The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About05-21-2009 PC Packet CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 33 ARROYO DRIVE May 21, 2009 7:30 PM WELCOME If this is the first time you have been to a Commission meeting, perhaps you'd like to know a little about our procedure. Under Oral Communications, at the beginning of the meeting, persons wishing to speak on any subject not on the Agenda will have 3 minutes to discuss their item. The Clerk will read the name and type of application to be heard in the order in which it appears on the Agenda. A staff person will then explain the proposal. The first person allowed to speak will be the applicant, followed by persons in favor of the application. Then persons who oppose the project or who wish to ask questions will have their turn. If you wish to speak, please fill out a card (which is available near the entrance door) and give it. as soon as possible, to the Clerk at the front of the room. When it is your turn, she will announce your name for the record. The Commission has adopted a policy that applicants and their representatives have a maximum time limit of 20 minutes to make a presentation on their project. Non-applicants may speak a maximum of 3 minutes on any case. Questions from Commissioners to applicants or non-applicants may be answered by using additional time. When the Commission is not in session, we'll be pleased to answer your questions if you will go to the Planning Division, City Hall, 315 Maple Avenue or telephone (650) 877-8535 or bye-mail at web- [email protected]. Wallace M. Moore Chairperson Roberto Bernardo Commissioner Mary Giusti Commissioner Stacey Oborne Vice Chairperson John Prouty Commissioner Rick Ochsenhirt Commissioner William Zemke Commissioner Susy Kalkin, Chief Planner Secretary to the Planning Commission Steve Carlson Gerry Beaudin Senior Planner Senior Planner Linda Ajello Associate Planner Billy Gross Associate Planner Bertha Aguilar Clerk Please Turn Cellular Phones And Paqers Off. Individuals with disabilities who require auxiliary aids or services to attend and participate in this meeting should contact the ADA Coordinator at (650) 829,3800. five working days before the meeting. In accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.5. any writing or document that is a public record, relates to an open session agenda item, and is distributed less than 72 hours prior to a regular meeting will be made available for public inspection at the Planning Division counter in the City Hall Annex. If, however, the document or writing is not distributed until the regular meeling to which it relales, Ihen the document or writing will be made available to the publiC at the location of the meefing, as listed on this agenda. The address of the City Hall Annex is 315 Maple Avenue, South San Francisco, Califomia 94080. PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 33 ARROYO DRIVE May 21, 2009 Time 7:30 P.M. CALL TO ORDER / PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL / CHAIR COMMENTS AGENDA REVIEW ORAL COMMUNICATIONS PRESENTATIONS . HOPE - SM County ten-year housing plan to end homelessness and working ADMINISTRA TIVE BUSINESS . Interview and appointment of Design Review Boardmembers CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Approval of meeting minutes of May 7, 2009. 2. Bay Badminton Center/applicant MANCINI, PROPERTIES INC/owner 1404 SAN MATEO AVE P09-0027: UP09-0007, DR09-0015 & SIGNS09-0014 (Continue Off Calendar) Use Permit to allow a commercial recreation facility at 1404 San Mateo Avenue in the Industrial Zone (M- 1) District in accordance with SSFMC Chapters 20.30, 20.76, 20.81,20,85 & 20,86. PUBLIC HEARINGS 3. SEES, CANDIES INC/applicant SEES, CANDIES INC/owner 210 EL CAMINO REAL P09-0025:SIGNS09-0012 Type "C" Sign Permit allowing a 16 It tall double sided freestanding cabinet sign and electronic advertising display, situated at210 EI Camino Real (APN 014-182-010), in the Planned Commercial Zone (P-C-L) District, in accordance with SSFMC Chapters 20,24, 20.76 & 20,86. Planning Commission Agenda - Cont'd May 21,2009 Page 3 4. Fed-Ex Ground/Jim Bowman/applicant WELLS ENTERPRISES/owner 202 Littlefield Ave UPM09-0003 (P06-0054) Use Permit Modification of the adopted conditions of approval allowing alternate interim fire suppression measures in lieu of providing an on,site vehicle turnaround or circumnavigation of the site, situated at 202 Littlefield Avenue in the Planned Industrial (P-I) Zoning District, in accordance the SSFMC Chapters 20,81 & 20.91. ITEMS FROM STAFF ITEMS FROM COMMISSION ITEMS FROM THE PUBLIC ADJOURNMENT s~~h. Secretary to the Planning Commission City of South San Francisco NEXT MEETING: Regular Meeting June 4, 2009, Municipal Services Building, 33 Arroyo Drive, South San Francisco, CA. Staff Reports can now be accessed online at: htto:llwww.ssf.neUdeDts/comms/planninq/aaenda minutes.asp or via http://weblink.ssf.net SK/bla S:\A.0~",-:JR<;\f'l"'v\',^,Lng CcwA"....i.<:.sio"'-\::('!;.o3\05-~1-0j R.PC 4.g~V\.GlCl,.;loc Planning Commission Staff Report DATE: May 21, 2009 TO: Planning Commission SUBJECT: Design Review Board Member Interviews and Appointments RECOMMENDATION: That the Commission interview and appoint members to the City's Design Review Board. BACKGROUNDIDISCUSSION: Role of the DRB The City's Design Review Board (DRB) is an advisory Board to the Chief Planner and the Planning Commission. The Design Review Board is tasked with reviewing and commenting on applications that are subject to design review. The purview of the DRB includes, but is not limited to: site design, the relationship of proposed projects to immediate and adjacent areas, privacy, noise and view protection, the bulk and massing of proposed structures, and preservation and enhancement of the natural environment. The DRB's technical knowledge and expert opinion are critical to ensuring high-quality development in the City - decision-makers often rely on comments provided by the DRB. DRB Term and Make-up The DRB consists of five members who hold office for four year terms with no established term limits. Section 20.85.050(a) ofthe South San Francisco Municipal Code (SSFMC) gives the Planning Commission the authority to appoint DRB members. The SSFMC also states that two members shall be state licensed architects, and two members shall be a landscape architect, designer, contractor, horticulturalist, or person with equivalent landscaping expertise or background. The final member of the DRB must be a SSF resident in one of the aforementioned positions or a building or engineering contractor. Current DRB Member Applicants The DRB Recruitment Notice was posted on April 8th, 2009 and closed on May 8th, 2009. Staff received seven applications for the five member Board. All five of the City's current DRB members applied for re-appointment. The table below contains the list of the seven applicants as well as select information from the applications (complete applications attached). Staff Report DRB Interview and Appointments Page 2 Applicant's Name Profession/License Current DRB SSF Member Resident Gooyer Robert Comelis Architect (Lie. #C.11242 No No Bill Harris Landscape Architect (Lie. #2428) Yes No Wing Lee Architect (Lie. #C.28929 No No David Nelson Landscape Architect (Lie. #2360) Yes No Michael Nilmeyer Architect (Lie. #C.9667) Yes No Aristides Ruiz Architect (Lie. #C.19811) Yes Yes Robert Williams Architect (Lie. #C.6892) Yes No CONCLUSION: Staff is recommending that the Commission conduct interviews and appoint five members to the City's Design Review Board. ~A' Susy Ka III Chief Planner I ghb/sk Attachements . Design Review Board Recruitment Notice . Complete Applications for Design Review Board Membership DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RECRUITMENT NOTICE The City of South San Francisco is now accepting applications from those interested in serving on the Design Review Board. About the Board The Design Review Board consists of design professionals who provide advice on new development projects and most exterior changes to existing buildings. The goal of the Design Review Board is to encourage better design and site planning that enhances the character of the city and ensures that new development fits sensitively into neighborhoods. The Design Review Board is advisory, with final decisions made by the Chief Planner, Planning Commission or City Council, depending on the complexity of the project. The Design Review Board meets on the 3rd Tuesday of every month at 4:00 p.m. in the City Hall Annex Conference Room, 315 Maple Avenue. It is comprised offive members, each appointed to a 4-year term or until the appointment of a qualified successor. There are no term limits for the Design Review Board. The Board is staffed by the Department of Economic and Community Development / Planning Division. Boardmembers receive a $50.00 per attended meeting stipend and participate in the Public Agency Retirement System (PARS). Reauirements: . Interest and motivation to serve the public . Sufficient time available to devote to evening or day meetings and the preparation for meetings . Two members shall be architects licensed by the state . Two members shall be either of the following: landscape architect, designer, contractor, horticulturist, or person with equivalent landscaping expertise or background. . One member shall be any of the above professions or a building or engineering contractor . At least one of the members shall also be a resident and elector of the City of South San Francisco Applications are available at the followina locations: Planning Division City Clerk's Office 315 Maple Avenue 400 Grand Avenue (650) 877-8535 650-877-8518 http://www.ssf.neUdepts/comms/plannina/desia n review/default.asp Applicants will be required to appear before the Planning Commission for a public interview at a Regular meeting tentatively scheduled for May 21, 2009. APPLICATIONS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE PLANNING DIVISION NO LATER THAN FRIDAY, MAY 8th AT 5:00 P.M. * The incumbents for these positions may complete an application to be considered for re-appointment. , . ,i:;~A';), '~f"'r. . .\.... ',<r;. rrC. - C' ,..{s .LL. S rc:' ....1'1 ',h-w-. ".Lf1.e ttg OJ OUUt an J ranctsCOi/pl;J ~.{f( ~~It, Economic & Community Development ~ment I;> v.J(j! Planning Division 'v\~-v>, <'00.9 315 Maple Avenue ,-,,-/t,..I;fc,, South San Francisco, CA 94080 (650) 877-8535 (fax) (650) 829-6639 Application for Design Review Board PLEASE NOTE: You are strongly encouraged to attend the "Citizens' Academy" Orientation and Training Seminar for prospective members of City Boards and Commissions. Please contact the City Clerk for registration information. Select those that apply: [XI Architect o Building Contractor o Designer 0 o Engineering Contractor 0 Horticulturist Other o Equivalence of landscaping expertise or landscaping background PERSONAL INFORMATION qc:cy~ ~~r C1ver..Jb""l..~'"l:- ~e- Name (last, first, middle) Name used on voter registration "2074 K;1P'"H0S'" k <Ja Address (number, street, and apartment number) ~ ~ 11:rO G\l\. ~410>' City, State and Zip C de Are you licensed by the state as an architect? ~ If yes - License #: Co .. II, 2.42- Are you a resident of South San Francisco? Yes @ Have you attended any meetings ofthe Design Review Board? ~ No Why are you seeking this appointment? :r: f"l::S'8"t- ~D4~1 /kJ 9l\JllVi 1"&~ -p ~l ~Ft~ i !kg" COMlMtJ~lrr. What qualifies you for this appointment? L l C.b1V~ ~ v-J/ ~ y~ C::Q<P C l~F ~ I t \. It' ~ ~-r. !