Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 156-1986 RESOLUTION NO. 156-86 CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA A RESOLUTION APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT GP-86-30' WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment GP-86-30 has been proposed to clarify certain aspects, to update background material and to correct errors in the South San Francisco General Plan adopted in June 1984; and WHEREAS, after public hearings on June 12, 1986, by Resolution No. 2368 the Planning Commission of the City of South San Francisco approved the General Plan Amendment and recommended it to the City Council as set forth in Exhibit "A"; and WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration has been prepared and processed in accord- ance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and WHEREAS, the City Council held public hearings on August 13, 1986, August 27, 1986, and September 10, 1986, and further considered on September 24, 1986 the amendment and the presentations made at the hearings; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT: 1. The Council determines there will be no significant effect on the environment and that the Negative Declaration is approved and certified. The City Clerk is directed to file a Notice of Determination thereof with the San Mateo County Clerk. 2. The Council hereby adopts as an amendment to the City's General Plan the amendment recommended by the Planning Commission as set forth in Exhibit "A" clarifying certain aspects, updating background material and correcting errors in the Land Use, Circulation and Transportation Elements of the General Plan adopted in June 1984, with the following changes: 1) Page 7: Along E1 Camino Real, fast food restaurants may be allowed only between Westborough Boulevard & Spruce Street. 2) Page 12: Auto, truck or equipment sales and rental lots and vehicle rental agencies should not be permitted in industrial and planned commercial areas unless such uses are located under major utility lines or under elevated freeways. Development standards shall apply 3) Page 15: Additional full service dinner house restaurants should be encouraged along South Airport Boulevard. Fast food restaurants without drive-through windows may be per- mitted in this area. I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a regular meeting held on the 24th day of September , 19 86 , by the following vote: AYES: NOES: Councilmembers Mark N. Addiego, John "Jack" Drago, Richard A. Haffey, Gus Nicolopulos, and Roberta Cerri Teglia None ABSENT: None -2- EXHIBIT A TO RESOLUTION NO. 156-86 PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT GP-86-30 June 12, 1986 City of South San Francisco Planning Division 400 Grand Avenue South San Francisco (415) 877-8535 EXHIBIT "A" GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT GP- 86- 30 The Land Use, Circulation, and Transportation Elements of the City's General Plan were revised and adopted in June, 1984. Since that time, there have been four amendments made to these elements to address specific concerns. This General Plan Amendment is not a wholesale revision, but merely an amendment to clarify certain aspects of the document, to update some major sections, and to correct errors which have become evident during the past two years. No changes are proposed for the Land Use Diagram; only the text is amended. This proposed amendment does not represent a change in policy or direction. The proposed changes which constitute the General Plan Amendment are listed below. Words proposed to be eliminated are indicated with strike-outs (example), new wording is indicated in bold print and underlined (example). After the General Plan Amendment is adopted, the policies will be re-numbered and all the changes will be integrated into the General Plan Document. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT Figure No. 2 (follows Page 4): reflect Terrabay annexation LOCAL SETTING - map revised to Page 7 - update as follows: The 1980's and Beyond During the 1980's, South San Francisco will experience a dramatic increase in new office, commercial and research and development centers. These will include the Gateway Center, Oyster Point Business Center, Sierra Point, and ~he-~e~me~-~S~-S~ee~Ame~ea~ B~e-s~e Sheazwater. Major new residential developments expected to be constructed during the next ten years include ~4~ 721 dwelling units on the South Slope of San Bruno Mountain, ~ ~we~-~s the remaining ~hases in the Stonegate Ridge Planned Community, ~89-a~e~a~-~we~m~-~es and in the St. Francis Terrace Condominium project (west of 1-280). am~-gR ~w~h~se-e~m~mm-~s-e~-~he-~me~-~-Ra~eh~-B~e-~ Thea~e-S~ee? During the ~988as next decade, it is projected that more than 3.5 million square feet of commercial and office building space, nearly 2.0 million square feet of building space for research and development, distribution and high technology uses and approximately 1500 additional dwelling units will be constructed within the City. Page 13, Policy 10 - changed as follows: Policy l0 Uses in vacated and operating schools with surplus space should be limited to non-intensive, light traffic generating, and predominately day-oriented uses. Specific permitted uses should be established for surplus school properties which are leased to private, public or non-profit organizations. Impacts of the change in use fro~ a school facility to a facility used by ~rivate, public, and/or non-profit organizations should be assessed, as well as imDacts from sDecific individual uses. Page 13, Policy 11 for clarity, revised as two separate policies: Policy 11 The-~mp=evememe-e~-memeem~e~m~m~-~ses-em~ B~e~s-she~-be-~e~m~e~-~ev~e~-~he a~ee-eee~e~-~y-~he-memeem~e~m~m~-~se-e~ 2 -'.i -'.i'F'='. F IGU~E UPDATED TO REFLECT TERRABAY ANNEXATION FIGURE NO. 2 LOCAL Si:~ t l~31 , ~ The improvement of buildinas and/or facilities containina nonconformina uses shall be~e~mitted, provided the area within said buildinqs or facilities occupied by the nonconformina use is not increased. Polic~ lla The nonconformina use of a ~ortion of a building or facility may be continued and may be extended within the buildina or facility. Page 14, Policy 12 - changed as follows: Policy 12 The eo~s~e~em desiun of buildings on in- fill properties should be compatible with surrounding uses. Page 14, Policy 13 - clarified as follows (refer to Policy 1): Policy 13 The benchmark density (units per net acre of land) shall be the number of dwelling units proposed on a specific site for each 43,560 square feet of raw land exclusive of land dedicated allocated for ~ew-p~b~e streets and submerged land. When the average e~oss slope of a p=~De~ey site is between 20% and 30%, ~-~he-e~e-s~ee the City may reduce the net density of a residential project up to fifty percent (50%) of the benchmark density in order to discourage grading and the destruction of natural hillside environment. Whe~-~he-ave~age-e~ess-s~e~e-e~ a-~e~e~y-~s-~ea~e~-~ha~-B0%-~he-e~y-may Page 15, Residential Land Use - clarified as follows: RESIDENTIAL LAND USE CATEGORY MAXIMUM BENCHMARK DENSITY (UNIT PER NET ACRE ) MfNfM~M-BeT AR~A-P~R BW~BBfN8 COMPARABLE EH~ST~N8 ZONING DISTRICT Low Density Medium Density High Density 8 15 3O ~7904 R-1 R-2 R-3 Page 16, Policy 14 - It is proposed that this policy be eliminated. No existing residential neighborhoods have been identified for reduced rear yard setbacks. New projects developed as Planned Unit Developments may propose reduced setbacks. Policy 14 ReaF-yaFd-se~baek-~equ~Femenes-sheuld-be ~ed~eed-~-s~e-~em~y-~es~de~a~-a~eas Based-~-eaeh-~d~v~d~a~-~e~gh~h~d eha~ae~e~se~es-~e-a~ew-~eem-add~e~s-~e-Be ma~e-w~eheme-mem~m~-va~amees? It is proposed that the following policy be added at this location to clarify issues relating to residential densities in existing low-density and medium density neighborhoods. Policy 14 Infill development may occur on individual lots of 7,000 s~uare feet or less within existin~ neighborhood densities. Page 16, Policy 15 - Clarify as follows: Policy 15 Reem-a~e~ens-ae~-aeeesse~y-bu~m~s-she~ be-areh~ee~ura~y-eempa~b~e-w~h-ex~s~m~ Accessory buildings and room additions should be architecturally c0eH~atible with the main structure and of a character and scale cc~Datible with the surroundin~ neighborhood. Page 16, Policy 16 - Clarify as follows: Undeveloped properties which are suitable for s~g~e-~am~y