Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 1993-06-09 Mayor Roberta Cerri Teglia Council: Jack Drago Joseph A. Fernekes "-"lohn R. Penna Robert Yee MINUTES City Council Municipal Services Building Community Room June 9, 1993 1'7_ NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Section 54956 of the Government Code of the State of California, that the City Council of the City of South San Francisco will hold a Special Meeting on Wednesday, the 9th day of June at 7:10 p.m., in the Municipal Services Building Community Room, 33 Arroyo Drive, South San Francisco,California. Purpose of the meeting: 1. Presentation of Public Safety Awards. ' ~ated: June 3, 1993 CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: AGENDA (Cassette No. 1) 1. Presentation of Public Safety Awards. City Clerk City of South San Francisco ACTION TAKEN 7:25 p.m. Mayor Teglia presiding. Council Present: Council Absent: Drago, Fernekes, Penna, Yee, and Teglia. None. Fire Chief Stark commended the individuals and presented the following fire awards: Jessica Ambrocio, Jorge Ambrocio, Janee Park; Bay Cities Building Materials - Neil Vannucchi and Nino Campagna; Swinerton and Walblerg - Tom Kowalski and David Grubb; Guy F. Atkinson - Charlie Blackman and Jim Stevens; Brodhead Steel - Mike Knittell and David Brodhead; Pacific Gas & Electric - Dennis Guido; R.A. Welding and Repair - Russ Asmussen; P.K.S. Towing - Peter Koehler; Hank's Equipment Rental - Hank Rogers; Terry Borelli, Richard Spencer and Tom Summers. Police Chief Datzman commended the following 6/9/93 Page 1 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN Awards - Continued. ADJOURNMENT: individuals and presented police safety awards: Kiiko Baptista, and Louis Matteucci. M/S Fernekes/Yee - To adjourn the meeting. Carried by unanious voice vote. Time of adjournment was 7:40 p.m. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, Barbara A. Battaya, City Clerk City of South San Francisco APPROVED. V~oberta Cerrtq~glia, Ma~or/~ City of South San Francisco The entries of this Council meeting show the action taken by the City Council to dispose of an item. Oral communica- tions, arguments, and comments are recorded on tape. The tape and documents related to the items are on file in the Office of the City Clerk and are available for inspection, review and copying. 6/9/93 Page 2 Mayor Roberta Cerri Teglia Council: Jack Drago Joseph A. Fernekes John R. Penna Robert Yee MINUTES City Council Municipal Services Building Community Room June 9, 1993 175 CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: AGENDA (Cassette No. 1) PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: INVOCATION: . RESENTATIONS Commending Resolution for Louis A. Matteucci 5oq7 AGENDA REVIEW ORAL COMMUNICATIONS ACTION TAKEN 7:56 p.m. Mayor Teglia presiding. Council Present: Council Absent: Drago, Fernekes, Penna, Yee, and Teglia. None. The South San Francisco Bandits Soft Ball Team presented the colors, and the Pledge was recited. Mayor Teglia commended Mr. Frank Cosentino for his sponsorship of the girls' team. Rev. Landi, St. Veronica's Church, gave the invo- cation. PRESENTATIONS Mayor Teglia read the Resolution aloud and presented it to Mr. Louis A. Matteucci for his ser- vice to the City as a Planning Commissioner. AGENDA REVIEW Interim City Manager Martel stated there were no changes to the Agenda. Mayor Teglia stated that there were a number of people present for discussion of the Senate bills, however, this would not take place until 9:30 p.m. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Mr. Pedro Gonzales, Park & Recreation Commis- sioner, stated that the Council at a meeting in De- cember brought up the subject of explaining the process of government to the residents in the com- munity which was an idea he supported. He stated that he had been involved with Congressman Lantos and Assemblywoman Speier in hispanic organiza- tions to acquaint them with government processes. 6/9/93 Page 1 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN ORAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNITY FORUM CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Motion to confirm expense claims of 6/9/93. ~-O .2. Resolution approving plans and specifications and advertising for bids for the West Orange Library Renovation. ~0~a9 ORAL COMMUNICATIONS He asked if the Council planned to organize such an educational program, and he offered his assis- tance in the event an educational program should go forward. Mayor Teglia stated that the Council had been deep- ly involved in the budget, however, if Mr. Gonzales was patient she would love to meet with him and put effort forward to develop something. Mr. Gonzales suggested invited all Board and Com- missioners to take part in the efforts by speaking on what their particular Board does, and possibly hold- ing meetings in the various neighborhoods. Ms. Marinel Bruemer, 750 Third Lane, stated her concern over a number of incidents of cars being broken into and vandalized which have caused ex- treme expense and burden to her neighborhood. She spoke of many incidents since 1984 where her fami- ly had been the victims because the area was very dark. She stated that she had been in touch with the Engi- neering Dept. for a street light to be erected and had no results. She urged the Council to assist her in this problem because summer was here and it could be a danger to children. Mayor Teglia stated that she was in receipt of Ms. Bruemer's daughter's articulate letter and had for- warded copies to the Director of Public Works and the Police Chief. She stated that she had asked them to get together with the Enforcement Officer to look at the problems, as well as the lighting. COMMUNITY FORUM No one chose to speak. CONSENT CALENDAR Approved in the amount of $1,624,995.25. 6/9/93 Page 2 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN CONSENT CALENDAR !. Resolution - Continued. A RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AUTHORIZING THE WORK AND CALLING BIDS FOR THE WEST ORANGE LIBRARY RENOVATION PROJECT o Resolution approving budget recommendation for the Downtown Commercial Rehabilitation Project..5'-t9 ~t tl A RESOLUTION APPROVING BUDGET RECOM- MENDATION FOR MEXICO TIPICO RESTAU- RANT IN THE DOWNTOWN COMMERCIAL REHABILITATION PROGRAM Motion to approve installation of lights at the Orange Memorial Park Bocci Courts by the S.S.F. Italian American Citizens Club. ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS 5. Informational report on status of Corporation Yard. CONSENT CALENDAR RESOLUTION NO. 63-93 RESOLUTION NO. 64-93 So ordered. M/S Fernekes/Drago - To approve the Consent Calendar. Carried by unanimous voice vote. ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS Director of Public Works Parini gave background information: the Parks and Public Works Corpora- tion Yards are located in Orange Park in two sepa- rate areas which need to be relocated due to the park expansion; Harris and Associates was hired to design a new Corporation Yard on a City owned parcel on North Canal Street; direction by Council was to design a simple no frills yard; there are budget problems in that $3,000,000 is not enough; $4,500,000 would be required to fund a minimum cost yard; fingers property was looked at as an alternate site; Council Subcommittee rejected the alternate site; Mr. Avanessian had designed a Yard for the City in 1985 and was contacted to scale down his plan to the current guidelines of $3,000,000. He suggested alternatives: 1) Continue with Harris and Assoc. and amend the budget to $4,500,000; 2) Cancel the Harris and Assoc. contract and negotiate a contract with Avanessian Assoc. to redesign the previous plan, and deal with a budget amendment; 3) Update the cost estimate to build the plan of 6/9/93 Page 3 AGENDA ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS 5. Informational Report - Continued. 