Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 1964-08-03632 REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO HELD MONDAY, AUGUST 9, 1964 TIME: PLACE: CALL TO ORDER: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND INVOCATION: ROLL CALL: MINUTES: CLAIMS: PARKING DISTRICT NO. I CLAIM: BUTLER ROAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT CLAIMS: SSF MUNI IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF 1963 -- CONSTRUCTION FUND CLAIM: 8:00 p.m. ~ouucil Chambers, City Hall The meeting was called to order by Mayor Patrick E. Aheru at 8:02 p.m. Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was recited, after which the in- vocation was given by Reverend Paul P. Coleman of St. Veronica's ~hurch. Present: Absent: Councilmen Patrick E. Ahem, Frank Bertucelli, Emilio Cortesi, Andrew Rocca, and Guido J. Rozzi. None. Mayor Aheru at this time made preser tation of service pins to those employees of the City who had been employed for ten, fifteen and twenty years. They were as follows: Lester Anderson - 10 Years John Baldi - l0 Years Dolph Corruccini - 15 Years Tom Galli - 15 Years Weru Jarvis - 15 Years Richard Platano - 15 Years A1 Brauns - 20 Years John Marchi - 20 Years After presentation, Mayor Aher% on behalf of himself and members of the Council, congratulated those employees for theirlyears of faithful service to the City. Mayor Ahem asked if there was a motion approving the minutes of the adjourned regular meeting of JuLy 15, 1964, and the regular ~eeting of July 20, 1964. Councilman Rozzi moved, seconded by Councilman Rocca and regularly carried, that the minutes of the adjourned regular meeting of July 15, 1964, and the regular meeting of July 20, 196~, be~approved as submitted. Mayor Ahem then asked if there was a motion approving the regular claims as submitted for payment. Councilman Rocca moved, seconded by Councilman Bertucelli and reg- ularly carried, that the regular claims totaling $31,310.03 be approved for payment. Mayor Ahern then asked if there was a motion approving the claim of Ben Mortara, Jr. for $60.00 for ~ecretarial services for the Parking Commission as submitted for payment. Councilman Rozzi moved, seconded by Councilman Rocca and regularly carried, that the claim as submitted for Parking District No. l, iu the amount of $60.00, be approved for payment. Butler Road Assessment District Claims: (a) Enterprise-Journal claim dated July 21, 1964, in the amount of $43.55 for legal advertisiu~ (Bids) for Butler Road Im- provement Project. (b) Enterprise-Journal claim dated J$1y 21, 1964, iu the amount of $8b.40 for legal advertising (Notice of Improvement) for Butler Road Improvement Project. Councilman Bertucelli moved, seconded by Councilman Rocca and reg- ularly carried, that the claims as submitted for the Butler Road Assessment District be approved for payment. City of South San Francisco Municipal Improvement Bonds of 1963 -- Construction Fund Claim: Brady Constructors claim dated July 27, 1964, in the amount of $43,281.34 for Progress Bilhin~ No. 16 for Waste Pumping and Treatment Works EulargemeuZ ~$3~,764.15 to be paid by South San Francisco and $10,51~.19 to be paid by San Bruno). Councilman Rocca moved, seconded by Councilman Bertucelli and reg- ularly carried, that the claim as submitted for the City of South San Francisco Municipal Improvement Bonds of 1963 - Construction Fund be approved for payment. SSF MARINA CLAIM: RESOLUTION NO. 4009 APPROVAL ENGINEER'S REPORT - CABOT & FORBES IND. PARK, UNIT NO. l: RESOLUTION NO. 4010 ESTABLISHING WAGE SCALE - CABOT & FORBES IND. PARK, UNIT NO. l: RESOLUTION NO. 4011 NOTICE OF HEARING - CABOT & FORBES IND. PARK, UNIT NO. l: RESOLUTION NO. 4012 SEALED PROPOSALS - CABOT & FORBES IND. PARK, UNIT NO. l: RESOLUTION NO. 4013 NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT - CABOT & FORBES IND. PARK, UNIT NO. l: RESOLUTION NO. 4014 SEWER SERVICE AGREEMENT - HOUSING AUTHORITY: RESOLUTION NO. 4015 SEWER SERVICE AGREEMENT - CAPE ESPERANCE: RESOLUTION NO. 4016 ADOPTING BUDGET - STATE HIGHWAY FUND TO CITIES: South San Francisco Marina Claim: Olympian Dred~in~ Company claiw dated June 30, 1964, in the amount of $96~.1~ for dredging services. ~ Councilman Rozzi moved, seconded by Councilman Bertucelli and reg- ularly