HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010-06-23 e-packet~zxs~ SPECIAL lyIEETII~TG
~~
REDEVELOPMENT ACIENCY
OF THE
c'~LIFOR~1~ CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue)
South San Francisco, California 94083
Meeting to be held at:
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING
COMMUNITY ROOM
3 3 ARROYO DRIVE
WEDNESDAY, JUNE 23, 2010
6:30 P.M.
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Section 54956 of the Government Code of the
State of California, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of South San Francisco will hold a
Special Meeting on Wednesday, the 23rd day of June, 2010, at 6:30 p.m., in the Municipal
Services Building, Community Room, 33 Arroyo Drive, South San Francisco, California.
Purpose of the meeting:
1. Call to Order.
2. Roll Call.
3. Agenda Review
4. Public Comments -comments are limited to items on the Special Meeting
Agenda.
ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
5. Resolution authorizing 1) execution of an Option and Purchase Agreement with
MP South City LP; 2) approving a total of $9,509,000 in loans consistent with
the terms of the Loan Term Sheets to affiliates of Mid-Peninsula Housing
Coalition for the development of an affordable housing project at 636 El
Camino Real; and 3) approving a budget amendment to the Redevelopment
Agency Low/Mod Housing Operating Budget.
6. Resolution for the Certification of the City's Investment Policy for FY
2010/2011.
Fiscal Year 2010/2011 Budget: a) Resolution approving the Budget for the
South San Francisco Redevelopment Agency for Fiscal Year 2010/2011 and
appropriating the corresponding funds; b) Resolution providing the Interim
Spending Authority for the first 60 days of the 2010-2011 lisc~il year.
8. Adjournment.
SPECIAL REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING JUNE 23, 2010
AGENDA PAGE 2
~o~ .,,,,,, ~~ p g Y
yx s~ Redevelo meat A enc
o r,
Sta Re ort
.f
~~ ~~~ p
LIFOR
DATE: June 23, 2010
TO: Redevelopment Agency Board
FROM: Marty Van Duyn, Assistant Executive Director
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN OPTION AND
PURCHASE AGREEMENT WITH MP SOUTH CITY L.P., APPROVING
THE PROVISION OF LOANS IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF $9,509,000
FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING AT 636 EL
CAMINO REAL, AND APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY LOW/MOD HOUSING OPERATING
BUDGET
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Redevelopment Agency Board adopt a Resolution authorizing
1) execution of an Option and Purchase Agreement with MP South City LP; 2) approving a
total of $9,509,000 in loans consistent with the terms of the Loan Term Sheets to affiliates of
Mid-Peninsula Housing Coalition for the development of an affordable housing project at
636 El Camino Real; and 3) approving a budget amendment to the Redevelopment Agency
Low/Mod Housing Operating Budget.
BACKGROND/DISCUSSION
On September 24, 2008, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of South San Francisco (Agency)
and MP South City L.P., (MPSC), an affiliate of Mid-Peninsula Housing Coalition (Mid-
Peninsula), entered into an Owner Participation and Loan Agreement (OPA) to develop amixed-
use, affordable rental housing project at the trailer park next to South San Francisco High School
(636 El Camino Real). The proposed development presents the City and Agency with an excellent
opportunity to revitalize a blighted area of El Camino Real and address the housing needs of very
low- and low-income families in South San Francisco.
In September, 2008, the Agency provided MPSC with a $4,950,000 loan to purchase the two-acre
site and pay for predevelopment expenses ($4,470,000 for acquisition and $480,000 for
predevelopment expenses). Following approval of the OPA, MPSC hired BAR Architects to
design amixed-use project on the site. At the City's urging, MPSC and BAR Architects designed
high-density 109-unit project with 5,000 square feet of commercial space. Following the City's
extensive review process that included City staff, the Design Review Board and the Housing Sub-
committee, the Planning Commission reviewed the project on June 3`d, 2010 and recommended
approval. At its meeting of June 23, 2010, the City Council will separately take final action
approving the project.
Staff Report
Subject: Option Agreement and Development Loan for 636 El Camino Real
Page 2
There have been many changes since the Agency Board approved the OPA in September 2008.
First, the scope of the project changed from a conceptual 80-unit development to 109-unit
development. Second, the State of California entered a severe financial crisis that resulted in the
reduction or elimination of various State housing programs. The increase in costs, due to the larger
development, and the decrease in funding options from State and Federal sources resulted in a
considerable project deficit. MPSC has diligently worked to secure new funding sources (see
attached project budget), but despite its efforts a gap of $9,509,000 remains.
Agency staff and MPSC discussed various alternatives to bridge the remaining deficit, including
returning ownership of the land to the Agency, having MPSC defer its developer fee, modifying
the interest rate on the Agency's loan, and having the Agency take ownership of the commercial
space. After reviewing the feasibility of these alternatives with MPSC, the Housing Sub-
committee recommended to the Agency Board that it approve $9,509,000 in loans to affiliates of
Mid-Peninsula, provided that MPSC returns ownership of the land to the Agency and surrenders all
Agency financial assistance if it is not able to secure the remaining funding. In addition, MPSC has
agreed to defer $698,500 in developer fees and give the Agency the option to control the 5,000
square feet of commercial space. The Agency Board reviewed the detail of this proposal at a study
session on May 12, 2010.
If approved, the Agency will commit to provide financing for the project in accordance with the
terms outlined in two loan term sheets (because of its size, the project is being financed as two
separate developments by two Mid-Peninsula affiliates). By approving the terms of the loans, the
Agency will be authorizing the Executive Director to sign letters committing the Agency to provide
financing to two Mid-Peninsula affiliates. Mid-Peninsula will use the commitment letters as proof
of local funding in its tax credit application due to the State on July 6, 2010.
To be competitive for tax credits, Mid-Peninsula must show it has 1) site control; 2) received al]
discretionary public approvals; and 3) secured local funding commitments. Demonstrating site
control, however, has become difficult since Mid-Peninsula proposes that MPSC return land
ownership to the Agency and that the Agency lease the Project site back to the two Mid-Peninsula
affiliates pursuant to ground leases for the two project components. Because Redevelopment Law
requires agencies to follow lengthy procedures when conveying land, it is not feasible for the
Agency to take possession of the land and enter into the ground leases prior to the State's July 6
funding application deadline. Therefore, staff recommends execution of the Option and Purchase
Agreement which will enable the two MPHC affiliates to demonstrate site control in conformity
with tax credit application requirements.
The Purchase and Option Agreement states that MPSC will grant the Agency an option to purchase
the land while simultaneously leasing the land to the two Mid-Peninsula affiliates for a term of at
least 75 years. The purchase price will be a reduction of the outstanding principal balance of the
existing Agency loan in the amount of the original price for the land ($4,470,000). The net result of
this action is that instead of providing MPSC a loan of $4,950,000 to buy the land and to pay for
predevelopment costs, the Agency will have effectively bought the land for $4,470,000 and
provided a loan to MPSC for $480,000 for predevelopment costs. The $9,509,000 in new Agency
Staff Report
Subject: Option Agreement and Development Loan for 636 El Camino Real
Page 3
financial assistance will supplement the assistance provided for land acquisition and the $480,000
in predevelopment financing. Execution of the Option and Purchase Agreement will satisfy the
condition of returning ownership of the land to the Agency, while preserving site control for MPSC
since the Agency's purchase is conditioned upon the simultaneous land lease. Once staff is able to
complete the required RDA land conveyance process, staff will request that the Agency board
authorize the Executive Director to exercise the purchase option and approve the loan agreements
and leases for the two MPHC affiliates.
FUNDING
Funds are available to provide the financing described in this report upon Agency Board approval of
a budget amendment to the Agency's Low/Mod Housing Operating Budget.
CONCLUSION
It is recommended that the Redevelopment Agency Board adopt a Resolution authorizing
execution of an Option and Purchase Agreement with MP South City LP, approving a total of
$9,509,000 in new loans consistent with the terms of the Loan Term Sheets to affiliates of Mid-
Peninsula Housing Coalition for the development of an affordable housing project at 636 El
Camino Real, and approve a budget amendment to the Redevelopment Agency Low/Mod
Housing Operating Budget. Including the $480,000 predevelopment loan amount approved in
September, 2008 the total loan for this project will be $9,989,000.
By; Approved:
Marty Van Duyn ~ M. Nagel
Assistant Executive Director Executive Director
Attachment: Resolution
Project Budgets
Option and Purchase Agreement
Loan Term Sheets
F.:~:~~~:~~vt:~:,•~t~
1464588.2
RESOLUTION NO
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE EXECUTION OF AN OPTION AND
PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT WITH MP SOUTH CITY, L.P.,
APPROVING THE PROVISION OF LOANS IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF
$9,509,000 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A MIXED-USE AFFORDABLE
HOUSING PROJECT AT 636 EL CAMINO REAL, AND APPROVING AN
AMENDMENT TO THE AGENCY LOW/MOD HOUSING
OPERATING BUDGET
WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of South San Francisco
(`'Agency") is a redevelopment agency existing pursuant to the Community
Redevelopment Law. California Health and Safety Code Section 33000, et seq. (the
"CRL"), and pursuant to the authority granted thereunder, has the responsibility to carry
out the Redevelopment Plan (the "Redevelopment Plan") for the El Camino Corridor
Redevelopment Project Area (the "Project Area");
WHEREAS, the Agency seeks development of certain real property located in the
City of South San Francisco adjacent to the Project Area at 636 El Camino Real and
kizown as San Mateo County Assessor's Parcel No. 014-160-040 (the "Property");
WHEREAS, MP South City, L.P., a California limited partnership ("MPSC"), an
affiliate of Mid-Peninsula Housing Coalition, a California nonprofit public benefit
corporation ("Mid-Peninsula"), purchased the Property using Agency financing pursuant
to an Owner Participation and Loa~~ Agreement dated as of November 19, 2008 and
executed by and between the Agency and the MPSC (the "OPA");
WHEREAS, MPSC and Mid-Peninsula South City II, L.P., a California limited
partnership (an affiliate of Mid-Peninsula, and hereafter referred to collectively with
MPSC as the "Developers") propose to develop amixed-use residential development on
the Property that will be available at affordable rents to low-, very low-, and moderate-
income households (the "Project");
WHEREAS, the Project will be of benefit to the Project Area because it will be
in close proximity to the Project Area and will increase the supply of housing that is
affordable to low- and moderate-income residents of the Project Area and the City;
WHEREAS, pursuant to the OPA, the Agency provided an
acquisitioi~/predevelopment loan to MPSC in the amount of Four Million Nine Hundred
Fifty Thousand Dollars ($4,950,000) using funds from the Agency's Low and Moderate-
Income Housing Set-Aside Fund; and
1464728.1
WHEREAS, MPSC and Agency staff have negotiated the terms and conditions of
(i) an Option and Purchase and Sale Agreement (the "Option Agreement") which
among other provisions provides that the Agency would have the right to acquire the
Property provided that the Agency concun-ently leases the Property back to the
Developers for development of the Project, and (ii) teen sheets describing the terms
upon which the Agency would provide loans (the "Loans") in the aggregate principal
amount of Nine Million, Five Hundred and Nine Thousand Dollars ($9,509,000) to the
Developers to assist in the financing of the Project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency
of the City of South San Francisco that it hereby:
1. Finds that the development of the Property in accordance with the Option
Agreement and the provision of the Loans for the Project will facilitate the development
of housing for low, very low- and moderate-income households, will be of benefit to the
Project Area, will fiu-ther the goals of the Redevelopment Plan, and will be consistent
with the implementation plan adopted in connection therewith.
2. Approves the provision of the Loans to the Developers pursuant to the terms and
conditions set forth in the Loan Term Sheets presented to the Agency and on file with the
Agency Secretary.
3. Approves the Option Agreement. and authorizes the Executive Director or his
designee to execute and deliver the Option Agreement substantially in the form on file
with the Agency Secretary.
4. Appropriates from the Agency s Low and Moderate-Income Housing Fund the
additional funds necessary to fund the Loans, and approves an amendment to the Agency
Low/Mod Housin` Operating Budget consistent with such appropriation.
5. Authorizes the I xecutive Director to execute and deliver such other instruments
and to take such other actions as necessary to carry out the intent of this Resolution,
including without limitation, the execution and delivery of commitment letters consistent
with the Loan Tern1 Sheets.
:~ :r. ~ ~ ~
I hereby certi 1~~, that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and
adopted by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of South San Francisco at a meeting
held on the day of , 2010 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Agency Secretary
1464728.1
EI Camino Family Housing
Prepared by Mid-Peninsula Housing Coalition
TOTAL DEVELOPMENT BUDGET,. PERMANENT FINANCING. SOURCES
ACQUISITION PERMANENT SOURCES
Land & Buildings $ 4,470,000 $ 41,009 SSF Land Loan $ 4,470,000 $ 41,009
Other Ac uisition Costs $ 12,286 $ 113 SSF Perm Loan Prev. Committed $ 480,000 $ 4,404
TofalAcquisition Costs $ 4,482,286 $ 41,122 1st Mortgage $ 4,493,151 $ 41,222
B Tranche Loan $ 4,868,705 $ 44,667
Tax Credit Investor Proceeds $ 19,288,419 $ 176,958
HARD COSTS San Mateo County Funds $ 1,789,843 $ 16,421
Construction/Rehabilitation $ 28,024,974 $257,110 MHSA $ 2,172,200 $ 19,928
Site Work $ 1,065,037 $ 9,771 Heart/Genentech Funds $ 1,000,000 $ 9,174
Demo & Off-site Improvements $ 549,650 $ 5,043 Deferred Developer Fee $ 698,500 $ 6,408
Construction Contin enc $ 1,951,951 $ 17,908 Additional Cit Perm Loan Req'd $ 9,508,537 $ 87,234
Total Hard Costs $ 31,591,613 $ 289,831 Total Sources $ 48,769,355 $ 447,425
SOFT COSTS
Architectural $ 1,497,000 $ 13,734
Survey & Engineering $ 487,600 $ 4,473
Construction Interest+ Fees $ 2,389,287 $ 21,920
Financing & Syndication $ 136,809 $ 1,255
Local Permits and Fees $ 2,135,140 $ 19,588
Legal Fees $ 146,000 $ 1,339
Developer Fee $ 2,800,000 $ 25,688
Net Upfront Developer Fee $ 2,084,500 $ 19,124
Relocation $ 731,261 $ 6,709
Reserves $ 529,730 $ 4,860
Other Soft Costs $ 1,842,628 $ 16,905
Total Soft Costs $12,695,456 $116,472
TOTAL DEVELOPMENT COSTS $ 48,769,355 $447,425 TOTAL SOURCES $ 48,769,355 $447,425
.^ ^ ^ ^ w .^ ^~ ~
E~ t;amino t-ami~y Mousing, ~ui~aing ~-
Preparedby.~ Mid-Peninsula Housin Coalition ~-
..
r
..
LAND
Acreage 2 acres
Density 53.50 units/acre
# of Stories 5
BUILDING
Residential 59,053 sf
Circulation and Common 18,580 st
CommerciaVChildcare 5,160 st
Garage 42,568 st
Total Building Area (w/o garage) 82,926 st
PARKING
# of spaces 146
parking ratio 2.05
type Concrete Podium
ACQUISITION total er unit
Land $ 2,235,000 $ 36,048
Other Ac uisition Costs $ 6 989 $ 113
Total Acquisition Costs $ 2,241, 989 $ 36,161
HARD COSTS
Construction/Rehabilitation $ 16,438,666 $ 265,140
Site Work $ 605,801 $ 9,771
Demo & Off-site Improvements $ 312,645 $ 5,043
Construction Contin enc 1 214 998 19 597
Total Hard Costs $ 18,572, > 10 $ 299,550
SOFT COSTS
Architectural $ 851,505 $ 13,734
Survey & Engineering $ 277,350 $ 4,473
Construction Interest + Fees $ 1,311,687 $ 21,156
Financing & Syndication $ 70,677 $ 1,140
Local Permits and Fees $ 1,059,578 $ 17,090
Legal Fees $ 75,500 $ 1,218
Developer Fee $ 1,400,000 $ 22,581
Relocation $ 465,000 $ 7,500
Reserves $ 302,579 $ 4,880
Other Soft Costs $ 1,024,207 $ 16,519
TotalSoRCosts $ 6,838,082 $ 110,292
TOTAL DEVELOPMENT COSTS $ 27,652,181 $ 446,003
UNIT TYPES Rental Range
Studios $0.00 - $0.00 0
1-Bedroom $526.00 - $728.00 11
2-Bedroom $630.00 - $1,114.00 30
3-Bedroom $723.00 - $1,282.00 20
4-Bedroom $0.00 - $0.00 0
TOTAL UN/TS 61
AFFORDABILITY Income Range
15%AMI 1 Person $11880 to 5 Person $18315 0
30%AMI 1 Person $23760 to 5 Person $3663G 14
35% AMI 1 Person $27720 to 5 Person $42735 0
40% AMI 1 Person $31680 to 5 Person $4889G 24
45%AMI 1 Person $35640 to 5 Person $54945 0
50% AMI 1 Person $39600 to 5 Person $6105G 23
55% AMI > Person $43560 to 5 Person $67155 0
60% AMI 1 Person $47520 to 5 Person $7326G 0
Manager's Unit 1
TOTAL UN/TS 62
AVERAGEAFFORDAB/L/TY 41
PREDEVELOPMENT SOURCES total er unit
SSF Land Loan $ 2,235,000 $ 36,048.39
SSF Perm Loan Previously Committed $ 273,028 $ 4,404
Genentech/HEART loan $ 568,807 $ 9,174
Other Predevelo ment Sources $ - $ -
tota/ $ 3,076,835 $ 49,626
CONSTRUCTION SOURCES
SSF Land Loan $ 2,235,000 $ 36,048.39
SSF Perm Loan Previously Committed $ 273,028 $ 4,403.67
Construction Loan $ 14,620,657 $ 235,817
Tax Credit Investor Proceeds $ 1,972,135 $ 31,809
County of San Mateo $ 1,018,076 $ 16,421
MHSA $ 1,086,100 $ 17,518
Genentech /HEART tunds $ 600,000 $ 9,677
Deferred Developer Fee $ 150,000 $ -
Additional Cit Perm Loan Re 'd $ 4,006,979 $ 64,629
total $ 25,811,974 $ 416,322
PERMANENT SOURCES
SSF Land Loan $ 2,235,000 $ 36,048.39
SSF Perm Loan Previously Committed $ 273,028 $ 4,403.67
1st Mortgage $ 2,526,199 $ 40,745
B Tranche $ 2,609,133 $ 42,083
Tax Credit Investor Proceeds $ 13,147,567 $ 212,058
County of San Mateo $ 1,018,076 $ 16,421
MHSA $ 1,086,100 $ 17,518
Genentech /HEART funds $ 600,000 $ 9,677
Deferred Developer Fee $ 150,000 $ -
Additional Cit Perm Loan Re 'd $ 4,006,979 $ 64,629
total 27,652,181 $ 446,003
EI Camino Family Housing, Building B
PreParedby.~ Mid-Peninsula Housin Coalition ~'~
„ a ~
~<'~ < ~-
LAND
Acreage
Density
# of Stories
1 acres
107.00 units/acre
4
BUILDING
Residential 44,347 st
Circulation and Common 19.151 sf
Garage 32.349 st
Total Residential Building Area 63.498 s/
PARKING
# of spaces 96
residential parking ratio 2.05
type Podium
~; :. ... .. ~ ..w DC ..
ACQUISITION total er unit
Land 8 Buildings $ 2,235.000 $ 47,553
Other Ac uisition Costs 5 298 $ 113
TotalAcquisition Costs $ 2,240,298 $ 47.666
HARD COSTS
Construction/Rehabilitatfon $ 11,586,308 $ 246,517
Site Work $ 459,236 $ 9,771
Demo & Off-site Improvements $ 237,005 $ 5,043
Construction Contin enc $ 736 953 $ 15 680
Tota/Hard Costs $ 13,019,503 $ 277,011
SOFT COSTS
Architectural $ 645,495 $ 13,734
Survey & Engineering $ 210,250 $ 4,473
Construction Interest + Fees $ 1,077,600 $ 22.928
Financing 8 Syndication $ 66,133 $ 1,407
Local Permits and Fees $ 1,075,563 $ 22,884
Legal Fees $ 70,500 $ 1,500
Developer Fee $ 1,400,000 $ 29,787
NetUpfiontDeve/operFee $ 834,500 $ 17,755
Reserves $ 227,150 S 4,833
Other Soft Costs $ 1,084,683 $ 23.078
TotalSoHCosts $ 5,857,374 $ 124,625
TOTAL DEVELOPMENT COSTS $ 21,117,174 $ 449,302
UNIT TYPES Rental Range
Studios $0.00 - $0.00
1-Bedroom $526.00 - $728.00
2-Bedroom $630.00 - $1,114.00
3-Bedroom $723.00 - $1,262.00
4-Bedroom $0.00 - $0.00
TOTAL RENTABLE UN/TS
0
13
13
21
0
47
AFFORDABILITY Income Range
15%AMI 1Persan$11880to5Person$1B315 0
20% AMI 1 Person $15840 to 5 Person $24420 0
25% AMI 1 Person $19800 to 5 Person $30525 0
30% AMI > Person $23760 to 5 Person $36630 14
35% AMI 1 Person $27720 to 5 Person $42735 0
40 h AM I 1 Person $31680 to 5 Person $48840 16
45 ~ AM I > Person $35640 to 5 Person $54945 0
50 ~ AMI 1 Person $39600 to 5 Pelson $61050 15
55 ~ AM I 1 Person $43560 to 5 Person $67155 0
60% AMI 1 Person $47520 l0 5 Pelson $73260 0
Manager's Unit 0
TOTAL UNITS 47
AVERAGEAFFORDAB/L/TY 41
PROJECT . ANC~lG
PREDEVELOPMENT SOURCES total er unit
SSF Land loan $ 2.235.000 $ 47,553
SSF Perm Loan Previously Committed $ 206,972 $ 4,403.67
Genentech/HEART $ 431,193 $ 9,174.31
Other Predevelo ment Sources $ - $
total $ 2,873,165 $ 61,131
CONSTRUCTION SOURCES
SSF Land Loan $ 2,235,000 $ 47,553
SSF Perm Loan Previously Committed $ 206.972 $ 4,404
Tax Exempt Construction Loan $ 10,850.798 $ 230,868
Tax Credit Investor Proceeds $ 921,098 $ 19,598
MHSA $ 1,086.100 $ 23,109
GP Equity $ - $ -
San Mateo County Funds $ 771,767 $ 16,421
HearVGenentech Funds $ 400,000 $ 8,511
Additional Cit Perm Loan Re 'd $ 3,350,000 $ 71,277
total $ 19,821,736 $ 421,739
PERMANENT SOURCES
SSF Land Loan $ 2,235,000 $ 47,553
SSF Perm Loan Previously Committed $ 206,972 $ 4,404
1st Modgage $ 1,966.952 $ 41,850
8 Tranche Loan $ 2.259,572 $ 48,076
Tax Credit Investor Proceeds $ 6,140,652 $ 130,652
MHSA $ 1.066.100 $ 23,109
AHP $ - $ 10,000
GP Equity $ 100 $ 2
San Mateo County Funds $ 771,767 $ 16,421
Heart/Genentech Funds $ 400,000 $ 8,511
Deferred Developer Fee $ 548,500 $ 11,670
Additional Cit Perm Loan Re 'd $ 5,501,558 $ 117,054
tots/ $ 21,117,174 $ 449,302
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
Redevelopment Agency of the City of South
San Francisco
400 Grand Avenue
South San Francisco, CA 94080
Attn: Executive Director
EXEMPT FROM RECORDING FEES PER
rnvFRnIMFNT CODE &&6103, 27383
Space above tnis une ror rcewiuci ~ u~~.
OPTION AND PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT
THIS OPTION AND PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT (this "Agreement")
is entered into effective as of , 2010, ("Effective Date") by and between
the Redevelopment Agency of the City of South San Francisco, a public body,
corporate, and politic ("Agency") and MP South City, L.P., a California limited
partnership ("Grantor"). Grantor and Agency are hereinafter referred to as the
"Parties."
RECITALS
A. Grantor possesses fee simple title. to that certain real property located in
the City of South San Francisco ("City") at 636 EI Camino Real, known as San Mateo
County Assessor's Parcel No. 014-160-040, and more particularly described in Exhibit A
attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference (the "Property").
B. Pursuant to that certain Owner Participation and Loan Agreement dated
as of November 19, 2008 and executed by and between Agency and Grantor (the
"OPA") Agency made a loan to Grantor in the amount of Four Million Nine Hundred
Fifty Thousand Dollars ($4,950,000) (the "Loan") to finance Grantor's acquisition of the
Property and certain predevelopment expenses associated with the development of the
Property as a mixed use retail and affordable housing development (the "Project").
C. Grantor desires to grant to Agency, and Agency desires to obtain from
Grantor an option to purchase the Property upon the terms and conditions set forth in
this Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows.
1. Recitals. The Parties acknowledge the truth of the foregoing recitals which are
by this reference hereby incorporated into this Agreement.
1463550.2
2. Grant of Option. Upon the terms and conditions set forth herein, Grantor hereby
grants to Agency an exclusive option (the "Option") to purchase the Property together
with the improvements thereon and all interests appurtenant thereto.
3. Agreement to Sell and Purchase. Upon delivery of notice of exercise pursuant to
Section 5 by Agency to Grantor, Grantor agrees to sell the Property to Agency, and
Agency agrees to purchase the Property from Grantor in accordance with the terms and
conditions set forth in this Agreement.
4. Purchase Price. The consideration for the purchase of the Property shall be a
reduction of the outstanding principal balance of the Loan by the amount of [Four Million
Four Hundred Seventy Thousand Dollars ($4,470,000)].
5. Conditions to Conveyance; Term; Method of Exercise. The Agency shall have
the right to exercise the Option only if concurrently with the closing for the conveyance
of the Property to Agency, Agency enters into ground lease agreements ("Ground
Leases") with Grantor and with MP South City II, L.P., a California limited partnership
whose general partner is pursuant to which each such entity shall
lease a portion of the Property for development of a mixed use, affordable multi-family
housing and retail development with associated parking and related improvements, for a
rent of One Dollar ($1.00) per year and for a term of not less than 75 years. Agency
shall have the right to exercise the Option at any time during the period commencing
upon the Effective Date and terminating on the tenth (10t") anniversary of the Effective
Date. To exercise the Option, Agency shall deliver written notice of exercise to Grantor.
The Parties acknowledge that the execution of the Ground Leases will require
compliance with the provisions of the California Health and Safety Code, including
without limitation the notice, hearing and report requirements of Section 33433 thereof.
The Parties further acknowledge that upon execution of the Ground Leases, the Parties
shall terminate the OPA; provided however, certain provisions of the OPA shall be
incorporated into the Ground Leases, including without limitation, requirements
regarding development of the Project and provisions imposing affordability restrictions
on the residential units in the Project.
6. Conveyance and Closing.
6.1 Escrow. Agency and Grantor shall establish an escrow with a title
company chosen by Agency (the "Title Company") within five (5) business days
following Agency's delivery of notice of exercise of the Option. Upon the opening of
escrow, the Parties shall deposit with the Title Company an executed copy of this
Agreement, which shall serve as the joint escrow instructions of Agency and Grantor for
the conveyance of the Property, together with such additional instructions as may be
executed by the Parties and delivered to the Title Company. Agency and Grantor shall
execute all deeds, instructions, and other instruments required by the escrow agent in
order to close the sale and purchase of Property in accordance with this Agreement.
6. 2 Time for Close of Escrow. Provided that all conditions to closing have
been satisfied, the closing for conveyance of the Property ("Close of Escrow") shall
1463550.2 2
occur not later than ninety (90) days following delivery of notice pursuant to Section 6.1,
unless such date is extended pursuant to the mutual written consent of the Parties.
6.3 Prorations and Closing Costs. Real property taxes, assessments, rental
income, utility costs, and all other charges and fees associated with the Property shall
be prorated as of the closing date. Escrow and recording costs shall be paid by
Agency. City and County transfer taxes and governmental conveyance fees shall be
paid by Agency. The Agency shall pay the cost of any policy of title insurance Agency
elects to purchase.
6.4 State of Title. At close of escrow for the conveyance of the Property,
Grantor shall by grant deed convey to Agency, fee simple title to such property free and
clear of all title defects, liens, encumbrances, deeds of trust and mortgages except (i)
nondelinquent real property taxes, and (ii) such exceptions to title as are approved in
writing by Agency ("Permitted Exceptions").
6.5 Inspections. Following the Effective Date and upon reasonable notice to
Grantor, Agency shall have the right to enter upon the Property for the purpose of
conducting inspections, surveys, and analyses at Agency expense.
7. Grantor's Representations and Warranties. Grantor represents and warrants to
Agency as of the Effective Date and as of the closing date for conveyance of the
Property, that: (i) Grantor possesses fee simple title to the Property free and clear of
easements, restrictions, leases, liens, claims, and encumbrances except as disclosed in
writing to Agency, (ii) all actions necessary on the part of Grantor to authorize the
execution of this Agreement and to undertake the actions contemplated hereby have
been taken, (iii) the person(s) executing this Agreement on behalf of Grantor have been
duly authorized to do so, (iv) Grantor is a limited partnership duly organized, validly
existing and in good standing under the laws of the State of California, and has the full
right, power and authority to execute this Agreement and perform the obligations of
Grantor hereunder; (v) this Agreement is the legal, valid and binding obligation of
Grantor, is enforceable in accordance with its terms, and does not violate any provision
of any agreement to which Grantor is a party or to which Grantor is subject, or any law,
judgment or order applicable to Grantor; (vi) no proceedings under any bankruptcy or
insolvency laws have been commenced by or against Grantor which have not been
terminated, no general assignment for the benefit of creditors has been made by
Grantor, and no trustee or receiver of Grantor's property has been appointed.
8. Grantor's Covenants. Grantor covenants that with respect to the Property, until
the earlier of (a) the expiration of the Option without Agency having exercised the
Option, or (b) the conveyance of the Property to Agency, Grantor: (i) shall not cause or
permit the Property to be subject to any easement, restriction, lease, lien, claim or
encumbrance absent Agency's written consent, (ii) shall not without Agency's prior
written consent, enter into or renew, replace, or modify any agreement regarding the
sale, rental, management, repair, improvement, or any other matter affecting the
Property that would be binding on Agency or the Property after the conveyance of the
Property to Agency; (iii) shall not permit any act of waste or act that would tend to
1463550.2 3
diminish the value of the Property for any reason; (iv) shall maintain and manage the
Property substantially in accordance with Grantor's established practices and the
requirements of the OPA, and (v) shall comply with all requirements of law, the OPA
and the documents executed by Grantor in connection with the OPA regarding the
relocation of existing occupants of the Property.