6/9/93 Page 4 ACTION TAKEN ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS Mr. Avanessian, etc. He recommended continuing with Harris and Associates along the current guide- lines. Councilman Yee stated that he was not on the Coun- cil a year ago when the decision was made to con- struct the Yard for $3,000,000, and now the staff was recommending to spend another $1,500,000 to which he was opposed in these economic times. He stated that there was a set of plans five years ago which had been abandoned by staff or Council as too expensive, so they want a plan with no frills that cost $1,500,000 more. He questioned why staff did not look into the original plans, and had instead spent $92,000 to hire another architect and come back and cost the City another $1,500,000. He stated that he saw no reason to compound mistakes, and that should be stopped. He described in detail why the present plans were not compatible with the area. He suggested: stay with the $3,000,000; take the original plan; talk to the architect and see what he can do with it. Mayor Teglia stated in detail that the Council did not have the money to construct the Yard with the original plans even though they were beautiful and a credit to the community had decided to use the money for the park expansion. She stated that the Council had decided to go with plans that were striped down and that was the direction. She stated that they had met with the architect on the original plan and related things to be removed from that plan, but the cost factor was not made known. Councilman Yee felt that the missing step was in not giving the original plan an honest evaluation and spending $92,000 for a new design which was not satisfactory, and the City had to come up with $1,500,000 additional. He stated that they should spend the $1,500,000 and go with the original plan. Discussion followed: that original architect had not been asked to think through the cost of scaling down AGENDA ACTION TAKEN ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS 5. Informational Report - Continued. LEGISLATIVE BUSINESS Motion to waive reading and introduce an ordinance on the Stormwater Management Program. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO AMENDING CHAP- TER 14.04 OF THE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE IMPOSI- TION OF A STORM WATER CHARGE REDEVELOPMENT MEETING RECONVENED Joint Public Hearing - with City Council on the pro- posed El Camino Corridor Redevelopment Plan; the related General Plan Amendment; Public Hearing opened on 5/26/93 and continued. 179 ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS his plan; the original architect should be asked tO rethink his plan; to agendize it for the next meet- ing with a cost factor from the original architect and find out how long it would take to rework the plan with drawings to go forward with a $3,000,000 project; cancel the Harris contract; the original architect not being asked to bid; this could be another Blandings house; etc. Mayor Teglia stated that the item would be contin- ued. LEGISLATIVE BUSINESS City Clerk Battaya read the title of the ordinance in its entirety. Director of Public Works Parini presented the staff report and stated he would come back at a later meeting to establish charges. Councilman Yee stated that he had abstained at the last meeting on this item because of a Westborough Water District utility bill for storm water taxes, however Council had nixed that so he could now vote. Councilman Drago stated that he had voiced his objections on additional fees, and would voice his open opposition at a later time. M/S Yee/Drago - To waive reading and introduce the ordinance. Carried by unanimous voice vote. Mayor Teglia reconvened the Redevelopment Agen- cy meeting at 9:00 p.m. 6/9/93 Page 5 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN PUBLIC HEARINGS Joint Public Hearing - with Redevelopment Agency on the El Camino Corridor Redevelopment Plan and General Plan Amendment, Final Environmental Im- pact Report and adopt Mitigation Monitoring Pro- gram, and resolution adopting General Plan Amendment GP-93-47; Public Hearing opened on 5/26/93; close Public Hearing; adjourn Redevelop- ment Agency meeting; and adopt resolutions 7a) and a) Resolution certifying the Final Environmental Impact Report for the El Camino Corridor Project and adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program. b) A RESOLUTION CERTIFYING REVIEW AND CONSIDERATION OF THE ENVIRONMEN- TAL IMPACT REPORT ON THE EL CAMINO CORRIDOR REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND THE AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO GENERAL PLAN, MAKING FINDINGS REQUIRED BY THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, AND STATING OVERRIDING CONSID- ERATIONS IN THE APPROVAL AND ADOP- TION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT Resolution adopting General Plan Amendment GP-93-47. A RESOLUTION ADOPTING AN AMEND- MENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN GP-93-47 PUBLIC HEARINGS Councilman Penna left the podium at 9:01 p.m. Mayor Teglia stated that she would chair the con- tinued Public Hearing, however both she and Coun- cilman Penna had conflicts of interest and would not take part in the vote on this item. She stated that both Bodies would consider testimony, howev- er, no action would be taken on the Plan tonight, the Hearing would be closed and action would be taken on the two resolutions. Director of Economic & Community Development Solomon explained the revision to the Plan in the Council packet was an updated land use circulation map, however, this would not be acted upon to night. He stated that the staff and Planning Commission recommended that Council adopt the resolution certifying the EIR, and adopt the resolution on General Plan Amendment GP-93-47. He stated that Mr. Wetmore would gave a brief slide presentation on kinds of development if BART went at grade. Mr. Bob Wetmore presented a slide presentation to illustrate graphically different housing types, and how they are represented in different densities throughout the bay area related to BART. Ms. Darlene Leveroni, 331 Heather Way, asked that her letter dated 6/2/93 be made a part of the public record which requests a parking provision be in effect as an integral part of the Redevelopment Project due to the parking and traffic obstacles that Sunshine Gardens will be encountering with the origination of BART. She requested BART have in place a permit parking program at no or minimal charge to the residents in this area. Mayor Teglia stated that the letter would be incor- porated into the record. Mr. Lou Dell'Angela, 460 Gardenside Ave., stated that Mr. Wetmore did people a favor tonight in showing the slides of the massing of buildings at 33 units per acre in some cases - which is scary. He questioned if the Council was serious about having 50 units per acre in density because it would 6/9/93 Page 6 June 2, 1993 City of South San Francisco City Hall 400 Grand Avenue South San Francisco, CA 94080 Dear Mayor Teglia and Honorable Councilmembers: We respectfully request this letter become part of the "El Camino Corridor Redevelopment Project", as well as part of the public record. The undersigned are long standing members of the city of South