The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2021-08-25 e-packet@6:30Wednesday, August 25, 2021 6:30 PM City of South San Francisco P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA Municipal Services Building, Council Chambers 33 Arroyo Drive, South San Francisco, CA Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency Regular Meeting Agenda HYBRID IN-PERSON/VIRTUAL MEETING August 25, 2021Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency Regular Meeting Agenda HYBRID IN-PERSON/VIRTUAL MEETING NOTICE The purpose of conducting the meeting as described in this notice is to provide the safest environment for staff and the public while allowing for public participation. Boardmembers Coleman, Flores and Nicolas, Vice Chair Nagales and Chair Addiego and essential City staff may participate via Teleconference. Pursuant to Ralph M. Brown Act, Government Code Section 54953, all votes shall be by roll call due to board members participating by teleconference. This meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the Governor ’s Executive Orders N-29-20, N-63-20 and N-08-21 allowing for deviation of Teleconference Rules required by the Brown Act & pursuant to the order of San Mateo County Department of Public Health regarding gatherings during the coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak, and recommendations to follow social distancing procedures, the City of South San Francisco will hold the meeting through a hybrid of in-person attendance with the Successor Agency, designated staff, and limited members of the public at the City Council Chambers and through the virtual platform, Zoom. In-person attendance by members of the public will be subject to maximum capacity and current health and safety protocols. American Disability Act: The Board Clerk will provide materials in appropriate alternative formats to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please send a written request to Board Clerk Rosa Govea Acosta at 400 Grand Avenue, South San Francisco, CA 94080, or email at [email protected]. Include your name, address, phone number, a brief description of the requested materials, and preferred alternative format service at least 72-hours before the meeting. Accommodations: Individuals who require special assistance of a disability -related modification or accommodation to participate in the meeting, including Interpretation Services, should contact the Office of the City Clerk by email at [email protected], 72-hours before the meeting. Notification in advance of the meeting will enable the City of South San Francisco to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to the meeting. Page 2 City of South San Francisco Printed on 9/29/2021 August 25, 2021Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency Regular Meeting Agenda ZOOM LINK BELOW -NO REGISTRATION REQUIRED Join Zoom meeting https://ssf-net.zoom.us/j/88485144058 (Enter your email and name) Join by One Tap Mobile : US: +16699006833,,88485144058# or +12532158782,,88485144058# Join by Telephone: Dial (for higher quality, dial a number based on your current location): US: +1 346 248 7799 or +1 669 900 6833 or 833 548 0276 (Toll Free) Webinar ID: 884 8514 4058 How to observe the Meeting (no public comment): 1) Local cable channel: Astound, Channel 26 or Comcast, Channel 27 2) https://www.ssf.net/government/city-council/video-streaming-city-and-council-meetings/city-council How to submit written Public Comment before the City Council Meeting: Use the eComment portal by clicking on the following link: https://ci-ssf-ca.granicusideas.com/meetings or by visiting the City Council meeting's agenda page. eComments are also directly sent to the iLegislate application used by City Council and staff. How to provide Public Comment during the City Council Meeting: 1) By Phone: (669) 900-6833. Webinar ID is 884 8514 4058. Click *9 to raise a hand to speak. Click *6 to unmute when called. By One tap mobile: US: +16699006833,,88485144058# or +12532158782,,88485144058# 2) Online at: https://ssf-net.zoom.us/j/88485144058 a. Enter an email address and name. The name will be visible online and will be used to notify you that it is your turn to speak. b. When the Clerk calls for the item on which you wish to speak, click on "raise hand." Speakers will be notified shortly before they are called to speak. c. When called, please limit your remarks to the time limit allotted. IN-PERSON: Please complete a Digital Speaker Card located at the entrance to the Council Chamber ’s. Be sure to indicate the Agenda Item # you wish to address or the topic of your public comment. When your name is called, please come to the podium, state your name and address (optional) for the Minutes. COMMENTS ARE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES PER SPEAKER. Thank you for your cooperation. Page 3 City of South San Francisco Printed on 9/29/2021 August 25, 2021Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency Regular Meeting Agenda PEOPLE OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO The Successor Agency's regular meetings are held on the fourth Wednesday of each month at 6:30 p.m. MARK ADDIEGO, Chair MARK NAGALES, Vice Chair BUENAFLOR NICOLAS, Boardmember JAMES COLEMAN, Boardmember EDDIE FLORES, Boardmember ROSA GOVEA ACOSTA, Board Clerk FRANK RISSO, City Treasurer MIKE FUTRELL, City Manager SKY WOODRUFF, City Attorney In accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.5, any writing or document that is a public record, relates to an open session agenda item, and is distributed less than 72 hours prior to a regular meeting will be made available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s Office located at City Hall. If, however, the document or writing is not distributed until the regular meeting to which it relates, then the document or writing will be made available to the public at the location of the meeting, as listed on this agenda. The address of City Hall is 400 Grand Avenue, South San Francisco, California 94080. Page 4 City of South San Francisco Printed on 9/29/2021 August 25, 2021Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency Regular Meeting Agenda CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AGENDA REVIEW PUBLIC COMMENTS Comments received by the deadline will be included as part of the meeting record but will not be read aloud during the meeting. The Public Comment portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wishing to address the Successor Agency on any matter NOT on the agenda. Comments on agenda items will be taken when that item is called. If joining the conference by phone you may raise your hand by dialing *9 and *6 to unmute. State law prevents Council from responding to public comments or taking action on matters not on the agenda . The Successor Agency may refer comments to staff for follow -up. Speakers are limited to three minutes. If there appears to be a large number of speakers, the Chair may reduce speaking time to limit the total amount of time for public comments (Gov. Code sec. 54954.3.