Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 1969-07-21REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN F~.ANCISCO HELD ~DNDAY, JULY 21, 1969 TIME s PLACE = CALL TO ORDER.. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND INVOCATION.. ROLL CALL.. MINUTES.. CLAI MS ~ PARKING DISTRICT NO. 1 CLAIMS.. CABOT, CABOT & FORBES INDUSTRIAL PARK, UNIT NO. 2 CLAIM.. CABOT, CABOT & FORBES INDUSTRIAL PA~K, UNIT NO. 2A CLAIM.' 1969 SO. AIRPORT BLVD. SANITARY SEWER ASSESSMENT DIST. CLAIMS.. 1969 SO. AIRPORT BLVD. FIRE SERVICE ASSESSN~:NT DIST. CLAIM.. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL FROM USE PERMIT ORDER UP-119 WESTBOROUGH-WEST PARK #2= 8500 p.m. Council Chambers, City Hall. The meeting was called to order by Mayor Pro Tem Warren Steinkamp at 8..03 p.m. The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was recited and the Invocation was given by Reverend Kenneth Glenn of the First Southern Baptist Church. Present= Absent.. Councilmen Patrick E. Ahern, F. Frank Man~nini, Warren Steinkamp and Andrew Rocca Councilman Frank J. Bertucelli. Mayor Pro Tem Steinkamp asked if there was a motion approving the Minutes of the regular meeting of July 7, 1969. Councilman Rocca moved, seconded by Councilman Mammini and regularly carried, that the Minutes of the regular meeting of July 7, 1969 be approved as submitted. Mayor Pro Tem Steinkamp then asked if there was a motion approving the regular claims as submitted for payment. Councilman Ahem moved, seconded by Councilman Rocca and regularly carried, that the regular claims, totaling $56,255.99, be approved for payment. Mayor Pro Tem Stetnkamp asked if there was a motion approving the claims for Parking Distri No. 1 as submitted for payment. Councilman Mammini moved, seconded by Councilman Rocca and regularly carried, that the claims as submitted for Parking District No. 1, totaling $1,617.53, be approved for payment. Cabot, Cabot & Forbes Industrial Park, Unit No. 2 Clatm~ Cooper-Clark & Associates claim dated July 1, 1969 in the amount of $2,898.10 for Soils Engineering Services. Councilman Man~nini moved, seconded by Councilman Rocca and regularly carried, that the claim~ as submitted for Cabot, Cabot & Forbes Industrial Park, Unit No. 2, be approved for payment. Cabot, Cabot & Forbes Industrial Park, Unit No. 2A Claim.. Cooper-Clark & Associates claim dated July 1, 1969 in the amount of $2,898.10 for Soils Engineering Services. Councilman Rocca moved, seconded by Councilman Mammini and regularly carried, that the claim as submitted for Cabot, Cabot & Forbes Industrial Park, Unit No. 2A, be approved for payment. 1969 South Airport Boulevard Sanitary Sewer Assessment District Claims.. (a) Wilson, Jones, Morton & Lynch claim dated June 27, 1969 in the amount of $3,240.23 for Legal Services. (b) L. C. Smith Co., claim dated June 30, 1969 in the amount of $15,745.36 for Services and Materials. Councilman Ahern moved, seconded by Councilman Mammini and regularly carried, that the claims as submitted for 1969 South Airport Boulevard Sanitary Sewer Assessment District be approved for payment. Councilman Rocca abstained from voting on the claim payable to L. C. Smith Co. 1969 South Airport Boulevard Fire Service Assessment District Claim.. Wilson, Jones, Morton & Lynch claim dated June 27, 1969 in the amount of $1,086.03 for Legal Services. Councilman Manwnini moved, seconded by Councilman Ahern and regularly carried, that the claim as submitted for 1969 South Airport Boulevard Fire Service Assessment District be approved for payment. The next item was the continued Public Hearing - APPEAL FROM USE PERMIT ORDER UP-119 Of THE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING COMMISSION - USE PERMIT FOR THE AMENDMENT OF PUD "F" IN WESTBOROUGtt-WEST PARK NO. 2. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL FROM USE PEEMIT OEDER UP-119 WESTBOROUGH-WEST PARK ~2: (CONTINUED) Mr. Bruce Rosengren, President of West Park Homeowners Association, spoke, stating that not much more could be added to their last presentation other than to request Council to seriously consider the area as a unique development which would be a credit to the City of South San Francisco in future years. He requested that the developer be obliged to leave lot 158 clear for open space and he explained how concerned the West Park Homeowners were, not only the houses involved, but the area as a whole. Mr. Donald Gamma, 3790 Cork Place, Vice President of Nest Park Homeowners Association, commended the City Council for their concern of the property owners in the matter of the Westborough Boulevard Extension and expressed his desire to have Council give the same consideration to the property owners who were now