Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 10/02/2003 MINUTES October 2, 2003 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION CALL TO ORDER / PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TAPE 1 7 :30 D.m. ROLL CALL / CHAIR COMMENTS PRESENT: Commissioner Giusti, Commissioner Honan, Commissioner Meloni, Commissioner Sim, Vice Chairperson Ochsenhirt and Chairperson Romero ABSENT: Commissioner Teglia STAFF PRESENT: Planning Division: Thomas C. Sparks, Chief Planner Steve Carlson, Senior Planner Bertha Aguilar, Admin. Asst. II Kimberly Johnson, Assistant City Attorney Richard Harmon, Development Review Coordinator Sergeant Jim Thane, Planning Liaison Maurice Dong, Assistant Fire Marshall City Attorney: Engineering Division: Police Department: Fire Prevention. AGENDA REVIEW No Changes Chief Planner Sparks noted that Commissioner Teglia was absent due to illness. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS None CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Approval of Regular Meeting Minutes September 18, 2003. Approved Motion Honan / Second Sim to approve the minutes. Approve by majority voice vote with Commissioner Meloni abstaining. PUBLIC HEARING 2. Frank & Nannette Diokno-owner/applicant 22 Vista Court P02-0019 and Negative Declaration ND02-0019 Approved (Continued from September 18, 2003) The Modification of a Residential Planned Unit Development involves the construction of a 2 story single family dwelling and on-site parking, in accordance with the provisions of South San Francisco Municipal Code Chapter 20.84. The Parcel Map will allow the existing 24,225 square foot lot at 233 Vista Court containing an existing single family dwelling to be split into a total of two lots with areas of 13,335 square feet (new lot) and 10,890 square feet 22 Vista Court), in accordance with SSFMC Title 19. s: \MLv\'utes \ fi.v\,Cl LLzed\~003 \1.0-0~-03 RPC. doc' PClge 1. of G Senior Planner Carlson presented the staff report. Nannette Diokno, 22 Vista Court, noted that they followed the Commission's recommendation and set up two meetings with the neighbors. They showed them the revised plans that reflected the decrease in square footage but did not reach a consensus. The Homeowners Association Board of Directors approved the modified plans. She pointed out that there will be minor cut and fill. The on-site drainage swells will connect to the City storm drain system. They lowered the roof line by 5 feet to mitigate view concerns. The soldier piers will be installed on either side to protect the neighbors during building construction. Commissioner Meloni asked if any neighbors in attendance were in favor of proj ect. Ms. Diokno noted that they were all in opposition of the project and had scrutinized the proposal. Public Hearing opened. Those opposing the project were: Alex Desuasido for Chito Desuasido 26 Vista Court Amelia Abalos 106 Valleyview Way Dennison V Raval 108 V alleyview Way Prank Acob 19 Vista Court Brenda Leus 157 Appian Way Victoria Chan for Michael Chan 17 Vista Court Zita Rey 23 Vista Court Alex Ku 107 Valleyview Way Gary Belaga 21 Vista Court Concerns were as follows: · The Homeowners Association review has not been consistent on this approval with other projects. · Loss of property values, views and open space · The proposal is inconsistent with the General Plan that calls for preserving opens space, provision of stable slopes, safety and conservation of property values. · The Safety Element was referenced regarding slope failure. (Staff noted that copies of this element were being distributed to the Commission.) · The applicant has left many unanswered questions. · One neighbor stated that she asked that the house be 1900 square feet or less. · The house does not conform with other neighborhood dwellings. · Loss of on-street parking. Public Hearing Closed. Commissioner Sim asked how much square footage can the neighbors build on their properties and if the side parking being provided by the applicant is allowed. Senior Planner Carlson noted that the dwellings in neighborhood have two-car garages, which will allow them to build up to 2500 square feet. He added that the side parking is out of setback area. Commissioner Meloni noted that Appendix A shows four houses being over 2000 square feet. He asked if this was accurate information and noted that this is not the largest house in the neighborhood and there is s: \M LV\.utes \ fi-V\.Cl LLzed\::2003 \1.0-0::2-03 RPC. d oc, PClge :2 of G another one larger. Senior Planner Carlson noted that the larger houses are towards the end of the cul-de- sacs. And that there is one house that is larger than the proposed. Commissioner Meloni asked the Homeowners Association Board of Directors if the Board had approved