HomeMy WebLinkAboutEC Draft EIR 02-1993c
~G3P~G~ C~V~MO~i~~IU~IC~~14ad U~iJpQ~~
G3C~~G3~ f~~G~ ~9C~ PG~P~G~
G~ ~G~JUV~ ~~G~WOJ~G~
~C~V~I~G~ p~1V~ ~JI~G~~~JC~~
G°~'ID G~C~~~d~pMC~R94 P~
SUMMARY
The "Summary" section of the Draft EIR for the Proposed EI Camino
Corridor General Plan Amendment and Redevelopment Plan is~ enclosed.
Complete copies of the 398-page Draft EIR are available for public review at
City Libraries and the City of South San Francisco, Planning Division, City
Hall, 400 Grand Avenue, South San Francisco, California.
SCH Number: #92113002
Prepared for the
City of South San Francisco and the
~` South San Francisco Redevelopment Agency
by
WAGSTAFF AND ASSOCIATES
Urban and Environmental Planners
in association with
f
The Crane Transportation Group, Transportation Engineers and .Planners
Freedman, Tung & Bottomley, Urban Designers
r~, Andrew Leahy, Consulting Civil Engineer
Illingworth 8 Rodkin, Noise Consultants
Donald Ballanti, Consulting Meteorologist
February 1993
~, II //
i, ~ d.i \ ? 1~ .~` tt "y... ~ "/) .~i // (~~ /(f~: r ` l~ -~..~ ! /.~ pl ~ Q iL
a i _ - tC.J:vv ~n ? ~yi; J ( r ~ •('' `i !~~"~' y-p ~;' J(L ~ A
J • l ~ ~/~ ~ .f ./ ~''' f 1i a r9i
~~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ . / ~' Q
~ ~;u ~` - f ;` ez~ f~~ ~ W ~.
/,i I fl ~ « ' ~ t j" 1 ~ . A ! N1S3Hj / _' ~ W W
/'•• ~`
y'/ I~I( I/p~ ~ •~~~1 ~~~a ~ t` '~~~~ ~, rte/ ''//~~ .J '.f ~~ ~• \•`'d;'l a
~~ hJ `-'t-_-.-1^J- L.~ IT~~,'~~ 4~.. ~f. ~ ~~~ ~-~) ~,~1~J~~ ~ ~ a7.! ~ 7+, ~ ~ ~ ~` O i
(\'~C. i.t_.ii~....iA..~1~ ~ ,~``..~,~~ ~, J., r :.. a ~~ /, - \/l+~ f , 1
~~/:tt~ n
«~ ~ a w ~~~~~ ~ `' . r
/ .
• 4 W ~ 1I W `~ ~•~ 'v 1` ~ ~ ,~J
n O /~ ~ ~ ..
•' ~ f e ,.S' ',,, ~ tr, ., \... ).//°/'/ff) ! '•~ ~ •r `may
t =~ ~ • _'
!' •
I~.~ j/ .1 •` `}•'~~ •i~~ A •`'~1, i/, i ~ ~ ~~> der/ 41~/ `~~' J '1 ~~ e j .
~ Y ~ -j/ ~
1 ~~ ~~~ .- ~
`\\ _ ~\\~ .tit rY'_'r '. ~ C,~"~.t(\ .I '.t ~7 'r2 ~~~~ ~~~\.! r>~`;\~,`~ /..n /~.~' ~~A~,
\ ~, ~ ~,' ~~( ~';~.\) \ ,~,f iljt )~ ~•r r•i y~ `,\ 005
i ~.~ ,.~11 ~: i., x_`11`}' ~~~ ~i-`':.{'! -''`~%~ ~,~;.~,. .-!~ ~~ ~ ~~~1` '~ _
\~~:. I I ~"1 `t .1~ 1 I,' ~ ~~.)i:~, ji ~~ .. .. A.,, ..•~LL~r~l if ~ / 0
~ •~ r ~ _ ... .. _- --__ -._..- _-
'~ ~,',1 ~ ~_.~ ~, •1 ~~.tf, '.' l 1 ~...~J Sai'~~JC rl / rr j ~I ` Z
„ ~ a _~ :. ~...~ ~ 1~ ~. ~ l1C/ .~. _ ~ ..~. a C
++;1 / , '~,.f~ ' t j; +II ~ Y 4 •l~ fr~.1~Y 17~. ~~. -'JAN ,///,j/`/ {L c ~
j/ .. / ~ -l / if ~ -
~~\ .;,. ~.•J/J/Jy ,tw~ f i /l1`~.~' N ~.7~ I$1.1- Z ./ ~ O
``\ 'r / ^ / 1, Ly YJ.L ,-_`_J T,y.!`,L \J(t WO F., W r(~/~1l - ~I_ a /(//,)~)1•~ I U
l ~ f /. ~~ (ate«n_ <o w ~
.1~ ~ ~/
~~\•~' /.,.. ~ .l.f~~~'~ \`. „ '~' +~.i^ w ly Z p~ y y V O y u C a 3 N - a
~ ~`'~`~ f :r~ ~ _.~r.. ~n/iy yy0o iw„ww $' ~~O~VI~`zp c7- W ¢
l\~J~ lJrr%~j\ Q1-u' U¢~O~ i ¢U- ¢Z~ Z O
;,~~ - ~ w of - - a z ~~ c
r w a ~~` ts3H •J - O w
s+J i z ~ O «z W
/ lay I .~~ ~ ,~ 1 ~ ~ \.:~` ` ~ •~ ¢ ~ m -~ , : ado ~ ~ ~~
~ `
~ ~• \~ \ t I J ~ 4 III-yI1~ ~ N ¢ ~ W ` Q 'C ~_ ~ ~ ~
\• \~ ~ `~ ~ooz U~ag \ ~ `L\
~S\ ' •~ C, I x U tD m W 1- N ' ~' W ,, ~ ~ _. _ ~ Z o
1- > Z P ~ F- ~ •.
y''\ •.iz'< O~ ~•` cZ7~o=cTi ~;•\•\_. ~ ¢[a ~ ~ .~ IOU 1?~ Ooa ~~~~
I r+~,~\ ~'(a lZm3 ~ <F'.~ Nc~InW- ~'~~ I ~ "`W`-'2j/~', ~I~QQW ~ OWO ~•i/`~•)
07 ~\ ,IQZ_•:. H~ /OZ¢Jd ~`~~•~. titi Yj~, ~l~ Wa \ ZpN r: ~~~
'~J\~IN HW~ \ aw i ,- /~ ~~Lp ~'{• j~l/ ~W I>Vl afZ ~ r
~y\ IN~ .rxm= ~ m¢ ~.~ • / - _ / l" ,.. C7~ i ~.' Jaws iii
> \ i _
a ¢a ~~l ~ ( ~ ;~i'IzJ ap0
. w ~. O'x" a I w 2 \ ,~ ~ ~~' ~~ ~ i Q H ~ j o U OF < d f 1 •`
c rn a z ~~
' o9rnw ~w~ \ / ~ ~ W 1- ~ `--w I ~
z¢f~ i 'Wx~b, off.,. \\ ~ ~ Z¢~, 1./~/ ItL., i
z
~; cw7as~w~~ ~ c~ ~ p00 _~ _-
;a~w~z~ St ¢ ILL wa ~w .'~
___ ~ / ~ N I Z Q Z U_ ~ ~ Q ~
< w r- U
N ~' • U t~ I 1 0 Z F- F- ¢ d
a UF-<~
f ~ o h W ~ $ ~ ~ ¢ ¢ ~
pP~ G~t•~" SPCC CIOgM , ~~ , ~ ~ O W '~' OJ C7 x¢ ! d J O ~ ' Z ~ ~'..
'I ,,~! Gama • ~ /^ • i ( ;Q~~a-im ~r,;fi /~; VfOQQ~ ~ ~1 ~~~
~< wz z
Z m < ~~ / 07pwz> ~, , I
,~ p J d
F
/ ~ ~.. `'';. ~~`., ~g 1 1 i~ '~'~\ ~ '•~'1~~::. w~~`.~ wT ~`~1~;~._//.~/ Cw7cc'o=¢Ixu _ ~
• f L-/
~/ji 1• ~\\ .)`~' ~~ ,~r~-1~V/ \•~`/ ~~op~~>~ `~'•~ / 11 r:\~"- ._~ U 1334
.~-.. ~~V' ~ \i~»"..1.1 ~,=~ ,-- ~~;~~~~ ~ ~~¢<o aa~~. ~% ~•!,` ~ a poi
' ~~ ~t. t .~ a ~~ ~ .i 1 (~{t. Al yy .~ 1 ~` ~ - ~
~ ~\ 1 ,' ~ r,\, ~ ~~ 1 ill GFa"~~ ri O OOS
, ~•
J ~ ..;~
a ••• ~ ,.
`n .,, ~. ,. •.•
~- - ---- _.. , - .. - :- 1° ~-. 1 of
_-_-_- ___ r - ___ _ ____ 1 .
EI Camino Corridor Program
City of South San Francisco
February 11, 1993
I. INTRODUCTION
Draft EIR
1. Introduction
Page 3
A. EIR PURPOSE AND APPLICATION
Plans are being formulated by the San Mateo County Transportation Commission
(SamTrans) and the Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART) to extend BART from Daly City
to San Francisco International Airport (SFO) via an alignment that would pass through the
EI Camino Corridor area of South San Francisco. The extension planning program has
included a comparative evaluation of three design alternatives for the extension--an at-
grade, aretained cut, and a covered "subway" configuration. Initially, SamTans and the
Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) expressed preference for the retained cut or
at-grade options. Alternatively, the City of South San Francisco has advocated the
underground "subway".configuration from the northern City limits to South Spruce Avenue in
order to avoid the detrimental effects of the retained cut and at-grade options on future
development. In response, SamTrans, BART, and the Metropolitan Transportation
Commission in the spring of 1992 adopted the covered "subway" option for the South San
Francisco segment of the extension as the "Locally Preferred Alternative," but have also
indicated that the preferred configuration will revert back to the retained cut or at-grade
alternative if sufficient additional funding for the subway option cannot be secured.
To secure funding for the subway BART alternative and to achieve other transit oriented
planning and economic development goals for the EI Camino Corridor, the City of South
San Francisco and the Redevelopment Agency of South San Francisco propose to establish
an approximately 175-acre EI Camino Corridor Redevelopment Project Area, to adopt and
implement an associated redevelopment plan and general plan amendment for the corridor
area, and to annex the 30.9-acre McLellan Nursery property which now exists as an
unincorporated "island" within the corridor. The overall intent of this combined
redevelopment plan, general plan amendment, and annexation proposal is to foster
economic and physical rehabilitation in the EI Camino Corridor area and, in particular, to
facilitate development of transit oriented housing near the new Hickey Boulevard BART
station.
The redevelopment plan and associated general plan amendment would be adopted and
implemented pursuant to California Redevelopment Law (California Health and Safety Code
Section 33000 et sew.) and California Planning Law (State Government Code Section 65300
et sew.). The annexation of the McLellan Nursery property would be accomplished pursuant
.522'DElR11.522
EI Camino Corridor Program
City of South San Francisco
February 11, 1993
Draft EIR
I. Introduction
Page 4
to State Government Code Section 56000 and annexation guidelines of the San Mateo
County Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO).'
This environmental impact report (EIR) has been prepared by the City of South San
Francisco (the "Lead Agency")Z pursuant to all relevant sections of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEDA) and to Health and Safety Code Section 33333.3. The
report is intended to inform City Redevelopment Agency, and LAFCO decision-makers, other
responsible agencies, and the general public of the proposed EI Camino Corridor
redevelopment plan, general plan amendment and annexation, and the environmental
consequences of their approval. As used in this EIR, the terms "redevelopment plan,"
"general plan amendment," "GPA," and "project" are defined to mean the proposed 1993 EI
Camino Corridor General Plan Amendment and Redevelopment Plan, the McLellan Nursery
property annexation, related changes to the City's General Plan Land Use and Circu/adon
Element and Housing Element to maintain internal consistency, and the various local and
state approvals, zoning changes, entitlements, permits, and other associated local and state
approvals, which may be required to adopt and implement the redevelopment plan, general
plan amendment, and annexation.
The term "City," as used in this EIR, is defined to mean the City of South San Francisco,
acting through its legislative body, the City Council, and its administrative departments. The
term "Agency," as used in this EIR, is defined to mean the City of South San Francisco
Redevelopment Agency.
This EIR is intended to serve as the CEQA- and Community Redevelopment Law-required
environmental documentation for City use in consideration of the proposed GPA and
redevelopment plan. As the Lead Agency, the City also intends that this EIR shall serve as
'The State Legislature in 1963 evaded the Knox-Nisbet Ad creating Local Agency Formation
Commissions (LAFCOs) to provide for orderly urban growth. LAFCOs are authorized to review
annexations, special distrid formations, and other types of bcal govemmentat changes. A LAFCO is
an administrative body, operating at the county level, and representing both the county and its does.
