Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 1962-11-05TIME: PLACE: CALL TO ORDER: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND INVOCATION: ROLL CALL MINUTES: PARKING DISTRICT NO. 1 CLAIMS: LITTLEFIELD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT CLAIM: SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO MARINA CLAIM: PERSON AND- S~NS'ON ASSESSmeNT D ISTR I CT C LA IMS: ~ REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO HELD MONDAY, NO~ 5, 196~ ~ouncil Chamber~, Clt~ Hal~l The meeting was catZ. ed to,order ~ ~ice-Ma~or~Ahern at 8:00 p.m. ?%edge of Allegiance to the Flag was reDited, ~ter whi~ch invo- %$ti~n~ w~ giv~a b~ Reverend R. EuEene. Lina~n of HillSide p Pvesent: Co~ci~e~ a~rick E. Aher~, Emilio Cortesi, Andrew Abseut: ~ :Council~n Leo J. R~an~ Vice~b~ Ahe~n ~sked if ~he~e ~s a lmo~io~ apprOvin~ 'the min- utes 0f the~ regular meeting of October 15, 196~. - C~u~ci~ Bozzi.moved, seconded b~ COUncilman Rocya and ~e~u- ~!~ aa~ed, ~t t. he m~nutes Of'The ~e~Ular mee~tn~of Oc~o- be~ 15, 1962] be'aPp~oVed~as submi~jed~~ ~ ~ : - ~'es~°~ ~he~ %hen a~d- if--~e ~ a motion app~ovin~ the ~ul~r .c~aims as submi~ted for pa~%~nt. Councilman Rozzi ~oved, ~con~ed b~ C6u~c~il~a~ Eocca a~d ~a~ula~ ea~ied, that the ~e~ular claims'totaltn~ $26'052.12 be approved fo~ payment. Vice-~Qr Ahem the6 ~as~ed if ther~ .was .a ~otion, apprqvin~:~ the claims ag' s~b~l~ed~f0r P~rkf,g Di,sriCt[~O~ lj C°~nc~I~a~ Roccm~mo~e~,,aeconded bY GOunoilma~'RoZzi a~d re~ularl~ carried, t hat [' bb9 9 iaims for Parki DiS, No. totaiin $3,o2R.01, be appr0ve~ for payment. ~ 6venue roy C! m: . amount of $2 8.56 fo ,p ietin of bonds. Councllm~ Rozzl moved, ~se~onded b~ Coun~ilman Rocca and larl; carried, ~hmt '2he eiaim as su~mit~ed fo~ Lit~lefSeld Avenue Improvement Project be apProved fo~ payment. Sp~t~ ~a~ F~aueis~QMari~a. C~a!m: : .... ~a{N[T~bb~~C°nstructi~n Company~ciaim.dabed OctObe~ ll, I962, ih the amount of $52,868'97 for ~0rk 6omPlSted as of September B0, 1962. ~ c~uneilman R~cca moved, $~Co~ded by~Coun~lmanROzzi and regu- larly carried, that the claim as submitted~ for ~the South San Francisco Marina be approved for payment. (a~ Chae. L.-Ha~ue~, Iuc:.: claim d~ed SepSember ~8, 1962, the amount of ~30,?16.28 for Wor~ accomplished to Septem- ber 28~ 1962, ~o ~e d~sbursed as folle~s: Persen~.and ' Swanso, Assessment Distric~i .$~7~172,76 and Major.Street ~John,'A. Blume & Asso~lates,:cta~m:.da.~ed October !8~ 1962, ~ in~he~ameu-~ of $4~788,57, for~'eu~iueer~in~ser~ices' to be ~dlsbursed as fol!ows: Person~ ~nd Swansom~ Assessmsn~ Dis- trio~, $4,~33.33~nd ~J°r~Street PrOject N0. ~50, $455'24. ~Ca!ifor~ia Wa~er ~Servic9 C~ayy c~%aim dated Octo~er 8, 196R, in~ the ~ou,$ ef $79,O~ ~or relocating meter. Although not ShOwn as an item ou the A~enda, Council also CogSide~ed the~cla~m of Mitp~in~, t~c~.dated October 2, done, as f~llows: (~m be forw~rde~d upon recel~$~of ~etease) ~c ~ ( )~Fer ~adin ~the area back of the new sidewalk on San Mateo Drive, and installin~ a field inlet $2pe catch basin nea~ t~ Nort~es~cerN~r of proper~y aS ~out-fall~ oipe- placed b2 ~thers. Work :~ ~ ~o i~clud~ ~am~n~ au~ pavin~ existin~ driveways to the new sidewalk elevation. (2) To continue ramps alon~ sidewalk all the way across parkin~ area and pave with similar surface to existin~ parkin~ area. PERSON AND SWANSON ASSESSMENT DISTRICT CLAIMS: ( CONTINUED ) PECKtS SUBDIVISION NO. 1 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT CLAIM: SPRUCE AVENUE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT CLAIMS: WILLOW AVENUE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT CLAIM: PUBLIC HEARING -- TREASURE ISLAND TRAInmR COURT ANNEXATION: RESOLUTION NO. 3605 ACCEPTING DEED/ TAX COLLECTOR -- DALY SUBDIVISION: RESOLUTION NO. 3606 ACCEPTING DEED/ LUTHERAN CHURCH - MISSOURI SYNOD -- WILLOW AVENUE: RESOLUTION N0.3607 ACCEPTING EASEMENT/ ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP -- WILLOW AVENUE: (3) Remove and replace portion of existin~ chainlink fence to permit required ~radin~. (4) For blade ~radlng the unpaved area North of build- lng for drainage to catch basin. This includes leveIin~ of piles of dirt and rubbish that was dumped on our property illegally when the adjoin- lng improvement work was being done. Councilman Rocca moved, seconded by Councilman Rozzi and regu- larly carried, that the claims as s~bmitted for the Person and Swanson Assessment District be approved for payment. Peck's Subdivision No. 1 Assessment District Claim: Enterprise-Journal claim dated October 25, 1962, in the amount of $19.40 for legal advertising (Notice to Pay Assess- ments). Councilman Rozzi moved, seconded by Councilman Rocca and regu- larIy carried, that the claim as submitted for Peckts Subdivision No. I Assessment District be approved for payment. Spruce Avenue Assessment District Claims: (a) A. Carlisle & Co. claim dated October 26, 1962, in the amount of $321.98 for printing of bonds. (b) Lowrie Paving Co., Inc. claim dated October 31, 1962, in the amount of $83,732.90, to b~ disbursed as follows: Spruce Avenue Assessment Fund, $59,184.12; Major Street Gas Tax Project No. 43, $23,888.63; and Motor Vehicle in Lieu Tax (Unappropriated Reserve Fund), $660.15. Councilman Rocca moved, seconded by Councilman Rozzi and regu- larly carried, that the claims as submitted for the Spruce Avenue Assessment District be approved for payment. Willow Avenue Assessment District Claim: Bragato Pavin~ Co. claim dated September 30, 1962, in the amount of $6,~54.17 for work completed as of September 30, 1962. Councilman Rozzi moved, seconded by Councilman Rocca and regu- larly carried, that the claim as submitted for the Willow Avenue Assessment District be approved for payment. There being no objections, Vice-Mayor Ahern ordered the Public Hearing on the Treasure Island Trailer Court Annexation held over to the next regular meeting of the City Council. City Attorney Noonan explained the first resolution ready for the attention of Council. Councilman Rozzi then introduced: "RESOLUTION ACCEPTING DEED TO THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO FROM TAX COLLECTOR OF SAN MATEO CO£NTY, CALIFORNIA". Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Patrick E. Ahern, Emilio Cortesi, Andrew Rocca, and G. J. Rozzi. Noes, none. Absent, Councilman Leo J. Ryan. City Attorney Noonan then explained the next resolution, after which Councilman Rocca introduced: "RESOLUTION ACCEPTING DEED TO THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO FROM CALIFORNIA AND NEVADA DISTRICT OF THE LUTHERAN CHURCH - MISSOURI SYNOD". Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Patrick E. Ahern, Emilio Cortesi, Andrew Rocca, and O. J. Rozzi. Noes, none. Absent, Councilman Leo J. Ryan. The City Attorney explained the next resolution ready for the Council's action, after which Councilman Rocca introduced: "RESOLUTION ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT TO THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRAN- CISCO FROM THE ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF SAN FRANCISCO (A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION SOLE)". Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Patrick E. Ahern, Emilio Cortesi, Andrew Rocca, and G. J. Rozzi. Noes, none. Absent, Councilman Leo J. Ryan. RESOLUTION NO. 3608 DESTRUCTION OF ELECTION MATERIAL/ APRIL 10, 1962: RESOLUTION NO. 3609 PLANS/SPECIFICATIONS SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT: RESOLUTION NO. 3610 BIDS -- STREET DIVIDER ISLANDS/ IMPROVEMENTS: RESOLUTION NO'. 3611 COMMENDATION -- ARTHUR A. RODONDI LEAGUE PRESIDENT: RESOLUTION NO. 3612 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE -- DOCUMENTS/SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT: RESOLUTION NO. 361'3 IMPRV. BOND BIDS -- L0WR IE- BOTH IN- SWANS ON (S ,C0ND SALE): ORDINANCE NO. 484 AMENDMENT CONTRACT STATE EMPLOYEES ~ RETIREMENT -- 2nd Readin¢/Adoption: City Attorney Noonan then explained the next resolution ready for Council attention, after which Councilman Rozzi introduced: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRAN- CISCO APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING DESTRUCTION OF MUNICIPAL ELEC- TION RETURNS AND SUPPLIES FOR 1962". Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Patrick E. Ahem, Emilio Cortesi, Andrew Rocca, and G. J. Rozzi. Noes, none. Absent, Councilman Leo J. Ryan. City Attorney Noonan explained the next resolution, after which Councilman Rocca introduced: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFI- CATIONS FOR SUBMISSION TO THE STATE WATER POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD AND UNITED STATES PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE PURSUANT TO AN APPLICA- TION FOR FEDERAL GRANT FOR SEWAGE TREATMENT WORKS UNDER 33 U.S.Co 466 ET. SEQ.". ROll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Patrick E. Ahern, Emilio Cortesi, Andrew Rocca, and G. J. Rozzi. Noes, none. Absent, Councilman Leo J. Ryan. Council then took action on the next resolution, after it had been explained by the City Attorney. Councilman Rozzi intro- duced: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AUTHORIZING THE WORK AND CALLING FOR BIDS ON THE IMPROVEMENT OF STREET DIVIDER ISLANDS". Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Patrick E. Ahem, Emilio Cortesi, Andrew Rocca, and G. J. Rozzi. Noes, none. Absent, Councilman Leo J. Ryan. T~e City Attorney explained the next resolution, after which Councilman Rocca introduced: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO CONGRATULATING ARTHUR A. RODONDI, CITY CLERK, ON HIS ELECTION AS PRESIDENT OF THE FINANCE OFFICERS DEPARTMENT OF THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES". Vice-Mayor Ahem at this time, on behalf of the Council, extended vo the City Clerk their congratulations for his election to this office and for having brought not o~ly distinction to his own office but to the City as well. Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Patrick E. Ahem, Emilio Cortesi, Andrew Rocca, and G. J. Rozzi. Noes, none. Absent, Councilman Leo J. Ryan. The City Attorney explained the next resolution, after which Councilman Rozzi introduced: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO DESIGNATING THE AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE FOR EXECUTION OF DOCUMENTS IN CONNECTION WITH FEDERAL GRANT FOR SEWAGE TREATMENT WORKS UNDER 33 U.S,C. 466 ET. SEQ.". Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Patrick E. Ahem, Emilio Cortesi, Andrew Rocca, and G. J. Rozzi. Noes, none. Absent, Councilman Leo J. Ryan. ~ouncil then took action on the next resolution. Councilman Rocca introduced: "A RESOLUTION CALLING FOR BIDS ON SALE OF IMPROVEMENT BONDS -- LOWRIE-BOTHIN-SWANSON PROJECT -- SECOND SALE - $81,000". Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Patrick E. Ahern, Emilio Cortesi, Andrew Rocca, and G. J. Rozzi. Noes, none. Absent, Councilman Leo J. Ryan. ~ity Attorney Noonan explained the ordinance which was ready for second reading and adoption, stating that a motion could 'se adopted by Council if they so desired that reading of the ordinance in its entirety be waived and that it be passed and adopted by the reading of title ChiN. Councilman Rozzi so moved, seconded by Councilman Rocca and reguIarly carried. City Attorney Noonan then remarked that a motion could be adopted by ~ouncil that the ordinance entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO AUTHORIZING AN AMEND- MENT TO THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF S©UTH SAN FRANCISCO AND THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE CALI- FORNIA STATE EMPLOYEESi RETIREMENT SYSTEM" be read for the second time by title and be passed and adopted, the reading in its en- tirety having been duly waived. Councilman Rozzi so moved, seconded by Councilman Rocca. Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Patrick E. Ahem, Emilio Cortesi, Andrew Rocca, and G. J. Rozzi. Noes, none. Absent, Councilman Leo J. Ryan. ORDINANCE -- FIRE PROTECTION WATER SUPPLY -- 1st Re adin_g/ Introduc t ion: THEODORE AND DORATHY M. KARAS -- CLAIM AGAINST CITY: SSF MARINA -- REQUEST FOR TIME E/TENS I0N: PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT - DISCUSSION P.C. RES0. NO. 1541: H. J. WRIGLEY VARIANCE APPLICATION P.C. RESO. NO. 1542: ~0~0 PAUL R. MARCHETTI VARIANCE APPLICATION P.C. RES0. N0. 1543: ~'05o City Attorney Noonan explained the ordinance which had been pre- pared for Council's attention, requesting Council make a chan6e on Pa~e 7, Section 10, striking out the words "and water divi- sion"-and stated it was ready for i~s first readin6 and intro- duction. He stated that a motion could be adopted by Council that readin~ of the ordinance in its entirety be waived and that it have its first readin~ and introduction by the readin~ of title only. Councilman Rozzi so moved, seconded by Councilman Rocca and regularly carried. City Attorney Noouan then stated that a motion could be adopted that au ordinance entitled "AN GRDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO REQUIRING ADEQUATE WATER SUPPLY AND FIRE PROTECTION FACILITIES" be introduced, read- iu~ iu its entirety having been duly waived. Councilman Rocca so moved, seconded by Councilman Rozzi. Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Patrick E. Ahem, Emilio Cortesi, Andrew Rocca, and G. J. Rozzi. Noes, none. Absent, Councilman Leo J. Ryan. Claim a6ainst the City was received from Theodore and Dorathy M. Karas, 121 Francisco Drive, allegin6 damages iu the amount of $1,146.00 as the result of flood conditions. Councilman Rocca moved, seconded by Councilman Rozzi and regu- larly carried, that the claim be denied and referred to the City's insurance carrier. At the request of Vice,Mayor Ahem, the City Clerk explained to Mrs. Ka?as, present in the audience, the reason for Council takin~ this action, after which she re- marked that the Insurance Company had contacted her earlier but not recently. Letter dated October 18, 1962, received from Healy Tibbitts Con- struction Co. requestin_~ an extension of time for completin_~ construction of the South San Francisco Marina. Councilman Rozzi moved, seconded by Councilman Rocca and regu- larly carried, that a thirty (30) day extension be ~ranted from the date of completion as presently set forth in the contract° Resolution No. 1541 entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COM- MISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO AMENDING ZONING 0RDI- NANCE NO. 353, AS AMENDED, BY REPEALING SECTION 4.2 IN TITLE "PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT", ADDING A NEW SECTION 4.2 "PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT OR PC DISTRICT", AND PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENTS l! TO ADD PLANNED UNIT OR PU DISTRICTS AND OTHER SECTIONS RELATING THERETO" received from the Planning Commission, together with Report of Hearings, Proposed Ordinance, and Finding of Facts. Vice-Mayor Ahem remarked that the only Council action which could be taken tonight on this matter was the settin~ of a Public Hear- in~ date. City Attorney Noonan explained the procedure required by Ordi- nance iu settin~ the Public Hearin~ date, after which Vice-Mayor Ahem commented that he understood that a number of people were present this eveuin6 who were interested in this Agenda item. He further remarked that if there ~ere no objections, Council would take up all Planniu~ Commission items other than this one, returnin~ to it as the last Planning Commission item. They would then listen to any comments and suggestions offered although no official action could be taken.. No objections were registered. VARIANCE Resolution No. 1542 was received from the Planning Com- mission recommendin~ permission be granted for the request to maintain 43% lot coverage instead of the required 40% lot cover- age at 202 Longford Drive. Councilman Rozzi moved, seconded by Councilman Rocca and regu- larly carried, thatthe recommendation of the Plannin~ Commission be approved and