Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015-05-21 e-packet SPECIAL MEETING O OVERSIGHT BOARD FOR THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY P.Q. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, California 94083 CITY HALL LARGE CONFERENCE ROOM, TOP FLOOR 400 GRAND AVENUE THURSDAY, MAY 21, 2015 2:00 P.M. PEOPLE OF SAM MATEO COUNTY You are invited to offer your suggestions. In order that you may know our method of conducting Board business, we proceed as follows: The regular meetings of the South San Francisco Oversight Board for the Successor Agency to the City of South San Francisco Redevelopment Agency are held on the third Tuesday of each month at 2:00 p.m. in the in the Large Conference Room, Top Floor at City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue, South San Francisco, California. In accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.5, any writing or document that is a public record, relates to an open session agenda item, and is distributed less than 72 hours prior to a regular meeting will be made available for public inspection in the City Clerk's Office located at City Hall. If, however, the document or writing is not distributed until the regular meeting to which it relates, then the document or writing will be made available to the public at the location of the meeting, as listed on this agenda. The address of City Hall is 400 Grand Avenue, South San Francisco, California 94080. In compliance with Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the South San Francisco City Clerk's Office at (550) 877-8518.. Notification 48 hours in advance of the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. Chairperson: Selected by: Neil. Cullen Largest Special District of the type in H&R Code Section 34188 Vice Chair: Selected by: Alternate: Michael Krause San Mateo, County Superintendent of Schools Assistant Superintendent, Business Services South San Francisco Unified School District Board Members: Selected by: Mark Addiego Mayor of the City of South San Francisco Councilmember, City of South San Francisco Barbara Christensen Chancellor of California Community College Director of Community/Government Relations, San Mateo County Community College District Reyna Farrales, San Mateo County Board of Supervisors Deputy County Manager, San Mateo County Paul Scannell San Mateo County Board of Supervisors (Public Member) Billy Gross Mayor of the City of South San Francisco Senior Planner, City of South San Francisco Counsel Craig Labadie Advisory: Mike Futrell —City Manager/Executive Director of Successor Agency Jim Steele—Assistant City Manager Richard Lee—Finance Director, City of South San Francisco Alex Greenwood—Director of Economic and Community Development, City of South San Francisco Steve Mattas —City Attorney, City of South San Francisco Krista Martinelli —City Clerk, City of South San Francisco Armando Sanchez—Redevelopment Consultant, City of South San Francisco CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AGENDA REVIEW OVERSIGHT BOARD SPECIAL MEETING MAY 21,2.015 AGENDA PAGE 2 COMMUNICATIONS FROM STAFF PUBLIC COMMENTS Comments from members of the public on items not on this meeting agenda. The Chair may set time limit for speakers. Since these topics are non-agenda items, the Board may briefly respond to statements made or questions posed as allowed by the Brown Act (Government Code Section 54954.2). However, the Board may refer items to staff for attention, or have a matter placed on a future agenda for a more comprehensive action report. MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION 1. Motion to approve the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of February 17, 2015, 2. Resolution approving the amended Long Range Property Management Plan and authorizing the Executive Director to submit it to the California Department of Finance. (Armando Sanchez, Housing Consultant). ADJOURNMENT OVERSIGHT BOARD SPECIAL MEETING MAY 21,2015 AGENDA PAGE t3 H S, G UL,AR MEETING MrNUTES O k u OVERSIGHT BOARD FOR THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, California 94083 CITY HALL LARGE CONFERENCE CE ROOM, TOP FLOOR 400 GRAND AVENUE TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 17, 2015 2:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER Time: 2:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Boardmembers Addiego, Christensen, Gross, Farrales, and Scannell and Chairperson Cullen. Absent: Alternate Vice Chair Alejandro Hogan, PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Recited. AGENDA REVIEW No Changes, COMMUNICATIONS FROM STAFF None. PUBLIC COMMENTS None. MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION 1. Motion to approve the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of January 20, 2015. Chairman Cullen explained modifications to the minutes made by the Clerk of the Board at his request. Motion- Boardmember Addiego/Second - Boardmember Scannell - to approve the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of January 20, 2015 as modified. Approved by the following vote: AYES: Boardmembers Addiego, Christensen, Scannell, Farrales, Gross and Chair Cullen; NOES: None; ABSTAIN: None; ABSENT: Alternate Vice Chair Hogan. 2. Resolution No. 3-2015 approving Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (RODS 15-16A) for the period July through December 2015. (Joe Martin, Sr. Financial Analyst). Finance Director Lee presented the staff report recommending approval of the RODS 15-16A. He advised the City's Successor Agency had approved the ROPE at a Special Meeting on February 11, 2015. He highlighted certain aspects of the schedule, including parts relevant to the Oyster Point Ventures Disposition and Development Agreement and certain bond proceeds. Boardmember Christensen queried the status of the Oyster Point Ventures project against the trigger date for abandonment of the deal. Economic and Community Development Director Greenwood advised the walk away date was mid- 2017. He commented on a recent conversation with the Developer indicating plans for the Development were in process, including a recently approved AC Hotel. Chair Cullen queried why Item 49 was highlighted in red font. Director Lee advised the state Department of Finance had flagged the item in a prior review, which set the template irrespective of resolution. Boardmember Scannell questioned whether another infusion of funds would be required relevant to Oyster Point Ventures, or whether interest would take care of the rest of the obligation. Director Lee advised that less any accrued interest another infusion would be required in the July- September 2015 time frame. Motion- Boardmember Christensen/Second- Boardinember Farrales - to approve Resolution No. 3- 2015. Approved by the following vote: AYES: Boardinembers Addiego, Christensen, Scannell, Gross, and Farrales and Chair Cullen; NOES: None; ABSTAIN: None; ABSENT: Alternate Chair Hogan. ADJOURNMENT Being no further business, Chair Cullen adjourned the meeting at 2:11 P.M. OVERSIGHT BOARD REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 17,2015 MINUTES PAGE 2 Submitted: Approved. 4Boar sta kSanFrancisco Neil Cullen, Chairperson Oversissor Oversight Board for the Successor Agenc Agency to the South San Francisco Redevelopment Agency redevelopment Agency OVERSIGHT BOARD REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 17,2015 MINUTES PAGE 3 H n Redevelopment Successor Agency Oversight Board 0 Staff &eport ATE: May 21, 2015 Members of the Oversight Board FROM: Alex Greenwood, Director of co is and Community Development SUBJECT: ADOPT A RESOLUTION AMENDED PROPERTY ENT PLAN AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO SUBMIT IT TO THE CALIFORNIA EAT ENT OF FINANCE. recommended RECOMMENDATION It is versi ght Board adopt a resolution approving Amended Authorizing Long-Range Property Management Plan (Amended LRPMP) pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34191.5 and to Actions. BACKGROUND On October 30, 2013 and November 12, 2013 the Oversight Board (Board) reviewed the draft Long Range Property age et Plan ( ) and requested several revisions. Pursuant to the Board's direction, staff e various technical changes to the LRPMP. The Board subsequently approved the final draft on November 1 , 2013 recte staff to submit it to California e et of Finance ( ) for approval. The deadline for submitting s was November 30, 2013 and many successor agencies submitted their plans just before the deadline. As a result DOF did not start its review of the South San Francisco Successor Agency's LRPMP for many months. Eventually DOF began its review and for the past year has been asking questions and requesting additional information in support of the submitted . complete list of DOF questions and staff replies is attached as Exhibit 1. Most of DOF's comments and questions related to requests for corrections, clarifications and additional information. oever, DOF did direct the Successor Agency to make the three substantial revisions listed below. The Amended LRPMP, attached s Exhibit A, incorporates 1 of the corrections and changes requested by DOF as well as other it updates and corrections. With Board approval final Amended will be submitted to DOF. DISCUSSION DOF required the Successor Agency to make three substantial revisions to the LRPMP. Two of the revisions are technical and one represents a meaningful deviation from e previous LRPMP. The significant c required is that the City must enter into compensation agreements with the taxing agencies prior to the transfer of properties held for future development. This requirement is addressed in e Amended LRPMP with required language s on e 90. Beyond the three major revisions Staff Report Subject. Amended Long Range Property Management Plan Page 2 of 3 listed below, the result of the question and answer interaction between DOF and staff largely satisfied DOF. The three major revisions are as follows: 1. Enter into Compensation Agreements with the taxing agencies prior tote transfer of properties. Section 34180(f) of the Health and Safety Code requires a successor agency to enter into a compensation agreement with the taxing entities in order to transfer properties held for future development to the City. The Amended LRPMP has been revised for each property transferred to the City for future development to include the following wording: "Pursuant to Section 34191.5(c)(2)(A) and this LRPMP, prior to the transfer of this property, the City and the Taxing Entities will enter into a Compensation Agreement pursuant to Section 34180(l). Each Compensation Agreement shall meet the characteristics described in the Compensation Agreements section of this LRPMP and will be subject to the directives ofDOF in connection with its consideration and approval of this LRMPM. " In addition, for each property held by the City for future development, the section describing the benefits to the taxing agencies will read: "Notwithstanding the financial benefits of development discussed above, the City and the Taxing Entities will enter into a Compensation Agreement pursuant to Section 3418069 as described in the Compensation Agreement section of this LRPMP. " Furthermore, the "Revenue Sharing" section of the LRPMP will be retitled "Compensation Agreements" in the Amended LRPMP and set forth the criteria for drafting the Compensation Agreements (see page 90 of Exhibit A). As the Board may recall, the compensation agreements contain a provision that says proceeds will be distributed to all of the taxing entities on pro-rata basis in proportion to each taxing entity's share of the base property tax revenues. 2. Move 559 Gateway (property #1) from the hold for governmental set the sell category in order to sell it tote City for a nominal fee. The property at 559 Gateway is used as a childcare facility operated by the YMCA and is subject to deed restrictions that limit its uses to public or governmental use. However, the Redevelopment Dissolution Statutes are explicit in defining governmental use as "assets that were constructed and used for governmental purpose, such as roads, school buildings, parks, police and fire stations, libraries, and local administrative buildings." DOF has determined that the property's current use as a childcare center operated by a nonprofit agency does not fit the public use criteria of the Dissolution Statutes. Nevertheless, DOF recognizes that 559 Gateway is restricted by deed to serve a public purpose; therefore, in order to comply with the Dissolution Statutes and the property's deed restriction, the property will be sold to the City.of South San Francisco for a nominal fee of$1 so that the childcare facility can continue operations. Staff Report Subject: Amended Long Range Property Management Plan Page 3 of 3 3. Make expeditious efforts to sell properties at 616, 700 and 915 Linden Avenue. DOF did not support wording in the LRPMP indicating that 616, 700, and 915 Linden Avenue (properties #29-3 1) would be held by the City for an indefinite period of time for redevelopment purposes. The properties at 700 and 915 Linden Avenue are currently used as green lots and 616 Linden Avenue is used as a parking lot. Market conditions have changed significantly since the City's adoption of the Downtown Station Area Specific Plan. Staff now believes it will be feasible to sell these properties in the near future. The Amended LRPMP has been revised to reflect new market conditions. Notwithstanding improved market conditions, the Oversight Board should be aware that the properties continue to suffer from hazardous contamination and that these conditions will affect sale prices of the properties, and/or may require remediation prior to sale. CONCLUSION It is recommended that the Oversight Board adopt a resolution approving the Amended Long- Range Property Management Plan (Amended LRPMP)pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34191.5 and Authorizing Related Actions By: By: Alex Gree e utrell nwood e rell Director of Economic and Executive Director Community Development Attachments: Resolution Exhibit I Table of Contents—DOF Questions and Staff Responses for Each Property Exhibit A—Amended LRPMP RESOLUTION FRANCISCO OVERSIGHT BOARD FOR THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDED LONG RANGE PROPERTY ENT PLAN PURSUANT TO HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 34191.5 ACTIONS Health aey Coe §34191(b)requires the Successor Agency ("Successor Agency")to e former City of out Francisco e evelo et Agency ("Agency")to r e a Long Range Property Management Plan ("Plan")to address the disposition use oft the real property formerly owned by the ency; and the Plan must be submitted to versi t Board forte Successor Agency and to e State Department of Finance ("Department") for approval no later than six months following the issuance to the uccessor Agency of a Finding o letion by the Department; and the Department issued a Finding of letion tote Successor Agency on May , 13; and WHEREAS,the Successor Agency prepared a draft Plan,which was reviewed the Oversight Board and approved on November 1 , 2013 and thereafter timely submitted tot the Department; and based comments received from the Department the uccessor Agency prepared e Property e e t Plan("Amended Plan") incorporating revisions responsive to the Department's comments; and and submitted it o the Oversight ,which reviewed the revisions at special eei on May 21, 15; and the Successor Agency submitted the draft Amended Plan to versi t Board for review; and WHEREAS, the Oversight reviewed considered tha Amended Plan, all written and oral staff reports, and all written and oral public comment relating tote Amended Plan, at a duly-noticed e i l meeting on y 21, 15; and WHEREAS, d the Amended Plan represents the direction of versi t Board with respect to all properties listed in e Amended ; and 2442999.2 WHEREAS, the Amended Plan has been prepared by the Successor Agency and reviewed by the Oversight Board in accordance with the requirements of Health and Safety Code §34191.5. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED that the Oversight Board forte Successor Agency of the City of South San Francisco Redevelopment Agency hereby: 1. Finds that the foregoing Recitals are true and correct and made a part of this Resolution. 2. Finds that the approval of the Amended Long Range Property Management Plan through this Resolution itself does not commit the Successor Agency or the City of South San Francisco to any action that may have a significant effect on the environment and thus does not constitute a"project" subject to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), pursuant to CEQA Guidelines §150 1(b)(3). 3. Approves the Amended Long Range Property Management Plan attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A. 4. Authorizes and directs the Successor Agency to undertake such actions as are necessary to carry out the intent of this Resolution, including transmittal oft e Amended Plan to the State Department of Finance. I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the Oversight Board for the Successor Agency of the City of South San Francisco Redevelopment Agency at a special meeting held on the 221" of May, 2015 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ATTEST: Successor Agency Secretary 2442999.2 2 Exhibit 1 IDOF Questions and Staff Responses for Each Property Table of Contents Property1—559 Gateway Blvd. .............................................................................................................................1 Property2—80 Chestnut Ave................................................................................................................................10 Property10—296 Airport Blvd..............................................................................................................................22 Property11—323 Miller Ave.................................................................................................................................30 Property 13—472 Grand Ave./306 Spruce Ave...................................................................................................33 Property14—468 Miller Ave.................................................................................................................................34 Property 15-18—201-227 Grand Ave...................................................-..............................................................35 Property 1 - 1—200 Linden Ave. and 212-216 Baden Ave..............................................................................44 Property 22-26—315-421 Airport Blvd. and 405 Cypress Ave..........................................................................51 Property27—216 Miller Ave.................................................................................................................................59 Property28—938 Linden Ave................................................ ...............................................................................60 Property29—905 Linden Ave................................................................................................................................61 Property 30-31—616-700 Linden Ave.................................................................................................... .............64 Property32—432 Baden Ave. ...............................................................................................................................68 Notes: 1. This package contains information packages delivered to the California Department of Finance (DOF) over the course of the past year.The information is provided to the Oversight Board exactly as it was provide to DOF.As such some references, such as the reference to the future adoption of the Downtown Station Area Specific Plan (DSASP), are outdated as that plan has now been adopted. 2. Each information packet listed in the Table of Contents first contains the written question and answer text, followed by back up documentation. Because there are sometimes more than one question and answer it on a page,there may be backup behind the question and answer page for several question items. Exhibit 1 Property#1—559 Gateway Blvd. DOF Question: The Plan states the childcare center was deeded to the Agency via the Second Amendment to the Declaration of Covenants,Conditions and Restrictions for Gateway Center,which limits the use of the property. Please provide the relevant pages of this document including the title page,signatory page, and those pages citing the restrictions. Also, please highlight the relevant information. Successor Agency Reply: Please see the attached eight-page Second Amendment, including the title page,the signatory page,and highlighted provisions.See particularly page 3,Section 2.3, "Restrictions on Use of Agency Parcel." 1 Exhibit 1 RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MA11-TO: Boston Properties Four Embarcadero Center Lobby Level, it One San Francisco, CA 94111 ...... Attention: Mr.Rcbert Pester (Sparc Above For Recorder's Use) SECONDAMENDMENT TO DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR GATEWAY CENTER This Secord Amendment to Declaration of Coven��antstions and Restrictions for Gateway Center ("Second Amendment") is made this day of May 2003, by and among GATEWAY CENTER LLC, a Delaware limited- iabeil—ityy company ("Declarant"), BP GATEWAY CENTER LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("BP"), ARE-681 GATEWAY BOULEVARD, LLC., a Delaware limited liability company ("ARE") and the REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, a political subdivision of the State of California(the"Agency"). RECITALS A. WHEREAS, Declarant has previously executed and recorded that certain Declamtion of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions for Gateway Center, dated September 24, 2 recorded October 2, 2000, as Document No. 2000-122882, in the Official Records of the County of San Mateo, California, as amended by that certain First Amendment to Declaration of Covenants, Coiditions and Restrictions for Gateway Center, dated June 25, 2002, and recorded July 3, 2002, as Document No. 2002-129599, in the Official Records of the County of San Mateo,California, (collectively the "Original Declaration"). B. WHEREAS, the Original Declaration encumbers certain real property located in the County of San Mateo, California, more particularly set forth as on Exhibits "A" and "A-1" attached hereto and made a part hereof, and referred to in the Original Declaration as the "Project"; C. WHEREAS, Declarant is currently the owner of that portion of the Project described on Exhijit "B" attached hereto and made a part her (the "Declarant's Parcel"); and D. WH-3REAS, BP is currently the owner of that portion of the Project described on Exhibit "C" attached hereto and made a part hereof(the"BP Parcel"); and E. WH---REAS, ARE is currently the Owner of that portion of the Project described on Exhibit "D" attached hereto and made a part hereof(the"ARE Parcel"); and 557153.02/WLA BOSTON PROPERTIESIGATEWAY CENTER B1006-001/5-28-03/kU&II [South San Francisro] 2 Exhibit 1 F. WEE AS, the Agency is currently the Owner of that portion of the Project described on f)ft "E" attached hereto and made a part hereof(the"' Agency Parcel'); and G. WEE AS, Declarant, BP, ARE and the Agency are the Owners of all of the Parcels in the Project and have the authority to and wish to amend the Declaration on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth; and H. WEE AS, as used herein, the term "Declaration' shall mean and refer to the Original Declaration as further amended by this Second Amendment AGREEMENT NOW,THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration,the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,the Owners hereby amend the Declaration as follows. 1. Definitions. All capitalized terms used in this Second Amendment and not otherwise defined°ierein,shall have the meaning given such terms in the Declarafion. 2. Aaencv Parcel 2.1. Creation of Agency Parcel and Removal of the Agency Building from Common Area. The Owners acknowledge that concurrent with the execution of this Second Amendment,the Agency has acquired title to the Agency Parcel from Declarant. The Owners further acknowledge that the Agency Parcel is currently designated as a Common Area under the Original Declaration. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Declaration,the Owners hereby agree that rpon the recordation of this Second Amendment in the Official Records of the County of San Mateo,California,the entire Agency Building shall be deemed to be removed from the Common Area under the Declaration and that the Agency shall have sole and exclusive use,subject to all the terms and conditions of the Declaration applicable to the Agency Parcel; provided,however,until such time as the Agency Building(as hereinafter defined)is constructed thereon the Agency shall comply with the second,third and fourth sentences of Section 9.7 of the Declaration with respect to the Agency Parcel. The parties further acknowledge that the transfer of the Agency Parcel to the Agency and removal of the Agency Building from the Common Area of the Project results in the Agency Parcel becoming a separate Parcel under the Declaration, subject to all terms and conditions of the Declaration, including,but not limited to,the assessment of Common Expenses against such Parcel and the obligation of the Agency,as the Owner of such Parcel,to pay its Proportionate Share of such Common Expenses in accordance with the terms of fie Declaration,as amended hereby. 2.2. Agency's Proportionate Share. The Agency intends to construct a day care facility(the"Agency Building")which, when constructed,shall contain approximately eight thousand three hur_dred(8,300) Square Feet of occupied space and five thousand(5,000) square feet of fenced,outdoor play area. The Agency and all other Owners hereunder acknowledge and agree that the Proportionate Share of the Owner of the Agency Parcel shall be calculated on such combined Square Footage,thirteen thousand three hundred(13,300) square feet and such figure shall be used to re-calculate the Percentage Share of all Owners of the Project and the Proportionate Shares of the Owners shall be adjusted accordingly,pursuant to Section 7.3.1 of the Declaration and provided further,that,upon completion of the Agency Building,the Agency r Y l 557153.02AVLA BOSTON PROPERUES/GATEWAY CENTER i Bl00b-OD1/5-28-031k"" -2- [South San Francisco] 3 Exhibit 1 Building may be remeasured in accordance with Section 4.9 of the Declaration and the Proportionate Shares of the Owners shall be further adjusted accordingly, if required, as a result of such remeasurement. 2.3. Restriction on Use of Agency Parcel. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Declaration, the Agency Parcel may be used only for(a) the operation of a child day care center which provides professional, supervised child care which is licensed and in compliance with a_l applicable laws and regulations("Day Care Center");(b)a branch public library;or(c)a public office facility which satisfies each and every one of the following requirements(collectively,the"Agency Office Use Requirements") at all times during such public office use: 'i)such public office facility is an amenity to the Project,(ii)such public office facility is compatible and harmonious with a Class A,high-rise office building project, (iii)such public office facility is compatible and harmonious all of the operations and businesses of tenants within the Project, (iv) such public office facility will not have a material adverse effect upon the ability to lease space in the Project as Class A,high rise office space at en market rates,and(v)such public office use does not burden or impose demands upon the available parking for the Project beyond the Agency Parking Area the Non-Exclusive Agency Parking Rights(as those terms are defined below). (a) For purposes of the foregoing Agency Office Use Requirements, an" t i'shall mean a use that professional commercial real estate brokers for Class ,high-rise office building projects would consider as likely to result in greater demand d higher--ents for office space at the Project. e event the Agency and any other Owner are unable to agree at any time as to whether any public office use of the Agency Parcel satisfies the Agency Office Use Requirements,the dispute shall be resolved by arbitration in accordance with Article XM of the of the Declaration. (c) Nothing contained herein shall be deemed or construed to excuse or diminish the obligations of the Agency to comply with all of the other covenants, conditions and restrictions of the Declaration,including,without limitation,the regulation of Improvements in Article Il of the Declaration and the regulation of uses and operations in icle III of the Declaration. 2.4 Ag cy Obligations. The Agency acknowledges that it intends to operate a Day Care Center on the Agency Parcel,and that the Agency has acquired the Agency Parcel without any representation or warranty from any Owner in the Project as to the suitability of the Agency Parcel for use as a Day Care Center,the compatibility of or impact of y other business operated in the t with or on the use of the Agency Parcel as a Day Care Center,or the condition of any Excel within the Project. The Agency acknowledges that it is aware of all Governmental -.2° ets with respect to the operation of a Day Care Center on the Agency Parcel, including,s ifically,but not limited to, any such Governmental e lation relating to Hazardous at °a_s in or around such a facility and child safety requirements with respect to such a facility,and shall assume all obligations with respect to and shall comply with all such Governmental eilations at all times with respect to the operation of such facility on the Agency Parcel. In addition to compliance with all Governmental Regulations,the Agency shall 557153.02 BOSTON CENTER B t 006-001/5-2s-03 -3- [sam srn Friaco] 4 Exhibit 1 at all times mainta-n the Agency Parcel as required and the Declaration, including, specifically, but not limited to the requirements as set forth in Article H of the Original Declaration. For purposes of the Declaration, "Claim"shall include claims, liabilities,penalties, forfeitures, losses or expenses arising in connection with any administrative proceeding,including reasonable attorne:W fees. 3. Exclusive Agency Parking Area. 3.1. Exclusive Parking Use. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the Declaration,the Agency shall be entitled to the exclusive use of ten (10) parking spaces in t:-►at certain area located on Declamt's Parcel, as outlined and designated as the"Agency Parking Area" on Exhibit "F" attached hereto(the"Agency Parking Area"), for parking of motor vehicles(excfu-dingrecreational and of oversized vehicles)and ingress and egress and pedestrian access with respect thereto. The Agency, in its sole discretion,may allow any of its visitors,patrons or invitees to use the Agency Parking Area for purposes of parking motor vehicles(excluding recreational and other oversized vehicles). The Agency shall indemnify,defend(with Counsel selected by Agency and subject to the reasonable approval of Owners and their Mortgagees)and hold Declarant and any other Owner of that portion of Declarant's parcel on which the Agency Parking Lot is located,and their Mortgagees,harmless from any and all claims, liabilities,penalties, forfeitures, losses or expenses(including,without limitation, attorneys fees and costs), or the death of or injury to any person or damage to any property whatsoever,arising from or caused in whole or in part, directly or indirectly,by the use of the Agency Parking Area by the Agency and/or any of its visitors,patrons, invitees,agents, employees or contractors. 3.2. Ownership and Maintenance of Agency Parking Area- Nothing herein shall be deemed to convey any fee ownership interest in the Agency Parking Area to the Owner of the Agency Parcel. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the Declaration, the Agency Parking Area shall be excluded from the defi nition of Common Area and the definition of Parking Areas under the Declaration, so to as the rights of the Agency to the Agency Pax-king Area hereunder remain ins ect. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Declarant shall be responsible for the repair and maintenance of the Agency Parking Area, as though it were a Common Area or Parking Area under the Declaration,in accordance with the terms of the Declaration, and shall include in Common Expenses all costs and expenses with respect thereto is would const--tute Common Expenses under the Declaration if the Agency Parking Area were still a Parking Area and Common Area. 3.3. Certain Rights Regarding Exclusive Parking Area. Notwithstanding anything to the cone ary in this Section 3,the following provisions of the Original Declaration will remain applicable or not be applicable to the Agency Parking Area, as set forth below: (a) The Declarant's right to grant any future exclusive parking rights under Section 5.5.2 of the Original Declaration shall be subject to the rights of the Owner of the Agency Parcel to the Agency Parking Area granted herein. (b) Notwithstanding the exclusion of the Agency Parking Area from the defi nition of Common Area and Parking Areas, the Agency Parking Area shall 557153.02/WLA BOSTON PROPER71ESIGATEWAY CENTER B1006-001/5-28-03/kIYU '4® [South San FmnCISCO] 5 Exhibit 1 remain sub:ect to the beneficial easements set forth in Sections 5.1.1, 5.1.3 and 5.1.4 of the Original Declaration. 3.4. Additional Parking. In addition to the exclusive use of the ten(10)spaces in the Agency Parking Area as set forth in Section 3.1, the Agency and its Permittees shall have the right,which right shall be appurtenant to and for the benefit of the Agency Parcel, in common with othe-s entitled to use the same,to park no more than twelve(12) for vehicles (excluding recreational and other oversized vehicles)within the Parking Areas, as such areas may be changed from time to time for use as parking in accordance with the terms of the Declaration(referred to herein as the "Non-Exclusive Agency Parking Rights"). Such Non- Exclusive Agency'?ar kin g Rights shall be subject to all oft e other terms and conditions of the Declaration, including,without limitation, the rights of Declarant to reserve or otherwise designate certain portions of the Parking Areas or certain parking spaces therein for the exclusive use of certain Own.-rs or Occupants or their respective Permittees and the right of Declarant to control the operation and regulation of the Parking Areas in accordance with Article V of the Declaration. 3.5. Other Parking Areas. In consideration of the grant to the Agency of the exclusive right to use the Agency Parking Area,the Agency shall relinquish and have no further right to use, or permit any of its Permittees to use,the Parking Garage or any other Parking Areas of the Project. The Agency, at its sole cost and expense, shall enforce this provision with respect to any of its visitors,patrons, invitees,agents, employees or contractors, which enforcement shall include,but not be limited to, posting notices in the Agency's building,delivering written notices of the parking restr-'ctions to any occupants,operators,patrons and other parties with respect to the permitted uses of the Agency Parcel and including such restriction in all contracts with any occupants,operators,patrons and other parties with respect to the permitted uses of the Agency Parcel, In the evew.the Agency fails to enforce this restriction, in Declarant's reasonable discretion,Declarant shall have the right t o t ake such enforcement measures as Declarant deems reasonably necessay, (including,without limitation,the right to tow or cause to be towed all vehicles in violatio-i of this provision),and shall have the right to charge all actual costs incurred therefor by Declamat directly to the Agency in accordance with Section 8.9 of the Original Declaration. 4. Traffic Control Plan. Without limiting Declarant's other rights under the Declaration to regu'.ate the Parking Areas and other Common Areas,the Agency and other Owners agree that Declarant may, from time to time,institute and enforce a reasonable plan or prescribe reasonable rules and regulations relating to the manner in which patrons of the Day Care Center drop-o-T and pick-up children from the Day Care Center in order to avoid traffic congestion or unsafe traffic conditions within or around the Project,provided any such plan and/or rules and regulations shall provide uppermost for the safety and well-being of the children utilizing the Day Care Center and shall be consistent with the standards, customs and guidelines for similar child care facilities in the Greater San Francisco Bay Area. The Agency,at its sole cost and expense, sill assist Declarant in enforcing any such drop-off and pick-up plan or rules and regulations, including,without limitation,posting notices in the Agency's Building, delivering written notice to the patrons of the Day Care Center, and including such drop-off and pick-up plan or rale s and regulations in all contracts with any operator and patrons of the Day Care Center. Declarant shall have the right t o t ake such enforcement measures,as Declarant 557153.021WLA BOSTON PROPERTIESIGATEWAY CENTER 111006-001/5-28-03/kIMI -5- [South San Francisco] 6 Exhibit 1 deems reasonably necessary in order to enforce any such plan or rules and regulations implemented for the drop-off and pick-up of children from the Day Care Center. 5. Agency Voting Rights. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Declaration the Agency hereby agrees that any rights that the Agency would otherwise have as an Owner under the Declaration to vote,or to consent to,approve of or disapprove of any matter, including, but not limited to, any further amendment of the Declaration are hereby irrevocably assigned to Declarant,or its successors or assigns,to exercise in its sole and absolute discretion, except with re spec-.to any matters which adversely affect the rights and obligations of the Agency as set forth in this Second Amendment, in which latter event,the consent of the Agency shall be required,provided such consent shall not unreasonably withheld. 6. No:curt her Modification. Except as expressly set forth herein,all terms and conditions of the Original Declaration remain unmodified and full force and effect. 7. CoLntemarts. To facilitate execution,this Second Amendment maybe executed in as many countmarts as may be convenient or required. The signature and acknowledgement of, or on behalf of, each party,or the signature and acknowledgement of all persons required to bind any party,need not appear on each counterpart. Signature pages and acknowledgement pages may be detached f r o m this Second Amendment without impairing the legal effects oft e signature(s)thereon and attached to a counterpart original to form a fully-executed original of this Second Amendment. All counterparts shall collectively constitute a single instrument. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Owners of all oft a Parcels in the Project have executed this Second Amendment as of the day of May, 2003. "Declarant": GATEWAY CENTER LLC, a Delaware limited liability company By: Boston Properties Limited Partnership a Delaware limited partnership Its sole member By: Boston o e Its ge.-- I e a De n r Y: B NF6atP&4Ts4c_ Its: v,-e.#- IN4 a't'4 R42,5.Ora &te 557153.0 LA BOSTON PROPERTIESIGATEWAY CENTER B I 006-00115-28-03/kIl/kil -6- fSouth San Francisco] 7 Exhibit 1 BI Ha BP GATEWAY CENTER LLC, a Delaware limited liability company By: Boston Properties Limited Partnership a Delaware limited partnership Its sole member By: BoAn Proqa.ics, Inc. a 156 i4are corporation Its 1 -r.eral n5r By: N It : a*,z Mv WC.A. a." 557153. BOSTON PROPERTIESIGATEWAY CENTER B1006-001/5-28-03/k]Ykll -7- [South San Francisco) 8 Exhibit 1 "ARE" ARE—681 GATEWAY BOULEVARD,LLC,a Delaware limited liability company By: Alexandria Real Estate Equities, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, managing member By: ARE-QRS Corp. a Maryland corporation, general partner B'y: N T11" 19 ac 71wit"Aftft4- "Agency" REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCIS olitical subdivision of the State f alifo By: Name:. lelu4d A i k,�o, Its: 44-iqeelz/-t, -) subdivision f alifo Approved As To]Form: (,no-rar, ecvzz exi4rzid) St,KnT. M as,AgcnlG eral Co sel 557153.021WLA BOSTON PROPERTIES/OATEWAY CENTER B1006.001/5-28-03/kIlIkil -8- [South San Francisco] 9 Exhibit 1 Property#8—80 Chestnut Avenue DOF Question: Per the LRPMP,there is a building on this site used for the South San Francisco Historical Society. Will this building remain after the proposed transfer? Successor Agency Reply: The building will remain after the property is transferred to the City and will continue to be occupied by the Historical Society until the City can expand the park further or determines to use the building itself. DOF Question: The LRPMP states the property was purchased to expand the park,which is specified in the Orange Memorial Park Master Plan and SF General Plan. Please provide these plans and highlight relevant information for this property. Successor Agency Reply: The first three pages attached are excerpts from the City's General Plan which shows that 80 Chestnut Street is zoned Public/Quasi Public use. Also attached are excerpts from the City's 2007 Orange Master Plan (please note the title is "Draft Master Plan Update" but is in fact the adopted Plan) .As stated in the LRPMP,the City's goal is to expand Orange Park into all of the property's owned by Cal Water. Cal Water decommissions wells intermittently and the City cannot fully plan the expansion of the park based on intermittent property releases.The 2007 Orange Park Master Plan envisions the entire Cal Water site being added to the park, however,the construction plans(page 11)only include the portions of the property Cal Water had already declared surplus at that time. DOF Question: I tried to view this parcel on the San Mateo County Assessor's website. The search did not retrieve the parcel using the parcel#that Agency provided. Do you know why this happened? Successor Agency Reply: The LRPMP incorrectly lists the APN as 011-324-160.The correct number is 011-324-190. Please see attached map. 10 rr a� I I if HUM� fill lie � r � 1D M� w ,H e 111110 eg k; 74� :13 C �vx v p; LLJ 9 .c to Z as to SE s � 7 TP j 7� Aj wn A to C4 4T Cu *r Ix .. ........ 411, w Exhibit 1 off X V Pl- je > V IV U1 4 Air RAF hill, wa Del Vol v V% WOMMU uvs mulwas 13 Exhibit 1 J,x uuuuu uuuuuuuuu a uuu�u V � �I { ? I r ¢ u G � a , f ° Prepared South San-Francisco%7 ✓//�%�' V, „,,,. �I G / HIV 14 Exhibit 1 j DRAFT' MAS�TER PLAN UP'DATE May 31, 2007 prepared for t City of South San Francisco prepared COICallander Ass landscape architectum master planning urban design 15 Exhibit 1 TABLE (DF CONTElts4ITS • •Section Page Executive Summary Site Context History of Orange Memorial Park 1990 Master Plan Summary • Existing Conditions ■ ■Planning Process 5 Overview Project Initiation Site Reconassaince and Analysis ■ Opportunities and Constraints • Program Development Public Outreach, Conceptual Design, and Design Refinement •Master Plan Summary Final Master Plan • Lighting and Artificial Turf Probable Construction Costs 15 Potential Funding Sources 16 Acknowledgements 17 Appendix 18 ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK Master Plan Update 16 Exhibit 1 LIS-r OF FIGURES 1 . Park Location Map 1 2. Aerial of Orange Memorial Park 2 3. Parking Entrance at Chestnut Avenue 6 4. Parking Entrance at Commercial Avenue 6 5. Bridges and Plaza over Colma Creek drainage channel 6 6. Open Turf/Community Event Area a 7. Youth Baseball Fields 9 8. Library/Performing Arts Center Option 10 9. Final Concept 11 '10. Orange Avenue Section 12 11 . Entry Plaza at Orange Avenue Perspective 12 12. Pool Building Perspective 12 13. Sculpture Garden Expansion 12 14. Skate Park Perspective 13 ® Open Turf Area Perspective 14 16. Central Plaza Perspective 14 17. Phasing Diagram 15 ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK Maur Plan Update 17 Exhibit 1 EXECUTI'VE SUMMARY The recent I t and growth within 1 San Francisco combined with recent upgrades and an increase in popularity of Grange Memorial Park create an appropriate opportunity to update the plan.master The intention plan is i vision improvements and to it of reference for securing funding is i in the t r . > > �mwiiMrvrmwm pn"'�" . i i9 � �1VNNU9!"PIIi�J��9�_,c, i iii it:%r ii!iiq%IlJ°Y Site Context Cahna Creek dmmage channel from Orange Avenue Orange is located in is roughly divided into a North side City of South San Francisco side by the Colma Creek drainage Avenue and Chestnut ® - s s channel.The North side of the park contains Camino is i i l the acquired Mazzanti property and Cal Water neighborhoods • properties,which are currently under negotiation commercial i i is for purchase by the city.Both the Mazzanti and approximately 1/2 c i addition Cal Water properties are relatively undeveloped. purchased the i t negotiation Additional r features on the North i include r r I r property,the size i studios,tennis an bocce I , t I increase almost c i recreation of i of combined with its central location center,a smm center and soccer make it i ti widely recreational aiv i c events alike. an empty field previously occupied i AMN MOO pogk 80 i YietntNt + Fwk IL a 9D o w o- -r w 3 Figure 1-Park lac ion map r ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK Maner Plan Update 1 r y � l r X n %/ /r f � '� � /�!!/r<'i�y r,/'��fl%«✓//7'r�,�l�j�,��� r��, �r �/,%%��� '% �l��� ,,l� ���l���������„/, P ('r • ► 017 ( • aim Exhibit PLANNING PRC�CESS Site Reconnaissance and sis Ljj�Td . , Site visits were conducted in December 2006 and purpose January 2007.The f these visits S �0 to familiarize i location, ~° ✓ condition, and context of the site. While at the I site, Callander Associates reviewed xi i relationships between park elements and analyzed the opportunities r i the site. Team members walked the site,talked to park goers, and compiled a photo log of the site.The site was g �� ✓' `t ° � � ,✓.� ��,�!'�'°���(S (�� VIII� 4 �� l fl i✓a' visited ri s times of the y and on t the weekend and weekday to observe the array of Frgure 3-Forking Enhance at Chestnut Avenue activities i ng the different time periods. t and size expansion examined property was all this information was cataloged r use throughout process. Opportunities and y Constraints ` The identified opportunities and constraints development and expansion r Memorial Park determined by the site analysis and city and public input : The 3-5 acre I azzanti property,the 4,.7 acre ✓ Cal Water property, and the artist studios present the three greatest potential areas of expansion. All 3 areas are either undeveloped or under-utilized and when combined would add an extra 9 acres of park space.They are all linked to each other and the Mazzanti and Cal Water properties are the ideal locations for additional sports fields and open ace. Expanding into ld mean rVure 4-ParEng EMance at Commerdal A nue that the 0.6 acres community linked i to connect the park to Commercial . The community be relocated. i st studios could then � O,pportunitieS u Relocation r demolition existing park facilities to improve relationships between park use areas J � >"rgure 5 Bridges and playa over Calma Creek dramoge rhannel 0 Covering a portion of Colma Creek drainage channel to create a stronger l ti i sides between the two improve circulation ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK s Maner Plan Update 0 Exhibit q-&'!ef �.a•... sx at a..4 ber..a. Ifl Nea9 :.m. r"" B :.0^}�::.i.',:NaAR 4':tE r.6,EFl � 6$.3 ���r¢�r• �µ §m FRn+9� 9 ed 80 Chestnut b" nV 'a ) *a•�'-- ww su�ti, u i `� a „.. yt r b I YI;AIa� �nXbg4V�i vL4 w t � b�(� ��lb +4 n a , r - a i Y�Oat 7 • � �6,6ffi a - � e '��� ..�, s +"y�u" VII"�„v r Ilfr a �mwry W a .�.rc na✓ms° �r� .�r z< {^- b ^'� Asti�'a�USS li4 ' ht3FCv.$S m mano Y" 1 u o,. a a ,_. 68as'pT9 -1[CC 6 W 4 ° m ' i y hb$+YL taC'^r9a-& r4t19.][S l'1"t.•i �� dm ,,. � r. ii_A ff PIT Up11 Ap OI AMR.WU yA;t °a pA„t;hG ':i[5�k C%h'Y.Y•— b+.&%b�.:r.4ca& uEbJSt..,)yap—._.a ai W:bA46%E�e ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK Final Concept Figure 9®Final Plan i large open turf soccer c ` i s could be subdivided into numerous c i s of smaller fi s Due to to v design youth cc . The comments of Alternative r of features from cei meeting that alternative were included final ° To regarding size baseball r start off,the bocce ball facilities were renovated addressed fields instead of creating ci i ° s® Trees were for Pee Wee, added around the cc facilities Bronco, t s f ix existing baseball a windbreak and a new shade structure modified proposed renovation; c b fencin& backstops, players from the sun and rain. bleachers, ° large open space/gathering Avenue s retained and the soccer field was The central plaza located over the drainage channel relocated. i tic fields was incorporated into si its favored by the is was integrated into si gn popularity and ability to i i along with i sides fronts.The field layout used in [ l concept In order that parents watch their children also provides maximum flexibility regards to the i picnicking in iti potential use r lighting and artificial turf. The playground was redesigned and expanded. in fenced soccer and baseball fields both could be ii over the channel,three in s and lighting creek crossings included in I designed to meet the needs of a single sport The thus creating r flow and access ORANGE MEMORIAL PARK r► Mager Plan Update 1 Exhibit 1 Property#10—296 Airport Blvd. DOF Question: The LRPMP states the City prepared full plans for the relocation of the Caltrain station and construction work was ready to commence, but was delayed due to planning for the bullet train (pg. 24 and pg. 59), Please provide the plans showing the Caltrain station relocation. Successor Agency Reply: Please see the attached plans showing the location of the proposed entrance to the Caltrain station. In addition attached are excerpts from the Caltrain South San Francisco Station Improvements construction plans showing the western entrance to the station at 296 Airport Blvd. DOF Question: Property map per the Assessor website does not show this parcel. Do you know why? Successor Agency Reply: We queried the property on the Assessor's web site and it produced the parcel map below showing the property. Please try again using the APN 012-338-160 as listed on the summa ry table. 22 H M1 3 fC c .y e m� c tn ' rm R", H Al 4sv CL a x 0 uw " w v a w C N_ LU LL�tLO tn 0 0 %/% % r water % z ®a"' W �V� w v 7 n W z ZZ<2 OC W=,'n 0 � ® w� Mom � re a of tA CD 0 r� r �LU� it k� + v " ���' m•Poia `� Sri w 6 n- n N M d Ln -. J ,(1,, „%y� 'i✓ -,�.a�, / /MI6/ C ,� J ,. fr ✓ l�y" yy W f. r, m , r f� Iffl �r iio N tA � ON v / RI�r / l � f l W1pj -wrl7mwx7 All re // ; �uod�o�ro�„ U 0 Cl) MOM Cl) z z z 0 ^m , J k W m. w I um z W CIA Z > a LU F— 0 (.) z o cc 0 LLJ 5 a' 4, pi 0 ow 0 o Al w, a rw ” 0 Vmiiyrr,��yii ' �q � i r P ff r la i item / "„ II a Wb'k dNd u b n o m w �W Il lid .. iE I� I�i• Ud1 �'tl �tl `! ML nl h� 4 6:. •�£.an I� NNd � 4 g ' ® ®_... . 60\ Ar a II a rcm. miX a:a..�x Iffi EAST GRAM AE ✓ ii//r,iii �/�� /��"°"' w�wb�ww rwww�wrwN�s✓tmlwNyxNi➢{�fr %��''// �� x� 4 ig ESP °� ,°„� < a hu z o g � wn. ® �w f gg ttm mr: P.t 4 3 L ; ulri, A Y X f PT r_�_ o o g - � ° r Va. eP Q�8 gpb �ye } by N_ l�5 a+� c� EAST GRAND eb < �� i;.r .«-,s a„..�_.,�...._w.r�.,.�.o,�a..,.�.�n-.-;r-o�rvr,nw�iN u���rx�wiri�il�N�,➢YAA�97Nimi�D1`77171J1�"�JYr����i���/�J)Y� � n, d d re gig LF RL LI. A 0,5 - g� M --®s If ig -II as gtig 6 a gel i5 OF- ad FH WE 4 d is] f ( —' ��. a f _..-.a•-...�.-....-.^°.�•w��_ ...-r.,_.�,J� ,.,,,. �I ,, „.. 1'� e � ` �x � iii //�� i � f� �$� h r -LAD- Big IS CID If Big Exhibit 1 / / I /ii arrm e t f i % 'J 0, rf, rc ,® / /%i / r��i`... / �r mr t i �, c��msm/'�✓m ,��f wwr, �# Y '"✓ a %;. y l r fir ✓ //, „ r/N� / / /ii; Y rep l r � ✓� . ;� a Xr G y � �' �a� !fir/✓ fT ,�arrrr�l� xra u .Y `� F�{f, u, 1: / ri I r✓, //@P"' a rJ 1 V'" 4,,�;� ""'n SO y frIG a ✓! r G ll� b , ! 11' r� ��P�, / �f j'lip l /� " d m "' ( 1 rr 6«r r M1 $ J ,. r lm n a atlJ'mw OJ` qv r Y JIl w A f p /f ✓i '/� ` e S ° ipn ✓ e k i�� � it ai erfi �. " s " ✓ l i� � rid 6G a "� H r /" r v roc¢r / Vm"" P� m ' ^ �r a,r ✓ m J B ' w 6", I Ii mt h' (s rF, ✓ I'„Ymm NIR�,Y ! Y yl �i re /� C 411 !F Y" �imm iP // d Jr' " naE'i !lYm ci1N(pfiVmF' �fW 'r t j arm , � : �r�' - Cllr ,)/l/ / fir✓, 11l r,r drkf e I'�".IQ b4 r Y Xl✓ ��y�C�� n✓j. �` k� � ytia 4� 'aY xa�!� f mw � / Yr Ai �` , / IJ6�'YP :J! lr !r/ l �r� J rl p F 1 m mdn mnmrw� �mo�mcaGw Wr J y""� �r�q r J,rr u rah' r 'y ll a 1,. U}NI fr%m via 3nJ w Jjr / wu l% r m/ � v N �� i � � 8 "Q An p,Alum % / @ '� 4 I 1 r �' / dY��°��� ' �✓�jiklYY�yI)r'�k �4Y�pntl�-V""" �)�riN Y ��pF" °% ro" ' +��. ,.m.. Yw.w,.�r° ,m r ✓ 1 r .F "" arr fi" C" e" ,/ /l ui c '�.w9 o wl.`d&v Yr �uS %. " Y rE Ac' MYYJdx uv roa, ^ma ,d�4, awm saws ",�✓ w,�a, -, ., ., .,_..w�w Exhibit 1 Property#11—323 Miller Avenue DOF Question: Property was developed with City-owned property as a parking structure and operates under the City's Parking District. Do the City and Agency have a joint agreement supporting the transfer to the City in a case such as this (dissolution of the RDA)? Successor Agency Reply: The Miller Avenue Parking Garage was largely developed on Parking District owned property and a small lot owned by the RDA.The Parking District and RDA did not enter into an agreement to transfer the RDA owned property to the Parking District. It was anticipated that the RDA property would transfer to the City upon the end of Project Area. DOF Question: Is there documentation showing the structure as included in the City's Parking District? If so, please provide these documents. Successor Agency Reply: See the map on the second page of the attached SSF Parking District Brochure showing the Miller Avenue Parking Garage. DOF Question: In the narrative the Agency states this property generates parking revenues,and they are required to cover maintenance and operating costs (pg. 26). Appendix A shows revenues are 0. Please quantify the revenue amount even though the net income is zero. Successor Agency Reply: It is difficult if not impossible to estimate the revenue generated solely by the parking spaces existing over the former RDA property since the garage functions as one project. For the entire Miller Avenue Parking Garage the Parking District has generated$108,000 year-to-date for 2013-14. Of the 255 parking stalls in the garage,approximately 40 stalls sit over the former RDA property(15.6%).A very crude approximation would be 15.6%of revenue totaling$16,900. It should be noted that the Miller Avenue Parking Garage functions at a deficit and the Parking District as a whole must subsidize the Miller Avenue Parking Garage. 2307980.1 3v Iluuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu �, IIIIIIIII � „� IIIIIIIIIIIII IIIVI � �' 09 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII � Ii uuul IIIUUWm z IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ullllll000uuui uul idol f X aluul muuu IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII � III'" d° TIt ILI �I �uuuuuuuu VIII auuuu V� cII .., x ll N' SID CO m L �V a) ) ` d 7 � 'FW .. En 51 10 ED cl P i0 C: Cl V Ll III m 9 u CD E m a,) uNk Z!, " � 1 ',n (D M IIIW t, ;'l u '. uiri 0) M V tM N I. II II w N uu N Il 4"9 "" N # VI II� III .. �k L.„.., ,u...mU M u' :I m o mw �� r JI1N111111111r// CD� 3 / 9 O f l III O �� CD CD I � II,,.. w uuuuuuuuuu ca r' u U ^ N ( � u a M o 615 uumul � :, iV ,.( '' „�m... II'�'ri C n CO O O imlYuuuuu � u”" m u., p U co x co uunnnnnnm �....� .. �.� > U.',ri .;�'7� I' ..,;Nul ,! " ...'"'�" .�..�� ,.I.,,,,,�' ..��. F O CO m 7 O X E Il.u... uuuuu Q"� (.D '�f": -i" 'm ,V:,. Y" 7 d f0 d li .csj a �„�, 8 q� 0.N G") ) � G LL E 0 4E 6. 0 CIA (D CL r c °y LO CAM, Ulm co � ~ P- co Emen U 1- CV ®, L TI- to j 5 #41 0 MfAal no it r '� If t cn anu CLt c zD4 > 1 p i 'rwuw' o,,.,irl r� W 4-1 � �I ULT J aillUGAV � J CU OL li Q.0 Q. fa (g) C ,Y L C o uj co cm O e Exhibit 1 Property#13—472 Grand Avenue/306 Spruce Avenue DOF Question: The LRPM P states this property is the site of a health center operated by the County of San Mateo and Sitike Counseling Services. Please specify funding sources for these services. Successor Agency Reply: The South San Francisco Medical Clinic is part of the San Mateo Health System and is funded by the County of San Mateo. Sitike is a private nonprofit agency and is funded by foundations,the County, the State of California and private individual donations. Exhibit 1 Property#14—468 Miller Avenue DOF Question: The LRPMP states this property serves as the parking lot for the health center. Appendix A and Narrative show parcel#for this property as the same as#13 (012-302-140). However, assessor map in Appendix B shows parcel as 12-301-020. Do you no why the there is confusion regarding this parcel? Successor Agency Reply: The correct APN of the Medical Clinic's parking lot at 468 Miller Avenue is 012-301-020.The LRPMP incorrectly listed APN 012-302-140 is is for 472 Grand Avenue,the Medical Clinic. 34 Exhibit 1 Property#15-18—201-227 Grand Avenue DOF Question: Property is currently a parking lot;however,is part of the Downtown Area Specific Plan for transit- supported development,which was expected to be adopted in early 2014(pg. 75-76). Was this plan adopted? If so, please provide this plan and any relevant staff reports highlighting use specifically of this property. Successor Agency Reply: The City is still working on finalizing the Downtown Area Specific Plan and adoption is now anticipated in August or September 2014. It is anticipated a draft will be available for public comment in the next 30 days. Nevertheless, attached are the internal preliminary draft pages of the DSAP showing the proposed zoning for 201-227 Grand Avenue.This zoning of allow a density of 80-100 units per acre. The Successor Agency is currently in discussions with a developer to enter into an Exclusive Negotiating Agreement(ENA)for the development of 37-55 residential units and 5,000 to 8,000 square feet of retail space on these properties.This development of this site would be contingent upon the adoption of the DSAP with the proposed zoning. DOF Question: in addition,please indicate how you plan to comply with statute relative to a compensation agreement with the taxing entities as specified in blue above (LE., "As section 34180(f)of the Health and Safety Code requires a successor agency to have a compensation agreement with the taxing entities to transfer property for future development,please indicate how you plan to comply with statute.") Successor Agency Reply: Once the Department of Finance has completed its review of the LRPMP,the Successor Agency intends to incorporate all necessary corrections and modifications into the LRPMP and have the Oversight Board review and approve an amended LRPMP. To address Section 34180(f),the Successor Agency will amend the LRPMP as follows: 1) In the introductory Property Disposition section of the LRPMP(page 54),the second paragraph of the section will be amended as follows: For the section discussing the properties that should be retained for implementing the development is of the approved Redevelopment Project Plan,the LRPMP will provide background information that will put into context the information provided for each property or group of properties. I n a ddition for each nrno------transferred a City pursuant to Section 34191.5(c)(2)(A)and this LRPMP,the City and the Taxing Entities will enter into a Compensation Agree n pursuant Section 341 O. Each pensation Agree t shall get the characteristics described in the Revenue Sharing s ion this LRP (page 1)and ill suiec to the directives Fin connection i its consideration and approval of this LRMPM. 1 35 Exhibit 1 2) For each property retained by the City for implementing the development goals of the approved Redevelopment Project Plan, the section "Financial Benefit to the Taxing Agencies,"will be amended as follows: Notwithstanding the financial benefits of development discussed above the City and the Taxing Entities will enter into a Compensation Agreement pursuant to Section 34180(f) as described in the Revenue Sharing section of this LRPMP(page 91). 