s~Bd~w~s~e~ low densit¥ development often have unusual shapes, limited street frontage and other physical constraints. In order to encourage s~§~e-~am~y low density developments on such sites, innovative designs, such as zero side line setbacks, building clustering, and other planned development concepts should be permitted. Policy 16 The use of ze~e-s~e-~ne-se~baeks-+ene-s~e~ aed-e~s~e~ed-he~s~m~-des~ms planned develol~uents should be encouraged in a~ new single family residential projects to maximize usable open space ~B-eaeh deve~epme~. Page 18, Policy 21 - Proposed to eliminate the policy, since multi-family projects are not permitted in low density areas. 4 Policy 21 The-he~qhe-e~-eew-eee~em~n~ums~-teweheuses~ an~-~en~a~-apa~emen~-bu~d~e~$-sheu~a-ne~ e~eeed-~we-~-s~er~es-~n-he~he-~n-~ew dens~e~-areas-end-~h~ee-~B~-s~e~es-~n-he~ghe ~ee~d~mq-ewe-~-s~e~es-eve~-pa~k~m~-~m P~emeed-~emme~e~e~-e~ees-e~-the-~y? Page 19, Policy 24 - Clarify as follows: Policy 24 Senior citizen ape~mene housing projects may be allowed to be constructed to a maximum density of 50 units/acre and off-street parking may be provided at a ratio e~-eme spaee-~e~-eaeh-~eu~-dwe~-~s lower than that which is otherwise required. This change allows discretion, based on factors, such as how much care is provided for the residents, in determining the parking standard. Page 20, Policy 27 - Update wording as follows: Policy 27 Areas that should be considered for mixed use development include the Downtown Business area, ~he-U?S?-Seee~ Shearwater, and properties along E1 Camino Real me~h-e~ Wes~be~e~gh-Be~eva~d. Page 20, Historical Preservation - Update section to reflect the City's ordinance No. 978-85 and the survey which is ongoing to identify historical structures. Historical Preservation ~n-e~deF-~e-be-e~ass~ed-as-e-h~seeF~e-bu~d~n§?-a a~eh~ee~e~-a~ehaee~egy-e~-eu~e?-amd-~essess-~mee~e~ e~-~eeae&emT-~es&~m;-see~&m~;-ma~e~&a~s-am~-we~kmamsh&p?- "H~see~e"-~s-gene~a~-aeeep~ed-~e-meam~--aP~s~-b~ Be~e~e-meme~-e~-~v~mg-~e~sems?~ Seme-e~-~he-e~ee~a-wh~eh-~s-~sed-~m-ehe-se~eee~em-e~ h~s~e~e-b~d~s-~e~de-~he-~e~ew~n~ a~e~a~ens+? examp~ev-~t-~s-a-rare-eF-exee~ene-examp~e-e~-a-eerea~n e~ee-e~-a~eh~eee~u~eT-a-p~e~ee-e~-a-~eeed-areh~eeee-er bu~ee~-eee~ memerab~e-eve~-~-~he-h~s~ery-e~-the-R~y?-e~e= The-b~d~mg-~s-eme-e~-a-geeup-wh~eh?-eakem-as-a-whe~e? exhibies-a~ehieeee~ai-~iey~-a~ehieeee~ai s~a~eaaeeT-e~-h~s~e~ea~-s~a~eaaee~-e~-~he B~ The-bu~id~m~-~s-ser~ee~ra~iy-~m-geed-eemdie~em? ~m-19S4-ehe-Se~h-Sam-P~ame~see-H~seer~ea~-See~eey-was ehae-may-have-hisee~ea~-si~m~eamee? The City intends to promote the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of South San Francisco ~rouah: (1) The identification, protection, enhancement, perpetuation and use of structures, sites and areas that are reminders of past eras, events and ~ersons important to local, state or national history, or which provide significant examples of architectural styles of the past or are elements in the histor~of architecture or which are unique and irreplaceable assets to the City of South San Francisco and its neighborhoods, or which provide for this and future generations examples of the physical surroundings in which past uenerations lived. (2) The development and maintenance of appropriate settings and environments for such structures, in such sites and areas. (3) The enhancement of property values, the stabilization of neiahborhoods and areas of the City, and the increase of economic and financial benefits to the Cityand its inhabitants. (4) The preservation and encouragement of a City of varied architectural stvles, reflectinq the distinct phases of its histor~ - cultural, social, economic, political and architectural. (5) The enrichment of human life in its educational and cultural dimensions in order to serve spiritual as well as material need b~ fosterinq knowledqe of the living heritaqe of the past. Page 21, Commercial Land Use - Proposed changes for consistency, clarification, and to reflect policy: COMMERCIAL/OFFICE LAND USE CATEGORY COMPARABLE EXISTING ZONING DISTRICT Retail Commercial Planned Commercial C-1 C-2 Retail Commercial: Includes, but is not limited to retail sales, services, offices, neighborhood and community