Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2003-04-23 e-packetSPECIAL MEET1NG CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, California 94083 Meeting to be held at: MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING CITY COUNCIL COMMUNITY ROOM 33 ARROYO DRIVE APRIL 23, 2003 6:45 P.M. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Section 54956 of the Govermnent Code of the State of California, the City Council of the City of South San Francisco will hold a Special Meeting on Wednesday, the 23rd day of April, 2003, at 6:45 p.m., in the Municipal Services Building, Community Room, 33 Arroyo Drive, South San Francisco, California. Purpose of the meeting: 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Public Comments - comments are limited to items on the Special Meeting Agenda 4. Interviews for the Cultural Arts Commission and Housing Authority 5. Discussion and appointments to the Cultural Arts Commission and Housing Authority 6. Adjournment City Clerk City of South San Francisco Inter-Office Memorandum DATE: April 23, 2003 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members City Clerk ~~ CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING - INTERVIEW APPLICANTS FOR HOUSING AUTHORITY AND CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSION The following information outlines this evening's interviews for the Housing Authority and the Cultural Arts Commission: HOUSING AUTHORITY I Jim Claar (reappointment) - has served on the Housing Authority since 1991: 6/26/91 - 3/31/95 partial term 1. 6:45 4/26/95 - 3/31/99 first full term 4/1/99- 3/31/03 second full term CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSION 2. 6:52 Sandra Ige 3. 6:59 Patricia Fourie 4. 7:06 Anthony Violanti 5. 7:13 Arthur Tognazzini 6. 7:20 Debbie Carey (originally interviewed for Parks & Rec Commission on 2/26/03) There are currently three vacancies on the Cultural Arts Commission due to the resignations of Richard Burgess, April 15, 2002; Alexis Winters, September 2, 2002; and Anne Waters, April 11, 2003. Attached is a copy of Council's interview questions. The questions are consistent with those asked in February 2003. A motion to confirm the reappointment of Mr. Claar is required, term expiring March 31, 2007. Ballots have been provided for the appointments to the Cultural Arts Commission, which has no term limit. A motion to confirm the appointments is required. This concludes the interview process. Enc: Applications, Questions, and Ballots for Cultural Arts Commission AGENDA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO REGULAR MEETING MUNICIPAL SERVICE BUILDING COMMUNITY ROOM APRIL 23, 2003 7:00 P.M. PEOPLE OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO You are invited to offer your suggestions. In order that you may know our method of conducting Agency business, we proceed as follows: The regular meetings of the Redevelopment Agency are held on the second and fourth Wednesday of each month at 7:00 p.m. in the Municipal Services Building, Community Room, 33 Arroyo Drive, South San Francisco, California. Public Comment: For those wishing to address the Board on any Agenda or non-Agendized item, please complete a Speaker Card located at the entrance to the Community Room and submit it to the Clerk. Please be sure to indicate the Agenda Item # you wish to address or the topic of your public comment. California law prevents Redevelopment Agency from taking action on any item not on the Agenda (except in emergency circumstances). Your question or problem may be referred to staff for investigation and/or action where appropriate or the matter may be placed on a future Agenda for more comprehensive action or a report. When your name is called, please come to the podium, state your name and address for the Minutes. COMMENTS ARE GENERALLY LIMITED TO FIVE (5) MINUTES PER SPEAKER. In the event that there are more than six persons desiring to speak, the Chair may reduce the amount of time per speaker to three (3) minutes. Thank you for your cooperation. The Clerk will read successively the items of business appearing on the Agenda. As she completes reading an item, it will be ready for Board action. KARYL MATSUMOTO Vice Chair RICHARD A. GARBARINO, SR. Boardmember BEVERLY BONALANZA-FORD Investment Officer MICHAEL A. WILSON Executive Director PEDRO GONZALEZ Chairman JOSEPH A. FERNEKES Boardmember RAYMOND L. GREEN Boardmember SYLVIA M. PAYNE Clerk STEVEN T. MATTAS Counsel PLEASE TURN OFF CELL PHONES AND PAGERS HEARING ASSISTANCE EQUIPMENT IS AVAILABLE FOR USE BY THE HEARING-IMPAIRED AT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETINGS CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL AGENDA REVIEW PUBLIC COMMENTS CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Motion to approve the minutes of the April 9, 2003 regular meeting 2. Motion to confirm expense claims of April 23, 2003 ADJOURNMENT REGULAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING APRIL 23, 2003 AGENDA PAGE 2 AGENDA CITY COUNCIL CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO REGULAR MEETING MUNICIPAL SERVICE BUILDING COMMUNITY ROOM APRIL 23, 2003 7:30 P.M. PEOPLE OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO You are invited to offer your suggestions. In order that you may know our method of conducting Council business, we proceed as follows: The regular meetings of the City Council are held on the second and fourth Wednesday of each month at 7:30 p.m. in the Municipal Services Building, Community Room, 33 Arroyo Drive, South San Francisco, California. Public Comment: For those wishing to address the City Council on any Agenda or non-Agendized item, please complete a Speaker Card located at the entrance to the Council Chamber's and submit it to the City Clerk. Please be sure to indicate the Agenda Item # you wish to address or the topic of your public comment. California law prevents the City Council from taking action on any item not on the Agenda (except in emergency circumstances). Your question or problem may be referred to staff for investigation and/or action where appropriate or the matter may be placed on a future Agenda for more comprehensive action or a report. When your name is called, please come to the podium, state your name and address for the Minutes. COMMENTS ARE GENERALLY LIMITED TO FIVE (5) MINUTES PER SPEAKER. In the event that there are more than six persons desiring to speak, the Mayor may reduce the amount of time per speaker to three (3) minutes. Thank you for your cooperation. The City Clerk will read successively the items of business appearing on the Agenda. As she completes reading an item, it will be ready for Council action. KARYL MATSUMOTO Mayor Pro Tem RICHARD A GARBARINO, SR. Councilman BEVERLY BONALANZA-FORD City Treasurer MICHAEL A. WILSON City Manager PEDRO GONZALEZ Mayor JOSEPH A. FERNEKES Councilman RAYMOND L. GREEN Councilman SYLVIA M. PAYNE City Clerk STEVEN T. MATTAS City Attorney PLEASE TURN OFF CELL PHONES AND PAGERS HEARING ASSISTANCE EQUIPMENT AVAILABLE FOR USE BY THE HEARING IMPAIRED AT CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE iNVOCATION PRESENTATIONS · Proclamation - National Historic Preservation Week, May 5-11, 2003; recipient: Historic Preservation Commission Chairman Bob Masuda · Proclamation- National Public Safety Telecommunications Week, April 13-19, 2003; recipient: Communications Manager Lorraine DiNapoli · Teen Poetry Contest Winners - Librarians Ann Mahon and Meg Cupman · Emergency Preparedness Update · BART Construction Update - Ann Marie Cullen, BART Liaison AGENDA REVIEW PUBLIC COMMENTS ITEMS FROM COUNCIL · Community Forum · Subcommittee Reports CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Motion to approve the minutes of April 9, 2003 2. Motion to confirm expense claims of April 23, 2003 Motion to adopt an ordinance amending SSFMC Chapter 3.12, implementing Council approved position title additions for the position of Safety Inspector Resolution approving a stop sign at the intersection of Zamora Drive and Alhambra Road ADMiNISTRATIVE BUSINESS Resolution designating a survey area for amendment of the Gateway Redevelopment Project Area and approve by motion issuance of a request for proposals for the lead consultant to prepare the plan amendment ADJOURNMENT REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 23, 2003 AGENDA PAGE 2 StaffReport DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: April 23, 2003 The Honorable Mayor and City Council Steven T. Mattas, City Attorney Adoption an ordinance amending Section 3.12.010 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code to change, modify or delete designated position titles. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt an ordinance amending Section 3.12.010 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code to change, modify or delete designated position titles. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Council has previously waived reading and introduced the following ordinance. The Ordinance is now ready for adoption. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 3.12.010 OF THE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL CODE TO CHANGE, MOD~Y OR DELETE DESIGNATED POSITION TITLES (Introduced 4-9-03 - Vote 5-0) By: Steven T. Mattas, City Attorney Michael A. Wilson, City Manager Enclosure: Ordinance ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 3.12.010 OF THE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL CODE The City Council of the City of South San Francisco does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1. 1. SECTION 3.12.010 is hereby amended as follows: SUBDIVISION (a) (4) a) Change the position of "Code Enforcement Officer" to "Safety Inspector." 