carried, that the claim as submitted for the Sou!th San Fran- cisco Marina be approved for payment. City Attorney Noouau explained the first resolution whioh had been prepared for Council action, after which Councilman RocCa intro- duced: "A RESOLUTION OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF ENGINEER'S REPORT - CABOT, CABOT & FORBES INDUSTRIAL PARK, UNIT NO. l". i Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Patrick E. Ahem, Frank Bertucelli, Emilio Cortesi, Andrew Rocca, and Guido J. Rozzi. Noes, none. Absent, none. City Attorney Noonan explained the u~xt resolution, after which Councilman Rozzi introduced: "A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHIN3 PREVAILING WAGE SCALE - CABOT, CABOT & FORBES LNDUSTRIAL PARK, UNIT NO. l". Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Patrick E. Ahem, Frank Bertucelli, Emilio Cortesi, Andrew Rocca, and Guido J. Rozzi. Noes, none. Absent, none. . City Attorney Noonan explained the n~xt resolution, after which Councilman Bertucelli introduced: "A RESOLUTION APPOINTING TIME AND PLACE OF HEARING PROTESTS IN RELATION TO PROPOSED ACQUISITIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS, AND DIRECTING NOTICE - CABOT, CABOT &iFORBES IN- DUSTRIAL PARK, UNIT NO. l". Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Patrick E. Ahem, Frank Bertucelli, Emilio Cortesi, Andrew Rocca, and Guido J. Rozzi. Noes, none. Absent, none. ~ City Attorney Noonan explained the next resolution, after which Councilman-Rozzi introduced: "ARESDLUTION CALLING FORiSEALED PROPOSALS - CABOT, CABOT & FORBES INDUSTRIAL PARK, UNIT!NO. l". Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Patrick E. Ahem, Frank Bertucelli, Emilio Cortesi, Andrew Rocca, and Guido J. Rozzi. Noes, none. Absent, none. ' City Attorney Noonau explained the next resolution, after which Councilman Bertucelli introduced: "A RESOLUTION DESCRI3ING PRO- POSED BOUNDARIES OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT AND DIRECTING RECORDATION OF NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT - CABOT, CABOT & FORBES INDUSTRIAL PARK, %~IT NO. l". Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Patrick E. Ahern, Frank Bertucelli, Emilio Cortesi, Andrew Rocca, and Guido J. Rozzi. Noes, none. Absent, none. i The City Attorney then explained the next resolution, after which Councilman Rocca introduced: "CITY ~0UNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA - A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EJdE- CUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO FOR SEWER SERVICES". ' Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Patrick E. Aheru, Frank Bertucelli, Emilio Cortesi, Andrew Rocca, and Gui$o J. Rozzi. The City Attorney explained the next resolution, after which Coun- cilman Rozzi introduced: "CITY COUN]IL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCIS- CO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA - RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDMENT TO CON- TRACT NO. NBy(U)-41902 WITH THE UNITE~D STATES OF AMERIC~ FOR SEWAGE SERVICE TO CAPE ESPERANCE HOUSING". ~ Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Patrick E. Ahem, Frank Bertucelli, Emilio Cortesi, Andrew Rocca, and Guido J. Rozzi. Noes, none. Absent, none. ', Inter-Office Memorandum dated July 2~, 1964, from the Director of Public Works submittin~ Budget Approval Expenditures of State Allo- cated (0.725¢) Funds f~r th$ 1964'65 fiscal year. City Attorney Noonan then explained ~he resolution, after which Councilman Bertucelli introduced: ".~ITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA - A RESOLUTION ADOPTING BUDGET FOR EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS ALLOCATED FROM THE STATE HIGHWAY FUND TO CITIES] Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Patrick E. Ahern, Frank Bertucelli, Emilio Cortesi, Andrew Rocca, and Guido J. Rozzi. Noes, none. Absent, none. 63' RESOLUTION N0. 4017 FREEWAY AGREEMENT DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS: RESOLUTION NO. 4018 TERMINAL COURT - TAX CANCELLATION: RESOLUTION NO. 4019 DEED - TAX COLLECTOR LOMALINDA TERRACE NO. 1.: RESOLUTION NO. 4020 GRANT OF EASEMENT SENALDI PROPERTIES: RESOLUTION -- ADDENDUM AGREEMENT MARCO WAY: RESOLUTION NO. 4021 HICKEY BOULEVARD EXTENSION - STORM DRAIN FACILITIES: City Attorney Noo~an explained the next resolution, after which Councilman Rocca introduced: "CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF sOUTH SAN FRANCISCO~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA - RESOLUTION APPROVING FREEWAY AGREEMENT". Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Patrick E. Ahem, Frank Bertucelli, Emilio Cortesi, Andrew Rocca, and Guido J. Rozzi. Noes, none. Absent, none. City Attorney Noonan explained the next resolution, after which Councilman Bertucelli introduced: 'CITY COUNCIL, CITY iOF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA - A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY ATTORNEY TO CONSENT TO CANCELLATION OF TAXES ON PROPERTY ACQUIRED FOR PUBLIC USE TO WIT: STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY KNOWN AS "TERMINAL COURT"; AND REQUESTING THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TO AUTHORIZE CAN- CELLATION OF TAXES AND THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY TO CONSENT THERETO". Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen PatriCk E. Ahem, Frank Bertucelli, Emilio Cortesi, Ardrew Rocca, and Guido J. Rozzi. Noes, none. Absent, none. City Attorney Noonan explained the text resolution, after which Councilman Rozzi introduced: "CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA - A P~SOLUTION ACCEPTING A DEED FROM ROSS CONTI, TAX COLLECTOR OF THE COUNTY OF SAN MATEO". Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen PatriCk E. Ahem, Frank Bertucelli, Emilio Cortesi, Ar.drew Rocca, and Guido J. Rozzi. Noes, none. Absent, none. 3ity Attorney Noonan explained the r.ext resolution, after which 3ouncilmau Rocca introduced: "CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN '.FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA - RESOLUTION ACCEPTING A GRANT OF EASEMENT FROM MARCO AND MARIE SENAIi,I FOR WATER AND GAS LINES, ELECTRICAL AND TELEPHONE WIRES, AND OTHER LIKE UTILITY iFACILITIES". Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen PatriCk E. Ahem, Frank Bertucelli, Emilio Cortesi, Andrew Rocca, and Guido J. Rozzi. Noes, none. Absent, none. : 3ity Attorney Noonan explained the text resolution entitled: "CITY 30UNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA - RESOLU- TION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A~' ADDENDUM AGREEMENT - MARCO WAY". There being no objections, Mayor Ahem deferred this resolution to ~he next meeting pending receipt of the executed Addendum Agreement. City Attorney Noonan briefly explair~ed the resolution which had been prepared with regard to the Hickey Boulevard extension !insofar as it concerned the tying into the City's storm drain of storm waters from vhe area outside the City. He explained the methods bY which the City could take its action with regard to the extension of Hickey Boulevard. He commented that a letter had been received from the developer of Serra Monte submitting statistics on their!water flow and the method by which it would be taken care of, as well as another letter from the Mayor of Daly City who assured the City:of their co- operation iu this matter. He then stated that the resolution had been prepared in order that the existing friendly and cooperative atmosphere could be maintained with the neighborning cities. Mayor Ahem at this time introduced James Fitzgerald, Chairman of the Board of Supervisors, Joseph Verducci, recently elected Super- visor, and County Engineer Don Wilson. Further explanation followed by the 3ity Attorney who remarked that the resolution placed on notice the City of Daly City ahd the County that no connection to the City's sto?m drain would be permitted un- til a study had first been made. He also stated that a~complete check of all maps and other document~ regarding storm w~ters had not been made but that the resolution could be adopted by COuncil if they so desired. In the meantime, a study of these documents would be made and still not hurt the good will of neighboring cibies and legal entities by the adoption of this resolution. Councilman Rozzi then introduced a resolution entitled: "CITY COUN- CIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA - A RESOLUTION GIVING NOTICE TO TEE COUNTY OF SAN M%TEO; THE CITY OF DALy CITY AND OTHER PARTIES THAT THE CITY OF SOUTH SANFRANCISC0 WILLiNOT PERMIT THE CONNECTION OF HICKEY BOULEVARD STORM DRAINS TO CITY,FACILITIES". Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes. Councilmen Patrick E. Ahem, Frank Bertucelli, Andrew Rocca, and Guido J. Rozzi. i Foes, Councilraan Emilio Cortesi, on ~he grounds that he'had already made his commitment on the matter and could not change his thinking. Absent, none. No objections to the adoption of the resolution came from the audience. HICKEY BOULEVARD EXTENSION - FURTHER DISCUSSION: ORDINANCE NO. 509 HiCKEY BOU~VARD EXTENSION: City Attorney Noouan then suggested the followiu~ motion for Coun- cil consideration: that it be moved that the Planning Officer and the Director of Public Works confer with the County Engineer in or- der to establish adequate space from the edge of the right-of-way to the side property for planning and safety purposes. Councilman Bertucelli so moved, seconded by Councilman Rozzi. Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Patrick E. Ahem, Frank Bertucelli, Emilio Cortesi, Andrew Rocca, and Guido J. Rozzi. Noes, none. Absent, none. City Attorney Noonan then suggested that the record show that the letter dated August 3, 1964,-[rom the Suburban Realty Company over the signature of E. V. Schulhauser wherein it states the ~atter of the flow of water, and the letter dated August 3, 1964,i from the City of Daly City over the signature of Michael R. DeBernardi offer- in~ their cooperation be made a part of the record. C0uucilman Rocca moved, seconded by Councilman Rozzi that the two mentioned letters be made a part of the record. Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Patrick E. Ahem, Frank Bertucelli, Emilio Cortesi, Ardrew Rocca, and Guido J. Rozzi. Noes, none. Absent, none. City Attorney Noouan then explained the ordinance couce!rnin~ the extension of Hickey Boulevard which was ready for second reading and adoption, stating that a motion could be adopted bY Council if they so desired that readin~ of the ordinance in its e~tirety be waived and that it be passed and adopted by reading of ithe title only. Councilman Rocca so moved, seconded by Councilman Bertucelli and regularly carried. City Attorney Noouan then remarked that a motion could be adopted by Council that the ordinance e!ntitled: "ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO CONSENTING TO THE ES- TABLISHMENT OF A PORTION OF HICKEY BOULEVARD EXTENSION !WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO AS A PART OF THE COUNTY HIGHWAY SYSTEM 'DF THE COUNTY OF SAN MATE0" be read for the second time! by title and be passed and adopted, the readiu~ in its entirety ~haviu~ been duly waived. Councilman Bertucelli so moved, seconded by Councilman Rocca. Under the question, the following persons spoke on the matter: Mr. Elchiuoff, Attorney at Law representing the West W~nston Manor residents, urged the Council to consider the effect the! extension of Hickey Boulevard would have on the City as a cross liateral. He also asked further study be made ou the matter of drainiage, comment- ing that additional water would cause flood damage. Hei fur~er com- mented that he understood that if the City did not appriove the ex- zeusiou of Hickey Boulevard it woul6 not receive funds for the im- provement of Chestnut Avenue. At the request of Mayor Ahern, County Supervisor Chairman Fitzgerald stated that the County has no commitment to the City on the matter. Mr. Elchinoff called on Dan Murphy of 104 Sutton Avenue who stated uhat at the conclusion of the last weeting he spoke to Mr. Fitz- gerald who remarked that if Hickey Eoulevard was not approved the City would not have the extension of Chestnut Avenue and all monies would go to the southern end of the County. ]~. Fitzgerald replied that the remarks were not correct and what he pointed out was the importance of improved roads. He stated if zhis road could not be passed, the City would lose the monies in- volved to some other city, which has happened in the past. Mayor Aheru stated that never to his knowledge was a threat ever imposed on the City over the extension of Hickey Boulevard and he would be willing to subscribe this statement under oathl. Mr. Elchiuoff at this time thanked Council for the =ons:ideratiou