involved in a similar situation where their privacy would be invaded. He stated that the whole area would feel the effect, not just the two or three homes concerned. Mayor Pro Tem Steinkamp at this time asked the City Clerk if any more written protests had been received to which he replied that none had been received. Mr. Henry Richman, Vice President of J. H. Snyder Company, spoke in behalf of their Use Permit, explaining how his company was doing its utmost to make the development a beautiful 1300-home complex in the Westborough-West Park area; how they had employed the finest in Landscape Architects; ho~ they had endeavored to cooperate with the Planning Commission, Planning Department to build a Common Green in a beautiful development and to have their houses a credit to the community. Mr. Richman continued, reiterating Mr. Guzzardo's, Landscape Architect, explanation of the concept of Common Greens. He further explained the impossibilities of having Common Greens wide all the way through, which thus required narrow corridors to approach these Common Greens. He stated that they had maintained a flow and pattern of the Common Greens, widening the Common Green corridor and lighting the area as recommended, with a better drainage system to be installed, to make this a beautiful development, a model complex of which West park, South San Francisco and the whole Bay Area would be proud. Mr. John Anagnos, 3787 Cork Place, asked about the enlargement of the Common Green butting his property. Mr. Richman explained the installation of landscaping which was recommended by the Landscape Architect. Mrs. Anita Anagnos, 3787 Cork Place, spoke that the landscaping was not their concern but the 18;foot Common Green behind their home. Mr. Richman again described the landscaping, lighting and drainage as existing in all of the Common Greens. Mr. LeRoy Gay, 3791 Cork Place, spoke that the width of the Common Green was their concern and not the narrowness of the corridors and challenged Mr. Richman's statement that a home built on lot 158 would he a model home on only an 18-foot Common Green. In the absence of Mr. Theodore Tronoff, Engineer, Mr. Rtchman brtefly explained the dimensions of other Common Greens. Mr. Kenneth Goslin, 3787 Cork Place, spoke that the difference between the two Other narrow corridors existing, was that these homes butted on the Common Green. Mr. Gay stated that he had measured every Common Green in the area and found the smallest, 24 feet from fence to fence. Mayor Pro Tem Steinkamp explained that Council had viewed the area but had not physically measured the areas. Mrs. Betty Murphy, 3771 Cork Place, spoke as an indiVidual home owner who purchased their home with the idea that the original concept would he followed and requested Council to uphold the plan under which they purchased their home. Councilman Mammini requested an explanation from the City Attorney and City Planner regarding construction in the manner which the original plans showed and the matter of the widening of the 8-foot Common Green. City Planner Daniel Pass explained that the complaint stemmed from the change from t~n houses to cuplets where the rear of several lots look upon the side entrances of family homes. Councilman Mammint asked if lot 158 wouldn't be oriented in the same manner as origi- nally planned to which City Planner Pass replied that it would be oriented to the rear of the Common Greens. City Planner Pass at this time presented the original drawing to Councilman Mammini and explained that the placement of this lot was unique in that it was the result of a study of the 1906 tracing of the San Francisco earthquake. Discussion followed concerning the layout of the home fronting the side of another home, and the situation of other homes in the area. City Attorney Noonan outlined the facts as they developed from the original map to the composite map which Council had viewed, explaining the original map showing the school site which was to have a large precentage of green area; the large green area of the 2~- acre park; and the long triangular piece of land which was on the recorded map. He further stated that the records showed the landscaping plans hy Anthony Guzzardo; the Agreement between the City and the successors and interests, at that time, SSF Corporati¢ in which the City detailed items of work the successors were to do. The only item of work did not concern this particular Common Green. He further explained to Council that a change in the original plan to accommodate the earthquake fault might alter the CONTINUED P~BLIC HEARING APPEAL FROM USE PERMIT ORDER UP-119 WESTBOROUGH-WEST PARK (CONTINUED) RECESS ~ RECALL TO ORDER~ RESOLUTION NO. 5113 GRANTING