Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 10/13/1988 (Cassette NO.1) October 13, 1988 Regular Meeting of the South San Francisco Planning Commission. CALL TO ORDER: 7:35 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Terry, Vice-Chairman Zellmer, Commissioners Boblitt, Mantegani, Matteucci, Warren and Wendler. ALSO PRESENT: Planning Division Jean T. smith Daniel Christians Richard Harmon Robert Ewing Michael Dickson H. J. wittwer Engineering Division Deputy city Attorney Police Department Building Division APPROVAL OF MINUTES of September 8, 1988 and September 22, 1988 commissioner Wendler asked that Page 4 of the September 8, 1988 minutes, under agenda item ZA-88-45, be corrected to indicate that her vote was "No". Motion-Mantegani/Second Zellmer: To approve the September 8, 1988 minutes as corrected, and the September 22, 1988 minutes as presented. Unanimously approved by voice vote. CHAIR COMMENTS AGENDA ITEMS - PUBLIC HEARINGS T. and R. Maqaline, PM-85-239, 320 Shaw Road Request from T. and R. Magaline for a two-year time extension (to November 14, 1990) for the tentative parcel map dividing the property into two parcels at 320 Shaw Road. October 13, 1988 Staff Report presented. Motion-Boblitt/Second Wendler: To approve a one-year time extension to November 14, 1989 for Parcel Map PM-85-239 based on the findings contained in the staff report. Unanimously approved by roll call vote. PRESENTATION OF RESOLUTION TO DEPUTY CITY MANAGER/CITY ENGINEER ROBERT S. YEE Chairman Terry stated Resolution No. 2399 would be presented to Robert S. Yee at his retirement reception on October 14, 1988. Page 1 of 7 Pages 10/13/88 PC MTG. AGENDA ITEMS - PUBLIC HEARINGS continued Motion-Wendler/Second Zellmer: To approve Resolution No. 239 commending Robert S. Yee for his services as Deputy city Manager/ city Engineer to the city of South San Francisco. Unanimously approved by voice vote. Standard Buildinq Co., Inc. (Manteqani Family, owners), PUD-88- 13, SA-88-100, Negative Declaration No. 635, west side of Chestnut Avenue, 450' north of Grand Avenue continued from the September 22, 1988 Planning commission meeting. Planned unit Development Permit and Subdivision Map to create a 19-unit single-family project on the west side of Chestnut Avenue, 450' north of Grand Avenue. Alden Company (City of South San Francisco, owners), PUD-88-14, SA-88-101, Neqative Declaration No. 636 continued from the September 22, 1988 Planning Commission meeting. Planned unit Development and Subdivision Map to create a 35-unit single-family project at the northwest corner of Chestnut and Grand Avenue. Chairman Terry reopened the public hearing for Standard Building Company, Inc. and Alden Company and announced that the Staff Reports would be given at the same time. commissioner Mantegani asked to be excused from the Commissioners' table as he is directly involved with the Standard Building Company application. October 13, 1988 Staff Reports presented. Senior Planner Christians asked that Special Condition No. 9 of PUD-88-13 (Standard Building Co.) be corrected by deleting "3~ or 6~ foot sideyard" from its paragraph and adding it to Special Condition No. 10 of PUD-88-14 (Alden Company). Representatives: Andrew Cresci Standard Building Co. 2222 19th Avenue San Francisco Kip Jones Alden Company 411 Borel Avenue San Mateo Page 2 of 7 Pages 10/13/88 PC MTG. AGENDA ITEMS - PUBLIC HEARINGS continued Mr. Cresci agreed to virtually all the conditions contained in the staff report, but objected to the Engineering Division requirement that Standard Builders is to pay for the street widening in front of the Mantegani and Murphy residences. He asked to have this condition removed. Mr. Jones stated his objections with the Engineering Division's conditions regarding signal improvements at Grand and Chestnut Avenues, street grades, pavement sloping and storm drainage improvements. He also requested that Special Condition No.6, regarding landscaping, be modified by omitting the requirement for a "letter of credit or other acceptable guarantee" and that Special Condition No.9, prevailing wage, be entirely omitted. The Commission discussed each of the developers requests. It called upon Senior Engineering Technician Richard Harmon to discuss the items that were listed by the developers. with respect to Mr. Cresci's street widening concern, Mr. Harmon stated that he had not had an opportunity to discuss the matter with the City Engineer nor with Mr. Cresci. From a safety stand point, Mr. Harmon explained that the widening must occur along Chestnut at the same time in order to have the lanes flow smoothly, rather than disrupted in front of these two houses. The Commission discussed this issue at length. Several Commissioners felt future developments, such as Terrabay, should contribute to the widening. other alternatives were considered but because of time constraints the Commission felt this issue could not be settled at this meeting. The Commission requested that staff refer this issue to the City Council for its discussion and resolution. Regarding