HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 173-1986 RESOLUTION NO. 173-86
CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AN AGREEMENT
WITH THE COUNTY OF SAN MATEO CONCERN-
ING THE CALIFORNIA IDENTIFICATION
SYSTEM (CAL-ID)
WHEREAS, the "CAL-ID" program is designed to do computer searches of
fingerprints on file with the State of California Department of Justice;
and
WHEREAS, an effort is underway to implement a uniform statewide net-
work to assist law enforcement agencies to obtain rapid, accurate, and
cost-effective identification of criminal offenders; and
WHEREAS, the County of San Mateo has entered into an agreement with
the State to install and operate a Remote Access Network {RAN) station
to communicate with the CAL-ID computers in Sacramento; and
WHEREAS, the County will purchase all necessary equipment and operate
and maintain the equipment in accordance with State policy guidelines and
procedures; and
WHEREAS, it will benefit the law enforcement efforts of the City of
South San Francisco to be able to obtain fingerprint information twenty-four
(24) hours each day;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council that:
1. It agrees to participate with other cities in the County of San
Mateo in the California Identification System program and authorizes the
Mayor to execute the agreement, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit "A".
2. It authorizes the City to contribute Six Thousand Eight Hundred
Forty Three Dollars {$6,843.00), which sum represents the City's share of
the installation costs and acknowledges that there will be on-going mainte-
nance and operation costs, the City's share of which is currently estimated
to be One Thousand Dollars {$1,000.00) per year.
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and
adopted by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco at an adj. regular
meeting held on the 29th day of October , 19 86 by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Mark N. Addieqo, John "Jack" Drago, Richard A.
NOES:
ABSENT:
Haffe¥. Gus Nicolopulos and Roberta Cerri Teqlia
None
None
-2-
EXHIBIT A TO RESOLUTION NO. 173-86
AG Pd~?-~,~r CONCEDING
CALIFORNIA IDEb~rIFICATION SYSTF~{ (CAL-ID)
THIS AC-REEME~f, by and between the COU!TTY OF S.:I: M-ATEO
(hereinafter referred to as the "County"), and those cities
within the County who become signatories to this agreement and
the Broadmoor Police Protection District (hereinafter jointly
referred to as "the Cities" cr "City" as the ccnte.-.~t requires),
is made in light of the roi!o'er;lng recitals:
A. The State of California Department of Justice
zaintains an automated system for retaining fingerprint files and
identifying latent fingerprints called the "California Identifi-
cation System" or "Cai-ID." In conjunction with Ca!-ID, the
state also maintains a statewide telecommunications network
d~dicated to the transmission of fingerprint identification data
for use by law enforcement agencies called the "Ca!-ID Tele-
communications System."
B. The Legislature has appropriated funds to provide
local law enforcement agencies with direct access to Ca!'-ID This
will allow California law enforcement agencies to solve many
presently unsolvable crimes and greatly iml~rove the ability of
those agencies to identify criminal offenders.
C. Pursuant to Penal Code secfion 11112.2, the Department
of Justice is required to develop a master plan recommending the
type, nu~-~ber, and location of equipment necessary to implement a
uniform statewide network of equipment and procedures allowing
local law enforcement agencies direct access to the California
Identification System. ?his uniform statewide net',-ork is
referred to as "Remote Access Network" or "RAN."
D. The County and the Cities have authority to perform
law enforcement functions in their respective communities and
desire to obtain direct access to the California Identification
System ~y _~articipating in PC-_'~ and to purchase ret. cie access
equipment necessary for' such direct access with the assistance cf
the State. This ~'ill enable the County and the Cities to obtain
_ , .~=~tl~e identification of criminal
rapid, accurate and cost-ef
offenders.
:~0~'~ THEREFORE, the' County and the Cities, in consideration
of .the mutual promises and agreements contained herein, AGREE AS
FOLLOWS:
!. PurpOse. The parties are entering into this agreement
in cr~c,r to obtain direct access to the Ca!ifcrnia Identification
System and to purchase rer~ote access equipment necessary for suck
direct access.
2. Te~m. This agreement shall be effective upon' its
execution by the County and by at least fourteen {14) cities.
This agreement shall c'ontinue in effect until terminated as
provided herein.
3. Administration of Agreement. The County shall
administer this Agreement. This Agreement does not create an
agency or entity which is separate from the parties to the
Agreement.
4. Duties of the County. The County will perform the
following duties:
(a) The County will contract with the State of
California to obtain partial funding to purchase remote access
equipment necessary for participation 'in Cai-ID.
(b) The County will purchase all necessary equipment
and place the equipment in the County Sheriff's Office, Title to
all e~uipment purchased will remain with the County.
(c) The County will operate this equipment and
provide fingerprint information to the Cities 24 hours each day.