=?JJhJhJl, CoNM\'W>IOt-.:l~ o..H"UQJ..( twet-. SPt4-R.. raWIl51U Additional information/qualifications that support your application ~Cr:7&"" ~~ _ Are you currently receiving any forin of compensation from the City for work performed? Yes cS) If yes, please explain: Do you h~y relatives serving on Council, comm.issions, Boards and Committees or otherwise employed by the City of South San Francisco? Yes ~lfyes, Name Position Relationship For official use only Accepted y Not Accepted Initials RESUME ROBERT C. GOOYER, AlA, FHFI FIRM RCG Architecture EDUCATION Bachelor of Architecture, University of Arizona, 1976 YEARS EXPERIENCE 30+ REGISTRATION Registered Architect, California (C-11 ,242) QUALIFICATIONS Mr. Gooyer's background includes management positions in various San Francisco Bay Area firms since 1977, directing the design and production documents for a wide spectrum of building projects. A large part of his current practice deals with the renovation and remodel of various commercial interiors. Mr. Gooyer has extensive experience in all phases of the project from initial programming to contract administration and project close-out, so vital to the satisfactory conclusion of a complex project. All work performed by Mr. Gooyer in the Last 25+ years has been produced by the use of ACAD A short list of some ongoing or recently completed projects. . Complete remodel & renovation Palo Alto Bowl Palo Alto, California . Complete remodel of Administration Las Colinas Medical Clinic San Jose, California . Complete Interior restoration Trinity Church Palo Alto, California . Residential Addition and Renovation San Mateo Park, California . New 5,000 sJ. Residence County of San Mateo, California AFFILIATIONS Past President - American Institute of Architects, SMC (AlA) Fellow, Health Facility Institute (FHFI) Master Commissioner, California Architects Board (CAB) Emergency Safety Assessment Inspector of the OES/AIA/SMC SMFCSD Facilities Implementation Plan Advisory Committee SMFCSD Foundation "Bids for Kids" Committee Coyote Point Museum Board of Directors & Volunteer Council President HONORS AND AWARDS Downtown Development Award, San Mateo, 1990 Superior Design Award, University of Arizona San Francisco Industrial Arts Association Design Award FIRM HISTORY ReG Architecture ReG Architecture was established in 1991 headquartered in San Mateo, California. The firm offers its clients the full range of architectural, planning and interior design services such as, but not limited to, master planning, feasibility studies, pre-design services, programming, schematic design services, construction document preparation and the full range of project construction management. The firm also handles such items as medical planning, construction document preparation along with obtaining state approvals and special construction management. The firm has become fully computer oriented since 1992 allowing the use of the latest technology such as CAD for the production of construction documents. All specifications are on computer allowing for the extreme flexibility required. Files are easily transferred from our office to consultants and our computers can be linked to those of our clients to streamline all aspects of a project. All this technology is available but if a client requests a hand drawn set of construction documents, those can also be accommodated. Projects are handled with the firm as Prime Architect or as a Consultant to another architectural firm needing the extra expertise Gooyer can bring to a medical related project. The intentional small size of the firm provides our clients with direct personal contact with the principal, Robert Gooyer, AlA, FHFI on all projects. It has been our goal to never become too large to not offer this personalized attention. Robert C. Gooyer, AlA has practiced Architecture, Planning and Medical Planning since 1976, after graduating from the University of Arizona with a 5 year Bachelors of Architecture Degree. Gooyer has been a registered Architect in the State of California since 1980 and recently obtained his NCARB Certificate. Prior to forming ReG Architecture in 1991, Gooyer worked in an assortment of managerial positions in various architectural firms on the San Francisco Peninsula. He has been the Principal-in-Charge or Project Manager for numerous projects ranging from $100,000,000.00 to as small as $1,000.00. These include acute hospitals, medical clinics, hotel complexes, industrial parks, regional and local shopping centers, religious facilities and large and small scale residences, His experience includes being the Project Architect for such projects as a 200,000 sq. ft. addition to a major medical center in southern California and a large shopping complex in the Bay area, to Principal-in-Charge of a recently completed $2,000,000.00 custom home and recently completed $25,000.00 addition as well as numerous other renovations, additions and remodels. Gooyer is a Corporate Member of the American Institute of Architects San Mateo County, has been its President as well as Vice-President, Treasurer, Director and Editor-in-Chief of the AIASMC's newsletter "Charrette" along with having chaired numerous committees and is again it's Treasurer. He is an Emergency Safety Assessment Inspector of the OES/AINSMC, a Master Commissioner for the California Architects Board and has served as a Planning Commisioner for the City of San Mateo. 04/28/2009 09:54 FAX 510 647 3712 HARRIS DESIGN 141 001/002 ~ 4PR '!1ie'City of South San ~rp'!ffisc~ 82009 Economic & Community Development ~Ient pj . D'" ~,< )if!', , anmng lVIS10n ' <..):'- Olf1h 315 Maple Avenue <,-"oF?: South San Francisco, CA 94080 (650) 877-8535 (fax) (650) 829-6639 " Application for Design Review Board PLEASE NOTE; You are strongly encouraged to attend the "Citizens' Academy" Orientation and Trainin2 Seminar for prospective members of City Boards and Com missions. Please contact the City Clerk for rel:istration information. Select those that apply: ~/~ ~ d - fJtlS srnw ~ JI. C3€ ~~D ~ If) "L.IfM)9:;/rfE' . iWI~ [J An:hitect Cl CI Building Contractor 1:1 CI e Designer Cl Engineering Contractor JiI Ian Horticulturist Other \.J'ff'J o,~ PERSONAL INFORMATION .f?) U,. H-ffP.~lf NLlIlle(liist;"fll;t, middle) 6<<;15 trtl()T Dr- Address (numbt:r. Slreet, and apartment Ilumber) Okt&-~() Cfr 0,+;1{ City, State and Zip Code ~ p C~ ~ J:t '2-4 'ZIi Are you licensed by the stilte: liS an a tec' If yes - License #: Are you a resident of South 8m. Fnmci!lco? Y eg ~ Have you attended any meetings ofthc Design Review Bourd? -QJNO Why are you seeking this appOintment? ~J1..~~ All ~~ Name u~ccJ on voter registraLion E-mail address Telephone number Q-Wu v() &2- P6\AS-et> to I (VC lAJ ()~ /. "l.AfJo~ltPe ~. What qualifies you for this appointment? L\ ~~ ~.t> l'lt:/t't'8 Av2-Oftl rr:e:t AdditiOlll\1 informl\Uon/qualificll.tiolls tbat SUPP011 your application An:: you currently receiving any form of compensation from the City for work perfonned? e No It'yes,please explain: pp.. ~ M ~ ~.fSIY\... Do yotll~ Jf:.Y relatives serving on Council, Commissions, Boards and Committees or otherwise employed by the City of South San Francisco'! Yes (,!? If yes, . NllII1e Position Relationship I poro.ff1etaJt:ii~;dnw,'." .'." Atcep~' "~~ ,~.;., . "1\f~~\f!l~,ir" . , .,.'...... ,I ..~t~>. . :'P.iJ'feH ] 04/28/2009 /' /" 09:54 FAX 510 647 3712 HARRIS DESIGN 141 002/002 EDUCATION .lADLI ~(\'1 0 F- ~ if'; Name and location of college/university/technical or trade school ~ 1~1i-ll Dates attended ~ .\....A- ' Degrees received thVO Major subjects Name and location of colloge/univclliityltecbnical or trade school Dllles attended MlljQI' subjects ~-Degrees received Name find location of collcgc/univcr.lity/!t:chnical or trade school Dilte:!llJUended MlIior subjects ,.,- Degree.~ received CIVIC ACTIVITIES, CLUBS. ASSOCIATIONS MISCELLANEOUS Military Se:rvice:; Dates and branch CA driver's license: number WORK EXPERIENCE UI1 (1-~ DllLtlll elnployed t~s 91PC'1lN Employer P (l.-l (VC I Pi1L Position Duties Dates employed Etnployer Position Duties Dllles e~ployed Etnployer Positioll Duties y knowledge, all statements in this application lire: complete und true. I agree and understand that any mis-statement of fOrfeit~g s 0 apPoi~tment to du~ Design Revil.'lw Board with the: City of South San Francisco. . 4-- t --O~ Signature Dll.te* · Application is kept on file fOr one year from receipt. THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO Planning Division, 315 Maple Avenue. South San Francisco, CA 94080, (650) 877.8535 (tax) (6.50) 829-6639 (;p. ~~p . .~~ry.,",._. ,-.''1-.1',;'1' '-'~~t,t'1 it?;.. rrTie City of Soutli San Pran~co Af4r o'B ~ " -€.a Economic & Community Development Dep~JJ9Ut . lOOg Planning Division '~ ~Po/.l..i"wir', 315 Maple Avenue . ,;;- South San Francisco, CA 94080 (650) 877-8535 (fax) (650) 829-6639 f" '-I.IJi'f~ ~......".....!~ ..t'1 . Application for Design Review Board PLEASE NOTE: You are strongly encouraged to attend the "Citizens' Academy" Orientation and Training Seminar for prospective members of City Boards and Commissions. Please contact the City Clerk for registration information. Select those that apply: I!I Architect o Building Contractor I!I Designer 0 o Engineering Contractor 0 Horticulturist Other o Equivalence of landscaping expertise or landscaping background PERSONAL INFORMATION Lee, Wing Name (last, first, middle) 1403 Hudson Avenue Address (number, street, and apartment number) San Francisco, CA 94124 City, State and Zip Code Lee, Winq Name used on voter registration [email protected] E-mail address 415-297-6493 Telephone number Are you licensed by the state as an architect? yes Are you a resident of South San Francisco? Yes e Have you attended any meetings of the Design Review Board? If yes - License #: c 28929 e No Why are you seeking this appointment? To provide professional inputs on urban design issues and ensure design quality on built environment of City of South San Francisco What qualifies you for this appointment? Professional architectural design experience in different scales and project types such as reSidential, commerCial, medical, mdustnal etc. 10 foster the notiOn on sustamable design and living in City of South San Francisco Additional information/qualifications that support your application Current San Francisco Hunter Points Shipyard Citizens Advisory Committee Member Current Supplemental Examination Comissioners for California Architects Board. Current Senior Lecturer at California College of tpe Arts Are you currently receiving any form of compensation from the City for work performed? Yes e If yes, please explain: NA Do you have any relatives serving on Council, Commissions, Boards and Committees or otherwise employed by the City of South San Francisco? Yes No If yes, NA Name Position Relationship EDUCATION University of Arizona - Tucson, Arizona Name and location of college/university/technical or trade school Architecture 1993-1998 Dates attended Major subjects Sha Tin