2. SECTION 3.12.010 (a) (3) (B) is hereby amended as follows: a) Add the position of "Safety Inspector I." b) Add the position of"Safety Inspector II." c) Add the position of "Safety Inspector III." SECTION 2. SEVERABILITY In the event any section or portion of this ordinance shall be determined invalid or unconstitutional, such section or portion shall be deemed severable and all other sections or portions hereof shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 3. PUBLICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE This ordinance shall be published once, with the names of those City Councilmembers voting for or against it, in the San Mateo Times, a newspaper of general circulation in the City of South San Francisco, as required by .law, and shall become effective thirty (30) days from and after its adoption. Introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of South San Francisco, held the day of ,2003. Adopted as an Ordinance of the City of South Francisco at a regular meeting of the City Council held the __ day of ,2003 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ATTEST: City Clerk As Mayor of the City of South San Francisco, I do hereby approve the foregoing Ordinance this __ day of ,2003. S:\Current Ord'skPosition change ordinance4-9.DOC Mayor DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: April 23, 2003 The Honorable Mayor and City Council The Director of Public Works RESOLUTION APPROVING THE INSTAl J.ATION OF STOP SIGNS ON ZAMORA DRIVE AT ALHAMBRA ROAD RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the installation of two-way stop signs on Zamora Drive at Alhambra Road. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Staff received a request for a two-way stop installation on Zamora Drive at Alhambra Road. Currently, there is no stop sign on either Zamora Drive or Alhambra Road. Vehicles on Zamora Drive yield to traffic on Alhambra Road with free flow of traffic on Alhambra Road. The Traffic Advisory Committee (TAC) reviewed this request at its February meeting and determined that a two-way stop sign could be installed on Zamora Drive at Alhambra Road if a petition was received from a majority of residents on Zamora. In May 1989, the City Council adopted a policy that directed the Engineering Staff to consider the collection of a petition (by the resident) for stop signs to be installed at intersections on minor/local residential streets. The policy indicates that the majority of residents living within a 300-foot radius of the intersection must agree to the stop installation and therefore, sign the petition. This policy was added, as the warrants set by the Department of Transportation may be (at times) too stringent for minor/local residential streets. Staff received a petition with signatures of residents who live within the 300-foot radius of the subject intersection. Of the 20 residents within the 300-foot radius, 16 residents signed a petition requesting the installation of a two-way stop on Zamora Drive. The stop sign will assign right-of-way to the vehicles on Alhambra Road requiring traffic on Zamora Drive to stop. It is therefore, recommended by the Engineering Division and the Police Department for the City Council to approve the installation of a two-way stop at the intersection of Zamora Drive and Alhambra Road. Please refer to Exhibit 1 for the vicinity of the intersection and Exhibit 2 as it displays the existing condition and the proposed recommendation for the installation of a stop sign. RESOLUTION NO. CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE INSTALLATION OF A TWO- WAY STOP SIGN ON ZAMORA DRIVE AT ALHAMBRA ROAD WHEREAS, staff received a request for a stop sign on Zamora Drive at Alhambra Road; and WHEREAS, the Traffic Advisory Committee reviewed this request at its February meeting and determined that a stop sign should be installed on Zamora Drive at Alhambra Road. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco that the City Council hereby authorizes the installation of a two-way stop sign on Zamora Drive at Alhambra Road. I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a meeting held on the day of ,2003 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: &\Current Reso's\4-23 stop.sign.zamora.res.doc ATTEST: City Clerk CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO CITIZENS~ PETITION FOR TWO-WAY STOP SIGN INTERSECTION OF ZAMORA ~ ALHAMBRA DRIVES (Controlling East/Westbound Traffic On Zamora) NAME ADDRESS 2. ~Toc,~ ~ 3'/6 :~-o~o~ pr, v'~ 5. 6. SIGNATURE l>/ 3 - 013- I0]. o 013 -/ol 10. 13. 14. I 16. 19. 21. 24. 25. I ~'~ ~5/3- c~a Page 1 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO CITIZENS' PETITION NAME FOR TWO-WAY STOP SIGN INTERSECTION OF ZAMORA ~ ALHAMBRA DRIVES (Controlling East/Westbound Traffic On Zamora) 30~Lck, 32. 33. ~1~ 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39, 40. 41. 42. 43. 44. 45. 46. 47. 48. 49. ADDRESS SIGNATURE · / · t - / t>/3- /o/- v 1~- t513 - Is/- Page 2 TWO- WAY STOP INSTALLATION ON ZAMORA AT ALHAMBRA NO. ! DATE i' ~ ~ ZAMORA DRIVE AT ALHAMBRA ROAD ~ I ~ VICINITY MAP - Exhibit 1 REVISION ' BY ~ APP'D ~ SCALE 1":600' i APPROVED: i DRAWN: KCM CiTY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO ~, DATE: 04/16/03 ~ ! CHECKED: TS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS EXHIBIT 2 ZAMORA EXISTING DRIVE ZAMORA ' ]~--~DRIVE NEW INSTALLATION ~/~" PROPOSED ZAMORA DRIVE AT ALHAMBRA ROAD -~-- R1 = STANDARD 36" StOP SIGN MOUNTED ON A 2" DIA, POLE City Cozmcil Staff Report DATE: April 23, 2003 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Assistant City Manager SUBJECT: Gateway Redevelopment Project Area Survey and Lead Consultant RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution Designating a Survey Area for the amendment of the Gateway Redevelopment Project Area and approve by motion issuance of a Request for Proposals for the Lead Consultant to prepare the Plan Amendment. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The South San Francisco Community Gateway Redevelopment Project Area (Project Area) consists of 176.2 acres of predominantly urbanized areas within the City of South San Francisco. The site consists of two distinct geographical sub-areas. The first sub-area, comprising 67.4 acres of land, is devoted to public transportation uses, with 23 acres of railroad Uses and over 43 acres of streets and highways. The second sub-area, totaling 108.8 acres, is comprised of two privately owned parcels: the vacant Bethlehem Steel plant property (99.4 acres) and the Edward Wire Rope Factory property (9.4 acres).The Project Area was adopted by the City Council in Ordinance No. 867-81, dated June 17, 1981. The Gateway Plan provides the Redevelopment Agency with powers, duties, and obligations to implement and further the program generally formulated for the revitalization of the areas within the boundaries in the Area. The Plan does not present a specific plan or establish specific developments for the area. Instead, the Plan presents a process and framework within which specific plans will be presented and approved. The major goals of the Plan include: Elimination of blight and blighting influences; Replan, redesign and development of large stagnated areas suffering from obsolete plant facilities; Establishment and implementation of performance criteria to assure high site design standards and environmental quality; Strengthening of the economic base of the Project Area and the community by installing public improvements needed to stimulate new office, hotel, commercial development, employment and economic growth. To~ Subject: Date: Honorable Mayor and City Council Gateway Redevelopment Area Plan Amendment April 23, 2003 Page 2 The Redevelopment Agency has proposed territory that would benefit from redevelopment, but is currently outside the Project Area, be added to the existing Project Area. It is proposed that the Gateway Redevelopment Plan be amended to include the addition of the Oyster Point Marina and Business Park comprising approximately 57 acres in size. The Marina is a boat-launching site and includes boat storage areas. The southem part of the site offers open space and a windsurfing boat-launch ramp; the northern part includes the berths. A pier at the eastern edge of the Marina juts out into the Bay. A few buildings exist in the interior of the site, the largest of which is the Marine Center. A single story clubhouse is located east of the Marine Center. Oyster Point Village and Marina Inn are located northeast of Oyster Point/Marina boulevards. The Agency wants to use the Project Area as a catalyst for commercial and recreational development of the Oyster Point Marina and Business Park. The proposed added territory could be the site for a new expanded conference center and hotel, making the marina an increasingly popular focus for marine, recreation and commercial activity. Working with the Harbor District, the City is also considering the feasibility of locating retail, offices, and other uses on the site that help realize the full potential of the site and bring a greater number of people closer to the water. The recently released Bay Ferry Action Plan by the Bay Area Council identifies Oyster Point as a site for a potential ferry terminal. Additionally, the former solid waste disposal site located near the eastern end of Oyster Point Boulevard is owned by the City and a cost of $1.6 million has been estimated for remediation of the soils in order to prepare the site for development. The landfill area has been proposed for the development of a new hotel. CONCLUSION: The first step in amending a redevelopment project area is for the City Council to adopt a resolution designating a survey area. The purpose of the survey area is to designate that area of the City that will be studied to determine whether the redevelopment project as amended is feasible. The boundaries of the amended project area must be within the survey area as designated by the City Council. The study will focus on making a preliminary determination of the blighting conditions within the survey area, the feasible land uses, the market demand for such uses, and financial feasibility of funding redevelopment projects within the Survey Area. The boundaries of the area proposed to be designated as the Survey Area include the entirety of the Oyster Point Marina and Business Park. he Resolution Designating a Survey Area is a necessary first step in the amendment process. To: Subject: Date: Honorable