Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 82-1988 RESOLUTION NO. 82-88 CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA A RESOLUTION APPROVING A POLICY ON THE USE OF PRIVATE ROADWAYS IN RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS IN SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO WHEREAS, private rather than public roadways may be appropriate for some residential developments in the City of South San Francisco; and WHEREAS, on the 26th day of May 1988, by Resolution No. 2396, the Planning Commission of the City of South San Francisco approved and recommended to the City Council a policy setting forth the circumstances under which private roadways may be used in residential developments; and WHEREAS, the Council has made minor modifications to the Planning Commission's recommendation; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco that the Council adopts the policy on private roadways in residential developments as set forth in Exhibit "A". I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a regular meeting held on the 22nd day of June , 1988 , by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Councilmembers Mark N. Addiego, Richard A. Haffey, Gus Nicolopulos, Roberta Cerri Teglia, and Jack Drago None None None ~ATTEST:I City Clerk Resolution No. 82-88 EXHIBIT "A" PROPOSED CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO POLICY ON PRIVATE ROADWAYS IN RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS This proposed policy shall apply to all future residential developments in the City of South San Francisco which contain five (5] or more detached or semi-detached single-family, dwellings in planned unit developments constructed with common driveways or private streets. Private roadways shall only be permitted in single-family planned unit developments having the following characteristics: The topography is too steep, the shape of the lot too irregular or other physical constraints are present so that public streets will not reasonably fit on the site without requiring variances from the public street standards of the Subdivision Ordinance. The roadways will improve access and public safety by eliminating direct vehicular backout onto public arterials. The roadways are not being proposed solely to increase density. e Sufficient budgeting is provided to fully maintain the driveways over the long term life of the project. In addition to the required covered resident parking and driveway aprons long enough to accommodate the normal passenger vehicle for each unit, guest parking is provided in common areas in proximity to each unit to offset the loss of parallel parking normally provided on public streets. If the topography limits the developer's ability to provide adequate apron spaces for each unit, these lost apron spaces shall be provided in common areas in proximity to each unit. A security gate, information sign and/or decorative pavement treatment indicating the private nature of the private roadway has been provided. [Revised 6/23/88]