LAFCOs are comprised of five members: two county supervisors, two aty officials, and a public
representative chosen by the other four members. The legislative rationale for LAFCOs is to
discourage urban sprawl and to insure an orderly formation of cities and special distrids.
2CEDA Guidelines define the "Lead Agency" as the public agency that has the principal
responsibility for carrying out or approving a project. The City is the public agency that will be gtled
upon to adopt and ultimately implement the proposed general plan amendment. The City is also the
public agency that will be called upon to adopt the redevebpment plan, while the RedevebpmeM
Agency is the public agency that wilt thereafter be prindpatly responsible for carrying out the
redevelopment plan. In this circumstance, both the City and the Agency have a claim to be the Lead
Agency for this EIR. In such circumstances, 14 California Code of Regulations Sedion 15051 (the
CEDA Guidelines) provides for the City and the Agency to agree upon which entity will serve as the
Lead Agency. The City and the Agency have accordingly agreed, by adopted resolutions, that the
City will serve as the Lead Agency and the Agency will serve as a "Responsible Agency."
5221DE/RU.522
EI Camino Corridor Program Draft EIR
City of South San Francisco I. Introduction
February 11, 1993 Page 5
the CEQA-required environmental documentation for consideration of this project by the
Redevelopment Agency (as a Responsible Agency under CEG~A),' any Trustee Agencies
(e.g., the State Department of Fish and Game),Z and the affected taxing entities 3
As stipulated by the state's Guidelines for Implementation of CEC~A, this report is intended
to serve as a public disclosure document that: (1) identifies those environmental impacts
associated with the proposed project that are expected to lie significant, (2) identifies
possible mitigation measures that could minimize or eliminate identified significant adverse
impacts, and (3) identifies and evaluates a range of reasonable alternatives to the proposed
project.
B. GENERAL APPROACH
1. Program EIR
This document has been formulated as a "program EIR" under the authority of Section
15168 of the CEQA Guidelines. A program EIR is an EIR that addresses the environmental
consequences of a series of related actions that can be characterized as one project. The
CEQA Guidelines stipulate that the series of actions addressed in a program EIR must be
related either: (1) geographically, (2) as logical parts of a sequence of contemplated
actions. (3) in connection with plans, regulations, or criteria governing a continuing program,
or (4) as individual activities carried out under the same statutory or regulatory authority and
having generally similar environmental effects which can be mitigated in similar ways. The
proposed 1993 EI Camino Corridor General Plan Amendment and Redevelopment Plan, and
the series of actions required for their implementation, are characterized by all four of these
relationships. Appendix A of this EIR describes the authority for and intent of the program
EIR in more detail.
'Under CEQA Guidelines, the term "Responsible Agency" includes all public agencies, other
than the Lead Agency, which have discretionary approval power over aspects of the project for which
the Lead Agency has prepared an EIR.
2Under CEC~A Guidelines, the term "Trustee Agency" means a state agency having jurisdction
by law over natural resources affected by the project that are held in trust by the people of
California.
'Pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33333.3, this DEIR will be distributed to each
affected taxing entity and to the Fiscal Review Committee for the redevelopment plan. "Affected
taxing entities" are defined in Health and Safety Code Section 333353.2 as those governmental
taxing agencies which levy a property tax on property in the project area.
522' DE/R~ 1522
EI Camino Corridor Program
City of South San Francisco
February 11, 1993
2. EIR Assumptions
Graft EIR
I. Introduction
Page 6
The proposed redevelopment plan, GPA and annexation are intended to establish the land
use allowances, development standards, and blight elimination measures necessary to
encourage and facilitate appropriate, BART-oriented real estate, public facilities, and
economic development in the EI Camino Corridor (project area). One of the principal
aspects of the planning program is to facilitate the undergrounding of BART and the
contiguous segment of Colma Creek as a key blight-elimination measure necessary to
accommodate the types of BART-oriented residential and economic development envisioned
by the City. .
The environmental impact analyses in this EIR are based on the conservative ("worst case")
assumption that the redevelopment plan, GPA, and annexation, and the combination of land
use and redevelopment actions made possible by these actions (transit oriented residential
and commercial land use intensification, housing assistance, street landscaping, etc.) will be
highly successful in stimulating real estate and economic development in the corridor and,
as a result, the project area could reach full "buildout" under the proposed general plan
amendment land use policies by the year 2010.
The conservative assumption applied throughout the report is that the proposed "project"-
i.e., the redevelopment plan, general pan amendment, and annexation--would include the
following changes and timing:
(a) completion of a proposed combination of project-assisted BART undergrounding and
Colma Creek undergrounding actions prior to the year 2010; and as a related result,
(b) project encouragement and facilitation of full buildout of the corridor by the year 2010
under the policies of the adopted Citv of South San Francisco General Plan, as amended
by the proposed EI Camino Corridor GPA.
Wherever possible, the impact assessments in this EIR describe: (1) the effects of buildout
in the project area without and with implementation of all the various proposed
redevelopment program actions (BART and Colma Creek undergrounding, commercial and
residential development assistance, etc.), and (2) the added effects of anticipated cumulative
development outside the project area, including atywide and regional growth.
Minor deviations in the future timing, order, or magnitude of the various individual
redevelopment plan actions are not expected to significantly change the findings in this EIR.
EI Camino Corridor Program Draft EIR
Ciry of South San Francisco I. Introduction
February 11, 1993 Page 7
C. EIR SCOPE: POSSIBLE SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
As provided for in the CEQA Guidelines, the scope of this EIR includes all environmental
issues to be resolved and all areas of controversy known to the City (the Lead Agency),
including those issues and concerns identified as possibly significant by the City in its Initial
Study of the proposed action (the City's Initial Study Checklist and narrative is included in
Appendix B of this report), and by other interested agencies and individuals in response to
the City's Notice of Preparation of a Draft EIR.' These possible areas of controversy and
issues of concern to be resolved are as follows:
1. Land Use factors, including the potential effects of the redevelopment plan, general
plan amendment, and annexation in facilitating changes in project area land use, and
the impacts of these land use changes on existing land use conditions within and
adjacent to the project area;
2. Visual and Urban Design factors, including the anticipated appearance of the various
proposed residential densities, the effects of proposed land use changes on the overall
appearance of the area, the impacts of the anticipated development pattern on
surrounding neighborhoods, and the urban design implications of the proposed Hickey
Boulevard BART station site plan;
3. Housing, Population, and Employment factors, including the anticipated relationship
of project-advocated housing types to identified local needs, and the effects of the
redevelopment plan, GPA, and annexation actions on citywide housing, population, and
jobs/housing ratio conditions;
4. Transportation factors, including the impacts of the GPA land use scenario and any
specific, project-financed local transportation system modifications on future
transportation characteristics throughout the corridor and surrounding local circulation
system, including changes in daily and peak-period traffic volumes, local roadway
system operation and safety, pedestrian conditions, and local transit needs;
5. Noise Impacts, including the effects of undergrounding on BART-generated noise, the
compatibility of the plan-faalitated future land use mix with projected local airport,
railroad, and arterial noise generation characteristics; and the effect of the project-
facilitated land use intensification and related traffic increases on the local noise
environment;
6. Stone dra/nage, water, and sewer faclllt/es impacts of the plan-facilitated land use
and infrastructure changes, including effects on runoff rates and volumes, related
'A Notice of Preparation (NOP) of a Draft EIR to Responsible Agencies and interested parties
was issued by the State Clearinghouse on October 29, 1992 and by the City on October 17, 1992.
5221DElRl 1.522
EI Camino Corridor Program
City of South San Francisco
February 11, 1993
Draft EIR
1. Introduction
Page 8
impacts on the adequacy of the municipal storm drainage system serving the corridor,
and the adequacy of the existing sewer and water system in the area to serve
anticipated growth;
7. Other Public service provision impacts including the effects of project-facilitated
intensification on police and fire protection, schools, parks and recreation, and road
maintenance needs;
8. Soils and geolog/c impacts, including the implications of possible differential
settlement potentials, high water table and shrink-swell conditions, and regional seismic
factors;
9. AIr quality Impacts associated with project-facilitated land use intensification and .
circulation system changes, and related implications of the new BAAQMD Bav Area '91
Clean Air Plan rules;
10. Vegetation and wildlife effects, including possible project-related impacts on local
sensitive species; and
11. Protect Relationships to Adopted Plans, including the consistency of the proposed
redevelopment plan and general plan amendment with pertinent policies of the Ci of
South San Francisco General Plan and relevant regional plans (Association of Bay
Area Governments plans, the Regional Air Quality Management Plan, etc.).
D. SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACTS
This EIR identifies possible significant adverse project impacts and recommends
corresponding mitigation measures. Where it is determined that certain impacts would
remain significant because no reasonably feasible mitigation measures have been identified
in this EIR, or because the mitigations that are identified may not reduce the impact to a
level of insignificance, the EIR describes such impacts as "unavoidable" (see chapter VII,
Unavoidable and Irreversible Adverse Effects). Impacts that are identified as possibly
significant, but which are not listed as "unavoidable" (in chapter VII), fiave been determined
to be capable of mitigation to a point of insignificance by implementation of the related
mitigation measure or measures recommended in this EIR.
E. REPORT ORGANRATION
The information in this EIR is generally organized under the headings listed above. For
each impact category, the report describes:
1. the setting;
522~DEIR~! 522
EI Camino Corridor Program Draft EIR
City of South San Francisco I. Introduction
February 11, 1993 Pege 9
2. impacts anticipated with the proposed project; and
3. mitigation measures recommended to reduce or eliminate anticipated significant
impacts.
In addition, the report includes a section evaluating various alternatives to the proposed
action, and a section summarizing the EIR information in terms of the various CEQA-
required impact categories, including growth-inducing effects, unavoidable adverse effects,
irreversible effects, short-term verses long-term environmental productivity, cumulative
impacts, and effects found not to be significant.
F. FISCAL IMPACTS
The fiscal impacts of the proposed redevelopment plan and associated GPA and annexation
are not identified in this EIR. CEQA Guidelines do not require evaluation of project fiscal
impacts. However, the fiscal effects of the redevelopment plan are being evaluated under a
separate Agency procedure being completed concurrently, but independently of the EIR
process.' Pursuant to California Community Redevelopment Law, the Agency has prepared
a Preliminary Reporiz on the plan that includes a fiscal analysis, and has established a
Fiscal Review Committee to review and comment on the fiscal aspects of the proposed
redevelopment plan. The Fiscal Review Committee includes representatives of those public
agencies that share in the proceeds of property taxes collected in the area.
'Section 15131(c) of the CEDA Guidelines allows the Lead Agency to present economic or
social information on a project in whatever form the agency desires to allow such factors to be
considered in reaching a decision on a project.
ZSouth San Francisco Redevelopment Agency, Preliminary Report EI Camino Corridor
Redevelopment Project, December 1992.
5221DE1R11.522
EI Camino Corridor Program
Ciry of South San Francisco
February 11, 1993
Draft EIR
I. Introduction
Page t 0
5221DElRI1.522
El Camino Corridor Program
City of South San Francisco
February 11, 1993
II. SUMMARY
Draft EIR
II. Summary
522/DEIR~I'ITI,EPGS.522
EI Camino Corridor Program Draft EIR
City of South San Francisco II. Summary
February 11, 1993 Page 13
II. SUMMARY'
This EIR chapter provides a brief summary of the proposed EI Camino Corridor project and
its environmental consequences. The chapter includes a summary description of the
various proposed project actions, a summary list of possible areas of controversy and
issues to be resolved, a summary identification of each significant impact and assoaated
mitigation recommendations, and a summary of project alternatives.
This summary should not be relied upon for a thorough understanding of individual impacts
and mitigation measures. Please refer to Chapter /V for a more complete description of
project impacts and mitigation measures.
A. PROPOSED PROJECT
Plans are being formulated by SamTrans and BART to extend BART from Daly Cih• to San
Francisco International Airport (SFO) via an alignment that would pass through the EI
Camino Corridor area of South San Francisco. The extension plans also call for
construction of a BART station in the corridor area at Hickey Boulevard. The
SamTrans/BART identified 'Locally Preferred Alternative" for the South San Francisco
segment is a covered subway configuration, with the stipulation that a retained cut or at-
grade configuration would be constructed if additional funds cannot be secured for the
subway option. To maximize the benefits and minimize the adverse impacts of the BART
extension plan and to stimulate revitalization of the EI Camino Corridor area, the City of
South San Francisco is advocating the underground 'subway" configuration for this corridor
segment of BART, and in combination with the subway option, is also advocating the
development of Vansit-oriented land uses in the Hickey Boulevard BART station vicinity.