shopping centers, grocery stores, ~as~-~e~ full service restaurants, banks, motels, w~h-~¥-%~e}-~r-~ess-~ms? and gasoline service stations. This category also encompasses neighborhood commercial areas which provide space for retail sales, services and related activities needed to serve a residential neighborhood. This commercial land use is the most restrictive and least intensive of the two commercial categories in the Plan. Appropriate types of uses in this category are grocery stores, drug stores, personal service establishments, and branch banks. Planned Commercial: Includes, but is not limited to large, commercial planned unit developments and mixed commercial/residential uses, including office parks, hotels and motels, w~h-~y-e~e-%~-e~-me~e-~eems?-~e~-~as~-~ee~ full service restaurants, gasoline service stations, research and development uses, and h~h-~se apartment or condominium residential uses. The benchmark density of residential uses in this district should not exceed thirty (30) dwelling units per net acre of land. Page 22, Policy 29 - Clarify to reflect actual City policy: Policy 29 New-~as~ Fast food restaurants w~h-~e-~ w~ews-sh~H~ma¥ be allowed only along E1 Camino Real south of Westborough Boulevard. Page 24, Signs - minor word changes for clarification: Signs There are many signs located throughout the community. Some signs detract from the architectural design of a building and can affect the overall appearance of the City. Most wall signs and freestanding signs are subject to design review approval by the City of South San Francisco. Certain large signs and all off-site advertising signs are subject to approval by the Planning Commission. An excessive number of signs or unusually large signs which are out of scale with a proposed use should be avoided. Colors of signs should complement the architecture of the adjoining build- ing and not adversely detract from uses in the surrounding area. Excessive copy, the advertising of products, and unattractive pictorial representation should be avoided. Banners, pennants, excessive~y-~a~e window signs, certain roof signs and ee~a~ projecting signs should be d~s=eH~a~e~ prohibited. Freestanding signs should be designed to b~e~d compliment or be compatible with the overall architecture of the site. ~he-same-e~sT-ma~e~a~sT-a~-~ex~e-~-~he-ma~-s~e~ev Monument signs are encouraged. Comprehensive sign programs sh~ shall be e~eeu~a~e~ required when there are ~h=ee two or more individual tenants located on the same site. Signs should be located so that they do not project into public right-of-ways or into public easements. Individual illuminated letters are preferable to canister signs since they are usually more compatible with the exterior design of a building. Many off-site advertising signs are located in the community, particularly along Highway 101 and E1 Camino Real, In 1982, there were approximately fourteen off-site advertising signs along Highway 101 and approximately seven off-site advertising signs along E1 Camino Real. These signs create a poor visual image of the City, and often obstruct views and adversely affect property values. Page 25, Policy 36 - Clarify as follows: Policy 36 e~-s~e-~e~e~eae~e~-s~ms Signs should be reviewed as to size, height, materials, colors, design, and number to prevent visual clutter throughout the community. Page 25, New Policy - Add a new City-wide policy to reflect the limitations already expressed in Policy D-17 and to reflect current City practice: New Policy To the extent legally practicable and to the extent that it is fiscally feasible from the City's viewpoint to do so, off-site advertisin~ signs, signs in public riahts-of- way, and siqns which advertise specific products should not be permitted. 8 Page 25 - Add section regarding landscaping: Landsco.