3) The final section of the LRPMP, "Revenue Sharing,"(page 91)will be amended as follows: Revenue ShaAng City 8f S8Uth SaR FFaReisee the Gity GeuHeil,' the GveRight BOaFd,avvp}arreavte- For each property to be transferred to the City pursuant to Section 34191.5(c)(2)(A)and this LRPMP the City and the Taxing Entities will enter into a Compensation Agreement pursuant to Section 34180(f) Each Compensation Agreement entered into by the City and Taxing Entities shall: A) Address compensation to the Taxing Entities for one or more of the properties that is transferred to the City in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 341915(c)(2)(A)and this LRPMP; B) Be approved by the Oversight Board; C) Be reviewed and approved by DOF. by operation of law or otherwise,following Oversight Board approval; D) Be executed by the City and all of the Taxing Entities as identified by the County Auditor- Controller,and by the County Auditor-Controller if required; E) Provide that specified proceeds from the subsequent disposition of the property or properties by the City pursuant to a DDA will be distributed to all of the Taxing Entities on a pro rata basis in proportion to each Taxing Entity's share of the base property tax revenues as determined by the County Auditor-Controller: F) Provide for the retention by the City of specified proceeds from the subsequent disposition of the property or properties by the City pursuant to a DDA to reimburse the City for the costs incurred for maintenance,improvement and disposition of the property or properties for procurement of pollution legal liability insurance related to the property or properties and for the relocation of any tenants subject Federal and State relocation laws and regulations; G) May contain other mutually acceptable terms to implement the intent of Sections 34180(f)and 34191.5 and this LRPMP with respect to the property or properties. 2 36 Exhibit 1 Notwithstanding the foregoing or any other provision of the LRPMP no Compensation Agreement shall be required,and the City may retain any proceeds from the disposition of a property,if a court order, legislation or DOF policy reverses DOF's directive regarding the need for a Compensation Agreement. In such case,any net disposition proceeds (as defined in Paragraph F above) received by the City for the disposition of a property pursuant to a DDA shall be used by the City to pay costs of one or more projects identified in the Redevelopment Plan. 3 37 43 , �� l / n CL UJ ro Y _ t. o 1 / s o / _ 0 !� CL y��t \'\ sa;a , CL UIE NN m E E l rr� W t ✓ ��i ��., `,�,f' 4..,. l B � _ �ry` °er"�r'ti7 I� �• �.�'�'®9 � Vii'.' �� 4V '�, 9wIgB 171adYry �'1 i W r ow p` J=>m T 0�� wm� om LJL Z' / $ co Z W w fJ w w Z C z n Z ?Z g O = O °Z H w K C C ° w ° U ° U Q O a Z Wy Z O ° O O C = y N Z ° 2 d U °c °c °° %co z � N e uw W W -0 3: 4-1 0 `a_ W 1\.�'I o Q c V C O ar E ® w en i z ev 'O W U C i 1 Z W L �, -Q 4J a C W r6 O Q -O O ti ul O W 't W cr ro L o rn Q W Q V 'y vl O W LJ L +' N C Q W -O ,u O U O U t6 m -0 O LA a C Z C C O C� O C L W W O C V, W �' W > W C V V V Q. W Vr ® > Q C L la w O W _ r L t W C W C N C U W °� s u Q °o ® 3 l7 �C- / a3s■■■, O ao wro L W a C 41 e m W C C — a) `W' u , o °S o aui L f _ _ _ m a r s tn v +� m ° W - o C u !n O.. � W � w W +' �- W W x L L O U (n u •C wn m i N W N W 'l�7 8 o' = O O} _ ` N � t g t m L ® 0 w 41 d d In I. e J +� p E C t O W r6 W m C > L Q ; o W ? c rm a 4 0 ® ` a ro W W 1111 n � fl E W v d- L � W O > -0 N C � 10 O W 1` V = W c L l7 O L m '^ W C ' t °- 41 .- — _ O 'i +r 7 O j ai `'y `L° m -0 s c > �_ W c y N+O, N N +, 17 > 4- a � v ® L m W u 41 rn ,,, X R - W .O en rn 3 r Uw l7 a d 3 2 Cn C7 N E L O _ is ®n NMI, X e s W Pp W W W W C °O c M w _0 O W 4 yh L 3 U C 9C C L ��. e� Z® i L W C > Cq 0 C ® O O L ++ C W W fY■ C ea W W "O eta t ] Q. 3 ® C N N W �`�'".'� H N= ® ® 4- i X c O F ra eon t O L .�&°„ '�9 C W en '°, C r en .0 W W m m 3 W W 1 o o D W o L c m W o °7 W d� 3C J "O C °> `! N C u 7 O1+' W P'I■I�SA rg'�/ _ < W 4' o ._ 0 3 C W ro o ® � c v° t W � �ai ®c oL E O a N U O Jl J■uw --F eu V + LA -O O W L >in W CL n mIn O w O � O -a W P L Q W _ aj i O +' � 3 d n t m > V °� p ru -0® C = W W j 0 a v en O c _v , ® °® W - ® •m 2 J 3 � W c W en u° c ea v w v +, c ® ro > , ® O W N (O N C W ® o Q In C o W � m W ® d N . ® - d✓ n N v r , uvi >. j i� rao !' 9 o / ............. �' y G O M^MI l7Mll° 44 Khoo o �a �. M 3 q/ a ` o N 19 x LLO w,,. �• /fir r z� w ! w / OF IMP e 1 W //0% Q % g � Yfln� ae its. poi, MEN IM ss/ I r r n° / 1 P µ �/% W / CN IN LI 0 Exhibit 1 LRPMP Pages to be Amended rm Property management Pion (this is only for reference) November 19, 2013 e) Revenues Generated by Property/Contractual Requirements The property generates$2,760.15 per year in parking revenues.These funds a re currently being used to offset the cost of operating and maintaining the parking lot. f) Environmental Contamination and Remediation There are no known environmental conditions on the property. g) Potential for Transit Oriented Development and Advancement of Planning Objectives This site is ideal for a smaller scale transit oriented development.The property is located within the downtown and is less than one-half(1/2) mile away from the South San Francisco Caltrain station. Conceptual plans indicate that 12 residential units can be built on the site upon adoption of the Downtown Station Area Plan(DSAP). h) History of Development Proposals and Activity Upon acquisition,the Agency demolished the existing building on the property.The Agency has not considered any other plans to develop the property. However,as stated above,the Agency has created a development program for the property based on the rezoning of the area by the DSAP. Prope,irly Dispositil�,on This part of the LRPMP lists the Successor Agency's,properties under the three applicable permissible categories allowed by the Redevelopment Dissolution Statutes. It begins with a discussion of the properties that are used for governmental purposes and the reason why these properties should retain their present functions.The next section lists the properties recommended for sale.The third section describes the properties that should be retained for the purpose of implementing the development goals of the approved Redevelopment Project Plan. 1)Paragraph to lamended For the section discussing the properties that should be retained for implementing the development goals of the approved Redevelopment Project Plan,the LRPMP will provide background information that will put into context the information provided for each property or group of properties. During the 1990's and 2000's the Agency's redevelopment focus was directed at developing what is arguably the world's premier biotech cluster. Nevertheless,in the few years preceding the dissolution of redevelopment the Agency acquired and assembled a significant amount of land for future development in the El Camino Corridor and Downtown Central project areas. Properties assembled include the former PUC properties,the Ron Price property(1 Chestnut),the Ford properties in the downtown and various other scattered sties.The City also adopted the 1999 General Plan that included plans for intensive development of the Downtown and within Transit Oriented Districts(TOD),adopted area plans for the El Camino Corridor to guide future development,and most recently started the process of developing a specific plan for the downtown (DSAP). 54 41 Exhibit 1 Long Term Property Management Plan November 19, 2013 For the purposes of the analysis, land values for residential and mixed use development near the study area are estimated to range from$50 to$75 per square foot.This price range is based on recent transactions and asking prices for properties in the surrounding area,as well as interviews with brokers and developers active on the San Francisco Peninsula. it should be noted that land prices vary greatly depending on the location and specific characteristics of the property,as well as zoning, intended use and market conditions. 2)Sample paragraph to be amended for each property that is to Financial Benefit to Taxing Agencies be retained by the City it the benefit of the City retaining the properties for future development and the fulfillment of the El Camino Project Area Plan is the most beneficial option for the City,the property,the residents,the region and the State,the financial benefit to the taxing agencies is virtually equal between the two options.As summarized below,and shown in more detail in Appendix H and Table 4,the net financial benefit to the taxing agencies is virtually equal over a 20 year period. Table 4 Nominal Present Value of Cash Flows Cash Flows Sell Option $53,288,000 $41,968,000 Retain for Development Option $61,944,000 $42,607,000 $45,000,000 . ......... $40,000,000 _, ......... $ old $35,000,000 $30,000,000 $25,000,000 'd $20,000,000 'O Sale $15,000,000 $10,000,00 PV Flold 0 $5,000,000 RT W W 0 N V W W 0 0 0 0 0 0 .............................. ftvmtown Central Project Area The goal of the property strategy for the Downtown Central Project Area is to maximize the long-term revenue to the taxing agencies and achieve the redevelopment plan projects it also maintaining the vision expressed in the City's General Plan as well as the Downtown Station Area Specific Plan.The 74 42 Exhibit Long Term Property Management Plan November 19,2013 Revenue Sharing 3)Section to be amended The City and Successor Agency will enter into revenue sharing has been modified to reflect that revenue sharing agreement(Revenue Sharing Agreement)whereby the taxing agencies will receive the net revenue from the sale of each property the City retains for future development.The Revenue Sharing Agreement will be approved by the Board of the Successor Agency of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of South San Francisco the City Council,and the Oversight Board,as applicable, Appendix DOF L R.IIII!°N P uu-opii�T it iw along Worksheet shee : peli i :1111. lnv iii mne° � iimlal Report fmmx !rpt Appendix E 'I`r;Insf&r Grant t Language 1:bi'll iii Gat;:Way Blvd. Appinidix G I'ra.slier Grant II . d IIII :iriigua e for x.72 r;" :knd Av w 6 i"c ^ Ave Appendix Brookwood ii-ou p Memorandum on I ownto°wain P "peliu ie Development 91 Exhibit 1 Property#19-21—200 Linden Avenue and 212-216 Baden Avenue DOF Question: RE#19: Per the LRPIVIP,the two parcels consist of a building occupied by the City's IT dept., and a pkg. lot(pg. 35). The Assessor's website does not accommodate a search for the 13A and 16A shown as suffixes to the parcel#s and a search for the parcel#012-033-334 did not retrieve a parcel. In addition, when I Goo e map the address it shows the IT dept. across the street. Please clarify why the search info does not reconcile with the LRPMP. RE#21:The LRPMP shows this parcel as a parking lot comprising the middle of three contiguous sections for future development(between parcels#19 and#20). However the assessor's website shows this parcel as 200 Linden. Please clarify why the assessor website-searched info does not reconcile with the LRPMP. Successor Agency Reply: RE#19:The correct APN of the 200 Linden Avenue (#19) is 012-334-130.The LRPMP incorrectly listed APN 012-033-334-13A and 13B. RE#21:The correct APN for 216 Baden Avenue(#21) is 012-334-030 and not 012-334-130 which is the APN for 200 Linden. DOF Question: In addition,the assessor's website shows there is an easement in between the two end parcels. Successor Agency Reply: The lots in this area of downtown are 100 feet deep.This can accommodates two uses with each use facing a separate street. in the case of this property,one use would face Baden Avenue and other would face 3rd Lane. We have found that on any lots easements were recorded to ensure that utilities could run from the service location to both ends of the property.The Successor Agency has encountered these types of easements in the past and they do not pose a concern. DOF Question: As with parcels#15-18, 1 will need to see the Plan (DSAP)for the area and any relevant staff reports highlighting use specifically of this property. Successor Agency Reply: The City has published a draft of the Downtown Area Specific Plan (DSAP)and adoption is now anticipated in November 2014.You can access the complete DSAP at hj1p: www.ssfdowinto n iaii ,or _g pj:41. For your convenience,attached are the pages of the //..................................................................... ....... P ........... DSAP showing the proposed zoning for 200 Linden and 212-216 Baden Avenue.This zoning would allow a density of 80-120 units per acre. 1 44 Exhibit 1 The City and former RDA have not advanced development plans for this site to the extent they did for other properties in the downtown. Nevertheless the City has developed conceptual plans for the potential development that could be accommodated on the site. Please refer to attached exhibit titled "Sub-area 1 Baden/Airport Mixed-use District."The subject properties are highlighted as Site 1.1. It is anticipated this site would accommodate 100 residential units and 6,500 square feet of retail space. DOF Question: In addition,please indicate how you plan to comply with statute relative to a compensation agreement with the taxing entities as specified in blue above. Successor Agency Reply: Once the Department of Finance has completed its review of the LRPMP,the Successor Agency intends to incorporate all necessary corrections and modifications into the LRPMP and have the Oversight Board review and approve an amended LRPMP. To address Section 34180(f),the Successor Agency will amend the LRPMP as follows: 1) In the introductory Property Disposition section of the LRPMP(page 54),the second paragraph of the section will be amended as follows: For the section discussing the properties that should be retained for implementing the development goals of the approved Redevelopment Project Plan,the LRPMP will provide background information that will put into context the information provided for each property or group of properties. in addition,for each property transferred to the City pursuant to Section 34191.5(c)(2)(A)and this LRPMP,the City and the Taxing Entities will enter into a Compensation Agreement pursuant to Section 311a0(flL. Each Compensation Agreement shall meet the characteristics described in the Revenue Sharing section of this LRPIMP(page,91)and will be subject to the directives of DOF in connection with its consideration and approval of this LRMPM. 2) For each property retained by the City for implementing the development goals of the approved Redevelopment Project Plan, the section"Financial Benefit to the Taxing Agencies,"will be amended as follows: Notwithstanding the financial benefits of development discussed above the City and the Taxing Entities will enter into a Compensation Agreement pursuant to Section 3410( ) as described in the Revenue Sharing section of this LRPMP(page 91). 3) The final section of the LRPMP,"Revenue Sharing,"(page 91)will be amended as follows: Revenue ShaFing,!:glllllgll&ill;igj:LAgi',eeiTlients The Gity and . AgeRey will eRteF*RtEl Fewenwe ShaFiFig has beeR medified-te- FeflIP-64 that FeveRme ShaFiFig affeement(Reyenwe ShaFiRg AgFeemest)wheFeby the taxiRe,ageRe*e-; reepive the Apt 2 45 Exhibit For each property to be transferred to the City pursuant to Section 34191.5(c)(2)(A)and this LRPMP the City and the Taxing Entities will enter into a Compensation Agreement pursuant to Section 34180(f) Each Compensation Agreement entered into by the City and Taxing Entities shall: A) Address compensation to the Taxing Entities for one or more of the properties that is transferred to the City in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 34191 5(c)(2)(A)and this LRPMP; B) Be approved by the Oversight Board; C) Be reviewed and approved by DOF,by operation of law or otherwise,following Oversight Board approval; D) Be executed by the City and all of the Taxing Entities as identified by the County Auditor- Controller,and by the County Auditor-Controller if required; E) Provide that specified proceeds from the subsequent disposition of the property or properties by the City pursuant to a DDA will be distributed to all of the Taxing Entities on a pro rata basis in proportion to each Taxing Entity's share of the base property tax revenues as determined by the County Auditor-Controller; F) Provide for the retention by the City of specified proceeds from the subsequent disposition of the property or properties by the City pursuant to a DDA to reimburse the City for the costs incurred for maintenance,improvement and disposition of the property or properties for procurement of pollution legal liability insurance related to the property or properties and for the relocation of any tenants subject Federal and State relocation laws and regulations; G) May contain other mutually acceptable terms to implement the intent of Sections 34180(f)and 34191.5 and this LRPMP with respect to the property or properties. Notwithstanding the foregoing or any other provision of the LRPMP, no Compensation Agreement shall be required,and the City may retain any proceeds from the disposition of a property,if a court order, legislation or DOF policy reverses DOF's directive regarding the need for a Compensation Agreement. In such case,any net disposition proceeds (as defined in Paragraph F above)received by the City for the disposition of a property pursuant to a DDA shall be used by the City to pay costs of one or more projects identified in the Redevelopment Plan. 2308077.1 3 M T c: �x L F U wa, evw( �� (• � ; ark � �, � � -c'1-- ��, X eg ,,.". 1 �/ •1 z a W - 0 �s _w ` 5U l! , (, ti �/ rrfwo 10 F �. N ; / z -100 illy wo r �pil alai Ul j v .0 _ <0 ti OL a w d9 LWL IL 7bl! i P ✓G N —— 1 Tf-- _0 m g z N H 3z Y 7i E2 E ti ° w z F � � v ¢ v W c z y H z az _ d v ¢ g v or � v a ° v 221. ®us w � c u 0 v oo 0 Z® c v 4 m 3 = a ® o l7 V v 0- �' -C O = - Q-O Z 0 8 c u a6 M m -0 O a ' m t m v C m C al C an C ® v L Q. `' v j > s 3 t 3 rn o u O +v+ m III� irwrn ® E c c ® °� �—° ° C 0 j f y v to 0 v c v u� c 3 4 o u I mn Q 0. o> "0 . v g. -M 4 � a) it y j r'r y 9 s x x +� L O "O 01 V i O ++ v N a) l7 61++ O = v ro v o ° ^' > 41 f E0 o o a v m � am g tn v , M 41 n E N -E c cn o C o v v I.0 m o y c 0O u C c Q d�E u IE HE nx + �� o' ° u � E a m V �41 + u N '0 v in Q ' u m C C O N EE 00 E Q O L 1(�f�' , v>: r4 v m CL w o E - > - , . f« ° c _ t; m _ m m y c `m 4 1 X_ n c +� E u 2= o i. C C O > w Mn - '_ � '�' ai w 'c v i yn 32 r lh l7 v 0 a 3 °0 2 E tm 4.- 7 -0 h E 41 O °^ RT L O C m 4— L Ol y® ®y v }Oi E •� ///' BAMM3j .cs� _ = v o ,moo .0 9 = m / o = r N > .E 3 0 aim V MX ,ad c = � v m041 ' 3 m o a� j .S �, E � ro m U ® -0 ® z s > —' = c > O c 3 4- = m 41 fa 0 m O x j .a m y O C C 4,u O 3 0 Q v s ® t ® ® Q c r;:nano 0 ® o _ Q v ® v 4j 41 CL as v v E ® cr v O 0 -o C V O 6 mCV ® -o O O a O r - m > N rorapr�ynaaaaaw ego 4, _ °a > c r- E c 2 o 2 an a _ d O ' c . a 3 u ,o 0 �.0 Ln C d ® avi w O m -0 o 2 y > I, to *, 3 c M y v 3 a�a U O d 0 � �0 n 41 V m a d a i". N _ O 1 v O ( c 0- d -0 0 rd ® uo4 V � 3v ' tvmvt `° m r c t m > ® p Q °c > v mro CD L � °0 c 41 41 C N E 4J v w C _ v m 0. X O O �u _ 3 ap 4J n yO v y 0 C p +�®-, m L �} U ® N Q 41 N r" r r/ All +� f r rl // US I L r f Pl� a OFF ,1 �� LL LL LL off .i // �fo r � f %ii, //,//A ao a f� m LU i ' 'OEM //% ro u, �/ %., f���//, i//� ��,', , „/,/iiiiii///ilia /�✓ / /�//////�//��//; w �u (IF ch Nq ilk c J� , _/noa„w Exhibit ca �w IF i a w ,tie. n f /i/ , i� 6/ li r jjj ol lk 5 rii .tl' 3. i i �r u�mrrrry Ill '13 (L 0 50 Exhibit 1 Property#22-26—315-421 Airport Blvd.and 405 Cypress Avenue (See reply for Property#27,a companion to these properties) DOF Question: Property has a vacant building that was formerly an auto dealership. The LRPMP states the Agency has prepared a mixed-use development program for the property via the Downtown Area Specific Plan ( SAP,pg.40). 1 will need to see the Plan and any staff reports... Successor Agency Reply: Please see the attached development program for 315 Airport Blvd.and 401-421 Airport Blvd.As you can see,the development of the sites would accommodate 155 residential units. DOF Question: ...plus please indicate how you will comply with statute relative to a compensation agreement with the taxing entities as specified in blue above. Successor Agency Reply: Once the Department of Finance has completed its review of the LRPMP,the Successor Agency intends to incorporate all necessary corrections and modifications into the LRPMP and have the Oversight Board review and approve an amended LRPMP. To address Section 34180(f),the Successor Agency will amend the LRPMP as follows: 1) in the introductory Property Disposition section of the LRPMP(page 54),the second paragraph of the section will be amended as follows: For the section discussing the properties that should be retained for implementing the development goals of the approved Redevelopment Project Plan,the LRPMP will provide background information that will put into context the information provided for each property or group of properties. in addition,for each property transferred to the City pursuant to Section 3 Compensation Agreement pursuant to Section 34180(f). Each Compensation Agreement shall meet the characteristics described in the Revenue Sharing section of this LRP (page 91)and will e subject to the directives of DOF in connection with its consideration and approval of this LRMPM. 2) For each property retained by the City for implementing the development goals of the approved Redevelopment Project Plan, the section "Financial Benefit to the Taxing Agencies,"will be amended as follows: Notwithstanding the financial benefits of development discussed above the City and the Taxing Entities will enter into a Compensation Agreement pursuant to Section 34180(f) as described in the Revenue Sharing section of this LRPMP(page 91). 3) The final section of the LRPMP,"Revenue Sharing," (page 91)will be amended as follows: 51 Exhibit 1 Re've:1111:1110 Sharing For each property to be transferred to the City pursuant to Section 34191.5(c)(2)(A)and this LRPMP the City and the Taxing Entities will enter into a Compensation Agreement pursuant to Section 34180(f) Each Compensation Agreement entered into by the City and Taxing Entities shall: A) Address compensation to the Taxing Entities for one or more of the properties that is transferred to the City in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 341915(c)(2)(A)and this LRPMP; B) Be approved by the Oversight Board; C) Be reviewed and approved by DOF, by operation of law or otherwise following Oversight Board approval; D) Be executed by the City and all of the Taxing Entities as identified by the County Auditor- Controller,and by the County Auditor-Controller if required; E) Provide that specified proceeds from the subsequent disposition of the property or properties by the City pursuant to a DDA will be distributed to all of the Taxing Entities on a pro rata basis in proportion to each Taxing Entity's share of the base property tax revenues as determined by the County Auditor-Controller: F) Provide for the retention by the City of specified proceeds from the subsequent disposition of the property or properties by the City pursuant to a DDA to reimburse the City for the costs incurred for maintenance improvement and disposition of the property or properties for procurement of pollution legal liability insurance related to the property or properties and for the relocation of any tenants subject Federal and State relocation laws and regulations; G) May contain other mutually acceptable terms to implement the intent of Sections 34180(f)and 34191.5 and this LRPMP with respect to the property or properties. Notwithstanding the foregoing or any other provision of the LRPMP, no Compensation Agreement shall be required,and the City may retain any proceeds from the disposition of a property, if a court order, legislation or DOF policy reverses DOF's directive regarding the need for a Compensation Agreement. In such case,any net disposition proceeds(as defined in Paragraph F above) received by the City for the disposition of a property pursuant to a DDA shall be used by the City to pay costs of one or more projects identified in the Redevelopment Plan. DOF Question: The LRPMP shows the purchase cost of parcels#22-27 as one combined amount. Do you have information to determine individual amounts by parcel? 2 52 Exhibit 1 Successor Agency Reply: The total acquisition price for the properties was$8,743,000,slightly higher than their appraised value of$8,114,000.The former RDA purchased the properties in one transaction so specific values were never attributed to individual sites. Nevertheless, RDA's appraisal had estimated values for each property.These individual value estimates were not entered into the summary spreadsheet but were included in the text narrative for each property. For your convenience,the appraised values for each property from the text section are listed below: #22-315 Airport Blvd. $2,100,000 #23-401 Airport Blvd. $1,100,000 #24-411 Airport Blvd. $995,000 #25-421 Airport Blvd. $1,800,000 #26-405 Cypress Ave. $719,000 7-216 M i Her Ave. $1,400,000 Total: $8,114,000 3 53 �+^�N�ro�' �P h u�i'v)h�. S 7• �� a K I�R F.B@�6. � ^ � `� a CpCp gg � C QO�PGO A pn O'd'f �C h n,� �f F O B Ir —ugg s„ •, ffix b, its: 'LL^ At. „ /o 22 ERE K IS INS/�l llama j `✓ ;. M/% r� / / C `� ` / m 3 a) CIS ca w w U Z 0 Cl) rezrr Affi/. c r- ±.. ice,;, %; to r � Q � Q m is to CD Al j r IM I r r %"m ell, /Jrl��Ig j l��i j��/N'a'i0➢ E § § } 6 / § k « = t = § ) \ } f f } ( a a co \ ] � {y < TFITIT _ \ \J \"?iffy, \ tm � \ .. .z ; . 3 „ � � � R" IT S e. \ . .�- : < � \ CL m 0 0 0 p o o Q m LL 0 0 d m m m C m Co m N C m yl ,I yl C.)I m cl) U J p 7 p 7 C7 H � ui. J fill fl l ..................... . 57 \ /e % < k k § \ d f= a t §§ § 2 _ $ _ ! a\ � } : �\Q ED k \ \ / Cl) \ ) /) \ D / (\ ? \ ^ ^ � \{ 2w �mmaw � | | I C \ � G w . I | I I I I I | I %dddd | /y lumo, � �`� Exhibit 'l Property#27—216 Miller Avenue (See reply for Property#22-26,a companion to this property) DOF Question: Property is a vacant lot and has been identified in the LRPMP for sale. The LRPMP states sale proceeds will go to advance the development of the properties per the Redevelopment Plan(pg.90). Per Section 34191.5(c)(2)of the Health and Safety Code,the proceeds should be identified as for distribution to taxing entities or to fulfill an enforceable obligation. Please identify one of these two uses for the proceeds. Successor Agency Reply: This property was originally listed in the LRPMP as property to be sold.Successor Agency staff is having preliminary discussions with a developer interested in acquiring this property and those listed as#22-26 (the former"Ford Properties").The developer initially approached the Successor Agency with an interest in only purchasing properties#22-25(315,401,411 and 421 Airport).The developer was not interested in#26(405 Cypress)and#27 (216 Miller) because they were smaller and difficult to develop. The Successor Agency indicated it would consider an exclusive negotiation for properties#22-25 if the developer agreed to purchase and develop all of the former Ford Properties, including#26-27. By leveraging the value of the larger sites,the Successor Agency will be able to sell and have all of the sites developed. Therefore,during the process of amending the LRPIVIP to address DOF questions,the Successor Agency will propose to the Oversight Board that Property#27, be transferred from "Sale"to"Retain for Future Development"and that pursuant to Section 34191.5(c)(2)(A)and the LRPMP,the City and the Taxing Entities will enter into a Compensation Agreement pursuant to Section 34180(f). Alternative If the Oversight Board and DOF do not agree to having the City retain the property for future development and entering into a compensation agreement,then the Successor Agency will: 1) Determine a means to include Property#27 as part of the combined former Ford properties sale and assign an individual value to the Property. 2) Per Section 34191.5(c)(2)of the Health and Safety Code, upon sale of the Property,the Successor Agency will distribute the proceeds to the taxing entities on a pro rata basis in proportion to each Taxing Entity's share of the base property tax revenues,as determined by the County Auditor-Controller. 2308139.1 59 Exhibit 1 Property#28—938 Linden Avenue DOF Question: Use of sale proceeds(Per Section 34191.5(c)(2)of the Health and Safety Code,the proceeds should be identified as for distribution to taxing entities or to fulfill an enforceable obligation. Please identify one of these two uses for the proceeds.) Successor Agency Reply: Per Section 34191.5 (c)(2)of the Health and Safety Code,upon sale of the Property the Successor Agency will distribute the proceeds to the taxing entities on a pro rata basis in proportion to each Taxing Entity's share of the base property tax revenues,as determined by the County Auditor-Controller. 1 60 Exhibit 1 Property#29—905 Linden Avenue DOF Question: The property was formerly a Beacon gas station,and is now a green space. The LRPMP designates the property for Future Development,yet it is not identified as in part of a redevelopment plan. The LRPMP states there were conceptual plans for a mixed-use housing development(pg. 50). How formal were these plans? Please provide. Successor Agency Reply: Unfortunately the concept plans for this site were created well before the Redevelopment Agency acquired the property in 1999 and we are no longer in possession of those plans.As shown on the attached map,the plan had been to assemble the blighted properties that included the gas station at 905 Linden,the adjacent car wash and the small market next door. Unfortunately,905 Linden was the only property the Redevelopment Agency was able to acquire. Nevertheless,the development potential of assembling these sites still exists and would result in the best outcome for the property.As shown in page 86 of the LRPMP,the market for single small properties such as 905 Linden is not very good at this time. DOF Question: Also the Agency must indicate they have a compensation agreement with the taxing entities as specified in blue above. Successor Agency Reply: Once the Department of Finance has completed its review of the LRPMP,the Successor Agency mtends to incorporate all necessary corrections and modifications into the LRPIVIP and have the Oversight Board review and approve an amended LRPMP. To address Section 34180(f),the Successor Agency will amend the LRPMP as follows: 1) In the introductory Property Disposition section of the L (page 54),the second paragraph of the section will be amended as follows: For the section discussing the properties that should be retained for implementing the development goals of the approved Redevelopment Project Plan,the LRPMP will provide background information that will put into context the information provided for each property or group of properties. In addition, or each property transferred,to.the City pursuant to Section 3 Entities will enter into a Compensation Agreement pursuant to Section 34180(f). Each Compensation Agreement shall meet the characteristics described in the Revenue Sharing section of this LRPMP (page 91) and will be subject to the directives of DOF in connection with its consideration and approval of this LRPMP. 2) For each property retained by the City for implementing the development goals of the approved Redevelopment Project Plan, the section "Financial Benefit to the Taxing Agencies,"will be amended as follows: 1 61 Exhibit 1 Notwithstanding the financial benefits of development discussed above the City and the Taxing Entities will enter into a Compensation Agreement pursuant to Section 34180(f) as described in the Revenue Sharing section of this LRPMP(page 91). 3) The final section of the LRPMP,"Revenue Sharing,"(page 91)will be amended as follows: For each property to be transferred to the City pursuant to Section 34191.5(c)(2)(A)and this LRPMP the City and the Taxing Entities will enter into a Compensation Agreement pursuant to Section 34180(f) Each Compensation Agreement entered into by the City and Taxing Entities shall: A) Address compensation to the Taxing Entities for one or more of the properties that is transferred to the City in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 34191 5(c)(2)(A)and this LRPMP: B) Be approved by the Oversight Board: C) Be reviewed and approved by DOF, by operation of law or otherwise following Oversight Board approval: D) Be executed by the City and all of the Taxing Entities as identified by the County Auditor- Controller,and by the County Auditor-Controller if reauired: E) Provide that specified proceeds from the subsequent disposition of the property or properties b i the City pursuant to a DDA will be distributed to all of the Taxing Entities on a pro rata basis in proportion to each Taxing Entity's share of the base property tax revenues as determined by the County Auditor-Controller: F) Provide for the retention by the City of specified proceeds from the subsequent disposition of the property or properties by the City pursuant to a DDA to reimburse the City for the costs incurred for maintenance, improvement and disposition of the property or properties for procurement of pollution legal liability insurance related to the property or properties and for the relocation of any tenants subject Federal and State relocation laws and regulations; G) May contain other mutually acceptable terms to implement the intent of Sections 34180(f)and 34191.5 and this LRPMP with respect to the property or properties. Notwithstanding the foregoing or any other provision of the LRPMP no Compensation Agreement shall be required,and the City may retain any proceeds from the disposition of a property,if a court order, legislation or DOF policy reverses DOF's directive regarding the need for a Compensation Agreement. In such case,any net disposition proceeds (as defined in Paragraph F above)received by the City for the disposition of a property pursuant to a DDA shall be used by the City to paw costs of one or more projects identified in the Redevelopment Plan. 2319404.1 2 62 u. r i / M (fl Ln r u r v r i � l i Exhibit 1 Property#30-31—616-700 Linden Avenue DOF Question: The LRPMP states the best use of this property is to combine it with#31 for a mixed-use housing development,for which the Agency prepared conceptual plans. See#29 above regarding this use. (From#29:The LRPMP states there were conceptual plans for a mixed-use housing development. How formal were these plans? Please provide.) Successor Agency Reply: The properties at 616 and 700 Linden Avenue have substantial environmental contamination and would need to be substantially developed to overcome the cost of the environmental remediation. However, the lots are relatively small and can only accommodate moderate densities. For these reasons,the City and the former RDA did not advance development plans for these sites to the extent they did for other properties in the downtown.The City then and now envisions these properties as being among the last to be developed.Once other downtown development opportunity sites have been developed and rent/sale prices have risen significantly,these properties may become economically viable.The development potential of these sites is shown in the attached exhibit,Linden Corridor Mixed-use. As shown for site 4.1 in the attached exhibit,each property could accommodate a building with approximately 20 units. DOF Question: Also the Agency must indicate they have a compensation agreement with the taxing entities as specified in blue above. Successor Agency Reply: Once the Department of Finance has completed its review of the LRPMP,the Successor Agency intends to incorporate all necessary corrections and modifications into the LRPMP and have the Oversight Board review and approve an amended LRPMP. To address Section 34180(fl,the Successor Agency will amend the LRPMP as follows: 1) In the introductory Property Disposition section of the LRPMP(page 54),the second paragraph of the section will be amended as follows: For the section discussing the properties that should be retained for implementing the development goals of the approved Redevelopment Project Plan,the LRPMP will provide background information that will put into context the information provided for each property or group of properties. In addition, for each property transferred to the City pursuant to Section 311.5(c)(2)(Ajcn this LRP P,the City and the Taxing Entities will enter into a Compensation Agreement pursuant to Section 34180(f). Each Compensation Agreement shall meet the characteristics described in the Revenue Sharing section of this LRPMP(page 91)and will be subject to the directives of DOF in connection with its consideration and approval of this LRPMP. 64 Exhibit 2) For each property retained by the City for implementing the development goals of the approved Redevelopment Project Plan, the section"Financial Benefit to the Taxing Agencies,"will be amended as follows: Notwithstanding the financial benefits of development discussed above,the City and the Taxing Entities will enter into a Compensation Agreement pursuant to Section 34180(f)as described in the Revenue Sharing section of this LRPMP (page 91). 3) The final section of the LRPMP,"Revenue Sharing,"(page 91)will be amended as follows: O ng C ) nsatJo rg ]IIIg Gaty Of c....+tic,., graR..:...e the Gity Ge uRe" and the OyeMigh+BeaFd plie-able For each property to be transferred to the City pursuant to Section 34191.5(c)(2)(A)and this LRPMP,the City and the Taxing Entities will enter into a Compensation Agreement pursuant to Section 34180(f). Each Compensation Agreement entered into by the City and Taxing Entities shall: A) Address compensation to the Taxing Entities for one or more of the properties that is transferred to the City in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 34191.5(c)(2)(A)and this LRPMP: B) Be approved by the Oversight Board; C) Be reviewed and approved by DOF, by operation of law or otherwise,following Oversight Board approval; D) Be executed by the City and all of the Taxing Entities as identified by the County Auditor- Controller,and by the County Auditor-Controller if required: E) Provide that specified proceeds from the subsequent disposition of the property or properties by the City pursuant to a DDA will be distributed to all of the Taxing Entities on a pro rata basis in proportion to each Taxing Entity's share of the base property tax revenues,as determined by the County Auditor-Controller; F) Provide for the retention by the City of specified proceeds from the subsequent disposition of the property or properties by the City pursuant to a DDA to reimburse the City for the costs incurred for maintenance, improvement and disposition of the property or properties,for procurement of pollution legal liability insurance related to the property or properties and for the relocation of any tenants subject Federal and State relocation laws and regulations: G) May contain other mutually acceptable terms to implement the intent of Sections 34180(f)and 34191.5 and this LRPMP with respect to the property or properties. 2 65 Exhibit 1 Notwithstanding the foregoing or any other provision of the LRPMP no Compensation Agreement shall be required,and the City may retain any proceeds from the disposition of a property,if a court order, legislation or DOF policy reverses DOF's directive regarding the need for a Compensation Agreement. In such case any net disposition proceeds (as defined in Paragraph F above) received by the City-for the disposition of a property pursuant to a DDA shall be used by the City to pay costs of one or more proiects identified in the Redevelopment Plan 2319405.1 3 66 r . OWN oil NOR r g s oil p " � 1 Aa / r / r r r %i 11. a ,G /` r /��/iii//% A- r' fA OF IWO I fl r / ijl no Al to f am my i 1 i r r rnimf 111, co OF ar, % / k u /i / / r r �J rmvumn 'IY t /! r /fsrnnrrrr, r %�j / r iii iirw, ma II r r i / r r r 4 I nw,�lnn r / /A i IMa ` 67 Exhibit 1 Property#32—432 Baden Avenue DOF Question: Use of sale proceeds(Per Section 34191.5(c)(2) of the Health and Safety Code,the proceeds should be identified as for distribution to taxing entities orto fulfill an enforceable obligation. Please identify one of these two uses for the proceeds.) Successor Agency Reply: Per Section 34191.5(c)(2) of the Health and Safety Code, upon sale of the Property the Successor Agency will distribute the proceeds to the taxing entities on a pro rata basis in proportion to each Taxing Entity's share of the base property tax revenues,as determined by the County Auditor-Controller, 1 68 iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillilillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillililllillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillI Amended Lon g Range Property Management Plan iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiillillillillillillilliillillillillillilliillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillilllI Successor Agency to the South San Francisco Redevelopment Agency iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiillillillillillillilliillillilillillillillillillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillilliilililI May 21, 2015 iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliilliillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilI Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 Table of Contents Introduction—........... ........... ....... .-...........--.........................--.—....................... .'-'�—.----�--�-'-1 Property Inventory................ —_—_......—... ........................... —_...................... ........... — ......... --..4 GatewayProject Area.........--- ................ _ ......... ...... .... ....................— .... ................ —..............4 1. S59 Gateway Blvd........... .............. ---- ................ —_...... ..............................._— ........ 4 B Camino Corridor Project Area ...... ....... — ..........................--_— ........... ......... .......... .......... --6 2-6. Former �PUCPnopertics— ........--.................................. ............................... ...... ...... .... 11 7. 1 Chestnut Avenue....... .................-- ........ ..............._—_................. ....................... ......15 8. 80 Chestnut Avenue..... --- .......... --- .................... ---'_--_---_—__—_—_16 Downtown Central Project Area -- ..... ............................. ----......... ..........................----�18 9, 480 North CanaL.................................... ... ... ........................................................ .............. .22 10L396 Airport Blvd. ............... ................... ............................... .................. ...... ..................._2] 11. 323 Miller Avenue..... —... ............... ........................---... .................. ...................... ......2S 12. 356 Grand Avenue............... ............. ......... ........................... ...—.... ................................l7 11 472GrandAvenue/3U6 Spruce Avenue........ ..................-- ................... —_................... .2Q 14. 468 Miller Avenue ....... — ....... — ... ... ....................... _ ..................... --- ...........— ...38 15. 201 Grand Avenue_-- .... .... ...........................--_ .................. .............__ .......... .... .31 16. I07 Grand Avenue.................... ...---...................... — ........ .......................................... .33 17-18. 217-219Gramd Avenue and 227 Grand Avenue..... ...... ...... ............... — .......... ........... .34 19. 2OO Linden Avenue—..... ..........—_— .................. ...... -- ..................... — .....................—]D 20L212 Baden Avenue _---........ ... .... ................. —_— .............. ............ .......................37 21. 21G Baden Avenue --- ..... ............._—....... ..... .... ............ .......................... — .......... _39 FordProperties............. .......-- .................... ....... — ......................................— ........................ ...4Q 22� 3l5 Airport Blvd, ......_.................... — ............. ............ .................................... —...............41 23. 401 Airport Blvd. ................. ............................. .................. ......................... ...................42 24. 411 Airport Blvd. ................... .............. ...._ .... ..... ..................................... — ............... ...43 25. 421 Airport BIlvd. ....... ................................ — ...... ........ ........ ................. ..........................—44 26` 4U5 Cypress Avenue........................_... .... ........ .................... ......— ...... .....................—....45 27, 216 Miller Avenue........... .............. ........ ......................---...................... ........ ..... ........46 28. 938 Linden Avenue...........................----.................................. ... .... ........ ......... .... ....47 29, 9Q5 Linden Avenue,.... .................... __....................... .................................. ......... .........48 30. G1G Linden Avenue—.... ...........--_—.................. ...... ... ......---..... .... ........................5O 31. 70O Linden Avenue ...................---............................. ...................... ..............................S2 32. 432 Baden Anenue/429 Third Lane.............. ........... — ................ .............................—... ....53 PropertyDisposition...---........................ ..................... ......---..... ................................... ............... 55 Permissible Use Category: Government Use ................ ........ ...... ............ .................. --- ..........S7 EI Camino Corridor Project Area...... ....................— .....---.............—....... ................ ................. —57 4-5. Former PU[ Properties Q93-331-0B0/O93-331'UG0..... ......... ......... ... ...... .................. .....57 8. 8Q Chestnut Avenue..... ..... ......... ......_—......... .......... ... ... ................. ........................ ....58 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 32, 2O15 9. 48O North CanaL----- .............................. ...... .......... ................... —_------_—_-59 10. 296 Airport Blvd. ---- ......... ...................................... — .................. ....... ...... ...... —58 11. 323 Miller Avenue........----.........----.............. ......—.... ......................_--- ...............61 12. 356 Grand Avemue—.......... .......--...... ....................-------------------.61 13-14. 472 Grand Avenue/306 Spruce Avenue and 468Miller Avenue .........-------..........62 Permissible Use Category: Sale............. ........... ... ... _......................... ........ .....................................63 Gateway Project Area....................... .............. — ...... —..................... ....................... ........... ..........6] 1. 558 Gateway Blvd_........................... ...----...................................................... .................... 63 Downtown Central Project Area .............................. ........................... ........ ................... .............. 64 28. 938 Linden Avenue.... ......................... ...... .......................................... ............... ...............64 32. 482 Baden 4vemme/429 Third Lane..... ... ... .... .......................... ............................... —_-64 27. 216 Miller Avenue (former Ford site) _-- ..... ............. ......----................ ... ..............6S Permissible Use Category: Approved Redevelopment Project Plan................. ..... ........ ................ —.66 E| Camino Corridor Project Area ....................................... ...... ............ ......... ............. ............ ... —G7 2'3, 6-7. 1 Chestnut Avenue and Former PUC Properties.......... --- ....... — ...........................68 Downtown Central Project Area .......... .......................... ..... ...........................................................75 15-18' 2U1, 207 217-Z1y' and 227 Grand Avenwe_...--...................... — ...... — .................—.7G 19'21. 200 Linden Avenue and 21Z and 216 Baden Avemua---........ — .... .............. -- ...... 78 22. 315 Airport Blvd, ....................... ................ ..... ... ............. ................... ........ ----.........8U 23-25. 401, 411 and 421 Airport Blvd................. .......................... — ...................... ........._........8Z 2& 405CypressAvenue--_---------_-------_---_----------_-84 29, 905 Linden Avenue........................................ ............... ----------_--------�5 30'31. 61G and 7OO Linden Avenue........ ------..................................... -- ......... ..........�87 Conclusion.... ........ .................... — .... ............... --_—.................. ............................. .......... -- ....... 88 Designation of Land us not "surplus property......... — .......................... ........................ ......... ....... 88 Guidelines for the Development ofPrnperdes_— .... .....................--........ —... ...... _............... .....@8 Use mf Sales Proceeds....... ... .......... .......... .......................... .....--- ............. — .......................... .....89 Compensation 4greenoent ........ — .......... ... ............... .................. ......... — ... ................................yO Appendices..................... ----- ................ ............................. ....... ................ ........................... .........91 Appendix A—D8FLRPMP Property Tracking VVorksheet— ... — .... ........ ............................... ...........91 AppendixB—Property Parcel Maps......... .............. ................. ..... —................................._ ..... ......91 Appendix C—Appraisal O11-]26-O3OhChestmmt/E| Camino Real) Excerpt ...... ................ ...................91 Appendix U—Environmental Report Excerpts.......... — ........................—.....................— .................. 91 Appendix E—Transfer Grant Deed Language for 559 Gateway Blvd-- ..................---................ ....91 Appendix F—Transfer Grant Deed Language for Public Use Pruperhes— .............. ....---...................91 Appendix G—Transfer Grant Deed Language for 472 Grand AveJ3O6 Spruce Ave.................... ....._-92 Appendix H —Property Tax Increment Projections........................ ...... .......... ... ......... .....................g1 Appendix |—Strategic Economics S5F ECHO U Study ofPUC Properties...............—........ ..........----91 Appemdh/J—BrnokxwoodGromp &WemoramdumonDovvntowmPrmpertiexDeve|opmemt-------91 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 Introduction This document constitutes the Long-Range Property Management Plan (LRPMP) of the Successor Agency (Successor Agency) of the former Redevelopment Agency of the City of South San Francisco (Agency). The LRPMP was prepared in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 34191.5 pursuant to ABx1 26 (as amended by AB 1484) (collectively, Redevelopment Dissolution Statutes). The Redevelopment Dissolution Statutes govern the disposition of the former Agency's real property. Pursuant to the Redevelopment Dissolution Statutes, the housing properties were transferred to the City of South San Francisco (City) and the non-housing properties were transferred to the Successor Agency. The Successor Agency is now responsible for disposition of the non-housing properties. The Redevelopment Dissolution Statutes required successor agencies to undergo two detailed Due Diligence Reviews (DDRs) to determine unobligated fund balances available for transfer to the affected taxing entities. Upon a successor agency's completion of these requirements, including any required payment of fund balances, outstanding tax entity passthrough obligations and residual payments, as applicable, the State Department of Finance (DOF) issues a Finding of Completion (FOC). The Successor Agency is required to submit to DOF the LRPMP within six months of the issuance of the FOC. The Successor Agency received its FOC on May 24, 2013; thus the LRPMP is due to DOF by November 24, 2013. Upon approval by the Oversight Board and DOF, the LRPMP governs and supersedes all other provisions relating to the disposition and use of the former Agency's real property assets. At the time of its dissolution, the Agency owned 32 non-housing parcels of real property. The properties are located within the boundaries of the Gateway, El Camino Corridor and Downtown-Central Project Areas (see Figure A).The properties are subject to the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan, the City of South San Francisco General Plan and the City's zoning and land use regulations as set forth in City codes and ordinances. The properties in the El Camino Corridor Project Area are also subject to the El Camino Chestnut Area Plan. The properties in the Downtown-Central Project Area are subject to the Downtown Station Area Specific Plan (DSASP)which was adopted on January 28, 2015. In accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 34191.5(c), Part I of the LRPMP contains an inventory of specified information related to each of the Successor Agency owned properties. The property inventory is grouped by project area in the following order: Gateway, El Camino Corridor and Downtown Central. The following information is required for each of the Successor Agency owned properties: a) Acquisition Information b) Purpose of Acquisition c) Parcel Data d) Estimate of Current Value e) Revenues Generated by Property/Contractual Requirements f) Environmental Contamination and Remediation g) Potential for Transit Oriented Development and Advancement of Planning Objectives h) History of Development Proposals and Activity 1 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 Part II sets forth the proposed plan for the disposition and uses of each of the properties. The Redevelopment Dissolution Statutes dictate that properties must be categorized for disposition in one of the following ways: 1. Use Property to Fulfill Enforceable Obligation; 2. Retention of Property for a Governmental Use; 3. Retention of Property for Future Development; or 4. Sale of Property. Part II of the LRPMP identifies the proposed disposition category for each property owned by the Successor Agency. In Part II, the property inventory is grouped first by disposition category, then by project area. Many of the Agency's properties were acquired for the purpose of assembling parcels into large developable lots in order to advance the Redevelopment Plan's goals. In such cases the disposition strategy will discuss assembled parcels jointly. Finally, in this LRPMP, the Successor Agency has not categorized any properties under the Fulfillment of Enforceable Obligations category; it has designated all properties into the remaining three categories. The LRPMP includes several appendices that provide background information that contributed to the preparation of this report or that provide supplemental information. Included in the appendices are Appendix A, the optional DOF tracking worksheet. Appendices B — J provide back up and supporting documentation discussed throughout the report. 2 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 3 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 Property Inventory The Agency owns one property in the Gateway Project Area, 559 Gateway, which is currently used as a childcare center. This section provides all of the required information regarding this property and its proposed disposition. 1. 559 Gateway Blvd. On May 28, 2003 the Agency acquired approximately 0.7 acres from Boston Properties for construction of the Gateway Childcare Center. The acquisition of the property was consistent with the South San Francisco General Plan (adopted in 1999) and the Gateway Redevelopment Plan for the Project Area as it furthered the Plan's goals of providing affordable childcare to the residents of the City and employees of businesses within the project area. The 30,330 sq. ft. lot includes an 8,300 sq. ft. Childcare Center building and a 5,000 sq. ft. fenced outdoor play area. a) Acquisition Information Based on Restrictive Covenants transferring the property from Boston Properties to the Agency and the recorded deed, the Agency parcel may only be used for: a) operation of a child day care facility; b) a public library; c) a public office facility as an amenity to the property. The Agency elected to build a C' f childcare center. Upon construction of the Childcare Center, Boston Properties deeded this parcel to the Agency by means of a Second Amendment to Declaration of 559 Gateway Blvd. Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions for Gateway Center (Restrictive Covenants). On May 28, 2003 the Agency Board adopted Resolution 03-2003 accepting the conveyance. Since the Agency is not a direct service provider, it leased the property to the Peninsula Family YMCA to operate the childcare center. Several easements are provided for in the Restrictive Covenants, including easements across and upon the property for utilities, parking,vehicular access, signage and maintenance. 4 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 b) Purpose of Acquisition The Agency acquired the parcel per the Second Amendment to Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions for the purpose of construction of a childcare center. The childcare center was to serve residents of the City and employees of businesses within the project area. Boston Properties conveyed the property to the Agency for$0; the property was conveyed as a condition of development for Boston Properties' development. C) Parcel Data 559 Gateway, APN 015-024-490: This is an irregular shaped parcel (see Appendix B) consisting of 30,330 sq. ft. (0.7 acre) and measures roughly 230 feet by 158.5 feet.The parcel is zoned Gateway Specific Plan with a General Plan designation of Business Commercial. d) Estimate of Current Value There are no current estimates for the value of the land as it was conveyed to the Agency for $0 and is restricted to public use.Therefore, it has value as a public facility but not for commercial use. e) Revenues Generated by Property/Contractual Requirements The Peninsula Family YMCA has a 25 year lease that is renewable in 2029. The annual rent for the property is waived in order to allow the YMCA to provide childcare subsidies. The Agency, however, must pay the Gateway Property Owners Association fees of$500 per month. f) Environmental Contamination and Remediation There are no known environmental conditions on the property. g) Potential for Transit Oriented Development and Advancement of Planning Objectives This property advances the Gateway Redevelopment Plan by providing affordable childcare to residents and employees of businesses within the project area.The property is restricted in its uses and cannot be redeveloped into transit oriented housing. However, the site benefits from regional employee shuttle services, operated by both Genentech and the Congestion Management Relief Alliance, which allow employees to use the Caltrain and BART stations. The program complies with the City Transportation Demand Management Ordinance and the General Plan. h) History of Development Proposals and Activity The property was developed into a childcare facility in compliance with Restrictive Covenants conveying the property to the Agency. The property is leased to the Peninsula Family YMCA. No other proposals or activity have been considered for this property. 5 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 The Agency owns seven parcels in the El Camino Corridor Project Area (see Figure B). These parcels are grouped into three property assemblages based on their acquisition history and proposed uses: • Former PUC properties— Five parcels that were purchased from the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (PUC) for future development as mixed-use, transit oriented development and open space. • 1 Chestnut Ave— This parcel was purchased to augment the development potential of the former PUC properties. • 80 Chestnut— This parcel was purchased from Cal Water in order to expand the Orange Memorial Park. This section provides all of the required information regarding these properties. It begins with a description of the Agency's key goals and objectives from the El Camino Corridor Redevelopment Plan and Five-Year Implementation Plan. These properties were purchased to achieve the goals and objectives outlined in the El Camino Corridor Redevelopment Plan and Five-Year Implementation Plan as described below. The El Camino Corridor Project Area was adopted in 1993 and amended to add area in 2000. El Camino Real (State Route 82) was the first highway and automobile route through the San Francisco peninsula. Spanning almost two miles in South San Francisco, the El Camino corridor is the City's most diverse area in terms of land use, and serves as a major neighborhood commercial center for the City. Commercial uses such as hotels, fast food restaurants, and shopping centers predominate. All but one of the City's neighborhood shopping centers is located in the corridor. Residential uses, offices and service commercial uses are located in small pockets. In addition, the area contains the Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, the County Government Center, Costco, and the South San Francisco BART station. The original Redevelopment Plan for the El Camino Corridor Project Area lists the following goals and objectives of the community redevelopment program in the El Camino Corridor Project Area, which serve as governing objectives for the property disposition program for this area:' 1. The elimination and prevention of the spread of blight, non-conforming uses and deterioration and the conservation, rehabilitation and redevelopment of the Project Area in accord with the General Plan,future specific plans, the Plan and local codes and ordinances, as they now exist or may hereafter be amended. 