To achieve these objectives, the City and the South San Francisco Redevelopment Agency
are proposing to adopt and implement a redevelopment project for the EI Camino Corridor
which includes the following components:
(1) a redevelopment plan for implementing various public improvement and facilities
projects in the corridor area, including the BART undergrounding;
(2) a general plan amendment for the redevelopment project area which creates a new
planning area (Planning Area 11) for the corridor and modifies the land use and
housing sections of the City of South San Francisco General Plan to accommodate
transit oriented residential development types and densities; and
522 GEIR`ll 522
EI Camino Corridor Program Draft EIR
City of South San Francisco I1. Summary
February 11, 1993 Page 14
(3) annexation to the City of the existing, 30.9-acre McLellan Nursery property, which is
currently an unincorporated county 'island" within the corridor area
Pursuant to California Community Redevelopment Law (California Health and Safety Code
Section 33000, et. seq.), the redevelopment plan component of the program is intended to
authorize and finance implementation of South San Francesco Redevelopment Agency
efforts to improve those existing and anticepated physical and economic conditions in the
project area that cannot reasonably be expected to be implemented by private enterprise
alone.
The proposed redevelopment plan would authorize a range of Agency actions designed to
alleviate blighted conditions and blighting influences within the project area, including
measures to {1) implement the undergrounding of a segment of the proposed BART Daly
City to SFO extension through South San Francisco from the northern City limits to South
Spruce Avenue and the covering of adjacent segments of the Colma Creek drainage
channel in order to eliminate blight conditions and facelitate the City's residential and
economic development goals, (b) improve other inadequate infrastructure and public facilities
in the corridor, {c) facilitate feasible transit-oriented residential and commerceal development
in the corridor, (d) improve related traffic cerculation, (e) improve affordable housing
opportunities, and (f) improve visual amenities within the project area.
B. AREAS OF POSSIBLE CONTROVERSY AND ISSUES TO BE RESOLVED
As provided for in CE~A statutes and guidelines, the environmental focus of this EIR is
limited to those areas of controversy or issues known to the City of South San Francisco
(the Lead Agency) and the South San Francesco Redevelopment Agency (a Responsible
Agency), including those concerns identified as possibly significant by the City in its
preliminary review (Initial Study) of the proposed project, and by other interested agencies
and individuals in response to the City's Notice of Preparation (NOP). These areas of
possible controversy and impact concern include:
1. Land use factors,
2. Visual and urban design factors,
3. Housing, population, and employment,
4. Transportation,
5. Noise,
6. Storm drainage, water, and sewer facelities,
7. Other public services,
8. Soils and geology,
9. Air quality, and
10. Vegetation and wildlife.
522~DElR1 fl. 522
EI Camino Corridor Program Draft EIR
City of South San Francisco II. Summary
February 11, 1993 Pas,~e 1S
C. SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATIONS
Each signif'~cant project impact and associated mitigation measure or measures identified in
this EIR is summarized in the SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATIONS chart that
follows. The summary chart has been organized to correspond with the more detailed
impact and mitigation discussions in Section IV of this EIR. The chart is arranged in five
columns: (1) significant adverse environmental impacts, (2) level of Impact signif'~cance prior
to implementation of recommended mitigation measures, (3) recommended impact mitigation
measures, (4) entity responsible for implementing each mitigation measure, and (5) level of
impact significance after implementation of the mitigation measures.
In those instances where more than one measure may be required to mitigate an impact to
a less-than-significant level, a series of mitigation measures is listed. For a complete
description of the environmental setting, impacts, and mitigation measures associated with
each particular environmental category, please refer to Chapter /V.
D. MITIGATION IMPLEMENTATION
For those mitigation measures identified in this EIR that are included as conditions of
project approval, a mitigation monitoring program would be formulated by the City and
Agency staff for use to ensure effective mitigation implementation. Implementation of most
of the mitigation measures recommended in this EIR would be subject to effective
monitoring through the City's and the Agency's normal development review procedures.
However, to satisfy State AB 3180, a documented record of mitigation implementation will
be necessary. Chapter VIII of this EIR includes a suggested Mitigation Monitoring Checklist
form for City and Agency staff use in meeting the requirements of AB 3180; i.e., in
establishing the 'livho, what, when, where, .and how" aspects for each mitigation measure
from this EIR that is ultimately required as a condition of project approval.
E. SUMMARY OF ALTERNATIVES
As noted in the Introduction, this EIR examines the comparative merits of five alternatives to
the proposed action, including: (1) a "no project" alternative, where no redevelopment,
general plan amendment, or annexation activities would be undertaken in the EI Camino
Corridor; (2) a redevelopment Ian pos u I an amendment; (3) a
redevelopment plan general plan amendment as proposed, but with r used residential
densities; (4) a redevelopment plan and general pan amendment as proposed, but with
increased residential densities; (5) a redevelopment plan and general plan amendment as
proposed, but with modified redevelopment activities; and (6) a redevelopment plan
amendment with a modified boundary configuration.
c~~ r: ~r~ r~ c~~
EI Camino Corridor Program
City of South San Francisco
February 11, 1993
Z
V
F..
G
Z
a
Q
Z
U
Z
LL
0
C
cu
t y .Q C ""'
"' > ci7 a~ p
L~ a H U N
.- H ~ m
o c E a ~' U
c ~ m ~ $,
2 ~ ~
_ O
cNQ ~ cNp ~ M N
~. N a~
y C C (~ ~ ~
_ C p to
v > t 3 c
y N o_o.s c
U C ~ m ~ ~
v y CC N C Q '~'
pp O
O ~ C U O ~
N
.~ ~ m ~ C C
~ U -
~ ~'
~~~:°cEc
c 3~ aci Q o c
~ ov~a~a~
~ U ~ x ~ E
t ~ c ` c ~ 4
C ~ ~. cp O ~
y c~ O y .: N tq
t6 y U U ~ ~' G
~ C p C E y N
~ ~ ~ a ''
~C N ~ N p
Q C ~ > "' ~.
W O m ~ ~ ~ O
N
~ O ~ C O m
C ~ C C ~ .N C
O E ~ N ~ O >
a O O ~ r ~
`' C
C cC4 ~ ~ ~ w O
cC n ~ ~ 'o ~ H
U ~ C ~ RS
cC ~ p «. ~ N
G. N p N C r `~
E~wvi`~~°v~ica
a~
~ y v N M H O
• C cts
G O c`C C O c~
O ~ +- v
..
E ~ ~' ~ ~ °'
y w m p ~ ,co tC
Q O .L-. ~ '~ C C
c c c c Q-;o ~
N~~~cp~
~ fC U
y U v vi .Np. ~ ~
v ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ ~
~ 3 ~ a~ N c
O, O O .O i~ ? N
o.~~~Z ttS
U
O
._. O=
~ 3
c C
o ~
~ a
O `O
co d
x
m
~~pp d
E
Q V
a
c? ~,
O
E
~ ~
m
E o
~ +..
a~
N a.
C H
p
Of
C
O
E
Q
O
N ~
~ +~
~ ~
N ~ O
C p
O ~ N
a y ~
t ~ ~.
C
N ~
ayi M 3
c >• c°
V ~ ~
d •X 3
o ~
~ ~ a~~i
J cC tC
U
m
•- m 'o
~ a
v ~m
w U r
Q ~ C
a~
U
C C
c~
~
Q
.
w .+
'
a;
c s
~ Z
_
~ ~ ~ ~
C ~
O N
C
~,
~ Q Z
m
tQ
O
C
O
p
C C
cC ~ .. O
C V p ~
p 'C ~ ~
O ~' r
a N ~ ~
E
Z
Q
J
m
m
C
Z
J
e
a~
O V
N
U N
E 'r
_ c
'~ o
C
~, °'
v
.-
Q a~i
~_
O H
U m
N -p
c ~'
~ C
J .
~ ~ L_
~ N c
o ~ •-
U w
.N
~ C
'~ .Q ..,.
.~ ~~ o d
'O ~_
~ ~ i0 .r
~ N U ~
ca
3~°~ c
m c ~ ~
4~-p C
o ~ c ~
4 c ~ D.
m
m E c
~ ~ ~ m
~ d N C
Z ~ 'O ~
Draft EIR
11. Summary
Page 16
cVII
a
m
~ ~
w 'o
'c coo
~ c
'N ~
c
c~
U t U
'c ~ 'c
~ ~ ~
CA J (/)
u u u
~ J ~
EI Camino Corridor Program
City of South San Francisco
February 11, 1993
m
c
mcL
n°.~~
c
0
w
c~
rn
O
c
r
O C t
a°in3
Z Z
z z
Draft EIR
II. Summary
Page 17
m
.~ •~
..
c ~
Z Z
J
J
v ~ N L O ~ ~ N
~ 2 ~ o a, ~
a fn
•~
,
~o PENN ~~0~°c 3v 3~ ~ oc~a>
mN
~~
~~ Q•
•~~o ~ ooao~~ma~°ic~ v,.>_ m n~~~ ~
C
v
~ ~ = o E
m ~ ~ O ~ ° ~ ~ ~ ° ~
°~ U ~ ~ n m
N
c a
~ H G .0
c c
2 0 ~ C
' C •
t4 N~ O N •x p is
r .
" y ~
~
O~ 0 0 y E
~ y
o ~ ~
~n u~ ~ ~' c ~ c
c c. Q. ~ a N ~
E ~ ~ ~ ~ o
..~,°'°' m
a
m
Q ~ ~, 3 ~ ~ cv L u~ ~ E ~ ~ ~° ca g ~ c ~ c •~ ~ ~ ~ .
c~
.
tq t0 y
"'~E c C~
a'
~c°
~° c O~~ O y ~ (A N
~r'ON~
ro~m O ~.-
~° 'd L
>>~
i
~ O
=>
t ac
i
c
~
~ ~
cti
~ ° °
= ~ v
i
a
~ ~ Q:
a
3
DLO. ~ E
~
- t
> .°
' ~
... tSf Q ~~ ~
v c o L ~
m a
i 2
~ m y W ~ o t0 ~~ a~
v m i
~
'o «- t Z~ w ~ ~
p c
c o ~ a S. L
o c ~ i tC
a a~ V~ - v n o
.o ~ >- N ~"? c ui c °
m ~ c c ,... a~ ~
~ u' ~ v_' c c c
ca t ~o
v~ a`s c ca c rn o ~ o- ~ v O ~ r~ ca T' c o cti ~ N ~ c cv ~ ~ w .r ..U-.
.
•
aci ~ C~ a~ ~ a~'i c ~ ~ ~ ~ o a E ~ ~' ~ ~' •° ~ rn
~ ca ° v' ~
~
°-a~ v~aaU~ ~
E ~ ~ ~ °-W~ ~U ~t ~ o
m ~,
E~ c
~
N~ aN ~
~
Z; ~Jia
o~c
• ~a~a o~ ~~
mE~DO o
~ oa~, Doman
c~~0°E~E~rn
~'~ ma~~
io
E~~~a~ u u u
L~~ O y 0 0 L~ , L C Z c O
O N~ ~~ 0 cC L~~ d
` (n ~
F- 'O F- _ ~ _ ~ .-. cSS V C
V O O Q O L L N r- .. to
U U H- « (!~ J (n
;~'~, a[.l' iF- -•! iii 1t h/xx -.r ~ ~ ~f;
r % L .,/ 1, r F I ~.
~~ ~ ,. inv. " t •l~ %
~, r ~i~ /
bl --(. - .fir • ~~. (J y F' ~r?3_
/,l,~\ s /~ ,1 Z w r
' U
~F
~ 4 1 / •2'
it tf1 _.N .
~I~J~` ~ •/I l d; j W
`s. _ y~~/i:J - ~//, of ~
~', `f 11 !l• a
_ _ _ l l; r~~_ ~) ;~ a
t ..' N ••' !! 0
7 ~ H Q
~ C Z N ~_:~ / / ~_
~ M ~ ~.
^2 r-_ ~oZ - r;
t7 ,. ~ O /.
(7 ~:
t~
Q w a W i~ ~
w V ~~~ Z (¢j I 0
oa oa J_
r W~ ~/ W° ~
v l~•~ ~ O
/1 ~1
i ~r• ~ W
_ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ •.~,~ f-
.. ~\
/ / ~
_ i
~ ~ ,~ J
a /. Z ~>. F ~.,'.' t
! •t• ~•1~~~!