9. Agency's Conditions to Closing. The Close of Escrow and Agency's obligation to
purchase the Property are expressly conditioned on:
(i) the Title Company's commitment to provide to Agency a CLTA (or if
Agency elects, an ALTA) owner's policy of title insurance ("Title Policy") in the amount
of the value of the Property and subject only to Permitted Exceptions;
(ii) Grantor's execution and delivery into escrow of all documents and
instruments required by this Agreement, and Grantor's compliance with all other
covenants and conditions to be performed or complied with by Grantor;
(iii) all representations and warranties of Grantor contained in this
Agreement shall be true and correct in all materials respect as of the Close of Escrow;
(iv) Grantor's execution and delivery to Agency of such instruments and
documents as Agency shall reasonably require, including without limitation, if
applicable, amendments to the documents executed by the Parties in connection with
the OPA;
(v) Grantor's delivery to Agency of all leases, rental agreements and
contracts affecting the Property or part thereof;
(vi) if applicable, Grantor's delivery to Agency of an Assignment and
Assumption Agreement in form reasonably required by Agency, pursuant to which
existing leases, rental agreements and such service agreements as Agency elects to
assume shall be assigned to Agency;
(vii) if applicable, a landlord estoppel certificate and tenant estoppel
certificates in form reasonably required by Agency;
(viii) if applicable, a bill of sale pertaining to any personal property to be
purchased by Agency.
10. Condemnation. If Agency has exercised the Option to purchase the Property
and prior to the Close of Escrow any governmental entity other than City or Agency
commences an action in eminent domain to take any portion of the Property, Agency
shall be entitled to the proceeds of such taking if and when Agency completes the
acquisition of the Property.
11. Risk of Loss. If Agency has exercised the Option and prior to the Close of
Escrow, the Property, or any portion thereof, is destroyed or materially damaged as a
1463550.2 4
result of an insured loss, Agency shall be obligated to purchase the Property pursuant
to this Agreement without abatement to the purchase price, provided that Grantor shall
assign to Agency Grantor's rights under all insurance policies covering the damage or
loss.
12. Voidable Transfers. Any attempt to sell, convey, transfer, assign, lease,
mortgage, or hypothecate the Property in violation of the terms of this Agreement shall
be voidable at the election of Agency.
13. Miscellaneous Provisions.
13.1 Notices. Except as otherwise specified in this Agreement, all notices to be
sent pursuant hereto shall be made in writing, and sent to the parties at their respective
addresses specified below or to such other address as a party may designate by written
notice delivered to the other parties in accordance with this Section. All such notices
shall be sent by:
(i) personal delivery, in which case notice shall be deemed delivered upon
receipt;
(ii) certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, in which case
notice shall be deemed delivered two (2) business days after deposit, postage prepaid
in the United States mail; or
(iii) nationally recognized overnight courier, in which case notice shall be
deemed delivered one (1) day after deposit with such courier.
Agency: Redevelopment Agency of the City of South San Francisco
400 Grand Avenue
South San Francisco, CA 94080
Attention: Executive Director
Grantor: MP South City, L.P., a California limited partnership
303 Vintage Park Drive, Suite 250
Foster City, CA 9444
Attn: Development Department, South San Francisco
Facsimile: (650) 357-9766
13.2 Binding Effect. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the
benefit of the heirs, administrators, executors, successors in interest and assigns of
each of the Parties hereto. Any reference in this Agreement to a specifically named
party shall be deemed to apply to any successor, heir, administrator, executor or
assign of such party who has acquired an interest in compliance with the terms of this
Agreement, or under law.
1463550.2 5
13.3 Parties Not Co-Venturers. Nothing in this Agreement is intended to or
shall be construed to establish the parties as partners, co-venturers, or principal and
agent with one another.
13.4 No Third Party Beneficiaries. Nothing in this Agreement is intended to or
shall confer upon any person, other than the Parties and their respective successors
and assigns, any rights or remedies hereunder.
13.5 No Brokers. Each Party warrants and represents to the other that no
person or entity can properly claim a right to a real estate commission, brokerage fee,
finder's fee, or other compensation with respect to the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement. Each Party agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the other Party
from any claims, expenses, costs or liabilities arising in connection with a breach of this
warranty and representation. The terms of this Section shall survive the expiration or
earlier termination of this Agreement.
13.6 Governing Law; Venue. This Agreement shall be governed by and
construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California without regard to
principles of conflicts of laws. The Parties agree that any controversy arising under or
in relation to this Agreement shall be litigated exclusively in the state and federal courts
with jurisdiction in San Mateo County, California. Each Party irrevocably consents to
service, jurisdiction, and venue of such courts for any such litigation, and waives any
other venue to which such party might be entitled by virtue of domicile or otherwise.
13.7 Attorneys' Fees. In any action at law or in equity, arbitration or other
proceeding arising in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing party shall recover
attorneys' fees and other costs, including but not limited to court costs and expert and
consultants' fees incurred in connection with such action, in addition to any other relief
awarded, and such attorneys' fees and costs shall be included in any judgment in such
action.
13.8 Remedies Cumulative. The rights and remedies of the Parties hereunder
are cumulative, and the exercise or failure to exercise one or more of such rights or
remedies by either Party shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same time or
different times, of any right or remedy for the same default or any other default. Upon
the occurrence of an event of default, the Parties may pursue all other remedies at law
or in equity which are not otherwise provided for in this Agreement, expressly including
the remedy of specific performance of this Agreement.
13.9 Time is of the Essence Time for Performance. Time is of the essence
and is a material term for each condition, term, obligation and provision of this
Agreement. When the time for performance of any obligation under this Agreement is
to be measured from another event, such time period shall include the day of the other
event. If the day of the time for performance is not a regular business day, then the
time for such performance shall be by the regular business day following such day.
13.10 Waivers; Modification. No waiver of any breach of any covenant or
1463550.2 6
provision of this Agreement shall be deemed a waiver of any other covenant or
provision hereof, and no waiver shall be valid unless in writing and executed by the
waiving party. An extension of time for performance of any obligation or act shall not
be deemed an extension of the time for performance of any other obligation or act, and
no extension shall be valid unless in writing and executed by the waiving party. This
Agreement may be amended or modified only by a written instrument executed by the
Parties or their successors in interest.
13.11 Captions; Interpretation. The section headings used herein are solely for
convenience and shall not be used to interpret this Agreement. The Parties
acknowledge that this Agreement is the product of negotiation and compromise on the
part of both Parties, and the Parties agree, that since both Parties have participated in
the negotiation and drafting of this Agreement, this Agreement shall not be construed
as if prepared by one of the Parties, but rather according to its fair meaning as a
whole, as if both Parties had prepared it.
13.12 Entire Agreement. This Agreement sets forth the entire agreement between
the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior written or
oral agreements, understandings, representations or statements between the Parties
with respect to the subject matter hereof.
13.13 Severability. If any term, provision, or condition of this Agreement is held
by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of
this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect unless the rights and obligations
of the Parties have been materially altered or abridged thereby.
13.14 Action or Approval. Where action and/or approval by Agency is required
under this Agreement, Agency's Executive Director or his or her designee may act on
and/or approve such matter unless the Executive Director determines in his or her
discretion that such action or approval requires referral to Agency's governing board
for consideration.
13.15 Further Assurances; Recordation. The Parties agree to execute,
acknowledge and deliver to the other such other documents and instruments, and to
undertake such actions, as either shall reasonably request or as may be necessary to
carry out the intent of this Agreement. This Agreement shall be recorded in the Official
Records of San Mateo County.
13.16 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more
counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which taken together shall
constitute one and the same instrument.
SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE(S).
1463550.2 7
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Option and Purchase
and Sale Agreement as of the date first written above.
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO,
A PUBLIC BODY CORPORATE AND POLITIC
By:
Name:
Title:
ATTEST:
By:
Agency Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By:
Agency Counsel
MP SOUTH CITY, L.P.,
A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
By: Mid-Peninsula Greenridge, Inc.,
a California nonprofit public benefit corporation
Its: General Partner
By:
Matthew O. Franklin
Its: Assistant Secretary and Authorized Signatory
SIGNATURES MUST BE NOTARIZED.
1463550.2 $
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN MATED
On , 20_, before me, , (here insert name
and title of the officer), personally appeared ,who
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s)
is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they
executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their
signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the
person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the
foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature
(Seal)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN MATED
On , 20_, before me, , (here insert name
and title of the officer), personally appeared ,who
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s)
is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they
executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their
signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the
person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the
foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature
(Seal)
]463550.2 9
Exhibit A
LAN D
(Attach legal description.)
1463550.2 10
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
MID-PENINSULA HOUSING COALITION
MP SOUTH CITY II, L.P.
Proposed Loan Terms
June 15, 2010
1. LOAN AMOUNT. To assist in financing the development of the Project
described below, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of South San Francisco, a
public body corporate and politic ("Agency") agrees to loan funds to MP South
City II, L.P., a California limited partnership (the "Developer") whose general
partner is Mid-Peninsula Greenridge, Inc., a California nonprofit public benefit
corporation that is an affiliate of Mid-Peninsula Housing Coalition, a California
nonprofit public benefit corporation in an aggregate amount not to exceed Four
Million Seven Thousand Dollar ($4,007,000) (the "Loan").
2. PROPERTY; PROJECT. The Loan shall be made in connection with the
development of a mixed-use, 62 -unit, affordable multi-family rental housing
development (the "Project") to be constructed on a portion of the property located
at 636 EI Camino Real, in the City of South San Francisco, known as San Mateo
County Assessor's Parcel No. 014-160-040 (the "Property"). Not less than 49%
of the residential units in the Project shall be restricted for occupancy by
households of low- and very low income for a period of at least fifty-five (55) years.
3. COST SAVINGS. Within ten (10) business days after Developer's receipt
of its limited partner(s)' capital contribution following the issuance of the IRS Form
8609 for the Project, Developer shall pay to the Agency as a reduction of the
outstanding principal balance of the Loan, cone-time payment in the amount of
percent ( %) of Excess Proceeds. "Excess Proceeds" shall mean
the sum of all sources of permanent financing for the Project (including equity and
mortgage debt) less the sum of actual uses as shown on the final cost certificate
for the Project. The Loan documents may provide that deferred developer fees and
reserves may be funded with a portion of the Excess Proceeds.
4. INTEREST RATE. The outstanding principal balance of the Loan shall not
bear interest until the earlier of: (i) the date that the Project's construction loan is
either converted to a permanent loan or repaid in full, or (ii) twelve (12) months
following the date of issuance of the final certificate of occupancy or equivalent for
the Project; thereafter, the outstanding principal balance of the Loan shall bear
interest at a simple annual rate equal to three percent (3%) per year.
5. MATURITY DATE. The Loan shall mature fifty-five (55) years from the
date that a final certificate of occupancy or its equivalent is issued for the Project
by the City of South San Francisco; provided however the maturity date may be
1463675.2
extended by twenty-five (25) additional years if Developer agrees to extend the
term of affordability restrictions for the Project for the same period.
6. USE OF LOAN PROCEEDS. The Loan proceeds shall be used to finance
the construction of the Project. The Agency may authorize a portion of the Loan
proceeds to be disbursed for specified predevelopment expenses.
7. REPAYMENT LIMITED TO RESIDUAL RECEIPTS. Annual installments
to repay the Loan shall be limited to residual receipts generated by the Project
pursuant to a formula to be specified in the Loan documents.
8. SECURITY. The Loan shall be secured by an Assignment of Agreements,
Plans and Specifications and by a Deed of Trust naming the Agency as the
beneficiary which shall be recorded against Developer's interest in the Property
and the Project.
9. NONRECOURSE. Repayment of the Loan shall be nonrecourse to the
Developer and its partners; recourse shall be limited to the Project and Developer's
interest in the Property and any other security (such as the plans, specifications
and other Project-related documents) provided by Developer or Developer's
affiliates.
1463675.2 2
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
MID-PENINSULA HOUSING COALITION/MP SOUTH CITY, L.P.
Proposed Loan Terms
June 15, 2010
1. LOAN AMOUNT. To assist in financing the development of the Project
described below, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of South San Francisco, a
public body corporate and politic ("Agency") agrees to loan funds to MP South
City, L.P., a California limited partnership (the "Developer") whose general
partner is Mid-Peninsula Greenridge, Inc., a California nonprofit public benefit
corporation that is an affiliate of Mid-Peninsula Housing Coalition, a California
nonprofit public benefit corporation in an aggregate amount not to exceed Five
Million Five Hundred Two Thousand Dollars ($5,502,000) (the "Loan").
2. PROPERTY; PROJECT. The Loan shall be made in connection with the
development of a mixed-use, 47-unit, affordable multi-family rental housing
development (the "Project") to be constructed on a portion of the property located
at 636 EI Camino Real, in the City of South San Francisco, known as San Mateo
County Assessor's Parcel No. 014-160-040 (the "Property"). Not less than 49%
of the residential units in the Project shall be restricted for occupancy by
households of low- and very low income for a period of at least fifty-five (55) years.
3. COST SAVINGS. Within ten (10) business days after Developer's receipt
of its limited partner(s)' capital contribution following the issuance of the IRS Form
8609 for the Project, Developer shall pay to the Agency as a reduction of the
outstanding principal balance of the Loan, cone-time payment in the amount of
percent ( %) of Excess Proceeds. "Excess Proceeds" shall mean
the sum of all sources of permanent financing for the Project (including equity and
mortgage debt) less the sum of actual uses as shown on the final cost certificate
for the Project. The Loan documents may provide that deferred developer fees and
reserves may be funded with a portion of the Excess Proceeds.
4. INTEREST RATE. The outstanding principal balance of the Loan shall not
bear interest until the earlier of: (i) the date that the Project's construction loan is
either converted to a permanent loan or repaid in full, or (ii) twelve (12) months
following the date of issuance of the final certificate of occupancy or equivalent for
the Project; thereafter, the outstanding principal balance of the Loan shall bear
interest at a simple annual rate equal to three percent (3%) per year.
5. MATURITY DATE. The Loan shall mature fifty-five (55) years from the
date that a final certificate of occupancy or its equivalent is issued for the Project
by the City of South San Francisco; provided however the maturity date may be
extended by twenty-five (25) additional years if Developer agrees to extend the
term of affordability restrictions for the Project for the same period.
1463646.2
6. USE OF LOAN PROCEEDS. The Loan proceeds shall be used to finance
the construction of the Project. The Agency may authorize a portion of the Loan
proceeds to be disbursed for specified predevelopment expenses.
7. REPAYMENT LIMITED TO RESIDUAL RECEIPTS. Annual installments
to repay the Loan shall be limited to residual receipts generated by the Project
pursuant to a formula to be specified in the Loan documents.
8. SECURITY. The Loan shall be secured by an Assignment of Agreements,
Plans and Specifications and by a Deed of Trust naming the Agency as the
beneficiary which shall be recorded against Developer's interest in the Property
and the Project.
9. NONRECOURSE. Repayment of the Loan shall be nonrecourse to the
Developer and its partners; recourse shall be limited to the Project and Developer's
interest in the Property and any other security (such as the plans, specifications
and other Project-related documents) provided by Developer or Developer's
affiliates.
1463646.2 2
o
~,
J O
c'~LIFOR~~~
City Treasurer's Report
DATE: June 23, 2010
TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council and Redevelopment Agency Board
FROM: Richard Battaglia, City Treasurer
SUBJECT: A RESOLUTIOIvT FOR THE CERTIFICATION OF THE CITI''S INVESTMENT
POLICY FOR F~' 201O-2011
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council and the Redevelopment Agency Board approve a
resolution to recertify the City's Investment Policy for fiscal year 2010-ll.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION
The Council. adopted the most recent investment policy recommended by the City Treasurer in June
2008. I~To changes are proposed at this time, but the Government Code requires this policy to be
reviewed and approved.
CONCLUSION
Approval of this resolution will certify the City's Investment Policy, which is conservative and
consistent with the Government Code.
Prepared by: ~ " ~ ;~'~
Riard A. Batta~t`ia
Ci'`~~ Treasurer
~'~
Approved by., ~ ~ ` ~ 1
. Nagel
City Manager
Attachments: Resolutions
Investment Policy
RESOLUTION NO.
CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAID' FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
.~ R1=~SOI,t.TTION C:ERTII~I'I'~TG THE IN~TF,ST'~7ENT
POLICY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010-I l
WHEREAS, California Government Code Section X3646 provides that the Treasurer of a
city may annually render to the legislative body of that local agency a statement of investment
policy, which the legislative body of the local agency shall consider at a public meeting; and
WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed a draft investment policy at a Budget study session
on May 19, 2010; and
Vv HEREAS, annual certification of the Investment Policy provides prudent financial
oversight.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of South San
Francisco hereby approve the changes to the Investment Policy-, attached hereto as Exhibit A.
~ ~ ~; ~, ~
I hereby certifi~ that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and. adopted by the
City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a meeting held on the
day of , 2010 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAII~T:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO.
REDEVELOPI~~ENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
A RESOLL'7'ION CERTIFYING THE IN`'ESTMENT
POLICY FOR FISC.gL YL~AIZ 2010-1 I
WHEREAS, California Gover~lment Code Section 53646 provides that the Treasurer of a
city may annually render a statement of investment policy, which the legislative body of the local
agency shall consider at a public meeting, and
WHEREAS. the Cite Treasurer desires approval of the FY 2010-11 Investment Policy; and
WHEREAS.. annual certification of the Investment Policy provides prudent financial
oversight.
NOW, THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED that the Redevelopment Agency Board of the City
of South San Francisco hereby approves the 2010-2011 Investment Policy.. attached hereto as Exhibit
A.
~: ~ ~:
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the
Redevelopment Agency Board of the City of South San Francisco at a meeting
held on the day of , 2010 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
AB S TAINT:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
City of South San Francisco Investment Policy
June 23, 201.0
PURPOSE:
The following statement is intended to provide guidelines for the `'Prudent Person Standard" of
investment of the City's temporary idle cash and to outline the policies for an effective cash
management system.
Investments shall be made with judgment and care which persons of prudence and intelligence
exercise in the management of their own affairs considering safety of principal liquidity, as well. as
probable income to be derived.
The City's cash management system's goal is to accurately monitor and forecast revenues and
expenditures enabling the City to invest funds to the fullest extent possible. The City Treasurer
attempts to obtain the highest yield possible as long as investments meet the criteria established for
safety and liquidity. This Investment Folicy applies to all City funds except retirement; pension, or
bond proceeds or bond reserves, which have their own constraining requirements.
The investment policies and practices of the Treasurer of the City of South San Francisco are based
upon federal, state, and•Iocal laws as well as prudent money management. The primary objectives
of these policies are, in priority order:
To assure compliance with all federal, state, and local laws governing the investment
of monies.
2. To maintain. the principal of the City's investments.
3. To remain sufficiently liquid to meet all expenses.
4. After safety and liquidity are assured, to Qenerate the maximum amount of
investment income within the parameters of this statement of investment policy.
INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES:
1_ . SAFETY OF PRINCIPAL is the foremost objective of the Investment Policy. The
Treasurer shall seek to ensure that capital losses are avoided with each investment
transaction. The objective is to mitigate credit risk (the risk that a security or a
portfolio will lose some or all of its value due to a real or perceived change in the
ability of the issuer to repay its debt} and interest rate risk (the market value of the
security in the portfolio will fall due to changes in general interest rates}.
2. L~LTIDITY is the second most important objective of the Investment Policy. It is
important that a portion of the portfolio contain investments, which can be easily
liquidated with minimal, or no risk to principal and/or interest. The longest maturity
of any investment shall be five years. The portfolio shall be structured so that
sufficient funds are readily available to meet all reasonably anticipated operating
expenses.
3. YIELD is the return earned by the City Treasurer on monies invested. The City's
funds shall be designed t:o attain a rate of return throughout budgetary and economic
cycles which is approximately equal to the return on a Market Benchmark Index
which will be reported tc- the City Council on a periodic basis. The current index that
is consistent with this policy, the market, and the cash flow needs of the City is the 1-
5year Government Index. Yield will be considered only after the basic requirements
of safety, liquidity, and credit quality have been met.
INVESTMENT POLICY:
The City is governed by the California (sovernment Code, Section ~~600 et.seq. Within the context
of these limitations, the following investments are authorized:
U.S. TREASURY SECURITIES for which the full faith and credit of the U.S. are pledged
for the payment of principal and interest. There is no limit to the percentage of the portfolio
that can be invested in U.S. Treasuries. However, their maturities shall be limited to ~ years
or less. However, their maturities shall be limited to ~ years or less.
OBLIGATIONS ISSUED BY AGENCIES OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
(AGENCIES), including the Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA}, the
Federal Farn1 Credit Bai~h System (FFCB), the Federal Home Loan Bank Board (FHLB),
the Federal I~Tational Mortgage Association (FNMA), the Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Corporation (FHLMC), Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA). The amount of any one issuer
shall not exceed 25 percent of the portfolio, with the maturity not to exceed 5 years.
FDIC Insured CORPORATE NOTES, issued by a corporation under the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation's (FDIC) Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program (TLGP). These
notes are backed by the full faith and credit of the United States Government. The amount
of any one issuer shall not exceed 25 percent of the portfolio.
COMMERCIAL PAPER must be of prime quality of the highest rating by both Moody's
and Standard and Poor's (Pl by Moody's and Al by Standard and Poor's). Eligible paper
is limited to corporations organized and operating within the U.S. and having total assets of
at least $500,000,000. There are also limitations as to the percent (10%) of the portfolio, the
time of investment (270 days) and the amount of any one issuer shall not exceed ~ percent. of
the portfolio.
REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS (Repos) allow a purchase of securities by a local agency;
by agreement, the seller will repurchase the securities on or before a specified. date and for a
specified amount. The maturity should. not exceed ninety days. Repos should only be
purchased when a purchase agreement is executed with a bank in which the underlying
security shall have a market value of at least: 102% for U.S. Treasuries or 10~% for U.S.
Agencies of the funds bo:-rowed. Pledged securities must be held by a third party custodian.
The issuing counter party shall be rated in a rating category of "AA" or its equivalent or
better by nationally recognized rating services (Standard and Poor's and Moody's).
-- 2
THE LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND is a pooled fund managed by the State
Treasurer whose permitted investments are identified in the Govenlrnent Code Section
164291. LAIF offers high liquidity as deposits and withdrawals can be wired to and from
South San Francisco on the same day, provided the request is made before 10:00 A.M. No
maximum limit for LAIF is set by this investment policy.
THE SALT MATEO COUI~~TY Il~TVESTMENT FUND established for the benefit of local
agencies. is a pooled fund managed by the San Mateo County Treasurer. Various County
monies due local agencies are deposited in the fund rather than forwarded to the local
agencies in check form. The Treasurer shall attempt to minimize balances in this fund to
less than $1 million of the portfolio, recognizing that it may take several days to obtain up to
date information from the County on new deposits and/or transfer the excess funds out. This
means that for several days, the `~ 1 million limitation may be exceeded.
MUTUAL FUNDS are shares of beneficial interest issued by diversified management
companies, as defined by Section 23701 M of the Revenue and Taxation Code. To be
eligible for investment, these funds must strive to maintain a net asset value of $1.00 per
share at all times and:
a) Attain the highest ranking in the highest letter and numerical rating provided by
not less than two of the three largest nationally recognized rating services; or
b) Have an investment advisor registered with the Securities and Exchange
Commission with not less than five years experience investing in securities and
obligations, and with assets under management in excess of five hundred million
dollars: and v
c) Invest solely in those securities and obligations authorized by Sections 53601
and ~363~ of the California Government Code. Where the City's Investment
Policy may be more restrictive than the State Code, the Policy authorizes
investments in mutual funds that shall have minimal investment in securities
otherwise restricted by the City's Policy. Minimal investment is defined as less
than 5 percent of the mutual fund portfolio.
Mutual fund investments shall not exceed 20% of the portfolio, with no more than 10% of
the portfolio invested with any one institution.
PROHIBITED INVESTMENTS:
Instruments not expressly authorized are prohibited. In accordance with Govenlrnent Code Section
~ ~ 601.6, investment in inverse floaters, range notes or mortgage derived interest-only strips is
prohibited, as are derivatives. Investment in anv security that could result in a zero interest accrual if
held to maturity is also prohibited.
-- 3
SUMMARY OF AUTHORIZED INVESTMENTS:
Instrument Limitations
Minimum % of
Rating Portfolio
U.S. Treasuries
U.S. Agencies
FDIC Corporate Notes
Commercial Paper
in
any single Maximum Minimum
Issuer Maturity Collateral
100% 100%
100% 2J%
100% 2J%
Pl/Al 10% ~%
~ years
J years
~ years
270 days
Repurchase Agreements
Issuing Counter Party AA
Collateral:
If U.S. Treasuries
If U.S. Agencies
Local Agency Investment Fund
(LAIF)
San Mateo County Pool
Mutual Funds
102%
10~%
100%
<$1.0 million
Aa.a Moody s/
AAAm S&P 20% 10%
* Except for brief periods after the County deposits tax proceeds in the City's account in the County
Pool.
AUTHORIZED INVESTMENTS PERSONNEL:
The City Treasurer and any Deputy Treasurer's he or she appoints are authorized to approve
investment transactions. Deputy Treasurers shall include at a minimum the City Finance Director.
MITIGATING CREDIT RISK:
Credit risk is the risk that a security or a portfolio will lose some or all of its value due to a real or
perceived change in the ability of the issuer to repay its debt. The City shall mitigate credit risk by
adopting the following strategy>ies:
1. No more than ~% of the total~~ portfolio may be invested in securities of any single issuer,
other than:
a. U.S. Treasuries and LAIF, which have no limit; and
b. U.S. Agencies. which shall be limited to no more than 2~% of the portfolio in any
one issuing Agency.
-- ~
2. The City Treasurer may elect to sell a security prior to its maturity and record a capital
gain or loss in order to improve the quality, liquidity or yield of the portfolio in response
to market conditions or City's risk preferences; and,
3. If securities owned by City are downgraded by either Moody's or Standard and Poor's
to a level below the quality required by this Investment Policy, it shall be the City
Treasurer's policy to review the credit situation and make a determination as to whether
to sell or retain such securities in the portfolio.
a. If a security is downgraded, the Treasurer will use discretion in determining whether
to sell or hold the security based on its current maturity, the economic outlook for the
issuer, and other relevant factors.
b. If a decision is made to retain a downgraded security in the portfolio, its presence in
the portfolio will be monitored. and reported monthly to the City Council.
DEPOSITORY SERVICES:
'vlonies must be deposited in state or national banks; state or federal savings and loan associations,
or state or federal credit unions in the state of California. The monies may be in inactive deposits,
active deposits,. or interest-bearing active deposits. The deposits in any institution cannot exceed
the amount of the bank's or savings and loan's paid up capital and surplus.
The bank. savings and loan, or federal credit union must secure the active and inactive deposits with
eligible government securities having a. market value of at least I10% of the total amount of the
deposits.
Funds held in a bank should be limited to weekly cash flow needs, and excess funds should be
either invested in LAIF or a money market mutual fund. Any depository institution used by the
City should provide overnight sweep vehicles that comply with this Investment Policy and the State
Government Code.
QUALIFIED DEALERS AND INSTITUTIONS:
Except for transactions with the State and County investment pools, the City shall transact
investment business only with banks, savings and loans, and v~~ith investment securities dealers as
defined in Government Code Section ~3601.~:
``The purchase by a local agency of any investment authorized pursuant to Section
X3601 or X3601.1, not purchased directly from the issuer; shall be purchased either
from an institution licensed by the state as abroker-dealer, as defined in Section
2004 of the Corporatians Code, or from a member of a federally regulated
securities exchange, from a national or state-chartered bank. from a federal or state
association (as defined by Section ~ 102 of the Financial Code) or fiom a brokerage
firm designated as a primary goverrnnent dealer by the Federal Reserve bank."
The City Treasurer shall investigate institutions that wish to do business with the City in order to
determine if they are adequately capitalized, make markets in securities appropriate to the City's
needs. Specifically, in order to achieve these objectives:
-- 5
The Treasurer shall establish a list of qualified securities dealers, and shall obtain a certification
submitted by all financial institutions v~rith which the City has an investment relationship on an annual
basis. The certification shall state that the institution has reviewed the City's investment management
plan and that it will:
• Exercise due diligence in monitoring the activities of its officers and employees engaged in
transactions with the City.
• Ensure that alI of its officers and employees offering investments to the City are trained in
the precautions appropriate to public sector investments.
In order to be qualified for use by the City, a qualifying institution must have:
a) At least three years experience operating with California municipalities. In
addition, individual traders or agents representing a dealer must have a minimum
of one year experience operating with California municipalities;
b) An inventory of trading securities of at least $10 million.
SAFEKEEPING AND CUSTODY OF SECURITIES:
To protect against potential losses caused by the collapse of individual securities dealers, all
securities owned by the City, except for investments with LAIF, the San Mateo County Investment
Pool, Repurchase Agreements as authorized in this Policy shall be kept in safekeeping by a third
party custodian acting as agent for the City under the terms of a custody agreement executed by the
bank and by the City. These funds will be held in the City's name. All trades will be executed by
delivery vs. payment (DVP). This ensures that securities are deposited to the third party safe keeper
prior to release of the City's funds to the broker, for a purchase, and ensures that cash is deposited
with the safe keeper prior to release of the City's security for a sale.
COMPETITIVE PURCHASE AND SALE OF ALLOWED SECURITIES:
Except for purchases in LAIF, the County Pool or with a Mutual Fund otherwise authorized in this
Policy, any purchase or sale of individual securities shall be made after soliciting at least three
quotes from authorized brokers, either verbally or in writing. The Treasurer shall make the
purchase or sale from the broker that offers the best executable price for the security. In the case of
a tie of two or more brokers, the Treasurer shall select by his/her choice. The Treasurer shall
maintain documentation relating to investment quotes for six months.
ETHICS AND CONFLICTS OF II\'T:EREST:
The Citv Treasurer and Deputy City Treasurers shall file a State Form 700 annually, wherein they
must disclose all personal assets such as stocks, bonds, properties, business entities, etc., in which
said officials may be involved and which could create a conflict of interest with the proper
execution of their offices or impair their ability to make impartial decisions.
- - b
REPORTING:
The Treasurer shall present to the City Council a quarterly report showing the types of investments,
institutions of investment, dates of maturity, amounts of deposit, current market value for all
securities, rates of interest, and other such data as may be required by the City Council.
