Region: CAD005130455EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: Not reportedOriginal schedule date: Not reportedNAICS Code(s): CA600T - Stabilization Measures Implemented, Other activityAction: THE OBRIEN CORP. (Continued)1000361611 TC3837232.2s Page 578 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedAction: 9Region: CAD005130455EPA ID: 2020 COR ACTION: Not reportedContaminated Media : Not reportedOperable Unit: Not reportedComplet. Date: Not reportedActual Date: Not reportedInst. Control: CA772GCEvent Code: SAN MATEOCounty: 9EPA Region: SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 450 E GRAND AVE UNIT AAddress: Not reportedAction Name: THE OBRIEN CORP.Name: Not reportedSite ID: CAD005130455EPA ID: Not reportedContaminated Media : Not reportedOperable Unit: Not reportedComplet. Date: Not reportedActual Date: Not reportedInst. Control: CA772EPEvent Code: SAN MATEOCounty: 9EPA Region: THE OBRIEN CORP. (Continued)1000361611 TC3837232.2s Page 579 OR P H A N S U M M A R Y Ci t y ED R I D Si t e N a m e Si t e A d d r e s s ZipDatabase(s) Co u n t : 2 0 r e c o r d s . S S A N F R A N C I S C O S1 1 3 7 5 7 5 0 7 OY S T E R P T I N T E R C H A N G E 10 8 H W Y 1 0 1 O V E R C R O S S I N G 94080San Mateo Co. BI S S A N F R A N C I S C O S1 0 6 9 3 1 8 4 2 SA N M A T E O A V E N U E S E W A G E / P U M P S T A T I SA N M A T E O A V E 94080SWEEPS UST SA N B R U N O 10 0 8 1 9 4 5 7 9 TO S C O C O R P S I T E 3 0 5 7 5 17 0 S A N B R U N O A V E 94066RCRA-SQG SA N F R A N C I S C O S1 1 3 7 5 6 9 7 5 AM R C O M B S R A M P 55 5 B L D G 6 4 0 R A M P 94128San Mateo Co. BI SA N F R A N C I S C O 10 0 0 2 3 1 4 6 7 US C G A I R S T A T I O N S A N F R A N C I S C O SF O I N T E R N A T I O N A L A I R P O R T B L D G 94128RCRA-SQG SF I A A1 0 0 3 3 9 1 4 2 I T B S O U T H - S F I A I T B S O U T H - S F I A 94128AST SF I A A1 0 0 3 3 9 1 4 1 I T B N O R T H - S F I A I T B N O R T H - S F I A 94128AST SO S A N F R A N C I S C O 10 0 0 5 9 5 6 3 0 PG & E E A S T G R A N D S U B S T A T I O N E G R A N D A V E B T W N H A R B O R & I N D L 94080RCRA-SQG, FINDS SO S A N F R A N C I S C O S1 0 5 0 2 6 6 5 7 SC R - S F A I R P R T T E R M N L T A N K SA N F R A N C I C O I N T E R N A T I O N A 94128HIST CORTESE SOU T H S A N F R A N C I S C O S10 5 0 2 6 7 0 0 HIG H W A Y 1 0 1 / O Y S T E R P O I N T HWY 1 0 1 A T O Y S T E R P O I N T B 94080HIST CORTESE SOU T H S A N F R A N C I S C O 100 8 1 9 4 3 5 2 SSF H W Y 2 8 0 HWY 2 8 0 S O U T H S A N F R A N C I S C O 94080RCRA-SQG SOU T H S A N F R A N C I S C O S11 4 2 0 6 4 9 6 177 A I R P O R T B L V D S RGA LUST SOU T H S A N F R A N C I S C O 100 3 8 7 8 2 6 3 SOU T H S A N F R A N C I S C O M U N I C I P A L D U M P BEL A I R R D O F F S A I R P O R T B L V D 94080CERC-NFRAP SOU T H S A N F R A N C I S C O 100 6 8 3 0 0 8 3 O’B R I A N C O R P S I T E EAS T E N D O F G R A N D A V E N U E FINDS SOU T H S A N F R A N C I S C O S10 5 0 2 6 6 9 7 HOM A R T D E V E L O P M E N T C O R P . GAT E W A Y B L V D & O Y S T E R P O I 94080HIST CORTESE SOU T H S A N F R A N C I S C O 100 7 2 0 0 7 3 2 PRO T E O L I X 225 A G A T E W A Y B L V D 94080RCRA-SQG SOU T H S A N F R A N C I S C O S10 5 0 2 6 6 9 9 SCR - 1 1 4 , 1 2 0 & 1 2 8 H A R B O R HAR B O R W A Y HIST CORTESE SOU T H S A N F R A N C I S C O 101 5 7 3 2 6 0 2 TEX A C O I N C SAN F R A N C I S C O I N T L A R P T 94066CERC-NFRAP SOU T H S A N F R A N C I S C O S11 3 1 7 5 5 1 2 US S T E E L S H E A R W A T E R S I T E VET E R A N S B L V D E A S T O F H W Y 1 0 1 94080HAZNET SOU T H S A N F R A N C I S C O 100 4 6 7 6 6 3 8 U S S T E E L S H E A R W A T E R S I T E VET E R A N S B L V D RCRA-SQG, FINDS TC 3 8 3 7 2 3 2 . 2 s P a g e 5 8 0 To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required. Number of Days to Update:Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days from the date the government agency made the information available to the public. STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL: National Priority List National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) and regional EPA offices. Date of Government Version: 04/26/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/09/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/10/2013 Number of Days to Update: 62 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 01/21/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/21/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NPL Site Boundaries Sources: EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) Telephone: 202-564-7333 EPA Region 1EPA Region 6 Telephone 617-918-1143Telephone: 214-655-6659 EPA Region 3EPA Region 7 Telephone 215-814-5418Telephone: 913-551-7247 EPA Region 4EPA Region 8 Telephone 404-562-8033Telephone: 303-312-6774 EPA Region 5EPA Region 9 Telephone 312-886-6686Telephone: 415-947-4246 EPA Region 10 Telephone 206-553-8665 Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites A site that has been proposed for listing on the NationalPriorities List through the issuance of a proposed rule in the Federal Register.EPA then accepts public comments on the site, responds to the comments,and places on the NPL those sites that continue to meet therequirements for listing. Date of Government Version: 04/26/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/09/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/10/2013 Number of Days to Update: 62 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 01/09/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/21/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980, the USEPA has the authority to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens. Date of Government Version: 10/15/1991 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/1994 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/1994 Number of Days to Update: 56 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4267 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC3837232.2s Page GR-1 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Federal Delisted NPL site list DELISTED NPL: National Priority List Deletions The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. Date of Government Version: 04/26/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/09/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/10/2013 Number of Days to Update: 62 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 01/09/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/21/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal CERCLIS list CERCLIS: Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System CERCLIS contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). CERCLIS contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. Date of Government Version: 04/26/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/29/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2013 Number of Days to Update: 72 Source: EPA Telephone: 703-412-9810 Last EDR Contact: 11/11/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/10/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FEDERAL FACILITY: Federal Facility Site Information listing A listing of National Priority List (NPL) and Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) sites found in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) Database where EPA Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office is involved in cleanup activities. Date of Government Version: 05/31/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/08/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/06/2013 Number of Days to Update: 151 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-8704 Last EDR Contact: 01/10/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/21/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site List CERCLIS-NFRAP: CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned Archived sites are sites that have been removed and archived from the inventory of CERCLIS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA’s knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list this site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. This decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that, based upon available information, the location is not judged to be a potential NPL site. Date of Government Version: 04/26/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/29/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2013 Number of Days to Update: 72 Source: EPA Telephone: 703-412-9810 Last EDR Contact: 11/11/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/10/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity. TC3837232.2s Page GR-2 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 09/10/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/02/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/16/2013 Number of Days to Update: 75 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 01/02/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/14/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDF: RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Transporters are individuals or entities that move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste. Date of Government Version: 09/10/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/02/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/16/2013 Number of Days to Update: 75 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 01/02/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/14/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG: RCRA - Large Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 09/10/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/02/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/16/2013 Number of Days to Update: 75 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 01/02/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/14/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RCRA-SQG: RCRA - Small Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 09/10/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/02/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/16/2013 Number of Days to Update: 75 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 01/02/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/14/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RCRA-CESQG: RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Conditionally exempt small quantity generators (CESQGs) generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 09/10/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/02/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/16/2013 Number of Days to Update: 75 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 01/02/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/14/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC3837232.2s Page GR-3 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental media or effect human health. Date of Government Version: 06/17/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/21/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/03/2013 Number of Days to Update: 104 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-0695 Last EDR Contact: 12/09/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/24/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies US INST CONTROL: Sites with Institutional Controls A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures, such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally required as part of the institutional controls. Date of Government Version: 06/17/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/21/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/03/2013 Number of Days to Update: 104 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-0695 Last EDR Contact: 12/09/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/24/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies LUCIS: Land Use Control Information System LUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure properties. Date of Government Version: 08/20/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/23/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/01/2013 Number of Days to Update: 70 Source: Department of the Navy Telephone: 843-820-7326 Last EDR Contact: 11/18/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/03/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies Federal ERNS list ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous substances. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/06/2013 Number of Days to Update: 66 Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard Telephone: 202-267-2180 Last EDR Contact: 01/10/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/14/2014 Data Release Frequency: Annually State- and tribal - equivalent NPL RESPONSE: State Response Sites Identifies confirmed release sites where DTSC is involved in remediation, either in a lead or oversight capacity. These confirmed release sites are generally high-priority and high potential risk. Date of Government Version: 11/06/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/06/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/03/2013 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 11/06/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/17/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS TC3837232.2s Page GR-4 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ENVIROSTOR: EnviroStor Database The Department of Toxic Substances Control’s (DTSC’s) Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program’s (SMBRP’s) EnviroStor database identifes sites that have known contamination or sites for which there may be reasons to investigate further. The database includes the following site types: Federal Superfund sites (National Priorities List (NPL)); State Response, including Military Facilities and State Superfund; Voluntary Cleanup; and School sites. EnviroStor provides similar information to the information that was available in CalSites, and provides additional site information, including, but not limited to, identification of formerly-contaminated properties that have been released for reuse, properties where environmental deed restrictions have been recorded to prevent inappropriate land uses, and risk characterization information that is used to assess potential impacts to public health and the environment at contaminated sites. Date of Government Version: 11/06/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/06/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/03/2013 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 11/06/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/17/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF (SWIS): Solid Waste Information System Active, Closed and Inactive Landfills.SWF/LF records typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposal facilities or landfills.These may be active or inactive facilities or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Section 4004 criteriafor solid waste landfills or disposal sites. Date of Government Version: 11/18/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/21/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/02/2014 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery Telephone: 916-341-6320 Last EDR Contact: 11/21/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/03/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State and tribal leaking storage tank lists LUST REG 9: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Report Orange, Riverside, San Diego counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 03/01/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/23/2001 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/21/2001 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego Region (9) Telephone: 858-637-5595 Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/09/2012 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8). For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/15/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/28/2005 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8) Telephone: 909-782-4496 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: Varies LUST REG 7: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Imperial, Riverside, San Diego, Santa Barbara counties. Date of Government Version: 02/26/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/26/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/24/2004 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Colorado River Basin Region (7) Telephone: 760-776-8943 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC3837232.2s Page GR-5 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING LUST REG 6V: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Inyo, Kern, Los Angeles, Mono, San Bernardino counties. Date of Government Version: 06/07/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/07/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2005 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Victorville Branch Office (6) Telephone: 760-241-7365 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 6L: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 09/09/2003 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/10/2003 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/07/2003 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Lahontan Region (6) Telephone: 530-542-5572 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 5: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Database Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Alameda, Alpine, Amador, Butte, Colusa, Contra Costa, Calveras, El Dorado, Fresno, Glenn, Kern, Kings, Lake, Lassen, Madera, Mariposa, Merced, Modoc, Napa, Nevada, Placer, Plumas, Sacramento, San Joaquin, Shasta, Solano, Stanislaus, Sutter, Tehama, Tulare, Tuolumne, Yolo, Yuba counties. Date of Government Version: 07/01/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/22/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/31/2008 Number of Days to Update: 9 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region (5) Telephone: 916-464-4834 Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 4: Underground Storage Tank Leak List Los Angeles, Ventura counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 09/07/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2004 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Los Angeles Region (4) Telephone: 213-576-6710 Last EDR Contact: 09/06/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/19/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 3: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Database Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Monterey, San Benito, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Santa Cruz counties. Date of Government Version: 05/19/2003 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/19/2003 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/02/2003 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Coast Region (3) Telephone: 805-542-4786 Last EDR Contact: 07/18/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 2: Fuel Leak List Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Solano, Sonoma counties. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2004 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region (2) Telephone: 510-622-2433 Last EDR Contact: 09/19/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/02/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly LUST REG 1: Active Toxic Site Investigation Del Norte, Humboldt, Lake, Mendocino, Modoc, Siskiyou, Sonoma, Trinity counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. TC3837232.2s Page GR-6 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 02/01/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/28/2001 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/29/2001 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board North Coast (1) Telephone: 707-570-3769 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST: Geotracker’s Leaking Underground Fuel Tank Report Leaking Underground Storage Tank Incident Reports. LUST records contain an inventory of reported leaking underground storage tank incidents. Not all states maintain these records, and the information stored varies by state. For more information on a particular leaking underground storage tank sites, please contact the appropriate regulatory agency. Date of Government Version: 12/16/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/17/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2014 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: see region list Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/31/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SLIC: Statewide SLIC Cases The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 12/16/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/17/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/16/2014 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/31/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies SLIC REG 1: Active Toxic Site Investigations The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 04/03/2003 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/07/2003 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/25/2003 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region (1) Telephone: 707-576-2220 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 2: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2004 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region (2) Telephone: 510-286-0457 Last EDR Contact: 09/19/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/02/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SLIC REG 3: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 05/18/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/15/2006 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Coast Region (3) Telephone: 805-549-3147 Last EDR Contact: 07/18/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SLIC REG 4: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. TC3837232.2s Page GR-7 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 11/17/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/18/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2005 Number of Days to Update: 47 Source: Region Water Quality Control Board Los Angeles Region (4) Telephone: 213-576-6600 Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2011 Data Release Frequency: Varies SLIC REG 5: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/05/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/21/2005 Number of Days to Update: 16 Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region (5) Telephone: 916-464-3291 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SLIC REG 6V: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 05/24/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/25/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/16/2005 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board, Victorville Branch Telephone: 619-241-6583 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SLIC REG 6L: SLIC Sites The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 09/07/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2004 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Lahontan Region Telephone: 530-542-5574 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 7: SLIC List The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 11/24/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/29/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2005 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: California Regional Quality Control Board, Colorado River Basin Region Telephone: 760-346-7491 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 8: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 04/03/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/03/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/14/2008 Number of Days to Update: 11 Source: California Region Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8) Telephone: 951-782-3298 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SLIC REG 9: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. TC3837232.2s Page GR-8 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 09/10/2007 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/11/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/28/2007 Number of Days to Update: 17 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego Region (9) Telephone: 858-467-2980 Last EDR Contact: 08/08/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/21/2011 Data Release Frequency: Annually INDIAN LUST R8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming. Date of Government Version: 08/27/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/28/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/16/2012 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6271 Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/11/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN LUST R7: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska Date of Government Version: 08/27/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/27/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/01/2013 Number of Days to Update: 66 Source: EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7003 Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/11/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R6: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in New Mexico and Oklahoma. Date of Government Version: 09/12/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/13/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/11/2011 Number of Days to Update: 59 Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-665-6597 Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/11/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Florida, Mississippi and North Carolina. Date of Government Version: 08/01/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/02/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/01/2013 Number of Days to Update: 91 Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: 404-562-8677 Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/11/2014 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually INDIAN LUST R1: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land. Date of Government Version: 02/01/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/01/2013 Number of Days to Update: 184 Source: EPA Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Last EDR Contact: 11/01/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/11/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R9: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Nevada Date of Government Version: 03/01/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2013 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 415-972-3372 Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/11/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC3837232.2s Page GR-9 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING INDIAN LUST R5: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Leaking underground storage tanks located on Indian Land in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin. Date of Government Version: 08/20/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/23/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/01/2013 Number of Days to Update: 70 Source: EPA, Region 5 Telephone: 312-886-7439 Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/11/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R10: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington. Date of Government Version: 11/06/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/07/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/06/2013 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/11/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State and tribal registered storage tank lists UST: Active UST Facilities Active UST facilities gathered from the local regulatory agencies Date of Government Version: 12/16/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/17/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/07/2014 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: SWRCB Telephone: 916-341-5851 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/31/2014 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually AST: Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tank Facilities A listing of aboveground storage tank petroleum storage tank locations. Date of Government Version: 08/01/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/10/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/01/2009 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916-327-5092 Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/21/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN UST R1: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 1 (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont and ten Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 09/28/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/07/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2013 Number of Days to Update: 156 Source: EPA, Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Last EDR Contact: 11/01/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/11/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R4: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 4 (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Tribal Nations) Date of Government Version: 08/01/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/02/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/01/2013 Number of Days to Update: 91 Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: 404-562-9424 Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/11/2014 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually TC3837232.2s Page GR-10 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING INDIAN UST R5: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 5 (Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 08/20/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/23/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/01/2013 Number of Days to Update: 70 Source: EPA Region 5 Telephone: 312-886-6136 Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/11/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R6: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 6 (Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas and 65 Tribes). Date of Government Version: 05/10/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/11/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/14/2011 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-665-7591 Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/11/2014 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually INDIAN UST R7: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 7 (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and 9 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 12/31/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/28/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2013 Number of Days to Update: 43 Source: EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7003 Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/11/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R8: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 8 (Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming and 27 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 07/29/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/01/2013 Number of Days to Update: 92 Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6137 Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/11/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN UST R9: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 9 (Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, the Pacific Islands, and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 07/29/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/30/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/06/2013 Number of Days to Update: 129 Source: EPA Region 9 Telephone: 415-972-3368 Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/11/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN UST R10: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 10 (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 02/05/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/06/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2013 Number of Days to Update: 65 Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/11/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC3837232.2s Page GR-11 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING FEMA UST: Underground Storage Tank Listing A listing of all FEMA owned underground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 01/01/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/16/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010 Number of Days to Update: 55 Source: FEMA Telephone: 202-646-5797 Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/28/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites INDIAN VCP R1: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 1. Date of Government Version: 09/17/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/06/2013 Number of Days to Update: 66 Source: EPA, Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1102 Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/14/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN VCP R7: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 7. Date of Government Version: 03/20/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2008 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: EPA, Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7365 Last EDR Contact: 04/20/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2009 Data Release Frequency: Varies VCP: Voluntary Cleanup Program Properties Contains low threat level properties with either confirmed or unconfirmed releases and the project proponents have request that DTSC oversee investigation and/or cleanup activities and have agreed to provide coverage for DTSC’s costs. Date of Government Version: 11/06/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/06/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/03/2013 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 11/06/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/17/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these properties takes development pressures off of undeveloped, open land, and both improves and protects the environment. Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) stores information reported by EPA Brownfields grant recipients on brownfields properties assessed or cleaned up with grant funding as well as information on Targeted Brownfields Assessments performed by EPA Regions. A listing of ACRES Brownfield sites is obtained from Cleanups in My Community. Cleanups in My Community provides information on Brownfields properties for which information is reported back to EPA, as well as areas served by Brownfields grant programs. Date of Government Version: 09/24/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/24/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/06/2013 Number of Days to Update: 73 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-2777 Last EDR Contact: 12/24/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/07/2014 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites TC3837232.2s Page GR-12 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING DEBRIS REGION 9: Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations A listing of illegal dump sites location on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation located in eastern Riverside County and northern Imperial County, California. Date of Government Version: 01/12/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2009 Number of Days to Update: 137 Source: EPA, Region 9 Telephone: 415-947-4219 Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/11/2014 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned ODI: Open Dump Inventory An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258 Subtitle D Criteria. Date of Government Version: 06/30/1985 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2004 Number of Days to Update: 39 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2004 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned WMUDS/SWAT: Waste Management Unit Database Waste Management Unit Database System. WMUDS is used by the State Water Resources Control Board staff and the Regional Water Quality Control Boards for program tracking and inventory of waste management units. WMUDS is composed of the following databases: Facility Information, Scheduled Inspections Information, Waste Management Unit Information, SWAT Program Information, SWAT Report Summary Information, SWAT Report Summary Data, Chapter 15 (formerly Subchapter 15) Information, Chapter 15 Monitoring Parameters, TPCA Program Information, RCRA Program Information, Closure Information, and Interested Parties Information. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2000 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/10/2000 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2000 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-227-4448 Last EDR Contact: 11/08/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/24/2014 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SWRCY: Recycler Database A listing of recycling facilities in California. Date of Government Version: 12/16/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/17/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/07/2014 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: Department of Conservation Telephone: 916-323-3836 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/31/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HAULERS: Registered Waste Tire Haulers Listing A listing of registered waste tire haulers. Date of Government Version: 11/20/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/25/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/31/2013 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: Integrated Waste Management Board Telephone: 916-341-6422 Last EDR Contact: 11/18/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/03/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN ODI: Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands Location of open dumps on Indian land. Date of Government Version: 12/31/1998 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2008 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-308-8245 Last EDR Contact: 11/04/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/17/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC3837232.2s Page GR-13 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example, contacting local law enforcement and local health departments. Date of Government Version: 08/06/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/11/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/03/2013 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: 202-307-1000 Last EDR Contact: 12/05/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HIST CAL-SITES: Calsites Database The Calsites database contains potential or confirmed hazardous substance release properties. In 1996, California EPA reevaluated and significantly reduced the number of sites in the Calsites database. No longer updated by the state agency. It has been replaced by ENVIROSTOR. Date of Government Version: 08/08/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/03/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2006 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: Department of Toxic Substance Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 02/23/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/25/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SCH: School Property Evaluation Program This category contains proposed and existing school sites that are being evaluated by DTSC for possible hazardous materials contamination. In some cases, these properties may be listed in the CalSites category depending on the level of threat to public health and safety or the environment they pose. Date of Government Version: 11/06/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/06/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/03/2013 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 11/06/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/17/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TOXIC PITS: Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Sites Toxic PITS Cleanup Act Sites. TOXIC PITS identifies sites suspected of containing hazardous substances where cleanup has not yet been completed. Date of Government Version: 07/01/1995 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/30/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/26/1995 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-227-4364 Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/27/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs A listing of drug lab locations. Listing of a location in this database does not indicate that any illegal drug lab materials were or were not present there, and does not constitute a determination that the location either requires or does not require additional cleanup work. Date of Government Version: 06/30/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/03/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/10/2013 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-255-6504 Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/28/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC3837232.2s Page GR-14 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING US HIST CDL: National Clandestine Laboratory Register A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example, contacting local law enforcement and local health departments. Date of Government Version: 09/01/2007 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/19/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/2009 Number of Days to Update: 131 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: 202-307-1000 Last EDR Contact: 03/23/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/22/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks CA FID UST: Facility Inventory Database The Facility Inventory Database (FID) contains a historical listing of active and inactive underground storage tank locations from the State Water Resource Control Board. Refer to local/county source for current data. Date of Government Version: 10/31/1994 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/05/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/1995 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916-341-5851 Last EDR Contact: 12/28/1998 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned UST MENDOCINO: Mendocino County UST Database A listing of underground storage tank locations in Mendocino County. Date of Government Version: 09/23/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/23/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/01/2009 Number of Days to Update: 8 Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 707-463-4466 Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2014 Data Release Frequency: Annually HIST UST: Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database The Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database is a historical listing of UST sites. Refer to local/county source for current data. Date of Government Version: 10/15/1990 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/25/1991 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/12/1991 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-341-5851 Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2001 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SWEEPS UST: SWEEPS UST Listing Statewide Environmental Evaluation and Planning System. This underground storage tank listing was updated and maintained by a company contacted by the SWRCB in the early 1990’s. The listing is no longer updated or maintained. The local agency is the contact for more information on a site on the SWEEPS list. Date of Government Version: 06/01/1994 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/07/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/11/2005 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/03/2005 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Local Land Records LIENS 2: CERCLA Lien Information A Federal CERCLA (’Superfund’) lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent Superfund monies. These monies are spent to investigate and address releases and threatened releases of contamination. CERCLIS provides information as to the identity of these sites and properties. TC3837232.2s Page GR-15 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 02/06/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/25/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2013 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-6023 Last EDR Contact: 11/13/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/11/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies LIENS: Environmental Liens Listing A listing of property locations with environmental liens for California where DTSC is a lien holder. Date of Government Version: 10/08/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/15/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/27/2013 Number of Days to Update: 43 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 12/09/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/24/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies DEED: Deed Restriction Listing Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program Facility Sites with Deed Restrictions & Hazardous Waste Management Program Facility Sites with Deed / Land Use Restriction. The DTSC Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program (SMBRP) list includes sites cleaned up under the program’s oversight and generally does not include current or former hazardous waste facilities that required a hazardous waste facility permit. The list represents deed restrictions that are active. Some sites have multiple deed restrictions. The DTSC Hazardous Waste Management Program (HWMP) has developed a list of current or former hazardous waste facilities that have a recorded land use restriction at the local county recorder’s office. The land use restrictions on this list were required by the DTSC HWMP as a result of the presence of hazardous substances that remain on site after the facility (or part of the facility) has been closed or cleaned up. The types of land use restriction include deed notice, deed restriction, or a land use restriction that binds current and future owners. Date of Government Version: 12/09/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/10/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/03/2014 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: DTSC and SWRCB Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 12/10/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/24/2014 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/16/2013 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: U.S. Department of Transportation Telephone: 202-366-4555 Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/13/2014 Data Release Frequency: Annually CHMIRS: California Hazardous Material Incident Report System California Hazardous Material Incident Reporting System. CHMIRS contains information on reported hazardous material incidents (accidental releases or spills). Date of Government Version: 10/14/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/30/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/03/2013 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: Office of Emergency Services Telephone: 916-845-8400 Last EDR Contact: 10/30/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/11/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies LDS: Land Disposal Sites Listing The Land Disposal program regulates of waste discharge to land for treatment, storage and disposal in waste management units. Date of Government Version: 12/16/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/17/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2014 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: State Water Qualilty Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/31/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC3837232.2s Page GR-16 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING MCS: Military Cleanup Sites Listing The State Water Resources Control Board and nine Regional Water Quality Control Boards partner with the Department of Defense (DoD) through the Defense and State Memorandum of Agreement (DSMOA) to oversee the investigation and remediation of water quality issues at military facilities. Date of Government Version: 12/16/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/17/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2014 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/31/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SPILLS 90: SPILLS90 data from FirstSearch Spills 90 includes those spill and release records available exclusively from FirstSearch databases. Typically, they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded after 1990. Duplicate records that are already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 90. Date of Government Version: 06/06/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2013 Number of Days to Update: 50 Source: FirstSearch Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Other Ascertainable Records RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRA - Non Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste. Date of Government Version: 09/10/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/02/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/16/2013 Number of Days to Update: 75 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 01/02/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/14/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies DOT OPS: Incident and Accident Data Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Incident and Accident data. Date of Government Version: 07/31/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/18/2012 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Telephone: 202-366-4595 Last EDR Contact: 11/06/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/17/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies DOD: Department of Defense Sites This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/10/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 62 Source: USGS Telephone: 888-275-8747 Last EDR Contact: 01/15/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/28/2014 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions. TC3837232.2s Page GR-17 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 12/31/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/26/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/13/2013 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Telephone: 202-528-4285 Last EDR Contact: 12/13/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/24/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters. Date of Government Version: 06/30/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/03/2013 Number of Days to Update: 57 Source: Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library Telephone: Varies Last EDR Contact: 12/26/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/14/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies ROD: Records Of Decision Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical and health information to aid in the cleanup. Date of Government Version: 04/26/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/01/2013 Number of Days to Update: 143 Source: EPA Telephone: 703-416-0223 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/24/2014 Data Release Frequency: Annually UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs. When the mills shut down, large piles of the sand-like material (mill tailings) remain after uranium has been extracted from the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low; however, in some cases tailings were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized. Date of Government Version: 09/14/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/07/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/01/2012 Number of Days to Update: 146 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 505-845-0011 Last EDR Contact: 11/26/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/10/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies US MINES: Mines Master Index File Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971. The data also includes violation information. Date of Government Version: 08/01/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/05/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/03/2013 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration Telephone: 303-231-5959 Last EDR Contact: 12/06/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2014 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/31/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2013 Number of Days to Update: 44 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0250 Last EDR Contact: 11/27/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/10/2014 Data Release Frequency: Annually TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant site. TC3837232.2s Page GR-18 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 12/31/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/29/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/02/2010 Number of Days to Update: 64 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-260-5521 Last EDR Contact: 12/26/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/07/2014 Data Release Frequency: Every 4 Years FTTS: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA, TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances Telephone: 202-566-1667 Last EDR Contact: 11/21/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/10/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FTTS INSP: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) A listing of FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) inspections and enforcements. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-1667 Last EDR Contact: 11/21/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/10/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HIST FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing A complete administrative case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2007 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HIST FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Listing A complete inspection and enforcement case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Stat. 829) requires all registered pesticide-producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March 1st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year. TC3837232.2s Page GR-19 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 12/31/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/10/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/25/2011 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4203 Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/11/2014 Data Release Frequency: Annually ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) supports the information needs of the national enforcement and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program. Date of Government Version: 07/20/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/10/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2012 Number of Days to Update: 61 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-5088 Last EDR Contact: 10/09/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/28/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PADS: PCB Activity Database System PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers of PCB’s who are required to notify the EPA of such activities. Date of Government Version: 06/01/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/17/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/01/2013 Number of Days to Update: 107 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0500 Last EDR Contact: 01/28/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/28/2014 Data Release Frequency: Annually MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking System MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 07/22/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/02/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/01/2013 Number of Days to Update: 91 Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission Telephone: 301-415-7169 Last EDR Contact: 12/09/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/24/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RADINFO: Radiation Information Database The Radiation Information Database (RADINFO) contains information about facilities that are regulated by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations for radiation and radioactivity. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/09/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/01/2013 Number of Days to Update: 23 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-343-9775 Last EDR Contact: 01/10/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/21/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Registry System Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and ’pointers’ to other sources that contain more detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C-DOCKET (Criminal Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System). Date of Government Version: 03/08/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/10/2013 Number of Days to Update: 111 Source: EPA Telephone: (415) 947-8000 Last EDR Contact: 12/10/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/24/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC3837232.2s Page GR-20 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database. Date of Government Version: 04/17/1995 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/03/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/07/1995 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4104 Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/01/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned RMP: Risk Management Plans When Congress passed the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, it required EPA to publish regulations and guidance for chemical accident prevention at facilities using extremely hazardous substances. The Risk Management Program Rule (RMP Rule) was written to implement Section 112(r) of these amendments. The rule, which built upon existing industry codes and standards, requires companies of all sizes that use certain flammable and toxic substances to develop a Risk Management Program, which includes a(n): Hazard assessment that details the potential effects of an accidental release, an accident history of the last five years, and an evaluation of worst-case and alternative accidental releases; Prevention program that includes safety precautions and maintenance, monitoring, and employee training measures; and Emergency response program that spells out emergency health care, employee training measures and procedures for informing the public and response agencies (e.g the fire department) should an accident occur. Date of Government Version: 05/08/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/25/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/10/2012 Number of Days to Update: 46 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-8600 Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/11/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies BRS: Biennial Reporting System The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LQG) and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/26/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/19/2013 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: EPA/NTIS Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 11/25/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/10/2014 Data Release Frequency: Biennially CA BOND EXP. PLAN: Bond Expenditure Plan Department of Health Services developed a site-specific expenditure plan as the basis for an appropriation of Hazardous Substance Cleanup Bond Act funds. It is not updated. Date of Government Version: 01/01/1989 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/27/1994 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/02/1994 Number of Days to Update: 6 Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 916-255-2118 Last EDR Contact: 05/31/1994 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned UIC: UIC Listing A listing of wells identified as underground injection wells, in the California Oil and Gas Wells database. Date of Government Version: 09/25/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/17/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/07/2014 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: Deaprtment of Conservation Telephone: 916-445-2408 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/31/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC3837232.2s Page GR-21 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING NPDES: NPDES Permits Listing A listing of NPDES permits, including stormwater. Date of Government Version: 11/19/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/21/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/02/2014 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-445-9379 Last EDR Contact: 11/21/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/03/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CORTESE: "Cortese" Hazardous Waste & Substances Sites List The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board (LUST), the Integrated Waste Board (SWF/LS), and the Department of Toxic Substances Control (Cal-Sites). Date of Government Version: 09/30/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/26/2013 Number of Days to Update: 56 Source: CAL EPA/Office of Emergency Information Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 12/31/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/14/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HIST CORTESE: Hazardous Waste & Substance Site List The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board [LUST], the Integrated Waste Board [SWF/LS], and the Department of Toxic Substances Control [CALSITES]. This listing is no longer updated by the state agency. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/22/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/08/2009 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 01/22/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned NOTIFY 65: Proposition 65 Records Listings of all Proposition 65 incidents reported to counties by the State Water Resources Control Board and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. This database is no longer updated by the reporting agency. Date of Government Version: 10/21/1993 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/01/1993 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/1993 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-445-3846 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/07/2014 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned DRYCLEANERS: Cleaner Facilities A list of drycleaner related facilities that have EPA ID numbers. These are facilities with certain SIC codes: power laundries, family and commercial; garment pressing and cleaner’s agents; linen supply; coin-operated laundries and cleaning; drycleaning plants, except rugs; carpet and upholster cleaning; industrial launderers; laundry and garment services. Date of Government Version: 09/10/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/11/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/16/2013 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: Department of Toxic Substance Control Telephone: 916-327-4498 Last EDR Contact: 12/09/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/24/2014 Data Release Frequency: Annually WIP: Well Investigation Program Case List Well Investigation Program case in the San Gabriel and San Fernando Valley area. Date of Government Version: 07/03/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/21/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/03/2009 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Los Angeles Water Quality Control Board Telephone: 213-576-6726 Last EDR Contact: 12/26/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/14/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC3837232.2s Page GR-22 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ENF: Enforcement Action Listing A listing of Water Board Enforcement Actions. Formal is everything except Oral/Verbal Communication, Notice of Violation, Expedited Payment Letter, and Staff Enforcement Letter. Date of Government Version: 08/09/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/13/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/08/2013 Number of Days to Update: 56 Source: State Water Resoruces Control Board Telephone: 916-445-9379 Last EDR Contact: 11/08/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/11/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies HAZNET: Facility and Manifest Data Facility and Manifest Data. The data is extracted from the copies of hazardous waste manifests received each year by the DTSC. The annual volume of manifests is typically 700,000 - 1,000,000 annually, representing approximately 350,000 - 500,000 shipments. Data are from the manifests submitted without correction, and therefore many contain some invalid values for data elements such as generator ID, TSD ID, waste category, and disposal method. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/16/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/26/2013 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916-255-1136 Last EDR Contact: 01/17/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/28/2014 Data Release Frequency: Annually EMI: Emissions Inventory Data Toxics and criteria pollutant emissions data collected by the ARB and local air pollution agencies. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/25/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/22/2013 Number of Days to Update: 58 Source: California Air Resources Board Telephone: 916-322-2990 Last EDR Contact: 12/26/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/07/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/08/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: USGS Telephone: 202-208-3710 Last EDR Contact: 01/15/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/28/2014 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SCRD DRYCLEANERS: State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. EPA Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. It is comprised of representatives of states with established drycleaner remediation programs. Currently the member states are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin. Date of Government Version: 03/07/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/09/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/02/2011 Number of Days to Update: 54 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 615-532-8599 Last EDR Contact: 01/20/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/05/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies WDS: Waste Discharge System Sites which have been issued waste discharge requirements. Date of Government Version: 06/19/2007 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/20/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2007 Number of Days to Update: 9 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-341-5227 Last EDR Contact: 11/21/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/10/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC3837232.2s Page GR-23 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING PRP: Potentially Responsible Parties A listing of verified Potentially Responsible Parties Date of Government Version: 04/15/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/03/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2013 Number of Days to Update: 72 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-6023 Last EDR Contact: 01/02/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/14/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly LEAD SMELTER 2: Lead Smelter Sites A list of several hundred sites in the U.S. where secondary lead smelting was done from 1931and 1964. These sites may pose a threat to public health through ingestion or inhalation of contaminated soil or dust Date of Government Version: 04/05/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/02/2010 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: American Journal of Public Health Telephone: 703-305-6451 Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LEAD SMELTER 1: Lead Smelter Sites A listing of former lead smelter site locations. Date of Government Version: 01/29/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/14/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/27/2013 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-8787 Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/21/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies EPA WATCH LIST: EPA WATCH LIST EPA maintains a "Watch List" to facilitate dialogue between EPA, state and local environmental agencies on enforcement matters relating to facilities with alleged violations identified as either significant or high priority. Being on the Watch List does not mean that the facility has actually violated the law only that an investigation by EPA or a state or local environmental agency has led those organizations to allege that an unproven violation has in fact occurred. Being on the Watch List does not represent a higher level of concern regarding the alleged violations that were detected, but instead indicates cases requiring additional dialogue between EPA, state and local agencies - primarily because of the length of time the alleged violation has gone unaddressed or unresolved. Date of Government Version: 06/30/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/13/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2013 Number of Days to Update: 31 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 617-520-3000 Last EDR Contact: 11/15/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/24/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly 2020 COR ACTION: 2020 Corrective Action Program List The EPA has set ambitious goals for the RCRA Corrective Action program by creating the 2020 Corrective Action Universe. This RCRA cleanup baseline includes facilities expected to need corrective action. The 2020 universe contains a wide variety of sites. Some properties are heavily contaminated while others were contaminated but have since been cleaned up. Still others have not been fully investigated yet, and may require little or no remediation. Inclusion in the 2020 Universe does not necessarily imply failure on the part of a facility to meet its RCRA obligations. Date of Government Version: 11/11/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/25/2012 Number of Days to Update: 7 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-308-4044 Last EDR Contact: 11/15/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/24/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies Financial Assurance 1: Financial Assurance Information Listing Financial Assurance information TC3837232.2s Page GR-24 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 10/31/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/06/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/03/2013 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-255-3628 Last EDR Contact: 10/25/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/11/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies Financial Assurance 2: Financial Assurance Information Listing A listing of financial assurance information for solid waste facilities. Financial assurance is intended to ensure that resources are available to pay for the cost of closure, post-closure care, and corrective measures if the owner or operator of a regulated facility is unable or unwilling to pay. Date of Government Version: 11/18/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/19/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/31/2013 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: California Integrated Waste Management Board Telephone: 916-341-6066 Last EDR Contact: 11/18/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/03/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies PCB TRANSFORMER: PCB Transformer Registration Database The database of PCB transformer registrations that includes all PCB registration submittals. Date of Government Version: 02/01/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/19/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2012 Number of Days to Update: 83 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-0517 Last EDR Contact: 11/01/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/11/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies COAL ASH EPA: Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List A listing of coal combustion residues surface impoundments with high hazard potential ratings. Date of Government Version: 08/17/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/21/2011 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 12/13/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/24/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies US FIN ASSUR: Financial Assurance Information All owners and operators of facilities that treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste are required to provide proof that they will have sufficient funds to pay for the clean up, closure, and post-closure care of their facilities. Date of Government Version: 10/28/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/29/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/06/2013 Number of Days to Update: 38 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-1917 Last EDR Contact: 11/18/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/03/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly COAL ASH DOE: Sleam-Electric Plan Operation Data A listing of power plants that store ash in surface ponds. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2009 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 202-586-8719 Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/28/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies FEDLAND: Federal and Indian Lands Federally and Indian administrated lands of the United States. Lands included are administrated by: Army Corps of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, National Wild and Scenic River, National Wildlife Refuge, Public Domain Land, Wilderness, Wilderness Study Area, Wildlife Management Area, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management, Department of Justice, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service. TC3837232.2s Page GR-25 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/06/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 339 Source: U.S. Geological Survey Telephone: 888-275-8747 Last EDR Contact: 01/15/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/28/2014 Data Release Frequency: N/A US AIRS (AFS): Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem (AFS) The database is a sub-system of Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS). AFS contains compliance data on air pollution point sources regulated by the U.S. EPA and/or state and local air regulatory agencies. This information comes from source reports by various stationary sources of air pollution, such as electric power plants, steel mills, factories, and universities, and provides information about the air pollutants they produce. Action, air program, air program pollutant, and general level plant data. It is used to track emissions and compliance data from industrial plants. Date of Government Version: 10/23/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/06/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/06/2013 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-5962 Last EDR Contact: 12/26/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/14/2014 Data Release Frequency: Annually US AIRS MINOR: Air Facility System Data A listing of minor source facilities. Date of Government Version: 10/23/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/06/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/06/2013 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-5962 Last EDR Contact: 12/26/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/14/2014 Data Release Frequency: Annually PROC: Certified Processors Database A listing of certified processors. Date of Government Version: 12/16/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/17/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/07/2014 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: Department of Conservation Telephone: 916-323-3836 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/31/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly MWMP: Medical Waste Management Program Listing The Medical Waste Management Program (MWMP) ensures the proper handling and disposal of medical waste by permitting and inspecting medical waste Offsite Treatment Facilities (PDF) and Transfer Stations (PDF) throughout the state. MWMP also oversees all Medical Waste Transporters. Date of Government Version: 09/20/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/11/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2014 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 916-558-1784 Last EDR Contact: 12/09/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/24/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies HWT: Registered Hazardous Waste Transporter Database A listing of hazardous waste transporters. In California, unless specifically exempted, it is unlawful for any person to transport hazardous wastes unless the person holds a valid registration issued by DTSC. A hazardous waste transporter registration is valid for one year and is assigned a unique registration number. Date of Government Version: 10/15/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/15/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/27/2013 Number of Days to Update: 43 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-440-7145 Last EDR Contact: 01/14/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/28/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC3837232.2s Page GR-26 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING HWP: EnviroStor Permitted Facilities Listing Detailed information on permitted hazardous waste facilities and corrective action ("cleanups") tracked in EnviroStor. Date of Government Version: 11/25/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/26/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/31/2013 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 11/26/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/10/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants) compiled by EDR’s researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800’s to 1950’s to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture of coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production, such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of soil and groundwater contamination. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned EDR US Hist Auto Stat: EDR Exclusive Historic Gas Stations EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station, filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR US Hist Cleaners: EDR Exclusive Historic Dry Cleaners EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies TC3837232.2s Page GR-27 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING EDR US Hist Cleaners: EDR Proprietary Historic Dry Cleaners - Cole Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: N/A Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR US Hist Auto Stat: EDR Proprietary Historic Gas Stations - Cole Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: N/A Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives RGA LUST: Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank The EDR Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank database provides a list of LUST incidents derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/30/2013 Number of Days to Update: 182 Source: EDR Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies RGA LF: Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List The EDR Recovered Government Archive Landfill database provides a list of landfills derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2014 Number of Days to Update: 196 Source: EDR Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies COUNTY RECORDS ALAMEDA COUNTY: Contaminated Sites A listing of contaminated sites overseen by the Toxic Release Program (oil and groundwater contamination from chemical releases and spills) and the Leaking Underground Storage Tank Program (soil and ground water contamination from leaking petroleum USTs). Date of Government Version: 11/13/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/16/2013 Number of Days to Update: 31 Source: Alameda County Environmental Health Services Telephone: 510-567-6700 Last EDR Contact: 12/30/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/14/2014 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Underground Tanks Underground storage tank sites located in Alameda county. Date of Government Version: 11/13/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/31/2013 Number of Days to Update: 46 Source: Alameda County Environmental Health Services Telephone: 510-567-6700 Last EDR Contact: 12/30/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/14/2014 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually AMADOR COUNTY: TC3837232.2s Page GR-28 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility List Date of Government Version: 12/05/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/10/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/03/2014 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: Amador County Environmental Health Telephone: 209-223-6439 Last EDR Contact: 12/09/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/24/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies BUTTE COUNTY: CUPA Facility Listing Cupa facility list. Date of Government Version: 08/01/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/02/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/22/2013 Number of Days to Update: 20 Source: Public Health Department Telephone: 530-538-7149 Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/28/2014 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned CALVERAS COUNTY: CUPA Facility Listing Cupa Facility Listing Date of Government Version: 09/30/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/26/2013 Number of Days to Update: 56 Source: Calveras County Environmental Health Telephone: 209-754-6399 Last EDR Contact: 12/30/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/14/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly COLUSA COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list. Date of Government Version: 06/20/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2013 Number of Days to Update: 39 Source: Health & Human Services Telephone: 530-458-0396 Last EDR Contact: 11/15/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/24/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies CONTRA COSTA COUNTY: Site List List includes sites from the underground tank, hazardous waste generator and business plan/2185 programs. Date of Government Version: 11/18/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/19/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/31/2013 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: Contra Costa Health Services Department Telephone: 925-646-2286 Last EDR Contact: 11/04/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/17/2014 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually DEL NORTE COUNTY: TC3837232.2s Page GR-29 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility list Date of Government Version: 01/09/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/10/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/25/2013 Number of Days to Update: 46 Source: Del Norte County Environmental Health Division Telephone: 707-465-0426 Last EDR Contact: 11/04/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/17/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies EL DORADO COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. Date of Government Version: 11/18/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/19/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/14/2014 Number of Days to Update: 56 Source: El Dorado County Environmental Management Department Telephone: 530-621-6623 Last EDR Contact: 11/04/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/17/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies FRESNO COUNTY: CUPA Resources List Certified Unified Program Agency. CUPA’s are responsible for implementing a unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste management regulatory program. The agency provides oversight of businesses that deal with hazardous materials, operate underground storage tanks or aboveground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/16/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/27/2013 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: Dept. of Community Health Telephone: 559-445-3271 Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/28/2014 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually HUMBOLDT COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. Date of Government Version: 12/16/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/17/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/07/2014 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: Humboldt County Environmental Health Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 11/20/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/10/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies IMPERIAL COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list. Date of Government Version: 11/06/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/06/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/04/2013 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: San Diego Border Field Office Telephone: 760-339-2777 Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/11/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies INYO COUNTY: TC3837232.2s Page GR-30 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list. Date of Government Version: 09/10/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/11/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/14/2013 Number of Days to Update: 33 Source: Inyo County Environmental Health Services Telephone: 760-878-0238 Last EDR Contact: 12/09/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/10/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies KERN COUNTY: Underground Storage Tank Sites & Tank Listing Kern County Sites and Tanks Listing. Date of Government Version: 08/31/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/01/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/30/2010 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: Kern County Environment Health Services Department Telephone: 661-862-8700 Last EDR Contact: 11/08/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/24/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly KINGS COUNTY: CUPA Facility List A listing of sites included in the county’s Certified Unified Program Agency database. California’s Secretary for Environmental Protection established the unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste regulatory program as required by chapter 6.11 of the California Health and Safety Code. The Unified Program consolidates the administration, permits, inspections, and enforcement activities. Date of Government Version: 12/12/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/13/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/07/2014 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: Kings County Department of Public Health Telephone: 559-584-1411 Last EDR Contact: 12/09/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/10/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies LAKE COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 01/23/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/25/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/27/2013 Number of Days to Update: 33 Source: Lake County Environmental Health Telephone: 707-263-1164 Last EDR Contact: 01/20/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/05/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies LOS ANGELES COUNTY: San Gabriel Valley Areas of Concern San Gabriel Valley areas where VOC contamination is at or above the MCL as designated by region 9 EPA office. Date of Government Version: 03/30/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/23/2009 Number of Days to Update: 206 Source: EPA Region 9 Telephone: 415-972-3178 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/07/2014 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC3837232.2s Page GR-31 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING HMS: Street Number List Industrial Waste and Underground Storage Tank Sites. Date of Government Version: 03/28/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/17/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/21/2013 Number of Days to Update: 65 Source: Department of Public Works Telephone: 626-458-3517 Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/28/2014 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually List of Solid Waste Facilities Solid Waste Facilities in Los Angeles County. Date of Government Version: 10/21/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/22/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/27/2013 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: La County Department of Public Works Telephone: 818-458-5185 Last EDR Contact: 01/21/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/05/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies City of Los Angeles Landfills Landfills owned and maintained by the City of Los Angeles. Date of Government Version: 03/05/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/10/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/08/2009 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: Engineering & Construction Division Telephone: 213-473-7869 Last EDR Contact: 01/20/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/05/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies Site Mitigation List Industrial sites that have had some sort of spill or complaint. Date of Government Version: 01/30/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/21/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/25/2013 Number of Days to Update: 32 Source: Community Health Services Telephone: 323-890-7806 Last EDR Contact: 01/20/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/05/2014 Data Release Frequency: Annually City of El Segundo Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in El Segundo city. Date of Government Version: 10/21/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/25/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/27/2013 Number of Days to Update: 33 Source: City of El Segundo Fire Department Telephone: 310-524-2236 Last EDR Contact: 01/20/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/05/2014 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually City of Long Beach Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in the city of Long Beach. Date of Government Version: 03/28/2003 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/23/2003 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/26/2003 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: City of Long Beach Fire Department Telephone: 562-570-2563 Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/11/2014 Data Release Frequency: Annually City of Torrance Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in the city of Torrance. Date of Government Version: 07/15/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/18/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/20/2013 Number of Days to Update: 33 Source: City of Torrance Fire Department Telephone: 310-618-2973 Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/28/2014 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually MADERA COUNTY: TC3837232.2s Page GR-32 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CUPA Facility List A listing of sites included in the county’s Certified Unified Program Agency database. California’s Secretary for Environmental Protection established the unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste regulatory program as required by chapter 6.11 of the California Health and Safety Code. The Unified Program consolidates the administration, permits, inspections, and enforcement activities. Date of Government Version: 09/20/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/24/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/18/2013 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: Madera County Environmental Health Telephone: 559-675-7823 Last EDR Contact: 11/20/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/10/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies MARIN COUNTY: Underground Storage Tank Sites Currently permitted USTs in Marin County. Date of Government Version: 10/07/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/09/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/26/2013 Number of Days to Update: 48 Source: Public Works Department Waste Management Telephone: 415-499-6647 Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/21/2014 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually MERCED COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. Date of Government Version: 08/23/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/27/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/08/2013 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: Merced County Environmental Health Telephone: 209-381-1094 Last EDR Contact: 11/20/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/10/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies MONO COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA Facility List Date of Government Version: 12/02/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/02/2014 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: Mono County Health Department Telephone: 760-932-5580 Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies MONTEREY COUNTY: CUPA Facility Listing CUPA Program listing from the Environmental Health Division. Date of Government Version: 09/11/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/12/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/14/2013 Number of Days to Update: 32 Source: Monterey County Health Department Telephone: 831-796-1297 Last EDR Contact: 11/20/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/10/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies NAPA COUNTY: TC3837232.2s Page GR-33 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Sites With Reported Contamination A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Napa county. Date of Government Version: 12/05/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/06/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/07/2012 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: Napa County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-253-4269 Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2014 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Closed and Operating Underground Storage Tank Sites Underground storage tank sites located in Napa county. Date of Government Version: 01/15/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/16/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2008 Number of Days to Update: 23 Source: Napa County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-253-4269 Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2014 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned NEVADA COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. Date of Government Version: 11/06/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/07/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/04/2013 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: Community Development Agency Telephone: 530-265-1467 Last EDR Contact: 11/04/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/17/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies ORANGE COUNTY: List of Industrial Site Cleanups Petroleum and non-petroleum spills. Date of Government Version: 11/04/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/13/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/04/2013 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: Health Care Agency Telephone: 714-834-3446 Last EDR Contact: 11/08/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/24/2014 Data Release Frequency: Annually List of Underground Storage Tank Cleanups Orange County Underground Storage Tank Cleanups (LUST). Date of Government Version: 11/04/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/13/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/04/2013 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: Health Care Agency Telephone: 714-834-3446 Last EDR Contact: 11/08/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/24/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly List of Underground Storage Tank Facilities Orange County Underground Storage Tank Facilities (UST). Date of Government Version: 11/04/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/13/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/04/2013 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: Health Care Agency Telephone: 714-834-3446 Last EDR Contact: 11/08/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/24/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PLACER COUNTY: TC3837232.2s Page GR-34 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Master List of Facilities List includes aboveground tanks, underground tanks and cleanup sites. Date of Government Version: 12/09/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/10/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/07/2014 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: Placer County Health and Human Services Telephone: 530-745-2363 Last EDR Contact: 12/09/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/24/2014 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually RIVERSIDE COUNTY: Listing of Underground Tank Cleanup Sites Riverside County Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Sites (LUST). Date of Government Version: 10/10/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/22/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/27/2013 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 951-358-5055 Last EDR Contact: 12/19/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/07/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Underground Storage Tank Tank List Underground storage tank sites located in Riverside county. Date of Government Version: 10/10/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/22/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/27/2013 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 951-358-5055 Last EDR Contact: 12/19/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/07/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SACRAMENTO COUNTY: Toxic Site Clean-Up List List of sites where unauthorized releases of potentially hazardous materials have occurred. Date of Government Version: 08/05/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/10/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/26/2013 Number of Days to Update: 47 Source: Sacramento County Environmental Management Telephone: 916-875-8406 Last EDR Contact: 01/06/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/21/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Master Hazardous Materials Facility List Any business that has hazardous materials on site - hazardous material storage sites, underground storage tanks, waste generators. Date of Government Version: 08/05/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/10/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/26/2013 Number of Days to Update: 47 Source: Sacramento County Environmental Management Telephone: 916-875-8406 Last EDR Contact: 01/06/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/21/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY: Hazardous Material Permits This listing includes underground storage tanks, medical waste handlers/generators, hazardous materials handlers, hazardous waste generators, and waste oil generators/handlers. TC3837232.2s Page GR-35 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 11/26/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/27/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/31/2013 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: San Bernardino County Fire Department Hazardous Materials Division Telephone: 909-387-3041 Last EDR Contact: 11/08/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/24/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SAN DIEGO COUNTY: Hazardous Materials Management Division Database The database includes: HE58 - This report contains the business name, site address, business phone number, establishment ’H’ permit number, type of permit, and the business status. HE17 - In addition to providing the same information provided in the HE58 listing, HE17 provides inspection dates, violations received by the establishment, hazardous waste generated, the quantity, method of storage, treatment/disposal of waste and the hauler, and information on underground storage tanks. Unauthorized Release List - Includes a summary of environmental contamination cases in San Diego County (underground tank cases, non-tank cases, groundwater contamination, and soil contamination are included.) Date of Government Version: 09/23/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/24/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/17/2013 Number of Days to Update: 23 Source: Hazardous Materials Management Division Telephone: 619-338-2268 Last EDR Contact: 12/09/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/24/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Solid Waste Facilities San Diego County Solid Waste Facilities. Date of Government Version: 10/31/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/19/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/31/2013 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 619-338-2209 Last EDR Contact: 11/18/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/11/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies Environmental Case Listing The listing contains all underground tank release cases and projects pertaining to properties contaminated with hazardous substances that are actively under review by the Site Assessment and Mitigation Program. Date of Government Version: 03/23/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/15/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/09/2010 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: San Diego County Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 619-338-2371 Last EDR Contact: 12/09/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/24/2014 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY: Local Oversite Facilities A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in San Francisco county. Date of Government Version: 09/19/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/19/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2008 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: Department Of Public Health San Francisco County Telephone: 415-252-3920 Last EDR Contact: 11/08/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/24/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Underground Storage Tank Information Underground storage tank sites located in San Francisco county. Date of Government Version: 11/29/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/10/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/15/2011 Number of Days to Update: 5 Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 415-252-3920 Last EDR Contact: 11/08/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/24/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY: TC3837232.2s Page GR-36 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING San Joaquin Co. UST A listing of underground storage tank locations in San Joaquin county. Date of Government Version: 12/18/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/19/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/08/2014 Number of Days to Update: 20 Source: Environmental Health Department Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/07/2014 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility List. Date of Government Version: 08/26/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/27/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/10/2013 Number of Days to Update: 44 Source: San Luis Obispo County Public Health Department Telephone: 805-781-5596 Last EDR Contact: 11/20/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/10/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies SAN MATEO COUNTY: Business Inventory List includes Hazardous Materials Business Plan, hazardous waste generators, and underground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 10/01/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/08/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/26/2013 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: San Mateo County Environmental Health Services Division Telephone: 650-363-1921 Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/31/2014 Data Release Frequency: Annually Fuel Leak List A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in San Mateo county. Date of Government Version: 12/12/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/17/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/07/2014 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: San Mateo County Environmental Health Services Division Telephone: 650-363-1921 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/31/2014 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SANTA BARBARA COUNTY: CUPA Facility Listing CUPA Program Listing from the Environmental Health Services division. Date of Government Version: 09/08/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/09/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/07/2011 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: Santa Barbara County Public Health Department Telephone: 805-686-8167 Last EDR Contact: 11/21/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/10/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies SANTA CLARA COUNTY: Cupa Facility List Cupa facility list TC3837232.2s Page GR-37 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 09/03/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/04/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/10/2013 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 408-918-1973 Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies HIST LUST - Fuel Leak Site Activity Report A listing of open and closed leaking underground storage tanks. This listing is no longer updated by the county. Leaking underground storage tanks are now handled by the Department of Environmental Health. Date of Government Version: 03/29/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/30/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/21/2005 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: Santa Clara Valley Water District Telephone: 408-265-2600 Last EDR Contact: 03/23/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/22/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LOP Listing A listing of leaking underground storage tanks located in Santa Clara county. Date of Government Version: 12/02/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/02/2014 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 408-918-3417 Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2014 Data Release Frequency: Annually Hazardous Material Facilities Hazardous material facilities, including underground storage tank sites. Date of Government Version: 11/12/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/03/2014 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: City of San Jose Fire Department Telephone: 408-535-7694 Last EDR Contact: 11/08/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/24/2014 Data Release Frequency: Annually SANTA CRUZ COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility listing. Date of Government Version: 12/09/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/10/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/03/2014 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: Santa Cruz County Environmental Health Telephone: 831-464-2761 Last EDR Contact: 12/09/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/10/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies SHASTA COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility List. Date of Government Version: 12/03/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/04/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/02/2014 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: Shasta County Department of Resource Management Telephone: 530-225-5789 Last EDR Contact: 11/21/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/10/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies SOLANO COUNTY: TC3837232.2s Page GR-38 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Leaking Underground Storage Tanks A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Solano county. Date of Government Version: 12/16/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/18/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/08/2014 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: Solano County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-784-6770 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/31/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Underground Storage Tanks Underground storage tank sites located in Solano county. Date of Government Version: 12/16/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/19/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/08/2014 Number of Days to Update: 20 Source: Solano County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-784-6770 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/31/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SONOMA COUNTY: Cupa Facility List Cupa Facility list Date of Government Version: 09/30/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/26/2013 Number of Days to Update: 56 Source: County of Sonoma Fire & Emergency Services Department Telephone: 707-565-1174 Last EDR Contact: 12/30/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/14/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies Leaking Underground Storage Tank Sites A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Sonoma county. Date of Government Version: 10/01/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/02/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/26/2013 Number of Days to Update: 55 Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 707-565-6565 Last EDR Contact: 12/30/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/14/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SUTTER COUNTY: Underground Storage Tanks Underground storage tank sites located in Sutter county. Date of Government Version: 12/10/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/11/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2014 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: Sutter County Department of Agriculture Telephone: 530-822-7500 Last EDR Contact: 12/09/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/24/2014 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually TUOLUMNE COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 11/04/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/06/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/04/2013 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: Divison of Environmental Health Telephone: 209-533-5633 Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/11/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies VENTURA COUNTY: TC3837232.2s Page GR-39 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Business Plan, Hazardous Waste Producers, and Operating Underground Tanks The BWT list indicates by site address whether the Environmental Health Division has Business Plan (B), Waste Producer (W), and/or Underground Tank (T) information. Date of Government Version: 10/29/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/21/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/14/2014 Number of Days to Update: 54 Source: Ventura County Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 11/19/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/03/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Inventory of Illegal Abandoned and Inactive Sites Ventura County Inventory of Closed, Illegal Abandoned, and Inactive Sites. Date of Government Version: 12/01/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/01/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/19/2012 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/21/2014 Data Release Frequency: Annually Listing of Underground Tank Cleanup Sites Ventura County Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Sites (LUST). Date of Government Version: 05/29/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/24/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/31/2008 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 11/19/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/03/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Medical Waste Program List To protect public health and safety and the environment from potential exposure to disease causing agents, the Environmental Health Division Medical Waste Program regulates the generation, handling, storage, treatment and disposal of medical waste throughout the County. Date of Government Version: 10/02/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/30/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/27/2013 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: Ventura County Resource Management Agency Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/11/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Underground Tank Closed Sites List Ventura County Operating Underground Storage Tank Sites (UST)/Underground Tank Closed Sites List. Date of Government Version: 11/26/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/18/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/08/2014 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/31/2014 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly YOLO COUNTY: Underground Storage Tank Comprehensive Facility Report Underground storage tank sites located in Yolo county. Date of Government Version: 12/18/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/24/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/08/2014 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: Yolo County Department of Health Telephone: 530-666-8646 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/07/2014 Data Release Frequency: Annually YUBA COUNTY: TC3837232.2s Page GR-40 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CUPA Facility List CUPA facility listing for Yuba County. Date of Government Version: 12/06/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/10/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2014 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: Yuba County Environmental Health Department Telephone: 530-749-7523 Last EDR Contact: 12/06/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/17/2014 Data Release Frequency: Varies OTHER DATABASE(S) Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report. CT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data Facility and manifest data. Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a tsd facility. Date of Government Version: 07/30/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/19/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/03/2013 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: Department of Energy & Environmental Protection Telephone: 860-424-3375 Last EDR Contact: 11/22/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/03/2014 Data Release Frequency: Annually NJ MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/19/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/28/2012 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 01/17/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/28/2014 Data Release Frequency: Annually NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD facility. Date of Government Version: 11/01/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/07/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/18/2013 Number of Days to Update: 11 Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone: 518-402-8651 Last EDR Contact: 11/07/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/17/2014 Data Release Frequency: Annually PA MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/24/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/19/2013 Number of Days to Update: 26 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 717-783-8990 Last EDR Contact: 01/20/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/05/2014 Data Release Frequency: Annually RI MANIFEST: Manifest information Hazardous waste manifest information Date of Government Version: 12/31/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/21/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/05/2013 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 401-222-2797 Last EDR Contact: 11/25/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/10/2014 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC3837232.2s Page GR-41 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING WI MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/27/2013 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: Department of Natural Resources Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 12/11/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/31/2014 Data Release Frequency: Annually Oil/Gas Pipelines:This data was obtained by EDR from the USGS in 1994. It is referred to by USGS as GeoData Digital Line Graphs from 1:100,000-Scale Maps. It was extracted from the transportation category including some oil, but primarily gas pipelines. Electric Power Transmission Line Data Source: Rextag Strategies Corp. Telephone: (281) 769-2247 U.S. Electric Transmission and Power Plants Systems Digital GIS Data Sensitive Receptors:There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers, and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located. AHA Hospitals: Source: American Hospital Association, Inc. Telephone: 312-280-5991 The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association’s annual survey of hospitals. Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Telephone: 410-786-3000 A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services, a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Nursing Homes Source: National Institutes of Health Telephone: 301-594-6248 Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States. Public Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on elementary and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are comparable across all states. Private Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on private school locations in the United States. Daycare Centers: Licensed Facilities Source: Department of Social Services Telephone: 916-657-4041 Flood Zone Data:This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2003 & 2011 from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Data depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. NWI:National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Scanned Digital USGS 7.5’ Topographic Map (DRG) Source: United States Geologic Survey A digital raster graphic (DRG) is a scanned image of a U.S. Geological Survey topographic map. The map images are made by scanning published paper maps on high-resolution scanners. The raster image is georeferenced and fit to the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) projection. TC3837232.2s Page GR-42 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION © 2010 Tele Atlas North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. TC3837232.2s Page GR-43 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING TC3837232.2s Page A-1 geologic strata. of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics 2. Groundwater flow velocity. 