the architectural design of home and if the Diokno's followed the guidelines of the Homeowners Association Board of Directors. Harry Gidwani, a Board of Directors member, noted that the Board looked at aesthetics, color tones and compliance with landscaping. They approved the architectural design of the house and not analyze any other features. He added that the Diokno's followed the rules. Commission comments: · The proposed lot is different from others in the neighborhood. · The applicant responded to the Commission's requests for more information. · The applicant has the right to split the lot and build a house on it. · Safety and construction is a concern that the Commission cannot guarantee that nothing will ever happen. Architects design homes above and beyond the requirements to ensure safety. · The size does not reduce the value of the neighborhood, it enhances it. Motion Meloni / Second Sim to approve the project and MND02-0019. Approved by unanimous voice vote. Recess called at 8:53 p.m. Recalled to order at 9:00 p.m. 3. Haskins, Richard Elmo/Owner Budget Rent-A-Car, Inc./Applicant 69 So. Linden Ave. P03-0076 and Categorical Exemption Section 15061(b )(3) Continued to 11/06/03 (Continued from September 18, 2003) Use Permit and Design Review allowing a truck rental facility accommodating a maximum of 35 rental trucks, site improvements, upgrades to the existing buildings, new landscaping with 17 at-grade open parking for employees and customers vehicles and off-site truck rental parking for up to 26 trucks and allowing a seven foot tall fence on a 1.68 acre site situated at 69 South Linden Avenue (APN 014-103-090 & 014-103-100) in the Industrial (M-l) Zone District in accordance with SSFMC Section: 20.30.030 (c), 20.74.120 (b) and Chapter 20.85. Public Hearing opened. Senior Planner Carlson presented the staff report. Commissioner Meloni asked that a Condition of Approval specify that the facility will be only for truck rental and car rentals will not be allowed. George A venessian agreed with the conditions of approval. They did ask that the Commission consider modifying Condition #3 to allow them to increase the landscaping in the front and rear of the property and not provide the strip of landscaping on the between 69 and 103 South Linden. He also noted that Condition #9 be removed because the tank referenced in such condition is not on the property that Budget will be using. Assistant City Attorney Johnson noted that the modification of condition of approval #3 was within the Commission's discretion. She noted that with regard to condition of approval #9, the applicant is on a month- to-month lease that they intend to terminate. She added that if this is the case they demonstrate with the S: \MLV\.utes \fi-V\.Cl LLzecl\::2003 \1.0-0::2-03 RPC. cl oc, PClge 3 of b submittal of legal documents within the next 6 months that they have no ability to use the property or to remove the tank. They also need to show that they have not used the tank and do not have any ownership interest in the tank during the time they have occupied this particular site. She added that apparently Mr. Haskins owns the tank but this needs to clarified as well as whose responsibility it is to maintain it although the tank is on Joint Powers Board (JPB) property. Commissioner Meloni noted that he did now want to burden on another property owner for a tank they do not own. Assistant City Attorney Johnson noted that this is why supporting documentation is needed to verify that Budget will not be using the property. If they were to use it, this would constitute a nuisance to them and they would be required to remove the tank. Senior Planner Carlson noted that staff could support the requested modification of condition of approval #3. The Commission discussed the proposed wash racks and if there were related conditions of approval for it. It was determined that there are no conditions of approval for the wash racks and that they are the responsibility of the Water Quality Division. The requirements are that the wash racks be covered and that they connect to the City sewer system. The applicant noted that they are not using the existing wash rack and that the new location of the wash racks was undefined. The Commission felt that there was not enough information on the wash racks. They suggested that the item be continued, and that the application was incomplete. They asked what was going to be done with the additional 2600 square feet of vacant building space? They asked the Assistant City Attorney to give some remedies for applicants who are conducting business without proper approvals. Assistant City Attorney Johnson noted that illegal use of property can be mitigated through administrative citation, and if necessary civil