INVESTMENT OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE:
The City shall establish an Investment Oversight Committee that shall meet at least quarterly. The
conunittee shall consist of at a minimum, the City Treasurer, the City Manager, and the Finance
Director.
The purpose of the committee is to:
• Review the portfolio on a quarterly basis to ensure compliance with the City's
Investment Policv and the requirements of the State of California.
• Make recommendations to Council to change the Investment Policy v~jhere
appropriate.
• Meet as needed to review the investment portfolio as a result of changes in the
marketplace or the economic position of any company or agency that affects the
City's investments.
The City Treasurer will report on any recommendations and/or actions taken by the Investment
Oversight Committee in his/her quarterly investment reports to the full City Council. The
Investment Oversight Committee shall meet and report at least semi-annually with the
Finance/Budget/Investment Committee of the City Council.
INTERNAL CONTROLS:
The Treasurer and the Finance Director are responsible for establishing and maintaining an intennal
control structure designed to ensure that the assets of the entity are protected from loss, theft, or
misuse. The internal control of the structure shall be designed to provide reasonable assurance that
these objectives are met.
Management responsibility for the investment program is delegated to the elected City Treasurer
~~ho shall be responsible for all investment transactions. The Deputy City Treasurer(s), appointed
by the City Treasurer, acts at the discretion and direction of the City Treasurer.
WIRE TRANSFER CONFIR'!'IATIONS:
Due to the need to preserve segregation of duties and checks and balances, all non-recurring,
outgoing wire transactions initiated by the City Treasurer or a Deputy Treasurer appointed by the
City Treasurer shall be confirmed by the bank with a second person, either a Deputy Treasurer or
within the Finance Department, prior to the completion of that wire transfer. Recurring/repetitive
wire transactions, such as with LAIF, the County Investment Pool, or to meet regular debt service
payments, maybe exempted from a second confirmation requirement, provided that a list of
-- 7
recurring wire transfers is established with the bank and that both the City Treasurer and the
Finance Director approve the list.
POLICY REVIEW:
This Investment Policy shall be reviewed at least annually to ensure its consistency with the overall
objectives of safety of principal, liquidity, and yield. The Policy should also be relevant to current
law, financial and economic trends, and should meet the needs of the City of South San Francisco.
o ~
~ ~
J O
c'~LIFOR~~~
Staff Report
DATE: June 23, 2010
The proposed General Fund Operating Budget has a surplus of $20,000 before transfers
out to the Capital Improvement Program
The General Fund portion of the CIP is proposed at $358,000, funded from reserves
General Fund Reserves meet Council's Reserves Policy:
v Projected ending balance of Undesignated Reserve of $5.1 million
o Total General Fund Reserves of $14.4 million
No additional contribution towards retiree health liability costs (OPEB) is included in this
budget
$636,000 in departmental reductions
$250,000 transfer to the Storm Water Fund for increased storm water regulations
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Jim Steele, Director oi, Finance
SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE 2010-11 OPERATING BUDGET FOR
THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution that approves the proposed
2010-11 Operating Budget. The proposed Capital Improvement Program (CIP) budget
will be transmitted by the Engineering Division separately.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
The proposed 2010-11 Operating Budget is attached for review and approval in continuation of
the discussion with the Council held at a Study Session on May 19, 2010.
FISCAL IMPACT:
•
Staff Report
Subject: Study Session for 2010-11 Operating Budget
Page 2 of 2
CONCLUSION:
The attached General Fund budget is balanced and financially prudent.
_~ /
Prepared by: C"°~' J~ Approved y:
Jim ,~ teele rry M. Nage
Finance Director City Manager
Attachments: Resolution
Proposed 2010-11 City of South San Francisco Operating Budget
CT/JSBN:ed
RESOLUTION NO.
CITY COUNCIL AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOARD,
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
A JOINT RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FISCAL YEAR 2010-11
OPERATING BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN
1RANCISCO AND THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF SOUTH
SAN FRANCISCO; APPROPRIATING THE CORRESPONDING
FUNDS; AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER/AGENCY
EXECUTIVE DIIZECTOR TO MAKE SPECIFIED
EXPENDITURES; AND APPROVING THE GANN
SPENDING LIMIT
WHEREAS, the proposed fiscal year 2010-11 City of South San Francisco Operating
Budget is attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, the City of South San Francisco ("City") Operating Budget contains the
Redevelopment Agency of South San Francisco ("Redevelopment Agency") Operating
Budget; and
WHEREAS, the City Operating Budget and the Redevelopment Agency Operating
Budget shall hereafter be referred to collectively as the "Operating Budget" for purposes of
adopting this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, Section 33606 of the California Health and Safety Code ("Code")
requires the Redevelopment Agency to adopt an annual budget; and
WHEREAS, Section 33334.3(d) of the Code states that moneys in the
Redevelopment Agency's Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund ("Housing Fund")
shall be used to increase, improve, and preserve the supply of low and moderate income
housing within the territorial jurisdiction of the Redevelopment Agency; and
WHEREAS, the Code further provides that the Redevelopment Agency shall
determine annually that the planning and administrative expenses incurred in the
Housing Fund are necessary for the production, improvement, or preservation of low
and moderate income housing.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of South
San Francisco ("City Council") and the Redevelopment Agency Board of Directors of the City
of South San Francisco ("Board"), that the fiscal year 2010-11 Operating Budget is hereby
approved, and hereby appropriates the funds set forth therein.
BE TI' FURTHER RESOLVED that consistent with the limitations set forth herein,
any and all expenditures for agreements relating to either the programs or materials contained
in the fiscal year 2010-11 Operating Budget or the Capital Budget for construction projects not to
exceed $25,000 may be expended or entered into under authority of or by the City
Manager/Agency Executive Director and are hereby authorized and the payments therefore
may be made by the Director of Finance.
BE I'I' FURTHER RESOLVED that monies received during fiscal year 2010-11 as a
consequence of a grant award approved by the City Council are hereby appropriated for the
purposes for which the grant has been approved. Such appropriation includes authorization for
the City Manager/Agency Executive Director to expend such monies and for the Finance
Director to make payments therefore in accordance with the terms and conditions and for the
purpose of the grant.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Finance Director is hereby. granted the
authority to increase budgeted revenues and budgeted expenses in departments specifically for
development related expenses such as expedited plan checks, legal reviews, traffic studies,
geotechnical studies, etc., where the developers pay up front for expenses that the City contracts
out for. In those cases, the Finance Director, upon receiving those deposits or payments, will
increase the budget for revenues and expenses in the appropriate departments where those
expenses will take place by a corresponding amount. Said transactions will have no net impact
on Reserves, as revenue will offset expenses.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Finance Director is hereby authorized to
increase budgeted revenues and expenses in departments so that departments may use
donations made to them. Said transactions will have no net impact on Reserves, as revenue
will offset expenses.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the fiscal year 2010-11 budget attached hereto
is hereby officially adopted:
- By department by fund for General Fund operating budget appropriations;
and
- By fund for other operating budget appropriations, including for the
Redevelopment Agency.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Gann Appropriations Limit enclosed in
the budget pages that follow is approved, and that the Finance Director may make minor
adjustments or corrections to this Gann Limit Schedule if needed to comply with audit
requirements.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager/Agency Executive
Director may authorize the Director of Finance to transfer budgets during .the year in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles between the following budget
categories provided the overall. appropriation by funding source is not increased without
City Council or Redevelopment Agency Board approval:
- Departments within the same fund; and
- Capital projects with the same funding source or type; and
- Operating and capital budgets for the same department if funded by the
same funding source or type.
BE I'I' FURTHER RESOLVED that the Redevelopment Agency Board and the
City Council of the City of South San Francisco hereby find that the planning and
administrative expenses for fiscal year 2010-11 as proposed in the attached budget
document for the Redevelopment Housing Fund are necessary for the production,
improvement, or preservation of low and moderate income housing, pursuant to Section
33334.3 of the California Health and Safety Code.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Director of Finance is hereby authorized
to use professional judgment to make corrections to the adopted budget schedules if any
related numbers represented on one budget schedule herein do not match the corresponding
number as represented in another budget schedule herein.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Director of Finance is hereby authorized
and directed to rollover any outstanding encumbrances from fiscal year 2009-10 into
fiscal year 2010-11 where sufficient budget savings otherwise allow the rollover.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Director of Finance is hereby authorized
and directed to rollover unencumbered appropriations from grants received in fiscal year
2009-10 or prior years if so allowed under the terms of the grant.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the staffing levels for each department, as
detailed in the fiscal year 2010--11 Operating Budget are hereby approved.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Director of Finance is hereby authorized
and directed to carry forward unspent fiscal year 2009-10 unencumbered non-recurring
project budgets in the Operating Budget, such as litigation projects.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the master fee schedule for fees for services
approved by the City Council for the fiscal year 2010-11 year is hereby approved.
~ * * * ~
I hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was regularly introduced and
adopted by the City Council and the Redevelopment Agency Board of the City of South
San Francisco at a regular meeting held on the day of June, 2010 by the following
vote:
AYES
NOES
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
City Clerk.
1464304.2
Prepared by the Finance Department
June 23, 2010
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..............................................................................................................................1
GENERAL FUND ...................................,..... ......................3
............................................................................
GENERAL FUND SUMMARY.............,........... .................................3
..........................................................
GENERAL FUND RESERVES............,.......... ..............................................4
..............................................
COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL FUND RESERVE POLICIES ...............................................................5
GENERAL FUND REVENUE DETAIL ...................................................................................................... 6
GENERAL FUND ADMINISTRATIVE .ALLOCATION TO OTHER FUNDS ..............................................9
GENERAL FUND REDUCTIONS ...........................................................................................................11
SUMMARY OF PRIOR YEARS GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES AND REVENUES ......................15
SUMMARY OF PRIOR YEARS BUDGET BALANCING SOLUTIONS ..................................................15
GANN LIMIT ................................................................................................................................................17
DEPARTMENT PAGES .....................................................................
.........................................................19
ADMINISTRATIVE DEPARTMENTS SUMMARY ................................ .................,,,,.,,,,.,,,,,,.,,,,19
.............
OPERATING DEPARTMENTS SUMMARY ............................................................................................19
POSITION BUDGET SUMMARY BY DEPARTMENT ............................................................................20
CITY COUNCIL (01) .............................................................................................. .........................21
CITY CLERK (02) .................................................................................................................................... 22
CITY TREASURER (03) .......................................................................................................................... 23
CITY ATTORNEY (04) ............................................................................................................................24
CITY MANAGER (05) ..............................................................................................................................25
FINANCE (06) .........................................................................................................................................26
Finance Administration & Budget (081) ...............................................................................................27
Accounting & Financial Services (062) ................................................................................................28
NON-DEPARTMENTAL (07) ...................................................................................................................29
HUMAN RESOURCES (09) .................................................................................................................... 30
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (16) ......................................................................................................31
ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (10) .........................................................................33
Economic & Community Development Administration (101) ............................................................... 34
Housing & Community Development (103) ......................................................................................... 35
Planning (104) ................................ ....................................................................................................36
Building (105) .................................:....................................................................................................37
Parking District (106) ..................... ,.................................................................................................... 37
Parking District (106) .......................,,...................................................................................................38
FIRE (11) ..................................................................................................................................................39
Fire Administration (111) .......................................................................................................................40
Fire Prevention (112) ........................,................................................................................................... 41
Disaster Preparedness (113)............, ...................................................................................................42
Emergency Medical Services (116) ..................................................................................................... 43
Operations (117) ..................................................................................................................................44
POLICE (12) ............................................................................................................................................45
Police Administration (121) ..................................................................................................................46
Services (122) ......................................................................................................................................47
Records (123) ......................................................................................................................................48
Communications (124) .........................................................................................................................49
Investigations (126) ..............................................................................................................................50
Patrol (127) .......................................................................................................................................... 51
PUBLIC WORKS (14) .....................................................................
........................................................ 52
Engineering (132) ................................................................................................................................53
Sewer Maintenance (133) ....................................................................................................................54
Streets Maintenance (134) ..................................................................................................................55
Garage (136) ........................................................................................................................................56
Storm Water Drainage (138) ................................................................................................................57
~i i r ur ~uu i H 5AN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-i-
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Water Quality Control Plant (139) .....
...................................................................................................
LIBRARY (15) ................
. 58
(
....................................................................................................
.)........
Library Administration 151 59
.....
,. ..................................................................................................
Main Library (152) .........
.
.
.................,,....................---............................................................................
Grand Avenue Library (153) ..... 61
.......,. ...................................................................................................
Literacy (154) ................. 62
.......................................................................................................................
PARKS AND RECREATION (17) 63
.......... ...................................................................................................
Parks & Recreation Administration (171) 64
.............................................................................................
Recreation (172) .........
. 65
.
................. :...................................................................................................
Parks Maintenance (173) ...
.. 66
.
.......... ...................................................................................................
Building Maintenance (174) . 67
................................................................................................................
Common Greens (174) .. 68
......................................................................................................................
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FUNDS 69
......................................................................................................
Merged Redevelopment Project Area Funds 71
..........................................................................................
RDA Bonds Fund 71
.....................................................................................................................................
Low & Moderate Housing Fund 72
...............................................................................................................
PROPRIETARY FUNDS 73
.............................................................................................................................
Sewer Enterprise Fund 75
............................................................................................................................
Storm Water Fund 75
...................................................................................................................................
Parking District Fund 76
...............................................................................................................................
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS 76
.....................................................................................................................
Gas Tax Fund 78
..........................................................................................................................................
Measure A Fund 78
......................................................................................................................................
Community Development Block Grant Fund 79
...........................................................................................
Common Greens Maintenance Districts Funds 80
...................................................................................... 81
Solid Waste Fund ........................................................................................ 82
............................................
Miscellaneous Special Revenue Funds
..................................................................................................
CITY SERVICE FUNDS 83
..............................................................................................................................
Vehicle Maintenance (City Garage) Fund 84
...............................................................................................
Equipment Replacement Fund 84
................................................................................................................
Vehicle and Other Equipment Purchases 85
............................................................................................
Deferred Vehicle Replacements 86
..........................................................................................................
Information Technology Fund 87
..................................................................................................................
Self-Insurance Fund 88
................................................................................................................................
Health & Benefits Fund
. 89
................................
...........................................................................................
OTHER FUNDS 90
..........................................................................................................................................
East of 101 Sewer Impact Fee Fund 91
.......................................................................................................
Sewer Capacity Charge Fund 91
.................................................................................................................
POSITION BUDGET DETAIL BY DEPARTMENT 92
......................................................................................
FROZEN POSITIONS 93
............................................................................................................................. 99
O OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-ii-
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
OVERVIEW AND ASSUMPTIONS
General Fund and Redevelopment Agency Funds
General Fund
Revenues
-Property Tax: projected 2009-10 decreased by .15%
-Sales Tax: no real growth in 10-11, but due to changes in the State's calculation of the triple flip, we will
see an increase of $1.2 million over projected 2009-10 receipts. This is still $600k less than the adopted
2009-10 budget
- Hotel Taxes: slight recovery from recession (about $100k) plus full year of voter-approved increased
TOT rate
- Building and Fire Permits: net increase of $150k -this is a combination of some decreases in Fire
permits and other categories, and an increase in estimated revenue generated by ongoing building &
improvement projects at Genentech sites
- Charges for Services: increased revenue expected for narcotics task force and paramedic service fees;
slight changes in other categories
- 3.6% increase to Administrative Allocation to Other Funds (General Fund charges to other funds)
- Continued expectation of low interest earnings
Expenditures
- 2% wage increase across the board
- Departmental reductions of $636,000 - no permanent regular employees affected
- Modified benefits package approved to begin April 1, 2010 carries through 2010-11
-Proposed half-year funding for filling vacant Deputy Fire Chief position
- Increased departmental contributions to Internal Service Funds (Equipment & Vehicle Replacement)
- Transfer out of the General Fund to the Storm Water Fund for increased storm regulations: $250,000
Other Funds
Redevelopment Agencv Funds
Revenues
- Flat tax increment from 2009-10:
• Includes a conservative estimate of the supplemental payment we expect in June, leaving room
for decreases in Assessed Values by July 1
- Supplemental ERAF payment of $905,2'10 (State take-away)
Expenditures
- Shift of one Police Officer from General Fund
• $100k total, which supplements Bike Patrol and provides police services year-round in the
Downtown
- $2 million loan funding from Housing fund for Downtown housing project
- Increased CIP funding
• $3.1 million from tax increment; ~$1.5 million from bonds; $1 million from Housing
~~ ~ r yr wu ~ h JAN rKHNG15G0 OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
This page is intentionally left blank.
~i i Y ur Suu ~ H 5AN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-2-
GENERAL FUND
GENERAL FUND
GENERAL FUND SUMMARY
Change from
Revenues and Other
Actual
Actual
Adopted
Projected
.Proposed. Adopted 09-10
Favorable /
Financing Sources 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 (Unfavorable) Chan e
Property Taxes 13,985,981 15,568,861 12,958,000 13,839,005 13,818,639 860,639 6.6%
ERAF Refund from County 1,429,004 1,630,474 780,000 2,117,868 850,000 70,000 9.0%
Sales Tax 12,481,431 12,029,656 10,870,000 9,090,919 1.0,276,731 (593,269) -5.5%
Transient Occupancy Tax 7,098,284 5,937,036 5,603,911 5,783,911 6,180,400 576,489 10.3%
Motor Vehicle In Lieu Fees 4,875,710 5,746,358 4,888,000 5,224,546 5,217,032 329,032 6.7%
Revenue from Other Agencies 1,588,530 2,221,595 999,400 1,353,011. 889,400 (110,000) -11.0%
Franchise Fees 3,099,779 3,179,597 3,250,000 3,250,000 3,250,000 - 0.0%
Business License 659,703 1,016,230 1,052,000 1,052,000 1,062,520 10,520 1.0%
Commercial Parking Tax 1,930,331 2,407,517 2,107,000 2,407,000 2,407,000 300,000 14.2%
Building and Fire Permits 3,125,990 2,534,067 2,416,200 2,988,625 3,136,299 720,099 29.8%
Charges for Services 6,332,601 6,828,051 5,795,400 5,720,357 5,867,926 72,526 1.3%
Fines 1,077,003 1,013,434 1,220,000 1,220,000 1,248,000 28,000 2.3%
Interest 1,345,934 584,923 861,000 567,719 550,000 (311,000) -36.1%
Rent 2,852,018 2,575,951 2,716,577 2,641,577 2,710,710 (5,867) -Oct%
Administrative Charges 2,118,614 2,222,500 2,225,000 2,225,000 2,304,250 79,250 3.6%
Other 743,804 916,825 879,000 556,000 569,000 (310,000) -35.3%
Transfers In 925,089 1,123,791 910,749 1,099,550 1,1.18,749 208,000 22.8%
Subtotal Revenues 65,669,805 67,536,865 59,532,237 61,137,088 61,456,655 1,924,418 3.2°/Q.
Pfus Prior Year Carryovers 476,628
Total Re sand D~a~ M ~ ~,~Y ~h~N ~~ # ' ~~z~ ~~ ,~` s
9 ~ ~~~ ~ .. ' , 1k ~",- "u "f ~'~~a x'~~r' X~La ~~'k asy .~h',
Finar~titg^ur~ es H `85°8t39,8pS 7,53fii.86 ~~ X9.532;237 g 61.$1t'[8.., ~,. 8't~458.#'r5S€~'~, `~~~A,:`fi~.9~1'Rk.~.k~~:.~~:_~€~ ~o~~~
Change from
Adopted 09-10
Operating Actual Actual Adopted Projected Proposed Favorable /
Budget Expenditures 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 (Unfavorable) Chan e
City Council 155,015 123,045 194,218 213,718 194,229 (11) 0.0%
City Clerk 391,474 337,176 389,249 355,499. 389,503 (254) -0.1%
City Treasurer 36,272 44,451 48,664 80,360 54,674 (6,010) -12.4%
City Attorney 777,576 634,237 745,747 745,747 745,868 (121) 0.0°,6
City Manager 733,744 737,230 742,197 759,286 743,035 (838) -0.1 °fa.
Finance 1,714,787 1,500,934 1,617,943 1,688,977 1,595,835 22,108. 1.4%
Non-Departmental 821,793 715,374 707,177 786,677 734,177 (27,000) -3.8%
Human Resources 1,078,237 1,036,630 986,209 986,209 970,220 15,989 1.6%
Economic & Comm. Dev. 3,066,405 3,288,543 2,503,161 2,886,234 2,605,799 (102,638) -4.1%
Fire 16,893,671 1'7,994,450 16,279,820 16,562,536 16,980,888 .(701,068) -4.3°~
Library 4,766,810 4,679,267 4,133,416 4,203,615 4,152,803 (19,387) -0.5%
Police 18,648,009 1'9,893,230 18,722,001 19,037,844 18,950;625 (228,624) -1.2°fo
Public Works 4,044,426 4,075,964 3,269,992 3,391,434. .3,212,592 57,400 1.8%
Parks and Recreation 10,826,043 10,699,709 9,898,731 9,964,796 9,856,455 42,276 0.4%
New Stonnwater Regulations 250,000 (250,000)
Modified Benefit Package Savings (72,300)
1`gtal Opera~n9 ~.M ~ .
~~
a, '
gtdget Expenditures 63,954,264 65,780,241 60,238,525 81,590,633 61,436,704 .4 ' {1,158,179) -2Aye
Operating Budget Impact 1,715,541 1,776,625 > (706,288} 23,083 19 951 -
Take Inaurdnce Rebate front Reserves 546,000 ~~
Gap Still Remaining: (2t9-16 From Reserves}: a ~ ~ (201 _}., -
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-3-
GENERAL FUND -RESERVES
GENERAL FUND RESERVES
Actual Actual
2007-08 2008-09
Net Operating Budget Impact (from Table I)
Less Transfers to Capital Projects:
Less Transfers to Retiree Health Fund
Less Transfer to Self Insurance Fund
(Worker's Comp Liability)
Less Transfers to Storm Water Fund
1,715,541 1,776,625
(526,032) (1,048,963)
(4,000,000) (500,000)
(100,000)
Adopted
2009-10 Projected Proposed
2009-10 2010-11
(201,288} - 19;951
(65,000) (647,359) (358,000)
(2,725,000}
Less Transfers to Debt Service (342,348) - (150,000) -
Pl,~t Impact~or~'General Fund Reserves {3,'t52,$3$) 'f27,6tZ2 ~~~A~fi,~88)'= ~`~3;~72;3~38~ ' ~(33$;t1~9
General Fund Reserves Projection
1. Discretionary Reservesl
Liquid Reserves Available
Emergencies 1,307,000 1,353,000 1,191;000 1,223;.000. 1,229';000
Economic Contingencies 4,576,000 4,735,000 4,167,000 4,280,000 4,302,000
Designated for future Economic Development and
Capital Projects 4,399,131 4,085,940 4,020,940 4,107,516 3,750,000
Undesig~atedReserve ~ 5,955,788 6,5~6,032`~ ~:, ~ 522'5,63+f ~ ~rF~~6r',~1~4 5,~3Q;58i1",
Subtpta# Discretiona Auail~ble Reserves 1fi,237,91g 16,739,972 14,604,574, ,r: ~;~9;G21~-' , ~~,r~~~#;~;5g~;
II. Non-Discretionary Reserves/
Reserves Already Committed
Encumbrances 210,849 476,628 _
Advances to Other Funds
Inventory and Other 72,586 78,064 45,210 45,210 45,210
Appropriated Capital Projects 1,418,182 772,534
SubtotaE Non_Disc;Fetfan~uy~(Cott~i~ittec~~ ResErvas ~ '},7(~~,fi17 ~1;3~7226 ~~"#a,21it}, ": ~;¢&~1¢' '~5;2.~~"
Total General Fund' Reserves 17,938 536;. ~ 18,467,.198. ~14,6~9,78d """ "'j~;694,839" " 14,356;790"'
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-4-
GENERAL FUND -RESERVES
COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL FUND RESERVE POLICIES
Proposed 2010-11 Budget
Projected 2009-10 Year End Reserves/ Does Reserve Fall
Reserves! Does Reserve Fall Within Within Target
Fund/Reserve Reserve Target Recommendation Target Recommendation? Recommendation?
General Fund /Reserve for 2% of General Fund operating $1,223,000 $1,229,000
Emergencies budget
Meets Target Meets Target
General Fund/Economic 7% of General Fund operating $4,280,000 $4,302,000
Contingencies budget
Meets target Meets tar et
9
General Fund/Undesignated 5% of General Fund operating $5,061,197 $5,052,664
Reserve budget. No maximum set. Exceeds minimum, within Policy Exceeds minimum, within Policy
guidelines. guidelines.
General Fund/ Reserve for No target. Can be used for one time
capital expenditures or capital $4,107,516 $3,750,000
Future Economic Development
& Capital Projects investments that foster economic
growth No target. No target.
ci I Y OF SDUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-5-
GENERAL FUND -REVENUE DETAIL
GENERAL FUND REVENUE DETAIL
Change from
Actual Actual Adopted Projected Proposed Adopted %°
2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2009-10 Change
Property Tax-Current Secured 13,257,726 15,061,541 12,435,000 13,577,500 13,557,134 1,122,134. 9.0%
Property Tax-Current Unsecured 86,398 100,362 583,000 155,000 155,000 (428,000) -73.4%
Property Tax-Prior Year (7,216} (36,544) (50,000) (50,000) (50,000)
Property Tax-Curr Suppl Secured 698,696 593,649 100,000 310,673 310,673 210,673 210.7%
Property Tax-Curr Suppl Unsec 22,063 8,430 8,500 8,500 8,500
Property Tax-Prior Supplemental 14,623 75,294 - -
Prop Tax-Adj & Augmentations 46,950 - -
Eraf-Refund 1,429,004 1,630,474 780,000 2,117,868 850,000 70,000 9.0°f°
CountyAdminFee (152,402) (180,821) (160,000) (162,668) (162,668) (2,668) 1:7%
Property Tax Pass-Thru Rev 66,092 - - -
Pro Tax Settlement 100,000 - -
TCtai Property Taxes 15,414,985- .17,1.. 935 ~ ~~'13r73B;`I~CfO 15 958 873 ~:'~fSS8,tt39 f ;~,~y930,6~3 = '.~&,8~=
Sales And Use 8,896,896 8,481,356 7,998,000 7,264,623 7,494,305 (503,695) -6,3%
1/2 Sales Tax-Public Safety 300,546 276,880 250,000 250,000 250,000 - 0.0%
Tax Collection Fees (28,802) (55,659) (44,000) (44,000) (44,000) - 0.0%
In-Lieu Sales Tax Triple Flip 3,312,791 3,327,079 2,666,000 1,620,296 2,576,426 (89,574) -3.4%
Franchise Fees 3,099,779 3,167,497 3,250,000 3,250,000 .3,250,000 - 0.0%
Peg Access 48,297 12,100 63,000 - (63,000) -100.0%
Transient Occup Hotel Motel 6,309,586 5,250,548 4,980,911 5,160,911 5,605,600 624,689 12.5%
Tot-Special 1% Meas I Nov 2004 788,697 686,488 623,000 623,000 574,800 (48,200) -7:7%
Past Due TOT Collections 241,355 - - -
Real Property Transfer Tax 376,243 267,447 475,000 200,000 225,000- 250 000 -52:6%
~`pf~t-OtherTaxes 23,1t14,01~'4 21,f~$*,OJ1 :20,261,91'1 18,324,829 :19,932;-'131 ~3~k 329V7H0 ~"
j ,:. ~ ~~=~-1,
Business License 628,512 1,016,230 1,052,000 1,052,000 1,062,520 10,520 1.0%
Parking Business Tax 1,930,331 2,407,517 2,107,000 2,407,000 2,407,000 300;000 14.2%
Building Inspection Permits 1,317,507 678,480 689,750 900,000 1,150,000 460,250 66.7%
Grading And Other Pw Permits 108,090 155,772 150,000 150,000 150,000 - 0.0%
Bldg Plan Check 406,662 476,271 272,820 272,820 272,820 - 0.0%
Bldg Plan Chk Out Expedite 65% 128,223 97,149 68,180 68,180 .68;180 - 0.0%
Bldg Plan Check-In House 109,481 116,627 128,030 300,000 300,000 171,970 134.3%
Electrical Permit 81,071 74,113 102,250 150,000 150,000 47,750 ' 46.7%
Plumbing Permit 71,930 84,474 52,706 75,000 75,000 22,294 42.3%
Mechanical Permit 59,816 55,568 42,165 60,000 60,000. 17,835 42.3%
Bldg Special Inspection 3,010 5,795 6,200 - -
10% Energy Plan Check 11,367 6,028 27,000 - -
Tree Permit 150 - -
Sb1473 Bdlg Standards 127 - - -
Fire Construction Permits 88,102 63,659 44,099 60,000 44,099 - 0.0%
Fire Prevention Fees-Misc 415,547 169,449 550,000 500,000 550,000 - 0.0%
Fire Prevention Inspection 120,455 229,158 242,000 242,000 242,000 0.0%
Renewable Fire Permits 39,905 146,200 30,000 30,000 30,000 - 0.0%
Genentech Bldg Chk/Inspections 73,925 54,903 44,100 - -
Special Activity Fire Permits 6,750 5,750 4,625 - -
Microfilming-Fire 4,429 3,183 3,000 - -
Code Enf Data Mgmt Fee 31,191 32,324 44,200 44,200 44,200 - 0.0%
Alarm Registration Fee 50,000 50,000 50,000 - 0.0°fo
Marbella Inp Fee (Clsd 9/30/05) - - - -
Health And Safety Revenue 79,570 79,037 51.500 - -
't~f8i i.IGenSes ~ Permits 5,716,024 5,957,814 5,625;200,. fi,497,625 ~ ~~: ~ ; 6,£SSSi9 >. ,~ ~ 1~,R30~61~ =18.3°/a'
Traffic And Court Fines 916,145 827,220 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 - 0.0%
Library Fines 89,392 96,010 80,000 80,000 108,000. 28,000 35.0%
Administrative Citation Fines 71,466 90,204 125,000 125,000 125,000 - 0.0%
False Alarm Fines 15,000 15,000 15,000 - 0.0%
Total Fines & Fflrfeitures 1,077;003 1,013;434 1,220,4(10 1,220,000 1,24$:000 ;_ i~$,000 3. ~`~ = 2.3~a
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-6-
GENERAL FUND -REVENUE DETAIL
Change from
Actual Actual Adopted Projected Proposed Adopted
2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2009-10 Change
Federal Grant 73,941 707,206 - _ _
State Grant 40,232 113,569 240,094 - -
Federal Library Grant 3,229 _ _ _
Federal Literacy Grant 25,000 _ _ _
Local Library Grant 3,775 _ _ _
Library Foundation 24,052 21,704 21,600 21,600 21,600 - 0.0%
California Library Literacy Grant 39,695 64,698 36,000 36,000 36,000 - 0.0°!°
County Library Grant 18,550 27,225 28,300 28,300 28,300 - 0.0%
Ca Library Svcs Act & Foundtns 622,232 540,588 421,000 491,199 421,000 - 0.0%
Senior Citizens Grant 109,977 120,137 120,500 120,500 120,500 - 0.0%
Prop Tax In Lieu Of Mvlf 4,608,649 5,563,165 4,673,000 5,009,546 5,002,032 329,032 7.0%
Motor Veh Lic Fee-0.65% 267,061 183,193 215,000 215,000 215,000 - 0.0%
Post Reimbursement 31,136 20,431 18,000 18,000 18,000 - 0.0%
Homeowners Tax Relief 126,459 141,473 130,000 70,000 70,000 (60,000) -46.2°!°
Mandate Cost Reimbursement 71,586 29,414 50,000 30,000 - (50,000) -100.0%
Traffic Signal Maintenance Street 14,720 14,709 1,500 7,300 1,500 - 0.0%
Off Highway Motor Vehicle Fees - - 2,000 - 2,000 - 0:0%
Property Abatements -Reimbrsmt 2,502 2,325 5,400 -
Summer Youth Grant - - 500 - 500 - 0.0%
Real Program 223,889 128,931 135,000 163,000 135,000 - _ _0.0%
Fresh Program 30,000 25,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 - 0.0%
Program Reimbursement-Intergovt 39,731 78,301 31,368 - -
Other A encies 87,825 185,886 5,000 60,250 5,000 - 0.0%
Total From Other Agencies 6,4 ,24p 7,967,953 9,>#87,4f~0 8,577;557 =: tI& k. £; ~ s=,, -` , . ,
,6r1 432 ; ~ ,~ x=21$ 2~. ~ 3 7`,~
City Forces-General 51,878 39,719 22,000 80,000 22,000 - 0.0%
Police County Task Force 299,451 230,298 198,000 198,000 298,000 100,000 50.5%
Police Department Services 301,905 330,556 255,000 255,000 305,000 50,000 19.6%
Communications Svc-Colma,Brsbn 90,557 92,821 92,000 92,000 92,000 - 0.0%
Police Recovery Charges 25,579 24,970 40,000 40,000 40,000 - 0.0%!