2. The achievement of an environment reflecting a higher level of concern for architectural, landscape, urban design and land use principles appropriate for attainment of the objectives of the Plan and the General Plan, as they now exist or may hereafter be amended. 'Redevelopment Plan for the El Camino Corridor Area with 1st amendment ord 1150-94,p.3 6 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 3. The control of unplanned growth by guiding revitalization, rehabilitation and new development in such fashion as to meet the needs of the Project, the City and its citizens. 4. The reduction of the City's annual costs for the provision of local services to and within the Project Area. 5. Increased sales, business licenses and other fees, taxes and revenues for the City. 6. The promotion of new and continuing private sector investment within the Project Area to prevent the loss of and to facilitate the increase of commercial sales activity. 7. The creation and development of local job opportunities and the preservation of the area's existing employment base. B. The development of a spectrum of housing types affordable to various segments of the community in a manner consistent with the Housing Element of the General Plan and the provisions of the Redevelopment Law, as they now exist or may hereafter be amended. 9. The elimination or amelioration of existing substandard condition, including substandard vehicular circulation and parking systems, inadequate infrastructure, insufficient off-street parking,and other similar public deficiencies adversely affecting the Project Area. 10. The assistance in undergrounding of BART through the project Area to ensure that the Project Area meets its full development potential upon the removal of existing blighting conditions. Furthermore, the 2000 Redevelopment Plan Amendment included the following relevant goals for the El Camino Corridor Project Area:2 e. Control of unplanned growth by guiding revitalization, rehabilitation and new development in such a fashion as to meet the needs of the Second Amendment to the Plan, the City of South San Francisco and its citizens. i. Promotion of new and continuing private sector investment within the Second Amendment Area to prevent the loss of and to facilitate the increase of commercial sales activity. k. Development of a spectrum of housing types affordable to various segments of the community in a manner consistent with the Housing Element of the General Plan and the provisions of the Redevelopment Law. z The Second Amendment to Redevelopment Plan for the El Camino Corridor Area Ord.1270-00,pp.3-4 7 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 I. Carrying out or providing for the carrying out of redevelopment In the Second Amendment Area in the interest of the general welfare pursuant to Health and Safety Code Sections 33020 and 33021, including planning, development, replanning, redesign, clearance, reconstruction, and provision of those residential, commercial, industrial, public or other structures or spaces as may be appropriate, including recreational and other facilities incidental or appurtenant to them, alteration, improvement, modernization, reconstruction or rehabilitation of existing structures, provision for open-space types of use such as streets and other public grounds and space around buildings, public or private buildings, structures and improvements, and improvement of public or private recreation areas and other public grounds. Based on these goals and objectives, the Agency has undertaken public infrastructure, public facility, economic development, property acquisition, and affordable housing activities in the El Camino Corridor Project Area. The City and Agency expanded the City's largest park, Orange Memorial Park by creating a linear park that connects the BART station to the original park. Redevelopment also supported the Specific Plan process for high density, transit-oriented development (TOD) in the BART station area and has helped catalyze mixed-used development in that area. Five-Year Implementation Plan The Five-Year Implementation Plan describes the goals and objectives for redevelopment activities in each of the project areas (based on the goals and objectives in the respective Redevelopment Plans) and presents specific programs and expenditures that would be undertaken. For the El Camino Corridor Project Area, the Implementation Plan states the following goals and objectives that are directly relevant to the development of properties that are owned by the former redevelopment agency (excerpted from pages 1-7 to pages 1-8 of the Implementation Plan):3 • Eliminate and prevent the spread of blight, non-conforming uses and deterioration and conserve, rehabilitate and redevelop the Project Area in accordance with the General Plan,future specific plans, the Plan and local codes and ordinances. • Achieve an environment reflecting a higher level of concern for architectural, landscape, urban design and land use principles appropriate for attainment of the objectives of the Plan and the General Plan. • Control unplanned growth by guiding revitalization, rehabilitation and new development in such fashion as to meet the needs of the Project, the City and its citizens. • Promote new and continuing private sector investment within the Project Area to prevent the loss of and to facilitate the increase of commercial sales activity. 3 See page I-7 to I-8,South San Francisco Redevelopment Agency,Five-Year Implementation Plan,FY 2009/10-FY 2013/14. 8 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 • Develop a spectrum of housing types affordable to various segments of the community in a manner consistent with the Housing Element of the General Plan and the provisions of the Redevelopment Law. • Eliminate or ameliorate existing substandard conditions, including substandard vehicular circulation and parking systems, inadequate infrastructure, insufficient off-street parking, and other similar public deficiencies adversely affecting the Project Area. • Present and create civic, cultural and educational facilities and amenities as catalysts for area revitalization. • Upgrade and expand recreational areas and open space. • Develop more east-west crossings on El Camino Real that connect the City's neighborhoods, and a continuous parallel street on the eastside to provide alternative travel routes. • Encourage development of a mix of uses, with pockets of concentrated activity that provide focus and identity to the different parts of El Camino Real. • Develop the South San Francisco BART station area as a vital pedestrian-oriented center, with an intensity and mix of uses that complement the area's new role as a regional center. • Increase opportunities for regional and neighborhood commercial uses • Extend Centennial Way along BART alignment and create east-west connections between El Camino and the neighborhoods. • Enhance pedestrian and bicycle connectivity around existing facilities such as Kaiser, Orange Memorial Park and the Municipal Services Building as well as new public facilities such as a new library. • Make improvements along Colma Creek Canal, including bank improvements, landscaping and removal of chain link fencing. 9 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 10 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 2-6. Former PUC Properties APN 093-312-050, 093-312-O60, 093-331-050, 093-331-060 and 011-326-030 Following the purchase of the former PUC properties, the City embarked on preparing an area wide plan for the northerly portion of El Camino Real between Chestnut Avenue and the SSF BART station. The central aim of the plan is to develop the area into a vibrant high density mixed-use neighborhood allowing for improved auto access as well as attractive and accessible bicycle, pedestrian and open space connections. Located in the geographic heart of South San Francisco, the former PUC properties were acquired by the Agency in order to redevelop them into new mixed-use, transit-oriented developments that would create a vibrant Transit Village district within South San Francisco. The properties are advantageously located at the City's busiest crossroads at Chestnut Avenue and El Camino Real. They are located in close proximity to the South San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) Station and the City's Transit Village Zoning District just north of the properties. The properties are also near key public amenities including Orange Memorial Park, the Centennial Way pedestrian and bike trail and the Municipal Services Building. The properties are adjacent to the right-of-way for the underground BART. h r ,.7i��r�l�r ,'/ / ���//I✓r� r�ii/rri/r r� /� r �1 ��. ) r 1 ��/� ,'� �i^;%.f�i, ('l✓raj rr�/� ���������'H/"'r �h�l ����r� r �///�i� ,��ji � '„ �,. ���r,/�" /�/ �,,;/� r/r�,��/rlJ�r� �fl�///l�✓iii///rirj���'% I���fl`f� i// ����� „rk i,,,,, -/i�///O%2>�i111alrL��,firr��i/y�Y//////✓!'i/L�%!i,,//,�f/� ���,,!,//%11u (��' Y11 PUC Properties The PUC properties are currently vacant, offering the opportunity to structure development, connections and open space in an integrated manner. Centennial Way—a bicycle and pedestrian trail within the Colma Creek and BART rights of-way that run through the length of the site —will be extended along the portion of the BART right-of-way between Chestnut Avenue and Colma Creek. This trail network will provide an important direct connection between the South San Francisco BART Station to the north and Orange Memorial Park to the south. Pedestrian and bicycle paths will connect new development and surrounding neighborhoods to the Centennial Way spine. Buildings, parks, and plazas will be oriented to the open space network to maximize access to and visibility of these amenities. 11 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 a) Acquisition Information In March 2006, the Agency Board approved a Purchase and Sale Agreement between the Agency and the City and County of San Francisco (CCSF)/San Francisco Public Utilities Commission to purchase approximately 21.3 acres of property. In July 2007, the Agency amended the Purchase and Sale Agreement to reduce the amount of property being purchased to 13.2 acres for a reduced price of $21,060,000. The purchase and sale was completed and the property was transferred to the Agency on January 31, 2008. b) Purpose of Acquisition The South San Francisco BART Station created new opportunities for innovative planning along El Camino Real. With the adoption of the South San Francisco General Plan in 1999, the City Council recognized that the SSF BART Station area could be a new activity node that would serve local residents and attract visitors. Specific to the El Camino Real Corridor, the City has: 1) adopted the SSF General Plan which encourages transit oriented development; 2) implemented the SSF BART Transit Village Plan and Ordinance; 3) prepared plans to extend Oak Avenue from Mission Road to El Camino Real; 4) constructed the majority of Centennial Way over the BART-SFO right-of-way; and 5) purchased a total of 14 acres of vacant land from the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission and Ron Price Motors to ensure high quality mixed use development. The most recently approved housing projects include Park Station at 1200 El Camino Real (99 units), the Mid-Peninsula Housing Project at 636 El Camino Real (109 affordable units and 5,700 sq. ft. of commercial space), and the newly approved Mission & McLellan project at 1309 Mission Road (20 units and 6,000 sq. ft. commercial). The City's planning effort is consistent with regional efforts to promote Transit Oriented Development and is governed by the following planning and policy documents: The Grand Boulevard Initiative(advisory document only) The Grand Boulevard Initiative is a collaboration of 19 cities, counties, local and regional agencies to improve the performance, safety, and aesthetics of El Camino Real and to provide coordinated planning for the entire corridor. El Camino Real Master Plan In 2007, the City adopted the El Camino Real Master Plan with the goal to "develop El Camino as a boulevard that accommodates its role as a regional corridor but with streetscape and development that provide identity to the street." South San Francisco General Plan Housing Element The Housing Element, updated in June 2009, contains an analysis of the community's housing needs, resources, constraints, and opportunities. The Housing Element identifies several housing sites within the Planning Area and estimates that these sites can accommodate approximately 549 housing units at the existing zoning and development standards. 12 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 El Camino Real/Chestnut Area Plan(2011) The City adopted a General Plan Amendment, Zoning Changes and Design Guidelines to permit high- density, mixed-use development along the El Camino Real Corridor. The purpose of the Amendment is to recognize the El Camino Real corridor as a strategic location in the city — the area is well served by schools, transit, and existing infrastructure— by replacing older policies and regulations, which promote low-intensity, auto-oriented single-use activity, with policies and regulations that target higher intensities and mixed-use development. Given this planning context, the Agency purchased these properties to create a new walkable, distinctive, mixed-use district at the geographic center of South San Francisco. A network of open spaces will form the armature of new development. New streets and pedestrian connections will extend through the area, enabling easy movement on foot. The BART right-of-way that extends through the length of the Planning Area will be transformed into a linear park and a pedestrian-oriented "Main Street," lined with restaurants, cafes and outdoor seating in a portion of the right-of-way. Development will be at high densities, reflecting adjacent transit access. The plan envisions a new neighborhood of up to 4,800 residents housed in low- to high-rise buildings. It will provide a range of commercial uses; walking access to everyday amenities; new civic uses, potentially including a new City Library; parks, plazas, and gathering spaces for the entire South San Francisco community. C) Parcel Data Former PUC Parcels APN 093-312-050, 093-312-060, 093-331-050, 093-331-060 and 011-326-030: These properties consist of various irregular shaped parcels encompassing 13.2 acres. The parcels are zoned according to a blend of development intensity as dictated by the El Camino Real/Chestnut Avenue Land Use Plan. The designations include High Density Residential, El Camino Real Mixed Use North, El Camino Real Mixed Use North High Intensity, El Camino Real Mixed Use North Medium Intensity and Public Use. Parcel 011-326-030 is a vacant site of approximately 1.9 acres. It is a well exposed corner lot with extensive frontage along east side of El Camino Real and along Chestnut Avenue. However, it suffers from extreme grade variance dropping precipitously from the El Camino frontage to the rear of the property. Parcels 093-312-060 and 093-312-050 are vacant lots of approximately 7.6 acres. They have extensive frontage along Mission Road but are also bisected by Colma Creek and the proposed Oak Avenue extension. Parcels 093-331-050 and 093-331-060 are two narrow, landlocked lots running behind properties facing El Camino Real between Orange Avenue and Chestnut Avenue. This corridor now serves as a linear park. It also contains a 21,000 sq. ft. building next to Orange Park that is occupied by the Boys and Girls Club.These lots are approximately 3.7 acres. 13 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 d) Estimate of Current Value The Successor Agency has only had parcel 011-326-030 recently appraised. Given the challenging development conditions that exist on this parcel, the appraisal dated September 9, 2013 by DANA Property Analysis estimates the value of the property to be$970,000 ($15.16/sq.ft.), see Appendix C. The value of the remaining parcels as currently configured is difficult to assess because sub-areas within each parcel can have widely varying values depending on their accessibility, potential for development and the presence of hazardous materials. A better understanding of the value of these properties can be derived from the disposition section of this report where the properties are subdivided and/or assembled into developable lots. e) Revenues Generated by Property/Contractual Requirements All parcels are vacant and undeveloped with the exception of a 21,000 sq. ft. building on parcel 093-331- 060. The building is rented to the Boys and Girls Club under a "Revocable Permit" that has existed between the PUC and the Boys and Girls Club since 1958 and prior to the Agency's acquisition of the property. The Agency assumed the Revocable Permit when it acquired the property. The Revocable Permit between the Agency and the Boys and Girls Club contains the following provisions: 1) no rent, 2) the buildings are considered to be temporary and can be demolished at the Boys and Girls Club expense, 3) the Boys and Girls Club must maintain liability insurance, 4) the Permit has no sunset clause and can be revoked at any time. f) Environmental Contamination and Remediation The Agency conducted Phase I and Phase II assessments and found parcel 011-326-030 has several adverse environmental conditions. See Appendix D for a complete listing of these conditions. The Phase I report indicates the remaining parcels do not have adverse environmental conditions. g) Potential for Transit Oriented Development and Advancement of Planning Objectives Sitting along El Camino Real and in close proximity to the BART station, the former PUC properties are a perfect example of land suitable for transit oriented development. This proposed efficient use of land creates a pedestrian oriented, walkable area close to transit that is part of the City's ongoing effort to promote integrated planning and development based on sustainability principles and practices. The vision for the Planning Area is one of "smart growth," enhanced by policies and design guidelines that ensure sustainable measures such as access to transit and green building h) History of Development Proposals and Activity Prior to the acquisition by the Agency, the PUC had not considered any development proposals that resulted in any significant development activity or review by the City. 14 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 7 J G!ieetnut A. enue The Agency purchased 1 Chestnut Avenue as an essential property in the implementation of the Redevelopment Plan for the El Camino Project Area.This property is necessary to achieving the Agency's development goals and to completing the redevelopment of the PUC properties. The property, which at the time housed Ron Price Motors, was acquired on January 8, 2008. Upon acquisition, the Agency leased the property back to Ron Price Motors for a period of three years. However, Ron Price Motors vacated the property prior to the end of the lease. The building was then partially leased to Green Builder's Exchange from 2008 to 2009. The property is currently leased to Red Cart Market, Inc., doing business as Pet Club Stores, Inc. c i c 1 Chestnut Avenue 1 Chestnut Avenue a) Acquisition Information The Agency acquired the property on January 11, 2008 by Grant Deed. The purchase price of$6,500,000 was based on the valuation provided by DANA Property Analysis, dated October 3, 2007. b) Purpose of Acquisition The Agency purchased this property because it is essential for the development of the former PUC Properties (see page 12) and the implementation of the Redevelopment Plan for the El Camino Project Area. For a complete description of the purpose of this acquisition, see page 13, part b) discussing the PUC properties. C) Parcel Data 1 Chestnut, APN 011-322-030: This is a parcel consisting of 1.65 acre or 72,000 sq. ft. with a 27,000 sq. ft. building (see Appendix B).The parcel is zoned El Camino Real/Chestnut Avenue Area, Mixed Use High Intensity. 15 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 d) Estimate of Current Value The property has recently been appraised twice due to negotiations with PG&E as it was considering acquiring the rights to locate a gas line through a portion of the property. Based on the two appraisals, the value of the property is between $4,034,525 and $4,841,000. PG&E's appraiser, Patrick Idiart and Associates, estimated the property's value as $4,034,525 ($55/sq. ft.) in an appraisal dated May 11, 2012. The Successor Agency appraiser, DANA Property Analysis, estimated a value of the property at $4,841,000 ($66/sq. ft.) in a report dated May 11, 2012. For the purposes of this report, it assumed the property value is the average of the two appraisals$4,438,080($61.64/sq.ft.). e) Revenues Generated by Property/Contractual Requirements On January 8, 2013, a lease was executed with Red Cart Market, Inc., doing business as Pet Club Stores, Inc.The term of the lease with Pet Club is three years (36 months) at a gross rate of$37,519 per month, with an option to extend the lease for an additional 12 months. A $500,000 tenant improvement allocation to Pet Club from the Successor Agency/Oversight Board includes a pay back of $13,899 per month for three years resulting in a net rent of $23,620/month. f) Environmental Contamination and Remediation On December 3, 2007, CSS Environmental submitted results of a Phase I and limited Phase II evaluation, including soil samples, concluding that no recognized environmental condition was found at the subject property. g) Potential for Transit Oriented Development and Advancement of Planning Objectives Sitting along Chestnut Avenue in close proximity to El Camino Real and the South San Francisco BART station, 1 Chestnut is ideal for transit oriented development. This proposed efficient use of this property and the PUC properties creates a pedestrian oriented, walkable area close to transit that is part of the City's ongoing effort to promote integrated planning and development based on sustainability principles and practices. The vision for the Planning Area is one of "smart growth," enhanced by policies and design guidelines that ensure sustainable measures such as access to transit and green building. h) History of Development Proposals and Activity At the time of acquisition the property housed Ron Price Motors.The property is currently leased to Red Cart Market, Inc., doing business as Pet Club Stores, Inc. Since it acquired the property, the Agency has not considered any development proposals. . 80 Chestnut Avenue This property comprises a portion of APN 011-324-190 purchased from California Water Service Company (Cal Water) on December 21, 2007. It consists of a 3,640 square foot single-story building and site improvements on a 30,000 square foot parcel of land. The building is occupied by the South San Francisco Historical Society and consists of 1,950 square feet of office space and 1,690 square feet of industrial warehouse space. The building will remain and the Historical Society will continue to occupy 16 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 the space until Cal Water is able to sell additional property to the City, at which time a proposed park expansion will proceed. Site improvements include a paved driveway, a 10-space parking lot, and landscaping. The quality and condition of the improvements are average. i qqp yy H� Y r nn g.... d,, p „ e f 80 Chestnut Avenue a) Acquisition Information The Agency purchased the site in December 2007 for$1,100,000 after Cal Water devised a plan to break up the 6.86 acre parcel into five separate parcels in order to accommodate the City's desire to purchase the site. By dividing the parcel, Cal Water was able to sell the portion containing the building at 80 Chestnut immediately to the Agency. b) Purpose of Acquisition The property was purchased in order to improve the property as a park. In December 2006, the City updated the Orange Memorial Park Master Plan and the South San Francisco General Plan (Park and Recreation Element). The planning process included the goal of expanding the Orange Memorial Park into the Cal Water site. Initially Cal Water had indicated it would consider selling the entire 6.86 acre parcel to the Agency. However, Cal Water decided it would retain the northwestern portion of the parcel to continue its water service operation. Subsequently, Cal Water devised a plan to break up the land into various parcels to accommodate the City's interest in expanding Orange Memorial Park. Splitting the land into five parcels allowed Cal Water to retain the land it needs and sell the portion containing the building immediately to the Agency. Cal Water plans to sell additional sub-area parcels to the City in the future to complete the expansion of the park. c) Parcel Data 80 Chestnut, portion of APN 011-324-190: This is an irregular shaped parcel consisting of 30,330 sq. ft. (0.7 acre), see Appendix B.The parcel is zoned Public/Quasi-Public. 17 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 d) Estimate of Current Value There are no current estimates for the value of the land as it is restricted to public use. Therefore, it has value as a public facility but not for commercial uses. e) Revenues Generated by Property/Contractual Requirements The property is leased to the South San Francisco Historical Society for $1 per year. The term of the lease is for one year and renews automatically each year until April 1, 2033 unless either lessor or lessee terminates the lease with 90 day notice. f) Environmental Contamination and Remediation There are no known environmental conditions on the property. g) Potential for Transit Oriented Development and Advancement of Planning Objectives Because the parcel is zoned Public/Quasi Public it has no potential for transit oriented development. h) History of Development Proposals and Activity The property was owned by Cal Water to operate wells providing water. Cal Water did not entertain any development proposals or activity. The Agency owns several parcels in the Downtown Central Project Area (see Figure C, page 22). This section provides all of the required information regarding these properties. It begins with a description of the Agency's key goals and objectives from the Downtown Central Redevelopment Plan and Five-Year Implementation Plan. The properties in Downtown Central Project Area were acquired to achieve these goals and objectives outlined in the Redevelopment Plan and Five-Year Implementation Plan and are described below. Downtown Central Redevelopment Plan The Downtown Central Project Area was adopted in 1989 and amended to add area in 2005. Downtown Central includes the oldest commercial and residential areas of the City—the Grand Avenue commercial district and adjoining residential areas. It also includes a large, formerly industrial area east of Highway 101 that is currently developed as a mix of office, industrial and biomedical research and development facilities. The original Redevelopment Plan for the Downtown Central Project Area lists following goals and objectives of the community redevelopment program in the Project Area: 1. To expand the retail component of the Downtown, providing diversification of offerings and encouraging major outlets as a draw to new shoppers. 2. To continue support of the various cultural and civic uses which provide major anchors, stressing special events which draw new attendees. 3. To promote the area as the financial hub, encouraging existing institutions to expand both physically and with related services. 18 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 4. To eliminate blight through abatement or code compliance, reconstruction and assembly of parcels into more developable sites for more desirable uses. 5. To improve public parking, other public facilities, services, utility lines, lighting, public safety and public transportation. 6. To create a pedestrian environment to encourage multiple stops by visitors and more frequent visits to Downtown. 7. To emphasize and highlight the existing architectural style and scale through rehabilitation and renovation of historic structures and encouraging infill developments that relate to existing structures. B. To expand and upgrade the housing opportunities in the community to eliminate blight and improve housing stock and standards for the present population. 9. To promote new and continuing private sector investment within the Project Area to prevent the loss of and to facilitate commercial and industrial activity. 10. To achieve an environment reflecting a high level of concern for architectural, landscape, and urban design and land use principles appropriate to attainment of the objectives of the Redevelopment Plan. 11. To retain and expand as many existing businesses as possible by means of redevelopment and rehabilitation acclivities and by encouraging and assisting the cooperation and participation of owners, businesses and public agencies in the revitalization of the Project Area.1 12. To provide for increased sales, business license, and other fees, taxes, and revenues to the City of South San Francisco. 13. To encourage maximum participation of residents, business persons, property owners, and community organizations in the redevelopment of the Project Area. 14. To create and develop local job opportunities and to preserve the area's existing employment base. 15. To replan, redesign and develop areas which are stagnant or improperly used. 16. To reduce the City's annual costs of providing of local services to and within the Project Area. Five-Year Implementation Plan As noted earlier, the Five Year Implementation Plan describes the goals and objectives for redevelopment activities in each of the project areas (based on the goals and objectives in the respective Redevelopment Plans) and presents specific programs and expenditures that would be undertaken. For the Downtown Central Project Area, the Implementation Plan states the following goals and objectives that are directly relevant to the development of properties that are owned by the Agency (excerpted from pages 1-5 to pages 1-6 of the Implementation Plan): • Expand the retail component of the Downtown, provide diversification of offerings and encourage major outlets as a draw to new shoppers. • Continue support of the various cultural and civic uses that provide major anchors, stressing special events that draw new attendees. 19 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 • Promote the Downtown area as the financial hub of South San Francisco, encouraging existing institutions to expand both physically and with related services. • Eliminate blight through abatement or code compliance, reconstruction and assembly of parcels into developable sites for desirable uses. • Improve public parking, other public facilities, services, utility lines, lighting, public safety and public transportation. • Emphasize and highlight the existing architectural style and scale through rehabilitation and renovation of historic structures and encouraging infill development that relates to existing structures. • Expand and upgrade the housing opportunities in the community to eliminate blight and improve housing stock and standards for the present population. • Promote new and continuing private sector investment within the Project Area to prevent the loss of and to facilitate commercial and industrial activity. • Achieve an environment reflecting a high level of concern for architectural, landscape, and urban design and land use principles appropriate to attainment of the objectives of the Redevelopment Plan. • Replan, redesign and develop areas that are stagnant or improperly used. • Promote Downtown's vitality and economic well-being, and its presence as the City's center. • Encourage development of Downtown as a mixed use activity center with retail and visitor- oriented uses, business and personal services, government and professional offices, civic uses, and a variety of residential types and densities. • Provide incentives for infill development, intensification and reuse of currently underutilized sites. • Enhance linkages between Downtown and transit centers, and increase street connectivity with the surrounding neighborhoods. • Provide new or improved parks, open spaces, and recreational facilities. 20 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 21 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 9. 480 North Canal On November 12, 2003, the Agency Board adopted a resolution authorizing a Purchase and Sale Agreement for acquisition of the property and improvements located at 480 North Canal in the amount of$3.65 million using redevelopment bond funds. In 1998, the City had conducted an assessment of the Downtown Central Fire Station and concluded that the existing building could not be seismically upgraded to conform to current building code standards. In June of 2002, the Black Mountain Water Company vacated the property at 480 North Canal and the owner listed the property for sale. The City determined that the facility's configuration was well suited to house the City's downtown area fire station and made an offer on the property. 480 North Canal a) Acquisition Information On November 12, 2003, the Agency authorized the purchase of the property and improvements located at 480 North Canal for $3.65 million. The property was conveyed to the City on April 28, 2004. The Agency used tax exempt bond funds to acquire the property as a public facility. b) Purpose of Acquisition The Agency acquired the property to house the City's downtown fire station after the City had determined the Central Fire Station could not be seismically upgraded.The City determined it could also locate the City's Emergency Operations Center and a training tower on the site. Consolidation of these facilities allowed the City to better serve the Downtown Project Area and the City at large. The property serves the Redevelopment goal of improving public facilities and public safety C) Parcel Data 480 N. Canal, APN 014-061-110: This is a 1.7 acre property (approximately 75,260 sf. ft.). This irregular parcel measures 294 feet by 265 feet (see Appendix B). The parcel is zoned Public/Quasi Public and is designated Mixed Industrial per the General Plan. d) Estimate of Current Value The property has not been appraised recently. Its estimated value is the acquisition price of $3.65 million. e) Revenues Generated by Property/Contractual Requirements The parcel houses Fire Station 61, the Emergency Operations Center (EOC) and Fire Training Tower. At this time the three uses on the property do not generate any revenue. There are no contractual agreements associated with this property. 22 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 f) Environmental Contamination and Remediation There are no known environmental conditions on the property. g) Potential for Transit Oriented Development and Advancement of Planning Objectives The property is used for public purposes and is not suitable for transit oriented development. Placing the fire station at this site advanced the Redevelopment Plan's goal of improving public facilities and public safety. h) History of Development Proposals and Activity The property serves the public goal and redevelopment goal of improving public facilities and public safety. No other development proposals or activity are being considered for this property. 10. 296 Airport Blvd. The Agency Board approved a Purchase and Sale Agreement, on December 9, 2009, pursuant to Agency Resolution 25-2009, to acquire a portion of the State Department of Transportation (DOT) property, .. .,................. known as the Sales Parcel. The property was acquired to expand the Caltrain station platform and make related public pedestrian , u f access improvements. DOT has a �' � recorded access easement for maintenance of the freeway from Grand Avenue towards the center of the site, along an established access road. a) Acquisition Information The purchase price, based on an appraised value of $1,300,000, was ✓iii„ �, :%P/ �,���r, ,/.,,�,,,,,. „ r,�� ,,, discounted by $537,000, due to the estimated cost required for the ///// "' ��✓��� clean-up of toxic materials found on the site. The final acquisition price was therefore $763,000. The property was conveyed to the Agency on January 28, 2010, subject to the DOT access Irit�l i i.ttl vt i iillir 111 y I� IIIIY Yid V I I)LV.�V I iV i t�� I i t i'liVi ,i easement. r, 296 Airport Blvd. 23 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 b) Purpose of Acquisition The property was acquired to extend the Caltrain station platform and make related public pedestrian access improvements from the station's current location to this site. The goal is to promote transit oriented development pursuant to the Agency's Five Year Goals and its Implementation Plan for the Downtown/Central Project Area. The Agency Board made the requisite findings of fact under Health and Safety Code Section 33445 for use of redevelopment funds for publicly-owned improvements. ' ,o, US lol NORTH- ✓" I f `' ! BOUND . 4 us o /" ar ` 1 SOUTH " b eouuD / f /' w// p �Rpty§ low a f / / Portion of 296 Airport Blvd.. IF AE " t r VF PROPOSED DESIGN OFT HE EAST E F TH E PEDESTRIAN A J&CLEUNE)EpCR¢6NG WE ST CALTRAlN WILLNEEDTOCONSIDE FEACCESSwHERLr IG$%'yNG U3 q R 6,CH T�/ PLAZA ES G RAND AVENUE.AM R PLAZAAT THIS LOT f+ISN ILl'P,PllI,f}1N /� f ATTRACTIVE CONNECTI �O CALTRAIN T /� J I Caltrain Station Improvements—Conceptual Plans C) Parcel Data 296 Airport, APN 012-338-160: This parcel consists of 0.6 acre or 24,325 sq. ft. The parcel is zoned Public/Quasi Public. d) Estimate of Current Value The property has not been recently appraised. Its estimated value is the discounted value of $763,000 due to adverse environmental conditions. e) Revenues Generated by Property/Contractual Requirements The property is vacant, unimproved land and does not generate any revenue.There are no contractual requirements associated with this property. f) Environmental Contamination and Remediation A Purchase and Sale Agreement indicates that hazardous materials exist on the Sales Parcel and that the property was conveyed in "as is" condition.The Agency assumed the responsibility for the abatement of all hazardous materials on site. An environmental consultant estimated the cost of remediation would be $537,000. The purchase price, based on an appraised value of $1,300,000, was discounted by this amount. 24 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 g) Potential for Transit Oriented Development and Advancement of Planning Objectives The parcel is zoned for Public/Quasi Public use and is an integral part of advancing transit oriented development for the entire downtown area. h) History of Development Proposals and Activity The City has prepared full plans for the extension of the train platform, expansion of the pedestrian entryway to the train station, and all associated public amenities for this site. Work on the project was ready to commence but was delayed due to planning for the Bullet Train and the electrification of Caltrain. 11. 323 Miller Avenue The Successor Agency owns the property at 323 Miller Avenue and the City of South San Francisco owns three adjacent parcels of land at 329 Miller Avenue. Together these properties house the City's new downtown parking structure. On December 13, 2006, the Agency Board adopted a resolution authorizing execution of a Purchase and Sale Agreement for acquisition of the property at 323 Miller Avenue, in the amount of $700,000. The Agency's intent was to maintain the existing affordable residential units until the City constructed the parking structure. The property was conveyed to the Agency by Grant Deed on March 14, 2007. Subsequently, the residential duplex was demolished and the property was incorporated into the parking structure. The parking structure is now a critical component of the City's Parking District. 323 4 �C l by icy of S outh Fran ra►t u a ��— Wnue � o _w r.i '-f WJllla Avenue �a Cats w.. Grand Memo .. .,... . w a w Parking Structure romnrarc a ux�mwa / Nafltrgad wv»n.a South San Francisco Downtown Parkina Map f Former Residential Duplex 25 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 a) Acquisition Information On December 13, 2006, the Agency adopted a resolution authorizing execution of a Purchase and Sale Agreement for purchase of real property in the amount of$700,000. The property was conveyed to the Agency by Grant Deed on March 14, 2007. b) Purpose of Acquisition The Agency purchased this property with the intent of combining it with three City owned parcels to build a parking structure for the downtown. The Agency maintained the affordable residential units until the City was ready to construct the parking structure. Subsequently, the residential duplex was demolished and the real property was incorporated into the parking structure developed on the site. The property now houses the easternmost area of the structure which contains the elevator shaft. C) Parcel Data 323 Miller Avenue, APN 012-312-070: This 3,500 sq. ft. lot measures 25 feet by 140 feet. The parcel is zoned Downtown Core. d) Estimate of Current Value The property value cannot be separated from the parking structure improvements and adjoining parcels. The unimproved land value in the downtown is estimated at $80/sq. ft. The value of this property without improvements is estimated to be approximately$280,000. e) Revenues Generated by Property/Contractual Requirements It is difficult if not impossible to precisely estimate the revenue generated solely by the parking spaces existing over the former RDA property since the parking garage extends over City and Successor Agency properties and functions as one project. For the entire Miller Avenue Parking Garage the Parking District generated $108,000 gross revenue in FY 2013-14. Of the 255 parking stalls in the garage, approximately 40 stalls sit over the former RDA property (15.6%). A very crude approximation would be 15.6% of revenue totaling $16,900. It should be noted, however, that net revenue from the property is $0 since the Miller Avenue Parking Garage functions at a deficit and the Parking District as a whole must subsidize the Miller Avenue Parking Garage. f) Environmental Contamination and Remediation There are no known environmental conditions on the property. g) Potential for Transit Oriented Development and Advancement of Planning Objectives The property is now occupied by a multi-story public parking structure. It serves the Downtown Transit Oriented Development Area. The parking garage helps the City achieve transit oriented development goals in Downtown SSF through higher density in-fill residential projects in existing surface parking lots. . It also provides public parking to visitors of nearby government facilities and patrons of downtown businesses. 26 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 h) History of Development Proposals and Activity The Agency maintained the affordable residential units at 323 Miller Avenue until the City constructed the parking structure. The property now houses the easternmost end of the parking structure which contains the elevator shaft and a small amount of unimproved commercial space. 12. 356 Grand Avenue On February 10, 2010, the Agency approved the expenditure of tax increment funds to purchase this property. For many years the property housed a market. The downturn of the economy made it increasingly difficult for the owner to maintain the market in good condition and several businesses failed on the site. The Agency secured an appraisal and made offers to the owner over several years until the owner agreed to sell the property in 2010. The Agency purchased this property to provide a pedestrian connection from the parking structure directly onto Grand Avenue, the City's main commercial street. r � r r V„ i 1 Breezeway at 365 Grand Avenue a) Acquisition Information On February 10, 2010, the Agency adopted a resolution authorizing the execution of a Purchase and Sale Agreement with David Tsui for$1.7 million. b) Purpose of Acquisition The rear of the property on Grand Avenue is strategically located directly across from the new parking structure on Miller Avenue. The Agency purchased this property to provide a pedestrian connection from the parking structure directly onto Grand Avenue, the City's main commercial street. This acquisition and the development of the pedestrian breezeway facilitated the movement of downtown visitors from the parking structure into the commercial area. The improvement advances the Redevelopment Plan goal of eliminating blighted conditions, increasing economic activity, improving pedestrian circulation, and encouraging further development in the surrounding area. 27 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 C) Parcel Data 356 Grand Avenue, APN 012-312-300:This 7,000 sq. ft. (0.16 acre) lot measures 50 feet by 140 feet. The parcel is zoned Downtown Core. The breezeway connection utilizes half of the property and the other half is vacant, unimproved land. d) Estimate of Current Value The unimproved land value in the downtown is estimated at $80/sq. ft. The value of this property without improvements is estimated to be approximately$560,000. e) Revenues Generated by Property/Contractual Requirements The property is vacant, unimproved land and does not generate any revenue. There are no contractual requirements associated with this property. f) Environmental Contamination and Remediation There are no known environmental conditions on the property. g) Potential for Transit Oriented Development and Advancement of Planning Objectives The property is located within a transit oriented planning area and has the potential to be developed into a transit oriented development. However, its current use as a public breezeway between the parking structure and Grand Avenue is important to creating economic vitality by facilitating the movement of shoppers into the commercial center. Half of the property can still be developed but because of its size it is more likely to be developed into retail space. h) History of Development Proposals and Activity The Agency acquired the property in 2010. Upon acquisition the Agency demolished the blighted building on the property that had housed several failed markets. Other than the construction of the pedestrian breezeway no other plans have been considered for the property. 13. 472 Grand Avenue/306 Spruce Avenue This property is a 14,000 square foot parcel containing a three story medical facility building and an adjacent parking lot.The facility also has a dedicated parking lot at 468 Miller Avenue. The basement level of the building contains vacante�����c�,nU office space, the building's mechanical systems (electrical, fire alarms, HVAC and boiler) andi�, ? restrooms. The San Mateo County Health Center occupies the second floor and Sitike Counseling Center occupies the first floor. The roof of they building contains cell tower equipment installed �b f u L ��iR vG by Sprint and the buildings exhaust fans. r, �t m � 1s'f rfi//r /l/ /lrll0 l/i� 472 Grand Ave 1306 Spruce Ave 28 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 The County Health Center is a primary care medical facility that is part of the San Mateo Health System and is funded by the County of San Mateo.The health center consists of exam rooms, a large office area, counseling rooms, a lobby, a computer server room, a meeting room, kitchen, and two (men's and women's) accessible restrooms. The County Health Center lease includes five (5) parking spaces in the adjacent lot and eleven (11) spaces in the lot at 468 Miller Avenue. Sitike is a private nonprofit agency and is funded by foundations, the County, the State of California and private individual donations. Sitike's tenant space is partitioned into office spaces, counseling rooms, entry lobby, kitchen, child care facility, two accessible restrooms, and access to an outdoor patio. The Sitike lease includes four(4) on-site parking spaces and seven (7) spaces at the parking lot located at 468 Miller Avenue. a) Acquisition Information On November 12, 1997, the Agency Board adopted Resolution of Necessity 16-97, finding that the public necessity required the acquisition of the real property located at 472 Grand Avenue/306 Spruce Avenue and 468 Miller Avenue. The City had previously made offers to purchase the property for its appraised value. However, the Agency could not reach an agreement with the property owner. Therefore, the Agency's resolution authorized the City Attorney to conduct an action in eminent domain for the acquisition of the property. b) Purpose of Acquisition The Agency acquired the building and the parking lots that serve the building in order to rehabilitate the building and provide vital health services for low-income residents residing in the downtown project area. The acquisition provided the Agency with the opportunity to rehabilitate a downtown property and locate a County Health Center providing primary health services, a nonprofit agency providing family and substance abuse counseling, and a chiropractic's office. The facility is currently still occupied by the County Health Center and Sitike Counseling Center. C) Parcel Data 472 Grand Avenue/306 Spruce Avenue, APN 012-302-140: This 14,000 sq. ft. (0.32 acre) lot measures 100 feet by 140 feet.The parcel is zoned Downtown Core. d) Estimate of Current Value In February of 2007, the property was appraised by DANA Property Analysis, concluding that its "as is" market value was $3,050,000. However, this valuation included the building at 472 Grand Avenue/306 Spruce Avenue and the dedicated parking lot at 468 Miller Avenue. The 2007 appraisal did not take into consideration the building's aging infrastructure and systems. Over the years many problems have arisen with respect to drainage and failed water lines that are buried between the walls and floors of the building. Therefore, based on an estimate of$90/sq. ft., this individual property is worth approximately $1.26 million. 29 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 e) Revenues Generated by Property/Contractual Requirements Sitike pays $5,858 per month to rent the first floor, the County Health Center pays$8,370 per month for the second floor, and Sprint pays $1,983 per month for the cell towers on the roof. Combined, the tenants generate $194,559 per year in revenues. Sitike and the County Health Center each have one- year leases. The most recent leases were approved in August 2013. Sitike's lease expires on August 31, 2014 and the County Health Center's lease expires on September 30, 2014. Both leases have been renewed annually for one year until the Department of Finance approves the property's proposed disposition. f) Environmental Contamination and Remediation There are no known environmental conditions on the property. g) Potential for Transit Oriented Development and Advancement of Planning Objectives This property is developed with a functional building in a transit oriented area and is not suitable for other transit oriented development at this time. The property advances a critical planning objective to provide health services to low income residents in the downtown and also helps prevent further deterioration of the building. h) History of Development Proposals and Activity The property serves the public goal and redevelopment goal of providing public facilities serving low- income residents residing in the project area. No other development proposals or activity are being considered for this property. 14. 468 Miller Avenue The property at 468 Miller Avenue was purchased in conjunction with 472 Grand Avenue/306 Spruce Avenue. This property serves the parking requirements of the property at 472 Grand/306 Spruce Avenue. I 1 ui� a) Acquisition Information See acquisition information for 472 Grand Avenue/306 Spruce Avenue. / b) Purpose of Acquisition I See acquisition information for 472 Grand Avenue/306 Spruce Avenue. C) Parcel Data �� 468 Miller Avenue, APN 012-301- , i , ,% 0201: This is a 7,000 sq. ft. lot 468 Miller Avenue measuring 50 feet by 140 feet (see App. B)The parcel is zoned Downtown Residential Medium. 30 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 d) Estimate of Current Value The unimproved land value in the downtown is estimated at $80/sq. ft. The value of this property without improvements is estimated to be approximately$560,000 but currently the property represents no additional value as it is needed to provide parking medical center, particularly for persons with disabilities. e) Revenues Generated by Property/Contractual Requirements The property serves the parking requirement for 472 Grand Avenue/306 Spruce Avenue. See acquisition information for 472 Grand Avenue/306 Spruce Avenue for more details. f) Environmental Contamination and Remediation There are no known environmental conditions on the property. g) Potential for Transit Oriented Development and Advancement of Planning Objectives The property serves the parking requirement for 472 Grand Avenue/306 Spruce Avenue. Unless the property at 472 Grand/306 Spruce converted to a use not requiring parking, the property cannot be redeveloped into a transit oriented project. The property 204M @@0Avg(ItMal planning objective to provide critical health services to local residents. h) History of Development Proposals and Activity The property has served as the parking lot for 472 Grand Avenue/306 Spruce Avenue. No other development proposals or activity are being considered for this property. 15. 201 Grand Avenue The Agency originally acquired this property through eminent domain. The building on the property and the bar that operated there had blighted conditions that needed to be addressed. Moreover, the Agency considered the site a suitable location to replace 25 public parking spaces that were lost due i to a commercial development on M K Baden Avenue. The property was subsequently developed into 13 metered parking spaces and /ll incorporated into the Downtown Parking District. However, the Agency Board stipulated that if the site was not needed for parking in the future it would serve as an excellent retail site for the entrance ✓��U1I4NUI���llllU���'f° // // f %Ge�� f�"/wi a to the Historic Grand Avenues Downtown Business District. 201 Grand Avenue 31 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 a) Acquisition Information On March 22, 2000, the Agency Board adopted a Resolution of Necessity for the property, occupied by the former Copa Cabana bar. The Copa Cabana had been subject to various code violations due to the substandard condition of the structure.The Agency acquired the property through eminent domain.The property's appraised value was $564,000 based on an appraisal conducted by Dana Property Analysis on December 29, 1999. The final property value of $611,097 was determined by the court in the subsequent condemnation action. b) Purpose of Acquisition The Agency originally purchased the property as a potential location for the replacement of 25 parking spaces lost in the Downtown Parking District due to the Agency's participation in the development of a new retail building on Baden Avenue that used a public parking lot. The installation of a new public parking facility was specifically identified in the Agency's Implementation Plan. The property was also severely blighted and suitable for redevelopment. C) Parcel Data 201 Grand Avenue, APN 012-316-110: This is an irregularly shaped 5,077 sq. ft. lot measuring 36 feet by 140 feet (see Appendix B).The parcel is zoned Downtown Core. d) Estimate of Current Value The property has not been appraised in recent years. The unimproved land value in the downtown is estimated at $80/sq. ft.; therefore, the value of this property without improvements is estimated to be approximately $406,160. However, the property is suitable for transit oriented development (see below) which may ultimately increase its value. e) Revenues Generated by Property/Contractual Requirements The property and the adjacent property at 207 Grand Avenue generate $5,436.18 per year in parking revenues but these funds are currently being used to offset the cost of operating and maintaining the parking lot. f) Environmental Contamination and Remediation There are no known environmental conditions on the property. g) Potential for Transit Oriented Development and Advancement of Planning Objectives Combined with the adjacent properties owned by the Successor Agency, this site is ideal for a transit oriented development. The property is located within the downtown and is less than one-quarter (1/4) mile away from the South San Francisco Caltrain station. Upon the extension of the train platform and expansion of the pedestrian entryway to the train station, the property will be one block away from the train station entrance. Plans for this site and the adjacent parcels indicate that 37 residential units and 8,000 sq. ft. of retail can be built at this location. 32 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 h) History of Development Proposals and Activity In August 2010, a developer approached the Agency with a proposal to develop this site and adjacent private properties into a 45 residential unit development with 14,000 sq. ft. of retail space. The Agency initiated efforts to acquire five additional parcels in an attempt to assemble the site for a development but was only able purchase four parcels before the dissolution of redevelopment. Nevertheless, as stated above,the assembled site is still suitable for a 37 unit development. 16. 207 Grand Avenue On December 8, 2010, the Agency Board adopted Resolution 23-2010 approving the execution of a Purchase and Sale Agreement to acquire the vacant parking lot located at 207 Grand Avenue for $350,000, the appraised valuation, in order to facilitate the Agency's implementation of the Redevelopment Plan for the project area. The property is currently being used as a parking lot containing 10 metered slots. The Agency purchased this property to combine it with other adjacent property it owned and create a 27,200 sq. ft. lot assemblage that would be ideal for a major transit oriented development in the Downtown. a) Acquisition Information The Agency purchased this property on December 10, 2010 for$350,000. b) Purpose of Acquisition The Agency purchased this property to combine it with 207 Grand Avenue other adjacent properties (201 and 217-219 Grand Avenue) it owned and to create a 27,200 sq. ft. lot assemblage that would be ideal for a major transit oriented development in the Downtown. With an assembled site, the Agency would be able to develop a mixed-use project containing 42 to 45 units and 14,000 square feet of retail. As conceived, the project would be developed in one or two phases depending on the acquisition of other lots. The first phase involving this property could be developed into a project consisting of 20-25 units and 7,000 square feet of retail. C) Parcel Data 207 Grand Avenue, APN 012-316-100: This is a 3,500 sq. ft. lot measuring 25 feet by 140 feet (see Appendix B).The parcel is zoned Downtown Core. d) Estimate of Current Value The property has not been appraised in recent years. The unimproved land value in the downtown is estimated at $80/sq. ft.; therefore, the value of this property without improvements is estimated to be approximately $280,000. However, the property is suitable for transit oriented development (see below) which may ultimately increase its value. 33 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 e) Revenues Generated by Property/Contractual Requirements The property and the adjacent property at 201 Grand Avenue generate $5,436.18 per year in parking revenues but these funds are currently being used to offset the cost of operating and maintaining the parking lot. f) Environmental Contamination and Remediation The Agency conducted a Phase I environmental assessment and found there were no reportable adverse conditions. g) Potential for Transit Oriented Development and Advancement of Planning Objectives Combined with the adjacent properties owned by the Successor Agency, this site is ideal for a transit oriented development. The property is located within the downtown and is less than one-quarter (1/4) mile away from the South San Francisco Caltrain station. Upon the extension of the train platform and expansion of the pedestrian entryway to the train station, the property will be one block away from the train station entrance. Plans for this site and the adjacent parcels indicate that 37 units and 8,000 sq. ft. of retail can be built at this location. h) History of Development Proposals and Activity In August 2010, a developer approached the Agency with a proposal to develop this site and adjacent private properties into a 45 residential unit development with 14,000 sq. ft. of retail space. The Agency initiated efforts to acquire five additional parcels in an attempt to assemble the site for a development but was only able purchase four parcels before the dissolution of redevelopment. Nevertheless, as stated above, the assembled site is still suitable for a 37 unit development with 8,000 sq. ft. of retail space. 