HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 1984-04-18Mayor Mark N. Addiego
Vice Mayor Richard A. Haffey
Council:
Emanuele N. Damonte
Gus Nicolopulos
Roberta Cerri Teglia
AGENDA
ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
AGENDA REVIEW
J ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMUNITY FORUM
Adoption of a Resolution approving
the form of a grant of easement
between the City and County of San
Francisco and property owners seek-
ing funding of the local share of
participation in the Noise Insulation
Program.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FORM
OF A GRANT EASEMENT BETWEEN THE
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
AND PROPERTY OWNERS SEEKING FUNDING
OF THE LOCAL SHARE OF PARTICIPATION
IN THE NOISE INSULATION PROGRAM
MINUTES
City Council
City Council Conference Room
April 18, 1984
ACTION TAKEN
ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
4:45 p.m. Mayor Addiego presiding.
Council present:
Council absent:
Nicolopulos, Teglia,
Haffey, and Addiego
Damonte.
Councilman Damonte had stated at the
3/14/84 meeting that he would not be in
attendance at tonight's meeting.
Recited.
AGENDA REVIEW
City Manager Birkelo stated that he had
nothing to add.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
No one chose to speak.
COMMUNITY FORUM
No one chose to speak.
City Attorney Rogers stated that this
form was essentially what San Francisco
sent back through the FAA to the City
saying they could live with it. He con-
tinued, the change over the last draft
that the subcommittee had a chance to
look at is in paragraph 5 which discusses
the effects of over burdening the ease-
ment. He stated that the approach now
was that if they exceed the levels in
paragraph 4, the formula for noise levels
allowed on a property - the ratchet down
formula, by the way, if they exceed
those levels now for three consecutive
map periods which is a period of eighteen
months then the easement is over burdened
to the extent that it is extinguished.
He continued, they had added in on their
own language about the easement not being
in effect during any period of
4/18/84
Page i
AGENDA ACTZON TAKEN
Adoption of a Resolution - Continued.
2. Progress Report on Magnolia Center
Study.
noi se exceeding the al l owabl e level s i n
paragraph 4 and included in their saying
that this would stop at the point that
they dropped back below that level or the
easement is extinguished. He stated that
they had not abrogated anything instead
they had given the City a little more.
Mayor Addiego questioned if they were in
temporary violation would it allow the
property owners to take whatever recour-
ses without the easement being encumbered
on their property.
City Attorney Rogers stated, yes, as if
there were no easement for the period of
time they were in violation and if they
went on for three consecutive map periods
it was extinguished. He stated that the
easement now had a life of twenty years,
which was the period of the improvements.
M/S Teglia/Haffey - To adopt the
Resolution.
RESOLUTION NO. 49-84
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
Vice Mayor Haffey stated that he and
Councilman Nicolopulos, as a subcommit-
tee, had met with the consultant, the
City Manager, and the Director of Parks
and Recreation and had been presented
with the work of phase two of this study.
He stated that he had outlines of what
Phase II included which are attached and
a permanent part of this record. He con-
tinued, the study takes a look at a
number of types of uses of property which
included the School District and City
property looking at market rate housing.
He stated that it had been found that the
market rate housing was not a viable
option because of the cost factors
involved in the amount of money to pro-
vide acquired property plus the type of
parking density that would go on the pro-
perty. He stated that it was noted that
senior housing seemed to be a more viable
alternative for the site in conjunction
with rehabilitating the Magnolia Center.
He stated that the options were: 1) Go
with the senior housing and rehabilitate
4/18/84
Page 2
Group 4/Architecture,
Research and Planning, Inc.