San Francisco, and of the "Sunshine Gardens" community in particular. As residents of this community, we are extremely concerned about the BART "Bay Area Rapid Transit" project and the potential impact it could have on the "Sunshine Gardens" area. The traffic and parking situation in the "Gardens" is now manageable..o To maintain the manageability, along with the safety and stability of the community, the Sunshine Gardens School, Parkway, Mater Dolorosa, and E1 Camino High; we are requesting a Parking Provision be in effect as an integral part of the Redevelopment Project. This provision will hopefully minimize many of the parking and traffic obstacles that "Sunshine Gardens" will be encountering with the origination Of BART. As concerned citizens who will be impacted, we request BART have in place a "Permit Parking Program" at no or minimal charge to the residents in our area. Such a program was effectively initiated at the Daly City Bart station with signs stating "No Parking 7-10 AM, except vehicles with permits". This was a solid and workable solution for the residents within walking distance of the Daly City Bart station. Again, we request this provision be in effect prior to the initial building of the South San Francisco Bart station. Respectfully submitted, Signature {J%-,~"~ ~,~-~3./~' Address .'~-~/ ~'~f'~/'~' ~.>'.ty *Registered Voter *Name ~-~w/~ ~. Signature~/~w~ ~' Address ~ ~'~ ~ Continued on Page 2 6/9/93 Pa.ge 6a Page 2 Signature fL. Signatnr~e Address Continued Page 3 6/9/93 Page 6b -- 183 Page 3 Signature Address Name 0 ~ ~.~. Signature Name Signature Address Name Signature Address Continued Page 4 6/9/93 Page 6c Page 4 Signature Name Signature Addr~s~ Name Signature Address Name signature Address Name Signature Address Name Signature Address Name Signature Address 6/9/93 Paqe 6d 185 6/9/93 Page 6e AGENDA PUBLIC HEARINGS 7. Joint Public Hearing - Continued. 6/9/93 Page 7 ACTION TAKEN .. PUBLIC HEARINGS cause traffic problems that would far outweigh any benefits other than what you get out of a subway. He stated that staff had put together Attachment A after his questions, which he did not feel answered his questions. He related: Item 4 did not make any sense; Item 6 deals with the high density question he had posed. He questioned why there was to be high density along El Camino with BART and a subway - he felt it was a bad idea with BART - because a subway would not affect the residents. He spoke of the answers to questions he had posed: there were plans to make McLellan's property high density, yet there were slope problems on the land and it would have to be graded severely otherwise the people in Burl Buri would be affected; Item 18 - suppose the City did not raise the $23,000,000 to put in a subway for BART, what happens then; what, were the obligations to high density; the EIR did not address traffic or pedestrian safety or the school issues, as well as, the parking in the existing neighborhood; BART was causing the problem and it was up to them to mitigate the environment they will cause. He asked the Council to reject density of 30 units to the acre, because to double the density was irre- sponsible. He stated that the Council had started the project under different assumptions and they should take a new approach. Mr. Gene Mullin, 229 Alta Loma Dr., stated that he was speaking for the Project even though earlier his concerns had dealt with the revenue issue. He asked on behalf of the Classroom Speakers Assoc. for Council approve staff's decision by which there will be money for capital improvement costs as a result of the Plan for the School District. He stated that the Agency had rejected that item and he approved. He stated he strongly recommended, on behalf of the teachers whose income falls below in terms of the housing for the redevelopment area, any plan put into effect will provide the schools the capital im- provements for the additional number of students. He stated that they were concerned that general AGENDA PUBLIC HEARINGS 7. Joint Public Hearing - Continued. RECESS: ECALL TO ORDER: 6/9/93 Page 8 ACTION TAKEN .. 167 PUBLIC HEARINGS fund revenues will have to be taken and will ad- versely impact and adversely affect the School Dis- trict. He stated that he was speaking in favor to insure that the negotiations that are going to take place guarantee adequate funding so that our general fund is used for salaries and is not impacted to accom- modate additional students. He stated that he assumed there was going to be a buffer zone for any development that takes place on the McLellan property and the El Camino Corridor, and assumed there was no egress into the residential areas. Mayor Teglia asked staff to respond to comments made. The Council and Agency recessed the meeting at 9:50 p.m. to allow time for staff to be able to re- spond to comments. Mayor Teglia recalled the meeting to order at 9:55 p.m., all Council was present. Discussion followed: staff agreed there could be impacts on surrounding areas and looked for BART to address those and the EIR on the alignment; they had addressed grading on the McLellan property, densities, a buffer zone, and access; planned to rely on the natural slope with 25 units per acre; there is a gradient of density moving away from the resi- dential areas; access will be limited solely to El Camino and not through the adjourning neighbor- hoods; EIR responds to traffic and pedestrian safety and the schools; the redevelopment area was de- signed to generate sufficient tax to make contribu- tions for the BART subway; payments that would be made to BART would be negotiated and would be based on the tax generated from the Project; terms of the agreement were yet to be negotiated with BART; it was understood that if the City is unable to reach an agreement they had the option to terminate the Plan and not go forward, etc. Mayor Teglia closed the Public Hearing. AGENDA ACTION TAKEN 1BB, PUBLIC HEARINGS Z. Joint Public Hearing - Continued. 6/9/93 Page 9 PUBLIC HEARINGS Discussion followed: the buffer zone; that had been an issue for the Committee; that the density be compatible with the neighborhood and the density would increase as the Project moves to El Camino with larger buildings; a surplus School District property that the City proposes to buy will be used as a parking buffer; whether the City could scale down the density and still make the fiscal obligations for the undergrounding of the station; without the number of units and density proposed overall there was no leeway to do all the items included in the BART and Colma Creek and a $9,000,000 contin- gency; the density going from 20 to 50 units to the acre; 1,200 units were permitted under the current zoning for the build out; McLellan was currently zoned for 8 units to the acre and 25 were proposed on the southwestern site; if the McLellan property was annexed, regardless of the Redevelopment Plan, would staff maintain the 8 units per acre or look at increased density; that was a possibility, however, the General Plan says 8 units; proposed densities for the Corridor; number of students the redevelopment would produce; the over all number was 3,000 units or 2,000 units but because of the blighting factors it will not develop; the School District would re- ceive the additional property tax, however, the amount of State revenue would be removed; the additional property tax would be the offset; action had to be taken to certify the EIR and adopt the General Plan Amendment; Council would take ac- tion at he next meeting on adopting the Plan itself; these two items could be held