(d) The County will comply with any procedures
necessary to regulate the ongoing use and maintenance of this
equipment which may be developed by the local R~N Advisory Board
established by Penal Code section 11112.4 and will adhere to the
pol~cy guidelines a,nd procedures adopted by the State.
(e) ~ne County will determine the shift assignments,
hours, and duties of all employees assigned to work on the CAL-ID
equipment.
5. RAN Advisory Board. Penal Code section 11112.4
provides th~ a local board must be established in any county
which elects to participate in RAN. The Board must be composed
of seven members, as follows: A r. em?oer of the Board of
Supervfscrs, the Sheriff, the District Attorney, the C~nief of
Police of the Department having the largest nurZoer of sworn
personnel within the County, a second chief selected by all other
police chiefs within the County, a mayor elected by the City
Selection Committee established pursuant to Government Code
sectioin 50270, and a ~ember at large chosen by the other
nembers. The RAN Advisory Board will coordinate acceptance,
deiivery, and installation of RAN equipment and develop any
procedures necessary to regulate the ongoing use and maintenance
of that equipment adhering to the policy guidelines and
procedures adopted by the Department of Justice. The RAN
Advisory Board will also advise the County and the Cities on all
matters concerning the CAL-ID.
6. Budget. ~ne County shall annually prepare by
September 1 1986 and by July 1 of each future year an operating
budget for the California Identification System setting forth
anticipated expenses, financing sources, and proposed service
levels necessary to carry out the purposes of this agreement.
~ne County will submit the proposed budget to the RA/~ Advisory
Board. Immediately after approving the annual budget, the RA_~
Advisory Board shall reconmend the budget to the governing body
of the County and each of the Cities for t/ue purpose of securing
from each of them contributions and/or appropriations in
accordance with each party's obligation as set forth in Section 7
below'. It is expressly agreed and understood that the Board has
no authority to bind any governin-~ body to make the recommended
contribution and/or appropriation and that this decision rests
solely with each governing boSl,'. Each party will deposit its
monetary contribution to the budget with the County on or before
October 1 of each year.
7. Contribution _of Parties. In consideration of the
mutual promises., contained.herein, the parties agree that they
shall make the following annual contributions toward maintaining
the Ca'llfornia Identification System.
(a) The County shall pay 50% of the annual budget.
(b) The Cities shall pay the remaining 50% of the
budget, apportioned among the participating cities in accordance
with the folio, wing formula:
(1) One-half of the Cities' share of the budget
apportioned by people units or population.
(i) Total population of all cities divided
into one-half of the total of the City's share of the budget
equals a factor in cents.
(ii) Population of each city times the
factor in cents equals the share per each c~ity.
(2) The remaining one-half of the City's share
of the budget to be apportioned on the basis of assessed
valuation as follows: ·
(i) Total assessed value of real and
personal property in all cities divided into one-half of the
total of the City!s share of the budget equals a factor in mils.
(ii) Assessed value of real and persona].
property of each city times the factor in mils equals the share
for each city.
(c) For the purpose of this Agreement, the total
assessed valuation of real and personal property in all cities
shall be the most recent such total maintained by the County
Assessor.
(d) The figures used for population in each City
shall be determined by a method and from a source established by
the County.
(e) ~ne o'Dligations incurred by the County and the
Cities under this Agreement will be incurred annually.
(f) ~ne 1986-87 apportionment for each city ~is
itemized in Attachment A.
(g) Access to Cal-ID will result in an' inc:'ease of
law enforcement resources for each party to this agreement. ~ne
partie's intend that the financial obligations created by this
agreeme..nt be considered as a supplement to each party's current
law enforcement resources and that any funds received by any
party for seized and forfeited property may be used to satisfy
those obligations in whole or in part.
8. Treasurer and Controller. The San Mateo County ,
Treasurer will be the depository and have custody of all money,
from whatever source, obtained in connection with this
ag,reement. The San Mateo County Controller shall perform the
functions of 'auditor or controller. The duties of the San Mateo
County Treasurer and the San Mateo County Controller shall be
those set forth in Government Code sections 6505 and 6505.5.
9. Withdrawal. Any party may withdraw from this
Agreement by filing written notice of intention to do so with the
Sheriff by March 31st of each year. The rights and obligations
of such party shall terminate at the end of the fiscal year in
which such notice is given. The withd'rawal of any party from
this agreement shall in no way effect the rights and obligations
of the remaining parties unless the withdrawal is by the County,
in which event this agreement shall terminate. If a party
withdraws from this Agreement, such party shall not be entitled
to the return of any funds contributed until termination of this
Agreement. If a party fails to make its contribution in
accordance with Section 7 of this Agreement, it will be deemed to
have withdrawn as of the end of the fiscal year in which it last
zade its contribution.