1. Groundwater flow direction, and Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principal investigative components: forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration. EDR’s GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in 1999Most Recent Revision: 37122-F4 SAN FRANCISCO SOUTH, CATarget Property Map: USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP 27 ft. above sea levelElevation: 4166978.5UTM Y (Meters): 552585.1UTM X (Meters): Zone 10Universal Tranverse Mercator: 122.4039 - 122˚ 24’ 14.04’’Longitude (West): 37.6503 - 37˚ 39’ 1.08’’Latitude (North): TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 127 WEST HARRIS AVENUE PHASE I ENVIROMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE ADDENDUM® TC3837232.2s Page A-2 should be field verified. on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES El e v a t i o n ( f t ) El e v a t i o n ( f t ) TP TP 0 1/2 1 Miles✩Target Property Elevation: 27 ft. North South WestEast 202019171717 21 2323 2727241514 18 19 44 10 6 11 6 22 22 22 22 22 26 26 28 28 27 21 14 13 11 9 8 11 14 12 General ENEGeneral Topographic Gradient: TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers). sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data using site-specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC3837232.2s Page A-3 WSW1/8 - 1/4 Mile ESEB6 Not Reported1/8 - 1/4 Mile East5 NNE1/8 - 1/4 Mile NNWA4 SE1/8 - 1/4 Mile WSWC3 S1/8 - 1/4 Mile ESEB2 E1/8 - 1/4 Mile NNWA1 GENERAL DIRECTIONLOCATION GROUNDWATER FLOWFROM TPMAP ID hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table. authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater AQUIFLOW® Search Radius: 1.000 Mile. Not found Status: 1.25 miles Search Radius: Site-Specific Hydrogeological Data*: * ©1996 Site-specific hydrogeological data gathered by CERCLIS Alerts, Inc., Bainbridge Island, WA. All rights reserved. All of the information and opinions presented are those of the cited EPA report(s), which were completed under a Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) investigation. contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail MapSAN FRANCISCO SOUTH NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY NWI Electronic Data CoverageNWI Quad at Target Property 0603260000B - FEMA Q3 Flood data 0650620007B - FEMA Q3 Flood data 0650620001B - FEMA Q3 Flood data 0650620002B - FEMA Q3 Flood dataAdditional Panels in search area: 0650620008B - FEMA Q3 Flood dataFlood Plain Panel at Target Property: YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail MapSAN MATEO, CA FEMA FLOOD ZONE FEMA Flood Electronic DataTarget Property County and bodies of water). Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC3837232.2s Page A-4 NE1/2 - 1 Mile SouthO63 E1/2 - 1 Mile NNW62 ENE1/2 - 1 Mile WestN61 ENE1/2 - 1 Mile WestN60 NE1/2 - 1 Mile WestN59 NNE1/2 - 1 Mile WestN58 E1/2 - 1 Mile SE57 NNE1/2 - 1 Mile WestN56 SE1/2 - 1 Mile East55 Not Reported1/2 - 1 Mile SW54 SE1/2 - 1 Mile NW53 Not Reported1/2 - 1 Mile South52 W1/4 - 1/2 Mile ENEM51 W1/4 - 1/2 Mile ENEM50 NW1/4 - 1/2 Mile SEL49 NW1/4 - 1/2 Mile SEL48 Not Reported1/4 - 1/2 Mile NNW47 SSE1/4 - 1/2 Mile WestK46 E1/4 - 1/2 Mile WestK45 E1/4 - 1/2 Mile WNWJ44 W1/4 - 1/2 Mile WNWJ43 ESE1/4 - 1/2 Mile WestH42 E1/4 - 1/2 Mile WestH41 N, E, S,1/4 - 1/2 Mile WestH40 N1/4 - 1/2 Mile WNWH39 S1/4 - 1/2 Mile WNWH38 S1/4 - 1/2 Mile WNWH37 Not Reported1/4 - 1/2 Mile WNWH36 NNE1/4 - 1/2 Mile WNWH35 Not Reported1/4 - 1/2 Mile NEI34 Not Reported1/4 - 1/2 Mile NEI33 S1/4 - 1/2 Mile NEI32 S1/4 - 1/2 Mile NEI31 NE1/4 - 1/2 Mile SW30 NNE1/4 - 1/2 Mile NEG29 SE1/4 - 1/2 Mile WestH28 WSW1/4 - 1/2 Mile NWF27 E1/4 - 1/2 Mile NWF26 SE1/4 - 1/2 Mile SSE25 NE1/4 - 1/2 Mile NEG24 NE1/4 - 1/2 Mile NEG23 Varies1/4 - 1/2 Mile NWF21 Varies1/4 - 1/2 Mile South20 NW1/4 - 1/2 Mile NWF19 NE1/4 - 1/2 Mile WSW18 SSE1/4 - 1/2 Mile NEG17 Varies1/4 - 1/2 Mile NWF16 Not Reported1/4 - 1/2 Mile NNE15 Not Reported1/4 - 1/2 Mile WSW14 E1/8 - 1/4 Mile SouthE13 N1/8 - 1/4 Mile SouthE12 S1/8 - 1/4 Mile WestC11 SE1/8 - 1/4 Mile ENE10 E1/8 - 1/4 Mile SSWD9 Not Reported1/8 - 1/4 Mile SSWD8 WNW1/8 - 1/4 Mile WSWC7 GENERAL DIRECTIONLOCATION GROUNDWATER FLOWFROM TPMAP ID ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC3837232.2s Page A-5 For additional site information, refer to Physical Setting Source Map Findings. Not Reported1/2 - 1 Mile NNEZ111 SE1/2 - 1 Mile NNEZ110 S1/2 - 1 Mile East109 Not Reported1/2 - 1 Mile WSWY108 N1/2 - 1 Mile WSWY107 Varies1/2 - 1 Mile SSW106 ESE1/2 - 1 Mile SW105 S1/2 - 1 Mile NNWX104 S1/2 - 1 Mile NNWX103 NE1/2 - 1 Mile West102 Not Reported1/2 - 1 Mile SSE101 Not Reported1/2 - 1 Mile SSE100 ESE1/2 - 1 Mile NNWV99 S1/2 - 1 Mile WSW98 Not Reported1/2 - 1 Mile SWW97 Not Reported1/2 - 1 Mile SWW96 Not Reported1/2 - 1 Mile NNWV95 Not Reported1/2 - 1 Mile NNWV94 NE1/2 - 1 Mile WestU93 NE1/2 - 1 Mile WestU92 Not Reported1/2 - 1 Mile ENE91 S1/2 - 1 Mile WestU90 ENE1/2 - 1 Mile WSW89 NE1/2 - 1 Mile SW88 E1/2 - 1 Mile SouthT87 NW1/2 - 1 Mile WestU86 ENE1/2 - 1 Mile NNE85 Not Reported1/2 - 1 Mile SouthT84 N1/2 - 1 Mile SouthT83 NE1/2 - 1 Mile WestS82 Not Reported1/2 - 1 Mile NNW81 NNE1/2 - 1 Mile WestS80 NE, E1/2 - 1 Mile SWP79 WSW1/2 - 1 Mile ENER78 WSW1/2 - 1 Mile ENER77 Not Reported1/2 - 1 Mile North76 NE1/2 - 1 Mile SWP75 E1/2 - 1 Mile SouthO74 WSW1/2 - 1 Mile ENE73 ESE1/2 - 1 Mile WSW72 SSE1/2 - 1 Mile North71 S, WSW1/2 - 1 Mile NE70 E1/2 - 1 Mile SouthQ69 E1/2 - 1 Mile SouthQ68 NNW1/2 - 1 Mile SWP67 E1/2 - 1 Mile SouthO66 E1/2 - 1 Mile SouthO65 NE1/2 - 1 Mile SWP64 GENERAL DIRECTIONLOCATION GROUNDWATER FLOWFROM TPMAP ID ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC3837232.2s Page A-6 Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994). of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION Stratifed SequenceCategory:CenozoicEra: QuaternarySystem: QuaternarySeries: QCode: (decoded above as Era, System & Series) at which contaminant migration may be occurring. Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY move more quickly through sandy-gravelly types of soils than silty-clayey types of soils. characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. 1 2 0 1/16 1/8 1/4 Miles TC3837232.2s Page A-8 > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: Not ReportedCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Not hydric Soil Drainage Class: water table, or are shallow to an impervious layer. Class D - Very slow infiltration rates. Soils are clayey, have a highHydrologic Group: Soil Surface Texture: Urban landSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 2 Max: Min: Min: 0 Max: 0.01 Not reportedNot reported 5 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec LayerUpperLowerSoil Texture ClassAASHTO GroupUnified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: Not ReportedCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Partially hydric Soil Drainage Class: water table, or are shallow to an impervious layer. Class D - Very slow infiltration rates. Soils are clayey, have a highHydrologic Group: Soil Surface Texture: Urban landSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 1 in a landscape. The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service SSURGO data. for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC3837232.2s Page A-9 No Wells Found STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location. 1/4 - 1/2 Mile NWCA4110009 22 FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID No Wells Found FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID 1.000State Database Nearest PWS within 1 mileFederal FRDS PWS 1.000Federal USGS WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION SEARCH DISTANCE (miles)DATABASE opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells. professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming an EDR Local/Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS Max: Min: Min: 0 Max: 0.01 Not reportedNot reported 5 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec LayerUpperLowerSoil Texture ClassAASHTO GroupUnified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. 0 7 2 07 6 8 0 6 8 0 5 6 0 5 2 5 2 0 8 0 480 440 4 4 0 4 4 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 360 3 6 0 3 6 0 32 0 3 2 0 3 2 0 3 20 2 0 0 200 24 0560200520480440 4 4 0 4 0 0 4 00 3 60 3 6 0 3 20 3 2 0 280 2 8 0 2 8 0 2 8 0 2 8 0 2 8 0 240 2 40 2 4 0 2 4 0 2 4 0 2 0 0 200 2 0 0 200 2 0 0 1 20 8 0 160 120 12 0 8 0 8 0 40 4 0 4 0 4 0 40 1 6 0 1 6 0 1 6 0 160 16 0 1 2 0 120 120 1 2 0 1 2 0 80 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 40 4 0 40 CA TC3837232.2s Page A-11 Date:06/22/1990 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:5.40 Shallow Water Depth:5.12 Groundwater Flow:WNW Site ID:550017C7 WSW 1/8 - 1/4 Mile Lower 50436AQUIFLOW Date:12/20/1995 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:5.95 Shallow Water Depth:1.80 Groundwater Flow:WSW Site ID:41-0824B6 ESE 1/8 - 1/4 Mile Lower 69017AQUIFLOW Date:03/24/1988 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:8.5 Shallow Water Depth:5.0 Groundwater Flow:Not Reported Site ID:41-09515 East 1/8 - 1/4 Mile Lower 69008AQUIFLOW Date:01/23/1992 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:10 Shallow Water Depth:5 Groundwater Flow:NNE Site ID:550047A4 NNW 1/8 - 1/4 Mile Higher 50660AQUIFLOW Date:10/08/1996 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:6.0 Shallow Water Depth:2.8 Groundwater Flow:SE Site ID:41-0092C3 WSW 1/8 - 1/4 Mile Higher 68832AQUIFLOW Date:06/06/1995 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:6.72 Shallow Water Depth:5.22 Groundwater Flow:S Site ID:41-0684B2 ESE 1/8 - 1/4 Mile Lower 50447AQUIFLOW Date:03/14/1994 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:6.31 Shallow Water Depth:4.63 Groundwater Flow:E Site ID:550059A1 NNW 1/8 - 1/4 Mile Higher 50445AQUIFLOW Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC3837232.2s Page A-12 Date:11/10/1998 Average Water Depth:11 Deep Water Depth:Not Reported Shallow Water Depth:Not Reported Groundwater Flow:Not Reported Site ID:55013914 WSW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower 50456AQUIFLOW Date:05/06/1992 Average Water Depth:3 Deep Water Depth:Not Reported Shallow Water Depth:Not Reported Groundwater Flow:E Site ID:550077E13 South 1/8 - 1/4 Mile Lower 50500AQUIFLOW Date:08/22/1996 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:6.40 Shallow Water Depth:4.10 Groundwater Flow:N Site ID:41-0264E12 South 1/8 - 1/4 Mile Lower 50498AQUIFLOW Date:12/20/1989 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:3.26 Shallow Water Depth:2.79 Groundwater Flow:S Site ID:550024C11 West 1/8 - 1/4 Mile Lower 50482AQUIFLOW Date:07/17/1989 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:3.7 Shallow Water Depth:1.19 Groundwater Flow:SE Site ID:41-057410 ENE 1/8 - 1/4 Mile Lower 68763AQUIFLOW Date:09/1990 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:8 Shallow Water Depth:4.0 Groundwater Flow:E Site ID:41-0197D9 SSW 1/8 - 1/4 Mile Lower 68919AQUIFLOW Date:01/31/1991 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:4.57 Shallow Water Depth:4.34 Groundwater Flow:Not Reported Site ID:550045D8 SSW 1/8 - 1/4 Mile Lower 68901AQUIFLOW Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC3837232.2s Page A-13 Date:09/03/1993 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:15 Shallow Water Depth:10 Groundwater Flow:Varies Site ID:001271F21 NW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower 68849AQUIFLOW Date:10/1992 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:7.48 Shallow Water Depth:5.70 Groundwater Flow:Varies Site ID:55009020 South 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower 50673AQUIFLOW Date:12/15/1994 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:7.33 Shallow Water Depth:5.15 Groundwater Flow:NW Site ID:41-0209F19 NW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower 68783AQUIFLOW Date:08/18/1998 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:7.0 Shallow Water Depth:2.71 Groundwater Flow:NE Site ID:55014118 WSW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower 50431AQUIFLOW Date:10/03/1994 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:6 Shallow Water Depth:4 Groundwater Flow:SSE Site ID:41-0940G17 NE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower 68712AQUIFLOW Date:09/03/1993 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:15 Shallow Water Depth:10 Groundwater Flow:Varies Site ID:41-0845F16 NW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower 68850AQUIFLOW Date:02/23/1996 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:4.76 Shallow Water Depth:3.9 Groundwater Flow:Not Reported Site ID:41-038215 NNE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower 68837AQUIFLOW Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC3837232.2s Page A-14 disinfectionTreatment objective: chloraminesTreatment process:Consecutive_connectionFacility type: SFWD - TREATEDFacility name: 12Facility id: disinfectionTreatment objective: chloraminesTreatment process:StorageFacility type: STATION 01 - BEFORE FILTERFacility name: 11Facility id: disinfectionTreatment objective: chloraminesTreatment process:StorageFacility type: RESERVOIR 02 TREATMENT PLANTFacility name: 10Facility id: disinfectionTreatment objective: chloraminesTreatment process:WellFacility type: WELL 01-02 - INACTIVEFacility name: 1Facility id: disinfectionTreatment objective: chloraminesTreatment process:Consecutive_connectionFacility type: SFWD - TREATEDFacility name: CA4110009012Facility id: disinfectionTreatment objective: chloraminesTreatment process:Treatment_plantFacility type: STATION 01 - BEFORE FILTERFacility name: CA4110009011Facility id: 95112Contact zip: San JoseContact city: Not ReportedContact address2: 1720 North First StreetContact address1:4083678232Contact phone: California Water Service-S San FranciscoOriginal name: Chet AucklyContact name: disinfectionTreatment objective: chloraminesTreatment process:Treatment_plantFacility type: RESERVOIR 02 TREATMENT PLANTFacility name: CA4110009010Facility id: PrivateOwner type:ActiveStatus: CWSPws type: Purch_surface_waterPWS Source: 15748Pwssvcconn:56110Population Served: California Water Service-S San FranciscoPws name: Not ReportedCounty:CAState: 09Epa region:CA4110009Pwsid: 22 NW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower CA4110009FRDS PWS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC3837232.2s Page A-15 disinfectionTreatment objective: chloraminesTreatment process:WellFacility type: WELL 01-15Facility name: CA4110009003Facility id: disinfectionTreatment objective: chloraminesTreatment process:WellFacility type: WELL 01-14Facility name: CA4110009002Facility id: disinfectionTreatment objective: chloraminesTreatment process:WellFacility type: WELL 01-02 - INACTIVEFacility name: CA4110009001Facility id: disinfectionTreatment objective: chloraminesTreatment process:Consecutive_connectionFacility type: STATION 01 - AFTER FILTERFacility name: 9Facility id: disinfectionTreatment objective: chloraminesTreatment process:WellFacility type: WELL 01-21Facility name: 8Facility id: disinfectionTreatment objective: chloraminesTreatment process:WellFacility type: WELL 01-20Facility name: 7Facility id: disinfectionTreatment objective: chloraminesTreatment process:WellFacility type: WELL 01-19Facility name: 6Facility id: disinfectionTreatment objective: chloraminesTreatment process:WellFacility type: WELL 01-18Facility name: 5Facility id: disinfectionTreatment objective: chloraminesTreatment process:WellFacility type: WELL 01-17 - INACTIVEFacility name: 4Facility id: disinfectionTreatment objective: chloraminesTreatment process:WellFacility type: WELL 01-15Facility name: 3Facility id: disinfectionTreatment objective: chloraminesTreatment process:WellFacility type: WELL 01-14Facility name: 2Facility id: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC3837232.2s Page A-16 Not ReportedEnf. Action:Not ReportedEnforcement Date: 92V0001Violation ID: 1992-01-01 - 2015-12-31Compliance Period: LEAD & COPPER RULEContaminant: Initial Tap Sampling for Pb and CuViolation Type: CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE-SSystem Name: ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION: Violations information not reported. 52680Population:Mixed (treated and untreated)Treatment Class: SOUTH SAN FRANCCity Served: 122 24 24Facility Longitude:37 39 16Facility Latitude: SO SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 230 MILLER AVE CALIFORNIA WTR SERV CO System Owner/Responsible PartyAddressee / Facility: SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE-S SAN FRANCISCOPWS Name: Not ReportedDate Deactivated:Not ReportedDate Initiated: CA4110009PWS ID: disinfectionTreatment objective: chloraminesTreatment process:Treatment_plantFacility type: STATION 01 - AFTER FILTERFacility name: CA4110009009Facility id: disinfectionTreatment objective: chloraminesTreatment process:WellFacility type: WELL 01-21Facility name: CA4110009008Facility id: disinfectionTreatment objective: chloraminesTreatment process:WellFacility type: WELL 01-20Facility name: CA4110009007Facility id: disinfectionTreatment objective: chloraminesTreatment process:WellFacility type: WELL 01-19Facility name: CA4110009006Facility id: disinfectionTreatment objective: chloraminesTreatment process:WellFacility type: WELL 01-18Facility name: CA4110009005Facility id: disinfectionTreatment objective: chloraminesTreatment process:WellFacility type: WELL 01-17 - INACTIVEFacility name: CA4110009004Facility id: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC3837232.2s Page A-17 Date:10/22/1998 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:9.54 Shallow Water Depth:9.21 Groundwater Flow:E Site ID:550153F26 NW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower 68866AQUIFLOW Date:08/18/1992 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:4.87 Shallow Water Depth:2.38 Groundwater Flow:SE Site ID:55009425 SSE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower 68933AQUIFLOW Date:07/02/1987 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:15.6 Shallow Water Depth:14.3 Groundwater Flow:NE Site ID:41-0204G24 NE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower 68855AQUIFLOW Date:07/02/1987 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:15.6 Shallow Water Depth:14.3 Groundwater Flow:NE Site ID:000146G23 NE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower 68854AQUIFLOW Not ReportedEnf. Action:Not ReportedEnforcement Date: 92V0001Violation ID: 1992-01-01 - 2015-12-31Compliance Period: LEAD & COPPER RULEContaminant: Initial Tap Sampling for Pb and CuViolation Type: CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE-S SAN FRANCISCOSystem Name: Fed Compliance AchievedEnf. Action:12/31/03Enforcement Date: 92V0001Violation ID: 01/01/92 - 12/31/03Compliance Period: LEAD & COPPER RULEContaminant: Initial Tap Sampling for Pb and CuViolation Type: California Water Service-S San FranciscoSystem Name: Fed Compliance AchievedEnf. Action:12/31/2003 0:00:00Enforcement Date: 92V0001Violation ID: 1/1/1992 0:00:00 - 12/31/2003 0:00:00Compliance Period: LEAD & COPPER RULEContaminant: Initial Tap Sampling for Pb and CuViolation Type: California Water Service-S San FranciscoSystem Name: Not ReportedEnf. Action:Not ReportedEnforcement Date: 92V0001Violation ID: 1992-01-01 - 2015-12-31Compliance Period: LEAD & COPPER RULEContaminant: Initial Tap Sampling for Pb and CuViolation Type: CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE-SSystem Name: ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC3837232.2s Page A-18 Date:01/18/1988 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:10 Shallow Water Depth:3 Groundwater Flow:Not Reported Site ID:000691I33 NE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower 68887AQUIFLOW Date:07/31/1995 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:Not Reported Shallow Water Depth:Not Reported Groundwater Flow:S Site ID:41-0938I32 NE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower 68870AQUIFLOW Date:07/31/1995 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:Not Reported Shallow Water Depth:Not Reported Groundwater Flow:S Site ID:001322I31 NE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower 68869AQUIFLOW Date:06/1996 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:10.84 Shallow Water Depth:6.22 Groundwater Flow:NE Site ID:41-032730 SW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower 68974AQUIFLOW Date:07/03/1995 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:9.5 Shallow Water Depth:5 Groundwater Flow:NNE Site ID:559002G29 NE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower 68868AQUIFLOW Date:03/31/1989 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:13 Shallow Water Depth:7 Groundwater Flow:SE Site ID:41-0584H28 West 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower 68651AQUIFLOW Date:01/20/1994 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:6.40 Shallow Water Depth:2.27 Groundwater Flow:WSW Site ID:41-0607F27 NW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower 68894AQUIFLOW Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC3837232.2s Page A-19 Date:04/14/1994 Average Water Depth:3.5 Deep Water Depth:Not Reported Shallow Water Depth:Not Reported Groundwater Flow:N, E, S, Site ID:550049H40 West 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher 68758AQUIFLOW Date:03/18/1994 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:7.5 Shallow Water Depth:4.5 Groundwater Flow:N Site ID:41-0762H39 WNW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower 69084AQUIFLOW Date:06/15/1993 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:3.23 Shallow Water Depth:1.09 Groundwater Flow:S Site ID:000715H38 WNW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower 69078AQUIFLOW Date:06/15/1993 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:3.23 Shallow Water Depth:1.09 Groundwater Flow:S Site ID:41-0250H37 WNW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower 69077AQUIFLOW Date:07/14/1995 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:7.02 Shallow Water Depth:6.20 Groundwater Flow:Not Reported Site ID:41-0004H36 WNW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower 69034AQUIFLOW Date:09/08/1997 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:6.25 Shallow Water Depth:2.65 Groundwater Flow:NNE Site ID:41-0990H35 WNW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower 69048AQUIFLOW Date:01/18/1988 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:10 Shallow Water Depth:3 Groundwater Flow:Not Reported Site ID:41-0173I34 NE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower 68888AQUIFLOW Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC3837232.2s Page A-20 Date:03/27/1998 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:11 Shallow Water Depth:7.4 Groundwater Flow:Not Reported Site ID:41-052947 NNW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower 68695AQUIFLOW Date:12/26/1991 Average Water Depth:10 Deep Water Depth:Not Reported Shallow Water Depth:Not Reported Groundwater Flow:SSE Site ID:41-0315K46 West 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower 69022AQUIFLOW Date:08/29/1995 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:8 Shallow Water Depth:5.82 Groundwater Flow:E Site ID:41-0333K45 West 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower 68993AQUIFLOW Date:08/30/1991 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:6.98 Shallow Water Depth:3.99 Groundwater Flow:E Site ID:41-0485J44 WNW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher 68954AQUIFLOW Date:06/02/1999 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:10.03 Shallow Water Depth:7.59 Groundwater Flow:W Site ID:41-0913J43 WNW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher 68707AQUIFLOW Date:02/04/1992 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:9.04 Shallow Water Depth:8.29 Groundwater Flow:ESE Site ID:41-0427H42 West 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower 68964AQUIFLOW Date:10/25/1995 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:9 Shallow Water Depth:8.5 Groundwater Flow:E Site ID:559005H41 West 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower 68943AQUIFLOW Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC3837232.2s Page A-21 Date:12/13/1991 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:9.97 Shallow Water Depth:6.68 Groundwater Flow:Not Reported Site ID:41-055154 SW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 68980AQUIFLOW Date:12/15/1992 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:22.62 Shallow Water Depth:16.8 Groundwater Flow:SE Site ID:55009153 NW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher 69055AQUIFLOW Date:06/17/1992 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:7.18 Shallow Water Depth:4.4 Groundwater Flow:Not Reported Site ID:41-045552 South 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 68599AQUIFLOW Date:05/17/1995 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:4.68 Shallow Water Depth:3.33 Groundwater Flow:W Site ID:41-0245M51 ENE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower 68906AQUIFLOW Date:05/17/1995 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:4.68 Shallow Water Depth:3.33 Groundwater Flow:W Site ID:000713M50 ENE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower 68905AQUIFLOW Date:06/1995 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:4.33 Shallow Water Depth:3.27 Groundwater Flow:NW Site ID:550050L49 SE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower 69041AQUIFLOW Date:06/1995 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:4.33 Shallow Water Depth:3.27 Groundwater Flow:NW Site ID:41-0328L48 SE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower 69040AQUIFLOW Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC3837232.2s Page A-22 Date:10/01/1993 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:9.5 Shallow Water Depth:8.5 Groundwater Flow:ENE Site ID:550156N61 West 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 68969AQUIFLOW Date:10/01/1993 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:9.5 Shallow Water Depth:8.5 Groundwater Flow:ENE Site ID:550156N60 West 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 68967AQUIFLOW Date:10/06/1998 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:2.5 Shallow Water Depth:1.5 Groundwater Flow:NE Site ID:550122N59 West 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 50422AQUIFLOW Date:05/06/1994 Average Water Depth:4.5 Deep Water Depth:Not Reported Shallow Water Depth:Not Reported Groundwater Flow:NNE Site ID:41-0111N58 West 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 68948AQUIFLOW Date:11/10/1992 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:5.41 Shallow Water Depth:4.07 Groundwater Flow:E Site ID:41-018157 SE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 69063AQUIFLOW Date:03/31/1997 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:3.48 Shallow Water Depth:3.10 Groundwater Flow:NNE Site ID:41-0680N56 West 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 68715AQUIFLOW Date:10/12/1994 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:5.21 Shallow Water Depth:4.72 Groundwater Flow:SE Site ID:41-090555 East 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 69002AQUIFLOW Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC3837232.2s Page A-23 Date:10/04/1989 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:8.33 Shallow Water Depth:5.66 Groundwater Flow:E Site ID:41-0098Q68 South 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 68818AQUIFLOW Date:10/09/1996 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:8.58 Shallow Water Depth:4.18 Groundwater Flow:NNW Site ID:41-0252P67 SW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 68806AQUIFLOW Date:12/04/1995 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:10.95 Shallow Water Depth:8.79 Groundwater Flow:E Site ID:41-0797O66 South 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 68616AQUIFLOW Date:12/04/1995 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:10.95 Shallow Water Depth:8.79 Groundwater Flow:E Site ID:001218O65 South 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 68615AQUIFLOW Date:10/28/1994 Average Water Depth:9.75 Deep Water Depth:Not Reported Shallow Water Depth:Not Reported Groundwater Flow:NE Site ID:41-0768P64 SW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 68751AQUIFLOW Date:09/17/1997 Average Water Depth:11.6" Deep Water Depth:Not Reported Shallow Water Depth:Not Reported Groundwater Flow:NE Site ID:41-0886O63 South 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 68834AQUIFLOW Date:04/22/1994 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:24.30 Shallow Water Depth:22.13 Groundwater Flow:E Site ID:41-076162 NNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher 69072AQUIFLOW Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC3837232.2s Page A-24 Date:10/05/1998 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:8.15 Shallow Water Depth:7.65 Groundwater Flow:NE Site ID:559013P75 SW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 50654AQUIFLOW Date:05/22/1992 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:7.06 Shallow Water Depth:7.9 Groundwater Flow:E Site ID:550051O74 South 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 68829AQUIFLOW Date:01/11/1991 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:10.61 Shallow Water Depth:10.26 Groundwater Flow:WSW Site ID:41-017673 ENE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 68610AQUIFLOW Date:06/11/1999 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:12.5 Shallow Water Depth:9.5 Groundwater Flow:ESE Site ID:55004172 WSW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 50510AQUIFLOW Date:11/30/1990 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:7.02 Shallow Water Depth:3.93 Groundwater Flow:SSE Site ID:55002071 North 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 68641AQUIFLOW Date:08/1993 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:17.42 Shallow Water Depth:14.08 Groundwater Flow:S, WSW Site ID:55002870 NE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher 68623AQUIFLOW Date:10/04/1989 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:8.33 Shallow Water Depth:5.66 Groundwater Flow:E Site ID:41-0116Q69 South 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 68819AQUIFLOW Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC3837232.2s Page A-25 Date:02/04/1999 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:10 Shallow Water Depth:9 Groundwater Flow:NE Site ID:550099S82 West 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 50453AQUIFLOW Date:06/28/1999 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:16.10 Shallow Water Depth:11.30 Groundwater Flow:Not Reported Site ID:41-088981 NNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher 69094AQUIFLOW Date:10/02/1991 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:10 Shallow Water Depth:7 Groundwater Flow:NNE Site ID:550035S80 West 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 50459AQUIFLOW Date:04/28/1997 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:5.20 Shallow Water Depth:2.07 Groundwater Flow:NE, E Site ID:41-0225P79 SW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 50664AQUIFLOW Date:01/05/1989 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:19.0 Shallow Water Depth:12.4 Groundwater Flow:WSW Site ID:41-0709R78 ENE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher 68938AQUIFLOW Date:01/05/1989 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:19.0 Shallow Water Depth:12.4 Groundwater Flow:WSW Site ID:000015R77 ENE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher 68937AQUIFLOW Date:06/15/1990 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:14 Shallow Water Depth:9.7 Groundwater Flow:Not Reported Site ID:41-028376 North 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher 68656AQUIFLOW Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC3837232.2s Page A-26 Date:03/01/1999 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:6.04 Shallow Water Depth:3.12 Groundwater Flow:ENE Site ID:41-096489 WSW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 67156AQUIFLOW Date:07/30/1999 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:2.35 Shallow Water Depth:1.44 Groundwater Flow:NE Site ID:55007188 SW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 50488AQUIFLOW Date:04/25/1994 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:8.89 Shallow Water Depth:8.55 Groundwater Flow:E Site ID:41-0205T87 South 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 68630AQUIFLOW Date:09/1995 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:5.27 Shallow Water Depth:4.09 Groundwater Flow:NW Site ID:41-0642U86 West 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 68605AQUIFLOW Date:09/12/1997 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:9.20 Shallow Water Depth:9.01 Groundwater Flow:ENE Site ID:41-093085 NNE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher 68665AQUIFLOW Date:09/16/1992 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:7.65 Shallow Water Depth:3.9 Groundwater Flow:Not Reported Site ID:41-0422T84 South 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 68787AQUIFLOW Date:06/19/1990 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:11 Shallow Water Depth:3.5 Groundwater Flow:N Site ID:550043T83 South 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 68702AQUIFLOW Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC3837232.2s Page A-27 Date:11/25/1986 Average Water Depth:11 Deep Water Depth:11 Shallow Water Depth:11 Groundwater Flow:Not Reported Site ID:41-0650W96 SW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 65790AQUIFLOW Date:03/16/1993 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:4.4 Shallow Water Depth:1.7 Groundwater Flow:Not Reported Site ID:550027V95 NNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher 69101AQUIFLOW Date:03/16/1993 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:4.4 Shallow Water Depth:1.7 Groundwater Flow:Not Reported Site ID:41-0531V94 NNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher 69100AQUIFLOW Date:01/07/1993 Average Water Depth:6.2 Deep Water Depth:Not Reported Shallow Water Depth:Not Reported Groundwater Flow:NE Site ID:550007U93 West 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 50415AQUIFLOW Date:09/29/1998 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:8.88 Shallow Water Depth:4.28 Groundwater Flow:NE Site ID:550038U92 West 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 50670AQUIFLOW Date:04/24/1989 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:4.5 Shallow Water Depth:1.5 Groundwater Flow:Not Reported Site ID:41-001591 ENE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher 68594AQUIFLOW Date:04/03/1996 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:8.45 Shallow Water Depth:6.10 Groundwater Flow:S Site ID:41-0753U90 West 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 50553AQUIFLOW Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC3837232.2s Page A-28 Date:05/14/1993 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:2.72 Shallow Water Depth:1.22 Groundwater Flow:S Site ID:000714X103 NNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher 69029AQUIFLOW Date:12/23/1996 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:6.5 Shallow Water Depth:5 Groundwater Flow:NE Site ID:41-0735102 West 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 68608AQUIFLOW Date:12/31/1992 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:13 Shallow Water Depth:10 Groundwater Flow:Not Reported Site ID:41-0577101 SSE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 68864AQUIFLOW Date:04/28/1995 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:7.93 Shallow Water Depth:4.35 Groundwater Flow:Not Reported Site ID:550064100 SSE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 50419AQUIFLOW Date:06/24/1998 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:8.28 Shallow Water Depth:4.54 Groundwater Flow:ESE Site ID:41-0325V99 NNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher 69096AQUIFLOW Date:11/15/1990 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:10.48 Shallow Water Depth:5.86 Groundwater Flow:S Site ID:41-018098 WSW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 68687AQUIFLOW Date:11/25/1986 Average Water Depth:11 Deep Water Depth:11 Shallow Water Depth:11 Groundwater Flow:Not Reported Site ID:880011W97 SW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 65789AQUIFLOW Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC3837232.2s Page A-29 Date:11/25/1991 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:10.23 Shallow Water Depth:7.27 Groundwater Flow:SE Site ID:550016Z110 NNE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher 68663AQUIFLOW Date:01/1998 Average Water Depth:15 Deep Water Depth:Not Reported Shallow Water Depth:Not Reported Groundwater Flow:S Site ID:41-0659109 East 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 68769AQUIFLOW Date:02/1999 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:9.77 Shallow Water Depth:7.57 Groundwater Flow:Not Reported Site ID:550034Y108 WSW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 50470AQUIFLOW Date:01/22/1999 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:11.71 Shallow Water Depth:10.34 Groundwater Flow:N Site ID:550026Y107 WSW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 50474AQUIFLOW Date:10/07/1996 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:9.63 Shallow Water Depth:6.55 Groundwater Flow:Varies Site ID:550065106 SSW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 52674AQUIFLOW Date:12/06/1994 Average Water Depth:11 Deep Water Depth:Not Reported Shallow Water Depth:Not Reported Groundwater Flow:ESE Site ID:550133105 SW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 50572AQUIFLOW Date:05/14/1993 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:2.72 Shallow Water Depth:1.22 Groundwater Flow:S Site ID:41-0673X104 NNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher 69030AQUIFLOW Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC3837232.2s Page A-30 Date:06/01/1988 Average Water Depth:Not Reported Deep Water Depth:24 Shallow Water Depth:15 Groundwater Flow:Not Reported Site ID:41-0621Z111 NNE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher 68669AQUIFLOW Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC3837232.2s Page A-31 Not ReportedNot ReportedNot ReportedNot ReportedBasement Not ReportedNot ReportedNot ReportedNot ReportedLiving Area - 2nd Floor 0%0%100%0.350 pCi/LLiving Area - 1st Floor % >20 pCi/L% 4-20 pCi/L% <4 pCi/LAverage ActivityArea Number of sites tested: 2 Federal Area Radon Information for Zip Code: 94080 : Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi/L. : Zone 2 indoor average level >= 2 pCi/L and <= 4 pCi/L. Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi/L. Federal EPA Radon Zone for SAN MATEO County: 2 29294080 ______________________ > 4 pCi/LNum TestsZipcode Radon Test Results State Database: CA Radon AREA RADON INFORMATION ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS RADON ® TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model (DEM) Source: United States Geologic Survey EDR acquired the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006. The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds to the USGS 1:24,000- and 1:25,000-scale topographic quadrangle maps. The DEM provides elevation data with consistent elevation units and projection. Scanned Digital USGS 7.5’ Topographic Map (DRG) Source: United States Geologic Survey A digital raster graphic (DRG) is a scanned image of a U.S. Geological Survey topographic map. The map images are made by scanning published paper maps on high-resolution scanners. The raster image is georeferenced and fit to the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) projection. HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION Flood Zone Data:This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2003 & 2011 from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Data depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. NWI:National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION AQUIFLOW Information SystemR Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table information. GEOLOGIC INFORMATION Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - A digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994). STATSGO:State Soil Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Services The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the national Conservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO) soil survey maps. SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Services (NRCS) Telephone: 800-672-5559 SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Services, mapping scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used to construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates the original soil survey maps. This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners, townships and county natural resource planning and management. TC3837232.2s Page A-22 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS FEDERAL WATER WELLS PWS:Public Water Systems Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water Telephone: 202-564-3750 Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources. PWS ENF:Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water Telephone: 202-564-3750 Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS). USGS Water Wells: USGS National Water Inventory System (NWIS) This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface water and/or groundwater. The groundwater data includes information on wells, springs, and other sources of groundwater. STATE RECORDS Water Well Database Source: Department of Water Resources Telephone: 916-651-9648 California Drinking Water Quality Database Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 916-324-2319 The database includes all drinking water compliance and special studies monitoring for the state of California since 1984. It consists of over 3,200,000 individual analyses along with well and water system information. OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION California Oil and Gas Well Locations Source: Department of Conservation Telephone: 916-323-1779 Oil and Gas well locations in the state. RADON State Database: CA Radon Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 916-324-2208 Radon Database for California Area Radon Information Source: USGS Telephone: 703-356-4020 The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey. The study covers the years 1986 - 1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at private sources such as universities and research institutions. EPA Radon Zones Source: EPA Telephone: 703-356-4020 Sections 307 & 309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for elevated indoor radon levels. TC3837232.2s Page A-23 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED OTHER Airport Landing Facilities:Private and public use landing facilities Source: Federal Aviation Administration, 800-457-6656 Epicenters:World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration California Earthquake Fault Lines:The fault lines displayed on EDR’s Topographic map are digitized quaternary fault lines, prepared in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey. Additional information (also from 1975) regarding activity at specific fault lines comes from California’s Preliminary Fault Activity Map prepared by the California Division of Mines and Geology. STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION © 2010 Tele Atlas North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. TC3837232.2s Page A-24 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED APPENDIX E SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites Project No. 60147707 Photo Date: January 28, 2014 Photo #1 View of site entrance at the southeast portion of the site looking north. Photo #2 Typical view of the site looking north. Photo #3 Typical view of the southern portion of the site looking northwest. Photo #4 View of dumped fill material at the center of the site. Photo #5 View of tires near the western corner of the site. Photo #6 View of the dumped concrete mix near the center of the site. Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites Project No. 60147707 Photo Date: January 28, 2014 Photo #7 Typical view of the site looking southeast. Photo #8 Typical view along the northern portion of the site looking northeast. Photo #9 Typical view of the southeastern portion of the site. Photo #10 View of 6” wire mesh fence along the southwestern side of site. Photo #11 View of CTC Food International Inc. adjoining property to the northeast, located at 131 West Harris Avenue. Photo #12 View of Tom Duffy Company located to the northeast at 215 Harris Court. Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites Project No. 60147707 Photo Date: January 28, 2014 Photo #13 View of 138 West Harris Avenue located east of the site. Photo #14 View of Time Clock Repairs and Service adjoining property to the west of the site at 120 West Harris Ave. Photo #15 View of Nakura, Inc. located to the adjoining southeast of the site located at 110 West Harris Avenue. Photo #16 View of the office building located adjoining to the southeast of the site at 139 Mitchell Avenue. Photo #17 View of Hotel Focus (111 Mitchell Avenue) located adjacent to the southwest of the site. Photo #18 View of parking lot to the adjoining northwest of the site. APPENDIX F CREDENTIALS Geotechnical Ŷ Environmental Ŷ Construction Materials Ŷ Facilities OAK BASTIAN FIELD ENGINEER PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Mr. Bastian over eight a years of engineering experience including Geotechnical Engineering, Environmental Services, Phase I Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs), and Transportation Engineering. Mr. Bastian has a year of Environmental Services, Phase I Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs), were he has conducted dozens site assessments on vacant lots, multi-family houses, office/warehouse buildings, agricultural land, multi-tenant retail centers, and industrial buildings. He prepares environmental site assessment reports; researches city directories and regulatory agency files; and reviews aerial photographs and topographic maps. Additionally, Mr. Bastian is experienced in sound and dust level metering Mr Bastian has two years of geotechnical engineering, construction management, and materials testing experience. As an engineer he has worked on a variety of projects including roadways, railways, industrial developments, residential and commercial developments, with local municipalities, the State of California and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. As part of these projects, he has been responsible for conducting geotechnical/field investigations, engineering analysis and evaluation, and site reconnaissance. Mr. Bastian has over three years working in the public works department for the City of Roseville, with a focus on transportation. During his time there he collected, summarized and analyzed information on multiple projects. Prepared and maintained reports, manuals, records, and files. PROJECT EXPERIENCE Sims Recycling – Roseville, Ca Mr. Bastian conducted a limited Phase I ESA for Sims Recycling in Roseville, Ca. The site was developed with a single story warehouse building (approximately 201,600 square feet) with associated paved driveways, loading bays, and parking. The northeastern portion of the building is office space. Sims Recycling. Solutions is an e-waste recycler. The warehouse building contains several pieces of large equipment that is used to move, grind, sort and separate the materials that come in for recycling. Hazardous materials were kept in a secure location in the center of the south side of the building. There were floor drains in the restrooms. Two exterior electrical transformers were on the western side of the building. Based on site reconnaissance, RECs were not identified associated with the current site operations. Sacramento Water Treatment Plant Upgrade – Sacramento, Ca Mr. Bastian conducted a geotechnical investigation for the temporary excavation shoring at the Sacramento Water Treatment Plant Upgrade Project. Six (6) borings were completed for this evaluation throughout EDUCATION Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering, 2010, California State Universty Sacramento Associate in Arts, General Education, 2001, Cosumnes River College CERTIFICATIONS40-Hour HAZWOPER No. 754874827 e-RailSafe System No. 205306601585 AFFILIATIONS/AWARDS Cal Geo Emerging Geoprofessionals American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Sacramento Young Member Form WORK HISTORY Terracon Consultants, Inc.; Field Engineer, 2012- Present City of Roseville, Public Works Engineering Intern, 2005-2008 Franklin Templeton Investments Operation Associate 2000-2004 Geotechnical Ŷ Environmental Ŷ Construction Materials Ŷ Facilities the project site. The borings were extended to depths of about 51½ to 76½ feet below the existing ground surface. The information obtained from the subsurface explorations, excavations at the site allowed recommendations presented in a report form, for temporary shoring/sheet pile walls and sloped excavations. ADDITIONAL COURSES Taber Drilling Seminar, 2008 USA NORTH 811 Safety Awareness for Excavator’s, 2012 Geotechnical ■ Environmental ■ Construction Materials ■ Facilities ISLAM (SAMI) R. NOAMAN SENIOR PROJECT MANAGER Professional Experience Mr. Noaman is a Senior Project Manager in Terracon’s Orange County, California office. He has over 11 years experience in environmental services including Phase I Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs), Limited Site Investigations (LSIs), and Remedial Investigations (RI). He has conducted over 200 site assessments on vacant tracts, retail centers, multi-family housing, downtown properties, office buildings, industrial properties, and landfill sites. He prepares environmental site assessment and environmental site investigation reports. Mr.Noaman is also proficient in interaction and coordination with local, state, and federal regulatory agencies. Phase I ESA 1527-05/13 Managed over two hundreds of Phase I ESA implementing ASTM E1527- 05/13 AAI standards. Management of tasks including proposal preparation, client interaction, site reconnaissance, assigned research tasks for staff professionals. Mr. Noaman have participated in developments of findings, conclusions, and recommendations throughout the ESA. Projects experience includes industrial properties, mid- and high- rise office buildings, natural resources sites, muklti-family residential properties, services stations, shopping centers, landfills, and drycleaners. The followings are examples of specific projects: Phase I ESAs Portfolios Mr. Noaman have managed several ESAs Portfolio including 10 water processing facilities, 12 commercial and retails properties, ten telecommunication tower sites, and eight grocerey store sites in Southerbn California. Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Mr. Noaman managed multiple Limited Site Investigations and Comprehensive Phase II ESA projects including, dry-cleaning properties, auto repairing facilities, gasoline stations, and multiple industrial facilities. Mr. Noaman possesses extensive experience in data evaluation and to identify validity, quality, and scientific significance including the correlation between human activities and environmental effects. LA Housing Partnership, 622-628 S. Alvarado St. LA Phase I (ASTM-1527-05) ESA for mixed retail and residential apartment building. The Phase I ESA resulted in a Phase II ESA. Multiple Soil Vapor Investigation associated with former dry cleaning operations were conducted as a result of the ESA investigation. Education Bachelor of Science, Chemistry/Environmental Chemistry, 2002, City University of New York, City College of New York Certifications Certified Engineer In Training (CA) Certification No. EIT 171371 40-Hour OSHA Hazardous Waste Operations & Emergency Response Training Course Work History Terracon Consultants, Inc. (Irvine), Senior Project Manager, June 2012 to Present Smith Emery GeoServices (SEG), (Los Angeles), Project Manager, August 2008 to June 2012 KLK Envronmental Group LLC. (Kearny NJ). Environmental Scientist August 2003 to June 2008 UniChem Inc.. (Kearny NJ). Staff Environemntal Chemist August 2002 to June 2003 Geotechnical ■ Environmental ■ Construction Materials ■ Facilities Gutierrez Financial-multiple locations, Los Angeles CA Mr. Noaman managed the this project whch consisted of removal of two 10,000-gallon, two 4,000-gallon, two 2,000-gallon, and one 550-gallon gasoline/diesel/waste oil USTs. Responsibilities associated with this project included client, regulators, client, and contractors coordination/interaction, field activities, data evaluation, and report evaluation. A no further action was obtained for the client. Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD Sites) Managed soil certification and soil characterization projects for export/import soils for over nine Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) school sites. Responsibilities were to prepare Sample Strategy Plans (SSP), implementation of sampling strategies proposed, preparation of soil certification reports, and submittal of reports to the LAUSD Office of Environmental Health (OEHS). Stormwater Prevention and Pollution Control Plan (SWPPP) Mr. Noaman is has managed six fright facilities SWPPP projects in Southern California. Mr. Noaman responsibilities include client and agency interaction, implementation of guildines required by the state of California Water Resources Board, and preparation of required documents/reports. Newton Plastics, Newton, NJ Responsibilities were to manage the removal of two 12,000-gallon (solvents & gasoline containing) tanks. Phase II and environmental site assessment at a plastic containers manufacturing company. Mr Noaman managed and assisted in report preparation, field activities, data evaluation, client and agency interactions, and report preparation. No further action letter from the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) was obtained for the client. Eagle Electric, NYC, NY Responsibilities were to manage the clean-up of former Coal storage facility located in the basement of the building of landmark building in NYC. The clean-up activities were included the removal of 412 tons of HAZMAT, manage and ensure safety of twelve personnel crew, coordination for hazmat transportation and disposal and client contact. AROL Chemicals, Newark, NJ Responsibilities were to complete Phase I ESA on the subject site. Phase II which included the removal of three 12,000-gallon USTs from a chemical plant and soil clean-up by disposal, managed all client/contractors communications and scheduling. Goblin Lighting, Staten Island, NY Supervised the Removal of five 500-gallon gasoline and one 1,100-gallon waste oil USTs and the clean-up of approximately 453 tons of gasoline contaminated soils. Responsibilities were to establish direct contact with client, contractors, disposal facilities (transfer station) and to ensure the implementation of Health and safety plan put in place during the course of the project. KeySpan Energy, NY Mr Noaman Managed the KeySpan project, which consisted of evaluation of boilers and above-ground tank systems and implementation of methods to prevent excessive scaling within these systems. Objectives were achieved by the development of a pH-controlled chemical reagent that was utilized by the client consistely. Geotechnical ■ Environmental ■ Construction Materials ■ Facilities Hach Company, OH Mr. Noaman played an important role in research and development of mass production of Ferrozine, an iron reagent used for determining trace levels of iron in chemical reagents and glycols. Ferrozine can also be used to analyze samples containing magnetite (black iron oxide) or ferrites. KIWA of the Netherlands Research and development associated with new synthetic methods to produce alkali Ferrates including potassium, sodium, and barium ferrates. Alkali ferrates are considered as an environmentally friendly oxidative reagents, used in wastewater treatment for municipal and industrial facilities. Geotechnical ■ Environmental ■ Construction Materials ■ Facilities CARL A. PARTEN OFFICE MANAGER PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Mr. Parten has over twenty-two years of experience in environmental site investigations and remediation studies for Industrial and Hazardous Waste sites, municipal solid waste landfill sites and underground storage tank (UST) facilities. He was the Risk Assessment and Corrective Action Manager for Terracon’s Dallas office before taking over the Orange County location as Office Manager. He has successfully managed and obtained regulatory closure of over 30 Voluntary Cleanup Program (VCP) sites and leaking underground storage tank (LUST) facilities, and coordinated UST removal and closure for numerous facilities in multiple states throughout the United States. Mr. Parten possesses extensive experience in the installation of monitor wells, aquifer characterization, sensitive receptor surveys, and risk-based assessments. Additionally, he has extensive experience in comprehensive soil and groundwater investigations on industrial facilities and municipal solid waste (MSW) landfill facilities, including evaluation of landfill gas/methane impacts. He has prepared and implemented corrective action work plans for remediation of chlorinated hydrocarbons at dry cleaner facilities and petroleum hydrocarbons at LUST facilities, MSW landfill facilities, and managed and implemented groundwater pump and treat, non-aqueous phase liquid (NAPL) recovery, and duel-phase vapor extraction systems for the recovery of petroleum hydrocarbons. Additionally, Mr. Parten developed work plans and implemented the remediation of heavy metals and poly-nuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). PROJECT EXPERIENCE Municipal Landfill – VCP Site Successfully oversaw and managed the engineering design and construction quality assurance for the closure and restoration of a high- profile MSW landfill in accordance with regulatory standards, subsequent to significant investigation activities. The remedy consisted of removal and consolidation of wastes and construction of LFG recovery trenches to prevent migration of landfill gas. The remedy utilized engineering controls and removal of impacted media. Project management responsibilities included coordination with Local, State and Federal officials, public/neighborhood communications, and interaction with attorneys, and management of project budgets that exceeded $4.5 million over seven years. Terracon continues to provide post closure care monitoring and O&M for the site. Department of Transportation Contract Successfully managed a two-year environmental services contract with the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) and coordinated multiple Terracon offices to provide geographic coverage of environmental consulting service throughout Texas. Mr. Parten was the liaison to TxDOT for the performance of environmental consulting services, and provided senior technical review of environmental investigations, Phase I ESAs, Education Bachelor of Science, Geology, Sul Ross State University, Alpine, Texas, 1994 Additional Courses: University of Houston TCEQ Texas Risk Reduction Program (TRRP) Training Program I, II, and III Roadmap to Remediation CAPM Refresher Course, Texas A&M University TNRCC Hazardous Waste Seminar TNRCC PST Risk Assessments Seminar TNRCC Pollution Prevention Training Workshop API Risk/Exposure Assessment Contaminant Fate and Transport Modeling in Risk Assessment Environmental Hydrology and Soil Science Certifications Licensed Professional Geoscientist (P.G.), I.D. # 221, Texas Board of Professional Geoscientists, March 2003 (current) Registered Professional Geologist (P.G.), I.D. # 004037; State of Tennessee, May 1996 (current) TCEQ Corrective Action Project Manager, CAPM #01091 (current) 40 Hour OSHA Hazardous Waste Site & Waste Management Training Affiliations BDA/Orange County CMAA Groundwater Resource Assoc. Geological Society of America Work History Terracon Consultants, Inc. (Irvine), Principal, Office Manager, August to Present ATC (formerly ATEC) Associates, Inc. - Dallas, Texas, Senior Project Manager April 1990 to August 1998 Terratech, Inc. - San Jose, California, Environmental and Geotechnical Technician February 1989 to March 1990 Woodward-Clyde Consultants - San Jose, California, Environmental and Geotechnical Technician March 1987 to February 1989 Geotechnical ■ Environmental ■ Construction Materials ■ Facilities removal of underground storage tanks, remediation of affected media and waste management, asbestos and lead-based paint investigations, and management of financial metrics and budgets in strict conformance with negotiated fees and procedures under a $2,000,000 contract. City-Operated LUST Facilities Provided senior project management of 14 City operated LUST facilities through coordination of investigation, regulatory reporting and response actions in the pursuit of closure. Mr. Parten was responsible for managing all site activities, evaluation of data, reporting, communicating with local and state officials, and management of budget and schedule requirements. Municipal Property Provided senior project management and technical review of several properties, including the remediation of metals and PAH-impacted soils, using a combination of excavation and removal and in-place stabilization. Work was performed under the EPA Brownfields Program and the Voluntary Cleanup Program. The $1.2 million dollar remediation project was part of a high-profile downtown parks and recreation redevelopment project that successfully established LEED Certified public parks in areas once occupied by commercial and industrial property. Mr. Parten was responsible for managing all site activities, evaluation of data, reporting, communicating with local and state officials, and management of budget and schedule requirements. 3.023-Acre Tract – VCP Site Successfully managed a Phase I ESA and subsequent comprehensive site investigation to evaluate historical site activities and non-native fill material. Chemicals of concern included VOCs, TPH, metals and PAHs in on-site soil and groundwater. Subsequent to completion of a risk-based assessment, response actions including remediation of approximately 1,500 cubic yards of impacted soils was performed to obtain a voluntary cleanup program Certificate of Completion. Mr. Parten was responsible for managing all site activities, evaluation of data, reporting, and communication with state officials. Retail Shopping Center – VCP Site Conducted extensive site investigation activities to evaluate the magnitude and extent of chlorinated solvents identified in the vicinity of a former dry cleaners facility. The chlorinated solvent plume was defined to drinking water standards and was delineated to a creek channel nearly 1,200 feet from the source property. Based on site investigation results, assisted the property owner in entering the site into the VCP, and managed and implemented response actions and treatment of affected media utilizing a combination of source- removal/excavation (750 cubic yards) within the building interiors, hydrogen-releasing compound (HRC®) treatment of backfill, and HRC injection into the underlying soil and groundwater across the site. Treatment technology effectively remediated affected soils and significantly reduced contaminant levels within the on-site source areas. Additional response actions were conducted to reduce on-site groundwater contamination levels through HRC injection at over 250 locations. Monitored natural attenuation and groundwater monitoring was performed for a period of approximately four years. Mr. Parten assisted the client in the establishment of a deed restriction (Municipal Setting Designation) that restricted the use of groundwater on the site. Mr. Parten interacted with City and State officials and prepared and submitted multiple reports documenting site activities, and managed a project budget totaling $1,200,000. Additional Project Experience Under the direction and senior technical review by Mr. Parten, final site closure has been obtained for over thirty VCP, Innocent Owner/Operator Program, LUST, and Industrial and Hazardous Waste facilities in multiple states across the United States. Additionally, Mr. Parten has coordinated and managed the removal of dozens of underground storage tank (UST) systems and remediation of contaminated soil and groundwater. Mr. Parten has provided expert testimony on multiple projects, and is a primary point of contact interacting with environmental attorneys and regulatory agencies. Terracon Consultants, Inc. 2817 McGaw Irvine, California 92614 P [949] 261 0051 F [949] 261 6110 terracon.com March 19, 2014 Kuber Development Company 1550 South 52 Street Tempe, Arizona 85281 Attn: Shane Kuber P: (602) 7687000 E: shanekuber@gmail.com Re: Limited Stockpile Characterization and Sampling Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites 127 West Harris Avenue South San Francisco, San Mateo County, California 94080 Terracon Project No. 60147707 Dear Kuber: Terracon Consultants, Inc. (Terracon) is pleased to present this letter report summarizing the findings from Terracon’s assessment of test pits and stockpiled materials at the above- referenced site. Terracon’s sampling activities consisted of the collection of representative samples from the test pits and stockpiles on March 3, 2014. No odors, discoloration or staining was observed associated with the observed materials. The soil samples were collected from bottom of the test pits TP-1, TP-2, TP-3 and TP-4 and composite soil samples were collected from the onsite stockpiles SP-5 and SP-6, as depicted in Figure 1, attached. The samples were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH), gasoline range organics (GRO), diesel range organics (DRO) and oil range organics (ORO) by United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Method 8015B, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260B, PAHs (Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons) by EPA Method 8270C and Title-22 Metals by EPA Method 6010B. Based on laboratory analysis of the soil samples collected from test pits and stockpiled materials, the samples did not exhibit TPH or VOCs concentrations above the laboratory method reporting limits, except for a TPH-ORO concentrations of 8.8 mg/Kg, 19 mg/Kg and 7.8 mg/Kg from TP-1, SP-5 and SP-6, respectively. Additionally, the samples did not exhibit PAHs compounds above the laboratory method reporting limits, except for naphthalene concentration of 0.085 mg/Kg from TP-3, and phenanthrene concentrations of 0.061 mg/Kg and 0.12 mg/Kg from TP-3 and TP-4 respectively. The stockpiled materials additionally exhibited various metals, including: arsenic, barium, beryllium, chromium, cobalt, copper, lead, mercury, nickel, vanadium and zinc at concentrations above the laboratory method reporting limits. A summary of the laboratory results are presented in Tables 1 and 2 (attached). ATTACHMENT A EXHIBITS USGS TOPOGRAPHIC QUADRANGLE MAP Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites San Francisco South, California Dated: 1995 SCALE: 1" = 2,000'South San Francisco, San Mateo County, CA PROJECT NO. 60147707 N EXHIBIT 1: TOPOGRAPHIC MAP 127 West Harris Avenue BORING LOCATION AND VINCINTY MAP PROPOSED ACCESS ROAD 2303 Norris Canyon Road, Wiedeman Hill San Ramon, California A-2 3140 Gold Camp Dr. #170 Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 PH. (916) 858 -1579 FAX. (916)858-8277 80135040 12/20/2013 EH NMN EH EH N.T.S. Project Manager: Drawn by: Checked by: Approved by: Project No. Scale: File Name: Date: Exhibit LOCATION MAP” ALL LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE. DIAGRAM IS FOR GENERAL LOCATION ONLY, AND IS NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES. IMAGE OBTAINED FROM GOOGLE EARTH APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORING. Legend: B-1 B-1 B-2 B-3 B-4 B-6 B-5 B-7 0 100 200 feet APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORING. Legend: TP-1 Approximate Sample Locations TP-1 TP-2 TP-3 TP-4 SP-5 SP-6 ATTACHMENT B TABLES VOCs PAHs TPH GRO TPH DRO TPH ORO EPA Method 8260B EPA Method 8270C EPA Method 8260B TP-1 3/7/14 8 to 9 ND ND <0.45 <5.7 8.8 TP-2 3/7/14 8 to 9 ND ND <0.48 <6.0 <6.0 TP-3 3/7/14 8 to 9 ND Naphthalene-0.085 Phenanthrene-0.061 <0.45 <5.7 <5.7 TP-4 3/7/14 8 to 9 ND Phenanthrene-0.12 <0.45 <5.9 <5.9 SP-5 3/7/14 Stockpile ND ND <0.43 <5.7 19 SP-6 3/7/14 Stockpile ND ND <0.44 <5.8 7.8 Notes: All units are in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) NA = not analyzed NE = not established EPA = United States Environmental Protection Agency bgs= below ground surface TCE = Trichloroethene TPH DRO = total petroleum hydrocarbons in diesel carbon range (C13-C22) TPH ORO = total petroleum hydrocarbons in waste oil carbon range (C23-C40) VOCs = Volatile Organic Compounds (1) Environmental Screening Levels (ESL) for shallow soils (<3m bgs), Interim Final-November 2007, SF Bay Reginal Water Quality Control Board. Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons EPA Method 8015MSample I.D.Sample Depth (feet bgs) mg/Kg Sample Date ESL(1)ND 80.3 80.3 2,500 Terracon Project No. 60147707 Naphthalene-2.8 Phenanthrene-40 TABLE 1 SOIL SAMPLE ANALYTICAL RESULTS - VOCs, TPH and PAHs Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites 127 West Harris Avenue South San Francisco, San Mateo County, California Sample I.D.Sample Date Arsenic Barium Beryllium Chromium Cobalt Copper Lead Mercury Nickel Vanadium Zinc Other Metals TP-1 3/7/14 8 to 9 <6.0 98 2.6 55 14 28 33 0.20 57 51 71 ND TP-2 3/7/14 8 to 9 5.4 120 1.8 57 16 27 11 0.20 77 47 60 ND TP-3 3/7/14 8 to 9 7.5 99 3.0 54 17 27 15 0.01 62 51 70 ND TP-4 3/7/14 8 to 9 <5.9 84 2.3 75 18 32 19 0.17 100 48 70 ND SP-5 3/7/14 Stockpile 3.7 85 1.3 43 11 20 30 0.10 39 38 58 ND SP-6 3/7/14 Stockpile 3.9 130 2.2 51 12 35 18 <0.020 54 47 65 ND 0.39 750 4.0 1,000 23 230 320*6.7 150 200 600 NE Notes: All units are in milligrams per kilograms EPA= Environmental Protection Agency < = not detected above laboratory reporting limits bgs= below ground surface (1) 2013 Tier 1 ESLs, San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board for Soil. ESLs(1) Sample Depth (feet bgs)EPA Method 6010B (mg/Kg) Terracon Project No. 60147707 TABLE 2 SOIL SAMPLE ANALYTICAL RESULTS - Metals Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites 127 West Harris Avenue South San Francisco, San Mateo County, California ATTACHMENT C LABORATORY DATA SHEETS AND CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY FORM ANALYTICAL REPORT TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. TestAmerica Irvine 17461 Derian Ave Suite 100 Irvine, CA 92614-5817 Tel: (949)261-1022 TestAmerica Job ID: 440-72799-1 TestAmerica Sample Delivery Group: 60147707 Client Project/Site: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites For: Terracon Consulting Eng & Scientists 2817 McGaw Ave Irvine, California 92614 Attn: Carl Parten Authorized for release by: 3/14/2014 7:57:32 AM Lena Davidkova, Project Manager II (949)261-1022 lena.davidkova@testamericainc.com The test results in this report meet all 2003 NELAC and 2009 TNI requirements for accredited parameters, exceptions are noted in this report. This report may not be reproduced except in full, and with written approval from the laboratory. For questions please contact the Project Manager at the e-mail address or telephone number listed on this page. This report has been electronically signed and authorized by the signatory. Electronic signature is intended to be the legally binding equivalent of a traditionally handwritten signature. Results relate only to the items tested and the sample(s) as received by the laboratory. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Table of Contents Client: Terracon Consulting Eng & Scientists Project/Site: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites TestAmerica Job ID: 440-72799-1 SDG: 60147707 Page 2 of 48 TestAmerica Irvine 3/14/2014 Cover Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 Table of Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 Sample Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 Case Narrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 Client Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 Method Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .22 Lab Chronicle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .23 QC Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .26 QC Association Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .41 Definitions/Glossary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .45 Certification Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .46 Chain of Custody . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .47 Receipt Checklists . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .48 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Sample Summary TestAmerica Job ID: 440-72799-1Client: Terracon Consulting Eng & Scientists SDG: 60147707Project/Site: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID ReceivedCollectedMatrix 440-72799-1 TP-1 (8-9')Solid 03/07/14 13:0503/11/14 09:40 440-72799-2 TP-2 (8-9)Solid 03/07/14 13:0903/11/14 09:40 440-72799-3 TP-3 (8-9)Solid 03/07/14 13:1303/11/14 09:40 440-72799-4 TP-4 (8-9)Solid 03/07/14 13:1703/11/14 09:40 440-72799-5 SP-5 Solid 03/07/14 13:2103/11/14 09:40 440-72799-6 SP-6 Solid 03/07/14 13:2503/11/14 09:40 TestAmerica Irvine Page 3 of 48 3/14/2014 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Case Narrative Client: Terracon Consulting Eng & Scientists TestAmerica Job ID: 440-72799-1 Project/Site: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites SDG: 60147707 Job ID: 440-72799-1 Laboratory: TestAmerica Irvine Narrative Job Narrative 440-72799-1 Comments No additional comments. Receipt The samples were received on 3/11/2014 9:40 AM; the samples arrived in good condition, properly preserved and, where required, on ice. The temperature of the cooler at receipt was 4.7º C. GC/MS VOA Method(s) 8260B: The matrix spike duplicate (MSD) precision for batch 168634 was outside control limits. Sample matrix interference and/or non-homogeneity are suspected because the associated laboratory control sample (LCS) precision was within acceptance limits. No other analytical or quality issues were noted. GC/MS Semi VOA Method(s) 8270C SIM: The matrix spike / matrix spike duplicate (MS/MSD) recoveries for batch 168256 were outside control limits. Sample matrix interference is suspected because the associated laboratory control sample (LCS) recovery was within acceptance limits. Method(s) 8270C SIM: The matrix spike / matrix spike duplicate / sample duplicate (MS/MSD/DUP) precision for batch 168256 was outside control limits. Sample matrix interference and/or non-homogeneity are suspected. Method(s) 8270C SIM: The following sample(s) was diluted due to the abundance of non-target analytes: PA-HHH23B-1 (440-71097-97). Elevated reporting limits (RLs) are provided. No other analytical or quality issues were noted. GC VOA No analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described in the Definitions/Glossary page. GC Semi VOA Method(s) 8015B: Hydrocarbon result partly due to individual peak(s) in quantitation range. SP-6 (440-72799-6), TP-1 (8-9') (440-72799-1), TP-3 (8-9) (440-72799-3) No other analytical or quality issues were noted. Metals Method(s) 6010B: The following sample(s) was diluted due to the nature of the sample matrix: TP-1 (8-9') (440-72799-1), TP-3 (8-9) (440-72799-3), TP-4 (8-9) (440-72799-4). Elevated reporting limits (RLs) are provided. Method(s) 6010B: The matrix spike / matrix spike duplicate (MS/MSD) recoveries for batch 168296 were outside control limits for barium, antimony and lead. Sample matrix interference is suspected because the associated laboratory control sample (LCS) recovery was within acceptance limits. No other analytical or quality issues were noted. General Chemistry No analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described in the Definitions/Glossary page. Organic Prep No analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described in the Definitions/Glossary page. VOA Prep No analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described in the Definitions/Glossary page. TestAmerica Irvine Page 4 of 48 3/14/2014 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Client Sample Results TestAmerica Job ID: 440-72799-1Client: Terracon Consulting Eng & Scientists SDG: 60147707Project/Site: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites Lab Sample ID: 440-72799-1Client Sample ID: TP-1 (8-9') Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/07/14 13:05 Percent Solids: 87.4Date Received: 03/11/14 09:40 Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) RL 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.0057 0.0057 mg/Kg ☼03/12/14 18:451 Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 18:451☼1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 18:451☼1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 18:451☼1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 18:451☼1,1-Dichloroethane <0.0023 0.0057 mg/Kg 03/12/14 18:451☼1,1-Dichloroethene <0.0057 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 18:451☼1,1-Dichloropropene <0.0023 0.0057 mg/Kg 03/12/14 18:451☼1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <0.0057 0.011 mg/Kg 03/12/14 18:451☼1,2,3-Trichloropropane <0.011 0.0057 mg/Kg 03/12/14 18:451☼1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <0.0057 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 18:451☼1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <0.0023 0.0057 mg/Kg 03/12/14 18:451☼1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <0.0057 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 18:451☼1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)<0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 18:451☼1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 18:451☼1,2-Dichloroethane <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 18:451☼1,2-Dichloropropane <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 18:451☼1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 18:451☼1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 18:451☼1,3-Dichloropropane <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 18:451☼1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 18:451☼2,2-Dichloropropane <0.0023 0.0057 mg/Kg 03/12/14 18:451☼2-Chlorotoluene <0.0057 0.0057 mg/Kg 03/12/14 18:451☼4-Chlorotoluene <0.0057 0.0011 mg/Kg 03/12/14 18:451☼Benzene <0.0011 0.0057 mg/Kg 03/12/14 18:451☼Bromobenzene <0.0057 0.0057 mg/Kg 03/12/14 18:451☼Bromochloromethane <0.0057 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 18:451☼Bromodichloromethane <0.0023 0.0057 mg/Kg 03/12/14 18:451☼Bromoform <0.0057 0.0057 mg/Kg 03/12/14 18:451☼Bromomethane <0.0057 0.0057 mg/Kg 03/12/14 18:451☼Carbon tetrachloride <0.0057 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 18:451☼Chlorobenzene <0.0023 0.0057 mg/Kg 03/12/14 18:451☼Chloroethane <0.0057 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 18:451☼Chloroform <0.0023 0.0057 mg/Kg 03/12/14 18:451☼Chloromethane <0.0057 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 18:451☼cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 18:451☼cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 18:451☼Dibromochloromethane <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 18:451☼Dibromomethane <0.0023 0.0057 mg/Kg 03/12/14 18:451☼Dichlorodifluoromethane <0.0057 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 18:451☼Ethylbenzene <0.0023 0.0057 mg/Kg 03/12/14 18:451☼Hexachlorobutadiene <0.0057 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 18:451☼Isopropylbenzene <0.0023 0.0046 mg/Kg 03/12/14 18:451☼m,p-Xylene <0.0046 0.023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 18:451☼Methylene Chloride <0.023 0.0057 mg/Kg 03/12/14 18:451☼Methyl-t-Butyl Ether (MTBE)<0.0057 0.0057 mg/Kg 03/12/14 18:451☼Naphthalene <0.0057 0.0057 mg/Kg 03/12/14 18:451☼n-Butylbenzene <0.0057 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 18:451☼N-Propylbenzene <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 18:451☼o-Xylene <0.0023 TestAmerica Irvine Page 5 of 48 3/14/2014 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Client Sample Results TestAmerica Job ID: 440-72799-1Client: Terracon Consulting Eng & Scientists SDG: 60147707Project/Site: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites Lab Sample ID: 440-72799-1Client Sample ID: TP-1 (8-9') Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/07/14 13:05 Percent Solids: 87.4Date Received: 03/11/14 09:40 Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) RL sec-Butylbenzene <0.0057 0.0057 mg/Kg ☼03/12/14 18:451 Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 18:451☼Styrene <0.0023 0.0057 mg/Kg 03/12/14 18:451☼Tert-amyl-methyl