over with action taken at the next meeting, and then introduce the ordi- nance, however, the Counsel preferred action be taken tonight; whether the Council had any stan- dards to control the type of development; General Plan has a specific policy to adopt such guidelines, and staff felt there was sufficient time to develop the guidelines; that future Councils should be the ultimate decision makers on developments; that the Council could be the Body to approve any project and direct staff to amend the General Plan to that effect; Council had acted as the Planning Commis- sion for Shearwater; this was a redevelopment district and projects are approved by the Redevelopment Agency; the EIR did include some guidelines, so there are parameters that conform to the concerns about high density housing; the existing zoning stays in place until there is an AGENDA ACTION TAKEN PUBLIC HEARINGS Joint Public Hearing - Continued. ADJOURNMENT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING: Councilman Penna Returned to the Podium: Public Hearing - Zoning Amendment to modify SSFMC Section 20.84.070(a) to allow flexibility in parking and loading requirements for commercial and industrial planned unit developments - ZA-92-80 Century Plaza; Conduct Public Hearing; Motion to uphold the recommendation of the Planning Commis- sion to deny ZA-92-80. ,5'-0~c/ PUBLIC HEARINGS agreement with BART and there is a demonstration that they have the funds; Vice Mayor Fernekes supported BART being underground, as well as setting standards as Councilman Yee suggested, etc. M/S Yee/Fernekes - To adopt the Resolution certify- ing the EIR. RESOLUTION NO. 65-93 Carried by majority roll call vote, Councilman Penna and Mayor Teglia abstained. M/S Fernekes/Yee - To adopt the resolution on General Plan Amendment GP-93-47. RESOLUTION NO. 66-93 Carried by majority roll call vote, Councilman Penna and Mayor Teglia abstained. M/S Drago/Fernekes - To adjourn the Redevelop- ment Agency Meeting. Carried by unanimous voice vote. Time of adjournment was 10:34 p.m. Councilman Penna returned to the podium at 10:35 p.m. Mayor Teglia opened the Public Hearing. Interim Director of Economic & Community Devel- opment Solomon presented the staff report. George Corey, Esq., 700 E1 Camino Real, Millbrae, stated that he was representing Syufy Ent. and was in favor of the ordinance. He stated the Company paid $15,000 for a parking study and made an appli- cation to use the Pay'N'Pak lot for parking, because of restrictions the planning staff recommended that we withdraw the application and seek to have an ordinance adopted by the City. He continued, under which we would have the ability to go back and make application. He stated that the problem was the PD zoning and 6/9/93 Page 10 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN PUBLIC HEARINGS Public Hearing - Continued. 6/9/93 Page 11 190 PUBLIC HEARINGS there were letters from Brentwood Holding Co. and the Price Club concurring with their request to give more flexibility to modify a property's parking requirements based upon specific parking needs. He stated there were different conditions when the use permit was approved, however, they could not make a good case before the Planning Commission because they said it was a Citywide application. He urged the Council to pass an enabling ordinance to give the planning staff the latitude and them the opportunity to make application to use the Pay'N'Pak property. He stated that the City could hire a traffic consultant and the applicant would pay the fee. Mayor Teglia stated there were also letters from John Benetti, Brentwood Holding Co. and Joseph Haggarty in support of the ordinance and they should be incorporated into the record. Mr. Edward Kitts, Leasing Agent, stated that he represented the owners of the "Pay'N'Pak building and had been trying to lease the building for one year with no less than ten offers. He stated the problem was no facility to apply for a variance of change in the parking requirements the City has in effect on the property. He stated the current offer being considered was a national firm with sales in excess of $400,000,000 a year that could bring revenues to the City of $1,100,000 a year. He stated the City had to have flexibility in order to attract major retailers so they could make application for a change in the ordi- nance. Mayor Teglia closed the Public Hearing. Councilman Yee related: he recognized that the Pay'N'Pak site had a parking problem and its use permit closed operations at 7:00 p.m.; no one want- ed to lease the site because of the condition; chang- ing the parking and the hours of business; sugges- tion to change the parking and hours of business; how could staff mix TSM with commercial parking and tell people the hours when they can shop; Council could change the conditions of the use 170 SOUTH SPRUCE AVENUE - SUITE 125 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94080 TELEPHONES: (415) 583-2164 OR (415) 583-2165 FAX: (415) 583-5821 June 7, 1993 City Council % City Clerk City of South San Francisco 400 Grand Avenue South San Francisco, CA 94080 Subject: South San Francisco Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment (Section 20.84.070 (a)) Dear Council Members: I have taken the opportunity to recently review the proposed South San Francisco Zoning Ordinance Text Am4ndment (Section 20.84.070 (a) and would encourage the City to adopt the amendment. The proposed ordinance, if adopted, would allow the City Planning Department more flexibility to modify a property's parking require- ments based upon their specific parking needs and after a parking study has been prepared for the City Planning Department. Sincerely, /~'John Benetti BRENTWOOD HOLDING COMPANY 170 So. Spruce Avenue, Suite South San Francisco, CA 94080 125 6/9/93 Page lla 6,1'95:E;149E, 4 THE F'~ IEE THE PRICE COMPANY PRICE CLUB®. P.O. BOX 85466 · SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92186-5466 ~ (619) ,5~1-4600 June 7, 1993 RE: City Council c/o City Clerk City of South San Francisco 400 Grand Avenue South San Francisco, CA 94080 ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENT - PARKING Dear Mayor/City Council: The Price Club supports the proposed changes to $SFMC Section 20.84.070(a) to allow flexibility in the parking requirements. During the last year the Price Club has commissioned numerous parking and traffic studies to determine what adequate parking is for a Price Club. The results of the studies indicate the parking requirements vary significantly based on location and sales, but in al! cases the parking demand was lower than what was provided and in most cases lower than IT£/code requirements. That's not to say that prime spaces closest to the front door were not always at a premium. I encourage you to change the code to allow traffic studies to determine the appropriate parking requirement. Sincerely, Lois Miller Vice President of Planning 6/9/93 Page 11b ~OUT~ SAN F~CZSCO ~ 940~0 ' ' 93 pear Mayor Teglia and City ?ouncil~. My wife and ! are the owner~ of those three b~ildin~s designated a~ 3500-3560 Callan Boulevard, South Sa~ Francisco. The three the uses in the buildings have changed dramatically. through 9.oity application to put a d~fferent use fn that building. The only pro=ese open to us was the variance which was extremely difficult t~ juuCi£¥ b~cause u£ t~. limitations in the Sou~ S~ Fr~oisoo situation different ~ay'~en 1% was when the ~{ldlngw were ~i~t in the 1970e. Zt would be useful ~nd ~n~flcial if we We are now'limited to'using '~e nhar~d parking a~angem~t a~ though we had a savings a~ ~n in one of ~e ~ildings Tact. that business no lo~e~ occupies t~a premises ~t all. believe we and the City wo~ld benefit from an o~dinance mllowi~ us to mak. application under ~e conditions which presently parking situation. , : .