Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-16-18 Final DRB MinutesDESIGN REVIEW BOARD MINUTES CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO DATE: October 16, 2018 TIME: 4:00 PM MEMBERS PRESENT: Mateo, Nelson, Vieira & Williams MEMBERS ABSENT: Nilmeyer STAFF PRESENT: Tony Rozzi, Principal Planner Adena Friedman, Senior Planner Justin Shiu, Consultant Planner Patricia Cotla, Planning Technician 1. Adminstrative Business 2. OWNER Maria & Hipolito Solis APPLICANT Andrea Costanzo ADDRESS 847 Baden Avenue PROJECT NUMBER P18-0066: DR18-0033 PROJECT NAME 2nd Story Addition (Case Planner: Adena Friedman) DESCRIPTION Design Review for a 2nd Story addition to an existing single family dwelling at 847 Baden Avenue in the Downtown Residential Low (DRL) Zoning District in accordance with Title 20 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code and determination that the project is categorically exempt from CEQA. The Board had the following comments: 1. The Board approved the design concept. 2. Consider adding some articulation to the second story addition by adding muntin trim for the windows. 3. Consider matching the front and garage doors with the same detail elements. 4. The renderings show a fence, but the plans are missing the detail information. 5. If a fence is being proposed, include the information on the site plan. 6. Clarify the type of pavers that will be used in the front yard. Recommend Approval with comments. 3. OWNER Genentech, Inc. APPLICANT Genentech, Inc. ADDRESS 781 Forbes Blvd PROJECT NUMBER P18-0039: DR18-0020 PROJECT NAME New Commercial Kitchen (Case Planner: Tony Rozzi) DESCRIPTION Design Review for a new indoor/outdoor dining area at 781 Forbes Blvd in the Genentech Master Plan (GMP) Zoning District in accordance with Title 20 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code and determination that the project is categorically exempt from CEQA. The Board had the following comments: 1. The Board liked the design concept. 2. Check with the Police Department, as the proposed double doors may not meet their regulations. 3. The bathroom facility should be located inside the building. 4. Check with the Building Department if handrails would be required for the walkway leading down into the structure. 5. Check with the Police Department for any additional security issues /concerns. Recommend Approval with Conditions. 4. OWNER Martin Sanchez APPLICANT Martin Sanchez ADDRESS 453 Valverde Drive PROJECT NUMBER P18-0067: DR18-0032 PROJECT NAME 2nd Story Addition (Case Planner: Ryan Wassum) DESCRIPTION Design Review for a 2nd Story addition to an existing single family dwelling at 453 Valverde Avenue in the Low Residential Density (RL- 8) Zoning District in accordance with Title 20 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code and determination that the project is categorically exempt from CEQA. The Board had the following comments: 1. The Board liked the design concept. 2. The front door and the garage door should match with the same square elements. The garage door should match the contemporary style of the residence design. 3. The existing and proposed windows should all match and include a mullion trim around the windows. Remove muntins to the sliding glass door for consistency in appearance. 4. Clarify whether the site will include a fence. If so, show the details on the plans with material type and height. The fence shall be no higher than three feet tall within the front yard setback area (15 feet from the front property line). 5. Consider a natural looking pervious stone for the front yard pavers. 6. Ensure no more than 50 percent of the front yard is covered by impervious surfaces. 7. The proposed front yard tree may grow too tall. Look at alternative species that will better scale the height of the dwelling. Recommend Approval with Conditions. 5. OWNER Sing Tao Newspaper SF LTD APPLICANT Florence Tso ADDRESS 215 Littlefield Avenue PROJECT NUMBER P18-0069: UP18-0012 & DR18-0035 PROJECT NAME Exterior Modifications / FAR Increase (Case Planner: Justin Shiu) DESCRIPTION Use Permit and Design Review for exterior modifications and to increase the maximum base floor area ratio (FAR) to allow additional floor area for an existing Industrial Office building at 215 Littlefield Avenue in the Mixed Industrial (MI) Zoning District in accordance with Title 20 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code and determination that the project is categorically exempt from CEQA. The Board had the following comments: 1. The Board liked the design concept. 2. Check with the Building Department, as the proposed ADA parking stalls need to be relocated to be accessible from the closest entry way to the building. Per code, the plans need to incorporate an ADA Van stall. 3. The site is lacking an ADA access path to the sidewalk. An accessible pathway shall be added at the front of the site to provide a connection to the sidewalk. 4. The board recommends a different siding material for the building. Consider a synthetic material as the current proposed siding may not hold up. 5. The applicant needs to hire a Land Surveyor to conduct a survey and determine the property lines. 6. A civil engineer should calculate the bio-retention needs. Landscaping should be designed with consideration of bio-retention; not all plants are suitable in bio-retention areas. 7. Provide a preliminary grading plan, which can inform ADA ramp/pathway needs and bio-retention needs. 8. The plans are showing additional parking spaces in easements. The applicant needs to obtain written permission from the owners of the easement before proposing the parking spaces. 9. The applicant needs to hire a Landscape Architect or Designer to design a landscaping plan that will meet the City’s requirements. Some proposed plants may not survive in South San Francisco, including Banana Tree, Gold Mop Weeping Cypress. The Tristaniopsis laurina are not large enough in scale with the building. Agapanthus africanus is medium water use. The design should meet AB 1881, with low water use species. 10. During construction, protect the existing trees from getting damaged. 11. The sidewalk needs to be continued along the front of the building for Pedestrian accessibility. 12. A Wind Study is recommend for the proposed roof garden, as some type of wind screen may be required to make the area functional for employees to utilize the area. Resubmittal required. 6. OWNER Gregory Welch P TR ET AL & Fred Bravo APPLICANT McDonalds USA LLC ADDRESS 587 El Camino Real PROJECT NUMBER P18-0063: DR18-0029 PROJECT NAME Exterior Modifications (Case Planner: Justin Shiu) DESCRIPTION Design Review for exterior modifications to an existing commerical building at 587 El Camino Real in the El Camino Real Mixed Use (ECRMX) Zoning District in accordance with Title 20 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code and determination that the project is categorically exempt from CEQA. The Board had the following comments: 1. The Board liked the design concept. 2. The required ADA parking stalls need to located closer to the entry door way. Check with the Building Department for the regulations on ADA requirements. 3. Review the Landscaping plan, as the species called out will not survive the SSF elements. Consider using Muhlenbergia capillaris, Pink Muhly Grass, instead of Blue Fescue. 4. Recommend planting 24” box trees, instead of the 15” boxes for better tree growth. 5. The signs are not part of this DRB review. 6. The applicant will submit a sign permit at a later date. Recommend Approval with Conditions 7. OWNER Gladys Ann Callan TR. APPLICANT McDonalds USA LLC ADDRESS 2298 Gellert Blvd PROJECT NUMBER P18-0053: DR18-0023 PROJECT NAME Exterior Modifications (Case Planner: Justin Shiu) DESCRIPTION Design Review for exterior modifications to an existing commerical building at 2298 Gellert Blvd in the Community Commercial (CC) Zoning District in accordance with Title 20 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code and determination that the project is categorically exempt from CEQA. The Board had the following comments: 1. The Board liked the design concept. 2. Check with the Building Department for the regulations on ADA requirements. 3. The signs are not part of this DRB review. 4. The applicant will submit a sign permit at a later date. Recommend Approval with Conditions.