Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05.20.99 Minutes CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 33 ARROYO DRIVE May 20, 1999 TlilBEl CALL TO ORDER / PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL / CHAIRMAN COMMENTS MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairperson Honan, Vice Chairperson Sim, Commissioner Baldocchi, Commissioner D'Angelo, Commissioner Meloni, Commissioner Romero, and Commissioner Teglia MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT Planning Division: Chief Planner Harnish Consultant Planner Knapp Adam Lindgren Richard Harmon Cyrus Kianpour ECD Director Marty Van Duyn City Attorney: Engineering Division: Econ. & Community Dev. AGENDA REVIEW Chief Planner Harnish asked that item 1 be heard after item 4. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Approval of the March 4, March 18, April 1 and April 15, 1999 Regular Meeting Minutes and the April 19, 1999 Special Meeting Minutes 2. Britannia Pointe Grand/T.J. Bristow, Owner 70 Harbor Way PUD-98-053/MODl and Negative Declaration ND-98-053 (Certified 4/99) Modification of Planned Unit Development to replace a 2 story, 56,000 sq. ft. office/R & D building with a 3-story, 70,000 sq. ft. office/R & D building. 3. W. W. Grainger/Craig Kozak, Owner Federal SignlPaul Kozlowski, Applicant 1430 San Mateo Ave. SC-99-026 and Categorical Exemption: Class 1, Section 15301 Type "C" Sign Permit to allow one non-illuminated and one internally illuminated sign, totaling more than 100 sq. ft. of sign area. Motion Te2:lia / Second Meloni. Approved by unanimous voice vote with the exception of item #1. \\MULD ER\ISHADD\File Cabinet\Old PC\working\minutes\1999\052099.doc Page 1 of 9 PUBLIC HEARING - AGENDA ITEMS 4. Terrabay (continued from May 6, 1999) Project Description The application requests modifications to the existing approved (1996) Specific Plan. The existing Specific Plan specifies that an 18-story, 400 room hotel, a 268,800 square foot high technology trade center, a 57,500 square foot 4-story condominium office building, an 18,000 square foot health club and three restaurants in a 5,000 square foot hotel seminar center would be built on the Phase ill Terrabay commercial site. The proposed modification would provide for 340,000 square feet of office, a 7,500 square foot restaurant and a 150-room hotel. The archaeological site (known as SMa-40) is proposed to be offered for dedication either to the City of South San Francisco, The County of San Mateo for inclusion in San Bruno Mountain County Park or another non-profit public trust. A Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) was prepared and certified by the City on February 17, 1999. A public hearing will be conducted before the Planning Commission on May 6, 1999 on the above described modified project and will include: Review and action on a Mitigation Monitoring Program for the proposed project; Amendments to the Specific Plan and Specific Plan Zoning Ordinance to modify the development mix and to codify certain development standards including protection of SMa-40 (the archaeological site); Review and action on a vesting tentative subdivision map; Review and action on the covenants, conditions and restrictions (C,C & Rs); Review and action on the Amended and restated Development Agreement. No precise plan review is sought at this time. Consultant Planner Knapp presented the staff report. Dennis Breen, representing the applicant, stated that the alternatives given by staff would not work. He proceeded to give examples of which alternatives would not work, which were transfer of density to the south of the archaeological site, and the wetlands that are being impacted by the development are taken by the hookramps. Bob Grandy, Grandy & Associates, gave a brief description of why the TDM program is relevant. He added that the site has the ability to provide density that is an element of a smart growth philosophy and supporting with transit services and alternative modes. He added that the TDM program is designed to provide incentives for transit, carpool, and vanpool use. Enforcement comes through annual reporting mechanisms to the City identifying the level of mode use. He added that they had confidence that this program will work. He added that the revised TDM program had one change from the plan submitted earlier. Chairperson Honan asked if the TDM update would be given to the Commission. Mr. Breen stated that the precise plan would have the update in it. Recess called at 8:00 p.m. Recall to order at 8: 10 p.m. Public Hearing was opened. Kathy Manus, 824 Templeton Daly City, gave a brief idea of what she would like to see on the mountain. She also included some of the things that Patrick Orozco would like to see on the mountain. She added that Friends of San Bruno Mountain Board of Directors believe that this is an opportunity to offer living history. She urged the Commission to approve the environmentally preferred plan. \ \MULDER\ISHADD\File Cabinet\Old PC\working\minutes\1999\052099.doc Page 2 of 9 Gene Dove, 38 Greenridge, asked if the lights could be turned off, and proceeded to playa prayer for the Commission to help them consider the project with their hearts. Charlene Moore, 901 Hillside, read a letter from Patrick Orozco. Which stated: 1) The Rumseinritocsi Tribe was not against development but against this being done on an ancient burial site because of its sacredness. 