(!~ ~ i W W ~ ~(~i (n ~ Q
~ ~ V ~1 `
~•\ ' ~~~ ~J •:.rr ~'l41' i Z Q i' ~;a~rf 4 ^~ " •4"`J~~~,~i ~ 4;'~.~
~ / ~, ° .~~ Cf)' a W ~~' ~'+i ifs y1 ~ .~ij ~. ... (/`~ %!,1• O
! , ~ ,~ \'"\' •, ti i ' - ~L. c. v~ \`r~% .~ i r ~1~ ..J ~ i ~'', 133j
. \ .^~ 1
~\\ ,,. ~. , ,~ ~ ~:. „ryt,,,}.~ ~ ~• ~~' -.1,.1.x- a ZI =
\`~. ,
Ii c\~`.~ 1 I v ~ 111 ~, ~ z •, ~ /. •~~ ~ ate, ~ ~ •+ ~ , t ,! ~ ( •~ ~ I~ ~ _-..
~':i
~ `~4~',1,,..;:;F,. ~r ~~.~r Js ~...4'~ .i`~ rJ~~('/I I!'"'//~~ ~,C` Q rn
' I r y~ r l•- !~ ~'I~! ~ 5
i~ l
C 9'7T._. / rT J.l: ~ l' J ~j ~r7..~ - ; @1 ~ f'~
• ~ ~ ! ,~~'- . r _'~:.:. -Tar Q ~ ~ w a ~ . •.. Z ¢ r ~
S Y j ~~ ~f ~ I ~ ~ `l { , ` it rNlS3hj i - Q ~ YI
~ ~~,J:`%¢~l"rf~f%l"ILL'''' ~~1r'' U~ °~~:~M ~''~i°-~'~ . Up F-
~,=i. , ky; ~~ i ~ wp N ~ ~ ~ ~ ., Q
-~ ,. , ~
, U O ,~7k e ~
:!•1, s '~ / w of ~ / a
~:'' ~`S~ f'~l~L U ~ / ..:: •~e r. Jig " ~k: ~ M~%, <` t, ,{
,. ~• f
.:~~ ~ ~ , Z m /may` ~.... \ ~` ~ ~ •..j"!, f~ 1
O W W H O J' < y' -~ N
@IU ~ ~ • x F W ~I~ ~.~• t~
/,
w O ~~ j w ~. ~~:
Zx /~ \\ Pte' ~ ~~ :. j:. INn
~ Q ~ ~~ [ n
d
Q O
U ° /
Q m
~ fA
w N J
O a
Z N /
/~ ~ / ...
/
i
~~
~~
~`<
~ ~ ~ *~
v ~'} \~ fy
\\ !~\\ + ! 1~_
\~~
.~
~-- --- --
/ ~ q. , / •kb .CSC . ~'f. ' ••
~ ~ z U : ,~ ~X) ••. is ~••/ • ~~ ,:
~' ~ ~ `' \:y' ~\y g w ~`c; fi'r' ~f t~t`v< *~..,
-~. `v
(/
' , .y"~~ .~ ~' p m ( ~ ~ r 1('~~.\ .~'t.~• 133
~: ~Y t ~ .
1 v~i i' ~_'` xcifjii~l ) -~ •.cC~,'C>i. .~.\~,~., .1 ,i~; ' C _ l 0
EI Camino Corridor Program
Ciry of South San Francisco
February 11, 1993
m
U
_ C
~ U
C
N CL
4. ~
C
O
.~
a~
U
C
fC cC «..
m~CL
d.. (n
Q
Z
Q
Z
.a
m
.~
a~
m
c
0
..
J
L «.
~ o ""
E ° ~ ~° o-~ ~~-Qa°'i ~ aQL ~ rnm o~~ o
c~~ rn E~~~~ ao o M o E o« ~ ~ ~ c ~° c
oo~'~o~ncc~to°~~ c°Em~g.
~ c 3 0 ; ~ a a~ a~ ~ ~ `a c o 'o ~
ai o o a, a3 > o ° v, °~-... ca v, m. E a 3
~~ c ~~ '~_ v N rn~ o0 3 a~°i ca ~ '° ~ 3 c 4 ~ m m m c m
~.., c v c a~ 3 o~v ~ ao °o ~ ~ mo U m ~ m"
fQ ~ N ~ ~ N
o~La~ic~mE~•aca~o~'fir~~~~o~n 2 ~'-$~a~~i
~a~~ocaaiv~o°'voEmEao~~m 0 ca~i~$c
.c~oio' ~°.'c._°aEE~'xo~~'?ia Z ~a ac" cc
3~ a~ •~ a~ ^~ ~ a~ o ~ c a ~ 'o v cv .~- aNi Q N a c~a a~~i
o° c a-v aL ° s ~, ° N m m ~ .~ o
(~ ° r c `o ° x c E c .~ s cv w° ao c p~ ~ ~' c
3 .. ca a m cv . 3 cv o ... 3 a~ 3 a co c4 :~ ~ ~ cc v~ vi 'v~
Draft EIR
II. Summary
Page 18
U
c~
a
m
c c~a
~ o
rn c
H ~
c ~ c
U ~ U
C N C
(n J (n
u u n
fn J (n
EI Camino Corridor Program
City of South San Francisco
February 11, 1993
a~
U
C
~ V
C
d 'C L
J
~~~
C
.Q
N
U
_ C
~ ~ ~
w, U ~
O C L_
d ~
J
Draft EIR
II. Summary
Page 19
~+
U
i -N. C O ~
C,' d ~ «O. d
p 0 0 0 Q 7 0
d ~ N
r > ~ > ~ ~ >
~i~ u°.~ U ccvv
m o `~ ~ ~ ~ 3
U ~ J ~ pN U y ~
C U Q: p_ C O +. Q
G) ~ ~ m O O •O ~
a 'c a in rn ~
L m a~ .r r.
,... c~ ° ° y N o c m
L c t ~ a~ m p~ oC
.,, O~~ v) fl. C N C U C
p ~~ ~ C N~ 'a ~ C
~ Q w 0 N ;? ~ O G~ O U
C m f~ N O N ~ N r
N.`-.O~ ~ y OH N ~~W
O `' p, Q= ~ p L
G. ~ ~ '~ ~ C cp0 m C N v) ~
~ ~U ~ o c w E~~ m
a~ ° ' `~
~ cw vino N~ ~ c QE
3p~om ~~s3 n.'~om
O fl. Q~ C r c~C O~ ~ '"' W~
r O- ~ > Q~ Y C N N N
!_ C~ O 'r O C p C C7 N~ 'C
c v) ~ a N Z O L
J J i
n C tLO- m :~ ~ C m 0
~ ~ m Rf N "' N ~ ~ 'y ~ ~
p Rf ~ m C_ U ~ fC ` m O N t~' pp ~i N r ~ C
3 O L o ~ •E ~ ~ O C OIL > ~ "' = t~ ~ 'p N m O
>~~'=>c~LU~Uo :an~a ode°a~s.•-~ ~;v>,c
~ ° o m t u' U ~ LLI ° ~ t ~ a~ c o ~ ~ N Y o v ~ ° ~ ° ~ n.
°c~aotn='~ cctc~ v~°>ve„a> L° :°'io~.m E
N c ° °' c m ° co v ~ 3 'c ~ m ~ ° ~ a>i ~" a~ ~ o ~ :t a~
ca 4 ~ ~ o v N rn ~ ~ ~ ` ^ o Q. c .o c- cca N ti o o ~ c > ~ ~
d U t0
N v2i 3 rn $ c cc Q J ~ t g Q cca ~ c`a o. '? ° rn m ~ ° N ,~ co ~ `° c c>v
°'~=crn~ m ° `° O°xo'd'NC~~~= NUccai °'~
.c «. •m c ~o 'c D ~ in .. m ~ a~ ~ ~ w o c .N
.r °c x c c ~ v°'i Q ~ cv ~ F- ~ ~ ~ rn ~ `> ~ ~ ~ c L ~ ~ Q c ~ c
~` vi a~ ~ cv w m ~ Q Z~ O c O E~ >. Q '~, ~ t p ~- N V o w
~ g oL°. `° J a~i ~ N c ° ~ m ro ~ ~ Q ~ o `U° 3 c ~ `~ ° m 'c N 'c
a~ g m~~ a a c c ~. v y ;i' a ~ N >:i ~ 3~ a~Ni ~~ ~. c c c`v ~~
~ cc_ a~°i~~°c°cc-caN Qom 2-~~'o~n~ ~sa~cc° ~~cA
> j ~ L = r ~ 'd J O ~ L L > C ~ C ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ f4
D ~ c aci v) o c cca ~ ~ coi 2 a V ~ v m c°~ fl. s axi a2i c0`a a°i a ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
EI Camino Corridor Program
City of South San Francisco
February 11, 1993
m
U
C C
.s
U
C :~= ~ (n
m Ct_, J
n°. in3 ~
c N ~
.s ~ a
~ m o
rn N ~ a~
w- >
~ ~i v
Y
o
a~0
s
~ ~
°' g vi ~
n. ca
Q
c m
E
o ~- ..
~ °' a~i c
~ ~ ~ ~
c ~ (~
~
o L
a~~~~
0 0
~
~
~~
c~
N ~ ~ iJ C ~
i E v'
~ N
v
i ui
m .. ca ~
~ ~~°'' ~
c a~t~c~
.4 w •~
c
c
~
~ v~
N
.~Y ~ ~ ~
'
~ ~a>>
ow
~ o ~ c.¢
a~
c c
iv~a..o
C U' ~
N C L , rn
O ~ «"
ain3~
Draft EIR
II. Summary
Page 20
y
~ Q ` O C Y m C N w
~Q C O N~ L a N ~~ ~ m .O _~ C
CD
~ a~ ~ d y O 3 O~~ ~ Of p O m O V cVp
'O O~ N U a~ ~ «. O ~. - m N C L L C m Q U
~ ccu ~ w ~ ~ •c° o ss y v Y o~ c ui c 3 ui .o coo E ~
a
>~ ~ y U c`t~ rn O O pa o N N v~ Q~ > m~~~ ~
~ C ~ N = N !A H 'r ~ Q m 'm ~ cC ~ ~ O N ~ N ~ t C
c~ U~~j~axi•yc~ aLCy~j'~c`a=L~i~,c.~ ~o
0 0 0 ~ >
N .C U d> c~ G .U C 'a ~ t¢~ t ~ C E C~$ C C C
U ~
V1 C O U~ C L m N N o ~ O 'C N ~
cod ~~c~a~a~it'p°'ma~~,~~'=io~~Ec3c rn~a~
~ c c C7 ~ v$ cco °~ ~ m -- ~ m -- o~ a rn cn J
w n3i o '~ v~ c ~ t~ Q c •o a~ ~ ~~ .o o~ Y c
.a c' ~ ~+oa~c,a_'m3.N~' Eca~mv~c>«-~ n n n u
vii o a~i ~ ~' ~ Q v c c c axi cvo c%~ v coo Q o m vii v~ rn m (n ~ u
EI Camino Corridor Program
City of South San Francisco
February 11, 1993
m
U
c
~ U
C
O•CL
.~
~~~
c
O
.~
a~
c
~ U j
C ;~-
O C t
~~~
J
H
Q
m
O
C CO ~ "' O m
F-
w
Q~ N C C C C O
-o ~ v, ~°- o- io E ~ 0°C
E rn ~ m E
O ~ ? C ~ «~.. C C
O O C O ~ CO ~ ~ ~
•.. ~ ~ ~
a> > -o o c~ ~ c U
r c ~ ~ Vj - ~ O W
t0 C W U ~ = N ~
t ti.. ~ cc
cc~E..E°~~~
~~ °o
`~° o m o c Y~ a o
C d O T ~fA O l6 w
m ~
~ ~ .~ d N
C
w Q~ ~ ~~~ v c
L O fNC O~ U ~U (SS t
= > a~ °~ ai 2 2 = ...