17-18. 217-219 Grand Avenue and 227 Grand Avenue On November 10, 2010 the Agency Board adopted a resolution approving the execution of a Purchase and Sale Agreement to acquire 217-219 Grand Avenue and 227 Grand Avenue for $1,500,000. The property at 217-219 Grand Avenue contains two 44 8 s. Ben Tre Restaurant 5,buildin nor 7 w� � '�;��� ✓ and Mom's Tofu occupy the "'" building facing Grand Avenue. A second building at the rear of the property w contains a vacant two- bedroom residential unit on the second floor and a e ara 8 8 and basement on the ground floor. The buildings are in fairly good condition and are ��„q,K�;� � n a�..,,. ..,,. structurally sound. 227 Grand 217-219 Grand Avenue Avenue is a vacant lot. 34 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 a) Acquisition Information The property was offered for sale by the owner and the Agency executed a purchase option reserving the right to purchase the property while it conducted an appraisal and an environmental assessment. Once those tasks were completed, the Agency entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement to buy the property and a vacant parcel at 227 Grand Avenue for$1.5 million. b) Purpose of Acquisition The Agency purchased this property to combine it with an adjacent property (201 and 207 Grand Avenue) it owned and create a 27,200 sq. ft. lot assemblage that would be ideal for a major transit oriented development in the Downtown. With an assembled site, the Agency would be able to develop a mixed-use project containing 42 to 45 units and 14,000 square feet of retail. As conceived, the project would be developed in one or two phases depending on the acquisition of other lots. The first phase involving this property could be developed into a project consisting of 20-25 units and 7,000 square feet of retail. C) Parcel Data 217-219 Grand Avenue, APN 012-316-100:This is a 7,000 sq. ft. lot measuring 25 feet by 140 feet. 227 Grand Avenue, APN 012-316-070: This is a 3,500 sq. ft. lot measuring 25 feet by 140 feet (see Appendix B). The parcels are zoned Downtown Core. d) Estimate of Current Value The property has not been appraised recently. Its estimated value in December 2010 was $1,230,000 and is a reasonable estimate for its current value. e) Revenues Generated by Property/Contractual Requirements The property currently generates over$5,885 per month in rental income from the two restaurants. Ben Tre has a lease ending in June 2014 that converts into a month-to-month tenancy. Mom's Tofu is on a month-to-month lease.The vacant residential unit could yield an additional $1,500 per month if rented. f) Environmental Contamination and Remediation The Agency conducted a Phase I environmental assessment and found there were no reportable adverse conditions. g) Potential for Transit Oriented Development and Advancement of Planning Objectives Combined with the adjacent properties owned by the Successor Agency, this site is ideal for a transit oriented development. The property is located within the downtown and is less than one-quarter (1/4) mile away from the South San Francisco Caltrain station. Upon the extension of the train platform and expansion of the pedestrian entryway to the train station, the property will be one block away from the train station entrance. Plans for this site and the adjacent parcels indicate that 37 units and 8,000 sq. ft. of retail can be built at this location. h) History of Development Proposals and Activity In August 2010, a developer approached the Agency with a proposal to develop this site and adjacent private properties into a 45 residential unit development with 14,000 sq. ft. of retail space. The Agency 35 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 initiated efforts to acquire five additional parcels in an attempt to assemble the site for a development but was only able purchase four parcels before the dissolution of redevelopment. Nevertheless, as stated above,the assembled site is still suitable for a 37 unit development. 19. 200 Linden Avenue 200 Linden Avenue consists of two parcels linked together. The Agency acquired the property from Wells Fargo N.A when it closed the First Interstate Bank/United California Bank at this location as a result of a merger between the two banks. One parcel contains ar,' ° building currently occupied by the City's �U�iAt Information Technology (IT) �Y�•;, Department. The second parcel serves as parking for the building and as a 64 a rrlU,/ space metered/ permit parking lot which is combined with properties at iii.,,.! „��iii��///%✓/% 212 -216 Baden Avenue. 200 Linden Avenue a) Acquisition Information The Agency acquired 200 Linden and the adjacent parcel from First Interstate Bank/United California Bank for$535,000.The property was conveyed by Grant Deed on October 8, 1996. b) Purpose of Acquisition The Agency initially purchased this site to serve as an interim branch library facility. Subsequently, the Agency used it for a variety of public services ranging from a community learning center to the City's IT Department. With the acquisition of adjacent properties, the Agency designated this property as a potential site for the development of a major mixed-use project that would include residential housing, retail space and a public parking structure. C) Parcel Data 200 Linden, APN 012-334-130: Combined these rectangular parcels consist of 0.32 acre or 14,000 sq. ft. and measure 100 feet by 140 feet.The parcels are zoned Downtown Core. d) Estimate of Current Value The property has not been appraised recently. Its estimated value of $1.6 million is based on the appraisal conducted for 217-219 Grand Avenue in December 2010 that stated this type of property is valued at $117/sq. ft. The property at 217-219 Grand Avenue is situated nearby and has a similar configuration of commercial space and parking. 36 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 e) Revenues Generated by Property/Contractual Requirements The building on the parcel is currently being used as offices for the City's IT Department; therefore, the building does not generate revenue. The metered parking lot generates $9,661.80. This revenue is combined with revenue from parking at 212 - 216 Baden Avenue. f) Environmental Contamination and Remediation There are no known environmental conditions on the property. g) Potential for Transit Oriented Development and Advancement of Planning Objectives Combined with the adjacent properties owned by the Successor Agency, this site is ideal for a transit oriented development. The property is located within the downtown and is about one-third (1/3) mile away from the South San Francisco Caltrain station. Upon the extension of the train platform and expansion of the pedestrian entryway to the train station, the property will be two blocks away from the train station entrance. Plans for this site and the adjacent parcels indicate that 100 residential units and 6,500 sq. ft. of retail can be built at this location pursuant to the DSASP. h) History of Development Proposals and Activity The property was formerly tied to an Exclusive Negotiating Rights Agreement (ENRA), executed on April 6, 2000, with Terranomics Development and Metrovation, for the purpose of developing new retail supporting uses for the downtown, including exploring the feasibility of incorporating the Agency parcel into a broader development on Baden Avenue and Cypress Avenue. The plan called for Terranomics and Metrovation to acquire adjoining parcels to assemble the entire block. However, they were not able to acquire the parcels and the parties canceled the agreement. In recent years, the Agency has been able to acquire several adjacent parcels. 20. 212 Baden Avenue On December 15, 1999, the Agency approved an ENRA with Robert and Kathleen Giorgi, for the development of a new 45,000 square foot retail furniture store on property owned by the Giorgi's, the City, and the Agency. The ENRA proposed to convey rat, City and Agency owned property that would be merged to form a lot large enough to accommodated g the proposed retail furniture store. In exchange the Agency would receive n .Ar�srr��rry f 1� rrurara,�ifrrRyNrifnw ri ay�eNi @ry>rdfr�r„wj f;�1j the property at 212 Baden ° ` Avenue. On June 14, 2000, 200 Linden 216 Baden 212 Baden 37 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 the City Council and Agency Board approved a Disposition and Development Agreement. By Resolution 20-2000 the Agency accepted the property at 212 Baden Avenue as part of the property exchange. The Agency subsequently demolished the structure located on 212 Baden Avenue and created a new surface parking lot to offset the loss of parking spaces the created by the exchange of properties. This property, along with 200 Linden Avenue and 216 Baden, was subsequently developed into 63 combined parking spaces (14 metered and 49 permitted spaces) and incorporated into the Downtown Parking District. However, the Agency Board stipulated that if the site was not needed for parking in the future, it should be developed as a retail space serving the Downtown Business District. a) Acquisition Information The Agency acquired this property on August 11, 2000 in exchange for property the Agency and City owned on the southeast corner of Baden and Linden Avenues. b) Purpose of Acquisition The Agency acquired this property to facilitate the development of a 45,000 square foot retail furniture store on a separate site located on the south-east corner of Baden and Linden Avenues. This property was intended to replace the public parking lost on the Agency and City owned lots where the development occurred. C) Parcel Data 212 Baden, APN 012-334-040:This is a 7,000 sq. ft. parcel (see Appendix B).The parcel is zoned Downtown Core. d) Estimate of Current Value The property has not been appraised recently. Its estimated value of$560,000 is based on the appraisal conducted for 207 Grand Avenue in December 2010,which stated that this type of property is valued at $80/sq. ft.The property at 207 Grand Avenue is situated nearby and has a similar configuration. e) Revenues Generated by Property/Contractual Requirements Combined with revenue from the lots parking at 200 Linden -216 Baden Avenue, these properties generate$9,662 in revenue.These funds are currently being used to offset the cost of operating and maintaining the parking lot. f) Environmental Contamination and Remediation There are no known environmental conditions on the property. g) Potential for Transit Oriented Development and Advancement of Planning Objectives Combined with the adjacent properties owned by the Successor Agency, this site is ideal for a transit oriented development. The property is located within the downtown and is about one-third (1/3) mile away from the South San Francisco Caltrain station. Upon the extension of the train platform and 38 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 expansion of the pedestrian entryway to the train station, the property will be two blocks away from the train station entrance. Plans for this site and the adjacent parcels indicate that 100 residential units and 6,500 sq. ft. of retail can be built at this location pursuant to the DSASP. h) History of Development Proposals and Activity The property was an acquisition target of Terranomics and Metrovation, which were attempting to acquire this site and combine it with other Agency and privately owned parcels to construct a major mixed-use development. However, Terranomics and Metrovation were not able to acquire the target parcels and cancelled the project. In recent years, the Agency has been able to acquire this site and an adjacent parcel. 21. 216 Baden Avenue On December 12, 2007, the Agency Board adopted Resolution 11-2007 authorizing the execution of a Purchase and Sale Agreement for 216 Baden for $781,000. At the time of acquisition the property sat between two Agency-owned properties at 200 Linden Avenue and 212 Baden Avenue. The property has street frontage on both Baden Avenue and Second Lane. The property is 3,500 sq. ft. and originally contained two buildings that were demolished by the Agency. a) Acquisition Information The Agency acquired this property on January 23, 2008 for$781,000. b) Purpose of Acquisition The purchase of this property was key to the assemblage of property on Baden Avenue. Combined with two Agency properties on both sides of this property, the Agency has assembled a site consisting of 31,404 sq. ft. (0.72 acre), suitable for a major development. C) Parcel Data 216 Baden, APN 012-334-030:This is a 3,500 sq. ft. parcel.The parcel is zoned Downtown Core. d) Estimate of Current Value The property has not been appraised recently. Its estimated value is $280,000 based on the appraisal conducted for 207 Grand Avenue in December 2010 that stated this type of property is valued at $80/sq. ft.The property at 207 Grand Avenue is situated nearby and has a similar configuration. e) Revenues Generated by Property/Contractual Requirements Combined with revenue from the lots parking at 200 Linden - 212 Baden Avenue, these properties generate $9,662 in revenue. These funds are currently being used to offset the cost of operating and maintaining the parking lot. f) Environmental Contamination and Remediation The Agency conducted a Phase I environmental assessment of the property. The report, dated January 25, 2008, found no recognized environmental conditions. 39 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 g) Potential for Transit Oriented Development and Advancement of Planning Objectives Combined with the adjacent properties owned by the Successor Agency, this site is ideal for a transit oriented development. The property is located within the downtown and is about one-third (1/3) mile away from the South San Francisco Caltrain station. Upon the extension of the train platform and expansion of the pedestrian entryway to the train station, the property will be two blocks away from the train station entrance. Plans for this site and the adjacent parcels indicate that 100 residential units and 6,500 sq. ft. of retail can be built at this location pursuant to the DSASP. h) History of Development Proposals and Activity The property was an acquisition target of Terranomics and Metrovation, which were attempting to acquire this site and combine it with other Agency and privately owned parcels to construct a major mixed-use development. However, Terranomics and Metrovation were not able to acquire the target parcels and cancelled the project. In recent years, the Agency has been able to acquire this site and an adjacent parcel. Ford Properties 315 Airport,401 Airport,411 Airport,421 Airport,405 Cypress, and 216 Miller The Ford Properties consist of six parcels located at: 315 Airport, 401 Airport, 411 Airport, 421 Airport, 405 Cypress, and 216 Miller. The listing for sale of the former Ford properties gave the City and the Agency a unique opportunity to acquire key sites in the downtown, which combined represent 94,814 square feet and are ideal for several major transit oriented developments in the downtown. On March 9, 2011, the City Council adopted a resolution approving the acquisition of the properties in an amount not to exceed $9,000,000. This acquisition ensured the City's ability to develop high quality mixed-use projects along Airport Blvd. a) Acquisition Information Subject to a Purchase and Sale Agreement executed on June 23, 2011, the Agency acquired the six parcels on September 9, 2011 for $8,743,000, slightly higher than their appraised value of$8,114,000. The former RDA purchased the properties in one transaction so specific values were never attributed to individual sites. Nevertheless, the RDA's appraisal had estimated values for each property. The appraised values for each property are listed below: #22 -315 Airport Blvd. $2,100,000 #23 -401 Airport Blvd. $1,100,000 #24-411 Airport Blvd. $995,000 #25 -421 Airport Blvd. $1,800,000 #26-405 Cypress Ave. $719,000 #27 - 216 Miller Ave. $1,400,000 Total: $8,114,000 40 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 b) Purpose of Acquisition The acquisition of the Ford Properties ensured the City's ability to develop high quality mixed-use projects along Airport Blvd. pursuant to the Downtown Revitalization Strategy developed by Van Meter Williams Pollack. The sites would accommodate 65 residential units, 21,000 square feet of retail, 114,000 square feet of commercial/office space, and 468 parking spaces. A more recent study based on the DSASP shows that the development potential of these properties will be 298 residential units and 17,000 sq. ft. of retail space. The proposed lot assemblage combined with other downtown projects underway or under consideration will have a transformative effect on the Downtown. The parcel inventory information for each of the six properties is presented below: 22. 315 Airport Blvd. This property has a building that was formerly used as the Ford auto dealership showroom and repair garage. Currently the building is vacant. C) Parcel Data 000 is a Airport, APi2 012-318-080:sq. This . is a 0.51 acre (22,136 sq. ft.) parcel. The parcel measures approximately ` 150 feet by 150 feet and includes ,d one structure on the parcel. The parcel is zoned Downtown Core. f �p d) Estimate of Current Value The Successor Agency estimates that property values in the downtown area have recovered and are close to !r land values in 2011 when the Agency , had the property appraised. Based 315 Airport Blvd. on that appraisal, the property value is estimated to be approximately$2.1 million. e) Revenues Generated by Property/Contractual Requirements Currently the property is vacant and does not generate any revenue. There are no contractual agreements associated with this property. f) Environmental Contamination and Remediation The Agency conducted a Phase I environmental assessment on the property and found it has three former gasoline underground storage tanks (USTs) that were abandoned in place and two former waste oil USTs that were removed from the property. TCE, DCE and vinyl chloride were additional contaminants left in place. Any development occurring on this property will necessitate the removal of the tanks and further studies to assess soil and groundwater contamination. Future development activities that disturb underlying soil or groundwater will likely encounter the contaminated media and require special handling and disposal. 41 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 g) Potential for Transit Oriented Development and Advancement of Planning Objectives This site is ideal for a transit oriented development. The property is located within the downtown and is less than one-quarter (1/4) mile away from the South San Francisco Caltrain station. Upon the extension of the train platform and expansion of the pedestrian entryway to the train station, the property will be across the street from the train station entrance. Plans for this site indicate that 58 residential units and 9,000 sq. ft. of retail can be built at this location. h) History of Development Proposals and Activity The Agency has not considered any other plans to develop the property. However, the Agency has prepared a development program for the property based on the rezoning of the area by the DSASP. 23. 401 Airport Blvd. 401 Airport consists of a parking lot with 20 spaces and one structure. Currently the structure is vacant. C) Parcel Data 401 Airport, APN 012-317-110: This h is a 0.23 acre (10,259 sq. ft.) parcel. The parcel measures 75.5 feet by PIII 151 feet and includes one structure s„p1g4VsiU�� on the parcel. The parcel is zoned Downtown Core and is in the Downtown Parking District. d) Estimate of Current Value The Successor Agency estimates that property values in the downtown area have recovered and � are close to land values in 2011 401 Airport Blvd. when the Agency had the property appraised. Based on that appraisal, the property value is estimated to be approximately$1.1 million. e) Revenues Generated by Property/Contractual Requirements Currently the property is vacant and does not generate any revenue. There are no contractual agreements associated with this property. f) Environmental Contamination and Remediation The Agency conducted Phase I and Phase II environmental assessments on the property and found it has three former gasoline USTs and a former waste oil UST that was removed. The soil and groundwater impacted with petroleum hydrocarbons are still in place. Future development activities that disturb underlying soil or groundwater will likely encounter the contaminated media and require special handling and disposal. 42 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 g) Potential for Transit Oriented Development and Advancement of Planning Objectives Combined with the adjacent properties owned by the Successor Agency, this site is ideal for a transit oriented development. The property is located within the downtown and is less than one-quarter (1/4) mile away from the South San Francisco Caltrain station. Upon the extension of the train platform and expansion of the pedestrian entryway to the train station, the property will be one block from the train station entrance. Plans for the assembled site indicate that 162 residential units and 8,000 sq. ft. of retail can be built at this location. h) History of Development Proposals and Activity The Agency has not considered any other plans to develop the property. However, the Agency has prepared a development program for the property based on the rezoning of the area by the DSASP. 24. 411 Airport Blvd. This property consists of a warehouse structure. Currently the property is vacant. C) Parcel Data 411 Airport, APN 012-317-100: This is a 0.26 acre (11,404 sq. ft.) parcel. The parcel measures 75.5 feet by 151 feet and includes one structure on the parcel. The parcel is zoned Downtown Core. rr d) Estimate of Current Value The Successor Agency estimates that property values in the downtown area have recovered and are close to land values in „m 2011 when the Agency had the property appraised. Based on that 411 Airport Blvd. appraisal, the property value is estimated to be approximately$995,000. e) Revenues Generated by Property/Contractual Requirements Currently the property is vacant and does not generate any revenue.There are no contractual agreements associated with this property. f) Environmental Contamination and Remediation There are no known environmental conditions on the property. g) Potential for Transit Oriented Development and Advancement of Planning Objectives This site is ideal for a transit oriented development. The property is located within the downtown and is less than one-quarter (1/4) mile away from the South San Francisco Caltrain station. Upon the extension 43 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 of the train platform and expansion of the pedestrian entryway to the train station, the property will be across the street from the train station entrance. Plans for this site indicate that 58 residential units and 9,000 sq. ft. of retail can be built at this location. h) History of Development Proposals and Activity The Agency has not considered any other plans to develop the property. However, the Agency has prepared a development program for the property based on the rezoning of the area by the DSASP. 25. 421 Airport Blvd. This property consists of 60 plus parking spots and no structures. Currently the property is vacant. C) Parcel Data 421 Airport, APN 012-317-090: This is a 0.52 acre (22,809 sq. ft.) parcel. The parcel measures 150 feet by 150 feet and has no structures on the parcel. The parcel is zoned Downtown Core. p n d) Estimate of Current Value The Successor Agency estimates that property values in the downtown area have recovered 411 Airport Blvd. and are close to land values in 2011 when the Agency had the property appraised. Based on that appraisal, the property value is estimated to be approximately$1.8 million. e) Revenues Generated by Property/Contractual Requirements Currently the property is vacant and does not generate any revenue. There are no contractual agreements associated with this property. f) Environmental Contamination and Remediation There are no known environmental conditions on the property. g) Potential for Transit Oriented Development and Advancement of Planning Objectives This site is ideal for a transit oriented development. The property is located within the downtown and is less than one-quarter (1/4) mile away from the South San Francisco Caltrain station. Upon the extension of the train platform and expansion of the pedestrian entryway to the train station, the property will be across the street from the train station entrance. Plans for this site indicate that 58 residential units and 9,000 sq. ft. of retail can be built at this location. Development of the site advances the City's and Agency's goals to intensify development, provide a broad range of high quality housing and help prepare and improve the site for future development. 44 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 h) History of Development Proposals and Activity The Agency has not considered any other plans to develop the property. However, the Agency has prepared a development program for the property based on the rezoning of the area by the DSASP. 26. 405 Cypress Avenue This property consists of a parking lot with no structures. Currently the property is vacant. C) Parcel Data 405 Cypress APN 012-314-100 This is a 0.2 acre (8,763 sq. ft ) parcel. The parcel measures approximately 140 feet by 71 feet and has no structures on the parcel. The parcel is zonedr. Downtown Core & Downtown. . I TThe Su ces oart A enc e t mates 8 y /;ivi i/ray,i����/�%✓ i that property values in the downtown area have recovered 405 Cypress Avenue and are close to land values in 2011 when the Agency had the property appraised. Based on that appraisal, the property value is estimated to be approximately$719,000. e) Revenues Generated by Property/Contractual Requirements Currently the property is vacant and does not generate any revenue.There are no contractual agreements associated with this property. f) Environmental Contamination and Remediation There are no known environmental conditions on the property. g) Potential for Transit Oriented Development and Advancement of Planning Objectives This site is ideal for a transit oriented development. The property is located within the downtown and is less than one-quarter (1/4) mile away from the South San Francisco Caltrain station. Upon the extension of the train platform and expansion of the pedestrian entryway to the train station, the property will be two blocks from the train station entrance. Plans for this site indicate that 28 residential units can be built at this location. Development of the site advances the City's and Agency's goals to intensify development, provide a broad range of high quality housing and help prepare and improve the site for future development. h) History of Development Proposals and Activity The Agency has not considered any other plans to develop the property. However, the Agency has prepared a development program for the property based on the rezoning of the area by the DSASP. 45 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 27. 216 Miller Avenue The Agency acquired this property to ensure the development of high quality housing in the downtown project area. It is an important component of the City's and former Agency's efforts to create a vibrant, transit-oriented, and diverse downtown. Development of this property will provide transit supported housing and easy connectivity to the downtown South San Francisco Caltrain station. C) Parcel Data 216 Miller, APN 012-314- 220: This is a 0.4 acre (17,500 sq. ft.) parcel. The parcel measures 125 feet by 140 feet and has no structures on the parcel. The parcel is zoned Downtown Core. d) Estimate of Current Value The Successor Agency /Al�lll� (fid,/ a, r,%���//,,,/,✓/////„�� / ��1��/r����I/�//iahr,t,,,,/%/,,,/,,,,!��/%//%////c,��//%%%///,li/�fl/llfNie!tiklf9yf�+rU:,,ci,,,,,,,, , i estimates that property 216 Miller Avenue values in the downtown area have recovered and are close to land values in 2011 when the Agency had the property appraised. Based on that appraisal, the property value is estimated to be approximately $1.4 million. e) Revenues Generated by Property/Contractual Requirements Currently the property is vacant and does not generate any revenue. There are no contractual agreements associated with this property. f) Environmental Contamination and Remediation There are no known environmental conditions on the property. g) Potential for Transit Oriented Development and Advancement of Planning Objectives This site is ideal for a transit oriented development. The property is located within the downtown and is less than one-quarter (1/4) mile away from the South San Francisco Caltrain station. Upon the extension of the train platform and expansion of the pedestrian entryway to the train station, the property will be two blocks from the train station entrance. Plans for this site indicate that 50 residential units can be built at this location. h) History of Development Proposals and Activity The Agency has not considered any other plans to develop the property. However, the Agency has prepared a development program for the property based on the rezoning of the area by the DSASP. 46 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 28. 938 Linden Avenue On December 9, 2009 the Agency Board adopted a resolution authorizing the Agency to execute a Purchase and Sale Agreement for the purchase of 938 Linden Avenue.The property has one 4,000 sq. ft. office building consisting of a lower story and a partial second story mezzanine that is not code compliant and can only be used for storage. It was constructed in the mid-1900s but is relatively well maintained.The first floor of the building is broken into smaller offices and restrooms with an open area of approximately 25 feet by 35 feet at the rear. The upper level is L shaped and consists of smaller offices. The building is a class C structure including a concrete slab floor, painted concrete block walls, and a �' a flat composition roof. There is limited parking in the front of the building " and ample parking at the �. rear, consisting of 19 spaces with perimeter 938 Linden Avenue landscaping. The two concrete areas and driveway to the back of the building are asphalt paved. The building has been vacant for an extended period of time. a) Acquisition Information The Agency completed the purchase of 938 Linden Avenue for$1.1 million on January 15, 2010. b) Purpose of Acquisition The intended use for the building was to relocate St. Vincent de Paul's Food Program from Grand Avenue to this site. The Agency believed this was a more suitable location for St. Vincent de Paul's to provide food services to the area's homeless population as it would afford them more space, including a seating area as well as space for additional homeless services. However, redevelopment was dissolved before St. Vincent's was able to secure sufficient funding to remodel the building and relocate its services to the site. C) Parcel Data 938 Linden Avenue, APN 012-102-030: The lot is 12,937 square feet (0.3 acre) and has a 4,000 sq. ft. building. The parcel is zoned Downtown Mixed Use. d) Estimate of Current Value The property has not been appraised in recent years. However, it is estimated that its current value is close to its$1.1 million acquisition price. 47 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 e) Revenues Generated by Property/Contractual Requirements The building has been vacant for some time as it had been intended for a nonprofit organization that was going to remodel the building. No efforts have been made to rent the property pending the dissolution of redevelopment and the adoption of this plan. f) Environmental Contamination and Remediation PIERS Environmental Services conducted a Phase I environmental assessment for the property in March 2009. The assessment revealed no evidence of recognized environmental conditions in connection with the prior use of the property. However, one recognized environmental condition was identified and consists of significantly elevated concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons in the shallow groundwater and capillary fringe soils beneath the property that are presumed to have originated from a former service station at 900 Linden Avenue, a closed leaking underground storage tank (LUST) case. The concentration of petroleum hydrocarbons beneath the building poses a potential risk of volatilization to indoor air. g) Potential for Transit Oriented Development and Advancement of Planning Objectives The highest and best use of the property is to hold and combine it with adjacent properties to construct a high density residential project. The property, however, is a significant distance from the downtown's transit hub and services and is therefore not considered a transit oriented development opportunity. h) History of Development Proposals and Activity At one time a private owner had assembled several properties adjacent to this one with the intent of developing them. However, the owner went bankrupt and the lender foreclosed on the properties and proceeded to sell them. The Agency purchased this property with the intent of conveying it for use by a nonprofit organization to operate food and social service programs for the homeless. The project had complete planning approvals and the nonprofit agency was in the process of securing funds to remodel the building when the State ended redevelopment. With no binding obligation in place, the project was terminated. 29. 905 Linden Avenue L;II����o� M;4J4W�dVbs���000, On October 27, 1999 the Agency Board adopted a resolution approving execution of a Purchase and Sale Agreement to acquire 905 Linden Avenue for $477,500. Prior to its acquisition, the property was occupied by a Beacon gas station. The previous owner removed the underground gasoline storage tanks and, upon acquisition, the Agency demolished the former gas station s� building. The property is currently maintained as a green space. 905 Linden Avenue 48 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 a) Acquisition Information The Agency purchased the property in December 1999 for$477,000. b) Purpose of Acquisition The purpose of the acquisition was to remove blighting conditions and incompatible uses in the project area caused by this property. Following the bankruptcy of the Beacon station operator at that location, the property owner began working under the supervision of the San Mateo County Health Services Agency to remediate soil and ground water contamination caused by gasoline from the underground tanks. The Agency learned that the owner was interested in selling the property and negotiated the purchase of the property. The Agency intended to hold the property until it could purchase additional properties in the area and then undertake a major redevelopment effort to construct high density housing on the assembled properties. C) Parcel Data 905 Linden Avenue, APN 012-101-100: This is an irregular shaped parcel consisting of 15,000 sq. ft. (0.34 acre), see Appendix B.The parcel is zoned Downtown Residential Medium Density. d) Estimate of Current Value The property has not been appraised in recent years. The unimproved land value of properties in the downtown area is estimated at $80/sq. ft. and the property could conceivably have a value of up to $1.2 million. However, the environmental condition of the property is considerably adverse so the value may be significantly lower. See Environmental Contamination and Remediation section, below. e) Revenues Generated by Property/Contractual Requirements The property is vacant, unimproved land and does not generate any revenue. There are no contractual requirements associated with this property. f) Environmental Contamination and Remediation Following the bankruptcy of the Beacon station operator, the former property owner worked under the supervision of the San Mateo County Health Services Agency to remediate soil and ground water contamination caused by gasoline from the underground tanks. The Agency upon further examination of the property determined that it would conduct a Phase II environmental assessment of the property prior to acquisition. The former property owner completed the removal of the gasoline storage tanks and all gas contaminated soil from the property. In addition, the Agency identified oil contamination from a waste oil tank in the rear of the building and a pair of hoists inside the building. The former owner subsequently removed the waste oil tank and the hoists and conducted additional testing to determine the extent of the oil contamination. On September 8, 1999, the oil-contaminated soil was removed from the property, leaving all soils free of gas and oil contamination. Subsequent test results have shown that, although the soil is clean of gasoline contamination, the groundwater continues to show signs of contamination. Wells have been installed to monitor the groundwater over several years to determine whether natural water flows will 49 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 clean the water or whether it will have to be flushed out. To date the water continues to be contaminated. The San Mateo County Health Services Agency has issued a letter of partial clearance indicating the soil surface area is free of gasoline and oil contamination. The County will not make a final closure certifying the site is clean until the groundwater is also clean. By purchasing the property, the Agency assumed the financial responsibility for the cleanup of the groundwater. At the time of purchase in 1999 the estimated cost of remediating the ground water was $100,000. That cost has likely increased significantly over the past 14 years. g) Potential for Transit Oriented Development and Advancement of Planning Objectives The highest and best use of the property is to hold and combine it with adjacent properties to construct a high density residential project. The property, however, is a significant distance from the downtown's transit hub and services and is therefore not considered a transit oriented development opportunity. Improving the property advances the City's and Agency's goals to alleviate blight and help prepare and improve the site for future development. h) History of Development Proposals and Activity At one time the Agency prepared conceptual architectural plans for this site for a mixed-use development that included adjacent properties however the Agency was not able to assemble the site. Nevertheless, the Agency subsequently prepared conceptual plans for a mixed-use housing development for this single site. 30. 616 Linden Avenue On October 9, 1996, the Agency Board approved a resolution of necessity for the condemnation of the property at 616 Linden Avenue. However, the Agency and the property owners subsequently reached an agreement for a negotiated purchase and sale of the property. On February 26, 1997, the Agency approved a Purchase and Sale Agreement. The property currently serves as a metered parking lot with 20 parking spaces. However, at the time of acquisition the lot consisted of a 4,000 sq. ft. Quonset but-type building and a 2,250 sq. ft. automotive repair building. The Agency demolished the buildings but the environmental conditions created by the former uses persist today (see Environmental Contamination and 616 Linden Avenue Remediation section, below). a) Acquisition Information On February 26, 1997, the Agency Board approved a Purchase and Sale Agreement in the amount of $325,000 for 616 Linden Avenue.The property was conveyed to the Agency on April 14, 1997. 50 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 b) Purpose of Acquisition The Agency acquired the property for a public use purpose. At the time Agency was working with an arts performance organization to create a performance theater that would serve the downtown project area. The arts performance organization was not able to raise sufficient funding to complete the project and the Agency terminated the project. C) Parcel Data 616 Linden Avenue, APN 012-174-300: This is a 14,000 sq. ft. lot measuring 100 feet by 140 feet (see Appendix B).The parcel is zoned Downtown Mixed Use. d) Estimate of Current Value The property has not been appraised in recent years. The unimproved land value of properties in the downtown area is estimated at $80/sq. ft. and the property could conceivably have a value of up to $1.1 million. However, the environmental condition of the property is considerably adverse so the value may be significantly lower. See Environmental Contamination and Remediation section, below. e) Revenues Generated by Property/Contractual Requirements The property generates $2,880 per year in parking revenues but these funds are currently being used to offset the cost of operating and maintaining the parking lot. f) Environmental Contamination and Remediation Prior to the Agency's acquisition the property was used for automotive repairs that included underground petroleum storage tanks. The storage tanks leaked and contaminated the soil and ground water on the property. It was anticipated that the petroleum compounds in the ground would be remediated through natural degradation. Without further testing it is unknown whether this has yet occurred. The groundwater is being monitored by wells and continues to show signs of contamination. The Successor Agency does not have an estimate of the cost to remediate these conditions. g) Potential for Transit Oriented Development and Advancement of Planning Objectives The highest and best use of the property is to hold and combine it with 700 Linden Avenue to construct a high density residential project when market conditions improve. The property is in close proximity to the downtown core and the Caltrain station and is suitable for transit oriented development. Improving the property advances the City's and Agency's goals to alleviate blight and help prepare and improve the site for future development. h) History of Development Proposals and Activity In the late 1990's and early 2000's the Agency was working with an arts organization to develop a performance arts theater. Since the cancellation of that project, not other developments have been proposed although the Agency had conceptual plans prepared for a mixed-use housing development on the site. 51 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 31. 700 Linden Avenue This property is across the street from 616 Linden Avenue and the Agency purchased it shortly after acquiring 616 Linden Avenue. The Agency envisioned that this lot would serve as neighborhood parking and as parking for visitors to the performance theater that would be constructed across the street. Prior to its acquisition the lot was vacant and a 8 nei hborhood nuisance due to constant weed overgrowth. To address the overgrowth the i (uuuum um�'�I Agency entered into a cooperative agreement with the owner whereby the Agency cleaned and sodded the lot. The Agency continues to maintain the property as an open green rr space. a) Acquisition Information On April 8, 1998, the Agency Board approved a Purchase and Sale Agreement in the amount 700 Linden Avenue of$315,000 for 700 Linden Avenue.The property was conveyed to the Agency on April 14, 1997. b) Purpose of Acquisition The Agency acquired the property for a public use purpose. At the time Agency was working with an arts performance organization to create a performance theater at 616 Linden Avenue. The Agency purchased this property to serve as parking for the neighborhood and the theater during performances. The arts performance organization was not able to raise sufficient funding to complete the project and the Agency terminated the project. C) Parcel Data 700 Linden Avenue, APN 012-145-370: This is a 14,000 sq. ft. lot measuring 100 feet by 140 feet. The parcel is zoned Downtown Mixed Use. d) Estimate of Current Value The property has not been appraised in recent years. The unimproved land value of properties in the downtown area is estimated at $80/sq. ft. and the property could conceivably have a value of up to $1.1 million. e) Revenues Generated by Property/Contractual Requirements The property is vacant, unimproved land and does not generate any revenue. There are no contractual requirements associated with this property. 52 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 f) Environmental Contamination and Remediation The Agency believes the automotive uses at 616 Linden Avenue have created a plume of groundwater contamination that extends into all properties in close proximity to the site, including this property. The high water table and soil and groundwater contamination make it financially infeasible to develop a high density project without taking out several feet of topsoil for appropriate disposition and treatment of the groundwater. g) Potential for Transit Oriented Development and Advancement of Planning Objectives The highest and best use of the property is to hold and combine it with 616 Linden Avenue to construct a high density residential project when market conditions improve. The property is in close proximity to the downtown core and the Caltrain station and is suitable for transit oriented development. Improving the property advances the City's and Agency's goals to alleviate blight and help prepare and improve the site for future development. h) History of Development Proposals and Activity In the late 1990's and early 2000's the Agency was working with an arts organization to develop a performance arts theater at 616 Linden Avenue and use this site as parking for the new theater. Since the cancellation of that project, not other developments have been proposed although the Agency had conceptual plans prepared for a mixed-use housing development on the site. 32. 432 Baden Avenue/429 Third Lane On January 8, 1997, the Agency Board approved Resolution 1-97 authorizing the execution of a Purchase and Sale Agreement for 432 Baden Avenue/429 Third Lane. This property was acquired for the development of a public parking lot to serve the 400 block of Grand Avenue, in the Historic Downtown Business District and Downtown/Central Redevelopment Project Area, in order to relieve existing parking problems. The residential property that existed on the site was demolished and a new Agency surface parking lot was constructed. a) ACgUISItIOn Information The Agency appraised the property ' „/r and negotiated a final purchase ,// price of$270,000.The property was transferred by Grant Deed on April 14, 1997. b) Purpose of Acquisition The Agency purchased this property to develop a public parking lot to serve the 400 block of Grand Avenue. Previously this section of the downtown had no public parking facilities, resulting in 432 Baden Avenue 1479 Third Lane 53 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 parking problems for the area. The Agency demolished the residential building that existed on the site and developed a new 16-space surface parking lot. The property was developed solely for the purposes consistent with the Redevelopment Plan for the project area. C) Parcel Data 432 Baden/429 Third Lane, APN 012-321-160:This is a rectangular parcel consisting of 0.22 acre or 7,000 sq. ft. and measures 50 feet by 140 feet (see Appendix B).The parcel is zoned Downtown Core. d) Estimate of Current Value The property has not been appraised in recent years. The unimproved land value of properties in the downtown area is estimated at $80/sq. ft. and the property could conceivably have a value of up to $560,000. e) Revenues Generated by Property/Contractual Requirements The property generates $2,760.15 per year in parking revenues. These funds are currently being used to offset the cost of operating and maintaining the parking lot. f) Environmental Contamination and Remediation There are no known environmental conditions on the property. g) Potential for Transit Oriented Development and Advancement of Planning Objectives This site is ideal for a smaller scale transit oriented development. The property is located within the downtown and is less than one-half (1/2) mile away from the South San Francisco Caltrain station. Conceptual plans indicate that 12 residential units can be built on the site pursuant to the DSASP. h) History of Development Proposals and Activity Upon acquisition, the Agency demolished the existing building on the property. The Agency has not considered any other plans to develop the property. However, as stated above, the Agency has created a development program for the property based on the rezoning of the area by the DSASP. 54 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 Property Disposition This part of the LRPMP lists the Successor Agency's properties under the three applicable permissible categories allowed by the Redevelopment Dissolution Statutes. It begins with a discussion of the properties that are used for governmental purposes and the reason why these properties should retain their present functions. The next section lists the properties recommended for sale. The third section describes the properties that should be retained for the purpose of implementing the development goals of the approved Redevelopment Project Plan. For the section discussing the properties that should be retained for implementing the development goals of the approved Redevelopment Project Plan, the LRPMP will provide background information that will put into context the information provided for each property or group of properties. In addition, for each property transferred to the City pursuant to Section34191.5(c)(2)(A) and this LRPMP, the City and the Taxing Entities will enter into a Compensation Agreement pursuant to Section 34180(f). Each Compensation Agreement shall meet the characteristics described in the Compensation Agreement section of this LRPMP and will be subject to the directives of DOF in connection with its consideration and approval of this LRMPM. During the 1990's and 2000's the Agency's redevelopment focus was directed at developing what is arguably the world's premier biotech cluster. Nevertheless, in the few years preceding the dissolution of redevelopment the Agency acquired and assembled a significant amount of land for future development in the El Camino Corridor and Downtown Central project areas. Properties assembled include the former PUC properties, the Ron Price property (1 Chestnut), the Ford properties in the downtown and various other scattered sties. The City also adopted the 1999 General Plan that included plans for intensive development of the Downtown and within Transit Oriented Districts (TOD), adopted area plans for the El Camino Corridor to guide future development, and most recently adopted the Downtown Station Area Specific Plan (DSASP). With the dissolution of redevelopment the City lost a significant amount of funding that was available for fulfilling the Agency's and City's vision for downtown and the El Camino Corridor. The adoption of AB1484 (the clean-up legislation for ABx1 26), however, gives the City the opportunity to retain properties suitable for transit oriented development (TOD)to advance the project area's redevelopment plan. This section of the LRPMP will demonstrate that some of the Agency's former properties in TOD areas should be retained for future development to fulfill the redevelopment plan for the area. This section will further demonstrate that ensuring the development of these properties as envisioned by the Redevelopment Plans will ultimately be of greater benefit to the taxing agencies through increased property tax revenue. Planning for the future of the former Agency's properties must seek a balanced approach between pursuing the goals of the Redevelopment Dissolution Statutes and taking today's market investment and cost development realities into consideration. The Successor Agency must also appreciate the benefits 55 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 of developing affordable housing in the project areas. Affordable housing is not simply about providing housing for low-income people, it is about providing housing to working people at affordable rents so that they have disposable income to promote a healthy economy. Despite all of the benefits and attractive features of South San Francisco, there is no denying that the residential development community unfairly views South San Francisco as a second tier city in the County (this comment is not meant to insult but rather to convey the movement of capital). As developers have stated, it costs the same to build in South San Francisco as it does to build in Redwood City, San Mateo or Millbrae. Given this fact, why build in South San Francisco when the return on investment is much higher in other cities?This means that without proactive involvement, properties in the former redevelopment project areas will not be developed if development is left to market forces. To ensure the growth planned in the former Agency's Redevelopment Plan, the City is going to have to take a leadership role and initiate development of the PUC properties and in the downtown. The City has to be able to retain some of the former Agency's properties in order to spark development and fulfill the vision of creating TOD areas around the South San Francisco BART and Caltrain stations. To understand the development potential of the former Agency's properties and to identify the long- term financial benefits to the taxing agencies, the City worked with architects, developers and financial analysts to prepare development programs for the former Agency's properties. Each property discussed in the section listing the properties that should be retained for implementing the goals of the approved Redevelopment Plan describe the development potential of the properties and the long-term financial benefits to the taxing agencies. One final element in this section that needs further explanation is residual land value (RLV). RLV is the value of land determined by deducting from the value of an improved property, the costs of development and a market rate profit. This methodology is often used where direct land sale comparable information is not available without substantial adjustment for the use and development conditions. Additionally, this method estimates the amount that a developer can afford to pay for the site based on the expected costs and revenues associated with the development program. A calculated residual land value equal to the expected cost of land suggests that a project is feasible. A residual land value significantly less than the expected cost of land, or negative, suggests that a project is not feasible. Residual land values were calculated for both apartment and condominium developments. Apartments provide the highest and best use for the sites in current and projected market conditions. Condominium market conditions may improve and provide greater feasibility in the future. RLV for condominiums trailed feasibility thresholds in most scenarios. Consideration of park-in-lieu-fees and affordable housing requirements further impair condominium feasibility. Accordingly, condominium RLV's are excluded from the results presented in the LRPMP. 56 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 CIII C�iiiiiimio Commmmiirlomm Cmmolcct Ammar. 4-5. Former PUC Properties 093-331-050/ 093-331-060 These properties were acquired from the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission along with parcels APN 093-312-050, 093-312-060 and 011-326-030. While the latter parcels have development potential, these parcels are landlocked and run behind properties facing El Camino Real. They have no development value and are zoned for public use. The corridor now serves as a linear park. Therefore, these properties must remain a public use in order to provide public access and a park. W v �9W �r mum w i 1 n ✓/1/1l U � „« � mfi 57 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 Upon transfer of the property to the City the grant deed will include language restricting the use of the property to governmental/public use. In the event that City as Grantee discontinues the restricted use or seeks to use the property for a non-governmental/public purpose, the City shall enter into a compensation agreement with the San Mateo County Auditor-Controller or other appropriate entity or entities, providing that all net revenue from such non-governmental/public use shall be distributed in the same manner as property tax, subject to then-current law respecting such distribution. For a description of the proposed grant deed language, see Appendix F. B. 80 Chestnut Avenue This property was previously owned by Cal Water to operate wells and provide water to its users. It has long been the City's intent to expand Orange Memorial Park onto this property as reflected in the Orange Memorial Park Master Plan. The property is zoned Park/ Open Space/Public-Institutional Use and it currently serves as a museum for the South San Francisco Historical Society's historical collection. Cal Water plans to sell additional sub-area parcels to the City in the future to complete the expansion of the park. Given the property's zoning and intended public benefit, this property must remain a public use. Upon transfer of the property to the City the grant deed will include language restricting the use of the property to governmental/public use. In the event that City as Grantee discontinues the restricted use or seeks to use the property for a non-governmental/public purpose, the City shall enter into a compensation agreement with the San Mateo County Auditor-Controller or other appropriate entity or entities, providing that all net revenue from such non-governmental/public use shall be distributed in the same manner as property tax, subject to then-current law respecting such distribution. For a description of the proposed grant deed language, see Appendix F. d 7� Al A A✓9q '�iP VOW, teu i Wr � , e5 ' Y& irk u ✓ orH ta P� H ors �µ.✓ c�1' i i�d, t bA i J� S 4,0 J✓ W !„ /'ail ,s P t t .......... ORAN(,�PALIVIORIAIL PARK r7 hti ti� ml a I a rr n d f�rk 'y' 4�r�'� �'° "�°+�aru��"✓'j"" Fw,@r o v�Tp 58 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 Downtown Centra l Project Area 9. 480 North Canal This property is used for Fire Station 61. An engine company (Engine 61), ambulance (Rescue 61), Type 1 Heavy Rescue (USAR 61) and BLS Ambulance operate out of this station as well as the on duty Battalion Chief (Battalion 17)who manages the daily operation of each shift. This is also the home of the Fire Administration office and the Fire Prevention Division. The property also contains a four-story training tower. As the only fire station serving the City's downtown central area, this property must remain a public use, particularly as the property was purchased with tax exempt bond funds for this purpose. Upon transfer of the property to the City the grant deed will include language restricting the use ;�,✓'�aiiiDj,„����/����i���� % ///����� J// ,���„������� of the property to governmental/public use. In the event that City as Grantee discontinues the restricted use or seeks to use the property for a non- governmental/public purpose, the City shall enter into a compensation agreement with the San Mateo County Auditor- 480 N. Canal Controller or other appropriate entity or entities, providing that all net revenue from such non- governmental/public use shall be distributed in the same manner as property tax, subject to then- current law respecting such distribution. For a description of the proposed grant deed language, see Appendix F. 10. 