Technical Institute I HON(.,"f 1:<=& '~Gr Name and location of college/university/technical or trade school Graphic Design and Communication Major subjects Bachelor of Architecture Degrees received 1990-1992 Dates attended Associate Degree in Graphic Design Degrees received NA Name and location of college/universityltechnical or trade school Dates attended NA Major subjects Degrees received CIVIC ACTIVITIES, CLUBS, ASSOCIATIONS Member of American Institute of Architects. Member of US Green Building Council. Committee Member of Mayor's Hunters Point Shipyard Citizens Advisory Committee MISCELLANEOUS NA Military Service: Dates and branch D 2540730 CA driver's license number WORK EXPERIENCE 2003-present Dates employed Wing Lee Architects Employer Principal Position Registered MBE, SBE architectural firm specializing in architectural and interior design and documentation service Duties 2007 -present Dates employed California College ofthe Arts (CCA) Employer Senior Lecturer Position Duties 2003-2008 Chong Partners Architecture Employer Senior Designer Dates employed Position Provide design direction and leadership for entitlement, master planning, conceptual design, schematic design, design development for various project types Duties I certify that, to the best of my knowledge, all statements in this application are complete and true. I agree and understand that any mis-statement of material fact will cau e to [, eit all rights to appointment to the Design Review Board with the City of South San Francisco. Date* r one year from receipt. THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO Planning Division, 315 Maple Avenue, South San Francisco, CA 94080, (650) 877-8535 (fax) (650) 829-6639 .11ie City of Soutli San pra~~P,P /6' <fA Economic & Community Development Departmeni~?;.~,. ~.9 Planning Division' 'IIt',:)- 315 Maple Avenue South San Francisco, CA 94080 (650) 877-8535 (fax) (650) 829-6639 Application for Design Review Board PLEASE NOTE: You are strongly encouraged to attend the "Citizens' Academy" Orientation and Training Seminar for prospective members of City Boards and Commissions. Please contact the City Clerk for registration information. Select those that apply: Cl Architect Cl Building Contractor Cl Designer Cl Cl Engineering Contractor ~ Horticulturist Other Landscape Architect Cl Equivalence of landscaping expertise or landscaping background PERSONAL INFORMA nON Nelson, David, William Name (last, first, middle) David William Nelson Name used on voter registration 2500 Deer Valley Road 333 Address (number, street, and apartment number) [email protected] E-mail address San Rafael, CA 94903 City, State and Zip Code (415) 479-8179 Telephone number landscape yes Are you licensed by the state as an architect? If yes-License #: Landscape Architect #2360 Are you a resident of South San Francisco? Yes No NO Have you attended any meetings of the Design Review Board? Yes YeiNo Why are you seeking this appointment? I have been a DRB member and appreciate the opportunity to work with the SSF DRB, Planning, and the applicants to improve their designs for a quality built environment. What qualifies you for this appointment? I have 9 years on the SSF DRB, I have been a registered LA for 27 years, I have a strong des1gn ethic and understand1ng of landscape arch1tecture, I have 20 years work1ng 1n SSF at Genentech, and for the City, and share detailed knowledge of plants, microclimate, sustainability, and quality design in my review comments. Additional information/qualifications that support your application I also believe I work well with Plannin3 staff, the other DRB members, the applicants and understand tEe goalS or tne ~lann1ng comm1SS1on ana 1ty counC11. Most of all, I enjoy my membership on the board, sharing my design knowledge with applicants, and appreciate the opportunity to assist the City in their goals of improving the SSF environment. Are you currently receiving any form of compensation from the City for work performed? Yes YeENo If yes, please explain: I receive $50/month on the DRB. I have no other City contracts for services. Do you have any relatives serving on Council, Commissions, Boards and Committees or otherwise employed by the City of South San Francisco? Yes NoNIfyes, Name Position Relationship For official use only Accepted V'. Not Accepted Initials Date EDUCATION University of Minnesota, College of Agriculture, St. Paul Name and location of college/university/technical or trade school Sept. 1974 - June 1978 Dates attended . Bachelor of Landscape Arch~tecture, Landscape Architecture (minor subjects: Horticulture and Art) Major subjects griH'llli'ltc"'Cl witch Cl;Rtc;nr.tc;on Degrees received Name and location of college/university/technical or trade school Dates attended Major subjects Degrees received Name and location of college/university/technical or trade school Dates attended Major subjects Degrees received CIVIC ACTIVITIES, CLUBS, ASSOCIATIONS Member of the American Society of Landscape Architects since 1988, Certified Playground Inspector, #11962-0511, Member of American Birding Association since 1994, Registered L.A. in MN {#15735)and NV (#J~e) MISCELLANEOUS Military Service: Dates and branch C3655734 CA driver's license number WORK EXPERIENCE 1/17/83 to date Dates employed MPA Design, San Francisco Employer Principal/Landscape Architect Position Proiect Desiqn/Proiect Manaqement/Teacher to younqer staff/Marketinq/Office Manaqement Duties 6/1/79 to 7/31/82 Dates employed St. Paul, Parks and Recreation Dept., MN Employer Landscape Architect in training Position Recreation Project Design/Project Drafting/Project Management/Construction Administration Duties 1972 to 1978 Dates employed self employed, Eagan, MN Employer landscape construction Position I graded new homes and laved sod, I designed home landscaping projects and constructed them. Duties I certify that, to the best of my knowledge, all statements in this application are complete and true. I agree and understand that any mis-statement of m rial fact w' cause m t; ei 11 rights to appointment to the Design Review Board with the City of South San Francisco. * Application is kept on file for one year from receipt. THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO Planning Division, 315 Maple Avenue, South San Francisco, CA 94080, (650) 877-8535 (fax) (650) 829-6639 .~J0,.<'9. ' ~if'j" .... tfF))'; rrtie City of Soutli San Pranfifco 4p4>"--V~/)1?'rf'\ Economic & Community Development Dep~t I ,.>~ v~ Planning Division ~~. Vtt9 315 Maple Avenue . 1l{9") 'Ze-., South San Francisco, CA 94080 ,U~~. (650) 877-8535 (fax) (650) 829-6639 ""-4'.~ Application for Design Review Board PLEASE NOTE: You are strongly encouraged to attend the "Citizens' Academy" Orientation and Training Seminar for prospective members of City Boards and Commissions. Please contact the City Clerk for registration information. Select those that apply: ~ Architect D Building Contractor D Designer D D Engineering Contractor D Horticulturist Other D Equivalence oflandscaping expertise or landscaping background PERSONAL INFORMATION 14i> 10 City, Stat and ip ode Telephone number Are you licensed by the state as an architect? ~ If yes - License #: ~~ 1 Are you a resident of South San Francisco? Yes t!J;> Have you attended any meetings of the Design Review Board? Why are you seeking this appointment? What qualifies you for this appointment? "" Additional information/qualifications that support your application --' Are you currently receiving any form of compensation from the City for work performed? e No If yes, please eXPlain:~;{'\ItMtW (Az> 'Deb ~ Do you have any relatives servi on Council, Commissions, Boards and Committees or otherwise employed by the City of South San Francisco? Yes No If yes, Position Relationship '~1 LfI'7}D1 Degre s received Vbb - "/71 Dates attend~d ajor subjects ~ ooU,gO/wri'''''i",tre,hni'''] "' tmde ~hool ~ Major subjects - Degrees received Name and location of college/university/technical or trade school Dates attended Major subjects Degrees received CIVIC ACTIVITIES, CLUBS, ASSOCIATIObJ ~.. ~ ~ -AlA ,*Q,,~ MISCELLANEOUS Military Service: Dates and branch CA driver's license number WORK EXPERIENCE ~ hies f!lt , ~ Dates employed Employer Position Duties Dates employed Employer Position that, to the be of my knowledge, all statements in this application are complete and true. I agree and understand that any mis-statement of ause me to forfeit all rights to appointment to the Design Review Board with the City of South San Francisco. e for one year from receipt. . THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO Planning Division, 315 Maple Avenue, South San Francisco, CA 94080, (650) 877-8535 (fax) (650) 829-6639 fJ1ie City of South San Prancisco Economic & Community Development Department Planning Division 315 Maple Avenue South San Francisco, CA 94080 (650) 877-8535 (fax) (650) 829-6639 Application for Design Review Board PLEASE NOTE: You are strongly encouraged to attend the "Citizens' Academy" Orientation and Training Seminar for prospective members of City Boards and Commissions. Please contact the City Clerk for registration information. Select those that apply: '" ~ fE' I ff?~l ~ ,( M Architect o Engineering Contractor Other .~~ ' tfP\, " -1A "-<:~4'- ., .,'itl,;. ';p '-.f ,t> ..t,A /cP" ~"~~'. '. /~ . '" " . "~. ~ 'J "0 ~~ Building Contractor [J o Designer o o Horticulturist o Equivalence of landscaping expertise or landscaping background City, State an p ode Are you licensed by the state as an architect? ~ Are you a resident of South San Francisco@ No Have you attended any meetings of the Design Review Board? Te ephone num r lfyes-License#: ~ om the City for work performed? @ No If yes, please explain: Do you h~y relatives serving on Council, Commissions, Boards and Committees or otherwise employed by the City of South San Francisco? Yes ~Ifyes, Name Position Relationship For official use only Accepted ",...---'" Not Accepted Initials Major subjects Name and location of college/university/technical or trade school Dates attended Major subjects Degrees received CIVIC ACTIVITIES, CLUBS, ASSOCIATIONS MISCELLANEOUS Military Service: Dates and branch J:~~# . I certify that, to the best of my knowledge, all statements in this application are complete and true. I agree and understand that any mis-statement of mat 'al fact will cause e to fo' . ts to appointment to the Design Review BOard with the City of South San Francisco. * Application is kept on file for one year from receipt. THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO Planning Division, 315 Maple Avenue, South San Francisco, CA 94080, (650) 877-8535 (fax) (650) 829-6639 ~ '11ie City of South San Pra~~ 0~./)>b EconOIlllC & Commumty Development I1~artme~ I .J -(:!.b Planning Division <1~ . <'a 315 Maple Avenue :It~~ ~ South San Francisco, CA 94080 G'b (650) 877-8535 (fax) (650) 829-6639 ~~ Application for Design Review Board PLEASE NOTE: You are strongly encouraged to attend the "Citizens' Academy" Orientation and Training Seminar for prospective members of City Boards and Commissions. Please contact the City Clerk for registration information. Select those that apply: ~ Architect o Building Contractor o Designer 0 o Engineering Contractor 0 Horticulturist Other o Equivalence of landscaping expertise or landscaping background PERSONAL INFORMATION \ ~hl^A0 ~~V's!: ~\\Qu\ Name (last, fIrst, middle) --.J]QLD~J\V}P% ~ Address (number, street, and apartrnee "mber) ~vt 13rlA~ ~l~ q4D~0 City, State and Zip Code ~ ,4rW C. tP8</2 Name used on voter regIstratIOn E-mail address (~) ~. 