HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 161-2017 (17-961)City of South San Francisco P.O. Box 711 (City Hall,
400 Grand Avenue)
South San Francisco, CA
City Council
Resolution: RES 161 -2017
File Number: 17 -961 Enactment Number: RES 161 -2017
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ANNUAL IMPACT FEE AND
SEWER CAPACITY CHARGE REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR
2016 -17.
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Mitigation Fee Act (Government Code Section 66000 et seq.), the City is
required to annually report certain information regarding the collection of development impact fees; and
WHEREAS, under the Mitigation Fee Act, the City is also required to make certain findings every five
(5) years regarding unexpended impact fees and summarize those findings in the annual report
( "Report"); and
WHEREAS, the Report for Fiscal Year 2016 -17 identifies unexpended impact fee programs for which
findings are required; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code section 66013, the City is also required to annually report
certain information in connection with the collection of Sewer Capacity Charges; and
WHEREAS, the Report for Fiscal Year 2016 -17, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A,
contains both the annual reporting information for the City's development impact fee programs and also
contains a section with the necessary annual information for Sewer Capacity Charges; and
WHEREAS, the Report has been available at City Hall for at least fifteen (15) days prior to this Council
meeting and was distributed to all Councilmembers in advance of said meeting.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of South San Francisco
hereby approves the Report for Fiscal Year 2016 -17.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of South San Francisco hereby makes
the findings outlined in the Report for Fiscal Year 2016 -17, attached hereto and incorporated herein as
Exhibit A, as required by Government Code Sections 66006.
City of South San Francisco Page 1
File Number. 17 -961
Enactment Number: RES 161 -2017
At a meeting of the City Council on 12/13/2017, a motion was made by Mark Addiego, seconded by Pradeep
Gupta, that this Resolution be approved. The motion passed.
Yes: 5 Mayor Normandy, Councilmember Garbarino, Vice Mayor Matsumoto,
Councilmember Gupta, and Councilmember Addiego
Attest y
sta Ma i
City of South San Francisco Page 2
1
Annual Impact Fee Report
For the City of South San Francisco
For Fiscal Year 2016-17
This report contains information on the City of South San Francisco’s development impact fees
for Fiscal Year 2016-17. This information is presented to comply with the annual reporting
requirements contained in Government Code section 66000 et seq. Please note that this annual
report is not a budget document, but rather is compiled to meet reporting requirements. It is not
intended to represent a full picture of currently planned projects as it only reports project
information, revenues and expenditures for Fiscal Year 2016-17.
Government Code Section 66006 requires local agencies to submit annual and five-year reports
detailing the status of development impact fees. The annual report must be made available to the
public within 180 days after the last day of the fiscal year, and must be presented to the public
agency (City Council) at least 15 days after it is made available to the public.
This report summarizes the following annual reporting information for each of the development
impact fee programs:
1.A brief description of the fee program.
2.Schedule of fees.
3.Beginning and ending balances of the fee program.
4.Amount of fees collected, interest earned, and transfers/loans.
5.An identification of each public improvement on which fees were expended and the amount
of the expenditures on each improvement, including the total percentage of the cost of the public
improvement that was funded with fees.
6.A description of each interfund transfer or loan, the date the loan will be repaid, the rate of
interest, and a description of the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will
be expended.
7.The estimated date when projects will begin if sufficient revenues are available to construct
the project.
8.The amount of refunds made to property owners.
In addition, this report contains information on the City of South San Francisco’s sewer capacity
charges. Government Code Section 66013 requires local agencies to submit annual reports
detailing the status of sewer capacity charges. The annual report must be made available to the
EXHIBIT A
2
public within 180 days after the last day of each fiscal year. This report summarizes the
following information for the sewer capacity charges:
1.A description of the charges deposited in the fund.
2.The beginning and ending balance of the fund and the interest earned from investment of
moneys in the fund.
3.The amount of charges collected in that fiscal year.