296 Airport Blvd. The Agency acquired this property from the State Department of Transportation (DOT) to relocate the Caltrain station, related public uses, and pedestrian access improvements. The City and Agency worked extensively with Caltrain to develop plans to relocate the South San Francisco station. The project was ready to begin construction but was delayed by the proposed bullet train. In addition, an easement is recorded over the Directors' Deed granting DOT access for maintenance of the freeway from Grand Avenue towards the center of the site, along an established access road. The parcel is zoned for Public/Quasi Public use and is an integral part of advancing transit oriented development for the entire downtown area.Therefore, this property must remain in public use. 59 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 Upon transfer of the property to the City the grant deed will include language restricting the use of the property to governmental/public use. In the event that City as Grantee discontinues the restricted use or seeks to use the property for a non-governmental/public purpose, the City shall enter into a compensation agreement with the San Mateo County Auditor-Controller or other appropriate entity or entities, providing that all net revenue from such non-governmental/public use shall be distributed in the same manner as property tax, subject to then-current law respecting such distribution. For a description of the proposed grant deed language, see Appendix F. e„` au di m a w m . ��� ,,Bey.,, ,....._......_..... l 'I'�`7 J✓/Uy,����� df������� �� "yi// / 'l _,.�”' ,. t ra i w�r r� reuaw.d, r w. •✓o.m,u..<e /' ,, �, ',, ,,,, �w .. � ✓ i. y� `"� WA . n z, 60 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 11. 323 Miller Avenue The City and Agency combined this property with City owned land to construct a five-level, open-air concrete parking structure containing 254 parking stalls. The property now operates under the City's Parking District. Since the Agency and City owned properties were combined together in order to create this parking structure, and the Agency owned property is currently used for an elevator and public circulation, the property must remain a public use. o� �i/.rnN,Tr6 ,v rw 'r nr� 323 Miller Avenue Upon transfer of the property to the City the grant deed will include language restricting the use of the property to governmental/public use. In the event that City as Grantee discontinues the restricted use or seeks to use the property for a non-governmental/public purpose, the City shall enter into a compensation agreement with the San Mateo County Auditor-Controller or other appropriate entity or entities, providing that all net revenue from such non-governmental/public use shall be distributed in the same manner as property tax, subject to then-current law respecting such distribution. For a description of the proposed grant deed language, see Appendix F. 12. 356 Grand Avenue This parcel serves as pedestrian access connecting the City's Miller Avenue Parking Structure to Grand Avenue (the City's main downtown arterial). As other former Agency properties that currently serve as parking lots are developed, the Miller Avenue Parking Structure will play an increasing role in providing parking for downtown visitors. It is important that visitors have easy and safe passageway from the parking structure to Grand Avenue. Due to its important role, the City may dedicate this land as a formal right-of-way in the future.This property must remain a public use to serve the needs of the downtown. 61 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 Upon transfer of the property to the City the grant deed will include language ; restricting he use of the property to 8 p p Y governmental/public use. In the event that City as Grantee discontinues the restricted use or seeks to use the property for a non- govern menta I/pu bl ic purpose, the City y shall enter into a compensation ;;i agreement with the San Mateo County Auditor-Controller or other appropriate entity or entities, providing that all net ������� revenue from such non-governmental/ public use shall be distributed in the same manner as property tax, subject to then- current law respecting such distribution. 356 Grand Avenue For a description of the proposed grant deed language, see Appendix F. 13-14. 472 Grand Avenue/306 Spruce Avenue and 468 Miller Avenue San Mateo County Health Center These properties (472 Grand Avenue/306 Spruce Avenue/) contain the Health Center operated by San Mateo County and ancillary parking (468 Miller Avenue). The Health Center is a primary care medical facility providing services for low-income residents in the downtown area. Given the importance of the Health Center to the area residents and the Center's need for additional space to provide supplemental services, the Successor Agency recommends that this property be transferred to the County of San Mateo. property The transfer of the to San Mateo County would be conditional to retaining the Health Center at this location and would revert to the City in the event the County elected to close the Health Center. The County may condition its acceptance of � � �bavyA mgt the property on receiving the property with any and all existing deferred maintenance n improvements completed. If San Mateo rr1 Count declines to take ownership of the im 31 Y p property, the City will retain ownership of the properties and continue using them for 472 Grand/306 Spruce Avenue a public use. 62 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 Upon transfer of the properties to the County of San Mateo, or to the City in the event the County does not accept the property, the grant deed will include language restricting the use of the property to governmental/public use. In the event that County accepts the property and subsequently closes the Health Center, the property shall revert to the City. In the event the City as initial or subsequent recipient of the property discontinues the restricted use or seeks to use the property for a non- governmental/ public purpose, the City shall enter into a compensation agreement with the San Mateo County Auditor-Controller or other appropriate entity or entities, providing that all net revenue from such non-governmental/ use shall be distributed in the same manner as property tax, subject to then- current law respecting such distribution. For a description of the proposed grant deed language, see Appendix G. Peii-ii-nissible Use Categoiiy� Sale Gateway Project Area 1. 559 Gateway Blvd. Boston Properties conveyed this property to the Agency as a condition of development for its project. The property is subject to the Second Amendment to Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions for Gateway Center, which limits the uses of this property to: a) the operation of a child day care facility; b) a public library; c) a public office facility as an amenity to the property. The Peninsula Family YMCA operates a childcare facility at the site.The facility is at capacity and given the continued growth of the 559 Gateway Blvd. biotech center, demand for childcares services in the area will only increase. Given the deed restriction and the prevalent use, the property must remain in public, governmental use. However, the Redevelopment Dissolution Statutes are explicit in defining governmental use as "assets that were constructed and used for governmental purpose, such as roads, school buildings, parks, police and fire stations, libraries, and local administrative buildings." The California Department of Finance has determined that the property's current use as a childcare center operated by a nonprofit agency does 63 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 not fit the public use criteria of the Redevelopment Dissolution Statutes. Nevertheless, California Department of Finance recognizes that 559 Gateway is restricted by deed to serve a public purpose, therefore the property will be sold to the City of South San Francisco for$1. Upon transfer of the property to the City the grant deed will include language restricting the use of the property to governmental/public use. In the event that City as Grantee discontinues the restricted use or seeks to use the property for a non-governmental/public purpose, the City shall enter into a compensation agreement with the San Mateo County Auditor-Controller or other appropriate entity or entities, providing that all net revenue from such non-governmental/public use shall be distributed in the same manner as property tax, subject to then-current law respecting such distribution. For a description of the proposed grant deed language, see Appendix E. Per Section 34191.5 (c)(2) of the Health and Safety Code, upon sale of the Property the Successor Agency will distribute the proceeds to the taxing entities on a pro rata basis in proportion to each Taxing Entity's share of the base property tax revenues, as determined by the County Auditor-Controller. Downtown Centra l l roj ct Area 28. 938 Linden Avenue This property was intended to serve as a facility for St. Vincent de Paul's to provide food services to the area's homeless population. Since redevelopment was dissolved before St. Vincent was able to secure sufficient funding to remodel the building and relocate its services, the property became subject to dissolution provisions. It is conceivable this property can be reassembled with adjacent properties to construct a high density residential development in the future however this is not likely given that no other funds are available to assemble surrounding property. As St. Vincent was unable to secure funding, this property shall be sold. Financial Benefit to Taxing Agencies Per Section 34191.5 (c)(2) of the Health and Safety Code, upon sale of the Property the Successor Agency will distribute the proceeds to the taxing entities on a pro rata basis in proportion to each Taxing Entity's share of the base property tax revenues, as determined by the County Auditor-Controller. 32. 432 Baden Avenue/429 Third Lane This property was acquired for the development of a public parking lot to serve the 400 block of Grand Avenue. However, with the development of the Miller Avenue Parking Garage and the passageway connection to Grand Avenue, this parking lot is not as critical a parking resource to this section of the downtown as it once was. Pursuant to the DSASP, the property has the potential to hold up to 12 residential units.The adoption of the DSASP has significantly increases the property's value, estimated to be approximately$880,000. The property will be sold through a negotiated purchase and sale agreement. The Successor Agency will solicit proposals from developers and select the developer that proposes the highest net value to the 64 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 taxing agencies through a combination of sale proceeds and future tax revenues. The Successor Agency will negotiate a sale price commensurate to the proposed project and will outline the terms in a negotiated Purchase and Sale Agreement. In order to facilitate the sale process, it is possible the Successor Agency will enter into an Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) with the developer while negotiating the purchase of the property. The Oversight Board will approve both an ENA and a final Purchase and Sale Agreement. Financial Benefit to Taxing Agencies It is estimated the property is currently worth between $560,000 and $880,000. The lower figure is based on recent estimates of undeveloped land in the downtown area ($80/sq. ft.), and the latter figure based on the development potential. With the adoption of the DSASP, the property can immediately be developed to its full potential and the taxing agencies will be better off in the long run by having the Successor Agency sell the property immediately. As summarized below and shown in more detail in Appendix H and Table 1, the net financial benefit to the taxing agencies would be approximately $607,000 more (in present value) over a 20 year period. Per Section 34191.5 (c)(2) of the Health and Safety Code, upon sale of the Property the Successor Agency will distribute the proceeds to the taxing entities on a pro rata basis in proportion to each Taxing Entity's share of the base property tax revenues, as determined by the County Auditor-Controller. Table 1 Nominal Present Value of Cash Flows Cash Flows Sell Option $2,216,000 $1,721,000 Retain for $1,641,000 $1,113,000 Development Option It should be noted that the main reason this property is suitable for disposition is that it is a stand-alone property that does not affect the development potential or the value of other Successor Agency properties.The Successor Agency believes that the property is environmentally clean. 27. 216 Miller Avenue (former Ford site) The Agency acquired this property to ensure the development of high quality housing in the downtown project area. It is an important component of the City's and former Agency's efforts to create a vibrant, transit-oriented and diverse downtown. Development of this property will provide transit supported housing and easy connectivity to the downtown South San Francisco Caltrain station. With the adoption of the DSASP, the number of units that can be developed on the property increased from 25 units to approximately 50 units, significantly increasing the property's value. The property's residual land value, as a result of the adoption of the DSASP may be as much as$6.1 million. 65 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 The property will be sold through a negotiated purchase and sale agreement. The Successor Agency will solicit proposals from developers and select the developer that proposes the highest net value to the taxing agencies through a combination of sale proceeds and future tax revenues. The Successor Agency will negotiate a sale price commensurate to the proposed project and will outline the terms in a negotiated Purchase and Sale Agreement. In order to facilitate the sale process, it is possible the Successor Agency will enter into an Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) with the developer while negotiating the purchase of the property. The Oversight Board will approve both an ENA and a final Purchase and Sale Agreement. Financial Benefit to Taxing Agencies It is estimated the property is currently worth approximately $1.4 million based on recent estimates of undeveloped land in the downtown area ($80/ sq. ft.) but can be worth as much as $6.1 million based on its development potential. As summarized on Table 2 below and shown in more detail in Appendix H, the net financial benefit to the taxing agencies would be approximately $1.6 million more (in present value) over a 20 year period if the buyer develops the property immediately. Table 2 Nominal Present Value of Cash Flows Cash Flows Sell Option $6,968,000 $5,259,000 Retain for Development Option $5,480,000 $3,665,000 Per Section 34191.5 (c)(2) of the Health and Safety Code, upon sale of the Property the Successor Agency will distribute the proceeds to the taxing entities on a pro rata basis in proportion to each Taxing Entity's share of the base property tax revenues, as determined by the County Auditor-Controller. Given that the taxing agencies will reap the same financial benefit by retaining the property for future development or selling it immediately, the Successor Agency recommends selling this property. It should be noted that the main reason this property is suitable for disposition is that it is a stand-alone property that does not affect the development potential or the value of other Successor Agency properties. The Successor Agency believes that the property is environmentally clean. Peiii-ii ble Use. ate Approved � � velopii ii-i Vi je PlaiiiI t � � � t uu� The Redevelopment Plans describes redevelopment projects in each Project Area that would meet the goals and objectives of the plan and specifically provide for the installation, construction, expansion, and improvement of public facilities, redevelopment of land by private enterprise and public agencies, rehabilitation, development or construction of low- and moderate-income housing within the Project and/or the City. In addition, the Five-Year Implementation Plan presents specific programs and expenditures that would be undertaken in each of the project areas (based on the goals and objectives in the respective Redevelopment Plans) and identifies these properties for future development. 66 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 In addition, the use of the property for an approved redevelopment project is in compliance with the City's General Plan and the El Camino/Chestnut Area Plan, and it will help achieve five of the General Plan's nine components: • Neighborhood-oriented development • Economic development and diversification • Increased connectivity and accessibility • Land use/transportation correlation and promotion of transit • Reinforcement of Downtown as the center of South San Francisco The General Plan emphasizes the need to improve and develop properties surrounding the BART and Caltrain stations. Redevelopment of these properties will help to achieve more efficient land use, stimulate mixed-use, transit-oriented development, and improve connections between residential and employment centers and transit hubs. In addition, the public improvements and land assembly will improve transportation and pedestrian linkages and improve residents' access to every day commercial needs and increase connectivity and accessibility within and among the Project Areas. EIII Camino Corridor Project Area The following activities described in the Five-Year Implementation Plan are directly relevant to the development of properties as described in the LRPMP (excerpted from Section II. A pages II-1 and II-3 of the Implementation Plan):4 2. Public Facilities-Development of new parks, and reconfiguration of landscaping and playfields to meet the current needs of residents. 3. Economic Development—The projects and activities will be designed to promote economic development in the Project Areas and include the..support for mixed-use development in the...El Camino Corridor Project Area.... 4. Property Acquisition, Demolition and Site Preparation— Major land improvement activities will include the Chestnut Avenue/Cal Water site and acquired from the PUC in the El Camino Corridor.... 5. Affordable Housing Program-The Housing Program promotes residential and mixed-use development on vacant and underutilized sites. Through this program the Agency will increase and preserve the low and moderate-income housing stock. Components of this program include assistance for the construction of new rental and ownership units, loans and grants for rehabilitation, and first-time homebuyer assistance. 4 See pages II-1 to II-3,South San Francisco Redevelopment Agency,Five-Year Implementation Plan,FY 2009/10-FY 2013/14. 67 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 Chapter 3.4 of the General Plan specifies guiding and implementation policies for the El Camino Real area, many of which will be facilitated by the proposed development strategy described in the LRPMP: 3.4-G-2 Encourage development of a mix of uses, with pockets of concentrated activity that provide foci and identity to different parts of El Camino Real. 3.4-G-3 Develop the South San Francisco BART station area as a vital pedestrian center, with intensity and mix of uses that complement the area's new role as a regional center. 3.4-1-8 Require any new development within % mile of the BART station at a density of no less than 30 units per net acre for residential uses, or an FAR of 1.5 for non-residential uses, or an appropriate combination of the two. 3.4-1-13 Develop the El Camino Real/Chestnut Area in accordance with the vision established for the area by the El Camino Real/Chestnut Area Plan 2-3, 6-7. 1 Chestnut Avenue and Former PUC Properties APN 093-312-050,APN 093-312-060,APN 011-326-030 El Camino-Chestnut Avenue Property Assemblage The City of South San Francisco has identified the intersection of El Camino Real and Chestnut Avenue as a key opportunity site for new development and economic revitalization. The El Camino Real/Chestnut Avenue Area Plan, adopted in 2011, establishes a compelling long-term vision for the area as a new mixed-use neighborhood with residential, retail, and civic uses at a range of densities, along with public plazas and open space that benefit the broader community. The Successor Agency owns approximately 9.5 acres of vacant and underutilized property between El Camino and Mission Road, originally purchased by the Agency with the goal of facilitating development in an area that faces a variety of implementation challenges. Following the dissolution of the Agency in 2012, the Successor Agency is responsible for developing a strategy for these properties. This could consist of the sale of individual properties, or the entering into a master development agreement with a single developer identified through a Request for Proposals (RFP) process or a negotiated purchase and sale agreement. The goal of this recommendation is to adopt a strategy most likely to maximize the long-term revenue to the taxing agencies while also maintaining the vision expressed in the former Redevelopment Agency's El Camino Corridor Project Plan,the El Camino Real/Chestnut Avenue Area Plan and the City's General Plan. The former PUC properties exemplify both the opportunities and challenges of infill development along El Camino Real in the post-redevelopment era. The relatively large size of the assembled parcels, combined with their location near the South San Francisco BART station, makes this one of the most important development opportunity sites along El Camino Real. Nevertheless, the study area has several physical characteristics that pose significant implementation challenges. There is a sharp slope downwards from El Camino Real toward Mission Road, with a grade change of up to 50 feet in certain 68 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 locations. The developable parcels are also oddly-shaped due to the BART easement and the Colma Creek Channel, both of which cut through the site. The City of South San Francisco has already made substantial public improvements to the area with the construction of Centennial Way, a multi-use bikeway and linear park constructed on top of the underground BART tunnel and alongside the Colma Creek channel. The trail provides an open space connection between the South San Francisco and San Bruno BART Stations for residents, commuters and recreationalists, offering an alternative to sidewalks along El Camino Real and Mission Road. As of its completion in May 2009, the trail was 2.85 miles long. Another major public infrastructure project planned in the study area is the Oak Avenue extension, which would extend Oak Avenue from Mission Road through to Arroyo Drive, in accordance with the General Plan.This extension is expected to improve east-west connectivity. Strategic Economics evaluated the potential for new residential, office retail, and mixed-use development in the study area with a focus on the next ten years or less (see Appendix 1). Strategic Economics found that the area is well-positioned for residential development with supporting commercial uses. There is strong demand for new residential development in South San Francisco and the broader northern San Mateo County area. Employment growth in the Silicon Valley and San Francisco is a major driver of demand for housing in the market area. The study area offers excellent access to regional transit and freeways, and is an ideal location for professionals seeking a convenient commute to job centers in San Francisco or on the Peninsula. Site Description The properties included in the development feasibility analysis are shown in Figure 1 on page 71. In addition to the 9.5 acres owned by the Successor Agency (shown in brown), the development program includes 2.8 acres that are subject to an easement because they are in the BART right-of-way. Although the BART tunnel is underground, structural constraints limit improvements that can be made on the ground above to projects that do not involve any foundation work, and development along this easement would require BART approval. The Colma Creek Channel, Antoinette Lane and the planned Oak Avenue extension also play a major role in defining the shape and size of the developable acreage. For this reason the properties do not follow the parcel configurations described earlier in the LRPMP. Instead they are divided into the areas described in Figures 1 and on page 71. 69 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 Figure 1 t Y . u °1$% ON 7 ,o , X00` SITE � ��,t�e �H P )A31TE r ji Ism in Site A is the southernmost of the three development sites, located between Chestnut Avenue and the proposed Oak Avenue extension. The site is divided into three subsections by the BART easement and Antoinette Lane. Each of these parcels is described in more detail below. • Parcel 1 is 1.9 acres with frontage along Antoinette Lane and Chestnut Avenue. It is currently home to a single-story retail building occupied by Pet Club. This parcel has received interest from businesses and developers. (Labeled "Site Al" in Figure 1.) • Parcel 2 is a long, shallow parcel between El Camino Real and the BART easement, with a total area of 1.5 acres. (Labeled "Site A2" in Figure 1.) • Parcel 3 is a triangular 0.9 acre parcel bounded by the proposed Oak Avenue extension, the BART easement and Antoinette Lane. (Labeled "Site A3" Figure 1.) Site B is located on the north side of the proposed Oak Avenue extension, bounded by the BART easement to the southwest and the Colma Creek channel to the northeast.The developable area owned by the Successor Agency is 1.5 acres; the BART easement is 1.1 acres. Site C is the largest parcel at 4.5 acres. Located on the north side of the proposed Oak Avenue extension, it is bounded by the BART easement and Centennial Trail to the southwest and by Mission Road to the northeast. 70 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 Strategic Economics worked with Successor Agency staff to devise a development program that is both market driven and consistent with the community's goals for the study area as expressed in the El Camino Real/Chestnut Avenue Area Plan and the goals of the El Camino Real Project Plan. The development program assumes redevelopment of all Successor Agency-owned parcels in a manner consistent with a master developer approach. In this approach, the property is redeveloped with the goal of maximizing the combined potential of all of the parcels. Orchestrating development across all parcels offers three major benefits: 1) Economies of scale. Larger projects can benefit from savings on some "soft" costs of development such as site planning, entitlements, financing and marketing. In some cases, they can also save on some of the "hard" costs related with construction. Larger projects are also more likely to be of sufficient scale to assist in addressing related public improvements in utilities, access, or other infrastructure. 2) More efficient site design. Developed incrementally, each parcel would need to address access, parking and open space separately. A master developer approach allows required parking to be provided in a more economical way, in particular by making use of the BART easement for retail parking for multiple buildings. Consistent with findings of the market analysis, the development program consists primarily of residential uses with some supporting retail. The development program is summarized in Figures 2, and the drawings are provided in Figures 3 and 4. Figure 2 Site A Site B Site C Developable Area(acres) 4.2 1.5 4.4 BART Easement 1.7 1.1 0 Description Residential Over Residential Over Residential Over Ground Floor Retail Podium Parking Podium Parking and Podium Parking Stories 4-5 Stories 5 Stories 6 Stories Retail Area(sq-ft.) 32,400 0 0 Residential Units 194 100 420 Residential Parking Ratio 1.5 1.5 1.5 Source:VMWP,2013. 3) Development of all Properties. In the event the Successor Agency elected to sell individual properties, Site C is the only site that would be developed consistent with the Agency's El Camino Corridor Project Plan,the El Camino Real/Chestnut Avenue Area Plan and the City's General Plan. Site Al would most likely be purchased by a business that would retain the existing use. Site A2 would not be developed or sold given the site's development constraints and environmental condition. The size and accessibility constraints of Site A3 and Site B would most likely preclude the development and sale of 71 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 these properties as well. Such outcomes waste a tremendous opportunity to develop hundreds of housing units in a transit oriented area. Development Description Site A consists of three buildings with a total of 194 residential units and 32,000 square feet of retail. Each building has three to four residential levels over ground floor podium parking and retail. The retail businesses in all three buildings would be served by 131 shared surface parking spaces on the BART easement and Antoinette Lane, at a ratio of approximately 4 spaces per 1000 square feet. Sites B and C are both entirely residential with one floor of ground floor podium parking. Site B contains 100 units in four levels above one level of podium parking. The structured parking is supplemented by an additional 26 surface parking spots on the BART easement. Site C is developed with 400 residential units in four levels above two levels of podium parking. Figure 3 WIIII RA i T' j 'jai%✓ i i ( r r Plan View 72 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 Figure 4 ,a lr r I r 1 s; The financial feasibility results are summarized in Figure 5. Strategic Economics used a "land residual" approach to test the feasibility of the development program. This method estimates the amount that a developer can afford to pay for the property based on the expected costs and revenues associated with the development program. If the residual land value is similar to the expected cost of land, it suggests that the project is feasible. If the residual land value is less than the expected cost of land, or negative, it suggests that the project is not feasible. Figure 5 Site A Site B Site C Development Costs Hard Costs $67,830,000, $31,388,00,01 0,011 $125,861,000 Soft Casts $20,349,000, $0,416,000, $37,758,0010 Financing Costs $3,224,000 $1,492,000, $5,982,000 Devellopeir"s return $101,969,00000 $5,076,000, $20,352,0000 Total Costs $102,372,000 $47,372,000 $189,953,000 Total Revenue $104,580,000 $47,078,000 $189,477,000 Residual Land Value $2,208,000 -$294,000 -$476,000 Per Sgluiare Foot $8.013 -$2.63 -$2.46 Source Strategic Econorrrics,2,113. 73 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 For the purposes of the analysis, land values for residential and mixed use development near the study area are estimated to range from $50 to $75 per square foot. This price range is based on recent transactions and asking prices for properties in the surrounding area, as well as interviews with brokers and developers active on the San Francisco Peninsula. It should be noted that land prices vary greatly depending on the location and specific characteristics of the property, as well as zoning, intended use and market conditions. Financial Benefit to Taxing Agencies While the benefit of the City retaining the properties for future development and the fulfillment of the El Camino Project Area Plan is the most beneficial option for the City, the property, the residents, the region and the State, the financial benefit to the taxing agencies is virtually equal between the two options. As summarized below, and shown in more detail in Appendix H and Table 3, the net financial benefit to the taxing agencies is virtually equal over a 20 year period. Notwithstanding the financial benefits of development discussed above, the City and the Taxing Entities will enter into a Compensation Agreement pursuant to Section 34180(f) as described in the Compensation Agreement section of this LRPMP. Table 3 Nominal Present Value of Cash Flows Cash Flows Sell Option $53,288,000 $41,968,000 Retain for $61,944,000 $42,607,000 Development Option $45,000,000 $40,000,000 $35,000,000 $30,000,000 $2.5,000,000 $2.0,000,000 PV Sale $15,000,000 PV Hold $10,000,000 $5,000,000 $0 It 0 00 0 r-4 It 0 00 0 r-4 dr cw cw cw cw cw en en en rn r^- l3 rn r^- l3 rn r-fl r-fl r-fl r-fl c`Jl c`Jl c`Jl c`Jl c`Jl rn rn rw rw rw rw rw rw rw rw rw rw rw 74 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 Downtown enh—a1 Proj ctArea The goal of the property strategy for the Downtown Central Project Area is to maximize the long-term revenue to the taxing agencies and achieve the redevelopment plan projects while also maintaining the vision expressed in the City's General Plan as well as the Downtown Station Area Specific Plan (DSASP). The following activities are directly relevant to the development of properties in the downtown as described in the LRPMP (excerpted from Section II. A pages II-1 and II-3 of the Implementation Plan): 2. Public Facilities–Streetscape improvements to Grand Avenue, the construction of the CalTrain plaza and other pedestrian plazas...creation of infill parks in the Downtown Central Area...development of new parks, and reconfiguration of landscaping and playfields to meet the current needs of residents. 3. Economic Development–The projects and activities will be designed to promote economic development in the Project Areas and include the following: continued support of Downtown businesses through property improvement loans, Agency development of new housing in the Downtown Central Project Area, support for mixed-use development in the Downtown Central... Project Area.... 4. Property Acquisition, Demolition and Site Preparation–Major land improvement activities will include the Chestnut Avenue/CalWater site ... scattered site acquisitions in the Downtown Central Project Area.... 5. Affordable Housing Program–The Housing Program promotes residential and mixed-use development on vacant and underutilized sites. Through this program the Agency will increase and preserve the low and moderate-income housing stock. Components of this program include assistance for the construction of new rental and ownership units, loans and grants for rehabilitation, and first-time homebuyer assistance. The General Plan seeks to reinforce the Downtown's identity and role as the physical and symbolic center of South San Francisco. General Plan strategies include increased residential development in the Downtown and better connections to surrounding areas. Chapter 3.1 of the General Plan specifies guiding and implementation policies for the Downtown area, many of which will be facilitated by the proposed development strategy described in the LRPMP: 3.1-G-1 Promote the Downtown's vitality and economic well-being and its presence as the city's center. 3.1-G-2 Encourage development of Downtown as a pedestrian friendly mixed-use activity center.... 3.1-G-3 Promote infill development, intensification and reuse of currently underutilized sites. 3.1-1-3 Maintain land uses and development intensities in Downtown. 75 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 Downtown Station Area Specific Plan (DSASP) The City of South San Francisco recently adopted the Downtown Station Area Specific Plan (DSASP) for the area surrounding the City's Caltrain commuter rail station, located just east of Highway 101.The DSASP Area is located within one half mile of the South San Francisco Caltrain station, and includes the majority of commercial and civic development Downtown. A portion of the Plan Area extends east of Highway 101. A primary goal of the DSASP is to implement transit-supportive development in Downtown South San Francisco that meets the diversity and affordability needs of the local community. In pursuit of this goal, the DSASP seeks to improve accessibility between the Caltrain station, Downtown, and the employment center east of Highway 101. The DSASP effort requires an analysis of land uses that can support these objectives, including additional housing opportunities, retail development, and office development, and an evaluation of existing development standards, such as parking requirements. At present, the Caltrain station is currently situated between the downtown and the employment area east of Highway 101; however the highway, ramps, and overpasses create physical barriers that separate the Downtown from the employment center and limit accessibility to the Caltrain station from all directions. As a result the South San Francisco Caltrain station is significantly underutilized due primarily to these accessibility issues. The City adopted the DSASP and the accompanying environmental impact report on January 28, 2015. The recent adoption of the DSASP has a significant impact on all of the properties in the downtown area due to its zoning revisions. The new zoning increases allowable densities, thereby enhancing the transit oriented nature of the area. Since the adoption of the DSASP, the value of developable sites has increased dramatically as a result of the zoning changes which allow for greater development intensity. All of the downtown properties currently owned by the Successor Agency have benefited from the DSASP. Their values have increased and their ability to fulfill the RDA Downtown Project Area plan have been enhanced. However,the ability to achieve these goals will be contingent on various sites remaining assembled in order to meet their development potential. Appendix J is a study of the development potential for all sites in the downtown area. 15-18. 201, 207, 217-219, and 227 Grand Avenue Grand-Cypress Property Assemblage The Grand-Cypress properties sit at the gateway to Downtown South San Francisco. The properties are an important component of the City's and the former Agency's efforts to create a vibrant, transit- oriented and diverse downtown. Development of these properties and other sites owned by the Successor Agency will craft a vision for the Downtown core that provide transit supported housing and easy connectivity to the downtown South San Francisco Caltrain station. Site Description 76 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 The Agency acquired these properties over the years to create a 27,200 sq. ft. lot assemblage that would be ideal for a major transit oriented development. Despite the dissolution of redevelopment, City staff has been working with a developer that created conceptual plans to develop a 37-unit residential development with 8,000 sq. ft. of retail space (see Figure 6). Under present conditions, the Successor Agency believes 217-219 Grand Avenue could be sold on its own for approximately $1.2 million. However, it is unlikely that the remaining unimproved properties would sell. More importantly, the individual sale of 217-219 Grand Avenue would eliminate the possibility of developing a high density housing development that would fulfill the Redevelopment Plan, region and State goals of developing transit oriented housing. The highest and best use of this property is to develop a project with high intensity uses. Therefore, to ensure this type of development occurs, the Successor Agency and/or the City will merge these parcels into a single parcel. Figure 6 rai+ e i r r , v I Because of current market conditions, it is estimated that the residual land value of the Grand-Cypress property assemblage is zero or slightly negative. However, since the adoption of the DSASP and the increased development and desirability of the area as a result of its full transition into a full TOD area the residual land value the Grand-Cypress assemblage is estimated to be $1.5 million. Financial Benefit to Taxing Agencies Although the taxing agencies would receive an immediate benefit from the sale of the 217-219 Grand Avenue, in the long run the taxing agencies would receive a greater benefit as a result of the development of the entire site from the property taxes generated by a new development. As summarized below and shown in more detail in Appendix H and Table 4, the net financial benefit to the 77 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 taxing agencies would be almost $1 million more (in present value) over a 20 year period. With a development estimated to be completed in 2016/17, the breakeven point between immediate sale of some properties and the property tax generated from a new development would occur in approximately 14 years (2027/28)for the taxing agencies. Table 4 Nominal Present Value of Cash Flows Cash Flows Sell Option $2,451,000 $2,218,000 Retain for $4,674,000 $3,217,000 Development Option $3,500,000 $3,000,000 $2„500,000 i $2„000,000 $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 $® -PV Sale Dev(Base) -PV Dev(DSP) 19-21. 200 Linden Avenue and 212 and 216 Baden Avenue Linden/Baden Avenue Land Assemblage The Linden/Baden Avenue properties sit in the heart of Downtown South San Francisco. The properties are an important component of the City's and former Agency's efforts to create a vibrant, transit- oriented and diverse downtown. Development of these properties will provide transit supported housing and easy connectivity to the downtown South San Francisco Caltrain station. Site Description The Agency acquired these properties over the years to create a 31,404 sq. ft. (0.72 acre) lot assemblage that would be ideal for a major transit oriented development. The Successor Agency worked with a consultant to estimate the development potential of the site. The development consultant estimates that since the adoption of the DSASP, the residential development potential of the sites is 100 units and 6,500 sq. ft. of retail space. 78 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 Under present conditions, the Successor Agency believes the property at 200 Linden Avenue may potentially be sold on its own for approximately $1.6 million. However, it is unlikely that the remaining unimproved properties would sell for an extended period of time. More importantly, the individual sale of 200 Linden Avenue would eliminate the possibility of developing a high density housing development that would fulfill the Redevelopment Plan, region and State goals of developing transit oriented housing. The highest and best use of this property is to develop a project with high intensity uses. Therefore, to ensure this type of development occurs, the Successor Agency and/or the City will merge these parcels into a single parcel. With the adoption of the DSASP and the increased development and desirability of the area as a result of its full transition into a full TOD area, the residual land value the Linden/Baden assemblage is estimated to be$2 million. Financial Benefit to Taxing Agencies Although the taxing agencies would receive an immediate benefit from the sale of 200 Linden Avenue, in the long run the taxing agencies would receive a greater benefit as a result of the development of the entire site from the property taxes generated by a new development. As summarized below and shown in more detail in Appendix H and Table 5, the net financial benefit to the taxing agencies would be almost $4.9 million more (in present value) over a 20 year period. With a development estimated to be completed in 2017/18, the breakeven point for the taxing agencies would occur in approximately 8 years (2021/22). Notwithstanding the financial benefits of development discussed above, the City and the Taxing Entities will enter into a Compensation Agreement pursuant to Section 34180(f) as described in the Compensation Agreement section of this LRPMP. Table 5 Nominal Present Value of Cash Flows Cash Flows Sell Option $3,047,000 $2,795,000 Retain for Option $11,199,000 $7,708,000 Development $9,000,000 $8,000,000 $7,000,000 $6.,000,000 „do $5,000,000 ° $4,000,000 a $3,000,000 $2„000,000 .. $1,000,000a $® Cb lv r� ' PV Sale PV Dev(Base) —PV Dev(DSAP) 79 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 22. 315 Airport Blvd. 315 Airport Blvd. is the first property visible to drivers exiting southbound Highway 101. It also has strong visibility to drivers continuing along Highway 101.The property is an important component of the City's and the former Agency's efforts to create a vibrant, transit-oriented and diverse downtown. Development of this property will provide transit supported housing and easy connectivity to the downtown South San Francisco Caltrain station. Located in the heart of downtown South San Francisco, the highest and best use of the property is to develop it with high intensity uses. The property is currently large enough to be developed on its own, however, two adjacent parcels immediately south of the property are underutilized.The property at 305 Airport Blvd. contains an older commercial building that is vacant and the property at 309 Airport is an SRO hotel that has been informally offered to the City in the past. Combining the two properties with 315 Airport Blvd. would form a 0.85 acre site (37,341 sq. ft.), see Figures 7 and 8 below. Such assemblage could best be accomplished by having the City work with a developer that is interested in pursuing a larger project that would incorporate all three parcels. Figure 7 AV i r � d"+ 31,5 - Airport �x 5t �w 309 Airport 4 E NININININ0Y0Y0Y0Y0Y0Y0Y0Y0Y0 Py� a 3050 Airp rt j d NZ as A VE% L. Fi ure 8 / / / 305 Airport 309 Airport 315 Airport Vacant,former automotive store SRO hotel (Partial view) 80 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 Site Description This 22,136 sq. ft. (0.51 acre) property is ideal for a major transit oriented development. The Successor Agency worked with a consultant to estimate the development potential of the site. The development consultant estimates that with the adoption of the DSASP, the residential development potential of the sites is to 58 units and 9,000 sq. ft. of retail space. Under present conditions (including poor condition of building, allowable uses and development challenges), the Successor Agency believes the property at 315 Airport Blvd. would be difficult to sell. Nevertheless, a land speculator may be interested in purchasing the property at a discounted price and holding it for development or reselling it to a developer in the future. It is estimated that the property would sell at between $1.8 and $2.1 million. If sold, it is likely that the property will remain undeveloped for an extended period of time, thus eliminating the near term possibility of developing a high density housing development that would fulfill the Redevelopment Plan, region and State goals of developing transit oriented housing. With the adoption of the DSASP and the increased development and desirability of the area as a result of its full transition into a full TOD area, the property will experience an increase in residual land value. Because it is a challenging development site, it is likely that the value will still be quite small, at approximately $80,000. With the acquisition of 305-309 Airport Blvd, a developer could achieve higher economies of scale and build a larger project that would result in a higher residual land value and a greater benefit to the taxing agencies in the long run. Financial Benefit to Taxing Agencies Although the taxing agencies may receive a benefit from the sale of 315 Airport Blvd., in the long run the taxing agencies would receive a greater benefit in the form of property taxes generated by a new development if the City is able to advance the development of site. As summarized below and shown in more detail in Appendix H and Table 6, the net financial benefit to the taxing agencies would be almost $2.3 million more (in present value) over a 20 year period. With a development estimated to be completed in 2016/17, the breakeven point for the taxing agencies would occur in approximately 11 years (2024/25). Notwithstanding the financial benefits of development discussed above, the City and the Taxing Entities will enter into a Compensation Agreement pursuant to Section 34180(f) as described in the Compensation Agreement section of this LRPMP. 81 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 Table 6 Nominal Present Value of Cash Flows Cash Flows Sell Option $2,68,000 $2,470,000 Retain for $6,873,000 $4,731,000 Development Option $5,000,000 $4,500,000 $4,000,000 ° $3,500,000 $ ° ,000,000 $2,,500,000 , wNO $2,000,000 ...... $1,500,000 � '$1,000,000 0�,� '$.500,000 �� ��� � $0 PV Sale PV Dev(Base) PV Dev(DSAP) 23-25. 401,411 and 421 Airport Blvd. 400 Block Airport Blvd. Land Assemblage Consisting of 1.06 acres, the properties on the 400 block represent the single largest development opportunity in downtown South San Francisco.The properties have strong visibility to drivers continuing along Highway 101. The property is an important component of the City's and the former Agency's efforts to create a vibrant, transit-oriented and diverse downtown. Development of this property will provide transit supported housing and easy connectivity to the downtown South San Francisco Caltrain station. Site Description This 43,043 sq. ft. (1.06 acre) property is ideal for a major transit oriented development. The Successor Agency worked with a consultant to estimate the development potential of the site. The development consultant estimates that under current conditions the site could accommodate 81 residential units and 8,000 sq. ft. of retail space. Upon adoption of the DSASP, the residential development potential of the sites increases to 162 units and 8,000 sq. ft. of retail space. Under present conditions (including the reduced number of residential units), the Successor Agency believes the property at 411 Airport Blvd. has the potential to be sold on its own for approximately $1 million. If 411 Airport Blvd. is sold on its own, it is unlikely the remaining unimproved properties would 82 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 sell for an extended period of time. It is possible a land speculator may be interested in purchasing the entire property at a discounted price and holding for it development or reselling it to a developer in the future. The highest and best use of this property is to develop a project with high intensity uses. Therefore, to ensure this type of development occurs, the Successor Agency and/or the City will merge these parcels into a single parcel. Because of its reduced development potential, it is estimated that the residual land value of the 400 block of Airport Blvd. is negative (-$7.2 million). However, with the adoption of the DSASP and the increased development and desirability of the area as a result of its full transition into a full TOD area, the property will experience an increase in residual land value to $3 million. Financial Benefit to Taxing Agencies Although the taxing agencies may receive a benefit from the sale of 411 Airport Blvd., or the potential sale of the entire site to speculative buyer, in the long run the taxing agencies would receive a greater benefit in the form of property taxes generated by a new development if the City is able to advance the development of site. As summarized below and shown in more detail in Appendix H and Table 7, the net financial benefit to the taxing agencies would be approximately $12.3 million more (in present value) over a 20 year period. With a development estimated to be completed in 2016/17, the breakeven point for the taxing agencies would occur in approximately 8 years (2021/22). Notwithstanding the financial benefits of development discussed above, the City and the Taxing Entities will enter into a Compensation Agreement pursuant to Section 34180(f) as described in the Compensation Agreement section of this LUMP. Table 7 Nominal Present Value of Cash Flows Cash Flows Sell Option $4,811,000 $4,313„000 Retain for $17,836,000 $12,277,000 Development Option $14,000,000 $12,000,000 ”- $10,000,000 $8,000,000 $6,000,000 $4,000,000 �wMm m u $2,000,000 $Q It IrD FD P- CG a) d '-fi N ro � ='� 40 r, W Dt 0 ei N ro It rl r-N '-N rl rl rl N N N N N N N N N N ro m m M M (1 4�D r R f7 © > N '(-Y) dt ; 6 f7 a r>-I N E�'1 c-1 rfl c-fl rl rl rl rfl N N N N N N N N N N ro ro ro ro 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N PV Sale PV Dev(Base) —PV Dev(DSMP) 83 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 26. 405 Cypress Avenue Consisting of 8,763 sq. ft., 405 Cypress Avenue has a moderate development opportunity. Nevertheless, coupled with other properties being developed in the area, this property has the potential to be developed according to the former Agency's plan. Development of this property will provide transit supported housing and easy connectivity to the downtown South San Francisco Caltrain station. Site Description This 8,762 sq. ft. (0.2 acre) property has the potential to be a transit oriented development. The Successor Agency worked with a consultant to estimate the development potential of the site. The development consultant estimates that under current conditions the site could accommodate 14 residential units. Upon adoption of the DSASP, the residential development potential of the sites increases to 28 units. The highest and best use of this property is to develop a project with high intensity uses. The property is marginally large enough to be developed on its own under current market condition. However, one adjacent parcel immediately west of the property are underutilized. The property at 204 Miller Avenue is an older commercial building that is vacant. Combining the two properties would form a 15,762 sq. ft. site (see Figures 9 and 10 below) that would increase the viability of the site. Such assemblage could best be accomplished by having the City work with a developer that is interested in pursuing a larger project that would incorporate both parcels. Figure 9 Figure 10 ROO + U f �, 314E r„. - sr- �o 7' G Vs"' JA Pd li i Cy pr �. 204 Miller 405 C ress A 204 Miller Under present conditions (including the reduced number of residential units), the Successor Agency believes the property has little sales potential. It is unlikely that a developer or land speculator would be interested in this property until all major sites in the downtown are developed. Because of its reduced development potential, it is estimated that the residual land value of the 405 Cypress Avenue is negative (-$1.2 million). However, with the adoption of the DSASP and the increased development and desirability of the area as a result of its full transition into a full TOD area, the property will experience an increase in residual land value to $650,000. With the acquisition of 204 Miller, a developer could achieve economies of scale and build a larger project that would result in a higher residual land value and a greater benefit to the taxing agencies in the long run. 84 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 Financial Benefit to Taxing Agencies In the short- to medium term, it is unlikely the taxing agencies will receive any benefit from the sale of 405 Cypress Avenue. The greatest potential for this site is if it is bundled with properties on the 400 Block of Airport Blvd. and is developed as part of that project. As summarized below, and shown in more detail in Appendix H and Table 8, the net financial benefit to the taxing agencies of having the City hold the property for development would be approximately $1.2 million more (in present value) over a 20 year period. With a development estimated to be completed in 2018/197, the breakeven point for the taxing agencies would occur in approximately 10 years (2021/22). Notwithstanding the financial benefits of development discussed above, the City and the Taxing Entities will enter into a Compensation Agreement pursuant to Section 34180(f) as described in the Compensation Agreement section of this LUMP. Table 8 Nominal Present Value of Cash Flows Cash Flows Sell Option $893,000 $845,000 Retain for $3,094,000 $2,070,000 Development Option $2„500,000 $2„000,000 $1,500,000 $1,000,000 . . $500,000 $® a �C ti ,k74 -PVSaIe Dev(Base) PV Dev(DSMP) 29. 905 Linden Avenue The highest and best use of the property is to construct a high density residential project. The property is one mile away from the downtown's transit hub but nevertheless has the potential to be a development site due to its proximity to the downtown core. Site Description This 15,000 sq. ft. (0.34 acre) property has the potential to be developed on its own or by combining it with adjacent private properties. The Successor Agency worked with a consultant to estimate the development potential of the site. The development consultant estimates that under current conditions the site could accommodate 11 residential units. Although this site is outside of the DSASP area it will still benefit from DSASP adoption as the desirability of the area will grow over time. 85 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 Under present conditions (including environmental conditions and development challenges), the Successor Agency believes the property at 905 Linden Avenue would sell to a developer interested in a smaller development site. A comparable vacant property across from 905 Linden Avenue recently sold and is being developed as a 5 unit residential project. The comparable property is 7,559 sq. ft. and sold for$600,000 ($79.38/sq. ft.) It is estimated that 905 Linden would sell for approximately $1.1 million if sold with all environmental remediation completed. However, it is estimated the property would have to be discounted by$100,000 to $200,000 if sold without remediation. An updated phase II environmental study will be necessary before the property is listed for sale. Financial Benefit to Taxing Agencies The taxing agencies will receive the financial benefit from the sale of this property and in the long-term benefit from the property taxes generated by a new development. As summarized below and shown in more detail in Appendix H and Table 9, the net financial benefit to the taxing agencies would be approximately$928,000 (present value) in sales proceeds and property tax revenue upon the sale of the property, and an additional $764,000(present value) in property taxes over a 20 year period. A sale is estimated to occur in 2016/17 and a development could be completed in 2019/20. Notwithstanding the financial benefits of development discussed above, the City and the Taxing Entities will enter into a Compensation Agreement pursuant to Section 34180(f) as described in the Compensation Agreement section of this LRPMP. Table 9 Nominal Present Value of Cash Flows Cash Flows Sales and TI Revenue (Sold in 2016/17) $928,000 $848,000 TI from Retaining for $1,158,000 $764,000 Development $900,000 $800,000 $700,000 $600,000 $500,000 $5400,000 - d� $300,000 r4s. $200,000 - — - — — — — $100,000 $o K tip\ ��! �� �ti\ 'P 'P � 'O 'P ,�+� ,�a �° ..�a ,yea `1° _P'O ..yea PV Sale Revenue —IPV Dev TI 86 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 30-31. 