Permit Program Maint Fee 20 _ _ _
General Plan Maint Fee 24 - - _
Fire Department Services 1,758 1,159 5,000 5,000 5,000. 0.0%
Paramedic Service Fees 1,165,542 1,387,765 1,250,000 1,250,000 1,400,000 150,000 12.0%
Bls Transport Service-Fire 509,224 311,965 440,500 214,958 216,000 (224,500) -51.0%.
Paramedic Intern Training 4,800 - - _
Restitution Damages 4,792 1,345 2,000 2,000 2,000 - 0.0%
Dvlpr Reimb-Large Dvlpmnts 241,692 683,429 _ _
Engineering Inspection Fees - 500 500 500 - 0.0%
P-ans And Specifications Non R 540 - - _
Planning Fees 220,085 242,518 175,000 175,000 175,000 - 0.0°!0
Microfilm-Building 57,446 26,350 50,000 50,000 50,000 - 0.0%
Developers Contribution/Reimb - 200 200 200 - 0.0%
Other Contribution/Reimbursmnt 349,154 356,490 5,000 165,000 5,000 - 0.0%
Passport Processing Fee 25,616 20,700 20,000 - - (20,000) -100.0%
Picnic/Facility Rental Fees 333,244 358,391 414,233 414,233 418,375 4,142 1.0%
Playground Programs 8,647 8,539 22,733 22,733 22,960 227. 1.0%
Aquatics Programs 352,125 394,452 330,233 330,233 333,535 3,302 1.0%
Swim Team 2,500 -
Sports 189,726 174,323 246,000 246,000 248,460 2,460 1.0%
Special Classes/Events 539,929 533,078 629,000 629,000 635,290 6,290 1.0%
Child Care Programs 1,308,530 1,331,687 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,350,000 50,000 3.8%
Adult Day Care 167,389 179,703 164,000 164,000 164,000 - 0.0°!°
Community Gardens 2,158 2,250 2,000 2,000 2,000 - 0.0%
Senior Program Fees 58,365 60,478 60,500 60,500 61,105 605 1.0%
Sale-Printed Material 2,943 1,797 5,000 5,000 5,000 - 0.0°{°
Library Miscellaneous Revenue 6,278 21,307 14,500 14,500 14,500 - 0.0%
Westborough Learning Center Fee 16,530 _ _ _
Library DVD Rental Fees 130 _ _ _
S Airport Ua Parking Lot 1,931 1,898 2,000 2,000 2,000 - 0.0%
Util Reimb. For Cap Projects 4,680 - _ _
City Administrative Fee 2,118,614 2,222,500 2 225 000 2 225 000 2 304 250 79 250 3 6%
Total Charges for Services 8,451,214 9,05b551 ! 7,970399> 7,945,357 8,17Zl17f; 201,T77 2.5%;
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRAP~CISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-7-
GENERAL FUND -REVENUE DETAIL
Change from.
Actual Actual Adopted Projected Proposed Adopted
2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2009-10 Change
Rent 2,750,960 2,404,966 2,616,577 2,466,577 2,510,710 (105,867) -4.0%
Cellular/Antennae Rental Rev. 101,058 170,985 100,000 175,000 200,000 100,000 100
0%
Interest Income-Investments 1,045,991 710,393 861,000 567,719 550,000 (311,000) .
-36.1%
Interest Income-Miscellaneous 875 2,097 - _ _ _
Unrealized Gains/Losses 299 068 127,567.64 - _ _ _
To~llse of Property 8< Nlotaey 4,137,952 ~- 3,1'`~b,874 `3,577,57 3,2895 - ~ ~,':~-3,25t?,~1tf ,•~"f~~5,887~ ,Y •,~,>:~r8.8'~Q?.
Sale Of Unclaimed Property 10,421 2,892 _ _ _
Claims Settlement 104,273 77,678 _ _ _
Jury Duty 46 57 _ _
Miscellaneous Revenue 119,572 242,772 244,000 209,000 197,000 (47,000) -1.9.3%
Miscellaneous Donations
Deposits Over/Under (48) (376) _ _ _
Communication Char es 85,000 85,000 97,000 97,000 97,000 - 0.0%a
Totat E1tEaer Revenues 319,264 40&~tt23: ~ ,_ „341 i1~tf ~~ 3 f~Qi~ ~. „ ~~';. =2;}4kQiktf ,, ~ r~~47;,D9~X , ".,~,;;;~`3;$°la=,
S~Lt~TQTAt_ 64,744,776 68,4'f3t47~~= -58y 21~~~87 6503~`,~S$---,<:&D,33~R94~ ~ :,~:Tt&,4~~ ~~~2~9eta'
Transfer In From Gas Tax 2106 836,000 686,000 686,000 686,000 708,000 22,000 3.2%°
Transfer In From Cdbg 34,249 33,249 33,249 34,249 34,249 1,000 3.0%
Transfer From Federal Grants 54,840 74,164 26,500 26,500 26,500 - 0:0%
Transfer From Capital Projects _ 29 180 - -
RDA pass-through 330,379 165,000 275,000 350;000 185,000 112.1
Transf In From S ecial Rev Fund 48,621 _
Total (3lrher Fi ` ancing Sources 92~`II89 :1,12:1, 31 910 749 , ,, 1 118f743 208;t100 ~i ~ X22 8°~
TQTAL G ERAL FUNpFO;VE,.NUE fi5,66;3,805 8T,~~:855: 532,236 ~ 81,137 ~ 67,45fi!¢55 '~2~#,4''f~° '~~°;
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-8-
GENERAL FUND -ADMINISTRATIVE ALLOCATION
GENERAL FUND ADMINISTRATIVE ALLOCATION TO OTHER FUNDS
FY 2010-11
Change
Actual Actual Adopted Proposed From
Fund Description 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2009-10
Aircraft Noise Insulation Program (ANIP)'' 10,500 11,000 11,000 11,330 3.0%
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) * 33,600 10,000 10,000 10,300 3.0%
West Park Maintenance Districts 1&2 68,250 74,667 88,000 90,640 3.0%
West Park Maintenance District 3 65,100 79,167 135,000 139,050 3.0%
Stonegate Maintenance District 64,050 63,167 44,000 45,320 3.0%
Willow Gardens Maintenance District 65,100 58,000 8,000 8,240 3.0%
Solid Waste Fund 17,850 19,000 19,000 19,570 3.0%
Redevelopment Agency (non-housing) 559,444 623,249 625,144 643,898 3.0%
Low Mod Housing 315,206 315,206 315,206 324,662 3.0%
Sewer Maintenance 63,000 66,150 66,150 68,135 3.0%
Water Quality Control Plant 740,250 790,000 790,000 813,700 3.0%
Parking District Fund 93,450 98,000 98,000 100,940 3.0%
Storm Water Fund 2,625 - - - -
Bond Redemption Fund 2,239 - - - -
Non Obligated Bonds Funds 2,625 2,500 - - -
East of 101 Traffic Improvements 2,625 2,500 2,500 2,575 3.0%
Conference Center 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,390 3.0%
East of 101 Traffic Impact Fees - - - 2,500 -
Child Care Impact Fees 2,500 2,500 - 2,500 -
Oyster Point Impact Fees - - - 2,500 -
East of 101 Sewer Impact Fees - - - 2,500 -
Sewer Capacity Charges - - - 2,500 -
Total 2,121,414 2,228,105 2,225,000 2,304,250 3.6%
''ANIP and CDBG charged according to OMB regulations from DMG
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-9-
This page is intentionally left blank.
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-10-
GENERAL FUND -REDUCTIONS
GENERAL FUND REDUCTIONS
Summary of Proposed General Fund Reductions FY 2010-11
Department Item Amount
City Council Supplies and Services 4,030
City Manager Supplies and Services 14,081
Finance Accountant II changed to Accountant I in books; Reduce contract
services 32,000
Non-Departmental Supplies and Services 13,000
Human Resources Supplies and Services 25,000
Information Technology 0.5 FTE reduction of contract staff 25,000
Economic & Community
Development Supplies and Services 28,000
Fire Increase revenue projections 130,000
Police Hold vacant 1.0 FTE Police Officer; Restore services; Add 1.0 FTE
Police Officer Downtown (81,000)
Public Works Hold vacant 1.0 FTE Lead Public Works Maintenance Worker 110,000
Public Works Garage Reduce gasoline budget 50,000
Library Freeze 0.5 FTE Reference Librarian; Increase revenue estimate
for fees and miscellaneous revenue 74,620
Parks & Recreation Hold vacant 0.5 FTE Recreation Manager; Hold vacant 1.0 FTE
Recreation Supervisor 211,000
Total 635,731
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-11-
GENERAL FUND -REDUCTIONS
Detail of Proposed General Fund Reductions FY 2010-11
Item Impact on Department Amount
City Council
1 20% reduction in printing budget. 980
2 25% reduction in copier charges budget. 500
3 10% reduction in office supplies budget. 400
4 10% reduction in dues, meetings and mileage reimbursements. 750
5 14% reduction in travel and conferences budget. 1,400
Total 4,030
City Manager
1 80% reduction in contractual services budget. 8,800
2 28% reduction in printing budget. 2,175
3 15% reduction in copier budget. 210
4 20% reduction in office supplies. 1,000
5 10% reduction in books and materials budget. 100
6 10% reduction in dues, meeting and mileage. 300
7 10% reduction in postage budget. 200
8 20% reduction in staff development budget. 360
9 30% reduction in travel and conferences budget. 936
Total 14,081
Finance
1 27% reduction in contract services. There will be fewer resources for outside
analysis/reports/studies. 14,000
2 Downgrade Accountant II on books to Accountant I. There will be less flexibility as
needs change to provide more complex accounting analysis, but no less service 18,000
than current.
Total 32,000
Non-Departmental
1 Reduces available city funds for Farmers Market. No impact on services. 13,000
Total 13,000
Human Resources
1 35% reduction in Advertising Budget. Human Resources now uses CaIOPPS and
the city's website for most recruitments. For hard to fill positions, additional 7,000
advertisement costs are now charged to the hiring departments.
2 100 % reduction in promotional budget. As recruitment slows down the need for
food and other rental fees for examinations and oral boards decreases. The 2,500
departments will pay any additional costs.
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-12-
GENERAL FUND -REDUCTIONS
Item Impact on Department Amount
Human Resources
3 100 % reduction in operating supplies. All charges related to operating supplies will
be paid out of the office supplies account. 2,000
4 100% reduction in maintenance grid operating equipment budget. Human
Resources no longer uses equipment that would be charged to this account. 2,900
5 44% reduction in postage budget. (Postage costs will be significant lower due to the 2,600
use of Internet and streamlining of recruitment practices.
6 25% reduction in staff development. HR will access more web/free events for 8,000
training and development.
Total
25 000
Information Technology
1 Reduce Webmaster staffing by 0.5~ FTE. There will be minimal impact on customer 25,000
service, duties will be absorbed by other staff.
Total _ 25,000
Economic & Community Development
1 95% reduction for travel and conferences. Eliminates training opportunities for the
Building division. g,000
2 44% reduction in clothing budget. There will be fewer purchases of new clothes for
the Building division. 2,000
3 16% reduction in office supplies budget for Planning division. 2,000
4 50% reduction in travel and conferences. There will be reduced training
opportunities for Commissioners. 5,000
5 There will fewer grants awarded by the Historic Commission. 5,000
6 50% reduction in promotional budget. 5,000
Total _ 28,000
Fire
1 Increase renewable permit revenue budget. Existing staff will perform additional
inspections and code enforcement activities. 5,000
2 Increase basic fire inspection fee revenue budget. Existing staff will perform
additional inspections and code enforcement activities. 25,000
3 Increase emergency incident cost recovery budget. Existing staff will perform
additional inspections and code enforcement activities. 15,000
4 Increase administrative citation revenue budget. Existing staff will perform
additional inspections and code enforcement activities. 50,000
5 Increase health and safety training revenue budget. Existing staff will perform
additional inspections and code enforcement activities. 35,000
Total 130,000
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-13-
GENERAL FUND -REDUCTIONS
Item Impact on Department Amount
Police
1 Hold 1 Police Officer position vacant. There will be minimal impact. 150,467
2 Restore Traffic School Liaison; Corporal, SL Officer, & COPPS Corporal to original
assignments; in 09-10 these positions supplemented regular overtime. (122,500)
3 Restore funding for 1 Officer (3 month vacancy), 1 Corporal (3 month vacancy),
and 2 Sergeants (6 month vacancy/). (208,967)
4 Add ayear-round Police Officer in Downtown. This will supplement bike patrol
downtown. Funds will come from RDA. 100,000
Total
(81,000)
Public Works
1 The Lead Public Works Maintenance Worker position will be held vacant. 110,000
Total 110,000
Public Works Garage
1 9% reductions in gas and oil budget. Less fuel will be available for use by city
departments. 50,000
Total 50,000
Library
1 Freeze one 20 hour per week Reference Librarian I I. Reference services will be
reduced including reducing the amount of Internet search training, telephone 46,620
reference assistance, participation in local events and volunteer coordination.
2 Increase revenue budget for FineslFees. 10 000
3 Increase revenue budget miscellaneous library revenue. 3 000
4 Increase revenue estimate for CLSA Interlibrary Loan and Direct Loan revenues. 15,000
Total 74,620
Parks & Recreation
1 Hold vacant Recreation and Community Services Manager Duties to be divided
among remaining Recreation Supervisor, Sports Coordinator, Acting Recreation 137,216
Manager.
2 Hold Recreation Supervisor vacant another 6 months; 6 months of savings was
already submitted as an ongoing savings beginning with 2009-10 Duties to be
covered by Interim Assignment of Assistant to the City Manager, Recreation 73,784
Supervisors, Administrative Assistant II, and Parks and Recreation Director.
Total 211,000
GRAND TOTAL REDUCTIONS 635,731
t;i i Y Ut- SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-14-
GENERAL FUND - SUMMARY OF PRIOR YEARS
SUMMARY OF PRIOR YEARS GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES AND REVENUES
80,000 -
EXPENDITURES
70,000 '
~ ~ ~.
j X
so,ooo ,~ , , ~ ~ ~ ~°. Q yn
~. a _,, .. ~ REVENUES:
50,000
w
0
0
ao,ooo
30,000
so,ooo
10,000
SUMMARY OF PRIOR YEARS BUDGET BALANCING SOLUTIONS
a,ooo
~a;~;
i
12,000 - %~
10,000
Yl ~/
O
O
O
C
000 -
w 8
~
, 08-09
/
6,000 - ~ 04-05
4,000 -
X3-04
2,000 -
Budget
Cuts
PERS Funding Fees/New or Increased
Refinance ShiFks Revenue
Property Taxes
Sales Tax
Transient Occupancy
Tax
Building & Fire Permits
Other
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-15-
2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 Projected Proposed
2009-10 2010-11
This page is intentionally left blank.
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-16-
GANN LIMIT
GANN LIMIT
GANN Appropriations Limit -Cumulative Percent Growth
CPI !Personal Population Change Cumulative Appropriation
Income % Change % Change Factor Change Factor Limit
1978-79 --- base year ---
1979-80 10.17 0.23 10.42 10.42 21,453,172
1980-81 12.11 1.33 13.60 25.44 24,371,032
1981-82 9.12 0.74 9.93 37.90 26,790,463
1982-83 6.79 0.59 7.42 48.13 28,778,332
1983-84 2.35 0.32 2.68 52.09 29,548,877
1984-85 4.74 1.72 6.54 62.05 31,481,825
1985-86 3.74 0.60 4.36 69.12 32,855,201
1986-87 2.30 0.48 2.79 73.84 33,772,203
1987-88 3.47 1.39 4.91 82.37 35,429,821
1988-89 4.66 0.51 5.19 91.84 37,269,963
1989-90 5.19 1.21 6.46 104.24 39,678,646
1990-91 4.21 1.26 5.52 115.52 41, 870,116
1991-92 4.14 1.56 5.76 127.95 44,283,754
1992-93 (0.64) 1.83 1.18 130.63 44,805,544
1993-94 2.72 1.62 4.38 140.74 46,769,848
1994-95 0.71 1.54 2.26 146.19 47,827,283
1995-96 4.72 0.27 5.00 158.50 50,219,960
1996-97 4.67 0.79 5.50 172.71 52,980,497
1997-98 4.67 0.77 5.48 187.65 55,881,688
1998-99 4.15 2.23 6.47 206.26 59,498,655
1999-2000 4.53 2.75 7.40 228.94 63,903,388
2000-01 4.91 2.42 7.45 253.44 68,663,438
2001-02 7.82 0.85 8.74 284.33 74,664,622
2002-03 (1.27) 0.11 -1.16 279.87 73,798,513
2003-04 2.31 0.17 2.48 289.29 75,628,716
2004-05 3.28 0.43 3.72 303.77 78,442,104
2005-06 5.26 1.16 6.48 329.94 83,525,152
2006-07 3.96 0.69 4.68 350.06 87,434,129
2007-08 4.42 0.96 5.42 374.45 92,173,059
2008-09 4.29 2.25 6.64 405.96 98,293,350
2009-10 0.62 2.31 2.94 420.83 101,183,175
2010-11 (2.54) 1.34 -1.23 414.43 99,938,622
Note: 1987-88 to 1990-91 based on County population growth
1991-92 based on City growth
1992-93 and 1993-94 based on County growth
1994 -95 through 2000-01 based on City growth, California per capita income
2000-01 through current based on state Department of Finance statistics
Appropriations Subject to Limit
2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-11
Proceeds of Taxes 39,271,119 41,809,768 47,060,893 42,517,629 42,991,856
Appropriations Subject
to Limit 39,271,119 41,809,768 47,060,893 42,517,629 42,991,856
Current Limit 87,434,129 92,173,059 98,293,350 101,183,175 99,938,622
Amount Under Limit 48,163,010 50,363,291 51,232,457 58,665,546 56,946,765
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-17-
This page is intentionally left blank.
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-18-
DEPARTMENT PAGES SUMMARY
DEPARTMENT PAGES
ADMINISTRATIVE DEPARTMENTS SUMMARY*
Actual Actual Adopted Proposed
Department 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
01 City Council 155,015 123,045 194,218 194,229
02 City Clerk 391,474 337,176 389,249 389,503
03 City Treasurer 36,272 44,451 48,664 54,674
04 City Attorney 777,576 634,237 745,747 745,868
05 City Manager 733,744 737,230 742,197 743,035
06 Finance 1,714,787 1,500,934 1,617,943 1,595,835
07 Non-Departmental 821,793 715,374 707,177 734,177
09 Human Resources 1,078,237 1,036,630 986,209 970,220
Total Administrative Departments 5,708,899 5,129,076 5,431,404 5,427,541
OPERATING DEPARTMENTS SUMMARY
Actual Actual Adopted Proposed
Department 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
10 Economic & Community Development 3,066,405 3,288,543 2,503,161 2,605,799
11 Fire 16,893,671 17,994,450 16,279,820 16,980,888
12 Police 18,648,009 19,893,230 18,722,001 18,950,625
14 Public Works 4,044,426 4,075,964 3,269,992 3,212,592
15 Library 4,766,810 4,679,267 4,133,416 4,152,803
17 Parks & Recreation 10,826,043 10,699,709 9,898,731 9,856,455
Total Operating Departments 58,245,365 60,631,164 54,807,121 55,759,163
GRAND TOTAL General Fund 63,954,264 65,760,241 60,238,525 61,186,704
"Expenses for the Information Technology department are allocated across all departments. Detail on the
IT department is on page 31 and detail on the Information Technology Fund detail is on page 88.
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-19-
DEPARTMENT PAGES SUMMARY
POSITION BUDGET SUMMARY BY DEPARTMENT
Full-time Positions
_Department Adopted
2007-0$ Adopted
2008-09 Adopted
2009-10 Proposed
2010-11
02 City Clerk 2.00 3.00 3.00 3
00
03 City Treasurer 1.00 1.00 1.00 .
1
00
05 City Manager 4.00 4.00 4.00 .
4
00
06 Finance 13.00 13.00 13.00 .
13
00
09 Human Resources 5.00 5.00 5.00 .
5
00
10 Economic 8~ Community Development 32.45 28.45 28.45 .
28
45
11 Fire 79.00 82.00 82.00 .
82
00
12 Police 110.20 111.00 109.00 .
109
00
14 Public Works 71.85 78 95 79 95 .
79 95
15 Library 23.00 23.00 23.00 23
00
16 Information Technology 6.00 6.00 6.00 .
6
00
17 Parks and Recreation 64.85 64.85 64.85 .
64.85
TOTAL Full-Time 412.45 420.25 _ 419.25 419.25
Part-Time Positions
02 City Clerk 1.07 - _ _
10 Economic & Community Developmentt
11 Fire
12 Police
14 Public Works
15 Library
17 Parks and Recreation 0.50
0.48
3.65
0.74
17.81
50.95 0.50
0.48
3.65
0.74
17.81
51.20 0.50
0.48
3.65
0.74
17.81
51.20 0.50
0.48
3.65
0.74
17.81
51.20
TOTAL Part-Time 75.20 74.38 74.38 74.38
GRAND TOTAL 487.65 494.63 493.63 493.63
A listing of position titles and position codes by department can be found in the Position Detail by
Department section on page 93. The list of proposed vacancies for FY 2010-11 is on page 99.
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
- 20 -
ADMINISTRATIVE DEPARTMENTS -CITY COUNCIL
CITY COUNCIL (01)
POSITION BUDGET SUMMARY
Adopted Adopted Proposed
Position Title 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
Council Members (Elected) 5.00 5.00 5.00
Total 5.00 5.00 5.00
FUNDING SOURCE SUMMARY
Change
from
Actual Adopted Amended Projected Proposed Adopted
2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2009-10 Change
General Fund 123,045 194,218 213,718 213,718 194,229 11 0.0%
Total 123,045 194,218 213,718 213,718 194,229 11 0.0%
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
Salaries and Benefits 70,185 135,616 135,616 135,616 139,383 3,767 2.8%
Supplies and Services 52,861 58,602 78,102 78,102 54,846 (3,756) -4.8%
Capital Outlay - - - - - -
Debt Service and Other - - - - - -
Total 123,045 194,218 213,718 213,718 194,229 11 0.0%
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-21 -
ADMINISTRATIVE DEPARTMENTS - CITI~' CLERK
CITY CLERK (02)
POSITION BUDGET SUMMARY
Adopted Adopted Proposed
Position Titles 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
Administrative Assistant II _ _ _
Assistant City Clerk 1.00 1.00 1.00
City Clerk (Elected) 1.00 1.00 1.00
Deputy City Clerk* 1.00 1.00 1.00
Full-Time Positions 3.00 3.00 3.00
Part-Time
Office Specialist _ _ _
Part-Time Positions _ _ -
Total 3.00 3.00 3.00
"1.0 FTE Deputy City Clerk is charged to RDA
FUNDING SOURCE SUMMARY
Change
from
Actual Adopted Amended Projected Proposed Adopted %
2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2009-10 Change
General Fund (net) 316,476 369,249 355,499 355,499 389,503 20,254 5.5%
Passport Processing Fee 20,700 20,000 - - - (20,000) -100.0%
RDA Funds - 102,106 102,106 102,106 104,965 2,859 2.8%
Total 337,176 491,355 457,605 457,605 494,468 3,113 0.6%
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
Salaries and Benefits 267,199 231,528 231,528 231,528 236,507 4,979 2.2%
Supplies and Services 69,976 157,721 123,971 123,971 152,996 (4,725) -3.0%
Capital Outlay _ _ _ _ _ _
Debt Service and Other - _ _ _ _ _
Total 337,176 389,249 355,499 355,499 389,503 254 0.1%
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
- 22 -
ADMINISTRATIVE DEPARTMENTS -CITY TREASURER
CITY TREASURER (03)
POSITION BUDGET SUMMARY
Adopted Adopted Proposed
Position Title 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
Treasurer (Elected) 1.00 1.00 1.00
Total 1.00 1.00 1.00
FUNDING SOURCE SUMMARY
Change
from
Actual Adopted Amended Projected Proposed Adopted
2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2009-10 Change
General Fund 44,451 48,664 80,360 80,360 54,674 6,010 12.4%
Total 44,451 48,664 80,360 80,360 54,674 6,010 12.4%
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
Salaries and Benefits 24,362 42,766 42,766 42,766 43,754 988 2.3%
Supplies and Services 20,089 5,898 37,594 37,594 10,920 5,022 85.1
Capital Outlay - - - - - -
Debt Service and Other - - - - - -
Total 44,451 48,664 80,360 80,360 54,674 6,010 12.4%
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-23-
ADMINISTRATIVE DEPARTMENTS - CITI~' ATTORNEY
CITY ATTORNEY (04)
FUNDING SOURCE SUMMARY
Change
from
Actual Adopted Amended Projected Proposed Adopted
2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2009-10 Change
General Fund 634,237 745,747 745,747 745,747 745,868 121 0.0%
i oral 634,237 745,747 745,747 745,747 745,868 121 0.0%
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
Supplies and Services 634,237 745,747 745,747 745,747 745,868 121 0.0%
Capital Outlay _ _ _ _ _ _
Debt Service and Other - _ _ _ _ _
Total 634,237 745,747 745,747 745,747 745,868 121 0.0%
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-24-
ADMINISTRATIVE DEPARTMENTS -CITY MANAGER
CITY MANAGER (05)
POSITION BUDGET SUMMARY
Position Title Adopted
2008-09 Adopted
2009-10 Proposed
2010-11
Administrative Aide 1.00 1.00 1.00
Assistant to the City Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00
City Manager* 1.00 1.00 1.00
Executive Assistant to the City
Manager* 1.00 1.00 1.00
Total 4.00 4.00 4.00
*0.2 FTE City Manager and 0.1 FTE Assistant to the City Manager are charged to RDA
FUNDING SOURCE SUMMARY
Change
from
Actual Adopted Amended Projected Proposed Adopted
2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2009-10 Change
General Fund 737,230 742,197 759,286 759,286 743,035 838 0.1%
RDA Funds 78,170 78,182 78,182 78,182 80,371 2,189 2.8%
Total 815,400 820,379 837,468 837,468 823,406 3,027 0.4%
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
Salaries and Benefits 680,866 662,404 662,404 662,404 676,524 14,120 2.1%
Supplies and Services 56,364 79,793 96,882 96,882 66,511 (13,282) -16.6%
Capital Outlay - - - - _ _
Debt Service and Other - - - - _ _
Total 737,230 742,197 759,286 759,286 743,035 838 0.1
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-25-
ADMINISTRATIVE DEPARTMENTS -FINANCE
FINANCE (06)
POSITION BUDGET SUMMARY
Adopted Adopted Proposed
Divisions 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
Administration/Budget Division 5.00 5.00 5.00
Accounting Division 8.00 8.00 8.00
Total 13.00 13.00 13.00
FUNDING SOURCE SUMMARY
Change
from
Actual Adopted Amended Projected Proposed Adopted
2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2009-10 Change
General Fund 1,500,934 1,617,943 1,688,977 1,688,977 1,595,835 (22,108) -1.4%
RDA Funds 129,022 357,036 357,036 357,036 367,033 9,997 2.8%
Total 1,629,956 1,974,979 2,046,013 2,046,013 1,962,868 (12,111) -0.6%
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
Salaries and Benefits 1,182,782 1,242,523 1,242,523 1,242,523 1,261,670 19,147 1.5%
Supplies and Services 318,151 375;420 446,454 446,454 334,165 (41,255) -11.0%
Capital Outlay - - - - - -
Debt Service and Other - - - - - -
Total 1,500,934 1,617,943 1,688,977 1,688,977 1,595,835 (22,108) -1.4%
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-26-
ADMINISTRATIVE DEPARTMENTS -FINANCE
Finance Administration & Budget (061)
POSITION BUDGET
Adopted Adopted Proposed
Position Titles 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
Administrative Assistant II 1.00 1.00 1.00
Assistant Director of Finance - - -
Budget Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00
Director of Finance 1.00 1.00 1.00
Financial Analyst I/II/Senior* 2.00 2.00 2.00
Total 5.00 5.00 5.00
*1.0 FTE Financial Analyst is charged to RDA
FUNDING SOURCES
Change
from
Actual Adopted Amended Projected Proposed Adopted
2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2009-10 Change
General Fund 544,393 503,709 553,709 553,709 514,030 10,321 2.0%
RDA Funds 129,022 131,193 131,193 131,193 134,866 3,673 2.8%
Total 673,415 634,902 684,902 684,902 648,896 13,994 4.8%
EXPENDITURES
Salaries and Benefits 528,922 487,810 487,810 487,810 498,131 10,321 2.1%
Supplies and Services 15,471 15,899 65,899 65,899 15,899 - 0.0%
Capital Outlay - - - - - -
Debt Service and Other - - - - - -
Total 544,393 503,709 553,709 553,709 514,030 10,321 2.0%
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-27-
ADMINISTRATIVE DEPARTMENTS - FINAPJCE
Accounting & Financial Services (062)
POSITION BUDGET
Adopted Adopted Proposed
Position Titles 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
Accountant I/II/Senior* 2.00 2.00 2.00
Accounting Assistant I/II 4.00 4.00 4.00
Courier 1.00 1.00 1.00
Financial Services Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00
Total 8.00 8.00 8.00
1.0 FTE Accountant 11 and 1.0 FTE Account Assistant 11 are charged to RDA
FUNDING SOURCES
Change
from
Actuall Adopted Amended Projected Proposed Adopted
2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2009-10 Change
General Fund 956,540 1,114,234 1,135,268 1,135,268 1,081,804 (32,430) -2.9%
RDA Funds - 225,843 225,843 225,843 232,166 6,323 2.8%
Total 956,540 1,340,077 1,361,111 1,361,111 1,313,970 (26,107) -0.1%
EXPENDITURES
Salaries and Benefits 653,860 754,713 754,713 754,713 763,538 8,825 1.2%
Supplies and Services 302,681 359,521 380,555 380,555 318,266 (41,255) -11.5%
Capital Outlay - - - - - -
Debt Service and Other - - - - - -
Total 956,540 1,114,234 1,135,268 1,135,268 1,081,804 (32,430) -2.9%
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-28-
ADMINISTRATIVE DEPARTMENTS -NON DEPARTMENTAL
NON-DEPARTMENTAL (07)
Adopted Adopted Proposed
ORGANIZATION /PROGRAM SUPPORTED 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
Animal Control 408,500 386,000 426,000
Professional Tech. Services -Gov't
• C/CAG 54,723 54,723 54,723
• C/CAG Congestion Relief Plan 166,325 166,325 166,325
Office Supplies 3,000 - -
• Newsletter 24,430 - -
• Printing 12,000 - -
• Business Cards 2,000 - -
Postage 20,213 20,213 7,213
Dues, Meetings, Mileage
• Peninsula Conflict 17,000 17,000 17,000
• League of CA Cities 18,690 18,690 18,690
• ABAG 10,750 10,750 10,750
• SAMCEDA 10,300
• Peninsula T.V. 43,050
• Airport Community Round Table 1,302 1,302 1,302
• Chamber of Commerce 2,500 2,500 2,500
• SAMCAT (Cable TV oversight) 2,756
• LAFCO 8,048 8,048 8,048
MaintenancelOperating Equipment
• Phones/Computers for Council 5,000 5,000 5,000
Chambers
• Non-Departmental Equipment 1,000 1,000 1,000
Promotional -TOT Allocation
• Chamber of Commerce 25,000 - -
• Plymire-Schwarz Museum and Fire 6,000 - -
Museum
Miscellaneous (Special Programs)
• Citizen's Academy 10,000 8,340 8,340
Phone Service 7,286 7,286 7,286
Total 859,873 707,177 734,177
* Funds for additional special programs will be appropriated from remaining FY 2009-10 funds carried over to
FY 2010-11.