(b)(1).). Speakers that are not in compliance with the City Council's rules of decorum will be muted. CONSENT CALENDAR Motion to approve the Minutes for the meetings of July 22, 2020 and December 9, 2020. 1. Report regarding a resolution of the Successor Agency to the Former Redevelopment Agency of the City of South San Francisco reviewing and approving the amended recognized obligation payment schedule for the period January 1, 2022 through June 30, 2022, pursuant to health and safety code sections 34177(o)(1)(E). (Mike Futrell, City Manager) 2. Resolution of the Successor Agency to the Former Redevelopment Agency of the City of South San Francisco reviewing and approving the amended recognized obligation payment schedule for the period January 1, 2022 through June 30, 2022, pursuant to health and safety code sections 34177(o)(1)(E). 2a. Adjournment. Page 5 City of South San Francisco Printed on 9/29/2021 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:21-673 Agenda Date:8/25/2021 Version:1 Item #:1. Motion to approve the Minutes for the meetings of July 22, 2020 and December 9, 2020. City of South San Francisco Printed on 9/29/2021Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ Call to Order: 11:24 p.m. Roll Call: Boardmembers Coleman and Nicolas, Vice Chair Nagales and Chair Addiego. Agenda Review: No changes Public Comments - comments are limited to items on the Special Meeting Agenda. None. ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS 1. Report regarding Resolution No. 03-2020 of the Successor Agency to the Former Redevelopment Agency of the City of South San Francisco, reviewing and approving a Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule and Administrative Budget for Fiscal Year 2021-22. (Janet Salisbury, Director of Finance). Suzy Kim, Senior Associate at RSG, presented the report to Council and indicated that all California redevelopment agencies were dissolved in 2012 by Assembly Bill x1 26. The Successor Agency is responsible for winding down the affairs of the Former Redevelopment Agency of the City of South San Francisco (“RDA”), including paying debt obligations and completing projects that were under contract with the RDA prior to dissolution. State law requires successor agencies to request funding for enforceable obligations on an annual basis. The Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule 21-22 requests funding for Fiscal Year 2021-22 and an Administrative Budget for the same period. Ms. Kim indicated that the San Mateo Countywide Oversight Board and the California Department of Finance must also approve the ROPS. The Oversight Board will consider the ROPS 21-22 at its meeting on January 11, 2021. An Oversight Board-approved ROPS must be submitted to DOF by February 1, 2021, who will make a determination by April 15, 2021. If the ROPS is not submitted to DOF on time, the City and Successor Agency could be subject to a civil penalty of $10,000 per day. Staff requested an administrative budget of $215,000 for Fiscal Year 2021-22 to cover professional services (including preparation of the ROPS and auditor fees), staff costs, and overhead required to MINUTES SPECIAL SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Teleconference via Zoom City Council conducted this meeting in accordance with California Governor Newsom’s Executive Orders N-25- 20 and N-29-20 and COVID-19 pandemic protocols. WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 9, 2020 8:30 P.M. or immediately following the City Council meeting SPECIAL SUCCESSOR AGENCY MEETING DECEMBER 9, 2020 MINUTES PAGE 2 administer obligations and prepare legally mandated reports. The ROPS 21-22 requests an administrative cost allowance of $200,895, which is lower than budgeted but the maximum permitted by law (50% of $401,789 in non-admin RPTTF distributed in Fiscal Year 2020-21). Any administrative costs incurred in excess of the $200,895 must be funded by the City and not the Successor Agency. Motion—Boardmember Nagales/Second—Boardmember Nicolas: To approve Resolution No. 03- 2020 of the Successor Agency to the Former Redevelopment Agency of the City of South San Francisco, reviewing and approving a Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule and Administrative Budget for Fiscal Year 2021-22. Approved by the following roll call vote: AYES: Boardmembers Coleman and Nicolas, Vice Chair Nagales and Chair Addiego; NAYS: None; ABSENT: None; ABSTAIN: None. ADJOURNMENT Being no further business Chair Addiego adjourned the meeting at 11:41 p.m. Submitted: Approved: Rosa Govea Acosta, CMC, CPMC Mark Addiego City Clerk Chair Approved by the Successor Agency: / / City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:21-671 Agenda Date:8/25/2021 Version:1 Item #:2. Report regarding a resolution of the Successor Agency to the Former Redevelopment Agency of the City of South San Francisco reviewing and approving the amended recognized obligation payment schedule for the period January 1,2022 through June 30,2022,pursuant to health and safety code sections 34177(o)(1)(E). (Mike Futrell, City Manager) RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Successor Agency to the Former Redevelopment Agency of the City of South San Francisco (“Successor Agency”)adopt a resolution approving the Amended Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule 21-22 as required by State law. BACKGROUND All California redevelopment agencies were dissolved in 2012 by Assembly Bill x1 26.The Successor Agency is responsible for