accepted. VARIANCE Resolution No. 1543 was received from the Planuiu~ Com- mission recommending permission be ~ranted for the request to maintain 3 foot side yard instead of required 5 foot side yard, and 14 foot rear yard instead of required 20 foot rear yard at 205 Norwich Drive. Councilman Rozzi moved, seconded by Councilman Rocca and regu- larly carried, that the recommendation of the Plannln~ Commission be approved and accepted. LOUIS J. POLETTI VARIANCE APPLICATION P.C. RESO. NO. 1544: ANDREW S. FERRARI VARIANCE APPLICATION P.C. RES0. NO. 1545: SEERS CANDLES, INC. USE PERMIT P.C. RES0. NO. 1546: PETER RAMIREZ USE PERMIT P.C. RES0. NO. 1547: W. L. LaFOND USE PERMIT P.C. RESO. NO. 1548: ENOCH J. & MARY CASHA USE PERMIT P.C. RESO. NO. 1549: DON CORD0 USE PERMIT P.C. RESO. NO. 1550: VARIANCE Resolution No. 1544 was received from the Planning Com- mission recommending permission be granted for the request to encroach 5 feet into required 15 foot front yard 300 feet North of 333 E1Camino Real. Councilman Rozzi moved, seconded by Councilman Rocca and regu- larly carried, that the recommendation of the Planning Commis- sion be approved and accepted. VARIANCE Resolution No. 1545 was received from the Planning Com- mission recommendin~ permission be granted for the request to maintain a 46.7% lo~ coverage instead of the required 40% lot coverage and to encroach two feet into the required five foot side yard at 543 Myrtle Avenue. Councilman Rozzi moved, seconded by Councilman Rocca and regu- larly carried, that the recommendatTon of the Planning Commis- sion be approved and accepted. USE PERMIT Res$1ution No. 1546 was received from the Planning Commission recommending permission be granted for the request to remove and reinstall existing fence, plus adding 15 feet of new fencin¢ at 210 E1Camino Real, subject to the following con- ditions: ~l) Tapered planting strip to extend from an undeter- mined width at the gate to a 36 inch width as it faces Spruce Avenue; (2) See's Candies, Inc. to consult with Director of Parks and Recreation as to the type of planting which might be desir- able in this area. Councilman Rozzi moved, seconded by Councilman Rocca and regu- larly carried, that the recommendatdon of the Planning Commis- sion be approved and accepted. USE PERMIT Resolution No. 1547 was received from the Planning Commission recommending permission be granted for the request for a dwelling,group of ? units at 457 Tamarack Lane and 458 Mfller Avenue-(Lot 15, Block ll5): one existing and six to be added in two stages of three each as per Master Plan #24-x-62, subject to the following conditious: (1) Stage 2 of develop- ment to be started 60 days after completion of Stage 1. (2) Balconies as shown on plan to have same restrictions as porches as defined in the ordinance. (3) The front yard con- crete to be removed and front yard kandscaped. (4) Hedge as shown in drawings to be either withlu building setback line, a variance applied for, or reduced ~o meet ordinance require- msnts. Councilman Rozzi moved, seconded by Councilman Rocca and regu- larly carried, that the recommendation of the Planning Commis- sion be approved and accepted. USE PERMIT Resolution No. 1548 was received from the Plannin~ Commission recommending permission be granted for the request t.o erect au 8-unit apartment house above a commercial develop- ment, ~ranting 9 units only, subjecz to the following conditions: (1) No commercial development; (2) Plans be revised and submitted to Architectural Committee for approval of open space and design; (3) Comply with recommendations of Director of Public Works as to grading and retaining walls. Lot 14, Block 129; Linden & Armour. Councilman Rozzi moved, seconded by Councilman Rocca and regu- larly carried, that the recommendation of the Planning Commis- sion be approved and accepted. USE PERMIT Resolution No. 1549 was received from the Planning Commission recommending permission be granted for the request to erect a 5-unit apartment in addition to singIe family