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-29-
ADMINISTRATIVE DEPARTMENTS -HUMAN RESOURCES
HUMAN RESOURCES (09)
POSITION SUMMARY
Adopted Adopted Proposed
Position Titles 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
Director of Human Resources 1.00 1.00 1.00
Human Resources Analyst IJII/Sr. 3.00 3.00 3.00
Human Resources Technician 1.00 1.00 1.00
Total 5.00 5.00 5.00
FUNDING SOURCE SUMMARY
Change
from
Actual Adopted Amended Projected Proposed Adopted
2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2009-10 Change
General Fund 1,036,630 986,209 986,209 986,209 970,220 (15,989) -1.6%
Total 1,036,630 986,209 986,209 986,209 970,220 (15,989) -1.6%
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
Salaries and Benefits 707,374 706,766 706,766 706,766 721,979 15,213 2.2%
Supplies and Services 329,255 279,443 279,443 279,443 248,241 (31,202) -11.2%
Capital Outlay - - - _ _ _
Debt Service and Other - - - _ _ _
Total 1,036,630 986,209 986,209 986,209 970,220 (15,989) -1.6%
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-30-
ADMINISTRATIVE DEPARTMENTS -INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (16)
POSITION BUDGET SUMMARY
Adopted Adopted Proposed
Position Titles 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
Administrative Assistant II 1.00 1.00 1.00
Director of Information Technology 1.00 1.00 1.00
Information System Administrator* 2.00 2.00 2.00
Information Systems Technician 2.00 2.00 2.00
Total 6.00 6.00 6.00
'1.0 FTE Information System Administrator is chargea' to RDA
FUNDING SOURCE SUMMARY
Change
from
Actual Adopted Amended Projected Proposed Adopted
2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2009-10 Change
Charges to Departments 1,345,081 1,344,602 1,344,602 1,344,602 1,398,820 54
218 4
0%
Charges to other Agencies 53,290 8,000 8,000 8,000 25,000 ,
17
000 .
212
5%
Other Revenues 164,845 50,000 167,834 167,834 40,000 ,
(10
000) .
-20
0%
RDA Funds - 164,045 164,045 164,046 168,638 ,
4,593 .
2.8%
Total 1,563,216 1,566,647 1,684,480 1,684,481 1,632,458 65,811 4.2%
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
Salaries and Benefits 773,376 713,762 711,369 711,369 706,308 (7,454) -1
0%
Supplies and Services 677,114 688,362 844,321 844,321 688,055 (307) .
0
0%
Capital0utlay
Debt Service and Other -
_ 180,130
_ 317,963 117,834 255,130 75,000 .
41.6%
Transfer out to other Funds 222,357 - 73,451 73,451 - _
Total 1,672,848 1,582,254 1,947,104 1,746,974 1,649,493 67,239 4.2%
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-31 -
This page is intentionally left blank.
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-32-
OPERATING DEPARTMENTS -ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (10)
POSITION BUDGET SUMMARY
Adopted Adopted Proposed
Divisions 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
ECD Administration 3.65 3.65 3.65
Housing and Community
Development 2 95 2.95 2.95
Planning 7.85 7.85 7.85
Building 11.00 11.00 11.00
Parking District 3.00 3.00 3.00
Full-Time Positions 28.45 28.45 28.45
Part-Time
Planning 0.50 0.50 0.50
Part-Time Positions 0.50 0.50 0.50
Total 28.95 28.95 28.95
FUNDING SOURCE SUMMARY
Change
from
Actual Adopted Amended Projected Proposed Adopted
2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2009-10 Change
General Fund (net) 1,538,266 997,260 1,380,333 1,466,332 343,799 (653,461) -65.5%
Planning/Building Fees 1,750,277 1,505,901 1,505,901 1,505,902 2,262,000 756,099 50.2%
Parking District Fund 619,278 527,000 527,000 527,000 537,000 10,000 1.9%
RDA Funds 335,654 498,099 498,099 498,099 512,046 13,947 2.8%
CDBG Funds 615,978 865,955 987,234 987,234 793,456 (72,499) -8.4%
Total 4,859,454 4,394,215 4,898,567 4,984,567 4,448,301 54,086 1.2%
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
Salaries and Benefits 2,340,588 2,141,503 2,055,503 2,141,503 2,117,512 (23,991) -1.1%
Supplies and Services 943,093 361,658 830,731 830,731 488,287 126,629 15.2%
Capital Outlay - - - - -
Debt Service and Other 4,862 - - - - -
Total 3,288,543 2,503,161 2,886,234 2,972,234 2,605,799 102,638 4.1%
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-33-
OPERATING DEPARTMENTS -ECONOMIC; AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Economic & Community Development Administration (101)
POSITION BUDGET
Adopted Adopted Proposed
Position Titles 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
Administrative Assistant II* 1.00 1.00 1.00
Assistant City Manager* 1.00 1.00 1.00
Associate Planner 0.15 0.15 0.15
Economic & Community
Development Coordinator* 1.00 1.00 1.00
Office Specialist 0.50 0.50 0.50
Total 3.65 3.65 3.65
'0.4 FTE ofAssisfant City Manager, 1.0 FTE of Economic & Community Development Coordinator and 0.7 FTE ofAdministrative
Assistant 11 are charged to RDA
FUNDING SOURCES
Change
from
Actual Adopted Amended Projected Proposed Adopted
2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2009-10 Change
General Fund 263,812 317,717 317,717 317,717 311,532 (6,185) -1.9%
RDA Funds 180,698 342,240 342,240 342,240 351,823 9,583 2.8%
Total 444,510 659,957 659,957 659,957 663,355 3,398 0.9%
EXPENDITURES
Salaries and Benefits 180,304 218,169 218,169 218,169 222,832 4,663 2.1%
Supplies and Services 83,508 99,548 99,548 99,548 88,700 (10,848) -10.9%
Capital Outlay - - - - - -
Debt Service and Other - - - - - -
Total 263,812 317,717 317,717 317,717 311,532 (6,185) -1.9%
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-34-
OPERATING DEPARTMENTS - ECONOMIIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Housing & Community Development (103)
POSITION BUDGET
Adopted Adopted Proposed
Position Titles 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
Community Development Coordinator 1.00 1.00 1.00
Manager of Housing and Redevelopment* 1.00 1.00 1.00
Office Specialist 0.95 0.95 0.95
Total 2.95 2.95 2.95
'0.4 FTE Manager of Housing and Redevelopment is charged to RDA
FUNDING SOURCES
Change
from
~\ctual Adopted Amended Projected Proposed Adopted
2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2009-1o Channa
Federal Grants 584,788 601,729 601,729 601,729 651,456 49,727 8.3%
County HOME Funds 1 Ei,175 13,000 25,515 25,515 12,000 (1,000) -7.7%
ARRA Funding (Stimulus) - - 161,564 161,564 - _
Interest /Other Income 1Ei,015 251,226 198,426 198,426 130,000 -
Total 615,978 865,955 987,234 987,234 793,456 48,727 0.6%
EXPENDITURES
Salaries and Benefits 29Ei,425 323,085 323,085 323,085 332,531 9,446 2.9%
Supplies and Services 2511,539 482,621 610,542 610,542 414,676 (67,945) -14.1
Capital Outlay _ _ _ _ _ _
Debt Service and Other _ _ _ _ _ _
Transfers to General Fund 35,249 34,249 34,249 34,249 34,249 - 0.0%
Total 581,212 839,955 967,877 967,877 781,456 (58,499) -7 0%
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-35-
OPERATING DEPARTMENTS -ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Planning (104)
POSITION BUDGET
Adopted Adopted Proposed
Position Titles 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
Administrative Assistant II 1.00 1.00 1.00
Associate/Senior Planner* 4.85 4.85 4.85
City Planner 1.00 1.00 1.00
Planning Technician 1.00 1.00 1.00
Full-Time Positions 7.85 7.85 7.85
Part-Time
Office Specialist 0.50 0.50 0.50
Part-Time Positions 0.50 0.50 0.50
Total 8.35 8.35 8.35
'`9.35 FTE Senior Planner and 0.5 FTE Associate Planner are charged to RDA
FUNDING SOURCES
Change
from
Actual Adopted Amended Projected Proposed Adopted
2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2009-10 Change
General Fund 1,310,987 688,701 1,043,774 1,043,774 856,972 168,271 24.4%
RDA Funds 125,916 126,818 126,818 126,819 130,369 3,551 2.8%
Total 1,436,903 815,519 1,170,592 1,170,593 987,341 171,822 27.2%
EXPENDITURES
Salaries and Benefits 869,730 575,518 575,518 575,518 588,291 12,773 2.2%
Supplies and Services 441,257 113,183 468,256 468,256 268,681 155,498 137.4%
Capital Outlay - - - - -
Debt Service and Other - - - - - -
Total 1,310,987 688,701 1,043,774 1,043,774 856,972 168,271 24.4%
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-36-
OPERATING DEPARTMENTS -ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Building (105)
POSITION BUDGET
Position Titles
Adopted
2008-09
Adopted
2009-10
Proposed
2010-11
Administrative Assistant I 1.00 1.00 1.00
Assistant Building Official 1.00 1.00 1.00
Building Inspector 5.00 5.00 5.00
City Building Official 1.00 1.00 1.00
Office Specialist 1.00 1.00 1.00
Permit Technician 1.00 1.00 1.00
Senior Building Inspector* 1.00 1.00 1.00
Total _____ 11.00 11.00 11.00
"0.5 FTE Senior Building Inspector is charged to RDA
FUNDING SOURCES
Change
from
Actual Adopted Amended Projected Proposed Adopted
2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2009-10 Change
General Fund 1,713,628 1,496,743 1,524,743 1,524,743 1,437,295 (59,448) -4.0%
RDA Funds 29,041 29,041 29,041 29,041 29,854 813 2.8%
Total 1,742,669 1,525,784 1,553,784 1,553,784 1,467,149 (58,635) -3.8%
EXPENDITURES
Salaries and Benefits 1,290,554 1,347,816 1,261,816 1,261,816 1,306,389 (41,427) -3.3%
Supplies and Services 423,074 148,927 262,927 262,927 130,906 (18,021) -6.9%
Capital Outlay - - - _ _ _
Debt Service and Other - - - - _ _
Total 1,713,628 1,496,743 1,524,743 1,524,743 1,437,295 (59,448) -3.9%
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-37-
OPERATING DEPARTMENTS -ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Parking District (106)
POSITION BUDGET
Adopted Adopted Proposed
Position Titles 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
Parking Enforcement Officer* 2.00 2.00 2.00
Parking Meter Collector 1.00 1.00 1.00
Total 3.00 3.00 3.00
1.0 FTE Parking Enforcement Officer is charged to R'DA
FUNDING SOURCES
Change
from
Actual Adopted Amended Projected Proposed Adopted
2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2009-10 Change
Parking District Fund 619,278 527,000 527,000 527,000 537,000 10,000 1.9%
RDA Funds 85,364 92,684 92,684 92,685 95,279 2,595 2.8%
Total 704,642 619,684 619,684 619,685 632,279 12,595 2.0%
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
Salaries and Benefits 204,937 206,513 206,522 206,522 213,391 6,878 3.3%
Supplies and Services 119,615 181,798 182,132 182,132 181,798 - 0.0%
Capital Outlay 16,549 - - - -
Debt Service and Other - - - -
Total 341,101 388,311 388,654 388,654 395,189 6,878 1.8%
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-38-
OPERATING DEPARTMENTS -FIRE
FIRE (11)
POSITION BUDGET SUMMARY
Adopted Adopted Proposed
Divisions 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
Administration 4.00 4.00 4.00
Prevention 7.00 7.00 7.00
Disaster Preparedness - - -
Emergency Medical Services 31.00 31.00 31.00
Operations 40.00 40.00 40.00
Full-Time Positions 82.00 82.00 82.00
Part-Time
Operations 0.48 0.48 0.48
Part-Time Positions 0.48 0.48 0.48
Total 82.48 82.48 82.48
FUNDING SOURCES SUMMARY
Change
from
Actual Adopted Amended Projected Proposed Adopted
2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2009-10 Change
General Fund (net) 15,503,753 13,640,021 13,855,236 13,855,236 14,397,589 757,568 5.6%
Fee Revenue 2,490,697 2,657,799 2,707,300 2,707,300 2,583,299 (74,500) -2.8%
RDA Funds 556,450 546,707 546,707 546,707 526,271 (20,436) -3.7%
Total 18,550,900 16,844,527 17,109,243 17,109,243 17,507,159 662,632 3.9%
EXPENDITURES SUMMARY
Salaries and Benefits 15,341,711 14,252,211 14,252,211 14,252,211 14,685,107 432,896 3.0%
Supplies and Services 2,383,262 1,926,538 2,191,254 2,191,254 2,078,988 152,450 7.9%
Capital Outlay 255,719 - - - - -
Debt Service and Other 13,757 119,071 119,071 119,071 216,793 97,722 82.1
Total 17,994,450 16,297,820 16,562,536 16,562,536 16,980,888 683,068 4.2%
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
- 39 -
OPERATING DEPARTMENTS -FIRE
Fire Administration (111)
POSITION BUDGET
Adopted Adopted Proposed
Position Titles 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
Deputy Fire Chief 1.00 1.00 1.00
Fire Chief 1.00 1.00 1.00
Management Analyst II 1.00 1.00 1.00
Senior Administrative Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00
Total 4.00 4.00 4.00
FUNDING SOURCES
Change
from
Actual Adopted Amended Projected Proposed Adopted
2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2009-10 Change
General Fund 983,056 914,740 913,265 913,265 1,099,270 184,530 20.2%
Total 983,056 914,740 913,265 913,265 1,099,270 184,530 20.2%
EXPENDITURES
Salaries and Benefits 562,301 541,355 541,355 541,355 655,051 113,696 21.0%
Supplies and Services 420,755 373,385 371,910 371,910 444,219 70,834 19.0%
Capital Outlay - - - - - -
Debt Service and Other - - - - - -
Total 983,056 914,740 913,265 913,265 1,099,270 184,530 20.2%
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
- 40 -
OPERATING DEPARTMENTS -FIRE
Fire Prevention (112)
POSITION BUDGET
Adopted Adopted Proposed
Position Titles 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
Administrative Assistant I 1.00 1.00 1.00
Fire Marshall 1.00 1.00 1.00
Safety Inspector I/II/III" 5.00 5.00 5.00
Total 7.00 7.00 7.00
" 1.0 FTE Safety Inspector position is charged to RDA
FUNDING SOURCES
Change
from
Actual Adopted Amended Projected Proposed Adopted
2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2009-10 Change
General Fund (net) 437,364 - - - - - 0.0%
Fee Revenue 783,663 960,299 1,011,800 1,011,801 960,299 - 0.0%
RDA Funds 388,280 395,448 395,448 395,448 395,448 - 0.0%
Total 1,609,307 1,355,747 1,407,248 1,407,249 1,355,747 - 0.0%
EXPENDITURES
Salaries and Benefits 1,018,986 603,970 613,970 613,970 617,517 13,547 2.2%
Supplies and Services 202,041 186,784 359,501 359,501 189,554 2,770 1.5%
Capital Outlay - - _ _ _ _
Debt Service and Other - - - _ _ _
Total 1,221,027 790,754 973,471 973,471 807,071 16,317 2.1%
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-41 -
OPERATING DEPARTMENTS -FIRE
Disaster Preparedness (113)
FUNDING SOURCES
Change
from
Actual Adopted Amended Projected Proposed Adopted
2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2009-10 Change
General Fund 111,077 116,213 116,213 116,213 113,851 (2,362) -2.0%
Total 111,077 116,213 116,213 116,213 113,851 (2,362) -2.0%
EXPENDITURES
Supplies and Services 111,077 116,213 116,213 116,213 113,851 (2,362) -2.0%
Capital Outlay - - - - - -
Debt Service and Other - - - - - -
Total 111,077 116,213 116,213 116,213 113,851 (2,362) -2.0%
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-42-
OPERATING DEPARTMENTS -FIRE
Emergency Medical Services (116)
POSITION BUDGET
Adopted Adopted Proposed
Position Titles _ 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
EMS Captain 1.00 1.00 1.00
Paramedic/Firefighter 30.00 30.00 30.00
Total 31.00 31.00 31.00
FUNDING SOURCES
Change
from
Actual Adopted Amended Projected Proposed Adopted
2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2009-10 Change
General Fund (net) 4,762,926 4,107,761 4,142,752 4,142,751 4,408,899 301,138 7.3%
Fee Revenue 1,707,034 1,695,400 1,695,400 1,695,401 1,621,000 (74,400) -4.4%
Total 6,469,960 5,803,161 5,838,152 5,838,152 6,029,899 226,738 3.9%
EXPENDITURES
Salaries and Benefits 5,945,809 ;5,143,919 5,153,919 5,153,919 5,264,716 120,797 2.3%
Supplies and Services 510,976 547,939 572,930 572,930 653,880 105,941 19.3%
Capital Outlay _ _ _ _ _ _
Debt Service and Other 13,176 111,303 111,303 111,303 111,303 - 0.0%
Total 6,469,960 5,803,161 5,838,152 5,838,152 6,029,899 226,738 3.9%
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANICISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
- 43 -
OPERATING DEPARTMENTS -FIRE
Operations (117)
POSITION BUDGET
Position Titles Adopted
2008-09 Adopted
2009-10 Proposed
2010-11
Battalion Chief
Fire Apparatus Engineer
Fire Captain
Firefighter 4.00
15.00
15.00
6.00 4.00
15.00
15.00
6.00 4.00
15.00
15.00
6.00
Full-Time Positions 40.00 40.00 40.00
Part-Time
Courier
0.48
0.48
0.48
Part-Time Positions 0.48 0.48 0.48
Total 40.48 40.48 40.48
FUNDING SOURCES
Change
from
Actual Adopted Amended Projected Proposed Adopted
2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2009-10 Change
General Fund 9,209,330 8,672,952 8,721,435 8,721,435 8,930,797 257,845 3.0%
Total 9,209,330 8,672,952 8,721,435 8,721,435 8,930,797 257,845 3.0%
EXPENDITURES
Salaries and Benefits 7,814,616 7,962,967 8,052,967 8,052,967 8,147,823 184,856 2.3%
Supplies and Services 1,138,414 7'02,217 660,700 660,700 677,484 (24,733) -3.5%
Capital Outlay
Debt Service and Other 255,719
582 -
7,768 -
7,768 -
7,768 -
105,490 -
97,722
1258.0%
Total 9,209,330 8,672,952 8,721,435 8,721,435 8,930,797 257,845 3.0%
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET , Proposed zu~ u-~i .i
- 44 -
OPERATING DEPARTMENTS -POLICE
POLICE (12)
POSITION SUMMARY
Adopted .Adopted Proposed
Divisions 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
Administration 2.00 2.00 2.00
Services 8.00 8.00 8.00
Records 8.00 8.00 8.00
Communications 13.00 13.00 13.00
Investigations 11.00 11.00 11.00
Patrol 69.00 67.00 67.00
Full-Time Positions 111.00 109.00 109.00
Part-Time
Records 0.48 0.48 0.48
Investigations 0.48 0.48 0.48
Patrol 2.69 2.69 2.69
Part-Time Positions 3.65 3.65 3.65
Total 114.65 112.65 112.65
FUNDING SOURCES SUMMARY
Change
from
Actual ,Adopted Amended Projected Proposed Adopted
2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2009-10 Chan e
General Fund (net) 19,174,867 18,115,001 18,434,864 18,434,864 18,243,625 128,624 0.7%
Grants/Fees 718,363 607,000 602,980 602,980 707,000 100,000 16.5%
RDA Funds 388,993 388,850 388,850 388,850 499,010 110,160 28.3%
Total 20,282,223 19,110,851 19,426,694 19,426,694 19,449,635 338,784 1.8%
EXPENDITURES SUMMARY
Salaries and Benefits 17,337,256 16,190,563 16,190,563 16,190,563 16,495,011 304,448 1.9%
Supplies and Services 2,540,953 2,531,438 2,847,281 2,847,281 2,455,614 (75,824) -3.0%
Capital Outlay 15,021 - - - - _
Debt Service and Other - - - _ _ _
Total 19,893,230 18,722,001 19,037,844 19,037,844 18,950,625 228,624 1.2%
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRA~dCiSCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
- 45 -
OPERATING DEPARTMENTS -POLICE
Police Administration (121)
POSITION BUDGET
Adopted Adopted Proposed
Position Titles 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
Chief of Police 1.00 1.00 1.00
Senior Administrative Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00
Total 2.00 2.00 2.00
FUNDING SOURCES
Change
from
Actual Adopted Amended Projected Proposed Adopted
2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2009-10 Change
General Fund 672,165 608,690 608,691 608,691 617,443 8,753 1.4%
Total 672,165 608,690 608,691 608,691 617,443 8,753 1.4%
EXPENDITURES
Salaries and Benefits 444,665 397,640 397,640 397,640 408,853 11,213 2.8%
Supplies and Services 227,500 211,050 211,051 211,051 208,590 (2,460) -1.2%
Capital Outlay - - - _ _ _
Debt Service and Other - - - _ _ _
Total 672,165 608,690 608,691 608,691 617,443 8,753 1.4%
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-46-
OPERATING DEPARTMENTS -POLICE
Services (122)
POSITION BUDGET
Adopted Adopted Proposed
Position Titles 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
Administrative Assistant I 1.00 1.00 1.00
Police Captain 1.00 1.00 1.00
Police Corporal 1.00 1.00 1.00
Police Lieutenant 1.00 1.00 1.00
Police Officer 1.00 1.00 1.00
Police Sergeant 2.00 2.00 2.00
Sr. Police Records Specialist 1.00 1.00 1.00
Total 8.00 8.00 8.00
FUNDING SOURCES
Change
from
Actual Adopted Amended Projected Proposed Adopted
2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2009-10 Change
General Fund 1,447,260 '1,510,431 1,510,631 1,510,631 1,550,688 40,257 2.7%
Total 1,447,260 '1,510,431 1,510,631 1,510,631 1,550,688 40,257 2.7%
EXPENDITURES
Salaries and Benefits 1,376,433 1,419,058 1,419,058 1,419,058 1,459,115 40,057 2.8%
Supplies and Services 70,827 91,373 91,573 91,573 91,573 200 0.2%
Capital Outlay - - - - - -
Debt Service and Other - - - - - -
Total 1,447,260 1,510,431 1,510,631 1,510,631 1,550,688 40,257 2.7%
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-47-
OPERATING DEPARTMENTS -POLICE
Records (123)
POSITION BUDGET
Adopted Adopted Proposed
Pncitinn Titles 2008-09 _ 2009-10 2010-11
Police Property & Evidence
Specialist 1.00 1.00 1.00
Police Records Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00
Police Records Specialist 4.00 4.00 4.00
Senior Police Records Specialist 2.00 2.00 2.00
Full-Time Positions 8.00 8.00 8.00
Part-Time
Police Evidence Clerk 0.48 0.48 0.48
part_TimP_ Positions 0.48 0.45 u.4sS
Total 8.48 8.48 8.48
FUNDING SOURCES Change
from
Actual Adopted Amended Projected Proposed Adopted
2008-09 200910 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2009-10 Change
General Fund 1,039,703 916,262 916,263 916,263 941,977 25,715 2.8%
Total 1,039,703 916,262 916,263 916,263 941,977 25,715 2.8%
EXPENDITURES
Salaries and Benefits 933,241 826,973 826,973 826,973 852,110 25,137 3.0%
Supplies and Services 106,462 89,289 89,290 89,290 89,867 578 0.6%
Capital Outlay - _ _ _
Debt Service and Other - - -
Total 1,039,703 916,262 916,263 916,263 941,977 25,715 2.8%
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-48-
OPERATING DEPARTMENTS -POLICE
Communications (124)
POSITION BUDGET
Adopted Adopted Proposed
Position Titles 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
Communications Dispatcher 10.00 10.00 10.00
Communications Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00
Supervising Communications 2.00 2.00 2.00
Dispatcher
Total 13.00 13.00 13.00
FUNDING SOURCES
Change
from
Actual Adopted Amended Projected Proposed Adopted
2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2009-10 Change
General Fund 2,003,673 2',008,275 2,018,276 2,018,276 2,041,922 33,647 1.7%
Total 2,003,673 2,008,275 2,018,276 2,018,276 2,041,922 33,647 1.7%
EXPENDITURES
Salaries and Benefits 1,582,587 'I ,534,912 1,544,912 1,544,912 1,568,559 33,647 2.2%
Supplies and Services 421,087 473,363 473,364 473,364 473,363 - 0.0%
Capital Outlay - - - - - -
Debt Service and Other - - - - - -
Total 2,003,673 2,008,275 2,018,276 2,018,276 2,041,922 33,647 1.7%
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-49-
OPERATING DEPARTMENTS -POLICE
Investigations (126)
POSITION BUDGET
Adopted Adopted Proposed
Titles 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
Police Sergeant 1.00 1.00 1.00
Police Corporal 8.00 8.00 8.00
Police Lieutenant 1.00 1.00 1.00
Senior Police Records
Specialist 1.00 1.00 1.00
Full-Time Positions 11.00 11.00 11.00
Part-Time
Court Liaison 0.48 0.48 0.48
Part-Time Positions 0.48 0.48 0.48
Total 11.48 11.48 11.48
FUNDING SOURCES
Change
from
Actual Adopted Amended Projected Proposed Adopted
2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2009-10 Change
General Fund 1,867,099 2,069,559 2,069,710 2,069,710 2,125,698 56,139 2.7%
Total 1,867,099 2,069,559 2,069,710 2,069,710 2,125,698 56,139 2.7%
EXPENDITURES
Salaries and Benefits 1,774,631 1,968,268 1,968,268 1,968,268 2,024,257 55,989 2.8%
Supplies and Services 92,468 101,291 101,442 101,442 101,441 150 0.1
Capital Outlay - - - _ _ _
Debt Service and Other - - - - _ _
Total 1,867,099 2,069,559 2,069,710 2,069,710 2,125,698 56,139 2.7%
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-50-
OPERATING DEPARTMENTS -POLICE
Patrol (127)
POSITION BUDGET
Adopted Adopted Proposed
Position Titles 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
Parking Enforcement Officer 3.00 1.00 1.00
Police Captain 1.00 1.00 1.00
Police Corporal 6.00 6.00 6.00
Police Lieutenant 3.00 3.00 3.00
Police Officer* 45.00 45.00 45.00
Police Sergeant 7.00 7.00 7.00
Police Services Technician 4.00 4.00 4.00
Full-Time 69.00 67.00 67.00
Part-Time
Reserve Officer 1.31 1.31 1.31
School Crossing Guard 1.38 1.38 1.38
Part-Time Positions 2.69 2.69 2.69
Total 71.69 69.69 69.69
* 2.0 FTE Police Officers are charged to RDA
FUNDING SOURCES
Change
from
Actual Adopted Amended Projected Proposed Adopted
2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2009-10 Change
General Fund 12,863,331 11,608,784 11,914,273 11,914,273 11,672,897 64,113 0.6%
RDA Funds 362,993 362,850 362,850 362,850 473,009 110,159 30.4%
Total 12,863,331 11,608,784 11,914,273 11,914,273 11,672,897 64,113 0.6%
EXPENDITURES
Salaries and Benefits 11,225,700 10,043,712 10,143,712 10,143,712 10,191,636 147,924 1.5%
Supplies and Services 1,622,610 1,565,072 1,770,561 1,770,561 1,481,261 (83,811) -5.4%
Capital Outlay 15,021 - - - - -
Debt Service and Other - - - - - -
Total 12,863,331 11,608,784 11,914,273 11,914,273 11,672,897 64,113 0.6%
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-51 -
OPERATING DEPARTMENTS -PUBLIC WORKS
PUBLIC WORKS (14)
POSITION BUDGET SUMMARY
Adopted Adopted Proposed