winding down the affairs of the Former Redevelopment Agency of the City of South San Francisco (“RDA”).This includes paying debt obligations and completing projects that were under contract with the RDA prior to dissolution.Former RDA enforceable obligations are funded primarily by Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Funds (“RPTTF”),or property tax generated by former redevelopment areas. State law requires successor agencies to request funding for enforceable obligations on an annual basis.The Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule 21-22 (“ROPS 21-22”)requesting funding for Fiscal Year 2021-22 was approved by the Successor Agency on December 9,2020,San Mateo Countywide Oversight Board (“Oversight Board”) on January 11, 2021, and California Department of Finance (“DOF”) on March 30, 2021. Since ROPS are commonly prepared using estimated budgets for the upcoming fiscal year,state law permits successor agencies to amend the ROPS if additional funding is required for the second half of the fiscal year. Successor Agency staff has identified a need to request $2,510,829 in RPTTF on an Amended ROPS for the January 1 to June 30, 2022 period (“Amended ROPS 21-22”). An Amended ROPS 21-22 is presented for Successor Agency Board approval.The Amended ROPS must also be approved by the San Mateo Countywide Oversight Board (“Oversight Board”)and California Department of Finance (“DOF”).The Oversight Board will consider the Amended ROPS 21-22 at its meeting on September 13,2021.An Oversight Board-approved ROPS must be submitted to DOF by October 1,2021,who will make a determination by December 20, 2021. DISCUSSION The Amended ROPS 21-22 requests $2,510,829 in RPTTF for Item 12,the Oyster Point Disposition and Development Agreement. The Successor Agency administers a DDA dated March 23,2011 between the former RDA,City of South San Francisco (“City”),and Oyster Point Ventures,LLC.The DDA was ultimately assigned and assumed by the current developer KR Oyster Point /KR-TRS (“Kilroy”or “Developer”).The former RDA negotiated the City of South San Francisco Printed on 8/20/2021Page 1 of 4 powered by Legistar™ File #:21-671 Agenda Date:8/25/2021 Version:1 Item #:2. current developer KR Oyster Point /KR-TRS (“Kilroy”or “Developer”).The former RDA negotiated the DDA to redevelop a former landfill into a life science/office campus,commercial development including a hotel and park/open space,and recreational area in the Oyster Point Marina area adjacent to the ferry terminal and harbor.The Successor Agency is required to pay for certain hard and soft costs related to infrastructure development, environmental remediation and construction of public improvements under the DDA. The ROPS 21-22 adopted by the Successor Agency in December 2020 and Oversight Board in January 2021 approved $7,073,582 in costs for the Oyster Point DDA under Item 12.This was based on costs known as of December 2020 when the ROPS 21-22 was prepared.DOF reduced Item 12 by $1,835,707 for contingencies, for a final approved amount of $5,237,875 ($1,325,401 in RPTTF and $3,912,474 in Other Funds).Although construction budgets commonly include contingencies for potential materials and labor cost increases,DOF stated that allocating funds for unknown contingencies is not an allowable use of funds.DOF instructed the Successor Agency to request construction cost increases in a timely manner through the Amended ROPS and Annual ROPS processes. The Amended ROPS 21-22 requests $2,510,829 in RPTTF for Item 12 to cover construction cost increases.It is important to note that if DOF had not denied the $1,835,707 contingency,the total increased cost would only be $675,122 higher than what the Successor Agency and Oversight Board originally approved ($2,510,829 - $1,835,707). Construction costs increased due to delays and modifications caused and imposed by third parties,mainly Pacific Gas and Electric Company (“PGE”)and ATT,the San Mateo County Health Department (“County Health”),and new Building Plan Check code requirements.These events led to unavoidable cost escalations for items that are enforceable obligations under the DDA and were outside of the Successor Agency’s control. The delays and resulting complications increased total project costs by $4,115,094 since the ROPS 21-22 was prepared,of which the Successor Agency’s share is $2,510,829.These costs are non-negotiable and do not include improvements that were within the scope of the settlement agreement negotiated with Kilroy and approved by the Oversight Board and DOF on the ROPS 20-21. The increased costs were caused by the following: (1)PGE Land Department approval of easements:The PGE Land Department reviews and approves (1) easements for joint trench facilities in the new roadways and (2)abandonment of its existing easements on former Oyster Point Boulevard,which were conveyed to the Developer per the terms of the DDA. Overhead utility lines across private properties were abandoned and required undergrounding (Rule 20A),compounding the easement process for the public right-of-way.The Developer fully funded all Rule 20A work however these resultant easements were intertwined and linked with new easements in the new roadway.After all easements were sorted and approved,a parcel map was prepared for recordation with County Recorder.ATT Engineering was also involved in this process (to a lesser degree)to establish replacement easements for its new facilities.All utility services in the old Oyster Point Boulevard remained active to serve other parcels located north of this project so all PGE and ATT easements remain intact until new replacement facilities are switched over and energized.Once the parcel map is officially recorded,PGE Land Department authorizes PGE Construction to proceed with switchover and energization of new facilities.The cost for this process is shared as an enforceable obligation as set forth in DDA Section 3.2.1A (Streets and Utilities to the Hub)and DDA Section 3.2.1B (Street and Utilities to the Point). This process resulted in 5-month delay. (2)County Health review and requirements:County Health regulates landfill sites and reviews plans for City of South San Francisco Printed on 8/20/2021Page 2 of 4 powered by Legistar™ File #:21-671 Agenda Date:8/25/2021 Version:1 Item #:2. (2)County Health review and requirements:County Health regulates landfill sites and reviews plans for buildings located over landfill.A methane monitoring system was included in the design submitted for building permit plan check.Subsequent review comments from County Health finalized methane monitoring system requirements and added a methane venting system at both public restrooms.This resulted in a 2-month delay. (3)Plan Check:The restroom design team factored in multiple resubmissions for plan check each time responding to plan check comments.Project team expected restroom building permit in February 2021 and it was not completed until May 2021, a three month delay. The site fire water and hydrant system (for piers and marina/park)are deemed a private system and is designed to state fire marshal standards.Cal Water only provides direct fire water service in public ROW.