2.) Gave alternatives such as the site being fenced off, building a replica village displaying how the Native American use to cook, weave and make arrowheads, nature hikes, and a monument where people can read about the Ohlone (Siplichiquin Tribe). She read a poem, which said that mother earth is crying sulfur acid tears. Donald Jacobberger, 2231 Delvin Way - San Francisco, spoke in favor of development. He added that he sympathizes with the sentiments made earlier. Patricia Hernandez, added that she was speaking on behalf of the ancestors who rest on San Bruno Mountain. She asked the Commission to think it was their family on that site. She added that the project would not benefit South San Francisco residents because of the high prices of the house. She added that the project is going to disgrace and disrespect sacred remains. Patricia Cammock, 885 3rd - San Bruno, added that Indian Ancestry is part of history and that they are being studied. She also stated that the Bay Area is diverse, and that she supported Patrick Orozco's ideas. Ken McIntire - 235 Old Ranch Rd. RWC, read a letter from a resident of the Terrabay Phase I project, who could not attend the meeting. The letter stated that many residents value the uniqueness of San Bruno Mountain. She added that they are loosing large amounts of open space. She added that there was a huge slide in the 1940s and erosion control work had not been completed. Jacklyn Jehl, Hemlock Street, remembered how she would go to Holy Cross Cemetery and how she enjoyed those quiet personal moments. She added that the Ohlone should have their sacred land untouched. Fred Andres,2413 Carlson - Richmond, is opposed to development on the mountain. He added that the communication between the applicant and the Planning Division has not been good with regard with the transfer of rights. He added that he is in favor with the transfer of development rights for the Point Neighborhood, the shellmound and the area north of the mound. Philip Batchelder-, 2915A Wheeler Street, responded to Mr. Jacobberger's comments with regard to development along transit routes. He added that the letter of Terrabay resident suggested to redevelop the dilapidated urban zones. He responded to Mr. Breen's comment in discussing what is critical to this development. He added that the City has cut its losses by approving less of Phase II. He referenced the Mitigation Monitoring Program, pages 5 and 7, and page 41. He added that opposition to the project was overwhelming. Valerie Tulier, 2674 22nd Street - San Francisco, who is, Mexican Jikaria Apache and Puerto Rican, asked that the Commission appeal to a cultural history. She asked the developer to think about what is important about the project that they could not respect ancestral ground. She added that it is there belief that if the bones of their ancestors, they will haunt those that disturbed the ground on which they lay. She wanted to appeal to the spiritual being of the Commission and wanted to establish a connections to their ancestors. She asked that the Commission not build on that land and they will be honored. She asked the Commissioners if they had felt the spirits on the land. Dan Shattuc, 907 West Cardinal Drive, Sunnyvale, honored the last speaker with a moment of silence. He added that the mountain is beautiful and he enjoys the environment. He added that the retaining walls are not aesthetically pleasing. He agreed with the Ohlone people that the area should be saved and a mural should be put up in the area, and that they know what the sites looked like. J. R. Laiwa, 2674 22nd Street - San Francisco, added that the indigenous people have to struggle for a small piece of land where their people are buried. He asked the Commission to have it in their heart to give the land to the Ohlone people. \ \MULD ER\ISHAD D\File Cabinet\Old PC\working\minutes\1999\052099.doc Page 3 of 9 Marie Blackowl, 407 Beach A venue, pointed out that an article in the newspaper said that there was a plan to let future office workers know the importance of the site, so there would not be littering. She added that the office buildings are not needed because there is enough congestion on Airport Boulevard. She stated that if the people of South San Francisco would have voted on the item, it would not have gotten as far as it is. Leland Behan, 186 Huntington Drive, DC, stated that he was taught to respect nature. He added that he cannot see the beauty, and sacredness of a building. He hoped that the decision of the Commission would make them proud if they decide to save the mountain, or ashamed for developing on it. Jan Pont, 111 Belmont, thinks they have heard many comments against the project but just one that is for development on the mountain. Many people would like to vote on it and the City should let the people decide what the final decision on the mountain should be. David Schooley