~. We en~or~e this ordinanoe .£or .ourselves and for othe~ ~rw~u 0£ the City who have similar ', ..~ . ,. ',.: . ' .a ,.' . . ,' 3500 Callan ~lvd , , .:.. , '~:'. ~ ., . . -. ' k '...".~':' ,." .'. ,.-: .......... AGENDA ACTION TAKEN PUBLIC HEARINGS 3. Public Hearing - Continued. 6/9/93 Page 12 194 PUBLIC HEARINGS permit; a consultant was needed to make this plan work or not work. Mayor Teglia remembered giving the Planning Commission some latitude in cases where the use requires more parking, however, she wanted some- one to monitor the situation because there were always major problems with the impacts. She related: the owner of all the property had an applicant for retail use on a portion of the property; the theater and the retail use were on separate par- cels with a real need for parking; a reciprocal park- ing agreement was worked out; the lot on El Camino which the City told them to look at to sup- port the use on that property had not been consid- ered; with this application, if the City will consider it, the owner is willing to dedicate that to parking; she had not understood why the retailer at that time wanted to close the doors at 7:00 p.m.; she did not understand this thing with the Price Club because they had come in with a deal to acquire land for parking and had said they could demonstrate an increase at the cash register for each parking place, and whey they would now want flexibility towards that - she did not know; she was concerned that this not become a mechanism to eliminate what the City needed in parking, etc. Councilman Drago stated this ordinance only provid- ed the mechanism to pursue their case in parking requirements and it still falls back on an enabling ordinance to put a condition for it to come back to Council, and it still would have to be accepted on some sort of documentation first at the planning level. He stated Item No. 6 tonight was an enabling ordi- nance allowing staff to go out and come back with certain conditions on fees and the like, and he had said he may want to vote against whatever they come up with at the time. He stated this does the same thing - when the project comes before the Commission or Council the opportunity is still there to deny it. He stated that in looking at the report, out of the eight cities surveyed, six offer some type of flexibil- ity and one was contemplating such an ordinance - AGENDA ACTION TAKEN PUBLIC HEARINGS Public Hearing - Continued. Public Hearing - To set 1993/94 Assessments for West Park 1 & 2 Parks and Parkways Maintenance District; Conduct Public Hearing. ._ff ~ 9, ~' 195 PUBLIC HEARINGS which is seven out of eight. He stated they were in competition with other cities, and maybe with anoth- er piece of property. It may not solve the entire problem, but reduce what we have now by being willing to dedicate the acreage along El Camino. He stated that if this mechanism was not in place the Planning Commission will never know if it will work, and felt these should be judged on their indi- vidual merits, etc. MIS Drago/Fernekes - To approve the amendment and direct staff to come back with an ordinance and Negative Declaration on ZA-92-80 at the next meet- ing. Carried by majority roll call vote, Councilman Yee abstained. City Clerk Battaya stated protest letters were re- ceived from Rosalie Durant, dated 5121193, and Edwin L. Cassaday, Jr., dated 5/18/93. Mayor Teglia stated she had a letter from Donna Flanagan expressing concerns of Braewood, and proceeded to open the Public Hearing. Dir. of Recreation & Community Services Nagel stated this was the first of two required Public Hear- ings to propose 1993-94 assessments, as well as the next two items that were assessment districts. He stated this was an assessment district established back in July 1991 to address the much needed capi- tal improvements and maintenance concerns on an annual basis. He related: assessment put in place the first year was $58.00 per unit per parcel; current year was reduced to $39.00 largely due to a lower mainte- nance cost than anticipated when the district was established; delays in moving on the project; had hired a consultant for the design and worked closely with the public and Council Subcommittee; had written surveys; thereafter the renovations were prioritized and included concrete walkways, some stairs and railing, addressed drainage and erosion concerns, hazardous irrigation was to be replaced and renovated, turf and planting renovation, trees, lighting would also be replaced. 6/9/93 Page 13 AGENDA A~TION TAKEN PUBLIC HEARINGS ). Public Hearing - Continued. 6/9/93 Page 14 ' 96 PUBLIC HEARINGS He stated the residents had wanted additional work done and wanted to have the assessment modestly raised to remove the play equipment and cover the area with plant material. He continued, three play areas will be renovated, as well as improvements to the park on Carter Drive. He stated the changes would increase the assessment by $15.00 per parcel per year. He stated that noticing had been done on the Public Hearing to all property owners and, in two weeks, staff would ask the Council to take final action on the engineer's report for $54.00 per unit per parcel being proposed for 1993-94. He stated the City would issue bonds for these three projects - this one, West Park 3 and Willow Gar- dens, not to exceed $905,000. He stated the num- bers in the engineer's report had changed and will be corrected in the report and the amount of bonds for West Park 1 and 2 would be $262,765, West Park 3 would be $333,745. He stated this would not change the assessments nor the project. He stated some folks were part of litigation with residual dollars left over wherein the Judge said those dollars should be a direct benefit for those properties included in the litigation. So, of the 747 units in West Park 1 and 2, 140 property owners will not be paying an assessment this year, as well as throughout the eight year assessment period. Mayor Teglia asked that the ten questions in Ms. Flanagan's letter be responded to by staff in writing and that anyone else with questions should contact Mr. Nagel. Ms. Flanagan stated she had been a part of this process and had filed a letter of protest in 1993 and in 1992, as well as having responded to the written survey. She stated she wanted her list of concerns answered for the Braewood Homeowners Assn., of which she was President. She stated the Assn. represented 162 units and felt this was an end run around to Proposition 13 and felt they would not get an increase in services because they have seen noth- ing but deterioration and neglect in West Park 1 and 2 with a steady decline in service. AGENDA ACTION TAKEN PUBLIC HEARING ). Public Hearing - Continued. 