(Before Phase IC fire water was provided from CalWater line service for site hydrants,Marina, and HD tenants.) The site fire water service was designed by Civil Engineer as a private system.With the Building Code change effective January 2020,the requirement for fire sprinklers was mandated.This requirement was not in project budget.The private site fire water system design must be revised to meet the new water flow requirements of two restroom buildings.This required additional resubmittal to accommodate the fire sprinkler and fire water system design triggered design impacts to multiple fire system components. The approval and permitting process requires review and approval of all component design before issuance of permit, i.e., fire system is approved only as a complete system. The above third-party delays led to a 5-month longer construction period than anticipated,causing cost escalations for enforceable obligations set forth in DDA Sections 3.2.1(A),(B),and (D)through (H). These include: (4)Project Management,Environmental,Architect and Civil Engineer Construction Administration,and Special Inspections -Additional building code mandated material testing and inspection services are required due to the added fire hydrants and sprinkler systems in both public restrooms.Additional project management and construction administration services are needed due to the longer construction period. (5)Restrooms -Two public restrooms,which are an enforceable obligation under DDA Section 3.2.1H (Landscaping at Bay Trail and Palm Promenade),received updated bids for approved building permit plans.The final plans mandated relocation of restroom sewer pump systems,addition of methane venting system,and addition of fire hydrant and sprinkler system.The revised restroom bid is higher than budgeted due to the revised and added scope,which resulted in a higher market price for materials and labor costs due to delayed construction start. (6)Site Settlement and COVID Impacts -Site settlement where landfill refuse was relocated was computer modeled and expected settlement ranges from 0 to 80 inches over a 50-year period after placement. Settlement is substantial,steep,and greatest in the first five years before gradually leveling off.Main roadway utilities and improvements were built first.As the largest and heaviest component of work,the roadways’early installation afforded as much settlement to take place before connections such as pedestrian pathways,driveways,curb,and gutters are tied into the roadway improvements.With the connections scheduled for one year after placement,design drawings must be revisited to account for in- situ settlement possibly requiring construction plan revisions to document modifications of connection City of South San Francisco Printed on 8/20/2021Page 3 of 4 powered by Legistar™ File #:21-671 Agenda Date:8/25/2021 Version:1 Item #:2. situ settlement possibly requiring construction plan revisions to document modifications of connection components.Connections must provide pedestrian and accessible walkways that are in compliance with grade and cross-slope ADA code requirements and ensure that surfaces and gutters still slope water to collection points.The COVID-19 pandemic impacted costs due to steeply rising material prices, unreliable and disrupted supply chains,unpredictable transportation,and staffing labor shortages.AGC Construction Association has reported price increases between April 2020 to February 2021 for:diesel fuel 114%,lumber &plywood 62%,copper and brass mill shapes 37%,and steel mill products 20%. The pandemic caused many factories,fabrication facilities,and mills to shut down as their operation was deemed to be not “essential.” Other facilities shut down when demand fell. Table 1 (attached)summarizes the additional costs stemming from construction delays as eligible under the DDA.Exhibit B (attached)provides a more detailed cost breakdown and illustrates how the construction delay escalated costs since the ROPS 21-22 was prepared. ADMINISTRATIVE BUDGET Pursuant to HSC Section 34177(o)(1)(E),the Successor Agency may submit one amendment to the ROPS if the Oversight Board makes a finding that a revision is necessary for the payment of approved enforceable obligations during the second one-half of the ROPS period.Successor Agency staff has identified a need to request $2,510,829 in RPTTF on an Amended ROPS for the January 1 to June 30,2022 period to cover construction cost increases.Construction costs increased due to delays and modifications caused and imposed by third parties,mainly Pacific Gas and Electric Company and AT&T,the San Mateo County Health Department and new Building Plan Check code requirements.These events led to unavoidable cost escalations for items that are enforceable obligations under the DDA and were outside of the Successor Agency’s control. CONCLUSION Adoption of the proposed Amended ROPS 21-22 is necessary to obtain funding for Fiscal Year 2021-22 obligations and are required by State law. Attachments: 1.Table 1 - Summarizes the additional costs 2.Exhibit A - Amended ROPS 21-22 Item 12 Oyster Point Detailed Project Cost Breakdown 3.Exhibit B - Amended ROPS 21-22 4.Exhibit C -Successor Agency Resolution approving the Amended ROPS 21-22 for the period January 1, 2022 to June 30, 2022 5.Presentation City of South San Francisco Printed on 8/20/2021Page 4 of 4 powered by Legistar™ Table 1: Amended ROPS 21-22 Item 12 Cost Breakdown DDA Exhibit Description Work Required Cost Agency Share Developer Share Total 3.2.1A Streets and Utilities at Hub PGE easement and parcel map process impacting authorization of energization by PGE Construction; project management oversight; site settlement and corrections / revisions of connections of pedestrian walkway and driveways to roadways $136,576 $945,898 $1,082,474 3.2.1B Streets and Utilities at Point $371,077 - $371,077 3.2.1C Clay Cap Repair at City Parcels – Phase IC Project management oversight; site settlement and corrections / revisions of connections of pedestrian walkway and driveways to roadways; escalation of material and labor due to Covid - - - 3.2.1D Reconfiguration of Parking Lot at Marina & Open Space Landscape $277,148 - $277,148 3.2.1E Recreation Fields $91,615 - $91,615 3.2.1F Future Hotel Site $86,028 - $86,028 3.2.1G Landscaping at Beach/Park $162,747 - $162,747 3.2.1H Landscaping at BCDC Area in City Parcels and Palm Promenade Restroom at Marina revised bid higher than budgeted; Work delayed due to longer permit plan check and regulatory approval conditions; added scope for fire/life safety systems mandated by building permit; special testing and inspection; project management oversight; escalation of material and labor due to Covid $1,385,638 $658,367 $2,044,005 TOTAL $2,510,829 $1,604,265 $4,115,094 Taxing Agency Benefit from Oyster Point The Successor Agency’s investment in the Oyster Point project will result in a significant increase in annual property tax revenues by adding over $2 billion in estimated new development value. Annual property tax revenues will increase from $840,000 in 2011 to approximately $24 million by project build-out in 2024. Some of these revenues will be realized earlier as different phases of the project are completed. Assuming 2% growth in annual assessed values, taxing agencies will benefit from nearly $850 million in estimated property tax revenues between 2024 and 2050. ROPS 21-22_Amend matrix 21_0806.xlsx Page 1 SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO FORMER RDA OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 8/6/21 ROPS 21-22 Amend Item 12 Orig. Sched of Value Change Event PM Soft Cost [G] Restroom [H]Risk [I]Change Total by Project Total Agency's Allocation 499,418$ 1,286,940$ 724,471$ 2,510,829$ DDA Exhibit Description 3.2.1A Streets and Utilities at Hub # 0.112 55,731$ -$ 80,845$ 136,576$ 3.2.1B Streets and Utilities at Point # 0.303 151,421$ -$ 219,656$ 371,077$ 3.2.1C Clay Cap Repair at City Parcels - Ph IC # 0.017 -$ -$ -$ -$ 3.2.1D Reconfiguration Parking Lot at Marina & Open Space Landscape # 0.226 113,093$ -$ 164,056$ 277,148$ 3.2.1E Recreation Fields #0.075 37,384$ -$ 54,231$ 91,615$ 3.2.1F Future Hotel Site #0.034 16,742$ 44,999$ 24,287$ 86,028$ 3.2.1G Landscaping at Beach / Park # 0.133 66,410$ -$ 96,337$ 162,747$ 3.2.1H Landscaping at BCDC Area in City Parcels and Palm Promenade # 0.101 58,637$ 1,241,941$ 85,060$ 1,385,638$ TOTAL for Agency 1 499,418$ 1,286,940$ 724,471$ 2,510,829$ Orig. Sched of Value Change Event Rest roo m [H] Change Total by Project Total Dev Allocation 420,369$ 658,367$ 525,529$ 1,604,265$ DDA Exhibit Description 3.2.1A Streets and Utilities at Hub #0.630 420,369$ -$ 525,529$ 945,898$ 3.2.1B Streets and Utilities at Point #- 3.2.1C Clay Cap Repair at City Parcels - Ph IC #- 3.2.1D Reconfiguration Parking Lot at Marina & Open Space Landscape # - 3.2.1E Recreation Fields #- 3.2.1F Future Hotel Site #- 3.2.1G Landscaping at Beach / Park #- Matrix showing Change Events impact to each project and cost share by Agency and Developer PHASE IC 2011 BUDGET Agency's Share and Allocation PHASE IC 2011 BUDGET Developer's Share and Allocation ROPS 21-22_Amend matrix 21_0806.xlsx Page 2 3.2.1H Landscaping at BCDC Area in City Parcels and Palm Promenade #0.370 -$ 658,367$ -$ 658,367$ TOTAL for Developer 1 420,369$ 658,367$ 525,529$ 1,604,265$ Total by Change Event 919,787$ 1,945,307$ 1,250,000$ 4,115,094$ Documentation Packages by Change Event G H I Agency 54.3%66.2%58.0% Developer 45.7%33.8%42.0% Proration footnote:[2][3][1] [1] [2] [3] Project Management cost allocation is based on Agency's share construction cost (20% share Strt & Util to Hub and 100% Strt & Util to Point; and Landscape exceeding Developer's $9.53 M obligation), Agency’s additional contract obligation proration (58%; 42% for Developer, rounded and for items outside of Strt & Util to Hub and Point, and Landscape), or based on the original project schedule of value. Ref. DDA Sect 3.2.1(vii) & 3.4.1 Exh. Restrooms budgeted at $2.76M from Developer $9.53 M contribution; $558K contingency utilized to expend Developer contribution; Agency responsible for balance of overage. Ref. DDA Section 3.2.1(vii) and Exhibit 3.4.1. Restroom bid dated 9/22/20 was based on 90% CD before submission for building permit and reported in approved ROPS 21-22 as Tab Item H-1 which estimated Agency funding of $413,589. This contract work was not ready for award so no contract commitment was executed. Building permit issuance in May 2021 lead to final pricing from Hathaway Dinwiddie on 5/7/21. The revised bid captured new code requirements and permit conditions for special testing and inspections, and increased previous cost $726,791. Total increase to project budget is $1,140,380 ($413,589 + $726,791). Contract has been finalized for execution. Allocation based on Agency's 20% share of Streets & Utility to Hub and 100% share of Streets & Utility to Point. Ref. DDA Section 3.2.1(i)1 and 3.2.1(i)2. Amended Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS 21-22B) - Summary Filed for the January 1, 2022 through June 30, 2022 Period Successor Agency: South San Francisco County: San Mateo Current Period Requested Funding for Enforceable Obligations (ROPS Detail) ROPS 21-22B Authorized Amounts ROPS 21-22B Requested Adjustments ROPS 21-22B Amended Total A Enforceable Obligations Funded as Follows (B+C+D) $ - $ - $ - B Bond Proceeds - - - C Reserve Balance - - - D Other Funds - - - E Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (RPTTF) (F+G) $ - $ 2,510,829 $ 2,510,829 F RPTTF - 2,510,829 2,510,829 G Administrative RPTTF - - - H Current Period Enforceable Obligations (A+E) $ - $ 2,510,829 $ 2,510,829 Certification