4.An identification of all of the following:
a.Each public improvement on which charges were expended and the amount of the
expenditure for each improvement, including the percentage of the total cost of
the public improvement that was funded with those charges if more than one
source of funding was used.
b.Each public improvement on which charges were expended that was completed
during that fiscal year.
c.Each public improvement that is anticipated to be undertaken in the following
fiscal year.
5.A description of each interfund transfer or loan from the capital facilities fund, the date
the loan will be repaid, and the rate of interest. In the case of an interfund transfer, the
report identifies the public improvements on which the transferred moneys are or will be
expended.
More detailed information on certain elements of the various fee programs is available through
other documents such as nexus studies, master plans, capital improvement programs, and
budgets.
The City does not typically earmark impact fees for any specific project as the revenues are
collected, but rather the revenues are applied toward a series of capital improvement projects as
outlined in the nexus studies, such as a future sewer infrastructure, transportation infrastructure,
and other capital facilities.
3
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Citywide Impact Fee Program
Childcare Impact Fee Fund (Fund 830)
Overview and Required Findings ............................................................................4
Financial Reporting ..................................................................................................5
Public Safety Impact Fee Fund (Fund 821)
Overview and Required Findings ............................................................................6
Financial Reporting ..................................................................................................7
Plan Area Impact Fee Programs
Oyster Point Interchange Impact Fee Fund (Fund 840)
Overview and Required Findings ............................................................................8
Financial Reporting ................................................................................................10
Traffic Impact Fee Fund (Fund 820)
Overview and Required Findings ..........................................................................11
Financial Reporting ................................................................................................12
Sewer Impact Fee Fund (Fund 810)
Overview and Required Findings ..........................................................................13
Financial Reporting ................................................................................................15
Other Reportable Citywide Charges
Sewer Capacity Charge Fund (Fund 730)
Overview and Required Findings ..........................................................................16
Financial Reporting ................................................................................................17
Fee Schedules........................................................................................................................18
4
Childcare Impact Fee Program
The nexus study for this citywide impact fee program was adopted by the City Council in 2001.
The study identified the need for new and expanded child care facilities in the City. Updates
since 2001 to this fee program have included a periodic inflation adjustment. The fee program
includes a 5% administrative fee. The estimated cost of the new and expanded facilities included
in the nexus study totaled $43.9 million. The nexus study identified new development’s share of
the cost as 24.6% of the total new and expanded facilities cost. The expected development
impact fee revenue was estimated at $11.3 million, which includes administrative costs of 5% of
total fee revenue. Existing development’s share of the cost is $33.1 million (75.4% of new
facilities) which must be funded with other funding sources such as the City’s General Fund,
grants, developer contributions, and Community Development Block Grants.
Annual Reporting Information:
1.The purpose of the Childcare Impact Fee Program is to provide new development’s share
of funding for new and expanded childcare facilities required at build-out of the City.
2.Refer to page 17 for the fee schedule outlining the amount of the fee. Page five provides
the beginning and ending balance for the account of this fee, the amount of fees collected
and interest earned.
3.There have been no projects completed during Fiscal Year 2016-17 using the Childcare
Impact Fee Program funding. There have previously been four projects completed using
Childcare Impact Fee Program funding. The approximate date for funding and
constructing future facilities will be determined, at the discretion of the City Council,
when adequate additional funds for facility construction have accumulated.
4.There are no potential refunds of Childcare Impact fees to property owners.
5.There were no interfund transfers or loans.
5
Childcare Impact Fee (Fund 830)
This citywide development impact fee program funds new development’s fair share of new and
expanded childcare facilities to serve the City.
Beginning balance, July 1, 2016 $2,874,841
Additions
Childcare impact fees collected $ 522,858
Interest earned 4,489
Total additions 527,347
Disbursements % Fee Funded
City administration 2,500 100%
Projects 0
Total disbursements (2,500)
Remaining balance as of June 30, 2017 $ 3,399,688
Planned projects for Fiscal Year 2017/18 % Fee Funded
There are no planned projects for
Fiscal Year 2017/18 0
Remaining balance after planned projects $ 3,399,688
6
Public Safety Impact Fee Program
The nexus study for this citywide impact fee program was adopted by the City Council in 2012.