6/9/93 Page 15 197 PUBLIC HEARING She stated that when Cagwin & Dorward were there they saw some hope as they came to their annual meeting, however, Environmental Care was not doing the job. She continued relating her concerns: at present there were some very serious safety and liability issues; the common areas do not have any snail bait and the snails come over to their property which does have snail bait; their Assn. dues are always being raised to take care of the common areas neglected by the City in their plantings and ground coverings over the past 17 years; a hazard to children was a row of tree stumps as they scrambled over 10-12' brick walls; ground cover no longer exists in many areas; children fall on unusable stairs; liability and safety hazards should have been addressed all along; one whole wall had collapsed in Carter Park; the area was a total disgrace and they did not feel that a $54.00 assessment is the way to go and the budget of existing monies should be used fairly to help Westborough; in hearing tonight of money spent on El Camino Corridor and the Corpo- ration Yard, she wondered if there wasn't money that could have been spent on West Park 1 and 2 common greens. She stated the Manor Assn. Manager was here tonight but had to leave due to the hour, and won- dered if areas east of them had to pay this $54.00. Mayor Teglia closed the Public Hearing and told Ms. Flanagan she would receive a letter responding to her concerns. Discussion followed: Ms. Flanagan had attended meetings on this subject; common greens were the responsibility of the homeowners; assessment funds were used to take care of the common greens, be- cause when the area was developed an assessment district was established to take care of the common greens; when Proposition 13 came in the assessment tax was buried in the property tax bill; there were not enough funds over the years to maintain the greens and the area deteriorated; private mainte- nance crews are hired to maintain the areas; City could not increase the assessment to maintain the greens; City had to wait ten years until a lot of Court cases were settled, so it was not neglected as a point of malice but due to a lack of funds; a major increase would be seen in maintenance; City was AGENDA ACTION TAKEN 198 PUBLIC HEARINGS }. Public Hearing - Continued. 10. Public Hearing - To set 1993/94 Assessments for West Park 3 Parks and Parkways Maintenance Dis- trict; Conduct Public Hearing. ~q' ~> 2.~7' PUBLIC HEARINGS concerned about major liability up there and now they had a vehicle; Ms. Flanagan wanted to see in writing that the common greens were the responsi- bility of the property owners because they had docu- mentation dating back many years on promises made by the City, and she had written letters to Quentin Kopp and the City on her concerns, etc. City Clerk Battaya stated that she had received a protest letter from Wanda Houser dated 5/27/93. Mayor Teglia opened the Public Hearing. Dir. of Recreation and Community Services Nagel related: the assessment would be $60.00 per parcel; public hearings had been held for the residents input; residents had agreed to a higher assessment of $15.00 per year; a description of the improve- ments; some residents were party to litigation and would pay nothing towards the eight year assessment unless maintenance costs rose over the eight year period, in which case there would be public hear- ings. Ms. Millie Burg, 3845 Radburn Dr., stated she was President of Westborough Homeowners Group//6, who had the same concerns as West Park 1 & 2. She stated that she had been a resident for 19 years and no improvements had been made to the area - even though she had attended all meetings on the subject. She stated this assessment was 345 over last year's assessment, which was an extremely high rate of increase at this point considering the economic facet that exists here that people are struggling through. She stated there was less opposition last year be- cause there was a reduction of $I01.00 to $45.00 annually. She stated in her 19 years of residency there has not been anything beneficial to the common greens, other than grass and leaf cuttings. She stated since it was an extensive liability she felt the common greens should be deeded back. She said the people do maintain their own backyards. If deeded back the property would become the individ- ual homeowner's responsibility and not be open to 6/9/93 Page 16 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN PUBLIC HEARINGS 0. Public Hearing - Continued. 11. Public Hearing - To set 1993/94 Assessments for Willow Gardens Parks and Parkways Maintenance District; Conduct Public Hearing. ~ ~.~'~ 199 PUBLIC HEARINGS free public use. She also felt that this was circumventing Proposition 13. These funds are for improvements that have not been made, yet have been collected for the past two years. It would behoove them to set a petition for- ward to initiate litigation because this represented monies to the City's General Fund. Mayor Teglia stated that was not true. They were not in violation because the funds were used only for that area. Ms. Burg stated that she wanted each Homeowners Assn. to receive an accounting of all monies spent there since the assessment was made in 1991 and let her know whether their common greens could be closed to the public and taken over by the Manor Assn. Mayor Teglia stated that the issue of being closed to the public had been raised at meetings and was rejected by the property owners attending the meet- ings. She was not cognizant of whether that could be done. Discussion followed: what the improvements ad- dressed; Ms. Burg complimented Councilman Yee for not wanting to waste money on studies; had been delays, but finally ready to go to bid, etc. Mayor Teglia closed the Public Hearing. Councilman Drago suggested sending a very concise letter to Mr. Cassaday and every Homeowners Assn. with a complete history of the assessment district, with a copy of a tax bill for 1975. Dir. of Recreation and Community Services Nagel stated that the project would be complete in No- vember. City Clerk Battaya stated she had received a protest letter tonight from Richard Lions, dated 6/8/93. Mayor Teglia opened the Public Hearing. Dir. of Recreation and Community Services Nagel gave a brief staff report. 6/9/93 Page 17 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Public Hearing - Continued. ITEMS FROM COUNCIL 12. Discussion of SB245 and SB629 at the request of Councilman Drago. .5'15.5 ?.00 PUBLIC HEARINGS Mayor Teglia closed the Public Hearing. ITEMS FROM COUNCIL Councilman Drago stated that this was put on the agenda at the request of a resident at the last meet- ing to discuss this legislation that pertains to our City. He stated that both sides of the issue tonight were present to debate the issues of traffic and noise. Ms. Denise LaPointe, Senator Kopp's office, stated SB245 deals with the Congestion Management Plan, which is on behalf of C/CAG, and would be covered by Belmont Councilman Gary Orton at the request of Senator Kopp. She stated Millbrae Councilman Frank Cannizaro would cover SB629. Belmont Councilman Orton stated Council was aware that C/CAG was sponsoring SB245 and, during negotiations with the airport, it was noticed that SB226 had no sanctions in it. He stated that C/CAG had met and suggested to the Congestion Management Air Quality Committee of C/CAG to discuss certain language for Senator Kopp's Bill 245. After much discussion arrived at the conclu- sion that SF Airport become part of the congestion management process in San Mateo County, which they had been left out of. He stated he had testified twice before the Senate Transportation Committee and Senate Appropriations Committee and could share some of the concerns of the Senators. He related: one had asked if LA International Airport wanted to expand would they be subject to the Con- gestion Management Agency of Los Angeles Coun- ty; the answer was yes; would SF International Airport be subject to the Congestion Management Agency in San Mateo County; the answer was no, they would not without legislation; this is intended to rectify that situation and not only make them a part of the process but have sanctions placed against them comparable to the sanctions placed against cities if there is a deficiency which they failed to mitigate; they felt it was fair and the MOU did not cover this. He stated that in negotiating the MOU a number of cities said they did not want to be limited in matters of concern such as this and the Airport's Commis- 6/9/93 Page 18 AGENDA ITEMS FROM COUNCIL 2. Discussion- Continued. 