home on rear of lot at 664 Grand Avenue, subject to the condition that open space and recreation area be redesigned and submitted to Architectural Committee for approval~ Councilman Rozzi moved, seconded by Councilman Rocca and regu- larly carried, that the recommendation of the Planning Commis- sion be approved and accepted. USE PERMIT Resolution No. 1550 was received from the Planning Commission recommending permission ~e granted for the request to install a 3' x 20' plastic sign iu addition to existing 3.5' x 20' sign at the rear of 509 Mayfair Avenue. Councilman Rozzi moved, seconded by Councilman Rocca and regu- larly carried, that the recommendation of the Planning Commis- sion be approved and accepted. LOUIS J. POLETTI USE PERMIT P.C. RESO. NO. 1551: UTAH CONSTRUCTION & MINING CO. -- RESUBDIVISION REQUEST: PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT -- DISCUSSION P.C. RESO. NO. 1541: USE PERMIT Resolution No. 1551 was received from the Planning Commission recommending permission be granted for the request to erect a temporary 10' x 20' sign North of 333 E1Camino Real, subject to the condition the permit be for one year with the privilege of applying to the Planning Commission for extension. Councilman Rozzi moved, seconded by Councilman Rocca and regu- larly carried, that the recommendation of the Planning Commis- sion be approved and accepted. Inter-Office Memorandum dated November 2, 1962, received from the Planning Commission recommending permission be granted for the request of Utah Construction and Mining Company to resub- divide 201 at the rear of parcels 14 and 15, BIock I0, South San Francisco Industrial Park, Unit No. 2-E and add this 201 to Lots I7 and 18, Block 10, South San Francisco Industrial Park Unit No. 2-D, to allow for the construction of a railroad spur to extend into Lot 18. This resubdivision request was granted upon the City Attorney approving this 20 feet being established as a per- ~anent easement and the City Attorney and City Clerk being satis- fied as to the division of the Assessment Districts. Letter from Utah Construction and Mining Company dated October 31, 196~, requesting this resubdiviston. Returning to Planning Commission Resolution No. 1541 concernin~ an Amendment to Zoning Ordinance No. 353, Vice-Mayor Ahem asked if there was anyone present who wished to be heard. Mr. Cappacioli remarked that he represented the Park Avenue Heights Home Owners Association and commented that he was in attendance at all of the Planning Commission Hearings on this matter as well as the study meetings which were held. He remarked on the size of the area in question being some sixty acres, and further com- mented on the unanswered questions concerning open areas and den- sity. He likewise commented on the suggestions which they made to the Planning Commission and which had not been accepted or adOpted wholly or in part. He remarked on having a land owner indicate how he planned to develop the area as welI as a piece meal development by an owner. Yr. Willis Swartzell of Larch Avenue commented that other areas were concerned with this matter, that he felt it was a step for- ward in the right direction, and that the Planning Commission should be complimented. Mrs. Jack Harrison stated that her husband, formerly a City Plan- ner, had conferred on the matter with Mr. Cappacioli, and that also the Master Plan Map should be made available for inspection before discussion. Mrs. Walter Clayton remarked that some of her neighbors saw the map on this development about one year ago. She commented that her area was considered as a high density area and stated that this upset her if it was to be approwed as such. She further stated that this Ieft the door open for the developer to deveIop the land as he pleased, which concerned not only herself but her aeighbors. She expressed concern on the development of the Hill- side areas since no information was available or given. Councilman Cortesi stated that some six months ago the Planning Commission