stated that he has valued the mountain and everyone in South San Francisco loves it also. He handed the Chairperson a newspaper article from 1989, which spoke of a march of more than a hundred people that tried to save the mountain. Brett Schembari, added that he grew up on San Bruno Mountain and related that he used to go there with his father. He added that there is something spiritual about the park. He added that this is the only memorial that the Ohlone people will have and no one should build on that land. Pacho Gonzalez Villa Real, 380 Washington, added that the healing for drug and alcohol problems comes from the mountain. He added that mother nature struck back last year in Pacifica on Longview and many thought it was EI Nino. This was the result of man trying to have his way and his will with nature. The animals do not have the power to make a decision, lying, stealing, and man cannot take away their lives. Michelle Maz, asked the Commission to think of their relatives that have passed. She asked the Commission not to disturb the mountain and the spirit that lives within the mountain. Dennis Breen addressed several issues that came throughout the meeting. He added that there are monuments available for the archaeological site. He added that his fum has invested millions of dollars on the project. They have development rights because of the contributions that have been given. Some of which are large amounts of land on the mountain that were given away, and contributions to the hookramps. Public Hearing closed. Assistant City Attorney Lindgren stated that he had asked Commissioner D'Angelo not to participate in the discussion of Phase III because he had not participated in the previous discussion on May 6. Chairperson Honan stated that Mr. Grandy's report noted that there can be development on the north side of the shellmound, but in the EIR report Mr. Crane suggested that it is best to build south of the shellmound. She asked Mr. Grandy if he had something in writing to substantiate his comment. TAPE 2 Mr. Grandy stated that his presentation was on the TDM plan, and he did not discuss the issue of north versus south. He added that he had not seen a report from Crane and Associates suggesting that it is better to build on the south side of the shellmound. Commissioner Romero stated that the Commission has spent a large amount of time discussing the item. He likes the idea of office buildings coming into South San Francisco but does not think it is appropriate to build a large office building on the site. He added that the shellmound should be saved, and that a building north of the shellmound should not be constructed. He stated that he would recommend denial of the project to the City Council. \ \MULDER\ISHAD D\File Cabinet\Old PC\working\minutes\1999\052099.doc Page 4 of 9 Chairperson Honan asked if the wetlands were located north or south of the shellmound. Consultant Planner Knapp replied that they are located on top, and north of the shellmound. Chairperson Honan asked if the EIR stated that development was preferred south of the shellmound. Consultant Planner Knapp stated that the EIR had the environmentally preferred development, which had all the development south of the shellmound. She added that Mr. Crane was asked to analyze the amount of development that could be transferred from the Point to the commercial site, and how much development could go south of the shellmound. Commissioner Meloni asked how much the difference was in square footage proposed in 1998 and what is being requested now. Consultant Planner Knapp added that the maximum being requested in 1998 was 343,000-sq. ft., and, assuming there was a 13% TDM program, there the request now would be approximately 400,000 sq. ft of office space plus the hotel and restaurant for approximately 540,000 square feet. This assumes that the 13% TDM program would work. Commissioner Baldocchi asked if the Commission decided to go with development only on the southern part, would there still be the thirty-foot buffer from the archaeological site. Consultant Planner Knapp replied that yes the thirty-foot buffer would still be there. Chief Planner Harnish added that if the Commission felt that it is appropriate to approve the development on the southern portion of the site, it would be necessary to redesign the project. Commissioner Baldocchi added that the TDM would return with specifics along with the Precise Plan. Chief Planner Harnish stated that the TDM has to based on the actual project, and then the most effective measures would be analyzed. Chairperson Honan asked if staff knew who the tenants would be, and what type of restaurant and hotel would go in to the building. Chief Planner Harnish added that it is difficult for the applicant to find a user for the hotel and restaurant until they know what has been approved. As far as the office building, staff does not know at the moment. Chairperson Honan asked if staff was sure that the building north of the shellmound would be a single tenant. She added that the height of the buildings to the south of the shellmound had not been determined and asked if the City was guaranteed a