ether (TAME)<0.0057 0.0057 mg/Kg 03/12/14 18:451☼tert-Butylbenzene <0.0057 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 18:451☼Tetrachloroethene <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 18:451☼Toluene <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 18:451☼trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 18:451☼trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 18:451☼Trichloroethene <0.0023 0.0057 mg/Kg 03/12/14 18:451☼Trichlorofluoromethane <0.0057 0.0057 mg/Kg 03/12/14 18:451☼Vinyl chloride <0.0057 0.0046 mg/Kg 03/12/14 18:451☼Xylenes, Total <0.0046 0.0057 mg/Kg 03/12/14 18:451☼Isopropyl Ether (DIPE)<0.0057 0.0057 mg/Kg 03/12/14 18:451☼Ethyl-t-butyl ether (ETBE)<0.0057 0.11 mg/Kg 03/12/14 18:451☼tert-Butyl alcohol (TBA)<0.11 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 18:451☼p-Isopropyltoluene <0.0023 Toluene-d8 (Surr)109 79 -123 03/12/14 18:451 Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)109 03/12/14 18:45179-120 Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)99 03/12/14 18:45160-120 Method: 8270C SIM - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS SIM) RL Acenaphthene <68 68 ug/Kg ☼03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 16:281 Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier 68 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 16:281☼Acenaphthylene <68 68 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 16:281☼Anthracene <68 68 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 16:281☼Benzo[a]anthracene <68 68 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 16:281☼Benzo[a]pyrene <68 68 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 16:281☼Benzo[b]fluoranthene <68 68 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 16:281☼Benzo[g,h,i]perylene <68 68 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 16:281☼Benzo[k]fluoranthene <68 68 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 16:281☼Chrysene <68 68 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 16:281☼Dibenz(a,h)anthracene <68 68 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 16:281☼Fluoranthene <68 68 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 16:281☼Fluorene <68 68 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 16:281☼Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene <68 68 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 16:281☼Naphthalene <68 68 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 16:281☼Phenanthrene <68 68 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 16:281☼Pyrene <68 2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr)86 35 -120 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 16:281 Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery Nitrobenzene-d5 73 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 16:28130-120 Terphenyl-d14 78 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 16:28113-100 Method: 8015B - Gasoline Range Organics - (GC) RL GRO (C4-C12)<0.45 0.45 mg/Kg ☼03/12/14 09:451 Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier TestAmerica Irvine Page 6 of 48 3/14/2014 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Client Sample Results TestAmerica Job ID: 440-72799-1Client: Terracon Consulting Eng & Scientists SDG: 60147707Project/Site: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites Lab Sample ID: 440-72799-1Client Sample ID: TP-1 (8-9') Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/07/14 13:05 Percent Solids: 87.4Date Received: 03/11/14 09:40 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)72 65 -140 03/12/14 09:451 Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery Method: 8015B - Diesel Range Organics (DRO) (GC) RL C13-C22 <5.7 5.7 mg/Kg ☼03/12/14 08:3803/13/14 05:451 Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier 5.7 mg/Kg 03/12/14 08:3803/13/14 05:451☼C23-C40 8.8 n-Octacosane 67 40 -140 03/12/14 08:3803/13/14 05:451 Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) RL Antimony <20 20 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:4610 Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier 6.0 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:4610Arsenic<6.0 3.0 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:4610Barium98 1.0 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:4610Beryllium2.6 1.0 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:4610Cadmium<1.0 2.0 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:4610Chromium55 2.0 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:4610Cobalt14 4.0 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:4610Copper28 4.0 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:4610Lead33 4.0 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:4610Molybdenum<4.0 4.0 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:4610Nickel57 6.0 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:4610Selenium<6.0 20 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:4610Thallium<20 2.0 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:4610Vanadium51 10 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:4610Zinc71 3.0 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:4610Silver<3.0 Method: 7471A - Mercury (CVAA) RL Mercury 0.20 0.020 mg/Kg 03/12/14 15:2603/12/14 19:071 Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier General Chemistry RL Percent Moisture 13 0.10 %03/11/14 15:371 Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier Lab Sample ID: 440-72799-2Client Sample ID: TP-2 (8-9) Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/07/14 13:09 Percent Solids: 83.9Date Received: 03/11/14 09:40 Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) RL 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.0059 0.0059 mg/Kg ☼03/12/14 20:121 Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:121☼1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:121☼1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:121☼1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:121☼1,1-Dichloroethane <0.0023 0.0059 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:121☼1,1-Dichloroethene <0.0059 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:121☼1,1-Dichloropropene <0.0023 0.0059 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:121☼1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <0.0059 TestAmerica Irvine Page 7 of 48 3/14/2014 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Client Sample Results TestAmerica Job ID: 440-72799-1Client: Terracon Consulting Eng & Scientists SDG: 60147707Project/Site: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites Lab Sample ID: 440-72799-2Client Sample ID: TP-2 (8-9) Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/07/14 13:09 Percent Solids: 83.9Date Received: 03/11/14 09:40 Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) RL 1,2,3-Trichloropropane <0.012 0.012 mg/Kg ☼03/12/14 20:121 Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier 0.0059 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:121☼1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <0.0059 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:121☼1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <0.0023 0.0059 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:121☼1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <0.0059 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:121☼1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)<0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:121☼1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:121☼1,2-Dichloroethane <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:121☼1,2-Dichloropropane <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:121☼1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:121☼1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:121☼1,3-Dichloropropane <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:121☼1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:121☼2,2-Dichloropropane <0.0023 0.0059 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:121☼2-Chlorotoluene <0.0059 0.0059 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:121☼4-Chlorotoluene <0.0059 0.0012 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:121☼Benzene <0.0012 0.0059 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:121☼Bromobenzene <0.0059 0.0059 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:121☼Bromochloromethane <0.0059 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:121☼Bromodichloromethane <0.0023 0.0059 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:121☼Bromoform <0.0059 0.0059 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:121☼Bromomethane <0.0059 0.0059 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:121☼Carbon tetrachloride <0.0059 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:121☼Chlorobenzene <0.0023 0.0059 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:121☼Chloroethane <0.0059 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:121☼Chloroform <0.0023 0.0059 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:121☼Chloromethane <0.0059 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:121☼cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:121☼cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:121☼Dibromochloromethane <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:121☼Dibromomethane <0.0023 0.0059 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:121☼Dichlorodifluoromethane <0.0059 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:121☼Ethylbenzene <0.0023 0.0059 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:121☼Hexachlorobutadiene <0.0059 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:121☼Isopropylbenzene <0.0023 0.0047 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:121☼m,p-Xylene <0.0047 0.023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:121☼Methylene Chloride <0.023 0.0059 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:121☼Methyl-t-Butyl Ether (MTBE)<0.0059 0.0059 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:121☼Naphthalene <0.0059 0.0059 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:121☼n-Butylbenzene <0.0059 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:121☼N-Propylbenzene <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:121☼o-Xylene <0.0023 0.0059 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:121☼sec-Butylbenzene <0.0059 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:121☼Styrene <0.0023 0.0059 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:121☼Tert-amyl-methyl ether (TAME)<0.0059 0.0059 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:121☼tert-Butylbenzene <0.0059 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:121☼Tetrachloroethene <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:121☼Toluene <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:121☼trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:121☼trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.0023 TestAmerica Irvine Page 8 of 48 3/14/2014 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Client Sample Results TestAmerica Job ID: 440-72799-1Client: Terracon Consulting Eng & Scientists SDG: 60147707Project/Site: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites Lab Sample ID: 440-72799-2Client Sample ID: TP-2 (8-9) Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/07/14 13:09 Percent Solids: 83.9Date Received: 03/11/14 09:40 Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) RL Trichloroethene <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg ☼03/12/14 20:121 Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier 0.0059 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:121☼Trichlorofluoromethane <0.0059 0.0059 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:121☼Vinyl chloride <0.0059 0.0047 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:121☼Xylenes, Total <0.0047 0.0059 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:121☼Isopropyl Ether (DIPE)<0.0059 0.0059 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:121☼Ethyl-t-butyl ether (ETBE)<0.0059 0.12 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:121☼tert-Butyl alcohol (TBA)<0.12 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:121☼p-Isopropyltoluene <0.0023 Toluene-d8 (Surr)109 79 -123 03/12/14 20:121 Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)107 03/12/14 20:12179-120 Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)100 03/12/14 20:12160-120 Method: 8270C SIM - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS SIM) RL Acenaphthene <36 36 ug/Kg ☼03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 14:471 Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier 36 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 14:471☼Acenaphthylene <36 36 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 14:471☼Anthracene <36 36 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 14:471☼Benzo[a]anthracene <36 36 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 14:471☼Benzo[a]pyrene <36 36 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 14:471☼Benzo[b]fluoranthene <36 36 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 14:471☼Benzo[g,h,i]perylene <36 36 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 14:471☼Benzo[k]fluoranthene <36 36 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 14:471☼Chrysene <36 36 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 14:471☼Dibenz(a,h)anthracene <36 36 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 14:471☼Fluoranthene <36 36 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 14:471☼Fluorene <36 36 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 14:471☼Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene <36 36 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 14:471☼Naphthalene <36 36 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 14:471☼Phenanthrene <36 36 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 14:471☼Pyrene <36 2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr)66 35 -120 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 14:471 Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery Nitrobenzene-d5 61 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 14:47130-120 Terphenyl-d14 61 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 14:47113-100 Method: 8015B - Gasoline Range Organics - (GC) RL GRO (C4-C12)<0.48 0.48 mg/Kg ☼03/13/14 03:331 Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)80 65 -140 03/13/14 03:331 Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery Method: 8015B - Diesel Range Organics (DRO) (GC) RL C13-C22 <6.0 6.0 mg/Kg ☼03/12/14 08:3803/13/14 08:151 Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier 6.0 mg/Kg 03/12/14 08:3803/13/14 08:151☼C23-C40 <6.0 TestAmerica Irvine Page 9 of 48 3/14/2014 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Client Sample Results TestAmerica Job ID: 440-72799-1Client: Terracon Consulting Eng & Scientists SDG: 60147707Project/Site: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites Lab Sample ID: 440-72799-2Client Sample ID: TP-2 (8-9) Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/07/14 13:09 Percent Solids: 83.9Date Received: 03/11/14 09:40 n-Octacosane 69 40 -140 03/12/14 08:3803/13/14 08:151 Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) RL Antimony <9.9 9.9 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:215 Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier 3.0 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:215Arsenic5.4 1.5 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:215Barium120 0.49 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:215Beryllium1.8 0.49 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:215Cadmium<0.49 0.99 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:215Chromium57 0.99 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:215Cobalt16 2.0 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:215Copper27 2.0 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:215Lead11 2.0 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:215Molybdenum<2.0 2.0 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:215Nickel77 3.0 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:215Selenium<3.0 9.9 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:215Thallium<9.9 0.99 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:215Vanadium47 4.9 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:215Zinc60 1.5 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:215Silver<1.5 Method: 7471A - Mercury (CVAA) RL Mercury 0.20 0.020 mg/Kg 03/12/14 15:2603/12/14 19:141 Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier General Chemistry RL Percent Moisture 16 0.10 %03/11/14 15:371 Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier Lab Sample ID: 440-72799-3Client Sample ID: TP-3 (8-9) Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/07/14 13:13 Percent Solids: 88.1Date Received: 03/11/14 09:40 Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) RL 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.0056 0.0056 mg/Kg ☼03/12/14 20:401 Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier 0.0022 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:401☼1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.0022 0.0022 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:401☼1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.0022 0.0022 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:401☼1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.0022 0.0022 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:401☼1,1-Dichloroethane <0.0022 0.0056 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:401☼1,1-Dichloroethene <0.0056 0.0022 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:401☼1,1-Dichloropropene <0.0022 0.0056 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:401☼1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <0.0056 0.011 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:401☼1,2,3-Trichloropropane <0.011 0.0056 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:401☼1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <0.0056 0.0022 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:401☼1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <0.0022 0.0056 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:401☼1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <0.0056 0.0022 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:401☼1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)<0.0022 0.0022 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:401☼1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.0022 0.0022 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:401☼1,2-Dichloroethane <0.0022 0.0022 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:401☼1,2-Dichloropropane <0.0022 TestAmerica Irvine Page 10 of 48 3/14/2014 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Client Sample Results TestAmerica Job ID: 440-72799-1Client: Terracon Consulting Eng & Scientists SDG: 60147707Project/Site: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites Lab Sample ID: 440-72799-3Client Sample ID: TP-3 (8-9) Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/07/14 13:13 Percent Solids: 88.1Date Received: 03/11/14 09:40 Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) RL 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <0.0022 0.0022 mg/Kg ☼03/12/14 20:401 Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier 0.0022 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:401☼1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.0022 0.0022 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:401☼1,3-Dichloropropane <0.0022 0.0022 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:401☼1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.0022 0.0022 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:401☼2,2-Dichloropropane <0.0022 0.0056 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:401☼2-Chlorotoluene <0.0056 0.0056 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:401☼4-Chlorotoluene <0.0056 0.0011 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:401☼Benzene <0.0011 0.0056 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:401☼Bromobenzene <0.0056 0.0056 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:401☼Bromochloromethane <0.0056 0.0022 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:401☼Bromodichloromethane <0.0022 0.0056 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:401☼Bromoform <0.0056 0.0056 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:401☼Bromomethane <0.0056 0.0056 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:401☼Carbon tetrachloride <0.0056 0.0022 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:401☼Chlorobenzene <0.0022 0.0056 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:401☼Chloroethane <0.0056 0.0022 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:401☼Chloroform <0.0022 0.0056 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:401☼Chloromethane <0.0056 0.0022 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:401☼cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.0022 0.0022 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:401☼cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.0022 0.0022 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:401☼Dibromochloromethane <0.0022 0.0022 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:401☼Dibromomethane <0.0022 0.0056 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:401☼Dichlorodifluoromethane <0.0056 0.0022 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:401☼Ethylbenzene <0.0022 0.0056 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:401☼Hexachlorobutadiene <0.0056 0.0022 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:401☼Isopropylbenzene <0.0022 0.0044 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:401☼m,p-Xylene <0.0044 0.022 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:401☼Methylene Chloride <0.022 0.0056 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:401☼Methyl-t-Butyl Ether (MTBE)<0.0056 0.0056 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:401☼Naphthalene <0.0056 0.0056 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:401☼n-Butylbenzene <0.0056 0.0022 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:401☼N-Propylbenzene <0.0022 0.0022 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:401☼o-Xylene <0.0022 0.0056 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:401☼sec-Butylbenzene <0.0056 0.0022 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:401☼Styrene <0.0022 0.0056 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:401☼Tert-amyl-methyl ether (TAME)<0.0056 0.0056 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:401☼tert-Butylbenzene <0.0056 0.0022 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:401☼Tetrachloroethene <0.0022 0.0022 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:401☼Toluene <0.0022 0.0022 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:401☼trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.0022 0.0022 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:401☼trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.0022 0.0022 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:401☼Trichloroethene <0.0022 0.0056 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:401☼Trichlorofluoromethane <0.0056 0.0056 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:401☼Vinyl chloride <0.0056 0.0044 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:401☼Xylenes, Total <0.0044 0.0056 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:401☼Isopropyl Ether (DIPE)<0.0056 0.0056 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:401☼Ethyl-t-butyl ether (ETBE)<0.0056 0.11 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:401☼tert-Butyl alcohol (TBA)<0.11 0.0022 mg/Kg 03/12/14 20:401☼p-Isopropyltoluene <0.0022 TestAmerica Irvine Page 11 of 48 3/14/2014 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Client Sample Results TestAmerica Job ID: 440-72799-1Client: Terracon Consulting Eng & Scientists SDG: 60147707Project/Site: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites Lab Sample ID: 440-72799-3Client Sample ID: TP-3 (8-9) Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/07/14 13:13 Percent Solids: 88.1Date Received: 03/11/14 09:40 Toluene-d8 (Surr)106 79 -123 03/12/14 20:401 Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)104 03/12/14 20:40179-120 Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)106 03/12/14 20:40160-120 Method: 8270C SIM - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS SIM) RL Acenaphthene <34 34 ug/Kg ☼03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 15:071 Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier 34 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 15:071☼Acenaphthylene <34 34 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 15:071☼Anthracene <34 34 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 15:071☼Benzo[a]anthracene <34 34 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 15:071☼Benzo[a]pyrene <34 34 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 15:071☼Benzo[b]fluoranthene <34 34 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 15:071☼Benzo[g,h,i]perylene <34 34 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 15:071☼Benzo[k]fluoranthene <34 34 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 15:071☼Chrysene <34 34 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 15:071☼Dibenz(a,h)anthracene <34 34 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 15:071☼Fluoranthene <34 34 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 15:071☼Fluorene <34 34 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 15:071☼Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene <34 34 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 15:071☼Naphthalene 85 34 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 15:071☼Phenanthrene 61 34 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 15:071☼Pyrene <34 2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr)87 35 -120 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 15:071 Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery Nitrobenzene-d5 69 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 15:07130-120 Terphenyl-d14 72 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 15:07113-100 Method: 8015B - Gasoline Range Organics - (GC) RL GRO (C4-C12)<0.45 0.45 mg/Kg ☼03/13/14 04:011 Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)71 65 -140 03/13/14 04:011 Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery Method: 8015B - Diesel Range Organics (DRO) (GC) RL C13-C22 <5.7 5.7 mg/Kg ☼03/12/14 08:3803/13/14 08:451 Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier 5.7 mg/Kg 03/12/14 08:3803/13/14 08:451☼C23-C40 <5.7 n-Octacosane 75 40 -140 03/12/14 08:3803/13/14 08:451 Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) RL Antimony <20 20 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:5210 Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier 5.9 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:5210Arsenic7.5 2.9 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:5210Barium99 0.98 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:5210Beryllium3.0 0.98 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:5210Cadmium<0.98 2.0 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:5210Chromium54 2.0 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:5210Cobalt17 TestAmerica Irvine Page 12 of 48 3/14/2014 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Client Sample Results TestAmerica Job ID: 440-72799-1Client: Terracon Consulting Eng & Scientists SDG: 60147707Project/Site: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites Lab Sample ID: 440-72799-3Client Sample ID: TP-3 (8-9) Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/07/14 13:13 Date Received: 03/11/14 09:40 Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) (Continued) RL Copper 27 3.9 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:5210 Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier 3.9 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:5210Lead15 3.9 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:5210Molybdenum<3.9 3.9 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:5210Nickel62 5.9 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:5210Selenium<5.9 20 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:5210Thallium<20 2.0 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:5210Vanadium51 9.8 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:5210Zinc70 2.9 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:5210Silver<2.9 Method: 7471A - Mercury (CVAA) RL Mercury 0.091 0.020 mg/Kg 03/12/14 15:2603/12/14 19:171 Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier General Chemistry RL Percent Moisture 12 0.10 %03/11/14 15:371 Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier Lab Sample ID: 440-72799-4Client Sample ID: TP-4 (8-9) Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/07/14 13:17 Percent Solids: 84.8Date Received: 03/11/14 09:40 Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) RL 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.0058 0.0058 mg/Kg ☼03/12/14 21:371 Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 21:371☼1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 21:371☼1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 21:371☼1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 21:371☼1,1-Dichloroethane <0.0023 0.0058 mg/Kg 03/12/14 21:371☼1,1-Dichloroethene <0.0058 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 21:371☼1,1-Dichloropropene <0.0023 0.0058 mg/Kg 03/12/14 21:371☼1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <0.0058 0.012 mg/Kg 03/12/14 21:371☼1,2,3-Trichloropropane <0.012 0.0058 mg/Kg 03/12/14 21:371☼1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <0.0058 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 21:371☼1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <0.0023 0.0058 mg/Kg 03/12/14 21:371☼1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <0.0058 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 21:371☼1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)<0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 21:371☼1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 21:371☼1,2-Dichloroethane <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 21:371☼1,2-Dichloropropane <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 21:371☼1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 21:371☼1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 21:371☼1,3-Dichloropropane <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 21:371☼1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 21:371☼2,2-Dichloropropane <0.0023 0.0058 mg/Kg 03/12/14 21:371☼2-Chlorotoluene <0.0058 0.0058 mg/Kg 03/12/14 21:371☼4-Chlorotoluene <0.0058 0.0012 mg/Kg 03/12/14 21:371☼Benzene <0.0012 0.0058 mg/Kg 03/12/14 21:371☼Bromobenzene <0.0058 0.0058 mg/Kg 03/12/14 21:371☼Bromochloromethane <0.0058 TestAmerica Irvine Page 13 of 48 3/14/2014 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Client Sample Results TestAmerica Job ID: 440-72799-1Client: Terracon Consulting Eng & Scientists SDG: 60147707Project/Site: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites Lab Sample ID: 440-72799-4Client Sample ID: TP-4 (8-9) Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/07/14 13:17 Percent Solids: 84.8Date Received: 03/11/14 09:40 Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) RL Bromodichloromethane <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg ☼03/12/14 21:371 Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier 0.0058 mg/Kg 03/12/14 21:371☼Bromoform <0.0058 0.0058 mg/Kg 03/12/14 21:371☼Bromomethane <0.0058 0.0058 mg/Kg 03/12/14 21:371☼Carbon tetrachloride <0.0058 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 21:371☼Chlorobenzene <0.0023 0.0058 mg/Kg 03/12/14 21:371☼Chloroethane <0.0058 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 21:371☼Chloroform <0.0023 0.0058 mg/Kg 03/12/14 21:371☼Chloromethane <0.0058 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 21:371☼cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 21:371☼cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 21:371☼Dibromochloromethane <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 21:371☼Dibromomethane <0.0023 0.0058 mg/Kg 03/12/14 21:371☼Dichlorodifluoromethane <0.0058 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 21:371☼Ethylbenzene <0.0023 0.0058 mg/Kg 03/12/14 21:371☼Hexachlorobutadiene <0.0058 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 21:371☼Isopropylbenzene <0.0023 0.0046 mg/Kg 03/12/14 21:371☼m,p-Xylene <0.0046 0.023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 21:371☼Methylene Chloride <0.023 0.0058 mg/Kg 03/12/14 21:371☼Methyl-t-Butyl Ether (MTBE)<0.0058 0.0058 mg/Kg 03/12/14 21:371☼Naphthalene <0.0058 0.0058 mg/Kg 03/12/14 21:371☼n-Butylbenzene <0.0058 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 21:371☼N-Propylbenzene <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 21:371☼o-Xylene <0.0023 0.0058 mg/Kg 03/12/14 21:371☼sec-Butylbenzene <0.0058 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 21:371☼Styrene <0.0023 0.0058 mg/Kg 03/12/14 21:371☼Tert-amyl-methyl ether (TAME)<0.0058 0.0058 mg/Kg 03/12/14 21:371☼tert-Butylbenzene <0.0058 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 21:371☼Tetrachloroethene <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 21:371☼Toluene <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 21:371☼trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 21:371☼trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 21:371☼Trichloroethene <0.0023 0.0058 mg/Kg 03/12/14 21:371☼Trichlorofluoromethane <0.0058 0.0058 mg/Kg 03/12/14 21:371☼Vinyl chloride <0.0058 0.0046 mg/Kg 03/12/14 21:371☼Xylenes, Total <0.0046 0.0058 mg/Kg 03/12/14 21:371☼Isopropyl Ether (DIPE)<0.0058 0.0058 mg/Kg 03/12/14 21:371☼Ethyl-t-butyl ether (ETBE)<0.0058 0.12 mg/Kg 03/12/14 21:371☼tert-Butyl alcohol (TBA)<0.12 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 21:371☼p-Isopropyltoluene <0.0023 Toluene-d8 (Surr)106 79 -123 03/12/14 21:371 Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)107 03/12/14 21:37179-120 Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)104 03/12/14 21:37160-120 Method: 8270C SIM - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS SIM) RL Acenaphthene <35 35 ug/Kg ☼03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 15:271 Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier 35 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 15:271☼Acenaphthylene <35 35 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 15:271☼Anthracene <35 TestAmerica Irvine Page 14 of 48 3/14/2014 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Client Sample Results TestAmerica Job ID: 440-72799-1Client: Terracon Consulting Eng & Scientists SDG: 60147707Project/Site: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites Lab Sample ID: 440-72799-4Client Sample ID: TP-4 (8-9) Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/07/14 13:17 Percent Solids: 84.8Date Received: 03/11/14 09:40 Method: 8270C SIM - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS SIM) (Continued) RL Benzo[a]anthracene <35 35 ug/Kg ☼03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 15:271 Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier 35 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 15:271☼Benzo[a]pyrene <35 35 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 15:271☼Benzo[b]fluoranthene <35 35 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 15:271☼Benzo[g,h,i]perylene <35 35 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 15:271☼Benzo[k]fluoranthene <35 35 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 15:271☼Chrysene <35 35 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 15:271☼Dibenz(a,h)anthracene <35 35 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 15:271☼Fluoranthene <35 35 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 15:271☼Fluorene <35 35 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 15:271☼Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene <35 35 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 15:271☼Naphthalene <35 35 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 15:271☼Phenanthrene 120 35 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 15:271☼Pyrene <35 2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr)80 35 -120 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 15:271 Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery Nitrobenzene-d5 68 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 15:27130-120 Terphenyl-d14 70 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 15:27113-100 Method: 8015B - Gasoline Range Organics - (GC) RL GRO (C4-C12)<0.45 0.45 mg/Kg ☼03/13/14 04:281 Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)69 65 -140 03/13/14 04:281 Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery Method: 8015B - Diesel Range Organics (DRO) (GC) RL C13-C22 <5.9 5.9 mg/Kg ☼03/12/14 08:3803/13/14 07:151 Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier 5.9 mg/Kg 03/12/14 08:3803/13/14 07:151☼C23-C40 <5.9 n-Octacosane 83 40 -140 03/12/14 08:3803/13/14 07:151 Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) RL Antimony <20 20 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:5410 Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier 5.9 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:5410Arsenic<5.9 3.0 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:5410Barium84 0.99 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:5410Beryllium2.3 0.99 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:5410Cadmium<0.99 2.0 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:5410Chromium75 2.0 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:5410Cobalt18 4.0 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:5410Copper32 4.0 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:5410Lead19 4.0 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:5410Molybdenum<4.0 4.0 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:5410Nickel100 5.9 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:5410Selenium<5.9 20 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:5410Thallium<20 2.0 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:5410Vanadium48 9.9 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:5410Zinc70 TestAmerica Irvine Page 15 of 48 3/14/2014 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Client Sample Results TestAmerica Job ID: 440-72799-1Client: Terracon Consulting Eng & Scientists SDG: 60147707Project/Site: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites Lab Sample ID: 440-72799-4Client Sample ID: TP-4 (8-9) Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/07/14 13:17 Date Received: 03/11/14 09:40 Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) (Continued) RL Silver <3.0 3.0 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:5410 Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier Method: 7471A - Mercury (CVAA) RL Mercury 0.17 0.020 mg/Kg 03/12/14 15:2603/12/14 19:191 Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier General Chemistry RL Percent Moisture 15 0.10 %03/11/14 15:371 Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier Lab Sample ID: 440-72799-5Client Sample ID: SP-5 Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/07/14 13:21 Percent Solids: 87.7Date Received: 03/11/14 09:40 Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) RL 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.0057 0.0057 mg/Kg ☼03/12/14 22:061 Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:061☼1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:061☼1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:061☼1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:061☼1,1-Dichloroethane <0.0023 0.0057 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:061☼1,1-Dichloroethene <0.0057 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:061☼1,1-Dichloropropene <0.0023 0.0057 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:061☼1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <0.0057 0.011 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:061☼1,2,3-Trichloropropane <0.011 0.0057 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:061☼1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <0.0057 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:061☼1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <0.0023 0.0057 