the signal improvements at Grand and Chestnut Avenue, Mr. Harmon stated that this was a normal request for developers. Senior Planner Dan Christians reported that the relocation of traffic signals and new street lights were described in the request for proposals for the sale of this property. Mr. Harmon stated that the Engineering Division had no objection to the additional wording requested for conditions G and I, pg. 3, as follows: "III. STREET IMPROVEMENT - NEW PUBLIC STREET G. Maximum street grade shall be 10%, minimum street grade shall be 1% unless different grades are approved by the City Engineer. I. The proposed street section shown on the tentative map is not acceptable. The street shall be designed with a crown in the center of the pavement sloping 2% toward both curbs in accordance with the City standards and normal engineering practice unless the City Engineer approves a modification." Page 3 of 7 Pages 10/13/88 PC MTG. AGENDA ITEMS - PUBLIC HEARINGS continued Lastly, Mr. Harmon explained that the condition regarding cleaning and repairing of storm drains is required during construction as there is a build up of silt and other debris that may clog the drains. The Commission felt it would be setting a precedent if it approved individualized landscaping and believed that some property owners would postpone landscaping beyond the ninety day allowance. The Commission concurred that Special Condition No. 6 for Alden Company and Special Condition No. 5 for Standard Building Company shall be modified as follows: "AII front and street sideyards shall be landscaped by the developer. Typical front yard landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Commission, Design Review Board and the City's landscape architect. II with regard to the prevailing wage condition several members of the Commission felt that this was not a land use issue but should be left to the City Council. Although both developers requested its deletion, the Commission was divided on whether it should remain as Special Condition No. 9 in the Alden project, since the property is currently owned by the City of South San Francisco; so it remained as a condition. Deputy City Attorney Ewing commented that Alden Company will be purchasing the property prior to development, hence it will be a private development. The condition was removed for Standard Builders. (Cassette NO.2) Chairman Terry requested staff to indicate in the report to the city Council the concern the Commission has regarding the widening of Chestnut Avenue and the prevailing wage issue. Motion-Warren/Second Matteucci: To recommend that the City Council approve Negative Declaration No. 635, SA-88-100 and PUD- 88-13 (Standard Building Co., Inc.) subject to all conditions, including modifications to Special Conditions No. 5 and 9 and the deletion of Special Condition No.8, and based on the findings contained in the staff report. Unanimously approved by roll call vote. ABSTAIN: Commissioner Mantegani. Motion-Boblitt/Second Wendler: To recommend that the city Council approve Negative Declaration No. 636, SA-88-101 and PUD- 88-14 (Alden Company) subject to all conditions, including modifications to Special Conditions No.6, and 10 and the Engineering Division's requirement regarding street grade, and based on the findings contained in the staff report. Unanimously approved by roll call vote. ABSTAIN: Commissioner Mantegani. commissioner Mantegani returned to the Commissioners' table. Page 4 of 7 Pages 10/13/88 PC MTG. AGENDA ITEMS - PUBLIC HEARINGS continued Rotary Plaza, Inc., PUD-88-16, SA-88-103, Neqative Declaration No. 647, 435 Blondin Way Planned unit Development Permit and Tentative Subdivision Map to allow a 14-unit single-family development with related parking, circulation, and landscaping at 435 Blondin Court. Blondin Homes, Ltd., SA-88-102, 433 Blondin Way Tentative Subdivision Map to resubdivide the Blondin Court Townhouse Subdivision to allow a connecting driveway with the adjacent property and modification of the common area at 433 Blondin Way. Rotary Plaza, Inc., PM-88-259, 435 Blondin Way Tentative Parcel Map to resubdivide the 0.905 acre parcel into three parcels at 435 Blondin Way. October 13, 1988 Staff Reports presented for PUD-88-16, SA-88- 103, SA-88-102 and PM-88-259. Senior Planner Christians reviewed the preliminary budget for the 14-unit project, and a combined budget that included the Blondin Court development--if the two developments should form one homeowners' association. Applicants' representative: George Avanessian 400 Oyster Point Blvd. Mr. Avanessian agreed to the conditions contained in the staff report but asked for clarification on the Engineering Divisions' requirement for a site plan of each lot, showing location of structures, utilities, etc. Mr. Harmon, Senior Engineering Technician, explained that one site plan of the entire project would be sufficient. The Commission reviewed the parking, including aprons, garages, carports and common open spaces. Commissioner Wendler felt not enough parking was being provided and