Mayor and City Council Gateway Redevelopment Area Plan Amendment April 23, 2003 Page 3 Over the next year, the Council as both the legislative body for the City and the Redevelopment Agency will be periodically requested to address various aspects of the amendment process. However, the next steps will actually reside with the Planning Commission, which will be asked to establish the boundaries of the proposed Project Area. In addition the Commission will determine whether to adopt the Preliminary Plan, which is a general discussion of the conditions affecting property in the Project Area and how this property will benefit from Redevelopment. The attached, Exhibit "B" indicates the location of the Oyster Point Marina and Exhibit "C" provides a complete map of the Marina which will be the designated survey. The Lead Consultant will propose a team, including sub-consultants, to provide fiscal, legal, engineering and planning consulting services to the City of South San Francisco Redevelopment Agency for the preparation and adoption of an Amended Redevelopment Plan for the Gateway Project Area. The lead consultant will also prepare all documents including: Preliminary Report, Draft Amended Redevelopment Plan, Final Amended Redevelopment Plan, and Report to the Council on the Proposed Plan Amendment. The Lead Consultant, under staff supervision, will direct the completion of all steps in the adoption process for the Plan Amendment, except for the preparation of any environmental documents which might be required. A request for Proposals for Environmental Services will be placed on the Agency Board's agenda in the near future. Attached as Exhibit "D" is the Request for Proposals to be issued. Final Lead Consultant selection and contract will be taken to the Redevelopment Board for authorization in July, 2003. Michael A. Wilson City Manager MAW:MVD:NF Attachments: Resolution Exhibit "B'" Area Map with Marina identified as Survey Area Exhibit"C'" Oyster Point Marina Park Map Exhibit "D" Request for Proposals RESOLUTION NO. CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING A S[~RVEY ARF~A FOR THE AMENDMENT OF THE GATE'WAY REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA WHEREAS, the purpose of the Survey Area is to designate that area of the City that will be studied to determine whether the redevelopment project as amended is feasible; and WHEREAS, the boundaries of the area proposed to be designated as the Survey Area include the entirety of the Oyster Point Marina and Business Park. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco that the City Council designates a Survey Area for the amendment of the Gateway Redevelopment Project Area. I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a meeting held on the __ day of ,2003 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: S:\Current Reso's\4~23gateway.red.project.res.doc ATTEST: City Clerk Exhibit "A" Resolution O4 Frencisco Boy OYSTER POINT BLVD Survey Area \ / \ /' Son Francisco Bay 0 2000 Scale in Feet 4000 Reference: Kleinfelder 1098 Exhibit "B" Area Map with Marina identified as Survey Area O5 Exhibit "C" Oyster Point Marina Park Map REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS LEAD CONSULTANT FOR AMENDMENT TO GATEWAY REDEVELOPMENT PLAN INTRODUCTION The City of South San Francisco Redevelopment Agency seeks a qualified Lead Consultant to provide comprehensive services related to the preparation and adoption of an Amendment to the Gateway Redevelopment Project Area Plan. OBJECTIVE The City of South San Francisco approved adoption of the Redevelopment Plan for the Gateway Project Area (Plan) on June 17, 1981 by Ordinance No. 867-81. The South San Francisco Gateway Redevelopment Project Area (Project Area) consists of 176.2 acres of predominantly urbanized areas within the City of South San Francisco. The Project Area consists of two distinct geographical sub-areas. The first sub-area, comprising 67.4 acres of land, is devoted to public transportation uses, with 23 acres of railroad uses and over 43 acres of streets and highways. The second sub-area, totaling 108.8 acres, is comprised of two privately owned parcels: the vacant Bethlehem Steel plant property (99.4 acres) and the Edward Wire Rope Factory prooperty (9.4 acres).The Project Area was adopted by the City Council in Ordinance No. 867-81, dated June 17, 1981. The City is considering amending the Plan the Oyster Point Marina and Business Park Properties which comprise approximately 57 acres. The proposed added territory could be the site for a new expanded conference center and hotel, making the Marina an increasingly popular focus for marine, recreation and commercial activity. The City, in conjunction with the Harbor District, is considering the feasibility of locating retail, offices, and other uses that help realize the full potential of the Marina and bring a greater number of people closer to the water. The recently released Bay Ferry Action Plan by the Bay Area Council identifies Oyster Point as a potential site for a new ferry terminal. The Marina is