~~EQ>v~v~ccio
J
H
Q
Q
m
N d
~ .Q N
~ a E
-- > E
~ ~ .C U
.C N t' O
L
~ ~ C N
O
~ N ~ c0 0=
L O O ~ N
-~ o- •~ °
•~ m
c O ~ o
~ ~ a ~ r
c ~ ~ E
O ".' ~
~ C ~ m O
N L N
aiE°'v~c,
`~ ~ ~ ~ d
~ N ~ t"n O
Draft EIR
II. Summary
Page 21
.°
~~~~ -~ Ewa, `Y~~~o rn c~ ~ ~m
>+ C «' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t CO O L t~ ~ ~ O ~ 0 ~ f~6 U Y O m
O p~ ~L ~ H H c0 cA «. pf ~ p1 O d «, ._
~_ ~ C O a C U O O~ ~ ._ ~ L 3 0> .O ~ C ~ N y C O U
O H C O .O r .r N~ N~ t ~ G) to C <C U O E
t"n ~ ~ m 4? a~ ~ ~ t7j ~ C) U ~ 'p N 'p fl. _ v~ fit.. .O N ~ O O cC I_
O Q~~ f0 ~~ (A >L7 .`r N C c- O O N O= ~ O V h
Em~.m~~ nc`~i~'cc~~n«'L'a`°mo°C~a~v~° oc`°E~v
a0 yr os~ ac m° c m m o• ~ a a
•--m v,~a,,rooa~~o°r3 E ...c o~m'ga~~ =>
c°° °' 3 c o c m Q 2 ~. m ca ° 'C acv ~ o ~° c ca
~ ° ~ > °~ ~ m c t ~ ~ o N m ron ~ ~ U ° N ccv a~i = 4 ° ~ o> 3 .~ c
o[ O css ~ °, w. p c 3 ~
2 c - ~ c`c ... 0 0 = ~ ~ w o c 'c a~ ns ca ~ ~ o ° ~' c ~'
>, m a~ o ~ c 3 ~ ~ ~ °~ 3 t ;~ 3 ~ c v c o. ~ m c .o in c ~ ~ cco t ~
m ~~~
°Z $.Qo
=Eaoo c°a~°°'UO`.NVic~Nrn~ c~U om3rno-c cn~c~
I•mocTw~ a~~mS-c~~~°~3~W °'Y~_~a0i~ u u u
Q C~~ ,Y OO c N =r O c O O~ C 0~ O~~ 3~~ L "" L x N O ~
op a ~ U . ° ~ ~3 ~ o U a . c .~ in ~ ca H o 3 a~ v 3 cn ~ cn
EI Camino Corridor Program
City of South San Francisco
February 11, 1993
a~
U
C
O
C ;~=
m C t
d ~~
C
.4
p1
O
U
C
~ U ~'
.C w 03
O C L
a°~n3
J
'fl a? -0 m
U ~ 'a a (~ >' .a c
~ U m O U
~ O 7 > ~ m ~ N
> >
m Q w~ m Q r=- 'C
~ ~ O
O O
m
O
a 3 v N ca ,.:
o ~ ~, a~
~ m
o m
~ ~ ~ m ~ ac W a
c~E°a ~E"m
O
E Q O N
~ V C m ~ O .~ ~
U O ~,
p
8 o r '~ ~ O~ O
C
7 C "'
C N ~_ _O
~ ~ ~ f
C O C
~aa.4 :C ~ ~ H
~n.v~~
`
a~ ° ~ 'g 4 c ~ ~
rn j
m o~ ~ cc > m c
ca v' a r
`.°W4~~~' cocc.
0
a~~~~~
:
Y s~.~o
"' «
..
C .._ ~ a C U
~ O !- ~ O = O N O m
:~ H ~ O
~~a °'~ ~
~ .- m ~ ~ w ~m ~ E
V7
Draft EIR
II. Summary
Page 22
C N m >~
•~
~
~ Eoo
~
~
Z.
~
o n? ~ E ~ a~ ~ ~ m ~ _~
~
y `
~v w
o c pC ~ ~'
O
O y~~
~
L C~~ N~
a .. _ L m N
~
c N~ a
L
Y
°
o
~
° •
E ~
'c
~rn
C%~.~ac
~•.
~o
>,=°
ioE-~ a
oor
cc c
a
R7 t0
E
C
m ~
.-.
~ O tq
~ U
.. O
4~ O
> ` 'am
O .
C
rnd
L
~
L
~
oa v
i
_~rn'~$ vL scorn
~
m
~
o
o
~ .
~ a
i ~
~E cvc
' c c
a
c~a
m~o~
c
o
.Z~
L
mo
°
`
° co
~fl.~
~ _o
~•~'m~o~~c~t
-Y~tc
•~a
~ °'~~m me
~ cv c :a m ai E ° ~ m ~ 2 •; E aNi ~
4 C ~ '-'
0
x c m _m a is
' 'v, ~
i ~ N O 4 ~
`C ~ ?~ 0 0 0 N O C
N t ~~ .N O c
0 C S C
~ c "' ~ a~ ~ c~ c a~i 3 c v> e•°a c o c m
o 4 w o w
O N L > C y «. d Y ~ O ,
.~ooac~oNo oao~oo O>~~~ rn~tn
=
H v~ 3 t vii v a v o v m .n m~~ ~~ m cCC v rn ~ c
n
EI Camino Corridor Program
City of South San Francisco
February 11, 1993
c
~ U
C)•CL
~~>
C
.s
rn
O
U
C
~ U ~
N•CL
a° n~~
Draft EIR
II. Summary
Page 23
o ~ a, ~ to vi vi
~I N C Z J J J
L .N m
C O ~ N
'N C U
L 3 ~ G.
C L ~ y
oa~~•
0
~ia~ co CU U U
N ~
v°'~'~
C ~ N
~ 53. O
Rf = Z C
U U ~
O O~ .~,.
L
~ .r W O m
f~ C N m !n
E ~ ~ c 3 OJ
p C O ~ ~ _
"_EN ~~ a o 0
C ~ r ~ ~
-0 fn fA
G1 ~. L .,. N
~ 0
N E 7= •fC
U O p 'V E Q ~ d
~ ` c~
C L .r
~ O ~' ~ ~ i i i
~ V ~ p N ~ N N
p O~ N C N N N
N p O •... ~ .~ •Qf •~
y _ ~ O W fA (n !n
C ~ L ~ L
c, E '~ c~ «.
Q
O m E O
O. ~ N (n to !n
L ~ ~ ~ O
c~ .. tC aUi
c
2 0, c ° m `n $ ~ m ~ ~ ~
W N ~ cLa c ~' ~ a~ ~ ¢ c a
N ~a o m~ p a v o cc m~ ~ N •~, ~ p c4 ~
~ ~ ~ L~ ~ y E -° m 'cv c~c 3~ m> Q
~ o 0 0~ c c o v c7a L c~ o ~~„ U Q: ~ c c
w a~
Q L~mE~ vmm~...~~=oOJ c a`'
>: c o ~ a ~
Z v a « .G dN- ~ ~ ~. a ~ ;n v m L 'N rn 'c c ;o
C LL ~ O
_ E N _
~ L ~ ¢ U m O~~ L Gr ca c p L 'c c4
~ "r c N c~ 2 ~ ~ •°' ~ U~~ w ~ °~ ~ c° ai m O ~ m e
~ ~ O C a~ ~ ~ O~ L C ~ cC U r p ~ CL J ~ LL N 7
a a>mEco I- arn>.om; vac ~ ~c~
O ~~ ~ ~~ ~ d~.n N ~ ~'~YQ ~~ ~ c ~~ EO ~~w
W ~N~C= O -~~~U~NaN~cE ~~ caa $J c~c
O ~ p ~ W ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ rn m •- U cn U y m g~ ~ g'
> ~ in J cn
~ v~ _o ~ iv Z ~ ~ w ~ Y~ N d ~~~ c w~ w Q 3~ u n u
2 n`.oaEi~ccc ~ W~~`~~°ww~cca°ozm cn~cn
EI Camino Corridor Program Draft EIR
City of South San Francisco II. Summary
February 11, 1993 Page 24
m
U
~ ~ Q
C ~ N
N Ct_,_ J J J J J J J J
n°. i~3 ~
o ~~'
-c
~ S2
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _
~¢ U U U U U U U (j
E
Nor
m~--
~
i3
~a
Q C
~
U
47 m ~ ~
~ ~ R
S
~ C
~ U m .... ~ m a>
~ x
~
~
O ~
O ~
O m
N
•~ .-.
~
~ ~
,~
~
~
~ = ca
~ ~ ~ U
N r
p ~
= ~ o cn w
~
~
~ v
i
m t
~ N
~. W ~
$
d
C C ~ ~
O
C N N N N N N N O O H Q=
N
~ C) ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~p
p U N t
~ fn !n !n (A fn .
fA .
In Q ~ ~ ~
m
U
C C
cv ~ ... O
U
~'
C = t,C
°
a
in3~
N N N C ~ ~ N t C
~
t0 W
~
C ~
~
N C N
= C Q ~ O
X LL
> > ~g
L `~° ~ yycE3
' ~~~
m ~
v
t ~
L
~
~ ~
N~
•a
c
> ~
> m ;~
C c c N~
~ ~ ~ c
a
Q
~
W ~
W :: ~ •,
> ai ~ ~ v .x ~ cv 0
N >~ ~ o E
` p~ E
C N 0 Q d N
~
Q >
Q L r '~ N
U
~
$
` m
ap 0 ~ Q ~ C O Q
v
~ ~ O
C O
N Q
O C C C C .~
in j C RJ
J
J O O m O
3
~
~ Q
2 =
~ ~~ N
C a~ ~
C~ ~
~ ~
N ~
N ,O ~~ O N
~ O ~ O ~ Q
tLS C~
~a via a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ d m c°o ti ~ >a •°'~
~- ~ >. Q V N Of ~ Q > > j, d ~- ~ ~ L O Q C C C
m m •-' ~ ~~ C ~ CO ~
m = O N '= C A W ULN.. U
O
N U~
~ U~
~ L ~ ~ N t V~ U~ N~~~~ U L
J ~ m
~~~
~ _ _ U ~ ~ ~ U 2U =~ `av•o ~ wU Q
E ^ ^ ^ ~
L ~ «. . ^ ^ ^ ~ m ~ N'o
>
~ ^ ~
H ca co w 3 ~ c
a fl. cn ~ cn
EI Camino Corridor Program
City of South San Francisco
February 11, 1993
a~
U
C L
RS cp ~
:_..~ ~
aci 'c t i
o ~=t
acne:
c •~
.4 c
~i
.~ c
~~
~ 0
a
U
C L
cC cC .r <
r V ] i
C;~O~
c~ ct t
... ~
a°in~:
J J J J J J J J J
r ~
U U U U U U U U U
t
p~
co t
v~
p
N
d~ m
t ~
Y O
~ ~ Q
m~ 'c
N
O
c~
~ O
o
L
~~
a g~ n = ~ o ~~ Qo ~~ ~
m ~ °~~ ~L ZLOJ ~ ma ~L c
i t p L c ~ p
i
c v
. y W ~
r
».- ~ a
'-' C Z
j
~ N Z ~
~ mNC
m ca °,~
a~ °~~c
a~ ~ oom
= °
~ E
~
,Q o
~
~ C ~
~C C i s
fa ~~
(C C U -~
O~
~ U
° y V
O c0 r
O fn
O r
~
O f/) m U
cC
~ o `-° a o o ~ ~ o ~ rn o o ~ g ~~ ~ a
, .g ~ o ~
a o c c ~ ~ n' c'av ~ c ~ cv ~ ~ % d p- c
~ ~ ~ O
gy
~ ~ L
C
C L O
~
C L O
C L Qj
C
C O~
N O m d
N
N
O N '
p
cU N~ ~
O O H ~
0 0 C1 ~ ~
O p ~, ~
O O cC ~
RS fA .~
~ td •c0
i O ~ 4? O ~ ~ ~ -gyp Q ;? ~ a O ~ Q E ~ m ~ ~ ~
Q~ Q C r Q fC w Q cCL+ Q O~ Q (a ._.. cn C (n N !n
Draft EIR
II. Summary
Page 25
rn m w
Z `~
,~ ~ g
a 'p W ~ O~ N p C C ~ U
mcn ~~ > ~ ~ ~ g w a
W ca O
~ ~
a
E W cn O
O m e
t0 ! ~
~ U 'u~
to ~
O
E
m !n
>, p -
~ O ~~ J
a ..
O
~ a~
~ x 7
C
3 ~ Z Z r N
~
~ J O t~ O
m J •C ~ ~ `-' N N C
N O O ~, ,r
C cC
~ ° ac
~ Z oa' OD
` ~ g ~ c c o~C ~ p
2 n o~ ~ a a
~cA c Q
O C
O «
. O~
~ ~ ~
~ ' ~~
~ C J
7 ~ d
i >
w O O ~f C
~tA 7
. 'd ~ 'D L
O ~
~ C 'O ~ '~ :
~ C
C
O x ~ = ` ~ ~
(ECU ~ O ~ .N $ Z~ C~ C Q y m ~ ~C N C
0 0 0 s a C N ~ ~ ~ c~ m c~
W OJ S ~ = N ~ N O Q ~ r.
'D O ~ _ = Z ~ (n J V7
~ w. u n u
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ c° m ^ ^ ^ ^ ~
C r cn J to
EI Camino Corridor Program
City of South San Francisco
February 11, 1993
c c
c~ ~
.4
c ~ c"a U
a; c ~_ . ~ ~
a°in~~~
c ~ ~`
sc U
~ Q
m
~~
m Q
m Q
m Q
m
Y ° ~ c ~ c
~a ~
O
~c
cEa cpap v c
c
cc
a
Y
C
Y
0 Q ~
O
O Cf ~'
C~ ~
~' Qr 't
C
C
O 0
m N O
«
.