616 and 700 Linden Avenue 616-700 Linden Avenue Assemblage The highest and best use of this property is to retain it and sell it for a high density residential development that can be built in the future. The two sites are relatively small and have petroleum compound contamination in the soil and groundwater. Despite these difficulties, the properties will serve well as transit oriented housing because of their proximity to the downtown's transit hub and the Caltrain station. Site Description Each property is 14,387 sq. ft. (0.33 acres) for a combined total of 0.67 acres. It would be challenging to develop each of these properties individually but combined they can be suitable for development. The Successor Agency worked with a consultant to estimate the development potential of the sites. The development consultant estimates that under current conditions the sites could accommodate 40 residential units. Although this site is outside of the DSASP area it will still benefit from DSASP adoption as the desirability of the area will grow over time. A comparable vacant property at the corner of Linden and Armour Avenue recently sold and is being developed as 5 residential units. The recently sold property is 7,559 sq. ft. and sold for $600,000 ($79.38/ sq. ft.). It is estimated that 616 and 700 Linden would sell for approximately $1,680,000 ($60/ sq. ft.) if sold with all environmental remediation completed. It is estimated the properties would have to be discounted by $200,000 to $400,000 if sold without remediation. An updated phase II environmental study will be necessary before the property is listed for sale. Financial Benefit to Taxing Agencies The taxing agencies will receive the financial benefit from the sale of this property and in the long-term benefit from the property taxes generated by a new development. As summarized below and shown in more detail in Appendix H and Table 10 the net financial benefit to the taxing agencies would be approximately$1,056,000 (present value) in sales proceeds and property tax revenue upon the sale of the property and an additional $1,300,000 (in present value) over a 20 year period.The sale is estimated to occur in 2016/17 and a development is estimated to be completed in 2019/20. Table 10 Nominal Present Value of Cash Flows Cash Flows Sales and TI Revenue (Sold in 2016/17) $1,155,000 $1,056„000 TI from Retaining for $1,971,000 $1,300,000 Development 87 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 $1,400,000 i $1,200,000 i ,ice r $800,000 $600,000 ,r $400,000 200,000 $0 ✓ a 0 r, m rn 0 0 m rn d pr`j u�'t tG T�- W 61 0 0 N 0 0 0 .0 0 .N .N d N .N d N .N 0 d N 0 0 0 0 0 0 V . . N V N V V V V . V . N Pvsale Revenue PV Dev TI Conclusion In summary and for the reasons set forth above, this LRPMP directs that each property be used or sold for a project identified in the approved Redevelopment Plan in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 34191.5(c)(2)(A). Upon approval of this LRPMP, the properties will transfer from the Community Redevelopment Property Trust Fund to the City, subject to the terms of this LRPMP. The Successor Agency is authorized and directed to take all actions necessary to cause such transfer of each Property to the City and to take all necessary steps to carry out goals and objectives of the LTPMP. To carry out the goals and objectives of the LTPMP the City will take the following steps: Because the City is obligated to dispose of the Properties in accordance with this LRPMP and to satisfy goals, objectives and purposes of the Redevelopment Plan and the Redevelopment Dissolution Statutes, the Properties are not "surplus" property of the City and are not subject to the disposition requirements and procedures of the Surplus Lands Act (Government Code Section 54220 etseq.). Instead, disposition of the Properties in accordance with this LRPMP and to satisfy goals, objectives and purposes of the Redevelopment Plan and the Redevelopment Dissolution Statutes constitutes a "common benefit" that may take place under authority of Government Code Section 37350 and/or other disposition authority deemed appropriate by the City. The provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act and Government Code Section 65402(a) regarding General Plan conformance will apply to the disposition of each property. Upon the transfer of properties pursuant to this LRPMP, and pursuant to the Redevelopment Dissolution Law, the City will use a number of methods and procedures to advance the development of the properties to their full potential. The methods and procedures the City uses will depend on the 88 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 marketability, financial feasibility, accessibility, condition and complexity of the properties. These methods will include, but not be limited, to: • Request for Qualifications (RFQ)—to identify prospective developers • Request for Proposals (RFP)—to obtain bids for development projects • Exclusive Negotiating Rights Agreements (ENRA) — to negotiate with specific developers on properties posing significant development challenges • Disposition and Development Agreements (DDA) —to dispose of land pursuant a development agreement • Cooperation Agreements — to include the City's participation in the development of properties posing significant development challenges that necessitate public participation in order to advance the development of the property or a public goal such as (but not limited to) affordable housing The guidelines will apply to the properties retained for future development and the properties with development potential in the Sale category(i.e. 432 Baden Avenue and 216 Miller Avenue). U se of Sales Viroceeds The proceeds received from the sale of the LRPMP Properties, if any, are anticipated to be programmed to advance the development of the properties in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan and the Redevelopment Dissolution Statutes goal of creating Transit Oriented Development. Proceeds if any will be used for the following purposes: • Environmental remediation of contaminated properties —for example, several properties have environmental contamination that must be removed prior to being suitable for residential development or public use. • Development of infrastructure that enhances the development potential of properties — for example, in order to make possible and maximize the development of the former PUC properties, it will be necessary to complete construction of the Oak Avenue Extension. • Cooperation agreements with developers to facilitate the development of properties — for example, the City will incorporate the inclusion of affordable housing within a proposed market rate development, or on a selected site, to provide the minimum required number of affordable units under of the former Redevelopment Plans. • Relocation — for example, relocate businesses in Agency owned properties to facilitate development. • Improvements to Public Use properties in the LRPMP that advance the goals of the Redevelopment Dissolution Statutes such as TOD and the former Redevelopment Plans. 89 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 For each property to be transferred to the City pursuant to Section 34191.5(c)(2)(A) and this LRPMP, the City and the Taxing Entities will enter into a Compensation Agreement pursuant to Section 34180(f). Each Compensation Agreement entered into by the City and Taxing Entities shall: A. Address compensation to the Taxing Entities for one or more of the properties that is transferred to the City in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 34191.5(c)(2)(A) and this LRPMP; B. Be approved by the Oversight Board; C. Be reviewed and approved by DOF, by operation of law or otherwise, following Oversight Board approval; D. Be executed by the City and all of the Taxing Entities as identified by the County Auditor- Controller, and by the County Auditor-Controller if required; E. Provide that specified proceeds from the subsequent disposition of the property or properties by the City pursuant to a DDA will be distributed to all of the Taxing Entities on a pro rata basis in proportion to each Taxing Entity's share of the base property tax revenues, as determined by the County Auditor-Controller; F. Provide for the retention by the City of specified proceeds from the subsequent disposition of the property or properties by the City pursuant to a DDA to reimburse the City for the costs incurred for maintenance, improvement and disposition of the property or properties, for procurement of pollution legal liability insurance related to the property or properties and for the relocation of any tenants subject Federal and State relocation laws and regulations; G. May contain other mutually acceptable terms to implement the intent of Sections 34180(f) and 34191.5 and this LRPMP with respect to the property or properties. Notwithstanding the foregoing or any other provision of the LRPMP, no Compensation Agreement shall be required, and the City may retain any proceeds from the disposition of a property, if a court order, legislation or DOF policy reverses DOF's directive regarding the need for a Compensation Agreement. In such case, any net disposition proceeds (as defined in Paragraph F above) received by the City for the disposition of a property pursuant to a DDA shall be used by the City to pay costs of one or more projects identified in the Redevelopment Plan. 90 Amended Long Term Property Management Plan May 21, 2015 Appendices peuu-dig B .... Piro ii- Pauu- peuu-dig E ............ ...Firaiui-i "eiui- uu- iui- Deed Laii-iguage foir 559 Gateway Blvd peuu-dig F ... °Firaiui-i "eiui- uu- iui- Deed Laiiii u age foir Public U se Piropeii-fies peuu-dux .... Firaiui-i "eiui- uu- .iui- Deed Laiiii ua ge foir 4.72 uu- .iui-d Ave /306 Spiruce Ave peuu-dig 11 .... Piro ii- Fax Iiii-i ii-eiii ii-i Pi 91 Appendices Appendix A DOF LRPMP Property Tracking Worksheet m m m Tn Tn Tn Tn co D cl m a a a oa m N w U m m m m m 1p m d a > > > > > o Q U C7m0 w¢ o v o 0 o u >Cm o>Cm V� � V� V N N N O y m m m J m 0 m 0 0 0 V M O O O O O O O O O O U rn u? co u? co m m rn _ o y � v o 0 0 0 0 0 LL� M M M M V N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 > N 0 y � m Q m m m d 2 U' m °m °m °m °m °m U Q Z U Q o rn o 0 0 0 0 Z Z Z Z Z U ro o 0 ro rn V N O O O O O N (0 O m L N N � 0 N W O N O N � 0 N � 0 E N~ N 0 N 0 y X.. X.. X.. X.. X.. t 0 O O U .2 5 11 O - �� EWE Elm EWE EWE �o ? W y v m 10 0 m `0 0 m `0 0 m `0 0 m `0 0 m o r a m o �' m m m N y l0 d 0 Y LL 0 ELL 0 ELL 0 ELL 0 Y LL O N O Y 0 mY d Z (0 l0 E A (0.- O l0 c0'c > m y 3 om m'Om m10m m'0m m'0m m'0m �a` � Eo 10a gymm� o o EuU E u U E u U E u U E u U w E U E o w Q M a 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 o � 0 o E U E y a o >° o , o >° o >° o >° o W�a >U 10 - y 2 U 0 0 cl 0 0 W W n . a U d w °-d Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z m o m K a y a 0 ° d O d? W 0> Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q O Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z a ; y y o `u d m m m m m m o � � m E 10 ai ai ai ai ai Z Q o y U> W N N d y N N ly/1 ly/1 N N 0 N N 0 0 0 Q Q d LL� LL� N; O O N > O O O O O > > O O E c N W = fA fA- O fA- O fA fA fA Q U U y N O O O N O O N O O N O O N O O N O O O E F � H M fA N a fA N C O N C O N C O N C O N C O fA O. fA O. fA O. fA O. 0 y > F 2 Wo m ro ro ro ro ro ro r v o > o O O O o 0 0 0 0 i i i Q N m m m m m N N N W a z � y D Y o m v 1W 1W I Y Y W °m o� u 42 IL y Eoa`o� E E a a SE E o N y � N N o o o D. N y Z 1 1 N y N p W W W W y � l0 ° 10 WE o0 0o a a 00 00 o LL E m 010 m m m m y M - m U K � a m w U C } 2 � F d m •- •- m m m m m 0 W n m m m m m m m m m m U d y y E ° E ° E ° E ° E ° E ° a E oEi� 1i m 1i m m� oEi� 1i m 1i m m� oEi� oEi� a a 0 o o o o cl w c z A Z 2 2 c a L_ W 0 O o.~ ° > O > O > O U > O ° am ao cn > 0 U J U U Z r ro rn N N m (6 d m m _ E N~ IJ/1 U U U U U ° c m A O p O >.v � 0 TO O_a Ta U N o o N � m= O N ° D TO-Fz m o o m 10 o m 10 o m w o m w o m w - m U a o m a ° J m - o - o - o - o - o o _ o o:om Q m E o w O m t T E In N In N In N In N In N Q LL' 3 U °- Y N v d m o > O °� m ° m o m o m o m o m am w Y m m m °� m - `o m o ° M m u o m m a s a s a s a s a s w._ a o m a o. U °-o. ° mU m.° u '°.° u '°.° v 10.°" v 1 owv `O T`m T`m� E f° O O N.- In L O O N L O O N L O O N L O O N L O O N m L m O m o 0 t l0 n T l0 = za - �� > EJ EJ EJ EJ EJ QLw o°U > � U T S O S O S O S O S o m rT, > O d N a l0 o ESL m ai ai ai w w mm U a� o� Omm � >.0 o m w m w m w m w m w s `m°> N >.- E O a > O a > O a > O a > O a > m a'In m�'.- T'- w m a m a = O O D m m m 0 m N o m N o m N o m N p m m m Ti L a N �U dLL a`s a`s a`s a`s a`s Q m_��n ma m m It m 10 m 10 m (0 m (0 m (0 s It v E m E K o o E K o o E K o o E K o o E K o o E o Y = am w m o oo UU ooUU ooUU ooUU ooUU J.T- oQ d a mo 5;w m > > > > > m m > m m ° m >o m m m m m m m m m m p m m m m m.c U `m 0 U 2 E 0 0 2 E 0 0 2 E 0 0 2 E 0 0 2 E U o 'o a o ° m o LL m a LL m a LL m a LL m a LL m a `o_m m � E£a m y ' mw 2 wm mw �wm mw �wm mw �wm mw mW 10 ~ mo `off ° m �Tn m m T=p mU mN mU mN mU mN mU c N mU c m m« NL (n '--' . m 0 o m o. O m O O m O O m O O m O O m O o m m m w�io= m 55 55 wEU)Z: wEi�= m w�ioSm JmomU �Oa � m = m-o � L ° L°-o -m�� L°-o -m�� L°-o -m�� L°-o -m�� L°-o -m�� mmam m° mUm' m m ~m a a w > m a o m F > m a o m F > m a o m F > m a o m �' m Ti's O m o o m m �a � E m�a � E m�a � E m�a � E m w mo" a �'a U �' m m w cmi � � aL°i m� �'62, aL°i m � � � aL°i m � � � aL°i m � � � aL°i m � Q � o�o o �`mn u m L� c10i U 5 U Q l i d L d U w Q d U w Q d U w Q d-�U w Q d U w Q F Q N d W t 0 l LL K K o_ m 2 m 2 m 2 m 2 m 2 m Ti co ° Em Em Em Em Em m c mom° °- xm Tn 'xm Tn 'xm Tn 'xm Tn 'xm Tn mm n m m m Tn o._ w m o._ w m o._ w m o._ w m o._w m m m r r r r r D o. a m o. a m o. a m o. -°s o w o- U w m(j o o t m- o ° m- o ° m- o ° m- o °- m- 6 0°>o `oa 2 10 c o 5 m m m °U E mw u U E mw u U E mw u U E mw u U E m ° m L N m d E S E S o c E S o E S o E S o E S o Y m m o 0 . m a L m a a m u a s m u a s m u a s m u a s m u > o o o o o m `m > m `m > m `m > m `m N d J_ C -O m o �.d v ami o !� o 0 0 !� o 0 o m ra `mE m mwu Kw mwv �w mwv �w mwv �w v mY m� o m a m m Q m c O m c ° m ° m ° `° ° m E m o m m o m m o m m o m m o m (j o f ° m a c m E -`o J � E -`o J � E -`o J � E -`O J `m E -`O J T , � m c6 w d - o O`m_ m o m m o m m o m m o m m o m °' n ww C) c ° o_�a� JO w too ym. w too ym. w too ym. w too ym. w t0.0 ym. mw m O tFw op lo w om Nd N 0 m m m m am lO m m N� lO m m m am lO m m N� m m m m� o c6 o���� N o m :N L° - m L N o.- m L N o.- m L N o.- m L N o.- m L m °'_' " m N m ` N p o m m E •- o - o a� - o w -� o a� -� o a� m L L° > o o ai> LL'-o o m (n O d O (n O d O (n O d o u O -O U O d O d LL l0 Z Z -mm m O_ O_ O_O _ O_ ° O_ w w C= O - O_ O_ A C C O O O O O m m O - - ~N O a a O U LL m m Tp m m m m m m m O O lo .O E c; a > c._ m- m m m m m m m �- d`m ami a E E E E E w E � -£ m aci o FF > > > > > -JO w W > 0 0 0 o a m N N N N N O F N '> '> N a=E N N U �'c c°n` N N N N N N LL J y o E N N N N N L o E 2 m m Tn N (p o o m o l0 2 C o o o o o Q= o - E U E m m m m m s m m o o ¢10 a o o o o o m o z z o z z z z z a z o O >`N T C N m 0 0 0 O U O-mm O.w O L N m °•- o m N 0 y N"O m n � o ma of 5 U) w2 J Tn O Q U E N U O•=O •- d 2 w E m m n N YO No o 0 U 2w, U o m 0 0 m °w a > s m m o a `m ro m Tn£ E ° E d n a, m m m n a N m m w o Q o u-�'° o f m J m ai m m W c E m z z z a m U z m o o L .1 m y m N, w m aoi o o° z z d o m m E m m E E" °Q n m F m c U ° m . o m € rn E U m m E UL o mLL�-m m 0 m QlO r, m M C E. O N m >'I� m (n .L_- O. T j Imn y U Q K m o J ~ m L °° m o ami m = F T O J m 0 C m m Z N m > O m E ° °o y o W p N C fA fA fA fA fA � fA fA C m O O O O O y� `off ai m m �> o > w U N U N m N C N C fA V M m W O Z m a m .O U U U E U U U U U N N K C O O O O O O O O 3 3 3 0 3 3 3 3 3 U 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 U 0 0 0 0 o r o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o r o 0 0 0 �, c m r v r ui ai r ai v N O N W U r O V N O of (O M N O m O o m O 2 Z N N N (O (O (O N O (O V Q m m m m m m Cm p o m m N N N N N N Na> - N �. mw mw mw 0 0a m L N U L O)O N N l0 N l0 - - N l0 O N N l0 O N N l0 O O J N {� 3 0 3 Q m N m N L Q O 0 a Y 6 O N"O Q O N O N"O Q O N 6 O N"O Q O N O N O a'�N F a a-OO a a S a S °'in �'o�m s m.2 N o s '2 N o s '2 N o s 'Q O m o L in m `o o `m `o o `m m n w E in°o.�.N 0 in°o.�.N 0 i0 00.�.N 0 " 42 0 Ti o m O.0 0 0 0- 3 0 0 v o m: 3 3 0 0 v o m: 3 0 0 ¢=- m N U O a N O a N a 0¢ N N N W d p '{-. � l0 U U m l0 co)U > N N j1/1 N a a N N N a a N N N a a N N N a N - M a - o_a 0 m m 0 = 0 - 'O ° E . 3.� 0 0-E m o� .� o a m-E x '� o a m-E x '� o a m r x m 10 w 3 a 0 a 0 0 0 E 0 a o 0. E o 0. m o 0. m o 0. o 0 E m 0�-T. 0 m 0 m - 0 - - - - E o x a s 0 3 3 0 Y 0 0_ 0 0_ ¢L m N o a o o m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o F o a - K K o D o U ¢ o 0 o ¢ o 0 U ¢ o 0 U ¢ o N 0 d K O 0 Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q w 0-0 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z m o m 0 a N a LL a d O 0� W 0> Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q O N Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z N a N 0 a r E m o m U} v in in in in in in in in w N N N N N N N N N N m A O N N N N N N N N >m m d J O O O O O O p O p O O O O (O O p O p m O O O O O W Q U `O 0 0 0 0 o v o m r �m O y z x Z 0 > O C?ro O o0 0 0 0 0 Q N W IL w m IL m s Z 0 o m a 0 0 w w a a a a w w w w w w w w JQ in °' °' °' °' 0 ) Z N N U U co U t 0 0 0 0 0 0 W O N U O N U O Q Q Q Q Q W Z v a a 0 m o 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 z M a o a D o 0 0 0 0 D o D o U U 0 0 0 0 0 fq } 2 F 0 m m m m •- •- •- •- •- dy 0 E 0 E 0 E 0 E 0 0 E 0 E 0 E 0 E 0 E E� E� E� E� m m m m m d a O O O O lL N lL N lL N lL N lL N W U U U U 0 0 0 0 0 'j N � U N N N N N O 3 N N 0 3 3 3 7 l0 l0 - - Z ~ o. a 0 m E a a a x >o a m O o LL°, �j o 0 0 C; N m m rn Z m a aci m 1. m ° mm mm m m m m sr am o m m m ° m ° o E °_ o E °_ o E °_ o E °_ c o 3 m Y °o�a °o�a a = d L L w sa po .o po .o mo°.� mo°.� mo°.� mo°.� d O�' m °-"m u m n a _ `oa o m - °_-° m o m-°o 2 o m m 2 °!�m 2 o m m .m N Q d J a 0 O) -_o O) O."NO O.L- O."NO °.L- O."NO °.L- O."NO ° F°N c -p o N m 0-3 ° °a o £n Q Z m m Z m a�i m .�a J m -O m o_ m - - m m m m m m m m 0 0 m 3 M C O E N 3'L-' T L w N -Y N N T N 'o T p > N ? > N ? > N ? > ? O�p O y o o °m m 0 E o - r E- m r E- Z m - m 2 oLmo °� o' °� o' �£ a �£ a �£ a� �£ a� m >� of m °� oo m42 oo m� m m m m > m._•- O N Q E 3 O E A O N - > U N > p T O N T O N T O N T O N 3 N N 0 y mo� NmTnU > 3 oE °_u m-°o-°- m m-°oaam om c6 pmc6 pm c6 pmmm - m 2 0 2 m m > > m > > m > > m > > x 3m o =-°o£ min �K o_� m �K o_w m Q-°o o_`o Q-°o o_`o Q-°o o_`o Q-°o o_`o W Q N N 3 d L N N N o O O O O J o E m m m m m ° d > - c m Q `o._ °' 0 0 0 0 0 0 m �� U - U - � o m � m m m N O)U O N t o N w w N l0 IA o N 1/1 o N 1/1 o N 1/1 o N 1/1 o N C U N O d OU N N.- N l0" l0 L L L L L U .�.- N "NO•- "NO w — — — — ° J .t o.N.�.- 1°/1 - N 1°/1 - N O - C N O U N .Y a C '�.O '�.O .l0-C l0.-C 'l0-C 'l0-C 'l0-C dY m2 E mo.- ooa ooa E��, E��, E��, E��, E��, E o -m -> -> m .- o Ein o ° o E o o 3 0 E 3 m E N m E N m E_N m E_N m E_N o_ m ° � >amomo cam° moo ° oa Uom om om om O w `m O C, w°m m o v > ° o ° 3 > >m > >m > >m > >m > >m m 3 m 3 ° N N m in 'y m N a m o E m v m o E a v m o E a v m a c o D o `o m O °-a m n 10 m n 10°-- m n m m p am m m o _ o- o - o m o _ F m m m 0 m N 3 m N 3 m N 3 m 0 3 d E 2 3 m o °� m m m 3 m N Uw o `o a o c m o £ m m 0 m .� o .- o N -- ° � o,T5 corm 3� gTn�oo m��-om mm�am m��-om 3NOOa x c aci 3 a>i °� °o. -°p m m 6 o.i c m a o. c m a o. c m a -°o'm a a? E -OO m aQm a - m0��£-p av'mmo av'mmo a?mmo m O -.2 o m m m 3 m °'°m s L c o a m m o o Y U 3 m n N c a"a :� o c E m m N F m°m s.= F m°m s.= F m°m s.= c °n., T N m .L- N N 2(n N N .L- O o C D.L- V.- N 0.L- V.- N D.L- V.-"NO vim .3ws,� J ONOO"� ONOO"� ONOO.- 3E.3w o_a o. p�' m w T N r N N N N m m N m m m N m ° o d am m m m m 3 o m m m-K m K m-K am w o a E a c m m m >. m o 3 m m m m m m >• o a" Z a a�i o a o m o m o£ o o o a£ o o o a£ o o o a£ 0 3 Ton m c ° .T mo w - o m E o o n 3 m u -o°0'if m u 3 m u w.�w - °-om r� maaaa �-Oo m:o o m:o �-°p m:o rE.2- _-o °m N m o Y _ y d 0> N L Q N N U aj N V �p n N �p n N �p o N Q Y l0 O y N m C N. N N d N U— _U U _U V _U V N O o m o m o > 3 m o m w o m m m - m m - m m - m o ° m S a o_-°o S$ z D ° ��.3 m -2 �.3£ o o o_J �.3£ o o_J p o o o O N o o o o o - - - o A'a c p - - - - - o o o - c a a a a a a IL C N A o o o o o O N E - c . V o v y y E E E m c Tn a d E E E E E O O O E W N o C O O O O O > > > O MO N O >' �'> '5 '5 '> N N N > U Z c o a m m m m m m am am am N° E N O a o o o x C y O Y Y Y Y Y Y U O O O O O O z z z z z O O O z z z z O O o O m m J O O O O. O. O O. O _ _ N N N N N l0 N N j N N N N E > O m O O - - O m - d d a a a c c a W m o m m m m m o .� E m z m m .� .� m z d O U U U m u o m m m E E m E m m m a N J M o N N N U U N O O p x C N_T N o N l0 N N O j o N �O LL� �OLL� do d) N U` C M >7k ro >tk O >tk E� °oa corm co3m 3m r y E co z v c m c m co c m W rn E»aica ui ov <»O o E». o <»u� o_a c d in d o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M.r... O y N O O O O W N W O U v E N N x Ea N W p N M V L� O r W O z m a m m m m m m 3 3 0a 0a 0a 0a 0a 0a 0 0 U 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o p 3 p 3 p 3 p 3 p 3 p 3 p p o 0 0 0 0 0 p p p p p p U d o 0 o rn v rn m o o o m in o o c0 0 r ai N o N ro r N O N N N J W M O O O O O O O O U � M of O O O N N O O O O N x z v ro r r r v v Q N N N N N N N N O O O O O O O O N Q Q m m m m N Q N C C C C PL U Q - m m Q Q Q Q o 0 m v v v m m m O £m m m o £ m ff. ff 0¢-6 O" N o-6 O 0 N o m`m OO"m£10 m N m o m-6 O Om 0 N: m o m-6 O o'"°m-£1w 0 N m 0-oE.0-0 o°0-o oE .0 m w o m w m w o .m w o .m , w o - - m u m_o u o o o m m o o o o o 42 0- t ¢2 t w t 30 a : m42 0 0 ' 0 $- -mm m E'E m n m 3 m n m 3 m n m 3 m 3 3 M a mr am F m 3a m ram per°w 3 a mom°�° 3a m ram p�°,� 3 a mr am p�°,� 3a m ram p!-° 3 a m �'o m m �'o m d m x o$ m x o$ `o Q m x o$ m x 0 0 m x `o$ .E p � .E p � U o. - E o m - E o m o o m - E o m - E o m - E o m o� 0 ° o� 0 ° U) o. 0 = o a w 3 o a w 3 w U a w 3 o a w 3 = o a w 3 o a w 3 m m x a U a U.� w p U ¢ U.0 w p m .� w p U ¢ U.� w p U ¢ U.� w p U ¢ U.� w p° a>i o a>i o~ p p p } a d v w °-d Z Z Z Z Z Z Z >; m o m - O a y K a 0 O d °o W N N Q Q Q Q Q Q Q O Q O d Z Z Z Z Z Z Z U) a` y a E m o m U> co in in in in in in in w N N N N N N N N N N W 0 N N N N N N N l0 � A A J N N O O O O a O O a O p O p E w (» (» N�0. > E O l0 > 0 (» !» !» Q U m m `o ° N O O O p N O p N O p N O p N O p N O p N E y o xt o xt o xt o xt o xt o xt Q o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 F H L O O M> E r M N r M N r M N r M N N M 0 N r Q W N V of 3 C N 3 C N 3 C N 3 C N 3 C N 3 C N 4 d rn r r U r U 1-6 1-6 1-6 r— N C6 L g C6 g C6 g C6 g C6 g C6 O y z x w 0 0 > O O r r r r r r m 3 N N N N N ) (n (n (n W IL IL � 3a 3a 3a 3a 3a 3a 3a Z d ww ww ww ww ww ww ww IL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z Q N N O O O O O O O Z W U L Q Q Q Q Q Q Q W y 03 03 03 03 03 03 03 0 3 3 3 3 3 3 0. p o p o p o p o p o p o p o M U p p p p p p p y } 2 W y 0 E E E E E E E o d N y O o O O O o o d E 7 lL lL w lL lL lL lL lL p O a a o 0 0 0 0 0 o m w � O a 2 ZO a~ a o a o 0 0 0> o j J U U U O O N M V LL O r Z N N N N N N N N m a E mo mo mQ o mQ o mQ o mQ o mQ `o m ° o. `o = O Y o a Y o a o m s _ o m s _ o m s _ o m s _ o m s _ o m s _ ¢°-o ¢°-o ¢°-o ¢°-o ¢°-o o o o o o o o o o o o m m m m m m m m m m E o�s E o�s E o�s E o�s E o�s E �'° o o ° m Q o m Q o m Q o m Q o m Q o m Q o -o w> U -o w> o U -o w> o U -o w> o U o- w> o U . > o U m 3 0°o m 3 m °� a 0 4 ai °� a 0 4 ai °� a 0 4 ai °� a 0 4 ai °� a 0 4 w °� a o 0 A ° ° °o ° ° °o �aa .aa �aa - �aa w �aa- w �aa M O.O N N:= N N:_ >.O y E N L >.O y E N L >.O y E N L >.O y E N L >.O y wE N U) O O N~ N t N~ N t U 1/1.�.- E n nT U 1/1.�.- E n nT U 1/1.�.- E n nT U 1/1.�.- E n nT U 1/1.�.- E n nT U w.�; E n nT 2 °- Ea `o Ea o m a° o .m m o_o o .m m o_oo .m m o_o o .m m o_o o .m m m `m o .m p J o m w J o m w >m m > , m >m m >m m > m m p_> m m m > m ¢ m > m ¢ m > m ¢ m > m ¢ m > m ¢ > > m y - m 3 m - m 3 L L 3 o m L L 3 m L L 3 o m L L 3 o m L L 3 o m L L 3 o m = X N 1/1 k N 1/1 o a O N o o N o a o N O a o N o a o N o a o N W Q W Q F O S t0 a F o S . a F o S t0 a F O S t0 a F o S t0 a F O S t0 a y U O O O O O O O O d T C N y 0 y 0 y 0 y 0 y 0 y 0 y 0 y 0 .0 co c0 co co co co co co.- C o J O S O S O S O S O S O S O S O S C y N.- �l0.- �l0.- �l0.- �l0.- �l0.- �l0.- �l0'- N r E C�. E C�. E C�. E C�. E C�. E C�. E C�. E C�. E m._ m._ m._ m._ m._ m._ m._ m._ d m E y m E y m E y m E y m E y m E y m E y m E y o U� v > >m > >m > >m > >m > >m > >m > > > >m Q m._ m._ m._ m._ m._ m._ m._ m._ Q a s Q a Q a Q a Q a s Q a Q a s Q a N y a U a U a a a a a a o O N o O l0 O l0 ow m m ow m m ow m.- o U) m 3 .o oa 3 . oa 3•L°£ �n 3•L°£°O 3 L°£°o 3•L°£°O 3•L° m°� 3 m 2 c m -OO.°n - -OO.°n - -OO m y'+�� ° ) y n° °) y n° ° ) won° -OO m'+��n -OO )° O E l0 3 m a L l0 3 m a w N O N U L N O V a L N O V a L N O V a L y N- o O L y N o. U ma U m m m s - s y d C N n� C N n� N 10 10 N'N m N N, m N N, m o a.L-N Y o-N y Y o N y Y o-N 1/1 .L- o.- N .L- o.- N U U m C m C m C a 3 E 3 y 3 E w o3 w O O T N T 7k T 7k T 7k T V T V 0 d N w o a N w o a N l0 o a N l0 o N l0 o N l0 o N._.= N N._ m T- 0 3 0 3._ E o 3._ E o 3._ E o 3 a'� 0 3 a a m m m? m m m? m m o- 10 m r w m r w m r m e m e 0 3 Tn m m o 3 Tn m m o m o y o m m o m m o m m o om y o m o a m m m m m�w o o °m mo m� E y o o 0 0 _Q2 0 0 0 o moo m o m m E o m m o m m E ° m m ° m v yo p_-- ro- ro- ro- `s �s p m o ° m m o ° m m w o m w w 0 ww o z !? w o o m !? w o o m m w m m y m O q o o C T — N ow 0`t'o o o o o _ _ am w m m o o E ° > m Eo mo.o. m o o o o E a m .V^U..0 9'y y •- •- N l0 W lL t a l0 N'3 a N •- •- •- •- '^ >y a d E E 0 m o E am m J m E. E. Lr-m d c c FF o o s U ui m'� m m c ° m o 0 E. 0 0 v`o o c O > > C),-5 o °s o iii-w '> > > > UZc oa m m ay mmm. s� - Ea 3.°° m m m m o' a ° 2 N N.m o o ° y O E C'N m m n l0 y o o o o 2 c-O - C N w .T ->'O N C C C C N Y Y N._ O C y y C O. E o o 0 0 ->w o 3 > c o o o o o d a m O ° a o L 5 o z z - m z z z z m o o `O - - d J N l0 O N N N N r J C c E y d w 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z Z Z Z Z Z U p E E N C_ i0 J m m � U A M C N N U U U) O O x d C O y d 0 d 0 N o O j Z 7k O >7k E '- E� w E m m m o o c d in d _ 0> 0 0 0 0 .y W p O N N Z N N N N N N N - - - ( \ \� \ 0\ cl k \ \ \ j \ ow ol X10 \}{ ((k Ww } °&f\« ! ; \(t» \/) w Ef \\_) ! : ! - ; [f�� : \/\ [ !a f f § - - - / }� / } } } § k\j> ) \ \ \ \ \� ) \ \ \ \ ]/ - \{ )) \{§) § ) \{§)) - 2 ( \ })> 0 })j ( ( })j ( 0 - k 2 }� cl ) = c - - / , \ } }_0 \\ \\ 7 LU m E 2 7 - k . 0 ! ; ! ; ! ; \ � � � w LU) f! f e) e) § 2 ( ® ® m a N o E o m E o m w s >o E m > o m ° �m m m '�' m m m m _ m ' m N m a n y in N o o " m °�f m o` a� Li o >' m a°�-° m mm ai OA N•- a N N N�' t0 o Y o >.�.- a o >.�.- 3 N N .�.-.X d o N m a�- Q•-o w a 3-0o s a�s N f-°o m N.- _m m M y C N U a L X p°j l0 o N 0 E l0 o o N N X 0 O L L O o-0 0 m £ `m m Y rn 3 u oa L oa m u °-'E ° y o 0 3 ° - °�o N °� o m o m y°- o m o.� '° o o L o m L L o x �.a � °-� m � mE � JOf mm100=°->oo��L >'10E o�T° E m� TEo o �'3 m U o y o m ^-' u o U o ° 0 o 0 10 m a N ? > m o E > m n o > m m s o °m ai o m t f m > o E o o m 2 c o w - m m o o w m m - m m a` o f Q -°o w £ `o a o a - Q`o a o_Q a -°Q a£4 d d T a U O O O O C O T T T T C y a d U N N N N O U J C N d d - ic ic ic E$ d C N N N N N Q Z Q Q Q Q u y ° o 3 m ° U o 21 m o w o o w o o E m M N r �_r N U w O T U IJ/1 N N O O �- y m o 3 0 o= J a� £ 52- m >' o u x c d ° c r m ti o w - ,d. o- 3 m ° n Ta m o Ta m u o c ao -°°� o Tn � .gym~� .gym~� No m£ N Z r O_O N N O_O N N N L E N d-O E 1/1 E Y IN/1 o f o f N N C'N O'- O l0 E N N o V N N o V O d� o w a 3 3 o c o c w m o.� ° m� m o o -'m->°o o. m->oo o. o w- co J 4 m u 3 o � J o J of•L-•- 'o w w N o N o w N U o 6 N N y N.�- N D N.�- N D - E U o m m 3 o 0o� N o N o° m N o° m - o m ° o m a>i o 16 m �s Fins F m F m F-w,° 5 m w w m m N o o a t m m o m m o a°m o m ° w o o -c .o o o w o'° o o n o Y".� ° mO c .°-o ° E o m m E J N >'E m o E° o N 10 3 0 m o rr o w >>..m m m$ `mE` ¢m°o a m E m o m s E o o o .r...o N o N T Q N �'L Q p YO o" V�L N L fA N o . O L o O°~ c6 N o L > �_ �p O l0 0 U�' N E o L N E O w N E v ° c o_o m o m E N _ m rn 3 E o m m m m aci c° m o N N.° m o a °o o N o ° J �'T N ° o w o S o o °� m E c FF > mo o"° No oQQ -° NOn > ° M o m m a m�� N��� m L� N m° '�m�cn m m�-�o Y � � o a ._ m > '> U �'c on` om m `mo °o °� mo '° o°m= 3mo T o m.2 m _ _ _ m o o c o ° i° °� c' `m a N o >> N O T >> d - coi= 0 3=° 3 m 2CV - � 3o T, N O° o m3� � o�° o.a moo °� � � m °_ °s n s a° ° o Q m ° o o-°.o m °o. m - o�° o am °- omo mo Fm °-, m aim- z o o `O - - d N - - J N l0 O N N N N r J C c N E y m m c- c m - d w o o o �E z z z ° ° m m U U E E N C � U A M C N N U U U) O O x d `o c > T T N d O LL� E m E y E ro r W O N N C d N d J J 0> O x Ea N W Z N N M m m Appendix B Property Parcel Maps q,. CM �. LO co h to . I �`�, CL CL ' co I o w "s1 a 9� ,, w 1 . f"w rv, "w. of e , LM i-n ••� 1 ry ,^,, G✓ �� "l.�"� ��� rye/ � P h 4M ., vi I IN �oj`r r . P ~4 .`fi.✓ f w,4, � �n � h 1 d fly / � ✓ cYt �v4,. �A 4' X (o 1"v o, CL Ln t f i LIL_ r6 �. c � LY g es lit ✓ r ��; r V �yb ti! f C5' A4 IS m a In tw nn r i ca r :` ` I C CL a- ---- ._. _ .... _._11.. _ ..,..._. ., ._. , .. - ..,.. Q N _ \ . y \ E E ` � ^ \ � .. . C / `» a 0 2 ) � � ! . � . 9 y � . 7 k ~ ° o � 2 § CL : . , < _ ( ± , J = 2 ` \ m < LA § N Ca CL 0 ri co CD tiw w ^ti ca, 0, co DE klo Tw tm 4A 4) CL < rl co ca tf 0 JA 11 i ma CQ CD 0 m 00 chi P7 AD�l ............ Z ca Q Ln < tJ a co c� ma LL o c � Ln cc IL m tu o cs'ra a Q Vic, --W-- u r C7 V)m No J C", u "L v c LI0 N `oCLa d 0 IS. o v 4, : L U; � b w rn M 9) la , a LL IL tt q In In ut � co mw fl- d 4 N r4 ci C) cc 0 ti U sir `: ca G ° CL rL C Q co ca c� 174 79 — — k I �r a t r ` v Fb A ' CYq ei cop ove a. ,r r y s r ...... ? ads r •s I r r ' J � 11c �.. 94g' UAA' .'._ 91 EE y p Cp QA., ct CID r M � u x a M �.. _�. r..... .m.___..._.� .._.... l < rA 1-4 CID � I a m L-7-1 L k s •3A01 7dV a cz CL LL cc w '.rip' � 1r7/N7q�A7 � ':'I, � x e m h ._............... ....... aai p w ° gDnbds- ca =_ fV co CL 00 CL —. P co CL CL d"I'l.")",'�.............. ........ —"3............1, <1< (D F7 G) 'PAV .......... ...... a. Q2 CD on . ............. ------ V "0 to m (D LD FA V CL LA d Yyy.ryP. ,vj. �n ma If 2 Ek CD ca r � i gyll r qJ'? _`"'�,,,�..�_.�.. .^`xwwm �� � cs� « � .. ••a�. '�`..sz �a ri e,� r'" � y �.. — rwwsxiwx.x m _a of I _ .V3{7/d17 a mi e¢'F M —, .pap..,� 0 ol ok I 7" � rm _ . y au � X CL CL IY tb b �crs+•. 'si, a.sn a6c s:+ °' 1 v< e-1 N N qq m 'C ccs .._ cx m u, tA bi zi cn M aax "'� . CL Zt LA d a �r; ---- ....wr o'ill CL OE 0 tD CD � k L I CL 00 'RAV N343a"I11 EL CL Cw 4A M n km 4 w n Vp'l- ca �s _ L .. _ �,"�,�t�_�..�.�.�,w.�k >r LL. amt�dw CL as m L711 76F Ll w fu CD CU ju f9 � � !µ �`C ✓� tir f� ip 9 � �� N. � �.. f � 00 ,... b co 41 ZN PoW A p M 1, �F v Q CO �. Nt , d rw aptQJ oj y.atl ,K c a J oo M ` OL c' CL a+ oi <t N r4 co cv co lei ay 0 se $ R C. cr) -� ry ED V, a+1 UO Zt M g :Th9" AMNI7 r sera y h: Z; ��� ,�✓�a7m� � � . rte., h � g M AMA! tlAkf� 4w:l,,w✓M ( y a N V ,er "- tS9 — aa � aa� "C3 $ .47dw !k7 rCU a CL Q M m Ln cc Co "k, f ca Li CL F cm :Pqv CID 41 10 Ilk 'Am ........... ®r 31 Wf CR Ilk, cu -kjL� JAr<1-1 N.RaMO Xh, .41 4K r A, IIIU!2� �-I Ti5 T� .......... op -i a r Am Ir mwja"Iff"...... 3A/7D CIY ........... co X (D _0 C_ C) (V I'll CL CL ri < m co cc -------------- L-J fl ar 0) -3AV a Cc G") CL 0 IK n Iv 0 cl). cn ---------- h Iq ..... ....... cn r- 0, 0 CND G) CD co -T 6101 'p z cz) (RD I ila os� —AkIl b pp It ........... G)j-- it It .......... co :),L-C", cn CID C co m W CL Ln CL r� < co Appendix C Appraisal 011-326-030 (Chestnut/El Camino Real) Excerpt APPRAISAL OF THE "PUC" PROPERTY (AS IDENTIFIED FOR THIS APPRAISAL) LOCATED AT THE NORTH CORNER OF EL CAMINO REAL AND CHESTNUT AVENUE IN SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA DRAFT PREPARED FOR Mr. Michael Lappen City of South San Francisco 315 Maple Avenue South San Francisco, CA 94080 DATE OF VALUATION September 9, 2013 PREPARED BY Paul E. Talmage, MAI Dana Property Analysis 7445 E. Eagle Crest Drive, #1041 Mesa, Arizona 85207 1 1T DANA Property Analysis 7445 E. Eagle Crest Drive, #1041, Mesa, Arizona 85207 5952 Dry Oak Road, San Jose, California 95120 (800) 280-9711 (480) 641-9711 Fax (480) 641-9902 talma e anaproperty.com September 17, 2013 DRAFT Mr. Michael Lappen City of South San Francisco 400 Grand Avenue South San Francisco, CA 94080 Re: Appraisal of the "PUC" property (as identified for this appraisal) located at the north corner of El Camino Real and Chestnut Avenue in South San Francisco, CA Dear Mr. Lappen: I have inspected and appraised the "PUC' property for the purpose of estimating its market value. The site is identified by various names as will be discussed, but the maps in this report are most helpful in specifying the area under consideration. Specific to the assignment are your instructions as follows: ".... need to appraise the site based on the existing zoning and development standards (the El Camino Real/Chestnut Plan). The property must be appraised as an independent parcel that can be developed separately, not as part of a larger development." There are exhibits presented in the report that show the subject site as a part of City-generated conceptual plans for the neighborhood. These are included for descriptive purposes and as a means of considering the development potential of the site on a stand-alone basis; they do not serve as a basis for valuing the property. For example, drawings show an extension of Oak Avenue along the northwestern border of the site; the extension is considered a possibility as a natural connection between El Camino Real and Mission Road, but not as an existing condition or as an extension certainty. Also, the drawings show the extension of Antoinette Lane to the path of the Oak Avenue extension; in the appraisal Antoinette is considered a cul-de-sac as it presently exists. There are some extraordinary assumptions in this report in addition to the Standard Limiting Conditions included in the Addenda. First, the size of the site 2 is shown as 63,992 square feet on one of the exhibits. The Assessor's map suggests that this may include a small portion of what may represent the extension of Oak Avenue. For purposes of this report I assume that the net area of the site is 63,992 square feet. Also, I have estimated a cost to level a portion of the site at the grade level of Antoinette Lane, excluding a strip of land at the higher elevation of El Camino Real, which itself rises above the Antoinette grade in a northwesterly direction from Chestnut Avenue. I assume the work involving this cost (adjusted from an expert cost estimate applying to a much larger area) would provide a flattened area having a width of on average about 85 feet. The conclusion of the valuation analysis described herein is presented in the last section of this report just before the Addenda. Sincerely, Paul E. Talmage, MAI California Certified General Real Estate Appraiser AG 004846 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Exhibits are in italics) Page Letter of Transmittal 2 Table of Contents 4 Scope of the Assignment and Means of Valuation 5 Aerial photograph showing the outline of the subject property 6 San Mateo County Assessor's Map 7 Descriptions of the Subject Neighborhood and the Subject Property 11 Map of Subject Property from the client 12 Map of the Subject Neighborhood from the client 13 Two pages of on-site, ground level photographs 16-17 The El Camino Real/Chestnut Avenue Area Plan 18 Conceptual Plans for the Neighborhood 21 Conceptual Plan 1 22 Conceptual Plan 2 23 Where the Area Plan and the Conceptual Plans Differ 25 Highest and Best Use and Valuation Analysis 28 Highest and Best Use 28 Aerial photograph showing multi-residential properties near the SSF BART Station 30 Valuation Analysis 31 Table showing land sale and listing comparables 32 Market Value Conclusion 36 Addenda 37 Certification 38 Maps of Comparable Properties USPAP Chart 2-2 Standard Limiting Condition Extraordinary Assumptions Qualifications 4 SCOPE OF THE ASSIGNMENT AND MEANS OF VALUATION The assignment is as follows: to "... appraise the site based on the existing zoning and development standards (the El Camino Real/Chestnut Plan). The property must be appraised as an independent parcel that can be developed separately, not as part of a larger development." (Per email from Mike Lappen of the City of South San Francisco.) An aerial photograph and an assessor's map on the next two pages show the location of the subject property. 1. Scope of the Assignment The scope of the assignment generally describes the overall range of work and the extent of data collection, confirmation, and reporting involved in conducting an assignment. This appraisal has been conducted according to national recognized appraisal standards and techniques and generally accepted appraisal practices. I generally reviewed pertinent project data, extensively investigated the relevant markets and selected the necessary comparable data to conduct the appropriate valuation methodology. Sources utilized to obtain this information include comparable data services, brokerage firms, local real estate publications, market participants, government officials, internet sites, and in-house resources. This report is presented in a summary format rather than a detailed self- contained format, reflecting the assumption that the intended report users have at least a generalized knowledge of the region and city characteristics. This report meets the criteria of a "summary" report as specified by the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP — see the USPAP summary of requirements in the Addenda). The data and analysis leading to the reported market value conclusion are set forth herein. As discussed in the letter of transmittal, there are a few exhibits of this report that show the property as part of City-generated conceptual plans for the area. These plans help for description and consideration of the value potential for the site on a stand-alone basis, but the valuation reflects the environs as they presently exist, not as they might exist in the future. Following are specifics to the assignment: Property Appraised: Use of the Real Estate Existing as of the Date of Value and Reflected in the Appraisal: The subject property is a vacant land parcel of about 63,992 square feet located at the north corner of El Camino Real and Chestnut Avenue in South San Francisco, CA. 5 RealQuestxom CR) - Report Page I of I Street Map Plus Report tll', Coii l-c)ci .11C For Property Located At e a.,�Q U,e;t F1 i'c.,,,-),f e 0 -1 a 1010 EL CAMINO REAL, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 940801-3205 44. Aerial Photograph showing the location of the subject property outlined in red 6 http://pro.realquest.com4isp/report.jsp?:&client=&action=coiifirm&,type--getreport&record,,n... 9/1312013 Conclusion. The as-is market value of the subject site on a stand-alone basis calculates as follows: Value as if the developable portion of the Site were level $1,620,000 Cost to cut, fill, compact and grade the developable area $ 650,000 As-is stand-alone value $ 970,000 The as-is conclusion equates to $15.16 per square foot for the 63,992 gross square foot. See extraordinary assumptions on the next page. 35 MARKET VALUE CONCLUSION The "as-is" market value of the subject site on a stand-alone basis is estimated as of September 9, 2013 - subject to standard limiting conditions included in the Addenda and three extraordinary assumptions listed below - as follows: 970 000 Extraordinary Assumption 1: I assume that there is reasonable access to the subject site from Antoinette Lane. Extraordinary Assumption 2: 1 assume that the net area of the site is 63,992 square feet exclusive of an area which might lie within the path of the Oak Avenue extension, should that road be extended to El Camino Real. Extraordinary Assumption 3: 1 have estimated a cost to level a portion of the site at the grade level of Antoinette Lane, excluding a strip of land at the higher elevation of El Camino Real, which itself rises above the Antoinette grade in a northwesterly direction from Chestnut Avenue. I assume the work involving this cost (adjusted from an expert cost estimate that applied to a larger area) would provide a flattened area having a width of on average about 85 feet. 36 Appendix D Environmental Report Excerpts CSS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 100 Galli Drive,Suite 1 Novato,CA 94949 (415)883-6203 fax(415)883-6204 October 7, 2005 Ms. Norma Fragoso Mr. Michael Lappin City of South San Francisco 1755 Creekside Oaks Drive, Suite 290 Sacramento, CA 95833 Subject: Transmittal of Environmental Site Assessment 1.12 Mile Corridor Owned by San Francisco Public Utilities Commission South San Francisco, CA CSS Project No: 6307 Dear Ms. Fragoso: CSS Environmental Services,Inc.(CSS)is pleased to submit the following Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) report for the approximately 1.12 mile corridor owned by the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission(SF PUC)in South San Francisco,California 94080,herein referred to as the Corridor.The ESA includes a Phase I and a Limited Phase II ESA. The objective of this ESA was to identify historical or current activities at the Site and surrounding properties which could have contributed to,or may currently contribute to, the degradation of the Site's soil and/or groundwater, thereby representing a recognized environmental condition.This ESA was prepared with considerations set forth in the ASTM designation El 527-00 document describing standard practices for Phase I ESAs. CSS has noted any significant variances to ASTM in the report. This ESA represents the opinions of CSS and is subject to the limitations and uncertainties statement included. Note: Parcel 2 is PUC property APN 011-326-030(corner Chestnut and El Camino Real Through this ESA,CSS has determined that a recognized environmental condition is present at the Corridor: TEPH-mo was present in surface soils at Parcel 2 (as shown on Wilsey Ham's "Parcels to be Acquired" of Appendix A)at a concentration of 1,900 mg/Kg. This concentration exceeds the residential and commercial Environmental Screening Levels for residual fuels of 1,000 mg/Kg and may inhibit future development. Further investigation of the source, nature and extent of TEPH-mo and the removal of any objectionable materials from this parcel should be performed. Other potential environmental conditions are identified on the Corridor. Please refer to the attached ESA for details. If you have any questions or comments regarding this report,please do not hesitate to call the undersigned at (415) 457-9551. Sincerely, CSS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES,INC. Aaron N. Stessman,PE, REA Principal Engineer Enclosure CSS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 100 Galli Drive, Suite 1 Novato,CA 94949 (415)883-6203 fax(415)883-6204 August 15, 2011 City of South San Francisco Department of Economic and Community Development Attn. Mr. Armando Sanchez 400 Grand Avenue South San Francisco, CA 94080 Subject: Results of Phase II Environmental Site Assessment of the Properties at 315 Airport Blvd(APN 012-318-030) and 401 Airport Blvd (APN 012-317-110) South San Francisco, California CSS Project No: 6670 Dear Mr. Sanchez: CSS Environmental Services, Inc. (CSS) is pleased to submit the following results of a Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (Phase 11 ESA) for the properties located at 315 and 401 Airport Blvd, South San Francisco, California,herein referred to as the subject property or Site. The Site's location is shown on the attached Figures 1 and 2. The Site is being considered for purchase by the City of South San Francisco(City). The Site is presently unoccupied and was most recently used by owner David Gonzales for the operations of South City Ford Motors as an automobile sales and repair facility. A recent Phase I ESA completed by CSS (April 29,2011)of six parcels of property near Airport Blvd and Miller Ave and the two subject properties were identified as having recognized environmental conditions. 315 Airport Blvd has three former gasoline USTs that were abandoned in place and two former waste oil USTs that were removed from the property. 401 Airport Blvd has three former gasoline USTs and a former waste oil UST that were removed. For both of these properties soil and groundwater impacted with petroleum hydrocarbons were left in place.At 315 Airport Blvd TICE,DICE and vinyl chloride were additional contaminants left in place. While both sites received environmental case closure from the San Mateo County Environmental Health Division's (SMEHD's) leaking underground storage tank program, future development activities that disturb underlying soil or groundwater will likely encounter the contaminated media and require special handling and disposal. Since their environmental case closure in 2001, no sampling of these properties had been conducted. This Phase II ESA was completed to assess current environmental conditions at the Site since redevelopment design and planning will require consideration of hazardous materials remaining in place. Through the conduct of the Phase II ESA, CSS has confirmed that there are presently recognized environmental conditions found at the subject property. The reader is referred to the body of this letter report for further details of the environmental investigation and its findings. 1 CSS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. Background CSS performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment in consideration of the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E1527-05 of six neighboring properties in South San Francisco, California: 315 Airport Blvd,401 Airport Blvd, 411 Airport Blvd,421 Airport Blvd,405 Cypress Ave and a parking lot on Miller Ave with no address identified by APN 012-314-220. Of these,the properties at 315 Airport Blvd and 401 Airport Blvd were identified as having recognized environmental conditions. The term recognized environmental condition is defined by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) as follows: "In defining a standard of good commercial and customary practice for conducting an environmental site assessment of a parcel of property, the goal of the processes established by this practice is to identify recognized environmental conditions. The term recognized environmental conditions means the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances orpetroleum products on aproperty under conditions that indicate an existing release, a past release, or a material threat of a release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products into structures on the property or into the ground,ground water, or surface water of the property. The term is not intended to include de minimis conditions that generally do not present a material risk of harm to public health or the environment and that generally would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies. Conditions determined to be de minimis are not recognized environmental conditions." The Site has a long history of residential and commercial use,with first identified development of the Site and vicinity occurring between 1891 and 1892 when residences,hotels,restaurant, saloon and dance hall, a real estate office and a blacksmith were developed. In 1920 a Ford automobile sales and service garage was constructed at 315 Airport Blvd and later expanded in 1956 and again in about 1970. From about 1925 to between 1987 and 1993 a gas station with service garage operated at 401 Airport Blvd and from 1950 to about 1960 another was operating at 315 Airport Blvd. In about 1993, the Ford dealership expanded their operations beyond 315 Airport Blvd to include new and used car sales, automobile service and detailing to 401 Airport Blvd and an adjoining property to the north at 411 Airport Blvd.Presently the Site parcels are vacant except for minor storage by the property owner David Gonzalez. The Phase I ESA found evidence of recognized environmental conditions in connection with the Site as follows: • Environmental records for 315 Airport Blvd show that a recognized environmental condition exists at its location: three abandoned-in-place gasoline USTs as well as soil and/or groundwater impacted with petroleum hydrocarbon compounds, TCE, DICE and vinyl chloride remain present. The presence of these compounds is thought to be associated with releases from the three abandoned-in-place USTs and appurtenances and/or two waste oil 2 CSS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. USTs that were removed from the property. While 315 Airport Blvd received environmental site closure in 2001, future redevelopment activities that disturb underlying soil and/or groundwater will require the review of a governmental agency. In the event of excavation or development of the property, San Mateo County Environmental Health Division must be notified as required by Government Code Section 65850.2.2. This notification notwithstanding, SMCEHD regulators have stated that the water quality objectives of the RWQCB have been satisfied,the corrective action protects public health for current land use and corrective action should not be reviewed if land use changes. • Environmental records for 401 Airport Blvd show that a recognized environmental condition exists at its location: soil and/or groundwater impacted with petroleum hydrocarbon compounds remain present. The presence of these compounds is thought to be associated with releases from three removed fuel USTs and appurtenances and/or a waste oil UST that was removed from the property. While 401 Airport Blvd received environmental site closure in 2001,this condition may impact future development activities that disturb underlying soil and/or groundwater. In the event of excavation or development of LOT 2, San Mateo County Environmental Health Division must be notified as required by Government Code Section 65850.2.2. This notification notwithstanding, SMCEHD regulators have stated that the water quality objectives of the RWQCB have been satisfied, the corrective action protects public health for current land use and corrective action should not be reviewed if land use changes. These conditions were further evaluated in the performance of this Phase 11 ESA. Investigation Activities CSS completed the following activities in the conduct of this Phase II ESA: • Prepared a Site Specific Health and Safety Plan for the conduct of the work • Obtained Subsurface Drilling Permits from the SMEHD • Marked boring locations on July 6, 2011 and cleared site utilities at the boring locations using a private underground utility locating service. • Notified underground utility owners in the vicinity through Underground Service Alert. • Pre-cored the concrete building slab at marked boring locations within the building at 315 Airport Blvd on July 12, 2011. • Completed 9 borings on July 13, 2011. The boring locations are shown on the attached Figure 2. Eight borings were completed using GeoProbe direct push drilling equipment supplied and operated by Fisch Environmental Exploration Services, a California C-57 licensed drilling company. One portion of the 315 Airport Blvd building could not be accessed by the drill rig and CSS-5 and CSS-6 were instead hand augered. CSS-5 was augered to a depth of two and a half feet and a single soils sample was collected at a depth of 2-feet. No water sample was collected at this location. While attempting to hand auger CSS-6, refusal due to an underground obstruction, possibly piping, was encountered at a depth of about 12-inches and no samples were collected. For the GeoProbe borings, 3 SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION REPORT FORMER CALTRANS MAINTENANCE STATION 296 AIRPORT BOULEVARD SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94080 PREPARED BY: TEC ACCUTITE 262 MICHELLE COURT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94080 PREPARED FOR: MR. KELVIN MUNAR CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 315 MAPLE AVENUE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94083 DECEMBER 31, 2007 ' n" ''IK';' :' TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................ 1 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION.......................................................................................................... 1 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL BACKGROUND................................................................................. 1 4.0 SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION...................................................................................... 2 4.1 Soil and Grab Groundwater Sampling ........................................................................... 2 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS................................................................. 3 6.0 LIMITATIONS.....................................................................................................................4 7.0 REFERENCES...................................................................................................................4 TABLES 1 SUMMARY OF SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS 2 SUMMARY OF GRAB GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS FIGURES 1 VICINITY MAP 2 SITE MAP 3 PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS IN SOIL AND GROUNDWATER ATTACHMENTS A BORING LOGS B BORING PERMITS C LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY DOCUMENTATION Subsurface Investigation Report Page 1 296 Airport Boulevard,South San Francisco,California December 2007 1.0 INTRODUCTION On behalf of the City of South San Francisco (Client), TEC Accutite conducted a subsurface investigation at the former Caltrans Maintenance Yard located at 296 Airport Boulevard, South San Francisco, California. The investigation was performed in accordance with TEC Accutite's scope of work (Bid # E-167, revised 12/21/2007). The objectives of the investigation were to characterize soil and groundwater beneath the portion of the property for sale, to determine if site remediation would be required and an approximate cost of any remediation prior to the City's purchase of the property. Presented below are the site background and results of the investigation. 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION The subject site is located in a light industrial/commercial area of South San Francisco, California. A Vicinity Map and Site Map are presented as Figures 1 & 2, respectively. The property and building are owned by Caltrans. Facilities on the property consist of a former gas station, former Caltrans maintenance yard, former office building, and two associated historic known underground storage tank (UST) systems (approximately 24,000 ft). The site is currently leased to Bob Jr's Towing and used as a storage yard for impounded vehicles. The site is located on the low lying areas west of San Francisco Bay in San Mateo County. Site topography gently slopes east, towards San Francisco Bay. Site elevation is approximately 19 ft above mean sea level and the nearest surface water is San Francisco Bay approximately 1,200 feet east-southeast of the site. 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL BACKGROUND 1890s and 1910s The subject property is a vacant lot. 1925 A building labeled Gas and Oils is identified in the northwestern corner of the subject property. 1950 The gas station is no longer present and a new building is identified as an office building. The Bayshore Highway overpass is present and runs above the eastern third of the subject property. 1965 The subject property appears to be vacant except for several parked cars. The City of South San Francisco's Building Division has two permits regarding the subject property, one to demolish the current building and one to construct the single-story office and maintenance garage building which still stands today. 1987 A 2,000 gallon gasoline UST was reportedly removed on June 30, 1987. The excavation area was subsequently backfilled and resurfaced. According to records, no contamination was detected at the site after tank removal. The above site history has been condensed from TEC Accutite's Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, dated December 31, 2007. Subsurface Investigation Report Page 2 296 Airport Boulevard,South San Francisco,California December 2007 4.0 SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION 4.1 Soil and Grab Groundwater Sampling In order to investigate the presence of petroleum hydrocarbons in the subsurface, TEC Accutite advanced six soil borings at the subject site. The objective of this investigation was to characterize soil and groundwater beneath the site specifically as related to the former USTs associated with the former gasoline station, Caltrans maintenance yard, and general site soil and groundwater. Boring logs are presented in Attachment A. Personnel: Project Manager Marc Mullaney performed all fieldwork. Permit: San Mateo County Drilling Permit#07-2933 (Attachment B). Clearing Utilities: Underground Service Alert (USA) was contacted prior to the drilling in order to identify any underground utilities. USA ticket#469645 was obtained. In addition, TEC Accutite utilized a private utility locator to confirm that the boring locations did not interfere with any underground utilities and to perform a utility survey. Drilling Co: Environmental Control Associates, Inc. (ECA), C-57#695970 Drilling Date: December 20, 2007 Number of Borings: Advanced six soil borings (B-1 through B-6). Drilling Method: Direct-push drilling rig. Boring Depth: Borings were advanced into the groundwater from approximately 8 feet below surface grade (bsg) to a maximum of 16 feet bsg. Temporary PVC casing was installed in all borings to collect groundwater samples. Sediment Lithology: Soils consist primarily of interlayered clays, sands, and gravels from the surface to approximately 16 feet bsg. Soil types are described using the USCS and recorded on the boring logs (Attachment A). Depth to Water: Groundwater was encountered in all borings between approximately 3.5 feet bsg and 7.5 feet bsg. Sample Technique: Soil samples were collected in acetate sleeves in the direct push sampler. In each boring the acetate sleeve was removed and a soil sample was cut from the sleeve approximately every 2 feet. The ends of each sleeve were capped with Teflon sheets and plastic end caps. Samples were properly labeled and placed in an ice chest with ice. With each soil sample, a split was collected and placed in a ziplock bag. Bags were sealed with air space and allowed to volatilize. A photo ionization detector (PID) was used to measure ionizable gases and readings were noted on the boring logs. For soils, the highest PID reading from each boring was submitted for analysis. A grab groundwater sample was collected from each boring utilizing a peristaltic pump with new tubing for each location. Analytical Results: All soil and groundwater samples were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPHg), TPH as diesel (TPHd), TPH as motor oil Subsurface Investigation Report Page 3 296 Airport Boulevard,South San Francisco,California December 2007 (TPHmo), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), fuel oxygenates, and the 17 California Assessment Metals (CAM-17). In soils, TPHg and VOCs were not present above ESL (Environmental Screening Level, see tables). TPHd was present above the ESL in soil sample B-6 @6' and TPHmo was present above the ESL in soil samples B- 2@4' and B-6 @6'. Arsenic and Vanadium were present above ESLs in all six soil samples. Cadmium was present above ESLs in soil sample B-4 @4'. Analytical results of soils are summarized in Tables 1 and 2. Grab groundwater sample B-5 contains TPHg, TPHd, and various VOCs above ESLs. Grab groundwater sample B-6 contains TPHd, TPHmo, and various VOCs above ESLs. Grab groundwater B-1 and B-2 contained chromium, lead, and vanadium above the respective ESLs. Grab groundwater sample B-3 contained arsenic, lead, and vanadium above the respective ESLs. Grab groundwater sample B-4 contained arsenic, cadmium, lead, and vanadium above the respective ESLs. Grab groundwater sample B-5 contained barium, chromium, lead, and vanadium were above the respective ESLs. Grab groundwater sample B-6 contained vanadium above the respective ESL. Analytical results of grab groundwater are summarized in Tables 3 and 4. The laboratory analytical report is presented in Attachment C. Boring Abandonment: All borings were backfilled with neat cement grout. 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS • No indications of any remaining USTs are on the property. All utilities have been mapped to scale on Figure 2. • Geologic conditions encountered in the boring locations (B-1 through B-6) show inconsistent interlayering of clays, sandy clays, and gravels. Soils appeared to be stained and hydrocarbon odors were observed in borings B-2, B-5, and B-6. • Analytical results indicate residual petroleum hydrocarbons exist in soil and groundwater in the vicinity of the former gas station (B-5 and B-6) and in the backfill area of the former Caltrans UST excavation (B-2). • Soil metals concentrations are uniformly above ESLs for arsenic and vanadium; however, the concentrations of arsenic and vanadium detected onsite are consistent with background levels of arsenic (10 mg/kg) and vanadium (150 mg/kg to 500 mg/kg) naturally occurring in soil of the San Francisco Bay area as published by the United States Geological Survey (Shacklette and Boerngen, 1984). Considering natural variations, the metal concentrations detected in onsite soil could be naturally occurring or imported in native fill material from unknown sources. • Similar to soils, grab groundwater metals concentrations are above the respective ESLs for arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, lead, and vanadium; however, grab groundwater samples were not properly filtered, and these concentrations are likely artificially elevated. • Since the former gas station from 1925 to the late 1940's appears to be the major contributor of contamination to the property, it is likely that funding from the State of California UST Subsurface Investigation Report Page 4 296 Airport Boulevard,South San Francisco,California December 2007 Reimbursement Fund will not be available without a clear UST owner or operator. If the contamination is attributable to the Caltrans UST, then funding may be available. • Cleanup costs of this type typically range from$500,000 to $1.2 million. Best estimate based on known contamination and metals in soil would indicate cleanup costs would be in the upper part of the range for residential standards. Cleaning up the main contamination and providing a deed restriction will save costs ($500,000 to $750,000) in the short term, but long term monitoring costs (if required)could eventually use up the difference. • TEC Accutite recommends that this report be submitted to San Mateo County Groundwater Protection Program with a further recommendation that the limits of the petroleum hydrocarbons in groundwater and metals concentrations in soil be defined both vertically and horizontally to the property line, as a first phase of plume delineation. 