Divisions 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
Engineering 6.13 6.13 6.98
Sewer Maintenance 9.50 9.50 9.50
Streets Maintenance 14.80 14.80 13.95
Garage 4.20 4.20 4.20
Storm Water 5.42 5.42 5.42
Water Quality Control Plant 38.90 39.90 39.90
Full-Time Positions 78.95 79.95 79.95
Part-Time
Water Quality Control Plant 0.74 0.74 0.74
Part-Time Positions 0.74 0.74 0.74
Total 79.69 80.69 80.69
FUNDING SOURCES
Change
from
Actual Adopted Amended Projected Proposed Adopted
2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2009-10 Change
General Fund 4,075,524 3,269,992 3,391,434 3,391,434 3,212,592 (57,400) -1.8%
Sewer Fund 18,527,197 2'.0,282,823 20,410,861 18,976,762 21,049,311 766,488 3.8%
Storm Water Fund 770,471 864,000 864,000 857,260 1,107,000 243,000 28.1%
Total 23,373,192 74,416,815 24,666,295 23,225,456 25,368,903 952,088 3.9%
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
Salaries and Benefits 2,325,790 1,851,042 1,851,042 1,851,042 1,784,474 (66,568) -3.6%
Supplies and Services 1,745,970 1,387,236 1,508,678 1,508,678 1,396,404 9,168 0.7%
Capital Outlay
Debt Service and Other -
3,764 -
31,714 -
31,714 -
31,714 -
31,714 -
(0) 0.0%
Total 4,075,524 3,269,992 3,391,434 3,391,434 3,212,592 (57,400) -1.8%
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-52-
OPERATING DEPARTMENTS -PUBLIC WORKS
Engineering (132)
POSITION BUDGET
Adopted Adopted Proposed
Position Titles 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
Administrative Assistant I/II 0.80 0.80 0.80
Associate Engineer 1.00 1.00 1.00
City Engineer 0.98 0.98 0.98
Director of Public Works 0.25 0.25 0.25
Engineering Technician 0.80 0.80 0.80
Public Works Inspector 0.30 0.30 1.00
Senior Engineer" 2.00 2.00 2.15
Total 6.13 6.13 6.98
*1.0 FTE Senior Engineer is charged to RDA and 0.85 f=TE Senior Engineer is budgeted in other divisions and/or departments
FUNDING SOURCES
Change
from
Actual Adopted Amended Projected Proposed Adopted
2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2009-10 Change
General Fund 898,324 732,686 946,804 946,804 744,244 11,558 1.6%
CIP Funds* 571,288 300,647 300,647 300,647 308,975 8,328 2.8%
RDA Funds 228,727 194,721 194,721 194,721 200,173 5,452 2.8%
Total 1,698,340 1,228,054 1,442,172 1,442,172 1,253,392 25,338 2.1%
* This is an estimate of salary and benefits charges to (;IP projects
EXPENDITURES
Salaries and Benefits 572,979 513,712 638,166 638,166 652,203 138,491 27.0%
Supplies and Services 325,346 218,974 308,638 308,638 224,296 5,322 2.4%
Capital Outlay - - - - - -
Debt Service and Other - - - - - -
Total 898,324 732,686 946,804 946,804 744,244 143,813 1.6%
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRAP~CISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-53-
OPERATING DEPARTMENTS -PUBLIC V'VORKS
Sewer Maintenance (133)
POSITION BUDGET
Adopted Adopted Proposed
Position Titles 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
Administrative Assistant I/II 0.50 0.50 0.50
Director of Public Works 0.35 0.35 0.35
Equipment Operator 0.20 0.20 0.20
Park Maintenance Worker 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lead Park Maintenance
Worker 0.10 0.10 0.10
Public Works Maintenance
Worker 5.20 5.20 5.20
Lead Public Works
Maintenance Worker 1.00 1.00 1.00
Public Works Supervisor 0.70 0.70 0.70
Senior Engineer 0.20 0.20 0.20
Superintendent of Public
Works 0.25 0.25 0.25
Total 9.50 9.50 9.50
FUNDING SOURCES
Change
from
Actual Adopted Amended Projected Proposed Adopted
2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2009-10 Chan e
Sewer Fund 1,517,142 1,507,085 1,507,085 1,507,085 1,561,689 54,604 3.6%
Total 1,517,142 1,507,085 1,507,085 1,507,085 1,561,689 54,604 3.6%
EXPENDITURES
Salaries and Benefits 973,299 1,028,081 1,028,081 1,028,081 1,053,107 25,026 2.4%
Supplies and Services 543,843 479,004 479,004 479,004 508,582 29,578 6.2%
Capital Outlay _ .. _ _ _ _
Debt Service and Other _ _ _ _ _ _
Total 1,517,142 1,507,085 1,507,085 1,507,085 1,561,689 54,604 3.6%
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-54-
OPERATING DEPARTMENTS -PUBLIC WORKS
Streets Maintenance (134)
POSITION BUDGET
Adopted Adopted Proposed
Position Titles 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
Administrative Assistant I/II 0.75 0.75 0.75
Electrical Technician 2.00 2.00 2.00
Equipment Operator 1.60 1.60 1.60
Lead Electrical Technician 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lead Public Works
1.60 1.60 1.60
Maintenance Worker
Public Works Inspector 0.70 0.70 -
Public Works Maintenance
2.50 2.50 2.50
W orker*
Public Works Supervisor 0.60 0.60 0.60
Senior Engineer 0.15 0.15 -
Senior Public Works
2.70
2.70
2.70
Maintenance Workers
Superintendent of Public
0.20 0.20 0.20
Works
Sweeper Operator 1.00 1.00 1.00
Total 14.80 14.80 13.95
FUNDING SOURCES
Change
from
Actual Adopted Amended Projected Proposed Adopted
2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2009-10 Change
General Fund 3,177,200 2,537,306 2,444,630 2,444,630 2,468,348 (68,958) -2.7%
Total 3,177,200 2,537,306 2,444,630 2,444,630 2,468,348 (68,958) -2.7%
EXPENDITURES
Salaries and Benefits 1,752,811 1,337,330 1,212,876 1,212,876 1,132,271 (205,059) -15.3%
Supplies and Services 1,420,624 1,168,262 1,200,040 1,200,040 1,172,108 3,846 0.3%
Capital Outlay - - - -
Debt Service and Other 3,764 31,714 31,714 31,714 31,714 - 0.0%
Total 3,177,200 2,537,306 2,444,630 2,444,630 2,468,348 (201,213) -2.7%
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-55-
OPERATING DEPARTMENTS -PUBLIC WORKS
Garage (136)
POSITION BUDGET
Adopted Adopted Proposed
Position Titles 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
Administrative Assistant I/II 0.40 0.40 0.40
Director of Public Works 0.05 0.05 0.05
Equipment Mechanic 2.00 2.00 2.00
Lead Equipment Mechanic 1.00 1.00 1.00
Public Works Supervisor 0.70 0.70 0.70
Superintendent of Public Works 0.05 0.05 0.05
Total 4.20 4.20 4.20
FUNDING SOURCES
Change
from
Actual Adopted Amended Projected Proposed Adopted
2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2009-10 Change
City Services Fund 1,431,148 1,413,384 1,413,384 1,442,250 1,398,352 (15,032) -1.1
Charged to Other Agencies - - - 3,000 - -
Total 1,431,148 1,413,384 1,413,384 1,445,250 1,398,352 (15,032) -1.1%
EXPENDITURES
Salaries and Benefits 600,152 502,993 502,993 502,993 537,961 34,968 7.0%
Supplies and Services 820,286 910,391 922,157 922,157 860,391 (50,000) -5.5%
Capital Outlay - 20,100 20,100 20,100 - (20,100)
Debt Service and Other - - - - - -
Total 1,420,438 1,433,484 1,445,250 1,445,250 1,398,352 (35,132) -2.5%
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-56-
OPERATING DEPARTMENTS -PUBLIC WORKS
Storm Water Drainage (138)
POSITION BUDGET
Position Titles
Adopted Adopted Proposed
2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
Public Works Maintenance
Worker
Senior Public Works
Maintenance Worker
Equipment Operator
Park Maintenance Worker
Lead Park Maintenance
Worker
Lead Public Works
Maintenance Worker
Administrative Assistant I/II
Public Works Supervisor
Environmental Compliance
Inspector
Su erintendent of Public
1.30 1.30 1.30
0.30 0.30 0.30
0.20 0.20 0.20
0.15 0.15 0.15
0.05 0.05 0.05
0.40 0.40 0.40
0.30 0.30 0.30
0.60 0.60 0.60
0.50 0.50 0.50
p 0.25 0.25 0.25
Works
Director of Public Works 0.10 0.10 0.10
Sweeper Operator 1.00 1.00 1.00
0.25 0.25 0.25
Technical Services Supervisor
City Engineer 0.02 0.02 0.02
Total 5.42 5.42 5.42
FUNDING SOURCES
Change
from
Actual Adopted Amended Projected Proposed Adopted
2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2009-10 Change
Storm Water Fund 770,471 864,000 864,000 857,260 1,107,000 243,000 28.1%
Total 770,471 864,000 864,000 857,260 1,107,000 243,000 28.1%
EXPENDITURES
Salaries and Benefits 548,294 623,859 623,859 623,859 639,004 15,145 2.4%
Supplies and Services 198,021 208,045 208,045 208,045 208,045 - 0.0%
Capital Outlay - - - - 250,000 250,000
Debt Service and Other - - - - - -
Total 746,315 831,904 831,904 831,904 1,097,049 265,145 31.9%
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRAINCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-57-
OPERATING DEPARTMENTS -PUBLIC WORKS
Water Quality Control Plant (139)
POSITION BUDGET
Adopted Adopted Proposed
Position Titles 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
Administrative Assistant I 2.20 2.20 2.20
Apprentice Operator 1.00 1.00 1.00
Assistant WQCP
1.00
1.00
1.00
Superintendent
Associate Engineer 1.00 1.00 1.00
Chemist 2.00 2.00 2.00
Director of Public Works 0.25 0.25 0.25
Engineering Technician 0.20 0.20 0.20
Environmental Compliance 1.50 1.50 1.50
Inspector
Lead WQCP Mechanic 2.00 2.00 2.00
Office Specialist 0.80 0.80 0.80
Operator II 13.00 13.00 13.00
Plant Electrician I/II 3.00 3.00 3.00
Plant Mechanic I/ll 6.00 6.00 6.00
Senior Engineer 0.20 0.20 0.20
Senior Environmental 1.00 1.00 1.00
Compliance Inspector
Senior Laboratory Chemist - 1.00 1.00
Superintendent of Water 1.00 1.00 1.00
Quality
Technical Services 0.75 0.75 0.75
Supervisor
Utility Worker 2.00 2.00 2.00
Full-Time Positions 38.90 39.90 39.90
Part-Time
Chemist 0.50 0.50 0.50
WQCP Consultant 0.24 0.24 0.24
Part-Time Positions 0.74 0.74 0.74
Total 39.64 40.64 40.64
FUNDING SOURCES
Change
from
Actual Adopted Amended Projected Proposed Adopted
2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2009-10 Change
Sewer Fund 17,010,055 18,775,738 18,903,776 17,469,677 19,487,622 711,884 3.8%
Total 17,010,055 18,775,738 18,903,776 17,469,677 19,487,622 711,884 3.8%
EXPENDITURES
Salaries and Benefits 4,603,162 4,648,419 4,648,419 4,648,419 4,760,261 111,842 2.4%
Supplies and Services 6,663,919 7,614,319 7,742,357 6,455,181 7,628,887 14,568 0.2%
Capital0utlay 203,000 203,000 203,000 56,000 (147,000 -72.4%
Debt Service and Other 5,742,974 6,310,000 6,310,000 6,163,077 7,042,474 732,474 11.6%
Total 17,010,055 18,775,738 18,903,776 17,469,677 19,487,622 711,884 3.8%
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-58-
OPERATING DEPARTMENTS -LIBRARY
LIBRARY (15)
POSITION BUDGET SUMMARY
Adopted Adopted Proposed
Divisions 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
Administration 5.11 5.11 5.11
Main Library 7.57 7.57 7.57
Grand Ave Library 3.32 3.32 3.32
Literacy Division 7.00 7.00 7.00
Full-Time Positions 23.00 23.00 23.00
Part-Time
Administration 2.54 2.54 2.54
Main Library 9.31 9.31 9.31
Grand Ave Library 1.95 1.95 1.95
Literacy Division 4.01 4.01 4.01
Part-Time Positions 17.81 17.81 17.81
Total 40.81 40.81 40.81
FUNDING SOURCES SUMMARY
Change
from
Actual Adopted Amended Projected Proposed Adopted
2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2009-10 Change
General Fund (net) 4,561,950 4,038,916 4,109,115 4,109,115 4,030,303 (8,613) -0.2%
Fees and Fines 117,317 94,500 94,500 94,500 122,500 28,000 29.6%
Grants 654,215 506,900 577,099 577,099 506,900 - 0.0%
RDA Funds 66,860 66,860 66,860 66,860 66,860 - 0.0%
Total 5,400,342 4,707,176 4,847,574 4,847,574 4,726,563 19,387 0.4%
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
Salaries and Benefits 3,567,514 ;3,267,426 3,272,426 3,272,426 3,276,099 8,673 0.3%
Supplies and Services 1,111,754 865,990 931,189 931,189 876,704 10,714 1.2%
Capital Outlay - - - - - -
Debt Service and Other - - - - - -
Total 4,679,267 4,133,416 4,203,615 4,203,615 4,152,803 19,387 0.5%
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRAPJCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-59-
OPERATING DEPARTMENTS -LIBRARY
Library Administration (151)
POSITION BUDGET
Adopted Adopted Proposed
Position Titles 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
Administrative Assistant I/II 1.00 1.00 1.00
Assistant Library Director 0.80 0.80 0.80
Librarian I/II 0.13 0.13 0.13
Library Assistant I/II 0.38 0.38 0.38
Library Director 1.00 1.00 1.00
Library Program Manager 0.80 0.80 0.80
Management Analyst I 1.00 1.00 1.00
Full-Time Positions 5.11 5.11 5.11
Part-Time
Librarian I 0.13 0.13 0.13
Library Assistant 0.68 0.68 0.68
Library Page 1.73 1.73 1.73
Part-Time Positions 2.54 2.54 2.54
Total 7.65 7.65 7.65
FUNDING SOURCES
Change
from
Actual Adopted Amended Projected Proposed Adopted
2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2009-10 Change
General Fund 1,209,670 '1,155,192 1,155,742 1,155,742 1,184,023 28,831 2.5%
Total 1,209,670 1,155,192 1,155,742 1,155,742 1,184,023 28,831 2.5%
EXPENDITURES
Salaries and Benefits 896,026 846,413 846,413 846,413 870,924 24,511 2.9%
Supplies and Services 313,644 308,779 309,329 309,329 313,099 4,320 1.4%
Capital Outlay - - - - - -
Debt Service and Other - - - - - -
Total 1,209,670 1,155,192 1,155,742 1,155,742 1,184,023 28,831 2.5%
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-60-
OPERATING DEPARTMENTS -LIBRARY
Main Library (152)
POSITION BUDGET
Position Titles Adopted
2008-09 Adopted
2009-10 Proposed
2010-11
Assistant Library Director 0.20 0.20 0.20
Librarian II 2.70 2.70 2.70
Library Assistant 1.62 1.62 1.62
Library Program Manager 3.05 3.05 3.05
Full-Time Positions 7.57 7.57 7.57
Part-Time
Librarian I/II 2.03 2.03 2.03
Library Assistant I/II 2.93 2.93 2.93
Library Clerk 0.31 0.31 0.31
Library Page 4.04 4.04 4.04
Part-Time Positions 9.31 9.31 9.31
Total 16.88 16.88 16.88
FUNDING SOURCES
Change
from
Actual Adopted Amended Projected Proposed Projected
2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2009-10 Change
General Fund 1,653,221 1,483,679 1,497,879 1,497,879 1,465,901 (17,778) -1.2%
Total 1,653,221 1,483,679 1,497,879 1,497,879 1,465,901 (17,778) -12%
EXPENDITURES
Salaries and Benefits 1,231,384 1,1,82,356 1,187,356 1,187,356 1,138,980 (43, 376) -3.7%
Supplies and Services 421,836 301,323 310,523 310,523 326,921 25,598 8.2%
Capital Outlay _ _ _ _ _ _
Debt Service and Other - _ _ _ _ _
Total 1,653,221 1,483,679 1,497,879 1,497,879 1,465,901 (17,778) -12%
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-61 -
OPERATING DEPARTMENTS -LIBRARY
Grand Avenue Library (153)
POSITION BUDGET
Adopted Adopted Proposed
Position Titles 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
Librarian I/II 1.17 1.17 1.17
Library Assistant I/II 1.00 1.00 1.00
Library Program Manager 1.15 1.15 1.15
Full-Time Positions 3.32 3.32 3.32
Part-Time
Librarian II 0.10 0.10 0.10
Library Assistant I/II 1.00 1.00 1.00
Library Page 0.80 0.80 0.80
Local History Specialist 0.05 0.05 0.05
Part-Time Positions 1.95 1.95 1.95
Total 5.27 5.27 5.27
FUNDING SOURCES
Change
from
Actual Adopted Amended Projected Proposed Adopted
2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2009-10 Change
General Fund 550,474 469,815 469,815 469,815 475,901 6,086 1.3%
Total 550,474 469,815 469,815 469,815 475,901 6,086 1.3%
EXPENDITURES
Salaries and Benefits 416,629 367,574 367,574 367,574 375,922 8,348 2.3%
Supplies and Services 133,845 102,241 102,241 102,241 99,979 (2,262) -2.2%
Capital Outlay - - - - -
Debt Service and Other - - - - - -
Total 550,474 469,815 469,815 469,815 475,901 6,086 1.3%
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-62-
OPERATING DEPARTMENTS -LIBRARY
Literacy (154)
POSITION BUDGET
Adopted Adopted Proposed
Position Titles 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
Administrative Assistant I/II 2.00 2.00 2.00
Literacy Program Manager* 2.00 2.00 2.00
Literacy Services Coordinator'' 3.00 3.00 3.00
Full-Time Positions 7.00 7.00 7.00
Part-Time
Library Page 1.34 1.34 1.34
Library Service Coordinator 0.05 0.05 0.05
Literary Services Assistant 1.95 1.95 1.95
Office Assistant 0.67 0.67 0.67
Part-Time Positions 4.01 4.01 4.01
Total 11.01 11.01 11.01
"0.5 FTE Literacy Services Coordinator and 0.1 FTE Literacy Program Manager are charged to RDA
FUNDING SOURCES
Change
from
Actual Adopted Amended Projected Proposed Adopted
2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2009-10 Change
General Fund 1,265,902 1,024,730 1,080,179 1,080,179 1,026,978 2,248 0.2%
RDA Funds 66,860 66,860 66,860 66,860 66,860 - 0.0%
Total 1,332,762 1,091,590 1,147,039 1,147,039 1,093,838 2,248 0.2%
EXPENDITURES
Salaries and Benefits 1,023,474 871,083 871,083 871,083 890,273 19,190 2.2%
Supplies and Services 242,428 153,647 209,096 209,096 136,705 (16,942) -11.0%
Capital Outlay - - - - - -
Debt Service and Other - - - - - -
Total 1,265,902 1,024,730 1,080,179 1,080,179 1,026,978 2,248 0.2%
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-63-
OPERATING DEPARTMENTS -PARKS AND RECREATION
PARKS AND RECREATION (1 ~~)
POSITION BUDGET SUMMARY
Adopted Adopted Proposed
Division 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
Administration 3.75 3.75 3.75
Recreation 19.00 19.00 19.00
Parks Maintenance 20.40 20.40 20.40
Building Maintenance 14.54 14.54 14.54
Common Greens 7.16 7.16 7.16
Full-Time Positions 64.85 64.85 64.85
Part-Time
Administration 0.50 0.50 0.50
Recreation 50.70 50.70 50.70
Part-Time Positions 51.20 51.20 51.20
Tota I 116.05 116.05 116.05
FUNDING SOURCES SUMMARY
Change
from
Actual Adopted Amended Projected Proposed Adopted
2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2009-10 Change
General Fund (net) 7,656,810 6,730,032 6,796,097 6,796,097 6,620,729 (109,303) -1.6%
Program Fees 3,042,900 3,168,699 3,168,699 3,168,699 3,235,726 67,027 2.1%
Grants 153,931 165,500 193,000 193,000 165,500 - 0.0%
Common Greens Funds 1,454,511 1,378,000 1,378,000 1,227,700 1,320,800 (57,200) -4.2%
Total 12,308,151 11,442,231 11,535,796 11,385,496 11,342,755 (99,476) -0.9%
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
Salaries and Benefits 7,998,303 6,820,723 6,847,237 6,847,237 6,799,805 (20,918) -0.3%
Supplies and Services 2,701,407 3,078,008 3,117,560 3,117,560 3,056,650 (21,358) -0.7%
Capital Outlay - - - - - -
Debt Service and Other - - - - - -
Total 10,699,709 9,898,731 9,964,796 9,964,796 9,856,455 (42,276) -0.4%
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-64-
OPERATING DEPARTMENTS -PARKS AND RECREATION
Parks & Recreation Administration (171)
POSITION BUDGET
Position Titles
Adopted ~4dopted Proposed
2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
Administrative Assistant II 1.00 1.00 1.00
Director of Recreation & 0.75 0.75 0.75
Community Services
Office Specialist 1.00 1.00 1.00
Recreation & Community 1.00 1.00 1.00
Service Manager
Full-Time Positions 3.75 3.75 3.75
Part-Time
Cultural Arts Specialist 0.50 0.50 0.50
Part-Time Positions 0.50 0.50 0.50
Total 4.25 4.25 4.25
FUNDING SOURCES
Change
from
Actuaf Adopted Amended Projected Proposed Adopted
2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2009-10 Change
General Fund 853,234 740,547 740,547 740,547 671,003 (69,544) -9.4%
Total 853,234 740,547 740,547 740,547 671,003 (69,544) -9.4%
EXPENDITURES
Salaries and Benefits 605,110 490,724 493,224 493,224 426,551 (64,173) -13.1%
Supplies and Services 248,123 249,823 247,323 247,323 244,452 (5,371) -2.1%
Capital Outlay - - - - _
Debt Service and Other - - - - -
Total 853,234 740,547 740,547 740,547 671,003 (69,544) -9.4%
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-65-
OPERATING DEPARTMENTS -PARKS ANID RECREATION
Recreation (172)
POSITION BUDGET
Adopted Adopted Proposed
Position Titles 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
Office Specialist 1.00 1.00 1.00
Preschool Teacher 5.00 5.00 5.00
Recreation & Community
5.00 5.00 5.00
Services Program Coordinator
Recreation & Community
6.00 6.00 6.00
Services Supervisor
Recreation Leader IV 1.00 1.00 1.00
Van Driver 1.00 1.00 1.00
Full-Time Positions 19.00 19.00 19.00
Part-Time
Community Services Site
Coordinator 2.50 2.50 2.50
Recreation Instructor 5.42 5.42 5.42
Recreation Leader I/II/III/IV'` 42.78 42.78 42.78
Part-Time Positions 50.70 50.70 50.70
Total 69.70 69.70 69.70
*Recreation Leader position includes a Sports Coach position
FUNDING SOURCES
Change from
Actual Adopted Amended Projected Proposed Adopted
2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2009-10 Change
General Fund (net) 1,624,610 928,451 981,467 981,467 811,986 (116,465) -12.5%
Program Fees 3,042,900 3,168,699 3,168,699 3,168,699 3,235,726 67,027 2.1%
Grants 153,931 165,500 193,000 193,000 165,500 - 0.0%
Total 4,821,440 4,262,650 4,343,166 4,343,166 4,213,212 (49,438) -1.2%
EXPENDITURES
Salaries and Benefits 4,035,794 3,443,754 3,459,719 3,459,719 3,406,324 (37,430) -1.1
Supplies and Services 631,716 653,396 690,448 690,448 641,389 (12,007) -1.8%
Capital Outlay - - - - - -
Debt Service and Other - - - - - -
Total 4,667,509 4,097,150 4,150,166 4,150,166 4,047,712 (49,438) -1.2%
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRAINCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-66-
OPERATING DEPARTMENTS -PARKS AND RECREATION
Parks Maintenance (173)
POSITION BUDGET
Position Titles
Adopted
2008-09
Adopted
2009-10
Proposed
2010-11
Administrative Assistant I/II 0.25 0.25 0.25
Director of Recreation &
0.15
0.15
0.15
Community Services
Groundsperson 1.30 1.30 1.30
Lead Park Maintenance Worker 1.85 1.85 1.85
Park Maintenance Worker* 10.85 10.85 10.85
Public Works Supervisor 1.60 1.60 1.60
Senior Engineer 0.10 0.10 0.10
Senior Park Maintenance Worker 1.90 1.90 1.90
Superintendent of Parks & 0.10 0.1A 0.10
Facilities
Tree Trimmer 2.30 2.30 2.30
Total 20.40 20.40 20.40
*1.0 FTE Park Maintenance Worker is charged to RDA
FUNDING SOURCES
Change
from
Actual Adopted Amended Projected Proposed Adopted
2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2009-10 Change
General Fund 3,035,266 3,003,082 3,008,082 3,008,082 3,053,110 50,028 1.7%
RDA Funds 91,889 89,902 89,902 89,903 92,419 2,517 2.8%
Total 3,127,155 3,092,984 3,097,984 3,097,985 3,145,529 52,545 1.7%
EXPENDITURES
Salaries and Benefits 2,049,466 1,856,600 1,856,600 1,856,600 1,902,768 46,168 2.5%
Supplies and Services 985,800 1,146,482 1,151,482 1,151,482 1,150,342 3,860 0.3%
Capital Outlay - - - - - -
Debt Service and Other - - - - - -
Total 3,035,266 3,003,082 3,008,082 3,008,082 3,053,110 50,028 1.7%
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-67-
OPERATING DEPARTMENTS -PARKS AND I~ECREATION
Building Maintenance (174)
POSITION BUDGET
Adopted Adopted Proposed
Position Titles 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
Administrative Assistant I/II 0.34 0.34 0.34
Building Maintenance 2 00 2.00 2.00
Craftsworker
Building Maintenance 6.00 6.00 6.00
Custodian
Director of Recreation & 0.10 0.10 0.10
Community Services
Lead Building Maintenance 2 00 2.00 2.00
Custodian
Public Works Supervisor
0.90
0.90
0.90
Senior Building Maintenance 3.00 3.00 3.00
Custodian
Senior Engineer
0.10
0.10
0.10
Superintendent of Parks & 0.10 0.10 0.10
Facilities
Total 14.54 14.54 14.54
FUNDING SOURCES Change
from
Actual Adopted Amended Projected Proposed Adopted
2008-09 200910 200910 2009-10 2010-11 2009-10 Chan
General Fund 2,143,701 2,057,952 2,066,001 2,066,001 2,084,630 26>678 1.3%
630
084 678
26 1.3%
701
143
2 2,057,952 2,066,001 2,066,001 ,
2, ,
Total ,
,
EXPENDITURES
Salaries and Benefits 1,307,932 1,029,645 1,037,694
307
8 1,037,694
307
028
1 1,064,162
467
020
1 34,517
(7,840) 3.4%
-0.8%
Supplies and Services 835,768 1,028,307 ,
1,02 ,
, ,
,
Capital Outlay - - _ _ -
Debt Service and Other - -
630
084
678
26
1.3%
701
143
2 952
057
2 2,066,001 2,066,001 ,
2, ,
Tntal ,
, ,
,
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FFZANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-68-
OPERATING DEPARTMENTS -PARKS AND RECREATION
Common Greens (174)
POSITION BUDGET
Position Titles
Adopted Adopted Proposed
2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
Administrative Assistant I/II
Groundsperson
Maintenance Crafstworker
Park Maintenance Worker
Senior Park Maintenance Worker
Public Works Supervisor
Senior Engineer
Superintendent of Parks &
Facilities Maintenance
Superintendent of Public Works
Tree Trimmer
0.46 0.46 0.46
0.70 0.70 0.70
2.00 2.00 2.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
0.10 0.10 0.10
0.90 0.90 0.90
0.25 0.25 0.25
0.80 0.80 0.80
0.25 0.25 0.25
0.70 0.70 0.70
Total 7.16 7.16 7.16
FUNDING SOURCES Change
from
Actual Adopted Amended Projected Proposed Adopted
2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2009-10 Change
Common Greens Funds 1,454,511 1,378,000 1,378,000 1,227,700 1,320,800 (57,200) -4.2%
Total 1,454,511 1,378,000 1,378,000 1,227,700 1,320,800 (57,200) -4.2%
EXPENDITURES
Salaries and Benefits 806,754 838,840 838,840 838,840 866,915 28,075 3.3%
0%
0
Supplies and Services 700,573 721,492 721,492 .
721,492 721,492 =
Capital Outlay 13,627 - - - _ -
Debt Service and Other
Transfer to other Funds -
127,705 -
160,000 -
779,231 -
753,969 - (160,000) -100.0%
7%
925) -7
407 (131
588
301 1
Total 1,648,659 1,720,332 2,339,563 .
,
,
,
2,314,
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-69-
This page is intentionally left blank.