a boat-launching site and includes boat storage areas. The southern part of the Marina offers open space and a windsurfing boat-launch ramp; the northern part includes the berths. A pier at the eastern edge of the Marina juts out into the Bay. A few buildings exist in the interior of the proposed added territory, the largest of which is the Marine Center. A single story clubhouse is located east of the Marine Center. Oyster Point Village and Marina Inn are located northeast of Oyster Point/Marina Boulevards. Additionally, the former solid waste disposal property located near the eastern end of Oyster Point Boulevard is owned by the City. The City has estimated that it will cost approximately $1.6 million for remediation of the soils in order to prepare the property for development. The landfill property has been proposed for the development of a new hotel. Exhibit "D" Request for Proposals 07 The City will need to evaluate the potential impacts to the Marina's existing parking and circulation infrastructure. The City is currently preparing plans to enhance pedestrian and bicycle access by connecting Oyster Point Boulevard with the San Francisco Bay Trail. In the future, the City may need to develop an overall parking strategy that reflects parking demand, potential for sharing and location of common parking areas or structures. BACKGROUND During the 1970's, following the closure of the landfill, the City began to investigate several alternative approaches to developing the Oyster Point Marina. The City Council eventually approved the Oyster Point Marina Specific Plan District in 1982, which was subsequently modified slightly in 1983. In addition to the open space areas and the pier at the periphery of the Marina, the specific Plan essentially outlined three land use zones for the interior parcels: Restaurants, hotels, motels, and offices in the western part of the Marina; Boat storage, repair, and public buildings in the central portion of the Marina; and Private clubs in the eastern part of the District. According to the Specific Plan, implementation shall be through Precise Plans approved by City Council. The East of 101 Area Plan and the General Plan both designate the interior of the Marina as Coastal Commercial. According to the East of 101 Plan, uses in this designation "shall typically include" business/professional services, office, convenience sales, restaurants, personal/repair services, limited retail, hotel/motel with a coastal orientation, recreational facilities, and marinas. The Zoning Ordinance includes a specific Oyster Point Specific Plan District, which establishes development standards and permits development of "coastal commercial" uses, including Bay- oriented hotels and restaurants, on the interior parcels in the Oyster Point Marina. The Bay Area Council updated the San Francisco Bay Plan in 1998. The Bay Plan policies for Oyster Point provide for the expansion of the Marina and development of a shoreline park. The Plan designates Oyster Point as a "water-oriented recreation" priority use area. The purpose of this designation is to increase recreational opportunities along the bayshore. Use related policies for shoreside parks can be summarized as follows: Recreational Uses. A variety of recreational uses are encouraged, including camping and picnic facilities, beaches, trails, marinas, launching facilities, and fishing facilities. Recreational facilities not specifically oriented to the water should be placed elsewhere, according to the plan, unless they are part of a larger water-front oriented park. Commercial-recreational Uses. Limited commercial-recreational uses are also permitted, if incidental to the park uses and in character with the park, and if they do not obstruct public access to the shoreline. Examples of commercial- recreational uses include restaurants, specialty shops, theaters, and amusements. Also, private boatels and restaurants are encouraged in yacht harbors. There are no residential areas in the Marina. There are some live-a-boards which require a discretionary rental agreement with the Harbor District. SCOPE OF SERVICES The lead consultant will propose a team, including sub-consultants, to provide fiscal, legal, engineering and planning consulting services to the City of South San Francisco Redevelopment Agency ("the Agency") for the preparation and adoption of an Amendment to the Gateway Redevelopment Plan to add territory to Gateway Project Area. The Lead Consultant will be responsible for the preparation of all documents required for a plan amendment to add territory in compliance with CRL section 33000 et seq including, but not limited to the documents set forth below, and direct the completion of all steps in the adoption process for the Plan Amendment, except for the preparation of any environmental documents which might be required. City/Agency staff will facilitate all required mailings. The Consultant will be responsible for preparation of the following documents: Preparation of the Preliminary Report Preparation of the Draft Amended Redevelopment