6.0 LIMITATIONS Our services consist of professional opinions, conclusions and recommendations made today in accordance with generally accepted engineering principles and practices. This warranty is in lieu of all other warranties either expressed or implied. TEC Accutite's liability is limited to the dollar amount of the work performed. This report is solely for the use and information of our client unless otherwise noted. Any reliance on this report by a third party is at such party's sole risk. Opinions and recommendations contained in this report apply to conditions existing when services were performed and are intended only for the client, purposes, locations, time frames, and project parameters indicated. We are not responsible for the impacts of any changes in environmental standards, practices, or regulations subsequent to performance of services. We do not warrant the accuracy of information supplied by others, nor the use of segregated portions of this report. Thank you for the opportunity to provide you with our services. If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to contact Marc Mullaney at(650)616-1209. OA,L G Sincerely, TEC o MARC �.. ccutitY� Zp V40.7438 Nathan W. Smith Marc Mullaney, PG 7438 Project Geologist Sr. Project Manager OF QA� 7.0 REFERENCES - California Regional Water Quality Control Board, "Screening For Environmental Concerns At Sites With Contaminated Soil and Groundwater', Interim Final—November 2007. - Shacklette, H. T. and Boerngen, J. G., 1984, "Element Concentrations in Soils and Other Surficial Materials, Conterminous United States," U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1270. CSS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 100 Galli Drive,Suite 1 Novato,CA 94949 (415)883-6203 fax(415)883-6204 September 3, 2009 City of South San Francisco Community Development Attn. Mr. Norma Fragoso 315 Maple Avenue South San Francisco, CA 94080 Subject: Results of Transmittal of Indoor Air Quality Assessment For 938 Linden Avenue South San Francisco, California CSS Project No: 6601 Dear Ms. Fragoso: CSS Environmental Services, Inc. (CSS) is pleased to submit the following results of an Indoor Air Quality Assessment(Assessment)performed for the property at 938 Linden Avenue(the Site)in South San Francisco, CA. The current assessment was performed to investigate the findings of a Piers Environmental Services Phase I Environmental Site Assessment(March 2009)of the Site indicating that "concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons beneath the property pose a potential risk of volatilization to indoor air." This property is under consideration for purchase by the City of South San Francisco for commercial use. Through the conduct of this Assessment,CSS has found that hydrocarbon compounds are present in indoor air at the Site and in outdoor air in the Site vicinity, at similar concentrations. A likely source of hydrocarbon compounds is a nearby freeway,Highway 101 located about a block east of the Site. Among the hydrocarbon compounds detected,benzene was found at concentrations exceeding residential human health screening levels in both indoor and outdoor air. As indoor air concentrations of benzene are no greater than those found in outdoor air, commercial occupancy of the Site poses no greater risk to human health from benzene exposure than the background for other Site vicinity workers. The reader is referred to the body of this letter report for further details of this environmental investigation and its findings. The Site is occupied by a two story building founded on a concrete slab and perimeter foundation with no basement. The building was constructed prior to 1956 and is of concrete block construction with a flat roof.At the time of our indoor air sampling,the building was vacant and no operating HVAC system was present. To evaluate indoor air concentrations within the Site structure, CSS collected three indoor air samples over a six hour period on August 19, 2009. Samples were collected in 6-liter summa canisters pre-cleaned and evacuated by the testing laboratory, Air Toxics Limited of Folsom, California. A constant flow rate of air sampling over the period was implemented through the use of calibrated flow controllers,one dedicated to each canister. CSS's field records of air sample collection are attached.The samples 5650-INDOORI and 3744-INDOOR2 were collect from rooms on the first floor in the northwest and southeast corners of the building,respectively. Sample 33779-INDOOR3 was collected in a central room on the second floor of the building. To gauge the background concentration of outdoor air in the vicinity of the building,sample 1 1882-OUTDOOR-BG was collected from the parking area behind the Site building near the southern corner of the Site property. An unopened summa canister sample, TRIP BLANK accompanied the collected samples and was analyzed for quality control purposes. All 6601 SSE Linden Indoor Report FINAL.doc CSS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. samples were analyzed by the Air Toxics Limited laboratory for benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes (BTEX) by Modified EPA TO-15 SIM (Selective Ion Monitoring). Air Toxics Limited is certified by the California Department of Health Services. During the time of sample collection the Site was vacant and the building's ventilation system was not operating. Wind conditions were calm in the morning hours,with an afternoon breeze from the northwest noted in the afternoon. The Air Toxics Limited laboratory report of the air sample analyses for BTEX are attached and summarized in Table 1.Also presented in the table are the California Human Health Screening Levels for Indoor Air(CHHSLs for Residential Land Use, California Environmental Protection Agency,January 2005)and the Environmental Screening Levels for Ambient and Indoor Air(ESLs for Residential Land Use, Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Francisco Bay Region, May 2008). Of the BTEX compounds,benzene was the only compound detected at a concentration greater than its corresponding screening level.Benzene was detected in all but the TRIP BLANK sample and at concentrations within a narrow range, from 0.53 mg/M3 (3744-INDOOR2) to 0.61 mg/M3 (5650-INDOORl and 11882- OUTDOOR-BG). The CHHSL and ESL for benzene is 0.084 mg/M3. CHHSLs and ESLs are conservative screening levels,for carcinogens such as benzene,residential screening levels are based on an estimated one in a million(1 x 10-6)cancer risk and exposure 24 hours a day,350 days a year,for 30 years.. As the maximum concentration of benzene was detected in the outdoor background sample,its presence is reflective of a background condition and commercial occupancy of the Site poses no greater risk to human health from benzene exposure than the background for other Site vicinity workers. Sources of elevated benzene in the background include motor vehicle emissions and industrial activities. In the United States,on-road motor vehicles account for 48%of benzene emissions and 70%in Southern California's South Coast Air Basin(EPA,National Air Quality and Emissions Trend Report 1999).The Site is located within about 700 feet of a major freeway,Highway 101,located a block east of the Site. Based upon the proposed commercial use of the Site,the benzene screening level of 0.084 mg/M3 is not representative of the limited exposure frequency and duration of the proposed use of the Site. A Site specific risk assessment considering the specific details of Site development and use would be necessary to evaluate the specific human health risk to Site workers from background concentrations of benzene. If you have any questions or comments regarding this report, please do not hesitate to call the undersigned at(415) 883-6203. Sincerely, CSS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES,INC. " G 9" lip,-- � Aaron N. Stessman,PE REA Principal Engineer Attachments 6601 SSE Linden Indoor Report FINAL.doc Appendix E Transfer Grant Deed Language for 559 Gateway Blvd. Appendix E 559 Gateway Blvd. Grant Deed Language Upon transfer of the property to the City the grant deed will include language restricting the use of the property to governmental use as follows: "The Successor Agency to the City of South San Francisco Redevelopment Agency, a public entity("Grantor") hereby grants to the City of South San Francisco, a municipal corporation ("Grantee"), all rights,title and interest Grantor has in the Property, as described more specifically in Exhibit A hereto, and subject to the restrictions on use set forth in that certain Second Amendment to Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions for Gateway Center, executed as of May 28, 2003, and recorded on July 2, 2003 in the Official Records of San Mateo County as Instrument No. 2003-182458, and which is incorporated by this reference as if fully set forth herein. In the event that Grantee discontinues the restricted use or seeks to use the Property for a non- governmental purpose, Grantee shall enter into a compensation agreement with the San Mateo County Auditor-Controller or other appropriate entity or entities, pursuant to Assembly Bill x1 26 and Assembly Bill 1484(collectively,the "Redevelopment Dissolution Law"), providing that all net revenue from such non-governmental use shall be distributed as property tax to the taxing entities as defined in the Redevelopment Dissolution Law. Said Property is held and hereafter shall be held, conveyed, hypothecated, encumbered, leased, rented, used and occupied subject to such aforesaid restriction on use, which is intended to constitute both an equitable servitude and a covenant running with the land. Each and every contract, deed or other instrument hereafter executed covering or conveying the Property or any portion thereof shall be held conclusively to have been executed delivered and accepted subject to such covenant, regardless whether such covenant is set forth in such contract, deed or other instrument. Said covenant shall be binding on the parties hereto, and on their successors and assigns." Appendix F Transfer Grant Deed Language for Public Use Properties Appendix F General Governmental Use Properties Grant Deed Language Upon transfer of the property to the City the grant deed will include language restriction the use of the property to governmental as follows: "The Successor Agency to the City of South San Francisco Redevelopment Agency, a public entity("Grantor") hereby grants to the City of South San Francisco, a municipal corporation ("Grantee"), all rights,title and interest Grantor has in the Property, as described more specifically in Exhibit A hereto, and imposes the following restriction on use: The Property may be used only for a governmental purpose. In the event that Grantee discontinues a governmental use or seeks to use the Property for a different purpose, Grantee shall enter into a compensation agreement with the San Mateo County Auditor-Controller or other appropriate entity or entities, pursuant to Assembly Bill x1 26 and Assembly Bill 1484 (collectively,the"Redevelopment Dissolution Law"), providing that all net revenue from such non-governmental use shall be distributed as property tax to the taxing entities as defined in the Redevelopment Dissolution Law. Said Property is held and hereafter shall be held, conveyed, hypothecated, encumbered, leased, rented, used and occupied subject to such covenant to the aforesaid restriction on use, which is intended to constitute both an equitable servitude and a covenant running with the land. Each and every contract, deed or other instrument hereafter executed covering or conveying the Property or any portion thereof shall be held conclusively to have been executed delivered and accepted subject to such covenant, regardless whether such covenant is set forth in such contract, deed or other instrument. Said covenant shall be binding on the parties hereto, and on their successors and assigns." Appendix G Transfer Grant Deed Language for 472 Grand Ave./306 Spruce Ave Appendix G 472 Grand Ave./306 Spruce Ave. &468 Miller Ave. Grant Deed Language Upon transfer of the property to the County or other applicable government entity, the grant deed will include language restricting the use of the property to governmental use as follows: "The Successor Agency to the City of South San Francisco Redevelopment Agency, a public entity("Grantor") hereby grants to the County of San Mateo, a political subdivision of the State of California [or other applicable governmental entity] ("Grantee"), all rights,title and interest Grantor has in the Property, as described more specifically in Exhibit A hereto, and imposes the following restriction on use: The Property may be used only for a governmental purpose. In the event that Grantee breaches this covenant and discontinues a governmental use or seeks to use the Property for a different purpose, Grantor may declare the forfeiture of that portion of the Property directly affected by such breach, and may re-enter and take possession of that portion of the Property as to which forfeiture shall have been declared and re-entry shall have been effected. In that event, if Grantee uses or intends to use the Property for any non-governmental use, Grantee shall enter into a compensation agreement with the San Mateo County Auditor-Controller or other appropriate entity or entities, pursuant to Assembly Bill x1 26 and Assembly Bill 1484(collectively,the "Redevelopment Dissolution Law"), providing that all net revenue from such non-governmental use shall be distributed as property tax to the taxing entities as defined in the Redevelopment Dissolution Law. Said Property is held and hereafter shall be held, conveyed, hypothecated, encumbered, leased, rented, used and occupied subject to such covenant to the aforesaid restriction on use and the aforesaid reversionary interest of Grantor, which are intended to constitute both equitable servitudes and covenants running with the land. Each and every contract, deed or other instrument hereafter executed covering or conveying the Property or any portion thereof shall be held conclusively to have been executed delivered and accepted subject to such covenant, regardless whether such covenant is set forth in such contract, deed or other instrument. Said covenant shall be binding on the parties hereto, and on their successors and assigns." In the event the County of San Mateo does not accept the property, the property will be conveyed to the City for public use and the following language will be included in the grant deed: "The Successor Agency to the City of South San Francisco Redevelopment Agency, a public entity("Grantor") hereby grants to the City of South San Francisco, a municipal corporation ("Grantee"), all rights,title and interest Grantor has in the Property, as described more specifically in Exhibit A hereto, and imposes the following restriction on use: The Property may be used only for a governmental purpose. In the event that Grantee discontinues a governmental use or seeks to use the Property for a different purpose, Grantee shall enter into a compensation agreement with the San Mateo County Auditor-Controller or other appropriate entity or entities, pursuant to Assembly Bill x126 and Assembly Bill 1484(collectively, the "Redevelopment Dissolution Law"), providing that all net revenue from such non-governmental use shall be distributed as property tax to the taxing entities as defined in the Redevelopment Dissolution Law. Said Property is held and hereafter shall be held, conveyed, hypothecated, encumbered, leased, rented, used and occupied subject to such covenant to the aforesaid restriction on use, which is intended to constitute both an equitable servitude and a covenant running with the land. Each and every contract, deed or other instrument hereafter executed covering or conveying the Property or any portion thereof shall be held conclusively to have been executed delivered and accepted subject to such covenant, regardless whether such covenant is set forth in such contract, deed or other instrument. Said covenant shall be binding on the parties hereto, and on their successors and assigns." Appendix H Property Tax Increment Projections Ln Ln m rq w r, 0 m m 't in Af4 in V4 m w a v W m t H rn N H rn -,t -zt cn u:) 0(i c0 rIL l3i C V r1i rr� 01 ol� Ht cq 41 lz� w rt O r N h ti 'Ir r, 0 N m It CD w m m 0 " > o V4 r.4 N N m t ct Ln LO w r 00 no 0) cn 0 'a- tr4 to in v4 IA in Ln ta to V)k v4 to 'A to r_z -i V4 In 0 0 0 0 W W N M M M Ln M rl M ('4 M W M M 0 ny J) A/4 tr, M M �A M V 0) 0 m N ;Z� tl od ai r C4 rn v -�F Ln Ln Lli rn' "i > m �T w w 0 m Ln m rq m m t, m m in M/6KOZ if4 V). i4 if4 H " " N " r1l N m m m E, tf4 tn V). V� in in in tn An tn liv V'�t4 6Z/SZOZ E an 00 " N " t" U') M co Ln m Lo M 00 0 �f LD m o Ln r,4 cm 8Z/LZOZ CD cu w 00 * Ln 0 Ln 0 m r�4 1-4 " LO m r, N 0 m m Ln m m �q in �6 -i o� (31 cyl c� ct r r4 > m r-� (-,� oc� rl-' & 06 & 0 0 0 m F- �t H r-, N r, Ln w q LZ197OZ ca Ln m w w t, t H m w m 0 kD m 0 > tn Ln Ln Ln tD 0 0 r-i r,4 rn et -cr Ln in ka r� CL Af� in Af� V� in "n V� �n �4 r4. q .4 ; V4 V4 tn V)- 1A i/1- w> ir4 A^ vl4 An 114 C) 0 0 m w m 0 rl Ln rl m 0 2 A/l.IA-Lq A^ 0 m t, m w 0 CL > 0) C� w Gi aL PIL cci OR ca OZ rl*� rl� oci C crt Ez/zzoz W Ln M 0 0 m m m m CY) > -Ln rl N m m w r� r� w m to N cf� t Ln w b, ZZriZOZ >W C tn V4 in ol V4 tn t6 V4 m V),), All� ll M J n T z/ozoz cr) c r14 Ln c) " cn oz/61oz Hi> - t4 V�. An-A 0 N P, LO 0 m Ln 0) 00 00 N N N, 0 > a) (5, 0 tn Ln H rfl 0 N Lo so rn rl ko m �o ko rn -j Le C4 crz r; kr� tl ffa ry Ti e 06 r-i Ln arz 4 6 g 6T/BTOZ > m N in r- 0 M W a) N LI) 00 H t 00 It OD 'I H H N r-4 N M m m t t -IT Ln, ST LTOZ Ln lf4 lul4 V). V} V4 V4 Ln 00 t H " r1i N Ln 'Cr m 00 m Ln -1 C) LO m cn iLn m Z.T/gToz > Lo m rn rn r, oo o Lo m m 0 �D N " 0) 0) Ln NI E Ln i oo �q �p N m kb m oo ,f Ln Lo ,t -�F 4 -* w p Lo < 0C� Le g "; g rq .6 T/STOZ Ln Ul LD U3 r, Ln fIJ 0 M Co r, �F r4 ,4 Si f �,6 zF 4 g r_ r, r-, r, r� 00 M 0 > Ln Ln Ln Ln -.0 00 M R 0 N M Ln 1,0 r- 00 M r-I rlt ST/t7jOZ V", to 4A in in in i t7l/CIOZ x 0 0 CD 0 0 ro m Ch Ln Lf) N w 00 00 r- in LO 1, 00 0 -:r C) C) 0 0 m -r� vl-v'� 0 �* ­1 `� 0 m A M r' m kl) uR m r' 0) to ko M kD 0 C> 0 o C� tR Ili C� rl� n n r� C� cl� a, M M 0 " M Ln 0, zt N m U) r- w o " 4 w r, lnr; -4' r,� ke 06 C5 fq 6 C,� g m m w w w m m m 0) m m 0 0 0 0 C, 0 0 C) m -Ln i/l, tr� �n tr� -V� il� vv �n 4A in 14 C� oc 'D V) CL 'A ta V). .z r.? " V4 V4 V} trL to m n w 0 m to tr4 t4 4^ 0 0 w c7 -zr Lo m N 0 Ln Ln LO w r- " " 14, 0 0 N m m "It un C-4 w r, r, w Ln LM r" H w ft:F c4 .4 to ryi :f ai r-' 6 Ln Lr1 6 h 6 r.IIJ kd w M 0 r, Ln M H 0 Cl a) C) 0) 0 H m Ln > N M Ul r-:. OC� Cl rlj vt W r, (3) rl M kb 00 0 N N oc 06 CO w w m m C cr ci, V'4 A/I 41 tn 4A 4A -LA -J4 V4 tfl- t14 v4 tl4 Vq lu4 in V4 in- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H M W 0 ID M N -* op t q W m N Sr 0 tn tn V4 ij4 0 " Ln m 0 w w w r m N r-. m © m m H U) py t 0 LO C� lf� ll� rl� Oli C ICL ry� cl1 w M m w fli C� w g r, oo oo a) cri o r-j r-4 rn -t� -�F Lr� (D m (D m m m m m m m m m IN Ln CJ tn in tn t4 V�- t4 tr4 V) -L� to to tn Vn t4 V'4 Ln m m -Vv An Cc c C1 C:) C:) C') C:) C) 0 0 (N tn -:r H Ln m oN r, Ln ou rn (v VV AA.in An 0 C) -�r t,4 �l N 00 w4 �t 00 r� r,4 r, k Ln �t E C� C� C� It n U� C� Lri rri fl� n rll� ll� "i kR IIL rl 0 " LI) m -:f a 00 w Lo t, of N r, m 0 as (3) 0 Le) 0 V) H r, N co �r 0 kD m m tD m (n W as llt� ll� rll� rl� 0( Oli Ci ai C� -i -t cl� clt n lz� lzl- Vr > N N N N N N rJ 04 M M ff) to M M rn M rn tlA V4 V4 V4 V4 to iP4 iX4 VT V4 i!4 tr4 tf4 ta 4^ V- t4 OD LD I, H 0 0 m C) CN m Ln N Lo oo oo N w w r, ri 00 w h 00 0 0 r " H LA m -* a) rl. m ial Ul 01 rl 0) w W Lr L'i LR 00 C LR rf� C� r,� vi mi -1 0 M a, M a, C� H m L'i O t, Ln Ln Ln r,4 rn Ln r- oo o N � t6 r-� a1 4 m ko co LM V4 A4 1^ 00 00 00 00 00 cn m a) CR CY) (7) 0 0 0 0 Ln V4 00 Ni 0) LO " -4 -0 u3 Lc� Lr CU � V Ln W Ln Ln 2 0. (P if4 V4 m LO r- 0 m m M LO Ln N w w w rl w w r- rl W 0 0 �* to M -:T 0) r, M Ln LA Or rl 0) ko W N La w Do 0 W rn 0 rl ul m 1-1 0 m m ch a) 0 -1 m U) m 4 41 M Lrj U Lri N ff� U� r+ 06 (:5 N t6 06 C; C4 LN tr� tn tn w w w w w m m m m m m 0 0 V4 V4 ir4 iJ4 F- in Q4 V). V4 V). -114 to H H (P E E co (n � 0 0 0 %D t rn f14 IN r- m Tt (n m wr 1-0 o m W 0 'tt UO M N 0 Ln Ln W CO rl �r4 N t Ln r> C� C� C� rl� Ci ci ll� a r� 1� rl:� Lc� V� Lri rl� It ol� < r- m 0 0 -�t " rl U) m n m r, a) Ln LA 01 r� 0) LO to Ln Lo 00 0 w rn 0 r, Ln m H 0 C) m m m LD H m m LA Ln 0 rl� re� Lq rl� oc C rl� lz� unt rl�, 171 ll� M 'L� cc� C� rIt 00 Do 00 od 00 m (3) m a) 0) 01 0 Ca o o V4. V4 V4 vl- lrh vl4 V4 In -La i✓ V6 tn LO W P, 00 CF) C N rn t Ln LD rl, 00 Q) - -e) C) N (N N N N N r14 M M M M r m m q) m ,r to w r, W m O H N m 0 0 C� 0 0 0 c 0 0 a 0 0 0 m m t4 M N N N r14 N r-4 > > N .-.irk ton 1j). ton n n �i � kD rmi t O m N oo m m 00 "T otl m .. ...__._— .,.... ._.,_ _ __._.,._........... ......__�,._ w d` o' o o w LLD S O h N r, r7 "F rR o .i N M 0 n It n r , oa I�t 'i n v o w m m m bE/£EOZ > to r9. N N m 'fit 'ra' o w w n 9tl Ub m m o Sri to to in to v? v1 to i.-, to vy in v j) in WZEOZ � II ZE/TEOZ m o o oo 0o m N m m m Ln m n m N oo co a m m o 0 +n to in irx N m m w er m t m ry n , w N w w m TE/O£OZ m t, w w V 'm m r "t «w n o N ,-L m � w O IC m N zf & co o ,q N rri bl` ea' lri Lri Lri bi 4 rri. m OE/SZOZ 0 > y N t w as o m m n m ,-+ m Ln r, m a m Ln CL Lu tr} +, to yr i a N N N N N m m en v r4 +n v} vt Vr v tm1 to ira vv v> trt 6Z/HZOZ v "/L ZOZ E CO a/9ZOZ L, w w N w m N O m m d' n In 0r C? m w N m n N. O 7 w m et m m m 7' N to N m m cr m o w N of m cm o 9Z/SZOZ d C'XY Ln m m " w C? r-i o w +-+ m m � n ri N N m Ln ors o a r" N co N Lr m N Ln n C N er w n m 0 Ti 14 N N, m T c ro in w w m m w w 0 m o n m -i m w w o Ni v w SZ/bZOZ r6 Ln m o Ln o w w w w n r- n n n w w w m m m m m }> 'tn '+n v> ih vn to yr vt 'V tn. An t vx v> an to t4 t4 to vv ,G trZfEZOZ EZ/ZZOZ �%n m CL ZZ/TZOZ > o o oo o o m N " w � m o n in w n m 0 i 0 IZ/4ZOZ °y qa vk to +n to o T m n m w ri 0 w n m m w to w N m �' OZ/O,TOZ 0) y p w m m n N w oo ao ao era n n ao o v' m m c N Ln o r' Lai r" ai m M r: r; ai m' m oo; oo' o ra oo w m N ci o o m m m m o ca N y en N m v uS w n n asm o N m er Ln w 6I/BIOZ CY t✓, to u'� tr', to t7a ar> of to An ti i <-i .-i. L'i l-i 00) an'vr.in en wr wr iy� �T/LTOZ �� LI/9TOZ n o o O o o o o N Ln H n o m n -It m N m r-i 'cf to V}vn k 0 N w O H m Ln m m " w M N N N ej -Ln N c vs Lr c m o N r w w m n w m w w m 91/9COZ "v 0 m rD N m P- Ln f rn rri rri � LD eei :i Lri m v o Pl N rn n 0 m w m N v) oo a v oo ctt oo N ST/bIC}Z 7 '.-i " cl N N N m m m V 't of mn .n n yr tr} <n trw vw ur,n AA to vx vx VT/EIOZ m w N N w 'rf n m m m 0 N Ln a o 0 0 W et m m Ln 0 m m � N as 0 N ,-r v ci Ln w Ln �t Ln a d o ' a Ln ri co M m I�t c oo + m v Lr N vi Ln si .zr lzt .-r kf to W n m w "y' " w m N N L-i N m Ln n o Gf w m m m o O c ip r� p In w w a1 N "r n O m w m N Ln co e-I Ln OD e-i Ln tQ N - - > m Ln Ln in w w w n n r, n oq oo oo m m m o 0 0 0 n n LL_ to th to to to to to VF to to tLn (n in t6 to jl. to ei` V'F to vi to x o o o o 'Q o m m m Ln o N w w w n w w n . w O 7 N to v1 v} in 0 V' •^^I rH M m et' m n m Ln m m n m w w m w r- C9 w m O n v rr 4 m m m m O ti m v1 m Cf m o rn w o N t w w w w m m Ln �(7, to t/}to to to to to t^ to in v? r1 r--4 N et x^i rl w H to to to in V-x to y f� O to in C Qy O O o o o o o w -tr m N N n m 4 m m * w o m In v}.irT to m 'l W? d.Y O 'rat' fz m N o Ln In w w n N N Ct D. C7 o N m m �' Lf? N w n n w m m n �^I w o 0 et 1 r Lr m v m n m Lr m m � a w ui o w m o n m m 1 0 m m m m o " m Ln N m Ln n as c N cr w n m m w to O N ny 'co.. oo oo o w m m m m m of o o 4 o tra va to to to to to trti V'•to v> ,•^i .-i .a ra ,� „-r to to vr. v, tr}to b L� 6 b C7 C? O ,-i m w O w m N W d' It w m N'. -Izr O y T tra to to to o N Lrl m 5t o w w w n m N n m of m� m .-i Ln aL x rt m w LD r: r: w w m m o r J H N N m of ,e Lri o m N N N N N N N N m m m m m m m m m N mO F- to to i/? to in to v! to to to to +n to to to to to Ln m va vl. o oo o o o 0 ri v 0 N m cr yr m m n Ln w m to t!} v} — o o "-' `rf N ri N w ,--1 •7 w n N n "Ct Ln 'V' o o o rl m w o Lo m N m n of m w N N C O N Le a :f O 0 w w r- m N n m O m ai o Ln o Ln ri n N w cr o w m m w m m w w w rl r, w w m m O ri rl N N m 4 4 m y N N N N N N N N m ni m m m rn cl cfs rvs to V)& v), -L} to v}'L} trS to to vp to t.r? tff to to to W w n O o o H m w o w m N 4 w It m N w w n w o " Ln m -It o w to w rh m N n m C7 m m o Ln w w '= to Cl vi r-I n N 01 1r C w m m w m m w +-� n Lr1 Ln w w re n Do oo al c) [� ti ri N' N m of V' Ln w O m to M N N N N N N N N m m m m m m m m m m F Ln to to to to t/} to in v} to in in to vl tr t o tta to oo o M o w Ln Ln Z3 Ln L'i C s o Ln m Ln t/I LI) ,Ni awy a tr> trs (D 0 tf? iS V1 ? w n o 0 o w m w O w m N 7' " r, m w M N w m v n c0 O N Lrl L 'rl` o rl w w n m N r, m C7 ai m o m Ln "� o yr q Ln ri n N oa et o w m m w m m w v''.. o Ln' v, Lo w r`+ h w w m m o H r-i N N M 4 , to 6 N 'C3 p �- to vT N N N ry N N N N m m m m m m m m m m to to to to to tr}trh to vT vT to to in tn.to to to to w oo m C7 r7 e7 �i eM o N m <S +^-L Ln m m n Ln eG m flo V N N N w ri e'a' w r. N n of Ln r N v9 n o C o m w o Ln rn N m rl a et m w N N w } rN tQ o N Ln (n .4f O w LD L,� n m N r-- m M w a vl 3 Ln r"i n N N ea" ® w m m w m m w �x ¢ n n w w n n m o7 m m o i ri N N m of er Ln w v N N N N N N N' N m m m mi m m m m m m m trr yr trr v vL to to tai vn to vx to vA to in in tr,Ar m d' Ln w n U7 m o e-a N m V Ln w n w m O N N m a N m m m m m W m M N w m e$ o w n w m o r-i N m V Ln w n w m o s-9' N m >- ¢-i ri N e-1 r-I N r-i N N N N N N N N N N m m m, m 7 °' o o o o o 0 o o 0 0 0 0 o 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 U a- > > n = O o 0 0 0 D o m ,� m w n m h O m m w h m m ..........----- ___._._...,.. .... +n i.n irs ir}irt• N tin ,-r m N N cr t h 0 w m n w w cL N 4 In w et Ili on m h m of rte. vi N Loa o .--i o h :•-i clr rt ,ti n o © r: ry Ln e5 cr m m h a V h 0 m Ln m o N m n w F N IT h m N 'c}' w m I--i M Ln m o N w 'rF cL an'n ri ,-+ .-i ti N ry N N rr5 m m rri F Fp '� in tr.irr trr in trr to trF irn'A irl in ire. c' 7 �`r® cu n o o o o o m H a m o s In -q m w V� an an 9r}U?9rT m m co W a Ln m o N °f Ol h Omi W oml c3) Fx m i7 w h n m t-I w rl CB' w h m m m n w r10, o 'h.. �Ni Y�J m � m A o 6m5 Uo .-i rnv ran Ln OOO ' pc' °tS � trl tr1 yr ir}in in ar>.an. i dc''��e' s m It Ln n N N w n Off, ° � h w m a w w -a a rr w Ln N m m �r m o w ry w p ar w oo (4 & cr o o rs r`� n-i o6 e4 L6 L6 r�7 ai v r: 14 ari r- err<'e o C m N Vt Ln m N Lo n a m w m a N '* w m o H m V Ln S ca `l 14 'v' Lr5 h o c H ry m '[r kc r- o m o N rl V lr w 0. c-i wi T-i r-e r-e ri .-n r i n7 nT r,o N s i r�i av rvi m en m m m '9c.Foc'.y N. to to arf.vl w trl vF in cn in in in Gv cn in an vt an tR in i,n it Oc' CL All 0- 0 'F � a r' m O a a o 0 o a a m m m m m m ,-1 H N Ln n m W Ln Fc'i r' m.. arr rr n n a m n rr, m m h m w , .-a a vs m w rn �"� ry > h m va LD m m N w »aw c7 m N m �c`q ai w t' t CFa m m .-1 N w m N w " o m N m m n N N Ln m N Ln GO .--E Ln m N Ln m m LSS Lr L l tC7ry. 0. u>.. +n to in ,� ,A T) rw tr ry ni ni m" ^ ��c' in in +n it+rf yr t/'i an + vii v`ni 0) f>��� (� a a a a a o b m m w oo c-I c-I rr a V' m co m w r J > to lfF to to irF a o Ln m w n n m N IH w m 'cr N 'CF m dj• fir,' 91 > N N C. m h w Ln w Ili Ili ei' h t" n w N Ln w �. Ln N m rd 4 eh n 4 V P- 'V~ V, oo w' h' N �` ✓i > ca .�-a. N a) o Oe r, env Imrr n rn LL to yr yr trt v'x trt v""Ii v"""Ii v"'"Ii inn vet±1i arvr>•%}iNn tNn"� <"1.�'Oc m w m m m n N vs h o ca o m m N n O Ln m m Ir 1 ,tae'' w Ln N N N m w �--1 o o w m m m m h Ln h N h M N r- CJ w w Ll'8 m N N m w v-I ca m CJ m N o --L m M lz IJ lie N w m r+ " O' - n " N Ln " N Ln N N to m Ln O m N'. I S (7 � N �t wn a am a un 14 n M a h Cf N 0 m rR w w Ln w er a cr w n l7 a ry "m Ln n o a N ll v n m It M Lr m tt�'FO ti. ti ran r e ni ev r+i ry m m m m` rn �` '4 Vf to cr va va v> vo- n yr n i}i in .n a 4 to an in tr en ira l 0 o o °o o °o oca o °n ClClr, x t 6 C7 a C3 c3 O m Ln m a N '-I m n o Ln M O h 0.n Q m 4 O o Cy O 17 c 4 an 4n tin i/T trY o 3b h m M a m rI w Ln m Ln w N N m Lf1 w o ,., o Lan o d H a m m cl N w C h V' el m Ln c4 m m w m N y" m L^S wH m 4 H n 4 .--I w LA rB' a P`. v rT IFS c t m m a r-i r-I N en m ci Ln Ln w h m m m n w sr r+e m N N L .G Uf N N m m m m m en en m m M m en m m er w +.'F VF in ir} to i1F to M M to V? VY V}Vl in do Vn {n+t1'b +J'}iq v} an.Af> tls Lf5 ny' _......_..............,�.-..... _..,., ....._._.._ ..............._......... .._. ___........,._. ...gym,,... q in iJlr � a ca a o c� o a o rn w w Ln m w N w Ln m r w m E -Ln in.tr&s!}v) tl a w r-1 O h h Ln m N m o o m� n N C.3 o n Ln Ln C .--il lr h h '4r r. cl O w Ln O o CO n m m m tl1, 1- w Ln m LFS 6O i�A N m O m m m N Ln O M1`` a m m Ln m m m w ? it of Ln ri m V '-I 4'� V ,-e ol Ln N 6 h m c,, era f7i o m m m m' m m m m m m m m m a N N m M m m m m M M M m tr M M m t1>to i1>•M.n en ira ir}in.in+r>• irr to iFr trx arr in Ga a a a a o o m Ln m N or m m m m m m m V m w m N irF to<n tr}tr} o o Ln n Ln c7 m Lr m m r- m m h N - m m txq. a 471 m OR, m C3 N I.1 m N h N m Ln M ci w w r6 m w Ln n o m w o m w m m w o m h Ln N h 'lt 'l Ln Ln Ln w w w w n n m as w m m o a Qi cL ir} i/!t!Y ih'+✓}to to to to an tFk irk to VL iq to 4 q fo O in i^ Q m '$j a c w CN O m O O o m m O w w N Ln N M N m h w w N :-I.. E to ifL tr}to in o O o r--B w n LF) Kr w Cr s-i N a m V m. o a o a m Lri N M m m a m -t m Ih N » a a a o Q Ire , Ln m m 'n m w Ln oo c r; re Lf m d O m m 9y m a N Ln m N h N m Ln m .-U W Lr5 h O m w C m w m m w o r1 n a-I kn t+✓I' O � d' Ln Ln Ln LD Lo w LD r` n' co w oo m m tJ>- Vr iA i1T<!F M to t/1 trT M'b to t/4 dr}vl-to in irF C7 x C w oD m O O m Ln m N V m .-d m V m Ln m -vr w-e [r Ln W co h O O Lrl n Ire m m Ln m m m m m h N Ln un m tea„ h N w c m ol cc m a N Ln m N r- el m 1rl cr r-r C3' C a m w o m w m m LD o m h' r m fl S m b m m Ln w w w w h n m m m m Cr1 un o C o '..-* u7 try rW a-i M M H wi H .-i .-I - .--1 . H H r-] H •-1 N to in t!'f to in ir? in to in I^in/n tr}in in v4 to vi Ln tr) en 4i w Ln QJ co " rl N w Ln W' Q O V Ln w 13� U s.. ri', �. m tl,n . d irF to an �«- x oo m O O m Ora m N zt m m wr m Ln m a H �t Ln a C1 G r m eo m h m Cl m h XFS m m Ln C) m o m LT n N Ln m m �0 to vn o W H N o c m m m 0 O N Ln m N h N m Ln M rti a s rre j a O ' 'Si m r, o m 'o o m w m m Lo Q m r` e^•I o m m Co C3 Q +* It m are Ln w w w w n n m m m m m m b d N +n L/Y ri v-i r-I r-i '-i v-I rI rf. ry •-i a-1 N N C H H H H N n t ar t r r n i r n n rr a n to in tn to v,}ll to in 4 w ry E w 1^ in xt E a m m o o a w w N Ln N r-I N m n w w N . m w r o O o +-r to h In V w V ri N a m 't m m a F. h m a a m Ln N ty m m o m 'Ct m Ln N 11, o m of ? a N mN N mnN m r A0 oo Li n L( Q Cr '�{' Lr n O cl LO d m 65 m m w a m n 1- Lre cl m d a m Ln Ln LD w Lo a N r> oo ago co 0) of m o f r-I ri ri a^^I n N = an to an an an an i16 to irr+vk aFr th tre trr v> ire irs t1! w [r Ln w h m m c7 r-I N m N Ln w n m m a M N m M 6J N N N N N N N N. N m M M m m N y m" w m <r Ln w h m m o N m st Ln w h oo e.' > w^I ti•-I ,--I ewi e-X ri M N N r`,4 N N N N N N N m m M M .t] o o o o o o o o 0 ca o o o c b o o O o o o o cL' N a�w N N N N N N N N e4 N N N' N N ry N N m rr,4 > w 2 c 0 T LO ea N t/1 to vM1 to O' of rf h N x-I N 't P M w N 111 O M r f'- r•- ; � .� p fXt m r P N M ry w N at 00 M 0.(1 ry �7 p a5 W N m P 14 R0 N 0 m m N m M 0 C) li N ry O rH a1 b" +`J aY .--I al m w w M (A o o X at <t 0 w (y V N cn r- 4 0 r-(� r1 m w O w 'w m d t/1 1/s a/? a-i e-I .•1 m-1 N N N AV M �P't n 'V 'V '�If f � wtlr 14 ines my Syr nv v n m U E w '� 'O h 0 w 0 w o w eft m ry h ^q' M aT e°-I m rf mA S ""� m 0 Iry 0 m ry a' w w N N N w '0 00 m w t1 w M C C jff cn re rl 'mot P <t N LO � rn 1"- m [t d H h at fci 05 00 W m ry m m w 0 co r oa N N 0 ry N p 00 00 ry �� �� w M w w ro o w m rn w N m x at w 0 w o w 0 w a at � � a� ± m e cg 7 a p w w n m a v u co ai . m V ry o o r r �li m m m m m m T ,� v try w vF art tfo-tr�to t!1•v}v}s1>•vt•+It an tr t1.��CIS vs, ui � L'e +"'r ."� Q o fold 0, M M M p 0 0 ,°w m } (n h M N M ry M p Qt 00 10 P w 'il ewI tat p h 01. m M �N 4r CSf h 00 r N O O cr eft w cl N w w ^7 P C p .°-I a1 •-} w w N a Ire ri w m m ry m " m ai to to ari SD ai m tn ry w r,i co 0 f 1 ✓ '�? CT O E ncr m urn ° w o m m o o .p-1 m m n p rrr Q tmn m co N cc lo. U a " .1°-a 1-: - - � N N ry m m m m a v aw m nii m +r�to vr"t✓r.+n ut-.rx encn t✓f tr><a+F i�°v*en+»°rn us er va tin yr X '�„ d �/ ..x' �,g�r ,�tz' 0 w P w w V W y 0 al 0 to 0 a O N !� m W N N w w m 0 m N P m al ry 0 m w 0 h p r-I N N N V VI ,, d m W 0 m AIY d N m m O P m P r1 w 00 e4 Ct Y �} 0- x m r, 0 m 'Y N' N m er w ay M P m at r- w [1° w w .. F ✓ N a T rn d 0 .-e .-e N N M m V; fp w w p cn _ } uF+n an cn�e�i1r�tNit�.r1i°v°v vNx vNi v aNi.aNir+Nr.°u°v '� � 5-1J "� •.. � r��W � � �: ro U w w w m y m w cr n cmt �ppu n}f,. m Er m +n tf>vk 0 a� P m h 0 ea oo p � P 'cr eo p w m ca w ca N so � b£/EEOZ Uk rr Pl' N Q C N a1 w a1 fr r 0 w Os,! m W h M rl � m h N r+ d at w e5 N m N to Kt w � h ry u a x m .-i -,r +o +ti nri ry - " m vi P- .-s rr .-i r, q N a M .=c N N N M M P e-i w at MM h N w TI to 0 to o w Z£/TEOZ a 13 a, a o 12 -+ N N m M v �t rn L V H H N N N N N N N N N N N 1 N — «. .n trr t✓a tra.rr yr a+f t✓a tfN to trx rf�to tes to<o. b£{OEOZ w m h m 0 0 0 P of 0 M m m. .-+ N m Ir P m h 2"c"--'° 0£/6fiZOZ N N oo m 0 0 ± m m N ae o , w r p v' - ry m ro ro m m P N r- Ca o w C� M }.. i 0q, p. m w m p = > > y 6 /BZOZ ai o - 0 0 a - en x 0 p M m c0e M aD 'c :2 v m ry P a 0 N m N m IT m N t w > > > i 8Z/LZOZ w m N N N m w rr" ,-1 w ,-1 r°°-r t N .-1 ,-a c c LZ/9ZOZ .--i ni ni e,i ai Ni r sfi rli mi n ewi tti .-i aei 0' 1fi 9Z/9ZOZ v}u"}2/i vT rt e•M rW N N N N N N N N N N N N N ✓�+n to to<n tra va va ur an<rr�e1> v> U? +n 3 3 3 y � a SZ/bZOZ 0 0 0 0 e:s 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 of air WEN to tfs+�cn v*cet+Ia vs en to us va to+.rn efT°v�Ur.n+n+Ir tn. vt rra o a 4 � £Z/ZZOZ as o+ ems, m sf. a ZZ/TZOZ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o p p 0 0 0 a 2' OZ/61OZ h m h- ,tfr a1>•<It•+1r.n tn.vt to v.+f`".IS ih arr v«yr t✓r to to tr}tfr 6T/81OZ 8T/LSOZ w ~ Z M L7191OZ p p 0 C. 0 0 0 0 0 d 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y '"' en to .n cn. cn+.rr +n an vt «ro to va va vc.ar vt v' w o 0 <t Si/trLOZ 0 ............. titi/fWZ m w to in dd o p a °Q QdQ °o o °o rQro � 00 .rvy O O aT d V 0 q Q O d L7 G? Q {] O 0 t? 47 O d' 0 p 0 O pp W �; O m N m h. d o Q O O o 0 Q q w qj o0 lG "7 m M LO rri, Q Q Ll C7 ca Q o O d O w w m p at, v/ O eft' 'G rf1 Q ti o rfl' sit p a w ry i"1'' ury U'S m x ww M zv P M O d M m m o N p 0 .-r w r h �t o d d p 0 w w W p P Qe m p 00 t o at m C? [4 cc +--I w m N �'r 00 m 9Y P VI 44 .-1 al p m N ' 0 0 0 17 C11. a1 0 N U'1 Ih aY .-1 M p m 0 0 rn m [D C , d` ur5 w ry co m m C7 - m et w 1.G P W m o T m q rn w a ai r; w o, 'C 4 v v a v a v w w w w m m w w an w ra p p C an cn wf+n+n.n to va+n in°cn to erx t11 in v* aft vt m m m � W tfY tfY ih o co '6t r N N at er w a r1 k <r 0 eq m P� ap ati rn aS in sn as w .-+ an d en m w v " oo w r of m ai r` r. m Mi m co .-i vi m e.i vt w tfr" r m N .-! p p m m m m 0 0 N -zr w P Cn .-1 m p v w w P w oa a, o m er n v r 0 m q N Ili a 4J v � Gr" v v 'fit' v to 511 m m Afi 6I1 Vi m m w' w .D w v}.to Yn vT v7 4*F v1 to 'A"t1} 't/} 0 w P co at o H It w w w m 0 H N m V M '!'r H c-I r•A nX .°°V r-II N N N N N N N N N N m M m m m m It w w P W m o 1 N m 4 °'0 '6L < < U —. ,p > ♦-r 0 .-1. rte'•• .°-1 N N N N N N N N N N m m m m � p,�_ O ro 0 0 tom, ±�„ y .1�.. +�+ O 0 0 O O O O O o 0 o o o O o o O c o C7 p.... N N N N - - - O. Q jjp t%s °u9 V' 4a o m q m Ln w w m w 7 m tlf tn m m w m �t o to o w -4 m 0 > (;I al -t 0 r- LD m w r- m Cr 'r m o) N < m ui w cr -T c& o 6 & N LS m o ai w &j r,m w r, w m m m Ln m o Ln w o - m c m It w w o N m Ln r- w 0 N Iz r 4 —Z r 4 N r4 r�� ff� ff� tl� Vk tll� lj� v^vll IA oo m m N o D r, . ......... m o) oo �o -�o Ln a'� r� m w ;, o w N > m m w G� 11 Ln m 0 'n m 0 F� r� r-j. o,� e,� rl� " N �4 N M M in vN vn vv vv v,�an lrr vn v 0 rl r� W M I W W It 0 fl, kn W Ln co C) r1l m m C) N Lo rn m Lo co 0i Ili I't rq c� %f� c� rl� mN M C7 44 m m r rl� It cl� r,� m 17� cli C� c� r. In �T Ln Lo m m m LD m o N m Lo w o D- v),in v�- V) ilk in 80acz > CL LZ/SZOZ > 0 0- 97/cizoz 0 c) 0 cD w -4 m w n m o o u) h m " r" m Ln m vT w " " w m m U) m m m o w m w szll7zoz > cc tZ/EZOZ r, r, 0 m Wa0z cr) m. KZ/TZOZ > 0 __j o 0 0 o w a u) w rl U) o o m r, m t, m rl� M 0 ID M M r� v Ot q q Lq 13� 11, 0(� lrr rt Cll� oz/6TOZ IiNlp w ® otC cr Lr ke r4 m m c3 w N 4 w q w w m ID m m m T mN 'o w rl w LD r- w IR m GT/SIOZ In in vn r.� N cq N m m 'T ST//IOZ E vk vk m vk I^ V, < o m w I, �t r, �t �T m r, r, m w m m w N rl r� IT/9TOZ o w " m m a w Ln w N t m o Ln o w a a Gj L'i n� "i R rl an c7i q Lq Lq ai *� NL C� rN� kli Lji Ili Ili ui qT/sloz of C) rn w m ID 0 Ln oo N r, t- �m c) w rn a Ln w r, r, m rq a w oo m w oo m lo M Ln LL 11 m In m m 4 St/tToz rNt cs� r�� rl f�� C� C� r"i rN� r�� I I - - I I N N N N N N r-4 N N N N N N �T1 ET OZ in vn In q^ vl} [A VF U4 t4 (D O o 0 w m c3 m m m &n O ul N a r4 Do tD w N Ln o tn Do Nt o) 'IT n cn rr) u) kD Dc 0 m w r- m ;t oo 0 N tc� C� �R f�� cy� cl� r-t. rl� o c Do m r� Lo w oo cL R c� C� QQCY 50J Fa. pr X m o m 0 ke Le r,� o6 r,� 6 L6 rf� "t ol c o o , r- o a m o cL M M V Ln Ln W LD r, 00 CO M M 0 v� q 4r1 O F- N N N N N N N N N N M r4 N N N N C4 fn w t�! m m M o o o o o co a) W In m H c] t Lo 0 W In Cr N W W P, M a X lb rL 'o6 tf �oi c F r-: 01 4 r,i L6 e d r6 -2 " w 0 w N M to co 0 oo m c I ID w 'o > t w " h w 0 nn o Ln c3 w w Lo " m m m F-: r•: Q6 D6 6 6 6 m 7i -r. elj N N N N en up wy X 61 L-L DL C < < dj m 0 m m m o 0 �r N w o Lo m 0 Ln rL W in A^ w m It rl m - m o m �o �* w o cL t " Im C] lc� rl�. a� of ll�. 1'1�� o�. Ci V� rq R kr� �q w .2 .2 o w o6 n� " �o o Ln c Co w Lo N w m m Lr1 r1B Ih �Ll -L, Q m �m -* �* Ln u) LD w r, w Do m cr, C� N N r-4 m N N N N N N N " m I^ vk 1^In-V4 ljT "I 1-1k in v), +n v) in u rr cr 145' cL c 0 0 0 0 0 m m o m N w N w w w us a m w 'Ir w rr w r-I o o C) y 17 oc� c) m w w rff m 't N m w m u 'I *' q o n m zf r-� cr� rr� -4� & o6 6 & ; r- m -,r p C 0 > CD N W D W M W r-I r, X 0 �t W M 0 rl LD LO oo co m -@ < a oli ll� rte. C� n C� u1 C� w w N w m m u) _Ln > H m m --t 4 w r-: o6 cd a� d d irk ilk w N " N N N N " N N N N r-4 N N N eN N r4 m ci V?iq Mk 9*k vn ilk vrk C� 0 0 H Tr w Tr Do oo m to M R Ln oo Ln w Kr cD E! 1n m 0) oo Do L'k m m L9 b 'I m r- w N r-, m c ci o a co Ln m - m a) r-j co ry) to m m ko N w " oo to Ln to LI1 n o cr oD a -o r,� L'I I. C� IR R L'I IT! `� ol� n n "I rq "I `� 171 L'I m r, r.4 r4 r4 m m �r q Ln q'o w r, n co &4 r4 14 N N N N N 1-4 in M 1^ in co 0 o o 0 O c)0 o n o Ln Lf) 'A Ili rl� v os e,q fl,LD rz Lf) --j tn r0 of N m m r, cD m r, a w oD w m 0 o 0 oo m oo m m h eH w r4 Do w U'1 Lf) U) h 0 a m Ln m 0 0 cD f`� Ct rNE tri q Lri Ili ol� n ol� n oo m m• 't a) 'n Ln c ct vj M 14 N N M M a -Ir M Lr� L6 L6 r-: r-� C6 o6 O tD c, m - " N N N N N N N " N N " N N r4 N > N 66 (71 6 N 4, ,-v vi t4 to in t6 '6 v *4 ilk vk t4 vi, vn w " " a o E w 'n i/l, q o C) It OD a oo co q m Ln rn r, Ln co v) ko N r a N m m w " w N Lm R i m N m m o o m h e r1t pl� l7i Ili Ct ci w It w m m ti m m w m Cw m fi m 'D H w " w L6 Lr� L6 L6 P-: 6 ZF o6 e > ry Lr> N 0 m to o Li) m 11, w m w m w m m cr m n < rNt rl� N� fr� rN rJ Nt cf cr u5 u5 w w p � - � . N " N N N N N N N N N > in in tn vk v4 in tt} tr}i4 V 1fY in to < m to r, Qo m o m a Ln w r- w m u c > 2 < m m m m M -IT 'W n OD 0) CD W N M a In W n OC) C) o - - - - - N N " N N N N m m m m o o o o C� o o c o o o a a o c o m o- 0 m w w Ln 0 m m m 0 m w a) rl 0 w m A/T to in r- 5r q N H r- " m " t LY) W t Ln 1, > �D cc� Lq oc� r�� r lr� Iq ffi l3i ol� a i �7 M " P, ........... .......... W 4 C) co cn m m 00 o ir, C5 in < " W M r, N Ln M N r r, W 0 . . 0 i > U') lzr m m w �4 r- 0 0 �r w N r, m 0 m P, WEER �n 4A .4 r4 rq C6 r1i cf -zi :F J3 Ln� Ls & & r-: rl� to ljf AA to qjt Vr 11% *n 'A�n �n v4 V) Wnoz �1 C) 0 0 <D N 00 0 M 7 0) N 00 C) W 00 r- r-j M 0 M 0 O� zr rn H M 0 �t �o Lt) LA 00 LO a m W rj m kt� rQ 0� Ca CNL m �c " r� " err U7 0 TE/OEOZ co tri m m w 4 m eW rN 06 'Zi 06 C 6 Ld f-i Lli r-:, > > w 0) " m r, 0 - m �o r, co m 0 0 0 OE/6zoz CL ci It W M uq oc� C� rl� ll� kc� O� C� rq Iq rl� 0 r4 . m m m m Gunn > > 0 m 1- h m ko h 0) m C14 00 m co r. 0 0 t N W Lzlgzoz 0 Lv 0 0 Ln It fn w [- W -* 0 t 00 0 " Ir Ln W rl 00 0 N O a) Cj CllS kl� C11 IR lj C;j It W kR rlj 01� Cl� ff� eN 0) t r, 00 00 LrL > oo rn q) Ln �t r� o N F w cc ch H ri r,� r-� �f -q� f �4 gz/szoz m Ln W W M r- 0 C�4 �t W M 0 M U) r, M M Ln rl M LA W W W lf� r v V� Iq q Lq Lsi lc� w� lc� tR r-6, rl TI� rl� rl� > r-4 rq cq N r4 rj r4 rj r4 N N N e-4 r4 rj r4 to if, V tZ/Ezoz co Ez/zzoz m w m m 0 r, LO m m Wizoz > �4 tn 0 w w 0 �t m m rl m N I, m It m > C� J� Lei kR r-�, -I r! w LD r, Ln w en -zt m m ko oj TZ/ozoz ro m 6 o Ln " m w 06 �4 " Ln 0 Ln t1i m w w 0 C14 LD r- Ln t w m OZ/6TOZ LY > a 0 Lb r- r, 00 -* a11 ") 0 w rf) c I- t IH I-z 1 N N er� fl� d� 66 V� & r r 06 rfi C & -Z GT/RTOZ vv vv -cn Vn 1^ � In in V). to"a i^ vv �j CU o c) o o o o 0) 0) m r, (.h " zt .-T m o Lm m Lr, Ln -Js to IA to 0 W 00 al 0 Lf) Ln " N Lr) 0 m co 0 N a) m C� lzl� � 1-t Lri -t C� rIL C? Vi r-� cl� -i Lr� rl> s m Ln LA 0 m m m m N " r 0 1-1 w m > M M N N N P4 IZT LD W " LD 0 w N w LD a) Ln W lz� ll�, C� Ili lc� C ll� kc C cl� rl� ll� n 'n tn CN r1l N M M 11 -t v Lr Ln > in yr trL v to to V to V} in -La try in V* ",­-.-" ""- ............. �0 00 co " 00 m r 00 r-, Ln LD LO 00 " 00 m `o 0 m Lf) 0 M 0 -4 C> Ln Ln 0 OC� rlL fli Cr� 1� tR 0) 00 *1 0 c 0 0 Z:5 0 C) m 8 0 0 C, 106 Ce -Z 06 j 6 r-� Lf� 0 e,4 en �,o a) N kn 0 C� 0 0 n 0 Iq fl, 0 -* r, - R 1 6 d d cs 6 0 0 > lll� Lg� tR ll� Lr� lj� LR Lc� Lc� ll• ll� ol� O� oc� IYL ai Ili Ci (D n Mr ""4 "04 M" rl 0" CMNJ '"o C"" r"4 1.Lr., r4 C� M M I R C! R R o n 1^ to In to il?4n to Vt (n Vh VT V} V} Vq V? to to 11) vv In to all OD f, w n V r6 4 +n tra to vi in era irs irt• Vs x 0 00 0 0 m t m w m 1.1 m 0 LO r" m n w m m to to t/ 0 w (N m w w n m m w M m W m LD " m t -M C� 't I-i Ci I-i ll:„ Ili ri rl�, C L'i rll� L'i C� ol� 13l clr IR ll� m Y) Ln w r-, w c N Ln i-, o m u6 o m r- m Kt m w r- m o m Ln Lo r-, m o -4 m m o aL L/) rJl tn to Ln Ln Ln tn in ko Lo ko Lo w w w Co N. r-, r� T-� o Ul. Afr to lllw to Vr AfarAfarV Vn vn in V'- V} to lfn -Ln Im c 0 0) Q > C) 0 0 0 0 0 00 N w U) 0 w CQ kD W r-, 0) t r4 tD E -�n Afr V) C) 0 N N 0 r4 0) w co 0 -qr " m cn " I D. 0 R 17� r1i 't N fl� rl el1 lzl� C�, LID 0i lc� ll O � cu & LD r-4 m w LD I, m m w 0) m w M w " �L CL CP o I q a -tT a) r, r, o Ln N 1,4 in o co m m > < M ryl -�I- Ln LO r• GO 0 r4 M r- 0 M LO 0 tn r� N w N m ti� Lr1 Le r* 06 d 14 f4 ff� Lr & PIZ crL d m Ln Vi m Ln Ln m Ln w kO W LO 1D w Lo w h r+ h to t/k Vn in 1^ V to Vn 'A 1^ V4 Vn ul4 10-vv 1^ to to 0 0 0 0 00 (n 0 t ZT, m 0 0 0 2n w N 0 LO 0 in to to to 0 w " ri 0 W w W t M iU'1 sH N. r, M M C lzj� C� r-� LrL cl� rIL rl� 114i ll� el� r-� fl� C� 0) X M W M Ln r�l M M LO N M �D M 0 It r� w CL w w m 0 0 N m t LO w r_ M 0 -0 2 to to in to VII t4 V� to In m z CL �4 N N rn m rm m m m ro m m m m rn 0: r,� E 2 to J). OL gr< CU tf). VI. In. 0 0 " T, m m �4 �r 1-1 0 ko r, 0 m 0 0 0 Ea 0 0 CL Ct C� Ili l3i n rIt I-i n R Lii -i C� lz� r-, rl� C� 0 0 w 0 0 -It m LD z w -* m Ln " r- r, 0 'r r- V) %r Ln m r, -t N " e-4 �t rl M 00 rl� cli a q rl rl� re� 13i rl cri w 17;F rl�, lcj� " ull 11 > r- r- w m 0 - m m -zt Ln LD LD r� vv w " " N " fN m m m m m rn m m m m m m 0 In sn to'u? V)} to lf} vn Vn to Vn+n to V4 in VF m 0 " m m m m t kn 0 w 0 t Ln r, m m m Ln (N 0 0 11 m w t-, C It rl� Ci ld� cri vi R w i Oli Itt 0 L N V� w w w r. Ln to w w w m m o " - " N m t q Ln M W P4 " " r4 CIJ r-4 N M M M M M rn M M M 0 �R to in V> 00 Vn 1^in Vn i4 AA to in in in VA vv to do V', e1 trT to 0 Ln rq 0 C3_0 w IlL Vi C C Lf� w 0 'n -4 rn A u m er 0 Lo 00 Qj ai > x 0 CO 0) 0) 0 N LO M Ln M -zr LC N 0 -4 w Ln 0 0 C. 0 0 00 a t Ln rl m m m Ln " 0 Q m w 1-1 r" t N flN �9 m rl 0 m �r m Ln CD LD fli w �t 0 tm m in m w CD 0 0 =3 C� C1 Ct C CO t L o r-z" U L6 Le r-� 06 oi G� C 6 I-z r4 C4 rl� fl� -:I� :f Ln� -M 00 0 0 co N " " r4 " f14 N m m m m m m m m M > m vD oO r- m -0 ci to to t4 to lr� 1/� 41n to (n ta t6 vl�in A/� Ln ca E 2 W to V4 fL 0 Ln m 0 m r, m 'Cr' w r- Ln Ln N w P, Ln w m m 11 LA 0 0 N m w li cl P,.. rl cl cTl ol al o� zt a� Lq n Y� LR -t 31 t c� ,z� r�, > 00 0 vt Ln W C) M CO LA N 0 0 M MO W 'xT " C14 m r, p m t m Ln o w rq co vr o w r,4 a) Ln cj a) ko ll� lc� ll� Lq kc� rl, ol� cl� ai Gi C -L -t r� fl� ff� ll:� ll*� Lf' r4 " " N N " N m m m m m m m m m in 14 to A^ to Vn Gn irf to lj! in to Vn vv to irk V} tin in o t Ln W r- 00 cn 0 - f1d m -zr ji w r, co (n C> wH IN m lzr 0 (N m N r-4 r1i r-4 C14 rq N N m rn m m m C c c: ai a) M LD M t M W r- W 0) 0 ri N M Ln W t M N r-4 N N C14 r,4 N N r4 M M M m 0 J.. co co 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CL m m m rq m CN . . . . > > 2 o C, of C'4 r'l U') 000 'Cr a M a M ¢n -T H C�l Ln r� r'4 M i.0 M 00 to L4 tn C) T M H a) rN M M a 0 W W a C W W Cy r kc� Ivi rr� Iq ry rl Lr� n W M - - v N m m 'n Oo LO �r rIj a) r" M 0 tD m 00 vr C) ul� 0) t:r 00 m > " Ln 00 a fy) w 0) N et h a) r v r, 0) N v h tra in 1^ -i rl,I r4 N N to to t4 t4� 4o 4A t4 to tra to to 'A Afr A/Y 0 0 C> m -* 0 m m r- r1l r, Ln m N to -kn t4 m m 0 m fl- w 0 0 r, rn 00 m oo r, r-4 �o > WIEN > ai C� a q Cr 0� lyi "ri l7i ci tc� a� ll�, rl� r1i C� 't Lq rq C� 0 . CA w " W m r4 0) rl LO 0) �i 0 rl rn 06 0- > m Ln aq r, " r, m w " rl. LO 0 ula m m Lo 0 m Wozoz s M It W r- M C� rlt "i Lr1 ll:� oci C� C� r� cq LrL ll:?trr err tra IH 1-4 1-4 N rl� N N " I OE/6zoz 4n ILn tn to VY err. lfa VY en to era tra E W 00 M r4 LO 00 0 �t rl Cr r rn rSJ M CN 0 Ch r� Lf� (M r-4 W w m C� cc w -:t m -;r In 00 fq 00 LO Lo co " 0 0) " co rl 0 0) Ili r,� co Cl LR rl� lr� oc� oc� 1% rl� 0(� -t r1i rIt C; I-Ii C� ll� lv� rl� SZUzoz s co co cc cc pa co r, Lo to �r m o no �o 4 1 a) w rn c) > > rrr m 1� m Ln r- (3) 11 m Lf) r, 0) m �* w 00 0 .4 m w r, Cs li s a a -i rIL rt r� rlt cl� ff� ff� m m Cli I;t WWOZ C, to-Ln Ar�V�-VY to V� V� V1. tar "(fv to to to to gz/szoz T to to to to to to C-A C,4 N . . . . tf 0 0 0 0 0 w w r, r- m m ko 0 w O > 'A Alf� 10-1 0 " w m m 0 0 m m w Ln 00 m m w r, m -zr fn 0 %T m 1* (N w r4 rN m �o P4 rN 00 m oc� fll� ry� 6 L6 Lf� 1� 4 �6 LA, r�l M, M, ff� in I I WIC. > Ln N �r Do rN r, 00 Ln m 0 0 1-1 CN Ln 00 r- rn W a, ryi llc� C� m r, Ln m zz/zzoz Va. - - I I I n rl�. -i Lq trr N r4 r4 m m m It �t L*) U) Ln tD tb > 14 t4 in A^ in VII in t4 va VY VY �to 4o IZ/OZOZ > 0) 9 000 0 0 �4 �oo rn �r r- co o o �r c) to " cq �t O tjl- to 4A� 0 00 �i LO N Ul ryl V) r- 0 0 LD P, M rq M W 0 0 m o Ln m r, Ln H r, m o o rj r, t, m in �* , ol� OZ/6tCZ -i > C' Iz r-� r-� 14 cy� 6 to' Q0, 0' 00- ol rl- 0), tn' Lo' rq, m > r� u3 -* m rn r4 rn rn -Zr LD r- 0 N Ln M rn 00 M cu a M U) r- a, fft W� rl� a� lz� lll� ol� C� Lq oc 0 ll'a if, Lq to to r-I N N " r1i m rri m m > 14 An trr ILn t4 an to to t4 to trr Mn E (n N M " It r4 t4 W -4 CO rl r- 0) M 0 " LD Do 00 �D < fn �A " Ln r4 en o rn m r4 a) r, w i, c,4 i ur) Ln ry) c) r, n n rl� Lq co U� M1 lzj� C� C� �R rl�. rq LFL rll� ltl� lll� LC} IR I-i 91/sToz qO cn 0 N I f� 0 �* c* M W M a, 10 M 1.70) 10 r*- "1 00 cn r tD oo o m Ln r- o F4 Ln r- a m I qT r, 0 > C? at 't '-t 'I rd rt PL ri 'r� ff� m 'Y� v '4� Zt� � Ln! Lq "ry 'R W- N r4 N C4 N r4 f4 r-4 rq r4 r4 " " N N N r4 rlJ f4 44 N to wa in Vr to IA�era V*. l.n -Ln to trr en to to Va in-Ln VY V). t7l/EIOZ 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 a 0 00 00 m LA T- re) w co tn 'r :T r, C-4 tt C:) 0 O' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 >1 A/r to AA 0 kD It W I M (D " m " 0 Ln N �-O r, Ln Xoo 0 0 a Cl 0 CD C=, C� "It IrL C:� tR -;t C� C C� C� po w X ir- m 0 r, ;r 00 w m -i a) r- Ln ro r�4 a c� cwi 8 8 8 8 OL m 4N rq m �4 -tr Ln �D w P� co Ch m C) 11 N m -t �r t- m Vi Ci Vi C� Iq C� W� C� Ln Ln C) m m m cn m m m m m m rm m �:r Cr Iq 'IT It oo r,� m 't -'T m m C'4 -Ln t4 to VY & * en w0 0 0 0 (D r- N t r Ln N m w E t4 V'�vn 0 0 cr r' r' M '-I r, 4 w Ln ca C�. cct r�� c� cl q oq r, Lr rll� r�, i 0 0 " w -* w 0 m m o N cn N o -ZT 0 w C) Y' m w "T 'Cr I- a (N Ln 0 w > PIZ. ll� C� h. lqj� oc tp rIL r- LrI M N O ci W -,t Ln w u:) P, w a a� trr VY 1^ V�- I^ Vr V'r lkn �Ln 'A in vv tra vi- In VI 4-4+n 0 Lo LA 0 m m N " a �t Ln Lo t- o m m -'t M 0 LA M W - r4 r4 0 w 14 Ln W ra (N -,:r 0 U5 m C: Ci Lq rl! ai rl� Ll� Lq lf� lll� C� N U'l 0 L" r4 M h� llc� cl N. = x cn " w m m r- -j u-) m m o6 r,� r, & 6 V CL M w w w m m 0 rlj N ffl m �* lot "M Wm 0 1-1 1-4 " t-4 N C", rq C-4 N w w 0 < to -Ln th to 0 0 C) 0 0 0 (D ryl &.0 ko rl rn m rl 0 0 w m CD m a Eto to _VY C) 0 to " m It 0 r" 0 Ln 0 0 N Ln r, zr to N 0 OL C� C� It tc� Iq C� Cli lzr pl� -i lr Vi lc� C� oc lyi Cr o po m Ln LA m op " rq cj q Lo " u-� oo _j t 0 Ln tN cn rl w Ln w r, m r1i Ln 0 Ln m rl La Ln 0 to > ai Ili tR cl� n rl�. Llr cri fli 0(� N rl� ll:� C� llr� C� An (D r, 00 00 00 m m C> 0 0 r-I rH C14 N N m -t I�t Ln r4 " N rN rlJ C-4 C-4 f4 (D to 4n to to to to trn to Va in Q). 1/o- err trr An a LD m rn a 00 m h " m Ln r" 0 0 r1i Nt r- r-I w C14 ON m M DO 0 M W -1 LD M 0 00 r, rl, CZ r-I 't 00 -:1* 0 00 u3 Lo fy� cl� oc Ili rl kR I-t an Ci Lli C� lll1 -i lc� lV oc Ili 01 Lni CX 00 0 (N (N m m 'IT Ln LA LO �o r, r, 00 00 m Ch C� <r M " N CJ " " r1l (N " N rlJ rQ C4 Cq �4 N rq �q r4 m tn Vr 1^ in to An in in Vr tn tn V�--Va -Ln -�n A/� Ln to to in to ko N 10 aj Do 00 (D ry W 0 r- r14 LA Gi C� LR r-4 N U)tr to t4 m m a m m r, 'A m 0 N m 0 r- r-I ko N m m LD w C9 m w a w m 0 w t- r, m -It w It 0 00 w w ryl M w 131 'It! ct -1 w Ll C� Ll C� C� -, D " oo m a� Ln < ,v w X c. a r-I C-4 cq m m V 'T 0 Ln Vo w h r-� 06 06 a� m o 00 fN N " r1i N N ry eq m > OD M w 2 to va to to to in Va to to in trr to to tq in t/a to to VY to CL C� t4l to tA. E 0 cr w rl 1-i m M 0 0 r, C) M W C'4 M 0 tD a M rq a X W N :T t, ll� ly� rl� cl� rl�. C� lll� Lri rl� oc� CL -t Cr r� C� lr� -t C� oc� co > w 0 m w T4 m C) w r- r- m 0 co w tD t < m It m " re " w rH Ln 0 m 0 m m m m 0 q ri -! rt elt ly� n ltl� ll� Lr� Lr� lll� IIR rll� rl�. oc� cxl m m 0 . . . . . . . . . N r4 r4 (N (N N N " fl7 r4 rfi to V)- V-1 to to to to t4 in An to to to �T tn tb r° W 0) 0 a N M d' Ln W M1 W M C:) N tN (N tN N m m m m m -M CL fn tr LA kD M1 w m C) rl N m 't Ln Lo rl w 0 0 %-A N m :3 - -4 -1 r-I " " r-4 r,4 " rj rj r-4 f-4 M M rn m 0 st 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O C> 0 0 0 0 0 C) 0 0 0 0 C N Ln m . . . . . . . . . f14 N N > > D -4 Li CL 0 ar. m LO 0 o a 0 -,1 N r r, 0:0 N 't m m M t m r tra to va H m r q w to m 4 w r- m w m co c, Lh m m 0 > "! q 01� lf� rl� rl� fl� Lq C� Ili rl� C� ;� n C� n lz� lg� a) 0 m ca cn �r " rn on Ln r- " C) e14 00 rl 0 P, t, m r1l re) m N 0 00 Ln r14 00 m t, Ln rl > r- t a, u5 rn o, r, ,t c� F,� z�, c� r,� r,� c� u� r� t7E/EEOZ es� eq r,� -,i t6 6 tD r-, r-, W M m 0 vi- Va tq tn Va in t/r Va V)-Afa 'In vn 11 -i 11 l t4 Q). if tla ECUEOZ C14 tl M Cn 00 m r, Ln 00 t r- 0 N LO Ln 0 -,l 00 > m m In m m 0 M A W " M m m w w C) > cu Qj ld� r1i fl� Vi Cli n Cli Oli Pri In 117� C� oo ll� lzj� Ili ci 't 0 . LO 0) w re) Ln rn r" 00 to 0 0 00 " 0) m m > w w It " m w " w "t 0 Ln m -tT w 1-4 0 w m r- Ln w w m m F, q m r- zt F� q :j� DUKE tn tn r N rr� M -4� 4 -:F Ln Ln o w w V) -un tra tn l✓lu to yA llfw 66AZOZ E 00 C) -1 Ln m q Ln N LD P, M r-4 �D M i3z/tzoz pa a, m Ln Ln m o) %(i Zt a� I-i C� V� r-� rl� kl� ll� LO m m 4 g -Ir m N m m w m 0 N tz/gzoz I'u 1-1 I-t rl� 01� cl� Op a� a� C� 0 0 N N m 0 > �r �D Do - �T w Ln M LO W eN Ln W 4 Ln W C4 " rQ m m m �m m to tn vv4 �n to-L6 t4-V� V). t4 lf�- to Va to to in to t4 lfa gz/szoz OH� m m m '0 'D "' '0 000 0 0 m M Ln U) w m ki) w 0 'D 0 w m Ln LD 2 W M kD kD M - 0 " -�t r, M N 0 M t7Z/EZOZ CL rf� C�� a� %R r� ll:� kc� Lri rq r� �r Ln 0 "*� w M m m J 4 rq of Ln w r4 06 & Ln & d to Ez/zzo?, Im M 00 r M m tn 01 -tT N N M r- " 0 0 N r, M M > M V� lq� li q 1� li It li rl� r1i LQ Lq oc C v" m to w r, W M 0 �4 M 0 0 r� ZZ/TZOZ > WOZOT Q3 as ta V�-v� 0 0 r, m Ln rn a) kD rj m Ln qr �D ro) cc v) Ln OZ/6TOZ C� rl� 01� rl� C� l3i Lq cl� -t ll� rl� Ci tR LR lz� N n Ln oo " " �m r m m m m m i Ln w " oo u) 61/81OZ > M r- M M W r M (D m 00 "Zt r-4 0 0 00 M r- C4 r- " r- N rl N 00 M m m 14 r, m lk, rq rlz C6 C6 zf -IF ln Ln LO & r-:, 06 06 C7 STILIOZ . > 0 LT/91OZ > E r- w Ln w P, o r o u) m w N m oo CO N rl W 0 M kO M rl 0 r-4 w 't r, 00 0) C) ca 0 U) M < It Lr� el� 01 C� lz� rl� cc� C� 01 %R 'It. 1~ cl� LrL n C> 01� r- 9T/STOZ -7a m -qr La 00 a r� 0) cq U3 " r� -qt " rl 0 " M w (n -C� L^ rq It W 00 r, tD 0 M 0) r M r Ch "t 0) r 01 Ln ST/t7TO? �! 'I q 'I f�t cl �4 " " " m m -;r Tt Ln Ln U� LO r� 00 L> rq viva fN 4 zf -:i ZF -zf �f 4 trio � 4 'Z� 4 vv Ar, ^ V1,V� V1,�n lf� V). V). tn �n V1. vn �4 V� �n'a). X C, 0 0 ca 0 0 0 rn to �D m rn Ln rq r4 Ln vr tm cp C, 0 o' a C� 0 L'6 vra vl-tn C) LD Ln 00 kD (7) m m 01 fq m ,,t r- 0 con 8 Lwn crY-, 8 ED 0 CO <3 M C� IR kc� Cli "R. kc� C� cl� ai IQ lll� r- 1* - 't 'r :r 6 cs C:5 (S d M cn tD rn " cn co w m 1I1 Ln Ln Le t--: 0 .--1 M L6 lC1 P C� n (D C3 C) 0 rh �t W 00 0 wH M Ln r, 0) " m Ln r, m �t �D rn r, C� C� R C� C� C� C:� 00 co ca co al m m 0) a) 0) C:� c� C� C� c! 'I r-j al r,� 11 N C) m ta It � CL Afa+Ln tra to tn lfa ll'a 1^ in tn I " " , r, " " r, - - en 2 AA tra v} ............. 000 0 0 0 LD a) 0 ko W Un 0 . . . tfa err Va 0 0 " " m m m " N m w -* m w a 0 m W m m M Ln " N " 0 U) r U) w 0 H 6 Le Ln 06 L6 Cn e Ln cr � r4 rf; ZF r-: c4 6 M o > a LD w m LO 1.0 a w m m -4 1- r Ln 0 r ll� Cli lc� rq C� 01� lll� L'i Iti Lq q ll� rI:. Ci n LR > < m �r tD oU 0 m Li) r, cy) " rn Ln r, Ci) N �r tD 0 00 OD 00 CO M 0) 0) M M M 0 Cl 0 0 0 V1, J-r ifr " � 'FO 76 76 1 L4 .�2 �q oo in po " m m cc Ln m m m N Ln LO CO Aa m m w to t6 to 0 0 r- " m r, w rl �11 to LO LC w " r, Ln w 0 Ln - q rliL Lr� lll� oc� "It Q� LR kr� 01� tl� W 10 r- M :t H m 4 Lk Ln M " 0 0 Cn M <:h 0) 0 & r4 rl� Le� r,: vi CL m 141 W r, cO c* (7) 0 rn �t LA W r, oo c) a Lq 2 ~ -;r ."t Nt 'r 'r r Nr � U) Ln Ln Ln Ln In Ln V) Ln w rq z 0 0 a w m Ln LO rl m r, r, N w w w m w (r (P VV to 1^ 0 0 0 -4 M w rl4 M " M W " W N h 1- 0 0 0 a E 0 0 qt Ln r, Ln 0 M Lm n w m 0 0 0 CL m 0 c u) W 00 r4 00 tD w 00 N tO W n m i H to CO M QO -@ ¢ Ln co N 0 0 m CA m m 0 0 N m 0 rl m t tn.V). vi, (U CL > U� r_� ce CF� C5 0, en -cr LO w r- 03 *0 al 0 m �t a 0 vt �r q vt q *r ,r -* Ln in Ln Ln Ln Ln m u) Ln ko < V1.ifl, in Ar� in. Q,� -tn A/� Q,� V� 'L� '4� .0 -i rl m 00 -;r LO Ln 0 m -t ry 0) Ln (n m rl N r, rn N W m Ln 0) m rn N r, r " " r, m 0 0 tW In C, co 00 tl� rl� Ll� C� Lr rl� vl� C� 17� oc� rl� r�: rl� rl� r", r-i 00 Cli ci M . . . . to m q Ln Ln w r- oo c) o 1-4 m * Ln 2 m C-4 N N fq N, tO tt �r ,* �r ,t -* �t �t T n Ln Ln Ln a) Ln -1 Va in to vn cc� vr to tf)- en V)o V)- i/V to A/a 4^ to -Va to An. -Ln _0 rq C:� C14 rq to m co 0) _0 00 �t m -4 r, Ln 0 N 1'1� r-� LO to N 00 aj m o � r14 r-4 u �14 r, 4-; < 0 00 00 m I Ln N M N a) m 00 zr kD m CD m tv ri m Ln C) rn r� P� ry) 'H -�T m C) r- M u) (Y) M (3) rq I, �t " cq �t r, m 0 0 Ln 0 00 00 M W rq �j -0 rl� tl ot L'i Lq ll*: r� C� ll� oc� r� rl� r�, rl� pl� rl� Op OIL l3i -2 1 to (3) -2 "6 (U r4 r4 rq M Ln m LO r- oO Ch 0 m t Lf) vi -,F r,' CC q) Cl r r r Nt r I-T -t rt r r Ln un Lil lii Ln U) > cq at A 4 t E to AA VI-to va in V., Af� V,� to tn to Vn to to m 00 m 0 E 0- 'A P� m OD 0) r� LO m 00 cr) w m fl, Ln -zr fm a) �t 00 CA 00 00 Ln LO "'r �l m 00 m " w " m m " -* -* w w o LO rl� ll�. C�. rl� lzj� lf� ll:� C� fli Ili rl� 0(� 1* M M r, - w Ct R m to cn m m rj r- m c4 N 4 r, cr� 6 e '4 L6 d oo oo ko 0 Ln Lm -* N " o m w F, r- r, r, r- F- by w m fl� r1i -i r*� ff� lzf� Ili L'i h� c0 C� lz� I-t "i 14 LrM1 NNN N vt -.-,k �t �t �t r -qr -ct KI, Ln v) Ln Ln u-� Ln vi to 41) to en tra 1^ to tra tra+n ra tra i^ Va Va lra ua A r Ln w r, co m 0 m r Ln LO r, cc o) o i (N en r 0 Q m m m m C, m C-L EL f� m It 0 w tit 00 0) 0 m �T m �O rl m N a 0 :3 N N a W < TN rq rN rq N rq N N m m , C)L (Z) 'O 0 0 m m > > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 rq N N r4 " N N rJ r,4 LO 0 o o O O o rN Ln ri m Ln m r. N w N N n O m w N ut V). tri trp V). N m m It "r �t w ri m m m d n m d cJ ------ CV > t1 d w O O n wt N .--a w o ri O w r-I L(p p m w m 00 c-I -;F Lr Lr M H n N Ln W 0) 0 '.� m M1 .i cr W -+ � n o M Ln 00 d N �r LO Gs/E£OZ > (� rt N 'r Ln w W m O N m Cr Lr n m m d CL ila to to in V, in vF c r r 'A rH rl r i t s� o ca d d d m It It m m m m N m <t - v d m n W Z�f�£DZ cr ri o N r- n N m m m er M .-i n It �. m d d m a� m m C C Lrl m Ln ,-I d a N L€/fleDZ a, p ,fin o o ai r, -a ri 00' V' 0) m r- O fy Lri LD r.' m n ct ® n r s l N v o rn m o w N m �t OF 6ZOz n. C .5^ ao VT N N m V V kVl w w n L11 �.. --- tn.+n. +lp,.(a• tn. +r>to tr. cn v>• w tmrf tmn. r 6Z/SZOZ a (b LD N ri m m n .--I *"4 M1 m m n "$ m Ln O n Ln Ln oo 't H'L/LZDZ e a) w 'f Ln m w n N o + tD n W Ln Ln o m r-I w m et �t Ln Lr? d N O M1 =r o Ln m M w m ,-o m m � m N - m LZf9ZOZ 00 Ln N m LD N f7 LD N 00 Lr1 ri r+ st C,] LD N' co 4 o iLn a N M m v Ln Ln w n n W m m d - r-I N N m � 'T 9Z/SZOZ n n N n n n n n n n n n n m m m m w w w 00 ; Vn to in. VF Z4 V}to Vk to to 'C/? t.? V} V) VF (n V} to V?V! in (as far SZ/VZOZ 2 17Z/£ZOz a_ o 0 d o d d d w n 1-4 W 11 m m M1 n Ln v n a m to v u o O N N w r- It m n w Ln d d m n d ? � m o rl 00 o n N LD O * m LD n rl CD c o 2 LD LrS 06 ' rfi r- r m r: cS u3 ri c ft G, zz/GzOZ > w m O W w d' M N r-i 1-1 N N m Ln M1 m a Le w � m Ln w W d rr v m cr rl d w W d LZ/'DZDZ ° (z' Lei ,nua tra to to r r r N N N N N rri 7 r� try V} trt V> to to to 4 +n. in OZ/6TOZ d d d d d d O It m m N d m m n N w m .-+ r. d aL, 6ti/'S EDz fn vw i./p to vs o W M1 a�i m W W w W n n ,� rt ri �r d y o w o N � W ct m m n N w ri m w n os r of rd r= C v C fri ai r, LD ffi ri N Lr STfL OZ W w Ln m-zr M N N N `-X m N N m ry Ln L n)1-1 txw r-I N m Ln - n X} n o ri N m . Ln 1 LZ/9ZOZ an � to to tn.t/p. vti i/? i/}tr} t/t rti ,-i .-,i r�i ... r-i f > E t/p vi +n to 9Z/STOZ w N .� n N 0 cr w o m n w �A -t m � CD w Ln oo Ln m w m m � Ln -* O -r Ln v M d w N 0 n I S C/tIOZ Ln n d Ln r-i C oo m N w N o a o m m Ln m v w ri Ln m -* -* Lnn uD r- ads ccoo m o m " m v LNn w r, co rn 'bZ/ETOZ LL. n n PR M1 M1 n n n n n n 00 00 W 00 m m m m m 00 b7 t.M1 t)'a V? t.r}to t/f t/h th to th V? trh U? i/Y V) V1 VF t+'] t!? to d d O O d O O Q O Ord.,a O d d d 0 0 0 w 1-1 lzr n m N Ln m m O W m m cr 1-4 N rr77 p0� p (� >.. VT AfF to V1F V4 d N O w W n It m m m M O N M M -i N O C] O p Cl O a- t C0 M n ri w N 17 w 'ti' M M lz Ln n O N m m O Ln C) ^Ln +2 (u x LD qi na ko 0 m w' 0 of w N w O' 4 m (r Cri r ,C4 'n C "M w w n N n m m m m m 0 0 r-X r-I ri N m w �' r-I r-I ri ri M H r4 v-I •H H N N N N N N Q d ............._.----...._.. .........,........— .._ .....-...__ ---- ... _ ... '�. V'p VT t/p t/p to t1T tJT t/1 VT V}to AA V}to V} V). M N G a O d O O d O 0 0 m 't ra w N w n n `r cr o r, cr E vti AA, Vn VT vp o o v m n v m W tr m 0 ri rl n �r � o o w o m n Clli -t Ln Ln m d m m m v O) O m n 1-1 w N m w -ZT m m Ict Ln n O cr N Q w m. N w m m w o er W N w O �r m M O w w n n r- w w a) m m O O w-i H s--tl N' +-1 ri. ri ri rl ri ri ri r-I " N N N N N N o t/p.V'} th Vp. to Vp. t/? VA t!1 to Vf Vk Vn N N d d C:S d d d d C7' rq. d' m w O m m w m N m LD m Q m m Ct m w m Ln 0 eH a0 O w m m n Lr a' m ro v iVt w 00 0 N N yL x x Ln n m d N v w W d r d cD m o rr Ln r- CL f�i W W W W m m V�l rD � t} t/ V V tL m/ O r-I 0 H r q O 1-1 O L? V} i/ t/o t? tp Z m Q Vti to O Y LL. C d 0 (D O' O O O O N O m 'J' O m W m g H w N 't 2°' t/ t/ t/r t fr v> d d w v m n w w m r. m � m m N m a O O M r-I lz tl n m m rh Ln ffp N N w N o q.. ci w m v N v" m w r-i w 0 I'r' M Lo m Ln LL (°.fl x 0 > O w m r-1 m n Ln V Ir m m �f` Ln w W O `in m ar trr. cr u7 n m o N � w W p N �s w W O m 'L 7 00 00 00 06 ai ai an C a C;i C; O' IA to up to t/> t in tr> t/f ri ai ri r ri ri cs. yr V t M i/A t/ to to CL C w w M w on W Cr N Cr m 00 m cr M Ln r-I r^f d" N m 00 Q0 W N n N rl m m. Ln aA 00 Ln m rH m 00 M1 w w w w �t Ln .-± fnv wr.. moN `r an rya rl .r woc oll v N m n rl n n n r+ 00 00 00 00 00 00 0) m m (n m O d O ri V}V} VF V'} -Ln V) VA in VF Vi- V). V}V'F to tLn Vk Vi. ri ri iH m o tn' a u w kD Ln 1m0 y Ln .