believed that the intent of City Council Resolution No. 82-88 (Policy on Private Roadways) was not being completely followed. Staff responded that any dwelling that did not have apron spaces had available at least two other additional spaces, with an overall total of 4.07 spaces per unit. Staff assured the Commission that the street treatment approved for Blondin Court will be retained and each entrance will have a monument sign, but no security gate. The Commission discussed the two homeowners' associations. commissioner Warren felt maintenance would be better administered Page 5 of 7 Pages 10/13/88 PC MTG. AGENDA ITEMS - PUBLIC HEARINGS continued if both associations were combined and commented that the proposed budget looked adequate. Mr. Avanessian stated that if the developers find it is legally possible to unite, it will be done. The Commission agreed to omit Special Condition No. 10, the prevailing wage requirement. When discussing the project's original design, Mr. Avanessian mentioned that the rear elevation included a solarium-type window, but this was removed during the design review process. The Commission felt solariums were a good design feature that should be encouraged by staff and the Design Review Board. Senior Planner Christians explained that there had been a preliminary submittal in August when the Design Review Board recommended that the windows be simplified and more unified. Director Smith commented that the windows referred to by Mr. Avanessian were not solariums but bay windows, which added light to a staircase and not to a living area. The Commission reiterated that the Design Review Board should be made aware of the Commission's preferences and that staff must communicate this message. Motion-Mantegani/Second Warren: To recommend that the City Council approve Negative Declaration No. 647, SA-88-103 and PUD-88-16 subject to the Special Conditions with the deletion of No. 10, and based on the findings contained in the staff report. Approved by the following roll call vote: AYES: Chairman Terry, Vice-Chairman Zellmer, Commissioners Boblitt, Mantegani, Matteucci and Warren. NOES: Commissioner Wendler. Motion-Mantegani/Second Zellmer: To recommend that the City Council approve SA-88-102 subject to the conditions and based on the findings contained in the staff report. Approved by the following roll call vote: AYES: Chairman Terry, Vice-Chairman Zellmer, Commissioners Boblitt, Mantegani, Matteucci and Warren. NOES: Commissioner Wendler. Motion-Mantegani/Second Zellmer: To recommend that the City Council approve PM-88-259 subject to the conditions and based on the findings contained in the staff report. Approved by the following roll call vote: AYES: Chairman Terry, Vice-Chairman Zellmer, Commissioners Boblitt, Mantegani, Matteucci and Warren. NOES: Commissioner Wendler. ITEMS FROM STAFF Six-month review of 20/20 Recycling Use Permits. The Commission briefly discussed 20/20 Recycling's operation over the past six months. Chairman Terry noted that several recycling centers have closed down in other communities because of economic reasons, ignoring state law. Commissioner Wendler requested UP-88-825 and UP-88-826 be scheduled for another six-month review; the entire commission concurred. Page 6 of 7 Pages 10/13/88 PC MTG. ITEMS FROM THE COMMISSION The Commission discussed with Deputy City Attorney Ewing the letter responding to Mr. Dell'Angela's inquiry on the submittal of written material to the Commission and allotted time for speaking on an item. The Commission agreed that its policy regarding submittal of written information is as follows: liThe Planning Commission has also established a policy that new written information on any case generally will not be considered if received by the Commission less than 48 hours prior to the hearing." Chairman Terry requested the letter also state that this policy was unanimously adopted by the entire commission. Motion-Zellmer/Second Warren: To approve the policy statement regarding the submittal of written information. Unanimously approved by voice vote. commissioner Warren commented that the current policy on time limits for speakers (Article IX, Section 2 of the Planning Commission By- Laws) was adopted March 11, 1982 when Mr. Dell'Angela was Director of Community Development. Chairman Terry asked the Commission to determine a date to meet with the City Council. Several dates in November were discussed and Chairman Terry mentioned that he would like to meet with the Council before the end of his appointment. (Cassette 3) vice-Chairman Zellmer asked staff if there was a six-month review of the Auto Studio use permit scheduled. Staff indicated a check of the records would be done. ADJOURNMENT Chairman Terry adjourned the meeting at 10:55 p.m. to October 27, 1988, 7:30 p.m. =~""",",,J';~:~.,,l:!,-,'''''?~*''4~~! ,"" I E. Paul Terry, Chairman \~ Planning commission cit.y ,of South San Francisco ..' ......,: 0. -.'", _, . "..- .' an T. Smith, Secretary lanning Commission City of South San Francisco EPT:JTS:sp Page 7 of 7 Pages 10/13/88 PC MTG.