UP-1!9~ .50 e? RESOLUTION NO. 5114 APPROVING FINAL MAP WESTBOROUGH-WEST PARK 2A SA-11~ PUBLIC HEARING GENERAL PLAN - ADOPTION OF HOUSING ELEMENT~ conclusion in their opinion of allo~i~hg7 the enlargment of the Common Green. He further explained the courses of action Open to Council based on this situation. Mrs. George Tanner, 3775 Cork Place, spoke, that when they bought their home three years ago, they were shown plans which displayed the area including the school and play grounds. She protested against having bought under these circumstances to be now faced with a change of plans and requested Council to consider their appeal. City Attorney Noonan again explained to Council how the change in mentioned lot might warrant a change in the Common Green area. Further discussion followed concerning the date the maps were recorded; the time the residents bought their properties; if the lots were reoriented; and the question as to whether or not, since the school area was released, if the original concept was not followed - if a discretionary right existed. In answer to Councilman Rocca's inquiry as to whether or not all of these facts were studied when the Planning Commission unanimously approved UP-119, City Planner Pass stated that when a map is approved, it has to he recognized by any and all governing bodies. He further explained the approved changes made in the original map. Further discussion followed concerning the platement of garages between the houses and the e~trances facing the side of other homes. Mr. George Tanner, 3775 Cork Place, spoke concerning the lack of privacy and sunlight to their home and requested the abandonment of lot 158. Councilman Ahern stated that in dtscussi~ this issue with some Planning Commissioners in private, was told that this developer was regarded as very progressive and cooperative and was willing to help in a solution. Councilman Ma~mini stated that earlier statements regarding the financial status of the developer had no bearing in this matter and since he bought in good faith, he could not have a lot denied him and suggested another meeting to further conclude the matter. He further questioned Mx. Rtchman if another lot could compensate in lieu of this lot. Mr. Richman replied that there was an unequal amount of land. City Planner Pass further stated that, functioning as City Planner, he recommended that there was another lot to consider in the former school site which would reduce that Common Green to 40 feet thereby eliminating a smaller proposed 18-foot Common Green, allowing for open space and ventilation. Mayor Pro Tem Steinkamp called a recess at 9=20 p.m. for Council to consider the matter. Mayor Pro Tem Steinkamp recalled the meeting to order at 9~38 p.m., stating that the developer had agreed to compromise and requested the City Attorney to explain. City Attorney Noonan stated, by eliminating lot 158 and adding lot 189A, presently shown on the map, Council could take action in the matter. Mayor Pro Tem Steinkamp stated that in view of an agreement among all concerned, declared the Public Hearing closed. City Attorney Noonan explained the first resolution which would accomplish the exchange of land, after which Councilman Ahern introduced the resolution entitled= "A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE GRANTING OF USE PRRMIT 119 AS MODIFIED." Roll call vote was as follows= Ayes, Councilmen Patrick E. Ahern, F. Frank Mammini, Andrew Rocca and Warren Steinkamp. Noes, none. Absent, Councilman Frank J. Bertucelli. City Attorney Noonan explained the second resolution approving the final map after which Councilman Mammini introduced the resolution entttled= "A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL MAP WESTBOROUGH-WEST PARK UNIT 2-A (RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS 142 THROUGH 157, BLOCK 7, LOTS 1 THROUGH 19, 73 THROUGH 81 AND A PORTION OF LOT 20, BLOCK 8) SA-11." Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Patrick E. Ahern, F. Frank Mammini, Andrew Rocca and Warren Steinkamp. Noes, none. Absent, Councilman Frank 3. Bertucelli. Councilman Rocca at this time complimented the developer and the residents for their sincerity and the manner in which they presented their arguments. Mayor Pro Tem Steinkamp declared the Public Hearing opened in the matter of the Adoption of the "Housing Element" of the General Plan. Mayor Pro Tem Stetnkamp asked the City Clerk if any written protests had been received to which he replied that none had been received. In reply to Mayor Pro Tem Steinkamp's invitation to those in the audience who wished to speak, Mr. Donald Grimes, 123 Francisco Drive, inquired if this was a revision of the General Plan. Councilman Mammini