shown him ou behalf of his clients. City Attorney Noonau then briefly explained the study which had been made concerning the matter of water drainage. Director of Public Works Goss then commented on the discussio~conceruing the matter of water drainage from the Serra Monte development which were held with the subdivider and the Engineer for the City of D~ly City. He commented that based ou preliminary plans the actual! runoff of water would be uo more than what it is at the present tiime. Mr. Paul Kaufmau, 109 Longford Drive, thanked Council for the check made recently by the City on the storm drain near his property. He commented that at no time did he me~tion the waters which would be coming from Serra Monte and that he only mentioned the water which would be coming from Hickey Boulevard. ORDINANCE NO. 509 HICKEY BOULEVARD EXTENSION: ( CONTINUED ) ORDINANCE -- REZONING BALBI PROPERTY: 2nd Reading/Adoption ORDINANCE -- REZONING - BRUSC0 & CASSINELLI PROPERTY: 2nd Reading/Adoption ORDINANCE -- REZONING GISELDINI PROPERTY: 2nd Reading/Adoption Mr. Kaufman then made mention of the building of a dam to the rear of Winston Manor for the retention of waters, which would create a lak~. He also stated that the storw, drain on his property was there illegally. He then asked about a future drain problem in his area and as to where the water would drain. City Attorney Noonan briefly explained this to Mr. Kauffman. Mr. Kaufman asked as to which development would take place first; Hickey Boulevard extension or Serra Monte subdivision, and was in- formed by County Engineer Wilson that the timing ou the construc- tion of the Junipero Serra Freeway, Hickey Boulevard extension and Serra Monte development would be going on more or less at the same time. Mr. Kaufmau stated the reason he asked was becaused he wished to know if a connection for storm drainage waters was tlo be made to 'his manhole, to which the City Manager replied that the! resolution stated uo connection was to be made. City Attorney Noonan at this time explained to Mr. Kaufman the reso- lution and what it proposed. Mr. Saciotes, president of the West Winston Manor Community Asso- ciation, remarked he was glad to see something done regarding the matter of the drainage of storm waters. He again asked for the al- ternate route and a no vote on the extension of Hickey !Boulevard. He further remarked that if the Hickey Boulevard extension was passed they would take every action necessary to stop it since he :Felt not all of the facts were brought to light. John Pene, 116 Duuman Way, asked County Engineer Wilson if Hickey Boulevard was to connect to Hillside Boulevard, to which he replied the Master Plan showed the connection. Mr. Pene then asked as to the location, to which Mr. Wilson replied this had not :been deter- mined but that it would be in the open area near the High School. Mr. Pene at this time commented on a discussion he had !had with the Arch Bishop's office in San Francisco concerning the property recent- ly acquired by them in the City of ¢olma for cemetery purposes and remarked that if this area was not available, it could not be used for highway purposes. Mr. Wilson commented that while it bas true that acquisition of cem- etery property could not be acquired through eminent dOmain it could 'se acquired through negotiation, just as in the case of the acquisi- tion of property from the Chinese Cemetery for the Hickey Boulevard extension. Mr. Elchinoff at this time polled the members of the Council as to their feelings if the extension of Kicke~ Boulevard had to be routed through either Evergreen Avenue or Holly Avenue in SunShine Gardens. Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen PatriCk E. Ahern, Frank Bertucelli, Andrew Rocca, and Guido J. Rozzi. Noes, Councilman Emilio Cortesi. A~ent, none. the next item for Council attention was the 2nd reading and adoption of the ordinance entitled: "AN 0RDZNANCE REZONING THE'PARCEL DE- SCRIBED HEREIN AND KNOWN AS THE BALBI PARCEL RESTRICTED MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT OR R-3 DISTRICT AND AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 353AS AMENDED ENTITLED ~ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CiTY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO¥ PASSED AND ADOPTED AUGUST 10, 1954". No objections being registered, Mayor Ahem continued the second reading and adoption of the ordinance to the next regular meeting pending receipt of the Nolte report. The next item was the 2nd reading ar.d adoption of the ordinance en- titled: "AN ORDINANCE REZONING THE PARCELS DESCRIBED HEREIN AND KNOWN AS THE BRUSC0 AND CASSINELLI PARCELS RESTRICTED MULTIPLE FAM- ILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT OR R-3 DISTRICT AND AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 353 AS AMENDED ENTITLED 'ZONING 0RDZNANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO' PASSED AND ADOPTED AUGUST 10, 19~". No objections being registered, Mayor Ahem continued the second reading and adoption of the ordinance to the next regular meeting pending receipt of the Nolte report. The next item was the 2nd reading ar d adoption of the ordinance en- titled: "AN ORDINANCE REZONING THE PARCELS DESCRIBED HEREIN AND KNOWN AS THE GISELDINI PARCELS RESTRICTED MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDEN- TIAL DISTRICT OR R-3 DISTRICT AND AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 353 AS AMENDED ENTITLED 'ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRAN- CISCO' PASSED AND ADOPTED AUGUST lO~ 1954." No objections being registered, Mayor Aheru continued the second reading and adoption of the ordinance to the next regular meeting pending receipt of the Nolte report. 637 ORDINANCE NO. 510 PERSONNEL SYSTEM AMENDING ORD. NO. 449: ORDINANCE -- REZONING NEIGHBORHOOD 18 WESTBOROUGH: 1st Reading/ Introduction JOHN S. FONTANA P.C. RES0. NO. 1750: O R) JAMES AND RAMONA HUBREL P.O. REs0. No. 174o: (HEro owa) REGIONAL PLANNING COMMITTEE - SAN MATE0 COUNTY: ANTONIO PALO~iBA USE PERMIT P.C. RES0. NO. 1757: City Attorney Noonan explained the ordinance which was ready for its second reading and adoption, stating that a motion could be adopted by Council if they so desired that reading of the ordinance in its entirety be waived and that it be passed and adopted by the reading of title only. Councilman Rozzi so moved, seconded by Councilman Rocca and regularly carried. City Attorney Noonan then remarked that a motion could be adopted by Council that the ordi- nance entitled: "AN ORDINANCE OF TP~ CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 449 AS AMENDED ENTITLED 'AN ORDINANCE OF THE .DITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO RECREATING AND RE-ESTABLISHING A PER- SONNEL SYSTEM FOR THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 216 AND ALL INCONSISTENT ORDINANCES'" be read for the second time by title and be passed snd adopted, the reading in its entirety having been duly waived. Councilman Bertucell:i so moved, seconded by Councilman Rocca. Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Patrick E. Ahem, Frank Bertucelli, Emilio Cortesi, A~drew Rocca, and Guido J. Rozzi. Noes, none. Absent, none. Pity Attorney Noouan remarked that because of changes to the pre- viously prepared ordinance which was due for second reading and adoption, the ordinance would be introduced and given its first reading at this time. He stated that if Council wished a motion could be adopted that reading of the ordinance iu its entirety be waived and that it have its first reading and introduction by the readin~ of title only. Councilman P.occa so moved, seconded ~y Dounci~man Bertucelli and regularly carried. City AttOrney Noonan then stated that a motion could be adopted that au ordinance en- titled: "AN ORDINANCE ZONING A P~GRCEL OF APPROXIM~TELY 106.930 ACPLES, KNOWN AS NEIGHBOB/iOOD 18 OF THE GENF~AL PLAN (A ~PORTION OF THE WESTBOROUGH AREA) DESCRI~iED HEP~IN; PLANNED COMLMUN1TY DISTRICT OR P.C. DISTRICT; PROVIDING REGULATIONS FOR SAID DISTRICT; AND .~MENDING ORDINANCE NO. 353 ENTITLED IZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO' ADOPTED AUGUST 10, 1954,"be introduced, reading in its entirety having been duly waived. CounCilman Rozzi so moved, seconded by Councilman Rocca. Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Patrick E. Ahem, Frank Bertucelli, Emilio Cortesi, Andrew Rocca, and Guido J. Rozzi. Noes, none. Absent, none. Variance Resolution No. 1750 from the Planning Commission recom- mending permission be ~ranted for the request of John S. Fontana for expansion of a non-conforming use and a 2 ft. side yard en- croachment at 719 Maple Avenue, subject to the following condi- tions: (1) That the Planning Officer be presented with a copy of a recorded deed showing ownership of bhe full 24.91 ft, of frontage; (2) That the entire structure be painted or stuccoed and painted at the time the addition is added. gouncilman Rozzi moved, seconded by Councilman Rocca and regularly ~arried, that the recommendation of the Planning Commission as con- tained in the resolution, subject to the conditions, be approved and accepted. ~ouncilman Rozzi then requested that the City Manager and the City Attorney meet with Mr. Fouaaua and explain the conditions. Use Permit Resolution No. 1740 from the Planning Commission recom- mending denial for the request of James and Ramona Hubrel to erect a second single family dwelling to the rear of 729 Baden Avenue iu au R-2 district. A new Use Permit under Resolution No. 1758 having been issued and au Iuter-0ffice Memorandum dated JuLy 30, 1964, haviug~been received from the Planning Officer requesting the rescinding of~Use Permit No. 1740, uo action ou this Use Pernit was taken and the Use Permit ordered rescinded. Letter dated July 21, 1964, received from the County of San Mateo Board of Supervisors concerning the Regional Planning Committee for San Mateo County and requesting Council to designate one of their members to this Committee and urging the Planning Commission to appoint someone from their group. Mayor Ahem requested that Chairman Fitzgerald be notified that an appointment would be forthcoming. USE PF2iMIT Resolution No. 1757 from the Planning CommiSsion recom- _ req ereo mendin~_ permission be ~ranted for the nest to t a s~.oghd single family dwelling to the rear of 8~2 Commercial Avenue in au R-2 district. Councilman Rozzi moved, seconded by Councilman Rocca that the recommendation of the Planning Commission be approved and accepted, and permission granted. Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Patrick E. Ahem, Frank ~rtucelli, Emilio Cortesi, Andrew Rocca, and Guido J. Rozzi. Noes, none. Absent, none. 638 JAMES AND RAMONA HUBREL USE PERMIT P.C. RES0. NO. 1758: AMERICAN GUILD HOMES AMENDMENT TO USE PERMIT N0. 1673: 5060 ALLEY DEVELOPMENT P.C. RES0. N0. 1759: PENALTY - BRADY C 0NSTRUCTORS TREATMENT WORKS ENLARGEMENTS: RESOLUTION NO. 4022 BIDS - 1964 STBEFT IMPROVEMENT: MONTHLY REPORTS: Inter-Office Memorandum dated July ~0, 1964, from the Planning 0ffi- .:er requesting Council to rescind Resolution No. 1740, issued pre- viously to James and Ramona Hubrel. USE PERMIT Resolution No. 1758 from the Planning Commission recom- mending permission be granted for tke request to erect a second single family dwelling to the rear of 729 Baden Avenue in au R-2 district. Councilman Rozzi moved, ~ecouded by Councilman Rocca, ~hat the recommendation of the Planning Commission be approved and accepted and permission granted. Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Patrick E. Aheru, Frank Bertucelli, Emilio Cortesi, Andrew Rocca, and Guido J. Rozzi. Noes, none. Absent, none. Inter-Office Memorandum dated July 30, 1964, from the Planning Com- mission recommending approval for the request of American Guild Homes to amend Use Permit Resolution No. 1673 to allow construction of a model home on Lot 12, Block 30, Tract 816, Westborough No. 3. Councilman Rozzi moved, seconded by Councilman Rocca, that the recom- mendation of the Planning Commission be approved and accepted and permission granted. Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Patrick E. Ahem, Frank Bertucelli, Emilio Cortesi, Andrew Rocca, and Guido J. Rozzi. Noes, none. Absent, none. inter-Office Memorandum dated July 3~, 1964, from the Planning Offi- cer regardiu~ Resolution No. 1759, passed by the Planning Commission at their meetiu~ of July 27, 1964, which reads as follows: "That iu order to expedite the development or redevelopment of p~operties ad- Joining the city's alleys, the Council and Commission should take constructive action to examine all of the possibilities for such de- velopments''. Councilman Rozzi moved, seconded by Councilman Rocca, that the recommendation of the Plannin~ Commission be approved and accepted. Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Patrick E. Aheru, Frank Bertucelli, Emilio Cortesi, Andrew Rocca, and Guido J. Rozzi. Noes, none. Absent, none. inter-Office Memorandum dated July 29, 1964, from the Director of Public Works recommeudiu~ extension of contract completion date for Brady Constructors (Treatment Works .Enlargements) to July 17, 1964, and penalty of $100 a day for additional time required to complete contract; and also recommending payment to Jeuks & Adamson for addi- tional engineering services. Accompanied by letter dated July 27, 1964, from Jenks & Adamson recommeudiu~ the extension of time ~d letter dated July 28, 1964, requesting payment of an additional $800.00 for engiueerin~ services beyond July 17, 1964 (79% to be paid by South San Francisco and 30% to be paid ~y San Bruno). No objections being registered, Mayor Ahem referred this matter to the City Attorney for study. inter-Office Memorandum dated July 2~, 196~, from the Director of Public Works submitting plans and specifications for the 1964 Street improvement Project. City Attorney Noonan explained the r~solution, after which Council- nan Bertucelli introduced: "CITY C0'JNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRAN- CISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA - A RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AUTHORIZING THE WORK AND CALLING FOR BIDS ON TPLE iMPROVEMENT OF 1964 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT". Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Patrick E. Ahem, Frank Bertucelli, Emilio Cortesi, Andrew Rocca, and Guido J. Rozzi. Noes, none. Absent, none. Monthly Reports were received from tae following: City Clerk (Tentative) - June, 196~ Parking District No. 1 - June, 1964 Fire Department - June, 1964 Library - June, 1964 San Mateo County Department of Public Health and Welfare - Housing Suave2 - April, May and June, 1964 San Mateo County Department of Public Health and Welfare - Sanitation Section - June, 1964. There being no objections, Mayor Ahem ordered the reports accepted and placed on file. DEPARTMENT OF ~ ~.i ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL: GOOD AND WELFARE: COMMENTS - HUBREL USE PERMIT: DISCUSSION - LIBRARY SITE: AD JOUP~NMENT: The following application was received from the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control: Application filed by Daniel Preffer and James Charles McAsey, Jr. for Ch-Sale General (public premises) at The Manor House at 107 Hickey Boulevard. There being no objections, Mayor Ahem ordered the report placed on file. There being nothing further, Mayor Ahem asked if any member of the Council had anything they wished to offer under Good and Welfare. .~ouncilman Cortesi asked why the Plsnning Commission denied permis- sion to Mr. James Hubrel to construct a second home on the rear of uis property when there were other such permits granted. Mayor Ahem commented that what Mr. Cortesi was referring to was the ear- lier resolution of the Planning Commission which recommended denial and which had been rescinded. He stated that a second resolution had been received from the Planning Commission recommending approval and that Council had acted earlier o~ this recommendatiOn, granting 5hem permission. Councilman Rocca asked about the new library, stating that it was not progressing as rapidly as it should. He requested the City Manager to have it expedited as quickly as possible. City Manager Aiello remarked that he had spoken to Mr. Paul Markling and that the design work was proceeding. He stated thait Mr. Mark- Ling had five people ou his staff working full time on this. It appeared the hold up was with the Civil Defense office and that as soon as the matter of the Emergency Operating Center, which was to be located in the basement of the library, had been cleared the de- sign would move more rapidly and the City could call for bids. Mayor Aheru then asked the City Manager to see what he could do to expedite the matter. There being nothing further, and at the request of City Attorney- Noonan, Councilman Rocca moved, secomded by Councilman Rozzi and regularly carried, that the meeting be adjourned to Monday, August lO~ 1964, at 5:30 p.m. Time of adjournment: 9:35 p.m. RES~PE~TFULLY SUBMITTED, APP.: (Meeting of 8/3/64)