~ .-. N ~
fl. R! C a
O m
cC V O C ""' ~ E C~ p
C C C
C ~ U ~
_
~ ` ~ ~
w ~ ~ ~ T
.r N C N p,
Q ~ OX
v
m 0 Y_
U C
C ~
t O N N
... O Cl 0 0
O
$ U
~ C ~
m
`
Q c ~ y C` U
4 ~? c~ ~
O
;?' ~ ~ C E O
~~ 3
U ~ ~ ~' ~ rn °c c ~ ~ `a C --
O
m ~ c cv ~ ~- '~
C ' ° N
~
vi $ a y v
m C ~
~ e ca
~ ° U ~ ~ ~
~ H ~ ~ ~ c ~
~ ;v
N ~ ~ ~ ~ c`C ~ N W ` ;v ~ O
~ ~ 'OV w 'C)
~ ¢ ° ~ ~ arc m~~ca
i ~a'2-v
C m N~ O •i m E~ t~ d~ r~ N m
~
R1 d C - .r
m m
~ ~ > N N C >. ~
O ~ ~ ~ C
O
H
~°' 3t E O O
~aN ~
:°~ c~c~ ~~~ ~
~ pC° aa c°~ ~~3 w;vca ~°ccan3
m
~~t.Q
C U O c~C
G7 C ~ . L7
a°O in3 ~
_ cis
~'a cco c ° c
0
~s
m u~i c N ~ ~ c
C
.U ~ O ~ Q. _ .~ ~
m ° ~` ~ aNi
~ c c ° c c
V ~y m ~ U ~ ~ CL
m O
O N> U n F.. iv O
O C LJ.I ~ ~ ~ O
~a ~ pw wm~0=
c~
a m 7 U O L L~ U
.1 - U ~,
o~ °'`~~° ~~~ ny 52
c°v ~ v°i cOn ~ c c a. m
fts cv ~ co
~3°~00~°''0
~~3i;vsoU
L7
c ~ ° c
'o o ~ ° v°~ ~ ~p ai
~ t~'Q cC q N ~ Y
oF-~ `~ °'~ °'° 3
L ~ y
ACC N c~ yr c~
3 m t~° c 3~
c
a3i L a m~ v U v~
U
c;mN~~w•xg
V~ 'C N m L V p O.
Q E o a `° E c~ m U
~ ~ t ~ ~ ~ ~ N O
C w ~ ~ ain O W
c 3 Y
a c v as °- N «. c rn
c C c c
N o ~ ~ in o ~ ° c~a ni
. t p 'X 'C c? in 3
N> V~ O>~~ O N
Draft EIR
II. Summary
Page 26
U
a
a
C cC
o
w. ~
C
•~, °
c ~
~ 'c
J (A
u n
J ~
EI Camino Corridor Program Draft EIR
City of South San Francisco II. Summary
February 11, 1993 Page 27
c~
c c
o .4
~ --
~'Ct ~ J J J J
~°~n3~
C
C •N.. C >n
N
Q C ~ fl.
Q O ~ G.
Q
O~
N ~ ~ > > ~ O
r w ~ Q
p
j
~~ U U~~ U Uw~DO
m
c ~n
c m c c
~ 0 3 0 ~
g ~ c'v a°i Z ~`-' ~ y ~
v~m~~
cLiJ
U~ ~ ~ _
O H O
C
' Z
~ m
"'
~ V
~
° O O
"
cC C O ~ ~ ~ '~ C N
~.
o a'
o ~ a
o °'
o
m
c c>'o ~ c ~ aci ~ c'v
c° N L cC N 7 O
N
~ c
g yap ~E~cO
'~c°3o
`°
a
i
>, ,C o
c-
'~, >, v •
a
i
~ 'O ~
N 3 3 ~ c
O O C O O o °
~ N~ E ~' » E
c
o
'
n
v x
° m '~ a
'a o m~~ c_
•c c
° v m cva ' rn -o ca U
Ec
m c~v
h v>,
~ °~
~
o ~ca~o
mrnw
.
~
°
° c
i o
~ 3 Y
m cv °
'
3 o y
>
- ~ m~ ~ c
Q~ o rn
E o
Q
v
i
~ ° c
~ N
v
:'
c
~ c ~ c
m o c _o
m ,c
c ~ c ~ ~ >`
3 ~
°
c a~ o
Eac
P-s m o
Eac ~ ~
° o ~
a~
°c ~ mE'> M
E CD
C
G
' > '"' O
~ N~
~ > ~' O
~ .` a 0
N~ N C
.
r ~ Q ~
~
~ ~ ° ~
~n ~ ~
va Q L ~
a
°' C ~ C •~ ~
~ m m
~~~
>
°'~
/
~'
~°
~ ~3 0 0
¢ coJ ~
~•3 o >
a
-
a'
~
inw'v~~cnoC•v E L a
m
U
C C
~ ca -- .4
c;~oc+a
m c s to to v3 c~
a~~~
tl) C ~
~ ~
~
U
O U L
G. :C E t
O O
t6 w
~ ~ C~ C
C "' ~
3 4 ~
~ ~ ~ ~
° C >
~ o ~
a
c _ a
i ~ i
c
a --
~ °
'
•m
°°
~ > o U °' ~
o c v~ c m E
•
•
c
a a
i
~ ~. Q O U O C O O ~- U F O L ~ O
` +
~ c
v 3 co 'a m
m
°
_. c
q~
.
e
CL
~ ~ v
°
'~ J 'o ~
~~ ~ Y~
~ c
o o
3 N
c c c
o~ m o
c 3 o ° ~
U ~,
m
~ c~
_ N
c a~ •- -
m m
o ~
3
N
~
w
a
2dw
= ~ 3 ~
ca ~ nvi~t
o a ~ a~~.D c ~ u n u
~
EI Camino Corridor Program
City of South San Francisco
February 11, 1993
m
U
C C
~ ~ .Q
C ~ lC (n
Y C Y, J J J
a°.~3~
~
~ C C
i
Q
~
~ ~
Q H ~ a
Q
c U
~
°' v~ ~, m m
~ ~
Q
~~
Um ' m
U.~v rn
mQ
~` c
Y O
U t0 ~
~
Lp
~ ~
'
"
~ of
`
°a
ov
m
~ o m ~ w~
~ m
~~N~ °W
~(n N C ~ O CO
v ° iii p O ~ O
C ~ ~ ~
' .U C ~
~ ~ .... c
~ 2 c~ 3
v=i ~'~~gNi c ~°
~ ai
m a~c>~ m m
~o~ ~a o
o
4 $
v Q
c
c
c
a~
~ i
~ N R u
C .- i ~
a
C E
O
N•°-'mo, ova ~-
~ omEt U;v E
m
U
C
~ ~ .~.
C _V pp7
N C L
... ..
a i~3
~ ~
C m _O U
~ m ~ ~ ~ ~
~' t Q N> >. r,C ~ U Z~ r
y a ~ ~ v c_`u o°C ~' ~ ~ ~ m
... ca .c ~ c cv y b ~
E~3" ~La "cam ~i
~, o ~' c m o, c E~ vi m ~' m a
co ~, ~, m o~ o c `v,° am~°~ o
_ . ~ ~ ~ ° cy c0 - a~i $ ~ 3
C~ w m H C~~ O .~ m cC0 =
•~C 'O ~+ g "" p H C O d ~„ m
C p C C O Q ~ m ~ N
H o. m c~ p Q v) ~
O ,Y V Q O
~o~=.cp-~Nmm c3~o ~
O O N O
U ~ O ~ N v~ H ~ y V ~O O- vi ~_
~~,~,pa~41U oo N O c
a ~~ o m v r cn v U cNO a v° 2 N
z
L ~ C U
~ O ~ C ~ O U
c;;°'x~ccn~~
o c ~ ~ co « W ~
p, O E " v' ~ v~
c a>
0:=. c m ~ o o M
m o °~ ~m~E
~ ~
c~ ~
~ ~ ~ U
~Q m ~~.~ oa
Q+,mc~~oJCo
~ p y ca m Q _ '~
O U ~ ~ N cv 0Op
~ N~ ~ C C t m
V C ~ ~ d ~ ~ ~
~ ~ C C ~ C L ~
C d V V 0~ C
~ H ~ 2 ~
a> o'c ~ ~ c p
m .
~ ~ 3 U U O
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t
m~s~~ml~n
Draft EIR
Summary
Page 28
cva
a
I
c ~
o
C> C
'~ ~
C
RS
U r U
'C N C
!/~ J (n
b II II
fn J (A
EI Camino Corridor Program
City of South San Francisco
February 11, 1993
c c
m co 0
_U
c ;= co Q ~ J
O cL_, Z J
a°in3~
C ~ ~ L
4 C d d
~ O N O
N p O
N Q 7 N ~ N
~ ~ Z LL 'p LL 'p
0
U
_ c
RS ~ «
C _V ~
N C t
a°in3
C N
cC co
~ ~
m
_
N 7 «r
C
~
O N •
~
y
E•~ E
on ~
~~ ~~ o
N
.p O d
~.
N co
m
~ ~ ~ ~
«. ca
c O m 'NC ~ C
N
C
g _N ~ ~
O ~, c o
~ U ~ r m ~
_
E to > .~
:t '
~ ~ ~ ~ c cv
m
~
~ N G ~ •
-~„ ~ ~
.r
.
.r O .r C
~ C
d O C ~
O .
.0 O ~
'oEEu,~o
Z d v v ~ co Q.
'
v
m
C ~
0
m
L
t N Rf a
C S C .V >~
d «,
O U co w
N cC
~
~
O U
O L O
~ C~ N O ~ O
L co c$ O L y
3 a p E co ~ctQ ~ co m ~
~
~ o~
o ~
o c ~ o ~ c
a. ~_ ~ ~ fl-
~ ~ ~ c ~. ~ v c
.
c0 ~ 3 3 ~
Vj; vV~a ai y rn
'~ Q_ Q
0 O~
C
C~ RS
~ m U
0
m
O C N ~
O ~+ co
•p N C 3 to d 'C
coo ~- .,..
Gov of a°,~o~ o
w -- rn co a a, ~ N~ o~ rn
~ C ~ ~ C y O 4i O H O coo C «~.
co ~ RS O Q~ O
~ O O~ Q > (~} w
`°
2
oE.o~ ~.Z
~0~
coU .a
~ ~
~o N ~ ;._ ~~ in a;U
~ N 1
O` ,
O` C •~ « N m O p L~ N m
F- ^ ~ D, 7 C i d ~ cC m U i r~
.O
C C
~ O O
.N .`
to ~ «`yr
C O c U
_ .0
i
'p L O c ~
~~ ~ ~~
~ o ° °~ ~
R3 N ~ ~ N
- O N C N
O co ~ ~ C
O. U ~ m O
~°'°'E'L
O U O ..o
O Q C "~ c
c N y
~ r w O _~
C C > 'O V
O N N ~ N
(~ ~ CJ m ~
O co N ~
Q a ° c° cca
O
c ~ v vo :- c
co ~ a~ c `o
yrnn.~aoirn
co E 3 v~ 'v~
v ~ o m ~-°'a
a~i ~ N m _~
~ > C (J c
C to
o ~ N ~ .N m ~
ai o ~~~ N
O ~ N y~ ~, d
2 > c° o co
r~°'v,~ c
a~ .
~ ~ ~ '~ ~ o
Q U iA O ~ ~ Q
Draft EIR
II. Summary
Page 29
a
0
c ~
'O
~ c
'N 7
c c
co
J ~ _U
N C
n~in
u u u
nJ(~
EI Camino Corridor Program
City of South San Francisco
February 11, 1993
m
U
c~ O O
.G ~ ~ ~ ~
Oct N J
O ~=~
a.in3~
c ~ c
c~c Qmo Q o
a~ E' m
N
m
U
C
~ U `~
•C _ O
O c L
... ~>=
a. !n >
a~
c
c °
O L p~ U N
to ~ ~ gpg.. ~ ~ O
°c ~ o E ~'° .~ m
3 U O ~ fZ~
O~ C i C V O
.~ fl.
d~ N m c L O m
S C 0 O '~ L p
= O .