Plan Preparation of the Final Amended Redevelopment Plan Preparation of the Section 33352 report to the City Council on the Amended Redevelopment Plan (It is anticipated that Redevelopment Agency staff will prepare required staff reports) The preparation of the above plans will include: Preparation of a detailed description of the proposed territory to be amended to the plan (legal descriptions and maps exist). Attendance at required public meetings for City Council, Agency and Commission. Preparation of a detailed description of the proposed amended redevelopment activities in consultation with Agency staff. Description of amended land use controls and standards. Preparation of analysis which documents that the proposed added territory meets the blight requirements of the Community Redevelopment Law (CRL). Analyses which document and assess the financial impact of the amended area on the Plan. Completion of fiscal impact report, including comparison of all revenue sources, such as pass through payments and housing set aside. Coordinate work with other planning activities conducted by San Mateo County or other agencies with jurisdiction. 09 In addition to preparing these documents, the lead consultant will: Prepare, monitor and periodically update a detailed schedule, which lays out all of the activities for the Plan Amendment Process. Participate at staff's direction in discussion with taxing entities regarding fiscal impacts of the proposed Plan Amendment. Advise Agency staff on meeting the legal requirement for community consultation in the absence of a formal Project Area Committee and coordinate community process with Agency staff. Advise and work with Agency staff on preparing responses to comments on the proposed Plan Amendment. Coordinate as required with environmental consultant on preparation of the environmental impact report. Present information as necessary at public meetings which may include: community forums, neighborhood groups and local business associations. Term of Contract for Consultation Services The Agreement for Lead Consultant Services will cover the entire Plan Amendment Adoption Process, which is tentatively projected to begin July 1, 2003. Proposal Content The Proposal must include, at least, the following for both the Lead Consultant and for each proposed member of the consulting team (sub-consultants): Name and principal place of business; Statement regarding the abilities, qualifications, and experience of Lead Consultant and each sub-consultant, especially with regard to preparation and adoption of redevelopment plan amendments since the adoption of AB 1290; Detailed proposal of the Plan Aauendment, including a work program showing schedule by task, anticipated start-up and completion dates, specific personnel to perform the work, budget by work tasks including total costs, anticipated required meetings with Council/Agency/Commission and a breakdown of hourly rates; Resumes of partners and associates who will be assigned to perform the contractual services; Listing of other similar contracts and descriptions of services including references for each contract; Description of any special services or talents your firm brings to this consultation service; Description of insurance coverage for Lead Consultant and team of sub- consultants sufficient to cover any claims arising out of the Lead Consultant or sub-consultants performance of services under this consulting agreement. 10 Evaluation Process All proposals received by the deadline will be evaluated. The selection criteria will include, but not be limited to, the following criteria: The technical competence, expertise and innovative ability of the respondent as demonstrated by the respondent's previous experience and references. The qualifications of the partners and associates and/or principals to be assigned to perform services for this contract; The respondent's fee schedule; The respondent's holding of sufficient insurance to protect the City from any liability arising as a result of respondent's advice; Respondent's ability to perform services in a timely and responsible manner. The top three or four finalists will be interviewed by the Agency. The Consultant chosen will not necessarily be the lowest bidder and the Agency reserves the right not to enter into a contract with any of the respondents. Schedule for Submission of Proposals One signed original and seven (7) copies of each response must be received no later than 4:30 p.m., June 2, 2003. Proposals may be mailed or hand delivered to the following address: Norma Fragoso Redevelopment Manager Department of Economic and Community Development 400 Grand Avenue South San Francisco, CA 94080 Any questions about this Request for Proposals, or about the selection process, may be directed to Norma Fragoso at 650-829-6620. The term of this contract for consulting services will begin when all parties execute the Agreement. It is anticipated that the selection process interviews will be conducted the week of June 15th, with final selection by the end of June, 2003.