The study identified the need for new and expanded public safety capital facility and equipment
to support new development projects. This fee program also includes an annual inflation
adjustment. The fee program includes a 2% administrative fee. The estimated cost of the new
and expanded public safety equipment and facilities included in the nexus study totaled $40.4
million. The nexus study identified new development’s share of the cost at $10.4 million (25.6%
of the total new and expanded equipment and facilities cost). Existing development’s share of
the cost is $30.0 million (74.4% of new equipment and facilities) which must be funded with
other funding sources such as the City’s General Fund, grants, or developer contributions.
Annual Reporting Information:
1. The Public Safety Impact Fee is collected to provide new development ’s share of funding
for new and expanded public safety capital facility and equipment required at build out of
the City.
2. Refer to page 17 for the fee schedule outlining the amount of the fee; Page seven
provides the beginning and ending balance of the account for this fee, the amount of fees
collected and interest earned.
3. Eight items listed in the Nexus Study were purchased using the Public Safety Impact Fee
Program funding. Additional items listed on page 7 are scheduled to be purchased in
Fiscal Year 2017-18. The approximate date for funding and constructing facilities and
procuring future equipment identified in the nexus study will be determined when
adequate additional funds have accumulated.
4. There are no potential refunds of Public Safety Impact Fees to property owners.
5. There were no interfund transfers or loans.
7
Public Safety Impact Fee (Fund 821)
This citywide development impact fee program funds new development’s fair share of new and
expanded capital facility and equipment to serve the City.
Beginning balance, July 1, 2016 $452,546
Additions
Public Safety impact fees collected – Fire $ 93,322
Public Safety impact fees collected - Police 39,332
Interest earned 545
Total additions 133,199
Disbursements % Fee Funded
Portable Radios 33,329 25.6%
Safety Clothing and Equipment 16,774 25.6%
Portable Computers 14,805 25.6%
Microwave Radios/Antenna 20,978 25.6%
DC Power Installation 3,896 25.6%
Base Radio Repeater 7,740 25.6%
Mobile Audio and Visual 90,893 25.6%
Trainer Tower Maintenance 3,196
Total disbursements (191,611)
Remaining balance as of June 30, 2017 $ 394,134
Planned projects for Fiscal Year 2017/18 % Fee Funded
Tower Training Maintenance 78,724 25.6%
Station Alert Package 55,300 25.6%
Personal Protective Equipment Dryers 6,167 25.6%
Total planned projects for Fiscal Year 2017/18 (140,191)
Remaining balance after planned projects $ 253,943
8
Oyster Point Interchange Impact Fee Program
The City Council adopted this plan area fee program on May 23, 1984 using a February 1983
Feasibility Study prepared by Nolte and Associates in conjunction with Resolution No. 71-84
which created the “Oyster Point Contribution Formula”. The 1983 Feasibility Study identified
the need for the Oyster Point Interchange project which was, at that time, referred to as the grade
separation project.
Updates to the fee program since 1984 include the following:
1. An ongoing monthly inflation adjustment.
2. June 26, 1996, fee program change via Resolution No. 102-96 included adjustments for:
a. the inflationary index that reduced the fee by approximately 22%,
b. the project description which increased the scope of the project to include the
Terrabay hook ramps and the southbound off-ramp flyover, and the use of more
current trip generation rates
3. October 9, 1996 fee program change via Resolution No. 152-96 that added additional
land uses with their associated trip generation rates.
The Feasibility Study identified new development’s share of the grade separation project cost at
64.8% and existing development’s share of the cost at 35.2%. The grade separation was
completed and funded in 1995 and is not part of this annual report. The increased scope portion
of the project, added in 1996, was identified as being 100% the responsibility of new
development. Of this additional scope, the flyover, estimated to cost $6.4 million, was
completed in 2005, and the hook ramps, estimated to cost $15 million, were completed in
October 2006. Additional work relating to property transfers and gaining final Caltrans project
acceptance is on-going.