2 ~ ~ m ~ ~ w
C
~ p U ~ ~ > ~ C
C tp _ L1J > O ~ .Q
U L O N 3 a O m
~ ~
«. p .r U c ~ 'O
R! f0 c O f~ ~
` ~ C ~ Q U C .p-.
o ~ ~ °'o o ~ g
~ ._ ._ ~ c U v~ rn
W
~ . ~
U
to G1 ~l a ~ ~
oar ~ ~ N c~~°m~ ~
2 m m N ~ v ~ o U~~ ca t `° °' L °' N
--L uNi W °•°a~,~cr-Eo...'"'NOCmc°a~
a~ c-' E o v~ ~ ~ ao•~ o ~ ~ mQ a:o~ m L
~UOOm p ~NEm~NU~.oca mom°`°
° a~i c ai 'rn Q ° E ~ ° E ~ S c~ m `o c ~ ~ v ai
m vim coo N W = ~ ~ ~' •~ ~ c ~ c`a m ° m 3 c Q
o~~v,vmi ~ o'mcco`°cEca>~co~EcUg'cgv
U V O m 0 0 O Q ::. O
z ~, °-o g ~ ~, o L m v 3 3,..0 0~ cc~ m o
o, m U c c~ cc c cv ~ m o .~ ~ N
~~ rn~ N o Q ~? ~~~~0 awr QED ~ rnct°i °'v
E c 3
~~.°m W 2E 3cvY~cvc~ c~~-a~mv
a~> ~~ p ~ min m~ € E nit E ~,r :a o N cc
O a~ v ~ ~ ~ O O~ O O O~ O O~~ N~ G N L
U rn ~c o .. ~ ~ ~ ° a 3 N U U ~ U E cc E' ca c~ w F- cv
Draft EIR
II. Summary
Page 30
a
m
c ~
O
c
.~ °
c ~
c~ °
N 'c
N
J (n
N II II
!A J (/)
EI Camino Corridor Program
City of South San Francisco
February 11, 1993
a>'
U
C
R! ~
C V
N •C t
..
d ~
c
0
a~
U
C
C ~ppO
N C L
a°in~
J
J
J J
~
C in
` ~
C i ~
C ~
o~
Q
o m
Q U
o
o~ ~ m
> m
~ > >
~ w ~
U.~v lip ~ w
U.~v ~
Umwv
~
~ c
o m
m
o ~
~°
° ~
`~ vi oU~
c
~ a
•
`
a 0 3
_
o b i
a
~ cc
cc
c g c
v e
v
c
v~
~ ~ '~ c ~
~
o y
~ c ~ ~. c
a c
v ~ ~ ~
m o O
a ~ °> >~
E
c
- ~
m ca x m
rn a
•y ~ ~ ~ a •~ ~ aci ~ ~ ~ ~ m ai c `n
'
v' ccu E ~
E ~ ca ~ ~ s ~ N ~
a ~ '- ~ 3 ~
'O
c c m~ v
s ~ ~' cxu
c~~~
m Q
cts m
~ ~' c o o
o mRU c~`~m ~~
mo v~~~c
~~~crsm t~~> 3' int.. '>Lo~U
o
m ~ '~ ~ ~
3 c ~ B ~-
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
c ~ a c 0
'fl C U tti N C $ C ~ •O ~- ~ co O ~ 'C U ~
~ L W N~ E p~ N d ~a a 0 C O d C
C U V`
O ~ Q~~ vi ~~ C W .~ ~ N C C C
C O
E C C) ry~ to y ~ y~~ O -p ~ O cfl 0
~~~
v
a ~~
o m a 'a ~ m° ~ ~ 2 0 0
i
w
as c y >• ~~
•c
a
° Q
3 ~~> o
a ~ o~~ c c° n. c c
~
a
i
acam~
oC•o ~ E a~ a~c
Wa~O
Z nu_ m~ -s >.o
¢ ~~~ ~ NaoO
¢ co ~ ~~
Draft EIR
11. Summary
Page 31
~ ~ ~ ~
-o
°> y r~~ c r
•m m
~„
v o
c
~ > >. s ~ ~ ° o o ~
`n > > > > m o a~
a>i v~ a~ m~ 3 c U 3 Q c
~ c c m m
E
•
ri 3 >> m m •o ~.
~E~ c m -v~
~`c~~o~E;mm c
S
s
3~
o'3a-mco
u>'a~
'no
--v~
~
'
~
~a~
ca o a -~
a
`
~
L c ~
>
o, ~
m ~
~
cti ~ E
c
~ ~
o Q ~ c ~ Q ~ o m ~ o o c .
o~~ ~~° Na a
°m°c~ ~N~ 2~'m c
o- ~ ~ m
vii rn ~ ~ c c i
~
~
o ~ c m ~
O N m ~ ~ °
E ~
~' ~ m ~ `-° m
~ •
.
r o is m E i ~
v
a>' ca •`
N
N
c
~ >
•rn c
~
C •U C6 X~~ J Q ~ ~ O r~~
'
~ O D U
d ~ c
a a
i
8 N v~ 7
N
w p A d m a- V Y
a a~ E y ~ C
y
`
cv .. $ C
<n ~'
3 .p U
~ c E c~ c
~3 ~ LL ..
E ~~rnmoo r-- ~ --
v>
~~,Qo ~Lca
to cO ZT d vi 'D ~ ~ ~ o~~m m
~ N ~
day
~ t
ti '~N3
O O rn _
a,
(n J !n
~ ~ N O cVC U ~ ; C
r V Rf d ~ ~ ~ ~ `
~? U ~ ~ N O ~ II II II
~
C a Q
~ ~ U ~ J
U C) C ~ cC
2 U v
i 0
d LL O in c ~ Q. fC tC (n
fn
EI Camino Corridor Program
City of South San Francisco
February 11, 1993
~~
c c
is ca o
52
N 'C t_ .~ Z J J
a°O in3 ~
~ in ~
gc a a
~ a~ o a~ o
~m
¢ o ~ ~
~ o~ z ~i v ~ ~
~ ~ U 7 m
O ~
_ ~ t/1
,
N C > ~
-
~ ~ C L
c
7
E ~ O ~ ~ 'C
~
E ~
'~ Q. N c
a ~ ~v, ~ ~
'~ Z d
-- m ~ ~ a>'x Q °~ W
c d p C~ L y V .L..
~
~ CC
c«0 .-.
c ~ c
Q `m c
E 0D E ~ •
~
o
~ ~ - v
~ 52 c
E
c
o c iuoa
`
; SE
c U Q c
a
ti ~ aE
'
Q wv
c ~ am
° ~ v,
cu a ~ m - N a m
Z ~ c ~
~ ¢ o z ¢~m Z ac`s
a~
U
C
~ ~ .r
c ~ O
d c L
.~ «_
0_V7~
Draft EIR
II. Summary
Page 32
--~ !/~ J
~ C L ~ c L
~ m «.
;v L
.~.
~ cC
¢ o m o 4 E« p$ m m 3
~n
o cca cca ~ c~a ° o H >
L ~ c~~:od ~ c m
- U ~
~ ~
o-~?U
o~ v s axi y~ L v~
N ~
c a t
>; ccv c co t~~ t ~ •~ a
1 C ~ C .L.. C ~ O
t F- ~ Vj ~ .~ «. ~
.,. D
U .
C ~+ ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ m
g C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
'
0 o
~U~ c aEL
n
~ o
~
m m
c C c
6
~c
•
~~Q ~°~ 2 c °.a~
O
v
~ m p
~ N ~
,,~ om
g; ~
L
3
V
g ~ ° g , ;,
aai ~ ; m N c
~ c c~ c
~
L
~
~ ~ «. o ~ ~ ,
~ m ~ ~
v 3
•
'c ~ 'c
cono,ao~3~~3v
F
U
V
U 3~a
C U ~~m
N F L rn~~
(/~ J (A
-
to L H O O
C
~
~cc c°
~~
~~ta ~
`° C
'~ ~`
E~~a unu
.
a
Q
N
Op
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ •°' ~ ~ ~
3
ii v
° o o
i ~
c
a i ~ ~ 3 v
i cn J cq
EI Camino Corridor Program
City of South San Francisco
February 11, 1993
~~
c
~ ca
U
C
m C L
« ~~
a. (/~ ~
C =i
.Q i
~~
rn~
~[
~1
C
~ ~ «
:., _U ~
O C L
d.fn~
Draft EIR
II. Summary
Page 33
J Z J
~+
C ~
d C
o
E- Q
Ga0 Z U ~
Y
2 ~ ~ c m
0
~ U
~mc~°im°'2
oQV~~oc
O
p U~
m~
7
Q a U° Y L«
~'
° ~v o ° c N o
c ;i'L~ 2~ v
• ~ ° ~- c ° m
~ d
• cp p N N Q O q1
~'m~ ~ ~
O1 7 D. ~
E c C
'-~~~~~
`~
C c
Q ..
.
p C ~ ~ ~ .`.. ~
' «
~ ,
N L C_ ~ cC m
~ ~
O
o E O m C '' C •
~ °
c
o
Z Z m Q N v°i ~~
J J fn
m ~ o
O~~ Y Ny C O ~
~ _ E
~ 7 ~ ~ p
N U
~f p m~~ C p p
v>« ~
d
~
C
vm
i
L d~ (UO C M S c
~ a 3~''~s
~ rn E m ~ V .., ~
Q
°
c
3 m
o ~ ~ °
m m i m ca .~ L ~
a~ o m
m
c
u~ N Y
o~
~ a
i
o`°
c t°~a °' 3~` ~~
~
~c
3
Ec~c~
a~ai~ sa
~
Y
NO~co
CaU c -
~c~ c
i
a~
~~~;°Y~tao E
°
t0 "' ~ m ~ N
_ ~ O
V
.
mc~•°~o
3
on
~
~3
U to
"
°oo~°'
o
,~
-
'
'c
.
. ~ c
amc c
a
~. t!1 m E°°_ ~ j G p (~ O O~ N~$ p p ca o c4
~ ;v ~ ~Q m
C j
0 3
C C O ~ ~ o
~ d Q Q~ ~ i
•O
.
N
m .
.. •, ~ N~
~ ~ ~' ~ U ~ ~ 0 3 ~ m ~ cOV
= c`n ~ N ~ cv _ c°c a vi ~ u n n
°
m U
Q 3
3
~ 3 _
~ c
' H v
~
3 3 ~
=
s
, >
~
~ a v~ c
~~~
a
~ c
cn
n
EI Camino Corridor Program
City of South San Francisco
February 11, 1993
c~
c
~~
c
mcL
a°i~~
c
0
ca
m
U
C
~ O r
c ~ O
N c L
0_tn~
J Z J
c ~
a c~ °-
a~
~ ~
d
7
L U
i
L
'p Z d LL
~ ~ '~
7 O N _
~ L U
~
O 0a m
N Q O c N~ .r
~ cv N=~~
~ma~ ~a ~ E ~N~~
~
~ ett m ~ ~
~ 4 ~ ~ a
i
_
~
.N ~ O a
i
C Y O ~
~
~ ~U 'd
;~ v
..- ~ w N ~
~ ~ C C 2
~
V ~ -Q' co O O ~ i
~
O N '~ ~ .~
.Q c ~ ;v O C O C1
N
'C cC N
C~ O~ N
U c
~
C) c~7 O
c V O H
p, C
+~ « ~ y
c0 L O G O
c m~ aiLO. vi c~ ~ v rn p 3~ E
ea
= 3 ~ •-'
-a
--
~ ~ c
o a~ o ~ m
m
~ - ~ c
; m ~ ~
m
ca >, c >.
c°
3 ;.,
O
~ ~ m c ~
ca c ~ c4 > ~ ~
Z ~ c
° ,~
~ co ~
° ~ 'a m 'D
v
i
0 0
U
j ~. ~ :.
L
~ X C C ~ o
N~ v m~~ c m
~~~
~
O
L U t0 ;
«. > O ~
U Gf ~ O Rf
c
~
~
~~ cNC r
o rn~ uoi ¢ c E O
Z Q `
O
Q
~ ~. E a 3
Draft EIR
II. Summary
Page 34
(n J (A
.~ ~
c C E
m .~ ~ U N O m ~ m~ O c m w
« L fA
m~ w~~~~~ ~ C C m V O C .._ w 7
~ V H ~ to X 7 H .V Qi ~ ~ ~ tq L '~ ~ 'C C ~
E~~~~3cc ~mc~m~c`oi;'v .o~~~`a
°~.'°r,~~o~m~ a~it~tm3~E o~c'~ac°
Q V Q m¢ .. 3 ui ¢ 0 3 a~ c a' ca ~ E
~ o> m~ c •~ --m o'o c~ 0 3 E o
~ N c c 3~ ~ c'cn o-c° c c m~ o o c t ~ ~ -: .o
•~v~v~~oom=E m'oooLL ~ o"omaci
o; ovm a~inw~ F'o~'~o~.rn~ U o o.~,~v,Q v
otoca~ci~Y°~ ~~mE3~Oc ~ aoi ~ai3Z•Q ~o
o - U .4 ... ca cc c ca
m~~ a~ r y~ Q~ c v~ °' a~ y ° ~~ rn vi m •°' j
o c ~$° o~ E c O o o c$ N~~ U ~ ~ ~ ~~ c c c
c~ N L v > > L c ~ vOi ccv E ~ c~ cco a ~ ~ = ~ ~ o o ~ ~
c ~.