of Oversight Board Chairman: Name Title Pursuant to Section 34177 (o) of the Health and Safety code, I hereby certify that the above is a true and accurate Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule for the above named successor agency. /s/ Signature Date South San Francisco Amended Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS 21-22B) - ROPS Detail January 1, 2022 through June 30, 2022 Item # Project Name Obligation Type Total Outstanding Obligation Authorized Amounts Total Requested Adjustments Total Notes Fund Sources Fund Sources Bond Proceeds Reserve Balance Other Funds RPTTF Admin RPTTF Bond Proceeds Reserve Balance Other Funds RPTTF Admin RPTTF $31,529,656 $- $- $- $- $- $- $- $- $- $2,510,829 $- $2,510,829 12 Oyster Point Ventures DDA OPA/DDA/ Construction $7,073,582 - - - - - $- - - - 2,510,829 - $2,510,829 Total outstanding balance as of 7/1/21 adjusted to $7,748,704 ($5,237,875 + $2,510,829) 13 Oyster Point Ventures DDA OPA/DDA/ Construction $18,597,872 - - - - - $- - - - - - $- 14 Oyster Point Ventures DDA Project Management Costs $835,295 - - - - - $- - - - - - $- 16 Harbor District Agreement Improvement/ Infrastructure $1,793,248 - - - - - $- - - - - - $- 17 Harbor District Agreement Project Management Costs $798,341 - - - - - $- - - - - - $- 21 Train Station Imprvmnts Ph 1(pf1002) Remediation $87,494 - - - - - $- - - - - - $- 22 Train Station Imprvmnts Phase 1 Project Management Costs $9,309 - - - - - $- - - - - - $- 23 Train Station Imprvmnts Phase 2 Remediation $620,000 - - - - - $- - - - - - $- 24 Train Station Imprvmnts Phase 2 Project Management Costs $148,115 - - - - - $- - - - - - $- 48 Administration Costs Admin Costs $1,200,000 - - - - - $- - - - - - $- 51 Accrued PERS Pension Obligations Unfunded Liabilities $168,800 - - - - - $- - - - - - $- 52 Accrued Retiree Health Obligations Unfunded Liabilities $197,600 - - - - - $- - - - - - $- RESOLUTION OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE FORMER REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO REVIEWING AND APPROVING THE AMENDED RECOGNIZED OBLIGATION PAYMENT SCHEDULE FOR THE PERIOD JANUARY 1, 2022 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2022, PURSUANT TO HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTIONS 34177(o)(1)(E) WHEREAS, pursuant to Part 1.85 of Division 24 of the California Health and Safety Code (“HSC”) Section 34170 et seq. (“Dissolution Act”), the Former Redevelopment Agency of the City of South San Francisco (“RDA”) was dissolved as of February 1, 2012; and WHEREAS, the Successor Agency to the Former Redevelopment Agency of the City of South San Francisco (“Successor Agency”) succeeded to all assets, properties, contracts, leases, books and records, buildings, and equipment of the former RDA and, except as repealed, restricted, or revised by the Dissolution Act, was vested with all authority, rights, powers, duties and obligations under the California Community Redevelopment Law (HSC Section 33000 et seq.) previously vested with the former RDA; and WHEREAS, HSC Section 34177(l) requires the Successor Agency to prepare a Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (“ROPS”) for each 12-month fiscal period, which lists the outstanding obligations of the former RDA and states the sources of funds for required payments; and WHEREAS, a ROPS for the July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022 fiscal period (“ROPS 21- 22) was approved by the Successor Agency on December 9, 2020 by adoption of Resolution No. 03-2020 and subsequently approved by the San Mateo Countywide Oversight Board (“Oversight Board” on January 11, 2021 and the California Department of Finance (“DOF”) on March 30, 2021; and WHEREAS, pursuant to HSC Section 34177(o)(1)(E), the Successor Agency may submit one amendment to the ROPS if the Oversight Board makes a finding that a revision is necessary for the payment of approved enforceable obligations during the second one-half of the ROPS period, which shall be defined as January 1 to June 30, 2022 (“ROPS 21-22B”) inclusive, and if additional funding is needed; and WHEREAS, as further required under HSC Section 34177(o)(1)(E), the ROPS amendment may only increase amounts on already approved enforceable obligations; and WHEREAS, Successor Agency staff has prepared an Amended ROPS for January 1 to June 30, 2022 (“Amended ROPS 21-22”), which must be submitted to the Oversight Board for approval then submitted to DOF no later than October 1, 2021; and WHEREAS, the Oversight Board will review the Amended ROPS 21-22 on September 13, 2021; and WHEREAS, the Successor Agency desires to approve the Amended ROPS 21-22 and transmit it to various parties as required by the Dissolution Act; and NOW, THEREFORE, the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of South San Francisco, does hereby resolve as follows: 1. The Recitals set forth above are true and correct, and are incorporated herein by reference; 2. The draft Amended ROPS 21-22 attached hereto as Exhibit A was prepared by the Successor Agency, reviewed and approved by the Successor Agency Board, and will be submitted to the Oversight Board; 3. The City Finance Director or designee is authorized to modify the draft Amended ROPS 21-22 to correct errors, to update the Amended ROPS 21-22 if necessary as a result of subsequent review by the Oversight Board, and provide clarifications consistent with requirements of the State Department of Finance and the intent of this Resolution; 4. The Executive Director of the Successor Agency or designee is authorized and directed to take all actions necessary to implement this Resolution, including without limitation, the submittal of the draft Amended ROPS 21-22 to the Oversight Board, the County Auditor- Controller, the County Administrative Officer, the State Department of Finance, and the State Controller, and the posting of this Resolution and the draft Amended ROPS 21-22 on the Successor Agency’s website; 5. The Finance Director or designee is authorized to incorporate the items on the Amended ROPS 21-22 into the 2021-22 operating budget once the ROPS is approved; 6. The Executive Director and the Finance Director, and their designees, are authorized and directed to take such actions as necessary and appropriate to carry out and implement the intent of this Resolution, including without limitation, the establishment of separate accounts and funds as necessary to appropriately document the receipts and expenditures of the Successor Agency. 