34-~.~lO Telephone number Are you licensed by the state as an architect? ~ If yes - License #: C- hex:1Z Are you a resident of South San Francisco? Yes G7 H"', you >rttended ~y mretin", of the De,ign Review Bomd? Y No ~ . Why"" you ,,,king thh appointment? ~e", - -to ~ ~ M.)l ~ ill '^J What qualifIes you for this appointment? jtw ~1j'" Additional information/qualifications that support your application Are you currently receiving any form of compensation from the City for work performed? ~ No IfyeS'PleaseeXPlain:~CZ)fA feU(~ l3r)~~ Do you~av.. y relatives serving on Council, Commissions, Boards and Committees or otherwise employed by the City of South San Francisco? Yes 0 fyes, Name Position Relationship For official use only Accepted V- Not Accepted Initials Date 4/,3/ ~ (p Nmne ~lIegel""i'eOOty/teebni"" ",.. M. b. ~ aJor su ~ects Dates attended K.o Degrees received Name and location of college/university/technical or trade school Dates attended Major subjects Degrees received Name and location of college/university/technical or trade school Dates attended Degrees received Major subjects CIVIC ACTIVITIES, CLUBS'elATIONS ~ -.MA ~&1 UI~ ~ MISCELLANEOUS A// A- MilitafY Service: Dates and branch jjo~/:9/1 CA driver's license nwnber WO;:.:;r;; ~ p~ Dates employed / 'CJ -+ ~ ~.M-...-o Employer ~ ~.o~A-- Position Duties Dates employed Employer Position Duties Dates employed Employer Position Duties I certify that, to the best of my knowledge, all statements in this application are complete and true. I agree and understand that any mis-statement of material a t wi I cause me to forfeit all rights to appointment to the Design Review Board with the City of South S Francisco. ~ . ~~d1 Date* * Application is kept on file for one year from receipt. THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO Planning Division, 315 Maple Avenue, South San Francisco, CA 94080, (650) 877-8535 (fax) (650) 829-6639 Planning Commission Staff Report DATE: May 21, 2009 TO: Planning Commission SUBJECT: Use Permit to allow a commercial recreation facility at 1404 San Mateo Avenue in the Industrial Zone (M-l) District in accordance with SSFMC Chapters 20.30, 20.76,20.81,20.85 & 20.86 Address: 1404 San Mateo Ave (APN 015-114-370). Zoning: Industrial Zone District SSFMC: Chapters 20.30, 20.76, 20.81, 20.85, 20.86. Owner: Mancini Properties, Inc Applicant: Bay Badminton Center Case No.: P09-0027 (UP09-0007 & DR09-0015) RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission continue this item off calendar. BACKGROUNDillISCUSSION: Staff is requesting that the item be continued off calendar. Staff and the applicant are working to revise site planning aspects of the project, and anticipate bringing the item forward at the Commission's June 4th meeting. However, because the item may involve a modified project description staff will send out a new public hearing notice for the meeting. 1JJ G.\~ -- ,--,--\,,\~ Billy Gt-bSS, Associate Planner GB/bg Planning Commission Staff Report DATE: May 21, 2009 TO: Planning Commission SUBJECT: Type C Sign Permit allowing a 16 foot tall double faced freestanding cabinet sign and electronic advertising display, situated at 210 El Camino Real (APN 014- 182-010) in the Planned Commercial (P-C) Zoning District, in accordance with SSFMC Chapters 20.76 and 20.86. Owner & Applicant: Sees Candies, Inc. Case Nos.: P09-0025 (Signs 09-0012) RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission deny Signs 09-0012, subject to adopting the findings denial. BACKGROUNDIDISCUSSION: The 4.21 acre site is improved with an existing 126,157 SF industrial manufacturing building situated at 210 El Camino Real constructed in the 1950s with many upgrades over the years. The site has a total of 6 existing building fac;ade signs (three on the store gables and three on the roof penthouse) that are comprised of two dimensional block lettering and are externally illuminated. The applicant proposes the addition of a new 16 foot tall freestanding two-sided sign which combines an internally illuminated cabinet sign, with block letters and an electronic reader board. Both the existing and proposed signs area as follows: TYPE GRAPHIC HEIGHT AREA Roof Fac;ade Store Subtotal 9.5 FT 5 FT 220 SF 100 SF 300 SF New Freestanding TOTAL 5 FT o 100 SF 400 SF The seasonal rooftop displays were approved in 1962 (D se Permit Resolution 1449; limiting such displays to three seasonal displays: Valentine Day, Mothers Day and Easter and a rooftop area of 9 FT X 12 FT). The store fac;ade signs were also approved in the same time period. A fifty foot Staff Report To: Planning Commission Subject: Signs 09-0012 - Freestanding Sign & Electronic Advertising Display May 21, 2009 Page 2 tall flag pole, with a restriction that no commercial flags be displayed, was approved by the Planning Commission in 1995 to replace a 30 foot tall pole near the intersection ofEl Camino Real and South Spruce Avenue, but was never constructed. As depicted on the applicant's plans, the proposed freestanding sign would combine an internally illuminated cabinet sign and an electronic display. The new sign will have a height of 16 feet and a length of 10 feet at the cabinet face, tapering to a width of 5 feet at the base. The total cumulative existing sign area is 300 SF. Including the proposed sign, the cumulative sign would increase to a total of 400 SF. The proposed project requires a Type C Sign Permit Special Circumstances, because the cumulative sign area is greater than 300 SF, the sign includes advertising copy, and the sign has a greater height than 10 feet [SSFMC Chapter 20.76]. Because the sign is to be placed abutting El Camino Real, a state highway (SR 82), a review by Caltrans is required prior to installation. The applicant proposes that the electronic display be utilized principally for advertising and to a lesser degree public service messages. The proposed sign height, illumination and placement near the roadway will allow the sign to be highly visible to regional travelers on SR 82. As set out in the applicant's letter, they believe that the signage is warranted due to the nature of and size of the use. The letter suggests that the new sign would be compatible with the area and includes photos depicting four signs: (1) Safeway (constructed in the 1960s); (2) Lay-Z-Boy (also 1960s); (3) the Brentwood Bowl (1950s); and (4) a newer school district electronic display sign. None of the commercial signs conform to the City's current Design Regulations and Guidelines. Were these signs to be proposed today, it is unlikely that the necessary findings could be made to approve them in their present form. The city has limited jurisdiction over school district improvements, including the electronic display sign shown in the applicant's materials. In 1984 the applicant proposed virtually the same sign and with the same objective of displaying advertising (approximately the same height size and location, but with a manually hand set marquee), but the proposal was withdrawn by the applicant. City staff had the same concerns regarding the freestanding sign (and this was before the addition of the penthouse signs and graphics). A copy of the 1984 plan and elevations are attached. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD The project was reviewed by the Design Review Board at their meeting of February 17,2009. The Board recommended denial ofthe proposed sign concluding that the building already has significant signage that is highly visible and distinct. Staff Report To: Planning Commission Subject: Signs 09-0012 - Freestanding Sign & Electronic Advertising Display May 21, 2009 Page 3 SIGN POLICY The design, height and size of the proposed freestanding sign and the purpose of the electronic reader board are not consistent with the City sign requirements set forth in SSFMC Chapter 20.76, and the sign proposal is not consistent with other freestanding signs recently approved by the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission has generally not approved cabinet signs, preferring instead signs that include backlit channel block lettering, and has not approved any electronic displays intended for advertising purposes, nor any permanent advertising signs (See SSFMC Sections 20.76.010 & 20.76.125 specifically prohibits advertising). The Municipal Code prohibits signs with "lights or illuminations which flash, move, rotate, scintillate, blink, flicker, reflect, vary in intensity, vary in color, or use intermittent electronic pulsations." (SSFMC Section 20.76.100(d).) Though this section would prohibit approval of many types of electronic signs, it would not prohibit approval of an electronic reader board that displayed static messages, which did not vary in intensity or color. Indeed, in August, 2008, the Commission approved an electronic, light-emitting diode (LED) sign for Anchor Drugs, located at 161 South Spruce. However, that approval was expressly conditioned on the applicant agreeing to use the electronic sign to deliver public and community-health announcements only, and not for any advertisings of products or services. Here, See's has proposed the electronic reader board primarily for advertising purposes, but has agreed to also use it for public service announcements. Further, for many years, the Planning Commission has generally discouraged freestanding signs that are of a regional nature (i.e., of heights greater than 10 feet), reasoning that the City sign regulations are intended to allow business identification from the local street system and parking lots, but are not intended to identify or advertise buildings or businesses from regional roadways or other nearby streets. The Commission's policy has been consistently applied to the newer commercial facilities along El Camino Real and other buildings in other commercial areas throughout the city. The Commission has approved larger signs for businesses that are clearly oriented to visitor serving and retail uses (e.g., hotels and big box retail) and typically have been limited to within 1,500 feet of the freeway (depicted on Exhibit 1 to Resolution # 1 04-96 - East of 101 Area Plan Policy DE 49). It should also be noted that the proposed 16-foot tall double-faced freestanding cabinet sign and electronic advertising display is proposed for a site considered to be a transitional use buffering the adjacent single family residential areas from the industrial and heavy commercial uses to the south. The proposed sign would be visible from some of the nearby residences, would fail to reinforce the residential character of the adjacent area, and is not the type of improvement that would contribute to visual clarity along the El Camino Real corridor. Staff Report To: Planning Commission Subject: Signs 09-0012 - Freestanding Sign & Electronic Advertising Display May 21, 2009 Page 4 El Camino Real Master Plan The sign potentially conflicts with goals of the El Camino Real Master Plan, a conceptual streetscape plan adopted in 2006 by the City Council. The El Camino Real Master Plan envisions a heavily tree-lined, landscaped, and pedestrian-friendly boulevard with a high aesthetic sensitivity and clarity of the adjacent southerly city entry. The proposed sign would contribute towards obscuring both the existing and planned city entry improvements including future landscaping and trees (that in part were apparently intended to soften views of the industrial facility). ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW City staff has determined that the proposed project is categorically exempt pursuant to the provisions of Class 11, Accessory Structures, Section 15311 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Because the project has been determined to be exempt, the Planning Commission is not required to taken any action on the environmental document. CONCLUSION: The site currently has 300 SF of existing signs (including rooftop signs, graphics and unique seasonal displays) that are already highly visible from the surrounding area. The proposed freestanding sign conflicts with the City's sign regulations (SSFMC Chapter 20.76) and the Design Guidelines, as the 16 foot tall illuminated sign will provide general advertising copy, and regional identification, is inconsistent with other signage approved in the area, and would set a new direction for future signs in the corridor. Therefore, it is recommended that the Planning Commission deny the freestanding sign based on the attached findings of denial. ATTACHMENTS: Draft Findings of Denial Design Review Board Minutes April 21, 2009 City Council Resolution 104-96 UP 78-473/MOD 1 Sign Applicant's Letter - March 25, 2009 Plans FINDINGS OF DENIAL 210 EL CAMINO REAL SIGNS 09-0012 MASTER SIGN PROGRAM (As recommended by City Staff on May 21, 2009) As required by the "Sign Permit Procedures:'(SSFMC Chapter 20.86), the following findings are made in opposition to P09-0025 Type C Sign Permit allowing a 16 foot tall double faced freestanding cabinet sign and electronic advertising display, situated at 210 El Camino Real (APN 014-182-010) in the Planned Commercial (P-C-L) Zoning District, based on public testimony and the materials submitted to the City of South. San Francisco Planning Commission which include, but are not limited to: Plans prepared by Signs America Inc., submitted in association with P09-0025; Applicant's letter of March 25,2009; Design Review Board meeting of April 21, 2009; Design Review Board minutes of April 21, 2009; Planning Commission staff report dated May 21, 2009; and Planning Commission meeting of May 21, 2009. The proposed Type C Sign Permit application fails to meet the requirements for approval, as articulated in South San Francisco Municipal Code, Section 20.86.060(b), for the following reasons: 1. The proposed sign is not an appropriate or effective sign within the site and in the wider context of its surroundings, because the business for which it is proposed, which is highly visible and distinct, already has substantial signage, including six existing fayade signs. The proposed freestanding, double-sided cabinet sign would not further serve the function of signs, which the City has identified as identification of a business in a manner that is most harmonious with an aesthetic and functional business environment. 2. The size, materials, graphic style, and illumination are not in keeping with the visual character of the area, as the newer existing freestanding signs along EI Camino Real and in other commercial areas throughout the City are less than 10 feet tall and comprised of channel block letters. 3. The sign was not recommended by the City's Design Review Board. General advertising signs are not permitted (SSFMC Section 20.76.010). 4. The proposed 16 foot tall double faced freestanding sign and electronic advertising display will be adverse to the public health, safety, general welfare of the community, and detrimental to surrounding properties and improvements. The location of the sign in close proximity to single family residential areas and would be detrimental to the residential character. The proposed siting and height will result in the sign being oriented to regional rather than local travelers - inconsistent with the city's sign policies and decisions. The sign size and design will not result in a consistent level of sign quality, and will not complement the architecture of newer buildings in the adjacent commercial areas and is not consistent with other newer signs approved along EI Camino Real and throughout commercial areas in the city. * * * MINUTES SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Meeting of April 21, 2009 TIME: MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT: Administrative Business: 2. OWNER APPLICANT ADDRESS PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT NAME DESCRIPTION 4:00 P.M. Mike Nilmeyer, Bill Harris and Robert Williams David Nelson and Aris Ruiz Steve Carlson, Senior Planner Billy Gross, Associate Planner Linda Ajello, Associate Planner Patricia Cotla, Planning Technician Roberto Bernardo, Planning Commissioner T om Carney, Code Enforcement Jon Kallas, Police Sees Candies, Inc Sees Candies, Inc 210 El Camino Real P09-0025 & Signs09-0012 See's Candies - Type C Sign (Case Planner: Steve Carlson) Type "C" Sign Permit allowing a 16 ft tall freestanding electronic sign for See's Candies at 210 El Camino Real in the Planned Commercial Zone (P-C) District in accordance with SSFMC Chapters 20.24, 20.76 & 20.85 & 20.86 The board had the following comments: 1. The Board identified that the facility already has highly visible large signage and seasonal rooftop displays and is not in favor of additional signage. DRB not in favor of the proposed project RESOLUTION NO. 104-96 CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA A RESOLUTION APPROVING A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (1) AMENDING THE E.AST OF 101 AREA PLAN TO ALLOW MONUMENT SIGNAGE OVER 12 FEET IN HEIGHT IN A CORRIDOR PARALLEL TO HIGHWAY 101 FOR VISITOR-SERVING USES WHEREAS, the City of South San Francisco desires to amend its General Plan; and WHEREAS, the East of 101 Plan serves as the General Plan for the East of 101 areaj WHEREAS, noticed public hearings related to the proposed amendment was held on May 2, 1396; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the amendment to allow monument signage over 12 feet in height in a corridor parallel to Highway 101 for visitor-serving useSj WHEREAS, the proposed amendment is consistent with the remainder of the South San Francisco General Plan; WHEREAS, the amendment to allow monument signage over 12 feet in height has been determined t~ be categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of South San Francisco hereby adopts the following General Plan Amendments: 1. Policy DE-49 of the East of 101 Area Plan is hereby amended to read as follows: Freestanding signs are discouraged, but may be installed as monument signs generally no more than 12 feet tall, as shown in Figure B on the previous page. Pole signs, as shown in Figure C on the previous page, are. discouraged. Monument signage taller than 12 feet may be allowed for traveler-oriented business at the City'S discretion for properties within the 1500 foot band of property east of Highway 101 as identified in Exhibit 1 attached hereto. The height of the sign shall be proportional to the size of the lot and should be no higher than the minimum required to be seen from Highway 101. For buildings which can be seen easily from the freeway, building signage is encouraged in place of taller monument signage. Signage shall otherwise follow the requirements of the current zoning ordinance and adopted design guidelines for signage. :2 . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the amendments approved herein shall take effect 30 days after adoption of the resolution. * * * . . . I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a reQular meeting held on the ?Fith day of ,llln~ 1996 by the following vote; AYES: Councilmembers ~ugene R. Mullin. John R. Penna and Robert Yee NOES: None ABSTAIN: Mayor Pro Tern Joseph A. Fernekes ABSENT: Mayor Jack Drago ATTEST: /s/ Barbara A. Battaya City Clerk J: \WPD\MNRSW\405\RESO\SIGNGP. 626 f \ . .. 0 ... .. r .. I .. n ." - . i t ~~ I I S...~ BRl.:'iO ~Ot;~T Af' PARK SAN FRANCISCO BAY ;~.. c~ SA.'V 'Rt:,YO CA..'V...u l'CIlIlr .".. oaar ... _. '. ~.---.-...._..-.,,-.... ' --- --- - ---..--.- -... - :....... -._. _..._c.... '.....~.__. --- SE.APU"iE HARBOIf EXHIBIT 1 to RESOLUTION NO. 104-96 ,:'1' , j ..", -_.J'''~ , .", ......., "'- .~-.. ;. \ .-v \ , \\ \ \ \, \, ~ ~ \... ~ ~ ~ r I ~ 11~.z1 ":......1 "- -, 'k ~ ",,- ......, "'" ~ -1 !lll \ '. "" ' .... "', -'-.... . ", ......, .............- J ':~I: "'~i ~ P~H'ziC2,.:za ~ I ~-~ i ;s J'" I ,~ ~~ N ~~ ) - do' z: -0 !5 ~~ a~ a! It II. ., z i ~ . ~ c . !!II \ ~ I I I ; ~l .,.., -I I I I i , , "I> " ::i ~~-i "-~ \\ ~. ~" ~~ ~.. , '--. '~_.' ~l ~.~ ~ i ~ \ . ,(i-l~ ~ ~ ~ ,: '-1 i>: '\l. . ~\~t;.i .(I ,-,' \i~ ~ ~<' ~ ~,' ~. .~ f l..l ~ ~' ~ f1 ~ ~ ~l\;'~~ -~ \1 ' ~"..~'. ~. ~.l ,~t\tl . . -'.~ -+-,"'/tl ; ,_...... .~\ '~ .s .\~~ - ':I.:":' u ~ - ~. . , -~ :,~ : =__1.; ~ 'J , .,-_ '__'." .. . _.....c_,~ i: . " \\\\.~~ ___'u ~.' ' i." . ,-\ \ '; -'- I -4-, i t=::=:_,:~~:"', . H" , - i " I I ftJ";::;! - il i! ! utJ I, 'i I " r1 n ,iJ.,' , i5: ::J; ft=ll :1 ' II . :' I j ~ ;; 'Ui I~ ';:. I ~ H:l ..~ ., lfii1i'- . 'I' I' ~.! I' :l t 0' :, I i @?) I 1 ~-;I.. l~ .1 'll"".'''i-Z- : I -. , ~. t ~ ~ i ,J..J ;. ';~ ~ !l ~..~ J , ----' . -<- , '~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ j A- pi t i ~ '3 ~ ! 1 ~ ..c- J \I ~ e ~ :J; ~.i'~ ~~\:: A:J 'lJ~ av \il'" ~z ~~ .(..., ~~ I, I '\ ~ t ~ ;: '" ~ ~. J.. ,j R~~N<l ~ ~ ~" i ~l , i~~~d . i~ ~t~ {U~I' , \.iih , ~ 't -,~ t. ,': . ;+ J..,d f:~' ,'" l, 11'~; ''i . J. I r1jpflj I~~~:.: Ii t :;;i-i ! I ~tJl . J i~~ \ i~' ..J..u.."-:'I' ~~"'I . ,~ ~ ~.--, ',' -- 'I ,_. g: '. ~.. I .', 'J "~t :; ~ / . .' , d D " ZD -3 ~= ::J~ a~ a! IE a IS Z i ~ .. ~ c( II (~) CORPORATE OFFICE So. SAN FRANCISCO KITCHW 21 () El CAMINO REAL SO. SAN FRANCISCO. CA 94080 (650) 563-7307 Los ANGElES KITCHHJ 3423 So. LA C1ENEGA BLVD. Los ANGELES. CA 90016 (3231 870-3761 (310) 559-4911 ""-~~;" T6-. ".. .' '~"\\;~ Jl~f' See.s. CANDIES KITCHENS AND SHOPS CONVENIENTLY LOCATED March 25, 2009 City of South San Francisco Planning Division 312 Maple Avenue South San Francisco, CA 94083 Subject: Type C Sign for See's Candies~ 210 'EI Camino Real To Whom It May Concern: CONSUMER AFFA.IRS DEPT. P.O. Box 93023 LONG BEACH, CA 90809-3023 (800) 789-7337 MAIL ORDER DEPT. P.O. Box 93025 LONG BEACli, CA 90809-3025 (800) 347'7337 QUANTITY DISCOUNT DEPT. P.O. Box 93024 LONG BEACH. CA 90809-3024 (800) 877 ,7337 See's Candies, a long time community employer and community supporter, wishes to expand its local presence via a new Electronic ("Banner") Reader Board. The new sign will be utilized to not only bolster sales by reminding the public of upcoming holidays and products, but also to promote community events that occur throughout the year, thereby increasing public awareness, morale and involvement. With our sales trending down, we feel that with the proper signage, we can attract and entice not only new but existing customers, to stop by and sample a piece or a pound of our wonderful product. Our goal is to keep our Company strong and survive for another 89+ years. l' The proposed sign 'lAtill be designed to fit into the environment: .. The sign is set back from the street so as not to protrude over Caltrans right-of- way. . Placed adjacent to the Bus Shelter so as not to occupy any parking spaces. s The mounting posts will be enclosed for a streamlined appearance. . The sign will be painted the same color scheme as the building (black on white). . The proposed sign is comprised of two portions: The upper portion is 2'xIO' internally illuminated light box "See's Candies". The text is black on a white background. The lower portion is a 3 'xl 0' Electronic Reader Board. Changeable text by red lamps. Text sizes are variable, depending on the number oflines (e,g. 2 lines ofa maximum of 12 characters 14" high; 4 lines ofa maximum of 18 characters 7" high). Messages: Fixed text (non-scrolling, l1on-flashing) changed a minimum of once every three days. The sign will be on an electric timer to set the hours of operation to that of the retail outlet, Q{JJJ..