~lna Landscaping improves the imaae of the city and should not be linu[ted to parks and street beautification. Landscaping should be developed to enhance residential districts and the working environment. Landscaping can be used effectively to screen parking areas from roadways and to provide a positive visual image. Landscaping can effectively screen storaae areas, utility areas, and trash containers from public view. Landscaping used in the city should be suited to the specific climate, should be drouaht and wind tolerant, and should be installed with automatic irrigation systems. Page 25 - Add two new policies to reflect current landscaping policy: New Policy Landscaping shall include a minimum of 15 percent of the trees as box specimens. New Policy A minimum of 10 percent of each site shall be landscaped. Page 25 - Policies 38 and 39 - Eliminate, to allow maximum opportunities for hotel development city-wide, with lot size and a discretionary permit determining the appropriate size. Policy 38 Heee~s-and-me~e~s-hav~ng-~ess-ehan-~y-%Bg} ~eems-she~d-be-~m~-~e-~he-E~-eam~me-Rea~ a~ee? Small or medium sized motels/hotels should be compatible in scope and size with surrounding uses. Larger motel/hotels should be limited to the area along the easterly slope of San Bruno Mountain and east of the main track of the Southern Pacific Railroad. PeaVey-B9 Heee~s-and-meee~s-hev~n§-~y-%Be~-e~-me~e ~eems-she~-~e-½~m~ed-~e-~he-a~ea-e~em~-~he eas~e~y-s~epe-e~-San-B~ne-Me~n~a~m-amd-eas~ e~-~he-me~n-~aek-e~-Se~he~m-Pae~e Ra~=ead? Page 26, Policy 43 - Correct grammatical error Policy 43 The maximum height of commercial buildings in the take off and landing paths of the San Francisco Airport should be determined by criteria established by the City, the Airport Land Use Committee, or by FAA requirements, whichever is me~e most restrictive. 9 Page 27, Policy 44 - Eliminate Policy. The specific standards for types of buildings, amount of insulation, etc., are located in State law. It is preferable not to summarize the specifics into a general policy. Bu~d~gs-nea~-the-~ake-e~-e~-~and~ng-pa~hs e~-~he-San-F~a~e~see-A~e~-she~d-~e- ~eq~ed-ee-have-add~ena~-ne~se-~ms~a~en ~e-m~e~m~me-~m~e~e~-ne~se-½evets~ Page 28, Policy 46 - Change word: Policy 46 Card rooms/gaming clubs should continue to be uses which are not permitted in any zone district in South San Francisco, unless a majority of electors voting thereon affirmatively approve a measure permitting legal gambling within South San Francisco. Card rooms which presently exist in the community should be phased out of existence. Abse~ without the approval of the electors set forth above, no new card rooms/gaming clubs should be allowed in the community, nor should the existing nonconforming card rooms be allowed to expand in area or in the number of tables operated or to relocate to another area of the City. Page 29, Industrial Uses - Clarify definitions of industrial uses as follows: ~ INDUSTRIAL LAND USE CATEGORY COMPARABLE ZONING DISTRICT Light Industrial Planned Industrial M-1 PCM Light Industrial: Includes, but is not limited to light industrial, distribution, manufacturing, wholesale and warehousing uses, limited office uses, auto repair and painting, cabinet and woodworking shops and machine shops, including incidental retail sales and commercial service types of uses but excluding ~u~k salvaqe yards. Limited o~en storaae facilities maybe ~ermittedwhen properly screened fr~public view. The uses in this classification tend to include a variety of smaller and low employment businesses. The light industrial area is proposed in the south central portion of the City in the Lindenville area. Planned Industrial: Includes, but is not limited to industrial parks, light manufacturing, distribution, wholesale and warehouse uses, limited and low-rise office uses, research and development 10 and including incidental retail sales and commercial service types of uses but excluding auto repair, 9u~k salvage yards, and meat processing, and open storaae facilities. The Planned Industrial designation is intended to encompass a broad range of large employment and intensive industrial uses. The Planned Industrial designation is for the most part proposed easterly of U.S. 101 in the Cabot-Utah area and adjacent to Railroad and South Spruce Avenues. These areas have the advantage of rail service and direct access to the freeway system. These are also in close proximity to the San Francisco International Airport. Newer portions of the Cabot-Utah area have well designed building and extensive landscaping. This design theme should be continued