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-70-
REDVELOPMENT AGENCY
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FIUNDS
Merged Redevelopment Project Area Funds
Summary of Revenues and Expenditures
Change
From
Actual Adopted Amended Projected Proposed Adopted
REVENUES 2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2009-10 Change
Gross Tax Increment Allocated
Gateway 9,472,670 8,283,877 8,678,604 9,171,930 9,170,000 886,123 10.7%
Shearwater 7,528,236 5,693,104 5,619,273 5,715,005 5,720,000 26,896 0.5%
Downtown 20,625,269 16,063,163 18,989,346 19,518,719 19,520,000 3,456,837 21.5%
Downtown Annex 30,278 30,278 63,090 63,086 60,000 29,722 98.2%
EI Camino 3,797,658 2,476,895 3,778,806 4,278,009 4,280,000 1,803,105 72.8%
EI Camino Annex 244,218 203,538 290,361 290,206 290,000 86,462 42.5%
Subtotal Tax Increment Allocation 41,698,328 32,750,854 37,419,480 39,036,956 39,040,000 6,289,146 19.2%
Adjustments: Other Appeals & Settlements (711,314) (300,000) (300,000) (500,000) (500,000) (200,000) 66.7%
Adjustments: CountyAdmin & Other (272,964) (327,509) (374,195) (934,143) (1,000,000) (672,491) 205.3%
Supplemental ERAF (8,519,894) (8,528,106) (905,210) (905,210)
Rent 135,566 105,000 105,000 93,700 100,000 (5,000) -4.8%
Interest & Other 1,007,612 1,100,000 1,100,000 677,244 700,000 (400,000) -36.4%
TOTAL SOURCES OF FUNDS 41,857,228 32,917,032 29,430,391 29,845,650 37,434,790 4,517,757 13.7%
EXPENDITURES
Redevelopment Activities 4,112,168 4,840,642 4,840,642 4,840,642 5,597,238 756,596 15.6%
Prior Year Tax Adjustment - - - - - -
CapitalOutlay 23,584 53,000 53,000 53,000 - (53,000) -100.0%
Debt Service 5,115,751 5,111,449 5,111,449 5,111,449 5,101,261 (10,188) -0.2%
Special Projects 517,893 900,000 900,000 900,000 1,000,000 100,000 11.1%
County Settlement 1,027,594 - - - - -
Transfers to Low/Moderate Income 8,214,709 6,550,171 7,423,896 7,378,194 7,808,000 1,257,829 19.2%
Housing Fund
Pass Through Payments to Taxing Entities
Gateway 1,207,746 490,618 533,427 583,427 580,000 89,382 18.2%
Shearwater 2,186,274 1,673,990 1,820,053 1,820,053 1,820,000 146,010 8.7%
Downtown 4,600,270 3,760,550 4,088,674 4,138,674 4,140,000 379,450 10.1%
EI Camino 322,865 274,256 298,186 348,186 350,000 75,744 27.6%
Subtotal Pass Through Payments 8,317,155 6,199,414 6,740,340 6,890,340 6,890,000 690,586 11.1%
Capital Proiects
Tax Increment-Funded Projects, Current 6,896,782 6,415,000 6,415,000 2,106,699 3,100,000 (3,315,000) -51.7%
Tax Increment Carryovers from Prior Year - 6,227,618 3,771,011 - 7,442,442 1,214,824 19.5%
Subtotal, Capital Projects 6,896,782 12,642,618 10,186,011 2,106,699 10,542,442 (2,100,176) -16.6%
TOTAL USES OF FUNDS 34,225,636 36,297,294 35,255,338 27,280,324 36,938,941 641,647 1.8%
Excess of Revenues over / (under) 7,631,592 (3,380,262) (5,824,947) 2,565,326 495,849 3,876,110
Expenditures
Fund Balance 52,274,146 51,647,396 46,449,199 54,839,472 55,335,320 3,687,925 -5.3%
Reserved for Loans Receivable 487,1fi5 - - 792,155 1,292,155 1,292,155
Designated for Capital Projects 1,435,2E>5 - - 16,188,579 - -
Reserved for Advances to Other Funds 14,717,778 - 15,744,223 15,744,223 15,744,223
Loan Payoff - - - - - -
Designated for ERAF shift - - - - - -
Designated for Pending Property Tax 8,416,485 - - 905,210 -
-
Refund
Reserved for Encumbrances 866,891 - - - - -
Unreserved / Undesignated Fund 35,183,776 - - 21,209,305 38,298,943
Balance
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-71 -
REDVELOPMENT AGENCY
RCIA Bonds Fund
Summary of Earnings and Uses
Change
From
Actual Adopted Amended Projected Proposed Adopted
BOND FUNDS 2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2009-10 Change
Interest 1,460,954 1,600,000 1,600,000 1,600,000 1,200,000 (400,000) -25.0%
TOTAL SOURCES OF FUNDS 1,460,954 1,600,000 1,600,000 1,600,000 1,200,000 (400,000) -25.0%
ucF nF RnND FUNDS
Capital Projects, Carryover from _ 4,102,924 4,102,924 - 8,746,137 4,643,213
Prior Year
Capital Projects, Current
3,734,718
4,000,000
4,000,000
3,282,847
1,500,000
(2,500,000)
Total, Capital Projects 3,734,718 8,102,924 8,102,924 3,282,847 10,246,137 2,143,213 26.4%
Advances, Actual 490,444 - - 1,026,445 - -
TOTAL USES OF FUNDS 4,225,162 8,102,924 8,102,924 4,309,292 10,246,137 2,143,213 26.4%
Excess of Bond Funds over / (under)
Uses of Funds (2,764,208) (6,502,924) (6,502,924) (2,709,292) (9,046,137) -
PriorYear Adjustment 554,164 - - - - -
Bond Funds, Balance After 25,421,434 10,025,881 - 22,712,143 13,666,005 -
Actual Advances
Less Committed Bond Funds 19,004,422 - - 18,526,005 9,779,867 -
Uncommitted Bond Funds, End 6,417,012 - - 4,186,138 3,886,138 -
of Year, After All Advances
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-72-
REDVELOPMENT AGENCY
Low & Moderate Housing Fund
Summary of Revenue and Expenditures
Change
From
Actual Adopted Amended Projected Proposed Adopted
REVENUES 2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2009-10 Change
Transfers In from Redevelopment 8,214,709 6,550,171 7,423,896 7,378,194 7,808,000 1,257,829 19.2%
Project Areas
Interest & Other
563,990
300,000
300,000
355,000
300,000
-
0.0%
Misc. Revenue /Rent 2,055,347 100,000 100,000 134,000 100,000 - 0.0%
TOTAL REVENUES 10,834,046 6,950,171 7,823,896 7,867,194 8,208,000 1,257,829 18.1%
USES OF FUNDS
Program Expenditures 982,304 2,681,806 2,681,806 2,681,806 2,192,738 (489,068) -18.2%
Capital Outlay & Special Projects - 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 2,000,000 500,000 33.3%
County Settlement
Debt Service - -
279,723 345,431 - -
345,431 345,431 -
347,117 -
1,686
0.5%
Housing Capital Projects (TI-funded) - _ 6,631,224 6,631,224 - 1,000,000 (5,631,224) -84.9%
NEW
Housing Capital Projects (TI-funded) _ _ _ - 6,631,224 6,631,224
Carried Over from Prior Year
Housing Capital Projects (Bond-
funded)
TOTAL USES OF FUNDS 1,262,027 11,158,461 11,158,461 4,527,237 12,171,079 9,896,434 88.7%
Excess of Revenues over / (under) g 572,019 (4,208,290) (4,208,290) 3,339,957 (3,963,079) 245,211
Expenditures
Fund Balance 31,274,469 22,235,873 27,066,179 34,614,426 30,651,347 8,415,474 37.8%
Loan Commitments to Mid Pen/Other 1,026,632 - - 1,026,632 1,026,632 -
Carryover Capital Projects 5,131,224 -• - 6,631,224 -
Loans Receivable 9,089,257 - - 9,545,801 11,545,801 -
Land Held for Redevelopment 1,900,000 •• - 1,900,000 1,900,000 -
Bond Funds, End of Year 2,271,260 •- - 2,271,260 2,271,260 -
All Other Reserved Funds 89,377 •- - 89,377 - -
Unreserved / Undesignated Fund 11,766,720 - - 13,150,132 13,907,654 -
Balance
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-73-
REDVELOPMENT AGENCY
Low & Moderate Housing Fund
Information Only: Planning and Administrative Budget
Conformance with Health and Safety Code
(Refer to Budget Adoption Resolution)
The Housing Fund obtains funding through the transfer of 20% of the proceeds of property tax increment from each of
the Redevelopment Project areas, as required by State Redevelopment Law. The Health and Safety Code Section
33334.3(d) states that it is the intent of the State Legislature that Housing Funds be used to the fullest extent possible
toward the production, improvement, or preservation of affordable housing, with planning and administrative
expenditures kept at reasonable levels. The following identifies the total planning and administrative costs included in
the proposed 2010-11 budget. As part of the budget adoption resolution, the City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Board certify that the costs shown here are not an unreasonable amount to be spent on planning and administrative
expenses, and that these costs are necessary to incur in order to foster the production, improvement, or preservation
of affordable housing.
Low/Moderate Housing Funds, 2010-11
8,208,000
Of
Low Mod
Proposed Housing
2010-11 Funds
Program Staff Costs: 69,184 0.8%
Advertising, Printing, Supplies, Meetings, Insurance
and Other Support Costs 19,000 0.2%
Legal, Financial, Computer, Human ResourcE;, and
Other City Administrative Support for Housing: 324,662 4.0%
Debt Service 347,117 4.2%
All Other Planning and Administrative Costs: 704,812 8.6%
Total Costs, not directly providing housing: 1,464,775 17.8%
* Legal, accounting, budget, human resources, utilities, computer, and building maintenance support costs
provided to the Housing Fund.
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-74-
PROPRIETARY FUNDS
PROPRIETARY FUNDS
Sewer Enterprise Fund
Summary of Revenues and Expenditures
Change
from
Actual ,Adopted Amended Projected Proposed Adopted
REVENUES 2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2009-10 Change
SSF Service Charge Revenue
Other Agency Share of O&M
Expenses
Other Agency CIP
Reimbursement
Other Agency Loan Payment
Reimbursement
Developer Contributions
Grants &CIP Contributions from
15,028,215 17,784,000 17,784,000 17,378,000 18,210,000 426,000 2.4%
3,998,179 3,900,225 3,900,225 3,944,037 4,348,863 448,638 11.5%
71,524 161,520 161,520 1,027,706 - (161,520) -100.0%
1,245,492 1,245,492 1,245,492 1,245,492 1,327,685 82,193 6.6%
5,631,088 - 2,669 - - -
188,006 406,500 406,500 61,699 29,620 (376,880) -92.7%
Others
Interest/Other Income
282,689
200,000 200,000 278,554
130,000
(70,000) -35.0%
32
7%
Transfers In 1,194,095 214,000 275,603 1,500,646 284,000 .
70,000
Debt Proceeds* 2,508,929 3,048,076 7,200,000 7,200,000
Total Revenues and Other 30,148,217 23,911,737 23,976,009 28,484,210 31,530,168 7,618,431 31.9%
Sources of Funding:
EXPENDITURES
Operating Expenses 12,784,223 13,769,823 13,897,861 12,610,685 14,006,837 237,014 1.7%
11
6%
Debt Service 5,742,974 6,310,000 6,310,000 6,163,077 7,042,474 732,474 .
Developer Contribution Refund"
616
369
7
278
773
2
7,859,480
5,612,516 2,000,000
6,958,000 2,000,000
4,184,722
150.9%
CIP Expenditures
Transfers Out ,
,
42,119 ,
,
36,000 611,308 350,150 30,000 (6,000) -16.7%
Total Expenditures 25,938,932 22,889,101 28,678,649 24,736,428 30,037,311 7,148 210 31.2%
Net Income 4,209,285 1,022,636 (4,702,640) 3,747,782 1,492,858 470,222 46.0%
354
3 212
256
10
Total Fund Balance 5,015,573 ,
8,76 ,
,
Rate Stabilization Reserve and 4,971,538 - - 5,378,538 6,010,799 6,010,799
the State Required Reserves
Other Reserves 266,585 - - - -
Undesignated Reserve, End (222,550) - - 3,384,816 4,245,413 4,245,413
of Year
The Sewer Fund consists of the Water Quality Control Plant Division, the Sewer Maintenance Division, and planned sewer
capital project expenses.
* The 2010-11 budget assumes $7.2 million in new bond proceeds to fund various CIP upgrade projects at the Water Quality
Control Plant. By the time the bond sale is ready to proceed, staff and City Council will need to evaluate the likelihood of
additional bonds that may be required for green energy projects at the Water Quality Control Plant.
^ Most of these large developer funded sewer projects are now completed for less cost than originally anticipated.
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-75-
PROPRIETARY FUNDS
Storm Water Fund
Summary of Revenues and Expenditures
Change
from
Actual Adopted Amended Projected Proposed Adopted
REVENUES 2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2009-10 Change
Service Charges 419,246 414,000 414,000 411,260 411,000 (3,000) -0.7%
Transfer In from Gas Taxes 250,000 445,000 445,000 445,000 445,000 - 0.0%
Transfer In from General Fund 100,000 - - - 250,000 250,000
Interest and Other 1,225 5,000 5,000 1,000 1,000 (4,000) -80.0%
Total Revenues 770,471 864,000 864,000 857,260 1,107,000 243,000 28.1
EXPENDITURES
Operating Expenses 746,315 831,904 831,904 831,904 847,049 15,145 1.8%
Storm Water Regulations - - - - 250,000 250,000
Total Expenditures 746,315 831,904 831,904 831,904 1,097,049 265,145 31.9%
Net Income 24,155 32,096 32,096 25,356 9,951 (22,145) -69.0%
Fund Balance 94,584 126,680 126,680 119,940 129,891 3,211 2.5%
Without a Proposition 218 vote, the Storm Water Fund has a capped revenue stream. With the cost of this service
continuing to increase, starting in Fiscal Year 2006-07, the Gas Tax fund began to supplement the Storm Water fund.
Since 2006-07, the supplement provided by the Gas Tax fund has more than doubled (from $200,000 per year in FY
2006-07 to $445,000 per year in FY 2009-10). E3eginning in FY 2008-09 the General Fund also started to supplement
the Storm Water Fund. While no new General f=und revenues were required to supplement this fund in FY 2009-10,
new storm water regulations will require that $250,000 in additional General Fund contributions will be required
beginning in FY 2010-11.
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRAINCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-76-
PROPRIETARY FUNDS
Parlking District Fund
Summary of Revenues and Expenditures
Change
from
Actual Adopted Amended Projected Proposed Adopted
REVENUES 2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2009-10 Change
Parking Fees 606,847 515,000 515,000 515,000 525,000 10,000 1.9%
Interest and Other 12,431 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 - 0.0%
Total Revenues 619,278 527,000 527,000 527,000 537,000 10,000 1.9%
EXPENDITURES
__
Employee Services 204,937 206,.513 206,522 206,522 213,391 6,878 3.3%
Supplies and Services 119,615 181,807 182,132 182,132 181,798 (9) 0.0%
Total Expenditures 341,101 388,320 388,654 388,654 395,189 6,869 1.8%
Net Income 278,177 138,680 138,346 138,346 141,811 3,131 2.3%
Advances from RDA 490,444 9,062,676 9,062,676 10,592,312 9,565,867
Undesignated Fund 126,610 471,812 471,478 171,478 176,680
Eauitv
* Net of Fixed Assets
The Parking District is borrowing funds from thie Redevelopment Agency for a period of up to 20 years to pay for a
new Parking Garage on Miller Avenue. RDA will be paid back from parking permit and parking meter revenues,
which will need to be raised overtime to pay for the loan costs.
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRAr\ICISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-77-
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
iGas Tax Fund
Summary of Revenues and Expenditures
Change
from
Actual Adopted Amended Projected Proposed Adopted
REVENUES 2008-t19 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2009-10 Change
Gas Tax 968,732 - - 1,050,000 994,535 994,535
Traffic Congestion Relief (Proposition 42 541,923 545,000 545,000 537,000 570,000 25,000 4.6%
Replacement)
City/County Association of Governments 110,066 110,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 - 0.0%
(CICAG)
Prop 1 B State Grant 930,841 - - - -
Federal Stimulus Grant (ARRA) 1,001,000 1,001,000 1,001,000 - (1,001,000) -100.0%
Interest/Other Income 54,455 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 - 0.0%
Total Revenues 2,606,018 1,686,000 1,686,000 2,728,000 1,704,535 18,535 1.1%
EXPENDITURES
Transfer Out to General Fund for Street 536,0(10 536,000 536,000 536,000 553,000 17,000 3.2%
Maintenance/General Engineering
Transfers Out to General Fund for 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 155,000 5,000 3.3%
Congestion Relief
Transfer Out to Sewer Fund 15,131 - - - - -
Transfer Out to Storm Water Fund 250,000 445,000 445,000 445,000 445,000 - 0.0%
Transfers Out to CIP Funds 1,038,004 1,001,000 2,740,782 2,740,782 1,446,000 445,000 44.5%
Total Expenditures 1,989,135 2,132,000 3,871,782 3,871,782 2,599,000 467,000 17.9 ~°
Net Income 616,8!32 (446,000) - (1,143,782) (894,465) (448,465) 100.6%
Total Fund Balance 2,802,143 - - 1,658,362 763,897 763,897
Gas Tax and Propositions 42 replacement funding and 1 B funding are distributed by the State of California and used for street and
related improvements.
Prop. 42 revenues are a share of the State's portion of sales taxes on gasoline for transportation projects.
The C/CAG funding is from fees on motor vehicles to be used for traffic congestion and storm water pollution relief.
Prop. 1B revenues are proceeds from State bonds for improvements to streets and roadways.
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-78-
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
N'leasure A Fund
Summary of Revenues and Expenditures
Change
from
Actual Adopted Amended Projected Proposed Adopted
REVENUES 2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2009-10 Change
Measure A Sales Tax 1,005,404 927,000 927,000 850,000 765,000 (162,000) -17.5%
Interest/Other Income 27,579 37,200 37,200 15,000 10,000 (27,200) -73.1
Total Revenues 1,032,983 964,200 964,200 865,000 775,000 (189,200) -19.6%
EXPENDITURES
Transfer Out to General Fund
Transfers Out to CIP Fund for
Street Improvement Projects
Transfer Out to Sewer Fund
475,527 1,018,000 1,375,432 1,375,432 940,000 (78,000) -7.7%
100,000 - - - - -
Total Expenditures 575,527 1,018,004 1,375,432 1,375,432 940,000 (78,000) -7.7%
Net Income 457,456 (53,800) - (510,432) (165,000) (111,200) 206.7%
Total Fund Balance 1,112,824 - - 602,392 437,392 437,392
Measure A sales tax revenues are distributed by the County of San Mateo to be used for road and traffic improvements
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-79-
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
Community Development Block Grant Fund
Summary of Revenues and Expenditures
Change
from
Actual Adopted Amended Projected Proposed Adopted
REVENUES 2008-0~! 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2009-10 Change
CDBG Entitlement 584,788 601,729 601,729 601,729 651,456 49,727 8.3%
HOME Investment Partnership 16,175 13,000 25,515 25,515 12,000 (1,000) -7.7%
ARRA Funding (Stimulus Grant) 161,564 161,564 -
Interest /Other Income 15,015 158,800 106,000 106,000 30,000 (128,800) -81.1%
Program Income
Prior Year Allocation Carry-over 92,426 92,426 92,426 100,000 7,574 8.2%
Total Revenues 615,978 865,955 987,234 987,234 793,456 (72,499) -8.4%
EXPENDITURES
CDBG Program Expenditures 547,963 805,706 772,064 772,064 747,207 (58,499) -3.2%
ARRA Expenditures 161,564 161,564 - -100.0%
Transfers Out -General Fund 33,249 34,249 34,249 34,249 34,249 -
Transfers Out -Capital Projects -
New Loans -
Total Expenditures 581,212 839,955 967,877 967,877 781,456 (58,499) -19.3%
Net Income 34,766 26,000 19,357 19,357 12,000 (14,000) -53.8%
Total Fund Balance 1,659,651 1,650,884 1,679,008 1,679,008 1,691,008
Reserved for Encumbrances 19,158 - - 20,000 - -
Reserved for Loans Receivable 1,347,746 1,230,327 1,230,327 1,230,327 1,200,327 -
Advances to Other Funds 346,748 346,748 346,748 346,748 346,748 -
Designated for CDBG Programs * (54,002) 73,809 101,933 81,933 143,933 70,124 95.0%
"Negative fund balance reflects lag in funding from CDBG (reimbursement basis).
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-80-
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
Common Greens Maintenance Districts Funds
Summar`,r of Revenues and Expenditures
Change
from
Actual Adopted Amended Projected Proposed Adopted
REVENUES 2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2009-10 Change
Property Taxes West Park 1&2/Trfs 812,3611 435,000 435,000 370,000 399,900 (35,100) -8.1%
Property Taxes West Park 3/Trfs 1,108,33x' 662,000 662,000 607,500 653,000 (9,000) -1.4%
Property Taxes Stonegate Rdg/Trfs (753,014) 236,000 236,000 207,300 222,600 (13,400) -5.7%
Property Taxes Willow Gardens/Trfs 286,82,' 45,000 45,000 42,900 45,300 300 0.7%
Total Revenues 1,454,5111 1,378,000 1,378,000 1,227,700 1,320,800 (57,200) -4.2%
EXPENDITURES
West Park 1 &2 545,42<3 565,162 565,162 565,162 574,951 9,789 1.7%
West Park 3 681,282 768,360 768,360 768,360 782,430 14,070 1.8%
Stonegate Ridge 193,312 177,391 177,391 177,391 181,105 3,714 2.1
Willow Gardens 100,937' 49,419 49,419 49,419 49,921 502 1.0%
Total Maintenance Expenditures 1,520,954 1,560,332 1,560,332 1,560,332 1,588,407 28,075 1.8%
Transfers Out to CIP 127,70Ei 160,000 779,231 753,969 - (160,000) -100.0%
Total Expenditures 1,648,659 1,720,332 2,339,563 2,314,301 1,588,407 (131,925) -7.7%
Net Income (194,148) (342,332) (961,563) (1,086,601) (267,607) 74,725 -21.8%
Designated for Common Greens
Maintenance and Capital
_Improvements 1,877,52.! - - 790,921 523,314 (287,995)
Revenues have been reduced by $111,093 in FY .?009-10 to reflect the State borrowing of property taxes. The State will repay
these funds with 2% interest by June 30, 2013.
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-81-
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
Sr~lid Waste Fund
Summary of Revenues and Expenditures
Change
from
Actual Adopted Amended Projected Proposed Adopted
REVENUES 2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2009-10 Change
Franchise Fee Revenue 173,325 173,325 173,325 173,325 173,325 - 0.0%
Total Revenues 173,325 173,325 173,325 173,325 173,325 - 0.0%
EXPENDITURES
Operating Expenditures 66,574 139,000 203,491 89,000 129,570 (9,430) -6.8%
Transfers Out to Capital 45,138 - 51,876 51,876 - -
Improvement Fund
Total Expenditures 111,712 '139,000 255,367 140,876 129,570 (9,430) -6.8%
Net Income 61,613 34,325 (82,042) 32,449 43,755 9,430 27.5%
Fund Balance 741,025 Ii49,048 658,983 773,474 817,229 168,181 25.9%
The Solid Waste Fund is funded from a portiion of the Solid Waste Franchise Fees received from the South
San Francisco Scavenger Company. Funding is used to pay for monitoring and remediation costs associated
with the closed Oyster Point landfill.
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-82-
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
Miscellaneous Special Revenue Funds
Summary of Revenues and Expenditures
Commute Total
Day in Reduction Proposed
REVENUES the Park Programs 2010-11
Donations 50,000 6,500 56,500
Raffle Ticket Sales 30,000 - 30,000
Total Revenues 80,000 6,500 86,500
EXPENDITURES
Day in the Park
Downtown Dasher
80,000 - 80,000
- 6,500 6,500
Total Expenditures 80,000 6,500 86,500
Net Income
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-83-
CITY SERVICE FUNDS
CITY SERVICE FUNDS
Vehicle Maintenance (City Garage) Fund
Summary of Revenues and Expenditures
Change
From
Actual Adopted Amended Projected Proposed Adopted
REVENUES 2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2009-10 Change
Charges to Departments 1,431,148 1,4113,384 1,413,384 1,442,250 1,398,352 (15,032) -1.1
Interest & Other Income - - - - - -
Charges to Other Agencies - - - 3,000 - -
Total Revenues 1,431,148 1,413,384 1,413,384 1,445,250 1,398,352 (15,032) -1.1%
EXPENDITURES
Salaries and Benefits 600,152 :102,993 502,993 502,993 537,961 34,968 7.0%
Supplies and Services 820,286 910,391 922,157 922,157 860,391 (50,000) -5.5%
Capital Outlay - 20,100 20,100 20,100 (20,100) -100.0%
Total Expenditures 1,420,438 1,433,484 1,445,250 1,445,250 1,398,352 (35,132) -2.5%
Revenues (under) /over 10,710 (20,100) (31,866) - - -
Expenditures
Undesignated Reserve 10,886 - - 10,886 10,886 -
End of Year
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-84-
CITY SERVICE FUNDS
Equipment Replacement Fund
Summary of Revenues and Expenditures
Change
from
Actual Adopted Amended Projected Proposed Adopted
REVENUES 2008-(19 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2009-10 Change
Equipment 355,54:5 387,686 387,686 382,726 387,686 - 0.0%
Vehicles 477,600 468,068 468,068 470,925 468,068 - 0.0%
Sale of Real/Personal Property 61,6610 27,656 -
Lease Proceeds 280,000 280,000 - 1,680,000 1,400,000 500.0%
Interest & Other Income 63,90;5 56,000 56,000 50,000 50,000 (6,000) -10.7%
Total Revenues 958,710 1,191,754 1,191,754 931,307 2,585,754 1,394,000 117.0%
EXPENDITURES
Vehicle Replacement 659,543 237,000 237,000
Equipment Replacement 151,286 481,500 591,500
Lease Purchase (Vehicles) 280,000 280,000
Transfer Out to Capital Improvement 124,985 - 215,377
Fund
Transfer Out to General Fund
200,177 397,000 160,000 67.5%
786,562 300,000 (181,500) -37.7%
- 1,680,000 1,400,000 500.0%
215,377
19,736
Total Expenditures 935,814 998,500 1,323,877 1,221,852 2,377,000 1,378,500 138.1%
Revenues (under) /over expenditures 22,896 193,254 (132,123) (290,545) 208,754 15,500 8.0%
Undesignated Reserve * 2,282,801 1,702,257 1,521,011 1,521,011
The Equipment Replacement Fund is used to accumulate funds for replacement of equipment and vehicles. Departments are
charged an annual replacement charge to cover future needs.
* Adjusted for net effects of depreciation and transfer of assets to balance sheet for CAFR.
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-85-
CITY SERVICE FUNDS
Vehicle and C)ther Equipment Purchases
FY 2010-11
Estimated
Replacement
Vehicle/Equipment to be
Department Division Tag # Replaced Cost in 10-11 Replacement Information
Police Canine 14 2004 Crowri Victoria 30,000 Replace with new Patrol Vehicle
Police Patrol 18 2006 Crown Victoria 30,000 Replace with new Patrol Vehicle
Police Traffic 41 2002 Kawasaki KZ1000 25,000 Replace with new Motorcycle
Police Traffic 44 1997 Kawasaki KZ1000 25,000 Replace with new Motorcycle
Fire ALS 125 2000 Chevy Lumina 30,000 Replace with Hybrid Escape
Code
Fire Enforcement 241 2000 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up 30,000 Replace with Hybrid Escape
Code
Fire Enforcement 242 2000 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up 30,000 Replace with Hybrid Escape
Fire Suppression 508 1996 Simon-Duplex Quint 560,000 Lease Purchase new Quint
Fire Suppression 513 1992 Spartan Pumper 560,000 Lease Purchase new Quint
Fire ALS 515 2006 Ford E450 Rescue ALS 280,000 Lease Purchase new Ambulance
Fire ALS 516 2006 Ford E450 Rescue ALS 280,000 Lease Purchase new Ambulance
Parks Park
Maintenance
256 1999 GMC 1500 Pick-Up
25,000
Replace with 1.5 Ton new Pick-Up
Streets and
Parks Medians 257 1998 GMG Sonoma Pick-Up 20,000 Replace with Ford Ranger
Parks Park
Maintenance
306 1991 GMC Dump Truck
45,000
Replace with F550 Dump Truck
Park
Parks Maintenance 614 97 Toro Gang Mower 92,000 Replace with new Mower
Public Works Street
Maintenance
734 Pump
15,000
Replace with a 4-inch Pump
Total, Equipment Replacement Fund: 2,077,000
Other Funds: (Budgeted in Sewer Fund)
Water Quality WQCP Admin 203 1994 Cheery Astro Van 20,000 Replace with Ford Ranger
Water Quality WQCP Admin 230 1995 GMC; Safari Van 15,000 Replace with new Van
Water Quality WQCP Admin 263 2000 CHE:VY 2500 Pick-Up 21,000 Replace with new Pick-Up
Total, Other Funds: 56,000
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-86-
CITY SERVICE FUNDS
Deferred Vehicle Replacements
FY 2010-11
Estimated
Vehicle Replacement
Department Division Tag # Deferred Purchases Cost in 10-11
Building Building Inspection 113 2001 Chevy Malibu 20,000
Common Greens West Park 1&2 Maintenance 271 2001 Silverado 2500 Service Body 35,000
Fire Fire Admin 109 2001 Chevy Malibu 20,000
Fire Fire Prevention 517 2005 Ford Expedition 4x4 35,000
IT Information Tech 122 1992 Chevy Astro Van 20,000
Library Project Read Grants 906 Ford E450 Book Mobile 80,000
Parks Park Maintenance 269 2001 Chevy 3500HD Flatbed 40,000
Parks Park Maintenance 272 2001 Chevy 2500HD Service Body 35,000
Police Investigation 133 2008 Ford Fusion 28,000
Police Investigation 136 2006 Ford 500 30,000
Police Patrol 2 2008 Crown Victoria 30,000
Police Patrol 6 2008 Crown Victoria 30,000
Police Patrol 11 2008 Crown Victoria 30,000
Police Traffic 42 2003 Kawasaki KZ1000 25,000
Parks MSB Maintenance 244 2001 Chevy 2500 Pick-Up 20,000
Streets Sewer Maintenance 236 2001 Chevy 3500 Service Body 40,000
Streets Traffic Markings 207 2001 Chevy 3500 Service Body 40,000
Total, Equipment Replacement Fund, Deferred Vehicles: 558,000
Other Funds:
Water Quality WQCP Admin 252 2001 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up 20,000
Total, Other Funds, Deferred Vehicles: 20,000
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRAINCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-87-
CITY SERVICE FUNDS
Information Technology Fund
Summary of Revenues and Expenditures
Change
from
Actual Adopted Amended Projected Proposed Adopted
REVENUES 2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2009-10 Change
Charges to Departments'` 1,301,057 1,300,492 1,300,492 1,300,492 1,354,710 54,219 4.2%
Telephone Maintenance^ 44,024 44,110 44,110 44,110 44,110 - 0.0%
Charges to Other Agencies 53,290 8,000 8,000 63,000 25,000 17,000 212.5%
PEG Revenue 50,162 50,000 50,000 40,000 40,000 (10,000) -20.0%
Transfers in for GIS 114,683 - 117,834 117,834 - -
Total Revenues 1,563,216 1,402,602 1,520,435 1,565,435 1,463,820 61,219 4.4%
EXPENDITURES
Salaries and Benefits 773,376 713,762 711,369 711,369 706,308 (7,454) -1.0%
Supplies and Services 628,890 644,252 800,211 800,211 643,945 (307) 0.0%
Telephone Maintenance 44,024 44,110 44,110 44,110 44,110 - 0.0%
GIS expenses 4,200 - 117,834 117,834 - -
Network Equip Replacement - 180,130 200,130 - 200,130 20,000 11.1%
Astound - SSF network fee - - - - - -
Initiaf Network Building Cost - - - - 55,000 55,000
Transfers Out to Capital 222,357 - 73,451 73,451 - -
Improvement Fund
Total Expenditures 1,672,848 1,582,254 1,947,104 1,746,974 1,649,493 67,239 4.2%
Excess of Revenues over (109,630) (179,650) (426,669) (181,539) (185,673) (6,023) 3.4%
Expenditures
Total Fund Balance 793,666 614,016 366,996 612,126 426,456 (187,560) -30.5%
Reserved for Encumbrances 156,716 - - - -
Reserved for Telecommunications 345,557 345,557 345,557 345,557 345,557
Improvements
Designated for Capital 73,451 - - 200,130 -
Reserved for All Other 1,925 - - - -
Unrestricted Fund Balance 216,017 268,459 21,439 66,439 80,899
'`Funds are set aside from charges to departments to pay for needed Information Technology upgrades.