~ol!! ~ ~~Mir ~I. ,mll~~ fr~~n CANDIES . e City of South San Francisco March 25, 2009 Page 2 - Messages: (continued) 1) Commercial Messages (examples): Beautiful.. . Decorated Eggs., .Ready for Easter Now in Shops.. .Decorated.._ Chocolate Hearts Give Mom. ..Her Favorite... Chocolates from See's Now in All Shops.. .Eggnog Truffles Great...Game Day Snacks...Rocky Road Footballs Now in Shops...St. Patrick's...Treats 2) Public Notices (examples): South San Francisco "Day In The Park" "Easter Egg Hunt" sponsored by the South San Francisco Police Department "Easter Egg Hunt" sponsored by the Park and Recreation Department South San Francisco School District. Display all functions that the various Schools have throughout the year. South San Francisco Police Athletic League. .. Fundraisers South San Francisco Learning Center...Fundraisers South San Francisco Historical Society.. . Fundraisers We thank you in advance for your consideration and approval of this request. RVD/mjg Sincerely, SEE'S CANDIES, INC. ~~ Richard Van Doren Vice President of Marketing - SIGNS AMERICA INC. Commercial and Architectural Signage ADA Compliant Specialists www.signsamerica.com . 2141 Third Street San Francisco, CA 94107 Ph: 415.512.7446 Fax: 415.512.7447 CONTRACTOR LICENSE #720811 A-KA'-'k. ...... ..... -t" A SEE'S CANDIES - POST & PANEL SIGN LOCATION 210 EI Camino Real South San Francisco, CA 94080 . Sign location is in the parking area, on north side of bus shelter . Sign does not take away a parking space . Sign does not extend over the sidewalk DESCRIPTION OF SIGN Post & Panel . Aluminum cabinet enclosing two 4" X 4" aluminum posts from base of sign to ground . White cabinet (to match building) Sign Face: . Overall Size -5' high X 10' wide . Face is divided into Upper and Lower areas . Double sided . 50 sq ft per side Top Portion: . Internally illuminated . 2' high X 10' wide, 40 sq ft . White background with black text "See's Candies" Bottom Portion: . LED Area -3' high X 10' wide, 60 sq ft . Black background with red text . Two to four lines of text . Text size: at 2 lines, 12 characters per line 14" high . at 4 lines, 18 characters per line 7" high . Two types of messages - civic and commercial . i.e. "Buckle Up For Safety" "Holiday Candy On Sale Now" . Change message once per week . Hours of operation of message area to be the same as the store hours . Message will be static - will not scroll or flash r:n. ..rtl ~ ,1C'l ",....... lZ 1.4 .,J ~~z O1-7CF':J. ::o~ cll1~\ c: ~~.J \R ::0 tI:I~ , ~n' ~' VI o c ~ ::TN VI...... "'0 ~m ~Q !!). 3 n -. ..0 6 Q~ ",Q!. ~ o (Xl o OJ c a. :::J lCl )> a. a. .... (1) VI VI VI -0'" ~::T::J V'l C OJ O"'T1 -. -C n X::J"" N~ .., ~~ro~~Vl ro Vl~~n......_ \:J (1) .....,...... _. ...- OJ ::t:tu,Vl~ -13 ..., 'J......v,...o ~~ ro N r-;-' ...... 9 a.. n' a. o '-J N ,,.. OJ r-T'" OO.,flo. I VI '-' ......~~\.Of1"~ "< ......""-J~t 0 "'0 " "'VI n 11111l C o III Co Vl- ~ l11n 0 w'" 3 ' ::J "0- W _. (1) 011l .... "Ul Vl n OJ "U - OJ ~ lC rt> ::J -- ....OJ (J') ""'Om ;:tl m_ OUl ""'On OW (J')~ m -. om ~3: G)w z...... )>.0 G)ffi mm r./l r:n. I~ cs ~~z o~r:J) ~.~\ c: L!..L.J \R ::0 tI:I~ ~", VI -0 '" rQT::r::J f~r x g"'T1 !:Q ::J ~ ro OJ ~"g ~ U'l ......."tl.:::J ~l/'J ro ro 'f......o.......)> "'0 "* VI 111 ~ --; 3 OJ ;jNU,...O:!.Cb ro o ~ N nag. a. ~~~)>VlQJ .......~~1.O~....... c:r ,,~~ ::J "< 0"0....... 0 H o " g> c ~ ::T VlN '" ...... ::Jo ~m "'n ~ '" !!l. 3 n _. o ::J _ 0 Q~ ",'" ~ o (Xl o "'VI 11111l ,?11l (Xl Ul- tpQ ,,::J wO- o (i)' "Ul n c VI rt" o 3 (1) .... .. OJ c 0: 5" lCl )> a. a. .... (1) VI VI .. b o ^ 3" lC Vl o c ....,. ::r b o 7<"" 3" lC m OJ '" ....,. - I ~ ~ j:c . .I...-:"'~ '."'"..-: <:.f" - ,jl1 .... 1o,-;e ',;~;{!r n o :::J n (1) "0 rt" C OJ < ro" :iE VI r./l r:n. .~ cs ~~z o r:J) ~l~\ c: L!..L.J \R ::0 tI:I~ ~n,' ~ VI -0'" r.......::T:J n'OJ 0 V'l ro X ::J J;1 NlC' ::J -+::t> ro III ....... ::J ~ t;; ~ ~ ~ VI I ....... -. ....... )> ,,*Vll11~--;3 "'-J.......u,o::r'" NN ... _.'V o ' ......g~::!. '-IN ......n 00 ~ I V'l Q.I ~~~\D!"1'~ ~~ n "'...... . o " Vl n "OJ OJ- lC~ rt> ::J W-- OJ \:l ro "0 OJ .... (1) a. ~ .. "'VI 11111l ,?11l (Xl Ul- tpQ ,,::J WO- 0-' ,,!R n c VI S- 3 (1) .... .. VI o c ~ ::T VlN "'...... ::Jo ~m "'n ~ '" !!l. 3 n -. o ::J _ 0 Q~ ",Q!. ~ o (Xl o OJ c a. S' lCl )> a. a. .... (1) VI VI .. m OJ VI rt" VI 0: (1) o ...." cr c a. S' lCl (f) ""'Om ;:tl m_ OUl ""'On OQJ (f):::J mCl.. o m' (f)Ul 1--13: G)QJ z.a )>c G)m mm n o .... :::J (1) .... o ...." m n OJ 3 S' o OJ :::J a. (J) "0 .... C n (1) /J ,\.' I f ~ " ~ ~ m x Vi' e!: :::J lCl (J) (1) (1) VI- (J) lB' :::J OJ lCl (1) r:n. lrtl ~ ~, C1 ~~Z ~~r:J) r./lt~\ c: l!'..L.J 'R ::0 tI:I~ ... ~,n,' ~ VI -0 '" r ~::r:J (J) -.0.1011 -. n X ::J ..., NlC (D"-rolll......:J :J - ::J ~ V'l ~ :::;; ~ Q. ....... )> "*LnVl~--;3 'J.......u,...o ~~ NN....... ...,-. 01 Nnc..n OO~Il>U'lQJ ......,..f).""-J\.O~....... ....... '-Jt ~. ~ "'...... . o " \:l .... (1) "0 OJ .... (1) a. cr "< I t . . "'VI n m 11111l X o III C Vi' , - VI (XlUl rt" !:t. t:::Q 0 :::J '::J 3 lCl ~O- (1) alii' .... Z "Ul (1) lB' :::J" cr 0 .... :::J" 0 0 a. (J) , lB' :::J OJ VI lCl 0 (1) c ~ OJ ::TN C 1Il...... "'0 a. ~m , - :::J '" Q ::J lCl i ~. 3 )> n ::J a. I 1,1 9 0 a. n;x;J .... '" III (1) ",'" VI ~ VI 0 (Xl 0 Vl ,,@ 01 rt> lCOO rt> ::J -- .J>.QJ (f) ""'Om ;::om OUl ""'On OQJ (f):::J m~ om ~3: G)QJ z...... )>.0 G)ffi mm ,~ --;;;.. -{~ ""I:t": ".C.." ','..'.. ~ .J:1.. ". -'~~ :: ! .:;',; ..h~;' ..~..... .1:~ -::~ .,t"_' '\"'" ,. ') r:n. r./l ~ l~ C1 (Jl~Z ~~r:J) r./l'~' c: t'"..L:J .n ::0 ~~ \. ~.n" ~ VI 'U ~ ,^ ::T ~ v' r @' 0 -n N l!)' j=l'x::JOlI--"=' ro~ro::J~U'l ~ I--" ~ O.I--":t> roU1.......(f)--13 ~U,"f8:2:~ ....... U"l'" ....,_. "N......gO-n rv'N OJ O-.....J I U'l~ CO.J;:::.-....JI..O~::I I--".J;:::.,J::::.", n .......'-J,J::.- . "'b " Vl n 01 ~ cil.... 1O II rt> l.n~ \:l .... (1) "0 OJ ro a. cr "< "'VI n ~ re c , - ~ (XlUl ~ l11n 0 w'" 3 ~~ W_. (1) o ro .... "Ul Ww NN ~. t j. 'I I_ ~ ~ ~ . U) ~ ~ c-, ~ N '" ;> Z CI - m r.n Vi... ...'" ~"". .., ~ .c c Oo ;;; "0 o m ro n ~ ~"'U1IlS?:::T roc Q!. '0 fl) m "'T1 :::!. ~ ~ :::!...... c Ql!rtl~3= ~ 0 ~ ~ ~~ ~. 3 m ffi ~ g O::~~ClJOl ~. 9-. 5."0 g g Gi", 0:_ roO' oq ~- "8 m ~ ~ "l ~ ~ n o " n ~ ro -0 a "0 ro ~ 3" ro ~~ w~ ~- cr;~ 5- c: " <0 VI ~ " 0 0- C OJ " 0 ~ QC x ro ::T N C m -< ~ VI...... a. m ~ 3 "'0 i=l ~ 0 ~m a c :::J s: " ~ " [ "'n lCl ii" '" ::J '" 3 0 0- !!).2. )> ro iJ1 Oo Cl.. ~ n n ::J ~ n "" ,0 Cl.. Oo ro 0 <0 ;>, g ro ro n/J 0- 0; 0- Oo '" III VI 0 3 n '" Oo "0 " '" - VI i3. ~ ~ .. ~ 0 (Xl 0 (J') ""'Om ;:tl m_ OUl ""'On OQJ (J')~ m -, om ~3: G)QJ z...... )>-@ G)m mm r ~':: 5~ -... ~~ '" "l :; .., ....; '" c ~~ Q~ m!].. Cb'm ro ;; "". no ro ~ " - r./l r:n. ,~ cs ~~z ~~r:J) ;gl~~j\ 'R ::0 tI:I~ ~n' ' ~' VI -0'" r@'=r:J @" x g 41 N~ -0 :J~ro~.......:J ., Ul .......~-'.,f:l.Ul en (D l{1 ....... ~. .......:t> "0 "* 111111 n --; 3 OJ ""-J.......J.,o::rro ..., ~ ~ ....... ""g ;:i'~. ro ''''''-IN ......n 0.. g:~~ (flOJ ...........{:::l. ~ I.O!'""" - cr ,,~~ ::J "< 0'\....... !' o " "'VI n 11111l ~ ro C co Ul~ VI l11n ..... '-jV OJ 0 ,,::J 3 wO- 0-' (1) '-J rn :; g> c ~ ::T VIti ~o ~!:!! "'n ::J '" G1 _. 3 n -, o ::J , 0 Q~ ",Q!. ~ o (Xl o OJ c a. S' lCl )> a. a. .... (1) VI VI .. Vl n 01 ~ ".... 01 - 'g 11- 0"1"": (f) ""'Om ;:tl m_ OUl ""'On OQJ (f):::J mCl.. o m' (f)Ul 1--13: G)QJ z.a )>c G)m mm ~ "0 m ro < 01 ....,. o' ::J ~ '" .c c 01 .., rt> "0 0 ro '" . I~ lJ1 ~ 0"1 0 .....;; . r . ~ - j- .... ...... o ~ ...... N o .....;; ...... ~ .... N ~ - ~'tR S~ S :<. - ~~\ (~ ~) Q C C' :::~~ :4lIFOF-t'; - Planning Commission Staff Report DATE: May 21,2009 TO: Planning Commission SUBJECT: MODIFICATION OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: Use Permit and Design Review allowing a two tenant building comprised of a 10,228 square foot industrial use and a 17,600 square foot commercial mail distribution center with a 32,000 square foot indoor garage for the occupants of 202 and 222 Littlefield Avenue, outdoor parking for twenty-one (21) vehicles and an indoor parking garage for up to seventy-eight (78) vehicles, outdoor overnight storage of up to five (5) tractor trailers, and 3 thirty (30) foot long loading docks, generating in excess of one hundred (100) average daily vehicle trips, and twenty- four (24) hour operation, site situated at 202 Littlefield Avenue (APN 015-143- 200) and a portion of neighboring property at 212-218 Littlefield Avenue (APN 015-143-150), in the Planned Industrial (P-I) Zone District, in accordance with SSFMC Chapters: 20.32,20.74,20,81,20.85 & 20.120. Owner: Wells Enterprises Applicant: Michael Nilmeyer Case No.: UPM08-0003 (P06-0054 - UP06-0016, DR06-0043 & TDM06-0005) RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission approve the Modification of Conditions of Approval of P06- 0054 allowing alternative fire protection measures in-lieu of a fire lane, subject to adopting f"mdings of approval. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: At their meeting of July 17,2008, the Planning Commission reviewed the applicant's proposed alternative fire protection measures (outlined in the May 14, 2008 letter) addressing the lack of a required fire lane (Fire Department condition of approval #1). The Commissioners accepted the proposed alternative measures, and on recommendation of city staff, directed that the matter be scheduled for a public hearing to adopt a new Fire Department condition of approval (Exhibit #A). Over the course of the last few months representatives of the applicant and the city have been discussing the specific provisions and revising the condition measures. The attached draft has been accepted by the applicant. The additional fire suppression improvements will afford a higher degree of life safety and are consistent with the General Plan goals and policies that encourage improvements to existing buildings. Therefore, city staff recommends that the Commission adopt the modified condition of approval. Staff Report To: Planning Commission Subject: UPM08-0003 FedEx 202 Littlefield Avenue May 21,2009 Page 2 of2 ~~~ -- Attachments: Draft Findings Exhibit # A- Draft Fire Department Condition of Approval #4 Adopted Conditions of Approval Applicant's Fire Protection Measures Proposa1- May 14, 2008 FINDINGS OF APPROVAL UPM 08-0003 202 LITTLEFIELD AVENUE (As recommended by City Staff May 21, 2009) As required by the Use Permit Procedures [SSFMC Chapter 20.81], the following findings are made in support of a Modification of the Conditions of Approval associated with a Use Permit allowing a two tenant building comprised of a 10,228 square foot industrial use and a 17,600 square foot commercial mail distribution center with a 32,000 square foot indoor garage for occupants of 202 and 222 Littlefield Avenue, outdoor parking for twenty-one (21) vehicles and indoor parking garage for up to seventy-eight (78) vehicles, outdoor overnight storage of up to five (5) tractor trailers, and 3 thirty (30) foot long loading docks, generating in excess of one hundred (100) average daily vehicle trips, and twenty-four (24) hour operation based on public testimony and the materials submitted to the City of South San Francisco Planning Commission which include, but are not limited to: Applicant's Letter dated May 14,2008; Planning Commission staff report, dated May 21,2009; and Planning Commission meeting of May 21,2009: 1. The modification of the conditions of approval adding more fire suppression measures to the existing building will not be adverse to the public health, safety or general welfare of the community, nor detrimental to surrounding properties or improvements. The additional life safety improvements will provide a greater degree of fire protection for building occupants, the existing improvements and the emergency responders. 2. The addition of fire suppression elements to the existing building complies with the General Plan Land Use Element goals and policies that encourage improvements to existing buildings. 3. The site, located in the Planned Industrial Zone District, is adjacent to other similar industrial uses and currently complies with the applicable standards and requirements of SSFMC Title 20. * * * EXHIBIT #A NEW CONDITION OF APPROVAL: D. FIRE DEPARTMENT 4. The property owner shall be responsible for providing adequate fire access, subject to the review and approval of the Fire Chief, or his or her designee; except that in the event that physical constraints prevent or limit providing fire lane access to portions of the site, the property owner shall implement the following measures, as identified in the May 14, 2008 letter from Laura 1. DeBell of Response Fire Protection, the owner's consultant, and approved by the Fire Chief: A. Within ninety (90) days from the effective date of the Planning Commission approval of the Modification ofUPM08-0003 and subject to the review and approval of the Fire Chief or his or her designee, the property owner shall replace existing sprinklers throughout the parking and distribution areas of the building with quick-response sprinklers. B. Within thirty (30) days from the effective date of the Planning Commission approval of the Modification of UPM08-0003 and subject to the review and approval of the Fire Chief or his or her designee, the property owner shall provide proper striping of the pavement and signage for the existing access roadways and to establish fire lanes on the project site, and shall thereafter continue to provide and maintain the access roadways and clear fire lanes on the project site. C. Within thirty (30) days from the issuance of the final Certificate of Occupancy for the property, the property owner shall pay the sum of twelve-thousand five-hundred dollars ($12,500.00) to the City of South San Francisco to fund Fire Department equipment and/or specialized training for fire protection of the site. CONDITIONS, OF APPROV AL 202 LITTLEFIELD AVENUE P06-0054 (As approved by Planning Commission on October 19, 2006) A. PLANNING DIVISION 1. The applicant shall comply with the City's Standard Conditions and with all the requirements of all affected City Divisions and Departments as contained in the attached conditions, except as amended by the conditions of approval. 2. The construction drawings shall substantially comply with the Planning Commission approved plans, as amended by the conditions of approval, including the plans prepared by Nilmeyer and Nilmeyer Associates/Architects, dated August 28, 2006, submitted in association with P06-0054. 3. Prior to the issuance of the Building Permit, the landscape plan shall include mature shrubs, trees that have a minimum size of 24 inch box and 15% of the total number of proposed trees shall have a minimum size of 36 inch box. The landscape plan shall be subject to the review and approval by the City's Chief Planner. 4. Prior to the issuance of any permit the owner shall provide a long-term off-site parking agreement with the owner of 222 Littlefield Avenue consistent with the requirements ofSSFMC Section 20.74.120. The agreement shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney, 5. Prior to the issuance of any Building Permit, the owner shall provide documentation of an approved BCDC permit. 6. The site shall be limited to outside overnight storage of eight (8) trucks and/or trailers. Any increase in the number of outside stored vehicles or trailers shall require prior approval by the City's Planning Commission. 7, The parking plan shall comply with the SSFMC Chapter 20.74. The plans shall be subject to the review and approval of the City's Chief Planner. 8. Prior to the issuance of any Building Permit, the plans shall be revised to provide a painted vehicle aisleway at the back of the building. The intent of striping is to avoid the area being used for parking of loading and to facilitate circulation through the area. The aisleway shall be subject to the review and approval by the City Fire Marshall and the City's Chief Planner. 9. Prior to the final inspection the owner shall provide a Final TDM Plan. The TDM Plan shall be subject to the review and approval by the City's Chief Planner. 10. All parking spaces and aisleways shall meet the City's minimum parking design standards delineated in SSFMC Chapter 20.74. 11. The owner shall ensure that all businesses and contractors working at the site have and maintain valid City Business Licenses. (Planning Contact Person: Steve Carlson PH: 650/877-8535, Fax 650/829- 6639) B. ENGINEERING DIVISION A. STANDARD CONDITIONS 1. The applicant shall comply with all of the applicable conditions of approval detailed in the Engineering Division's "Standard Conditions for Commercial and Industrial Developments", contained in our "Standard Development Conditions" booklet dated January 1998. A copy of this booklet is available at our Engineering Division office at no charge to the applicant. B. SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1. The applicant shall provide a permit from BCDC for the existing access road and a continuous sidewalk along the frontage of the property, 2. The applicant shall replace the proposed 12'xI2' roll-up door with either two new 15' wide roll-up doors or one 25' wide roll up door for 2-way traffic in and out of the interior parking. 3. The applicant shall provide a drainage plan for the project and install an additional catch basin for the site. 4. Any sidewalk, curb and gutter shall be constructed to City standards. 5. Developer shall stripe the existing 20' wide access road in red paint with the "Fire Lane" legend and place "No Parking at All Times" signs along the existing access road. 6. The Fire Lane, which travels behind the building, shall comply with all City standards. c. FEES Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit for the project, the applicant shall pay the City of South San Francisco the following fees for a 53,448 GSF truck / distribution facility with offices, prior to the issuance of the Building Permit for the proposed development: Oyster Point Overpass Fee 53,448 gsftruck terminal/distribution @ 9.86 trips/l,OOO gsf= 527 new vehicle trips. Less credit of existing 53,448 gsfmanufacturing @ 3.99 trips/lOOO gsf= 214 existing vehicle trips. Total new vehicle trips = 527 - 214 = 313 vehicle trips. Contribution Calculation: 313 X $154 X (8466.48/6552.16) = $62,285.00 (The Oyster Point Overpass Fee is computed based on the August 2006 San Francisco Construction Cost Index (eCI). The fee shall be re-calculated to reflect the most current CCI upon payment.) East of 101 Traffic Impact Fee 53,448 gsf office use @ $2.11 per each square foot = $12,775.28 (Engineering Division: Sam Bautista PH: 650/ 829-6652) c. POLICE DEPARTMENT A. Municipal Code Compliance The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 15.48 of the Municipal Code, "Minimum Building Security Standards" Ordinance revised May 1995, The Police Department reserves the right to make additional security and safety conditions, if necessary, upon receipt of detailed/revised building plans. B. Building Security 1. Doors a, The jamb on all aluminum frame-swinging doors shall be so constructed or protected to withstand 1600 lbs. of pressure in both a vertical distance of three (3) inches and a horizontal distance of one (1) inch each side of the strike. b. Glass doors shall be secured with a deadbolt lockl with minimum throw of one (1) inch. The outside ring should be free moving and case hardened. c. Employee/pedestrian doors shall be of solid core wood or hollow sheet metal with a minimum thickness of 1-3/4 inches and shall be secured by a deadbolt lockl with minimum throw of one (1) inch. Locking hardware shall be installed so that both deadbolt and deadlocking latch can be retracted by a single action of the inside knob, handle, or turn piece. d. Outside hinges on all exterior doors shall be provided with non-removable pins when pin-type hinges are used or shall be provided with hinge studs, to prevent removal ofthe door. e. Doors with glass panels and doors with glass panels adjacent to the doorframe shall be secured with burglary- resistant glazing2 or the equivalent, if double-cylinder deadbolt locks are not installed. f. Doors with panic bars will have vertical rod panic hardware with top and bottom latch bolts. No secondary locks should be installed on panic-equipped doors, and no exterior surface-mounted hardware should be used. A 2" wide and 6" long steel astragal shall be installed on the door exterior to protect the latch. No surface-mounted exterior hardware need be used on panic-equipped doors. g. On pairs of doors, the active leaf shall be secured with the type of lock required for single doors in this section. The 1 The locks shall be so constructed that both the deadbolt and deadlocking latch can be retracted by a single action of the inside door knob/lever/turnpiece. A double-cylinder deadbolt lock or a single-cylinder deadbolt lock without a turnpiece may be used in "Group B" occupancies as defined by the Uniform Building Code. When used, there must be a readily visible durable sign on or adjacent to the door stating "This door to remain unlocked during business hours", employing letters not less than one inch high on a contrasting background. The locking device must be of type that will be readily distinguishable as locked, and its use may be revoked by the Building Official for due cause. 