Annual Reporting Information
1. The purpose of the Oyster Point Interchange Impact Fee Program is to provide new
development’s share of funding for this project required at build-out of the plan area.
2. Refer to page 18 for the fee schedule outlining the amount of the fee. Page 10 provides
the beginning and ending balance of the account for this fee, the amount of fees collected
and interest earned.
3. The construction portion of the flyover and hook ramps is completed and funding through
the fee program will continue through build-out of the plan area. As impact fees are
collected, they will be used to pay back the Successor Agency for the advance of $14.45
million.
4. The fund has one loan from the former Redevelopment Agency. The amount owed as of
June 30, 2017, is approximately $10.7 million. Since the dissolution of the
9
Redevelopment Agency in 2012, the interest rate charged by the Successor Agency is
0%. The loan is repaid as new impact fee revenue is received. Given that the amount of
future impact fee revenue is unknown, the repayment date is unknown.
5. There are no potential refunds of Oyster Point Interchange Impact Fees to property
owners.
10
Oyster Point Interchange Impact Fee (Fund 840)
This plan area development impact fee program funds new development’s fair share of the
Oyster Point Interchange project.
Beginning balance, July 1, 2016 $ 28,529
Additions
Fees collected $ 23,650
Interest earned 5
Total additions 23,655
Disbursements
% Fee
Funded
Projects 0
Repayment of RDA Loan 23,000 100%
Total disbursements (23,000)
Remaining balance as of June 30, 2017 $ 29,184
Planned Projects for Fiscal Year 2017/18
% Fee
Funded
U.S. 101 Off Ramp/Hook Ramps (st1013)
38,366 100%
U.S. 101 Flyover to Oyster Point (st1014)
14,196 100%
Total Planned Projects in Fiscal Year
2016/17 (52,562)
Remaining Balance After Planned Projects (23,378)
Loans to Oyster Point Interchange Fee Fund from
Successor Agency to RDA
Due Date and
Interest Rate
Balance, July 1, 2016
10,714,152 None & None
Less payment during fiscal year (23,000)
Balance, June 30, 2017 (10,691,152)
Fees available (future fees required) for current
and completed projects [1] $ (10,714,530)
[1] Includes the Successor Agency loan of $10.7 million.
11
Traffic Impact Fee Program
The 2001 nexus study for this plan area fee was adopted by the City Council in 2002. The study
identified the need for new and expanded roadway and intersection improvements to serve the
area located east of US 101 in the City of South San Francisco. The study was updated on May
6, 2005, and on July 19, 2007. This fee program includes an annual inflation adjustment and a
2.5% administrative fee. The estimated cost of the new and expanded facilities included in the
2007 study totaled $38.5 million ($32.4 million in net cost after accounting for fees already
received). There are 26 road improvements listed in the 2007 study and two studies for a total of
28 projects. The study determined that new development would be responsible for 100% of the
cost of the 28 projects.
Annual Reporting Information
1. The purpose of the Traffic Impact Fee Program is to provide new development’s share of
funding for new and expanded roadway and intersection improvements to serve the area
located east of US 101 at build-out of the plan area.
2. See page 18 for the fee schedule outlining the amount of the fee; See page 12 for
beginning and ending balance of the account for this fee and for the amount of fees
collected and interest earned.
3. Of the approximate $7 million of unexpended traffic impact fee revenue, $287k was
spent in Fiscal Year 2016-17 with another $3.2 million budgeted to be expended on
projects in Fiscal Year 2017-18 (refer to table on page 12). The remaining $3.8 million
will be used to fund projects in subsequent years, such as the design of projects listed in
the original and updated fee studies. The approximate date of funding to complete
financing of projects identified in the nexus study and the traffic fee study updates is
unknown, as the sole source of funding is the traffic impact fee, which is dependent on
the implementation of new developments. Of the 26 improvement projects listed in the
nexus study, six have been completed. A traffic study, which will prioritize the
construction of the new and expanded facilities listed in the nexus study is in progress.