:? c ~ ~ co a~ ~ m .Q F- F- '..U-. ~ r a~ ~[ L W m o U m U U
~NSn~~moE ~¢c3R~ma~ _ .~ mm-aa~a~ n n n
n~ .n v c° o v ~' o. OQp m 'vii u~i v o U u0i O ~ d v~ a a cn ~ c=n
EI Camino Corridor Program
City of South San Francisco
February 11, 1993
a~
U
C
~ ~
C ~
m C L
r r
~ (n >
C
O
-~
a~
U
_ C
c0 ~ ...
~., U ~
N~CL
d ~~
J J
Z
U
H N
Q _O Q O
w ~
Z U.~ v U.?~
~ ~
~ ° ~ v n
N ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c c`v
a~ ~ ~ o Q v°i ° c~ °°' ~ c m
a~iU ~ N ~~ a~it rn o >.oU
~ ° -a a~ ..- ~
w °
L ~ ~ ~°„ o
L °- o ~ ca
~ fl
~ .
..,
N L ~ O ~ 'p N
~ V
7 .
O ~ ~ O
U~ _
O I? ~
~ ~ ~ ~ o
t c °- vii ~ O
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~
~, Q c o N °-
O U t o cCC c c
~
~
p O p
C L N C~ Q 0 0
:.~ N V •~ O ... •2 vj C w ~ ~ ~ L
~- ca c v m ~ ~ p. co 0 a' ° E o
.~m~m~o
~
`° `~~° ~ °o
0 > E
° ca. m
° c
~
O ~
~ o
~. ~j ~ 0 C1 C 0
'` L C J ~c
~ O -
U N :p 'fl C~ Q U O c~ ~ V~ Y
tea`'`-°~`~3 ~L£Q ~~m
z U~ E a ~' a~ 2 c c~ U v~ c co
J ~
Draft EIR
II. Summary
Page 35
L
Q m r ~
7
O '~
~ Q w ~
L m C 0 ~.~ N
m ~ '~ tQ
O C ~
~
U
c"o m ;~ ~
'c ~
c i m~
a
'a v ~ ~
cva
U` p
C '~ L U C G.
N E
vcC- ~ O ... O
0 cv r ._
U ~
N O r~
~
~ m cC ~j ~ 0
O C
in d _ O
.a
O~ .p ~' O _
O O` O C~
°-~ >>g °'a~° ~O>
o m
v X v ~, :N c
~ a~ m o m
~ U
E
0 'c ca
Of C
y N C>
~ c0 O •
~ .
,,
p cv cC c0 'N O
~_ = m C- ~ H .~- N N
ca C C C
C
V t4 c
tC
O C .: U ~ B O O 4? 'C m e
-. N
O E U ~„ C
0 0 0
C uj •~ O
~ '
`- E ~ N ~
O
~ D. O C to ~ R1 p
U L d ._
Q fA J (n
~ ~ d'p U U y ~ 0 0 N II II
3a O
H 3~ a a~ o m cn~u
v
i
EI Camino Corridor Program Draft EIR
City of South San Francisco II. Summary
February 11, 1993 Page 36
m
U
C C
~ ~ .Q
C ;= C~0 Q ~
~N C L_ , Z .J
a°.i~3~
c •N
.s ~ ;,
~ ~ F- v
~~ Q m N
C
N
~ L
tq OO L w
O C V ° O
.3 ~ ~ y ° .r C O C
°~ ~E~c~~c o~mE
L ~ w o ~' o °' L a c
~ c a o 0 o c o~°
~ ~ ~ ~ to ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~
O ~ U O~ y y C
~ ~ ~ «+ .,.. ~ ~ N C N O
R7 O O m~~ C_ N O~ O~
C N tLn ~ N O~ p U L U O
o ? ~cao;? m~~vcNa
U
~ia v ~ ~ m ~ c >. ~ m ~' coi ° ~
~ m~ ~ U Rf L U ~ cC m d C
~ Z Q ~ ^ ^
c~
c c ~
ia~+.o
C =~ ~ m
O C _
0~=~ N ~
n.cn3~ m
t ~~ L > C d~ N tOA N C
~ C m lC ~ t0 ~ V V N N~ L~ L U RJ v1 t
C1 > C ` L O >, U .,, rj O ~ sZ ~
C ~ ° 1_~ O O ~• C cC ~ C t~ uj w ~ >~ ~ ~ lC m C C
~ O d L col d" tQ ~~ 3 L~ O U° ~ ~ -~ « U~ L RS
«. a ~ O N Ri U
° °1 'D ~. m ., w. ~ a o U o 4 0 ° ° ° v~ ~ ~ m ~ 3 ~
o~ 'v o aci '>. `n c v d w r v~ cca r ~ ~ ~ N ~ i c .O ° c a.
a~ ~ 3 ~V ~.~ m ~U.~JCn ~ c~ ° ~~t v ~ arc E
p~c°E~~v°~a~~i°'~„Ow' ~ 4°~'~~~~a~~'-'acid °
~~ M •° c U~~~ o a~~ c o :° c~~ v X m c o~ ~ a
~,L• aim cn~~ p ~.m>.om°°~~ o
° ~ c S. ° c c ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ o N ~ ~ ~ ° ' c ~' ° cco ~ cca
v~ ~ cco a m c ° ° ~ " ~ ~ ~ t ~ `° m ° a ~ `r° N ° m o' ~ o c N c
> ~ rn ~ N a c ~ ... ns ~ v N N ca ca o to ~ to
~ ~ ~ '~ ° U ~ N L _ .U ~ ° O ~ m ~ C y ~ N RS ~ ~ ~ N
Q Q O a ~ O ~ ~ C ;~ a> ~ N ~ 0 O «.. 0 = '~ >' U cts ° N y ~ II II II
~ aom3EaoC~ccoti~ow= U ~~-~v,ao~o~c°i~~ t~~u
EI Camino Corridor Program
City of South San Francisco
February 11, 1993
a~
U
C
~ ~
C U
m~CL
d
~ '
~~
~~
~L
a>
U
C
c0 c>3 «.
C ;~= p~
N C t_
n°. ink
Q
Z
Q
Z
Draft EIR
II. Summary
Page 37
~
,V $ ~ C
N x N C O ~~ p
•~ E o g °
o v
'v a~
° ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ai in
Y
8 o
'"
m
~~
.r t
n ~ ? c
U N
~
' ~ O
tis ~
~ >, .~
~ t
~ .:0
m
~'°-
_
~ U ~°~
'E
3
~ mo
O' Q rn
L ~ C
~
w O' ~ 0
,~ to
~ ~ w ~O
O. ~ ,.,
O to
R
~~
m~ my
~ ~
U ti,
ao S
°'
~, ' O N E
4? d N
3 ~ U >` ~
c,l ~ •- e
~ ~ C
E ~
~; a o c ~ °- ~ .~ °'
o ~ o ~ c
° ~ is ° U o ~ N ~ 4
~ > a~
~ ~ s ° m
c
~ ~-
a
~ ~ ~ Q c0 N O o
!n C) v tOn ~
• • • O
Z
'
U
.
~
C
a~
m
~
v°i N ~
N p - O
r t t •V ~ tot rn O to
~ ~ 'd
>
U ...
o
3 . Y
m
~ r ~ ° m m
~
=
~
o
0
~ y ~-- ~
c~
m~
~
a> m «- >. a~ t c m rn a
O ~' _
- c
~ N C N ~
~ ~ t ~
o
O . ~
a
~ ~~ y
m~ t0 O
V ~
~ O
~
V1
3 c~
~ m
c
L
~
o c°
~ H
N
~~~
~' c,s ~ ~ ~
n ~
N ~ ~
c Q g ~ v
~' ° E ~ o o
>
.
~ N o i
o m~ >. o a~ m=. o rn c
w ~ ~ O ~ ~ ° $ c ccc o ~ ~ L ~ ~ ~
o ~ 0 3 v ... c rn ca ma c
=
' '
'
~ 3 c ,
m ~ c~ v w
~ ~ o ~
~ o -- c c ° c
a ~ ° $
c y
c
rn m ~
to o ~,
` ~
d ~ .
C
` O
~ "' ` C
OOp H O
~ O d ~
~ II II II
~ N j
Q I~ U C N L
> ~ '' t4
Q~ O >. 'X U Q C C O~
m 0 .G ~ m to m m t,4 U tl.
U) ~
(~ J (n
EI Camino Corridor Program
City of South San Francisco
February 11, 1993
m
c
~~
c :~
m ct_
a° in 3
c~
.4
...
c~
rn
~i
Z Z
Q Q
Z Z
L
'
y
cC
U ~ U
O O w j
r
~ O N
C ° ~ m
~
~ ~
Q
c w a
EL ° ~ m
Ewe o•o
c~o~ma
N c °
° ~ L
.
.~
~ ° ~ 3 .
N N c `~ o
oca~,
o ~ ° ~ ~ ~
~
rn ~
c~
•-
oo
.
~
E
~ C o 7 ~
o-
m >.
~
~
Z O
~
~ H «~. ~ Q
m
U
_ C
O ~ .r
C U O
m C L
a°~n3
J J
c >, c ~ '~ ~ ~ +~ m a>
N 'D ~ p $ O y ,,, ~ v~ Q L C
c`o°~;~ccaccamvi.. ~~~£:a~'~ co~E ~o
~ °
}~~°°~Ec° vii°°~m~oaX~N~~mo>E
..- m o a~
y'o~N~a~m.~N ~o~E~mcm~'~~,ca~~vaLo
~ my ~ s W °' E Q `- --v
c _
~,L 3 jc~c,~m~msE mtNEa>>_
~~~`~ym~.mm d >.~-Loom~ovca°~..,,°°`°
d o °y c~~ ~~~ = c ~_ ' o N a c c> m 3 o vi c c o
;sm~c`Uc' E Q~sOC.~~a~~vE~OO"~MOa~
Q~ E 3~ C O~ N C L d O~ .~.~ ~ - m ~ p Ep N O _~= C
C Ca y N U U 3 ° .O ~ cC .. 7 ~ cC C) .. ~ ~ ~ ° °
>- o ~ o~ c c~c 'a m e ~~ 0 3°° 3~= E c t~~ c c 3~
~ J C U O r d «.. O ~ N 'O :_~ C C O O ~= ~ O ~ C O w
V N C ~ '"' ~? U ~ «C ~ ~ - aci ~ U 3 O C U O ~ ~
t' d t 'r N N «. C
d ~~ 3 E~ `-~° ~~ g ~°~ a~~ E ~ m o c~ 3 N~
o, o m ~ ~ ° 'v N o~ ~ ¢ ° r ° m m 3 ~ ~ m ~ ° io
~ oocai~~cm~E oQm~m'o~g~o`~'~m~~a>~
E m
Q J N O fC w V cd ~ O J O O= r d~ O a.`~ ~ m ~~ r > E
Draft EIR
II. Summary
Page 38
U
CQ
a
m
c R
'~ ~
Cn C
'y 7
c
U r U
C N C
(/~ J fn
u u a
!n J (n
EI Camino Corridor Program
City of South San Francisco
February 11, 1993
m
U
C
~ cv
C ;~
G> C L
a°in3
c
0
cv
rn
a~
U
C
c0 cC .~
C :=' O
~C~
a° in
a
~`~~
~~~~
.~ ~ U x h
a ~
E ~ E ~
C ~ ~ ~
Q ~ .
y
~ ~ c c ~
~a~~~E
viU mt o
m ~ p~
~ ~ ~ '~ ~'`
~~am
~ ~ .U
_~ Q c p C
~m~ac
U o a~
~ ~
vd°'~oc
O
~ Q y ' > '"
RS
~ CO ~ V ~ H
Draft EIR
II. Summary
Page 39
U
c>s
a
E
n~
c coo
U 0
:~ >
c ca
~c
N ~
- C
C
:) t U
N 'c
T~ ~
7 J ~
II II it
~J(n
EI Camino Corridor Program Draft EIR
City of South San Francisco II. Summary
February 11, 1993 Page 40
m
U
C
~ ~
C U
N C L
a°in3
c
0
.~
rn
m
U
C
~ U `~
.C r.- G
m C L
~ ~~
U
t4
a
E
m
..a
c ca
~ o
'c ca
rn c
N ~
U L U
C rn C
N
(A J !n
q it II
(I1 J (n