Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 05/22/1986 (Cassette No.1) May 22, 1986 Regular Meeting of the South San Francisco Planning Commission. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Wendler, Vice Chair Boblitt, Commissioners Agee, Getz, Hoyer, Martin and Terry. ALSO PRESENT: Planning Division Jean T. Smith Interim City Attorney Robert Rogers Police Department Ron Petrocchi PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ORAL COMMUNICATIONS No one chose to speak. AGENDA ITEMS Fiji Jamaat, UP-81-590/Mod 2, 373 Alta Vista Drive Request pursuant to Special Condition No. 3 to allow the closing hour to be extended to 11:00 p.m. during the yearly Ramadan from May 10, 1986 to June 12, 1986 at 373 Alta Vista Drive in the R-1 Single Family Zone District. Staff informed the Commission that the letter of request for the extended hours was received on May 9, 1986 and Notices of Public Hearing were not mailed to the neighborhood. Applicant not present. Motion-Getz:Second Agee: To deny the request for extension of hours pursuant to Special Condition No. 3 of UP-81-590/Mod 2, on the grounds of no public notification, inadequate time for the application to be considered by the Commission, and failure of the applicant to present his case. AYES: Vice Chair Boblitt, Commissioners Agee, Getz, Hoyer, Martin and Terry. ABSTAIN: Chair Wendler. PC Mtg. 5/22/86 Page 1 of 5 Pages AGENDA ITEMS (PUBLIC HEARINGS) City of South San Francisco, ZA-86-34, GP-86-30, and Negative Declaration No. 547 Continued from Planning Commission Meeting of May 8, 1986. Public Hearing for a Zoning Amendment application of the City of South San Francisco and an environmental determination of same to amend and revise Title 20 (Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map) of the South San Francisco Municipal Code. Public Hearing for General Plan Amendment application to amend various sections of text, policies, and exhibits of the Land Use, Circulation and Transportation Elements of the South San Francisco General Plan. Speaking With Concern: Gary Randalls Clark & Cramer 300 Montgomery Street San Francisco Bill Ryan, PG&E 170 Market Street San Francisco Mr. Randalls' concern was regarding two adjacent lots on West Harris Avenue that are currently zoned Heavy Industrial. The proposed zoning map has the two properties, which are under the same ownership, split showing one lot Planned Industrial and the other lot zoned Planned Commercial. Director Smith indicated the line on the proposed zoning map was copied from he General Plan map which does not show lot lines and could be shifted to reflect Mr. Randalls' concern. Mr. Ryan was provided with a copy of the April 30, 1986 memorandum written by Interim Assistant City Attorney Robert Kasper in response to Mr. Ryan's letter of April 9th. Mr. Ryan was satisfied with the memo and thanked the Commission. The Commission agreed to discuss the City Attorney's April 28, 1986 memorandum, reviewing the areas that the consultant indicated needed to be discussed with City staff. 2. The Commission agreed with the City Attorney's suggestion for pre zoning islands and the unincorporated areas of the City. 17. The Commission agreed that the definition of "hospital" should be included in the ordinance. 45. City Attorney Rogers suggested removing the reference to PC Mtg. 5/22/86 Page 2 of 5 Pages AGENDA ITEMS (continued) alcohol in the definition of Full Service Restaurant. 54. The Commission agreed that the definitions of "family home" "small family day care home", "child day care facility", and "child day care" need to be reworked. 55. The Commission agreed to delete the last sentence from Section 20.22.030, which reads as follows: "...except that a use permit is not required when a Commercial use type is replacing an existing Commercial use type." Section 20.22.020. The Commission agreed that the word "are" should be substituted for the word "shall" when used in reference to uses permitted with a use permit throughout the Ordinance. 59. Section 20.26.030. Uses Permitted Subject to Obtaining a Use Permit, Commercial Use Types. The Commission agreed to list "eating and drinking establishments that serve alcoholic beverages" to this subsection. It was also agreed that this use type should be standardized throughout the ordinance. (Cassette No.2) 62. City Attorney Rogers suggested that the consultant meet with Associate Planner David Carbone to resolve height regulations related to the San Francisco International Airport. 