The projects currently underway are shown in the Fiscal Year 2017-19 Capital
Improvement Program (CIP) budget. The remaining nexus study projects will be
programmed in future years’ CIP budgets.
4. There were no interfund transfers or loans.
5. There are no potential refunds of Traffic Impact Fees to property owners.
12
Traffic Impact Fee (Fund 820)
This plan area development impact fee program funds new development's fair share of new and
expanded roadway and intersection improvements east of US 101 to serve the City of South San
Francisco.
Beginning balance, July 1, 2016 $ 7,213,252
Additions
Fees collected $ 109,867
Interest earned 9,507
Total additions $119,374
Disbursements % Fee Funded
City administration 2,500 100%
Gateway/E. Grand Traffic Improvements (tr1004) 333 100%
South Airport Blvd/Utah Ave (TIF #20 & tr1010) 550 100%
Grand/East Grand (TIF #26 & tr1103) 10,722 100%
Airport Blvd/Grand Ave (TIF #13 & tr1104) 2,732 100%
Oyster Point Blvd/Route 101 Northbound On-Ramp (TIF
#35 & tr1105) 55,878 100%
E. Grand, Gateway & Forbes Intersection (tr1602) 29,413 100%
Oyster Pt., Gateway & Veterans Intersection (tr1603) 19,268 100%
E.101 Traffic Model Update (tr1702) 165,239 100%
Total disbursements (286,633)
Remaining Balance as of June 30, 201 7 $ 7,045,993
Planned Projects for Fiscal Year 2017/18 % Fee Funded
Gateway/E. Grand Traffic Improvements (tr1004) 203,986 100%
South Airport Blvd/Utah Ave (TIF #20 & tr1010) 245,243 100%
Traffic Impact Fee Study (tr1013) 98,121 100%
Airport Blvd/Miller Ave (TIF #12 & tr1102) 5,772 100%
Grand/East Grand (TIF #26 & tr1103) 254,631 100%
Airport Blvd/Grand Ave (TIF #13 & tr1104) 4,556 100%
Oyster Point Blvd/Route 101 Northbound On-Ramp (TIF
#35 & tr1105) 1,114,418 100%
101 Northbound Off-Ramp to E Grant/Executive (TIF
#38 & tr1107) 37,028 100%
E. Grand, Gateway & Forbes Intersection (tr1602) 570,587 100%
Oyster Pt., Gateway & Veterans Intersection (tr1603) 580,732 100%
E.101 Traffic Model Update (tr1702) 134,761 100%
Total planned projects for Fiscal Year 2017/18 (3,249,835)
Remaining balance after planned projects $3,796,158
13
Sewer Impact Fee Program
The 2002 nexus study for this plan area fee was adopted by the City Council in 2002. The study
identified the need for new and rehabilitated sewer collection and treatment facilities to serve the
area located east of US 101 in the City of South San Francisco. This fee program also includes
an annual inflation adjustment. The estimated cost of the 20 new and expanded sewer projects
included in the study totaled $21.4 million. The study identified new development’s share of the
cost of the required facilities at $15.5 million (72.4% of the total new and expanded facilities
cost) while existing development’s share of the cost (existing deficiency) is $5.9 million (27.6%
of new facilities). New development’s share of the cost, $15.5 million, was increased to include
some master planning costs ($425,000) and some CEQA reviewing costs ($600,000) for a total
cost to new development of $16,425,000. Of that amount, $12,429,000 was to be sewer impact
fee funded and $4,066,000 was to be funded directly by developer contributions. Of the twenty
total projects listed in the nexus study, eleven projects are either fully or partially funded with the
sewer impact fee funds, four are existing development’s responsibility, four are to be funded by
developer contributions, and one is to be funded with a combination of developer contributions
and revenues from existing development. Existing development’s share will be funded with the
sewer charges appearing on property tax bills as a direct levy.