stated they wouId not take action until the Master Plan had been presented. Vice-Mayor Ahem remarked on the progress made in the City during the past six years by the City CouncZ1. He also commented on the wany meetings which had to be attended by the Planning Commission in order to acquire further knowledge on such matters, and that sacrifices and absences from home are necessary in their civic in,retest and service to the City. ALso, that the Planning Com- Tission is constantIy seeking more control rather than less. Councilman Rocca stated that the mat~er was now up for study, and that it required a lot of study. He assured the people present that the Council would examine every phase of the matter before passing ou the ordinance. Councilman Rozzi suggested that Mr. Cappacioli make available to the City Manager the information he had for study before action ~a~s taken. Eiscussiou followed concerning the date set for hearing, after which Councilman Rocca moved, seconded by Councilman Rozzi and re~ularly carried, that the Public Hearing date be set for Decem- be~ 3, 1962. PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT -- DISCUSSION P.C. RES0. N0. 1541: ( CONTINUED ) NON-RESIDENT LIBRARY FEE: MONTHLY REPORTS: GOOD AND WELFARE: SSF MARINA: ADJOURNMENT: Comments followed concerning information on the Public Hearing to be held reaching all of the people. Mr. Bechini of 775 Parkway remarked that the residents of Park Avenue Heights have an idea of what is going on and that all people should be advised. Mrs. Lucille Cramer remarked that s~e learned of this through ]he legal notices in the newspaper. She said they moved from San Francisco to avoid the congested areas. She further stated zhat areas other than Park Avenue Heights also would be affected by this ordinance, and requested the Council listen to the de- mands of the people. City Manager Aiello suggested that in order that the public be i~formed newspaper coverage be given as well as notices for- warded to the Improvement Clubs throughout the City, advising of the Public Hearing to be held. This was agreeable to all present. Inter-Office Memorandum dated October 15, 1962, received from Librarian Lauretta Hussar statin~ the Library fee card for non- residents had been raised from $~.50 to $10.00, effective Octo- ber 10, 1962, making the non-resident charge comparable with ~hat of other Peninsula libraries. There being no objections, Vice-Mayor Ahem ordered the Memoran- dmm accepted and pIaced on fiIe. Monthly Reports were received from: Parking District No. 1 for June, July, August and September, ~962 County of San Mateo Department of Public Health and Welfare - Sanitation Section - September, 1962 Fire Department - September, 1962 Police Department - September, 1962. There being no objections, Vice-Mayor Ahern ordered the Reports accepted and placed on file. There being nothing further, Vice-MaMor Ahem, under Good and Welfare, urged everyone to be sure to vote the following day. He also requested support to the City's Bond Issue on the Sewage Treatment Plant enlargement. At the request of Councilman Rocca, 3ity Manager Aiello gave a detailed report on the progress of tae Marina. He stated that all floats were in place, piling was being driven for the build- ings, and that three buildings were ~nder construction as well as other work being done. He commented that time had been lost because of the storm, and at this point the Harbor was about 85% complete. Further discussion followed concerning the Harbor development. At the request of Councilman Cortesi, City Manager Aiello explained the City's cost iu the matter. Vice-Mayor Ahem then explained the reason Mayor Ryan was absent was because he was attending a school function. There being nothing further, Councilman Rocca moved, seconded by Councilman Rozzi and regularly ca?tied, that the meeting be adjourned until Monday, November 19, 1962, at 8:00 p.m. Time of adjournment: 9:25 P.m. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, City Clerk Vuce- Ma~or