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:061☼1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <0.0057 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:061☼1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)<0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:061☼1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:061☼1,2-Dichloroethane <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:061☼1,2-Dichloropropane <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:061☼1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:061☼1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:061☼1,3-Dichloropropane <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:061☼1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:061☼2,2-Dichloropropane <0.0023 0.0057 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:061☼2-Chlorotoluene <0.0057 0.0057 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:061☼4-Chlorotoluene <0.0057 0.0011 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:061☼Benzene <0.0011 0.0057 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:061☼Bromobenzene <0.0057 0.0057 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:061☼Bromochloromethane <0.0057 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:061☼Bromodichloromethane <0.0023 0.0057 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:061☼Bromoform <0.0057 0.0057 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:061☼Bromomethane <0.0057 0.0057 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:061☼Carbon tetrachloride <0.0057 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:061☼Chlorobenzene <0.0023 0.0057 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:061☼Chloroethane <0.0057 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:061☼Chloroform <0.0023 0.0057 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:061☼Chloromethane <0.0057 TestAmerica Irvine Page 16 of 48 3/14/2014 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Client Sample Results TestAmerica Job ID: 440-72799-1Client: Terracon Consulting Eng & Scientists SDG: 60147707Project/Site: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites Lab Sample ID: 440-72799-5Client Sample ID: SP-5 Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/07/14 13:21 Percent Solids: 87.7Date Received: 03/11/14 09:40 Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) RL cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg ☼03/12/14 22:061 Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:061☼cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:061☼Dibromochloromethane <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:061☼Dibromomethane <0.0023 0.0057 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:061☼Dichlorodifluoromethane <0.0057 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:061☼Ethylbenzene <0.0023 0.0057 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:061☼Hexachlorobutadiene <0.0057 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:061☼Isopropylbenzene <0.0023 0.0045 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:061☼m,p-Xylene <0.0045 0.023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:061☼Methylene Chloride <0.023 0.0057 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:061☼Methyl-t-Butyl Ether (MTBE)<0.0057 0.0057 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:061☼Naphthalene <0.0057 0.0057 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:061☼n-Butylbenzene <0.0057 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:061☼N-Propylbenzene <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:061☼o-Xylene <0.0023 0.0057 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:061☼sec-Butylbenzene <0.0057 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:061☼Styrene <0.0023 0.0057 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:061☼Tert-amyl-methyl ether (TAME)<0.0057 0.0057 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:061☼tert-Butylbenzene <0.0057 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:061☼Tetrachloroethene <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:061☼Toluene <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:061☼trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:061☼trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:061☼Trichloroethene <0.0023 0.0057 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:061☼Trichlorofluoromethane <0.0057 0.0057 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:061☼Vinyl chloride <0.0057 0.0045 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:061☼Xylenes, Total <0.0045 0.0057 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:061☼Isopropyl Ether (DIPE)<0.0057 0.0057 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:061☼Ethyl-t-butyl ether (ETBE)<0.0057 0.11 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:061☼tert-Butyl alcohol (TBA)<0.11 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:061☼p-Isopropyltoluene <0.0023 Toluene-d8 (Surr)107 79 -123 03/12/14 22:061 Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)106 03/12/14 22:06179-120 Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)105 03/12/14 22:06160-120 Method: 8270C SIM - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS SIM) RL Acenaphthene <68 68 ug/Kg ☼03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 15:481 Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier 68 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 15:481☼Acenaphthylene <68 68 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 15:481☼Anthracene <68 68 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 15:481☼Benzo[a]anthracene <68 68 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 15:481☼Benzo[a]pyrene <68 68 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 15:481☼Benzo[b]fluoranthene <68 68 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 15:481☼Benzo[g,h,i]perylene <68 68 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 15:481☼Benzo[k]fluoranthene <68 68 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 15:481☼Chrysene <68 68 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 15:481☼Dibenz(a,h)anthracene <68 68 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 15:481☼Fluoranthene <68 TestAmerica Irvine Page 17 of 48 3/14/2014 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Client Sample Results TestAmerica Job ID: 440-72799-1Client: Terracon Consulting Eng & Scientists SDG: 60147707Project/Site: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites Lab Sample ID: 440-72799-5Client Sample ID: SP-5 Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/07/14 13:21 Percent Solids: 87.7Date Received: 03/11/14 09:40 Method: 8270C SIM - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS SIM) (Continued) RL Fluorene <68 68 ug/Kg ☼03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 15:481 Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier 68 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 15:481☼Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene <68 68 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 15:481☼Naphthalene <68 68 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 15:481☼Phenanthrene <68 68 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 15:481☼Pyrene <68 2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr)77 35 -120 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 15:481 Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery Nitrobenzene-d5 69 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 15:48130-120 Terphenyl-d14 65 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 15:48113-100 Method: 8015B - Gasoline Range Organics - (GC) RL GRO (C4-C12)<0.43 0.43 mg/Kg ☼03/12/14 12:201 Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)75 65 -140 03/12/14 12:201 Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery Method: 8015B - Diesel Range Organics (DRO) (GC) RL C13-C22 <5.7 5.7 mg/Kg ☼03/12/14 08:3803/13/14 04:441 Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier 5.7 mg/Kg 03/12/14 08:3803/13/14 04:441☼C23-C40 19 n-Octacosane 68 40 -140 03/12/14 08:3803/13/14 04:441 Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) RL Antimony <9.9 9.9 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:275 Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier 3.0 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:275Arsenic3.7 1.5 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:275Barium85 0.49 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:275Beryllium1.3 0.49 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:275Cadmium<0.49 0.99 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:275Chromium43 0.99 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:275Cobalt11 2.0 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:275Copper20 2.0 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:275Lead30 2.0 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:275Molybdenum<2.0 2.0 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:275Nickel39 3.0 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:275Selenium<3.0 9.9 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:275Thallium<9.9 0.99 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:275Vanadium38 4.9 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:275Zinc58 1.5 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:275Silver<1.5 Method: 7471A - Mercury (CVAA) RL Mercury 0.10 0.020 mg/Kg 03/12/14 15:2603/12/14 19:271 Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier TestAmerica Irvine Page 18 of 48 3/14/2014 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Client Sample Results TestAmerica Job ID: 440-72799-1Client: Terracon Consulting Eng & Scientists SDG: 60147707Project/Site: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites Lab Sample ID: 440-72799-5Client Sample ID: SP-5 Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/07/14 13:21 Date Received: 03/11/14 09:40 General Chemistry RL Percent Moisture 12 0.10 %03/11/14 15:371 Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier Lab Sample ID: 440-72799-6Client Sample ID: SP-6 Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/07/14 13:25 Percent Solids: 85.4Date Received: 03/11/14 09:40 Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) RL 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.0058 0.0058 mg/Kg ☼03/12/14 22:341 Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:341☼1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:341☼1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:341☼1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:341☼1,1-Dichloroethane <0.0023 0.0058 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:341☼1,1-Dichloroethene <0.0058 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:341☼1,1-Dichloropropene <0.0023 0.0058 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:341☼1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <0.0058 0.012 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:341☼1,2,3-Trichloropropane <0.012 0.0058 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:341☼1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <0.0058 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:341☼1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <0.0023 0.0058 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:341☼1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <0.0058 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:341☼1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)<0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:341☼1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:341☼1,2-Dichloroethane <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:341☼1,2-Dichloropropane <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:341☼1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:341☼1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:341☼1,3-Dichloropropane <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:341☼1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:341☼2,2-Dichloropropane <0.0023 0.0058 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:341☼2-Chlorotoluene <0.0058 0.0058 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:341☼4-Chlorotoluene <0.0058 0.0012 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:341☼Benzene <0.0012 0.0058 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:341☼Bromobenzene <0.0058 0.0058 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:341☼Bromochloromethane <0.0058 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:341☼Bromodichloromethane <0.0023 0.0058 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:341☼Bromoform <0.0058 0.0058 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:341☼Bromomethane <0.0058 0.0058 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:341☼Carbon tetrachloride <0.0058 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:341☼Chlorobenzene <0.0023 0.0058 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:341☼Chloroethane <0.0058 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:341☼Chloroform <0.0023 0.0058 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:341☼Chloromethane <0.0058 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:341☼cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:341☼cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:341☼Dibromochloromethane <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:341☼Dibromomethane <0.0023 0.0058 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:341☼Dichlorodifluoromethane <0.0058 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:341☼Ethylbenzene <0.0023 0.0058 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:341☼Hexachlorobutadiene <0.0058 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:341☼Isopropylbenzene <0.0023 TestAmerica Irvine Page 19 of 48 3/14/2014 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Client Sample Results TestAmerica Job ID: 440-72799-1Client: Terracon Consulting Eng & Scientists SDG: 60147707Project/Site: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites Lab Sample ID: 440-72799-6Client Sample ID: SP-6 Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/07/14 13:25 Percent Solids: 85.4Date Received: 03/11/14 09:40 Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) RL m,p-Xylene <0.0046 0.0046 mg/Kg ☼03/12/14 22:341 Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier 0.023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:341☼Methylene Chloride <0.023 0.0058 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:341☼Methyl-t-Butyl Ether (MTBE)<0.0058 0.0058 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:341☼Naphthalene <0.0058 0.0058 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:341☼n-Butylbenzene <0.0058 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:341☼N-Propylbenzene <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:341☼o-Xylene <0.0023 0.0058 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:341☼sec-Butylbenzene <0.0058 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:341☼Styrene <0.0023 0.0058 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:341☼Tert-amyl-methyl ether (TAME)<0.0058 0.0058 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:341☼tert-Butylbenzene <0.0058 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:341☼Tetrachloroethene <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:341☼Toluene <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:341☼trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:341☼trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.0023 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:341☼Trichloroethene <0.0023 0.0058 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:341☼Trichlorofluoromethane <0.0058 0.0058 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:341☼Vinyl chloride <0.0058 0.0046 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:341☼Xylenes, Total <0.0046 0.0058 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:341☼Isopropyl Ether (DIPE)<0.0058 0.0058 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:341☼Ethyl-t-butyl ether (ETBE)<0.0058 0.12 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:341☼tert-Butyl alcohol (TBA)<0.12 0.0023 mg/Kg 03/12/14 22:341☼p-Isopropyltoluene <0.0023 Toluene-d8 (Surr)107 79 -123 03/12/14 22:341 Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)104 03/12/14 22:34179-120 Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)111 03/12/14 22:34160-120 Method: 8270C SIM - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS SIM) RL Acenaphthene <70 70 ug/Kg ☼03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 16:081 Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier 70 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 16:081☼Acenaphthylene <70 70 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 16:081☼Anthracene <70 70 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 16:081☼Benzo[a]anthracene <70 70 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 16:081☼Benzo[a]pyrene <70 70 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 16:081☼Benzo[b]fluoranthene <70 70 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 16:081☼Benzo[g,h,i]perylene <70 70 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 16:081☼Benzo[k]fluoranthene <70 70 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 16:081☼Chrysene <70 70 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 16:081☼Dibenz(a,h)anthracene <70 70 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 16:081☼Fluoranthene <70 70 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 16:081☼Fluorene <70 70 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 16:081☼Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene <70 70 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 16:081☼Naphthalene <70 70 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 16:081☼Phenanthrene <70 70 ug/Kg 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 16:081☼Pyrene <70 2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr)82 35 -120 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 16:081 Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery TestAmerica Irvine Page 20 of 48 3/14/2014 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Client Sample Results TestAmerica Job ID: 440-72799-1Client: Terracon Consulting Eng & Scientists SDG: 60147707Project/Site: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites Lab Sample ID: 440-72799-6Client Sample ID: SP-6 Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/07/14 13:25 Percent Solids: 85.4Date Received: 03/11/14 09:40 Method: 8270C SIM - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS SIM) (Continued) Nitrobenzene-d5 71 30 -120 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 16:081 Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery Terphenyl-d14 75 03/12/14 11:4503/13/14 16:08113-100 Method: 8015B - Gasoline Range Organics - (GC) RL GRO (C4-C12)<0.44 0.44 mg/Kg ☼03/13/14 04:561 Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)69 65 -140 03/13/14 04:561 Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery Method: 8015B - Diesel Range Organics (DRO) (GC) RL C13-C22 <5.8 5.8 mg/Kg ☼03/12/14 08:3803/13/14 04:131 Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier 5.8 mg/Kg 03/12/14 08:3803/13/14 04:131☼C23-C40 7.8 n-Octacosane 73 40 -140 03/12/14 08:3803/13/14 04:131 Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) RL Antimony <10 10 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:285 Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier 3.0 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:285Arsenic3.9 1.5 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:285Barium130 0.50 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:285Beryllium2.2 0.50 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:285Cadmium<0.50 1.0 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:285Chromium51 1.0 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:285Cobalt12 2.0 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:285Copper35 2.0 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:285Lead18 2.0 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:285Molybdenum<2.0 2.0 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:285Nickel54 3.0 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:285Selenium<3.0 10 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:285Thallium<10 1.0 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:285Vanadium47 5.0 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:285Zinc65 1.5 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:285Silver<1.5 Method: 7471A - Mercury (CVAA) RL Mercury <0.020 0.020 mg/Kg 03/12/14 15:2603/12/14 19:291 Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier General Chemistry RL Percent Moisture 15 0.10 %03/11/14 15:371 Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier TestAmerica Irvine Page 21 of 48 3/14/2014 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Method Summary TestAmerica Job ID: 440-72799-1Client: Terracon Consulting Eng & Scientists SDG: 60147707Project/Site: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites Method Method Description LaboratoryProtocol SW8468260BVolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)TAL IRV SW8468270C SIM Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS SIM)TAL IRV SW8468015BGasoline Range Organics - (GC)TAL IRV SW8468015BDiesel Range Organics (DRO) (GC)TAL IRV SW8466010BMetals (ICP)TAL IRV SW8467471AMercury (CVAA)TAL IRV EPAMoisturePercent Moisture TAL IRV Protocol References: EPA = US Environmental Protection Agency SW846 = "Test Methods For Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods", Third Edition, November 1986 And Its Updates. Laboratory References: TAL IRV = TestAmerica Irvine, 17461 Derian Ave, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92614-5817, TEL (949)261-1022 TestAmerica Irvine Page 22 of 48 3/14/2014 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Lab Chronicle Client: Terracon Consulting Eng & Scientists TestAmerica Job ID: 440-72799-1 Project/Site: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites SDG: 60147707 Client Sample ID: TP-1 (8-9')Lab Sample ID: 440-72799-1 Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/07/14 13:05 Percent Solids: 87.4Date Received: 03/11/14 09:40 Analysis8260B LB03/12/14 18:451 TAL IRV168634 Type Batch Method Batch Prep Type LabAnalystRun Prepared or Analyzed Initial AmountAmount FinalBatch NumberFactor Dil Total/NA 5.02 g10 mL Prep3546 16825603/12/14 11:45QCTTAL IRVTotal/NA 15.03 g2 mL Analysis8270C SIM 1 16889003/13/14 16:28AITAL IRVTotal/NA 15.03 g2 mL Analysis8015B 1 16836103/12/14 09:45TLTAL IRVTotal/NA 5.05 g10 mL PrepCA LUFT 16845703/12/14 08:38SJTAL IRVTotal/NA 30.04 g1 mL Analysis8015B 1 16860403/13/14 05:45KWTAL IRVTotal/NA 30.04 g1 mL Prep3050B 16829603/11/14 15:47DTTAL IRVTotal/NA 2.01 g50 mL Analysis6010B 10 16860603/12/14 14:46TKTAL IRVTotal/NA 2.01 g50 mL Prep7471A 16861003/12/14 15:26JS1TAL IRVTotal/NA 0.49 g50 mL Analysis7471A 1 16880503/12/14 19:07ENTAL IRVTotal/NA 0.49 g50 mL AnalysisMoisture 1 16828703/11/14 15:37SPTAL IRVTotal/NA Client Sample ID: TP-2 (8-9)Lab Sample ID: 440-72799-2 Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/07/14 13:09 Percent Solids: 83.9Date Received: 03/11/14 09:40 Analysis8260B LB03/12/14 20:121 TAL IRV168634 Type Batch Method Batch Prep Type LabAnalystRun Prepared or Analyzed Initial AmountAmount FinalBatch NumberFactor Dil Total/NA 5.08 g10 mL Prep3546 16825603/12/14 11:45QCTTAL IRVTotal/NA 15.06 g1 mL Analysis8270C SIM 1 16889003/13/14 14:47AITAL IRVTotal/NA 15.06 g1 mL Analysis8015B 1 16870703/13/14 03:33TLTAL IRVTotal/NA 5 g 10 mL PrepCA LUFT 16845703/12/14 08:38SJTAL IRVTotal/NA 30.02 g1 mL Analysis8015B 1 16860403/13/14 08:15KWTAL IRVTotal/NA 30.02 g1 mL Prep3050B 16829603/11/14 15:47DTTAL IRVTotal/NA 2.03 g50 mL Analysis6010B 5 16860603/12/14 14:21TKTAL IRVTotal/NA 2.03 g50 mL Prep7471A 16861003/12/14 15:26JS1TAL IRVTotal/NA 0.51 g50 mL Analysis7471A 1 16880503/12/14 19:14ENTAL IRVTotal/NA 0.51 g50 mL AnalysisMoisture 1 16828703/11/14 15:37SPTAL IRVTotal/NA Client Sample ID: TP-3 (8-9)Lab Sample ID: 440-72799-3 Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/07/14 13:13 Percent Solids: 88.1Date Received: 03/11/14 09:40 Analysis8260B LB03/12/14 20:401 TAL IRV168634 Type Batch Method Batch Prep Type LabAnalystRun Prepared or Analyzed Initial AmountAmount FinalBatch NumberFactor Dil Total/NA 5.1 g 10 mL Prep3546 16825603/12/14 11:45QCTTAL IRVTotal/NA 15.03 g1 mL Analysis8270C SIM 1 16889003/13/14 15:07AITAL IRVTotal/NA 15.03 g1 mL Analysis8015B 1 16870703/13/14 04:01TLTAL IRVTotal/NA 5 g 10 mL PrepCA LUFT 16845703/12/14 08:38SJTAL IRVTotal/NA 30.03 g1 mL Analysis8015B 1 16860403/13/14 08:45KWTAL IRVTotal/NA 30.03 g1 mL Prep3050B 16829603/11/14 15:47DTTAL IRVTotal/NA 2.04 g50 mL Analysis6010B 10 16860603/12/14 14:52TKTAL IRVTotal/NA 2.04 g50 mL TestAmerica Irvine Page 23 of 48 3/14/2014 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Lab Chronicle Client: Terracon Consulting Eng & Scientists TestAmerica Job ID: 440-72799-1 Project/Site: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites SDG: 60147707 Client Sample ID: TP-3 (8-9)Lab Sample ID: 440-72799-3 Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/07/14 13:13 Date Received: 03/11/14 09:40 Prep7471A JS103/12/14 15:26 TAL IRV168610 Type Batch Method Batch Prep Type LabAnalystRun Prepared or Analyzed Initial AmountAmount FinalBatch NumberFactor Dil Total/NA 0.49 g50 mL Analysis7471A 1 16880503/12/14 19:17ENTAL IRVTotal/NA 0.49 g50 mL AnalysisMoisture 1 16828703/11/14 15:37SPTAL IRVTotal/NA Client Sample ID: TP-4 (8-9)Lab Sample ID: 440-72799-4 Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/07/14 13:17 Percent Solids: 84.8Date Received: 03/11/14 09:40 Analysis8260B LB03/12/14 21:371 TAL IRV168634 Type Batch Method Batch Prep Type LabAnalystRun Prepared or Analyzed Initial AmountAmount FinalBatch NumberFactor Dil Total/NA 5.12 g10 mL Prep3546 16825603/12/14 11:45QCTTAL IRVTotal/NA 15.07 g1 mL Analysis8270C SIM 1 16889003/13/14 15:27AITAL IRVTotal/NA 15.07 g1 mL Analysis8015B 1 16870703/13/14 04:28TLTAL IRVTotal/NA 5.28 g10 mL PrepCA LUFT 16845703/12/14 08:38SJTAL IRVTotal/NA 30.01 g1 mL Analysis8015B 1 16860403/13/14 07:15KWTAL IRVTotal/NA 30.01 g1 mL Prep3050B 16829603/11/14 15:47DTTAL IRVTotal/NA 2.02 g50 mL Analysis6010B 10 16860603/12/14 14:54TKTAL IRVTotal/NA 2.02 g50 mL Prep7471A 16861003/12/14 15:26JS1TAL IRVTotal/NA 0.49 g50 mL Analysis7471A 1 16880503/12/14 19:19ENTAL IRVTotal/NA 0.49 g50 mL AnalysisMoisture 1 16828703/11/14 15:37SPTAL IRVTotal/NA Client Sample ID: SP-5 Lab Sample ID: 440-72799-5 Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/07/14 13:21 Percent Solids: 87.7Date Received: 03/11/14 09:40 Analysis8260B LB03/12/14 22:061 TAL IRV168634 Type Batch Method Batch Prep Type LabAnalystRun Prepared or Analyzed Initial AmountAmount FinalBatch NumberFactor Dil Total/NA 5.02 g10 mL Prep3546 16825603/12/14 11:45QCTTAL IRVTotal/NA 15.11 g2 mL Analysis8270C SIM 1 16889003/13/14 15:48AITAL IRVTotal/NA 15.11 g2 mL Analysis8015B 1 16836103/12/14 12:20TLTAL IRVTotal/NA 5.33 g10 mL PrepCA LUFT 16845703/12/14 08:38SJTAL IRVTotal/NA 30.00 g1 mL Analysis8015B 1 16860403/13/14 04:44KWTAL IRVTotal/NA 30.00 g1 mL Prep3050B 16829603/11/14 15:47DTTAL IRVTotal/NA 2.03 g50 mL Analysis6010B 5 16860603/12/14 14:27TKTAL IRVTotal/NA 2.03 g50 mL Prep7471A 16861003/12/14 15:26JS1TAL IRVTotal/NA 0.50 g50 mL Analysis7471A 1 16880503/12/14 19:27ENTAL IRVTotal/NA 0.50 g50 mL AnalysisMoisture 1 16828703/11/14 15:37SPTAL IRVTotal/NA TestAmerica Irvine Page 24 of 48 3/14/2014 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Lab Chronicle Client: Terracon Consulting Eng & Scientists TestAmerica Job ID: 440-72799-1 Project/Site: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites SDG: 60147707 Client Sample ID: SP-6 Lab Sample ID: 440-72799-6 Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/07/14 13:25 Percent Solids: 85.4Date Received: 03/11/14 09:40 Analysis8260B LB03/12/14 22:341 TAL IRV168634 Type Batch Method Batch Prep Type LabAnalystRun Prepared or Analyzed Initial AmountAmount FinalBatch NumberFactor Dil Total/NA 5.04 g10 mL Prep3546 16825603/12/14 11:45QCTTAL IRVTotal/NA 15.06 g2 mL Analysis8270C SIM 1 16889003/13/14 16:08AITAL IRVTotal/NA 15.06 g2 mL Analysis8015B 1 16870703/13/14 04:56TLTAL IRVTotal/NA 5.3 g 10 mL PrepCA LUFT 16845703/12/14 08:38SJTAL IRVTotal/NA 30.06 g1 mL Analysis8015B 1 16860403/13/14 04:13KWTAL IRVTotal/NA 30.06 g1 mL Prep3050B 16829603/11/14 15:47DTTAL IRVTotal/NA 2.01 g50 mL Analysis6010B 5 16860603/12/14 14:28TKTAL IRVTotal/NA 2.01 g50 mL Prep7471A 16861003/12/14 15:26JS1TAL IRVTotal/NA 0.49 g50 mL Analysis7471A 1 16880503/12/14 19:29ENTAL IRVTotal/NA 0.49 g50 mL AnalysisMoisture 1 16828703/11/14 15:37SPTAL IRVTotal/NA Laboratory References: TAL IRV = TestAmerica Irvine, 17461 Derian Ave, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92614-5817, TEL (949)261-1022 TestAmerica Irvine Page 25 of 48 3/14/2014 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 QC Sample Results TestAmerica Job ID: 440-72799-1Client: Terracon Consulting Eng & Scientists SDG: 60147707Project/Site: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 440-168634/3 Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 168634 RL 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg 03/12/14 17:481 MBMB Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResultQualifier <0.0020 0.0020 mg/Kg 03/12/14 17:4811,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.0020 0.0020 mg/Kg 03/12/14 17:4811,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.0020 0.0020 mg/Kg 03/12/14 17:4811,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.0020 0.0020 mg/Kg 03/12/14 17:4811,1-Dichloroethane <0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg 03/12/14 17:4811,1-Dichloroethene <0.0020 0.0020 mg/Kg 03/12/14 17:4811,1-Dichloropropene <0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg 03/12/14 17:4811,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <0.010 0.010 mg/Kg 03/12/14 17:4811,2,3-Trichloropropane <0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg 03/12/14 17:4811,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <0.0020 0.0020 mg/Kg 03/12/14 17:4811,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg 03/12/14 17:4811,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <0.0020 0.0020 mg/Kg 03/12/14 17:4811,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) <0.0020 0.0020 mg/Kg 03/12/14 17:4811,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.0020 0.0020 mg/Kg 03/12/14 17:4811,2-Dichloroethane <0.0020 0.0020 mg/Kg 03/12/14 17:4811,2-Dichloropropane <0.0020 0.0020 mg/Kg 03/12/14 17:4811,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <0.0020 0.0020 mg/Kg 03/12/14 17:4811,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.0020 0.0020 mg/Kg 03/12/14 17:4811,3-Dichloropropane <0.0020 0.0020 mg/Kg 03/12/14 17:4811,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.0020 0.0020 mg/Kg 03/12/14 17:4812,2-Dichloropropane <0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg 03/12/14 17:4812-Chlorotoluene <0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg 03/12/14 17:4814-Chlorotoluene <0.0010 0.0010 mg/Kg 03/12/14 17:481Benzene <0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg 03/12/14 17:481Bromobenzene <0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg 03/12/14 17:481Bromochloromethane <0.0020 0.0020 mg/Kg 03/12/14 17:481Bromodichloromethane <0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg 03/12/14 17:481Bromoform <0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg 03/12/14 17:481Bromomethane <0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg 03/12/14 17:481Carbon tetrachloride <0.0020 0.0020 mg/Kg 03/12/14 17:481Chlorobenzene <0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg 03/12/14 17:481Chloroethane <0.0020 0.0020 mg/Kg 03/12/14 17:481Chloroform <0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg 03/12/14 17:481Chloromethane <0.0020 0.0020 mg/Kg 03/12/14 17:481cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.0020 0.0020 mg/Kg 03/12/14 17:481cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.0020 0.0020 mg/Kg 03/12/14 17:481Dibromochloromethane <0.0020 0.0020 mg/Kg 03/12/14 17:481Dibromomethane <0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg 03/12/14 17:481Dichlorodifluoromethane <0.0020 0.0020 mg/Kg 03/12/14 17:481Ethylbenzene <0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg 03/12/14 17:481Hexachlorobutadiene <0.0020 0.0020 mg/Kg 03/12/14 17:481Isopropylbenzene <0.0040 0.0040 mg/Kg 03/12/14 17:481m,p-Xylene <0.020 0.020 mg/Kg 03/12/14 17:481Methylene Chloride <0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg 03/12/14 17:481Methyl-t-Butyl Ether (MTBE) <0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg 03/12/14 17:481Naphthalene <0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg 03/12/14 17:481n-Butylbenzene <0.0020 0.0020 mg/Kg 03/12/14 17:481N-Propylbenzene TestAmerica Irvine Page 26 of 48 3/14/2014 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 QC Sample Results TestAmerica Job ID: 440-72799-1Client: Terracon Consulting Eng & Scientists SDG: 60147707Project/Site: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 440-168634/3 Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 168634 RL o-Xylene <0.0020 0.0020 mg/Kg 03/12/14 17:481 MBMB Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResultQualifier <0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg 03/12/14 17:481sec-Butylbenzene <0.0020 0.0020 mg/Kg 03/12/14 17:481Styrene <0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg 03/12/14 17:481Tert-amyl-methyl ether (TAME) <0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg 03/12/14 17:481tert-Butylbenzene <0.0020 0.0020 mg/Kg 03/12/14 17:481Tetrachloroethene <0.0020 0.0020 mg/Kg 03/12/14 17:481Toluene <0.0020 0.0020 mg/Kg 03/12/14 17:481trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.0020 0.0020 mg/Kg 03/12/14 17:481trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.0020 0.0020 mg/Kg 03/12/14 17:481Trichloroethene <0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg 03/12/14 17:481Trichlorofluoromethane <0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg 03/12/14 17:481Vinyl chloride <0.0040 0.0040 mg/Kg 03/12/14 17:481Xylenes, Total <0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg 03/12/14 17:481Isopropyl Ether (DIPE) <0.0050 0.0050 mg/Kg 03/12/14 17:481Ethyl-t-butyl ether (ETBE) <0.10 0.10 mg/Kg 03/12/14 17:481tert-Butyl alcohol (TBA) <0.0020 0.0020 mg/Kg 03/12/14 17:481p-Isopropyltoluene Toluene-d8 (Surr)110 79 -123 03/12/14 17:481 MBMB Surrogate Dil FacPreparedAnalyzedQualifierLimits%Recovery 110 03/12/14 17:4814-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)79 -120 102 03/12/14 17:481Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)60 -120 Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 440-168634/4 Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 168634 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.05000.0548 mg/Kg 11070 -130 Analyte LCSLCS DUnitResultQualifier %Rec Spike Added %Rec. Limits 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.05000.0509 mg/Kg 10265 -135 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.05000.0440 mg/Kg 8855 -140 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.05000.0472 mg/Kg 9465 -135 1,1-Dichloroethane 0.05000.0477 mg/Kg 9570 -130 1,1-Dichloroethene 0.05000.0561 mg/Kg 11270 -125 1,1-Dichloropropene 0.05000.0529 mg/Kg 10670 -130 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 0.05000.0504 mg/Kg 10160 -130 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 0.05000.0424 mg/Kg 8560 -135 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.05000.0534 mg/Kg 10770 -135 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.05000.0518 mg/Kg 10470 -125 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 0.05000.0353 mg/Kg 7150 -135 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)0.05000.0492 mg/Kg 9870 -130 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.05000.0473 mg/Kg 9575 -120 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.05000.0485 mg/Kg 9760 -140 1,2-Dichloropropane 0.05000.0506 mg/Kg 10170 -130 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.05000.0498 mg/Kg 10070 -125 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 0.05000.0494 mg/Kg 9975 -125 1,3-Dichloropropane 0.05000.0473 mg/Kg 9570 -125 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.05000.0488 mg/Kg 9875 -120 TestAmerica Irvine Page 27 of 48 3/14/2014 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 QC Sample Results TestAmerica Job ID: 440-72799-1Client: Terracon Consulting Eng & Scientists SDG: 60147707Project/Site: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 440-168634/4 Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 168634 2,2-Dichloropropane 0.05000.0553 mg/Kg 11160 -145 Analyte LCSLCS DUnitResultQualifier %Rec Spike Added %Rec. Limits 2-Chlorotoluene 0.05000.0470 mg/Kg 9470 -125 4-Chlorotoluene 0.05000.0498 mg/Kg 10075 -125 Benzene 0.05000.0467 mg/Kg 9365 -120 Bromobenzene 0.05000.0493 mg/Kg 9975 -120 Bromochloromethane 0.05000.0496 mg/Kg 9970 -135 Bromodichloromethane 0.05000.0527 mg/Kg 10570 -135 Bromoform 0.05000.0515 mg/Kg 10355 -135 Bromomethane 0.05000.0490 mg/Kg 9860 -145 Carbon tetrachloride 0.05000.0528 mg/Kg 10665 -140 Chlorobenzene 0.05000.0495 mg/Kg 9975 -120 Chloroethane 0.05000.0537 mg/Kg 10760 -140 Chloroform 0.05000.0504 mg/Kg 10170 -130 Chloromethane 0.05000.0477 mg/Kg 9545 -145 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.05000.0531 mg/Kg 10670 -125 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.05000.0534 mg/Kg 10775 -125 Dibromochloromethane 0.05000.0539 mg/Kg 10865 -140 Dibromomethane 0.05000.0479 mg/Kg 9670 -130 Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.05000.0516 mg/Kg 10335 -160 Ethylbenzene 0.05000.0516 mg/Kg 10370 -125 Hexachlorobutadiene 0.05000.0544 mg/Kg 10960 -135 Isopropylbenzene 0.05000.0497 mg/Kg 9975 -130 m,p-Xylene 0.100 0.107 mg/Kg 10770 -125 Methylene Chloride 0.05000.0520 mg/Kg 10455 -135 Methyl-t-Butyl Ether (MTBE)0.05000.0449 mg/Kg 9060 -140 Naphthalene 0.05000.0441 mg/Kg 8855 -135 n-Butylbenzene 0.05000.0491 mg/Kg 9870 -130 N-Propylbenzene 0.05000.0507 mg/Kg 10170 -130 o-Xylene 0.05000.0524 mg/Kg 10570 -125 sec-Butylbenzene 0.05000.0519 mg/Kg 10470 -125 Styrene 0.05000.0536 mg/Kg 10775 -130 Tert-amyl-methyl ether (TAME)0.05000.0444 mg/Kg 8960 -145 tert-Butylbenzene 0.05000.0518 mg/Kg 10470 -125 Tetrachloroethene 0.05000.0523 mg/Kg 10570 -125 Toluene 0.05000.0483 mg/Kg 9770 -125 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.05000.0532 mg/Kg 10670 -125 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.05000.0556 mg/Kg 11170 -135 Trichloroethene 0.05000.0524 mg/Kg 10570 -125 Trichlorofluoromethane 0.05000.0612 mg/Kg 12260 -145 Vinyl chloride 0.05000.0494 mg/Kg 9955 -135 Isopropyl Ether (DIPE)0.05000.0475 mg/Kg 9560 -140 Ethyl-t-butyl ether (ETBE)0.05000.0458 mg/Kg 9260 -140 tert-Butyl alcohol (TBA)0.250 0.263 mg/Kg 10570 -135 p-Isopropyltoluene 0.05000.0521 mg/Kg 10475 -125 Toluene-d8 (Surr)79 -123 Surrogate 108 LCSLCS QualifierLimits%Recovery 1114-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)79 -120 TestAmerica Irvine Page 28 of 48 3/14/2014 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 QC Sample Results TestAmerica Job ID: 440-72799-1Client: Terracon Consulting Eng & Scientists SDG: 60147707Project/Site: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 440-168634/4 Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 168634 Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)60 -120 Surrogate 104 LCSLCS QualifierLimits%Recovery Client Sample ID: TP-1 (8-9')Lab Sample ID: 440-72799-1 MS Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 168634 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.0057 0.05700.0583 mg/Kg 10265 -145☼ Analyte MSMS DUnitResultQualifier %Rec Spike Added Sample Result Sample Qualifier %Rec. Limits 1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.0023 0.05700.0541 mg/Kg 9565 -145☼ 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.0023 0.05700.0524 mg/Kg 9240 -160☼ 1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.0023 0.05700.0525 mg/Kg 9265 -140☼ 1,1-Dichloroethane <0.0023 0.05700.0515 mg/Kg 9065 -135☼ 1,1-Dichloroethene <0.0057 0.05700.0572 mg/Kg 10065 -135☼ 1,1-Dichloropropene <0.0023 0.05700.0534 mg/Kg 9465 -135☼ 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <0.0057 0.05700.0449 mg/Kg 7945 -145☼ 1,2,3-Trichloropropane <0.011 0.05700.0518 mg/Kg 9150 -150☼ 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <0.0057 0.05700.0476 mg/Kg 8450 -140☼ 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <0.0023 