injunction to prohibit the use. Laurie Tallorico, Budget Rent-A-Car, noted that she understands the City's frustration. She added that they intend to continue the truck rentals only without the car rental facility and they would not use the third (JPB) parcel. Ms. Tallorico noted that the existing wash rack is being used and it drains to the sanitary sewer. They will install a state of the art facility with the new wash rack. She noted that they are willing to accept the conditions and would provide the information requested for condition #9. She pointed out that they do not want to shut down the facility because of their employees. Ms. Tallorico noted that the cars need to be moved to other locations and these locations are undergoing a change also. She added that they have no intention of using or subleasing the additional square footage. There was a discussion on the landscaping being provided only in the front and back and if the applicant could pay in lieu fees being that they were not providing landscaping along the side of the property. Senior Planner Carlson noted that the applicant is exceeding the 10% landscaping requirement by providing landscaping in the front and back. Commissioner Giusti added that a condition be added to include a 6 month review on the permit. Motion Honan / Second Sim to continue the item to allow the applicant to remove all cars from the premises, and to have applicant revise plans to include final location of wash racks and landscaping. They asked to see landscaping elevations and enhance the area between 69 and 103 South Linden Avenue. The Commission discussed scheduling the next review. They felt that the project would be continued to November 6,2003 to allow the applicant and staff to prepare the requested documents and revised plans. Commissioner Honan asked if the cars could be moved immediately. Ms. Tallorico noted that they could have the cars removed from the property by Wednesday October 8, 2003. s: \M LV\.utes \ fi.V\.Cl LLzecl\::2003 \1.0-0::2-03 RPC. cl oc, PClge -4- of G 4. Antonio M. Brandi - Applicant San Bruno Investments - Owner 233 So. Maple Avenue P03-0031/UP03-0004 and Negative Declaration ND03-0031 Approved Use Permit Modification and Design Review to expand an existing facility by demolishing a 9,852 sq. ft. building and adding a 20,000 sq. ft. multi-tenant industrial building in the M-1 Industrial Zoning District in accordance with SSFMC 20.91. Senior Planner Carlson presented the staff report. Antonio Brandi, architect, noted that they are improving the property and they have no objections to the conditions of approval. Commission comments: · What type of tenant would generate 100 vehicle trips per day. · Additional landscaping is needed on buildings D & E along South Maple Staff and applicant response: · Staff noted that the 100 ADT is based on studies by the National Transportation of Engineers. · Mr. Brandi noted that there is 6 feet of landscaping along the property and could continue it along the property . · Senior Planner Carlson added that buildings A, B, C & D could also have landscaping and condition number three can be modified to have the Design Review Board review the plan. Public Hearing opened. Being there no speakers the Public Hearing was closed. Motion Meloni / Second Giusti to approve the item including upgrading all dead material in the landscape areas and have the revised landscape plan reviewed by the Design Review Board. ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS 5. Items from Staff None Chairperson Romero presented a resolution commending Mike Meloni for his service on the Commission. Mike Meloni noted that his heart has always been in South San Francisco and thanked everyone for being a part of a good team. He mentioned that the Planning Commission has a great staff and asked that the Commission support staff. 6. Items from Commission None Chief Planner Sparks presented a resolution commending Mike Meloni from the Planning Division staff. Assistant City Attorney Johnson thanked Mike Meloni for taking her under his wing and wished him well on his retirement. Chief Planner Sparks reminded the Commission of the appreciation brunch on the weekend. S: \MLV\.utes \ fi-V\.Cl LLzecl\::2003 \1.0-0::2-03 RPC. cl oc, PClge 5 of G 7. Items from the Public None 8. Adjournment 10:00 P.M. Motion Meloni / Second Ochsenhirt to adjourn the meeting at 10:26 p.m. Thomas C. Sparks Secretary to the Planning Commission City of South San Francisco W ~~~evc William Romero, Chairperson Planning Commission City of South San Francisco NEXT MEETING: Regular Meeting October 16,2003, Municipal Services Building, 33 Arroyo Drive, South San Francisco, CA TCSlblh S: \MLV\.utes \fi-V\.Cl LLzecl\::2003 \1.0-0::2-03 RPC. cl oc, PClge G of G