10. Termination And Disposition Of Property. This Agree-
ment shall be deemed terminated when the number of cities parti-
cipating in this Agreement is six (6) or less or when the County
withdraws. Upon termination, any surplus money on hand shall be
returned to the parties hereto in proportion to the contributions
of the parties during the life of this Agreement, including
distribution to parties which may have withdrawn at an earlier
date. Upon termination, title to all property and equipment
shall remain with the County.
11. Amendment. This Agreement may be amended from time to
time by the consent of the parties.
12. Liability. Each party shall indemnify, defend, and
hold harmless every other party from all claims, suits, and
actions for injuries or damages arising out of the negligent or
intentional acts or omissions (whether active or passive) of such
party.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this
Agreement o~~ ~ ~ day of S~P '~ , 1986.
ATTEST:
Clerk of the Board
SAN MATEO COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
ATTEST. ·
Clerk of City Council~
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
September
12, 1986
CAL
ATTACHMENT A
ID FIRST YEAR
COUNTY SHARE: 68,450
CITIES SHARE: 68,450
CITY' POPULATI ON
POPULAT ION ASSESSED A.V. TOTAL
SHARE VALUE* SHARE SHARE
Atherton 7,852
Belmont 24,709
Brisbane 3,039
Broa dmoor 6,500
Burl lngame 26,828
Colma 723
Daly Clty 81,037
East Pal'o Alto 18,670
Foster City 24,473
Half Moon Bay 7,725
Hi I Isborough 10,904
Menlo Park 27,853
Mil Ibrae 20,336
-P-aci f i ca 36,795
edwood City 57,315
an Bruno 34,842
5an Carlos 25,914
San Mateo 81,859
S. San Francisco 51,725
489 668,551 953 1 , 443
1 , 540 965,914 1,377 2,91 8
189 416,252 594 783
405 113,026 16 1 566
1,672 1,847,090 2,634 4,306
45 78,378 11 2 157
5,051 1,868,434 2,664 7,715
1 , 1 64 267,272 381 1 , 545
1,525 1,252,049 1,785 ;5,311
481 313,408 447 928
680 1,141,697 1,628 2/308
1 , 736 1 , 826,323 2,604 4,340
1 , 268 804,094 1 , 147 2,414
2,293 887,692 1 , 266 3,559
3,572 2,463,533 3,513 7,085
2,172 1,287,269 1,836 4,007
1,615 1,393,049 1,987 3,602
5,102 3,868,369 5,516 10,619
3,224 2,538,053 3,619 . ~-'-6~84'3~
549,095
POPULATI'ON FACTOR: 0.06233
ASSESSED VALUE: 0.00143
34,225 24,000,453 .~4,22~i 68,450
POPULATION SOURCE: Summary Report, State Department of Finance, 4/26/85,
(1/1/85 Estimates).
ASSESSED VALUE SOURCE: Tax Rates and Valuation of Taxable Property of San
Mateo County for 1985-1986
*= Assessed Value in Thousands
'RESOLUTION NO. 484Z~
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
AUTHORIZING THE DEPARTMENT OF GENEP3~L SERVICES
OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TO PURCHASE CERTAIN ITEMS
%',~HEREAS, the Local Advisory Board for the California
Identification System has requested that the County of San Mateo
obtain random access network equipment to be operated by the
Sheriff's Department for the use of all County law enforcement
agencies.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the San Mateo County Board
of does authorize the Office of
Supervisors
hereby
Procurement,
Department of General Services of the State of California, to pur-
chase material, supplies, and equipment necessary for participa-
tion in the California Identification System for and on behalf of
the County of San Mateo pursuant to Section 14814, Government
Code, and that the County Director of General Services is hereby
authorized and directed to sign and deliver all necessary requests~
and other documents in connection therewith for and on behalf of
the County of San Mateo.
1986.
Regularly passed and adopted this 23rd day of
Ai'~S and in favor of said resolution:
Supervisors:
K. JACQUELINE SPEIER
S edt ember ,
JOHN M. WARD
TOM NOLAN
WILLIAM J. SCHUMACh~ER
NOES and against said resolution:
Super vi sore:
NONE
Absent Supervisors:
ANNA G. ESHOO
(SEAL)
ATTEST:
TOM NOLAN
Vice-President, Board of Supervisors
County of San Mateo
State of California
EUNICE M. BRECHT
Clerk of the Board
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
)
COUNTY OF SAN ~gXTEO)
ORLEI~E FERRAND0, Deputy Clerk, Board of Supervisors, does
hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a full, true and
correct copy of Resolution No. 4842fJ entered in the
minutes of said Board.
In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and the
seal of said Board this 23rd
day of September , 198__6.
ORLE NE FE RRANDO
Deputy Clerk, Board cf Supervisors