stated that this was requested by the State of California of all cities to bring up to date the housing element, a means of determi6i~ng the housing conditions throughout the State. City Planner Pass explained that this study merely provides goals, objectives, standards and the execution of these standards to meet national housing policies. Mr. Nell Martin of the firm of Hahn, Wise & Associates, further explained the study which was requested hy the State of California which would show areas suitable for PUBLIC HEARING GENERAL PLAN - ADOPTION OF HOUSING ELEMENT ~ (CONTINUED) PROCLAMATION LAW AND ~ORALITY WEEK AUGUST 11-18, 1969.' RESOLUTIONS AWARD OF CONTRACT EXTENSION OF FORBES BLVD. KAUFFMANN COURR AND PT. SAN BRUNO BOULEVARD C.C.&F. UNITS 2 new housing, areas for proper remedial treatment or preservation, and would identify areas which should he used for housing. In answer to Councilman Ahern's question as to what could be done with buildings in disrepair, Mr. Martin stated that the City could enforce the Building Code. City Planner Pass stated that it was suggested in the new plan that a Board of Con- demnation be organized to take some of the burden now on the Chief Building Inspector. He further stated that this study pointed out areas needing attention; areas needing conservation and areas that, in the future, needed demolition; and that this study originated from a request of the National Association of Home Builders. Mr. Grimes requested information concerning the report made in 1955 concerning the high density in the Westborough area. Councilman Mammini explained that this area at that time was County land. City Planner Pass further explained that this area was later zoned R-3 and P-C Districts and there were no changes to the plan. He further commented that this study was later used to determine the size of culvert to be installed in the Spruce Avenue Drainage Proje¢ Councilman Rocca requested the City Manager, City Attorney and Director of Public Works if they were sufficiently familiar with this ~udy to recommend action hy Council at this time. City Attorney Noonan replied that he had drawn up the legal vehicle to make this effective and that the State law requires it. City Manager McKenzie explained that, as the City Planner indicated, this was just the housing element of the General Plan and the City was in no way bounds, Director of Public Works Goss commented that it was a very comprehensive plan and recommended it as a fine plan, very conservative and logical. Mr. Nell Martin briefly explained the Federal and State control of grants if this study were not adopted. At this time, Mayor Pro Tem Steinkamp declared the Public Hearing closed. City Attorney Noonan stated that the Proclamation designating the week of August 11 - 18, lgGg as LAW AND MORALITY WEEK was requested hy the City Manager. Mayor Pro Tem Steinkamp so proclaimed. City Attorney Noonan stated that the next two resolutions entitled= "A RESOLUTION OF AWARD OF CONTRACT CABOT, CABOT & fORBES INDUSTRIAL PARK UNIT NO. 2 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT EXTRNSION OF fORBES BOULEVARD, KAUF~ COURT AND PT. SAN BRUNO BOULEVARD" and "A RESOLUTION OF AWARD OF CONTRACT CABOT, CABOT & fORBES INDUSTRIAL PARK UNIT NO. 2A ASSESSMENT DISTRICT EXTENSION OF foRBES BOULEVARD, KAUFPV~N COURT AND PT. SAN BRUNO BOULEVARD' were concerned with the award of contract for public improvements in Cabot, Cabot & Forbes Industrial Park, Units No. 2 and No. 2A. Director of Public Works Goss declared the bids received and stated that the low bidder, with a bid of $g56~650.12, was McGuire & Hester and this bid was over the Engineer estimate made in June of this year. City Manager McKenzie at this time read the communication dated Ju}y 21, 1969 from Wilsey & Ham as addressed to the City Council concerning the award of contract. City Attorney Noonan explained to Council that it is required that monies or a bond he deposited for monies needed in excess of the funds remaining in the Assessment District before awarding the contract. He further explained that monies raised by assessment district proceedings, whereby Council was the administrative body, was for the total assessment districts and this would require taking funds from one district and leaving the other district unable to put in improvements in other areas. City Attorney Noonan recommended a two-weeks' revision of this matter and a continuance. Mr. Samuel Nash, Engineer for Wilsey & Ham, stated that he had contacted Mr. Gilbert of Cabot, Cabot & Forbes, and Mr. Gilbert had stated that they would be willing to pay the overcharges in the assessment district as they occurred. This was done in two other occasions and he explained