6/9/93 Page 19 ACTION TAKEN .. ITEMS FROM COUNCIL sion had some clarification and one was that the cities would be free to redress from the legislature - which they believed they were doing with this. He stated the Bill had passed through the Senate and was now in the Assembly and, after review, it was hoped Assemblywoman Speier would carry the Bill in the Assembly. He stated that C/CAG, at it's meeting, had unani- mously supported the provisions of SB245 as writ- ten. He stated there had been opposition from organized labor when it was first written and they took the concerns and modified the language and requested that not only Senator Kopp but the entire delegation of representatives from San Mateo County carry that legislation. Millbrae Councilman Canizzaro stated they had been working for several years with Senator Kopp to try to resolve the noise and insulation problems relative to the existing noise generated by the Airport. He stated that the recent experience with the Airport had been that in order for them to discharge any funds to help mitigate noise due to existing opera- tions it usually meant that they had to bargain away some very basic rights. He continued, the City felt they should not bargain away and alternatively felt that the Airport should step up to the line and help resolve this noise insulation program. He stated the program had started back in 1983 and in the ten years that funding has been available from the Federal Government there has only been about 500 homes in the area insulated out of a global amount of about 10,000+ homes. He stated there was concern that with the current pace of insulation there will be a very long time before funding is available for all the homes. He stated in the most recent episode the Airport offered to make funding available to those cities that have chosen to agree to their master expansion. He stated that Millbrae felt the expansion plan is really a separate issue from current noise problems and any funding that the airport would give under their proposal would require a City to approve their master plan regardless of the impacts. He stated AGENDA ACTION TAKEN ...LTEMS FROM COUNCIL 2. Discussion - Continued. 6/9/93 Page 20 . 2,02 ITEMS FROM COUNCIL that they felt there was a conflict between two local agencies, the City and County of San Francisco, through their airport, and the City of Millbrae and other cities, and felt it was an appropriate subject for a resolution of the differences at the State level. He continued, as a result Senator Kopp agreed to that and sponsored this legislation that would make it mandatory for the Airport to spend a minimum of $4,000,000 a year and more if necessary to com- plete the insulation in the whole area based upon the present map delineating the 65 CNEL area and have that completed by the year 2000. He stated that was a very different provision than was in the MOU which provides for those cities that have agreed to the expansion plan. The airport will provide up to $120,000,000 in funds from whatever source - not necessarily out of their money and there is no minimum. He stated this Bill guarantees the cities funding infusion from the Airport and assures that we could address all the noise insulation problems in the area by the year 2000. Mr. Lou Turpin, SF International Airport Director, stated that about the time he become Airport Direc- tor in 1981 the City of San Francisco went to Sacra- mento and got a Bill passed that says you can't sue the airport for noise. He continued, the County of San Mateo became extremely upset and the people were very concerned that the City of San Francisco would unilaterally go for it and seek legislation that would impact the County. He stated the legislation had a two year time frame and, at the end of that time frame, there was a backlash from that action by the City and County of San Francisco and a number of lawsuits were filed by individual homeowners. He related history on the Bill: in 1990 received a letter from Senator Kopp asking him to meet with representatives of the Kohn Co., who desired to build housing east of 101; wrote back he would be happy to do that but there was a problem; the Air- port had a three pronged strategy dealing with noise - to have a most aggressive regulation for ~ENDA ._LTEMS FROM COUNCIL 2. Discussion- Continued. 6/9/93 Page 21 ACTION TAKEN . 203 ITEMS FROM COUNCIL dealing with noise by having the quietest airplanes, not permitting houses under a flight path (which was litigated in the City in 1985) and providing insula- tion for homes; 1,685 homes scheduled to be insu- lated; $25,000 allocated and only $5,000,000 has been spent; rate of spending by communities is a function of individual programs and their ability to insulate homes; next came AB2405 and this Council was advised in 1990 that that Bill was drafted on behalf of the developer and did not survive the Assembly; the following year SB2~6 was formulated as a noise bill and did not have sufficient support in the assembly to pass out of the Assembly and turned into a two year bill; it was gutted in 1991 and devel- oped into two pieces - a congestion management piece and a noise piece that was vetoed by the Gov- ernor last November; this year the bill was split into two bills, essentially the same as the one vetoed by the Governor. He related the following on SB629: it was unneces- sary and redundant to the local efforts that have been accomplished; it singles out SFIA as the only airport in the State that must provide the type of funding that is called for in the Bill - as a State mandated requirement; SFIA has approximately 4,500 homes in the noise impacted areas in the State; assuming that by the year 2000, with the noisy airplanes phased out, we will have fewer than 1,000 homes in the noise impacted areas in the State; Los Angeles Airport will have in the year 2000 51,000 noise impacted homes according to State definition; so, why is San Francisco so unique; why doesn't this Bill apply to Los Angeles or other airports - because a Bill of this nature would not survive in the State Capital; the Bill as constructed will not do what they are telling you it will do; there are not 10,000 homes in the 65 CNEL - there are fewer than 5,000 homes; the State cannot mandate by law insulation outside the current 65CNEL noise impact boundary, etc. He explained how funds were allocated: MOU with individual contract arrangement with the Airport; City & County of San Francisco guarantees that they will insulate every home currently impacted or any home impacted from 1983 to the current date; this legislation will never affect the MOU; the State has indicated that they cannot mandate SFIA to AGENDA ACTION TAKEN ITEMS FROM COUNCIL 2. Discussion - Continued. 