1. The purpose of the Sewer Impact Fee Program is to provide new development’s share of
funding for new and rehabilitated sewer collection and treatment facilities to serve the
area located east of US 101 at build-out of the plan area.
2. Refer to page 18 for the fee schedule outlining the amount of the fee. Page 15 provides
the beginning and ending balance of the account for this fee, the amount of fees collected,
and interest earned.
3. There was one project that was partially funded in FY 2016-17 using the Sewer Impact
Fee program funding. Funding for that project and one additional project was budgeted
and is scheduled to continue in FY 2017-18. The approximate date for funding and
constructing additional future facilities and infrastructure will be determined when
adequate additional funds have accumulated.
4. There were no interfund transfers or loans.
5. There are no potential refunds of Sewer Impact Fees to property owners.
14
Sewer Impact Fee (Fund 810)
This plan area development impact fee program funds new development's fair share of new and
rehabilitated sewer collection and treatment facilities to serve the area located east of US 101 in
the City.
Beginning balance, July 1, 2016 $503,766
Additions
Fees collected $ 185,752
Interest earned 3,063
Net Fee Credit Permits 0
Total additions 188,815
Disbursements % Fee Funded
City administration 2,500 100%
Pump Station #2 Upgrade (ss1702) 1,860 100%
Total Disbursements (4,360)
Remaining balance as of June 30, 2017 $688,221
Planned Projects for Fiscal Year 2017/18 % Fee Funded
Littlefield Ave. (So) Subtrunk Repair/Upgrade
(ss1023)
42,101 80%
Pump Station #2 Upgrade (ss1702) 298,140 80%
Total Planned Projects in Fiscal Year 2017/18 (340,241)
Remaining Balance After Planned
Projects 347,980
Loans to Sewer Impact Fee Fund
Due Date and
Interest Rate
Developer Prepayment for East Grand Avenue
Subtrunk project (ss1014) [1] (1,824,713)
None & Pooled
City Rate
Fees available (future fees required)
for current and completed projects
[2] $(1,476,733)
[1] The developer prepaid the sewer impact fees to allow for earlier construction of project
ss1014 and receives credit against future sewer impact fee obligations.
[2] Includes the $2.0 million developer prepayment.
15
Sewer Capacity Charge Program
The original analysis was adopted by the City Council in 2000 and annual updates included a
preset adjustment to the charges based on borrowing costs. The most current Sewer Capacity
Charge Analysis by Bartle Wells & Associates is dated August 26, 2009 and was adopted by the
City Council in April of 2010 to be effective in Fiscal Year 2010-11. This analysis identifies the
need for sewer collection and treatment capacity in the City of South San Francisco. There are
two components to the Sewer Capacity Charge: the capital assets valuation charge and the capital
improvements charge. The capital assets charge accounts for the existing value of the sewer
collection and treatment system which is calculated using the depreciated replacement cost of the
system’s assets. The capital assets charge (also called a “buy-in” fee) assigns a value to the
benefit that new development receives from the availability of sewer capacity (which existing
development has maintained over the years through the sewer rates). The total depreciated
replacement value is $161.6 million, of which 37.2 percent is new development’s fair-share, or
$60.1 million. The second component is the charge for future improvements to the system
identified in the City’s Capital Improvement Program. The total cost of these future
improvements is $84.6 million, the fair-share allocation to new development is 37.2 percent of
that amount, or $29.8 million. The total fair-share is $90 million. These funds may be used for
capital improvements to maintain capacity in the system.
Annual Reporting Information:
1. The sewer capacity charges do not exceed the estimated reasonable costs of providing the
facilities for which the fee is charged (see § 66013, subd. (a)).