the procedure of payment. He further remarked that this was necessary because of the time element with the winter season to be considered and the reasons for the bids being higher than the Engineem'estimate. He explained that these might be because of their timidity in possible problems with the filled ground. He requested of Council that award he made to McGuire & Hester with the condition that Cabot, Cabot & Forbes submit evidence that they will make up the difference in the District at such time the District funds are depleted. He stated that this would not legally require the City to sign a contract until this condition was made. City Attorney Noonan explained that the contract would be between the City and the contractor and not Cabot, Cabot & Forbes and they would be liable for the bills. Mr. Nash remarked that Cabot, Cabot & Forbes.would pay for improvements in Cabot, Cabot & Forbes Unit No. 1, namely, the installation of portion of railroad crossing protection; the removal of the Swift spur track; the portion of modification to the lighting system. He further explained the escalation of construction costs which have occurred in the time between the Engineers' report and the receipt of bids. Discussion followed between Councilman Mammini and Mr. Nash regarding the total 200 acreage; the sale of bonds through assessment districts and the possibility that portions of this land would be too expensive to sell for warehouse sites; and the development of portions of the land for hotel-motel complex and high-rise office building. RESOLUTIONS AWARD OF CONTRACT C.C.&F. UNITS 2 & 2A~ (CONTINUED) RESOLUTION NO. 5115 ADOPTING HOUSING ELFJ4~NT OF THE C~NERAL PLAN~ RESOLUTION CONCERNING WATER FACILITIES IN STONEGATE RIDGE: ORDINANCE AMENDING ORD. NO. 353~ 1st Reading/Introduction 1 ORDINANCE AMENDING ORD. NO. 511 WEST PARK 1 AND 2): let Reading/Introduction ORDINANCE AMF_NDING ORD. NO. 528 STONEGATE RIDGE: 1 st Reading/Introduction GRADING PERMIT APPLICATION FUTURE CATHOLIC PARISH SITE WEST PARK NO. 3~ CITY PLANNER'S REPORT: City Manager McKenzie recommended that the award of contract be continued so that the legalities could be written into the agreement with Cabot, Cabot & Forbes. Mr. Nash remarked that this situation was not established until this afternoon when the bids were opened and again stated that Cabot, Cabot & Forbes were willing to write a letter stating that they would do the same thing as in Unit No. 1 and make up the difference. Councilman Rocca remarked that he believed Cabot, Cabot & Forbes was a very resonsible and fine Industrial Park hut that Council did not have physical evidence and further suggested having a special meeting to conclude this. A discussion followed concerning a special meeting which could be held to review further information which would be received by that time. Mayor Pro Tem Steinkamp ordered the resolutions continued until all of the information concerning the matter would he on hand. City Attorney Noonan explained that this resolution was prepared in accordance with the second Public Hearing, after which Councilman Mammini introduced the resolution entitled~ "A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE HOUSING ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN." Roll Call vote was as follows= Ayes, Councilmen Patrick E. Ahern, F. Frank Mammini, Andre~ Rocca and Warren Steinkamp. Noes, none. Absent, Councilman Frank J. Bertucelli. The next resolution concerned the water facilities in Stonegate Ridge. At the request of the City Attorney for a continuance, Mayor Pro Tem steinkamp so ordered. Mayor Pro Tem Steinkamp ordered the titIe of the ordinance read. The titIe of the ordinance was read. City Attorney Noonan then explained the ordinance and advised the Council regarding procedure for introduction. Councilman Ahem moved that reading of the ordinance in its entirety be waived and that the ordinance be introduced and read for the first time by reading title only, seconded by Councilman Rocca and passed by a unanimous vote. Councilman Rocca moved that the ordinance entitled: "AN ORDINANCE AN~DING ORDINANCE NO. 353, AS AMENDED, ENTITLED 'ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO,'" the entire reading of which has been duly waived, be introduced, seconded by Councilman Ahern and passed by the following roll call vote. Roll call vote was as followst Ayes, Councilmen Patrick E. Ahern, F. Frank Mammini, Andrew Rocca and Warren Steinkamp. Noes, none. Absent, Councilman Frank J. Bertucelli. Mayor Pro Tem Steinkamp ordered the title of the ordinance read. The title of the ordinance was read. City Attorney Noonan explained the ordinance and advised the City Council regarding procedure for