457 Forbes Boulevard
South San Francisco
California 94080 USA
(415) 871-0709
451 College Avenue
Santa Rosa
California 95401 USA
(707) 575-7508
Telex: 331431
MAGNOLIA CENTER STUDY
City of South San Francisco
18 April 1984
8385
PHASE
I
II
III
IV
V
II REPORT OUTLINE
Introduction and Summary
Goals for Use of Site
Market Area Demographic Background
A. Definition of Market Area
B. Population
C. Employment
D. Housing Stock (Include Statement
about Seniors Housing)
Market Area Housing Demand Trends
(Address need for Seniors Housing)
A. Historical Absorption of New Housing Units
B. Absorption of New Seniors Housing
Market Area Housing Supply Trends
A. Currently Selling Residential Projects
(Include Seniors Housing)
1. Number of Units
2. Unit Sizes
3. Unit Sales Price
4. Price per Square Foot
5. Monthly Absorption
Minutes
4/18/84
Page 2a
MAGNOLIA CENTER STUDY
City of South San Francisco
18 April 1984
VI
VII
B. Projects Under Construction
(Include Seniors Housing)
1. Number of Units
2. Unit Size
3. Unit Prices
4. Price Range per Square Foot
C. Proposed Residential Projects
(Include Seniors Housing)
1. Number of Units
2. Unit Size
3. Unit Prices
4. Price per Square Foot
Development Recommendations
A. Types of Development
B. Types of Units
C. Size of Units
Planning Recommendations
A. Neighborhood Context
B. Site Plan
C. Site Area
Page two
Minutes
4/18/84
Page 2b
MAGNOLIA CENTER STUDY
City of South San Francisco
~-18 April 1984
Page Three
VIII
IX
Development Options
A. General Discussion
B. Specific Options
1. Sell Site
2. Seniors Housing with Community/
Seniors Center
3. Community/Seniors Center Alone.
C. Construction Budgets
Summary
Append ix
Additional Site Plan Alternates.
Notes From Public Meetings.
Minutes
4/18/84
Page 2c
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
Progress Report on Magnolia Center
Study - Continued.
the Magnolia Center, which is a com-
bination of School and City level; 2) Go
with the Magnolia Center rehabilitation
which would be a negative cash flow for
the City and a financial burden; 3)
Forget the whole thing and demolish the
building and sell the land, which was the
only option with a positive cash flow
that meets none of the community goals.
He stated that Phase III of the study was
to move forward to explore positive uses
of the land concentrating on senior
housing. He stated that the study was
divided into thirds, two-thirds of which
were paid for by the City of South San
Francisco and the last third would be
paid for by the County of San Mateo. Me
stated that the City next Thursday would
be receiving from the consultants the
completion of Phase II wi th greater
detail and that Phase III would be
completed in six weeks. He stated that
in terms of financing the City was
looking at redevelopment money and sour-
ces of income other than the General Fund
which was one of the major objectives of
Phase III. He stated that Councilman
Nicolopulos had a suggestion in the event
that other sources of income were not
found.
Councilman Nicolopulos stated that there
was a Mello/Ruiz Act which provides for
the City to act as the agency and
assessment bonds with a two-thirds vote
of the electors of the City wherein the
voters would be taxing themselves for the
two million needed for senior housing.
City Manager Birkelo stated that the
Finance Director was doing an analysis
which would be forthcoming in Council
packets and would be used in Phase III.
Director of Parks and Recreation Norton
stated that the consultant would be doing
a lot of research and would be talking to
Herman Fitzgerald, Esq. and Ken Jones
Esq., plus potential developers to come
back to Council with a realistic package
to implement the plan.
Discussion followed on when there would
4/18/84
Page 3
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
2. Progress Report on Magnolia Center
Study - Continued.
Closed Session for the purpose of
the discussion of personnel matters,
labor relations and litigation.
RECALL TO ORDER:
RECESS:
RECALL TO ORDER:
3. Police Department Goals and
Obi ecti ves.
be ads placed to attract people in any of
the phases; that the School Board had
been made aware of the phases through
liaison meetings; whether the School pro-
perty had been declared surplus; the dif-
ference in appraisal of the property
between the City and the School District;
site plans showing the projected density
on the site - 150 units of senior
housing.
City Manager Birkelo stated that the one-
third payment of $25,000 funding comes
from the County but was actually the
City's share of Community Block Grant
Funding allocated to the City and was not
County Funds per se but HCDA funds allo-
cated by the County.
Council adjourned to a Closed Session for
the discussion of labor relations at 5:00
p.m.
The meeting was recalled to order at 6:00
p.m., all Council present, no action
taken.