height. Consultant Planner Knapp replied that the developer had requested the buildings south of the shellmound to be 150 feet if there is no development approved on the Point. Chairperson Honan asked if the Point would be dedicated as open space. Assistant City Attorney Lindgren replied that the Commission can add that as a condition of approval. Commissioner Baldocchi added that she would support a condition to have the Point dedicated to open space. Commissioner Teglia stated that the Chairperson brings up good points. He added that it was a shame that the Commission has been through study sessions and has asked for options, and all of a sudden they get all the options. He felt that staff was recommending development on the southern side of the shellmound. Chief Planner Harnish stated that staff recommendation was to permit the three pads, two south of the shellmound and one north of the shellmound, which would include the office building. He added that staff's recommendation remains unchanged and that they would support the decision that the Commission would make. Commissioner Teglia asked how staff would suggest that the Commission handle the issue should they prefer the south only option. He added that the Commission is doing a general approval and stated that the Chairperson made a good point in with regard to approval of this project which dictates what the precise plan will be later. He added that pads, work in the rest of the City where there is a set development, but something so sensitive, needs to be designed to maximize what is there now. He added that the approval the Commission gives should allow some flexibility. He asked if it was feasible to make an approval were grading not to take place until the Commission gets more specifics on what is going into the site. Chairperson Honan disagreed with Commissioner Teglia, and did not believe that staff had given alternative direction to the Commission. She added that she read it in the Environmental Impact Report. She stated that the Commission has asked over and over again for alternatives and have never received a response. Vice Chairperson Sim added that he has learned a lot about the project, cultural artifacts, Ohlone Indians, and environment. He added that this has been encouraging to him. He asked about traffic issues regarding the placement of the development, be it north, south or both, would there be a differences on the level of service. He also asked if intersections were going to remain F. Consultant Planner Knapp added that the alternatives were \ \MULD ER\ISHAD D\File Cabinet\Old PC\working\minules\1999\052099.doc Page 5 of 9 designed so they would not exceed the impacts and mitigations in the 1998-99 SEIR. Mr. Crane added that if the split development or just on one pad, they can work from an operation standpoint. Vice Chairperson Sim asked about the wetlands being overtaken by the hookramps and the flyover. Consultant Planner Knapp stated that the hookramp would occur east of the shellmound. She added that there are two ways to deal with it one is a retaining wall that would take away one of the wetlands, and a causeway that would not. Jan O'Flaherty proceeded to explain the design of the hookramps and added that it was in the preliminary stages. Chairperson Honan asked Ms. O'Flaherty to show the Commission where the hookramps would be. Ms. O'Flaherty proceeded to do so on the model of Terrabay Phase III. Commissioner Teglia asked if the hookramps could be relocated to minimize the retaining walls. Ms. O'Flaherty stated that there were some alternatives that they looked at on how to get traffic from 101 to Bayshore Boulevard. Commissioner Teglia asked if should there be no development on the north pad does that open up any options or opportunities. Ms. O'Flaherty stated that it does not change much in the area, because the grade on Bayshore Boulevard is at the existing grade. Whether there is development on the north side or not, it is not impacting the profile of the Bayshore Boulevard realignment project. Vice Chairman Sim encouraged City Engineer Kianpour to have some information on the hookramps available to the City Council the following week. Vice Chairperson Sim added that he is looking at both sides, the applicant has his economic situation to control, and the sensitivity of the area from an ecological standpoint and from the historical archaeological aspects of the site. He added that the project has a lot of economics, FAR, transfer of property, but he did not see the idea of what the mountain might become. The Ohlone Indians have a vision of what the area might be for them. He added that he is struggling on a vision of the project. He does not want it to be made up of only economics. He stated that the area will be market driven and would like to know what the vacancy rates were going to be. He added that his vote would be no development on the project do to the reasons he mentioned. Chairperson Honan stated that the speakers had asked the Commission if they have searched their souls and asked them to speak from their hearts. She added that she will speak for herself and has done a lot of soul searching, and toured