^Dollars reserved in this fund are set aside for future replacement of the citywide phone system.
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRAINCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-88-
CITY SERVICE FUNDS
Self-Insurance Fund
Summary of Revenues and Expenditures
Change
From
Actual Adopted Amended Projected Proposed Adopted
REVENUES 2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2009-10 Change
Charges to Departments 2,767,028 2,920,000 2,920,000 2,547,186 2,606,800 (313,200) -10.7%
Interest Income 60,446 85,000 85,000 65,000 65,000 (20,000) -23.5%
Insurance Rebate 613,997 - - - - -
Transfer in from Health & Benefits _ _ _ 400,000 - -
Fund
Transfer in from General Fund - - 2,725,000 2,725,000 - -
Total Revenue 3,441,471 3,005,000 5,730,000 5,737,186 2,671,800 (333,200) -11.1%
EXPENDITURES
Injury Pay
Claims Defense & Management
Insurance Premiums
Workers Compensation Claims
Liability Claims
Transfer Out to General Fund 368,753
244,775
1,040,429
2,094,295
234,533
- 524,000
320,000
983,000
1,142,000
234,000
505,000 524,000
320,000
983,000
1,142,000
234,000
- 492,045
70,408
976,199
962,666
94,942
- 590,454
77,448
1,025,009
1,010,799
150,000
- 66,454
(242,552)
42,009
(131,201)
(84,000)
(505,000) 12.7%
-75.8%
4.3%
-11.5%
-35.9%
-100.0%
Repair and Maintenance - - - - _
Transfer Out to Benefits Fund - - - -
Total Expenses 3,982,786 3,708,000 3,203,000 2,596,260 2,853,710 (854,290) -23.0%
Revenues (under) /over (541,315) (703,000) 2,527,000 3,140,926 (181,910) 521,090 -74.1%
Expenses
Cash Balance, End of Year'` 2,617,868 1,914,868 5,144,868 5,758,794 5,576,884 (181,910)
Estimated Liabilities * 5,523,000 5,523,000 5,523,000 5,523,000 5,523,000
*A recent actuarial analysis of the self insurance fund recommends that funding be increased to cover the 75% level
of confidence for expected losses.
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-89-
CITY SERVICE FUNDS
HeaNth & Benefits Fund
Summary of Revenues and Expenditures
Change
From
Actual Adopted Amended Projected Proposed Adopted
REVENUES 2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2008-09 Change
Benefit Charges to Departments 3,452,985 ;3,739,050 3,739,050 3,692,138 3,354,740 (384,310) -10.3%
Leave Accrual Charges to
Departments 365,917 - - - - -
Insurance Refund - - - - - -
PERS Refund - - - - - -
Transfers In from Other Funds
for Retiree Health Liability 500,000 - - - - -
Interest
Total Revenue 4,318,902 3,739,050 3,739,050 3,692,138 3,354,740 (579,852) -15.5%
EXPENDITURES
Vacation payouts 350,948 542,000 542,000 299,101 350,000 (192,000) -35.4%
Sick Leave payouts 33,043 135,000 135,000 35,000 35,000 (100,000) -74.1%
Accrued Vac/Sick Leave 22,963 50,000 - - - (50,000) -100.0%
Dental and Vision 547,976 673,000 673,000 548,000 575,400 (97,600) -14.5%
Retiree Health Insurance 1,899,208 2,751,600 2,751,600 2,039,433 2,222,982 (528,618) -19.2%
Unemployment Insurance 55,555 46,000 46,000 114,149 116,432 70,432 153.1%
All Other 30,795 27,170 27,170 30,056 30,000 2,830 10.4%
Transfer Out to Self Insurance
Fund _ _ - 400,000 - -
Total Expenditures 2,940,489 4,224,770 4,174,770 3,465,739 3,329,814 (894,956) -21.2%
Revenues (under) /over 1,378,413 (485,720) (435,720) 226,399 24,926 (1,864,133) 383.8%
Expenditures
Reserved for Retiree Health 5,614,725 4,963,756 5,841,124 5,866,050 902,294 18.2%
Benefit Liability
" Funds are being accumulated to pay down the retiree health liability, currently estimated by an actuary to be $59.5 million.
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRAIVCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-90-
OTHER FUNDS
OTHER FUNDS
East of 101 Sewer Impact Fee Fund.
Summary of Revenues and Expenditures
Change
from
REVENUES Actual Adopted Amended Projected Proposed Adopted
2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2009-10 Change
Operations:
Sewer Impact Fees 46,931:1 25,000 25,000 250,000 75,000 50
000 200
0%
Prior Year Adjustment to Impact Fees (91,401') , .
Transfer in from RDA CIP - 214,000
Interest/Other Income (33,15E~) 8,600 - _
Total Revenues and Other
Sources of Funding (77,624) 25,000 239,000 258,600 75,000 50,000 200.0%
EXPENDITURES
Transfers out to CIP 1,078,964 183,750 190,233 1,500,646 134,000 (49,750) -27
1%
Transfer out to Gen. Fund - 2,500 2,500 .
Total Expenditures 1,078,964 183,750 190,233 1,500,646 136,500 (47,250) -25 7%
Net Income (1,156,588) (158,750) 48,767 (1,242,046) (61,500) 97,250 -61.3%
Total Fund Balance (665,348) (824,098) (616,581) (1,907,393) (1,968,893) (1,144,796) 138 9%
Cumulative Advances from
Development Pre-Funding* 749,176 1,971,093 1,971,093
v~~uCa~y~iu~eu Reserve S3,szS 63,699 2,199
'The revenue for this restricted fund is received from development impact fees paid by new development upon building permit
issuance. The revenues may only ve used to fund specific sewer capital projects as outlined in a nexus study previously
adopted by the City Council. The nexus study shows the relationship between new development and the need for sewer
system improvement to support that development. The fee is charged to new development located East of 101.
*In 2007, the City entered into an agreement with Genentech in which the company agreed to pre-fund the sewer impact fees
for the E. Grand Avenue Sewer Trunk project in order for the project to be completed prior to Genentech pulling building
permits. As a result, the prepayment of those fees, or until Genentech enters into a new agreement, which is expected to
occur this calendar year.
L1 i r UI- SUUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-91 -
OTHER FUNDS
Sewer C-apacity Charge Fund
Summary of Revenues and Expenditures
Change
from
Actual Adopted Amended Projected Proposed Adopted
REVENUES 2008-09 2009-10 2009-10 2009-10 2010-11 2009-10 Change
Operations:
Capacity Charges 144,679 - - 255,000 100,000 100,000
Interest/Other Income - - - 1,500 5,100 5,100
Total Revenues and Other 144,679 - _ 256,500 105,100 105,100
Sources of Funding
EXPENDITURES
Transfers out to CIP 144,679
Transfer out to General Fund (for
administrative costs)
150,000 150,000
2,500 2,500
Total Expenditures 144,679 - - - 152,500 152,500
Net Income - - - 256,500 (47,400) (47,400)
Total Fund Balance - - - 256,500 209,100 209,100
*The revenue for this restricted fund is received from sewer capacity charges paid by users that connect to
sewer facilities for the first time, and by users; who increase their sanitary sewer usage. The charge is typically
due upon building permit issuance and is charged in areas of the City receiving sewer service from the City
(excludes Westborough area that receives sf;wer service from Daly City). The charge assists with the funding
required to replace, upgrade, and construct skewer infrastructure not funded by other sources.
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRAINCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-92-
POSITION BUDGET DETAIL
POSITION BUDGET DETAIL BY' DEPARTMENT
Administrative Departments
Position
Code
Position Title Adopted
2007-08 Adopted
2008-09 Adopted
2009-10 Proposed
2010-11
City Clerk
0310 Administrative Assistant II 1.00 - - -
0285 Assistant City Clerk - 1.00 1.00 1.00
E100 City Clerk (Elected Official) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
0320 Deputy City Clerk - 1.00 1.00 1.00
Full-Time 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Part-Time Hourly Positions
X415 P/T Office Specialist 1.07 - - -
Part-Time 1.07 - - -
Department Total 3.07 3.00 3.00 3.00
City Treasurer
E105 City Treasurer 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Department Total 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
City Manager
0305 Administrative Aide 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
N100 Assistant City Manager (in ECD) - - - -
N 180 Assistant to the City Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
N115 City Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
M550 Executive Assistant to City Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Department Total 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00
Finance
M620 Accountant I / II /Senior (flexible staffing) 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Accountant
A225 Accounting Assistant II 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00
0310 Administrative Assistant II 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
M105 Assistant Director of Finance 1.00 - - -
M635 Budget and Financial Manager - 1.00 1.00 1.00
A455 Courier 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
N145 Director of Finance 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Financial Analyst I / II /Senior (flexible staffing) 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
M610 Financial Analyst
M540 Financial Services Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Department Total 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-93-
POSITION BUDGET DETAIL
Position
Code Position Title Adopted
2007-08 Adopted
2008-09 Adopted
2009-10 Proposed
2010-11
Human Resources
N130 Director of Human Resources 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
M270 Human Resources Analyst II / (flexible staffing) 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Senior Human Resources Analystt
0265 Human Resources Technician 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Full-Time 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Part-Time Hourly Positions
R310 Human Resources Clerk - - - -
X440 Office Assistant - - - -
Part-Time Positions
Department Total 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Information Technology
0310 Administrative Assistant II 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
N165 Director of Information Technology 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
A525 Information Systems Technician 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
M650 System Administrators 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Department Total 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00
Operating Departments
Economic and Community Development
0315 Administrative Assistant I 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
0310 Administrative Assistant II 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
M215 Assistant Building Official - 1.00 1.00 1.00
N100 Assistant City Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
M115 Associate Engineer* 1.00 - - -
M125 / Associate Planner /Senior (flexible staffing) 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
M335 Planner
A135 Building Inspector 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
M210 City Building Official 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
M430 City Engineer* 1.00 - -
M155 City Planner 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
M725 Community Development Coordinator 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
M185 Economic & Community Development Coordinator - 1.00 1.00 1.00
A167 Engineering Technician* 1.00 - - -
M145 Manager of Housing and Redee~elopment 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
A295 Office Specialist 2.45 2.45 2.45 2.45
C175 Parking Enforcement Officer 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
A245 Parking Meter Collector/Repairer 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
A460 Permit Technician 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
A462 Planning Technician 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
A400 Senior Building Inspector 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
M340 Senior Engineer* 2.00 - - -
Full-Time 32.45 28.45 28.45 28.45
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-94-
POSITION BUDGET DETAIL
Position Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed
Code Position Title 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
Economic and Community Development
Part-Time Hourly Positions
X415 P/T Office Specialist 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Part-Time 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Department Total 32.95 28.95 28.95 28.95
Fire
0315 Administrative Assistant I 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
M205 Battalion Chief (40 Hours) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
M390 Battalion Chief (shift) 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
M110 Deputy Fire Chief 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
8185 EMS Captain 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
6120 Fire Apparatus Engineer 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00
B100 Fire Captain 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00
N150 Fire Chief 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
M410 Fire Marshall 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
B125 Firefighter 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00
M560 Management Analyst II 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
B130 Paramedic !Firefighter * 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00
6200 Safety Inspector I 2.00 4.00 4.00 4.00
6190 Safety Inspector III - 1.00 1.00 1.00
0340 Senior Administrative Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Full-Time 79.00 82.00 82.00 82.00
Part-Time Hourly Positions
X540 Courier 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48
Part-Time 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48
Department Total 79.48 82.48 82.48 82.48
* In addition to the total count shown, authority to overhire by three in this position has been g ranted to the City
Manager. No additional dollars have been added for these potential over hires.
Police
N155 Chief of Police 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
M280 Police Captain 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
M275 Police Lieutenant 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
C165 Police Sergeant 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00
C100 Police Corporal 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00
C115 Police Officer * 46.00 46.00 46.00 46.00
C175 Parking Enforcement Officer 3.00 3.00 1.00 1.00
C125 Police Service Technician 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00
C180 Senior Police Records Specialist 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00
C105 Police Records Specialist 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00
C110 Police Property & Evidence Specialist 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
M290 Police Records Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
M165 Communications Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
A365 Supervising Communications Dispatcher 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-95-
POSITION BUDGET DETAIL
Position
Code
Position Title Adopted
2007-08 Adopted
2008-09 Adopted
2009-10 Proposed
2010-11
Police
A150 Communications Dispatcher * 9.20 10.00 10.00 10.00
0340 Senior Administrative Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
0315 Administrative Assistant I 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Full-Time Positions 110.20 111.00 109.00 109.00
Part-Time Hourly Positions
X193 Court Liaison 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48
X190 Police Evidence Clerk 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48
X325 Police Reserve Officer 1.31 1.31 1.31 1.31
X405 School Crossing Guard 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38
Part-Time Positions 3.65 3.6~ s.oa s.oa
Department Total 113.85 114.65 112.65 112.65
* Due to the long lead-time needed to recruit and train new Officers, in addition to the total count shown, authority to
overhire by three in this position has been granted to the City Manager. No additional dollars have been added for
these potential overhires.
Public Works
0315 Administrative Assistant I 3.00 4.00 4.00 4.00
0310 Administrative Assistant II 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
D100 Apprentice Operator I 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
M465 Assistant WQCP Superintendent 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
M115 Associate Engineer 2.00 2.00 2.00
D120 Chemist 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
M430 City Engineer 1.00 1.00 1.00
N160 Director of Public Works 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
A160 Electrical Technician 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
A167 Engineering Technician - 1.00 1.00 1.00
D155 Environmental Compliance Inspector 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
A170 Equipment Mechanic 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
A175 Equipment Operator 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
A335 Lead Electrical Technician 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
A345 Lead Equipment Mechanic 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
A195 Lead Park Maintenance Worker 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15
A200 Lead Public Works Maintenance Worker 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
D180 Lead WQCP Mechanic 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
A295 Office Specialist 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80
D150 Operator II 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00
A250 Park Maintenance Worker 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15
D105 Plant Electrician I 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
D140 Plant Electrician II 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
D130 Plant Mechanic I 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
D135 Plant Mechanic II 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00
A310 Public Works Inspector 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
A275 Public Works Maintenance Worker 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
M255 Public Works Supervisor 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60
M340 Senior Engineer 0.55 2.55 2.55 2.55
D160 Senior Environmental Compliance Inspector 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
D170 Senior Lab Chemist - - 1.00 1.00
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-96-
POSITION BUDGET DETAIL
Position
Code
Position Title Adopted
2007-08 Adopted
2008-09 Adopted
2009-10 Proposed
2010-11
Public Works
A360 Senior Public Works MaintenancE: Worker 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
M630 Superintendent of Public Works 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75
M355 Superintendent of Water Quality 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
A370 Sweeper Operator 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
M735 Technical Services Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
D125 Utility Worker 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Full-Time 71.95 78.95 79.95 79.95
Part-Time Hourly Positions
X545 Laboratory Chemist 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
X570 WQCP Consultant 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24
Part-Time 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74
Department Total 72.69 79.69 80.69 80.69
Library
0315 Administrative Assistant I 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
M640 Assistant Library Director 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
A240 Librarian II 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00
A215 Library Assistant I I 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
N110 Library Director 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
M235 Library Program Manager 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
M500 Literacy Program Manager 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
A445 Literacy Services Coordinator 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
M570 Management Analyst I 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Full Time 23.00 23.00 23.00 23.00
Part-Time Hourly Positions
R210 Librarian I 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
R240 Librarian II 1.35 1.35 1.35 1.35
X670 Librarian II 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40
R220 Library Assistant I 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
X220 Library Assistant I 1.11 1.11 1.11 1.11
R215 Library Assistant I I 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
X235 Library Clerk 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32
X250 Library Pages 7.90 7.90 7.90 7.90
X665 Literacy Services Assistant I 1.95 1.95 1.95 1.95
X655 Literacy Services Coordinator 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06
R630 Local History Specialist 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05
X440 Office Assistant 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68
Part-Time 17.81 17.81 17.81 17.81
Department Total 40.81 40.81 40.81 40.81
Parks & Recreation
0315 Administrative Assistant I 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
0310 Administrative Assistant II 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05
A465 Building Maintenance Craftsworlker 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
A140 Building Maintenance Custodian 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRAPJCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
_97_
POSITION BUDGET DETAIL
Position Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed
Code Position Title 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
Parks & Recreation
N175 Director of Recreation and Community Services 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
A505 Groundsperson 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
A190 Lead Building Maintenance Custodian 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
A195 Lead Park Maintenance Worker 1.85 1.85 1.85 1.85
A280 Maintenance Craftsworker 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
A295 Office Specialist 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
A250 Park Maintenance Worker 11.85 11.85 11.85 11.85
A495 Preschool Teacher 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
M255 Public Works Supervisor 3.40 3.40 3.40 3.40
M715 Recreation & Community Services Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Recreation & Community Services 00
5 5
00 00
5 5.00
M530 Program Coordinator . . .
M295 Recreation & Community Services Supervisor 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00
A515 Recreation Leader IV 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
A320 Senior Building Maintenance Custodian 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
A350 Senior Park Maintenance Worker 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
M360 Superintendent of Parks and Facilities 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
M630 Superintendent of Public Works 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25
A375 Tree Trimmer 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
M340 Senior Engineer 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45
A510 Van Driver 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Full-Time 64.85 64.85 64.85 64.85
Part-Time Hourly Positions
R660 Community Services Site Coordinator 2.25 2.50 2.50 2.50
R650 Cultural Arts Specialist 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
X350 Recreation Instructor 5.42 5.42 5.42 5.42
X360 Recreation Leader I 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09
R365 Recreation Leader II 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25
X365 Recreation Leader II 11.57 11.57 11.57 11.57
R370 Recreation Leader III 4.12 4.12 4.12 4.12
X370 Recreation Leader III 18.08 18.08 18.08 18.08
R375 Recreation Leader IV 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22
X375 Recreation Leader IV 4.51 4.51 4.51 4.51
X370 Sports Coach 1.93 1.93 1.93 1.93
Part-Time 50.95 51.20 51.20 51.20
Department Total 115.80 116.05 116.05 116.05
Total Full-Time Positions 412.45 420.25 419.25 419.25
Total Part-Time Positions 75.20 74.38 74.38 74.38
TOTAL BUDGETED POSITIONS 487.65 494.63 493.63 493.63
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-98-
POSITION DETAIL -FROZEN POSITIONS
FROZEN POSITIONS
The following positions were frozen as part of 'the prior years' and current budget processes in order to maintain
budget balance over the longer term. The positions listed in FY 2010-11 will remain vacant during proposed
fiscal year.
epartment
ositions
PriorYear Proposed
Frozen Vacancies Vacancies
Positions FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 Change
from
09-10 to
10-11
City Clerk
Office Specialist (Part-time) ~ (0.57) - - -
Sub-Total (0.57} - - -
City Manager
Director of Community Outreach ~ ~ 1.00 - - -
Sub-Total 1.00 - -
Finance
Accounting Assistant II 1.04 - - -
Sub-Total 1.00 - - -
Information Technology ~
Support Coordinator 1 A0 - - -
Information Technology Manager 1.0~ - - -
PC Technician ~ 1..00 - - -
Sub-Total 3:00 - - -
Economic an d Community Development
Associate Planner - 1.00 1.00 -
Office Assistant (Part-time) - 1.00 1.00 -
Assistant Building Official - - - -
Sub-Total 2.00 2.00 -
Fire
Deputy Fire Chief - 1.00 - (1.00)
Safety Inspector III - - - -
Fire Inspector II 3.00 - - -
Administrative Assistant II 1.00 - - -
Battalion Chief '1.00 - - -
Sub-Total 5.00 1.00 - (1.00)
f
Police
Police Officer (3 month vacancy) 0.25 - (0.25)
Police Officer - - 1.00 1.00
Corporal (3 month vacancy) 0.25 - (0.25)
Sergeant (2.0 vacancies for 6 months) 1.00 - (1.00)
Parking Enforcement Officer - 1.00 1.00 -
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
-99-
PC~41TInN DETAIL -FROZEN POSITIONS
Change
Prior Year Proposed from
Frozen Vacancies Vacancies 09-10 to
Department Positions Positions FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 10-11
Police
Dispatch Supervisor - 1.00 1.00 -
Police Services Technician 1.0~ - - -
Police Records Specialist 1:,00 ' - - -
Communications Dispatcher * - - - -
Sub-Total 2.00 3.50 3.00 (0.50)
Public Works
Associate Engineer - - - -
Assistant Engineer 1.00 - - -
Director of Public Works 1.OQ - - -
Development Review Coordinator 1 A0 - - -
Part-Time CIP Project Engineer °_- Q.48 - - -
Equipment Mechanic - 1.00 1.00 -
Lead Public Works Maintenance Worker 1.00 1.00 -
Building Maintenance Custodian
~ °t .00 - - -
Building Maintenance Custodian - - - -
Equipment Mechanic 1.Oa - - -
Parks Maintenance Worker - - -
PublicWorks Maintenance WorN;er 4.00 - - -
Senior Engineer/Superintendent st - - - -
Superintendent of Parks ~ - - -
Deputy Director of Maint Services - ` - - -
Lead PW Maintenance Worker `1.00 - - -
Senior PW Maintenance Worker 2.00 - - -
Senior Electrical Technician 1.00 - - -
Lead Parks Maintenance Worker - - - -
Senior Parks Maintenance Worker - - - -
Groundsperson ' 1.,00 -
Equipment Operator
-
- _ _
Sub-Total 14.48 2.00 2.00 -
Library
Librarian II ~ 1.00 1.00 -
Part-Time Librarian I 0.50 0.50
Library Assistant I (part-time regular) 1.00 1.00 -
Part-Time Hours (as FTEs) 5.69 1.63 1.63
Sub-Total `5.fi9 3.63 4.13 0.50
Parks 8~ Recreation
Parks Maintenance Worker - 1.00 1.00 -
Building Maintenance Custodian - 2.00 2.00 -
Recreation Supervisor - 1.00 1.00 -
Recreation Manager - 0.50 1.00 0.50
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
- 100 -
POSITION DETAIL -FROZEN POSITIONS
Change
Prior Year Proposed from
Frown ° Vacancies Vacancies 09-10 to
Department Positions Positions FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 10-11
Parks S~ Recreation
Superintendent of Recreation `1.00 - -
Pre-School Teacher 2.00 -
Community Services Site Coordinator 1;.f~0 - -
Part-Time Hours (as FTEs) 7.1.0 - -
Sub-Total 11.10 4.50 5.00 0.50
_ 13
16 50)
(0
TOTAL FROZEN POSITIONS 41 70 .
16.63 .
* Not counting 1.0 FTE Dispatcher position eliminated with shift of Fire Dispatch Services to County Fire
Dispatch.
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OPERATING BUDGET, Proposed 2010-11
- 101 -
S
~ n
~, `"
~, ~
J O
c~LIFOR~~A
~a e orb
DATE: June 23, 2010
TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council and Redevelopment Agency Board
FROM: Jim Steele. Finance Director
SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION PROVIDING INTERIM SPENDING AUTHORITY FOR THE
FIRST 60 DAYS OF THE 2010-11 FISCAL YEAR
RECOMMENI}ATION
It is recommended that the City Council and Redevelopment Agency Board adopt a resolution
providing interim spending authority for the first 60 days of the fiscal year, in the event the
proposed 2010-11 operating budget is not approved on June 23, 2010.
B.ACKGROU ND/DISCL; S S ION
The City's authority to expend fund~.s, granted under prior budget resolutions, expires on June 30,
2010. A resolution must be passed to allow for continued operations until the budget is adopted,
assuming the budget is not adopted on June '?3, 2010.
The proposed resolution allows the 2008-10 operating budget to be continued for a period of 60 days
in terms of staffing and appropriations, which would be prorated accordingly.
CONCLUSION
.!adopting this resolution allows the Cite to continue operation in a fiscally sound marnzer until a final
budget is passed.
.~
B y ~ ~ ~ ~-~ Approvedl ~ ~ ~
Jim Steele ~~-a~r'`~ M. Nagel ~_
ii
Finance Director City Manager
Attachment: Resoluticros
J~BN;ed
RESOLUTION NO.
CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNI A
A RESOLUTION PROVIDING II~TTERIM SPENDING
AUTHORITY FC-R THE :FIRST 60 DAYS OF THE 2010-11
FISCAL YEAR, IN THE EVENT THE 2010-11 OPER_ATII~IG
BUDGET IS ~?OT APPROVED ON JUNE 2 ~, 2010
WHEREAS, the City's authority to upend funds granted under prior budget
resolutions, expires June ~0, 2010; and
VvHEREAS. a resolution must be passed to allow for continued operations until
the budget is adopted. assuming the budget is not adopted June 23, 2010; and.
WHEREAS, the proposed resolution allows the 2009-2010 operating budget to be
continued for a period of h0 days into fiscal year 2010-2011 in terms of staffing and
appropriations, which would be prorated accordingly.
NOW, THEREFORE. BE IT RESOT VED, by the City Council of the City of
South San Francisco that the Cit~d Council hereby approves interim spending for the first
60 days of the fiscal year in the event the 2010-2011 operating budget is not approved on
June 23. X010.
~~ ~ k ~ ~
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution. was regularly introduced and
adopted by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a meeting
held on the dad- of _ 2010 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
-1-
RESOLUTION NO.
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, CITY OF SOUTH SA?~? FRANCISCO, STATE OF
CALIFORI~TLA
A RESOLUTION PROVIDING INTERIM SPENDING
AUTHORITY FOR THE FIRST 60 DAYS OF THE 2010-11
FISCAL FEAR, I?~ THE EVENT THE 2010-11 OPERATI?~1G
BUDGET IS NOT APPROVED ON 1tJNE 23. 2010
WHEREAS, the City's authority to expend funds granted under prior budget
resolutions. expires June 30, 201G; and
WHEREAS, a resolution must be passed to allow for continued operations until
the budget is adopted, assuming file budget is not adopted June 2 ~, 2010; and
WHEREAS, the proposed resolution allows the 2009-2010 operating budget to be
continued. for a period of 60 days into fiscal year 2010-2011 in terms of staffing and
appropriations, which ~~ouid be prorated accordingly.
NO~w', THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED, that the Redevelopment Agency
Board of the City of South San Francisco hereby approves interim spending for the first
60 days of the fiscal near in the event the 2010-2011 operating budget is not approved on
June 23, 2010.
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and
adopted by the Redevelopment Agency Board of the City of South. San Francisco at a
meeting held on the day of _ 2010 by the following vote:
AYES
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
-~
DATE: June 23, 2010
TO: Honorable Mayor and. City Council
FROM: Jim Steele, Director of Finance
SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION ADOPTING REVISIONS TO THE MASTER FEE
SCHEDULE FOR 2010-11 FF,ES FOR SERVICES
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution adopting revisions to the Master Fee
Schedule for the 2010-11 fiscal year, :reflecting fees and charges for services.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION
Annually, staff reviews existing fees and charges as part of the budget development process. The current
modifications to the Master Fee Schedule are recommended to cover increased or previously unidentified
costs to the City, and to eliminate discor.~tinued fees. Development impact (AB 1600) related fees and sewer
charges, which have different approval processes, are not included in this document.
FISCAL IMPACT
The attached fee changes provide the revenue projections used in compiling the Proposed Budget for
2010-11.
CONCLUSION
Approval of the proposed Master Fee Schedule for 2010-11 provides reasonable cost recovery for City
Services.
~'
Jim St ~ e
Director of Finance
Approved: ~ 7
M. Nagel
City Manager
Attachments: Resolution
Exhibit A
R.]ESOLUTION NO.
CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
A RESOLUTION ADOPTII~,YG REVISIONS TO THE MASTER
FEE SCHEDULE FOR 2010-11 FEES FOR SERVICES
WHEREAS, staff recommends modification to the Master Fee Schedule for 2010-11
fiscal year as set forth in the exhibits to this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the fees reflect the reasonable costs of providing the subject services.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT 1ZESOLVED by the City Council of the City of South San
Francisco that the City Council hereby approves and adopts revisions to the Master Fee Schedule
to include fee amendments specified in the staff report and attached as exhibits hereto.
* ~ ~
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the City
Council of the City of South San Francisco at a Public Hearing held on the day of June, 2010
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Exhibit A
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
Proposed Changes 2010-11
MASTER FEE SCHEDULE-CHARGES FOR SERVICES
CITY CLERK:
The below item to be deleted from the Master Fee Schedule
Passport Execution Fee $30.00 per person, effective August 19, 2002
POLICE DEPARTMENT:
The below item to be added to the Master Fee Schedule:
In Car Video - DVD $50.00 for each copy
LIBRARY DEPARTMENT':
The below item wording to change from each to per set:
Flash cards for students (math, etc.)
$2.50 per set
The below item to be deleted from the Master Fee Schedule
Use of reservable two-hour computer
stations for wordprocessing, etc.
$5.00 for each two hours or portion
thereof. [June 14, 2006; R: 42-06]