as the remaining vacant land is developed and older portions of the area are privately redeveloped. P~ammed Industrial areas located adjacent to residential or commercial areas sheu~d shall be required to provide buffer areas including setbacks, walls or fences and landscaping to reduce noise, traffic, visual and ~de~ other impacts on the adjoining uses. Page 29, Industrial Uses, Policy 48 - Clarify as follows: INDUSTRIAL ISSUES AND POLICIES Heavy Industrial Uses Certain heavy industrial uses e~eem create unacceptable environmental impacts and cause health, safety, traffic or land use problems. New uses which produce flammable, toxic, odorous, or otherwise dangerous and/or offensive by-products sheH~d shall no longer be permitted in the City. Other industrial uses with potential negative impacts may be ~ermitted if they are restricted in their intensity and location and if the negative environmental impacts are mitigated. Policy 48 Additional ~ek-~e~m~maAs chemical plants, meat processing plants, auto salvage yards, above-ground flammable liquid storage, and other similar intensive industrial uses sheH~d-shall not be allowed in the community in the future. Uses such as truck terminals and storage facilities shall not be allowed unless restrictive mitigation measures are implemented to eliminate any potential adverse environmental impacts. 11 Page 30, Policies 49-52 - Clarify as follows: Policy 49 Industrial uses which include substantial hazardous wastes sheHAd shall be prohibited in the community. Policy 50 Industrial uses which generate a significant ameHB~-e~ exterior noise (55 dB CNEL or greater), odors, a~d~or generate heavy truck traffic sheH~d shall not be permitted near residential uses. Policy 51 Ail ~dHs~a~ open storage yards areas sheH~d shall be screened from pHb~e view by extensive landscaping and/or fencing and adequate parkin~ shall be provided. Open storage facilities shall be limited to the Light Industrial designation. Policy 52 New auto repair and auto painting establishments sheu~d shall be limited to the Light Industrial areas of the community. Appropriate mitigation measures shall be required to address adverse environmental impacts. Page 30, New Policy - A new policy has been developed under the industrial land use category to replace the current policy 1-11. The Commission indicated that these uses should be allowed only under utility lines in locations other than along South Airport Boulevard. New Polic~ Auto, truck and/or equipment sales and rental lots and vehicle rental agencies should not be permitted in industrial and planned commercial areas unless such uses are located under major utility lines. Development standards shall apply. Page 30, Policy 54 - Eliminate; a city-wide policy regarding landscaping is already included. b~d~a~-s~e-she~d-~e-~aa~sea~e~? Page 40, Proposed Bridges and Thoroughfares, Policy 68 - Eliminate the policy and update the background information, due to completion of the East Grand Avenue Separation Project: Major improvements to all three interchanges with Highway 101 are planned by the City during the next 10 years or have been recently completed. These improvements include new grade separations and freeway on and off-ramps at Oyster Point Boulevard a~-a~-Eas~-G~a~d-Ave~e? currently in progress. The 12 East Grand Avenue Separation Pro~ect was completed in 1985. The Produce Avenue on-ramp to 101 is aAse-~e~esed under construction to be widened to accommodate increased southbound traffic volumes. CIRCULATION ISSUES AND POLICIES Proposed Bridges and Major Thoroughfares In accordance with Section 66484 of the Government Code, the following bridge crossing and major thoroughfare improvements are identified as major circulation proposals of this Plan: (See Figure 9) Eas~-~=am~-Avem~e-e~e~e-Se~ara~em---Eas~-e~em~-AvemHe ~s-a-ma~e~-eas~-wes~-ehe~e~h~a~e-se~v~m§-as-~e ~.e~e~-eeeess-~em-H~§hwa~-~9~-~e-~he-~abe~-~a~e~ amd-Fe=~es-~md~se~a~-e~ea-amd-~e-~he-~aeewey-Redeve~- e~mem~-P~e~ee~? Eas~-~am~-Avem~e-a~-am~-~e-Se~he~m-Pae~e-~a~ea~ ~aeks-was-mee~e~-~e-&me~ease-sa~eey-am~-~e~ee-~a~&e eee~es~ee~ Fueu~e-e~ee-and-~ndus~F~e~-deve~epmenes-w~-~me~eese ~e~e-ve~tmes-beyem~-~e-ea~ae~e~es-e~-see~ems-e~ ehe-ex~s~n~-Fea~way-sys~em-~nAess-me~e~-~m~evemen~s The-Ees~-~amd-Avemue-~rade-Sepa~ae~em-p~e~ee~-w~ll p~ev~e-a-b~e-eve~-ehe-Se~he~m-Pae~e-Ra~ea~ e~aeksT-pass-~m~e~-ehe-exis~im§-Hi~hway-}8~-i~eeway se~ee~es-am~-D~evi~e-eew-em-am~-eli-~emps-ee-ehe-i8~ ~eewayr--Th~s-p~e~ee~-~s-be~m~-eems~e~e~-~m eee~ee~em-w~h-~he-~e~ewey-Re~eve~epmem~-P~e~ee~-em~ w~-~e-eemp~e~e~-~y-~9~? Pe~ey-66 The-Eas~-6~em~-AvemHe-6~a~e-Se~a~a~em- w~h-~he-~s~-~hese-e~-~he-~a~eway-Re~eve~- Page 49, Planning Area No. 1 - Update to reflect Shearwater and update Gateway exhibit: PLANNING AREA NO. 1, GATEWAY/CABOT, CABOT AND FORBES/OYSTER POINT/S~R~WATER/SOUTH AIRPORT BOULEVARD This planning area includes all land located east of the Bayshore Freeway, between the San Francisco International Airport and the South San Francisco/Brisbane City Limits. 13 The area contains the largest concentration of industrial development in the entire City. Between 1976 and 1981 more than 2.3 million square feet of new industrial building space was constructed in this planning area. For the purpose of analysis, this study area has been divided into northern and southern subareas. Oyster Point/Grand (Northern Subarea) This is primarily an industrial area with the Cabot, Cabot and Forbes Industrial Park being the dominant land use. The City's Gateway Redevelopment Project is a~se located in this area. This project, which includes the former Bethlehem Steel and Edward's Wire Rope properties, is planned to be developed as a major office, commercial, and research park. "The Gateway" is planned to contain 2.6 million square feet of office and research building space and two major hotel. Major street and highway improvements w~-Be-ee~s~e~e~-ee~eu~e~-w~th have been undertaken with the construction of the first building phase of the Gateway Project. These improvements include the construction of the East Grand Avenue/Southern Pacific Railroad grade separation project, new highway on and off ramps at Grand Avenue, a 4-lane arterial street (Gateway Boulevard) through the Gateway Project from East Grand Avenue to Oyster Point Boulevard, and street widenings along both East Grand Avenue and Oyster Point Boulevard adjacent to the Project. se~a~a~e~-~egee~-e~-~ew-h~hwa¥-~e~ehe~e-a~-eysee~-Pe~ Be~eve~-~s-a~se-~emme~-~e-eemmee~e~-w~h-~he-~aeeway-P~e~ee~?- Th~s-~m~e~ehan§e-~e~ee~-~s-~emne~-~e-be-eem~e~e~-b~-~99~? The City's U.S. Steel Redevelopment Project is also located in this area. This project, which includes the former U.S. Steel/ American Brid~e site and the former SSA site on Oyster Point Boulevard has been ap~roved as am/xed-use develo~aent, includin~ offices, hotels, c~,,ercial ~ses, public facilities, and residential uses. A second major railroad ~rade separation project and new highway interchange at Oyster Point Boulevard and Highway 101 is planned to be completed b~ 1990. In addition, ~e-mew-BH~m~-eems~ee~em-~m-~he-Sa~eway-P~egee~? this sub-area will experience major growth at ~eH~ three locations. These include the Sierra Point site, which is planned to contain intensive office uses, the Oyster Point Marina site, which is planned to contain intensive office uses, the Oyster Point Marina site, which is planned to contain commercial uses, and the Oyster Point Business Park site located northwesterly of the Marina, which, ~s-~a~e~-~e at build-out, will contain approximately 450,000 square feet of office space, 313,000 square feet of warehouse/office building space, and a 224 boat marina. The-~eee~¥-~eme~she~-~?S?-S~ee~Ame~ea~-B~§e-s~e-e~-eys~e~ 14 Peie~-Beu~evaed-is-p~aneed-~e-eeneaie-a-~ae~e-eemmeeeiai-ee-mi~e~ ~se-deve~epmee~ Page 51, Policy 1-10 - Clarify policy to reflect actual City Policy: Policy 1-10 Additional full service dinner house restaurants should be encouraged ~e-~eea~e along South Airport Boulevard. Fast food restaurants w~h-~ve-~h~e~h-se~v~ee w~ews-she~ shall not be permitted in this area. Page 51, Policy 1-11 - Eliminate this policy, since a City-wide policy has been developed to restrict these uses. New-e~eT-er~e~7-ae~e~-eq~Dmem~-se~es-~e~s7 see~e~e-e~eas-em~-veh~e~e-~em~a~-a~eme~es Be~eve~-~m~ess-s~eh-~ses-a~e-~e-be-~eee~e~ Page 52, Policy 1-2 - Propose to eliminate policy; South Airport Boulevard is