2. The sewer capacity charge’s accounting and reporting requirements are being met, i.e.,
the revenues are kept in a separate fund and the City provides annual reports on the use of
the funds collected (see § 66013, subds. (c) and (d)). Since the update for the sewer
capacity charges went into effect in Fiscal Year 2010-11, $1.2 million of collected sewer
capacity charges has been spent on Water Quality Control Plant upgrades.
3. There were not any interfund transfers or loans.
16
Sewer Capacity Charges (Fund 730)
This fee program funds the cost associated with providing collection and treatment capacity to
new development, both through the existing infrastructure provided, and through future capital
projects not funded by other sources.
Beginning Balance, July 1, 2016 $2,312,921
Charges collected $1,630,615
Interest earned $4,903
Total Additions $1,635,518
Disbursements % Charge Funded
City Administration $2,500 100%
Bad Debt $2,664
Projects $ 0
Total Disbursements $5,164
Remaining Balance, June 30, 2017 $3,943,275
Planned Projects for Fiscal Year 2016/17 Amount % Charge Funded
No projects are planned $0
Remaining Balance After Planned Projects $3,943,275
17
Fee Schedules for 2016-17
Childcare Impact Fee Rates for Fiscal Year 2016-17
Land Use per Unit or per Gross Sq. Ft. (GSF)
Residential
Low Density $1,979 per unit
Medium Density $1,858 per unit
High Density $1,851 per unit
Other Residential $1.28 per GSF
Commercial/Industrial
Commercial / Retail $0.68 per GSF
Hotel / Visitor Services $0.18 per GSF
Office / R&D $0.57 per GSF
Other Non-Residential $0.54 per GSF
Public Safety Impact Fee Rates for Fiscal Year 2016-17
Land Use per Unit or per Square Foot (SF)
Residential
Low Density $1,285 per unit
Medium Density $810 per unit
High Density $563 per unit
Commercial/Industrial
Commercial / Retail $0.44 per SF
Hotel / Visitor $0.42 per SF
Office / R&D $0.44 per SF
Industrial $0.18 per SF
18
Oyster Point Interchange Impact Fee Rates for Fiscal Year 2016-17
The impact fee is calculated by multiplying the number of vehicle trips by $154 and by the
percentage increase in the Construction Cost Index (CCI) as published in the Engineering News-
Record (ENR) from the date of adoption, when the CCI was 6,552.16, to the current effective
CCI.
Vehicle Trips are based on average daily traffic (ADT). The rates shown below are based on
1,000 gross square feet of land use.
The ENR CCI published in April is used to calculate monthly increases. The CCI for April 2013
and 2014 were 10,373.34 and 10,894.84, respectively, resulting in a percentage increase of 5.0%.
Land Use ADT Trip Rate per 1,000 GSF
General Industrial 5.46
Manufacturing 3.99
Warehousing 4.50
Hotel 10.50
General Office Building 12.30
Research & Development (R&D) 5.30
Restaurant (Dinner House/High Turn-over) 56.30 / 164.40
General Commercial 48.00
Traffic Impact Fee Rates for Fiscal Year 2016-17
Area of Building x Land Use Fee where the Land Use Fee is:
R&D = $5.82 per building sq. ft.
Hotel = $1,353.93 per room
Commercial = $24.11 per building sq. ft.
Sewer Impact Fee Rates for Fiscal Year 2016-17
Gallons per area x area x $4.73. The generation rate for all land use is 400 gallons per day per
1,000 square feet of building area.
19
Sewer Capacity Charge for Fiscal Year 2016-17
The fee is updated each calendar year. For calendar years 2014, 2015 and 2016, the fee was
$3,944 per EDU. An EDU, or Equivalent Dwelling Unit, is the amount and strength of sewage
equivalent to that discharged by a single-family residence. EDU = (0.00347 x Q) + (0.362 x
BOD) + (0.589 x TSS). Q = gallons per day of sewage to be discharged; BOD = pounds per day
of biochemical oxygen demand to be discharged; TSS = pounds per day of total suspended solids
to be discharged.