Mayor Addiego declared a recess at 6:00
p.m. for dinner.
The meeting was recalled to order at 6:45
p.m., all Council present.
Mayor Addiego stated that the Council
would begin with Communications in that
the Chief of Police was not in
attendance.
Councilwoman Teglia questioned eleven
dispatchers and stated that only ten had
been authorized - not eleven; whether all
positions had been filled; the personnel
turn over.
Discussion followed on the futures
report; whether the Police Department's
three year phases in the budget proposal
was reasonable; that spending $642,859
over the three year period was not
feasible; that Mayor Addiego wants an
analysis of the calls for service; need a
definition of calls for service; that the
City had absorbed the PST Program, added
three more officers and in total a gain
4/18/84
Page 4
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
m 3.
Police Department Goals and
Objectives - Continued.
of twelve people in the department;
trading some PSTs for more sworn
officers; having a ratio of service calls
to manhours; define the unit measure for
calls; that the budget guideline was 4%
increase in materials and supplies which
does not allow for new positions for a
hal?ced budget; City Manager prioritize
Police Department§ futures budget and
later see what new revenue could kick in
at a later time; Items 1 - 17 the Council
would contribute input where they wanted
to spend money.
Discussion followed: Item No. 3, page
No. 5, use other groups rather than just
the Neighborhood Services for the
emergency language bank volunteer
program; Item No. 4, cultural sensitivity
training, City should pay more money for a
professional package of instructors with
Council control of the final selection
process for one year at a time; Item No.
5, additional patrol beat, have two offi-
cers rather than a full beat of 4.5 men -
1985-86 get two officers and in 1986-87
three additional men as there is no
justification now for a full beat; sup-
portive of Item No. 6.
Council apprised Police Chief Datzman of
the conversation on his futures report
before he arrived.
Discussion followed: Item No. 7 do with
existing PSTs; Item No. 8 phase in one
lieutenant in 1985-86 and one in
1986-87; supportive of Item No. 9; Item
No. 10, perhaps have a 5% differential -
questioned how to test and maintain the
use of an additional language and the
number of employees getting the benefit;
Item No. 11 use a pure position rather
than a PST such as a Police Clerk; sup-
portive of Item No. 12 and No. 13 ; Item
No. 14 look at on a Citywide basis; Item
No. 15 and No. 16 would rather have a
patrol street officer rather than an
investigator or a crime analyst; Item No.
17 should be looked at Citywide; need to
change time line with direction given by
Council tonight and have it ready before
Budget is ready with the 1985-86, 1986-87
projections showing the financial impacts
4/18/84
Page 5
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
3. Police Department Goals and
Objectives - Continued.
CLOSED SESSION
4. Closed Session for the discussion
of property negotiations.
RECALL TO ORDER:
ADJOURNMENT:
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
City of South San Francisco
that had been agreed to.
Discussion followed on human sensitivity
programs; Council goals and objectives;
public relations problems with the canine
program which the Chief stated had been
solved by reinforcing cages in the cars;
direction on abandoned vehicles had been
taken care of; the need for a greater
code enforcement presence in the downtown
area; alternatives available in replacing
the 'Parki.~n~g Enforcement Officer when he
retires - use a PST for the industrial
area and an Enforcement Officer downtown;
Council agreed to having a PST do a sur-
vey on types of deliveries and frequency
in the downtown area, etc.
City Manager Birkelo stated that Council
was invited to an informational luncheon
tomorrow at the Sierra Point Harbor
Master's Office which was being sponsored
by the Cole Company.
CLOSED SESSION
Council adjourned to a Closed Session for
the discussion of property negotiations
at 8:06 p.m.
The meeting was recalled to order at 8:19
p.m., all Council present, no action
taken.
M/S Teglia/Haffey - That the meeting be
adjourned.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
The meeting was adjourned at 8.'20 p.m.
APPROVED:
City of South San FranciscO6
4/18/84
Page 6
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
The entries of this Council meeting show the action taken by the City Council to dispose
of an item. Oral communications, arguments, and comments are recorded on tape. The tape
and documents related to the items are on file in the Office of the City Clerk and
available for inspection, review and copying
4/18/84
Page 7