the mountain. She stated that nationality should not playa role on the mountain because they are all one. She stated that she will respect the ancestral bones and would like them to respect her bones. She does not feel that they have been given a base for the Phase ill. She explained that to raise children a solid base is needed or it will fail, and she added that it is the same as building. She then proceeded that she would vote no on the project. Commissioner Baldocchi stated that she was struggling with Phase III, and the developer has the right to build on it. It is important that they work together to do what is best for South San Francisco and to make all parties comfortable. She added that she liked the archaeological site being preserved and having a team of people talk about what is the best way to preserve it. She stated that she is not opposed to intensifying the site and is not comfortable with three pads. Commissioner Teglia added that the Commission is sounding like they are coming to a consensus. It is obvious that there will be development on the south pad, but if there is a change the Commission might need study sessions, information, and a Specific Plan. Commissioner Meloni added that there were a number of options for a development for the developer. He expressed the same concerns as Chairperson Honan and added that there is no base for the project. He added that he would also vote no on the project. Motion Romero 1 Second Te2lia to deny staff's recommendation. Approved by unanimous roll call vote. Ayes: Commissioner Baldocchi, Commissioner Meloni, Commissioner Romero, Commissioner Teglia, Vice Chairperson Sim and Chairperson Honan Abstain: Commissioner D'Angelo Recess called at 10:00 p.m. \ \MULDER\ISHADD\File Cabinet\Old PC\working\ll1inutes\1999\052099.doc Page 6 of 9 Meeting recalled to orderl0:15 p.m. CONSENT CALENDAR Chief Planner Harnish informed the Commission that the minutes for the May 6, and May 20 Public Hearing on the Terrabay project were being done by a court reporter and that the meeting had also been taped. He added that the Council wanted to receive these before their meeting the following Wednesday and that the meeting was also being taped by TCI. Chairperson Honan requested a copy of the tape and she would route it to the other Commissioners. 1. Approval of the March 4, March 18, April 1 and April 15, 1999 Regular Meeting Minutes and the April 19, 1999 Special Meeting Minutes Commissioner Teglia gave corrections to the minutes of March 18, April 1, and April 19 minutes. Motion Romero 1 Second Sim to approve minutes of March 4, 1999. Approved by majority voice vote with Commissioner D'Angelo, Commissioner Meloni, and Commissioner Teglia abstained. Motion Te2lia 1 Second Romero to approve minutes of the March 18,1999 with modifications. Approved by majority voice vote with Commissioners D' Angelo and Meloni abstaining. Motion Te2lia 1 Second Sim to approve April 1, 1999 with modifications. Approved by unanimous voice vote. Motion Te2lia 1 Second Romero approved by majority voice vote with Commissioner Baldocchi abstaining. Motion Te2lia 1 Second D' An2elo to approve April 19, 1999 with revisions and to go back to the Commission for approval. Approved by majority voice vote with Chairperson Honan voting no. ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS 5. Items from Staff Chief Planner Harnish introduced Rocque J. Yballa the new Assistant Fire Marshall. He also thanked Richard Johnson for the work he has done in the Building Division. a. Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Year 1999-2000 adoption of Planning Commission Resolution finding that the proposed Capital Improvement Program is consistent with the adopted City General Plan, in accordance with Government Code, Division 1, Section 65401. City Engineer Kianpour gave a brief presentation on the Capital Improvement program, which covered: 1) street projects 2) CIP program dollars 3) CIP new appropriations 4).Project Identifications 5) Funding source designation 6) which are the high, medium, and low priority projects. Commissioner Meloni asked when Spruce and Linden A venues were going to be fixed. City Engineer Kianpour informed the Commissioner that they were working with San Mateo County on stabilizing the area. Commissioner D'Angelo asked what the status was on the Hickey Boulevard extension from EI Camino to Old Mission Road, and if there was a plan to extend it to Hillside Boulevard. City Engineer Kianpour stated that the extension from Mission Road to Hillside Boulevard is in the City of Colma and it has been with the County for several years. Commissioner D'Angelo offered his assistance in the project because he works for County Public Works. \ \MULD ER\ISHAD D\File Cabinet\O Id PC\working\minutes\1999\052099.doc Page 7 of 9 Commissioner Romero asked what type of material would be used on the retaining wall for J uniperro Serra. City Engineer Kianpour stated that the material would be soldier pile, pressure treated wood, the wall would be 14 feet to 15 feet tall, and they are planning on requesting a budget increase for aesthetic improvements. Commission Romero requested that