70. Section 20.72.040. City Attorney Rogers and Director Smith agreed to meet and re-work this section as per the Commission's directions. 78. Section 20.73.050 (c) (1). City Attorney Rogers and Director Smith agreed to meet and resolve this item. 80. The Commission agreed that references to company cars and numbers of employees should not be used to determine required parking. 109. and 120. The Commission agreed that this section should use IRS guidelines and the time periods should be reduced. 121. Section 20.78.020. The Commission agreed with the City Attorney's suggestion and amended the section to read as follows: "Planned Unit Development regulations shall apply to all areas of the City shown on the Zoning Map with the Capital letter "P" following the density designator of that zoned district. When so designated, a Planned Unit Development permit shall be required for all new developments within the zoned district. Projects of three units or fewer PC Mtg. 5/22/86 Page 3 of 5 Pages AGENDA ITEMS (continued) located within 300' of an already existing Planned Unit Development shall conform to the design of the closest adjacent Planned Unit Development and shall require Design Review approval." 128. and 134. Commissioner Getz recommended that the property owner receive notice when a long term lessee has applied for a use permit or variance. 131. Section 20.81.040 (e). Commission agreed to delete subsection (e) and add to Section 20.81.070 (a) as follows: "...may require reasonable guarantees and evidence that such conditions are being, or will be, complied with, however, no use permit shall be issued unless and until the requirements of the CEQA have been met. 137. and 138. Section 20.82.040. The Commission agreed to the City Attorney's recommendation to amend the following: (a)...In this context, personal, family or financial difficulties, loss of prospective profits and neighboring violations or pre-existing non-conforming uses or facilities are not hardships justifying a variance. FH~~Re~,-a-~~ev~eHs va~~afiee-eafi-fieve~-Rave-se~-a-~~eeeaefi~,-rer-eaeR-ease-fflHS~ be-eefis~aerea-efiiy-efi-~~s-~fia~v~aHai-ffler~~s. (b) That such variance, ~s-fieeessa~y-re~-~Re-~~ese~va~~efi afia-efijeymefi~-er-sHbs~afi~~ai-~~e~e~~y-~~~R~s-~essessea-by e~Re~-eefire~ffl~fi~-~~e~e~~y-~fi-~Re-saffle-v~e~fi~~y-afia-~Ra~-a va~~afiee, if granted, would not constitute a special privilege of the recipient inconsistent with limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone in which such property is situated. The Commission agreed with the City Attorney's suggestion to delete subsections (c) (d) and (e) and add a parking variance procedure to Section 20.82.045. 147. Section 20.84.020. The Commission agreed to add the following to the end thereof "...and which are not subject to a Specific Plan as defined in the California Planning and Zoning Law." (Cassette No.3) 162. The Commission agreed that the appeal period shall be fifteen days. 186. The Commission agreed to amend the language in Section 20.90 to language similar to that used in Section 20.91.090, with PC Mtg. 5/22/86 Page 4 of 5 Pages AGENDA ITEMS (continued) regards to limiting the information Council receives on an appeal. 189. The Commission agreed with the City Attorney's suggestion to delete Section 20.91.030. Upon completing review of the City Attorney's memorandum the Commission agreed to review the Police Department's memo dealing with areas that were not previously discussed. The Commission consented to the recommendations Sergeant petrocchi requested with the exception of 20.08.444-Secondhand/Seconds Sales, which Sergeant petrocchi and City Attorney Rogers agreed to discuss. Items from the Commission Commissioner Getz informed the Commission that City Council upheld the Commission's decision to require an EIR for the Orchard Supply Hardware use permit. Adjournment Meeting was adjourned at 11:45 p.m. to a Study Session on Monday, June 2, 1986, 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room. ean T. Smith, Secretary Planning Commission City of South San Francisco JTS:JAW:sp PC Mtg. 5/22/86 Page 5 of 5 Pages