introduction. Councilman Ahern moved that reading of the ordinance in its entirety be waived and that the ordinance be introduced and read for the ERst time by reading title only, seconded by Councilman Rocca and passed by a unanimous vote. Councilman Ahern moved that the ordinance entitled~ "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 511 PASSED THE 10TH DAY OF AUGUST, 1964, (WEST PARK 1 AND 2, PLANNF. D COMN)JNITY DISTRICT)," the entire reading of which has been duly waived, he introduced, seconded hy Councilman Mammtni and passed hy the following roll call vote. Roll call vote was as follows~ Ayes, Councilmen Patrick E. Ahern, F. Frank Mammini, Andrew Rocca and Warren Steinkamp. Noes, none. Absent, Councilman Frank J. Bertucelli. Mayor Pro Tem Steinkamp ordered the title of the ordinance read. The title of the ordinance was read. City Attorney Noonan then explained the ordinance and advised the Council regarding procedure for introduction. Councilman Mammini moved that reading of the ordinance in its entirety be waived and that the ordinance be introduced and read for the first time by reading title only, seconded by Councilman Rocca and passed by a unanimous vote. Councilman Rocca moved that the ordinance entitled: "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 528 PASSF~ THE 7TH DAY OF JUNE, 1965, (STONEGATE RIDGE PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT)," the entire reading of which has been duly waived, be introduced, seconded hy Councilman Mammini and passed by the following roi1 call vote. Roll call vote was as follows~ Ayes, Councilmen Patrick E. Ahern, F. Frank Mammini, Andrew Rocca and Warren Steinkamp, Noes, none. Absent, Councilman Frank J. Bertucelli. The Inter-Office Memorandum dated July 10, 1969 from the Director of Public Works as addressed to the City Manager recommending authorization to issuance of Grading Permit for rough grading for future Catholic Parish Site in West Park No. 3, subject to con- ditions, was the next matter for Council's consideration. Accompanying was the Grading Permit Application as filed by Denis J. Shanagher, A.I.A., in behalf of the Roman Catholic Archbishop of San Francisco. Councilman Ahern moved, seconded by Councilman Mammini and regularly carried, that the recommendation of the Director of Public Works he approved and accepted and the Grading Permit, in accordance therewith, he granted. The next item was the City Planner's Report to the City Council with respect to Use and Variance Requests considered on July 14, 1969. CITY PLANNER'S REPORT: (CONTINUED) ACCEPTANCE OF WORK & REQUEST TO FILE NOTICE OF COMPLETION * CABOT, CABOT & FORBES UNITS 2 & 2A: FINAL ACCEPTANCE 1969 GRAND AVE. BRANCH LIBRARY LIGHTING I~ROVEMENTS - REQUEST TO FILE NOTICE OF COMPLETION: EXTF~NSION OF TIN~ REQUEST SO. AIRPORT BLVD. SANITARY SEWER AND PUMP STATIONs MONTHLY REPORTS DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL ~ PARKING LOT LFJISE BADEN & LINDEN AVENUES'. GOOD AND WELFAREs INFORMATION REQUEST CONCERNING 2~ACRE PARK SITE: DISCUSSION CONCERNING DUST PROBLEM IN AVALON PARK s 5ogo There being no objections, Mayor Pro Tem Steinkamp ordered the Reports accepted and placed on file. The next item was the Inter-Office Memorandum dated July 8, 1969 from the Director of Public Works to the City Manager recommending acceptance of improvements and requesting authorization to file Notice of Completion - Cabot, Cabot & Forbes Industrial Park, Units No. 2 and No. 2A. Accompanying is the communication dated June 26, 1969 from Wilsey & Ham concerning the subject matter. Councilman Rocca moved, seconded by Councilman Ahern and regularly carried, that the recommendation of the Director of Public Works he approved and accepted and authori- zation to file Notice of Completion be granted. The Inter-Office Memorandum dated July 9, 1969 from the Director of Public Works to the City Manager recommending acceptance of work and requesting authorization to file Notice of Completion - 1969 Grand Avenue Branch Library Lighting Improvement - was the next matter for Council's attention. Councilman Ahern moved, seconded by Councilman Rocca and regularly carried, that the recommendation of the Director of Public Works he approved and accepted and authori- zation be granted to file Notice of Completion. The next item was the Inter-Office Memorandum dated July 11, 1969 from the Director of Public Works as addressed to the City Manager recommending extension of time for the completion of So. Airport Boulevard Sanitary Sewer and Pump Station. Accompanying was the communication dated July 10, 1969 from L. C. Smith Company requesting the extension of time. Councilman Mammini moved, seconded by Councilman Ahern and regularly