25/16" security laminate, 1/4" polycarbonate, or approved security film treatment, minimum, inactive leaf shall be equipped with automatic flush extension bolts protected by hardened material with a minimum throw of three- fourths inch at head and foot and shall have no doorknob or surface-mounted hardware. Multiple point locks, cylinder activated from the active leaf and satisfying the requirements, may be used instead of flush bolts. h. Any single or pair of doors requiring locking at the bottom or top rail shall have locks with a minimum of one throw bolt at both the top and bottom rails, 2. Windows a. Louvered windows shall not be used as they pose a significant security problem. b. Accessible rear and side windows not viewable from the street shall consist of rated burglary resistant glazing or its equivalent. Such windows that are capable of being opened shall be secured on the inside with a locking device capable of withstanding a force of two hundred- (200) lbs. applied in any direction. c. Secondary locking devices are recommended on all accessible windows that open. 3. Roof Openings a. All glass skylights on the roof of any building shall be provided with: 1) Rated burglary-resistant glass or glass-like acrylic material? or: 2) Iron bars of at least 1/2" round or one by one-fourth inch flat steel material spaced no more than five inches apart under the skylight and securely fastened. or: 3) A steel grill of at least 1/8" material or two inch mesh under skylight and securely fastened. b. All hatchway openings on the roof of any building shall be secured as follows: 1) If the hatchway is of wooden material, it shall be covered on the outside with at least 16 gauge sheet steel or its equivalent attached with screws. 2) The hatchway shall be secured from the inside with a slide bar or slide bolts. The use of crossbar or padlock must be approved by the Fire Marshal. 3) Outside hinges on all hatchway openings shall be provided with non-removable pins when using pin-type hinges. c. All air duct or air vent openings exceeding 8" x 12" on the roof or exterior walls of any building shall be secured by covering the same with either of the following: 1) Iron bars of at least 1/2" round or one by one-fourth inch flat steel material, spaced no more than five inches apart and securely fastened, or: 2) A steel grill of at least 1/8" material or two inch mesh and securely fastened and 3) If the barrier is on the outside, it shall be secured with galvanized rounded head flush bolts of at least 3/8" diameter on the outside. 4. Lighting a. All exterior doors shall be provided with their own light source and shall be adequately illuminated at all hours to make clearly visible the presence of any person on or about the premises and provide adequate illumination for persons exiting the building. b. The premises, while closed for business after dark, must be sufficiently lighted by use of interior night-lights. c. Exterior door, perimeter, parking area, and canopy lights shall be controlled by photocell and shall be left on during hours of darkness or diminished lighting. d. Exterior parking lighting must be a minimum of 5 foot candles, using high-pressure sodium lighting on 10 foot masts. 5. Numbering of Buildings 6. Alarms NOTE: a. The address number of every commercial building shall be illuminated during the hours of darkness so that it shall be easily visible from the street. The numerals in these numbers shall be no less than four to six inches in height and of a color contrasting with the background. b. In addition, any business, which affords vehicular access to the rear through any driveway, alleyway, or parking lot, shall also display the same numbers on the rear of the building. a. The business shall be equipped with at least a central station silent intrusion alarm system. To avoid delays in occupancy, alarm installation steps should be taken well in advance of the final inspection. 7. Traffic, Parking, and Site Plan NOTE: a. Handicapped parking spaces shall be clearly marked and properly sign posted, For additional details, contact the Traffic Bureau Sergeant at (650) 829-3934. b, On-street parking is not allowed. All company and employee vehicles must be parked on-site, for a period not exceeding 72 hours. Failure to comply with this condition may result in the immediate revocation of the Use Permit. c. All trailers stored on-site must be maintained, in good repair, and free of graffiti. Graffiti must be removed or cleaned within 24 hours of the event. 8. Misc. Security Measures a. Commercial establishments having one hundred dollars or more in cash on the premises after closing hours shall lock such money in an approved type money safe with a minimum rating ofTL-15. b. All loading dock and parking areas must be monitored by a CCTV system. The system must be of sufficient lighting, color rendition and resolution as to aid in the ready identification of any subject committing a crime on the premises, as well as their vehicles and license plate numbers. CCTV recordings must be maintained for a period of no less than 30 days. 9, Revocation of Use Permit a. Failure to comply with this Use Permit may result in the immediate suspension of the Use Permit by the Chief Planner, pending a hearing by the Planning Commission. (Police Department contact, Sgt. E. Alan Normandy PH: 650/877-8927) D. FIRE DEPARTMENT 1. Provide 20 foot clearance fire access road from street to rear of property. Fire road to be marked as stated in SSF Municipal Code 15.24.090. Present access road allows fire vehicles to cross onto adjoining properties to exit from rear area of buildings, please maintain as same. 2. Provide 1500 gpm fire hydrant on site, Fire Department to determine location, 3. Project must meet all applicable Local and State Codes. (Fire Department: Bryan Niswonger PH: 650/829-6671) E. WATER QUALITY CONTROL PLANT 1, A plan showing the location of all storm drains and sanitary sewers must be submitted. 2. The onsite catch basins are to be stenciled with the approved San Mateo Countywide Stormwater Logo. 3, Storm water pollution preventions devices are to be installed. A combination of landscape based controls (e.g., vegetated swales, bioretention areas, planter/tree boxes, and ponds) and manufactured controls (vault based separators, vault based media filters, and other removal devices) are preferred. Existing catch basins are to be retrofitted with catch basin inserts or equivalent. These devices must be shown on the plans prior to the issuance of a permit. If possible, incorporate the following: . vegetated/grass swale along perimeter . catch basin runoff directed to infiltration area . notched curb to direct runoff from parking area into swale 4. The applicant must submit a signed maintenance schedule for the storm water pollution prevention devices installed. 5. If air conditioning units are installed on the roof, the roof condensate must be routed to sanitary sewer. This must be shown on plans prior to issuance of a permit. 6. Trash handling area must be covered, enclosed and must drain to sanitary sewer, This must be shown on the plans prior to issuance of a permit. 7. Loading dock area should be designed with a roof or over hang and any run on must be pumped or drain to the sanitary sewer system. This must be shown on plans prior to issuance of a permit. 8. Fire sprinkler system test/drainage valve must be plumbed into the sanitary sewer system. This must be shown on the plans prior to issuance of a permit. 9. Plans must show how existing catch basins will be protected during construction. 10. Prior to the issuance of any permit provide a drainage plan. (Water Quality: Cassie Prudhel PH: 650/829-3840) JUN-18-2008 09:49 From:RFP 858-459-3415 To: 15508293954 Page:2/3 RESPONSE FIRE PROTECTION www.responsefire.com May 14,2008 Fire Chief Philip White City of South San Francisco Fire Departm~nt Fire P~vention Division 480 North Canal Street So. San Francisco, CA 94080-4603 RE: FedEx Ground Facility - 202 Littlefield Avenue Dear Chief White: 1 am writing on behalf of FedEx Ground regarding their facility at 202 Littlefield A venue in your jurisdiction, specifically in regards to the issue at' fire department access. As you are aware, currently portions of the fire department access roadways circumventing this building encroach upon abandoned railroad property. FedEx Ground has pursued possible purchase of these easements, however that option is not possible at this time. Therefore, we are proposing to provide the following alternative mitigation and protection measures, as allowed by Section 503.1.1, Exc~ptions #1 & 20f the 2007 California Fire Code, and we ask for your approval. FedEx. Ground proposes to replace the existing sprinklers throughout the parking and distribution areas of the building with qui~k-response sprinklers; the existing ordinary hazard pipe schedule piping will remain, as this occupancy is a Ordinary Hazard Group 1 occupancy under the current NFPA 13, and So the system meets the requirements for that occupancy, To our knowledge, the sprinklers currently installed are the original sprinklers installed at time of building construction in 1960, By replacing the sprinklers,. we will upgrade the fire protection to the superior sprinkler technology now available, including the quick-response element for faster sprinkler activation and, thereby, notification. We propose to complete this work within 90 days, unless a time extension is mutually agreed upon due to unexpected circumstances. FedEx Ground also detennined that existing sprinkler system was not monitored, and has contracted with ADT to provide central station monitoring to ensure prompt Fire Deparbnent notification. FedEx will also provide proper striping of the existing pavement lIDd signage of the existing access roadways and fire lanes and maintain these to provide clear lanes, This includes the portions on abandoned railroad property for as Jong as such areas remain available for this use. This work will also be completed within 90 days. Additionally, FedEx Ground will pay an "in-lieu" fee in the amount ofSI2,SOD.OO, to offset necessary training and/or additional equipment needed to protect the facility without proper access. This fee will be due and payable within 30 days of issuance of the Final Certificate of Occupancy. Please consider this request in the spirit in which it is presented, In no way docs FedEx. Ground wish to compromise the safety of their facility, their assooiates., or the community. We believe that this proposed alternative provides a level of fire md life safety that meets the spirit of the code~ and mitigates the .- 3056 Renault Street _ San Diego, CA 92122. Ph:(858) 677-9278. Fax:(858) 459.3415 Fire Protection Consulting and Design . JUN-18-2008 09:50 From:RFP 858-459-3415 To: 16508293954 Page:3"3 May 14. 2008 FedEl{ Ground Facility - SOllth San Francisco, CA Fire Department Access Alternative Proposal Page 2 of2 potential access issues for the site, providing a reasonable level of safety for responding fuefighters. We ask for your acceptance of this proposal. Thank you for your consideration and assistance. Sincerely, Q~. QM Fire Protection Consultant ' FIRE DEPARTMENT RESPONSE: By my signature below, I accept your proposal for alternative measures to address fire department access for the subject facility as described herein. si~0UCf 6. - 7-6& Date