0.05700.0533 mg/Kg 9465 -140☼ 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <0.0057 0.05700.0409 mg/Kg 7240 -150☼ 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)<0.0023 0.05700.0546 mg/Kg 9665 -140☼ 1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.0023 0.05700.0492 mg/Kg 8670 -130☼ 1,2-Dichloroethane <0.0023 0.05700.0532 mg/Kg 9360 -150☼ 1,2-Dichloropropane <0.0023 0.05700.0537 mg/Kg 9465 -130☼ 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <0.0023 0.05700.0513 mg/Kg 9065 -135☼ 1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.0023 0.05700.0492 mg/Kg 8670 -130☼ 1,3-Dichloropropane <0.0023 0.05700.0530 mg/Kg 9365 -140☼ 1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.0023 0.05700.0495 mg/Kg 8770 -130☼ 2,2-Dichloropropane <0.0023 0.05700.0598 mg/Kg 10565 -150☼ 2-Chlorotoluene <0.0057 0.05700.0483 mg/Kg 8560 -135☼ 4-Chlorotoluene <0.0057 0.05700.0515 mg/Kg 9065 -135☼ Benzene <0.0011 0.05700.0500 mg/Kg 8865 -130☼ Bromobenzene <0.0057 0.05700.0538 mg/Kg 9565 -140☼ Bromochloromethane <0.0057 0.05700.0540 mg/Kg 9565 -145☼ Bromodichloromethane <0.0023 0.05700.0568 mg/Kg 10065 -145☼ Bromoform <0.0057 0.05700.0573 mg/Kg 10150 -145☼ Bromomethane <0.0057 0.05700.0531 mg/Kg 9360 -155☼ Carbon tetrachloride <0.0057 0.05700.0543 mg/Kg 9560 -145☼ Chlorobenzene <0.0023 0.05700.0518 mg/Kg 9170 -130☼ Chloroethane <0.0057 0.05700.0611 mg/Kg 10760 -150☼ Chloroform <0.0023 0.05700.0538 mg/Kg 9465 -135☼ Chloromethane <0.0057 0.05700.0505 mg/Kg 8940 -145☼ cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.0023 0.05700.0559 mg/Kg 9865 -135☼ cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.0023 0.05700.0566 mg/Kg 9970 -135☼ Dibromochloromethane <0.0023 0.05700.0597 mg/Kg 10560 -145☼ Dibromomethane <0.0023 0.05700.0516 mg/Kg 9165 -140☼ Dichlorodifluoromethane <0.0057 0.05700.0555 mg/Kg 9730 -160☼ Ethylbenzene <0.0023 0.05700.0530 mg/Kg 9370 -135☼ Hexachlorobutadiene <0.0057 0.05700.0415 mg/Kg 7350 -145☼ TestAmerica Irvine Page 29 of 48 3/14/2014 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 QC Sample Results TestAmerica Job ID: 440-72799-1Client: Terracon Consulting Eng & Scientists SDG: 60147707Project/Site: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) Client Sample ID: TP-1 (8-9')Lab Sample ID: 440-72799-1 MS Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 168634 Isopropylbenzene <0.0023 0.05700.0519 mg/Kg 9170 -145☼ Analyte MSMS DUnitResultQualifier %Rec Spike Added Sample Result Sample Qualifier %Rec. Limits m,p-Xylene <0.0046 0.114 0.110 mg/Kg 9670 -130☼ Methylene Chloride <0.023 0.05700.0528 mg/Kg 9355 -145☼ Methyl-t-Butyl Ether (MTBE)<0.0057 0.05700.0522 mg/Kg 9255 -155☼ Naphthalene <0.0057 0.05700.0441 mg/Kg 7840 -150☼ n-Butylbenzene <0.0057 0.05700.0444 mg/Kg 7855 -145☼ N-Propylbenzene <0.0023 0.05700.0511 mg/Kg 9065 -140☼ o-Xylene <0.0023 0.05700.0547 mg/Kg 9665 -130☼ sec-Butylbenzene <0.0057 0.05700.0498 mg/Kg 8760 -135☼ Styrene <0.0023 0.05700.0551 mg/Kg 9770 -140☼ Tert-amyl-methyl ether (TAME)<0.0057 0.05700.0509 mg/Kg 8960 -150☼ tert-Butylbenzene <0.0057 0.05700.0520 mg/Kg 9160 -140☼ Tetrachloroethene <0.0023 0.05700.0533 mg/Kg 9465 -135☼ Toluene <0.0023 0.05700.0509 mg/Kg 8970 -130☼ trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.0023 0.05700.0534 mg/Kg 9470 -135☼ trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.0023 0.05700.0590 mg/Kg 10460 -145☼ Trichloroethene <0.0023 0.05700.0522 mg/Kg 9265 -140☼ Trichlorofluoromethane <0.0057 0.05700.0652 mg/Kg 11455 -155☼ Vinyl chloride <0.0057 0.05700.0515 mg/Kg 9155 -140☼ Isopropyl Ether (DIPE)<0.0057 0.05700.0532 mg/Kg 9360 -150☼ Ethyl-t-butyl ether (ETBE)<0.0057 0.05700.0532 mg/Kg 9360 -145☼ tert-Butyl alcohol (TBA)<0.11 0.285 0.271 mg/Kg 9565 -145☼ p-Isopropyltoluene <0.0023 0.05700.0501 mg/Kg 8860 -140☼ Toluene-d8 (Surr)79 -123 Surrogate 107 MSMS QualifierLimits%Recovery 1074-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)79 -120 105Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)60 -120 Client Sample ID: TP-1 (8-9')Lab Sample ID: 440-72799-1 MSD Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 168634 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.0057 0.05650.0583 mg/Kg 10365 -145020☼ Analyte MSDMSD DUnitResultQualifier %Rec Spike Added Sample Result Sample Qualifier %Rec. Limits LimitRPD RPD 1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.0023 0.05650.0534 mg/Kg 9465 -145120☼ 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.0023 0.05650.0534 mg/Kg 9540 -160230☼ 1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.0023 0.05650.0528 mg/Kg 9365 -140130☼ 1,1-Dichloroethane <0.0023 0.05650.0503 mg/Kg 8965 -135225☼ 1,1-Dichloroethene <0.0057 0.05650.0577 mg/Kg 10265 -135125☼ 1,1-Dichloropropene <0.0023 0.05650.0525 mg/Kg 9365 -135220☼ 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <0.0057 0.05650.0412 mg/Kg 7345 -145930☼ 1,2,3-Trichloropropane <0.011 0.05650.0527 mg/Kg 9350 -150230☼ 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <0.0057 0.05650.0439 mg/Kg 7850 -140830☼ 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <0.0023 0.05650.0516 mg/Kg 9165 -140325☼ 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <0.0057 0.05650.0406 mg/Kg 7240 -150130☼ 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)<0.0023 0.05650.0544 mg/Kg 9665 -140025☼ 1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.0023 0.05650.0471 mg/Kg 8370 -130425☼ TestAmerica Irvine Page 30 of 48 3/14/2014 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 QC Sample Results TestAmerica Job ID: 440-72799-1Client: Terracon Consulting Eng & Scientists SDG: 60147707Project/Site: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) Client Sample ID: TP-1 (8-9')Lab Sample ID: 440-72799-1 MSD Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 168634 1,2-Dichloroethane <0.0023 0.05650.0538 mg/Kg 9560 -150125☼ Analyte MSDMSD DUnitResultQualifier %Rec Spike Added Sample Result Sample Qualifier %Rec. Limits LimitRPD RPD 1,2-Dichloropropane <0.0023 0.05650.0535 mg/Kg 9565 -130020☼ 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <0.0023 0.05650.0493 mg/Kg 8765 -135425☼ 1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.0023 0.05650.0482 mg/Kg 8570 -130225☼ 1,3-Dichloropropane <0.0023 0.05650.0535 mg/Kg 9565 -140125☼ 1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.0023 0.05650.0477 mg/Kg 8470 -130425☼ 2,2-Dichloropropane <0.0023 0.05650.0579 mg/Kg 10365 -150325☼ 2-Chlorotoluene <0.0057 0.05650.0474 mg/Kg 8460 -135225☼ 4-Chlorotoluene <0.0057 0.05650.0497 mg/Kg 8865 -135325☼ Benzene <0.0011 0.05650.0501 mg/Kg 8965 -130020☼ Bromobenzene <0.0057 0.05650.0535 mg/Kg 9565 -140125☼ Bromochloromethane <0.0057 0.05650.0542 mg/Kg 9665 -145025☼ Bromodichloromethane <0.0023 0.05650.0571 mg/Kg 10165 -145120☼ Bromoform <0.0057 0.05650.0577 mg/Kg 10250 -145130☼ Bromomethane <0.0057 0.05650.0527 mg/Kg 9360 -155125☼ Carbon tetrachloride <0.0057 0.05650.0549 mg/Kg 9760 -145125☼ Chlorobenzene <0.0023 0.05650.0502 mg/Kg 8970 -130325☼ Chloroethane <0.0057 0.05650.0432F2mg/Kg 7660 -1503425☼ Chloroform <0.0023 0.05650.0535 mg/Kg 9565 -135120☼ Chloromethane <0.0057 0.05650.0502 mg/Kg 8940 -145125☼ cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.0023 0.05650.0555 mg/Kg 9865 -135125☼ cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.0023 0.05650.0556 mg/Kg 9870 -135225☼ Dibromochloromethane <0.0023 0.05650.0610 mg/Kg 10860 -145225☼ Dibromomethane <0.0023 0.05650.0527 mg/Kg 9365 -140225☼ Dichlorodifluoromethane <0.0057 0.05650.0536 mg/Kg 9530 -160335☼ Ethylbenzene <0.0023 0.05650.0524 mg/Kg 9370 -135125☼ Hexachlorobutadiene <0.0057 0.05650.0333 mg/Kg 5950 -1452235☼ Isopropylbenzene <0.0023 0.05650.0500 mg/Kg 8870 -145425☼ m,p-Xylene <0.0046 0.113 0.108 mg/Kg 9670 -130125☼ Methylene Chloride <0.023 0.05650.0538 mg/Kg 9555 -145225☼ Methyl-t-Butyl Ether (MTBE)<0.0057 0.05650.0527 mg/Kg 9355 -155135☼ Naphthalene <0.0057 0.05650.0443 mg/Kg 7840 -150040☼ n-Butylbenzene <0.0057 0.05650.0401 mg/Kg 7155 -1451030☼ N-Propylbenzene <0.0023 0.05650.0491 mg/Kg 8765 -140425☼ o-Xylene <0.0023 0.05650.0540 mg/Kg 9665 -130125☼ sec-Butylbenzene <0.0057 0.05650.0461 mg/Kg 8260 -135825☼ Styrene <0.0023 0.05650.0548 mg/Kg 9770 -140125☼ Tert-amyl-methyl ether (TAME)<0.0057 0.05650.0515 mg/Kg 9160 -150125☼ tert-Butylbenzene <0.0057 0.05650.0488 mg/Kg 8660 -140625☼ Tetrachloroethene <0.0023 0.05650.0527 mg/Kg 9365 -135125☼ Toluene <0.0023 0.05650.0506 mg/Kg 8970 -130120☼ trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.0023 0.05650.0533 mg/Kg 9470 -135025☼ trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.0023 0.05650.0590 mg/Kg 10460 -145025☼ Trichloroethene <0.0023 0.05650.0536 mg/Kg 9565 -140325☼ Trichlorofluoromethane <0.0057 0.05650.0642 mg/Kg 11455 -155125☼ Vinyl chloride <0.0057 0.05650.0515 mg/Kg 9155 -140030☼ Isopropyl Ether (DIPE)<0.0057 0.05650.0530 mg/Kg 9460 -150025☼ Ethyl-t-butyl ether (ETBE)<0.0057 0.05650.0531 mg/Kg 9460 -145030☼ TestAmerica Irvine Page 31 of 48 3/14/2014 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 QC Sample Results TestAmerica Job ID: 440-72799-1Client: Terracon Consulting Eng & Scientists SDG: 60147707Project/Site: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) Client Sample ID: TP-1 (8-9')Lab Sample ID: 440-72799-1 MSD Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 168634 tert-Butyl alcohol (TBA)<0.11 0.283 0.262 mg/Kg 9365 -145330☼ Analyte MSDMSD DUnitResultQualifier %Rec Spike Added Sample Result Sample Qualifier %Rec. Limits LimitRPD RPD p-Isopropyltoluene <0.0023 0.05650.0467 mg/Kg 8360 -140725☼ Toluene-d8 (Surr)79 -123 Surrogate 108 MSDMSD QualifierLimits%Recovery 1104-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)79 -120 105Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)60 -120 Method: 8270C SIM - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS SIM) Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 440-168256/1-A Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 168890 Prep Batch: 168256 RL Acenaphthene <30 30 ug/Kg 03/11/14 14:4303/13/14 13:041 MBMB Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResultQualifier <30 30 ug/Kg 03/11/14 14:4303/13/14 13:041Acenaphthylene <30 30 ug/Kg 03/11/14 14:4303/13/14 13:041Anthracene <30 30 ug/Kg 03/11/14 14:4303/13/14 13:041Benzo[a]anthracene <30 30 ug/Kg 03/11/14 14:4303/13/14 13:041Benzo[a]pyrene <30 30 ug/Kg 03/11/14 14:4303/13/14 13:041Benzo[b]fluoranthene <30 30 ug/Kg 03/11/14 14:4303/13/14 13:041Benzo[g,h,i]perylene <30 30 ug/Kg 03/11/14 14:4303/13/14 13:041Benzo[k]fluoranthene <30 30 ug/Kg 03/11/14 14:4303/13/14 13:041Chrysene <30 30 ug/Kg 03/11/14 14:4303/13/14 13:041Dibenz(a,h)anthracene <30 30 ug/Kg 03/11/14 14:4303/13/14 13:041Fluoranthene <30 30 ug/Kg 03/11/14 14:4303/13/14 13:041Fluorene <30 30 ug/Kg 03/11/14 14:4303/13/14 13:041Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene <30 30 ug/Kg 03/11/14 14:4303/13/14 13:041Naphthalene <30 30 ug/Kg 03/11/14 14:4303/13/14 13:041Phenanthrene <30 30 ug/Kg 03/11/14 14:4303/13/14 13:041Pyrene 2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr)70 35 -120 03/13/14 13:041 MBMB Surrogate 03/11/14 14:43 Dil FacPreparedAnalyzedQualifierLimits%Recovery 68 03/11/14 14:4303/13/14 13:041Nitrobenzene-d5 30 -120 69 03/11/14 14:4303/13/14 13:041Terphenyl-d14 13 -100 Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 440-168256/2-A Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 168890 Prep Batch: 168256 Acenaphthene 66.7 49.0 ug/Kg 7450 -95 Analyte LCSLCS DUnitResultQualifier %Rec Spike Added %Rec. Limits Acenaphthylene 66.7 47.2 ug/Kg 7148 -99 Anthracene 66.7 53.9 ug/Kg 8154 -106 Benzo[a]anthracene 66.7 56.4 ug/Kg 8552 -109 Benzo[a]pyrene 66.7 53.5 ug/Kg 8054 -110 TestAmerica Irvine Page 32 of 48 3/14/2014 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 QC Sample Results TestAmerica Job ID: 440-72799-1Client: Terracon Consulting Eng & Scientists SDG: 60147707Project/Site: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites Method: 8270C SIM - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS SIM) (Continued) Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 440-168256/2-A Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 168890 Prep Batch: 168256 Benzo[b]fluoranthene 66.7 56.7 ug/Kg 8552 -113 Analyte LCSLCS DUnitResultQualifier %Rec Spike Added %Rec. Limits Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 66.7 48.8 ug/Kg 7350 -125 Benzo[k]fluoranthene 66.7 57.8 ug/Kg 8750 -116 Chrysene 66.7 55.5 ug/Kg 8355 -108 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 66.7 49.5 ug/Kg 7443 -124 Fluoranthene 66.7 55.5 ug/Kg 8354 -115 Fluorene 66.7 55.7 ug/Kg 8353 -102 Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 66.7 47.8 ug/Kg 7248 -121 Naphthalene 66.7 42.7 ug/Kg 6448 -96 Phenanthrene 66.7 52.8 ug/Kg 7953 -107 Pyrene 66.7 60.5 ug/Kg 9151 -104 2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr)35 -120 Surrogate 70 LCSLCS QualifierLimits%Recovery 61Nitrobenzene-d5 30 -120 68Terphenyl-d14 13 -100 Client Sample ID: Matrix SpikeLab Sample ID: 440-71097-A-97-E MS Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 168890 Prep Batch: 168256 Acenaphthene <120 68.8 132F1ug/Kg 19245 -120☼ Analyte MSMS DUnitResultQualifier %Rec Spike Added Sample Result Sample Qualifier %Rec. Limits Acenaphthylene <120 68.8 <120 ug/Kg 9345 -120☼ Anthracene <120 68.8 <120 ug/Kg 8755 -120☼ Benzo[a]anthracene <120 68.8 <120 ug/Kg 8750 -120☼ Benzo[a]pyrene <120 68.8 <120 ug/Kg 7945 -125☼ Benzo[b]fluoranthene <120 68.8 <120 ug/Kg 8645 -125☼ Benzo[g,h,i]perylene <120 68.8 <120 ug/Kg 7025 -130☼ Benzo[k]fluoranthene <120 68.8 <120 ug/Kg 8345 -125☼ Chrysene <120 68.8 <120 ug/Kg 9755 -120☼ Dibenz(a,h)anthracene <120 68.8 <120 ug/Kg 7525 -135☼ Fluoranthene <120 68.8 <120 ug/Kg 8645 -120☼ Fluorene <120 68.8 <120 ug/Kg 7450 -120☼ Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene <120 68.8 <120 ug/Kg 6920 -130☼ Naphthalene <120 68.8 <120 ug/Kg 7240 -120☼ Phenanthrene <120 68.8 <120 ug/Kg 9550 -120☼ Pyrene <120 68.8 <120 ug/Kg 11740 -125☼ 2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr)35 -120 Surrogate 64 MSMS QualifierLimits%Recovery 64Nitrobenzene-d5 30 -120 72Terphenyl-d14 13 -100 TestAmerica Irvine Page 33 of 48 3/14/2014 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 QC Sample Results TestAmerica Job ID: 440-72799-1Client: Terracon Consulting Eng & Scientists SDG: 60147707Project/Site: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites Method: 8270C SIM - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS SIM) (Continued) Client Sample ID: Matrix Spike DuplicateLab Sample ID: 440-71097-A-97-F MSD Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 168890 Prep Batch: 168256 Acenaphthene <120 69.1 <120F2ug/Kg 4545 -12012325☼ Analyte MSDMSD DUnitResultQualifier %Rec Spike Added Sample Result Sample Qualifier %Rec. Limits LimitRPD RPD Acenaphthylene <120 69.1 <120 ug/Kg 8945 -120420☼ Anthracene <120 69.1 <120 ug/Kg 8755 -120025☼ Benzo[a]anthracene <120 69.1 <120 ug/Kg 8750 -120225☼ Benzo[a]pyrene <120 69.1 <120 ug/Kg 8145 -125325☼ Benzo[b]fluoranthene <120 69.1 <120 ug/Kg 8845 -125330☼ Benzo[g,h,i]perylene <120 69.1 <120 ug/Kg 6925 -130130☼ Benzo[k]fluoranthene <120 69.1 <120 ug/Kg 8545 -125230☼ Chrysene <120 69.1 <120 ug/Kg 9655 -120025☼ Dibenz(a,h)anthracene <120 69.1 <120 ug/Kg 6725 -1351130☼ Fluoranthene <120 69.1 <120 ug/Kg 8545 -120025☼ Fluorene <120 69.1 <120 ug/Kg 6950 -120625☼ Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene <120 69.1 <120 ug/Kg 7020 -130230☼ Naphthalene <120 69.1 <120 ug/Kg 6840 -120425☼ Phenanthrene <120 69.1 <120F1ug/Kg 12150 -1202425☼ Pyrene <120 69.1 <120 ug/Kg 11740 -125130☼ 2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr)35 -120 Surrogate 59 MSDMSD QualifierLimits%Recovery 60Nitrobenzene-d5 30 -120 72Terphenyl-d14 13 -100 Method: 8015B - Gasoline Range Organics - (GC) Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 440-168361/35 Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 168361 RL GRO (C4-C12)<0.40 0.40 mg/Kg 03/12/14 02:031 MBMB Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResultQualifier 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)89 65 -140 03/12/14 02:031 MBMB Surrogate Dil FacPreparedAnalyzedQualifierLimits%Recovery Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 440-168361/33 Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 168361 GRO (C4-C12)1.60 1.53 mg/Kg 9570 -135 Analyte LCSLCS DUnitResultQualifier %Rec Spike Added %Rec. Limits 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)65 -140 Surrogate 96 LCSLCS QualifierLimits%Recovery TestAmerica Irvine Page 34 of 48 3/14/2014 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 QC Sample Results TestAmerica Job ID: 440-72799-1Client: Terracon Consulting Eng & Scientists SDG: 60147707Project/Site: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites Method: 8015B - Gasoline Range Organics - (GC) (Continued) Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample DupLab Sample ID: LCSD 440-168361/34 Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 168361 GRO (C4-C12)1.60 1.53 mg/Kg 9670 -135020 Analyte LCSDLCSD DUnitResultQualifier %Rec Spike Added %Rec. Limits LimitRPD RPD 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)65 -140 Surrogate 96 LCSDLCSD QualifierLimits%Recovery Client Sample ID: Matrix SpikeLab Sample ID: 440-72705-A-1 MS Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 168361 GRO (C4-C12)<1.9 7.34 4.83 mg/Kg 6660 -140 Analyte MSMS DUnitResultQualifier %Rec Spike Added Sample Result Sample Qualifier %Rec. Limits 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)65 -140 Surrogate 79 MSMS QualifierLimits%Recovery Client Sample ID: Matrix Spike DuplicateLab Sample ID: 440-72705-A-1 MSD Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 168361 GRO (C4-C12)<1.9 7.02 4.88 mg/Kg 7060 -140130 Analyte MSDMSD DUnitResultQualifier %Rec Spike Added Sample Result Sample Qualifier %Rec. Limits LimitRPD RPD 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)65 -140 Surrogate 82 MSDMSD QualifierLimits%Recovery Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 440-168707/32 Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 168707 RL GRO (C4-C12)<0.40 0.40 mg/Kg 03/13/14 00:451 MBMB Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResultQualifier 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)98 65 -140 03/13/14 00:451 MBMB Surrogate Dil FacPreparedAnalyzedQualifierLimits%Recovery Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 440-168707/30 Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 168707 GRO (C4-C12)1.60 1.52 mg/Kg 9570 -135 Analyte LCSLCS DUnitResultQualifier %Rec Spike Added %Rec. Limits 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)65 -140 Surrogate 105 LCSLCS QualifierLimits%Recovery TestAmerica Irvine Page 35 of 48 3/14/2014 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 QC Sample Results TestAmerica Job ID: 440-72799-1Client: Terracon Consulting Eng & Scientists SDG: 60147707Project/Site: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites Method: 8015B - Gasoline Range Organics - (GC) (Continued) Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample DupLab Sample ID: LCSD 440-168707/31 Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 168707 GRO (C4-C12)1.60 1.52 mg/Kg 9570 -135020 Analyte LCSDLCSD DUnitResultQualifier %Rec Spike Added %Rec. Limits LimitRPD RPD 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)65 -140 Surrogate 104 LCSDLCSD QualifierLimits%Recovery Client Sample ID: Matrix SpikeLab Sample ID: 440-73001-A-1 MS Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 168707 GRO (C4-C12)<0.39 1.55 1.41 mg/Kg 9160 -140 Analyte MSMS DUnitResultQualifier %Rec Spike Added Sample Result Sample Qualifier %Rec. Limits 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)65 -140 Surrogate 104 MSMS QualifierLimits%Recovery Client Sample ID: Matrix Spike DuplicateLab Sample ID: 440-73001-A-1 MSD Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 168707 GRO (C4-C12)<0.39 1.53 1.40 mg/Kg 9160 -140130 Analyte MSDMSD DUnitResultQualifier %Rec Spike Added Sample Result Sample Qualifier %Rec. Limits LimitRPD RPD 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)65 -140 Surrogate 105 MSDMSD QualifierLimits%Recovery Method: 8015B - Diesel Range Organics (DRO) (GC) Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 440-168457/1-A Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 168148 Prep Batch: 168457 RL C13-C22 <5.0 5.0 mg/Kg 03/12/14 08:3803/12/14 13:401 MBMB Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResultQualifier <5.0 5.0 mg/Kg 03/12/14 08:3803/12/14 13:401C23-C40 n-Octacosane 67 40 -140 03/12/14 13:401 MBMB Surrogate 03/12/14 08:38 Dil FacPreparedAnalyzedQualifierLimits%Recovery Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 440-168457/2-A Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 168148 Prep Batch: 168457 C10-C28 33.3 23.3 mg/Kg 7045 -115 Analyte LCSLCS DUnitResultQualifier %Rec Spike Added %Rec. Limits TestAmerica Irvine Page 36 of 48 3/14/2014 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 QC Sample Results TestAmerica Job ID: 440-72799-1Client: Terracon Consulting Eng & Scientists SDG: 60147707Project/Site: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites Method: 8015B - Diesel Range Organics (DRO) (GC) (Continued) Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 440-168457/2-A Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 168148 Prep Batch: 168457 n-Octacosane 40 -140 Surrogate 67 LCSLCS QualifierLimits%Recovery Client Sample ID: Matrix SpikeLab Sample ID: 440-72877-G-1-A MS Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 168148 Prep Batch: 168457 C10-C28 33.2 25.4 mg/Kg Analyte MSMS DUnitResultQualifier %Rec Spike Added Sample Result Sample Qualifier %Rec. Limits n-Octacosane Surrogate MSMS QualifierLimits%Recovery Client Sample ID: Matrix Spike DuplicateLab Sample ID: 440-72877-G-1-B MSD Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 168148 Prep Batch: 168457 C10-C28 33.2 23.6 mg/Kg Analyte MSDMSD DUnitResultQualifier %Rec Spike Added Sample Result Sample Qualifier %Rec. Limits LimitRPD RPD n-Octacosane Surrogate MSDMSD QualifierLimits%Recovery Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 440-168296/1-A ^5 Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 168606 Prep Batch: 168296 RL Antimony <10 10 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:105 MBMB Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResultQualifier <3.0 3.0 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:105Arsenic <1.5 1.5 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:105Barium <0.50 0.50 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:105Beryllium <0.50 0.50 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:105Cadmium <1.0 1.0 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:105Chromium <1.0 1.0 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:105Cobalt <2.0 2.0 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:105Copper <2.0 2.0 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:105Lead <2.0 2.0 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:105Molybdenum <2.0 2.0 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:105Nickel <3.0 3.0 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:105Selenium <10 10 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:105Thallium <1.0 1.0 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:105Vanadium <5.0 5.0 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:105Zinc <1.5 1.5 mg/Kg 03/11/14 15:4703/12/14 14:105Silver TestAmerica Irvine Page 37 of 48 3/14/2014 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 QC Sample Results TestAmerica Job ID: 440-72799-1Client: Terracon Consulting Eng & Scientists SDG: 60147707Project/Site: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) (Continued) Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 440-168296/2-A ^5 Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 168606 Prep Batch: 168296 Antimony 49.3 47.2 mg/Kg 9680 -120 Analyte LCSLCS DUnitResultQualifier %Rec Spike Added %Rec. Limits Arsenic 49.3 48.6 mg/Kg 9980 -120 Barium 49.3 47.8 mg/Kg 9780 -120 Beryllium 49.3 48.3 mg/Kg 9880 -120 Cadmium 49.3 48.4 mg/Kg 9880 -120 Chromium 49.3 47.8 mg/Kg 9780 -120 Cobalt 49.3 51.8 mg/Kg 10580 -120 Copper 49.3 47.5 mg/Kg 9680 -120 Lead 49.3 48.6 mg/Kg 9980 -120 Molybdenum 49.3 50.2 mg/Kg 10280 -120 Nickel 49.3 51.7 mg/Kg 10580 -120 Selenium 49.3 44.2 mg/Kg 9080 -120 Thallium 49.3 48.1 mg/Kg 9880 -120 Vanadium 49.3 49.4 mg/Kg 10080 -120 Zinc 49.3 45.9 mg/Kg 9380 -120 Silver 24.6 24.1 mg/Kg 9880 -120 Client Sample ID: TP-1 (8-9')Lab Sample ID: 440-72799-1 MS Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 168606 Prep Batch: 168296 Antimony <20 49.5 <20F1mg/Kg 3975 -125 Analyte MSMS DUnitResultQualifier %Rec Spike Added Sample Result Sample Qualifier %Rec. Limits Arsenic <6.0 49.5 48.2 mg/Kg 8875 -125 Barium 98 49.5 160F1mg/Kg 12675 -125 Beryllium 2.6 49.5 48.8 mg/Kg 9375 -125 Cadmium <1.0 49.5 44.4 mg/Kg 9075 -125 Chromium 55 49.5 99.3 mg/Kg 8975 -125 Cobalt 14 49.5 62.7 mg/Kg 9875 -125 Copper 28 49.5 75.6 mg/Kg 9575 -125 Lead 33 49.5 76.6 mg/Kg 8775 -125 Molybdenum <4.0 49.5 43.9 mg/Kg 8975 -125 Nickel 57 49.5 107 mg/Kg 10175 -125 Selenium <6.0 49.5 39.1 mg/Kg 7975 -125 Thallium <20 49.5 42.1 mg/Kg 8575 -125 Vanadium 51 49.5 106 mg/Kg 11175 -125 Zinc 71 49.5 114 mg/Kg 8775 -125 Silver <3.0 24.8 21.1 mg/Kg 8575 -125 Client Sample ID: TP-1 (8-9')Lab Sample ID: 440-72799-1 MSD Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 168606 Prep Batch: 168296 Antimony <20 50.3 20.9F1mg/Kg 4275 -125820 Analyte MSDMSD DUnitResultQualifier %Rec Spike Added Sample Result Sample Qualifier %Rec. Limits LimitRPD RPD Arsenic <6.0 50.3 47.3 mg/Kg 8575 -125220 Barium 98 50.3 157 mg/Kg 11875 -125220 Beryllium 2.6 50.3 50.4 mg/Kg 9575 -125320 TestAmerica Irvine Page 38 of 48 3/14/2014 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 QC Sample Results TestAmerica Job ID: 440-72799-1Client: Terracon Consulting Eng & Scientists SDG: 60147707Project/Site: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) (Continued) Client Sample ID: TP-1 (8-9')Lab Sample ID: 440-72799-1 MSD Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 168606 Prep Batch: 168296 Cadmium <1.0 50.3 46.0 mg/Kg 9275 -125420 Analyte MSDMSD DUnitResultQualifier %Rec Spike Added Sample Result Sample Qualifier %Rec. Limits LimitRPD RPD Chromium 55 50.3 106 mg/Kg 10175 -125720 Cobalt 14 50.3 65.3 mg/Kg 10275 -125420 Copper 28 50.3 78.7 mg/Kg 10075 -125420 Lead 33 50.3 67.4F1mg/Kg 6875 -1251320 Molybdenum <4.0 50.3 44.7 mg/Kg 8975 -125220 Nickel 57 50.3 116 mg/Kg 11875 -125820 Selenium <6.0 50.3 39.1 mg/Kg 7875 -125020 Thallium <20 50.3 42.7 mg/Kg 8575 -125220 Vanadium 51 50.3 110 mg/Kg 11875 -125420 Zinc 71 50.3 117 mg/Kg 9375 -125320 Silver <3.0 25.1 21.6 mg/Kg 8675 -125220 Method: 7471A - Mercury (CVAA) Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 440-168610/1-A Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 168805 Prep Batch: 168610 RL Mercury <0.020 0.020 mg/Kg 03/12/14 15:2603/12/14 19:021 MBMB Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResultQualifier Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 440-168610/2-A Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 168805 Prep Batch: 168610 Mercury 0.800 0.870 mg/Kg 10980 -120 Analyte LCSLCS DUnitResultQualifier %Rec Spike Added %Rec. Limits Client Sample ID: TP-1 (8-9')Lab Sample ID: 440-72799-1 MS Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 168805 Prep Batch: 168610 Mercury 0.20 0.816 1.14 mg/Kg 11670 -130 Analyte MSMS DUnitResultQualifier %Rec Spike Added Sample Result Sample Qualifier %Rec. Limits Client Sample ID: TP-1 (8-9')Lab Sample ID: 440-72799-1 MSD Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 168805 Prep Batch: 168610 Mercury 0.20 0.784 0.944 mg/Kg 9570 -1301920 Analyte MSDMSD DUnitResultQualifier %Rec Spike Added Sample Result Sample Qualifier %Rec. Limits LimitRPD RPD TestAmerica Irvine Page 39 of 48 3/14/2014 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 QC Sample Results TestAmerica Job ID: 440-72799-1Client: Terracon Consulting Eng & Scientists SDG: 60147707Project/Site: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites Method: Moisture - Percent Moisture Client Sample ID: TP-1 (8-9')Lab Sample ID: 440-72799-1 DU Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 168287 Percent Moisture 13 12 %720 Analyte DUDU DUnitResultQualifier Sample Result Sample Qualifier LimitRPD RPD TestAmerica Irvine Page 40 of 48 3/14/2014 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 QC Association Summary TestAmerica Job ID: 440-72799-1Client: Terracon Consulting Eng & Scientists SDG: 60147707Project/Site: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites GC/MS VOA Analysis Batch: 168634 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch Solid 8260B440-72799-1 TP-1 (8-9')Total/NA Solid 8260B440-72799-1 MS TP-1 (8-9')Total/NA Solid 8260B440-72799-1 MSD TP-1 (8-9')Total/NA Solid 8260B440-72799-2 TP-2 (8-9)Total/NA Solid 8260B440-72799-3 TP-3 (8-9)Total/NA Solid 8260B440-72799-4 TP-4 (8-9)Total/NA Solid 8260B440-72799-5 SP-5 Total/NA Solid 8260B440-72799-6 SP-6 Total/NA Solid 8260BLCS 440-168634/4 Lab Control Sample Total/NA Solid 8260BMB 440-168634/3 Method Blank Total/NA GC/MS Semi VOA Prep Batch: 168256 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch Solid 3546440-71097-A-97-E MS Matrix Spike Total/NA Solid 3546440-71097-A-97-F MSDMatrix Spike Duplicate Total/NA Solid 3546440-72799-1 TP-1 (8-9')Total/NA Solid 3546440-72799-2 TP-2 (8-9)Total/NA Solid 3546440-72799-3 TP-3 (8-9)Total/NA Solid 3546440-72799-4 TP-4 (8-9)Total/NA Solid 3546440-72799-5 SP-5 Total/NA Solid 3546440-72799-6 SP-6 Total/NA Solid 3546LCS 440-168256/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Solid 3546MB 440-168256/1-A Method Blank Total/NA Analysis Batch: 168890 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch Solid 8270C SIM 168256440-71097-A-97-E MS Matrix Spike Total/NA Solid 8270C SIM 168256440-71097-A-97-F MSDMatrix Spike Duplicate Total/NA Solid 8270C SIM 168256440-72799-1 TP-1 (8-9')Total/NA Solid 8270C SIM 168256440-72799-2 TP-2 (8-9)Total/NA Solid 8270C SIM 168256440-72799-3 TP-3 (8-9)Total/NA Solid 8270C SIM 168256440-72799-4 TP-4 (8-9)Total/NA Solid 8270C SIM 168256440-72799-5 SP-5 Total/NA Solid 8270C SIM 168256440-72799-6 SP-6 Total/NA Solid 8270C SIM 168256LCS 440-168256/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Solid 8270C SIM 168256MB 440-168256/1-A Method Blank Total/NA GC VOA Analysis Batch: 168361 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch Solid 8015B440-72705-A-1 MS Matrix Spike Total/NA Solid 8015B440-72705-A-1 MSD Matrix Spike Duplicate Total/NA Solid 8015B440-72799-1 TP-1 (8-9')Total/NA Solid 8015B440-72799-5 SP-5 Total/NA Solid 8015BLCS 440-168361/33 Lab Control Sample Total/NA Solid 8015BLCSD 440-168361/34 Lab Control Sample Dup Total/NA Solid 8015BMB 440-168361/35 Method Blank Total/NA TestAmerica Irvine Page 41 of 48 3/14/2014 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 QC Association Summary TestAmerica Job ID: 440-72799-1Client: Terracon Consulting Eng & Scientists SDG: 60147707Project/Site: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites GC VOA (Continued) Analysis Batch: 168707 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch Solid 8015B440-72799-2 TP-2 (8-9)Total/NA Solid 8015B440-72799-3 TP-3 (8-9)Total/NA Solid 8015B440-72799-4 TP-4 (8-9)Total/NA Solid 8015B440-72799-6 SP-6 Total/NA Solid 8015B440-73001-A-1 MS Matrix Spike Total/NA Solid 8015B440-73001-A-1 MSD Matrix Spike Duplicate Total/NA Solid 8015BLCS 440-168707/30 Lab Control Sample Total/NA Solid 8015BLCSD 440-168707/31 Lab Control Sample Dup Total/NA Solid 8015BMB 440-168707/32 Method Blank Total/NA GC Semi VOA Analysis Batch: 168148 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch Solid 8015B 168457440-72877-G-1-A MS Matrix Spike Total/NA Solid 8015B 168457440-72877-G-1-B MSDMatrix Spike Duplicate Total/NA Solid 8015B 168457LCS 440-168457/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Solid 8015B 168457MB 440-168457/1-A Method Blank Total/NA Prep Batch: 168457 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch Solid CA LUFT440-72799-1 TP-1 (8-9')Total/NA Solid CA LUFT440-72799-2 TP-2 (8-9)Total/NA Solid CA LUFT440-72799-3 TP-3 (8-9)Total/NA Solid CA LUFT440-72799-4 TP-4 (8-9)Total/NA Solid CA LUFT440-72799-5 SP-5 Total/NA Solid CA LUFT440-72799-6 SP-6 Total/NA Solid CA LUFT440-72877-G-1-A MS Matrix Spike Total/NA Solid CA LUFT440-72877-G-1-B MSDMatrix Spike Duplicate Total/NA Solid CA LUFTLCS 440-168457/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Solid CA LUFTMB 440-168457/1-A Method Blank Total/NA Analysis Batch: 168604 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch Solid 8015B 168457440-72799-1 TP-1 (8-9')Total/NA Solid 8015B 168457440-72799-2 TP-2 (8-9)Total/NA Solid 8015B 168457440-72799-3 TP-3 (8-9)Total/NA Solid 8015B 168457440-72799-4 TP-4 (8-9)Total/NA Solid 8015B 168457440-72799-5 SP-5 Total/NA Solid 8015B 168457440-72799-6 SP-6 Total/NA Metals Prep Batch: 168296 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch Solid 3050B440-72799-1 TP-1 (8-9')Total/NA Solid 3050B440-72799-1 MS TP-1 (8-9')Total/NA Solid 3050B440-72799-1 MSD TP-1 (8-9')Total/NA Solid 3050B440-72799-2 TP-2 (8-9)Total/NA Solid 3050B440-72799-3 TP-3 (8-9)Total/NA TestAmerica Irvine Page 42 of 48 3/14/2014 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 QC Association Summary TestAmerica Job ID: 440-72799-1Client: Terracon Consulting Eng & Scientists SDG: 60147707Project/Site: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites Metals (Continued) Prep Batch: 168296 (Continued) Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch Solid 3050B440-72799-4 TP-4 (8-9)Total/NA Solid 3050B440-72799-5 SP-5 Total/NA Solid 3050B440-72799-6 SP-6 Total/NA Solid 3050BLCS 440-168296/2-A ^5Lab Control Sample Total/NA Solid 3050BMB 440-168296/1-A ^5Method Blank Total/NA Analysis Batch: 168606 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch Solid 6010B 168296440-72799-1 TP-1 (8-9')Total/NA Solid 6010B 168296440-72799-1 MS TP-1 (8-9')Total/NA Solid 6010B 168296440-72799-1 MSD TP-1 (8-9')Total/NA Solid 6010B 168296440-72799-2 TP-2 (8-9)Total/NA Solid 6010B 168296440-72799-3 TP-3 (8-9)Total/NA Solid 6010B 168296440-72799-4 TP-4 (8-9)Total/NA Solid 6010B 168296440-72799-5 SP-5 Total/NA Solid 6010B 168296440-72799-6 SP-6 Total/NA Solid 6010B 168296LCS 440-168296/2-A ^5Lab Control Sample Total/NA Solid 6010B 168296MB 440-168296/1-A ^5Method Blank Total/NA Prep Batch: 168610 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch Solid 7471A440-72799-1 TP-1 (8-9')Total/NA Solid 7471A440-72799-1 MS TP-1 (8-9')Total/NA Solid 7471A440-72799-1 MSD TP-1 (8-9')Total/NA Solid 7471A440-72799-2 TP-2 (8-9)Total/NA Solid 7471A440-72799-3 TP-3 (8-9)Total/NA Solid 7471A440-72799-4 TP-4 (8-9)Total/NA Solid 7471A440-72799-5 SP-5 Total/NA Solid 7471A440-72799-6 SP-6 Total/NA Solid 7471ALCS 440-168610/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Solid 7471AMB 440-168610/1-A Method Blank Total/NA Analysis Batch: 168805 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch Solid 7471A 168610440-72799-1 TP-1 (8-9')Total/NA Solid 7471A 168610440-72799-1 MS TP-1 (8-9')Total/NA Solid 7471A 168610440-72799-1 MSD TP-1 (8-9')Total/NA Solid 7471A 168610440-72799-2 TP-2 (8-9)Total/NA Solid 7471A 168610440-72799-3 TP-3 (8-9)Total/NA Solid 7471A 168610440-72799-4 TP-4 (8-9)Total/NA Solid 7471A 168610440-72799-5 SP-5 Total/NA Solid 7471A 168610440-72799-6 SP-6 Total/NA Solid 7471A 168610LCS 440-168610/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Solid 7471A 168610MB 440-168610/1-A Method Blank Total/NA General Chemistry Analysis Batch: 168287 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch Solid Moisture440-72799-1 TP-1 (8-9')Total/NA TestAmerica Irvine Page 43 of 48 3/14/2014 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 QC Association Summary TestAmerica Job ID: 440-72799-1Client: Terracon Consulting Eng & Scientists SDG: 60147707Project/Site: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites General Chemistry (Continued) Analysis Batch: 168287 (Continued) Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch Solid Moisture440-72799-1 DU TP-1 (8-9')Total/NA Solid Moisture440-72799-2 TP-2 (8-9)Total/NA Solid Moisture440-72799-3 TP-3 (8-9)Total/NA Solid Moisture440-72799-4 TP-4 (8-9)Total/NA Solid Moisture440-72799-5 SP-5 Total/NA Solid Moisture440-72799-6 SP-6 Total/NA TestAmerica Irvine Page 44 of 48 3/14/2014 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Definitions/Glossary TestAmerica Job ID: 440-72799-1Client: Terracon Consulting Eng & Scientists SDG: 60147707Project/Site: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites Qualifiers GC/MS VOA Qualifier Description F2 MS/MSD RPD exceeds control limits Qualifier GC/MS Semi VOA Qualifier Description F1 MS and/or MSD Recovery exceeds the control limits Qualifier F2 MS/MSD RPD exceeds control limits Metals Qualifier Description F1 MS and/or MSD Recovery exceeds the control limits Qualifier Glossary These commonly used abbreviations may or may not be present in this report. ¤Listed under the "D" column to designate that the result is reported on a dry weight basis Abbreviation %R Percent Recovery CNF Contains no Free Liquid DER Duplicate error ratio (normalized absolute difference) Dil Fac Dilution Factor DL, RA, RE, INIndicates a Dilution, Re-analysis, Re-extraction, or additional Initial metals/anion analysis of the sample DLC Decision level concentration MDA Minimum detectable activity EDL Estimated Detection Limit MDC Minimum detectable concentration MDL Method Detection Limit ML Minimum Level (Dioxin) NC Not Calculated ND Not detected at the reporting limit (or MDL or EDL if shown) PQL Practical Quantitation Limit QC Quality Control RER Relative error ratio RL Reporting Limit or Requested Limit (Radiochemistry) RPD Relative Percent Difference, a measure of the relative difference between two points TEF Toxicity Equivalent Factor (Dioxin) TEQ Toxicity Equivalent Quotient (Dioxin) TestAmerica Irvine Page 45 of 48 3/14/2014 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Certification Summary Client: Terracon Consulting Eng & Scientists TestAmerica Job ID: 440-72799-1 Project/Site: Proposed Fairfield Inn & Suites SDG: 60147707 Laboratory: TestAmerica Irvine All certifications held by this laboratory are listed. Not all certifications are applicable to this report. Authority Program EPA RegionCertification ID Expiration Date Alaska CA0153110State Program 06-30-14 Arizona State Program 9 AZ0671 10-13-14 California LA Cty Sanitation Districts 9 10256 01-31-15 California State Program 9 2706 06-30-14 Guam State Program 9 Cert. No. 12.002r 01-23-14 * Hawaii State Program 9 N/A 01-29-15 * Nevada State Program 9 CA015312007A 07-31-14 New Mexico State Program 6 N/A 01-31-14 * Northern Mariana Islands State Program 9 MP0002 01-31-14 * Oregon NELAP 10 4005 01-29-15 USDA Federal P330-09-00080 06-06-14 USEPA UCMR Federal 1 CA01531 01-31-15 TestAmerica Irvine * Expired certification is currently pending renewal and is considered valid. Page 46 of 48 3/14/2014 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 47 of 48 3/14/2014 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Login Sample Receipt Checklist Client: Terracon Consulting Eng & Scientists Job Number: 440-72799-1 SDG Number: 60147707 Login Number: 72799 Question AnswerComment Creator: Freitag, Kevin R List Source: TestAmerica Irvine List Number: 1 TrueRadioactivity wasn't checked or is </= background as measured by a survey meter. TrueThe cooler's custody seal, if present, is intact. TrueSample custody seals, if present, are intact. TrueThe cooler or samples do not appear to have been compromised or tampered with. TrueSamples were received on ice. TrueCooler Temperature is acceptable. TrueCooler Temperature is recorded. TrueCOC is present. TrueCOC is filled out in ink and legible. TrueCOC is filled out with all pertinent information. TrueIs the Field Sampler's name present on COC? TrueThere are no discrepancies between the containers received and the COC. TrueSamples are received within Holding Time. TrueSample containers have legible labels. TrueContainers are not broken or leaking. TrueSample collection date/times are provided. TrueAppropriate sample containers are used. TrueSample bottles are completely filled. N/ASample Preservation Verified. TrueThere is sufficient vol. for all requested analyses, incl. any requested MS/MSDs TrueContainers requiring zero headspace have no headspace or bubble is <6mm (1/4"). TrueMultiphasic samples are not present. TrueSamples do not require splitting or compositing. N/AResidual Chlorine Checked. TestAmerica Irvine Page 48 of 48 3/14/2014 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13