-i m t- c) 00 m Ln 'm. V ' o n to 00 w7 D. V} V} Vp• O u9 w m w M W -Zt N cf m W m a' M to rl r-I V N M m ? w O C) w Q Ln >, W N n N n m m Ln rl W Ln M r-I m m n w w w w w t/?V) w "�,,, •-# M C1' tr n m C N � L/p n m I N 1* w W d N ;r r'1 , Ln Ln x n r n n n n 00 00 00 Do c0 co m m m m C O O O 00 Op. N M CL il V! t}t/? t/} to V} V} V). trT t/}V7 V}V V? V} rl ri r > O tP to H W Vb t/Y 3 E L- E w n w c' m Ln N w Ln m co n vi N m Ln N w m Ln (D ^ w m m d' m Ln N o a-i Ln N -1 - m m m to 00 ri Lr) m Lr1 Lr n rep N "! m M1 m st M Lr ri O Ct ri r iXJ Ln > m N n N M1 M m Ln wl 00 Ln M ew' m W n lD LD' w w r4i m V w M1 m O N cr Ln M1 m t°i N e w o0 o N �t n n M1 n n n W W W W co W m m 0) C) m o 0 0 CL a to tr,t/> i/F tf. t/s t✓� t/>to to to sr to an V} vp t/> r >- Vk Vp ts'h } Cl Ln 4 Ln w n m m d Cq N m "cr r4 w M1 W m d M N m M d ri �R w^t v^i r^i r^7 N N, N N N N N N N N m m m m m m, v w m V Ln w n 00 m O ri N M I Ln w n W m O w•a N M Y 0) e-1 N N N N N N r-4 N N N M M M M �m a o o 0 0 0 a 0 o o 0 o 0 o d o 0 0 0 d d U Ln N M N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N > d Ll [i dV O F- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 rw w -i r. m N ri ri V7 m M1 V 8n LO 7 V} V} V} V} VT vA V7- m w m o w m N N sr m en w " 0 _ ____...._ .,....... ___._.,._.. ............. y-.». W m N rl Ln m M1 w 0 m m m 00 m 817 .. N > ' Ln o Ln 0 Ln o Lo 0 Ln o Ln o >;r m bE/EEOZ CL t? i1} -r r-i N N m m d r Tt Ln U) w w w E€fZEDZ iv kn uw in v} us v SrA ux to in in m a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r-- w ri rl m N ri ri w m r- It Lo V} 4A V} V} V} Vk V} m w m 0 w m N N 'Ct m Ln w ri 0 > m ru .i Ln m t, to o m rn m m m ui E/O OZ ca m r-4 Ln r; cd cr m ai m r' tD ar -1 00 1ri OE/6ZOZ r r`�' m m 0 m 0 en 0 0 0 Ln 0 to 0 SY m N N m m v w Ln s� s- 1, 4. i1> i1r i1> ar7 ur � fiZ/BZOZ C]» iJt t1} VA Vr VF VA Vf i1L _ a al c 0 0 0 0 0 0 tr M1 r, m rt m 0 ri N rti m ri '* 0 $Z/LZOZ a 0) 0) Ln V} V} VF V. in N m M1 V m Ln ri m 0 N w M qt > LZ/9ZOZ ru ct 0 � 0 It n 0 ri m m m N 0 at> � ci. cv V) ri m ko v -i w w m 0 r` It" co Sr -4 9Z/SZOZ {J'7 > w w A W m m 0 c-4 N N M "�' I to w N LL h M1 r` r, M1 M1 m m 00 0o m m m m m .n +�t to Vr xrR v vs +� yr SZ/teoz irZ/€ZOZ N o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o r oo r, v n m o M 0 o N v �Z/ZZOZ m tr? v7. v} cn VM i17r uk� 0� d cr pct M1 d m 1t, w m Cs ri m Ln `9 ca Li 0 m o ri w w o 0 Ln w m w Ln N ca ZZ/LZOZ `� "a„ > V) lM1D m 0 rw�. � " rn rw- Ln m m omo °M1 "da4 CZ/OZOZ a Lim.. c'cl [/? s-I N N M 3" '* 117 w M1 w w m 0 err vrr xrr r vH ux v� Va r3 rn OZ/(iqZ > 6L/BLOZ 'R9 07 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o M1 m r-i r M1 m o ri � o N ct L R in us v> vi. AA Vag v>• 0 cr � �r r• 't m m w m 0 ri m n SVLTOZ o r1 o -i w Lc C C Lr tt� rra lr Lri N CL 19'TOZ :� m n Ln Ln 0 00 N 00 Ln m m 1n m ro 0 Q LL 7 w m 0 M1 M1 Ln m s-i m co M1 � au V} ri N N m a It 1n w M1 co m m o 5T/SiO2 0 jn vv tn +n V- ilk V> in. ire V? �Ln r„g Sr/17TOZ > TJ 0. " bL/£TOZ c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cr tt w m m n N. M1 m crr m 1n ,--r v V} V} V7. V} An in m �t m M M1 0 V' m �t ri 0 N w V Ln E CU W to c m M1 C r, Ir. en Ln M1 ri R w r- 0 0 0 o O C7 0 0 o Q C7 m 0 0 o Co o C3 0 0 o o A^ < irr m 00 00 r- rte: r, 00 0o cri e� r � ei lD 00 0 C C C 0 0 o a 0 o o r+ N m >;r Ln w r-, m 0 ri N m v in Cj p d r to ca o o a a iii,. « umi, emn ijm} vmi vmi, ° 0 0 0 0 0 0 m W r- loo Ln � o 0 0 V} in V} V1 V} V). r-I VA +n' V7. Vf Vb V4 t4 Vf V} Vt 0 0 0 0 0 t 0 0 0 M1 M M m N q ri m w N N cr Ln y, tlT, tA.. [11• iF> V) V) Vti• 0 ct 0 o N h en w 0 M1 M1 0 M1 h Ln 0 0 m M1 +r^e Ln m cr m 1n 0 LO M m w N 1n '... N X M1 m m .-i N m Ln w m o +--1 M V' w 0 Lr I'� a w Lo to r. M1 r.. h M1 M1 w m m m m M1 m I CM 0 5 LT V} t14 V! Vf #/} V} V} V} V} 'd/? -Ln V- in 0 to a c VF 0 E 0 0 0 0 Cl 0 0 0 0 0 rt Ln x-1 m It w 0 m m 0 cl' m CL VL en Vt V> Vx VT VE 0 0 00 m m "4 m m ri N w 0 N w C 0 C 0 tr o N M rl ri e-i r^I N w N ri Q 0 It 0 C CN r- M tD O rl r 0 r, r, u N < 0 m r, ri m m ct m Ln 0 w m m w h 0o m eH N M Ln w 00 o ri M T* w p d 'V? V} V? i.Fr <1} in V} Vk VA +JT +.n V7. +1? c° Ln N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1-1 m m m N 0 ri m w N rV � 0 r-I a +v> v7 u* i1� i1, o m o 0 N n Lr w o 0 M1 o m n "LI) Ln a CD M n r~ r1r m o m lri o w m cr7 w N un a v x r- 06 c r' .-? r i m Lr to' 06 6 r rri �f l6 d Ln qr c 0 CL w w r, r, M1 re M1 n m m m w m r� m o ir} in Vt srr v} +11 VF � in Vi sn � V} i1} 0 w Z a ta` 1 v} <CL c x a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cr Ln ri 00 m m o �t G CLn V V). VA V} 0 0 m m M t m m ri N to 0 N w 0 0 C} w o N m N r-i ri r-i N LO N -1 0 W c1 > Co d' o c] N R' o tD O r- R Q P, M1' Lin C} C 0 M r+ ri m m 'r m Ln 0 'w m m w Ln w ry r- 00 ON ri N m LO w m 0 '1 M Ct Lo V? V4 <. lD tD w M1 M1 M1 r+ r- r`* 00 06 m m m c O v> Vx in <n in +rr to � uk to t1} uk Vlr v o- W 'C3 00000 4A 0 'L' Ln rV m M m Ln w ri 0 ct N rn M VI V) V1 V1 V) 0-o m LO Ln M m ri m L`rr7 h m Cllr Vr LO m ri S •w m m cr m m 0 0 0 0 o r. ri rti .-i N C7 0 VD• V? V) 4/} ri r•8 14 ri ri r- 1-1 -1 r m i�x t1h +n i1} n to uk v% a1> i1} v4 o, rs 0 ' 0 rya Q LL . p, 0 00 r-i ri Lnl to A O0r o 0 00 r-N i1x us v7 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 ri N r- Ln oo Lr1 w r-s 0 <t N Ln m a N 0 0 0 0 _ <n +n v7 vi in w w Ln 14 m m m d m M1 m + IT M1 ri C) VD 0 0 mr t ri M M M1 m ri m 0 h m r l w m ri m ? o C e�c_5 U Ri {S1 (J5 p: Cfi Ct (']' C7 O O ,--i 4-i a-i rr ref gj.. C M It j �p I-. V} V? [/} VF L? r•i ri >1 ri r-i ri r^I rti r°iE r-9 0.. 0 Q) <nyr v7 inV-� V) .n V? in +n mut w An acr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r. M M w r M m in M1 as w <-i N 7 0t} 0o rl It r-i m m m m 'A It M m Q 0 M o rM w 117 w cr o 0 0 '-' N in N c 00 w Lt d' rtl rn` Ml 't Lf1 r- 0ti ri 'q i,, v--tl rw m 1n re m �i m Ln n m r-1 4 to co ri -ry m m m m m 0 0 0 0 0 ri ri li c to i1z V7. vn an 1 r i 1 ri r i 1 rd r Ln J i.+'} iJ"}, 'in VA V} "!✓T gn `C1L .� V'1•- -It in w rn m m 0 ri N m v Ln w rn co m 0 +4 N m st nr -1 ri N N N N N N N N N N m m m M M m N C fYl m V` to w M1 m m 0 ri N M V u" Lo r- m m 0 r-i N m :3 ri ci ri -i rq ri r-1 N N N N N N N N N N m m m m O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q Q' 1n1 Y N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N " N N N N N > > LA 0 H L� ri C] Q. m �, LO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m N LO " m LO r- N 0 0 m 7 LD m 14 to to m -,t W m r- r'l m 0 1 o- 131 -1 CQ r�� t1t C� 01� I)l -1 �R rL C� �j n C\i n 2 0) m r, 14 -1 r, Ln CY) -4 m -t 8 m > Ln 00 rl LO Ln �T " 0) r, �10 �T N 00 N m It Ln Lo tD t� 00 m 0 �i vi. 4"� V). tr). in lf� �n tVa0z Waoz m m Ln r- " 0 w m > lj'� tn J), 'A lll� �n m �H w kD m 10 w m rl C4 0) (v aj C� 1-t rq rll� ff� O� ai lr� ll� C� 0 � (A m p- �r 1� rl 'I m m -Q, > w r� w �n -;r N 1-4 m w -t " EL 1/� -I rq m 't Ln �o 'D r- co cn -I "'I -uv V-� Ar� V). .z 4 OE/QOZ tn in V-� E 0 0 It rl w 0 Ln CD m -I m W M M 0 w tf� Ifl. lri-lj'� tr� V). Ln cli C) m 0 en rl rj 00 Lo Ln LO (n m 8Z/LZOZ CD —M Cz It l3i C� R ol� Lr� r� oc� lyi r", I-i > co r- to n "t �t m (D m w w Ln m Cj a Ln w F- w m fN (14 m -* LM 1-0 r- co > O� 0) 0) 0) al ON LZ/9?OZ t4 C� Ct C� C� C� C� C� C� > tn gz/szoz SZ/t7zoz 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a a tD fn -i LO 00 00 co 00 -T 00 00 0) > 4/� 4^ V� VV An 0 00 �00 W W N 0 Ln " LO M r, Ln rq C� rl� oc� oc� rl� Ll� :� C� fli lll� a� Ui C� �* 0 Do 0) en a) [- 00 00 rl 00 m �4 > Ll� rl m to m " �r P, �r w " t" N Ez/zzoz Ln r, w m N m m w w ca -Ln -Ln �n tn V�lt-�-Ln zz/izoz A^tn if� �n r co co 0) o o o o o o o o o w m tD OD co co 00 TZ/ozoz v� tr� tr� �� 4.4 in in 0 00 00 Lo tD r4: 0 Ln " w m r- Ln r-j m OZ/6TOZ 93. r1t Oi oc� fll� -t W� lz� C� N N 0 W 0 0 0 m m m r- w t, 00 rl rr� > m r w m �r w cli N -cr r- w m -t Lc� CK� a "f), r-I " 1-4 > A^I/). V� t4 8T/LTOZ 0 0 0 0 C� 0 14 w N, m �t m r- 0 m 0 00 �o a L119TOZ E v,� v,� in vi. Ar� �4n N r� w w Ln 65 N Ln m m " o w �o < a) llj� C� C� llz� C� a� C� C� C� rIt rIL lld� Lr� m �* rl (A " �t 00 Ln m m rl m r, M� 't Ln Lo r, m 6 m -�t U-1 r-, 00 ST/t7loz li -i -L -i li rlt rl� N r"t rl� rl� r4 �4 " rl r-I t7T/EIOZ tn kn V� V� (n-Ull V) V)P i^ q^ �Ln IA. V� AA, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C> tD 00 r- LA m 0 m rl Ln m 0 r-i m U�� 00 CC), CO3 8 �Rl LA in �n V1, �n 4A /� 0 co 0 r, m LD oo kn tD 4 Lo -* oo r- r,4 a) 0 0 0 CD 0 0 0 CL t C� fl� llc� G� O� 0(� &� ci Vi rt C� rll� lr� 0 m C5 d d C� 6 C� 6 2 0) x -3- w 00 0 m Ln 00 c) m w co " v- re� 0 0 CD a C� 'n C4 f'4 P4 M M rn M �t -,I- r,4 00 0 00 kD n a 'i r-q " -i a� '-t J), V� �n CL lf�-V� V). V� I I in ai rl Ln W r, w w E v) Ln in �n An tn in 0 0 w r, N Ln " Ln m w Ln r-i a C� P- Lq rl*� rlz� Lq rIt C� c7i q Lr� llz� C� -t 0 -tr a > 0 w 0 r m W w Ln w It w r� r, < 0 N w m m co ry) m Ln rq a) r, Lr) 4 cx > 't W 00 C) M IVI OD 0 M Lo 00 r, < < rl� rl� rv� rr� ce� IZF a 0 y -4 r-O r-I 11 — — An�n A^ tn t/l, V� V� VIL 4A tn Vl�t4 ln� V-� '. (D 0 0 c 0 0 0 0 0 0 C) C) 0 ID w r� Lr� Ln .0 tn J-� ta tn 0 w 0 r- m w w m w �r w kli lui I'li Oli rlt M In " M r- Ln "T 18� affl a, X w 00 0 m LA 00 C6 ff� �6 06 -Z:� r-, m W OL M CJ E "o E m 0 1 -t -I o o m z u U -Ln I^ V-�An vv J�. -,I- in �n tn t4 1/� , C tn Ln OU (U P� r� LA ILO r� to to i^ -J)6 V)� An V)6 In, tn CD to r, (N LO " LA M kD Ln -1 C, E Ln r, r, Ln " CD cl� C� Lq lz� Cli I-i CL C� ci C& 6 r-� oi, Le ce Ln ti -zt �o 4 r- rl� > CD to m m co rn 0) LA C-q m r, Ln �r < 0 m m w 0 m �D w I-i t� i3- > a) rl� r4 rl; rl; ry� ry� cr� ff� tn OL CL < 00000C, lzr P4 w m w m Ln m Ln m �o Ir 00 co I�t VI iA VII (n 4111, in " in DO " LO w e4 00 kn N 0 00 rl r� lz� tq Oli -L Iq LQ cq ri ll� Iq 0� r� 't r-�. q A " f14 Cq r4 r14 M M en M -.T -�t r Ln 44-Ln vv 'J'i.V', tn V', -,n "n A^ -,n V,� vv 0 m 0 0 Lo to 0 0 Lr� -i C� C� C) P, rq -�r �t cr w in o 0 0 0 0 C� w m M Ln m Lr� m w -�T w w -.g C) 0 Ln >, V� L6 m m " w rl to w Ln r4 0 w r� r, m 0 C, w if V� llc� O�� li n kq cKi rl� LR a� ll� lll� rl� q -a c� CD —. W X li �H� 14 . . . rlj m m ry) rn �r V, :I- LM CL M 14 r-4 1-1 �q r-4 r-i > AA, tn lf� Ila An�Ln t6 tn U) Ln 0 E m E 0 0 0 0 a w m �T 0 " w m l4n in �(n An ta 0 -*- LM " r" 0 N Ln C, r- r, m m (U rIt L'i cei Lr� Cli Lfi rlt Lq CIL Lfi It c1q, Q(� Ln w w w w 0 w rl I, > w m w w m w It r� 0 < N N eq m m m m -;r It -IT Ln 0 14 14 �z Iz 1� r4 14 V; 1; An tr� tf� tn t4 All- tr� V� V� V� t4 �Ln tn Ln V). V) tO r� W M 0 r-4 M -:t M W r- W M ;r rq . . . m 13 E a) m LO w r, w m 0 -� c -4 H -I -I r-i rj rq r4 r-4 " N (-4 t�4 rn M :3 m C, aj 0 CD 0 0 C> C) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CL m 0 mo rq N fN r4 cl� N N > > r-I , a- 5 to K Appendix I Strategic Economics SSF ECHO II Study of PUC Properties Sowth San III ECHO H Case &tdy Draft Report September 19, 2013 Prepared for. Grand Boulevard Initiative City of South San Francisco VAN METER WILLIAMS UP POLLACKS Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................3 II. STUDY AREA OVERVIEW ..............................................................................................5 III. MARKET FINDINGS.........................................................................................................7 IV. DEVELOPMENT FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS.....................................................................9 V. CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................15 APPENDIX..................................................................................................................................16 I. INTRODUCTION Report Purpose The City of South San Francisco has identified the intersection of El Camino Real and Chestnut Avenue as a key opportunity site for new development and economic revitalization. The El Camino Real/Chestnut Avenue Area Plan, adopted in 2011, establishes a compelling long-term vision for the area as a new mixed-use neighborhood with residential, retail, and civic uses at a range of densities, along with public plazas and open space that benefit the broader community. The City owns 10 acres of vacant and underutilized property between El Camino and Mission Road, originally purchased by the redevelopment agency with the goal of facilitating development in an area that faces a variety of implementation challenges. Following the dissolution of the redevelopment agency in 2012, the City of South San Francisco, as the successor agency, is responsible for developing a strategy for these properties. This could consist of the sale of individual properties, or the City could enter into a master development agreement with a single developer identified through a Request for Proposals (RFP)process. The goal of this case study is to shed light on these options and make recommendations to the City on the strategy most likely to maximize the long-term value of the properties while also maintaining the vision expressed in the El Camino Real/Chestnut Avenue Area Plan. The ECHO II consultant team, led by Strategic Economics with sub-consultant Van Meter Williams Pollack (VMWP), worked closely with City staff to define a scope of work that would help the City to understand the short- to mid-term implementation options for the City-owned properties. The case study began with a market analysis to understand the short-term potential for development. Next, the team explored a range of options for phased development at the site, and tested the feasibility of a development program that would be consistent with a master-developed approach to the area. Based on this analysis, the team determined that an orchestrated master developer approach to development is most likely to meet City goals. Grand Boulevard Initiative and ECHO 11 Project Background Because the study area exemplifies both the opportunities and challenges of infill development along El Camino Real in the post-redevelopment era, it was selected as a case study for the second phase of the Economic and Housing Opportunities (ECHO II) Assessment funded by the Grand Boulevard Initiative (GBI). The Grand Boulevard Initiative is a regional collaboration of cities, two counties, and local and regional agencies dedicated to the revitalization of the 47-mile El Camino Real corridor from Daly City to San Jose. The GBI vision is for El Camino Real to achieve its potential as a vibrant multimodal corridor that connects places where residents work, live, shop and play. The vision will be achieved by integrated land use and transportation planning that targets infill development along the corridor and balances the need for cars and parking with transit,walking and biking. The Economic and Housing Opportunities Assessment is an ongoing study sponsored by GBI. The first phase of the Economic and Housing Opportunities Assessment(ECHO I) assessed the economic benefits of infill development along El Camino Real, and provided building prototypes and renderings to illustrate the impact of change. The second phase of the study (ECHO II) addresses implementation challenges to infill development along the corridor. To ensure that the ECHO II analysis reflected the variety of conditions found on the corridor, the consultant team conducted four case studies of cities along the corridor. In addition to South San Francisco, the other case study cities are Daly City, Belmont and Mountain View. Case study findings will be incorporated into an implementation guidebook that describes strategies and tools applicable to other GBI cities. South San Francisco ECHO 11 Case Study Final Report-DRAFT -3- Report Contents Following this introduction, Section II provides a more detailed overview of the study area. Section III summarizes the results of a market analysis prepared for the study area, and Section IV provides the results of the financial feasibility analysis. Major conclusions from the analysis are summarized in Section V. Detailed assumptions used in the financial feasibility analysis are included as an Appendix. South San Francisco ECHO 11 Case Study Final Report-DRAFT -4- II. STUDY AREA OVERVIEW The South San Francisco study area comprises approximately 16 acres between El Camino Real and Mission Road, located at the heart of the 98-acre planning area in the El Camino Real/Chestnut Avenue Area Plan (see Figures 1 and 2).' The Area Plan accommodated a significant amount of future City growth within the core of the planning area, including 1,215 residential units, 186,800 square feet of ground floor retail, 73,000 square feet of office space and a 50,000 square feet library. The City's zoning regulations support the Plan's vision of intensified development, requiring a minimum floor area ratio (FAR), and allowing residential densities of up to120 units per acre by right. Foundation work is not allowed directly above the BART tunnel. Fi ure 1 South San Francesco Stud Area Boundary f° n r ��iriF✓�/�� , 1 1'�'i IV i J r i rr r d u r r � }} Source:City of South San Francisco,2010;Strategic Economics,2013. The boundaries of the study area have been chosen to coincide with the boundaries of City-owned vacant and underutilized properties, reflecting the case study's focus on the City's strategy for these properties. The original study area proposed by the City of South San Francisco in its ECHO II case study application corresponds to the entire 98- acre planning area defined in the El Camino Real/Chestnut Area Plan, and includes numerous additional privately-and publicly-owned properties north and south of the study area. South San Francisco ECHO 11 Case Study Final Report-DRAFT -5- Figure 2. Study Area Context ✓� N"J��!i S lu#Ih ��A1 i����o i� � + r fl l Illhq"�"'","" ( f✓��j/6� �t'S,r'T�� �V l � i�i 7 + (��f!l�'^ 1 % ',�,^��,t! ," , •e �+,roy »roiiio � u� l� �rvima; vmu,, t I� ti ✓�'IU,;' ��! � rmUi vii ��N�SeA V (�yaoi ml + � �n� i m Source:City of South San Francisco,2010;Strategic Economics,2013. The relatively large size of the assembled parcels, combined with its location near the South San Francisco BART station, makes this one of the most important development opportunity sites along El Camino Real. Nevertheless, the study area has several physical characteristics that pose significant implementation challenges. There is a sharp slope downwards from El Camino Real toward Mission Road, with a grade change of up to 50 feet in certain locations. The developable parcels are also oddly- shaped due to the BART easement and the Colma Creek Channel which both cut through the site. The City of South San Francisco has already made substantial public improvements to the study area with the construction of Centennial Way, a multi-use bikeway and linear park constructed on top of the underground BART tunnel and alongside the Colma Creek channel. The trail provides an open space connection between the South San Francisco and San Bruno BART Stations for residents, commuters and recreationalists, offering an alternative to sidewalks along El Camino Real and Mission Road. As of its completion in May 2009, the trail was 2.85 miles long. Another major public infrastructure project planned in the study area the Oak Avenue extension, which would extend Oak Avenue from Mission Road through to Arroyo Drive, in accordance with the General Plan. This extension is expected to improve east-west connectivity within the study area. South San Francisco ECHO 11 Case Study Final Report-DRAFT -6- III. MARKET FINDINGS Strategic Economics evaluated the potential for new residential, office retail, and mixed-use development in the study area with a focus on the next ten years or less. The analysis included a review of demographic, employment, and market trends and interviews with real estate brokers and developers with experience in South San Francisco and the broader North San Mateo County market area. Key findings of the market analysis are summarized below. For additional details on the methodology and results, see Strategic Economics' market analysis memorandum.' The study area is well-positioned for residential development with supporting commercial uses. There is strong demand for new residential development in South San Francisco and the broader northern San Mateo County area. Employment growth in the Silicon Valley and San Francisco is a major driver of demand for housing in the market area. The study area offers excellent access to regional transit and freeways, and is an ideal location for professionals seeking a convenient commute to job centers in San Francisco or on the Peninsula. Recent development in North San Mateo County suggests that low-rise apartment development(3-5 stories over podium) will be the most feasible to build. Some small condo projects are currently planned in the area, however, these are mainly on small sites that do not offer sufficient economies of scale for rental projects. The return of the market for larger condo projects is anticipated to take several years, however the exact timing is difficult to predict. In general, demand for multi-family housing in the study area is projected to be between 50 and 104 units per year on average. The amount of residential development that could be absorbed in any one year will depend on a number of factors including the timing of other nearby projects. In terms of retail, neighborhood-serving businesses such as restaurants, personal and financial services are most likely to be successful in the study area. The amount of retail that could be supported in the study area in the near term is on par with a traditional strip center(10,000 square feet) or possibly a grocery-anchored neighborhood center (30,000 to 120,000 square feet). The location is excellent for a grocery-anchored neighborhood center as evidenced by the success of the existing Safeway. Whether a new grocery store can serve as an anchor as part of redevelopment of the study area will depend in part on whether a new grocery store is provided as part of the nearby Centennial Village project. Strong competition from nearby regional centers makes a larger shopping center unlikely. To attract prospective households and businesses, it will be important for the area to offer amenities such as local-serving retail. Residential and office brokers emphasized the importance of pedestrian-oriented retail, restaurants and activities to the success of new projects. While there are several grocery stores and other types of retail near the BART Station and near the intersection of El Camino Real and Chestnut Avenue, the existing development surrounding the study area currently lacks the walkable form and critical mass of retail to create a hub of activity. New retail uses intended to support pedestrian activity do not necessarily need to be integrated on the ground floor of residential buildings; depending on the project,it may be more effective to concentrate retail in a separate structure. 2 The North San Mateo County market area was defined to include Daly City, South San Francisco, Colma, San Bruno, and Millbrae. These cities share certain demographic and employment characteristics that differentiate them from cities farther south along the Peninsula, thus comprising a distinct market area in which households and businesses are likely to consider locational decisions. 3 Strategic Economics, "South San Francisco Market Analysis Memo," Prepared for the City of South San Francisco and SamTrans, September 7, 2012. South San Francisco ECHO 11 Case Study Final Report-DRAFT -7- The potential for office is limited in the near term. Although South San Francisco is an important center for the biotech and logistics industries, firms in these sectors are concentrated along the US-101 highway and are unlikely to be interested in locating in the study area. Due to the risk associated with an unproven location, a major tenant would need to be identified before a developer would proceed with an office project. For these reasons, office uses are not included in the development program described in Section IV. South San Francisco ECHO 11 Case Study Final Report-DRAFT -8- IV. DEVELOPMENT FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS Working with city staff, the consultant team explored a range of development scenarios for the study area. The feasibility analysis focuses on the development program that was deemed to be market-driven, consistent with the community's vision, and likely to generate the greatest value. This section begins with a description of the City-owned properties and the development program. Next, the results of the financial feasibility analysis are presented along with a summary of key findings. Assumptions used in the financial feasibility analysis are documented in the appendix. Site Description The properties included in the development feasibility analysis are shown in Figure 3. In addition to the 10 acres owned by the City (shown in blue), the development program includes 2.8 acres that are subject to an easement because they are in the BART right-of-way. Although the BART tunnel is underground, structural constraints limit improvements that can be made on the ground above to projects that do not involve any foundation work, and development along this easement would require BART approval.4 The Colma Creek Channel, Antoinette Lane and the planned Oak Avenue extension also play a major role in defining the shape and size of the developable acreage. Figure 3. Study Area Parcel Boundaries SIT It C 1 �o r� I 0,9� goo Itft,ryIGY r1106 t Al . � ,0iti 0 .., 4A / ISO 44I'1"E a 0 ,) � v , �i S1 11 ,01�, Source:Van Meter Williams Pollack,2013. 4 City of South San Francisco, El Camino Real/Chestnut Ave Area Plan, July 2011. South San Francisco ECHO 11 Case Study Final Report-DRAFT -9- Site A is the southernmost of the three development sites, located between Chestnut Avenue and the proposed Oak Avenue extension. The site is divided into three subsections by the BART easement and Antoinette Lane. Each of these parcels is described in more detail below. • Parcel 1 is 1.9 acres with frontage along Antoinette Lane and Chestnut Avenue. It is currently home to a vacant single-story retail building. This parcel has received interest from businesses and developers. (Labeled"Site Al"in Figure 3.) • Parcel 2 is a long, shallow parcel between El Camino Real and the BART easement, with a total area of 1.5 acres. (Labeled "Site A2"in Figure 3.) • Parcel 3 is a triangular 0.9 acre parcel bounded by the proposed Oak Avenue extension, the BART easement and Antoinette Lane. (Labeled"Site A3"in Figure 3.) Site B is located on the north side of the proposed Oak Avenue extension, bounded by the BART easement to the southwest and the Colma Creek channel to the northeast. The developable area owned by the City is 1.5 acres; the BART easement is 1.1 acres. Site C is the largest parcel at 4.5 acres. Located on the north side of the proposed Oak Avenue extension, it is bounded by the BART easement and Centennial Trail to the southwest and by Mission Road to the northeast. Development Program The consultant team worked with City staff to devise a development program that is both market driven and consistent with the community's goals for the study area as expressed in the El Camino Real/Chestnut Avenue Area Plan. The development program assumes redevelopment of all City-owned parcels in a manner consistent with a master developer approach. In this approach, the property is redeveloped with the goal of maximizing the combined potential of all of the parcels. Orchestrating development across all parcels offers two major benefits: 1) Economies of scale. Larger projects can benefit from savings on some "soft" costs of development such as site planning, entitlements, financing and marketing. In some cases, they can also save on some of the "hard" costs related with construction. Larger projects are also more likely to be of sufficient scale to assist in addressing related public improvements in utilities, access, or other infrastructure. 2) More efficient site design. Developed incrementally, each parcel would need to address access, parking and open space separately. A master developer approach allows required parking to be provided in a more economical way, in particular by making use of the BART easement for retail parking for multiple buildings. Consistent with findings of the market analysis, the development program consists primarily of residential uses with some supporting retails Because initial analysis found that construction costs are prohibitively high for buildings over six stories; the development program does not include buildings over that height. The final development program is summarized in Figure 4, and the drawings are provided in Figures 5 and 6. Site A consists of three buildings with a total of 194 residential units and 32,000 square feet of retail. Each building has three to four residential levels over ground floor podium parking and retail. The retail businesses in all three buildings would be served by 131 shared surface parking spaces on the BART easement and Antoinette Lane, at a ratio of approximately 4 spaces per 1000 square feet. 5 Earlier iterations of the analysis included a development scenario with more retail on Site A. This scenario was founded to be financially infeasible and was therefore excluded from consideration in later stages of the analysis. South San Francisco ECHO 11 Case Study Final Report-DRAFT -10- Sites B and C are both entirely residential with one floor of ground floor podium parking. Site B contains 100 units in four levels above one level of podium parking. The structured parking is supplemented by an additional 26 surface parking spots on the BART easement. Site C is developed with 400 residential units in four levels above two levels of podium parking. Figure 4.Summary of Sites and Building Prototypes Tested Site A Site B Site C Developable Area (acres) 4.2 1.5 4.4 BART Easement 1.7 1.1 0 Description Residential Over Residential Over Residential Over Ground Floor Retail Podium Parking Podium Parking and Podium Parking Stories 4-5 Stories 5 Stories 6 Stories Retail Area (sq. ft.) 32,400 0 0 Residential Units 194 100 420 Residential Parking Ratio 1.5 1.5 1.5 Source:VMWP,2013. Figure S. Plan View i m r i i Source:Van Meter Williams Pollack,2013. South San Francisco ECHO 11 Case Study Final Report-DRAFT -11- Figure 6. Axial View n .. h �q ti Source:Van Meter Williams Pollack,2013. Financial Feasibility Results The financial feasibility results are summarized in Figure 7. Strategic Economics used a "land residual" approach to test the feasibility of the development program. This method estimates the amount that a developer can afford to pay for the property based on the expected costs and revenues associated with the development program. If the residual land value is similar to the expected cost of land,it suggests that the project is feasible. If the residual land value is less than the expected cost of land, or negative, it suggests that the project is not feasible. For the purposes of the analysis, land values for residential and mixed use development near the study area are estimated to range from $50 to $75 per square foot. This price range is based on recent transactions and asking prices for properties in the surrounding area, as well as interviews with brokers and developers active on the San Francisco Peninsula. It should be noted that land prices vary greatly depending on the location and specific characteristics of the property, as well as zoning, intended use and market conditions. South San Francisco ECHO 11 Case Study Final Report-DRAFT -12- Figure 7. Financial Feasibility Results Site A Site B Site C Development Costs Hard Costs $67,830,000 $31,388,000 $125,861,000 Soft Costs $20,349,000 $9,416,000 $37,758,000 Financing Costs $3,224,000 $1,492,000 $5,982,000 Developer's Return $10,968,000 $5,076,000 $20,352,000 Total Costs $102,372,000 $47,372,000 $189,953,000 Total Revenue $104,580,000 $47,078,000 $189,477,000 Residual Land Value $2,208,000 -$294,000 -$476,000 Per Square Foot $8.03 -$2.63 -$2.46 Source:Strategic Economics,2013. Key Findings Low-rise residential projects with podium parking and ground floor retail are likely to be financially feasible within the next few years. The low and slightly negative residual land values in Figure 4 indicate that none of the projects tested are feasible under current market conditions. However, the development program would become feasible with relatively small increases in residential rental rates, holding construction costs constant. A 5 percent increase in residential rents (from $2.80 to $2.95 per square foot)would be sufficient to achieve a residual land value of$50 per square foot on Site C(Figure 8). Due to the lower density of residential units on Site A and Site B, these sites would require a 12 percent increase in residential rents (from $2.80 to $3.15 per square foot) to achieve a residential land value of$50 per square foot. Figure 8. Increase in Rent to Achieve Residual Land Value of$50 1sq,ft. Site A Site B Site C Residential Market Rent($/sq. ft.) $2.80 $2.80 $2.80 Required Rent($/sq.ft.) $3.15 $3.15 $2.95 Percent Increase 12% 12% 5% Source: Strategic Economics Significant densities can be achieved with buildings that are four to six stories. Site C achieves a residential density of 95 units per acre,in the range of the densities envisioned in the El Camino Real/Chestnut Avenue Area Plan,which envisions high-rise development. The advantage of this building type over high-rise towers is that the building costs are significantly lower per square foot,6 making them much more likely to be feasible in the near term. 6 In a development feasibility analysis conducted by Strategic Economics and VMWP elsewhere in the Bay Area, high-rise construction costs were estimated to be 40 to 50 percent higher than low-rise construction costs on a per- square-foot basis. South San Francisco ECHO 11 Case Study Final Report-DRAFT -13- The financial feasibility of retail uses is dependent upon surface parking.In the development program, the BART easement and Antoinette Lane provide convenient and ample customer parking for Site A ground floor retail. This is an ideal use of the BART easement because development over the easement would be cost prohibitive. Use of this area for parking enables greater retail and residential development on the other developable sites. If the BART easement were not available for use as surface parking, the parking would need to be provided elsewhere on Site A,which would either take away from the building footprint of Parcels 1, 2 and 3, or require additional structured parking. The expected revenue generated by the retail uses is not sufficient to support the initial high cost of structured parking. ECHO II case studies in Mountain View and Daly City have also found that onsite parking can be a major challenge for retail uses,particularly for smaller properties. In this case, the use of the BART easement for shared parking is a critical advantage in facilitating development on the City-owned parcels. A master-developer approach enables cost efficiencies and site design flexibility that translate into improved development feasibility. The development program tested in the financial feasibility analysis is a"best-case" scenario that maximizes shared costs and site design flexibility for all City-owned parcels. In contrast, redevelopment in other locations along El Camino Real is hindered by design and financial feasibility challenges associated with small, shallow parcels. In particular, shallow parcels constrain the ability to of a site to accommodate parking and vehicle access, a problem that is effectively solved in the study area with use of the BART easement. However, while a high-density transit-oriented project with the City's involvement seems likely to result in a favorable partnership with BART, an incremental development strategy is less likely to lead to a maximally beneficial surface parking arrangement. South San Francisco ECHO 11 Case Study Final Report-DRAFT -14- V. CONCLUSION The study area presents a unique opportunity for coordinated development to realize the vision of the neighborhood as a vibrant node of activity along the El Camino Real corridor. The market study and development feasibility analysis illustrate the substantial benefits of treating the City parcels as a single development opportunity that allows for coordinated,phased development of the study area. A coordinated, master developer approach can maximize the value of the property and result in development that is consistent with the El Camino Real/Chestnut Avenue Area Plan. In the current market, certain properties, such as Parcel 1 on Site A, may be attractive for immediate sale because of their location, access and existing improvement. However, this would severely limit the ability to develop the adjacent properties on Site A, resulting in lower property value overall, and development that is inconsistent with the long term vision. The City can facilitate development of the site through a RFP process and by entering into a development agreement with the chosen developer. The financial analysis found that the most profitable site for development is Parcel C, at the north end of the site. Including this area with more challenging to develop parcels at the south end of the site may be a useful incentive to help attract a developer. A development agreement can be structured to allow some flexibility for the developer to respond to the market, while also providing terms that will be financially favorable for the City. The City may also be able to help bring some public resources to help facilitate development, such as regional, state or federal grants for streetscape or other improvements that help to improve the attractiveness of the area for new development. Given improving market conditions, it seems likely that development could occur within the next five years. The analysis shows that residential development with supporting retail is likely to be feasible soon with improving market conditions. Given the strong residential demand in San Mateo County, market conditions are likely to improve to the point where residential development is attractive for developers, meaning that the City will not need to hold the properties for a long time before development is possible. South San Francisco ECHO 11 Case Study Final Report-DRAFT -15- APPENDIX FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY ASSUMPTIONS Cost Assumptions Development costs consist of hard construction costs, soft costs such as permits and fees, financing costs and developer profit. Hard Costs Hard costs consist of material and labor costs for construction. The construction costs used in the model were provided by VMWP based on recent construction projects and information from local contractors. Figure A-3 summarizes the hard costs for major program elements. These costs assume prevailing wages for labor. Note that certain variations exist in construction costs for different scenarios and sites, as follows: • Residential construction costs are $171 per square foot for Type V, four-story construction and $182 per square foot for Type 3A, five-story construction. • Parking construction costs range from $85 to $95 per square foot depending on the complexity of the structure. Figure A-3. Summary o f Hard Costs Item Cost Per Sq. Ft. Retail Area (including TI) $125 Retail Tenant Improvements $50 Residential Area $171/$182 Parking Structure $85/$95 Podium Landscaping $50 Landscaping $25 Surface Parking $25 Antoinette/Colma Creek Bridge $75 Source:VMWP,2013. Soft Costs Soft costs include permits, architectural fees, engineering fees, developer overhead,insurance, taxes, legal fees, accounting fees and marketing costs. . Soft costs are typically estimated to be a certain percentage of hard costs. In this model, Strategic Economics estimated soft costs to be 30 percent of hard costs. Financinq Costs Financing costs were based on the assumption that a construction loan would be obtained for 65 percent of the cost of development for a term of 15 months, with a 6.0% interest rate and a 1.5% loan fee. The cost estimate assumes an average outstanding loan balance of 55 percent. South San Francisco ECHO 11 Case Study Final Report-DRAFT -16- Developer Profit The analysis assumes developer profit equal to 12 percent of development costs, not including land. Actual profit margin expectations depend on a variety of factors including market conditions and the expected project timeframe. Revenue Assumptions The value of apartments and retail space were estimated using an income capitalization approach, in which the expected rental income is divided by a standard capitalization rate to obtain value per square foot. Residential Valuation Residential valuation assumptions are listed in Figure. The apartment rent of$2.80 per square foot is based an evaluation of overall market conditions in San Mateo County as well as asking rents for a sample of recently-constructed transit-oriented apartment projects in South San Francisco, Colma and San Bruno. Figure A-4. Residential Valuation Assumptions Parameter Value Monthly Rent per SF $2.80 Vacancy 5.0% Operating Expenses 28% Capitalization Rate 5.0% Capitalized Value per SF $470 Source:Cassidy Turley,2013, Strategic Economics,2013. Retail Valuation Retail valuation assumptions are listed in Figure A-5. Given that this will be new construction, the monthly rent assumption of$2.50 per square foot is higher than the North San Mateo County average asking rent of$2.15 for the fourth quarter of 2012. The capitalization rate assumption is based on the 2012 average San Mateo County retail capitalization rate reported by Cassidy Turley. Figure A-5. Retail Valuation Assumptions Parameter Value Monthly Rent per SF (NNN) $2.50 Vacancy 5% Non-Reimbursable Expenses 10% Capitalization Rate 6.5% Capitalized Value per SF $392 Source:Terranomics,2012; Cassidy Turley,2013,Strategic Economics,2013. South San Francisco ECHO 11 Case Study Final Report-DRAFT -17- Appendix J Brookwood Group Memorandum on Downtown Properties Development Brookwood Group ATLANTA LOS ANGELES NEW YORK SAN FRANCISCO SEATTLE MEMORANDUM (D RAF Date: August 23, 2013 To: Armando Sanchez, City of South San Francisco From: Shepherd Heery, Alan Katz and Jelani Dotson Re: South San Francisco Downtown Properties Financial Feasibility Analysis Preliminary Results Memorandum INTRODUCTION This memorandum summarizes the results of a development feasibility analysis prepared by Brookwood Group for ten city-owned properties in the downtown. The development program and construction cost information were provided by the architectural and urban design firm of Van Meter Williams Pollack(VMWP) on July 17, 2013. Separately, the Grand/Cypress project development program was provided by Gould Evans Architects on December 12, 2012. The purpose of the analysis includes providing development feasibility information to the City for its Property Management Plan (PMP) and related activities following dissolution of its redevelopment agency. This analysis represents Part Two of an analysis of South San Francisco's Successor Agency property portfolio. Part One of the analysis was prepared by the consulting firm of Strategic Economics (See Mission-Chestnut Preliminary Financial Feasibility Analysis Results Memorandum, May 10, 2013) and focuses on the El Camino Chestnut Area. This downtown properties feasibility memorandum includes the following sections: I. DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM Page 2 II. METHODOLOGY Page 5 III. SUMMARY OF RESULTS Page 6 IV. ASSUMPTIONS Page 7 V. APPENDIX 1 Page 11 Strategic Advisory Se�rr�eti - Eerr � ���� Scrat�¢d�s� tk-wp rr� a��gernent Planning&De,ig Sw raatkxa¢Services Two Ernbarcadero Center,Suite 2910 a San Francisco,California 04111 a (415)402-0800 a Brookwood Group.corn PMP - Downtown Properties Memorandum August 23, 2013 Page 2 of 14 I. DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM The analysis herein focuses on ten City-owned properties in the Downtown. The sites range in size from 0.15 acres to 1.15 acres (4.5 acres total) and can accommodate infill residential and residential/retail mixed-use developments. Site locations are provided in Figures 1 and 2. Baseline development program information appears in Tables 2 and 3. Building types range from townhomes over tuck-under garages to mixed-use high density buildings with sub-grade parking, ground-level retail podium and residential flats. A parking ratio of 1.5 spaces per unit (or more) applies to each site, except Grand and Cypress assumes a minimum ratio of 1 space per unit. Density ranges from 25 to 80 dwelling units per acre. In total, the baseline program includes approximately 240 residential units, 480 parking spaces, and 24,000 square feet of retail. The planning and zoning standards used to prepare the baseline development programs vary. VMWP applied conceptual zoning standards to generate the programs in 2009, prior to the adoption of the current zoning ordinance. Gould Evans used current zoning standards to generate the Grand/Cypress program—taking into consideration future zoning changes resulting from the Downtown Station Area Plan (DSAP). The City is currently preparing the Downtown Station Area Plan that will include updated zoning standards and increased densities in certain parts of the downtown. In addition to the baseline development program (based on conceptual and current zoning), alternative development programs were prepared for the downtown sites, except Grand and Cypress, using residential densities and parking standards anticipated for the DSAP. In most cases, the residential units at each site increased and parking spaces decreased (in proportion to units). Table 1 summarizes the distinction between the baseline and DSAP alternatives. Table 1. Development Program Alternative Comparison mommomiim Units Parking Units Parking Site 1.1 50 88 100 100 Site 2.1 81 138 162 162 Site 2.2 29 62 58 58 Site 2.4 14 21 28 28 Site 3.5 25 38 50 50 Baden 4 8 12 12 Grand/Cypress 37 49 37 49 Site 4.1 20 30 20 20 Site 4.2 20 30 20 20 Hillside 11 17 11 11 Totals 240 480 500 510 1 °O ° = r- M O O n J,% 66 L° M r, w � M N u i r/ N u l0 s rl Rt N Ln 0 O 0 N cI c-I I� L LfI N r 0 0 N c-I � O N O � LL n� ci O S `� c-I O M ill JJ � x x ✓ir c-I M s_ O LfI c-I 0 N 0 Rt LfI LLn 0 cI M LL CF) r I �� r n� y��„�wu• 0 M 0 s_ O 7 cI Ln r, O l0 O 00 I, O M Rt to LL 00 i 6 N o s_ O O r,� � 7 O � Ol O N 9 J 0 <° Ln c-I � Lr c o o L c O C 41 Nri4• 41 r% 0 //* 3 mn ,, / r��/, �� Vl C10 U 0 t O d +�+ N Q % p CL ++ +� C Q O O N J a E tin > c z J c a C: t 3 M 0 % s %/orf ,/ 0 C N +� N L c O r-I r c > a 0 s C: r14 Rt p 1 p D Q 0 �O i6 i6 i6 O N C C C 0 r, O eq 0A pp R 0 0 N N N N N Q m J 3 2 I- y r to M H c-I Ln r14 LO d N m 0000 m m -a O Ln O CF)O : C: r14 N ry) 00 r Y✓%" � S 00 L / ��'✓ x (�wf',i* M M O Ln r-I O CF)F N c-I 10 N O i p i oirt�, �/ b u I� '��,r m i/r i 1� if J r/� � �' r a L X r6 0 L t O Z 1 �rt�� ��' I' O E l / " ' �llr/1!1 z N l / �� / r R L N �`, ,k'/�� ,i Op U N O to Q t d O O Q �' Q 4- C: 11� 0 L" � O y d E tw > CL rn O I/ ' O G/ N C L N 6 �, ° o j, "�,,� c U •� D a o p 0 Q ° 76 76 76 O N O % e , U +� erj s ago :, w � Q Q •� a Q a M .9� :a''� o o a� a� a� a� Q @:. ���i f0 m J LL H PMP - Downtown Properties Memorandum August 23, 2013 Page 5 of 14 II. METHODOLOGY Brookwood Group used the "residual land value" approach to determine the feasibility of the development program for each site. Residual land value (RLV) is the value of land determined by deducting from the value of an improved property,the costs of development and a market rate profit. This methodology is often used where direct land sale comparable information is not available without substantial adjustment for the use and development conditions. Additionally, this method estimates the amount that a developer can afford to pay for the site based on the expected costs and revenues associated with the development program. A calculated residual land value equal to the expected cost of land suggests that a project is feasible. A residual land value significantly less than the expected cost of land, or negative, suggests that a project is not feasible. Strategic Economics found that the expected cost of land in the ECR-Chestnut plan area ranges from $50 to $75 per square foot. Brookwood reviewed appraisals prepared for the City of South San Francisco. Land values in the downtown are markedly more valuable, and typically range from $70 to $90 per square foot. Residual land values were calculated for both apartment and condominium developments. Apartments provide the highest and best use for the sites in current and projected market conditions. Condominium market conditions may improve and provide greater feasibility in the future. Residual Land Values for condominiums trailed feasibility thresholds in most scenarios. Consideration of park-in-lieu-fees and affordable housing requirements further impair condominium feasibility. Accordingly, condominium RLV's are excluded from the results. It should be noted that comparable sales and rental data used in this analysis are very limited. Development of buildings of the quality and character provided for in this analysis do not exist currently in the downtown. PMP - Downtown Properties Memorandum August 23, 2013 Page 6 of 14 III. SUMMARY OF RESULTS In summary, projected market conditions (improved rent pricing via downtown revitalization) extend feasibility to several sites. Additional density and lower parking ratios, per the DSAP, makes development feasible for most of the sites. See Appendix 1 for preliminary RLV results. Grand and Cypress, Site 3.5, Baden and Hillside appear to have the best preliminary Current Market results. Projected Market assumptions (10% price increase above Current Market assumptions) make Grand/Cypress and Site 3.5 feasible. For the DSAP (higher density) alternatives,the results improved. Two of the sites (Site 3.5 and Baden) show feasibility and the Hillside site shows a positive RLV in Current Market conditions. Projected Market assumptions make development feasible or positive for all sites, except Sites 4.1 and 4.2. Apartment pricing used for these scenarios appears in Table 4. Table 4. Pricing Scenario Assumptions e ® ® Current Market $2.80 Projected Market $3.10 Notes: A.The data used to establish Current Market includes rent comp reports, rental listings on apartment company websites and third party websites such as craigslist and Zillow, multiple listing service (MLS) databases and Strategic Economics. It is important to clarify that there is little or no truly comparable product located downtown at this time. As a result, current market lease rates for the El Camino Real Chestnut Area (similar mixed-use product quality and density) are applied to the downtown sites. B. "Current Market"conditions reflect Brookwood's opinion that the downtown's walkability, urban character and amenities and proximity to public transit(Samtrans, CalTrain, and San Francisco Bay Ferry) support a lease rate ($2.80/nsf)on par with the similar quality product in the El Camino Chestnut Area. The City's policies and active effort to enhance the urban environment reinforce Brookwood's opinion. C. "Projected Market" pricing reflects Brookwood's view of market conditions as downtown revitalization gains momentum and comes to fruition. PMP - Downtown Properties Memorandum August 23, 2013 Page 7 of 14 IV. ASSUMPTIONS This analysis includes assumptions for costs and revenues as follows: Cost Assumptions The development costs assumptions in this report include hard costs, soft costs,financing costs and developer profit. • Hard Costs Van Meter Williams and Pollack provided construction "hard" cost estimates for the downtown properties based on recent projects and interviews with local contractors. This price exceeds costs for similar construction at the El Camino Real sites to account for the additional costs associated with building in the downtown on smaller sites with tight working conditions and standards, traffic congestion, noise reduction standards, additional security and diminished economy of scale. Hard cost assumptions are summarized in Table 5 below: Residential Hard Cost $200 Commercial Hard Cost $150 Commercial Tenant Improvements Cost $50 Landscape Cost $30 Landscape Podium Cost $75 Parking Hard Cost(structure) $140 Parking Hard Cost(surface) $50 Parking Hard Cost(mechanical lift) $30 Hard Cost Contingency 5% • Soft Costs Strategic Economics used a soft cost factor of 25%of hard costs for the calculation of soft cost (architecture and engineering, permits and fees, taxes and insurance, and other indirect costs). For comparison purposes, Brookwood used the same soft cost factor. Further, Van Meter Williams and Pollack suggested that 25% is appropriate for the smaller sites (<20 units) assuming that small-scale, multi-discipline, entrepreneurial builders can deliver smaller projects at a lower cost. • Financing Costs Conventional financing is assumed for each site in this analysis. In addition to a conventional construction loan, Brookwood assumes that the project would be financed by equity from the developer and that developer's profit includes the cost of equity financing during the development period. PMP - Downtown Properties Memorandum August 23, 2013 Page 8 of 14 Construction loan (Table 6) assumptions include: Loan-to-Cost 65% Construction Loan Fees and Closing 1.5% Interest Rate 6.00% Construction Period 16 Months Average Balance(%of loan amount) 60% • Developer's Profit This analysis assumes a developer profit of 12%of total development costs, excluding land. In addition to covering developer overhead and profit, this variable, we assume, covers the cost to finance early stage project costs and provide the necessary financial guarantees before construction loan funding begins. Actual profit margin expectations depend on a variety of factors including size, scope and complexity of project, market conditions and schedule. Revenue and Valuation Assumptions The value of the residential units (apartments) and retail space are estimated using the standard income capitalization approach (Net operating income divided by an appropriate cap rate). In addition, the value of for-sale residential units (Condos) is estimated using South San Francisco comparable sales and historical data on a per-square-foot-basis. • Residential revenue and valuation Rental and sale price information for new multifamily units (apartment and condo) in Downtown South San Francisco is not readily available because no significant new supply has been developed in the area over the last 10 years. As a result, this analysis relies on adjusted city-wide and regional data. Rental price is based on Strategic Economics' assumptions for the El Camino Real— Chestnut area (ECR-Chestnut), adjusted for the downtown. Strategic Economics concluded that the appropriate rental rate for residual land value analysis for ECR- Chestnut is$2.80 per square foot. For the downtown, a discount factor of 10% is applied to reflect the premium afforded to the ECR-Chestnut site's proximity to the South San Francisco BART station. The resultant rental rate is$2.50 per square foot. A premium of 10% is then applied to reflect the downtown's walkability, urban character and amenities and proximity to public transit (Samtrans, CalTrain, and San Francisco Bay Ferry) Sale price is based on comparable sales data for condominiums in South San Francisco. Historical data is adjusted using a growth rate derived from the S&P Case-Shiller Home Price Index for the San Francisco region (CSI-SF). Comparable sales data was obtained from a multiple listing service (MILS) database, Strategic Economics and Zillow. After PMP - Downtown Properties Memorandum August 23, 2013 Page 9 of 14 adjusting Strategic Economics and Zillow sales data using the CSI-SF, an average was calculated for these three sources. The resultant sales rate is$380 per square foot. The capitalization rate used for this analysis is 5%; the same rate used at ECR-Chestnut. According to reports from Property Portfolio Research, lower interest rates and strong demand for multifamily investment will keep cap rates stable in the near-term. Residential revenue and valuation assumptions are listed in Table 7 below. Condominium sales price per square foot $380 Condominium parking sales price per space $35,000 Monthly Rent per square foot $2.80 Monthly Rent per parking space $50 Vacancy 5% Operating Expense 28% Capitalization Rate 5% Sales Expense(excludes Park-in-lieu Fee) 5% • Retail (Commercial) revenue and valuation Several of the downtown properties analyzed in this report have a retail component to the development program including Sites 1.1, 2.1, 2.2 and Grand/Cypress. The majority of the retail is located within a few blocks of each other in the Downtown Core on heavily-trafficked streets including Airport Boulevard and Grand Avenue. Site 1.1 has 6,500 square feet of retail oriented towards Linden Avenue (at Baden Avenue). According to John Penna of Penna Realty—local commercial/residential broker, commercial lease rates in the downtown vary as described Table 8: Choice restaurant-ready space, less than 1,500 square feet $3 to $4 Typical restaurant-ready space,greater than 2,000 square feet $1.50 Typical commercial space (non-restaurant) $1.50 (or less) A property's vacancy period can range from six months to two years in the downtown depending on the size and functionality of the space. Restaurant uses are by far the most popular in the downtown, with seemingly insatiable demand for 1,500 square feet or less. Current and prospective commercial tenants also include general retail, medical/dental clinics and service-oriented business (office space). The retail space at each site within the program can accommodate single-tenant or multi-tenant restaurant configurations. In order to accommodate both possibilities in this analysis,the assumed commercial lease rate is$2.50. PMP - Downtown Properties Memorandum August 23, 2013 Page 10 of 14 Retail revenue and valuation assumptions are listed in the Table 9 below. Monthly Rent per square foot $2.50 Vacancy 10% Non-reimbursable Operating Expenses 10% Capitalization Rate 6.5% O 1� O O O O O O ® O M O O O O O O C O O O O O O ��..r•• O O O O Ol C5 V} V? V? O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 O en rl N N °^ V? V? V? ® O rr-I O O O O O O O O O O O O i NJ 000 O 0 a) 0 0) C5 til O O O O O O O O e 'w l0 O(V R* M ID M 00 N V} i--I N O IWsi 14 14 V? V? O N O O O O O O O V? 00 00 O O O O O O O O O O 00 N V} r-I M M V? V? O r-I O O O O O O C „w 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O D. O O 0 M m 000 00 LM l0 rl 00 I� q O N O O O O O O N O O O O O O O W 0 0 0 0 0 O J M ko n N O ILVV I CIO V} Q iZ:,-I N 14 Q O 00 O O O O O O 00 00000 0 r1 O l0 O 00 l0 Ill;pri;,lN N N 00 r-I Ln k Gl r;•••q ui [M/} V? V? V? ice:T ien ELI'„�dl"V � J Q O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O L O z l0 O O O O O O 00 cO J M O O Ln 00 O O) Vim.r-q c Q � V} V} V} � � °pa 9i. Ln w � 4- 0 w N c Q ui w O I IM t C bb 1 L N 3 a M-I X ° $ 0 a ++ + a s c u v w c o C N c-I z c c w 0 3 W w — w U a c E `L O N O f3 E N f6 E +�+ b.0 N 7 N L1 p 4, r1 a a L c a 0 c a 0 w a co Q o Q w o u o 'v o u oC c a w w •7 w -0 U v m a V)i cr w v v w o o c v o o v a Q a j 0 D 2 V) ii in H = a O O O O O O O O M N O O O O O O O O V? 00 O O O O O O O O O O �* O N N 1- R* n r-1 Gl T LA M M tfl- N Cil ri ri ri N i/? qj,)- qj,)- O O O O O O O O M O O O O O O O V? OLn O w � p O O l0 V} N W N rI N N qj,)- qj,)- qj,)- O ri O O O O O O O 00 ri 0 0 0 0 0 O ON O O O O O O O V? O O O O O O O M O� N l.0 � N M ,J:, l0 l0 I/)- qj,)- qj,)- O O O O O O O O 7° 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O p N O R* Ln O 0) °°5 l0 N R* M w M 14 14 qj,)- qj,)- O N O O O O O O O 00 O O O O O O O V? O O O O O O O a) NN R* M O LA LLM 00 N V1- r-I M -lif ri ri 14 V? qj,)- qj,)- O r I O O O O O O 00000 0 oil 1 O O O O O O 0 0 O M m 0 M 00 00 ( . qj,)- q ' w O N 0 0 0 0 0 O cr� O O O O O O L 'p. O M 0 0 1- N O l 00 N 14 M, O 00 O O O O O O O O O O O O O 00 O O O O O O ^„...... r r-1 O� O 000 T 7 1= O 0 O O O O O O Ili (6 Ln O O O O O O L0 O O O O O O E M O O � O M eq u a) M„ an a) L c Q w O EE d m L L C: bb � . 1 L Q 3 o $ o a ° O a 5 c a1 N r- 0 C N r-1 _' r c 1 0' 3 a) 0 ri 3 4 w — w ,� c E 'l x 0 N o E v `° E ��„ no v v*'i � m 4, � a a c Q. D n C Q o w Q co D i an O a) O U 0 'v 0 U oc a s W a a) w � w -0 v m Ln tw w v v w o o v o o a`) a a a a o o = V in = a a O M O O O O O O 00 O O O O O O OO^ l* OOi 10)0 O r-q O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N V). 000 O� O Ln O r-1 O N 10 O l0 Ill ri O r-1 O O O O O O O N r-q O O O O O O O N O O O O O O O t/? O O O O O O O m O IN 10 0w0 O LM N LR 10 qj,)- t/? t/? O O O O O O IN O O ® O O O O O O O O N 10 O r-1 O R* N o0 N ^, 00 N tf)- r-I 14 Q u•"� O O 0 0 0 0 0 O coo O O O O O O O � O O O O O O O I� O ri 00 O :T 00 O 00 R* N LA M Ln l tf)- N M 10 M N N t/? ® O N O O O O O O w IIw O O O O O O 0 Ln O ON t/1- O IM O O O O O O O p u+ m O O O O O O m Ln rN-I R* O M III �,� r-q Ln r-q M N of N t/} t/} t/} M N N w O r-q O O O O O O O I 00 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 000 00 100, M 1M0 LD Ln r-q t/? t/? 00 Nu;,ii&'9. 7 -a O O O O O O O O� II w M Ln r-1 O O O O O O on ^u. ° 100 O Q01 O l00 E Ln M Ln c M tom/? t/} tom/? LM :T N an a) L c Q IV O EE d m L L C: bb �. 1 L Q 3 o $ U, o a 4- O a ss c + a1 y O C N ri 1 �' 3 0 r-I 3 y _ y v ,� c E LL x +, m a a c Q. D n c Q o w Q co D 0 v o v o 'v o v oc a s w a a� w 72 w -0 U a) m "' a OD bD w v v w o o c v o o v a a a a o o = V) LZ in = a a O O O O O O O O M N O O O O O O O O t/? 00 O O O O O O O O O O �* O N N I- R* n r-I Gl T LA M M tfl- N Ol ri r-I ri N V? t/? qj,)- qj,)- rl 0 O O O O O r-I O O N O O O O O O O M ? 000 O r-I O n O O N N t/ r-I O N 1.0 O N N r-I t). v). LD 00 N O rI O O O O O O O N r-I O O O O O O O N O O O O O O O t/? 6 6 6 6 6 O O m O N l.D 000 W 00 000 0 M r-I t/-)- t/-)- LA LD t/} t/} qj,)- qj,)- O O O O O O O O ® 0 0 0 0 0 O Or-q O R * N 0 00 M 00 N tf)- r-I r-I r-I °tit 11 V} V} V} 14 ri — qj,)- qj,)- O O O O O O O O O :T O O O O O O O � 6 6 6 6 6 O O 00 O 00 R* N M ri Ln .1 t/1- N M Ol LO r-I t/} t/? N N V? t/? in in O 00 O O O O O O O N O O O O O O O I� O O O O O O O V? 6 6 6 6 6 O O O N tf)- r-I LA LD qj,)- t/} ri ri O O O O O O O O n tom/? O O O O O O O O cr 6 6 6 6 6 O O m On rN-I R* O O � r-I Ln r-I M N N M M t/? in in O l0 O O O O O O O W E O r-I O O O O O O O V/ 00 � 0O DO O O O 0 N M O 00l0 M O U- M N 00 O M M Ln r-I t/? t/? 00 00 V? O E O O O O O O O O O O LA O O O O O O O O O Lr� t/?r-I an IZ 00000 O O O O O N l0 0 n m O :T i Ln l0 Il M M M O r-I O M tom/? t/? tom/? LO LNA qf/eq CL 0 O L d C O -i w CN r�-I E r-1 O N 0 N E Q X 7 Q 4' i N O ++ z 7 a+ IS c w O 41 W tin tw c c o L° a a Q a E w f6 E tiu a`, � m a s a 0 n c Q o w a Lo O w O U O '� O u OC c N N a Ls U w w w w w c0 O c w O O w m D D 2 Ln ii in H H OC a