6/9/93 Page 22 Z04 ITEMS FROM COUNCIL insulate outside the current 65 CNEL noise impact boundaries; funds are available from the Federal Government to a larger area than the 1983 contour map because the Airport purposely has not changed their map to assure that they could allow for the maximum amount of Federal money to float a local community; as the result of a lawsuit in St. Louis, the FAA told him they may require as of September 30th that all airports in the country file a new map, which would seriously raise questions about the ability to fund Federally outside current 65 CNEL impact boundaries. He stated we do have a MOU and Mr. Canizzaro was commenting on the situation in Millbrae, and that MOU has been offered to every city on the Peninsula. He stated the MOU was an agreement to work with the Airport to solve noise and traffic problems and in exchange for that we are prepared to make certain financial commitments. He stated that MOU had been offered to Millbrae and they had elected not to sign it and have applied directly for ~ Federal grants and have received a considerable amount in Federal grants at this time. He stated the Airport has always had two plans, one being the MOU program - which is a full guaranty of funding, and the other is the Federal program - which is an 80-20% program. He stated the 20% has always been a discretionary amount based on SFIA's budgetary constraints. He stated that an allegation has been made from Millbrae, that that is not discretionary. He continued, Millbrae is saying the Airport Commission is obligated by law to pay that 20% and the Commission disputes that conten- tion and it is now involved in a legal dispute and the Airport Commission has placed a moratorium on contributions until the legal matter is cleared. He related the following with respect to SB245: the Bill violates Federal law; if the Bill is passed it would force them to chose to follow State law and forego Federal grants in the future or to follow Federal law and violate State law; it requires the Airport spend money off Airport, which they have said repeatedly they are not permitted to do; that was why, based on the MOU, they had put $120,000,000 in the MOU for transportation pro- jects - on Airport unless the Airport is permitted AGENDA ACTION TAKEN ITEMS FROM COUNCIL 2. Discussion - Continued. 6/9/93 Page 23 ITEMS FROM COUNCIL legally to spend money off Airport; the concept was that if the Airport spends $120,000 on Airport, for example, for a BART inter-module station at the Airport, that would free up that money that might be spend by Samtrans, Caltrans or other agencies and the money could be made available for local com- munities; SB245 holds SFIA to a higher standard than any community on the Peninsula - it makes SFIA the "golden goose" and destroys any incentive at all for local communities in this County to ad- dress traffic problems, etc. He continued, SFIA is less than 12 % of traffic southbound on 101 on a 250,000 vehicle per day average and less than 13% of traffic northbound on 101; will stand up and proportionally take responsi- bility of traffic impacts they create, etc. He stated they had negotiated an MOU - it was not perfect, but it contains $250,000,000 that is legflly binding on the Airport Commission. Mr. Lou Dell'Angela, 460 Gardenside, SSF, stated he was President of Coalition of Airport Neighbors and very, very disappointed that this important issue was being heard at midnight when people had al- ready left due to the late hour. He stated that a month ago he asked Council to support these two bills, which was neither complicated or even de- manding and protected the people in this County. He stated that it protects the cities in terms of traffic and guarantees that everyone who is impacted by airport noise is going to have their home insulated in a timely manner. He stated that Mr. Turpen paints a good picture, yet the agreement says up to $120,000,000 and does not say $120,000,000, which he felt was an illusion and could be argued by attorneys. He stated Senator Kopp's bill stipulates a guaranty for the people that money shall be made available to insulate all homes by the year 2000 and, if the FAA cannot come up with these funds, the Airport shall. He stated that with the MOU there was no guaran- tee, but with the Bills you do and he did not under- stand why the Airport is so adamant about making a commitment to insulate all homes in this City by the AGENDA ACTION TAKEN ITEMS FROM COUNCIL 2. Discussion- Continued. 6/9/93 Page 24 ?_06 ITEMS FROM COUNCIL year 2000. He stated the track record up to now was 400 homes insulated or 600 homes out of 5,000 to be done after 10 years in the program, so they needed the Bills to protect this City. He stated SB245 deals with a congestion, manage- ment plan and for a major industry, the Airport, to expand and not expect to meet our requirements to alleviate and mitigate traffic congestion was unreasonable, etc. He urged the Council to support the two Bills be- cause he felt the MOU has too many holes in it and escape clauses. Ms. Marjorie Carlson stated she was a 38 year resident of So. San Francisco and concurred with Mr. Dell'Angela's comments and felt this item should have been heard at the beginning of the Agenda rather than sit for 4-1/2 hours. She stated the planes go out over her home and at 2:00 p.m. were bombarded with noise. Mayor Teglia stated this City had been very aggres- sive over the last ten years to get funds. However, they cannot control all factors with the Airport and the FAA. She apologized for the long delay in hearing the item. Ms. LaPointe stated Senator Kopp would like Coun- cil to pass a resolution in support of both bills be- cause he had been carrying this for five years and felt it serves his constituency. Ms. Deirdre Coolagh, West Winston Manor, stated she called for a timetable for her home to be insulat- ed and had been told when they got to her house they would have run out of money. She stated because her 18-month old covers her ears, her four-year old can read the numbers on overhead planes and she cannot talk on the telephone because of overhead planes they insulated their home at their own expense, with the hope of reimburse- ment in the future, by the City. Discussion followed: Bills do not address reim- bursement; 10,500 homes were affected by the map; how lawsuit affects funding for SSF's program. AGENDA ACTION TAKEN ITEMS FROM COUNCIL 2. Discussion- Continued. 13. Oral Committee Reports CLOSED SESSION 14. Closed Session for the purpose of the discussion of personnel matters, labor relations, property negotiations and litigation. ADJOURNMENT: Z07 ITEMS FROM COUNCIL Mr. Turpen stated because of the MOU if there were a change in the map it would not affect So. San Francisco regardless of Federal funding; he stated that no variance out of Sacramento could make the Airport insulate homes less than 65 CNEL; 4.5 million was committed this year out of the $120 million; dollars will be available on the schedule of the cities; $120 million included Federal 20% funding; Airport will guarantee funds with the MOU with the 1983 map, etc. There were no reports from Council. CLOSED SESSION The Council chose not to hold a Closed Session. M/S Fernekes/Yee - To adjourn the meeting to Wednesday, 6/16/93, 700 p.m., City Council Con- ference Room, City Hall, for the purpose of the discussion of the 1993-1994 Operating Budget, and a Closed Session pursuant to Government Code. Carried by unanimous voice vote. Time of adjournment was 12:53 a.m. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, Barbara A. Battaya, City Clerk~ City of South San Francisco APPROVED. erta Cerri Teglia, ~fior City of South San Fra~i~co The entries of this Council meeting show the action taken by the City Council to dispose of an item. Oral communica- tions, arguments, and comments are recorded on tape. The tape and documents related to the items are on file in the Office of the City Clerk and are available for inspection, review and copying. 6/9/93 Page 25