they be noticed when the CIP goes before the City Council Vice Chairperson Sim asked what the selection criteria is used in the process and if some of the Commissioners can get involved in this process. He also asked if there was a way that the Engineering Division could help other local entities. City Engineer Kianpour stated that he would be willing to look into that and invites any of the Commissioners to participate if they wish. Commissioner Meloni asked about doing the MSB HV AC replacement in two projects. City Engineer Kianpour stated that Phase I of the MSB project was up and running when they decided to do the Police Department side of the building. Vice Chairperson Sim asked for an update on Artrise. City Engineer Kianpour stated that a presentation was given to Council and an issue was money needed to retrofit the existing structure. Engineering Division will work with Artrise and return to Council with options. Commissioner Teglia asked if a cleanup of the Central Fire Station was part of the Capital Improvement Program. City Engineer Kianpour stated that a painting contract for the interior of the building is being done, but there is not one for the exterior of the building. That will be determined after the fire station study relocation, but as part of the building maintenance program there have been some interim improvements. Commissioner Teglia suggested a power wash for the building. Commissioner Teglia asked about the Chestnut A venue widening project. City Engineer Kianpour stated that they have been looking at replacing the signal at the intersection of Chestnut and Grand, widening to the south of Grand, and improving the operation of the intersection. Commissioner Teglia stated that on one side of Chestnut the homeowners have improved their landscaping and on the other side of the street has never been maintained. He suggested that the City purchase that section and fix it. Commissioner Romero asked about removing an overpass at Hickey Boulevard and replacing it with a stop light, and what the purpose of that was. City Engineer Kianpour stated that they have noticed a lot of accidents at that intersection and it is due to a lack of a protected left turn on Hickey. He explained how they would create a left turn signal at that intersection. Commissioner Romero stated that children do not use Hickey because of the traffic and he suggested that they consider putting a stop sign at the intersection near Chevy's restaurant for the children's safety. Motion Sim 1 Second D' An2elo. Approved by unanimous voice vote. a. General Plan Scheduling Chief Planner Harnish stated that the draft General Plan document is nearly complete and wanted some direction from the Commission on how they would handle it. He added that the options were to have the meetings on alternative Thursdays starting with a study session before the regular meeting, on off meeting days, or once a month. The Commission stated that some would be on vacation during the summer. They decided to schedule a study session on the General Plan Update for July 22, 1999. 6. Items from Commission lI'1\.PEL3 Commissioner Teglia stated that the Commission received an update on the outdoor produce displays on Grand A venue. He added that he was disturbed by the fact that Panaderia Hernandez has made an effort, but the other business has not made an effort to clean up their area. He noted that staff states that they continue to violate, and he \ \MULDER\ISHADD\File Cabinet\Old PC\working\minutes\1999\052099.doc Page 8 of 9 would like to schedule a revocation hearing, in accordance with provisions of the Planning Commission's approval of the Use Permit. Battalion Chief Johnson stated that the boxes in the doorway are fine, but the violation is inside the doorway. He added that Norma Fragoso has translated for them to make sure that the applicant understands what is happening. Commissioner Teglia added that there was a sense of competition if one store did something and the other had to follow. He thought it was unfair to have Panaderia Hernandez spend a lot of money fixing the area while the other store does not have to. Motion Te2lia 1 Second Meloni directing staff to schedule a revocation hearing for J alisco Market. Approved by unanimous voice vote Commissioner Teglia asked about a letter thanking Council for allowing Commissioners to attend the Monterey Conference. Chief Planner Harnish stated that it was written and Chairperson Honan signed it. Commissioner Teglia requested a copy of the letter. Vice Chairperson Sim stated that there is graffiti on the transformer on Westborough Townhomes. He asked staff to clean it out as soon as possible. 7. Items from the Public None 8. Adjourn Motion Sim / Second Baldocchi to adjourn the meeting. The meeting was adjourned at 11:30 p.m. ~~~/Jr Marty Van Duyn Secretary to the Planning Commission City of South San Francisco L~~ (JiYclith Honan, Chairperson Planning Commission City of South San Francisco NEXT MEETING: Regular Meeting June 3, 1999, Municipal Services Building, 33 Arroyo Drive, South San Francisco, CA. \ \MULD ER\ISHAD D\File Cabinet\Old PC\working\minutes\1999\052099.doc Page 9 of 9