7. The Executive Director of the Successor Agency and/or his designee are authorized to execute contracts and agreements for the items listed on the Amended ROPS 21-22, as approved by the Oversight Board, up to the amounts specified on the approved ROPS for such items, unless specifically directed otherwise by the Oversight Board. * * * * * Exhibit A – South San Francisco’s Successor Agency’s Draft Amended ROPS 21-22 South San Francisco Amended ROPS 21-22 1 ROPS 21-22 $5.7 MILLION APPROVED BY DOF 2 ROPS Item OB Approved DOF Adjustment Final Approved Item 12 Oyster Point Project Costs $7,073,582 $(1,835,707) $5,237,875 Item 13 Oyster Point Enviro Insurance $84,604 $84,604 Item 14 Oyster Point Project Mgnt $206,000 $206,000 Item 48 Admin Cost Allowance $200,895 $200,895 Total Requested $7,565,081 $(1,835,707) $5,729,374 RPTTF: $1,816,900 Other Funds: $3,912,474 RPTTF $1,816,900 Other Funds $3,912,474 AMENDED ROPS 21-22 $2.5 MILLION INCREASE TO ITEM 12 3 DDA Exhibit Description Cost Comparison (Agency Share) Apr 2021 Aug 2021 Difference 3.2.1A Streets and Utilities at Hub $6,434,835 $6,571,411 $136,576 3.2.1B Streets and Utilities at Point $13,863,394 $14,234,471 $371,077 3.2.1C Clay Cap Repair at City Parcels – Phase IC $649,002 $649,002 $0 3.2.1D Reconfiguration of Parking Lot at Marina & Open Space Landscape $9,920,603 $10,197,751 $277,148 3.2.1E Recreation Fields $2,830,419 $2,922,034 $91,615 3.2.1F Future Hotel Site $5,473,510 $5,559,538 $86,028 3.2.1G Landscaping at Beach / Park $5,597,941 $5,760,688 $162,747 3.2.1H Landscaping at BCDC Area in City Parcels and Palm Promenade $4,826,223 $6,211,861 $1,385,638 TOTAL $49,595,928 $52,106,757 $2,510,829 PHASE ID PHASE IID PHASE IIID PHASE IVD STREETS & UTILITIES AT HUB STREETS & UTILITIES TO POINT CLAY CAP REPAIR AT PHASE IC RECONFIGURED PARKING AT MARINA RECREATION AREA FUTURE HOTEL SITE BEACH/PARK BAY TRAIL & PALM PROMENDADE B C D E F G F E D H H G B A PHASE IC H C H D D PHASE IIC H PHASE IC UP TO 1,746,230 GSF OF OFFICE/R&D SPACE STREETS & UTILITIES IN BUSINESS PARK RELOCATION OF SEWER PUMP STATION LANDSCAPING AT BCDC PHASES IID-IVD PHASES IID-IVD A P J I PHASES ID UP TO 508,000 GSF OF OFFICE/R&D SPACE CLAY CAP REPAIR AT PHASE ID CLEANUP OF SUMP 1 METHANE MITIGATION SYSTEMS RELOCATION OF REFUSE PHASE IIC REPAVING OF PARKING PHASE IIC LANDSCAPING AT PARKING PHASE IIC LANDSCAPING AT BCDC PHASES IIC I J K L L N N N O N O S R R S T T K M EXHIBIT 3.2A Q Q P M Oyster Point Site Plan 5 Vision for Oyster Point : Kilroy Realty Oyster Point Construction Underway: 6 OYSTER POINT DDA PROPERTY TAX IMPACT 7 Property Tax Estimates Annual 2011: $840,000 2024: $23,954,000 Cumulative (2% Growth from 2024) 2030: $178 million 2040: $301 million 2050: $847 million - 5,000,000 10,000,000 15,000,000 20,000,000 25,000,000 30,000,000 35,000,000 40,000,000 20242025202620272028202920302031203220332034203520362037203820392040204120422043No Investment Oyster Pt OYSTER POINT DDA (ITEM 12) THIRD-PARTY CONSTRUCTION DELAYS 8 5-Month Delay & Added Costs PGE/ATT Easement Approval County Health Mandates Restroom Design Mandates OYSTER POINT DDA (ITEM 12) ROPS 21-22 PROJECT COSTS 9 DDA Exhibit Description Work Required Cost Agency Share Developer Share Total 3.2.1A Streets and Utilities at Hub PGE easement and parcel map process impacting authorization of energization by PGE Construction; project management oversight; site settlement and corrections / revisions of connections of pedestrian walkway and driveways to roadways $136,576 $945,898 $1,082,474 3.2.1B Streets and Utilities at Point $371,077 - $371,077 3.2.1C Clay Cap Repair at City Parcels – Phase IC Project management oversight; site settlement and corrections / revisions of connections of pedestrian walkway and driveways to roadways; escalation of material and labor due to Covid - - - 3.2.1D Reconfiguration of Parking Lot at Marina & Open Space Landscape $277,148 - $277,148 3.2.1E Recreation Fields $91,615 - $91,615 3.2.1F Future Hotel Site $86,028 - $86,028 3.2.1G Landscaping at Beach/Park $162,747 - $162,747 3.2.1H Landscaping at BCDC Area in City Parcels and Palm Promenade Restroom at Marina revised bid higher than budgeted; Work delayed due to longer permit plan check and regulatory approval conditions; added scope for fire/life safety systems mandated by building permit; special testing and inspection; project management oversight; escalation of material and labor due to Covid $1,385,638 $658,367 $2,044,005 TOTAL $2,510,829 $1,604,265 $4,115,094 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:21-672 Agenda Date:8/25/2021 Version:1 Item #:2a. Resolution of the Successor Agency to the Former Redevelopment Agency of the City of South San Francisco reviewing and approving the amended recognized obligation payment schedule for the period January 1,2022 through June 30, 2022, pursuant to health and safety code sections 34177(o)(1)(E). WHEREAS,pursuant to Part 1.85 of Division 24 of the California Health and Safety Code (“HSC”) Section 34170 et seq.(“Dissolution Act”),the Former Redevelopment Agency of the City of South San Francisco (“RDA”) was dissolved as of February 1, 2012; and WHEREAS,the Successor Agency to the Former Redevelopment Agency of the City of South San Francisco (“Successor Agency”)succeeded to all assets,properties,contracts,leases,books and records, buildings,and equipment of the former RDA and,except as repealed,restricted,or revised by the Dissolution Act,was vested with all authority,rights,powers,duties and obligations under the California Community Redevelopment Law (HSC Section 33000 et seq.) previously vested with the former RDA; and WHEREAS,HSC Section 34177(l)requires the Successor Agency to prepare a Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (“ROPS”)for each 12-month fiscal period,which lists the outstanding obligations of the former RDA and states the sources of funds for required payments; and WHEREAS,a ROPS for the July 1,2021 through June 30,2022 fiscal period (“ROPS 21-22)was approved by the Successor Agency on December 9,2020 by adoption of Resolution No.03-2020 and subsequently