designated for Planned Commercial and Planned Industrial uses on the Land Use diagram. New-~md~s~a~-~ses-she~d-mee-Be-pe~m~e~ed a~em~-Se~h-A~e~-Be~eva~d? Page 52, Policy 1-13 - rewritten to clarify and to reflect the project already approved for this site: Policy 1-13 The City-owned property located along South Airport Boulevard should only be developed with an intensive commercial use: sHeh-as-a h~e~-a~d~e~-a-~-se~ee-d~e~-he~se ~esea~am~? Industrial and/or storage uses she~ shall not be permitted on this site. Page 53, Policy 2-3 - Addition to reflect current practice: Policy 2-3 A new sign ordinance should be adopted for the area. Nonconforming signs should be required to conform with the ordinance within a reasonable period of time. Window signs shoul~ be restricted. Page 54, Policy 2-6 - Update to reflect current ordinance: Policy 2-6 New uses which are more parking intensive than current uses should not be permitted in the downtown area unless additional off- 15 street parking is provided on site or unless an-~n-~eu-park~n~-~ee-~s-~a~d, measures to mitigate the parking are provided, amonu which may be the payment of in-lieu parkin~ fees. Page 55, Policy 2-11 - Update policy to reflect 1985 General Plan Amendment which limited the area: Policy 2-11 Infill apartment and planned residential developments consistent with the densities and policies of the Land Use Element should be encouraged in the High Density Residential area located between Spruce Avenue, Orange Avenue, M~e~-Ave~e Fourth Lane and Railroad Avenue. Page 62, The South Slope - update the number of dwelling units in Terrabay: The Specific Plan indicates that development will occur along the lower slopes and within the valley pockets of San Bruno Mountain. The approved Specific Plan indicates that ~4~ 721 dwelling units, a 400-room hotel, a 286,000 square foot high technology trade center, three restaurants, an 18,000 square foot health club, a recreation center, a four acre park facility, and a fire station will be constructed in this area. (See Figure 20) Included in the Terrabay Plan is a four lane extension of Hillside Boulevard from its intersection with Randolph Avenue easterly to Airport Boulevard. Page 64, Policy 5-2 - Clarify policy to more clearly state the actual intent: Policy 5-2 Ail future multiple-family residential developments in the Sunshine Gardens area should be built to densities a character and scale which a~e-e~m~a~b~e-w~h relate to surrounding low density residential uses. Page 65, Policy 5-4 - Eliminate Policy. If it is the City's intent to give density credit for land required for public improvements, a general policy should be developed. Pe~y-~-4 A~-mew-~eve~eDmem~-p~epesa~s-a~em~-ehes~m~ Avea~e-sheu~-be-~equ~ed-~e-ded~ea~e ~re~e~y-e~-g~an~-easemen~s-~e-~he-$~y-ee enabie-ehis-~ea~way-ee-be-wi~eme~-im-ehe ~e~e?--B~d~n§-dens~y-e~ed~-~e~-~and-~e 16 Page 66, Policy 5-7 - Clarify policy to reflect RPD zoning along the west side of Chestnut Avenue: Policy 5-7 The vacant agricultural properties along the west side of Chestnut Avenue, north of Grand Avenue, should be developed in a residential planned development at a building density not to exceed ten (10) dwelling units per net acre. Page 72, Policy 8-2 - Add statement to policy to reflect existing sign program: Policy 8-2 Any new uses proposed in the Brentwood or Southwood Shopping Centers should be less intensive with regard to required off-street parking requirements than current uses and shall conform to existing si~n pro,rams. Page 83, Policy 10-7 - Eliminate restriction as to what type of development is proposed: Policy 10-7 The remaining vacant property located between Gellert Boulevard and Appian Way should be developed as-a-~ew~heuse-ee~em~m-deve~ep- me~ at substantially the same density, design, and quality as the St. Francis Terrace Phase I development. Page 89, Policy D-17 - Eliminate portion of policy and add it as a city-wide policy: Policy D-17 High quality signs, including wood carved, individual letters, canopy signs and professionally painted signs should be encouraged. T~-~he-ex~e~-~ega~y p~ae~ea~e-a~-~e-~he-ex~e~-~ha~-~-~s ~e-de-se?-e~-s~e-ad~e~s~§-s~g~s?-s~§~s eB-~he-s~dewa~ks?-a~-s~s-wh~eh-a~e~e 17