carried, that the recommendation of the Director of Public Works for an extension of time not to exceed 30 working days, as contained in his Inter-Office Memorandum of July 11, 1969, be approved and accepted. Councilman Rocca abstained from voting. Monthly Reports were received from the following: Building Department - June 1969 Fire Department - June li There being no objections, Mayor Pro-LTem Steinkamp ordered the Reports accepted and placed on file. Department of Alcoholic Beveraqe Controls Application as filed by Dennis and Bernice Zablosky for Off Sale Beer & Wine at Westborough and Junipero Serra Boulevards. There being no objections, Mayor Pro Tem Stetnkamp ordered the Report placed on file. The next item was the matter terminating the parking lot lease between the City of South San Francisco and the Standard Oil Company for the lot on Baden and Linden Avenues. Letter dated June 25, 1969 was received from Standard Oil Co. of Calif. in this regard. Councilman Mammini moved, seconded by Councilman Ahern and regularly carried, that the City Manager he authorized to execute the Agreement. There being nothing further, M~yor Pro Tem Steinkamp asked if any member of the City Council had anything they wished to offer under Good and Welfare. There being none, he then asked if any member of the audience wished to speak under Good and Welfare, Mr. Bruce Rosengren, President of the West Park Homeowners Association, requested information concerning the progress of the 2~acre park site. City Manager McKenzie stated that the City had received preliminary costs of the park at the last meeting hut were awaiting further information from the Superintendent of Recreation and Parks who was on vacation. Mr. Henry Richman, Vice President of J. H. Snyder Company, further explained that the bids came back higher than the estimates and they have been resubmitted for further study to bring the costs down to the original estimate. Mayor Pro Tem Steinkamp requested the City Manager to contact Mr. Maxey on his return for a full report. NLr. John Kmetz, 417 Valverde Drive, referred to a letter dated July 9, 1969 from Piombo Construction Company regarding a proposal for adequate dust control in West- borough Subdivision No. 4 and requested to know if Council had approved the Piomho proposal. Director of Public Works Goss remarked that the City Staff, City Manager, Police Department, Public Works Department have been checking on the situation and found that a new water wagon had been employed and a dust pallative had been sprayed and further, that Piomho was doing a good job. In answer to Mr. Kmetz's question as to why was there still dust, Director of Public Works Goss remarked that one water sprinkler had been broke, hut was now operative. Mr. Kmetz invited an inspection from his living room window. GOOD AND WELFARE: (CONTZNUED) DISCUSSION CONCERNING INTERSECTION AT GALWAY & WESTBOROUGH BLVD.: COMMENTS CONCERNING CYC DANCE: STATF~T CONCERNING WESTBOROUGH BLVD. F. XT.: AIXIOURNI~I~NT: Mms. Antoinette Fraschiert, 478 Avalon Drive, remarked that the dust was not only damaging to their homes but was a serious health problem. Mayor Pro Tem Steinkmap stated that while this was a difficult problem, the City Staff was doing everything in its power. Mrs. Fraschieri further stated that the other surrounding districts were likewise being affected. Discussion followed between Police Chief Fabbri and Mrs. Fraschieri concerning the watering from three water rigs and the constant supervision by the construction staff as well as the City Staff, A resident of Westborough spoke concerning the danger of the intersection of Galway Place and Westborough Boulevard for the crossing of youngsters against a 35-mile-an- hour traffic. Police Chief Fabbri responded that the signals were held up prior to the painting of the stripes for the crosswalks, sign posting and also the installation of "U" signs. Councilman Mammini at this time briefly commented on a recent dance held hy the newly-formed c6m~um~tyYouth Council whereby they had realized almost $400 which would be used beneficially for the Magnolia Recreation Center. Mr. Donald Grimes, 123 Francisco Drive, complimented Councilman Mammini for his support and encouragement to this group. Councilman Rocca stated that the matter of the Westborough Boulevard Extension was to he scheduled for the August 4th meeting. There being nothing further, Mayor Pro Tem Steinkamp adjourned the meeting to an Executive meeting to be held following in the City Council Study Room. Time of adjournment: 11:08 p.m. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, City Cierk APPROVED: Mayor Pro Tem *The discussions contained herein are excerpts and not verbatim.