approved by the San Mateo Countywide Oversight Board (“Oversight Board”on January 11, 2021 and the California Department of Finance (“DOF”) on March 30, 2021; and WHEREAS,pursuant to HSC Section 34177(o)(1)(E),the Successor Agency may submit one amendment to the ROPS if the Oversight Board makes a finding that a revision is necessary for the payment of approved enforceable obligations during the second one-half of the ROPS period,which shall be defined as January 1 to June 30, 2022 (“ROPS 21-22B”) inclusive, and if additional funding is needed; and WHEREAS,as further required under HSC Section 34177(o)(1)(E),the ROPS amendment may only increase amounts on already approved enforceable obligations; and WHEREAS,Successor Agency staff has prepared an Amended ROPS for January 1 to June 30,2022 (“Amended ROPS 21-22”),which must be submitted to the Oversight Board for approval then submitted to DOF no later than October 1, 2021; and WHEREAS, the Oversight Board will review the Amended ROPS 21-22 on September 13, 2021; and WHEREAS,the Successor Agency desires to approve the Amended ROPS 21-22 and transmit it toCity of South San Francisco Printed on 9/29/2021Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™ File #:21-672 Agenda Date:8/25/2021 Version:1 Item #:2a. WHEREAS,the Successor Agency desires to approve the Amended ROPS 21-22 and transmit it to various parties as required by the Dissolution Act; and NOW,THEREFORE,the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of South San Francisco does hereby resolve as follows: 1.The Recitals set forth above are true and correct, and are incorporated herein by reference; 2.The draft Amended ROPS 21-22 attached hereto as Exhibit A was prepared by the Successor Agency, reviewed and approved by the Successor Agency Board, and will be submitted to the Oversight Board; 3.The City Finance Director or designee is authorized to modify the draft Amended ROPS 21-22 to correct errors,to update the Amended ROPS 21-22 if necessary as a result of subsequent review by the Oversight Board,and provide clarifications consistent with requirements of the State Department of Finance and the intent of this Resolution; 4.The Executive Director of the Successor Agency or designee is authorized and directed to take all actions necessary to implement this Resolution,including without limitation,the submittal of the draft Amended ROPS 21-22 to the Oversight Board,the County Auditor-Controller,the County Administrative Officer,the State Department of Finance,and the State Controller,and the posting of this Resolution and the draft Amended ROPS 21-22 on the Successor Agency’s website; 5.The Finance Director or designee is authorized to incorporate the items on the Amended ROPS 21-22 into the 2021-22 operating budget once the ROPS is approved; 6.The Executive Director and the Finance Director,and their designees,are authorized and directed to take such actions as necessary and appropriate to carry out and implement the intent of this Resolution, including without limitation,the establishment of separate accounts and funds as necessary to appropriately document the receipts and expenditures of the Successor Agency. 7.The Executive Director of the Successor Agency and/or his designee are authorized to execute contracts and agreements for the items listed on the Amended ROPS 21-22,as approved by the Oversight Board, up to the amounts specified on the approved ROPS for such items,unless specifically directed otherwise by the Oversight Board. ***** Exhibit A - South San Francisco’s Successor Agency’s Draft Amended ROPS 21-22 City of South San Francisco Printed on 9/29/2021Page 2 of 2 powered by Legistar™ Amended Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS 21-22B) - Summary Filed for the January 1, 2022 through June 30, 2022 Period Successor Agency: South San Francisco County: San Mateo Current Period Requested Funding for Enforceable Obligations (ROPS Detail) ROPS 21-22B Authorized Amounts ROPS 21-22B Requested Adjustments ROPS 21-22B Amended Total A Enforceable Obligations Funded as Follows (B+C+D) $ - $ - $ - B Bond Proceeds - - - C Reserve Balance - - - D Other Funds - - - E Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (RPTTF) (F+G) $ - $ 2,510,829 $ 2,510,829 F RPTTF - 2,510,829 2,510,829 G Administrative RPTTF - - - H Current Period Enforceable Obligations (A+E) $ - $ 2,510,829 $ 2,510,829 Certification of Oversight Board Chairman: Name Title Pursuant to Section 34177 (o) of the Health and Safety code, I hereby certify that the above is a true and accurate Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule for the above named successor agency. /s/ Signature Date South San Francisco Amended Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS 21-22B) - ROPS Detail January 1, 2022 through June 30, 2022 Item # Project Name Obligation Type Total Outstanding Obligation Authorized Amounts Total Requested Adjustments Total Notes Fund Sources Fund Sources Bond Proceeds Reserve Balance Other Funds RPTTF Admin RPTTF Bond Proceeds Reserve Balance Other Funds RPTTF Admin RPTTF $31,529,656 $- $- $- $- $- $- $- $- $- $2,510,829 $- $2,510,829 12 Oyster Point Ventures DDA OPA/DDA/ Construction $7,073,582 - - - - - $- - - - 2,510,829 - $2,510,829 Total outstanding balance as of 7/1/21 adjusted to $7,748,704 ($5,237,875 + $2,510,829) 13 Oyster Point Ventures DDA OPA/DDA/ Construction $18,597,872 - - - - - $- - - - - - $- 14 Oyster Point Ventures DDA Project Management Costs $835,295 - - - - - $- - - - - - $- 16 Harbor District Agreement Improvement/ Infrastructure $1,793,248 - - - - - $- - - - - - $- 17 Harbor District Agreement Project Management Costs $798,341 - - - - - $- - - - - - $- 21 Train Station Imprvmnts Ph 1(pf1002) Remediation $87,494 - - - - - $- - - - - - $- 22 Train Station Imprvmnts Phase 1 Project Management Costs $9,309 - - - - - $- - - - - - $- 23 Train Station Imprvmnts Phase 2 Remediation $620,000 - - - - - $- - - - - - $- 24 Train Station Imprvmnts Phase 2 Project Management Costs $148,115 - - - - - $- - - - - - $- 48 Administration Costs Admin Costs $1,200,000 - - - - - $- - - - - - $- 51 Accrued PERS Pension Obligations Unfunded Liabilities $168,800 - - - - - $- - - - - - $- 52 Accrued Retiree Health Obligations Unfunded Liabilities $197,600 - - - - - $- - - - - - $-